{"meta":{"query_hash":"b7ef19bd4518","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Law in Context"},"cohort_total":49,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":49,"exported":49,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b7ef19bd4518","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Law+in+Context"},"results":[{"id":"W2035467982","doi":"10.1017/s1744552313000177","title":"Multiculturalism meets privatisation: the case of faith-based arbitration","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Political science; Law; Multiculturalism; Religious law; Family law; Supreme court; Faith; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Law and economics; Islam","score_opus":0.03095093799431146,"score_gpt":0.3302311450385649,"score_spread":0.2992802070442534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035467982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9268641,0.00029995828,0.0005065766,0.031998206,0.0012575582,0.0003211799,0.000004707743,0.000007994599,0.038739737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983106,0.0000382199,0.0004482812,0.0008635804,0.0002532761,0.000007062492,0.0000021363724,0.00000331773,0.00007351783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988004,0.00016291892,0.00046329378,0.000060723632,0.00042948197,0.000083193656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979257,0.00032615932,0.00043583717,0.00006140903,0.0012114742,0.000039450562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005695582,0.000058396887,0.00010357163,0.000074443975,0.000089331545,0.00010637886,0.00030194776,0.000051395447,0.00014192777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038563626,0.000038735434,0.000078989935,0.00007697943,0.00022939082,0.00050193444,0.00001199861,0.00010302549,0.000007874789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004531494,0.00013982812,0.00078710675,0.0000055871214,0.000050562598,0.00015902886,0.030984838,0.00046726377,0.0019030086,0.9417771,0.001942775,0.021737568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024460936,0.001204147,0.055975698,0.0020903072,0.00030795526,0.0025662133,0.21422581,0.02429263,0.04537656,0.47458693,0.15314254,0.0017702539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039771598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031696558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46719018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106671854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010447052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98597246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041335800","doi":"10.1017/s1744552314000202","title":"Elusive equalities and the Great Recession: restoration, retrenchment and redistribution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Austerity; Recession; Redistribution (election); Financial crisis; Inequality; Political economy; Great Depression; Capitalism; Politics; Neoliberalism (international relations); Great recession; Economics; Political science; Economic collapse; Keynesian economics; Development economics; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.029935402425781087,"score_gpt":0.2633551563689273,"score_spread":0.23341975394314624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041335800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87669706,0.007969571,0.006220078,0.02227108,0.0027141364,0.00016334213,0.000077479046,0.000009021236,0.083878234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99751073,0.0008288996,0.00011433108,0.00090564316,0.0003160042,0.0000026059745,0.0000044201965,0.0000042131296,0.0003131624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991211,0.000050398812,0.00056932325,0.00010595279,0.000075045806,0.000078143545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907047,0.0001658218,0.0005191829,0.00007050272,0.00014320639,0.00003079352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010443949,0.00006948573,0.0002142251,0.00008419958,0.000062920895,0.000097194716,0.00014101986,0.00004699174,0.00003467743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010947672,0.000054552387,0.00003977456,0.000039611346,0.00017975313,0.0002841912,0.00003902287,0.00013018082,0.0000042803927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013531797,0.000012441991,0.0024126165,0.0000034260377,0.000023083658,0.000005945921,0.0020392009,0.000006046485,0.0000066962925,0.98988646,0.00054916384,0.0049195806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004980229,0.0001440878,0.012528038,0.00023775251,0.000008105009,0.00015134859,0.00040900148,0.00096094323,0.00015424132,0.23264927,0.7475974,0.00017957561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037855736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024432168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7572372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008363704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012107696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22245818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051649364","doi":"10.1017/s1744552305004039","title":"Conceptualising the child through an ‘ethic of care’: lessons for family law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; Paternalism; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law; Work (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.1037074131153287,"score_gpt":0.45320066360418537,"score_spread":0.34949325048885665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051649364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4577068,0.043367185,0.0024066437,0.37886167,0.00458195,0.0009895621,0.00023339177,0.00002582096,0.11182697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98013777,0.00057629,0.0017092696,0.015621954,0.0018895611,0.0000039668626,0.000009788311,0.000015017138,0.000036389654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833876,0.00010290686,0.0007270392,0.000113567774,0.00057198113,0.00014577057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972386,0.0005907351,0.00037658768,0.00014947729,0.0015744052,0.00007023098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008302459,0.000098835124,0.00030207128,0.00005345968,0.000076004406,0.000030358988,0.00035461472,0.00013641162,0.000026593343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027189127,0.00006917591,0.00016294973,0.000055297958,0.00027216808,0.00032359603,0.00003075261,0.0007336837,0.0000015587041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003738921,0.00012261442,0.00028182194,0.000053162003,0.000095385025,0.00003155773,0.02909156,0.00011717063,0.00021145941,0.9588366,0.00016379969,0.010620982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045744306,0.0009918134,0.00085412635,0.0012076477,0.00009450103,0.00031069366,0.0163254,0.0001843204,0.0028721534,0.0076182545,0.964808,0.00015866745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014973115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028890667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9646442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015152992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002287547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31875312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092250354","doi":"10.1017/s1744552313000347","title":"Must equal mean identical? Same-sex couples and marriage","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocal; Same sex; Rhetoric; Gender equality; Sociology; Social psychology; Positive economics; Psychology; Gender studies; Economics","score_opus":0.04634538852839661,"score_gpt":0.39358217511626903,"score_spread":0.34723678658787244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092250354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91049075,0.0010506093,0.001051672,0.0071675344,0.0047495137,0.00009270555,0.000020394038,0.000012012904,0.07536478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929057,0.00019052118,0.00008648448,0.0031177434,0.0015062144,0.000002046614,0.0000023556765,0.000014278406,0.00217465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838287,0.00018761988,0.00068601774,0.00014380987,0.00039472798,0.0002049573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986974,0.00047061572,0.00031626518,0.00012419344,0.0002493809,0.0001421364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009736158,0.00011160201,0.00024393095,0.00018845314,0.00004627701,0.00010679631,0.00040777054,0.00009739519,0.0008136926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022145046,0.00010157369,0.00008529204,0.000042493135,0.00016250186,0.00020814339,0.00006187282,0.00031779977,0.000121727426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027052188,0.00024972344,0.07607961,0.00004536485,0.00020085517,0.00024440052,0.003634419,0.0000050009776,0.00019556422,0.86947024,0.006821336,0.04278298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016435346,0.0012128256,0.34443498,0.00041386377,0.00019081682,0.0027838333,0.0027351698,0.00054299063,0.00014775225,0.20109266,0.42911538,0.0008943824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045936825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005183345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6683776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084383704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044063938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8909363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099287198","doi":"10.1017/s1744552314000020","title":"Purpose-based or knowledge-based intention for collective wrongdoing in international criminal law?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Crimes against humanity; Genocide; Wrongdoing; Commit; Mens rea; Context (archaeology); Commission; Political science; Law; Criminal law; Criminology; War crime; Meaning (existential); International law; Humanity; Sociology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.1169198430689947,"score_gpt":0.34054395617846994,"score_spread":0.22362411310947525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099287198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44892177,0.00073974876,0.11940137,0.027983889,0.042806678,0.0022461433,0.00032611744,0.00012328134,0.357451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947646,0.000004949816,0.00069180195,0.001577905,0.0011583669,0.00003963102,0.000038306105,0.000021497364,0.0017029097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981854,0.00014523504,0.00085895986,0.00020143804,0.0004268764,0.00018209143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963949,0.0009896448,0.00049888133,0.000097796874,0.0019625926,0.000056204415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012171114,0.00016106198,0.0002702541,0.0004682859,0.00012306191,0.00028194557,0.00051642756,0.00008879453,0.0004872476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059928687,0.000141721,0.0001817337,0.000043924658,0.0002903729,0.00048363535,0.000025912928,0.00034662886,0.000018056058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031795993,0.00082929054,0.0004564605,0.00007086057,0.000108313114,0.000023974399,0.024091061,0.00051831605,0.000387101,0.955083,0.0009110561,0.014340971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01865926,0.0013913271,0.00095594843,0.0025921406,0.0001268619,0.00004766761,0.014518105,0.055066176,0.0063691214,0.040531132,0.85900736,0.0007348826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067696004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039343823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91455185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000573103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003264552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97818565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099996689","doi":"10.1017/s174455231000042x","title":"Trade unions, democracy and power","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Trade union; Democracy; Sociology; Labour law; Individualism; Liberalism; Collective bargaining; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Law; Free trade; Law and economics; Politics; Political economy; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.03642301042718207,"score_gpt":0.3221016714868006,"score_spread":0.2856786610596185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099996689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79699975,0.0005221194,0.0001338425,0.017467488,0.0018915472,0.00007576458,0.000010823266,0.000007866191,0.18289077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99694467,0.00018308601,0.00022559936,0.0022967467,0.00011262075,4.0137405e-7,2.7379176e-7,0.0000032708601,0.00023331093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927276,0.00007231788,0.00023915726,0.000050014176,0.0002766754,0.000089043395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995599,0.000077960445,0.00013267672,0.00003293669,0.00013016099,0.00006636075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004419552,0.000041047024,0.000083684325,0.00007131778,0.00007949102,0.000039350667,0.0002450292,0.000032521275,0.00044277252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089554014,0.000034517812,0.000037996884,0.00004259171,0.00012742853,0.00033145968,0.000021601498,0.00010708392,0.0000011771155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002270796,0.000076364166,0.0059351153,1.6436904e-7,0.000032985896,0.000049586968,0.010846573,1.9878944e-7,0.00005813314,0.9751719,0.00027775572,0.0075284885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013181515,0.00009929164,0.18990992,0.0000980029,0.000011039897,0.000030952433,0.00765196,0.000002995788,0.00023932895,0.09483925,0.7056759,0.00012323694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00250464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005126813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88033265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056762467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006981957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48480487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119533214","doi":"10.1017/s1744552309990309","title":"‘Receiving’ the Swiss Civil Code: translating authority in early republican Turkey","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Promulgation; Civil code; Turkish; Ideology; Political science; Code (set theory); Law; Scholarship; Democracy; Modernization theory; Sociology; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.03847833127912919,"score_gpt":0.34042990501536435,"score_spread":0.30195157373623516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119533214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8170255,0.00026573215,0.000062971056,0.04494068,0.0027799779,0.00009831374,0.000010135534,0.0000097034,0.134807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984686,0.00004294322,0.00006871211,0.0005029319,0.00083489105,0.0000036858141,3.9269756e-7,0.0000036782317,0.0000741621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984044,0.00014665906,0.0004753024,0.0001040532,0.00068852364,0.00018108684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987481,0.00041872266,0.00022925645,0.000058136706,0.00048581578,0.00005995095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019484201,0.000076639335,0.00016156449,0.000090352456,0.00022554613,0.00013595133,0.0006360307,0.00007111733,0.00015782869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008204704,0.00005752391,0.00009752993,0.00016628193,0.00055842655,0.00031293774,0.000039870156,0.00062465336,0.0000036453782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005456238,0.00006276983,0.06575359,6.297228e-7,0.00004002428,0.000047544123,0.018340128,0.000017240318,0.00019065625,0.90348727,0.00016071385,0.01184489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001997777,0.00009180056,0.33494553,0.0003221594,0.00002094018,0.00006889852,0.011105283,0.00010330481,0.00013856884,0.30274767,0.34811276,0.0003452994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036188703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48154825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6007396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028973233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9702294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120702823","doi":"10.1017/s1744552310000297","title":"Bountiful’s plural marriages","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Wife; Agency (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Pluralism (philosophy); Gender studies; Sociology; Politics; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.01938030807207539,"score_gpt":0.3446879276915298,"score_spread":0.32530761961945437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120702823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4048246,0.00011444818,0.0001495315,0.012955799,0.007119113,0.000053834858,0.000019584091,0.000009897756,0.57475317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949709,0.000029981718,0.00039545348,0.0017676614,0.0015317091,9.3383056e-7,0.0000011712619,0.0000038630437,0.0012983319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988706,0.00006649794,0.00032078158,0.00006269362,0.0005282889,0.000151131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988289,0.0002740143,0.00020207335,0.000052030766,0.00054526125,0.00009775503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000589337,0.000058926,0.00011896162,0.00008202068,0.00009469625,0.00009620968,0.00049014116,0.0000596952,0.0008747108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004120168,0.000054244178,0.00008701609,0.00004830891,0.0007536764,0.00034281638,0.00002655052,0.0003230588,0.000028335198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027391587,0.000035502962,0.003705437,4.9003614e-7,0.000025313075,0.0000817995,0.00088094344,0.0000038038843,0.00038041497,0.99127096,0.0007364411,0.0028515137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003538149,0.00001801306,0.0010966116,0.000023796196,0.000004397255,0.000055542412,0.0008109619,0.0000027817387,0.00016492487,0.008313005,0.9890877,0.000068432884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044435873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01963028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096070944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008037429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126576312","doi":"10.1017/s1744552305004027","title":"Adolescence, autonomy and Harry Potter: the child as decision-maker","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Wizard; Harry potter; Autonomy; Art history; Wizard of oz; Art; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01898586690847304,"score_gpt":0.350366182317237,"score_spread":0.33138031540876395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126576312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87540364,0.0018324419,0.00025892124,0.022291975,0.0029720291,0.0001867962,0.000013703225,0.000007743895,0.09703276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981376,0.00011706413,0.00019519012,0.016770896,0.00068172935,0.0000043485848,0.0000013407416,0.000009279003,0.0008441381],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987854,0.00007094057,0.00052180287,0.00013088602,0.00032613135,0.00016485793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991866,0.00020858369,0.00025996266,0.00011708576,0.00013460693,0.00009316582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046651982,0.00010137307,0.00014810446,0.00009890956,0.0000645941,0.000054187916,0.00037426825,0.000052675874,0.00085092953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028486178,0.00007029898,0.00007190126,0.000038598682,0.00010464177,0.00019815548,0.00005460711,0.0003303287,0.00014846808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001140729,0.00083575887,0.039446186,0.000009580604,0.00030018127,0.00037963063,0.009506083,0.000018605464,0.00008794266,0.3055821,0.011973144,0.63072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041205436,0.0002484954,0.12712094,0.0006818246,0.000017610906,0.0021049043,0.0019112049,0.000030713418,0.00017217167,0.0057690516,0.8576562,0.0001663684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027641843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076516584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84568304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015985312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006888526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9317082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134575841","doi":"10.1017/s1744552306002011","title":"The socio-legal context of privacy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Right to privacy; The Right to Privacy; Dialectic; Context (archaeology); Rhetoric; Individualism; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Political science; Privacy law; Privacy by Design; Privacy laws of the United States; Sociology; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Law; Human rights; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.027332598815892797,"score_gpt":0.32819230619500905,"score_spread":0.30085970737911627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134575841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8440988,0.0038476568,0.0014812074,0.06019194,0.0070563443,0.00042921037,0.00006534866,0.000027969061,0.08280149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981353,0.00024851848,0.00010323333,0.0003499988,0.00090854993,0.0000026699984,0.0000023995215,0.000005403733,0.00024389237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982176,0.0002083872,0.00059044134,0.000083752704,0.0007405291,0.00015929306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982216,0.00043377592,0.0005109611,0.000119736666,0.00067231525,0.00004166291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014472024,0.00007262135,0.00015356576,0.000076050026,0.00019624435,0.00014277369,0.0011415567,0.00007025545,0.00006296372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007674392,0.000055705947,0.00012700677,0.00007979897,0.0004166187,0.00059546455,0.000116804425,0.00024517797,0.000009813367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022488931,0.00016096317,0.0040716473,0.000003089652,0.00006326952,0.00003755153,0.0043213298,0.0000057851203,0.0004080609,0.9534337,0.004852773,0.03241693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012027083,0.000073031035,0.0031586876,0.000081704944,0.000009298975,0.000026643174,0.004593321,0.000023884317,0.0013505098,0.08570972,0.90367496,0.00009553845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018399308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022400795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8988222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022157351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022766033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99543786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143929422","doi":"10.1017/s1744552306002035","title":"A culture of retribution: symbolic violence in legal and literary discourses on juvenile delinquency","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Juvenile delinquency; Loneliness; Sociology; Retributive justice; Criminology; Economic Justice; English culture; The Symbolic; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013107956206022531,"score_gpt":0.33348542536331993,"score_spread":0.3203774691572974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143929422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710191,0.003916087,0.000050394472,0.0024105662,0.00074315263,0.00010025153,0.000028358027,0.0000047178733,0.021727396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99825406,0.0005906482,0.000036936955,0.00032823588,0.000634222,0.0000021609565,0.0000026034281,0.0000036991748,0.00014743474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986357,0.00013740556,0.00051024667,0.00009793737,0.00048564124,0.00013306667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908376,0.00014439465,0.00027368072,0.00004427493,0.00041179286,0.000042081512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005515295,0.00007351184,0.0002232805,0.00011296243,0.000059280712,0.00006996268,0.00026434634,0.00008072674,0.000030400995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019457174,0.000067543624,0.00008030355,0.000120842575,0.00023624017,0.00041144938,0.00001624506,0.00022641114,0.0000016084794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031849564,0.00030644189,0.04252198,0.000008007716,0.00003217787,0.00021801001,0.019073099,0.00003207132,0.00041528663,0.90637326,0.00033657692,0.030364575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0127435485,0.0010704043,0.22692232,0.0077888775,0.000076723496,0.00015632906,0.029924916,0.00024138387,0.0018382277,0.45013583,0.268059,0.0010424475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070204777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015203963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45623744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016030652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017456544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144244468","doi":"10.1017/s1744552310000273","title":"Ambivalence towards law: Business Improvement Associations, public disorder and legal consciousness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Disenchantment; Ambivalence; Reverence; Legal consciousness; Consciousness; Law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Public law","score_opus":0.01708505304140144,"score_gpt":0.30941448299763724,"score_spread":0.2923294299562358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144244468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89718056,0.00055156834,0.00011367063,0.055395965,0.004789433,0.00016749371,0.00004280121,0.000019908353,0.04173858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959968,0.00037992312,0.00018010687,0.0020955934,0.0006341201,0.0000051454645,0.0000036005279,0.0000064621427,0.00069827086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843735,0.00008184809,0.0003958389,0.00012342524,0.0007687656,0.00019275553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978924,0.00013346053,0.0003281514,0.00006789928,0.001477069,0.00010101844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010756254,0.00009391488,0.00017144432,0.00002089141,0.0002654637,0.0004049264,0.00052356767,0.00014088796,0.00018387058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043990885,0.00008132573,0.00008131797,0.0001230047,0.00055059826,0.0009695703,0.000068324516,0.00041979665,0.0000039540355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016728047,0.00014799729,0.0070115076,0.000003552358,0.00007124274,0.000027275411,0.004034126,0.0000019592953,0.00065992674,0.97144866,0.00038457877,0.016192475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018424181,0.00004584316,0.015781702,0.00007227666,0.000020014351,0.00004297339,0.0079331035,0.000013295587,0.0002247583,0.019212296,0.9545733,0.00023806265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008416431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091826044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9541887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014328101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030860567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149387058","doi":"10.1017/s1744552314000044","title":"The Egyptian revolution in and out of the juridical space: an inquiry into labour law and the workers' movement in Egypt","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Mainstream; Law; Politics; Institution; Political science; Diversity (politics); Political economy; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.016633027082104863,"score_gpt":0.3229276941757789,"score_spread":0.30629466709367403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149387058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552655,0.00042712063,0.000043766813,0.039847374,0.00088423473,0.00014524854,0.000002148077,0.0000014661766,0.0033830926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962609,0.0003548302,0.000031492422,0.003017787,0.00021411969,0.000003551531,2.2533969e-7,0.0000035455291,0.00011357482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834085,0.0005582858,0.00041796386,0.000083730105,0.00047586497,0.00012330736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990578,0.00039057876,0.00024988572,0.00009209061,0.00016549927,0.000044094206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003033816,0.00006307057,0.00014011799,0.00004820062,0.00015956028,0.00009460289,0.00042650494,0.000049596907,0.000011622275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033084612,0.0000327416,0.000039560346,0.00008952804,0.00090624276,0.00023481365,0.00009572051,0.00024365685,1.8861253e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011779495,0.000057224435,0.022994582,0.0000011373667,0.000018362764,0.000002161403,0.022108143,0.000020650821,0.00004810724,0.9501176,0.000056419838,0.0044578006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00609545,0.00013608819,0.47654566,0.0005596927,0.000013133077,0.0000036521403,0.029419169,0.00033180384,0.00011992976,0.23107837,0.25553966,0.0001573981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33474505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71903926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001290779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008385339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9891956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149410759","doi":"10.1017/s1744552311000140","title":"AIDS – the time for changes in law and policy is now","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Existentialism; Political science; Medicine; Criminology; Development economics; Economic growth; Psychology; Law; Family medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.07142914698955574,"score_gpt":0.37636895878129667,"score_spread":0.3049398117917409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149410759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8670262,0.00088358595,0.00012453072,0.055561136,0.0006711432,0.00048328415,0.00007061121,0.000010941843,0.075168535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858188,0.00010688394,0.00040034752,0.012104146,0.00050871406,0.000007209082,0.0000017866959,0.000013484419,0.0010386255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913067,0.000035747955,0.00033331465,0.00009244408,0.00027511723,0.00013268409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991585,0.00022847233,0.00016508125,0.00008980041,0.00029317528,0.000064956184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046222974,0.000088793146,0.00021356565,0.00017869109,0.00001971326,0.000021219055,0.00023804266,0.000054488988,0.00015667778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016535062,0.000060207218,0.00005431879,0.00006385375,0.00015746479,0.00012931626,0.000044174758,0.00020115552,0.000021557353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045614108,0.0010259975,0.029323246,0.000071488284,0.00081102265,0.0007186394,0.10225362,0.0000042714314,0.008842647,0.6812017,0.006464788,0.1647212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.030095052,0.0051595187,0.038103215,0.0026139887,0.0002187768,0.0033900235,0.018488105,0.0011130353,0.039982177,0.07409799,0.78601307,0.00072502746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006790865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035853584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7795483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010371137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007187595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24551791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149554426","doi":"10.1017/s1744552311000395","title":"Calculating claims: Jewish and Muslim women navigating religion, economics and law in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Judaism; Negotiation; Sociology; Narrative; Oppression; Law; Family law; Religious law; Religious identity; Gender studies; Political science; Economics; Islam","score_opus":0.031577596041233474,"score_gpt":0.31361164356622584,"score_spread":0.2820340475249924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149554426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882257,0.0005563354,0.00000620815,0.0017566265,0.00045536575,0.000047188896,0.0000033401097,0.0000015982479,0.008947615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980918,0.0003042104,0.000080945676,0.0011937928,0.00029012162,0.0000019926558,8.5282187e-7,0.0000047684293,0.000031490323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989772,0.00012367674,0.0004261623,0.00007011246,0.00021059028,0.00019229787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897105,0.0005303408,0.00021970595,0.00003209371,0.000115910894,0.00013088676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012115297,0.000060228005,0.00013672684,0.00003253239,0.00009860412,0.000074527445,0.00013189454,0.000047545764,0.000024373181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002681127,0.00006155327,0.000015106301,0.00004280372,0.00008794354,0.0005278515,0.00003674968,0.00025494426,5.342525e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003483583,0.00003250246,0.28302938,0.0000059533695,0.00004485829,0.000050775663,0.10006485,0.00015856238,0.000023953711,0.5809602,0.000060427617,0.03553369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0073874616,0.0001884418,0.13059357,0.0015771296,0.000035830974,0.00036007082,0.47212443,0.0037146546,0.00016207814,0.15243666,0.23018815,0.0012315286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6610814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96182066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42852354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007931504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030641785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3411755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153155984","doi":"10.1017/s1744552312000249","title":"The vulnerable subject of negligence law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Subject (documents); Jurisprudence; Relevance (law); Law; Criticism; Duty; Autonomy; Duty of care; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Damages; Common law; Law and economics; Liability; Computer science","score_opus":0.04358637366607834,"score_gpt":0.37210867690184324,"score_spread":0.3285223032357649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153155984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26493943,0.0030650897,0.0005896404,0.01664124,0.0027382488,0.00017882498,0.000013646718,0.000009017882,0.7118249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981884,0.00023343031,0.000103020066,0.00041605183,0.0004860013,0.0000026275054,2.3828723e-7,0.000002952048,0.0005673262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893737,0.00014595286,0.00032563426,0.000036947575,0.00041521265,0.00013888719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986856,0.000588475,0.0002485632,0.00006633555,0.00035401777,0.000056990597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017385676,0.000038509235,0.00008076854,0.000022324271,0.00023238298,0.000056692297,0.00054409564,0.000029159564,0.0000614023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021280686,0.000027126056,0.00006734252,0.00006457076,0.00025336788,0.0003680159,0.00003377979,0.000200612,0.000010587132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018180737,0.000050782473,0.0017791131,5.477192e-7,0.000019204146,0.0000013410238,0.003782864,0.000016802678,0.0002478839,0.98906535,0.0002202171,0.004797743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019312605,0.000014793549,0.00081687846,0.000033086362,0.000004058018,0.0000066844095,0.0024914986,0.000009614872,0.0017087215,0.011646531,0.98303396,0.000041075837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006544245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012683831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9828137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008737481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089167545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161184406","doi":"10.1017/s1744552308002036","title":"Informal formality: tenantries,<i>ejidos</i>and family land","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Urban and Rural Development Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Proposition; Situated; Point (geometry); Sociology; Political science; Law; Linguistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Geometry; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04703497653909988,"score_gpt":0.29946942759674494,"score_spread":0.25243445105764506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161184406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91246164,0.0014185824,0.00003585135,0.007045406,0.0012003628,0.00006251097,0.0000047292474,0.000009456976,0.07776148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931516,0.004047877,0.00012942262,0.0013103845,0.00030819955,8.9063013e-7,9.933997e-7,0.0000034710931,0.0010471544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988489,0.00004510984,0.00036958838,0.000056619734,0.00052489503,0.00015484613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928075,0.00012467586,0.00017247273,0.000031247964,0.00030522185,0.000085616324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005262522,0.00006723659,0.00014176324,0.00009794195,0.00013377209,0.000050304163,0.00027489048,0.000058386493,0.000048885504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097512326,0.00005165233,0.000048106063,0.000048739483,0.00027066658,0.0006779038,0.00004462278,0.00016172853,0.000009214266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000720282,0.0002482561,0.27691033,0.000015151962,0.0003647528,0.0013342189,0.13510679,0.00001442832,0.00012744873,0.4690696,0.006128448,0.10996027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015646542,0.000060086997,0.08297671,0.00010258983,0.000004755459,0.0001804811,0.0036137127,0.000008470929,0.000076379845,0.0018543936,0.90942556,0.00013220051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013185178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045315507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9032971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006818868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000197475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25287116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170212252","doi":"10.1017/s1744552307004077","title":"Bills of Rights as process: the Canadian experience","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Articulation (sociology); Process (computing); Charter; Law and economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Product (mathematics); Fundamental rights; Law; Sociology; Public administration; Human rights; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03309545042952662,"score_gpt":0.3659922449062566,"score_spread":0.33289679447673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170212252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6535835,0.0005463269,0.00003159683,0.0065689483,0.0011834411,0.00007166898,0.0000038173366,0.0000023569307,0.33800834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861205,0.000035547608,0.000015741269,0.0009179576,0.00034903336,0.0000011745318,1.6346252e-7,0.0000013009515,0.00006705315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988088,0.00003454119,0.00032646544,0.00005196457,0.00064159144,0.00013666089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986737,0.00020628725,0.00019012736,0.00003141155,0.0008215463,0.00007694708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083147845,0.000044973443,0.000096176576,0.00008831749,0.00026021825,0.000032877146,0.00047539026,0.000035784356,0.00012811096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028806872,0.000029342755,0.00005373625,0.00011361478,0.0007524055,0.00019247772,0.0000142786,0.00011427417,0.000008513885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003997634,0.000028327115,0.0076705534,3.5048177e-7,0.000034550954,0.00007650742,0.02453132,0.00000812844,0.000022400563,0.9650567,0.00007480767,0.0024563894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062573876,0.00007697834,0.016267981,0.0002441782,0.000011166422,0.000061751,0.031686816,0.0000023194498,0.001790359,0.3619804,0.5871032,0.00014910339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6852349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9602163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6030763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021589665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005820163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31686115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171575193","doi":"10.1017/s1744552314000019","title":"The narratives of geographical indications","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Wine Industry and Tourism","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Narrative; Sociology; Mode (computer interface); Aesthetics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017824244793314875,"score_gpt":0.26679139087245946,"score_spread":0.24896714607914458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171575193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86993754,0.00012847949,0.00064150017,0.06988959,0.0015983927,0.00006956098,0.0000017068646,0.0000072360353,0.057725992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996332,0.0000037721181,0.000045941688,0.00090627576,0.0026505154,0.0000014483911,9.477802e-7,0.0000039874435,0.000055144148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918866,0.000018499959,0.0003866741,0.000049173006,0.00028604953,0.000070922084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889326,0.00015414161,0.00045879706,0.00006716591,0.00041973815,0.0000069118314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055308297,0.00005251266,0.000098613615,0.0001365248,0.000058264504,0.00008846309,0.00044949053,0.000038157264,0.000065697925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022554082,0.00003526604,0.0000777106,0.000101538266,0.00014165955,0.00044091378,0.000049747014,0.00019754756,0.000010090794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007501075,0.000111673464,0.024518628,0.000004348187,0.00008795345,0.000009573256,0.00022351855,0.000041552783,0.00017157159,0.9588356,0.0038934862,0.012027086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009704215,0.000025066298,0.051075812,0.00013431431,0.000012168472,0.000021693895,0.00077591016,0.0002214659,0.00014831219,0.10854055,0.83799005,0.00008421366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012768057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012688803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85029507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009565969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001568244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14381073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200768038","doi":"10.1017/s1744552308003042","title":"Should we use the criminal law to punish HIV transmission?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntariness; Criminal law; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Transmission (telecommunications); Political science; Sexual transmission; Commission; Law; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Sexual assault; Psychology; Virology; Poison control; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Geography","score_opus":0.10779706126197551,"score_gpt":0.37438372832617584,"score_spread":0.2665866670642003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200768038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9057479,0.0006651031,0.0064149518,0.058583982,0.0020962341,0.00017097262,0.0000124832595,0.000019970352,0.026288422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928822,0.00066506,0.00030842205,0.00434883,0.0005640972,0.000003507677,7.6795146e-7,0.0000070053247,0.0012201421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823636,0.00016786471,0.00044287104,0.000113104885,0.0008657557,0.0001740266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847054,0.0004603873,0.00015489254,0.000096497926,0.00067963643,0.00013806902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056375103,0.00009113264,0.00016906894,0.0001435918,0.00037339522,0.0001625192,0.0006775129,0.00005696291,0.00040727388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016780736,0.00006595835,0.00020753223,0.00019833856,0.0002659371,0.00051461207,0.000031326843,0.00029527157,0.000033519198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008276739,0.0006709919,0.0029709714,0.000008628972,0.0003617849,0.0013624653,0.26310208,0.0014230435,0.00052943407,0.5609105,0.011572317,0.15626007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003994175,0.00007392233,0.00059434416,0.00013079052,0.00011129084,0.00020270994,0.0885345,0.000084491876,0.00019533858,0.00074956723,0.90879726,0.00012634721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017887745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052708253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89722496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001721179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016456377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317993304","doi":"10.1017/s1744552313000037","title":"The Question for the Description of the Law. By Reidar Edvinsson, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2009. x + 113 pp. ISBN 978-3-540-70501-7, £99 hardback.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.029214662150871908,"score_gpt":0.30505415021221577,"score_spread":0.27583948806134384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317993304","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37707555,0.060507953,0.0058020414,0.39972663,0.0275569,0.0034209178,0.00029764688,0.00006208837,0.12555027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944086,0.0024697545,0.00006796889,0.0015036975,0.00085328985,0.000028268589,0.0000012316593,0.0000064373885,0.000660754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998041,0.00020169033,0.0005884182,0.000113015805,0.00084772834,0.00020815122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971982,0.00072256563,0.00054390245,0.00011017818,0.0013781535,0.000047005393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014199759,0.00011114524,0.00017336111,0.000023750375,0.0008114572,0.00020135223,0.0009009692,0.00007489275,0.000057408062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006039442,0.00006023632,0.00021339742,0.000101352205,0.0010646839,0.00048182724,0.00008095777,0.00024956957,0.000015898508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009256604,0.00007030758,0.0019851618,0.0000019916308,0.00014711292,0.0000011868651,0.0013656066,0.00003485466,0.0005379516,0.9624845,0.02331926,0.009959516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007170012,0.00007325184,0.007945773,0.00023151484,0.00004249137,0.000009767539,0.0040308326,0.000087651526,0.0006423142,0.09054989,0.8955451,0.00012438762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03519461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038348936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8722259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024355041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001933509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9791987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327854615","doi":"10.1017/s1744552314000263","title":"Accessing pension resources: the right to equality inside and out of the labour market","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Normative; Ideology; Institutionalisation; Reproduction; Welfare; Legitimacy; State (computer science); Welfare state; Distribution (mathematics); Politics; Economics; Labour economics; Race (biology); Sociology; Production (economics); Political science; Law; Market economy; Gender studies; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.05475981189709239,"score_gpt":0.3842065543059261,"score_spread":0.3294467424088337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327854615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85579973,0.00013229476,0.000029502278,0.0415705,0.0012650047,0.00008036205,0.0000044217454,0.0000026189998,0.10111555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954379,0.000067396824,0.000023721665,0.0031435431,0.0006691516,7.796453e-7,3.4444454e-8,0.000002722511,0.0006547254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861807,0.0004205543,0.00031816392,0.0000559813,0.00048966834,0.000097574026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867487,0.0006047169,0.00030140023,0.000060045266,0.00032279902,0.000036185247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019731107,0.000050695624,0.00013459507,0.000035524194,0.00026786438,0.000069383306,0.00045979363,0.000039640305,0.000020922214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001092787,0.000024993598,0.00006605896,0.000069212845,0.00038025956,0.00014803445,0.00013329415,0.00014859604,9.60617e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027420488,0.000083000836,0.033293407,0.000012573618,0.00016259078,0.000005335842,0.21464245,0.000018387773,0.00045236645,0.71513903,0.0027549958,0.033161655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010513316,0.00006821667,0.2071898,0.0005774668,0.000023574941,0.000009415789,0.023159394,0.000027297083,0.0007759131,0.13752635,0.62943316,0.00015810151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038061284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027046042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62667817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055390767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004689278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9907078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343857214","doi":"10.1017/s1744552315000129","title":"Women and wrongful convictions: concepts and challenges","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Conviction; Harm; Criminal justice; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Homicide; Law; Focus (optics); Sociology; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; History","score_opus":0.09333300553530946,"score_gpt":0.37484015361986345,"score_spread":0.281507148084554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343857214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9717356,0.00854347,0.000070500006,0.0060296124,0.0008180609,0.000034296,0.000001995249,0.00000520728,0.01276129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99205726,0.007132641,0.000052316263,0.00030612072,0.0002918704,0.0000026092043,1.9695841e-7,0.000002678337,0.00015427807],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992262,0.0000898622,0.00021669001,0.00007249561,0.000301423,0.000093301875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990821,0.0001713772,0.0001252327,0.000031643598,0.0004661341,0.0001235048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070371956,0.000047409383,0.00012189722,0.00011229348,0.000059346956,0.00007967681,0.00012577981,0.000037138336,0.00005224645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024327583,0.000044143446,0.000026286169,0.000047913054,0.00021498659,0.00032037002,0.000026388985,0.00009944749,0.0000034756183],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019268885,0.0001304001,0.00456304,0.000007927984,0.00019502288,0.000111763075,0.3119242,0.000026287551,0.000023507515,0.24105708,0.00019910418,0.441569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008335668,0.0001228087,0.00086994516,0.00005694973,0.000026815324,0.00008643184,0.6933925,0.000048847607,0.000008595693,0.0056890696,0.29878494,0.000079487916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026519634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018859366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44148952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016143589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009532018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465854157","doi":"10.1017/s1744552316000045","title":"‘I can't put that on paper.’ How medical professional values shape the content of death certificates","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coroner; Collegiality; Deference; Argument (complex analysis); Psychology; Professional standards; Medicine; Public relations; Medical education; Political science; Medical emergency; Social psychology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Pedagogy; Management","score_opus":0.0994454571536955,"score_gpt":0.3598549919507351,"score_spread":0.2604095347970396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465854157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65505666,0.00040305316,0.00017133915,0.34140417,0.0010952386,0.00019062746,0.00001902283,0.00001329464,0.0016465787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99128616,0.00026049648,0.0001253533,0.0062875887,0.0002824722,0.00000708106,0.0000017874423,0.000012450218,0.0017366109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978965,0.000086060805,0.0005081705,0.00011709637,0.0012520353,0.00014014042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981325,0.0007163052,0.0004082352,0.00014209248,0.0004961497,0.00010470701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069555,0.00012220391,0.0003231694,0.00009701696,0.00002765039,0.00001660735,0.0004747783,0.00010245833,0.00064358074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061366125,0.000052367468,0.00020153653,0.000031476164,0.00020481103,0.00012357107,0.00006887957,0.0002939078,0.000004161834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036734168,0.0013505048,0.3429614,0.000051398783,0.0010657526,0.0014046958,0.0021334135,0.0000011403071,0.029935254,0.36706465,0.0138163995,0.23654196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012916132,0.001999315,0.71779484,0.011244412,0.00015393284,0.0025023944,0.0025338063,0.00024333863,0.12127445,0.022219481,0.1066685,0.00044941343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011351186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007740742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3748334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015055572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018735192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70467573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472228386","doi":"10.1017/s1744552316000100","title":"Exploring fatal facts: current issues in coronial law, policy and practice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Jurisdiction; Publicity; Politics; Law reform; Law; Political science; Human rights; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.12555243700841423,"score_gpt":0.4307287500337716,"score_spread":0.30517631302535736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472228386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92294836,0.0023080518,0.00075279496,0.063918814,0.0012305711,0.0001831023,0.000015186039,0.000021572614,0.008621573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947606,0.002580447,0.00064254267,0.0012876756,0.00061233545,0.0000038295625,7.061364e-7,0.00000904402,0.000102875194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989482,0.000047505975,0.00044582703,0.000092810995,0.00034442323,0.00012119622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990009,0.00041027987,0.000213583,0.00006442779,0.00024342896,0.00006740137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039004243,0.000087243534,0.0002177963,0.00017614487,0.000011809451,0.000027467282,0.00013080129,0.000032719756,0.000037583195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082630676,0.000057539284,0.000054300144,0.000038934468,0.00008272056,0.00081464654,0.000059447422,0.00019377536,0.000005050871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018449421,0.00036413613,0.026997223,0.000023920691,0.0001238972,0.0011990897,0.002471961,0.000001139442,0.0033958992,0.5512524,0.00022281235,0.41210255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072767283,0.00051497266,0.037668746,0.0027097082,0.00002859778,0.0025585867,0.00069860346,0.000012092875,0.006344431,0.0042840648,0.93770045,0.00020303717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009932752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004320684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9374776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029244987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008375102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2346384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604633643","doi":"10.1017/s1744552315000178","title":"Refashioning vagrancy: a tale of Law's narrative of its imagination","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Vagrancy; Narrative; Sociology; Constitution; Relation (database); Law; Aesthetics; Criminology; Political science; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.040597409719370196,"score_gpt":0.35926888372387034,"score_spread":0.31867147400450013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604633643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71662176,0.0032305256,0.00018216358,0.009920415,0.0026358333,0.00019339091,0.000027462502,0.000011209648,0.26717722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984392,0.000148468,0.00034019016,0.0003132984,0.00026673859,0.0000015363191,0.0000018793208,0.0000043137597,0.000484411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983892,0.00015767373,0.00046757062,0.00007124475,0.0008168125,0.000097486656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969122,0.00012010731,0.0005870232,0.000044934095,0.0022726844,0.00006306228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010762663,0.0000638494,0.0001897489,0.000023038185,0.000058191472,0.00003145259,0.00039263212,0.000078656296,0.00008826048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034763815,0.000055307497,0.00011720244,0.000104921724,0.00033086917,0.0006578724,0.000028568169,0.00017983814,0.000002769205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008826264,0.00011584529,0.00053060934,0.000006172395,0.000077070974,0.000014529985,0.21148594,0.00006932165,0.0010168386,0.7843571,0.0007058377,0.0015325076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0070879175,0.00048599596,0.0010108473,0.0017463833,0.00006159578,0.00006377946,0.2875238,0.00013780943,0.023081278,0.13554114,0.5428278,0.00043169013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078201015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030140693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64881593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001794032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021981886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22553743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803002060","doi":"10.1017/s1744552308003017","title":"Professional monopolies and divisive practices in law: ‘les femmes juridiques’ in civil law, Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Education, sociology, and vocational training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Habitus; Political science; Cultural capital; Practice of law; Representation (politics); Sociology; Legal education; Competition (biology); Capital (architecture); Geography","score_opus":0.233001727346931,"score_gpt":0.48282713828207224,"score_spread":0.24982541093514124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803002060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.937112,0.00094890536,0.0000041262556,0.03142043,0.001535565,0.00009190179,0.000009146149,0.000003638854,0.028874313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99626917,0.0007839958,0.00018886181,0.0017525324,0.0007248195,0.00000984673,0.000003880595,0.000005831331,0.00026108185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820536,0.0004959629,0.0004934335,0.00012988946,0.00049760204,0.0001777559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967417,0.0022095712,0.0005312665,0.000041787345,0.000409011,0.000066663146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001637828,0.000090207126,0.00019055557,0.000114803224,0.0001853431,0.000039348586,0.00031140872,0.000086443026,0.00004616659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011540195,0.00008584801,0.00003214215,0.00008202414,0.00086791255,0.000609425,0.000033211934,0.00035779751,7.4018584e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003673681,0.00013127927,0.16283268,0.000004523171,0.000029777324,0.00007647902,0.050482824,0.000018843852,0.0000141037235,0.78528094,0.0004952148,0.0005966104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029810506,0.0001180023,0.353006,0.00097385386,0.000013339726,0.0001730105,0.29276118,0.000039966682,0.00016590138,0.09373892,0.2555297,0.00049907644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6558882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.978296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.691542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037641785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015044842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35007802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949802397","doi":"10.1017/s1744552319000144","title":"Intimacy in bordered globalisation: theory and method - Review symposium of Daphna Hacker , Legalized Families in the Era of Bordered Globalization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, 385 pp. ISBN: 978-1-107-14499-6 Hardback) Guest Edited by Susan B. Boyd , Peter A. Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hacker; Globalization; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Economic history; Law; History","score_opus":0.011948231453024885,"score_gpt":0.27563354710875965,"score_spread":0.2636853156557348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949802397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9270259,0.013261185,0.0010948112,0.0039416477,0.001253321,0.0013521548,0.0015887658,0.000011023256,0.05047119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711011,0.027535638,0.00042482247,0.00021141063,0.00004333454,4.5981247e-7,0.00006123359,0.000007285293,0.00061473163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967473,0.001449546,0.0007737957,0.00018669623,0.0006963237,0.00014631584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997111,0.00049423816,0.0010185972,0.00016496316,0.0011563377,0.000054865417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026651677,0.00010898908,0.00050326117,0.00009305773,0.000061831815,0.000059148126,0.0006732211,0.00014341075,0.000044022625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029878077,0.00013261878,0.00013901916,0.00038772935,0.0005093734,0.00069958006,0.00010225706,0.00029975097,5.6767954e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020143024,0.0012952536,0.25530294,0.00089285936,0.00081263104,0.00013924815,0.005871228,0.0006660901,0.0018380524,0.61607766,0.11381438,0.0012753698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018100308,0.0005113788,0.4064192,0.014193028,0.00047978162,0.00010449551,0.028220167,0.0018821916,0.000113856855,0.001836634,0.52725023,0.0008887722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1410611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0649925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.614241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020394314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030833037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9520689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950022340","doi":"10.1017/s1744552319000156","title":"Co-ordinating family expectations - Review symposium of Daphna Hacker , Legalized Families in the Era of Bordered Globalization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, 385 pp. ISBN: 978-1-107-14499-6 Hardback) Guest Edited by Susan B. Boyd , Peter A. Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hacker; Globalization; Media studies; Sociology; Economic history; Political science; Law; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.014211752428919266,"score_gpt":0.266413786562389,"score_spread":0.25220203413346975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950022340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91278183,0.0067752684,0.0002821612,0.0018734778,0.0011081389,0.0008697782,0.0016307713,0.000010954465,0.074667595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834635,0.014917303,0.00018266829,0.00014292439,0.00005844088,5.680438e-7,0.00009301322,0.0000087188955,0.0011328299],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730504,0.00064562884,0.0008183867,0.00017568824,0.00089256256,0.00016270862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643046,0.00037430355,0.0012749686,0.00017011866,0.0016887684,0.000061393075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010605961,0.00010928011,0.00047582024,0.00009678423,0.00011051715,0.00006367388,0.0008144979,0.00013336194,0.00003771447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002138359,0.00013797988,0.00020699379,0.00036767815,0.00050064974,0.0007166443,0.00006426958,0.0003233846,0.0000016705702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009134457,0.0020953096,0.2413605,0.0010885263,0.0013228573,0.00020056032,0.011134474,0.0010810437,0.010095839,0.22205254,0.5079799,0.0006749658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015250269,0.00066900725,0.26024064,0.017769922,0.00055182585,0.00007625589,0.0899192,0.0020373832,0.00025428119,0.00024570676,0.61193186,0.0010536523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122520804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038728103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22180684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022392895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035253307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9788126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951512047","doi":"10.1017/s1744552319000077","title":"Fairness, accountability and transparency: notes on algorithmic decision-making in criminal justice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Blame; Status quo; Big data; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Optimism; Law and economics; Political science; Abstraction; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.057647867856363236,"score_gpt":0.4215282451482901,"score_spread":0.3638803772919269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951512047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818831,0.00019302651,0.00025484053,0.0040570353,0.0014473154,0.000099776415,0.000007306154,0.0000037124883,0.012053876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99782294,0.00024264248,0.00034670203,0.0012860057,0.00028178823,8.842135e-7,3.1417392e-7,0.0000055640944,0.000013171306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983767,0.00013187525,0.0004486429,0.00012739174,0.00075367733,0.00016170494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996639,0.0025004325,0.00019747538,0.00005894767,0.00054363895,0.000060497656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018878736,0.00008456714,0.00020885174,0.0001322392,0.00007757806,0.00018101676,0.00038746794,0.0001168055,0.00013880344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014228345,0.00007603506,0.00006490889,0.000081015394,0.0001881455,0.0006835265,0.000024417503,0.00043821838,0.000008042995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009407637,0.0004423942,0.05485115,0.00004297836,0.000064686086,0.00018900106,0.16805299,0.00032939002,0.00014709041,0.577376,0.000037915353,0.19752562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076932227,0.0009310363,0.23469289,0.0062281196,0.00014537085,0.00006905211,0.12787433,0.0010283996,0.00019585952,0.5983515,0.021807825,0.0009824196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043274527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029278817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1965432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026760463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024178253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974694872","doi":"10.1017/s1744552319000284","title":"Comparing legal styles","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Comparative law; Style (visual arts); Scholarship; Political science; Law; Globalization; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Divergence (linguistics); Comparative research; Identity (music); Legal research; Sociology; Law and economics; Social science; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.06641153170401724,"score_gpt":0.3785980862439102,"score_spread":0.31218655453989297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974694872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6388183,0.00031059765,0.00004567774,0.0025887215,0.0014714827,0.000052082316,0.0000018512262,0.0000048358556,0.3567064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996933,0.000085739266,0.00007507404,0.00060476107,0.00048537413,0.0000011916171,7.6601316e-7,0.0000041213334,0.0018099735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986519,0.00009117723,0.00038906554,0.00008318134,0.00066092785,0.0001236991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987556,0.00025046285,0.00023208253,0.000045670702,0.0006734231,0.000042770196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005353261,0.00006820357,0.00019676522,0.00011009759,0.000063378786,0.000111303096,0.00051731843,0.000028252167,0.00046822272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001092111,0.00006171919,0.00010164507,0.000055157103,0.00013953264,0.00058290234,0.000058207374,0.00016900846,0.00009906153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087514076,0.00006174137,0.05519088,0.0000010121421,0.000088300105,0.00003103545,0.002615944,0.00007762287,0.00012117041,0.9398989,0.0006229111,0.0012029583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009193935,0.000059381822,0.012942427,0.0001355346,0.0000042878223,0.000015035002,0.0045833397,0.00008188444,0.00023315936,0.0038721785,0.9770562,0.000097187316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034965673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01705572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9764333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002194233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010442526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95174915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3019987319","doi":"10.1017/s1744552320000051","title":"Indigenous rights in the context of oil and gas pipelines in Canada: exposing naturalised power structures through a lens of intersectionality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Situated; Pipeline transport; Pipeline (software); Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economy; Geography; Economics; Engineering; Ecology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02792226136437441,"score_gpt":0.3097843392168419,"score_spread":0.2818620778524675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3019987319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98792195,0.0008471357,0.0000059791514,0.0037878638,0.0009243664,0.0001001771,0.000022625354,0.0000014226056,0.006388506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99810565,0.000742182,0.00006002822,0.0008510853,0.00021739223,6.5484187e-7,0.0000024955339,0.000003816436,0.000016729935],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979134,0.00032264186,0.0008363176,0.00011509134,0.00063600333,0.00017649842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983394,0.00045185004,0.0005434401,0.00005728091,0.0005615611,0.00004642733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006873293,0.00009652381,0.00027993924,0.00010255094,0.0001952459,0.00002683444,0.00042725593,0.000068656715,0.000041442396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005411004,0.00006636277,0.000056355315,0.00016552997,0.00023560929,0.00034364,0.0000043688146,0.00031907574,1.8726608e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025982023,0.00009753873,0.007558494,0.000022993247,0.000041842653,0.00005003228,0.78346455,0.00003274647,0.000044232078,0.20733404,0.000030140856,0.0010635735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008439518,0.0006278383,0.07136659,0.0017566452,0.00005273242,0.00027036172,0.43221602,0.0000671667,0.0042660525,0.06688539,0.41328505,0.00076664943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9810801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99929446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41325492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005741492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006151783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124810699","doi":"10.1017/s1744552317000180","title":"Representing Canadian justice: legal iconography and symbolism at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Iconography; Supreme court; Law; Legal culture; Sociology; Politics; Premise; Economic Justice; Democracy; Legal history; Political science; History; Art history; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.023210687881393872,"score_gpt":0.3129553996394149,"score_spread":0.289744711758021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124810699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77855825,0.0010169302,0.0000016417773,0.054313313,0.002533272,0.00007606126,0.000034985114,0.0000016517763,0.1634639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99677825,0.00024522172,0.000016944849,0.001030033,0.00044220797,7.7089294e-7,6.16262e-7,0.0000031583595,0.0014827943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989242,0.00006730558,0.0002662542,0.000072465096,0.00050854427,0.00016123767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987633,0.00015180114,0.00037937908,0.000108788365,0.0004785089,0.000118175856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078845385,0.000055015113,0.00012051994,0.000012949851,0.00075956853,0.00017949911,0.00071211305,0.000056776644,0.000119367905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038339925,0.0000410646,0.000072843955,0.00002567181,0.00051913125,0.00031800725,0.00006199733,0.00019231715,3.9727217e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007054132,0.000033152806,0.068543255,0.000013499483,0.0003344847,0.0002699387,0.031472664,0.000048653204,0.00021791199,0.84287685,0.052836753,0.0032822823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062406814,0.00001178795,0.026414428,0.00014124335,0.000036892936,0.000050645613,0.017576315,0.000020202597,0.00023535383,0.0032430782,0.9515408,0.000105150575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9684607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99892575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89870405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024018649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008056608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5842064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128418895","doi":"10.1017/s1744552320000427","title":"Transcarceral lawscapes enacted in moments of Aboriginalisation: a case-study of an Indigenous woman released on urban parole","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Prison; Coercion (linguistics); Michel foucault; Sociology; Discipline; Field (mathematics); Power (physics); Space (punctuation); Criminology; Law; Social science; Political science; Politics; Ecology","score_opus":0.03819199297291951,"score_gpt":0.3577425165597778,"score_spread":0.31955052358685826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128418895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99849075,0.00005312569,0.000020782465,0.000408166,0.00017561213,0.0001250782,0.000012866432,0.0000039092383,0.00070969725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995258,0.000027382124,0.000019951962,0.00024088519,0.0001638293,0.0000040263762,0.000002808753,0.000004649116,0.000010654035],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821156,0.0002637055,0.00064669945,0.0001173645,0.00064804364,0.00011265178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988702,0.00014459934,0.00039467274,0.00006454705,0.00043878687,0.00008721104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037927015,0.00008134376,0.00026500743,0.0002592841,0.000056721292,0.000031927113,0.00031774025,0.000044773886,0.000108139204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007692483,0.00007948431,0.000099405544,0.00032857695,0.000071234645,0.00029152687,0.000008505904,0.00018380168,0.0000011351435],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015697617,0.0031781602,0.048440337,0.000017915183,0.00031944262,0.0026792781,0.9176773,0.0022583266,0.00069573766,0.002095748,0.000040963594,0.021027049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003321437,0.0020741783,0.004646497,0.00013900117,0.00015036121,0.000092058326,0.986558,0.00053418847,0.00054229534,0.000094614414,0.0016948251,0.00015252046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09080349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17895065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088147156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013285362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015305675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9152509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164537606","doi":"10.1017/s1744552321000161","title":"Myth and concealment at colonial law's foundations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Colonialism; Negation; Racism; Law; Sociology; Work (physics); Epistemology; Political science; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03274311785472162,"score_gpt":0.3593945095243192,"score_spread":0.32665139166959756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164537606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52124965,0.0030082134,0.00008074018,0.10155306,0.005124435,0.00015626132,0.000040217772,0.00001668496,0.36877075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909731,0.00084286445,0.00023970017,0.0049482174,0.00051895925,0.0000019343238,0.0000037650293,0.0000034035293,0.0024680363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989635,0.00011777989,0.00026400512,0.00008382648,0.00046377454,0.0001071402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989732,0.00017362942,0.00015605241,0.00003983751,0.0005854375,0.00007185555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038766177,0.000052984717,0.00011562855,0.0000063696552,0.00022078451,0.00012867169,0.0001924066,0.000070075475,0.0004398299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106515516,0.000048942897,0.00007769762,0.00005092039,0.00035916857,0.00027003436,0.00005769478,0.00014754046,0.000009748735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033834942,0.00006333374,0.0009522672,0.0000015816072,0.000071842245,0.00012451765,0.020757403,0.000007905429,0.00025358633,0.9738955,0.0023388888,0.001499328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000822955,0.000024251682,0.00044440915,0.000058974474,0.0000098397295,0.00006828017,0.004602222,0.0000046440377,0.00033466378,0.014111689,0.97945476,0.00006331594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010590919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03772107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97711587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000324004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019139657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.979838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164813521","doi":"10.1017/s1744552321000197","title":"Improvising with Peter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Scholarship; Kindness; Improvisation; Active listening; Relation (database); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Art; Psychology; Law; Visual arts; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.021045785279795726,"score_gpt":0.3231918301694952,"score_spread":0.3021460448896995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164813521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42700884,0.0020116754,0.00045131822,0.022393307,0.003224296,0.00008832283,0.000007826518,0.000017340359,0.54479706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948611,0.0001515745,0.0006920637,0.0021679436,0.0005860303,6.028198e-7,8.029518e-7,0.000004029267,0.0015358106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990301,0.000079049525,0.0002030885,0.00006688304,0.00051626755,0.00010458074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988935,0.00008711226,0.0001392592,0.00004067797,0.0007899611,0.000049497925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034931072,0.00004657565,0.00009684107,0.00000768367,0.00007678332,0.00012753268,0.0002479524,0.000051888066,0.00030989942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092638715,0.000035835397,0.00007991732,0.00006873688,0.00014697353,0.00034399543,0.000020780044,0.00019068018,0.0000063967727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018124902,0.0002428677,0.0064387904,0.000006080756,0.00028597325,0.0018196224,0.08321498,0.000057242672,0.0018130682,0.8749671,0.0022167019,0.028756298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012687349,0.000051875733,0.00075967575,0.00023251801,0.000013449297,0.00020123064,0.02032323,0.0000049411246,0.0016537361,0.008019773,0.96734816,0.0001226507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000234499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060124286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96513146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013230517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025256336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33931816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205556454","doi":"10.1017/s1744552321000392","title":"Qualified to be deviant: stigma-management strategies among Chinese leftover women","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Stigma (botany); Queer; Human sexuality; Identity (music); Gender studies; Population; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.025144366741383553,"score_gpt":0.35512987953418984,"score_spread":0.3299855127928063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205556454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8863923,0.0006753078,0.00011443501,0.006913235,0.0016297901,0.00008052434,0.000002052254,0.000010008716,0.10418238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937759,0.0005115614,0.00022902254,0.00136701,0.00039841,0.00000517041,0.0000015809213,0.0000075156922,0.0037038273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983925,0.00015410647,0.00042137672,0.000121450284,0.00070792297,0.00020264434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989781,0.00015663085,0.00016632385,0.000075835625,0.00049215154,0.00013099916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006597306,0.000091495225,0.00018695634,0.00013006436,0.00009941215,0.00026980264,0.000454259,0.00006917406,0.0007958796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001629527,0.000077103374,0.000080296486,0.00020339992,0.00011662407,0.000426301,0.000071002236,0.0001950044,0.00002438229],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032058224,0.00057949,0.0090618115,0.000019884912,0.00094856444,0.0031873563,0.47380933,0.0015292275,0.00027355622,0.48394036,0.0031871109,0.023142725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014129858,0.000059854,0.013402846,0.00038738037,0.000011343778,0.0000218914,0.29710364,0.00001303311,0.00015421929,0.016829481,0.6703876,0.00021570559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008609458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076314383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6672005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002662673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014892929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87143236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205717149","doi":"10.1017/s1744552321000380","title":"Stigmatisation, identities and the law: Asian and comparative perspectives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Content analysis; Political science; Law; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03274287025853858,"score_gpt":0.3485797787596692,"score_spread":0.31583690850113066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205717149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7564703,0.005385095,0.00069539074,0.057715558,0.0007730089,0.00012416778,0.000015786736,0.0000069660005,0.17881368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724555,0.0009108102,0.00013509576,0.0007660369,0.00013500982,0.0000011581227,8.342542e-7,0.0000014624092,0.00080406776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916714,0.00023245548,0.00020731917,0.000055607317,0.00028725466,0.000050245435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988896,0.0002693928,0.00013884649,0.00002726731,0.0006436617,0.000031234777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004898309,0.000040081173,0.00011233948,0.000031837266,0.00012537143,0.00023599176,0.00011062097,0.00002280692,0.0001180565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017316504,0.000029965864,0.000027991158,0.0000423496,0.00062899926,0.00034137568,0.00002183513,0.00010262789,0.000001053016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028390541,0.000013693029,0.0004938127,7.506966e-7,0.00003605324,0.000011259759,0.1722738,0.000006842554,0.000009009786,0.82650846,0.00010914324,0.00050879066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030584966,0.000026741855,0.007888261,0.00012809694,0.000021698035,0.000109663655,0.7365803,0.0004894468,0.00006902297,0.16879219,0.08271356,0.00012250645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010246311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1115862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6577163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005657475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000849224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90462506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226150996","doi":"10.1017/s1744552322000015","title":"In or against the state? Hospitality and hostility in homelessness charities and deportation practice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Sociology; State (computer science); Citizenship; Corporate governance; Social exclusion; Public administration; Immigration; Political science; Criminology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04934695451406467,"score_gpt":0.4275496487775462,"score_spread":0.3782026942634815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226150996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938128,0.0008467933,0.0000104183255,0.0036606865,0.0007428153,0.00021138882,0.000021710333,0.000002541591,0.0006908311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805766,0.00077765645,0.000017776296,0.00096777896,0.000079919,0.000041730764,0.0000030855047,0.0000064521782,0.0000479391],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978895,0.00076396763,0.00071793696,0.00010673642,0.00038024076,0.00014159996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978062,0.0013382809,0.00046285626,0.00005544693,0.00030318534,0.00003404517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023091657,0.00007402383,0.00027061,0.00010892577,0.00015969672,0.00003062996,0.00018476779,0.000041554395,0.00007330369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005884404,0.000054997574,0.000020161277,0.00010817552,0.00009264906,0.00053256407,0.00012172039,0.00069425977,5.8298355e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009609719,0.00023421987,0.7578883,0.000050631712,0.000037910468,0.0006313863,0.20142597,0.000060775816,0.000019917758,0.019796595,0.0000073440556,0.018885953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016435076,0.000068430156,0.5174075,0.00015532966,0.0000041544363,0.0000072997436,0.47251263,0.00008496462,0.000008075271,0.0051706033,0.0028581298,0.00007939055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00899886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.102569975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27108666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002648996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019569202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300960989","doi":"10.1017/s1744552322000489","title":"Communal Justice in Shakespeare's England: Drama, Law, and Emotion By Penelope Geng, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2021. 257 pp. ISBN: 9781487508043 $75.00 (hardback)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Drama; Economic Justice; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Political science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.015365663588426523,"score_gpt":0.2788610716912361,"score_spread":0.2634954081028096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300960989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42961448,0.11895483,0.00010493078,0.01197659,0.00602144,0.00071928883,0.00065571844,0.00003346637,0.43191925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984727,0.012732423,0.00013564572,0.0006765586,0.00031054055,0.0000012277461,0.000015785095,0.0000073924066,0.0013934074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797034,0.0005179551,0.0003872693,0.00015114741,0.00079008995,0.00018321173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988718,0.00022439193,0.0003590503,0.00009529319,0.0003614649,0.000088004075],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011775816,0.000109462555,0.00024218763,0.000003988905,0.00032522963,0.00007441019,0.0007553917,0.00010492587,0.00352781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006821236,0.00011737008,0.00011375983,0.000037399543,0.00028000108,0.0008974841,0.00019296497,0.0003888633,0.0000016575804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016762115,0.0012490128,0.0061814194,0.000060944647,0.00055040553,0.00033811305,0.39257613,0.0005278721,0.00090054603,0.47769225,0.095282465,0.022964636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020389054,0.000112359674,0.000960003,0.00007605255,0.000029908506,0.000020900548,0.05176414,0.000045521243,0.000034663826,0.00081937824,0.9439628,0.00013535492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1423856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28593323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8486803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010001161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012073838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387103439","doi":"10.1017/s1744552323000228","title":"Deliberative Experience and the Civic Aspirations of Legal Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Queen Mary University of London","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Democracy; Scholarship; Politics; Legal education; Sociology; Law; Political science; Civic engagement; Public administration","score_opus":0.07293135299148787,"score_gpt":0.4386718920952426,"score_spread":0.3657405391037547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387103439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68048316,0.00027925978,0.00024222473,0.18636659,0.0034311789,0.00020928576,0.000006065606,0.000011515493,0.12897071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996415,0.0001482428,0.00012247798,0.001907357,0.0002705394,0.000012087311,0.0000018131889,0.0000027213698,0.0011197174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989276,0.00019517989,0.00038668248,0.00005472749,0.00036931608,0.00006649296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787116,0.0006615903,0.00033783453,0.000051035946,0.0010480387,0.00003033508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010680731,0.0000400542,0.000088015804,0.00015276401,0.00013483336,0.00014600698,0.00025436791,0.00002736559,0.00012447528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013732935,0.000030481691,0.00003681636,0.00032448367,0.00041020647,0.000999989,0.000021167323,0.00018377145,0.000007744812],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041396434,0.00005175262,0.00069785095,8.386195e-7,0.000018731285,0.0000015307014,0.06388009,0.00001605273,0.00007381124,0.9251162,0.0010636431,0.009038105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012489834,0.000037421054,0.007005601,0.00010145833,0.000013600728,0.000027436741,0.08406699,0.000117557334,0.0003018602,0.034095068,0.87289083,0.00009320055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050326725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005697044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89102113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006490487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088131713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76079285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387895001","doi":"10.1017/s1744552323000253","title":"The immigrant versus the state: The marginal contribution of tribunal judges to administrative justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Appeal; Immigration; Bureaucracy; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.06347462636925948,"score_gpt":0.38988330320280884,"score_spread":0.32640867683354935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387895001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69693565,0.0021757847,0.00035353538,0.26712635,0.0078922855,0.0005349654,0.00014092098,0.00001783454,0.024822688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824077,0.0005688421,0.0000049994837,0.000522729,0.00049681304,0.000009989596,0.0000015480596,0.0000022566987,0.00015205026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982198,0.00024763777,0.00041444623,0.00007072882,0.0008641203,0.00018330199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580216,0.002713109,0.00028041206,0.000058250236,0.0011029396,0.000043152668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020645745,0.00007087332,0.00013153143,0.00004279815,0.0006459646,0.00009275558,0.0006943152,0.00002600719,0.000025602512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016738082,0.000035020952,0.00010710056,0.00025811567,0.00087748,0.00012266333,0.00007175688,0.0001987468,0.000021929984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015059101,0.000034771136,0.00054817216,6.976849e-7,0.00020388629,0.000034576897,0.009338627,0.00013671804,0.00005506268,0.9792505,0.0023049226,0.0065861624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025705406,0.00044985654,0.032338355,0.00015712254,0.00011364954,0.000022502005,0.09314494,0.00005026176,0.00050009374,0.07699508,0.7934869,0.00017068145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039610695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045095146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9022554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016311898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003400797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9723294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402317321","doi":"10.1017/s1744552324000181","title":"The social construction of childhood: is a minimum age of marriage attainable in plural societies?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Sociology; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01858541913049665,"score_gpt":0.3188866371314921,"score_spread":0.30030121800099546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402317321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.976833,0.0009643807,0.00011603181,0.004743015,0.0021601426,0.00009362082,0.000032772597,0.0000046394102,0.015052409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99837273,0.0004588366,0.000112575086,0.00026335142,0.0003325373,0.0000016794406,0.0000016986472,0.000006269936,0.00045031705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984504,0.00013328606,0.0005822876,0.00008432254,0.00059352093,0.00015615743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896985,0.00030141912,0.0002738632,0.00004436509,0.0003825359,0.00002797569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010199639,0.000072649396,0.00018858083,0.00011326791,0.000095714815,0.00008684049,0.0004109391,0.00009008211,0.00005408326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011212875,0.000059281196,0.00016628773,0.00017535475,0.000553998,0.00024406594,0.000039553383,0.00024974425,0.0000013577078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012243552,0.00014522446,0.01808677,0.00003281492,0.00025559045,0.00011486804,0.17468049,0.00003562855,0.0006359462,0.7931157,0.0018395297,0.01093505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003927552,0.0002672228,0.090881675,0.0010708113,0.00006589481,0.00008015203,0.47787833,0.0006943863,0.0006021651,0.29375273,0.1303461,0.00043297457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012276669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003207984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49936292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023382832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037867844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2417417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402647563","doi":"10.1017/s174455232400020x","title":"Socio-Legal Instabilities in Ukraine's Wartime Compensation Law for Damaged and Destroyed Residential Property","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Land Use and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Compensation (psychology); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03405640236540714,"score_gpt":0.33619019761222274,"score_spread":0.3021337952468156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402647563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95736206,0.00050543086,0.00027494947,0.017170567,0.001389737,0.00032536138,0.0000106125235,0.000015842368,0.02294546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981719,0.000086310465,0.0001700768,0.000469062,0.0003559846,0.000008980838,0.000002741525,0.000005305884,0.0007296262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990404,0.000113113994,0.00032670685,0.000092880204,0.0003131452,0.0001137352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999447,0.0002407864,0.000071059294,0.000031734686,0.00017598535,0.000033472024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001077484,0.000056931694,0.00011671718,0.00009965372,0.000072777,0.0002711894,0.00017276435,0.000038667913,0.000052659878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011857011,0.00004002785,0.000053634878,0.000044794313,0.00014955355,0.0006187341,0.000034203335,0.00012055584,0.000002215304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027054865,0.00007593027,0.0014097412,0.00003004446,0.00008566697,0.0001259496,0.028935507,0.000048854607,0.00027118644,0.95757073,0.0009815845,0.01019425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031422346,0.00022300742,0.0029690152,0.0006418512,0.000034389708,0.000018958277,0.017099427,0.0009417222,0.0003907078,0.04955365,0.92476887,0.00021616176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010277221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05604288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9237873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018601154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012532178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99631345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406246085","doi":"10.1017/s1744552324000405","title":"Climate futures in the time of the unbroken asset","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Asset (computer security); Economics; Financial economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.048836903803171974,"score_gpt":0.2941233003034688,"score_spread":0.24528639650029682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406246085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9210035,0.0012067814,0.000020354333,0.016050005,0.0014132314,0.000094520394,0.0002013744,0.0000015230155,0.060008716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956579,0.0003797916,0.000021356118,0.003679785,0.00012676377,0.0000025819556,0.0000021228188,0.00000410157,0.00012557677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896526,0.000030962987,0.0007687998,0.00007819743,0.00004471144,0.00011206484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909693,0.00020999834,0.0005003314,0.00012945707,0.00005249247,0.00001078514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010198825,0.00006516849,0.00022302342,0.00018651217,0.000026407057,0.000048507303,0.00076534325,0.000048978967,0.00014495995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012529331,0.000047540885,0.00013001988,0.00009973808,0.00006120001,0.00014715108,0.000082456965,0.0001894426,0.000028374247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007963106,0.00010738205,0.06047287,0.000010776348,0.00006326963,0.0000076382175,0.002525527,0.00015141896,0.000027281747,0.93384206,0.0014727436,0.0012394126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004790017,0.00011478607,0.37310138,0.00075128424,0.00001908722,0.00009536842,0.0040366957,0.0023535967,0.00089621625,0.38288856,0.2306114,0.00034161934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047376257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019208802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5509535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108494714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001895859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1938661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410477996","doi":"10.1017/s1744552325000072","title":"From avoidance to empowerment? Understanding the (in)significance of the law for migrant care workers in Austria","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Empowerment; Sociology; Demographic economics; Political science; Law; Criminology; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.061433664840476014,"score_gpt":0.3864376354236998,"score_spread":0.3250039705832238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410477996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86773324,0.0010892721,0.00034015748,0.09848604,0.004516084,0.0007686313,0.00006605442,0.000003928562,0.026996607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99850386,0.000037383365,0.000026495445,0.0010108481,0.00022972973,0.00001149211,2.3060855e-7,0.0000024726767,0.0001774922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901086,0.00012019321,0.0003695801,0.000072687384,0.00029849206,0.00012820539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989505,0.0006474894,0.00018445835,0.00005207746,0.00014846714,0.000017021006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005528625,0.000056150555,0.00015244598,0.00006119041,0.00013513128,0.000033436452,0.0005287279,0.000045500467,0.0000037101624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025405863,0.000034265788,0.00010017742,0.00019768225,0.00028916224,0.00009050354,0.00004409638,0.00016009396,2.723146e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047185685,0.00006304157,0.054709777,0.000008960537,0.00014100992,0.00000723566,0.24191174,0.00041895415,0.0001824235,0.69940525,0.0007816954,0.0018980413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002582581,0.00004984132,0.0357249,0.001964824,0.000019737858,4.389001e-7,0.6760215,0.000012004102,0.0006552725,0.25074127,0.032087903,0.0001397319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040811792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30654106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44866398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006211491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001815061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9655755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411909166","doi":"10.1017/s1744552325100128","title":"Shakespeare’s Theater of Judgment: Six Keywords By Kevin Curran , Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2024. 208 pp.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Historical Art and Culture Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Curran; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Materials science","score_opus":0.0213656449858782,"score_gpt":0.24424288371886768,"score_spread":0.22287723873298948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411909166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018003672,0.0074513373,0.00006222648,0.0075498587,0.008171685,0.00014388504,0.00013925393,0.000014432882,0.95846367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9151672,0.00047747375,0.000013493555,0.00040948996,0.0006148848,9.5172453e-7,0.000004353283,0.000004679406,0.08330744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989157,0.000034497953,0.00043568443,0.00011526985,0.0003686723,0.00013021246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989811,0.00009434288,0.00021799844,0.000073000236,0.0005924218,0.00004110367],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018535639,0.00012268453,0.00027618444,0.000078593606,0.00010523385,0.000055727396,0.00042540737,0.000041101317,0.0025013082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003477098,0.00009624351,0.00016519264,0.00003503172,0.00024395008,0.00029265071,0.00008347466,0.0002298504,0.0000032610074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000269985,0.00024622836,0.0006141249,0.000009512707,0.00035316078,0.000038014212,0.01057495,0.000008034597,0.00015383886,0.2798578,0.7054134,0.0024609317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081386435,0.000074200194,0.000029974579,0.00023751629,0.000035013705,0.0000025811441,0.0024722372,0.000013196194,0.00019818151,0.0012187576,0.9948159,0.000088615074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006903082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014943833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89716357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017100172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039976836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415907553","doi":"10.1017/s1744552325100207","title":"Social reproduction and migrant labour: extending the view to Sicilian olive groves and tomato greenhouses","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sicilian; Reproduction; Social reproduction; Construct (python library); Silence; Work (physics); Agriculture","score_opus":0.023605982060680947,"score_gpt":0.3128357780527831,"score_spread":0.2892297959921022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415907553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9691445,0.0013312593,0.000038483744,0.027325846,0.00065707177,0.00013142862,0.0000027292135,0.000013334852,0.0013553437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99425936,0.00007538062,0.0000146768225,0.004664218,0.0009026185,0.000002061937,4.882249e-7,0.0000064015876,0.00007482156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991845,0.000028472195,0.00031589667,0.0001305266,0.00022053978,0.00012004679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924785,0.00007450777,0.00017339358,0.000055467757,0.00043693572,0.0000118259095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006192326,0.00009052551,0.00016845658,0.0001364125,0.0001516429,0.0003384602,0.0001981705,0.000034004683,0.000006031551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041851864,0.00006770672,0.0000558736,0.00015361742,0.00011155636,0.0006192427,0.0000987493,0.00012747732,0.0000016742081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003852742,0.00017330959,0.06853279,0.00020436016,0.00024471208,0.00007562233,0.008143685,0.000024294624,0.00014410797,0.8098426,0.002229207,0.11000004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016747422,0.00005088347,0.5053768,0.0006816942,0.00010699682,0.00004978479,0.02479096,0.00007223983,0.00006803455,0.13489488,0.33196047,0.00027250944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031218415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024601182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67494774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086561384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024796598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47193113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415947423","doi":"10.1017/s1744552325100256","title":"The FARC-EP as environmental governance actors: shifting the ecological perspective on war","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental governance; Scholarship; Corporate governance; Perspective (graphical); Accountability; Environmental justice; Service (business); Political ecology; Politics","score_opus":0.019421342179967157,"score_gpt":0.30581743375279213,"score_spread":0.286396091572825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415947423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8993854,0.00031288978,0.00002590764,0.056571454,0.0005866446,0.00007100419,0.000003547602,0.000004090067,0.043039087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870578,0.00022740479,0.000019247138,0.011598978,0.000065965534,0.0000039953416,3.3120818e-7,0.0000029798998,0.0010232974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989415,0.00013043753,0.00031338795,0.00012257772,0.00036879737,0.00012329375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987242,0.0008905118,0.00023316909,0.00010252769,0.00002470594,0.000024855784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004000053,0.000086750646,0.0000994625,0.000019688203,0.00018435805,0.000043212556,0.0007408761,0.000050108363,0.0008760603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000467113,0.00004829197,0.000100206555,0.000053638312,0.00045995894,0.0001521923,0.00014125028,0.00034943537,0.00012292653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085176836,0.00061985746,0.25522777,0.0000010238792,0.00043561042,0.00021094063,0.0038441638,0.0012351056,0.0013035117,0.6889195,0.009726842,0.03762394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010722411,0.00018480705,0.7256089,0.00006841408,0.000026907828,0.00006838342,0.007997287,0.00027685286,0.0010907645,0.030128367,0.23334128,0.00013582665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000371897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011250622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6587911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062879315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026427584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9592245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}