{"meta":{"query_hash":"db6a3b0a0e87","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/db6a3b0a0e87","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Management+and+Decision+Making"},"results":[{"id":"W1980088322","doi":"10.1504/ijmdm.2008.021217","title":"Leveraging knowledge in buyer-supplier alliances: a theoretical integration","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Business; Industrial organization; Restructuring; Outsourcing; Scope (computer science); Knowledge transfer; Knowledge management; Organizational learning; Competition (biology); Knowledge sharing; Competitive advantage; Process (computing); Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.030492144563529302,"score_gpt":0.2983116405799082,"score_spread":0.26781949601637894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980088322","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1991533,0.007170398,0.47197467,0.022695797,0.00018347501,0.0003817262,0.00010851197,0.000091983544,0.29824007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9475862,0.0036779884,0.04345205,0.00037316585,0.00006812362,0.00027790872,0.000039950726,0.000012576116,0.0045120185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782133,0.0013488126,0.00008825229,0.00015735895,0.00040504048,0.0001791888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993891,0.0047838725,0.0005606154,0.00031485062,0.00022582816,0.00022377029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036693993,0.0004330144,0.0004969811,0.0027496975,0.0023912054,0.007749943,0.001568362,0.0035493593,0.005446575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068624616,0.0005326947,0.0007151077,0.0033749072,0.008764258,0.014158842,0.0048783845,0.0015200415,0.00063524576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011974877,0.000061370774,0.0006337547,0.00013316832,0.000012328588,0.00017781692,0.0030166009,0.0048269527,0.000097841155,0.97701687,0.00029085804,0.013720398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028102859,0.000057699515,0.0005895491,0.0002573666,0.00002179931,0.0002669526,0.003950241,0.028882658,0.00019029886,0.9571157,0.00861701,0.000022498994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013646348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012950753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007749943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027620003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029814478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020039856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986355995","doi":"10.1504/ijmdm.2008.019361","title":"Hierarchical alternatives in Multi Criteria Decision Making","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Structuring; Computer science; Management science; Operations research; Decision analysis; Fuzzy logic; Risk analysis (engineering); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.17649775624336914,"score_gpt":0.475308037549923,"score_spread":0.29881028130655385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986355995","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063664117,0.009998707,0.9673684,0.0009350913,0.00023481874,0.00018106872,0.000075348486,0.00007361497,0.014766552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34135932,0.009809886,0.643019,0.0003372451,0.00046630847,0.0006572549,0.00017782857,0.00004775677,0.0041254335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98036504,0.014798248,0.00049338804,0.00056035764,0.0033550707,0.00042788062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99414647,0.004583235,0.0003014435,0.0002103163,0.00062254374,0.00013589405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01078379,0.0014184855,0.0014974994,0.002803304,0.001165036,0.002681377,0.001341135,0.0017498453,0.0036576686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012239372,0.0005209893,0.0010539663,0.0052784337,0.003261631,0.0028798704,0.00206095,0.0021345161,0.00061050645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042960877,0.000036251422,0.00022586528,0.00052825175,0.000073657975,0.00016337063,0.00043386256,0.14220138,0.0004516765,0.79741627,0.0021225782,0.056303896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035139285,0.00006090947,0.00013597487,0.00020628668,0.000028038068,0.000043884458,0.00013249242,0.23581025,0.0003251879,0.7542629,0.008925525,0.00003345457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039336486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040551275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01078379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002615364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018972831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057030797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005304630","doi":"10.1504/ijmdm.2008.017195","title":"Behaviour validity of a simulation model for sustainable development","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Sustainable development; System dynamics; Process (computing); Management science; Risk analysis (engineering); Appeal; Economics; Ecology; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.22333857882677105,"score_gpt":0.4355001228104194,"score_spread":0.21216154398364834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005304630","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040023807,0.00014215663,0.92438114,0.00281457,0.00008943187,0.00017147134,0.00025642742,0.00047436685,0.031646673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8603726,0.00025842586,0.13234153,0.0003040924,0.000059737376,0.0006393544,0.00044567094,0.00013479599,0.005443935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99304223,0.004700933,0.00029301253,0.0005233249,0.0011254642,0.00031511445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98267555,0.013741141,0.0008231827,0.0013097309,0.0012114233,0.00023904747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062129432,0.00050716696,0.0006680695,0.0010730329,0.00075693906,0.0023295847,0.0012361599,0.0018431173,0.0067889034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031513967,0.00023105726,0.0011760489,0.00066600787,0.0029817002,0.0024900057,0.002148016,0.0018357518,0.0008667013],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008453085,0.00006147164,0.002634512,0.00008541999,0.000037514306,0.00011855344,0.0005241147,0.3066122,0.0007234062,0.6777415,0.0008623955,0.010514363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020203108,0.000044798024,0.00035281165,0.000042862834,0.000015480662,0.0000367668,0.00008739624,0.76017916,0.00033628973,0.23538753,0.0034803317,0.00001642714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005439559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021677557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067889034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002187701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031767464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032857597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031345802","doi":"10.1504/ijmdm.2006.008170","title":"Knowledge management and administration depend on semiotic information systems","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Fetzer Institute","keywords":"Semiotics; Information system; Action (physics); Knowledge management; Computer science; Audit; Perspective (graphical); Control (management); Management information systems; Epistemology; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.026937533387110486,"score_gpt":0.37576001350851357,"score_spread":0.3488224801214031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031345802","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020866036,0.009370993,0.59251785,0.038010087,0.0008886117,0.0003982757,0.00016271931,0.00044737977,0.33733803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7727629,0.0061329915,0.19200636,0.003517878,0.00086137775,0.0009637052,0.00025624075,0.00022176062,0.023276728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98378927,0.00848097,0.001220508,0.0016232288,0.0041898354,0.0006962082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97592795,0.015087656,0.0019605996,0.003964976,0.0021950281,0.000863865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011180946,0.00064511446,0.0010582408,0.0035132826,0.0035071312,0.018284578,0.0015457644,0.003676152,0.0030522181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020542832,0.00073701964,0.0010117842,0.0024400894,0.04125242,0.019217085,0.006892611,0.0047582313,0.0014289158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006187633,0.000008356822,0.00010271801,0.00003970259,0.000007236373,0.00003154963,0.001375248,0.00037398233,0.000113755086,0.9924017,0.0004082925,0.005131196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013373578,0.000020137806,0.00017026515,0.000099339224,0.0000067123297,0.00009463966,0.0005723898,0.0010751898,0.0002156267,0.9658252,0.031886827,0.000020295904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022513845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009721466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018284578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042382553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006381469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059131205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035937534","doi":"10.1504/ijmdm.2006.009144","title":"Multi-criteria optimisation of budgeting decisions by telecommunication service providers in a simulation game","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Computer science; Operations research; Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Mathematical optimization; Service (business); Production (economics); Service provider; Microeconomics; Business; Economics; Mathematics; Marketing","score_opus":0.09997363985255961,"score_gpt":0.43443225982949524,"score_spread":0.3344586199769356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035937534","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09318247,0.00023190779,0.8955385,0.0008676615,0.000042053573,0.00020116704,0.000173161,0.0001311663,0.009631908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90968853,0.00023232852,0.08448062,0.00009743815,0.000020485788,0.00039917036,0.00010016673,0.000040713432,0.004940523],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979425,0.0013482491,0.00006305827,0.00020397356,0.00022577061,0.00021646173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996976,0.0021944204,0.0002763623,0.000070175854,0.00021460769,0.00026844567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028010642,0.0012965328,0.0017086368,0.0007559396,0.00069658103,0.002410871,0.0015091441,0.0021517538,0.0029510397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005306922,0.0008534571,0.001153019,0.00096322654,0.0014930754,0.0016717846,0.0014467521,0.0015510854,0.00026327546],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035234636,0.000013257014,0.00012549365,0.000010740198,0.0000112991665,0.000033255357,0.000028172575,0.9897041,0.00013877334,0.008983547,0.00007120776,0.0008449134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014578596,0.000015505282,0.00003139205,0.00000383305,0.0000045018155,0.0000048175484,0.000009176297,0.996523,0.0000639564,0.0031927468,0.00013172379,0.0000048486418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014699276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009245714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014699276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034139613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026273732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029227436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251135511","doi":"10.1504/ijmdm.2018.093503","title":"Finding consistent weights assignment with combined pairwise comparisons","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Ranking (information retrieval); Consistency (knowledge bases); Computer science; Data mining; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm","score_opus":0.12558393593173395,"score_gpt":0.41686170791094057,"score_spread":0.2912777719792066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251135511","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018987644,0.00005371537,0.9973253,0.000039757546,0.000021025995,0.00006903001,0.000022379965,0.00010044611,0.00046949892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03490395,0.00008211142,0.9639515,0.000036833375,0.000030042405,0.0003668969,0.00011917988,0.00010740709,0.0004020026],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94933254,0.0323611,0.001918113,0.0053328243,0.010178607,0.0008769199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9494143,0.03176187,0.0027864107,0.0074114795,0.008139975,0.00048590323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026262166,0.0025756585,0.0032627364,0.007656833,0.0022188555,0.0040140585,0.003961561,0.0024376323,0.0051128245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.099573866,0.0014989546,0.0026460723,0.008806808,0.002912091,0.006239059,0.0050610933,0.0038732307,0.0016018676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047140077,0.00035373238,0.0028106289,0.0015704208,0.001255646,0.00041567563,0.001613819,0.162842,0.009765328,0.13812701,0.005759008,0.6750153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011070275,0.00042947702,0.0008520331,0.00022391434,0.00026262467,0.00029378253,0.0004154605,0.53125143,0.008460054,0.4504003,0.0071582096,0.00014200599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010455546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016379982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026262166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013243437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032200909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13888925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416037407","doi":"10.1504/ijmdm.2025.149569","title":"An integrated fuzzy Delphi-DEMATEL and analytic network process for sustainable operations and evaluations in process mining","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making","topic":"Business Process Modeling and Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Consistency (knowledge bases); Process (computing); Process mining; Analytic network process; Fuzzy logic; Task (project management); Cyclomatic complexity","score_opus":0.027002559243970894,"score_gpt":0.3690665314516174,"score_spread":0.3420639722076465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416037407","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045403797,0.00036205503,0.92430556,0.0015009361,0.00006915759,0.004674836,0.00012723717,0.00013661585,0.023419838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2802364,0.0002537096,0.71363425,0.00017825844,0.00001684349,0.0041044117,0.0000936826,0.000026661828,0.0014558046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.8899007,0.09519571,0.002320113,0.0017124979,0.009671924,0.0011990999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96333194,0.02632359,0.0015432811,0.0015671202,0.006647829,0.0005861345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08397295,0.0012836086,0.0011844666,0.008634731,0.0038524582,0.005237239,0.0017890246,0.0013007679,0.0035513006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07111287,0.00088550063,0.00125951,0.005106401,0.0035966446,0.0048402296,0.0070832768,0.0021372675,0.00037041891],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052655244,0.00082744216,0.008046025,0.0016743891,0.0003372546,0.00028492734,0.023291318,0.108939804,0.0028099327,0.46114376,0.004085271,0.3880334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000279451,0.0010068676,0.005137739,0.001549188,0.00018414512,0.00029236733,0.018867088,0.6189633,0.0050560427,0.31706253,0.031337596,0.00026363207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005088962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0079650385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08397295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009580538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0134377275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44409674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}