{"meta":{"query_hash":"b7ef19bd4518","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Law in Context"},"cohort_total":49,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":49,"exported":49,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b7ef19bd4518","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Law+in+Context"},"results":[{"id":"W2035467982","doi":"10.1017/s1744552313000177","title":"Multiculturalism meets privatisation: the case of faith-based arbitration","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Political science; Law; Multiculturalism; Religious law; Family law; Supreme court; Faith; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Law and economics; Islam","score_opus":0.03095093799431146,"score_gpt":0.3302311450385649,"score_spread":0.2992802070442534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035467982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32314104,0.0013079514,0.02245207,0.09107704,0.00043249415,0.00016515229,0.000030874155,0.000052298692,0.56134117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893702,0.000094773124,0.00079576584,0.0019995281,0.0000701905,0.00003472671,0.0000025864738,0.0000089756995,0.0076232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98207664,0.008968421,0.00046374902,0.0015911772,0.0023538924,0.004546169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881126,0.006935909,0.00086581736,0.001516106,0.0014646865,0.0011049213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017872434,0.0003156168,0.00074950967,0.00089000195,0.029117774,0.013448592,0.0020802687,0.013465095,0.0072798566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018309422,0.0005354252,0.0010145168,0.00095787825,0.047683813,0.009381248,0.015408896,0.01164308,0.0004161076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000589704,0.000013424448,0.0001757576,0.0000060732177,0.0000027197036,0.00034531727,0.0055096936,0.00010579831,0.00006941454,0.9926737,0.0004572126,0.0006350905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102698934,0.000049215327,0.000780997,0.00019073466,0.000036017726,0.00071468495,0.018962616,0.0035903938,0.00085089303,0.90640324,0.0682547,0.00006384888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036928445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038469933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036928445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014605744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012863742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10597259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041335800","doi":"10.1017/s1744552314000202","title":"Elusive equalities and the Great Recession: restoration, retrenchment and redistribution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Austerity; Recession; Redistribution (election); Financial crisis; Inequality; Political economy; Great Depression; Capitalism; Politics; Neoliberalism (international relations); Great recession; Economics; Political science; Economic collapse; Keynesian economics; Development economics; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.029935402425781087,"score_gpt":0.2633551563689273,"score_spread":0.23341975394314624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041335800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39478084,0.011968714,0.0065669445,0.32168025,0.0008168019,0.000042981766,0.00010053257,0.000044554636,0.26399833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99237543,0.00122388,0.00024206942,0.0025875906,0.00014795052,0.000011157547,0.000008756991,0.000009879544,0.0033933425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849916,0.0006925598,0.000041226045,0.00012438234,0.00019597897,0.0004467798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822754,0.0006615714,0.00033408936,0.00016093596,0.00023572998,0.00038013136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033827624,0.0001568767,0.00026445033,0.00084365427,0.0050111995,0.0060545024,0.00062542356,0.0022838253,0.005264222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055210064,0.0001248056,0.0001860254,0.00092169485,0.02651785,0.005530901,0.0073811784,0.0040721097,0.00023150072],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004016777,0.000031492043,0.0016531949,0.00003239925,0.0000039320084,0.00016181669,0.0107981805,0.000364823,0.00010892865,0.9683394,0.0072799497,0.011185617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002975283,0.000035044566,0.011256639,0.00036658943,0.0000059589142,0.00016939426,0.04240092,0.0012309242,0.0002913111,0.8179187,0.12626614,0.000028609309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009110636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014743554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009110636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072654667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030760586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052714884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051649364","doi":"10.1017/s1744552305004039","title":"Conceptualising the child through an ‘ethic of care’: lessons for family law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; Paternalism; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law; Work (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.1037074131153287,"score_gpt":0.45320066360418537,"score_spread":0.34949325048885665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051649364","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031456187,0.05356058,0.08355905,0.6102697,0.002275255,0.00010375889,0.000060422888,0.000065917695,0.21864915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88214296,0.026977891,0.027068786,0.048353072,0.0021475458,0.00033456416,0.000046936828,0.00012467786,0.012803523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903639,0.007278282,0.00023200916,0.00045775418,0.0009694626,0.0006985421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98714775,0.010107894,0.0005673601,0.00052286475,0.0007432059,0.0009109028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017478487,0.00056877645,0.000760488,0.002015746,0.00808485,0.012128501,0.003222236,0.012758041,0.0039767153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015445828,0.0004667702,0.00074359763,0.0015555456,0.11082377,0.025827834,0.008156893,0.01648846,0.00046179554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015532057,0.0000055528676,0.00009649153,0.000020959782,0.0000010163631,0.00009130356,0.008533554,0.00011515245,0.0000124902235,0.98793346,0.0013533647,0.0018350935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069527855,0.000015119617,0.0001768724,0.00042207795,0.0000021263909,0.00026771426,0.015005306,0.00033767443,0.00003985841,0.91257364,0.07113781,0.0000148313065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019093893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014120262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019093893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015143779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0124465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109876335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092250354","doi":"10.1017/s1744552313000347","title":"Must equal mean identical? Same-sex couples and marriage","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocal; Same sex; Rhetoric; Gender equality; Sociology; Social psychology; Positive economics; Psychology; Gender studies; Economics","score_opus":0.04634538852839661,"score_gpt":0.39358217511626903,"score_spread":0.34723678658787244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092250354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35848776,0.0073805754,0.0126214605,0.2384055,0.001652184,0.000061135615,0.000050265964,0.000023676172,0.3813174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934934,0.0004266202,0.0002831727,0.004027327,0.00011330823,0.000011397099,0.0000028997638,0.0000032151288,0.0016387488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98831254,0.009081567,0.0002512148,0.0006158911,0.0009853041,0.0007535104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99335796,0.004553876,0.0007033969,0.0003861825,0.0005084578,0.00049006613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009384284,0.0001403208,0.00042320162,0.0006122251,0.0062424275,0.005055516,0.00080773135,0.0045900843,0.005146831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017248992,0.00020612491,0.00023263403,0.00071593316,0.04477107,0.006316558,0.0051919017,0.0047095213,0.0002951954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012580032,0.000015558713,0.00066706166,0.000013649427,0.0000023931364,0.00008605692,0.014482166,0.000031610303,0.000045616223,0.981473,0.0008251756,0.0023450807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034033663,0.00005440208,0.0026003395,0.00020932859,0.000011246897,0.00026603107,0.037468627,0.00028621487,0.00022003426,0.9121095,0.046713863,0.000026342903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060006087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049037253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009384284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003673012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024667552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04962945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099287198","doi":"10.1017/s1744552314000020","title":"Purpose-based or knowledge-based intention for collective wrongdoing in international criminal law?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Crimes against humanity; Genocide; Wrongdoing; Commit; Mens rea; Context (archaeology); Commission; Political science; Law; Criminal law; Criminology; War crime; Meaning (existential); International law; Humanity; Sociology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.1169198430689947,"score_gpt":0.34054395617846994,"score_spread":0.22362411310947525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099287198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17988303,0.0019584221,0.16570222,0.04902455,0.00078856846,0.00021645117,0.00018076136,0.00020168233,0.6020443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99295723,0.00018176604,0.004233894,0.0007558469,0.000094496405,0.000061848856,0.000019892577,0.000021025062,0.0016741129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99018985,0.005264513,0.000720061,0.0010377935,0.0017724728,0.0010153346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773458,0.011183214,0.0029686096,0.004611026,0.0025792343,0.0013120767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012729003,0.00038419498,0.0006883056,0.0026816272,0.002869046,0.009491427,0.0018752383,0.0063963677,0.004602895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020967498,0.00053344364,0.0011822506,0.0014883924,0.055912614,0.014401104,0.0055628275,0.006027208,0.0006728137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008762538,0.000023287213,0.00058638176,0.000037288206,0.0000057102884,0.000061384766,0.0039296574,0.00014555966,0.00005850838,0.992789,0.00026550976,0.0020888813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009616754,0.000022633401,0.0011349088,0.00017192404,0.000013105893,0.00012344962,0.0042066034,0.0011077333,0.0001435856,0.9880747,0.004969583,0.000022105745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002593191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024495183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012729003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036764368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037570053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0673182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099996689","doi":"10.1017/s174455231000042x","title":"Trade unions, democracy and power","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Trade union; Democracy; Sociology; Labour law; Individualism; Liberalism; Collective bargaining; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Law; Free trade; Law and economics; Politics; Political economy; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.03642301042718207,"score_gpt":0.3221016714868006,"score_spread":0.2856786610596185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099996689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021771574,0.035206378,0.0068370425,0.20973773,0.0013164255,0.000036016623,0.000060600225,0.000074127536,0.72496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89703256,0.010369268,0.001760425,0.020262308,0.0020278203,0.000103144754,0.000060769282,0.00006736246,0.06831634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927891,0.003988739,0.00020490923,0.0009794644,0.001151758,0.00088608585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99472165,0.0034996101,0.00054726534,0.00042516048,0.00036431858,0.00044205392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071177715,0.0003426423,0.00056435884,0.0010631947,0.007598664,0.011794142,0.0009784717,0.005099903,0.009038075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008527196,0.00023956464,0.00031296205,0.001568899,0.03974513,0.008164817,0.006687781,0.0054069003,0.0016194321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047411295,0.000009002928,0.00016059536,0.0000225951,0.000002475149,0.000026599653,0.0023658052,0.00012897138,0.00001929006,0.98667926,0.0045711533,0.0060093896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010479248,0.000007971887,0.00021618596,0.00010260809,0.0000015371968,0.00002433108,0.0013049232,0.000094976196,0.000041248324,0.89565635,0.102534205,0.0000051214197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037192695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003107661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011794142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062683458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050404523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04548031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119533214","doi":"10.1017/s1744552309990309","title":"‘Receiving’ the Swiss Civil Code: translating authority in early republican Turkey","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Promulgation; Civil code; Turkish; Ideology; Political science; Code (set theory); Law; Scholarship; Democracy; Modernization theory; Sociology; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.03847833127912919,"score_gpt":0.34042990501536435,"score_spread":0.30195157373623516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119533214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9070973,0.00087479566,0.00042754103,0.0033323935,0.00008832553,0.000019933046,0.00003289564,0.000024406783,0.08810239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952454,0.00010986469,0.00010832677,0.00020096378,0.0000060420393,0.0000041160556,0.000013403635,0.000012515158,0.004299369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981589,0.0007304562,0.00007994397,0.00019010763,0.00032177503,0.00051880005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877316,0.0003934279,0.00017708426,0.00008688105,0.00043990667,0.0001295113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027471923,0.00038172855,0.00025472042,0.0009674107,0.006795111,0.004273543,0.00068268017,0.0016457393,0.0027721676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031119934,0.00029085134,0.0001992365,0.0009534204,0.008348531,0.0018218965,0.0020760964,0.0023116064,0.0007425266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002588886,0.00010607069,0.014221116,0.00014776879,0.000009746668,0.0048531108,0.40659255,0.0011154428,0.0023044639,0.5116552,0.009560002,0.049175594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096569,0.00050624,0.095217615,0.0007499093,0.000042652453,0.0025097218,0.4296469,0.0033159684,0.006463273,0.02026837,0.44095793,0.00022482147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08509637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11653763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08509637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017558826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008649762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16920209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120702823","doi":"10.1017/s1744552310000297","title":"Bountiful’s plural marriages","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Wife; Agency (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Pluralism (philosophy); Gender studies; Sociology; Politics; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.01938030807207539,"score_gpt":0.3446879276915298,"score_spread":0.32530761961945437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120702823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72913086,0.0011348831,0.0012602106,0.022085872,0.00027278787,0.000029730378,0.00008114501,0.000033704713,0.24597089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98536366,0.0001583035,0.00010068815,0.0008770802,0.000015289805,0.0000047160424,0.00001124082,0.0000070275264,0.013461992],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786395,0.00073331106,0.000028517112,0.00012995323,0.0003304715,0.0009137594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856097,0.00045822223,0.00012709323,0.00007587542,0.00026503913,0.00051272917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001893261,0.00022616811,0.00023354545,0.0006835962,0.04525954,0.0041549434,0.0007125614,0.0018114875,0.0043443986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029587778,0.00018880214,0.00013153604,0.0009605799,0.015123461,0.001529562,0.0037417982,0.0028740484,0.00016944727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004913206,0.000030229685,0.004885005,0.000028039944,0.000005445193,0.0019084672,0.75297946,0.000099549696,0.0005853908,0.20822294,0.018251233,0.012955195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007947853,0.00003699059,0.011959976,0.00013113716,0.000009925147,0.0010536559,0.6137894,0.00039328221,0.00056713633,0.011098126,0.36089414,0.000058324153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7044215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86633307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7044215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021477314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008968676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59463835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126576312","doi":"10.1017/s1744552305004027","title":"Adolescence, autonomy and Harry Potter: the child as decision-maker","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Wizard; Harry potter; Autonomy; Art history; Wizard of oz; Art; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01898586690847304,"score_gpt":0.350366182317237,"score_spread":0.33138031540876395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126576312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6632682,0.018249331,0.0030104893,0.13641584,0.00088656816,0.00005520154,0.0000446581,0.000036320635,0.17803337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99178857,0.0024503882,0.00023041152,0.0024134244,0.000053434742,0.000010884268,0.000004838149,0.000009193302,0.0030388501],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973176,0.0018174195,0.00004859017,0.00013863068,0.00021230154,0.000465347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761885,0.00088236225,0.0003361499,0.000100850266,0.00014872373,0.0009128862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035335063,0.00021862611,0.00024093605,0.0005430899,0.0069656726,0.0067997184,0.00057438505,0.0018743433,0.0018546565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059263143,0.00022744118,0.00022644321,0.00033982832,0.024337208,0.004474336,0.005435286,0.0059499973,0.00020681195],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046133824,0.00014155601,0.008988907,0.00004159763,0.000012491778,0.0034773161,0.65248334,0.00013781675,0.00042597513,0.31350312,0.0071375207,0.013604153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004469475,0.00011276064,0.012161778,0.0004508275,0.000025871579,0.0062141055,0.6094525,0.00031027646,0.00061159354,0.16348016,0.20705731,0.000078134566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007897508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015463088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007897508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030739813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034950285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022303343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134575841","doi":"10.1017/s1744552306002011","title":"The socio-legal context of privacy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Right to privacy; The Right to Privacy; Dialectic; Context (archaeology); Rhetoric; Individualism; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Political science; Privacy law; Privacy by Design; Privacy laws of the United States; Sociology; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Law; Human rights; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.027332598815892797,"score_gpt":0.32819230619500905,"score_spread":0.30085970737911627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134575841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07488731,0.021926435,0.04822756,0.3540742,0.0012526261,0.00011235627,0.00032572597,0.00008679355,0.49910706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717001,0.005069659,0.004584602,0.012073716,0.0008353526,0.00008813338,0.000057985788,0.000035759524,0.005554725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9710396,0.018448481,0.00097143947,0.002273196,0.0052891537,0.001978147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753582,0.01793344,0.0020401045,0.0020560054,0.0015526041,0.001059681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014049281,0.00036312125,0.0006845705,0.0028773574,0.013267308,0.014714047,0.0016973289,0.00873045,0.004150211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021157578,0.0005268395,0.0006675629,0.003708019,0.08235099,0.014358454,0.010034296,0.010100169,0.0005891353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021424087,0.0000046764617,0.00016441573,0.000018224857,0.0000026496673,0.00007555644,0.0038828102,0.000064332045,0.00005370871,0.994055,0.00065111555,0.0010254696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008423514,0.000018716313,0.0008395577,0.00021180298,0.000008874107,0.00028094626,0.0077518392,0.00029297406,0.00016721265,0.8892226,0.101177394,0.000019620029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007926812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048278063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014714047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009074238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008556162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07430059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143929422","doi":"10.1017/s1744552306002035","title":"A culture of retribution: symbolic violence in legal and literary discourses on juvenile delinquency","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Juvenile delinquency; Loneliness; Sociology; Retributive justice; Criminology; Economic Justice; English culture; The Symbolic; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Linguistics","score_opus":0.013107956206022531,"score_gpt":0.33348542536331993,"score_spread":0.3203774691572974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143929422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8574966,0.00536317,0.0018294068,0.017233115,0.00029996547,0.000033993372,0.000030766856,0.000032425356,0.117680654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784887,0.00072139915,0.00010682407,0.00030702856,0.00006651061,0.000011204503,0.0000052640103,0.000014087651,0.0009188831],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881584,0.0087362025,0.00039641804,0.0005195375,0.0013812552,0.0008081763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814416,0.013132361,0.0023373454,0.00067233416,0.0012754392,0.001140975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057008723,0.0006576183,0.000712354,0.0046827113,0.022732334,0.016326414,0.0014950709,0.0024824443,0.0019341119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015953753,0.00041654886,0.00027383704,0.0034483303,0.06782224,0.008660407,0.011121939,0.0048563755,0.00017565276],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007912061,0.000010961159,0.0011582671,0.000036277073,0.000002982251,0.00041657448,0.96887994,0.000015622156,0.00015352106,0.027338037,0.0002985447,0.0016813558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040833884,0.000020069012,0.002376203,0.00024501508,0.0000070605706,0.0004189676,0.97538304,0.0000732202,0.00023861846,0.005417613,0.015799342,0.000016699552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021569302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023136977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022732334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008086601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00479567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058672726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144244468","doi":"10.1017/s1744552310000273","title":"Ambivalence towards law: Business Improvement Associations, public disorder and legal consciousness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Disenchantment; Ambivalence; Reverence; Legal consciousness; Consciousness; Law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Public law","score_opus":0.01708505304140144,"score_gpt":0.30941448299763724,"score_spread":0.2923294299562358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144244468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7961943,0.0012650763,0.002540248,0.07448393,0.00018986472,0.000029604369,0.000013625861,0.00003090021,0.12525246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986669,0.000104712584,0.000063720756,0.00078244234,0.000018397155,0.0000040893974,0.0000013938069,0.0000022059467,0.00035604194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96813184,0.022700487,0.0005582017,0.0010245914,0.004210041,0.003374749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97411776,0.0144729195,0.0047099474,0.0010956838,0.0019585574,0.0036451563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016095404,0.00018041619,0.00042151604,0.0029679858,0.015953738,0.020374358,0.0010790516,0.004163181,0.0027701752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019730782,0.0003366704,0.00029397733,0.0023195723,0.08423707,0.00912684,0.015449505,0.0062475232,0.00020168262],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024217337,0.00014224622,0.011369469,0.00005429589,0.000011041352,0.00047520138,0.3392287,0.00013512242,0.00026671652,0.6396578,0.0016261591,0.007009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025966685,0.000066014036,0.010332146,0.00032536752,0.000013656691,0.00046711095,0.7214119,0.0004940954,0.00030055296,0.20824352,0.05826437,0.00005524718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064281267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004443536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020374358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008663032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00860787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08512163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149387058","doi":"10.1017/s1744552314000044","title":"The Egyptian revolution in and out of the juridical space: an inquiry into labour law and the workers' movement in Egypt","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Mainstream; Law; Politics; Institution; Political science; Diversity (politics); Political economy; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.016633027082104863,"score_gpt":0.3229276941757789,"score_spread":0.30629466709367403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149387058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.848311,0.0037410513,0.00024315584,0.024394695,0.00008300715,0.000028661156,0.000029817726,0.000007310201,0.12316129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904484,0.0006389584,0.000047997233,0.0008453207,0.000025909683,0.000007646379,0.000005452543,0.0000036221384,0.007976567],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998384,0.0006491792,0.000040021383,0.00006649211,0.0001766175,0.00068372727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983273,0.0009694014,0.0003491596,0.000047151832,0.00015148349,0.00015544184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003044623,0.00017718876,0.00023966057,0.0014678332,0.012653691,0.00837728,0.0010133412,0.0029692745,0.0046697655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026272158,0.00022673357,0.00012468582,0.0021810315,0.025793303,0.0023238135,0.0041637067,0.0033789417,0.00026316152],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007613285,0.00007484266,0.0049486076,0.00013073097,0.00000580546,0.0022609087,0.6536566,0.00020450106,0.00063450605,0.31873646,0.004437875,0.014833066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014457509,0.00002953213,0.013079067,0.00031497728,0.000004142723,0.00016250994,0.86033916,0.00015491433,0.00022814864,0.009572008,0.116081625,0.000019451887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07637429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10221351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07637429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020679433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0102932695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15185946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149410759","doi":"10.1017/s1744552311000140","title":"AIDS – the time for changes in law and policy is now","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Existentialism; Political science; Medicine; Criminology; Development economics; Economic growth; Psychology; Law; Family medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.07142914698955574,"score_gpt":0.37636895878129667,"score_spread":0.3049398117917409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149410759","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005059217,0.011239118,0.0007294741,0.9543449,0.0060271737,0.000012160203,0.000033811604,0.000042354084,0.022511726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21891929,0.010724483,0.0038806722,0.7253768,0.008476231,0.000056005953,0.00011795986,0.00006803296,0.032380566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99335206,0.0026757515,0.0004181019,0.00083696493,0.0014502538,0.0012667689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9807992,0.00828988,0.0015594529,0.0013181798,0.003831122,0.0042020986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011093389,0.00027306742,0.0005321925,0.0004956805,0.0045089023,0.009652273,0.0013193934,0.012751573,0.012668284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013820806,0.00027838585,0.00055734144,0.0006364211,0.017775312,0.01010376,0.003468646,0.017242502,0.002124201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054270007,0.00017222205,0.0009267674,0.00025691715,0.000024320796,0.00036618023,0.0046583842,0.00024331133,0.0012756513,0.7007608,0.24061427,0.050647035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017992448,0.00004950338,0.0017588935,0.000466665,0.000007719719,0.00016104312,0.004818826,0.00010756582,0.00016036404,0.104678355,0.8877437,0.000029414854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011287287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008627775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012751573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006074239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01156332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058668196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149554426","doi":"10.1017/s1744552311000395","title":"Calculating claims: Jewish and Muslim women navigating religion, economics and law in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Judaism; Negotiation; Sociology; Narrative; Oppression; Law; Family law; Religious law; Religious identity; Gender studies; Political science; Economics; Islam","score_opus":0.031577596041233474,"score_gpt":0.31361164356622584,"score_spread":0.2820340475249924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149554426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921268,0.00016669925,0.00005499701,0.001243632,0.00001061594,0.000030485466,0.00006177202,0.0000024433432,0.0063025053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959863,0.0002498113,0.00012136458,0.0003704566,0.0000043329933,0.000012267983,0.000043894514,0.0000046775644,0.003206885],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966576,0.0005619706,0.000061189385,0.00020955656,0.0009018693,0.0016078134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949109,0.0014176563,0.00060740724,0.00015294008,0.0016414095,0.001269704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030081633,0.00033614892,0.0006200257,0.0032218809,0.036299787,0.0059964177,0.0022144543,0.001788535,0.0048977723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009013368,0.00049971626,0.00027522165,0.004521876,0.012342824,0.001725819,0.005636125,0.0030394068,0.00029470638],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005835913,0.00010057046,0.05911106,0.000029176212,0.0000067636565,0.00074738666,0.9248162,0.000065035994,0.00045722787,0.004681192,0.0015559512,0.00837112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002413482,0.000012907928,0.018475827,0.00002964923,0.000003157172,0.00006641033,0.97573143,0.00012891978,0.00009937013,0.00021728085,0.005215568,0.000017125523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98560876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99401665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06114732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06114732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061617844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44365692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153155984","doi":"10.1017/s1744552312000249","title":"The vulnerable subject of negligence law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Subject (documents); Jurisprudence; Relevance (law); Law; Criticism; Duty; Autonomy; Duty of care; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Damages; Common law; Law and economics; Liability; Computer science","score_opus":0.04358637366607834,"score_gpt":0.37210867690184324,"score_spread":0.3285223032357649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153155984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1612167,0.0077681714,0.06211316,0.067021295,0.0004963443,0.00015140367,0.00009616922,0.00006262621,0.7010741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881941,0.00082532567,0.0017451228,0.0017728742,0.00015934343,0.000048314694,0.000011739497,0.00001203622,0.007231043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99296737,0.003983737,0.0002469569,0.0006515849,0.0015294754,0.0006209556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938221,0.003576326,0.0005886232,0.0006528888,0.0008494118,0.0005106766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005726675,0.00032168883,0.00060850056,0.0018386703,0.0050232587,0.0067024543,0.0010741573,0.0038105985,0.0031990085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074435654,0.000247148,0.00046307387,0.00081883627,0.05336895,0.005490787,0.008487057,0.0036065334,0.00025255198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014703262,0.0000026142347,0.00017001321,0.0000084650255,0.0000015335863,0.00008245266,0.0036774531,0.000055307337,0.000059945844,0.994998,0.00026794168,0.00067483954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004000785,0.000014994508,0.00050152733,0.00012609022,0.000005553549,0.00018001453,0.0034374108,0.00034893298,0.00010219855,0.9697611,0.025508793,0.000009345237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00843551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005531494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00843551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006815051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066347676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04944688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161184406","doi":"10.1017/s1744552308002036","title":"Informal formality: tenantries,<i>ejidos</i>and family land","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Urban and Rural Development Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Proposition; Situated; Point (geometry); Sociology; Political science; Law; Linguistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Geometry; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04703497653909988,"score_gpt":0.29946942759674494,"score_spread":0.25243445105764506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161184406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.750003,0.0009196253,0.004832224,0.009210354,0.000051220726,0.00004079297,0.000045578254,0.000025480891,0.2348717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99598926,0.00007405085,0.00022821953,0.0001128963,0.0000053541626,0.000005338026,0.0000050358462,0.000002223869,0.0035775953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990823,0.00041075455,0.000029935014,0.000075140866,0.00013306549,0.00026882946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991586,0.0002376064,0.00023126858,0.00006737447,0.0001355295,0.00016949495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001039467,0.0001246012,0.00018287542,0.00050677743,0.004223542,0.0032953813,0.00045895734,0.00073700986,0.0035726523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001186883,0.000101966965,0.00008447446,0.0007636022,0.016642183,0.0014696431,0.0027408039,0.0010673414,0.000086808606],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003172818,0.000040061084,0.008110807,0.00004779645,0.0000045991333,0.00053108716,0.0432227,0.00028423022,0.0004925913,0.93662715,0.0014990519,0.009108162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006916147,0.00013561001,0.089700736,0.0006415839,0.000035014247,0.0009844222,0.36069095,0.0016984539,0.0011890717,0.25068673,0.29410142,0.00006681639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077822424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17156027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077822424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059563746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026839233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1547389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170212252","doi":"10.1017/s1744552307004077","title":"Bills of Rights as process: the Canadian experience","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Articulation (sociology); Process (computing); Charter; Law and economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Product (mathematics); Fundamental rights; Law; Sociology; Public administration; Human rights; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03309545042952662,"score_gpt":0.3659922449062566,"score_spread":0.33289679447673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170212252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18835597,0.008329234,0.0040203957,0.13896371,0.00101395,0.00023498523,0.00043632596,0.00012650198,0.6585189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9008913,0.005040248,0.0020146258,0.009085208,0.0000985325,0.00006504823,0.00012564231,0.00012323639,0.08255614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746062,0.006749354,0.00056850654,0.0018761879,0.0091679925,0.007031717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98423517,0.006001929,0.00068764726,0.0006894616,0.004989178,0.003396495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013220837,0.000835374,0.0010196932,0.0031429764,0.09040851,0.019175205,0.00400664,0.008149038,0.011842012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025607686,0.000949067,0.00082651706,0.008758184,0.04887673,0.0073439665,0.007987749,0.012460674,0.0007966753],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059719347,0.000054309472,0.0020128677,0.00015194718,0.000010925818,0.0012908314,0.36218303,0.0005791988,0.00047444005,0.577577,0.03495653,0.0206492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003095031,0.00003583423,0.0030400837,0.00031605735,0.000020459578,0.00034570182,0.20370042,0.0005404653,0.00034452803,0.01597331,0.77549726,0.00015488295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99582493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31944343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31944343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31996757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78934914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171575193","doi":"10.1017/s1744552314000019","title":"The narratives of geographical indications","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Wine Industry and Tourism","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Narrative; Sociology; Mode (computer interface); Aesthetics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017824244793314875,"score_gpt":0.26679139087245946,"score_spread":0.24896714607914458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171575193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80955887,0.0011915987,0.006820309,0.014669003,0.00015460642,0.00006805611,0.00026846858,0.00003761424,0.16723135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968054,0.00023613905,0.00043389172,0.00013100158,0.000007913987,0.0000120713485,0.000026471036,0.000010496606,0.00233654],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927967,0.0052835653,0.00020201252,0.00028285486,0.00089509983,0.00053981866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894699,0.007236775,0.0012693495,0.0006278147,0.00078810443,0.0006081264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052052527,0.00045172125,0.00030393276,0.001607286,0.007276622,0.008631405,0.0012577245,0.0019731685,0.002936078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013850408,0.00034450964,0.00025595055,0.0026125032,0.025798213,0.007023997,0.0070114536,0.002925772,0.00020170705],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040844327,0.0000078405465,0.0018019559,0.00005898389,0.0000042534753,0.0008457881,0.7687392,0.00029194617,0.00041129513,0.2218824,0.001609987,0.004305462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007436406,0.000016234073,0.0016011571,0.00023235203,0.000007612879,0.00034229155,0.8381276,0.00047716207,0.0004344034,0.01977598,0.13895571,0.000022102817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027665114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024884654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027665114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008299483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041390317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06021726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200768038","doi":"10.1017/s1744552308003042","title":"Should we use the criminal law to punish HIV transmission?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntariness; Criminal law; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Transmission (telecommunications); Political science; Sexual transmission; Commission; Law; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Sexual assault; Psychology; Virology; Poison control; Medicine; Suicide prevention; Geography","score_opus":0.10779706126197551,"score_gpt":0.37438372832617584,"score_spread":0.2665866670642003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200768038","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004937778,0.007522724,0.0018062684,0.95637304,0.0023533772,0.000025165644,0.000023117971,0.000027965334,0.026930561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34844714,0.020821152,0.0054990468,0.5964624,0.00502842,0.00016801537,0.000053641103,0.000115311086,0.02340486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988309,0.00631843,0.0003399289,0.0008645388,0.00214171,0.0020264115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98221177,0.008263695,0.0019595956,0.0012194728,0.0034839879,0.0028615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013311101,0.00053701474,0.00071304885,0.0016532518,0.007317003,0.009810776,0.0024391748,0.020738548,0.009404581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066179246,0.00044525214,0.0005920618,0.0010539788,0.034621373,0.021440363,0.0037571213,0.020330645,0.0027265355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006598188,0.00026853848,0.008001409,0.00028323987,0.00007209255,0.0005267106,0.007794927,0.00028385574,0.00029704778,0.6448097,0.22215901,0.11543749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007306335,0.00015361638,0.0044990964,0.002110855,0.000045215405,0.0009002072,0.01791886,0.0006142929,0.00048720767,0.5277906,0.4453005,0.00010653063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015220001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024682812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020738548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038836442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011975233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07039666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317993304","doi":"10.1017/s1744552313000037","title":"The Question for the Description of the Law. By Reidar Edvinsson, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2009. x + 113 pp. ISBN 978-3-540-70501-7, £99 hardback.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.029214662150871908,"score_gpt":0.30505415021221577,"score_spread":0.27583948806134384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317993304","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008177844,0.64667815,0.003455099,0.2268782,0.010276364,0.000018311468,0.00032433408,0.00008256416,0.1114691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11316093,0.44938943,0.008183196,0.04513307,0.014806765,0.00017066828,0.00088071584,0.0006068365,0.3676684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982591,0.00075357175,0.00010731225,0.00025697149,0.00049333705,0.00012963971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986401,0.0006925443,0.00015594436,0.00015090751,0.0002596104,0.000100869875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026548933,0.00078560447,0.0007675586,0.0018250047,0.0018008591,0.005792871,0.0015328616,0.0034301956,0.027058925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065486236,0.0005855363,0.0005241458,0.0019244573,0.01020092,0.014370978,0.0024754899,0.005223705,0.008753887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023934546,0.000010328912,0.0000921661,0.0002755132,0.00000826369,0.000054921013,0.0011439145,0.000080393154,0.00007847979,0.41588745,0.53512603,0.047218632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060074217,0.00000568531,0.00025951889,0.00083340553,0.0000031474792,0.00012547671,0.0010743688,0.00007659865,0.000052646483,0.14532225,0.85223293,0.000008081403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006700784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007985573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027058925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035838205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027662104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09052116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327854615","doi":"10.1017/s1744552314000263","title":"Accessing pension resources: the right to equality inside and out of the labour market","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Normative; Ideology; Institutionalisation; Reproduction; Welfare; Legitimacy; State (computer science); Welfare state; Distribution (mathematics); Politics; Economics; Labour economics; Race (biology); Sociology; Production (economics); Political science; Law; Market economy; Gender studies; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.05475981189709239,"score_gpt":0.3842065543059261,"score_spread":0.3294467424088337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327854615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2056416,0.0016585649,0.015326328,0.061455593,0.00029487087,0.00006251001,0.0001919086,0.00004919638,0.71531934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879501,0.00024057776,0.00063833146,0.00132441,0.00008112901,0.000030770905,0.000020844158,0.000011823845,0.009702037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99067885,0.005193338,0.00044424253,0.00081148336,0.0012557992,0.0016161323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99259394,0.0038594033,0.0006813996,0.001132907,0.00085376884,0.00087852724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008926254,0.00014314365,0.00037890565,0.00071358046,0.004743486,0.008446997,0.0009570231,0.003252856,0.007153456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017494798,0.00022479455,0.00020882675,0.0005393848,0.031840198,0.0066080266,0.009008003,0.0032381862,0.0007827019],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019625162,0.000018237131,0.0010379968,0.000017577962,0.0000037897219,0.00007072356,0.017880728,0.00009611361,0.00025078582,0.9710109,0.0019747582,0.0076186806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031645028,0.00005083358,0.004745297,0.00035711922,0.000016220974,0.00017172801,0.022394417,0.00034754616,0.0007841394,0.84774095,0.123320214,0.00003989928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007977739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063538454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008926254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00244509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004794792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047207117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343857214","doi":"10.1017/s1744552315000129","title":"Women and wrongful convictions: concepts and challenges","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Conviction; Harm; Criminal justice; Criminology; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Homicide; Law; Focus (optics); Sociology; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; History","score_opus":0.09333300553530946,"score_gpt":0.37484015361986345,"score_spread":0.281507148084554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343857214","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17312528,0.048757058,0.017200902,0.52958614,0.0016898088,0.000093210474,0.00014121877,0.00003090568,0.22937554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841145,0.0060113086,0.0007762155,0.006154065,0.0007102543,0.000057568115,0.000014375142,0.000014531726,0.0021471984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98504746,0.011049759,0.0004103356,0.00088340463,0.001429181,0.0011799015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9575146,0.033934843,0.0032712251,0.0011841706,0.0024279433,0.0016671922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020977052,0.0005252891,0.0010882625,0.0059734914,0.0075662904,0.01616887,0.0027688832,0.0053276503,0.0052641523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029576465,0.0005139474,0.0005264384,0.0035488869,0.10872193,0.016954493,0.01141638,0.00876674,0.0002614604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008657643,0.000019592395,0.002290095,0.00005568307,0.000005078244,0.00017677354,0.025504926,0.000062594336,0.000011302231,0.96443605,0.0012236983,0.0062054656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064825067,0.000018837996,0.0019559923,0.0006704448,0.0000069112616,0.00021703348,0.07688627,0.00019737393,0.00004655704,0.8979757,0.021996433,0.000022006507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009420302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007103306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020977052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009181201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063598687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11093855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465854157","doi":"10.1017/s1744552316000045","title":"‘I can't put that on paper.’ How medical professional values shape the content of death certificates","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coroner; Collegiality; Deference; Argument (complex analysis); Psychology; Professional standards; Medicine; Public relations; Medical education; Political science; Medical emergency; Social psychology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Pedagogy; Management","score_opus":0.0994454571536955,"score_gpt":0.3598549919507351,"score_spread":0.2604095347970396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465854157","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054488577,0.0048827208,0.014936345,0.75351,0.0060052364,0.00012502482,0.00038420846,0.0002037941,0.16546413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8137977,0.0036053483,0.00871555,0.10256297,0.0026491643,0.00013787785,0.00030006698,0.0003138141,0.06791743],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850738,0.0075758738,0.0005473589,0.0010628217,0.004456392,0.0012837402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95292497,0.023179514,0.005349789,0.004087643,0.011603406,0.00285465],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021547968,0.000199006,0.0003236993,0.0014324111,0.009420748,0.008398244,0.001761463,0.0030960653,0.0119315935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10991744,0.00031233043,0.0003883405,0.001713961,0.023631921,0.010003403,0.0046865423,0.0065396028,0.004019249],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000786253,0.000035282083,0.0133783035,0.00027835878,0.000031973166,0.0010164138,0.2008172,0.00019738707,0.00062842946,0.315203,0.37619033,0.09214466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022604041,0.000054514374,0.011276037,0.0009079541,0.000025810168,0.0009024091,0.06809845,0.000211428,0.0006019463,0.051594924,0.8661976,0.0001063354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06550483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08603731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99057925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010257753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011614243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13024706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472228386","doi":"10.1017/s1744552316000100","title":"Exploring fatal facts: current issues in coronial law, policy and practice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Jurisdiction; Publicity; Politics; Law reform; Law; Political science; Human rights; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.12555243700841423,"score_gpt":0.4307287500337716,"score_spread":0.30517631302535736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472228386","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012087173,0.13901979,0.0026537199,0.8299091,0.0018977231,0.000032610318,0.00006156476,0.000024933122,0.0143133635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6024719,0.27693835,0.0062787477,0.09871054,0.012271392,0.00017728229,0.000111626425,0.000060487477,0.002979576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9581246,0.027182225,0.0036635173,0.0029734203,0.0054567144,0.002599523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62997,0.3258135,0.016232943,0.005248658,0.016288064,0.0064468533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08747481,0.00035381786,0.0009806047,0.00565895,0.009416178,0.02515887,0.003954964,0.014966623,0.007765447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20208168,0.0009983806,0.00070919143,0.006005741,0.05546393,0.026486142,0.0124896215,0.014210103,0.0010640423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009795992,0.00010781421,0.005215909,0.005721602,0.000030290763,0.0008144979,0.08010968,0.00080010644,0.00034311923,0.6412434,0.041587565,0.22392805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027122105,0.00009269168,0.008249171,0.03299975,0.00004077837,0.0009130999,0.16298968,0.0006404912,0.00032656873,0.4797033,0.3138511,0.00016638818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02295034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03130056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08747481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017448239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03822458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4626165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604633643","doi":"10.1017/s1744552315000178","title":"Refashioning vagrancy: a tale of Law's narrative of its imagination","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Vagrancy; Narrative; Sociology; Constitution; Relation (database); Law; Aesthetics; Criminology; Political science; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.040597409719370196,"score_gpt":0.35926888372387034,"score_spread":0.31867147400450013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604633643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2020689,0.0059606866,0.02179171,0.101445556,0.0018299576,0.00007454703,0.000098976016,0.00022342485,0.66650623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98439884,0.0005423208,0.0007228006,0.0016665201,0.00016823136,0.000029350718,0.00001593426,0.00009082328,0.01236506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993194,0.0048984643,0.00008528477,0.00046296528,0.0007618375,0.00059739174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947831,0.0037106744,0.00028512496,0.00041770298,0.0004302859,0.00037317118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056105764,0.00078638794,0.0004950999,0.0026107857,0.0150060905,0.017074984,0.0020547397,0.004792758,0.0038180996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011220099,0.00037249882,0.0004474822,0.0011164406,0.09991802,0.014335535,0.008010873,0.010746887,0.0004288034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001352805,0.00001354938,0.00010545884,0.000020053927,0.0000014206353,0.00020311175,0.22772825,0.00007661495,0.0001402429,0.76732033,0.0025015026,0.0018760357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022531462,0.000055246142,0.00038188064,0.00034767878,0.000008360822,0.00041859105,0.34906107,0.0009072705,0.0006427048,0.32218483,0.32592246,0.00004738156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010243834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009228503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017074984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010305037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031694209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0747686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803002060","doi":"10.1017/s1744552308003017","title":"Professional monopolies and divisive practices in law: ‘les femmes juridiques’ in civil law, Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Education, sociology, and vocational training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Habitus; Political science; Cultural capital; Practice of law; Representation (politics); Sociology; Legal education; Competition (biology); Capital (architecture); Geography","score_opus":0.233001727346931,"score_gpt":0.48282713828207224,"score_spread":0.24982541093514124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803002060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786886,0.0014441962,0.000120532015,0.0047146226,0.00004052249,0.000024741388,0.00015043675,0.0000055282,0.014810861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98563564,0.0009109511,0.00012593323,0.00061881257,0.000010067498,0.000013145102,0.00009003957,0.0000070693054,0.012588276],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759775,0.00032007165,0.000039295424,0.00020953911,0.00052032835,0.0013131412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976083,0.00045989774,0.00025117848,0.000042342057,0.0006798099,0.0009584553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014800464,0.00025932436,0.00039892836,0.00222504,0.031438462,0.004754236,0.0017423815,0.0018031312,0.006548959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036197691,0.00041136175,0.00025262183,0.0035042479,0.007101988,0.0016145317,0.0027464386,0.0025986703,0.00035317504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104734434,0.00019326543,0.14031449,0.000118988595,0.000020236155,0.0023772633,0.78014404,0.00024116032,0.0008976246,0.020530317,0.014770998,0.040286854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010313592,0.000040330735,0.24179275,0.00020509941,0.000013205683,0.00061335054,0.68278164,0.00033687713,0.00021403209,0.000691997,0.07323815,0.00006221707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99707794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095319405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.095319405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09044279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6915939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949802397","doi":"10.1017/s1744552319000144","title":"Intimacy in bordered globalisation: theory and method - Review symposium of Daphna Hacker , Legalized Families in the Era of Bordered Globalization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, 385 pp. ISBN: 978-1-107-14499-6 Hardback) Guest Edited by Susan B. Boyd , Peter A. Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hacker; Globalization; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Economic history; Law; History","score_opus":0.011948231453024885,"score_gpt":0.27563354710875965,"score_spread":0.2636853156557348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949802397","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017600684,0.985268,0.00059767516,0.0113440845,0.0010432393,0.000042476226,0.00005286191,0.000007768163,0.0014679034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006117065,0.9851607,0.0020662174,0.003371383,0.0011385668,0.00024703666,0.00008759993,0.000028179866,0.0017831885],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98499,0.01062084,0.0009569532,0.0008047434,0.0023823367,0.00024515355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9508387,0.038101573,0.0024600916,0.0013235083,0.006545053,0.00073100097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024199553,0.0011053465,0.0027663235,0.009655035,0.001592813,0.00803266,0.0022315197,0.0031230827,0.008300629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04075789,0.00088981877,0.001421795,0.015417116,0.0069094016,0.010005442,0.004796974,0.004444164,0.0019540137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007777376,0.000067468434,0.0010148666,0.05283995,0.00038942808,0.00015269723,0.011297902,0.00048269946,0.0002651622,0.075586185,0.29085046,0.5669754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032737666,0.00006715117,0.0034093983,0.12653512,0.00027760473,0.0003094938,0.009410285,0.0001877079,0.00031873846,0.039049298,0.82030594,0.0000965776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016023891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024199553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008947134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017918821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.127981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950022340","doi":"10.1017/s1744552319000156","title":"Co-ordinating family expectations - Review symposium of Daphna Hacker , Legalized Families in the Era of Bordered Globalization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, 385 pp. ISBN: 978-1-107-14499-6 Hardback) Guest Edited by Susan B. Boyd , Peter A. Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hacker; Globalization; Media studies; Sociology; Economic history; Political science; Law; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.014211752428919266,"score_gpt":0.266413786562389,"score_spread":0.25220203413346975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950022340","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007398069,0.9384219,0.000060610848,0.049116407,0.010051765,0.000009117863,0.000060634895,0.0000065466643,0.002198909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039348723,0.95444995,0.00018479918,0.020637676,0.011664725,0.00005788953,0.00014080813,0.000029770687,0.008899468],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99520564,0.0018818737,0.00039343763,0.00037882055,0.0018391815,0.00030113594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814643,0.0064268927,0.0012090137,0.00043601307,0.008738919,0.0017248205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073335627,0.00143103,0.001946985,0.0055254586,0.0022315385,0.00494885,0.0018741925,0.0046977745,0.015430839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021382598,0.0007066416,0.0009318064,0.00605303,0.003515612,0.0063156392,0.0036713316,0.00679692,0.005209158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019647103,0.000008743446,0.00011790816,0.0025261906,0.00002071563,0.000039640654,0.00058208784,0.00004755123,0.0000410155,0.0028689604,0.93250275,0.06122485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010164591,0.000013857171,0.0013724176,0.011844074,0.00003205862,0.00020314085,0.001298103,0.000019847133,0.00005431141,0.002643423,0.9824751,0.00003353287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058034852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0717016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058034852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012353996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021253986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115394056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951512047","doi":"10.1017/s1744552319000077","title":"Fairness, accountability and transparency: notes on algorithmic decision-making in criminal justice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Blame; Status quo; Big data; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Optimism; Law and economics; Political science; Abstraction; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.057647867856363236,"score_gpt":0.4215282451482901,"score_spread":0.3638803772919269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951512047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032026485,0.012923404,0.19195195,0.3717367,0.0032783053,0.00020337659,0.00013088147,0.000116410716,0.38763246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94676036,0.0028427627,0.023820236,0.015454405,0.0026517562,0.00023465992,0.000025597468,0.00009282268,0.008117473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9423111,0.04131514,0.001710726,0.002975407,0.008394951,0.0032927466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8477025,0.13229841,0.004652381,0.0073262122,0.0065766317,0.001443861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051432874,0.0008235929,0.0011842252,0.0029262907,0.007483555,0.0151586225,0.002948709,0.0104717985,0.005676108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10829877,0.0005289944,0.001575704,0.0025744152,0.07169493,0.016360736,0.008450016,0.016225211,0.000677786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000611233,0.0000052630157,0.0000737279,0.0000129714945,0.0000043853784,0.000016835644,0.0002117918,0.00083837734,0.00001001872,0.99695086,0.00067947013,0.0011901916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000505967,0.0000034567615,0.000045335237,0.000036288704,0.0000024646258,0.000006559299,0.00007746146,0.001229511,0.00002958272,0.99602807,0.002530366,0.000005845478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0085812695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003956223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051432874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011922434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009020502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27200633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974694872","doi":"10.1017/s1744552319000284","title":"Comparing legal styles","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Comparative law; Style (visual arts); Scholarship; Political science; Law; Globalization; Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Divergence (linguistics); Comparative research; Identity (music); Legal research; Sociology; Law and economics; Social science; Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.06641153170401724,"score_gpt":0.3785980862439102,"score_spread":0.31218655453989297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974694872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48300743,0.0014225525,0.0077705476,0.0029804304,0.00015939157,0.00011403604,0.0006879103,0.000073045514,0.5037847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935322,0.00031471747,0.0013389704,0.00019584273,0.00003448713,0.000022991748,0.00024668017,0.000025971374,0.004288196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932215,0.0028457218,0.00036418223,0.00045668293,0.0023974008,0.00071451976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814292,0.008807975,0.0030187764,0.0014503854,0.0039732354,0.0013203794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045324275,0.00025685187,0.00027362694,0.0071408344,0.0020159283,0.0061633578,0.00065653113,0.00081141543,0.014488198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027777642,0.000106512736,0.00028857507,0.0048404206,0.0047540083,0.0038106437,0.0029053409,0.00088076777,0.0012662471],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020999284,0.000078607765,0.0901902,0.00023675023,0.00007154111,0.00044114707,0.08253979,0.0007210018,0.001211852,0.7082683,0.0076909503,0.108339824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007109325,0.00030650676,0.2707748,0.0009714613,0.00009110254,0.0012510885,0.16156532,0.0030633071,0.0015551734,0.29463726,0.26560265,0.00011016074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007164969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014488198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030083132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095581246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048467815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3019987319","doi":"10.1017/s1744552320000051","title":"Indigenous rights in the context of oil and gas pipelines in Canada: exposing naturalised power structures through a lens of intersectionality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Situated; Pipeline transport; Pipeline (software); Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economy; Geography; Economics; Engineering; Ecology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02792226136437441,"score_gpt":0.3097843392168419,"score_spread":0.2818620778524675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3019987319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47072223,0.0027004727,0.005045453,0.029512,0.00009600091,0.00014205292,0.00019453568,0.000031563595,0.4915557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927106,0.00045272944,0.0005385242,0.00037857346,0.00001174321,0.00001923701,0.000014455997,0.00000785078,0.0058662156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99288684,0.001775453,0.000101535974,0.0004170517,0.0014853732,0.0033337355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99446964,0.0026863916,0.00046073546,0.00027397837,0.0011022097,0.0010071784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004254787,0.00042280462,0.0005748078,0.0036837447,0.03743617,0.016721739,0.0027887963,0.003181171,0.006055263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006287345,0.00040661343,0.00043246057,0.004767761,0.10278115,0.005150951,0.011393961,0.0049218005,0.00016420847],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012638584,0.000018886436,0.0021679876,0.000042096446,0.000008896443,0.000577347,0.28434446,0.000563346,0.00020711706,0.70645016,0.0012835753,0.0043234183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001575685,0.000021802116,0.012847546,0.0004247632,0.00003490114,0.00019892961,0.7252301,0.0011424064,0.00030028197,0.13867666,0.12101328,0.00009366111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9877359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18544598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18544598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17412479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94476724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124810699","doi":"10.1017/s1744552317000180","title":"Representing Canadian justice: legal iconography and symbolism at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Iconography; Supreme court; Law; Legal culture; Sociology; Politics; Premise; Economic Justice; Democracy; Legal history; Political science; History; Art history; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.023210687881393872,"score_gpt":0.3129553996394149,"score_spread":0.289744711758021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124810699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4017484,0.004967201,0.0034252678,0.044681486,0.0007265874,0.00006805043,0.0005689867,0.00011666513,0.54369736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828166,0.00072636956,0.00048226622,0.00076283,0.000022653352,0.000008258872,0.000042799682,0.000029934354,0.015108222],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970962,0.00067851355,0.00004372292,0.00028754823,0.0009826139,0.0009113626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996816,0.0010131851,0.00017053077,0.00013533996,0.0011208788,0.0007440554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017470839,0.0005323193,0.00041611388,0.003058417,0.04569801,0.015079843,0.00182423,0.0021840534,0.010449366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047181454,0.00028086625,0.0002736053,0.0044159833,0.032943614,0.002640216,0.004114942,0.0035549407,0.00031284272],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051997093,0.000026017036,0.0056397202,0.000106114945,0.000017992901,0.0013274417,0.5678062,0.0006859465,0.0011804096,0.35194948,0.040301614,0.03090711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008316707,0.000024564139,0.013243371,0.00030265065,0.000033284952,0.00039584783,0.4684493,0.0008153912,0.0006809987,0.014717684,0.50118786,0.00014080683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9938584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15211013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15211013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11883998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98343205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128418895","doi":"10.1017/s1744552320000427","title":"Transcarceral lawscapes enacted in moments of Aboriginalisation: a case-study of an Indigenous woman released on urban parole","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Prison; Coercion (linguistics); Michel foucault; Sociology; Discipline; Field (mathematics); Power (physics); Space (punctuation); Criminology; Law; Social science; Political science; Politics; Ecology","score_opus":0.03819199297291951,"score_gpt":0.3577425165597778,"score_spread":0.31955052358685826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128418895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850648,0.00087121996,0.0006277442,0.0035851272,0.00012196611,0.00012352075,0.000083562125,0.000012974727,0.009509091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98915315,0.0010207067,0.00057534804,0.0006007546,0.000052591866,0.000066869085,0.00003885981,0.000023441153,0.0084682945],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968663,0.0017516664,0.000101056845,0.00026994248,0.00040258732,0.0006084414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996858,0.0014883901,0.0004524634,0.00021558552,0.00033723714,0.00064825185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023778647,0.00077026634,0.00090190425,0.0016444103,0.022615632,0.0042216475,0.0030640722,0.0040832423,0.006251239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063656936,0.0008674143,0.0006048255,0.001241115,0.011777749,0.002207435,0.0067364112,0.0056590526,0.0009238647],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032344724,0.00007069792,0.0034027023,0.00011585246,0.000007377755,0.02603706,0.9653959,0.000035701185,0.00047484558,0.0018350926,0.00060552475,0.0019868552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017903517,0.000054800985,0.0031881214,0.00012710202,0.0000068943514,0.0061746817,0.9836195,0.00004392432,0.00021624679,0.00026844547,0.006282838,0.000015784099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06028555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19840388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06028555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070972517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048939716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11986929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164537606","doi":"10.1017/s1744552321000161","title":"Myth and concealment at colonial law's foundations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Colonialism; Negation; Racism; Law; Sociology; Work (physics); Epistemology; Political science; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03274311785472162,"score_gpt":0.3593945095243192,"score_spread":0.32665139166959756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164537606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20576845,0.018020362,0.022177186,0.23613958,0.001423202,0.000045167497,0.0000875507,0.00009551742,0.516243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914607,0.0009348905,0.0008253504,0.0022378422,0.00024128325,0.000017485569,0.000006819269,0.000022111084,0.0042536077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939126,0.0035875528,0.00015316725,0.0007934093,0.00085466175,0.0006986618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915193,0.005630223,0.0006804571,0.0010136215,0.00070400385,0.00045245854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076749376,0.00028788752,0.0005460919,0.0019295877,0.009488796,0.012293599,0.0014394115,0.004434247,0.0031599833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013387174,0.00039116913,0.00032548953,0.001044882,0.09721753,0.011395642,0.006551261,0.0081115505,0.00025253682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051498164,0.000004481784,0.000108878805,0.000011163499,0.0000017423589,0.000056394183,0.018516812,0.000052787153,0.00003920777,0.9789908,0.00093740557,0.0012752459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011399163,0.000015212201,0.0004788522,0.00024853664,0.0000069034973,0.00020193496,0.014292246,0.00041490354,0.00023079848,0.90094143,0.08313682,0.000020885065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0101738395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068996744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012293599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007803042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056615293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164813521","doi":"10.1017/s1744552321000197","title":"Improvising with Peter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Scholarship; Kindness; Improvisation; Active listening; Relation (database); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Art; Psychology; Law; Visual arts; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.021045785279795726,"score_gpt":0.3231918301694952,"score_spread":0.3021460448896995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164813521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33221713,0.0021786147,0.025482353,0.07194836,0.0032817323,0.0002453685,0.00016555237,0.00058733387,0.56389356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8670399,0.0006073669,0.0040978077,0.0034425643,0.00036488354,0.00008068545,0.000044251636,0.00017750268,0.12414508],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843866,0.00073332275,0.00003204357,0.00020970353,0.0003763578,0.00020992223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974618,0.0014661351,0.0001930593,0.00020316067,0.0002287279,0.00044705006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011198849,0.00045057968,0.00020917009,0.0006137333,0.007073297,0.004153833,0.0006404366,0.0018163051,0.022458645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007499532,0.00016761551,0.00018623626,0.00033242418,0.0073062317,0.0032931124,0.004104269,0.004825724,0.0036892372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022009073,0.0001217431,0.0019094445,0.00033496518,0.000014257399,0.00396792,0.5941723,0.00028545488,0.009941307,0.20411003,0.08568164,0.099240914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012768094,0.00015199007,0.0013860615,0.00044857347,0.00001185187,0.0029856798,0.26342186,0.0005924537,0.0064502615,0.019270444,0.7052252,0.000042878335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016675569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030401251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022458645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001323306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012216228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075131655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205556454","doi":"10.1017/s1744552321000392","title":"Qualified to be deviant: stigma-management strategies among Chinese leftover women","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Stigma (botany); Queer; Human sexuality; Identity (music); Gender studies; Population; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.025144366741383553,"score_gpt":0.35512987953418984,"score_spread":0.3299855127928063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205556454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99302423,0.00022472884,0.00008960733,0.0018301106,0.000018693027,0.000017880204,0.00000612098,0.0000028553181,0.004785803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981805,0.00017194127,0.000042183947,0.00031003164,0.0000065675836,0.000007634473,0.000005770711,0.0000013266333,0.0012740911],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889356,0.00034580487,0.000052601546,0.00007279235,0.0002372445,0.0003980201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883586,0.00029680473,0.0003558157,0.00007048803,0.00012324427,0.00031784523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001735208,0.0002898708,0.00026412954,0.0010262664,0.009228333,0.002313183,0.00070455234,0.00084465486,0.0036495915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002692567,0.00019655713,0.00027652702,0.0007461509,0.005561688,0.001817181,0.0036607857,0.001283929,0.00020477481],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036445337,0.0001219526,0.10849246,0.000092898576,0.000013301301,0.0023571365,0.85596555,0.000042003452,0.0018041269,0.006815597,0.0013814371,0.022877077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009080254,0.00007397203,0.061526444,0.00019965193,0.000021149044,0.00063928775,0.92333496,0.00033889883,0.00054757425,0.0018296087,0.011448591,0.000030854895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04676315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05637269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04676315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00385186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043811444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092981935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205717149","doi":"10.1017/s1744552321000380","title":"Stigmatisation, identities and the law: Asian and comparative perspectives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Content analysis; Political science; Law; Sociology; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03274287025853858,"score_gpt":0.3485797787596692,"score_spread":0.31583690850113066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205717149","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31488082,0.09499886,0.001781631,0.07550561,0.0017932061,0.00006478911,0.00007883574,0.000023526567,0.5108728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525822,0.028240174,0.0003735386,0.0031862955,0.00049528317,0.0000664107,0.000023291412,0.000019918345,0.015012826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969721,0.0020910804,0.00012412273,0.0001157196,0.00026142405,0.00043551758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664474,0.0019288223,0.0005390677,0.00018996105,0.00031784558,0.00037965062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058268835,0.00043919747,0.00044414238,0.0028274728,0.009043732,0.013679162,0.0012379864,0.0030124292,0.005201967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036749109,0.00023785605,0.00034124736,0.007004983,0.028643128,0.011688663,0.0057372684,0.0034192284,0.00041060796],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021807298,0.00005742862,0.0020154172,0.0003795447,0.000007284843,0.0007478566,0.43975255,0.000053595046,0.00021794495,0.54194975,0.0025936505,0.012203264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000923407,0.00006343267,0.008895445,0.0016501654,0.000019074063,0.00066638895,0.75825864,0.00020470089,0.000305185,0.056378596,0.17351775,0.00003131786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017638966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01991735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017638966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010397574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056698783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07543999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226150996","doi":"10.1017/s1744552322000015","title":"In or against the state? Hospitality and hostility in homelessness charities and deportation practice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Deportation; Sociology; State (computer science); Citizenship; Corporate governance; Social exclusion; Public administration; Immigration; Political science; Criminology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04934695451406467,"score_gpt":0.4275496487775462,"score_spread":0.3782026942634815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226150996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9182005,0.001657684,0.0003583402,0.04139214,0.00015249674,0.000013853209,0.000015268728,0.000012862662,0.038196865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980051,0.00022717247,0.000020256217,0.00058182725,0.000019493706,0.0000028759387,0.0000014334381,0.000002741313,0.0011391853],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955772,0.0028529337,0.00010167866,0.0001605964,0.00028278274,0.0010246972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930112,0.0030347286,0.0016393489,0.00024475416,0.0004263076,0.0016436916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004746071,0.00010057935,0.00020966148,0.0010355574,0.0099604465,0.007404139,0.0008390961,0.0017673394,0.0061674276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0081891455,0.00022749863,0.00013498789,0.001015837,0.031277653,0.0030649898,0.0082583325,0.0028477125,0.00027130952],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003605248,0.00006971947,0.019972563,0.000107404165,0.0000064414967,0.0009426259,0.8779352,0.000070540154,0.00018199929,0.08438499,0.0045881076,0.0117044775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005681685,0.000037917132,0.01334307,0.00031439008,0.0000035036942,0.00028436384,0.95821327,0.000056473575,0.00007044362,0.0041423417,0.02351272,0.000015903814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030165633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04711928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030165633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070579946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056165652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059980094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300960989","doi":"10.1017/s1744552322000489","title":"Communal Justice in Shakespeare's England: Drama, Law, and Emotion By Penelope Geng, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2021. 257 pp. ISBN: 9781487508043 $75.00 (hardback)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Drama; Economic Justice; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Political science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.015365663588426523,"score_gpt":0.2788610716912361,"score_spread":0.2634954081028096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300960989","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017433412,0.6463223,0.00055495667,0.15796307,0.0055806353,0.000020744998,0.00019354554,0.00008460412,0.17184673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49840027,0.13852873,0.00043583894,0.014216398,0.0021959955,0.000068178735,0.00010657642,0.00012358696,0.34592435],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992725,0.00037961517,0.00002057016,0.00006395293,0.00014495161,0.00011829636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992499,0.00036198916,0.00008005235,0.000035069603,0.00009087424,0.0001821334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009787625,0.0005817486,0.00044848828,0.0007094507,0.007201741,0.0061448854,0.00055772456,0.0022689558,0.011211189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001989706,0.00035407094,0.00016751324,0.0014771242,0.012657391,0.0043693692,0.002167463,0.002687478,0.0019104097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033457312,0.000021605085,0.0007316979,0.00031631286,0.000012387521,0.00048894476,0.2278741,0.000062448395,0.00013861469,0.060591333,0.67262983,0.037099306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059235977,0.000011152705,0.0048274756,0.0007484635,0.0000035723983,0.00027036513,0.11118994,0.0000305586,0.000043991,0.006596241,0.87625515,0.000017114462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17656338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32776183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17656338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060642064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043715253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35107136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387103439","doi":"10.1017/s1744552323000228","title":"Deliberative Experience and the Civic Aspirations of Legal Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Queen Mary University of London","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Democracy; Scholarship; Politics; Legal education; Sociology; Law; Political science; Civic engagement; Public administration","score_opus":0.07293135299148787,"score_gpt":0.4386718920952426,"score_spread":0.3657405391037547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387103439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8816729,0.00023341658,0.0025052968,0.0057159564,0.000043385968,0.00002938563,0.000010308068,0.000020076443,0.109769255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861026,0.000032572007,0.00013388263,0.0001227652,0.0000046417426,0.0000047043027,0.0000025935515,0.000003322522,0.0010853795],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99159664,0.006095242,0.00015269322,0.00042732817,0.0009072569,0.00082082616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907607,0.005050222,0.0011659542,0.0005559693,0.00048632672,0.0019808533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007919784,0.00017356715,0.00023131781,0.001055662,0.0073356666,0.01136264,0.0006449198,0.0017380468,0.00566675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009936152,0.00022434321,0.0002518549,0.00043262632,0.028205652,0.0048318626,0.011141403,0.0038757517,0.0003723955],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048158643,0.0004824153,0.018841112,0.00009524369,0.000014953607,0.00043986386,0.78441936,0.00025188606,0.0011576575,0.17676571,0.001462231,0.016021369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047822243,0.00020468346,0.024645923,0.00029423708,0.000015973563,0.00056209817,0.7835399,0.00096461945,0.00087799376,0.099715106,0.08906073,0.00007087311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014854819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024807127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01136264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002367127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002797739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041884363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387895001","doi":"10.1017/s1744552323000253","title":"The immigrant versus the state: The marginal contribution of tribunal judges to administrative justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Appeal; Immigration; Bureaucracy; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.06347462636925948,"score_gpt":0.38988330320280884,"score_spread":0.32640867683354935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387895001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92153573,0.00076234626,0.0010848199,0.012973346,0.00009557264,0.000033583852,0.00003338405,0.000008128432,0.063473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989009,0.000052307638,0.000058044625,0.00043779716,0.000025018713,0.0000053652943,0.000003531141,0.0000020836615,0.0005150494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785567,0.012306843,0.00061779766,0.0013050009,0.0035177947,0.0036958577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90573955,0.06248882,0.008815945,0.0036360885,0.01245241,0.006867259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021979876,0.00009160967,0.00038111547,0.0016263431,0.009331984,0.008800684,0.0014177583,0.0016505978,0.0048153135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10252936,0.00020799293,0.00021897034,0.0015265566,0.013585907,0.0028959834,0.004055374,0.003299031,0.00027671162],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025497525,0.0003338805,0.2636922,0.00019352467,0.000105970386,0.0028540425,0.24110444,0.0008605567,0.0016457912,0.39823923,0.013865053,0.07685047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081735845,0.00035780884,0.4944079,0.0008294983,0.00014766514,0.0011535437,0.34149548,0.0028348134,0.001310439,0.086571604,0.07065538,0.00015415119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066106625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21424446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066106625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071106823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010394463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13144368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402317321","doi":"10.1017/s1744552324000181","title":"The social construction of childhood: is a minimum age of marriage attainable in plural societies?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Sociology; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01858541913049665,"score_gpt":0.3188866371314921,"score_spread":0.30030121800099546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402317321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6906622,0.0042562387,0.015373757,0.022102771,0.00019570687,0.000050923412,0.00008534673,0.000047937672,0.26722503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984049,0.00028378368,0.0004416113,0.00011826254,0.000017680512,0.000006055916,0.000007330385,0.0000063096545,0.0007139892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936469,0.004551939,0.00017220428,0.00045600295,0.00051753025,0.0006553304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956054,0.0017707896,0.00092724484,0.00048004216,0.00046915928,0.00074722467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063961884,0.00020086621,0.00033609092,0.0013750009,0.00899429,0.007487835,0.00078735186,0.0013440037,0.0024590795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006064097,0.00025773695,0.0001948252,0.0010671873,0.06134516,0.0051857186,0.007065247,0.0022657337,0.00014480093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020379672,0.000020869766,0.0048651304,0.000039128463,0.0000043438854,0.00023493363,0.23304091,0.00012812112,0.00042637973,0.75370264,0.00043756052,0.007079603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000118504,0.000104208324,0.017700262,0.00065459806,0.00001859367,0.000667497,0.49632093,0.0004905818,0.00085172406,0.36766553,0.11545869,0.000055444463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010587908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010645192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010587908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005610651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041544107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040708244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402647563","doi":"10.1017/s174455232400020x","title":"Socio-Legal Instabilities in Ukraine's Wartime Compensation Law for Damaged and Destroyed Residential Property","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Land Use and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Compensation (psychology); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03405640236540714,"score_gpt":0.33619019761222274,"score_spread":0.3021337952468156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402647563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9572338,0.0012882724,0.0014909246,0.008240848,0.000041339514,0.000053012798,0.000101676924,0.000020418263,0.031529758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987185,0.0001178595,0.00021972819,0.000271191,0.000006310065,0.000007690954,0.0000136849,0.0000021465066,0.0006429622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.992516,0.0028481053,0.00092544366,0.00058340124,0.0018894315,0.0012377016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786164,0.013185554,0.003906065,0.001013146,0.0026506544,0.0006281879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012561086,0.00008837107,0.00028485857,0.0028198226,0.005365186,0.008006822,0.0012450621,0.0019702117,0.0018235978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021373557,0.00031729697,0.00023332174,0.002577054,0.007904849,0.0027644825,0.004059835,0.0021695462,0.00011895414],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010299313,0.00021942047,0.17996459,0.00033012094,0.00008761186,0.009712858,0.1703079,0.0038020797,0.0026658054,0.58417773,0.0045876703,0.044041228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025297424,0.00023236072,0.4038025,0.0015860359,0.00012108027,0.003726696,0.33632457,0.0076145674,0.0035958288,0.12374738,0.11899074,0.00023301982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052951325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07752446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052951325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012589181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010081094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10528624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406246085","doi":"10.1017/s1744552324000405","title":"Climate futures in the time of the unbroken asset","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Asset (computer security); Economics; Financial economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.048836903803171974,"score_gpt":0.2941233003034688,"score_spread":0.24528639650029682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406246085","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33886606,0.01634602,0.09506044,0.07067793,0.0017209866,0.00004742766,0.00040240953,0.00012875343,0.47675002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99249786,0.0010136499,0.0021879035,0.000523517,0.00015416618,0.000010747902,0.0000264215,0.000020429105,0.003565158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883074,0.0005684534,0.000046331363,0.00015393265,0.00023757825,0.00016306106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976973,0.0011356041,0.0003350098,0.00025108978,0.00035157372,0.00022934376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027705336,0.00017115308,0.00023046277,0.0010719585,0.0024031582,0.0066990834,0.00062225334,0.0019322683,0.004467994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071957638,0.00013811243,0.00021287071,0.0011289836,0.013495737,0.010748246,0.0032832453,0.0028993657,0.00027804554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010219274,0.00000233113,0.00014064688,0.0000061453948,8.2272e-7,0.000050920567,0.0013784113,0.00026285194,0.00005310006,0.9956197,0.00046980873,0.0020049664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002415684,0.000012191371,0.0005563099,0.00007332856,0.0000024616995,0.00008301959,0.002062729,0.0008734606,0.00015439736,0.9596906,0.036475126,0.000013935921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032487232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002476028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066990834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033925166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013668544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024614573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410477996","doi":"10.1017/s1744552325000072","title":"From avoidance to empowerment? Understanding the (in)significance of the law for migrant care workers in Austria","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Empowerment; Sociology; Demographic economics; Political science; Law; Criminology; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.061433664840476014,"score_gpt":0.3864376354236998,"score_spread":0.3250039705832238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410477996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93769526,0.0025467887,0.0009912287,0.02648538,0.0001368635,0.000025674892,0.000011984149,0.000008077638,0.03209871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823344,0.00041751025,0.000094813884,0.00051038305,0.000015220505,0.000010684357,0.0000024499677,0.0000027874205,0.0007126395],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915992,0.0058022463,0.00020870246,0.0003836576,0.00055252964,0.0014536858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99339527,0.00423124,0.0011061538,0.00015850793,0.00028508445,0.0008237267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009427731,0.00029669618,0.0004292989,0.0012813306,0.007962651,0.00949906,0.0011644308,0.003248266,0.0030209308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009151531,0.00036310288,0.0002563875,0.0006785622,0.025949962,0.0072555137,0.0074517787,0.0043295408,0.00019545334],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012675595,0.000029839468,0.0027400262,0.000058719394,0.0000033143865,0.0005034959,0.9685413,0.000032764307,0.00020931984,0.023191946,0.00052592094,0.0041506994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044156213,0.000018956565,0.0025082482,0.00026415483,0.0000030027384,0.00017455788,0.9808832,0.000077851066,0.00005764862,0.0045846575,0.011415935,0.000007416732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077897194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009210641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00949906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059131593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005058815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049859166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411909166","doi":"10.1017/s1744552325100128","title":"Shakespeare’s Theater of Judgment: Six Keywords By Kevin Curran , Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2024. 208 pp.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Historical Art and Culture Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Curran; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Materials science","score_opus":0.0213656449858782,"score_gpt":0.24424288371886768,"score_spread":0.22287723873298948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411909166","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013747488,0.6278218,0.0037126413,0.12937927,0.015441978,0.000031430398,0.0004183692,0.00010439937,0.22171532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.086676456,0.27656573,0.004713514,0.015513783,0.0064657563,0.00009897169,0.00044723088,0.00044225706,0.6090763],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984977,0.000625321,0.00010068356,0.0001529416,0.0004884654,0.00013487348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810827,0.0009922853,0.000105801635,0.00015226095,0.00046893192,0.0001724803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021520895,0.0010164856,0.00057688,0.0021087774,0.0040413486,0.006229842,0.0009716626,0.0027653382,0.01825238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006625635,0.00073169544,0.00040971546,0.0028882474,0.0069368314,0.010171443,0.0017855972,0.0044804187,0.007143432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023071063,0.000008212789,0.00009403738,0.00020074952,0.0000053278386,0.00008022866,0.0036052386,0.00006634793,0.00008746834,0.072123796,0.87669045,0.04701497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026685573,0.0000031756701,0.00040104805,0.00041344968,0.000002122683,0.00008623287,0.0016315094,0.000029178338,0.00006199717,0.016217155,0.98114324,0.000008184979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036925748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08032419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036925748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050875526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055930773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0734216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415907553","doi":"10.1017/s1744552325100207","title":"Social reproduction and migrant labour: extending the view to Sicilian olive groves and tomato greenhouses","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sicilian; Reproduction; Social reproduction; Construct (python library); Silence; Work (physics); Agriculture","score_opus":0.023605982060680947,"score_gpt":0.3128357780527831,"score_spread":0.2892297959921022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415907553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36622506,0.0058942307,0.003936604,0.045143247,0.00029764086,0.00006692874,0.000043092194,0.000023072607,0.57837003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907568,0.0009936393,0.0003384168,0.001370826,0.00017424209,0.000020316515,0.000008187754,0.00000750973,0.0063300272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983621,0.00094922783,0.000032335683,0.00010495943,0.00017953146,0.00037181764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980927,0.0009480581,0.00035450136,0.00016575768,0.00019175469,0.00024722776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023527225,0.00035519167,0.0002672577,0.002458364,0.0067378054,0.0098715415,0.0014077071,0.0035821316,0.004571368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022403223,0.00018365547,0.00042887166,0.001276502,0.04695558,0.0048503876,0.008044888,0.0032185074,0.00020007182],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016024193,0.000034608394,0.003464854,0.000065990745,0.000006015638,0.0012152838,0.22269605,0.00025693094,0.0001605135,0.76166123,0.0017856855,0.008636733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021063644,0.000081885926,0.025637696,0.0013997693,0.000020321297,0.001117283,0.46854022,0.0011710929,0.00031514504,0.21057466,0.29106936,0.000051647763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024361636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02349392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024361636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070754606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003091199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05133629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415947423","doi":"10.1017/s1744552325100256","title":"The FARC-EP as environmental governance actors: shifting the ecological perspective on war","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental governance; Scholarship; Corporate governance; Perspective (graphical); Accountability; Environmental justice; Service (business); Political ecology; Politics","score_opus":0.019421342179967157,"score_gpt":0.30581743375279213,"score_spread":0.286396091572825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415947423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33773404,0.013854309,0.0069277952,0.05864037,0.0004212085,0.000061086466,0.000100255056,0.000030234803,0.5822307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943243,0.0014712862,0.00041744643,0.00067087926,0.000042476593,0.000016571388,0.000012715774,0.0000095642135,0.0030347928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973968,0.0016611156,0.00004082329,0.00021405182,0.00021691523,0.00047035344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966409,0.0023151482,0.0003223141,0.0001546421,0.00029841778,0.00026850597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026621113,0.0003435534,0.00022804787,0.0026443163,0.008079743,0.011200692,0.00095388526,0.0018956909,0.0046697967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035346248,0.00016116301,0.000102368744,0.00181509,0.029342426,0.008169313,0.0046285074,0.0025684712,0.00018545441],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016986174,0.00002974904,0.0060551288,0.0001454179,0.0000043419977,0.0007962596,0.23776542,0.00029982478,0.00025133774,0.72775185,0.004422737,0.022460895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044877597,0.000017890898,0.011123501,0.0009692943,0.000010170116,0.00030552555,0.63585615,0.00059532793,0.0002834528,0.10156197,0.24924931,0.000022855129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032136735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074757874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032136735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01159899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048258156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08415693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}