{"meta":{"query_hash":"67ab16940a33","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management"},"cohort_total":57,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":57,"exported":57,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/67ab16940a33","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Innovation+Management"},"results":[{"id":"W1689724755","doi":"10.1142/s1363919615400083","title":"LEAN AND GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY START-UPS: LINKING THE TWO RESEARCH STREAMS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"STREAMS; Business; Computer science; Process management; Marketing; Operations management; Industrial organization; Economics","score_opus":0.08410423641153097,"score_gpt":0.36632631921168957,"score_spread":0.2822220828001586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1689724755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3109114,0.09194596,0.12242846,0.032484792,0.0014197105,0.00037916904,0.0002360511,0.00017652044,0.44001797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92240494,0.038764704,0.02189786,0.0038090246,0.0004934422,0.00023366626,0.00022705366,0.0000711714,0.01209802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99388736,0.0023369365,0.00027247955,0.0006654376,0.0018662552,0.0009714167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767358,0.015891911,0.0021438282,0.0014473669,0.0021670766,0.0016140357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008717056,0.0008753898,0.0008503579,0.0066209356,0.0019177328,0.010608108,0.001119166,0.0019344977,0.0043351683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0091962395,0.00044481904,0.00070959097,0.0097898785,0.01539455,0.011145842,0.008934209,0.0037580158,0.0005050628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002543978,0.00017809124,0.019945923,0.0023313551,0.000091440554,0.0008319805,0.028372386,0.0020719906,0.00078666763,0.7165626,0.0018731214,0.22669998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053316606,0.0007973955,0.05585134,0.0073378403,0.0002351701,0.0013365278,0.14649191,0.0032318768,0.00623452,0.48934805,0.28888914,0.00019291507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033339558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051511154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010608108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008340245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008803141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06051296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1833801072","doi":"10.1142/s1363919615500322","title":"DETERMINANTS OF THE CUSTOMER'S PERCEPTION OF INNOVATIVENESS: AN INVESTIGATION IN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Institution; Perception; Service (business); Context (archaeology); Marketing; Core (optical fiber); Service delivery framework; Curriculum; Process (computing); Higher education; Knowledge management; Educational institution; Public relations; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.04497789410022307,"score_gpt":0.31814391777532947,"score_spread":0.2731660236751064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1833801072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996419,0.00001293279,0.00004205782,0.00003937376,7.8752817e-7,0.000003687578,0.000006983873,5.1844506e-7,0.00025165858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998623,0.000014226316,0.000030680003,0.000018231762,0.0000017269346,0.0000032134017,0.000009820152,5.9992897e-7,0.000059282313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734455,0.0011538147,0.00015273775,0.00010431625,0.00075031666,0.0004942779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829995,0.010294718,0.002837406,0.00030140797,0.0020257344,0.0015411415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029593054,0.00015505303,0.00034111599,0.00097216363,0.0009685137,0.001944037,0.00042002753,0.00081949343,0.0029152816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012219465,0.00018600696,0.00041264918,0.001433905,0.00085628976,0.0010922763,0.00094579515,0.001089305,0.00029457433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014702669,0.0005838156,0.97340405,0.000040084808,0.000029598656,0.0003633924,0.013763079,0.00009514146,0.0005127796,0.00031632266,0.00011828256,0.010626518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007280811,0.000525473,0.9502516,0.000023391302,0.000028089644,0.00043033098,0.04693479,0.0008022638,0.0003535673,0.0001696632,0.00045677886,0.000016827824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057189665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004988308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057189665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082533737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012382652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01565051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970985250","doi":"10.1142/s1363919611003076","title":"THE IMPACT OF TRADE POLICY REGIMES ON FIRMS' LEARNING FOR INNOVATION FROM SUPPLIERS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiary; Business; Industrial organization; Demise; Order (exchange); International trade; International economics; Economics; Multinational corporation; Finance","score_opus":0.08291025010944868,"score_gpt":0.288055602046749,"score_spread":0.20514535193730032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970985250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99583095,0.000246652,0.00011540684,0.00022506161,0.0000033519595,0.000008438672,0.00019651969,0.0000047828967,0.0033688392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945444,0.00006936095,0.000028990069,0.000015989575,0.0000047410595,0.0000044600865,0.000083478306,0.0000010552666,0.0003374397],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998237,0.0006207904,0.00013873387,0.00026024142,0.00021827506,0.0005249155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9548467,0.02688044,0.014226764,0.0011564948,0.0010786586,0.0018110551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002209178,0.00014551762,0.00031234592,0.0011722941,0.000558752,0.0020266927,0.0004133971,0.0006978452,0.0053013894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018178608,0.00012204988,0.00039173523,0.002040107,0.001288237,0.001043629,0.0013646699,0.0010120267,0.00039464128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021101616,0.00010634619,0.9809656,0.000050093062,0.00010090418,0.00027726893,0.0009371616,0.0027060537,0.00072273833,0.00200348,0.00022897462,0.011690252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056707795,0.00006691967,0.9967601,0.000020431256,0.000025930098,0.000037936534,0.0008801931,0.0008962382,0.0002990746,0.00038242558,0.00061884,0.0000062817235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013636868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01895828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013636868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00194139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091560464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027114987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987936636","doi":"10.1142/s1363919613500230","title":"SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM RETURNS TO INNOVATION FROM THE APPLICATION OF TECHNOLOGY AND TRAINING PRACTICES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Obsolescence; Term (time); Training (meteorology); Service (business); Marketing; Business; Econometrics; Actuarial science; Economics","score_opus":0.0669529149597221,"score_gpt":0.38627269080094523,"score_spread":0.3193197758412231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987936636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962566,0.00043307483,0.0011193107,0.00016307649,0.00001469652,0.00003572087,0.00044173672,0.000017024184,0.0015187192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99668026,0.00020481365,0.0002821441,0.00002509428,0.000034446377,0.000036033867,0.0007692105,0.000008628454,0.0019593404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967422,0.0006674496,0.00033969327,0.00043073134,0.0009751881,0.00084472395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8883748,0.07261674,0.023293171,0.004673031,0.004290986,0.006751299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071803452,0.000440542,0.00073987746,0.001803636,0.00036868927,0.0022650633,0.0010076708,0.0013921227,0.0056915334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043909542,0.00025043805,0.001513279,0.0021563096,0.0011209057,0.0025693155,0.002271962,0.0025164953,0.0011378629],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049245846,0.0006078569,0.97043836,0.000121895966,0.00048201415,0.00018394021,0.00023124622,0.006514928,0.0007502577,0.00083380734,0.00015170155,0.01919152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000531566,0.00055096287,0.99497557,0.000016515625,0.000090507616,0.00006975468,0.00024392559,0.0026627427,0.00044032786,0.0006218709,0.00030445866,0.000017981067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040168045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004243799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071803452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094821106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009016653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03797376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998148071","doi":"10.1142/s1363919610002933","title":"INTERNET-BASED TECHNOLOGY USE AND NEW PRODUCT TIME-TO-MARKET: THE MODERATING EFFECT OF PRODUCT INNOVATIVENESS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"New product development; Product (mathematics); Business; Quality (philosophy); Marketing; Order (exchange); Time to market; The Internet; Computer science","score_opus":0.017714136368078778,"score_gpt":0.2552899909524687,"score_spread":0.2375758545843899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998148071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977671,0.00022751502,0.00018518056,0.00010419318,0.000005676471,0.000029334766,0.00005988557,0.0000035182973,0.0016176777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984883,0.00022569812,0.00042552678,0.000042194784,0.000012415493,0.00006096677,0.000076641394,0.000006746717,0.0006614133],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646616,0.0018642738,0.0002664058,0.00036264022,0.0007278779,0.00031251978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9101409,0.0659017,0.015735483,0.0018354469,0.0022561953,0.004130339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035903566,0.0004371854,0.00059300207,0.0012385064,0.00049139105,0.0020893447,0.00057550106,0.00083567697,0.007484713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026108705,0.0003450043,0.0008363282,0.0010305656,0.00079749443,0.0016138154,0.0016976302,0.0014888345,0.00040842817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007846812,0.0016392862,0.9732906,0.0001470299,0.00051691284,0.00025416605,0.0017555446,0.00027501932,0.0019462504,0.0004531125,0.00009734074,0.018839905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027240441,0.0007470757,0.99567705,0.000047657697,0.00024824298,0.000121430734,0.0010719695,0.00055401993,0.0007336552,0.00021438654,0.0005446665,0.000012610533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023993761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023028026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007484713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056038966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009052335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025038838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007195154","doi":"10.1142/s1363919613400148","title":"INNOVATION PROCESS, DECISION-MAKING, PERCEIVED RISKS AND METRICS: A DYNAMICS TEST","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Technology Assessment and Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Marketing; Metric (unit); Risk perception; Decision maker; Test (biology); Business; Risk management; Process (computing); Knowledge management; Psychology; Computer science; Management science; Economics; Perception; Finance","score_opus":0.013332750048285023,"score_gpt":0.30039655085645167,"score_spread":0.2870638008081666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007195154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891501,0.000053296655,0.0037466194,0.00014295526,0.000012956943,0.0005223414,0.00018962874,0.000023887418,0.006158144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955065,0.000039216753,0.0026986382,0.000018308372,0.000006993085,0.0006548879,0.00011303599,0.000007638896,0.0009548489],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99401784,0.0027926278,0.00042110635,0.0008817967,0.001287298,0.0005992258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8727707,0.11080399,0.00841834,0.0027955172,0.0026296477,0.002581666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010184049,0.0005927111,0.00063477666,0.0018564978,0.0006900961,0.0035669464,0.0010903563,0.0016721013,0.010454287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047015794,0.00040084773,0.001578516,0.0015522187,0.0018476476,0.0051806956,0.0025070498,0.001594628,0.0007957595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006452466,0.011544432,0.8450491,0.000690651,0.0005747302,0.0007232803,0.014844527,0.023852546,0.006767745,0.030372454,0.00089695473,0.058231194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087004947,0.022585602,0.714725,0.0002582261,0.00056616525,0.00069007324,0.017931921,0.20515113,0.0064681387,0.024038691,0.0064940886,0.00022095066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017424586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006514256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010454287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019245278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026240568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053859055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010235476","doi":"10.1142/s1363919611003738","title":"THE EMERGENCE OF INNOVATION-BASED WIRELESS CLUSTERS: QUALITY AND TIMING MATTER","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Extant taxon; Quality (philosophy); Cluster (spacecraft); Economic geography; Industrial organization; Marketing; Innovation diffusion; Business; Value (mathematics); Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07474095061239851,"score_gpt":0.3103847081714431,"score_spread":0.2356437575590446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010235476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9586176,0.0013624902,0.00450071,0.0011392591,0.000051106468,0.00008902991,0.00017819343,0.000038969138,0.03402268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968394,0.0005606334,0.00074963993,0.000042490614,0.000022712049,0.000011881942,0.000100973775,0.000013124146,0.0016591022],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986896,0.00019862446,0.00008040275,0.00021733728,0.00046361345,0.00035047886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874719,0.004773287,0.0031312385,0.0007511587,0.0024700016,0.0014023745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002580299,0.00017467237,0.00040093064,0.0026294696,0.0014634528,0.005585614,0.00066017086,0.00072759436,0.0033893806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01632163,0.000225509,0.0004028376,0.0030275225,0.0026206258,0.004236499,0.0025816222,0.0012708639,0.00036639706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009381486,0.00023236878,0.6254996,0.0005901855,0.0001820388,0.0019079787,0.037373897,0.0060538366,0.0061139977,0.15575776,0.0028362302,0.16251402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008192129,0.0003816199,0.8754149,0.0003318448,0.00011735791,0.00091496535,0.044793095,0.0033548558,0.0034552554,0.029043494,0.041989353,0.000121394274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012439767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016568009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012439767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004531954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026927858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032881737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019502520","doi":"10.1142/s1363919607001679","title":"GAMES OF INNOVATION: THE ROLES OF NONPROFIT ORGANISATIONS","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Enabling; Perspective (graphical); Business; Nonprofit organization; Public relations; Open innovation; Marketing; Political science","score_opus":0.021281551856286413,"score_gpt":0.27905189114089113,"score_spread":0.2577703392846047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019502520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09098914,0.006256364,0.4064801,0.029998029,0.00082495087,0.00065741286,0.00015454227,0.00017836782,0.46446112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9259628,0.0019163624,0.049299948,0.0012369632,0.0002903453,0.00060720695,0.000053363758,0.000047845228,0.02058524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934511,0.004738181,0.00017895747,0.000365836,0.0006823179,0.00058361073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98777664,0.008040604,0.0011594864,0.0006154064,0.000692418,0.0017154656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004621689,0.0010965649,0.00065772294,0.0014384736,0.0032802538,0.009424054,0.0016976836,0.0039591608,0.0062708203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013881124,0.0005312017,0.0010516645,0.0009981713,0.013169447,0.013256636,0.0053416975,0.0034139259,0.0005872029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018206767,0.000015303793,0.00023501334,0.000045823082,0.0000062044674,0.00006084755,0.001682991,0.0016653129,0.00016515238,0.99280775,0.0006524874,0.0026449356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032704225,0.000043434535,0.00027610423,0.0000812459,0.000011264422,0.00011024811,0.0016193211,0.011934609,0.00018943618,0.96217555,0.023505269,0.000020765481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002301797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017344333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009424054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003951751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028115686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028672159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025111772","doi":"10.1142/s1363919602000653","title":"ASSESSING ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE CREATION THEORY IN COLLABORATIVE R&D PROJECTS","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge creation; Realm; Organizational learning; Context (archaeology); Business; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Marketing; Political science","score_opus":0.039059251308320705,"score_gpt":0.31016820023002967,"score_spread":0.27110894892170895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025111772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95159394,0.00031514847,0.011942645,0.00044239842,0.000009698584,0.0003519022,0.000027588938,0.000017137469,0.035299633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99560404,0.00012522565,0.0037767892,0.000028952842,0.000004511708,0.00020913889,0.000026308968,0.0000023398957,0.00022264628],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98152816,0.012769239,0.00065894565,0.00080582174,0.0030950047,0.0011428345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.847678,0.13027842,0.009511575,0.004375085,0.0042966665,0.0038602734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016831692,0.00054377335,0.0005141444,0.0066930354,0.002981549,0.007447854,0.001532161,0.0018886739,0.0017732836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061970714,0.0004824221,0.00066615164,0.0039232764,0.0057439446,0.005607292,0.0064903973,0.0015466168,0.00024905056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003266059,0.004139859,0.5596139,0.0010912901,0.00035217757,0.0009811056,0.057537667,0.015336815,0.0012912661,0.15335628,0.0009090885,0.20506401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030655408,0.002701699,0.482787,0.0010287963,0.00035369664,0.0012824878,0.2109249,0.102526546,0.0040813405,0.17982571,0.013985743,0.00019550018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015415702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018339447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016831692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00424142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038436153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0890156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032267538","doi":"10.1142/s1363919607001862","title":"FIRM OWNERSHIP AND THE DETERMINANTS OF SUCCESS AND FAILURE IN NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF MANUFACTURING FIRMS IN THE GUANGDONG PROVINCE OF CHINA","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"International Business and FDI","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Business; Facilitator; New product development; Joint venture; Empirical research; Product (mathematics); Success factors; Industrial organization; Conceptual framework; Marketing; Commerce; Business administration","score_opus":0.026931259389915065,"score_gpt":0.2975596410297167,"score_spread":0.27062838163980163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032267538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99982953,0.000023030903,0.000012037256,0.000019503248,3.253616e-7,0.0000018860006,0.000018514218,3.159895e-7,0.000094878764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998406,0.00002048338,0.000011318892,0.0000032021233,6.219961e-7,0.0000016303145,0.000030196035,1.7923635e-7,0.00009181835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996394,0.000073703006,0.000029829696,0.000052730662,0.000083838044,0.00012046135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687815,0.00085055473,0.0011072133,0.00015571227,0.0003073565,0.0007010462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007234749,0.00018921825,0.00019621446,0.00093766034,0.00076277676,0.000560029,0.00038182334,0.00024777965,0.0011484311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019521083,0.00018491693,0.00027137366,0.001194763,0.0007270496,0.00041338292,0.00060790323,0.00030877817,0.00010963857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011825427,0.000028010503,0.9981766,0.0000035095818,0.000011737339,0.000072611125,0.00053620565,0.00010167033,0.00010073319,0.000042759417,0.000026184938,0.00088818854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023614634,0.00002402886,0.99850994,0.0000029545504,0.0000061856103,0.000032178374,0.00088947883,0.00039042268,0.000042599502,0.000013750364,0.00008410396,0.0000018458343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18751785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21578138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18751785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001955654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002003377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37285274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034928162","doi":"10.1142/s1363919607001606","title":"GAMES OF INNOVATION: A NEW THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVE","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Open innovation; Business; Reproduction; Innovation management; Knowledge management; Value creation; Investment (military); Value capture; Industrial organization; Product innovation; Marketing; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.018264755964099936,"score_gpt":0.2975722025611259,"score_spread":0.27930744659702594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034928162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022947628,0.04189123,0.43553084,0.045962777,0.0021135022,0.00016068177,0.00037400998,0.0001860879,0.45083323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8203932,0.029574541,0.102238216,0.004870036,0.004361762,0.00053643883,0.00022416505,0.00015853414,0.03764316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822515,0.00082859484,0.00007371043,0.00021361184,0.0004606247,0.0001983262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624133,0.0027347323,0.00019292408,0.00022884402,0.00032733657,0.0002749451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019144727,0.0012322894,0.0013432206,0.0025864549,0.0018552354,0.006957553,0.0022340785,0.003542465,0.0060580275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00394745,0.0005316039,0.0015084208,0.0019043521,0.012463461,0.011307697,0.0025052107,0.0046267654,0.00079304865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011462797,0.0000025243335,0.000026707716,0.000012347126,0.0000015849646,0.000011747781,0.00006501867,0.00071482314,0.00001306985,0.9980894,0.0003671754,0.00069441367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061653977,0.000008753409,0.000039428243,0.000038791026,0.000003034557,0.000036202757,0.000115838426,0.0055190083,0.000018456942,0.9778765,0.016332295,0.000005520648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045437515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003115728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006957553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00530666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020890248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038502693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036533531","doi":"10.1142/s1363919609002212","title":"THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN FOREIGN COMPETITION, ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY AND PIONEERING INNOVATION: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION IN CANADA","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"International Business and FDI","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Absorptive capacity; Incentive; Context (archaeology); Monopoly; Economics; Empirical evidence; Industrial organization; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.05341250849906554,"score_gpt":0.26334497955141645,"score_spread":0.2099324710523509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036533531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99450076,0.00045500757,0.00011352863,0.0002961641,0.0000038306343,0.00002936622,0.0008609985,0.0000087427,0.0037315814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99671614,0.00054836634,0.00025956653,0.000053592274,0.000002678829,0.000008933852,0.0006009198,0.0000051196052,0.001804551],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897146,0.000068977046,0.000050248775,0.0001158259,0.00037929893,0.0004141537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99270976,0.0017904859,0.001103664,0.00021321097,0.0025335166,0.0016493424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012922622,0.0003208683,0.00067588215,0.0029947003,0.005221191,0.0022283832,0.0014746842,0.0006269523,0.00298973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056933765,0.0002879419,0.00069694634,0.00751281,0.0013990885,0.00076069345,0.001194371,0.0011152979,0.00025657628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020488688,0.0001774999,0.96778405,0.00013530086,0.00006242705,0.00079360127,0.00613861,0.0012282068,0.000567454,0.0033490881,0.002062796,0.017495949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026038477,0.00005674989,0.9824693,0.00009341203,0.000060259255,0.00017859199,0.009024242,0.0034198938,0.00028240265,0.00025733293,0.0040833205,0.00004832791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99834037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04718106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04718106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07061052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34232414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069226628","doi":"10.1142/s1363919607001655","title":"INTER-ORGANISATIONAL TIME: THE EXAMPLE OF QUEBEC BIOTECHNOLOGY","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Pace; Field (mathematics); Entrainment (biomusicology); Context (archaeology); Institution; Organisational change; Dimension (graph theory); Knowledge management; Temporality; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.017943988748594146,"score_gpt":0.2551460862006511,"score_spread":0.23720209745205695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069226628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18448587,0.0057976814,0.011165102,0.02390952,0.00041180916,0.0001077581,0.000652186,0.00015372803,0.77331626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91613644,0.0026210572,0.00458833,0.0012548015,0.00007001682,0.00005313975,0.00021213229,0.000044225133,0.07501993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992187,0.00023759756,0.000012423709,0.000066642584,0.00020676308,0.00025787848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986523,0.00048808908,0.00012704727,0.00007672442,0.00044534355,0.0002105629],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081381825,0.00024989495,0.00017770227,0.0016916735,0.008221159,0.0040651867,0.00079557823,0.0014102417,0.009566345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00221026,0.00010001936,0.00030627666,0.0033498998,0.003451904,0.0019331955,0.0013344873,0.001024102,0.0006192379],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015497782,0.000051298954,0.007530989,0.00014500374,0.000021295364,0.0037368364,0.01401595,0.00567096,0.0016150748,0.88350224,0.023406519,0.06014894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005298298,0.0000656877,0.02602211,0.00027004405,0.00003251008,0.0006010883,0.018301785,0.0091110645,0.0007856794,0.05248177,0.89217544,0.00009982326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9429158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9349954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99177885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043310463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017380534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31424087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086070874","doi":"10.1142/s1363919612400129","title":"DISCONTINUITY AND COLLABORATION: THEORY AND EVIDENCE FROM TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Discontinuity (linguistics); Multinational corporation; Business; Work (physics); Knowledge management; Regression discontinuity design; Industrial organization; Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.031322927819448516,"score_gpt":0.2929596022269929,"score_spread":0.2616366744075444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086070874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90783197,0.020723233,0.011933566,0.0037551736,0.000057624675,0.00025542732,0.00015670809,0.000021406682,0.05526501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903177,0.006429647,0.00231257,0.00018329159,0.000035927038,0.0001537806,0.00007168246,0.000010740781,0.0004846978],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709273,0.019550068,0.0016355545,0.0017957109,0.0049340795,0.0011572887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65883607,0.2934696,0.028086927,0.0071722576,0.00703335,0.005401774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019621741,0.00042943645,0.00089874613,0.006158888,0.0038308653,0.006649306,0.002138885,0.0030691,0.0073543224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.118509226,0.00070426404,0.00056924287,0.008679096,0.00795992,0.009297562,0.009255443,0.002588271,0.000746062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011014353,0.0020046954,0.36510777,0.003658733,0.00046577654,0.0019535858,0.15194292,0.0034600769,0.00048396806,0.18022738,0.0020616336,0.28753203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006972504,0.0020783124,0.46061522,0.007692812,0.00048203944,0.003693782,0.16053459,0.009103479,0.0011752325,0.29584372,0.057862666,0.0002208725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030767662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016767613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019621741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002475597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002462598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10377097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086407809","doi":"10.1142/s1363919603000738","title":"REGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS IN THE PERIPHERY: THE CASE OF THE BEAUCE IN QUÉBEC (CANADA)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Regional Development and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regional innovation system; Silicon valley; Business; Innovation process; Order (exchange); Innovation system; Core (optical fiber); Process (computing); Regional science; Innovation management; Knowledge management; Economic geography; Marketing; Industrial organization; Geography; Entrepreneurship; Computer science; Work in process; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.0360130696945422,"score_gpt":0.31480682157071405,"score_spread":0.27879375187617184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086407809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94093525,0.0015502882,0.00050909515,0.0042809215,0.000020858552,0.00006468932,0.00036264502,0.000028256816,0.052247908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98814464,0.0005251517,0.0004149543,0.00030460046,0.00000428403,0.000010779073,0.0001070297,0.000006122829,0.010482508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991047,0.000117670636,0.000014638963,0.00009117056,0.00013374635,0.0005381005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985493,0.00026549216,0.000119381046,0.000048047994,0.00043216356,0.0005854896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057347695,0.00021541803,0.0002470175,0.0009303594,0.011635325,0.0038132295,0.0012489419,0.0012476274,0.0047410554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017017672,0.00017940167,0.00030939226,0.002757789,0.0030466411,0.0008894171,0.001605936,0.0009281815,0.00024112815],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089409604,0.00040462965,0.36179453,0.0009054174,0.0001824612,0.05172192,0.17646337,0.015932383,0.006636624,0.17258555,0.04046794,0.17201108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011050783,0.00018431703,0.5552462,0.0005689435,0.00013437384,0.0034032527,0.2086521,0.009463764,0.0012411401,0.0048109884,0.21599048,0.00019399112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067613035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.067613035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056424063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49056917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101974896","doi":"10.1142/s1363919607001631","title":"THE POWER OF NON-CONTRACTUAL INNOVATION","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Cancer Institute; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Normative; Core (optical fiber); Forcing (mathematics); Business; Open innovation; Renting; Publishing; Industrial organization; Marketing; Telecommunications; Knowledge management; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.01303857948537619,"score_gpt":0.24856488249540784,"score_spread":0.23552630301003166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101974896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12732051,0.002078763,0.15488623,0.031711917,0.00023998685,0.00018758318,0.000069887465,0.00017033496,0.68333477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856205,0.0004270093,0.0054368502,0.00048585137,0.00012650054,0.00013836044,0.00001641695,0.000031533727,0.0077169207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810495,0.008343604,0.0006568244,0.0025469246,0.0055825226,0.0018206344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9491832,0.03342578,0.0032680861,0.008972255,0.0031626418,0.0019879572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023611382,0.00041376238,0.00063771766,0.0022277494,0.0066555045,0.014967775,0.0025396827,0.00433129,0.005146865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034729462,0.0005815446,0.0008735121,0.001799132,0.05092456,0.01886918,0.008898842,0.0056542703,0.000763921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003994813,0.0000056680087,0.00012570442,0.0000093156395,0.0000019733145,0.000027743888,0.0006416873,0.00029621492,0.000035013978,0.99669975,0.00014233992,0.0020104633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011393357,0.0000084911235,0.00014809059,0.000029787992,0.0000025767672,0.000043597258,0.00041437603,0.0014805478,0.00010017195,0.99105257,0.0067007653,0.000007515777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022202355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015730935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023611382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066639017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076328996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12487042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103789430","doi":"10.1142/s136391960700162x","title":"WHERE DO GAMES OF INNOVATION COME FROM? EXPLAINING THE PERSISTENCE OF DYNAMIC INNOVATION PATTERNS","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamism; Product innovation; Innovation management; Competition (biology); Limiting; Industrial organization; Investment (military); Innovation process; Knowledge management; Product (mathematics); Process (computing); Production (economics); Variety (cybernetics); Business; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Marketing; Work in process; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.08445237375692291,"score_gpt":0.3718350040717138,"score_spread":0.28738263031479094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103789430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7854768,0.0010916485,0.18738268,0.005347209,0.00007458918,0.00011233036,0.00017207117,0.00017504813,0.020167502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919065,0.00018445736,0.0067001493,0.0000977789,0.000014663318,0.00004070814,0.00003203252,0.000018543262,0.0010051619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867755,0.0005160342,0.000084670035,0.0002719143,0.00017239264,0.00027740007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98624855,0.009818007,0.0018462924,0.00087375386,0.0005836008,0.0006298003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021917683,0.00039732084,0.00082004146,0.0015772035,0.0011812988,0.0035869856,0.0011334529,0.001625186,0.0033954585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026210586,0.00053573307,0.0011116973,0.0008947499,0.0035519775,0.009445538,0.0020436633,0.0011939609,0.00027911938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011683475,0.000078071804,0.030039404,0.00018477807,0.00012255204,0.00043261464,0.0026536896,0.045294333,0.0014477493,0.8950381,0.0015968982,0.022994885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004260572,0.00003112069,0.006582263,0.00003843816,0.00003453536,0.00016976899,0.00068827556,0.1557261,0.00038686013,0.8336643,0.0025901755,0.00004549972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055907997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004218207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055907997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016273389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008775791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011807263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109863341","doi":"10.1142/s1363919615500474","title":"NETWORK TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION BY US BIOTECHNOLOGY FIRMS: A CONTEXTUAL APPROACH OF SOCIAL MEDIA APPLICATIONS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Business; Secrecy; Construct (python library); Marketing; Aggregate (composite); Affect (linguistics); Production (economics); Industrial organization; Biotechnology; Knowledge management; Economics; Computer science; Biology; Microeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02914171188784001,"score_gpt":0.3048157636373901,"score_spread":0.27567405174955006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109863341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988004,0.000069626294,0.00015574793,0.00004158555,7.490026e-7,0.000015134894,0.000076338285,8.1905034e-7,0.00083966873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995484,0.000091455804,0.0001938464,0.000014209431,0.0000020220273,0.000017273007,0.000059478916,8.4791805e-7,0.00007248914],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985966,0.00084568805,0.000080766295,0.00015944472,0.00015609902,0.0001615023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935254,0.0041607427,0.0015074012,0.00020704237,0.00037102515,0.00022840807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010654944,0.00016960294,0.0002096263,0.0021669362,0.0009069567,0.0014061836,0.00025251298,0.00041712468,0.0013675479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061657974,0.00017545423,0.00018939118,0.003449664,0.00076975604,0.0013093568,0.0015333008,0.0003885125,0.000093492716],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011973167,0.00021878985,0.9590162,0.00007881161,0.000055785476,0.00028677032,0.024923721,0.00035774452,0.0008906808,0.0009691004,0.00011413887,0.012968608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006073295,0.00021311078,0.9426275,0.00005643778,0.00005622086,0.0001723733,0.053056072,0.0012824017,0.00059591874,0.000600237,0.0013167262,0.000016844797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012766336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03241258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012766336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009763964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006507641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025384068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121987734","doi":"10.1142/s1363919610002660","title":"THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AN INNOVATION ORIENTATION AND COMPETITIVE STRATEGY","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Market orientation; Reputation; Competitive advantage; Service (business); Marketing; Context (archaeology); Product innovation; Service innovation; Entrepreneurial orientation; Sample (material); Product (mathematics); Service-orientation; Industrial organization; Knowledge management; Entrepreneurship; Computer science","score_opus":0.044902722096036754,"score_gpt":0.3192237556099006,"score_spread":0.27432103351386383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121987734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98676205,0.0000717296,0.00018693563,0.00015393442,0.0000052861265,0.000024693738,0.00003493332,0.000002319555,0.012758157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912363,0.000081028775,0.0001848308,0.000026377711,0.000003647952,0.0000087563085,0.000041759275,0.0000017804048,0.0005281992],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824476,0.00032799234,0.00012724687,0.0001003123,0.0007829567,0.0004168609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717236,0.009850061,0.006232466,0.0005192511,0.004795105,0.0068794973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020513583,0.00021373261,0.00014498274,0.002389385,0.0010322114,0.002838933,0.0003360241,0.00055161444,0.0024465874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010908165,0.00011180565,0.00034216276,0.0016755587,0.0017607664,0.0006633998,0.0011422314,0.0011206943,0.00020794058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004538469,0.00025718825,0.989606,0.000014663826,0.00003716873,0.00008260694,0.0008667762,0.000117970674,0.00041050502,0.0019521174,0.00012557913,0.006484036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071208474,0.00008747494,0.99502665,0.000016853961,0.000018738387,0.00009626135,0.002289373,0.0003078023,0.00012821151,0.0010033443,0.0010055834,0.00001251643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042765863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074519314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042765863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033943744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051908134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085033834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131913147","doi":"10.1142/s1363919615400010","title":"DOES GOVERNMENT FUNDING HAVE THE SAME IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PUBLICATIONS AND PATENTS? THE CASE OF NANOTECHNOLOGY IN CANADA","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation Policy and R&D","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Citation impact; Government (linguistics); Productivity; Citation analysis; Realm; Political science; Bibliometrics; Business; Economics; Library science; Economic growth; Computer science","score_opus":0.06566804944691594,"score_gpt":0.2978934265141584,"score_spread":0.23222537706724244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131913147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84089524,0.009604967,0.0007152381,0.03849614,0.00010318742,0.00007783033,0.0031336965,0.00008066974,0.10689299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912821,0.0018499232,0.00020118852,0.00044161401,0.000029273579,0.000009185095,0.00030296075,0.000010071876,0.005873638],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591297,0.00047882472,0.00013982423,0.00029164337,0.0011894517,0.0019871772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978139,0.0072711254,0.0023472353,0.0005825122,0.008724947,0.0029351497],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023379738,0.00029768105,0.00090178044,0.0044126874,0.0054176576,0.0060489895,0.0014901849,0.0017666732,0.0070276735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019448558,0.00019063259,0.0008484995,0.011122097,0.002565523,0.002075092,0.0011791385,0.0014956404,0.00053942716],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007211486,0.0002705148,0.67162097,0.0004929822,0.0005115504,0.004602975,0.005917542,0.02261469,0.0018118543,0.17967907,0.03143734,0.08031929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028838863,0.00014431476,0.8380505,0.0005446922,0.0011139531,0.00069138996,0.020044431,0.029402608,0.0020246054,0.022190304,0.08524029,0.00026449017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99636745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.090376206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10423937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65572834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169582627","doi":"10.1142/s1363919607001618","title":"THE DYNAMICS OF GAMES OF INNOVATION","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Interdependence; Business; Open innovation; Competition (biology); Marketing; Process (computing); Argument (complex analysis); Set (abstract data type); Production (economics); Industrial organization; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.015878425407148962,"score_gpt":0.2764231895153919,"score_spread":0.26054476410824295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169582627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17201613,0.0058661886,0.23458494,0.034300987,0.00053080556,0.00038646383,0.00038573865,0.00040023393,0.5515286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96288234,0.0013430853,0.019202892,0.0006624293,0.00014506192,0.00038395566,0.00009312916,0.00006708853,0.015220117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99435633,0.003064809,0.00018574607,0.0007820087,0.0010256626,0.0005853571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98907393,0.007677462,0.0009502758,0.000698184,0.0006774076,0.00092267146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036542537,0.0007824744,0.00074088085,0.0021968936,0.003199895,0.008851989,0.0017630702,0.0029045318,0.010122797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017143464,0.000535452,0.0010954061,0.0010728627,0.012591771,0.010278575,0.005046338,0.0029171533,0.00077939505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001471353,0.000008687252,0.00026468484,0.000025354348,0.000011063341,0.000065709006,0.001269123,0.0033626636,0.000098937104,0.9917367,0.00077348447,0.0023689477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023652983,0.000013897394,0.00022021147,0.000032476917,0.0000059087074,0.000047904166,0.0006143943,0.016976021,0.000072164396,0.9700416,0.011937472,0.000014282631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049281754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029322573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010122797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005497522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021241626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03988743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171824286","doi":"10.1142/s1363919614500376","title":"INCORPORATING NETWORK ANALYSIS INTO EVALUATION OF 'BIG SCIENCE' PROJECTS: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE CANADIAN LIGHT SOURCE SYNCHROTRON","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Secretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos Aires; Genome Prairie; Genome Canada; Canadian Light Source","keywords":"CLs upper limits; Social network analysis; Government (linguistics); Big data; Scale (ratio); Scientific instrument; Network science; Work (physics); Data science; Core (optical fiber); Computer science; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Social media; Telecommunications; Engineering; Complex network; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.358731749205141,"score_gpt":0.5731939792993171,"score_spread":0.21446223009417614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171824286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85103357,0.003332647,0.014771542,0.017671807,0.0002177862,0.002361583,0.0033138376,0.00038718252,0.10690999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98608726,0.0010331923,0.00924858,0.00024943898,0.000035627436,0.0004010339,0.0007894164,0.00004549975,0.002109936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9265699,0.027006332,0.0024204624,0.0018570934,0.038712565,0.0034336776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7571916,0.097549684,0.01812483,0.0068712514,0.10747707,0.012785645],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.083733395,0.0007238756,0.00078047236,0.011302185,0.007245704,0.00861216,0.0030380373,0.0013858672,0.0020623638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17939343,0.00038828613,0.00060458895,0.018327098,0.0030000985,0.0052551683,0.0050008274,0.00088065455,0.0002950637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012673013,0.00054164877,0.46795028,0.002490601,0.00068512495,0.00051448337,0.027205644,0.026595613,0.0013904889,0.044650592,0.025732765,0.40097544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020353158,0.001207907,0.74346995,0.0015471873,0.00043257888,0.00018103787,0.05895579,0.09836337,0.0026884316,0.01562531,0.07695265,0.00037222763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7889238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8292955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9886978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06061976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07261917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4428298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215102475","doi":"10.1142/s1363919615500577","title":"THE \"EVERYTHING'S DIFFERENT, EVERY TIME\" INNOVATION MANAGEMENT PROBLEM: A PROMISING MODEL DEVELOPMENT","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Underpinning; Identification (biology); Action (physics); Context (archaeology); Knowledge management; Computer science; Risk management; Risk analysis (engineering); Innovation management; Management science; Business; Process management; Engineering","score_opus":0.17397554744604216,"score_gpt":0.3938142948295334,"score_spread":0.21983874738349124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215102475","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050654456,0.0011057568,0.91230786,0.010145075,0.00015661756,0.00047019494,0.00057770085,0.00020171695,0.024380574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48417196,0.0021274507,0.5041529,0.0007979553,0.00018913006,0.002022587,0.00047818816,0.00005351142,0.006006301],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826103,0.0012471783,0.000052037718,0.0001987152,0.00014455486,0.00009652674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325514,0.0058652475,0.00022666962,0.0001542535,0.00031658186,0.00018209023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003815605,0.0009597217,0.0010082586,0.0011513393,0.0009798127,0.002975488,0.002039942,0.0023592599,0.0048662093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0088193575,0.0004282862,0.001282408,0.0015569577,0.0014448646,0.0034102823,0.0019745661,0.0029341648,0.0004632333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001351648,0.00027114767,0.0036407816,0.0003468941,0.00010002182,0.00021528098,0.0007213307,0.55594134,0.00046740178,0.41230372,0.0019447134,0.023912258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037471287,0.00008978194,0.00029652665,0.00008275819,0.000021093549,0.00004521099,0.0002715196,0.8508845,0.000104724655,0.14485368,0.0032856583,0.00002718441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0094728675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009920721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0094728675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015456878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036374382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020179093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336794057","doi":"10.1142/s1363919616400065","title":"CLOWN SCOUTING AND CASTING AT THE CIRQUE DU SOLEIL: DESIGNING BOUNDARY PRACTICES FOR TALENT DEVELOPMENT AND KNOWLEDGE CREATION","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Context (archaeology); Knowledge management; Boundary (topology); Meaning (existential); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Management; Business; Engineering; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.07576102176536702,"score_gpt":0.4112946887112308,"score_spread":0.3355336669458638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336794057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93061376,0.00028489105,0.02364522,0.0015829682,0.000054551132,0.00044368225,0.00003759904,0.00011703608,0.04322041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807178,0.000078742916,0.0150699215,0.00007195229,0.0000039526494,0.0001297464,0.000021650132,0.0000306103,0.0038756393],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959436,0.002773899,0.000064586755,0.00026705675,0.0003470061,0.00060375145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99343044,0.0036373583,0.00042920688,0.00073018525,0.00043179502,0.0013410798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004769764,0.000434634,0.0002613622,0.0011526583,0.008230211,0.005456852,0.0017419262,0.001746516,0.005577362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011224052,0.0004471025,0.00025704736,0.0006994418,0.008227825,0.002927421,0.005040878,0.0011644601,0.0005971731],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007197076,0.0011042985,0.03112326,0.0005419453,0.000017478857,0.004801465,0.7277846,0.0035131657,0.0220962,0.04746604,0.004637383,0.15619452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015420833,0.0012896445,0.035694826,0.000976613,0.000034238186,0.0013035443,0.7783868,0.011385009,0.010383622,0.017877027,0.14234245,0.0001720986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020040378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053927504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020040378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003341309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064517483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039847493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346699153","doi":"10.1142/s1363919616020011","title":"CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION: STATE OF THE ART AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES FOR RESEARCH","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Creativity; Variety (cybernetics); Field (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Object (grammar); Creativity technique; Research Object; State (computer science); Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Regional science; Engineering","score_opus":0.09658428156208203,"score_gpt":0.4626868588591737,"score_spread":0.36610257729709167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346699153","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006325148,0.93873584,0.0016370139,0.053788636,0.0019073184,0.000009170628,0.00002471936,0.00001865748,0.0032461244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022342555,0.9522786,0.0043674223,0.011378628,0.0086874915,0.000096542404,0.00007126212,0.000024417566,0.0007531512],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988372,0.005811203,0.0009043695,0.0017570494,0.0021584495,0.0009969148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8755761,0.108421996,0.0026858088,0.0032984463,0.0058155055,0.004202173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03463018,0.0013051125,0.0040062023,0.00630291,0.004024244,0.021825196,0.0039892155,0.013600446,0.010569093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02614077,0.0006284404,0.002460135,0.009877849,0.023882203,0.0356484,0.0075115724,0.014406025,0.002413176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032172943,0.00036270943,0.0018597014,0.017892204,0.00016135229,0.0004467371,0.0049584657,0.001011979,0.00050376425,0.43282685,0.038119335,0.5015351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005207756,0.00018990629,0.0018855328,0.02479524,0.0000869461,0.0008297899,0.010974369,0.0010825855,0.00024741396,0.638024,0.3216843,0.00014783854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022927357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028284248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03463018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006883481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013368821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1831441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519337536","doi":"10.1142/s1363919617500189","title":"FORMALISING THE DEMAND FOR TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: RATIONAL HERDS, MARKET FRICTIONS AND NETWORK EFFECTS","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Microeconomics; Point (geometry); Set (abstract data type); Economics; Industrial organization; New product development; Rational expectations; Diffusion; Path (computing); Path dependence; Business; Computer science; Econometrics; Marketing; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05217713920734499,"score_gpt":0.352715737754453,"score_spread":0.30053859854710796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519337536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4720821,0.0010195557,0.46940735,0.00783832,0.00009722328,0.00019861571,0.0008534148,0.00021174041,0.04829178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773566,0.00043528233,0.017127935,0.00017225793,0.000082286126,0.00011124153,0.000114961236,0.000020832907,0.0045785746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889815,0.00041794605,0.000056480003,0.0002228695,0.00014903222,0.00025552648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875365,0.009141872,0.0017958835,0.00083927094,0.0003634646,0.00032309708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027556994,0.0008230245,0.00125179,0.0014876598,0.0007570501,0.002809997,0.0023485827,0.004909381,0.011665501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012848135,0.0008687915,0.0012604329,0.0013581042,0.0028222182,0.006465949,0.0021279864,0.001977505,0.0005133927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006398936,0.00013582771,0.005272467,0.00013018995,0.00005026028,0.000630652,0.00049468136,0.12874445,0.0009170683,0.85732335,0.0007221575,0.0055148555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007768744,0.000079982834,0.0014479866,0.000040577386,0.00004382071,0.00018702704,0.00025939895,0.5456979,0.00017602628,0.45039916,0.0015535221,0.000036899328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056610145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034736968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011665501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020113478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010451499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03902495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561663802","doi":"10.1142/s1363919617500396","title":"THE MEDIATING ROLE OF TEAM COLLABORATION BETWEEN PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE AND NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"New product development; Business; Product (mathematics); Team effectiveness; Team composition; Process management; Knowledge management; Economic Justice; Procedural justice; Psychology; Marketing; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.050997763376462696,"score_gpt":0.35289127473332665,"score_spread":0.30189351135686393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561663802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935822,0.00009068175,0.0013593477,0.00027095247,0.00000825183,0.000026412856,0.000016499513,0.0000054178686,0.0046402006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993824,0.00003225373,0.00042390422,0.000014123006,0.0000043883833,0.000016373446,0.0000073291417,0.0000014931063,0.00011775599],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98276055,0.012050319,0.0008010931,0.0009636385,0.0017346032,0.0016898067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9153892,0.05766191,0.014211856,0.0032208683,0.0036753912,0.005840847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010708548,0.00027188697,0.00036819,0.0011110456,0.0016498223,0.0027357435,0.00059480924,0.0005797684,0.002565296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045025814,0.00018281421,0.0004222311,0.0006893425,0.0013702641,0.0013071607,0.0042932294,0.00084416725,0.00017040841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003617953,0.0011877697,0.8959941,0.00023553675,0.00023624492,0.00046378808,0.032941658,0.0013548312,0.0020944946,0.006016922,0.0003684717,0.058744363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028059736,0.0005461028,0.96166646,0.00018035302,0.00013884492,0.00020990144,0.026673485,0.0027467723,0.001201366,0.0047400123,0.0018326141,0.000036047837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027590573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035466247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010708548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010593851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045183874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056632936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576426139","doi":"10.1142/s1363919617500438","title":"THE EMERGENCE OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY FIRMS THROUGH THEIR SENSEGIVING ACTIVITIES AND COMPETITIVE ACTIONS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Construct (python library); Marketing; Process (computing); Conceptual model; Entrepreneurship; High tech; Industrial organization; Knowledge management; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0482766681553885,"score_gpt":0.3249554044141127,"score_spread":0.2766787362587242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576426139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808791,0.00026453793,0.002324482,0.0005804705,0.00001190075,0.000039313076,0.000021603428,0.0000119139,0.015866518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981027,0.00010846727,0.00075020245,0.000059822418,0.0000054864863,0.000012125205,0.000014808443,0.000003259001,0.0009430291],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975382,0.0011578405,0.00007517729,0.00030077426,0.00044096838,0.000487091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98915404,0.0060036713,0.0020683391,0.0007034744,0.0005885172,0.0014819327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003604538,0.00019630353,0.00017174555,0.00206503,0.0019449753,0.00653047,0.00059392606,0.0009732994,0.0027266846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00824443,0.00024955688,0.0002313597,0.001099564,0.0048875134,0.0027490284,0.0037239634,0.0010062946,0.00031806232],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031357346,0.0005633843,0.44674125,0.000378715,0.000098735734,0.0025967413,0.30642214,0.00047319246,0.014298076,0.08242719,0.0015674323,0.14411959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003337627,0.00046479615,0.4839382,0.0002993248,0.00007536336,0.0013885755,0.42791623,0.0024998412,0.004293524,0.024340952,0.054626044,0.0001237573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017708458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034053156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00653047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016804737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001449881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019062817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600636111","doi":"10.1142/s1363919617500608","title":"ANTECEDENTS OF EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY AND ORGANISATIONAL INNOVATION: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Empirical research; Value (mathematics); Knowledge management; Sample (material); Psychology; Conceptual framework; Business; Sociology; Public relations; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1061924558854895,"score_gpt":0.4517729531155693,"score_spread":0.3455804972300798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600636111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986247,0.00007232952,0.0000939816,0.000109799046,0.0000027102305,0.00003495607,0.000024887497,0.0000010143175,0.0010355195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99929976,0.00009776489,0.00027956645,0.00003332868,0.000006626364,0.00004962967,0.00003293889,9.854266e-7,0.0001994746],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963844,0.0014332526,0.00033192476,0.00030675755,0.00096969755,0.00057403994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93630725,0.046533782,0.008269313,0.0018140498,0.002858319,0.004217352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061721676,0.00023915338,0.0004990463,0.002243945,0.0022840588,0.0027038443,0.000984329,0.001266357,0.004690089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024473287,0.00038858346,0.00074257184,0.002344166,0.0016385284,0.001450876,0.0024379906,0.0017002368,0.00031047844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009609401,0.0013436972,0.9784701,0.000084898486,0.000052909378,0.00032272376,0.009205239,0.00016995144,0.00013978052,0.00087217096,0.00013056291,0.00911194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029647763,0.0003334332,0.96228313,0.00018692826,0.00009707056,0.00041520898,0.033381518,0.0013395093,0.00019688299,0.000892046,0.0008214316,0.0000231476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074113896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008687251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074113896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015720071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045066513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032641947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765463810","doi":"10.1142/s1363919618500354","title":"EVALUATION OF EFFECTS OF COLLABORATIVE PATTERNS ON THE EFFICIENCY OF SCIENTIFIC NETWORKS USING SIMULATION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Knowledge flow; Order (exchange); Knowledge management; Star (game theory); Work (physics); Data science; Business; Mathematics; Engineering; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.06036113235301766,"score_gpt":0.33506014119691363,"score_spread":0.274699008843896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765463810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878655,0.0001870535,0.009679669,0.00018078033,0.00001284135,0.000052735813,0.00010986423,0.00008466938,0.0018269194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961713,0.00006611824,0.0035382938,0.000008378986,0.0000031792706,0.00002492307,0.0000594947,0.000007714035,0.000120656776],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969085,0.0019795385,0.0001773541,0.00029470815,0.00036458852,0.00027537125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9018288,0.08667359,0.004214827,0.003702012,0.0025023958,0.0010783027],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062576267,0.0006382606,0.00070845644,0.0017213917,0.00066062465,0.0015937027,0.0010059639,0.0009856579,0.001077166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04507113,0.00037731457,0.00060808344,0.0015973443,0.000917539,0.0023659067,0.0010809988,0.0008148188,0.00009461081],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034157233,0.00023759875,0.021700285,0.00007519416,0.00011549487,0.00006635064,0.000100815894,0.9662262,0.001088138,0.0018336631,0.00013105867,0.008083687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025677376,0.00023602546,0.0044277194,0.000009678049,0.000043904332,0.000020479521,0.00008138103,0.992665,0.0011970239,0.0011483502,0.0001335016,0.000011275984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01006354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005416127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9982786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017847344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001047447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03309387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773581148","doi":"10.1142/s1363919617400138","title":"INNOVATING WITH SERVICE ROBOTS IN HEALTH AND WELFARE LIVING LABS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Living lab; Nexus (standard); Service (business); Robot; Robotics; Welfare; Knowledge management; Assisted living; Archetype; Independent living; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Human–computer interaction; Gerontology; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.027102957681572563,"score_gpt":0.2823292978144678,"score_spread":0.25522634013289525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773581148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74568146,0.0013304158,0.07886702,0.009778362,0.0002018569,0.00050345564,0.000057735648,0.00026915214,0.16331042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97555035,0.0006457017,0.0155978,0.00053309806,0.0000464176,0.00020521678,0.000024023124,0.000033805096,0.007363604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893357,0.008322357,0.00017834025,0.00046454117,0.00088299945,0.0008161244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99263716,0.0041849543,0.00080629543,0.0005989548,0.0005895615,0.0011830872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069010505,0.00040620446,0.0003081911,0.0011487193,0.0047932537,0.0055740364,0.0016151337,0.0020367429,0.0077951937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008806251,0.000196891,0.00060937204,0.0009787211,0.012695012,0.0057169604,0.010016577,0.0015434127,0.0010595673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045711288,0.0013405728,0.025508646,0.0009728226,0.00006344722,0.0044543375,0.15444542,0.006170412,0.008104451,0.50251913,0.008027154,0.28793645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018045661,0.002096695,0.021509204,0.0012528192,0.00009888027,0.0051518152,0.32459226,0.012982531,0.010622292,0.19314304,0.42816007,0.00020992549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011877901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019178232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077951937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033816292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032490212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0364967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773746053","doi":"10.1142/s1363919618500482","title":"EVALUATING BARRIERS TO KNOWLEDGE SHARING AFFECTING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TEAM PERFORMANCE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"New product development; Business; Knowledge management; Process management; Knowledge sharing; Product (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Affect (linguistics); Computer science; Marketing; Psychology","score_opus":0.10714286054562915,"score_gpt":0.42862491105750455,"score_spread":0.3214820505118754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773746053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99698454,0.00007724845,0.00041934496,0.00013555933,0.0000040880172,0.0000684057,0.00001674312,0.0000040708837,0.0022900614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908507,0.00005922352,0.000502085,0.000018725223,0.000002580725,0.00006994866,0.000025689178,0.0000025624956,0.00023414177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768562,0.012472993,0.0021271328,0.00091813476,0.0052806297,0.0023449329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71168107,0.20678307,0.048904557,0.0051854434,0.016208276,0.011237653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0278052,0.00042005331,0.00058757997,0.0017144816,0.0021013722,0.0051461766,0.00092669955,0.0010052338,0.0021535698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14200497,0.00032866606,0.00049277174,0.0013138427,0.0016525963,0.0030004578,0.003990072,0.0010620762,0.0003289322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016264258,0.0033340503,0.8494567,0.0008419732,0.00027689413,0.00039986247,0.055357333,0.0032833372,0.0040071243,0.0023012967,0.0006699298,0.07844501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011391832,0.0051321555,0.86155564,0.0005680895,0.00034086264,0.00023184746,0.109558895,0.009831873,0.0062138513,0.0026401046,0.0036629136,0.00014990412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004034332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038116574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0278052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002754861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058061066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14704967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799735648","doi":"10.1142/s1363919618400042","title":"DETERMINANTS OF PROPENSITY VS. INTENSITY OF INNOVATION CO-OPERATION FOR SMEs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Business; Telephone survey; Industrial organization; Perspective (graphical); R&D intensity; Marketing; Technology transfer; Management; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.045926954761642685,"score_gpt":0.3149105460409976,"score_spread":0.2689835912793549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799735648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985007,0.00009952188,0.00020545935,0.00021333586,0.00000295684,0.000010349688,0.000052155156,0.000003387371,0.00091218384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99973017,0.000034638157,0.00006504225,0.000009347617,0.0000062729587,0.000004960909,0.000032923483,9.666778e-7,0.00011555031],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812394,0.00065721147,0.00027530736,0.0002195957,0.00029712316,0.0004267445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93802243,0.03130077,0.02013528,0.001997238,0.0015456489,0.0069985967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028551233,0.00013761198,0.0002954184,0.0014618281,0.0004851729,0.0014281927,0.00042561124,0.00092043815,0.005966513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021939974,0.000120332064,0.00060054986,0.0015503996,0.00081777544,0.00094422995,0.0016246793,0.00102554,0.00050061353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041994066,0.000078582765,0.99690896,0.000010956018,0.000030465735,0.000055055785,0.00026471776,0.0001259479,0.00013934475,0.00018906409,0.000040330495,0.0021146818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036931212,0.00008105047,0.9969723,0.000017260625,0.00002409612,0.00017398069,0.0014246021,0.0004956697,0.00011095373,0.00046605314,0.00022391263,0.000006396953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014155552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001795156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005966513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030711174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007180917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019959986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803950235","doi":"10.1142/s1363919619500166","title":"STRATEGIC ORIENTATIONS, THE MEDIATING EFFECT OF ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY AND INNOVATION: A STUDY AMONG MALAYSIAN MANUFACTURING SMEs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia","keywords":"Absorptive capacity; Business; Perspective (graphical); Industrial organization; Manufacturing; Business administration; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.026161728700628304,"score_gpt":0.2819959174529876,"score_spread":0.25583418875235925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803950235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99965096,0.00003405061,0.000021170488,0.00002397684,3.440861e-7,0.0000015867422,0.00000245015,1.08988594e-7,0.00026541145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99981564,0.000058054855,0.00003060213,0.000010084429,6.06984e-7,0.0000021135672,0.0000029649584,1.7056331e-7,0.00007970554],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946576,0.00024266835,0.000041636158,0.000060211798,0.00006987908,0.00011988738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632984,0.0020834135,0.0007824008,0.00010392963,0.00026351094,0.00043693796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015374918,0.00018430999,0.00019143551,0.0007156207,0.000693208,0.0010149413,0.00020033392,0.0003660865,0.000849643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028536494,0.00017856018,0.00029197935,0.00060855196,0.00066410104,0.0009300316,0.0008633109,0.00044683492,0.00010318799],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049024256,0.0002105265,0.962371,0.00006825246,0.0000214753,0.0005262668,0.025536465,0.000090683556,0.0007964479,0.0006115086,0.000039697075,0.009678708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007987386,0.00034482678,0.9163442,0.00013077342,0.00005614098,0.0005990028,0.07997753,0.00060364587,0.0006451896,0.0003984481,0.00087563414,0.000016564063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005564495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011067175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005564495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006200942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014935427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011064172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805397364","doi":"10.1142/s1363919619500117","title":"INNOVATION COLLABORATIONS IN LOW-TO-MEDIUM TECH SMEs: THE ROLE OF THE FIRM’S INNOVATION ORIENTATION AND USE OF EXTERNAL INFORMATION","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Business; Sample (material); Knowledge management; Marketing; Control (management); Industrial organization; High tech; Management; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.015836286272127336,"score_gpt":0.2610828232473995,"score_spread":0.24524653697527218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805397364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980001,0.000063225285,0.000121720775,0.0000704691,0.0000013462959,0.0000056666045,0.000007154466,0.0000020030618,0.0017284525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998092,0.000028773526,0.00006236331,0.000012239831,0.0000020720554,0.00000399508,0.000009736042,6.693146e-7,0.00007100398],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99557734,0.0018544984,0.00045567,0.00035057482,0.0010148496,0.00074719754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.924555,0.03991659,0.022207951,0.0016901908,0.0034710343,0.0081591755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005331222,0.00018960022,0.00030252687,0.0023757222,0.0012955421,0.0040465896,0.00042548793,0.0006693926,0.0019749864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028843166,0.00014119793,0.00025014428,0.0020288737,0.0012894456,0.0017754727,0.004347029,0.0007950963,0.00031150848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012949063,0.00034464244,0.97257996,0.00005939446,0.000051392897,0.0004172358,0.00766332,0.00025316575,0.0008731012,0.0010251775,0.000092757226,0.016510379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002403033,0.00031805172,0.97546524,0.00008075298,0.000048080485,0.00035391102,0.019898865,0.00091211894,0.00072944467,0.0012202102,0.00092535734,0.000023930184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021231752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029406142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005331222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00117212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019430344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028194487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883280472","doi":"10.1142/s136391961950021x","title":"INDIVIDUAL AMBIDEXTERITY AND ANTECEDENTS IN A CHANGING CONTEXT","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Ambidexterity; Construct (python library); Context (archaeology); Extant taxon; Work (physics); Knowledge management; Business; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.026090349327611374,"score_gpt":0.28190388218470697,"score_spread":0.25581353285709557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883280472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99521834,0.00008566791,0.00040691887,0.00016524486,0.000007956481,0.000013128407,0.0000139094855,0.000007119992,0.004081651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997199,0.00003860907,0.00011760886,0.000013955633,0.0000027801418,0.000003943487,0.000008394684,0.0000012230856,0.00009373029],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792504,0.00073512114,0.00015005878,0.00024836487,0.00048276174,0.0004587043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906635,0.0030160008,0.0020348388,0.0008669439,0.0006853096,0.0027333964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019225113,0.00017698275,0.000290439,0.001223042,0.0014693883,0.002542273,0.00021370694,0.00047823254,0.0022043956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007855183,0.00020881358,0.00027335656,0.0008515668,0.0030561993,0.0010528243,0.0030936557,0.0009092777,0.00016447972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013192502,0.00052935036,0.9609008,0.000058817714,0.00008961038,0.0006378012,0.008610267,0.0010624207,0.001882478,0.005578309,0.00020552201,0.02031276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061243004,0.00017679967,0.98334634,0.000037997263,0.000020113926,0.00023847766,0.008713269,0.0009595282,0.00031888808,0.00486119,0.0012969176,0.000024345793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002330577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004023084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002542273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007427092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009813724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01016736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886903329","doi":"10.1142/s1363919619500257","title":"ASSESSING TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF INNOVATIONS IN CANADA: THE GLOBAL SNAPSHOT","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"United Nations Development Programme","keywords":"Yearbook; Data envelopment analysis; Snapshot (computer storage); Scale (ratio); Context (archaeology); Industrial organization; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.08296269148181669,"score_gpt":0.42589895799663,"score_spread":0.34293626651481335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886903329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9143189,0.0060305833,0.0036696673,0.0015356113,0.00004334368,0.00015686674,0.010185601,0.00013492255,0.0639245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98486775,0.0032497006,0.0038262485,0.00010510309,0.000006402287,0.000025486886,0.0031330383,0.000025468467,0.004760658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975684,0.0001731593,0.000069927795,0.00023173417,0.0013826089,0.0005741791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99565494,0.00053284026,0.0002865964,0.00016055182,0.0030574745,0.00030752586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001847659,0.0004774286,0.0006305703,0.0049887225,0.0016595008,0.0027650662,0.0007348312,0.00032041798,0.0014912672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005475137,0.00015916092,0.0008192335,0.01682198,0.00071249047,0.000860484,0.0011946686,0.0005397584,0.00015225746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063099817,0.00018754513,0.615858,0.0013285574,0.00063320686,0.0011947219,0.0041051456,0.05211923,0.0028154757,0.034768824,0.01234412,0.2740142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022698632,0.00019406811,0.92349243,0.00026858156,0.0003176293,0.00031157446,0.0073612826,0.01211025,0.0031677426,0.001913661,0.050707962,0.00013209744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9844758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98881054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9413963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05860369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052851867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42520154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912155953","doi":"10.1142/s1363919620500127","title":"THE INNOVATION VALUE CANVAS: A GUIDE TO DEFINING VALUE PROPOSITIONS AND TARGET CUSTOMERS FOR COMMERCIALIZATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Value proposition; Business model; Value (mathematics); Value capture; Open innovation; Value creation; Business; Marketing; Industrial organization; Proposition; Technological change; Product innovation; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.014484693679394145,"score_gpt":0.29151466180091123,"score_spread":0.2770299681215171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912155953","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004131965,0.010041958,0.5451389,0.018498996,0.0008004998,0.0031708244,0.0064649503,0.004466215,0.4072856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024261797,0.009784729,0.84494406,0.0040035304,0.00028635442,0.0036088172,0.0032245538,0.0019173123,0.10796892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989335,0.0005181185,0.00014570657,0.000081225866,0.00023749848,0.00008397362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99660575,0.002389317,0.00016127089,0.00018594519,0.00046805904,0.00018966763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027276806,0.0019702916,0.00096423936,0.0068101627,0.0025244926,0.0089053,0.0031435515,0.0046352786,0.065476626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0079936115,0.0013499896,0.0012470161,0.004820547,0.0035520447,0.010112382,0.003284842,0.0060484824,0.027540537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027247363,0.00013580952,0.00039612158,0.0004933675,0.00001095679,0.00047382724,0.0032108838,0.0018970169,0.0012597853,0.7592912,0.13964395,0.09315987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014818815,0.00003857295,0.00033279895,0.0006398139,0.000005111774,0.00036479894,0.0010907053,0.0032160394,0.00046375752,0.24193881,0.75185937,0.000035368823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005763235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011701107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065476626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003398377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045103347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21904111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955381700","doi":"10.1142/s1363919620500413","title":"THE RELATIONSHIP OF PERCEIVED EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE WITH ADAPTIVE PERFORMANCE IN NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT TEAMS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Emotional Intelligence and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Emotional intelligence; Adaptability; Psychology; Dimension (graph theory); Product (mathematics); Adaptive behavior; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Knowledge management; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Management; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05285481684802376,"score_gpt":0.3298073697769689,"score_spread":0.27695255292894516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955381700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99948907,0.000046431505,0.000040984218,0.000017902716,0.0000025390627,0.0000022473835,0.0000070167903,7.424362e-7,0.00039311277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998913,0.00001633154,0.000020196572,0.000004427363,0.0000021148405,0.0000021151027,0.0000115705625,3.5631578e-7,0.000051440784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908936,0.00039325777,0.00010508357,0.00008596644,0.00019074579,0.00013553484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99180764,0.0030326666,0.0026412292,0.00024393538,0.0006638698,0.0016106486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013608795,0.00018601795,0.00016881234,0.0007303867,0.00025294576,0.0007758012,0.00022048483,0.00028519527,0.000990179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008741425,0.00010435553,0.0002809086,0.00042811316,0.00037928802,0.00026045597,0.000546321,0.0005593701,0.00012074009],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010709866,0.00025328735,0.99257845,0.00001324886,0.000056573957,0.00007335038,0.0006352243,0.00016491502,0.00024753937,0.00003977637,0.000053883363,0.005776824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036340941,0.00010859892,0.99907696,0.0000037357468,0.000013370941,0.000045684785,0.0003709773,0.00023574592,0.00005444172,0.000026460631,0.000057341193,0.0000030222318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012240951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007952228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0013608795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026971407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021321684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007197082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966053445","doi":"10.1142/s1363919620500449","title":"ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE IN THE INNOVATING FIRM: SIZE, R&D AND SECTOR EFFECTS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation Policy and R&D","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Product innovation; Business; Endogeneity; Industrial organization; Product (mathematics); Process (computing); Innovation management; Innovation process; New product development; Survey data collection; Marketing; Economics; Work in process; Econometrics","score_opus":0.048791887267346734,"score_gpt":0.28113655006467153,"score_spread":0.2323446627973248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966053445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99518955,0.0004576771,0.00045640784,0.00039220773,0.000016824646,0.000017433824,0.00023938325,0.0000133672565,0.003217171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873537,0.00007909044,0.00006171847,0.00003615234,0.0000144068445,0.0000058986907,0.00012918357,0.0000032480432,0.00093491655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983729,0.0004074244,0.00013840372,0.00031439844,0.0003551268,0.00041170957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96314484,0.0155291045,0.0119684525,0.0019766206,0.0013877618,0.005993247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018190892,0.00019156624,0.00034735276,0.0011356523,0.00037700665,0.0013992738,0.00061693543,0.00083699066,0.010007073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01095397,0.00015540412,0.0010812264,0.001391097,0.0008367678,0.0011173519,0.0015591853,0.0011730911,0.0010438552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012787791,0.00013681981,0.9940546,0.000016092028,0.00011461657,0.00013945634,0.00014328423,0.00060064264,0.00046414774,0.0002983462,0.00015577672,0.0037483375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005202414,0.000078714846,0.9983399,0.000006503123,0.000044499648,0.000039828745,0.00024581896,0.00050717185,0.00013379559,0.00013959735,0.00045530061,0.0000036010713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006941668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074385754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010007073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007702873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008075721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03347701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986492014","doi":"10.1142/s1363919620500693","title":"EFFECTS OF EMPLOYEE CREATIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING ON INNOVATION OUTCOMES AND NON-FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: THE MODERATING ROLE OF CULTURE AND COMMUNICATION","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Structural equation modeling; Sample (material); Creativity; Innovation management; Business; Creative problem-solving; Knowledge management; Marketing; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.004968701026845788,"score_gpt":0.22824904245623517,"score_spread":0.22328034142938938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986492014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99814296,0.00008798546,0.00014287852,0.00014856165,0.0000053924,0.000009617577,0.000015421392,0.0000023313746,0.0014450153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995433,0.00004605172,0.0001272902,0.000031790973,0.000008886302,0.000015269923,0.000018047944,0.0000026243918,0.00020672455],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915558,0.0047674417,0.000571506,0.0005094732,0.0014380922,0.0011577335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76774085,0.17422773,0.037991554,0.005923832,0.0050410926,0.00907494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011859948,0.00046782926,0.00046840817,0.0011713745,0.00097533135,0.003392721,0.00068006874,0.0010019743,0.0044199666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06473601,0.00020163684,0.0006706278,0.0010052903,0.0017745416,0.0016469565,0.003000074,0.0018055195,0.0003644398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038511437,0.0016659945,0.95138824,0.00013992462,0.00025671828,0.00016955927,0.008078335,0.0006264089,0.0007054453,0.0009487546,0.00015094668,0.035484485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002621113,0.00044844588,0.9898802,0.00008623403,0.000087624016,0.000079334095,0.006315834,0.0007876714,0.0007734205,0.0010996979,0.00038839842,0.000026981746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015290458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016579956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011859948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084514596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019665621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062722206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014391191","doi":"10.1142/s1363919621500250","title":"OWNERSHIP, COMPENSATION AND BOARD DIVERSITY AS INNOVATION DRIVERS: A COMPARISON OF U.S. AND CANADIAN FIRMS","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Incentive; Salary; Shareholder; Business; Accounting; Executive compensation; Diversity (politics); Recession; Compensation (psychology); Finance; Economics; Market economy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04642488663989682,"score_gpt":0.26096767029665796,"score_spread":0.21454278365676113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014391191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914744,0.0008608238,0.00008056309,0.00022851201,0.000006562334,0.000021933334,0.0047955127,0.000007364698,0.0025243585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947038,0.0005169609,0.000111022455,0.00006351446,0.000007745257,0.000009131844,0.0033693518,0.000004425239,0.0012140562],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991241,0.000046466856,0.00004120211,0.00013997268,0.0002870771,0.0003611492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951526,0.00038082263,0.0016002252,0.00014817847,0.0015535555,0.0011645682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010685286,0.0003091434,0.00032577047,0.003747736,0.0015180901,0.001401573,0.0007314699,0.00038716744,0.0019432905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032126186,0.00019322716,0.00065112766,0.007199181,0.000565884,0.0005907819,0.0008994443,0.0004018511,0.00023541602],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041677205,0.000018599283,0.9940591,0.000021308935,0.000043315704,0.000040642008,0.00055414555,0.00010273983,0.00010131198,0.00016977037,0.0009705279,0.0038769264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018561813,0.0000070413635,0.99825996,0.000009675681,0.000015788002,0.000014582964,0.0006441959,0.0001323717,0.000029224493,0.00001532359,0.0008658007,0.000004128523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98169154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01830846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012897378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0149074355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093577504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020841561","doi":"10.1142/s1363919619500129","title":"PATENT OWNERSHIP FRAGMENTATION AND MARKET VALUE: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Patent portfolio; Portfolio; Intellectual property; Business; Transaction cost; Industrial organization; Profit (economics); Market value; Bargaining power; Fragmentation (computing); Economics; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.1681320725424271,"score_gpt":0.31350215592841074,"score_spread":0.14537008338598364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020841561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957224,0.00059734366,0.00037413425,0.00029900696,0.0000048977195,0.000027757793,0.000766057,0.000016161279,0.00219224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985759,0.000105515996,0.00008399033,0.000024482633,0.000027940694,0.0000132650275,0.000755558,0.000005225206,0.0004080375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877006,0.00029054124,0.00007991767,0.00020451294,0.00027137756,0.00038368197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93084806,0.04118359,0.020823471,0.0016018949,0.0015906224,0.0039524073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025015657,0.00035046917,0.0007657333,0.0036403718,0.0005999531,0.002620486,0.0013914482,0.001470464,0.011304354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019803712,0.0003453913,0.0010438175,0.0045493604,0.0013625732,0.0035652148,0.0014022499,0.0017279243,0.00142619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031826962,0.0005868139,0.9828377,0.000045242326,0.0002547636,0.00042145202,0.00031596154,0.0026197394,0.00032585041,0.001821853,0.0009724859,0.009479855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049996062,0.0002861172,0.9798114,0.00003128835,0.00012718163,0.0002830404,0.00070782576,0.014680673,0.00025918192,0.002366379,0.0013732269,0.000023631179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066201543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040016766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011304354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013970123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064775435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037816823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094208487","doi":"10.1142/s1363919620400034","title":"UNVEILING THE DIVERSITY OF SCHOLARLY DEBATE ON LIVING LABS: A BIBLIOMETRIC APPROACH","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Fragmentation (computing); Diversity (politics); Bibliometrics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Field (mathematics); Data science; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.062438442263737036,"score_gpt":0.2638435647018828,"score_spread":0.20140512243814576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094208487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5999718,0.147256,0.05533076,0.03986973,0.00155432,0.0020204466,0.027420312,0.0005846685,0.125992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90934247,0.039243046,0.03124627,0.0019811192,0.0018926646,0.0013906033,0.011901336,0.00021666348,0.0027858068],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.92594886,0.027048878,0.011249815,0.004920937,0.029055415,0.0017760955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6712784,0.25161228,0.03369419,0.012376289,0.028538873,0.002499993],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0524167,0.00080461433,0.0023613123,0.2397015,0.0045269164,0.021204052,0.0019872133,0.0022167293,0.0035874236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19013222,0.0005487676,0.0010469427,0.27446884,0.007007152,0.015217621,0.010941543,0.0013602802,0.00087083195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027858204,0.00017831476,0.2387066,0.027191274,0.0020719692,0.0013535846,0.09185724,0.0024517758,0.0044972394,0.16806637,0.028195081,0.4351519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099638826,0.0002027841,0.26527178,0.017571064,0.0017324478,0.0018120919,0.14057331,0.005898442,0.0030801566,0.15275413,0.410651,0.00035311456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044319932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007342562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7602985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005610276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0094523085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27720928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135946263","doi":"10.1142/s1363919621500638","title":"UNDERSTANDING THE SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS AND DETERMINANTS OF OPEN INNOVATION IN SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Pace; Open innovation; Business; Marketing; Industrial organization; Knowledge management; Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.07345462361949343,"score_gpt":0.3239786925830577,"score_spread":0.2505240689635643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135946263","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019223688,0.9766484,0.0007942332,0.00061567686,0.00008095895,0.0003315773,0.0012048556,0.000009327089,0.0010912997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07333251,0.9226465,0.001761627,0.00043006282,0.00006923217,0.00050326355,0.0010303259,0.000007867176,0.0002184588],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934274,0.0015883615,0.002807966,0.00063331285,0.0013202868,0.00022268793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.911273,0.07073902,0.011094299,0.0010317332,0.005112411,0.0007494657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008741697,0.00068733055,0.0027423943,0.025230173,0.00071593723,0.0026603877,0.00096912065,0.0015452375,0.002513471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045634393,0.00070162595,0.0034965002,0.023994597,0.0011039854,0.0036719404,0.0016187839,0.00079780986,0.00032539893],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018617135,0.00010435322,0.031771526,0.74215347,0.00442715,0.0008859067,0.0032517002,0.00033660987,0.00061443995,0.0022189224,0.002430661,0.21161906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076012315,0.00030573076,0.088801205,0.81459475,0.022389445,0.002596747,0.00708683,0.00026583154,0.0006125007,0.0020986302,0.06106348,0.00010876928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050141844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016005782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025230173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017909023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012558294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04623103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209148786","doi":"10.1142/s1363919621400077","title":"VALUE APPROPRIATION AND INNOVATION COLLABORATION DYNAMICS: A REVIEW AND RESEARCH AGENDA","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Value (mathematics); Dynamics (music); Knowledge management; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Political science; Engineering; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.09721628178067321,"score_gpt":0.4125249740885432,"score_spread":0.31530869230787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209148786","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023181233,0.9989028,0.0000955422,0.00038513952,0.00006761743,0.000004788645,0.0000075457197,0.0000018087322,0.00030293022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003008922,0.99648714,0.00016774227,0.00014156682,0.00011036302,0.000011718256,0.000012016677,0.0000012251996,0.000059259102],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976405,0.00081815704,0.0004956757,0.0003173907,0.0006027004,0.00012553348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750209,0.01973731,0.002322475,0.0002606535,0.002324664,0.00033410022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004866768,0.00091412186,0.002208141,0.010305878,0.00084487343,0.003938698,0.0011207402,0.0022243138,0.002447253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013724243,0.00068449054,0.0014700224,0.01530404,0.0014803404,0.0049747084,0.0013730341,0.0016704364,0.0005490287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001187767,0.00010490167,0.0021727185,0.22336717,0.0006937721,0.00044877097,0.0016032591,0.0005361165,0.00071914546,0.0130629465,0.009967849,0.7472046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032773874,0.00028461503,0.012038045,0.29063737,0.0035210482,0.0029062945,0.0035391334,0.00056437246,0.00080352917,0.012198952,0.67335045,0.00012341666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043704873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078008645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010305878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002299292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010700757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02573824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209250349","doi":"10.1142/s1363919621400065","title":"FROM DESCRIPTION TO ACTION: ACTOR-NETWORK THEORY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Computer science; Knowledge management; Actor–network theory; Context (archaeology); Ontology; Action research; Action (physics); Participatory action research; Epistemology; Data science; Management science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.03845694070201934,"score_gpt":0.29272618101564646,"score_spread":0.25426924031362713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209250349","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053652365,0.08144706,0.4585129,0.06584018,0.001160589,0.00029409802,0.00035187145,0.00022089783,0.33852005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88642126,0.034195323,0.06325401,0.002107128,0.00059878203,0.00050899165,0.00018731723,0.0000746984,0.012652502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946396,0.003762154,0.00018264164,0.0005409534,0.0006345566,0.00024011685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864672,0.011376341,0.00084578566,0.00050052657,0.0004841005,0.0003261001],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066603892,0.00070896634,0.0006536284,0.005064944,0.0021872178,0.008042803,0.0016067522,0.0029426212,0.005097876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010105672,0.00040794435,0.000779222,0.004966963,0.014558342,0.01708407,0.0030343926,0.0021684512,0.00055745593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001465457,0.000014570607,0.0005947277,0.00029180176,0.000015555941,0.000096558324,0.0032032847,0.0018851156,0.000076105716,0.9721177,0.0010002459,0.02068964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007894347,0.000016051277,0.00037171596,0.0004801228,0.000012521006,0.00012064859,0.0023029768,0.0046870564,0.00012598113,0.9599216,0.031937864,0.000015637426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003175291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020147131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049528787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027811788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03593582},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3214833505","doi":"10.1142/s1363919621501000","title":"ALONE OR IN COOPERATION: WHAT IS THE BEST STRATEGY FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF RADICAL PRODUCT INNOVATION IN THE VIDEO GAME INDUSTRY?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Coopetition; Business; Video game; Product (mathematics); Product innovation; Marketing; Industrial organization; New product development; Process (computing); Sample (material); Computer science; Game theory; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.05450130294953845,"score_gpt":0.30373186756021525,"score_spread":0.2492305646106768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214833505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.983166,0.0004471276,0.0018420143,0.0004663753,0.000007665534,0.000035109453,0.000017870438,0.000012471295,0.0140054235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931943,0.00007048672,0.0004254296,0.000019163283,0.000003930279,0.0000065437494,0.0000061859923,0.0000035464739,0.00014530985],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962029,0.0016649298,0.00018604135,0.00043455325,0.0008083596,0.0007032244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9628322,0.021881837,0.009297017,0.0009034052,0.0022913266,0.0027942103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004495816,0.0005741672,0.00040830555,0.0015912668,0.0007091519,0.005127058,0.00065134454,0.0013770825,0.002075084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027593214,0.00016700623,0.0003882191,0.0008233892,0.0017527103,0.0032488853,0.0012028883,0.0007266638,0.0006050316],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000717788,0.0014291264,0.775555,0.0005623408,0.00044889096,0.00078434934,0.0064608036,0.004974035,0.012635105,0.0158551,0.00077317544,0.17980422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056679903,0.0017470474,0.9283851,0.00024068668,0.00032034714,0.0008252849,0.019930232,0.019809658,0.008708628,0.016960446,0.0028907852,0.00012520562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014949242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024081385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005127058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014544562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017926516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023776412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247347864","doi":"10.1142/s1363919600000160","title":"EAST ASIAN FINANCIAL SYSTEMS AND THE TRANSITION FROM INVESTMENT-DRIVEN TO INNOVATION-DRIVEN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Private Equity and Venture Capital","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Investment (military); Industrialisation; Frontier; Finance; Entertainment; Capital (architecture); Foreign direct investment; Economic growth; Economics; Market economy; Politics","score_opus":0.015338058877555032,"score_gpt":0.2254226898311897,"score_spread":0.21008463095363467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247347864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78958935,0.0066461456,0.0008545967,0.035710935,0.00019144603,0.000025261297,0.0001673902,0.000031104806,0.16678375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99410206,0.002104877,0.0001194434,0.00074096373,0.00005095338,0.000004942964,0.000019621826,0.0000030136969,0.0028542336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972254,0.000060247145,0.000019349069,0.000017539207,0.000042978172,0.0001372991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898547,0.0001389603,0.0004962317,0.00002368177,0.00012794483,0.00022768075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009845181,0.00014328733,0.00008372566,0.00091895415,0.0010695757,0.0054649524,0.00022529946,0.0005863785,0.0034140314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014918277,0.00008183773,0.00007135326,0.0011989122,0.00238816,0.002539671,0.0012736159,0.0010621895,0.00017244129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009589002,0.000077295976,0.063976794,0.00012526553,0.00001792891,0.0015717836,0.01127826,0.0007533887,0.00073297153,0.8561363,0.008402711,0.05683132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068690664,0.0001289939,0.4459076,0.000713582,0.00004405856,0.0018278023,0.032098446,0.0035580085,0.0017661653,0.251391,0.26241487,0.00008084343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008423493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008533907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008423493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026091696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021696475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018930912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304845551","doi":"10.1142/s1363919622400278","title":"SUCCESS OF OPEN INNOVATION EVENTS FOR SOLVERS","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Big Data and Business Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Open innovation; Solver; Event (particle physics); Knowledge management; Computer science; Affect (linguistics); Open source; Design science; Process management; Business; Marketing; Psychology","score_opus":0.10413407465106495,"score_gpt":0.3693765982180052,"score_spread":0.2652425235669403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304845551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9562777,0.00041019305,0.0036736066,0.0017882544,0.00014704897,0.00025472924,0.00027788433,0.000085733904,0.037084796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948003,0.00022084122,0.0015801343,0.00026637188,0.00007016502,0.00022701533,0.00020582073,0.00003340837,0.0025959143],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98351014,0.009572069,0.0011510608,0.00079631305,0.0028129974,0.0021572749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90579283,0.053657204,0.01666327,0.0028941846,0.0064065205,0.014585978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012497535,0.00046037897,0.0005546245,0.0015893347,0.002261596,0.008713522,0.0009989185,0.0019703018,0.0105464775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09271429,0.00024131539,0.0007141206,0.0014372331,0.0017339232,0.004539384,0.0071796686,0.0023366672,0.001304678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017336386,0.0037566328,0.52075475,0.0036026447,0.00043460107,0.0017934211,0.13074555,0.0034491841,0.004906028,0.061725814,0.011978942,0.2551189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004995244,0.003937064,0.40803003,0.002434059,0.0004461808,0.0013986693,0.3397993,0.00822069,0.0073991753,0.06526826,0.16198201,0.00058504165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004357606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085079717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012497535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015396806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028220706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06609404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312045894","doi":"10.1142/s1363919622500517","title":"THE LIMITS TO INTERNATIONAL OPEN INNOVATION WITHIN SMEs: THE ROLE OF DISTANCE","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"International Business and FDI","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Seniority; Context (archaeology); Function (biology); Business; Border crossing; Distance decay; Geographical distance; Marketing; Economic geography; Economics; Sociology; Political science; Geography; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.022980232138112566,"score_gpt":0.28251057933232,"score_spread":0.2595303471942074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312045894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96293676,0.00087362126,0.0012248484,0.002524865,0.000012579216,0.000013118166,0.000013883084,0.000008793021,0.03239151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940014,0.0001750412,0.000104365696,0.000054828648,0.0000033744868,0.0000052532223,0.0000030918877,0.000002163126,0.0002517367],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99026513,0.0038454586,0.0006932577,0.0006791412,0.0027480838,0.0017689235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9554959,0.025606375,0.008117532,0.0018663246,0.004325824,0.004588066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007298341,0.00017922712,0.00037454578,0.0014760653,0.004341312,0.009171178,0.0011235409,0.0010861761,0.0018367551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03418464,0.00024424447,0.00024160453,0.0020072544,0.010994805,0.005475041,0.0075566405,0.0015978195,0.00012586653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001974815,0.00016549318,0.25969115,0.00046000216,0.00007038861,0.002033679,0.540761,0.0011819445,0.0032018344,0.10326204,0.0010291073,0.08794601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001705133,0.00018094367,0.24446873,0.0007746423,0.000048614023,0.0010748707,0.6811323,0.00094288157,0.0009144672,0.028158998,0.04218127,0.00010516935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042256463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059219435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042256463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006630137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008013468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08402103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367179437","doi":"10.1142/s1363919622300045","title":"USER ENGAGEMENT IN HEALTHCARE LIVING LABS: A SCOPING REVIEW","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"User engagement; Health care; Knowledge management; User innovation; Experiential learning; Living lab; User experience design; Customer engagement; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Psychology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1142530567529097,"score_gpt":0.3858646017323157,"score_spread":0.271611544979406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367179437","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034344065,0.9974056,0.00039576585,0.000535121,0.0001671039,0.0002432767,0.00009674922,0.000008130898,0.0008047598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004180671,0.99394315,0.000649904,0.00034905574,0.000073042866,0.0005392581,0.00010566613,0.0000074736276,0.00015177921],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781446,0.009277615,0.0060532475,0.0011752456,0.004821007,0.0005283378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87921345,0.099611655,0.008179452,0.0019497115,0.010355891,0.0006898882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023747688,0.0017036531,0.004403977,0.01710991,0.0015994565,0.0057748286,0.0021445416,0.0035838257,0.0042428803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09777965,0.0012709281,0.004717122,0.01767584,0.0020482284,0.0050963815,0.004299153,0.0024138235,0.00081091566],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008794557,0.00006906193,0.00066337816,0.6268953,0.001021648,0.00013053001,0.0016614863,0.00026906238,0.00025823052,0.0026967032,0.0062739546,0.35997266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014902985,0.000077975026,0.0010940608,0.9137967,0.0024437609,0.00021338799,0.0008280712,0.00007735428,0.00019054765,0.0010000927,0.08023601,0.000027254127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008114716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015992848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023747688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046168743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021004898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12559128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386225026","doi":"10.1142/s1363919623500172","title":"DEVELOPING INDICATORS OF OPEN INNOVATION EVENT OUTCOMES","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Polytechnique Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Business; Open innovation; Ecosystem; Best practice; Marketing; Environmental resource management; Field (mathematics); Knowledge management; Process management; Computer science; Economics; Ecology; Management","score_opus":0.05279362948160246,"score_gpt":0.35347400626364023,"score_spread":0.30068037678203774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386225026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90789425,0.00046711726,0.030600948,0.000634781,0.0001064953,0.00094098103,0.004274055,0.00024239384,0.05483901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799834,0.0002021763,0.015339542,0.000033749955,0.000027325366,0.00085585733,0.0023767164,0.000023559756,0.0011576966],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931075,0.0025237515,0.0012147764,0.0004934973,0.0019788824,0.0006816062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9219425,0.03644138,0.022850368,0.003087338,0.012072159,0.0036062675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011191716,0.00054627727,0.0003937208,0.011369253,0.0010216667,0.0034565562,0.0010447835,0.0007951016,0.0043151057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04834429,0.00018544629,0.00052906986,0.008228483,0.0010240352,0.005296637,0.0040879534,0.00088651926,0.00077525614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027791254,0.0004917183,0.8105068,0.0009675674,0.00013418496,0.00017467169,0.011981043,0.0025723102,0.0014471122,0.016934605,0.0036034475,0.15090849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028396595,0.0005945108,0.9217942,0.0005210861,0.00012288049,0.00019369923,0.032711897,0.008447028,0.0035747867,0.012491574,0.019423874,0.00009621674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011732293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024957221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011369253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020804112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018880652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059188128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388157681","doi":"10.1142/s1363919623400054","title":"REASONS AND TRIGGERS USING RESEARCH RESULTS IN CORPORATE PRODUCT ENGINEERING","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Quality and Supply Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Product (mathematics); New product development; Process (computing); Usability; Computer science; Engineering research; Product engineering; Knowledge management; Process management; Business; Product design; Marketing","score_opus":0.1551686329150866,"score_gpt":0.3556641312887871,"score_spread":0.2004954983737005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388157681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7864937,0.0051447013,0.10938937,0.019953705,0.00046145704,0.0021258588,0.0002813638,0.0011151882,0.07503471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97879344,0.0007263518,0.018269232,0.0007140073,0.000056433008,0.00040180684,0.00007594941,0.00013991313,0.0008228439],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.56240463,0.3415637,0.03385944,0.007085303,0.04575993,0.009326956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.32830226,0.5835348,0.038580675,0.017042076,0.027498731,0.005041581],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17358108,0.0012978808,0.001201671,0.008901846,0.0057334313,0.0147570595,0.0025102836,0.00636304,0.0020017095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31024784,0.0015454693,0.0019681782,0.0056490903,0.014530368,0.013817453,0.0089897225,0.0043710372,0.00066908833],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005991031,0.0003206485,0.048733298,0.004570723,0.00017001641,0.0049197576,0.76935583,0.0011954572,0.010278837,0.086755656,0.0032962866,0.069804505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100697514,0.0007082071,0.031498287,0.0065781684,0.00029130193,0.004786981,0.80067456,0.0052276817,0.014171297,0.056358047,0.07886223,0.000742509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013968871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013337942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82641894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007577363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072441646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91799545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388195990","doi":"10.1142/s136391962340008x","title":"MANAGING THE CO-CREATION PROCESS: WHEN THE CAKE DOES NOT RISE","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Service and Product Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Co-creation; Process (computing); Creativity; Open innovation; Business; Ideation; Service (business); Innovation process; Value (mathematics); Value creation; Marketing; Knowledge management; Process management; Computer science; Work in process; Political science","score_opus":0.022912876108946528,"score_gpt":0.3070814201197462,"score_spread":0.28416854401079966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388195990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2467883,0.0051229876,0.22623914,0.1308752,0.0040314235,0.0019366071,0.000119757824,0.002435031,0.38245162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91517496,0.0009094004,0.04339007,0.0048533585,0.00037615674,0.0010030272,0.000091514594,0.0005509565,0.0336505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95440924,0.020343393,0.0019311281,0.0052885036,0.01180922,0.00621859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9211232,0.027789615,0.0077839,0.015464913,0.011689449,0.016148962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033898626,0.001056153,0.0011442286,0.0028292695,0.02073711,0.03593948,0.003978748,0.0115211485,0.010741595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.093797125,0.0010445775,0.0011592689,0.0020924113,0.023718571,0.039345946,0.024878232,0.010759725,0.004532141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005333361,0.00076976774,0.022878049,0.00087611325,0.00013446693,0.0042810272,0.18916306,0.0016228621,0.0083161285,0.5330191,0.034692816,0.20371318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014338635,0.00067195663,0.006982291,0.0014810435,0.000082733895,0.002562258,0.117824696,0.006921001,0.0056404658,0.38675234,0.47060946,0.00032828492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033685316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028438617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03593948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007731853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02046997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17927521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401385464","doi":"10.1142/s1363919624300010","title":"BUILDING A BRIDGE BETWEEN “EQUITY AND INGENUITY”: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF ORGANISATIONAL JUSTICE AND INNOVATION AND FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ingenuity; Bridge (graph theory); Equity (law); Economic Justice; Engineering ethics; Business; Sociology; Marketing; Political science; Economics; Engineering; Law; Medicine; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.13988832637418283,"score_gpt":0.4436738849668845,"score_spread":0.3037855585927016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401385464","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043036224,0.9980872,0.00025643595,0.0007378815,0.000112873524,0.0000712194,0.000069321846,0.0000038100916,0.00023073965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007881394,0.98980206,0.0010507251,0.00083282095,0.00009960905,0.00017087407,0.00008568652,0.000004181329,0.00007259627],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867791,0.0053545353,0.0039310846,0.0009695825,0.0025831503,0.0003826553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9129472,0.06955491,0.008730381,0.001504299,0.0065097027,0.0007535686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022830779,0.0009800232,0.0043445863,0.01726989,0.00079886045,0.0044926605,0.0017833335,0.0020245528,0.00368704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07585821,0.0008347864,0.0041654273,0.01451292,0.001712887,0.0051516867,0.0026021432,0.0019571288,0.00032516572],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009474796,0.000035269757,0.0015287498,0.7667154,0.003515701,0.00013603145,0.0009508977,0.00020385208,0.00028154254,0.004021738,0.004036406,0.21847968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040600735,0.00008923746,0.0033889685,0.917814,0.010017462,0.000262691,0.0009922184,0.000103337545,0.00015393931,0.0027170985,0.06438524,0.000035244568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007573477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028337218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022830779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003570397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027083611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12074214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405704914","doi":"10.1142/s1363919624400061","title":"ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN TRANSFORMING HRM PROCESSES WITHIN ORGANIZATIONS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Innovation Management","topic":"AI and HR Technologies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Human resource management; Scopus; Systematic review; Computer science; Process management; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.026842871269111543,"score_gpt":0.28639845421951776,"score_spread":0.2595555829504062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405704914","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011162777,0.9687007,0.0052181305,0.0060250345,0.00038852848,0.00021191947,0.000080388854,0.000024740206,0.008187766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23106536,0.7408532,0.022608915,0.003989609,0.0004549223,0.0004883241,0.000084482774,0.000017922317,0.00043725804],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9605092,0.029713597,0.003373151,0.0011731317,0.004807235,0.00042371138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89588106,0.09190228,0.0066697216,0.0018594487,0.003267087,0.0004205261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03301309,0.00055846473,0.0010583885,0.0069261244,0.0007068214,0.0056599914,0.0009096785,0.0017068596,0.0013090189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059721336,0.00043728919,0.0017010116,0.006883761,0.002712789,0.005360827,0.0022630738,0.0016974177,0.00017225591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015233154,0.00014849771,0.00677001,0.1446213,0.003107949,0.00018912677,0.0068373308,0.002336129,0.0005960473,0.035890404,0.0022254963,0.79712546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025818474,0.0013653969,0.04494979,0.53152645,0.010133181,0.0012273598,0.014615173,0.0027678295,0.003257915,0.09293599,0.29667175,0.0002909935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039337496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005591025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03301309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030527695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008912466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17459202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}