{"meta":{"query_hash":"acb11bddd04e","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Law in the Built Environment"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/acb11bddd04e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Law+in+the+Built+Environment"},"results":[{"id":"W1541803598","doi":"10.1108/17561450911001243","title":"Legal incoherence and the extra‐constitutional law of regulatory takings","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in the Built Environment","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Law; Jurisprudence; Common law; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Political science; Private law; Property law; Public law; Economics; Sociology; Property rights","score_opus":0.022114634204567184,"score_gpt":0.3012256096318854,"score_spread":0.2791109754273182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541803598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61715925,0.0013252688,0.0023599744,0.08822201,0.0004950031,0.00057349855,0.000025328969,0.0000076006977,0.2898321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99798775,0.00019908194,0.00041976117,0.0011170015,0.00019988215,0.0000046909713,4.7806355e-7,0.0000013252463,0.000070033166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876934,0.00012115696,0.00030850017,0.00006599232,0.0006541032,0.00008092383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993962,0.00018438979,0.0002586711,0.00009493396,0.000036884052,0.000028894458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012312148,0.00005264263,0.00009173442,0.000021193264,0.00014448003,0.000054911063,0.00060337334,0.000029700888,0.000058514528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035841975,0.000031387324,0.00006268499,0.000029802253,0.0018214738,0.0001972514,0.000039415412,0.00015626132,0.0000025756258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003793101,0.00007108483,0.0001759902,4.3283782e-7,0.0000147411165,0.000006043903,0.0015793481,0.00033536064,0.0002376727,0.9961834,0.000036551883,0.0013214655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011984084,0.000051958632,0.01888913,0.000051704603,0.000023602352,0.00008621058,0.00069000514,0.000054056305,0.00033374896,0.15896976,0.8195631,0.00008830319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011331594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018920848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83721364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008411043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051618394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6711296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1863183068","doi":"10.1108/ijlbe-11-2014-0034","title":"The acceleration dilemma: can English law accommodate constructive acceleration?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in the Built Environment","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Law; Damages; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Originality; English law; Nomothetic and idiographic; Breach of contract; Dilemma; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.0584758481953842,"score_gpt":0.3352275647461609,"score_spread":0.2767517165507767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1863183068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6980653,0.000348226,0.0011320567,0.09380216,0.0028403057,0.00086017465,0.0000760912,0.000025195563,0.20285049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974944,0.00018974635,0.00028568666,0.00092846336,0.0009565716,0.000023273902,0.0000060795455,0.0000057918096,0.00010996469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815255,0.00027299332,0.00039281347,0.00009846443,0.0009314674,0.00015167869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990106,0.00022054961,0.00030483303,0.00016208502,0.00022180694,0.00008013094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015522301,0.000082956765,0.000091408976,0.000025039903,0.00041637215,0.00042314146,0.0010786699,0.000046891844,0.000045969315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011864562,0.000052090192,0.00006553311,0.000051199324,0.00043985812,0.0004515421,0.00009718227,0.00026004645,0.000013318044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029945812,0.00008350132,0.0005336582,2.5228488e-7,0.000037627,0.00000717129,0.011041845,0.0014255365,0.00004837883,0.9847526,0.00049762597,0.0015418903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062590925,0.00004068377,0.0013917614,0.000010723742,0.000015186186,0.00001600161,0.0061427155,0.00007590325,0.0003886142,0.039196026,0.95199955,0.000096940144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027659638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053327912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9515019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040116018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117927135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41813284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985583299","doi":"10.1108/17561451011058807","title":"Legal challenges in ensuring regular maintenance and repairs of owner‐occupied apartment blocks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in the Built Environment","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Apartment; Business; Payment; Audit; Transparency (behavior); Stock (firearms); Collateral; Finance; Engineering; Accounting; Political science; Law; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.030955312318987915,"score_gpt":0.22824549303514788,"score_spread":0.19729018071615997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985583299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847046,0.0014962415,0.000082893705,0.0033838544,0.0004641809,0.000086799686,0.000015031787,0.0000020546909,0.0097643295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382937,0.004484899,0.0012679164,0.00017005595,0.00012961746,0.000005681928,8.989476e-7,0.000009614786,0.00010195887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987738,0.000024138108,0.00074378646,0.00017178364,0.00013672396,0.00014975044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991336,0.000058556845,0.0005607129,0.00020009317,0.000015583559,0.000031453535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001128449,0.00010642031,0.00026753068,0.00014759018,0.000020900148,0.000023228244,0.00039805495,0.00006264187,0.000048828748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001872579,0.00008039719,0.00008276331,0.000028592005,0.00013458326,0.0001527987,0.00007004831,0.00023805656,0.0000049181785],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002590794,0.0008951774,0.03971104,0.00002893085,0.0001776802,0.0004683531,0.0065593985,0.0021042405,0.0031260748,0.9381562,0.00015339487,0.00836046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003097815,0.00025481812,0.24731497,0.00020683977,0.000012292843,0.0005567402,0.0003389923,0.00052872644,0.0038202337,0.03090943,0.71260005,0.00035911766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023900767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022513272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90724677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008948044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008509124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32785022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009727530","doi":"10.1108/ijlbe-01-2014-0005","title":"Legal orderings of waste in built spaces","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in the Built Environment","topic":"Public Spaces through Art","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Built environment; Context (archaeology); Materiality (auditing); Originality; Business; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.040316789677387825,"score_gpt":0.32852858091296705,"score_spread":0.2882117912355792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009727530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93810534,0.00024607376,0.00013107096,0.019974645,0.0006349984,0.000098549295,0.0000031732297,0.000002721089,0.040803425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838185,0.00019419324,0.0005539544,0.00033178346,0.00030100526,0.0000032633457,5.809221e-7,0.0000058111955,0.00022757132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977656,0.00021832512,0.00042454601,0.00008931322,0.001330933,0.00017128976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927354,0.00013289828,0.0003383602,0.000120547265,0.00006471915,0.00006991748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002308473,0.000079067,0.00015576615,0.00011854631,0.000027292383,0.00006799102,0.0010819468,0.000047726997,0.00009392073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020602984,0.000060331193,0.00006509756,0.00009059149,0.00031519812,0.0004950154,0.000111766705,0.00019765533,0.000012971076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004925592,0.0017172074,0.101152584,0.0000104098535,0.00025127106,0.000639951,0.13544448,0.028410647,0.0024707424,0.71921706,0.0050850324,0.00510803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015721305,0.00017546941,0.0070115835,0.00008873419,0.000011143593,0.00005146219,0.018964821,0.000093632894,0.0009566646,0.013839628,0.95708716,0.0001475917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065165795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040889643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9520021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039467937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012480306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98511624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032227693","doi":"10.1108/ijlbe-12-2013-0041","title":"‘Temporary’ relocation: spaces of contradiction in South African law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in the Built Environment","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Settlement (finance); Negotiation; Contradiction; Originality; Law; Scale (ratio); Demolition; Sociology; Political science; Business; Geography; Finance; Archaeology; Cartography","score_opus":0.08412431815584526,"score_gpt":0.3817909071646522,"score_spread":0.29766658900880694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032227693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814377,0.00050887367,0.00021233699,0.0035353058,0.00065241405,0.0001851078,0.0000103765215,0.0000029618163,0.013454933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991568,0.0001133621,0.000104271916,0.00022750901,0.0003212695,0.000013209876,0.0000037411162,0.000007202753,0.000052670246],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980837,0.0004240767,0.00067366974,0.000074562726,0.0006243591,0.00011962202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902886,0.00018354908,0.00054615276,0.000109030094,0.000082248975,0.00005015518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015270427,0.0000735931,0.0002346406,0.00007462859,0.000047526755,0.000010085282,0.00037120449,0.00007150877,0.00006245536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048192203,0.000052188498,0.000049359147,0.000051021943,0.00011962809,0.00015939659,0.00004466555,0.00031454916,0.000014430797],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006013626,0.0006517764,0.37675792,0.000029404348,0.000120645826,0.0001231826,0.29943532,0.0031502617,0.00019782882,0.3176913,0.00012271739,0.0011182807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009898679,0.0007465969,0.22295871,0.0011701249,0.00007003178,0.000018274433,0.49947515,0.00033685612,0.00064975175,0.07850054,0.18572733,0.0004479411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002757434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017155537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23919077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029950417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000764795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41684338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625359810","doi":"10.1108/ijlbe-03-2017-0012","title":"The right to walk in cities, a comparative review of Macau, Lisbon and Las Vegas","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Law in the Built Environment","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Walkability; Originality; Attractiveness; Pedestrian; Value (mathematics); Stakeholder; Business; Public relations; Built environment; Marketing; Political science; Transport engineering; Engineering; Civil engineering; Creativity; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.11883080836166542,"score_gpt":0.428676590864882,"score_spread":0.3098457825032166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625359810","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046722664,0.98701197,0.000003725395,0.0023773885,0.00029854054,0.00048284233,0.000029500414,8.1050837e-7,0.009328001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006627078,0.99259,0.0000417899,0.00020149867,0.00020624718,0.000021594411,0.0000045047013,0.000005423512,0.00030185535],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973974,0.00049444556,0.0009500576,0.0001404992,0.0008723199,0.00014523581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818504,0.00048356413,0.0010020933,0.0002329445,0.000044203247,0.00005217806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029112382,0.00015446095,0.00073532516,0.00006604919,0.00013448064,0.000084751795,0.0017109256,0.00007263511,0.000103317885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008395656,0.00008140261,0.00022296586,0.000049602175,0.00049730187,0.00015241186,0.00008704864,0.00038393008,0.000005327624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018986649,0.0009599381,0.005268584,0.008912175,0.0008869139,0.00053645234,0.022765178,0.000018165334,0.0000011914243,0.059097808,0.003447241,0.8979165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011383759,0.000028233828,0.0011386328,0.020186923,0.00007584212,0.000008150219,0.0000978541,1.9530538e-7,8.3055943e-7,0.001562859,0.9767068,0.000079858306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008587429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002697851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97325957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029011173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013825254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33195022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}