{"meta":{"query_hash":"813a3c21f86e","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Law Ethics and Technology"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/813a3c21f86e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Law+Ethics+and+Technology"},"results":[{"id":"W4285315965","doi":"10.55574/clnm2093","title":"A Case Study of Extradition: United States V. Meng Wanzhou","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Ethics and Technology","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Cornerstone; Law; Ideology; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.06856771573241849,"score_gpt":0.38792804769503014,"score_spread":0.31936033196261165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285315965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97668374,0.00011180118,0.00031401205,0.019562406,0.0005481229,0.00004641485,0.000011621334,0.000012726665,0.0027091308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987209,0.00036857722,0.00036070723,0.0002787166,0.00014841136,0.0000014770691,0.0000070758615,0.000004198283,0.00010995295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876404,0.00018425904,0.0003515035,0.00008535204,0.00053605944,0.00007877712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963192,0.00038531586,0.0003034796,0.000055152228,0.002901361,0.000035502308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009032802,0.000054319804,0.00012174593,0.0002645761,0.00021226286,0.00004860875,0.00019161716,0.00014918762,0.000054409695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047390984,0.00005170414,0.000033133183,0.00021409678,0.00026858307,0.00015747058,0.000048670216,0.0005199518,6.0197226e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014399927,0.00026141747,0.0013894647,0.0000032162475,0.0001536565,0.0032675616,0.010208355,0.000028058066,0.0001575615,0.98321867,0.000033645865,0.0012639703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034962008,0.0010291025,0.00033414367,0.00023779632,0.00013543176,0.014982751,0.19213147,0.00023736064,0.0044735293,0.52396536,0.2586579,0.00031892184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023725377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007927951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4592533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005304813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019222252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44239828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308319116","doi":"10.55574/qgsj9827","title":"A NEW CYBERBULLYING LAW? EXTENSION OF LEGAL INTERPRETATIONS IN CHINA AND RUSSIA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Ethics and Technology","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Impunity; Law; China; Political science; Anonymity; Face (sociological concept); Order (exchange); Power (physics); Sociology; Human rights; Business; The Internet; Computer science","score_opus":0.012845068157257451,"score_gpt":0.2824879981165476,"score_spread":0.2696429299592902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308319116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7701845,0.0016760491,0.15522362,0.06662138,0.0018543284,0.00014102722,0.0000069098683,0.00006812918,0.004224055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98567384,0.00011209397,0.013844009,0.0003061274,0.000024345816,0.0000017929251,4.4850333e-7,0.0000040682194,0.0000332709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990513,0.00007323755,0.00032953528,0.00013518562,0.00032024682,0.00009053079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993333,0.000111112524,0.0002415689,0.00010337752,0.00017292671,0.000037674923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069335836,0.00006548903,0.00013923061,0.0004092902,0.00012994152,0.000055718992,0.00044406825,0.00008907381,0.0000097497505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011557201,0.000062825886,0.000030758252,0.00021036078,0.00010870107,0.0002611879,0.0003799336,0.0010283513,2.5906402e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022866787,0.000029794852,0.00024931677,0.0000033067342,0.000025980802,0.000102882674,0.00091281545,0.000089379544,0.00407238,0.9741473,0.00001486011,0.020329116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026773962,0.0014714879,0.0031798836,0.00034718876,0.000027181071,0.009629638,0.0007945003,0.011528225,0.013014736,0.90844154,0.048538286,0.00034991585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059985364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020153073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21548934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041739484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001151418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44677317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409348541","doi":"10.55574/qkmd5023","title":"HALLUCINATIONS IN LEGAL PRACTICE: A COMPARATIVE CASE LAW ANALYSIS","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Ethics and Technology","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.06968377022821066,"score_gpt":0.43010975311146543,"score_spread":0.3604259828832548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409348541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54362476,0.0010450237,0.0064252466,0.31717062,0.0013574293,0.00017830248,0.000046340192,0.000055573735,0.13009673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966286,0.00014939292,0.0006937585,0.0023765152,0.000021968193,0.0000024966998,5.085182e-7,0.0000020613566,0.00012470747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990413,0.00013699278,0.000349929,0.0001420597,0.000238863,0.00009085936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815273,0.0009691047,0.00021976569,0.000084044754,0.0005507509,0.000023619566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005358268,0.00006953419,0.00018076919,0.00078392925,0.00013205664,0.00007093181,0.0002845694,0.00015371558,0.000013963373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011901398,0.00005994123,0.000054242097,0.0007194864,0.00040429737,0.00031611716,0.00009877682,0.0010821011,0.0000014734974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002376057,0.00012370037,0.00016271834,0.0000022918362,0.00012895137,0.0029062156,0.0004046452,0.00010114861,0.0025183368,0.9931324,0.000023852312,0.0004719686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031070684,0.00041932391,0.00040341224,0.00022666101,0.00056642306,0.022261411,0.003659183,0.005333126,0.054172453,0.5743706,0.335085,0.00039533668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005613568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003994049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45300385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004713624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009079552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47012514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}