{"meta":{"query_hash":"e2e33f2a3c68","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Intellectual Property Management"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e2e33f2a3c68","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Intellectual+Property+Management"},"results":[{"id":"W1970517924","doi":"10.1504/ijipm.2008.017855","title":"Same issues, different treatment: common law and civilian approaches to the copyright treatment of freelance works","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Intellectual Property Management","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Legislature; Exploit; Legislation; Law; Copyright law; Common law; Political science; Intellectual property; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.10675313282887453,"score_gpt":0.24353480504784314,"score_spread":0.13678167221896861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970517924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66895765,0.00858838,0.0032640833,0.03713054,0.0036356142,0.0030030215,0.000023122504,0.00013478634,0.27526283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98766875,0.0028820378,0.00024504875,0.0015996366,0.001187425,0.00003658845,0.0000123660575,0.000034274028,0.0063338657],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978867,0.000046991885,0.0007850727,0.0003206636,0.00067164755,0.0002889332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987805,0.00014271382,0.00037124488,0.0003196473,0.0003365336,0.000049381677],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020479738,0.00038255192,0.0005435094,0.00039445856,0.00024617094,0.00027880713,0.00080240757,0.00006244405,0.0012402646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064069405,0.0001666333,0.00024605353,0.00025665836,0.00025838445,0.00062921114,0.00028073785,0.0001457996,0.00013330033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008794913,0.0071860226,0.0029785507,0.00026718836,0.0068170074,0.00068254827,0.022128979,0.0009105476,0.00057395163,0.022771673,0.34254897,0.5843396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020093364,0.0011820782,0.00077020406,0.00033910677,0.00020555669,0.00012907671,0.00088565965,0.010915251,0.0023682353,0.0011072792,0.9797115,0.00037673808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012277432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007362441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6371625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026400582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019876143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088595557","doi":"10.1504/ijipm.2009.022956","title":"Complementarities between strategies to protect inventions and innovations: evidence from manufacturing SMEs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Intellectual Property Management","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Industrial organization; Business; Patent analysis; Commerce; Manufacturing engineering; Engineering; Computer science; Data science","score_opus":0.1885978782164752,"score_gpt":0.29083309797147444,"score_spread":0.10223521975499925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088595557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9106876,0.00036485933,0.050481588,0.01822577,0.0013039225,0.0011938607,0.000015260224,0.00010856829,0.017618557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99172574,0.00012245447,0.0026081535,0.0035148922,0.0011989612,0.000014850504,0.000020525207,0.000017541393,0.000776856],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789643,0.000032733777,0.00081430405,0.0002781649,0.0007254991,0.00025285356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986537,0.00015385766,0.00033103314,0.0001537796,0.00067395665,0.00003363552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005313236,0.0002506377,0.00028376575,0.0008931625,0.00020680795,0.0010319111,0.0008173277,0.00004783274,0.000909143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041613766,0.00016890452,0.000104649705,0.00027754903,0.00006695952,0.0020780538,0.0003718254,0.00029120775,0.00017790457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031024036,0.0009160033,0.0056776823,0.00040225015,0.0038052604,0.0003524407,0.011591044,0.001967457,0.0054248627,0.016090509,0.11794435,0.8327257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047533596,0.0019580792,0.077342145,0.008242871,0.000897328,0.00010119228,0.024453698,0.004444877,0.022763828,0.10030586,0.75216126,0.0025754876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007946074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000069642396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83015025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011962739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032395066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142000732","doi":"10.1504/ijipm.2006.011024","title":"Pledges and pitfalls: Canada's legislation on compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals for export","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Intellectual Property Management","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; TRIPS architecture; Business; International trade; World trade; TRIPS Agreement; Intellectual property; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.06511728233811544,"score_gpt":0.28739083885113015,"score_spread":0.22227355651301473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142000732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7062355,0.0041113887,0.046702795,0.02758579,0.0047903527,0.001282414,0.00035994372,0.000024099054,0.20890766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99593174,0.00045131397,0.00087465387,0.0014223029,0.00031918197,0.0000037133323,0.000006124113,0.000013314275,0.0009776363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987864,0.000011951165,0.0008261028,0.00014880029,0.00008582888,0.00014090909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990854,0.0001795832,0.00044869355,0.00006933215,0.00015984238,0.00005712825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043883384,0.00010784936,0.00026089806,0.00026009325,0.00003446553,0.000048283942,0.00023428761,0.000028053455,0.00014294358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001280984,0.000089127534,0.00008509667,0.0000489369,0.000049758208,0.00010378523,0.000062164036,0.00010327476,0.000007809038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028386249,0.0014343342,0.0050027194,0.00032855256,0.002987716,0.00008369224,0.0015812292,0.010221883,0.0009273232,0.4460908,0.33908337,0.18941976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016213793,0.00023956144,0.001958973,0.00010192438,0.000029870838,0.000025962388,0.000114759365,0.032224394,0.0034818156,0.013197959,0.9467586,0.00024475754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004091992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088168634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60767525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021604856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048170536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6185895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170403539","doi":"10.1504/ijipm.2011.041082","title":"Intellectual property sharing agreements in gene technology: implications for research and commercialisation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Intellectual Property Management","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Consolidation (business); Incentive; Business; Industrial organization; Commercialization; Commerce; International trade; Marketing; Economics; Market economy; Finance; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.4458699219257813,"score_gpt":0.34383659893685126,"score_spread":0.10203332298893003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170403539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7959288,0.00090486556,0.03729047,0.0179413,0.004017973,0.005631774,0.000025907178,0.00022438976,0.13803452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99277866,0.0004499057,0.0021505146,0.000887136,0.0005795071,0.00013627192,0.000020182251,0.000048820548,0.0029490055],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974347,0.0000383077,0.0009987692,0.0004596224,0.0005791251,0.00048949063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970297,0.00018944482,0.00033481728,0.00026927263,0.0021397504,0.000036984107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018877201,0.00027173953,0.00033001008,0.0026455775,0.00027552256,0.00031830987,0.0014506767,0.0001355367,0.00052813365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017241503,0.00016527262,0.00010874802,0.00089547486,0.00027158056,0.0010260225,0.00094732834,0.0005149042,0.00014769667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012560125,0.0058162715,0.04042498,0.00084890623,0.002843535,0.00023287047,0.021932775,0.00016735698,0.008554128,0.056967445,0.12087269,0.7287789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012771524,0.0029675255,0.010934536,0.0028672765,0.00041921576,0.00043058742,0.016898755,0.024471447,0.018428804,0.18895733,0.71831554,0.0025374822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004185065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001020464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7262414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026919215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046126414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6739622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561818194","doi":"10.1504/ijipm.2016.079584","title":"An assessment of Canadian university technology transfer offices","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Intellectual Property Management","topic":"Innovation Policy and R&D","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Genome Prairie; Genome Canada","keywords":"Technology transfer; Transfer (computing); Business; Telecommunications; Engineering management; Engineering; Computer science; International trade","score_opus":0.03700758332322597,"score_gpt":0.25687462419231905,"score_spread":0.2198670408690931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561818194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40546006,0.00016422366,0.21040063,0.04286668,0.0021139206,0.0003566,0.00022936081,0.0000322651,0.33837628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99469584,0.0004071659,0.001466336,0.00022655378,0.00006587687,5.221095e-7,0.0000015782316,0.000006872918,0.0031292269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917096,0.0000145014255,0.00048812738,0.0001200168,0.0000823468,0.00012403472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993088,0.000024514018,0.00018865611,0.00011251303,0.0003088118,0.000056692985],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038890526,0.000073402894,0.00016372217,0.0027076225,0.000036129946,0.000017920891,0.00059717905,0.000051948988,0.0012565079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055618264,0.00004782674,0.00006677433,0.00040764853,0.00007807395,0.00026488764,0.000031641408,0.00008669606,0.000046140143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104727405,0.00021737644,0.0034301612,0.000013112075,0.0006111905,0.000057060355,0.00046333362,0.00010355655,0.00069125806,0.95638907,0.0053897374,0.032529417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001315683,0.00047577603,0.0058593326,0.00011336666,0.000014437416,0.000032920623,0.00063201744,0.00052860734,0.0020986137,0.007905486,0.9808224,0.00020139628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021994337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001126736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97543263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026874218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007693231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387530483","doi":"10.1504/ijipm.2023.134070","title":"A review of the practices related to the protection of indigenous designs and traditional cultural expressions under intellectual property law in Canada and India","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Intellectual Property Management","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Intellectual property; Traditional knowledge; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Law; Business; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.17109103130398887,"score_gpt":0.31111815752151295,"score_spread":0.14002712621752408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387530483","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011597011,0.97567683,0.000114655566,0.0035038318,0.002181327,0.006173195,0.00004851404,0.000029519113,0.011112425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013712227,0.9824117,0.00004502401,0.0021118743,0.0002945819,0.00014995382,0.000022205875,0.00006076212,0.0011917066],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960696,0.00026509754,0.0018969957,0.0003881798,0.0010957419,0.0002844047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586844,0.00066043634,0.002284506,0.00028240727,0.000863404,0.000040795792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013771366,0.00044401034,0.0010352733,0.000583303,0.00019380788,0.00019431085,0.0013559,0.00011870814,0.00048473984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028425818,0.00016803057,0.00027262952,0.0010960634,0.00022941575,0.0006536149,0.00089561666,0.0009086199,0.000025640767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000557278,0.00047381673,0.000012050468,0.04823237,0.003127637,0.00007408911,0.0033117412,0.000075233,0.000033977485,0.0010288279,0.17671779,0.7663552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032008326,0.00013491882,0.000032861182,0.06877345,0.0005462934,0.0001617045,0.0010126552,0.00034036933,0.000015317133,0.0002625701,0.9280815,0.00031827463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103549376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048559986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7660369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004970507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070106896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9688013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}