{"meta":{"query_hash":"b34feb008f07","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies"},"cohort_total":19,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":19,"exported":19,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b34feb008f07","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Philosophical+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1968914034","doi":"10.1080/09672550902811498","title":"<i>Values and Virtues: Aristotelianism in Contemporary Ethics</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Aristotelianism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.3153169998616818,"score_gpt":0.5703807229051839,"score_spread":0.2550637230435021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968914034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022552215,0.046121906,0.02440423,0.13912609,0.003919583,0.000036456393,0.000083239924,0.00005594884,0.76370037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9256666,0.00860209,0.0070208083,0.01718469,0.004720095,0.00016514934,0.000044005832,0.00007425861,0.03652237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725926,0.0016796729,0.00011268452,0.00023139208,0.0004727192,0.0002442962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971301,0.0019952292,0.0001778994,0.00020808824,0.00034050702,0.00014816102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040010456,0.0005074677,0.0006726444,0.001801202,0.006645682,0.00993997,0.0011266506,0.005271801,0.0041552573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003759632,0.0003121262,0.00043221514,0.002371701,0.058698893,0.0121044675,0.0030485913,0.008808844,0.0007502121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017989682,0.0000023637094,0.000013879725,0.000010329282,7.222063e-7,0.000006456352,0.0012934026,0.000011577683,0.00000826021,0.99633235,0.0016841582,0.00063483504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039862443,0.0000035939536,0.00006879752,0.000045466702,0.0000014894641,0.000034093606,0.0011013111,0.000058191414,0.000021578328,0.9739237,0.024733964,0.000003890006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037560205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039222254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00993997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045207106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002680017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032800257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972752880","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2013.787816","title":"Principled Tyranny: Can Korsgaard Explain Evil Action?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.18197146116590412,"score_gpt":0.36255076276636505,"score_spread":0.18057930160046093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972752880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014955364,0.007524529,0.058452077,0.112211,0.0029911932,0.000054889373,0.00017246664,0.00023751397,0.8034011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90042335,0.002314968,0.011579273,0.016270742,0.0013875001,0.00018590437,0.00010695645,0.00045090678,0.06728039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979944,0.0008951369,0.000067334484,0.00039165182,0.0003654653,0.00028596763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845815,0.00090536993,0.00011152719,0.00026967877,0.00018087756,0.00007430814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034734593,0.00074376276,0.00057436805,0.0010855948,0.0031918276,0.0046007633,0.0017818657,0.0050619384,0.014105395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063349344,0.00043273895,0.0009918228,0.00064747076,0.020469218,0.009727906,0.003374843,0.0056568957,0.002909525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061757746,0.0000028516063,0.000034883167,0.000009648324,0.0000013997366,0.000040116938,0.00079295086,0.000081860635,0.000014373012,0.9944325,0.0035826955,0.0010006367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008006772,0.0000031357931,0.000060975643,0.000041310068,0.000002221448,0.00005946007,0.00033897866,0.0004308325,0.000044939097,0.9648039,0.034199577,0.000006671884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004508359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036798073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014105395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032722263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001574523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04718727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008237334","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2011.629368","title":"Physicalists Have Nothing to Fear from Ghosts","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Physicalism; Nothing; Epistemology; Philosophy; A priori and a posteriori; Reflection (computer programming); Metaphysics; Computer science","score_opus":0.10483252335589299,"score_gpt":0.45226960440078273,"score_spread":0.34743708104488974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008237334","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19464326,0.009312141,0.051651593,0.40214446,0.0038068043,0.000054876167,0.00007929669,0.00019984238,0.33810762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97646207,0.0010397773,0.0026916403,0.012584853,0.00034185807,0.000016022725,0.000010862724,0.000053826076,0.0067990134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943106,0.003285323,0.0001839543,0.00055696,0.001359524,0.00030353965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864827,0.007790516,0.0015610653,0.0018699513,0.0016149515,0.00068071706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007067964,0.00035678214,0.00065127906,0.00065680215,0.0037710974,0.00534075,0.0011503547,0.004845596,0.004253539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015209304,0.00038630603,0.00032875568,0.0003814897,0.06936308,0.011564972,0.004556981,0.011035236,0.0009566913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028274904,0.000018858296,0.0003447339,0.000060836966,0.000011156623,0.00016426342,0.020380627,0.00008744955,0.00031946317,0.97120374,0.005136273,0.002244367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002066615,0.000037129143,0.0003704562,0.00019312535,0.000013060457,0.00042885524,0.012371319,0.00024710907,0.000513678,0.9218432,0.063935235,0.000026094882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009981076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057280174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007067964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020130666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014418537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037379384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027360481","doi":"10.1080/09672550500169232","title":"A Substantivist Construal of Discourse Ethics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Construal level theory; Epistemology; Philosophy; Discourse ethics; Sociology; Linguistics; Social science","score_opus":0.20264126375258967,"score_gpt":0.4932450579785083,"score_spread":0.29060379422591864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027360481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06485651,0.0032185,0.40011102,0.07003422,0.0005947642,0.00029000125,0.00025552048,0.0004561442,0.46018332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96214885,0.00039481738,0.030894132,0.0013868385,0.0002993538,0.00024768926,0.00010194989,0.00007877663,0.004447624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93800575,0.04919158,0.0020082428,0.0028208334,0.0071074585,0.000866075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.948931,0.03213004,0.0038454887,0.0071629263,0.0071212146,0.0008093782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038403753,0.00070964237,0.0011421813,0.005687503,0.0044523533,0.014892863,0.002696002,0.008350624,0.0040127435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041723482,0.00069618487,0.00096532307,0.0023631228,0.051666748,0.015264711,0.008694004,0.0062909154,0.0008282946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003464623,0.0000042494003,0.00005399313,0.000017308186,0.0000027241354,0.000012970901,0.002705519,0.0001386725,0.000053585678,0.99584097,0.00024560338,0.00092085806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011900374,0.000008068415,0.000077292716,0.00007208831,0.0000057525713,0.00004540824,0.0013089495,0.0015001636,0.00018513306,0.98269075,0.014085618,0.000008763495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015028215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009897018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038403753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074656764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039850813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20310086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056775528","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2013.767523","title":"Wittgenstein, Non-Factualism, and Deflationism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05963912155101302,"score_gpt":0.2949242781024614,"score_spread":0.23528515655144838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056775528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105992824,0.02429074,0.06965297,0.04921067,0.0009516433,0.00005355983,0.00021516216,0.00019761625,0.74943477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9717917,0.0031043058,0.0053208233,0.0012666788,0.00053971197,0.000047941463,0.000084061845,0.000055823282,0.017788768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975924,0.0010569458,0.00011551035,0.00040807045,0.0006042465,0.00022289062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765426,0.0013505805,0.0002835295,0.00036636056,0.0002590896,0.000086092936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003070758,0.00040456167,0.00037242303,0.0019605127,0.002501498,0.003720738,0.0008863634,0.0017593413,0.0052818274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040437505,0.00029361265,0.00050737336,0.00213973,0.02775586,0.009179449,0.0024510592,0.0039181868,0.0004415338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035513995,0.0000035637288,0.000040130395,0.000010451272,0.0000012804719,0.000021271871,0.00060527865,0.00003988655,0.00002902655,0.99762386,0.0004941052,0.0011276486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037475454,0.0000031458728,0.00013589264,0.000022233105,0.0000017079282,0.0000406742,0.00020333863,0.00018326037,0.00010002747,0.98917305,0.010129824,0.000002939853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032041168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002407205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065204324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065204324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013850268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04730928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058747057","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2013.857815","title":"Experimental Philosophy: An Introduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08823016672647294,"score_gpt":0.32438009122522327,"score_spread":0.23614992449875033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058747057","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044504725,0.273186,0.3370111,0.06984108,0.015941102,0.0008970028,0.002786048,0.00096296694,0.29492417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16940747,0.32975096,0.23511896,0.051232707,0.055441376,0.010188135,0.0028269016,0.0015517912,0.1444817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746025,0.0014777671,0.00020064185,0.0003520491,0.00040894066,0.00010042713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911912,0.007534273,0.00021868316,0.00055296114,0.00037074133,0.00013201349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005792218,0.001785666,0.0017715708,0.0042945733,0.0016918362,0.0037150912,0.002271241,0.0036347792,0.02885949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006514334,0.0013103137,0.0013854398,0.0037104927,0.010775877,0.008184774,0.003682788,0.00568561,0.006260723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020891166,0.00013307994,0.00010266071,0.0008015276,0.000012631752,0.000049481772,0.00031088127,0.00032156534,0.00026999429,0.9463405,0.021758715,0.029877989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029460583,0.00005119914,0.00032695735,0.00054924155,0.000010464959,0.0001160427,0.00012459898,0.0003379018,0.00019683113,0.803855,0.19438177,0.000020521427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064973504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007509438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02885949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026323174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017280484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09654462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068806593","doi":"10.1080/09672550802008765","title":"Comments on Hales:<i>Relativism and the Foundations of Philosophy</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Luck; Epistemology; Philosophy; Adjudication; Relativism; Naturalism; Axiom; Mathematics; Law; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.11520759642764607,"score_gpt":0.39256400566044974,"score_spread":0.2773564092328037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068806593","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020705853,0.0024044982,0.0003198052,0.9686166,0.019774878,0.000014341575,0.00015378717,0.00009260539,0.008416485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010827942,0.00324582,0.0006435908,0.876489,0.037813764,0.00014984555,0.00013371705,0.00051231246,0.07018407],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957684,0.0017155516,0.00026972004,0.00067067024,0.0012567461,0.00031889265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759076,0.015073894,0.00065914507,0.000745083,0.0065876776,0.0010265248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006604606,0.0015421088,0.0018407851,0.0015365031,0.008516609,0.0072274245,0.0043573524,0.022996848,0.03701906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04025039,0.00074920116,0.0013191465,0.0017450425,0.009412958,0.014290569,0.004493473,0.031528313,0.017130943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008670026,0.000002490902,0.00001778317,0.000015987562,0.000001265761,0.000041334453,0.00024935402,0.00001754551,0.000011537614,0.005919335,0.99311996,0.00059486995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021298629,0.000009512862,0.0002652087,0.00026861273,0.000004995121,0.00011760947,0.0019867828,0.00026166215,0.00013754595,0.01326258,0.98360544,0.00005880684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05052839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041171513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05052839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009428867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004011648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12384105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086898372","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2014.979325","title":"The Good of Friendship at the End of Life","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Value (mathematics); Performativity; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14082140326376905,"score_gpt":0.32352731478096053,"score_spread":0.18270591151719148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086898372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2232415,0.006648547,0.015282097,0.030097678,0.0011652615,0.000024630268,0.0001082289,0.00013605559,0.72329605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902006,0.00044609426,0.00045336148,0.0005121231,0.00017065943,0.000007080379,0.000015210666,0.00001780311,0.00817703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99617887,0.0022469338,0.00006364656,0.00030433017,0.00054378074,0.000662488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964701,0.00085768994,0.00042336987,0.0006218418,0.0004890224,0.0011379968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027622445,0.0003241066,0.00040569346,0.0009287799,0.009687685,0.0067082914,0.0005705033,0.0016929029,0.0053114444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005037963,0.00017716512,0.00028827865,0.0005463054,0.023451932,0.007977226,0.006930826,0.002530619,0.001083343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000626139,0.000016987151,0.002281064,0.00005279211,0.000025142304,0.00029351545,0.03397573,0.00013651546,0.0004095403,0.93961644,0.0061349818,0.016994745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000213015,0.00014547411,0.008068827,0.00027708607,0.000043675755,0.0010982037,0.04944965,0.00034811138,0.00075529306,0.5733509,0.36637783,0.00006366474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014674641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024347492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009687685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015592574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009489088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017768621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089784413","doi":"10.1080/09672550903164392","title":"The Matter of Fact in Literature","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Philosophy; Criticism; ROWE; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Poetry; Skepticism; Face (sociological concept); Literature; Linguistics; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.0654230267257346,"score_gpt":0.3338711939228501,"score_spread":0.2684481671971155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089784413","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027048407,0.06666405,0.023490567,0.077554375,0.004060219,0.000082756684,0.00015344324,0.0001187433,0.8008275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95346814,0.00942766,0.004068896,0.00410041,0.0037200314,0.00008180838,0.00007844719,0.00010689094,0.024947733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97570205,0.017310504,0.0007643177,0.0017555173,0.0036468373,0.00082074344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9644444,0.02497811,0.00258783,0.0038222289,0.0034529364,0.00071453187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012677179,0.0006353744,0.0007837225,0.0075414684,0.008917298,0.0188453,0.0016422035,0.0041463636,0.008550125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025369473,0.00038364308,0.0005861921,0.0068463255,0.06681964,0.017405258,0.007235541,0.0039864196,0.00095080654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064076426,0.0000024524747,0.00009585216,0.000068582856,0.0000036872084,0.0000671506,0.010088673,0.00006179858,0.000033510507,0.9826188,0.0029329923,0.0040200944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008091972,0.000015531821,0.00036132633,0.0006943499,0.000009306663,0.00025455916,0.008722618,0.00018461715,0.00012975547,0.7294259,0.26018018,0.000013746161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019328531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016126335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0188453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009826812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042930464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07129884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780193615","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2018.1415699","title":"Agamben’s Coming Philosophy: Finding a New Use for Theology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.3212102864943231,"score_gpt":0.4858920907652394,"score_spread":0.16468180427091633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780193615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021710731,0.053416356,0.012922568,0.34678626,0.006879631,0.000032922,0.00008157602,0.0001460886,0.558024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7778739,0.01885598,0.011036327,0.057192553,0.007805024,0.00017424766,0.00011120637,0.00030701575,0.12664379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769896,0.0014278223,0.000051753115,0.0002821452,0.00032710598,0.0002122993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980326,0.0012219523,0.00011918076,0.00023202205,0.00018498888,0.00020918889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002928771,0.00044973474,0.00055164384,0.0019891066,0.0047508962,0.006914285,0.0009278136,0.0035039615,0.0061048483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005551328,0.00020618683,0.0002991086,0.0016305092,0.025793092,0.008548403,0.0039490005,0.0073084114,0.0009338653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073120277,0.000002940766,0.00009681558,0.00003083671,0.0000014433887,0.000025123129,0.008846779,0.000013910266,0.00003899419,0.9645903,0.021027677,0.0053178263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007889544,0.000008730331,0.00046838133,0.00029556715,0.0000031344268,0.000086827655,0.004464938,0.00010795071,0.000074139614,0.25379482,0.7406769,0.000010635714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051885606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01021682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006914285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045423284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028348675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032957137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781867789","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2018.1415694","title":"Wilfrid Sellars and the Foundations of Normativity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.09456226524818263,"score_gpt":0.3468717373048951,"score_spread":0.2523094720567125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781867789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014599929,0.07817367,0.027237799,0.115880154,0.0035612197,0.00003656608,0.00016973546,0.00013706669,0.7602039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78971434,0.031136306,0.012811485,0.012616974,0.003938464,0.00019130696,0.0001254496,0.0002415364,0.14922406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974437,0.0012639742,0.000094314004,0.00036033054,0.00064155326,0.00019611638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979831,0.0013265741,0.00014335952,0.00015289399,0.00029088932,0.0001031447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026555613,0.00046984368,0.00045113728,0.0013569967,0.0042620436,0.0061688866,0.0006840191,0.0020731024,0.005485488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004601718,0.00034117582,0.0003652749,0.0013648734,0.019879268,0.0090053305,0.002305488,0.0041632303,0.0014227777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055262612,0.0000030130063,0.000028383654,0.0000138799605,0.0000015910258,0.000016997166,0.00055144844,0.000063682055,0.000022784712,0.9912854,0.005852634,0.0021547356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061264573,0.000004547928,0.000087505934,0.000048644557,0.0000019899733,0.00002631407,0.00045151485,0.00010534405,0.00006325259,0.914425,0.08477255,0.000007190553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048756925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004676961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061688866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004432273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023697342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032158554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080527152","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2020.1812967","title":"Responses to naturalism: critical perspectives from idealism and pragmatism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Pragmatism; Naturalism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Intersection (aeronautics)","score_opus":0.11579467621130099,"score_gpt":0.3707562326392472,"score_spread":0.25496155642794616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080527152","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04087941,0.02327104,0.023350475,0.55895406,0.0047704335,0.000088798166,0.00004720359,0.000060672257,0.34857795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542951,0.006640916,0.0034930783,0.022310177,0.00224115,0.00016676102,0.000023335362,0.00010169447,0.010727595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.981739,0.01500597,0.00027745657,0.0006271305,0.0015987976,0.00075163814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97115636,0.024766384,0.0013252634,0.0009071525,0.0012276066,0.00061726145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017025907,0.0006720101,0.0007682732,0.0023379526,0.011098642,0.013366243,0.0021666773,0.0063011628,0.0030594799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022152843,0.00034242662,0.0006112258,0.0017463131,0.0885496,0.018147502,0.006099513,0.014502079,0.00033726744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011946322,0.000008724518,0.000055656663,0.000056534533,0.0000024167944,0.000056840516,0.04136368,0.00006506842,0.00003280954,0.9535861,0.0032753989,0.0014848438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001723698,0.000018024877,0.00015217364,0.0002611305,0.0000033163592,0.00009958599,0.052219134,0.0002860075,0.00011034492,0.86006093,0.0867557,0.000016499234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020683303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025137435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017025907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008199023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045498526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09004265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211127453","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2021.1992479","title":"“Charles Taylor Responds”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Secularity; Sociality; Subjectivity; Morality; Capitalism; Politics; Political subjectivity; Epistemology; Sociology; Critical theory; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Religious studies","score_opus":0.15662930107860257,"score_gpt":0.4417852016112992,"score_spread":0.2851559005326966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211127453","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000096156065,0.002304071,0.00018731257,0.85073715,0.14224157,0.000014380825,0.0000624369,0.000070282156,0.004286577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018013542,0.0023391785,0.00034504806,0.8760342,0.05128929,0.000050649636,0.00007720584,0.00015553233,0.06790766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538285,0.0010089382,0.0003369127,0.00083887717,0.0019348209,0.0004976225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98606443,0.0039247433,0.0009653345,0.0005721711,0.00659967,0.0018737292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049994444,0.0009935636,0.0010972725,0.0011872097,0.00445774,0.0052284,0.0025506818,0.018657362,0.029108403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035069857,0.00079206686,0.0009768956,0.0009636993,0.0028210043,0.006572258,0.003585304,0.027385375,0.027755706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004888368,0.0000021881012,0.00003358357,0.0000124340295,0.0000011946161,0.00001978434,0.00003221794,0.0000061884816,0.000018750112,0.0008427467,0.9973086,0.0017175021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038159337,0.0000038757225,0.00012285681,0.00005838,0.0000029676153,0.000050548933,0.00023778288,0.000033932996,0.00006499624,0.0009593037,0.9984457,0.000015894873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007795223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01372345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029108403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00317957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005872319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0973773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309767496","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2022.2148229","title":"Spinoza and the Philosophy of Love","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0785813972591514,"score_gpt":0.30581475664917307,"score_spread":0.22723335939002165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309767496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03794729,0.009738664,0.01098114,0.026789054,0.0005654409,0.000033971617,0.00005688817,0.000036178088,0.91385144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95510435,0.0022511159,0.0021528583,0.0018840005,0.00032073594,0.000050178616,0.000021119007,0.00003381425,0.038181797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981869,0.0009498825,0.00008149386,0.0002619936,0.00026032617,0.00025931222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979101,0.0012454261,0.00015374883,0.00026288917,0.00023301598,0.00019482734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033713758,0.00034555764,0.0006883528,0.0014948645,0.009172876,0.008822348,0.0008489269,0.002802279,0.006970552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037390527,0.00037101866,0.0005157637,0.0013433729,0.044082243,0.010515295,0.003698624,0.0062695104,0.0005941251],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039850156,0.0000023149908,0.000028309014,0.000004780655,8.1388214e-7,0.000008896102,0.0011706561,0.00001861614,0.000007974407,0.99796873,0.0002508426,0.0005341219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001242867,0.0000063855027,0.00010086649,0.00002445886,0.0000025314196,0.00004372268,0.0013875098,0.00009124224,0.000021827478,0.97815406,0.020149479,0.0000054362436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008342426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009179853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009172876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054577086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003482564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039598644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362604429","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2023.2199029","title":"Rousseau and the Spirit of Autonomy: A Pathos of Vigour","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministry of Colleges and Universities","keywords":"Pathos; Autonomy; Vitality; Politics; Feeling; Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Social contract; Aesthetics; Energy (signal processing); Philosophy; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.07587791507187186,"score_gpt":0.3174018759750636,"score_spread":0.24152396090319173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362604429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14446129,0.008445501,0.019675743,0.068449825,0.0005976464,0.0000512437,0.000012253649,0.00007239502,0.7582342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98744476,0.00067168,0.0013818751,0.0016680307,0.000105573745,0.000020423297,0.000002647712,0.000016348658,0.008688576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947184,0.0039890474,0.0000639393,0.00031098598,0.000413759,0.00050392776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981614,0.00096367055,0.00023789273,0.00020480216,0.00015738122,0.00027492282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039172135,0.00027520905,0.00022298394,0.0008066587,0.005332456,0.00537835,0.00048562497,0.0022495312,0.0010745099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004034821,0.00017074755,0.0003313876,0.000371466,0.057805963,0.0052438662,0.0049928357,0.003684886,0.00026563444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071417917,0.000007885455,0.000180579,0.000009277489,0.0000016975832,0.000042965738,0.022039212,0.000057939757,0.00008818469,0.9743338,0.00078588305,0.002445369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021412478,0.000053686435,0.0010601503,0.00014470298,0.000004972626,0.0002575696,0.026813963,0.00031190887,0.00025846428,0.8042407,0.16680522,0.000027161514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027927347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028271247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00537835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003012955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002378006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0218606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390611859","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2023.2300546","title":"Philosophy as Dialogue","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Humanities; Sociology","score_opus":0.1337487715887487,"score_gpt":0.3471556465420032,"score_spread":0.2134068749532545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390611859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068996954,0.03746812,0.051568702,0.113962755,0.005442076,0.00010957687,0.00022068151,0.0003576123,0.7839708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7683824,0.021112641,0.01981034,0.03888349,0.0066986005,0.00056874874,0.00027945914,0.0007052689,0.14355913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98773885,0.00889304,0.0003012026,0.0011515216,0.0012680378,0.00064733665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99442494,0.0028309012,0.00040654,0.0010993872,0.00068315474,0.00055506866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070099267,0.00065367005,0.0007996777,0.0015206764,0.005496279,0.01729806,0.0012285215,0.0049014734,0.009836022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086018415,0.00034214222,0.00053556403,0.002428607,0.038912978,0.02011672,0.0058602,0.007430887,0.0030226589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004079016,0.0000026100224,0.00001815731,0.00002780211,0.0000017639743,0.000013147737,0.0022729423,0.00004796093,0.000027919632,0.99187917,0.0038206677,0.0018837308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009018597,0.000010419747,0.000046994177,0.000084343425,0.0000022870424,0.000051690786,0.0012569794,0.0001265126,0.000054229782,0.77719647,0.22115648,0.00000453407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029741896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011727515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01729806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007203514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005633456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052265465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404464264","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2024.2418619","title":"Schelling’s Metametaphysical Critique of Hegel","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1132134972055257,"score_gpt":0.38269788466052457,"score_spread":0.26948438745499886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404464264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047073808,0.005693794,0.19419526,0.07364594,0.0010331644,0.00007097903,0.0002050238,0.00050247624,0.6775795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94153386,0.0015793359,0.019118128,0.0066530523,0.00054545474,0.00014787336,0.000069329726,0.00016655939,0.03018637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763596,0.0010173061,0.00009181059,0.00044673786,0.0006246061,0.00018352304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824274,0.0010513344,0.00011264139,0.0002802857,0.00024700214,0.00006585841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027765238,0.00061005336,0.0005120316,0.001506871,0.0021221654,0.0034461664,0.0013244477,0.0034364183,0.005500818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004881668,0.0002857682,0.00077760377,0.00067982863,0.03628186,0.006488549,0.0031639314,0.0047871047,0.0011688393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046463033,0.0000018127396,0.000025592084,0.000010237775,0.00000166479,0.000009454318,0.0005944385,0.000090439215,0.000060689476,0.9977837,0.0005725795,0.0008448574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046625214,0.000006069782,0.00004355306,0.00001916195,0.000002172575,0.000031009444,0.00016601697,0.00021757226,0.00020684785,0.98721373,0.012084283,0.000004818772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001633442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014571241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005500818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00467758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022414748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03393835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406051495","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2024.2444978","title":"Two Philosophies of ‘As If’: Vaihinger and Maimon on the Use of Fictions in Science and Metaphysics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Doctrine; Theology","score_opus":0.20690589167227377,"score_gpt":0.34159818652732094,"score_spread":0.13469229485504716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406051495","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047666337,0.066829644,0.0667552,0.50493056,0.0045732968,0.00006514189,0.00019838515,0.00025476926,0.30872664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9193928,0.0055544013,0.011695987,0.031824782,0.0021124363,0.00015251474,0.0000557433,0.00014138196,0.029069854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99339974,0.004382067,0.00016210826,0.0008116389,0.00076130964,0.00048309015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99017197,0.0075175404,0.0005844892,0.0006977078,0.00074328674,0.0002849521],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007761781,0.00068882207,0.00071513973,0.0024539968,0.004746952,0.007347854,0.0012706153,0.007414379,0.0025145963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014421953,0.0004425004,0.0007270918,0.0015420457,0.04493025,0.013501433,0.0038873171,0.0075427094,0.00051657204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010928025,0.000003549953,0.00005237225,0.000014132478,0.0000019726926,0.000018395858,0.0036773689,0.00005059216,0.000031942174,0.9905551,0.0033388934,0.0022448048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017303992,0.000015672622,0.00015806899,0.0001558713,0.000007883606,0.00008585411,0.0012584769,0.0004250638,0.0003373235,0.8967188,0.10079911,0.000020609368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046537183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024790661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009258045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027110968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06717217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411420836","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2025.2519272","title":"“Epistemic Blame and Positive Epistemic Norms: On Ichikawa’s <i>Epistemic Courage</i> ”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Courage; Blame; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.06230323943560859,"score_gpt":0.3444219502833311,"score_spread":0.28211871084772255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411420836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031756893,0.009581782,0.09067632,0.17884877,0.0030379265,0.00010317485,0.00003825006,0.00009739069,0.6858595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93815094,0.0038739967,0.013120119,0.014613606,0.0013082236,0.00021322981,0.000020901753,0.000085832304,0.028613042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633265,0.0020331182,0.00010376078,0.0003908185,0.0008881819,0.00025142066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922569,0.0051300675,0.0005487169,0.0004543456,0.0012962002,0.0003138085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006970876,0.00063816545,0.00043266654,0.0011593866,0.0046245,0.004856583,0.0017066525,0.0037094161,0.0028325121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016973794,0.00032033614,0.0003638236,0.0008327656,0.036992483,0.010929882,0.0061815428,0.0066490606,0.0005846775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010912324,0.000005724794,0.00009838623,0.000030282485,0.0000020456655,0.0000696358,0.0061564776,0.000083303086,0.000055607517,0.98698723,0.0034133927,0.003086961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000097200955,0.000015912254,0.00034519396,0.00016722173,0.000008698981,0.00007798523,0.0028376202,0.0006156013,0.00026255538,0.9482024,0.047432385,0.000024697782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003808078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050332397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006970876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030961786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003152966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03686601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}