{"meta":{"query_hash":"5d3a1342978c","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family"},"cohort_total":20,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":20,"exported":20,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5d3a1342978c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Law+Policy+and+the+Family"},"results":[{"id":"W2028132958","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebt012","title":"Protection Against Unilateral Dispositions of the Family Home - An Irish Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Irish; Legislature; Veto; Law; Position (finance); Perspective (graphical); Family law; Political science; Common law; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.027985795494629186,"score_gpt":0.3344826306900675,"score_spread":0.3064968351954383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028132958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89730346,0.000083215644,0.00020376698,0.036523793,0.00028158783,0.00026397844,0.000026880756,0.0000071913546,0.06530611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699736,0.00013971482,0.000053207717,0.0017422094,0.00074705074,0.000012143756,7.2885695e-7,0.000004566539,0.00030300042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906474,0.00017558664,0.00023511564,0.000067032044,0.00035616395,0.00010134485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891245,0.000076900986,0.00025798052,0.00009268486,0.0005990675,0.000060895865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034650383,0.000059658665,0.00009586401,0.000054527136,0.00039330832,0.00014765689,0.00047070038,0.00003851593,0.0000078012345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000732583,0.000033764394,0.00010852772,0.00012043146,0.0006514544,0.00044583803,0.00005731583,0.00017547091,0.0000034571715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033579738,0.000053010826,0.00008416304,8.3763535e-7,0.0000582831,4.2140346e-7,0.007343091,0.000061326165,0.0025348214,0.9889832,0.00017422799,0.00067302847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031674907,0.00017635185,0.16502,0.00016243091,0.00008657471,0.000044793247,0.025982376,0.00074377557,0.0005621483,0.6842901,0.11946988,0.0002940263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04346543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005526343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30469307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012319435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016042002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9629042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030536740","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebr014","title":"Children's Experiences with Family Justice Professionals in Ontario and Ohio","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Psychology; Mental health; Mythology; Social work; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.03246308992886996,"score_gpt":0.31290730709302095,"score_spread":0.28044421716415097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030536740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9407302,0.00028333286,0.000019851626,0.0032293494,0.00026496727,0.00007634504,0.0000014813446,0.0000032933124,0.055391137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99619305,0.00031174772,0.00013163239,0.00268188,0.0004762984,0.0000030073622,5.206326e-7,0.0000030656258,0.0001987795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914825,0.00010696797,0.00020299562,0.00007466428,0.0003558834,0.00011125262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994787,0.00011305996,0.00016710756,0.000037433034,0.00014320615,0.000060519105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005444192,0.00006602944,0.00011306219,0.00008529064,0.00018759537,0.00006324399,0.00022667402,0.000036753307,0.000021624108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060462517,0.000038257578,0.000027499811,0.00006311897,0.0005067336,0.00033586935,0.000036615536,0.00017066784,8.1457995e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005695572,0.000085808526,0.0071511674,0.000001347125,0.00006910519,0.000021090285,0.25958866,0.0000014725443,0.00001144636,0.7305272,0.000087623295,0.0018855215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005051005,0.00023524745,0.8075204,0.00032068926,0.00008439307,0.00018444976,0.12337897,0.000005202539,0.00005873784,0.03614606,0.026752118,0.00026276207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14155616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05356583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8003692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061386425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029697065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9637041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059075898","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/16.2.145","title":"Context and Inclusivity in Canada's Evolving Definition of the Family","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Charter; Commission; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Inclusion (mineral); Interdependence; Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.04102726335986378,"score_gpt":0.2980762770370748,"score_spread":0.257049013677211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059075898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9318186,0.0024977485,0.0000024100657,0.025882632,0.00031330794,0.00007517589,0.000013865283,0.0000014238443,0.039394822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99583006,0.001318615,0.000023614011,0.002549872,0.00022788477,0.0000010372138,9.573432e-8,0.0000020758746,0.000046767433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893314,0.00020137307,0.00024879113,0.000048609403,0.00046471864,0.00010334506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896914,0.00048422496,0.0002403336,0.000034042587,0.00023602409,0.00003621858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046883512,0.000057027853,0.00013821777,0.000027314776,0.00027200676,0.000040428575,0.00025687835,0.00002573721,0.0000071420254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005928444,0.000031061347,0.00004844735,0.000071125156,0.000542326,0.0001574301,0.00010514467,0.00014473248,3.0957648e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008512936,0.000038037473,0.016094323,0.0000064026713,0.00015173409,0.0000104765195,0.04121322,0.000016153219,0.0002796826,0.93500644,0.0011390507,0.0059593623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004664028,0.000046525533,0.8233069,0.00037794636,0.00005538158,0.0000372335,0.036854126,0.00029035241,0.00008975476,0.07608393,0.057961393,0.00023241156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95534027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83897656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8589225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035028532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016550253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20920835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089722476","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebl018","title":"Conceiving Parents Through Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Reproduction; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Ecology","score_opus":0.047326292776962986,"score_gpt":0.39640947325238995,"score_spread":0.34908318047542697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089722476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7797036,0.0024832045,0.0007971232,0.03059623,0.0008920886,0.00013674048,0.0000047964013,0.000023933646,0.18536226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98632324,0.0005682122,0.00048035075,0.011377558,0.0011532773,6.8672256e-7,6.324865e-7,0.000005041178,0.000091004054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999165,0.000020953737,0.00031039194,0.0000718893,0.00029938747,0.00013239334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991764,0.00019489552,0.00019865985,0.00009427455,0.00028457696,0.00005122991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061941653,0.00006381985,0.00016334996,0.000060693885,0.00006839434,0.00002185914,0.00015979054,0.00004182372,0.0000029701487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035127412,0.000036133402,0.00007003327,0.000050773142,0.0004906326,0.00013285667,0.000044594366,0.00021750794,0.000003129131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083304755,0.00003368961,0.0012277642,0.000006979146,0.00013036313,0.00007042297,0.00048509648,0.0000010430854,0.0005156584,0.9929116,0.00014842962,0.003635919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0101053445,0.00046804897,0.04460678,0.00038156757,0.00008623037,0.0031958725,0.0014740089,0.000010682837,0.0093485275,0.42253113,0.50764394,0.00014790415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013137845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019885016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57038045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055896908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006633957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19860579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109720334","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebt017","title":"Family Law Reform in (Neoliberal) Context: British Columbia's New Family Law Act","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Family law; Law; Context (archaeology); Law reform; Political science; Best interests; Guardian; Relocation; Dispute resolution; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.024046559922244557,"score_gpt":0.3120802885177703,"score_spread":0.28803372859552573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109720334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49615642,0.0015333631,0.000017059578,0.016829822,0.0010528014,0.00021927261,0.000026163034,0.000025944237,0.48413914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96746546,0.0012442128,0.00011988527,0.025629798,0.0022586607,0.0000049459863,0.0000021205167,0.000014261503,0.0032606414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975198,0.0003523532,0.00064190215,0.00018185996,0.00091889396,0.00038520273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835694,0.00048058905,0.00040236433,0.00010434044,0.00044204624,0.00021374262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001325013,0.00015374915,0.00042693663,0.000043878772,0.0006436352,0.00091714755,0.0008153912,0.00013225815,0.000021984559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003035434,0.00013527843,0.00022417332,0.00013402486,0.001537393,0.0006971389,0.00015498501,0.0004168794,0.000014146949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014340402,0.00005158843,0.0004233012,0.000003931031,0.00018505711,0.000030564446,0.010300617,0.000007536943,0.00008935587,0.97669584,0.0027089843,0.009359821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004647484,0.000096944204,0.032896303,0.00023899412,0.000035049692,0.00005085079,0.0047103735,0.00001976842,0.000010286219,0.12009349,0.8369377,0.00026270983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9435747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64807445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8566024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060765096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018305996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8844075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265908887","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebv007","title":"Positions Taken by Judges and Custody Experts on Issues Relating to the Best Interests of Children in Custody Disputes in Québec","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Best interests; Psychology; Relevance (law); Ideology; Social psychology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.03355166571764596,"score_gpt":0.35431235521343385,"score_spread":0.3207606894957879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265908887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9155494,0.0012444523,0.000018913546,0.06925485,0.00015492784,0.00011835314,0.000017347746,0.0000023305763,0.01363943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767685,0.00039146337,0.00005646228,0.0013682303,0.00024461636,0.000003026307,0.0000019558433,0.0000049471196,0.00025247558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896955,0.00022081399,0.00031592062,0.000074180716,0.00031482783,0.000104724604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991174,0.00046742798,0.00016003916,0.00005967612,0.00012506868,0.00007043016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008796696,0.00006895188,0.00013065897,0.00016202277,0.00012362858,0.000073002084,0.00029498097,0.000048196343,0.0000013383868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054044987,0.00004043401,0.00003709941,0.00012428177,0.00034341862,0.00015725655,0.000062169805,0.00018646818,0.0000015727111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020267471,0.00015341795,0.054049224,0.00000147695,0.0000813994,0.000006282078,0.06345588,0.0010465953,0.000065237,0.87650436,0.001911701,0.0025217435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011778925,0.0012271156,0.5156558,0.002377495,0.00012808832,0.00019252436,0.16179098,0.0027486363,0.00009950448,0.22078212,0.082317315,0.0009014975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16199501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05148986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65572226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012031682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013435731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.965818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564531045","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebx002","title":"Cohabitation, Law Reform, and the Litigants","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Plaintiff; Legislature; Legislation; Unjust enrichment; Duration (music); Law reform; Political science; Law; Property (philosophy); Common law; Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Restitution","score_opus":0.031969344300304604,"score_gpt":0.3577228666456351,"score_spread":0.32575352234533045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564531045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24784987,0.00076732336,0.00007639485,0.14868788,0.0010734109,0.00012591934,0.000015166503,0.000005444822,0.6013986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99307084,0.0015671321,0.00006464686,0.003753436,0.0008442827,0.0000014942933,5.256264e-7,0.00000370683,0.00069393904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990891,0.00017102902,0.00022696929,0.000052299194,0.00036333626,0.00009724308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987173,0.00046871722,0.0003539861,0.00010227753,0.00030159575,0.000056118628],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017676911,0.00005455151,0.000111604146,0.000035528712,0.0015093603,0.00049838336,0.0005309216,0.000045526118,0.0000021916828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005288263,0.000026735459,0.000069099915,0.000021178079,0.0030233394,0.0003517227,0.00007501785,0.00017033193,0.0000023822406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013450728,0.0000065991376,0.00026402334,7.937883e-7,0.00007177941,0.0000028252418,0.006785039,0.0000037732732,0.000004549562,0.99215406,0.000058957117,0.00051309203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003985969,0.000018083336,0.024917994,0.00005831244,0.000032766337,0.00003790623,0.0028151826,0.00023836263,0.0000030563936,0.87651324,0.09131116,0.000067999295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030431516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029892935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74522096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057955327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760568154","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebx008","title":"Views of the Child Reports: The Ontario Pilot Project","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Toolbox; Economic Justice; Psychology; Child custody; Social justice; Medical education; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Law; Criminology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09454657027648862,"score_gpt":0.39249080634773736,"score_spread":0.29794423607124876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760568154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6307805,0.00017837068,0.000012735198,0.04977933,0.0012830006,0.0002173406,0.000006304985,0.0000023874393,0.31774002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962294,0.00014714838,0.000011061554,0.0014480331,0.0011234513,0.0000019258937,2.575029e-7,0.0000026426371,0.0010360545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890417,0.00016694891,0.00031990037,0.000052364594,0.00046902546,0.0000875688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985831,0.00013744686,0.0008638841,0.00019253128,0.00019869319,0.000024382396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001391752,0.000053344535,0.00010929814,0.000025867197,0.0009701567,0.00020535398,0.00067707465,0.000021728014,0.000016390468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000349275,0.000020220912,0.00011624741,0.000027171118,0.0009123923,0.00020607648,0.00007585005,0.00016781736,7.0052295e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015230766,0.000045556575,0.0033404597,0.0000010283322,0.00012917652,0.0000045638853,0.028111061,0.000009065798,0.000022123957,0.9663494,0.00075438595,0.0010808578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009303036,0.00006225802,0.16713522,0.000115140116,0.000056061188,0.000101685575,0.000400969,0.0000067313385,0.0001158146,0.08568526,0.74532807,0.00006250539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33127177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1691662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88066417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060093855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031040874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84599435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980370897","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebz013","title":"One Parent, Three Parents: Judges and Ontario’s All Families Are Equal Act, 2016","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Champion; Legislation; Discretion; Law; Variety (cybernetics); Diversity (politics); Family law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.055754113234218874,"score_gpt":0.3267932573809631,"score_spread":0.27103914414674424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980370897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84779745,0.0019433019,0.000030455665,0.018669983,0.0008188542,0.000111805566,0.000025816635,0.000008162885,0.13059418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99282426,0.0024814007,0.000021147354,0.003418479,0.0009059007,0.0000021331898,0.000001153896,0.0000032645548,0.00034227595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998883,0.00007686421,0.00025437624,0.00009371204,0.00053191703,0.00016015096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906605,0.00029617245,0.00024779042,0.00004953382,0.00026567964,0.000074777556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047109736,0.00008882367,0.00020355664,0.00006694051,0.0002610486,0.000119200326,0.0003028515,0.000043279804,0.000028005958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001379726,0.000059374983,0.00007978039,0.000039260496,0.00090040686,0.00027992597,0.00011567434,0.0001543371,0.00001466705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024124328,0.00004017916,0.058092363,0.0000017201047,0.00034945767,0.000005069546,0.005098905,0.000003935537,0.000023743936,0.9340414,0.00023473332,0.0018672746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025194967,0.0000857836,0.26690227,0.00018202554,0.00007369125,0.00001908069,0.005461695,0.000003234825,0.00000877815,0.4440326,0.28053898,0.00017238891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22081776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13375852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49000877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013310072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028700606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88204813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204919874","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebab038","title":"<i>Legal Recognition of Non-Conjugal Families: New Frontiers in Family Law in the US, Canada and Europe</i>, Nausica Palazzo","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Heading (navigation); Diversity (politics); Law; Sociology; Family law; Family ties; Political science; Genealogy; History; Geography","score_opus":0.031181710097383703,"score_gpt":0.3077276335350605,"score_spread":0.2765459234376768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204919874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8616518,0.0016500538,0.00003107407,0.016453052,0.0009826836,0.000105458,0.000049312875,0.000002183341,0.119074404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806588,0.0039366395,0.00011733878,0.01450361,0.0005428835,0.000001412748,0.0000026339937,0.0000046915097,0.00023196166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838775,0.00035753744,0.0004199413,0.00010698995,0.0005623193,0.00016544331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998991,0.00042521034,0.00019781046,0.000068222806,0.00025915014,0.000058586815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095058436,0.00009372231,0.00023872584,0.00007242544,0.00014566608,0.00009213243,0.00031367762,0.000041283787,0.0000021917806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030410546,0.00006267777,0.000044408782,0.00019075276,0.0005638047,0.00018387608,0.000059615046,0.00021576749,2.928704e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010146534,0.00021646167,0.010739476,0.000037571826,0.0006004585,0.00044171678,0.21524926,0.000059691436,0.00068832753,0.7354636,0.024078308,0.011410466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006151721,0.00014272721,0.08378044,0.00027003523,0.00007009306,0.00011029415,0.22392003,0.000045406374,0.00014396102,0.044239923,0.6408135,0.00031183343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84497374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7267123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6912237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008426467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010279677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27827448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210682962","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebac008","title":"Urgent Care Proceedings for New-born Babies in England and Wales – Time for a Fundamental Review","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Harm; Political science; Medicine; Child protection; Population; Nursing; Family medicine; Law; Environmental health","score_opus":0.049685731142844344,"score_gpt":0.3818860813052129,"score_spread":0.33220035016236854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210682962","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034091345,0.99239933,0.000002867692,0.002827704,0.00031358039,0.0009365727,0.00017116939,0.0000045611764,0.0030033102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00042889328,0.99561965,0.00009470227,0.0017148862,0.0017147716,0.000051914056,0.000020291738,0.000016041513,0.00033881847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861926,0.000093695555,0.0006078841,0.00014079182,0.0003525202,0.00018582057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982754,0.00082147424,0.00057515845,0.00004438238,0.00016824936,0.0001153103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011318192,0.00017148611,0.0007543861,0.00015308922,0.00024622027,0.0001505488,0.00046601394,0.00007054724,0.00002554353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065926346,0.00011165601,0.00036314994,0.00008265292,0.00024951127,0.00015520149,0.00007453543,0.00019826824,7.305711e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029692205,0.000046965342,0.000031259515,0.004830238,0.0006074699,0.000007963098,0.024557121,2.6081995e-7,5.307377e-7,0.5035183,0.003706844,0.46239617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012159549,0.00006010182,0.000004786743,0.006466055,0.0002605076,0.000052304924,0.0007906414,0.0000010823754,1.7051894e-7,0.0030423342,0.9879873,0.000118778546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012880662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029147533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98428047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020533607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006440799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285178857","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebac016","title":"Mothering Practices and Human Rights Abuses of Girls in Marginalized Contexts: Examining the Moral Culpability of Women who Abuse Children","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Culpability; Criminalization; Criminology; Sociology; Human rights; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04203768626629395,"score_gpt":0.36626626945277185,"score_spread":0.3242285831864779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285178857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870084,0.00039967007,0.000005538893,0.0003848951,0.000092493334,0.000117754564,0.000014507931,0.000002431987,0.011974335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992396,0.00021049437,0.00002378977,0.00034036598,0.00013825165,0.000006698319,3.4645274e-7,0.000003808194,0.000036636513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833846,0.0005582594,0.0004063869,0.00008330172,0.00046554912,0.00014802022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845636,0.000496917,0.000780728,0.00008088561,0.00014709828,0.0000379982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029384713,0.000070476795,0.00022395763,0.000096558455,0.00033559857,0.000053396314,0.00048440293,0.000021524604,0.000021346917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017258976,0.00004347691,0.000048041933,0.00009951707,0.0009221772,0.00026333577,0.00009011191,0.0001918327,1.1627951e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006099219,0.00009460688,0.045753233,0.000008099248,0.00016711965,0.0000052364994,0.08104023,0.00011145654,0.00049488724,0.8713952,0.0000141112805,0.00030593143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058361194,0.00038562063,0.85886836,0.00026722628,0.00005625463,0.00007179465,0.022743559,0.00010569169,0.00030674104,0.10279382,0.008358896,0.00020593459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035928607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034963648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8131151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011085273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000735448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97049123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289355304","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebac013","title":"Experience with Ontario’s <i>Parenting Plan Guide</i> and <i>Template</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Multidisciplinary approach; Plan (archaeology); Conciliation; Psychology; Mental health; Resource (disambiguation); Medical education; Nursing; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Psychiatry; Law; Mediation","score_opus":0.038377389262331744,"score_gpt":0.32988441375496086,"score_spread":0.2915070244926291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289355304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90747285,0.00059858314,0.000014978905,0.013070937,0.00041417155,0.000090320005,0.000010471404,0.000007974132,0.07831969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99536264,0.00023401184,0.0001253267,0.0026941353,0.00036458913,0.0000065928893,5.7214095e-7,0.0000034144678,0.0012087268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988516,0.0001249974,0.00021951023,0.00007673507,0.00059327274,0.00013386943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932396,0.0002140033,0.00022284499,0.000034730907,0.00014587614,0.000058588168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054336974,0.000066921886,0.0001262943,0.000035185938,0.0011548192,0.00018769856,0.00031290672,0.0000144646065,0.000028677076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008005478,0.000041098,0.000041386487,0.000057383204,0.0007032642,0.00022079815,0.00016200502,0.00019038148,5.042779e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062223227,0.000043647775,0.010186871,0.0000024147075,0.00029357246,0.00006803011,0.3573816,0.00010007542,0.00014988278,0.6275399,0.0020223903,0.0015893899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014899663,0.00006569164,0.005680873,0.000024010862,0.00001968365,0.0001467652,0.031051721,0.000005343841,0.000016686028,0.0031405324,0.9582631,0.00009561597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4426995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06697472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9562407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025346383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015000241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95005053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290805179","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebac014","title":"Family Court Responses to Claims of Parental Alienation in Quebec","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Family law; Psychological intervention; Family court; Psychosocial; Social psychology; Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychiatry; Geography","score_opus":0.031462736814688974,"score_gpt":0.3472758280890271,"score_spread":0.31581309127433815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290805179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95604444,0.00022096813,0.00007545947,0.025198,0.000719772,0.00011463388,0.000048071128,0.0000035715318,0.017575117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639547,0.00020752702,0.00008325426,0.00216658,0.00023477222,0.000005184665,0.0000025331226,0.0000047805406,0.00089989573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825925,0.00047591192,0.00038269383,0.00006865572,0.00070103427,0.00011243767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988737,0.0005795963,0.00024107948,0.00005452161,0.00019549813,0.000055616136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017979594,0.000057317335,0.00013325001,0.00030260146,0.0002591514,0.00005454683,0.000415569,0.000033638407,0.000010029995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002665156,0.00004377747,0.000079404555,0.00021344026,0.00030286468,0.00015341982,0.00010168897,0.00021989305,0.0000011413726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063173525,0.00006562952,0.0027260284,0.0000010350622,0.00004689959,0.0000111629515,0.014681656,0.0016719954,0.00030036503,0.9782673,0.00044802195,0.00114814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063937414,0.00033262893,0.41583815,0.00015176399,0.0000480835,0.0000645752,0.06067452,0.0017002597,0.000026023255,0.18125455,0.33319077,0.0003249511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11319126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013374121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7970128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028669625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003635207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8927141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384519883","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebad017","title":"Cohabitant protection on relationship breakdown in Ireland: A lesson in illusory justice?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Irish; Cohabitation; Jurisprudence; General partnership; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Law reform; Common law","score_opus":0.062315521629999204,"score_gpt":0.36818286033509456,"score_spread":0.30586733870509536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384519883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89643484,0.00009795245,0.000038553135,0.04170594,0.0007604274,0.0001713695,0.000005940321,0.000016915345,0.060768053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976029,0.00047771572,0.0000069819785,0.0007566027,0.00071345066,0.0000066843177,9.2974966e-7,0.0000044129824,0.0004303708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884814,0.00023393362,0.00030139106,0.00007140805,0.00041771453,0.00012743492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916786,0.00047827588,0.00016705344,0.00004357129,0.00010344681,0.00003976558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017606074,0.000056995905,0.00010971141,0.00037062896,0.00016099557,0.000070186405,0.00016942433,0.000063832245,0.0000041743547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005235753,0.000041356627,0.000053235,0.00028527962,0.00019390428,0.00019435356,0.000022211718,0.00026235482,0.000010327333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054314255,0.000041089686,0.0018599228,0.0000037423513,0.000018838662,0.000031117597,0.015351206,0.00034225447,0.000058987032,0.9757398,0.00009563602,0.0059142937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007018906,0.0002026669,0.5413333,0.0005167982,0.000036179263,0.000055447006,0.005136231,0.0012708526,0.000024916106,0.26008618,0.18411463,0.00020389489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0149952965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042257407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7156536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018427124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012274475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389634029","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebad024","title":"Introducing a randomized controlled trial into Family Proceedings: Describing the ‘how?’ and defending the ‘why?’","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre","funders":"National Institute for Health and Care Research","keywords":"Randomized controlled trial; Randomization; Intervention (counseling); Hindsight bias; Best practice; Psychological intervention; Economic Justice; Medicine; Psychology; Family medicine; Political science; Nursing; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04883326152579963,"score_gpt":0.3245925051070547,"score_spread":0.27575924358125503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389634029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9127373,0.001997134,0.00015206552,0.06211203,0.0024820364,0.0011678287,0.000004134153,0.000026983056,0.019320482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98837703,0.00068546983,0.000027373515,0.0063177766,0.0042277738,0.00007039995,8.048914e-7,0.00001787251,0.00027552305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802345,0.000432165,0.00065985316,0.0001758973,0.00046849207,0.0002401129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953881,0.0035930362,0.0005844255,0.00012799414,0.00024635036,0.000060116272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004991375,0.00018272032,0.00065215497,0.00022378094,0.00042646436,0.0004605785,0.0005651875,0.000063811305,0.000011683232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012577983,0.00007533576,0.000387341,0.00018364766,0.000663653,0.00019815542,0.00013177667,0.00045327988,0.000008098313],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.3936688,0.000030637293,0.000017612832,0.000002744114,0.0016220264,0.000017812245,0.017244503,0.000011725408,0.00023200276,0.5831009,0.0021124193,0.0019387658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.9326122,0.00011047811,0.00033678324,0.00013398658,0.00035297705,0.00034632196,0.0071539613,0.00040518978,0.000024346864,0.047137346,0.011254558,0.00013185019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009229627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027055445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5389434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003893527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005168804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4441369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391975176","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebae004","title":"Child support and income inequalities: a cross-continental comparison from welfare design to judicial implementation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Welfare; Inequality; Economic inequality; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Demographic economics; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.04720538233803346,"score_gpt":0.4360260783765567,"score_spread":0.38882069603852326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391975176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7560893,0.0030420166,0.0010537383,0.19303861,0.0044977325,0.0005178377,0.0003999775,0.000055086457,0.04130567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923811,0.00058359926,0.0000525197,0.0028093713,0.0040830094,0.0000049828254,0.0000025217448,0.00000640088,0.000076471246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884677,0.00011946577,0.0003727413,0.0000872094,0.00042325308,0.00015057372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992528,0.0003708664,0.0001287956,0.000031244814,0.00013487236,0.00008145162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080857426,0.00008610173,0.00018702997,0.00011595242,0.0005532007,0.0003698871,0.00021011813,0.000044807835,0.000020490119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014006329,0.000055771965,0.000080357764,0.000090297595,0.0004934182,0.0002912277,0.00008544907,0.00014329873,0.0000036629258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025577017,0.000014417467,0.0012572372,0.0000032746586,0.0004311355,0.000012354821,0.072695345,0.000008747562,0.000017456394,0.91732365,0.0005343595,0.0074462406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008293806,0.0005443184,0.1622943,0.00044663466,0.00033053942,0.00007975792,0.13214578,0.000168872,0.00038616383,0.3746182,0.32004967,0.0006419419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05983447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020669606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5427055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008349196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010736349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94642615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405222990","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebae020","title":"Enforceability of mahr under a sha<i>rīʿa</i> law-based contract in New Zealand: a comparison with United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Islamic Finance and Banking Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Kingdom; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.031540284267300864,"score_gpt":0.2924168718455855,"score_spread":0.26087658757828464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405222990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898267,0.00012344835,0.000042758187,0.008051597,0.0001863882,0.000064630876,0.000008293185,0.0000046066502,0.001691619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99508494,0.000010083275,0.000021932767,0.004409285,0.0003913136,7.6506484e-7,0.0000033392212,0.0000055808287,0.00007274897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923426,0.000012997042,0.0003085836,0.00007811717,0.00025553923,0.00011048028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941283,0.00020887655,0.00019566383,0.000047536116,0.00012945711,0.0000056607164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028587604,0.00009570435,0.00021434971,0.00014762132,0.000041013245,0.000130006,0.00014420702,0.000023870116,0.0000045348024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031268475,0.00005701421,0.00003646895,0.00012578591,0.00019198738,0.00024699018,0.000035137724,0.00015748067,3.770689e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048328663,0.000022709251,0.011657207,0.00003926654,0.00013529185,0.000031401636,0.00015113002,0.00050938426,0.000033307744,0.9859438,0.0007722282,0.0002209742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019475322,0.00020426874,0.3549603,0.0036642714,0.00042600045,0.00013163098,0.00048459007,0.011230873,0.00019397346,0.21806946,0.39048845,0.00067086954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9468603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6388027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76787436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005683458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002015295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36778817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407591516","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebaf003","title":"Unblocking the implementation of altruistic surrogacy in Portugal: inclusive legal reform proposals through a comparative analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Portuguese; Political science; Presidential system; Strengths and weaknesses; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.03264502392212487,"score_gpt":0.4474482634525465,"score_spread":0.41480323953042164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407591516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9270746,0.0010468065,0.00024500766,0.048825268,0.00017382583,0.00030780447,0.00001453944,0.0000061093774,0.022306003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742085,0.00037719088,0.00013245216,0.0018762719,0.00014029023,0.0000063164625,0.0000035814642,0.0000021446058,0.000040911844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988561,0.000088104745,0.000563115,0.000090737514,0.00029774325,0.00010417078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867654,0.00022829893,0.00043606537,0.00012260152,0.0005183803,0.000018142664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006884334,0.000076752796,0.0003319788,0.00033557435,0.000071131406,0.000020769336,0.00019996113,0.00003008733,0.0000035268658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022900931,0.00003832551,0.00011322996,0.00044582886,0.00037540804,0.00013302686,0.000089131354,0.00021610087,2.1532539e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093552785,0.000059790153,0.008113833,0.000019755811,0.0012613551,0.000019992453,0.0029460494,0.00003515496,0.00023853777,0.98464084,0.000058366935,0.0016708152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015939878,0.0007395304,0.5264058,0.0006261314,0.0016473467,0.00041085217,0.047642615,0.00041930337,0.014698511,0.3642875,0.026971053,0.00021146849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016950594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007718919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62035334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002126253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040679134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9895956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410347839","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebaf014","title":"Parental union in Quebec: a model for recognizing cohabitants?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Social Policies and Family","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford","keywords":"Psychology; Political science; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03528852351554066,"score_gpt":0.37134858586319863,"score_spread":0.33606006234765795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410347839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5003275,0.0024583156,0.0061275233,0.2231119,0.0032930889,0.00065332826,0.000094348885,0.000025652687,0.26390833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98869705,0.00087188405,0.00012236477,0.0084546255,0.00060758885,0.0000047618914,8.607176e-7,0.0000035288772,0.0012373214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919844,0.00011310554,0.00027157515,0.000056911635,0.00021903598,0.00014092846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991477,0.00041990768,0.00014217233,0.000033796514,0.00022062319,0.000035770674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009511794,0.000056233395,0.00013631428,0.00012652653,0.00019499088,0.00012162652,0.00029546474,0.00005238034,0.0000010398052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004060667,0.00004144462,0.00009890388,0.00011144808,0.00036523998,0.00020695389,0.0000386413,0.00010544057,4.2423366e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021317063,0.000023984732,0.00038221545,0.0000020399543,0.000052420353,0.00000130206,0.009048776,0.00008754568,0.000040770876,0.9802004,0.0011530143,0.008794337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005060016,0.000031082265,0.007170723,0.00022380149,0.00003503049,0.0000033682118,0.012696338,0.005243624,0.00001765377,0.8627219,0.10666663,0.0001298043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13219394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038845047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48836952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018837658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003441572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97869354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}