{"meta":{"query_hash":"e364f3c9fb2f","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Liability and Scientific Enquiry"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e364f3c9fb2f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Liability+and+Scientific+Enquiry"},"results":[{"id":"W2116538325","doi":"10.1504/ijlse.2010.031821","title":"Establishing business integrity and value congruence – a comparative investigation of ethical information practices among New Zealand banks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Liability and Scientific Enquiry","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Polytechnique Montréal","keywords":"Business; Privacy policy; Content analysis; Internet privacy; Information privacy; Privacy by Design; Personally identifiable information; Public relations; Accounting; Computer security; Computer science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.06934681320062722,"score_gpt":0.37368802012237845,"score_spread":0.30434120692175126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116538325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98760545,0.00014497404,0.00028959644,0.00039286976,0.00000488254,0.00006507509,0.0000106780035,0.000001497023,0.011485137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992243,0.000099794226,0.0002082397,0.000023233377,0.0000014789123,0.000027310076,0.0000079533265,0.0000015924776,0.00040623674],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98380035,0.0087067075,0.0011061834,0.0006850445,0.0044974075,0.0012042896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9565954,0.020991497,0.009934702,0.0023793604,0.0078014443,0.0022975414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016950313,0.00013930998,0.00037149256,0.0036554849,0.0061404314,0.0059902845,0.0006768677,0.0005445614,0.0028244064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055354465,0.0003296907,0.00022156865,0.0035780866,0.009762666,0.00635823,0.0053413683,0.0011508047,0.00020685613],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019639735,0.0002422419,0.14216162,0.00018914892,0.000029190829,0.00049047417,0.7902691,0.00007923427,0.0015329855,0.0138388015,0.0004122995,0.0505586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020446103,0.0002450156,0.27045318,0.00024720412,0.000024089606,0.00024254325,0.7152855,0.000372725,0.00085619016,0.0021133835,0.0101036765,0.000036071746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063511595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08712168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063511595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010858486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009757648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120162308","doi":"10.1504/ijlse.2012.045530","title":"The fashion issue an examination of the current intellectual property rights within England and Wales and the European Community, concerning design infringement and counterfeit goods within the fashion industry: part one","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Liability and Scientific Enquiry","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfeit; Intellectual property; Copying; Law; Legislation; Exclusive right; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.1118202386246511,"score_gpt":0.3205790711922977,"score_spread":0.20875883256764663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120162308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5179864,0.008201188,0.0027406209,0.029789457,0.00040570257,0.00006550559,0.00011052808,0.000027879621,0.44067267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9118539,0.0018032051,0.00077177567,0.0071200375,0.00019729654,0.000035747616,0.00004677867,0.00001682963,0.07815448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99486923,0.001764218,0.00036421348,0.0005715241,0.0015384598,0.0008923568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933369,0.0043970607,0.00068739953,0.00042080204,0.00089760864,0.0002602546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038339854,0.00013060743,0.0002775267,0.0016065928,0.004535714,0.011061686,0.000795866,0.004520365,0.0054594046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109024765,0.0003438724,0.0004198826,0.001891132,0.009371956,0.0037525764,0.0022016126,0.003260997,0.00062236213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119761244,0.000095967465,0.011239102,0.00023045298,0.000018746785,0.0027771585,0.06076326,0.00020698887,0.0033747416,0.8707659,0.010834757,0.039573096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000650551,0.0005948974,0.11082499,0.0010881467,0.00007367752,0.0029858898,0.079498194,0.000653692,0.0023798405,0.05000632,0.7516359,0.00019339341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03874213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062565565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03874213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055447035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003774983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07703322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W959161730","doi":"10.1504/ijlse.2011.044086","title":"The war on Facebook: privacy on social networks","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Liability and Scientific Enquiry","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Privacy policy; Information privacy; Privacy by Design; The Internet; Social network (sociolinguistics); Privacy software; Business; Visibility; Social media; Computer science; Public relations; Computer security; Political science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.09248120093325589,"score_gpt":0.342934749020081,"score_spread":0.2504535480868251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W959161730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048971135,0.015005877,0.030628532,0.23931156,0.0033555017,0.00017613322,0.00050226436,0.0005936138,0.6614554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79576963,0.017523173,0.011559103,0.027682008,0.0042367233,0.00034311292,0.00038413357,0.00041294884,0.14208911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908366,0.005734341,0.00029890664,0.0005283027,0.0020133874,0.0005884034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914623,0.005396141,0.0007783029,0.0013158397,0.0005169291,0.00053044205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042445688,0.0005221534,0.00033014014,0.0013388558,0.007264579,0.012382309,0.0010006564,0.005426982,0.013242024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01527838,0.00043157247,0.00043984526,0.0016558039,0.007925862,0.018699372,0.0067368387,0.004735634,0.0029347774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007904632,0.000023954812,0.0027491215,0.00020305025,0.00001462779,0.0009713749,0.026684167,0.0005761867,0.0010754816,0.74017763,0.11283518,0.114610255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010583398,0.000033313972,0.0018407019,0.00060951395,0.000010457025,0.0010817372,0.010605471,0.0013710788,0.0014059924,0.12822877,0.8547456,0.00005670271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035813812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003732692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013242024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002547458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018874543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044299006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}