{"meta":{"query_hash":"5e3acb508f9b","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Management Development"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5e3acb508f9b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Management+Development"},"results":[{"id":"W2360467531","doi":"10.1504/ijmd.2016.076554","title":"Short-term volatility and the long-term trend of the Canadian dollar on the foreign currency market","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management Development","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Liberian dollar; Monetary economics; U.S. Dollar Index; Currency; Volatility (finance); Speculation; Interest rate; Reserve currency; Commodity; Debt; Inflation (cosmology); Value (mathematics); International economics; Financial economics; Devaluation; Macroeconomics; Us dollar; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.025752440012506178,"score_gpt":0.23272535930476626,"score_spread":0.20697291929226008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2360467531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9333764,0.005385532,0.0008940083,0.0038140425,0.00012567856,0.00001679578,0.001944441,0.000026134265,0.054416984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947766,0.0022538847,0.0001008576,0.000064310516,0.00004244245,0.0000028123238,0.0004448158,0.0000079690135,0.0023064145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959666,0.000036908856,0.00001602744,0.000042601434,0.00017059047,0.00013709159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970843,0.0007650441,0.00064598507,0.000072356044,0.0011410821,0.00029124552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009640969,0.0002275008,0.0003193896,0.0017427249,0.0010793816,0.003875183,0.00046466241,0.00057723554,0.0035476107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00629828,0.00012209517,0.00032521685,0.0033483496,0.0011949228,0.001317144,0.00058868225,0.0007957985,0.00030718732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052066665,0.000071120725,0.7256069,0.0002419446,0.00026165016,0.0009613539,0.002068543,0.022689119,0.0021238702,0.17134,0.016006652,0.058108173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013030494,0.00004804894,0.9432431,0.00015506633,0.0001341419,0.00013622588,0.0033974107,0.021866336,0.0006297681,0.01391446,0.016365176,0.000097207616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8305958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80253494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16940421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0111264195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009024837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34080368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237651274","doi":"10.1504/ijmd.2018.093605","title":"Parental leave policies and issues: is Canada there yet?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management Development","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parental leave; Popularity; Maternity leave; Health care; Demographic economics; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Work (physics); Law","score_opus":0.1069226267628973,"score_gpt":0.40545221340451754,"score_spread":0.2985295866416202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237651274","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12848148,0.120808944,0.0006928736,0.66388184,0.0021285068,0.00007133198,0.0038048478,0.000073201445,0.08005696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7972799,0.106889375,0.0013956325,0.070845895,0.00068643835,0.00004705032,0.0017348374,0.00006797256,0.021053014],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485743,0.00043117476,0.00021093812,0.00032989556,0.0020030243,0.002167602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763599,0.002670319,0.0020527674,0.00036605564,0.009985817,0.008565123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037089493,0.00026764174,0.00055350806,0.0021822834,0.010716634,0.0070449607,0.001971694,0.002201294,0.008787486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014324488,0.00025042778,0.0005367896,0.006912249,0.0036261738,0.0022555315,0.0026035542,0.003943391,0.00042289734],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003789742,0.0002662056,0.22776356,0.0017132616,0.00015555472,0.0014114573,0.016193585,0.0010558133,0.0004944452,0.14209035,0.23755163,0.37092525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060207854,0.000090073525,0.3833632,0.0051304023,0.00017840564,0.0004125934,0.0516518,0.00057150156,0.00040165507,0.008469924,0.5494346,0.0002356762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09259288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09259288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29323456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6718115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251192340","doi":"10.1504/ijmd.2016.083593","title":"Financial impacts and risks of climate change: a case study of fish farming in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management Development","topic":"Coastal and Marine Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Delta; Climate change; Context (archaeology); Pangasius; Extreme weather; Agriculture; Mekong delta; Business; Fishery; Aquaculture; Food security; Flooding (psychology); Catfish; Geography; Environmental science; Water resource management; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03699685985798654,"score_gpt":0.2959118146822869,"score_spread":0.2589149548243003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251192340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99793833,0.00004432781,0.00031552737,0.00018704882,0.0000025756524,0.000029149205,0.00010605019,0.0000058210794,0.0013711042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826777,0.00014954363,0.0006183497,0.000024611749,0.0000023002813,0.000019181802,0.00007258098,0.000004048547,0.00084164675],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996668,0.00016012437,0.000012859222,0.00002890964,0.000029881712,0.00010139643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986527,0.0008759405,0.00012200288,0.000037169768,0.000101951715,0.0002102634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007446606,0.0005066195,0.00029234117,0.000552237,0.0014168527,0.0011178459,0.000969702,0.0010513924,0.002037376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015811372,0.00032104607,0.00042665342,0.00090297475,0.00073511875,0.0008695612,0.00092410506,0.00083206757,0.0001143047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051650277,0.0026401533,0.40549508,0.00032926825,0.00021832413,0.041077442,0.00968743,0.50140506,0.0025030316,0.0105209965,0.0034197106,0.022187034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002320996,0.0017405885,0.22871824,0.00018745642,0.00017745596,0.0036274176,0.08704221,0.6620519,0.0024314332,0.0054397127,0.008181367,0.00017013121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15935281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18474042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15935281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035064516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015191756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31685054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}