{"meta":{"query_hash":"db6a3b0a0e87","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/db6a3b0a0e87","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Management+and+Decision+Making"},"results":[{"id":"W1980088322","doi":"10.1504/ijmdm.2008.021217","title":"Leveraging knowledge in buyer-supplier alliances: a theoretical integration","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Business; Industrial organization; Restructuring; Outsourcing; Scope (computer science); Knowledge transfer; Knowledge management; Organizational learning; Competition (biology); Knowledge sharing; Competitive advantage; Process (computing); Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.030492144563529302,"score_gpt":0.2983116405799082,"score_spread":0.26781949601637894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980088322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36416146,0.00053475855,0.12778884,0.0011487606,0.0031481874,0.00033022996,6.234675e-7,0.000049402148,0.5028377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990887,0.00015996333,0.006672356,0.0012357952,0.00080576784,0.00000517048,0.0000029899577,0.000014846815,0.00021613901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833065,0.000012198815,0.0006989032,0.0002047447,0.00057967164,0.00017383994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989576,0.00008723698,0.00036242668,0.00010672507,0.00047390466,0.000012143413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084676803,0.00015952096,0.00020375107,0.0013048702,0.00010181903,0.00026515775,0.00043202998,0.000043032887,0.00025610506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008165986,0.00013386174,0.000083551975,0.00044440504,0.000082627244,0.0008048173,0.00034390067,0.00018499576,0.00008636084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026745844,0.00014857552,0.006805476,0.000026200389,0.00006344139,0.00030530788,0.00022837405,0.000077012606,0.0000118500875,0.75036484,0.0034515364,0.23824993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0077998904,0.00006639318,0.07855741,0.0028204874,0.0001193585,0.00022201028,0.005904819,0.062825166,0.00004410597,0.6267461,0.21399707,0.0008971872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002148364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009194323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6267255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008664159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011619749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5458724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986355995","doi":"10.1504/ijmdm.2008.019361","title":"Hierarchical alternatives in Multi Criteria Decision Making","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Structuring; Computer science; Management science; Operations research; Decision analysis; Fuzzy logic; Risk analysis (engineering); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.17649775624336914,"score_gpt":0.475308037549923,"score_spread":0.29881028130655385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986355995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56684476,0.0004775787,0.42888328,0.00019433192,0.0022144269,0.00015238867,0.000006214501,0.000014810277,0.0012122237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7226913,0.00033503576,0.27610093,0.0004430287,0.00026204684,0.0000034468135,5.9071675e-7,0.000023495792,0.0001401119],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902431,0.00031344587,0.002973929,0.0007744819,0.0052708816,0.00042415728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99167496,0.0051737484,0.0013211182,0.00053247134,0.0011287817,0.00016890174],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055649807,0.00036397093,0.0007183607,0.0040293215,0.00022732842,0.00092191633,0.002704877,0.00013027118,0.0008437091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049111843,0.00027973924,0.00033288647,0.00083760073,0.00019816787,0.0015122845,0.0015427434,0.00050532026,0.00009411408],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018658378,0.00024964684,0.046569675,0.0000045519564,0.000094967276,0.004536668,0.0008535618,0.0015683554,0.0001264615,0.0018308003,0.0038770163,0.93842244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057754316,0.00013980824,0.675003,0.0023166838,0.000026508007,0.0019425389,0.0010252451,0.07493613,0.000032258242,0.21963933,0.018599097,0.0005639606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000031694549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001604113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9378585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019168961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005023095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005304630","doi":"10.1504/ijmdm.2008.017195","title":"Behaviour validity of a simulation model for sustainable development","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Sustainable development; System dynamics; Process (computing); Management science; Risk analysis (engineering); Appeal; Economics; Ecology; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.22333857882677105,"score_gpt":0.4355001228104194,"score_spread":0.21216154398364834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005304630","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35263917,0.00013534781,0.64621294,0.000018944116,0.0002799506,0.00014019311,0.0000018534072,0.000004098971,0.0005675012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8757532,0.000012295938,0.1227438,0.00004971484,0.00008852838,0.000003488669,4.137447e-7,0.000008442751,0.001340076],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951988,0.000046348214,0.001705406,0.0002561383,0.002621588,0.00017173415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99373037,0.0018711137,0.0012711807,0.00020974387,0.0028505465,0.00006703629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035790636,0.00013133572,0.00035440587,0.0011599597,0.00019492881,0.00021084106,0.0007967066,0.00004727167,0.000055332464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013282868,0.00009877242,0.00020514605,0.0002669375,0.000040149527,0.00060420216,0.00042076473,0.00007626046,0.0000038047347],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014871125,0.00023611041,0.030299198,0.000025667112,0.00016454844,0.00039267685,0.0017297323,0.5757322,0.000018211556,0.027681598,0.011562418,0.35067055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017662382,0.0000959215,0.046987414,0.00024291269,0.00002833819,0.000108961736,0.0012860772,0.68051887,0.00002663308,0.25450698,0.014249477,0.00018215948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001153484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022978363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52346915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008435487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007223815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40278223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031345802","doi":"10.1504/ijmdm.2006.008170","title":"Knowledge management and administration depend on semiotic information systems","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Fetzer Institute","keywords":"Semiotics; Information system; Action (physics); Knowledge management; Computer science; Audit; Perspective (graphical); Control (management); Management information systems; Epistemology; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.026937533387110486,"score_gpt":0.37576001350851357,"score_spread":0.3488224801214031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031345802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32920727,0.00088130624,0.19501306,0.0015394335,0.00558965,0.0011462083,0.000015278658,0.00005787818,0.4665499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99437934,0.00055588054,0.004193793,0.00019688519,0.0003453017,0.000004304767,0.0000040682758,0.000003401687,0.0003170242],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984056,0.000053732278,0.00062754535,0.000069538975,0.0007331594,0.00011042895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990166,0.00012436043,0.0004695971,0.000056782275,0.0002795678,0.000053080203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001294284,0.000082004495,0.00010377561,0.00046079606,0.00021913358,0.0005880547,0.00017803279,0.000035002333,0.00003540547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003772486,0.000072592724,0.000034640427,0.00009783747,0.000027437176,0.0016091716,0.00006902577,0.00006233041,0.000029228397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015677068,0.000020611775,0.00033898497,0.000023887398,0.000072382594,0.0000063370703,0.002660533,0.0002824552,3.1328037e-7,0.42352307,0.00198767,0.570927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001857666,0.0001534053,0.0072698477,0.0007625949,0.000055786037,0.00005782664,0.033265743,0.0028236476,0.000008192364,0.005791494,0.9477574,0.00019640275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004356172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021880725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9457697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014401873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001665865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5670625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035937534","doi":"10.1504/ijmdm.2006.009144","title":"Multi-criteria optimisation of budgeting decisions by telecommunication service providers in a simulation game","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Competitor analysis; Computer science; Operations research; Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Mathematical optimization; Service (business); Production (economics); Service provider; Microeconomics; Business; Economics; Mathematics; Marketing","score_opus":0.09997363985255961,"score_gpt":0.43443225982949524,"score_spread":0.3344586199769356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035937534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56704026,0.0004284942,0.43092462,0.0004549162,0.0005331598,0.00023543609,0.00000940325,0.0000092967275,0.000364381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7953709,0.00008836984,0.20418464,0.0001856587,0.00007595271,0.0000040336995,0.000006215133,0.000016800786,0.00006744583],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933694,0.00028518547,0.0029170765,0.00042766222,0.0027741161,0.00022658039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99083287,0.004654577,0.0021145036,0.00047092533,0.001861866,0.000065285196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051237606,0.00022680504,0.00046191763,0.0021187617,0.0000906003,0.00071067153,0.0015598356,0.00010890179,0.00019208196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030974795,0.00019278149,0.0001588657,0.0009418172,0.000058163696,0.0014648582,0.0006206204,0.00022708888,0.00001800411],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087886944,0.00038264174,0.010334288,0.000010754228,0.00005833484,0.000053543015,0.00067650335,0.22413184,0.0039791795,0.00038066495,0.0023699033,0.7567435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004595045,0.000078646466,0.14233492,0.0013293223,0.000040838753,0.000051337283,0.0013965901,0.7865318,0.0001947514,0.05133854,0.0117612565,0.00034694586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004081655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000085933105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75639653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015802225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034114004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7861401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251135511","doi":"10.1504/ijmdm.2018.093503","title":"Finding consistent weights assignment with combined pairwise comparisons","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Pairwise comparison; Ranking (information retrieval); Consistency (knowledge bases); Computer science; Data mining; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm","score_opus":0.12558393593173395,"score_gpt":0.41686170791094057,"score_spread":0.2912777719792066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251135511","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36495084,0.00014857927,0.62432265,0.00090664235,0.0027231367,0.00020964551,0.000005650228,0.00002033182,0.006712521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.862851,0.00003320472,0.13585386,0.00055117917,0.00032932922,0.000002604902,7.19593e-7,0.00001571733,0.00036239458],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99285245,0.00015790117,0.0016397579,0.0004742322,0.0046012127,0.00027447153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99425006,0.0020868313,0.0013870195,0.0004251805,0.0016830344,0.00016786538],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037536966,0.0002479621,0.0004781131,0.0015350261,0.00026749977,0.001280944,0.0015082918,0.00006143002,0.00089126034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069151237,0.00015958844,0.00018053564,0.00045441097,0.00020711335,0.000656933,0.0007385652,0.0002034202,0.00011778735],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040905876,0.0003243883,0.051630937,0.0000061285114,0.00057901745,0.0011529464,0.0005860527,0.0005706726,0.000090576184,0.01901633,0.06027511,0.8616772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015099501,0.0020141061,0.30336398,0.0037522707,0.00029707834,0.0012888093,0.005299993,0.06014779,0.00036987095,0.23370454,0.37348905,0.001173021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000014132194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011200288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8605042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001362685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038296184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416037407","doi":"10.1504/ijmdm.2025.149569","title":"An integrated fuzzy Delphi-DEMATEL and analytic network process for sustainable operations and evaluations in process mining","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Management and Decision Making","topic":"Business Process Modeling and Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Consistency (knowledge bases); Process (computing); Process mining; Analytic network process; Fuzzy logic; Task (project management); Cyclomatic complexity","score_opus":0.027002559243970894,"score_gpt":0.3690665314516174,"score_spread":0.3420639722076465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416037407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7645453,0.00081378454,0.23285255,0.00066187157,0.00014725744,0.00023420449,7.6487595e-7,0.000017012262,0.0007272596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99198216,0.00013312213,0.007007228,0.0005419467,0.00021726493,0.000023520923,0.000009093808,0.00001149954,0.000074147414],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986081,0.000010669479,0.00058924395,0.00025467796,0.00035228772,0.00018499131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979703,0.0001058917,0.00025588373,0.00007896933,0.0015731642,0.000015833813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012192613,0.00014860093,0.00025147176,0.001276134,0.00024728617,0.0009960409,0.000260991,0.00004849801,0.000009114468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028423563,0.00012722425,0.00004063359,0.0007317524,0.000037758346,0.001744372,0.00011899221,0.000097838536,2.910053e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070200034,0.00020331037,0.053054683,0.00074331736,0.00040678552,0.00007297228,0.000408616,0.56830907,0.000006484233,0.039466772,0.0004367503,0.33618927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014581721,0.000017268745,0.011462576,0.0012956314,0.00028801052,0.00000813285,0.006355671,0.82110375,0.0000012135008,0.15726998,0.0005694786,0.00017013066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002534534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007944409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33601913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034137087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041899464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96048456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}