{"meta":{"query_hash":"b34feb008f07","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies"},"cohort_total":19,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":19,"exported":19,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b34feb008f07","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Philosophical+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1968914034","doi":"10.1080/09672550902811498","title":"<i>Values and Virtues: Aristotelianism in Contemporary Ethics</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Aristotelianism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.3153169998616818,"score_gpt":0.5703807229051839,"score_spread":0.2550637230435021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968914034","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07606731,0.01291349,0.00036952732,0.884901,0.0034925584,0.00020742138,0.000007658984,0.0000273629,0.022013705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9576759,0.0059083262,0.0010588284,0.03328436,0.0019827082,0.000003369004,9.195608e-7,0.000009238905,0.00007635329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99555135,0.0016848859,0.0011949416,0.00017660954,0.0011938632,0.0001983268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866231,0.010967936,0.00069878297,0.000101316014,0.0014654262,0.0001434297],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007883103,0.00014626328,0.00043617678,0.00021737261,0.00032738034,0.000015108952,0.00039811802,0.0003464396,0.00003268782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036398508,0.00011085257,0.00007517296,0.00010770923,0.00045264093,0.0003507031,0.00017149247,0.007332387,0.00002321596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026998192,0.0012224297,0.034316543,0.00029229544,0.0015328875,0.003554715,0.06392599,0.000026974014,0.0019552952,0.8539986,0.023372209,0.013102227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013820285,0.0002797953,0.008964233,0.0009845532,0.00001894233,0.000051500505,0.003799411,0.000010660524,0.000018496336,0.97744995,0.0069338903,0.0001065345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024261779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010278701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8816086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020704481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031222904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99495775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972752880","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2013.787816","title":"Principled Tyranny: Can Korsgaard Explain Evil Action?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.18197146116590412,"score_gpt":0.36255076276636505,"score_spread":0.18057930160046093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972752880","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3186436,0.0030426588,0.000058098987,0.6177628,0.008467838,0.0003094715,0.00006211078,0.00008338839,0.05157006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877961,0.0008640314,0.00007067178,0.0031473234,0.0077500674,0.000018889461,0.0000032877767,0.000021775755,0.00032783003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977661,0.00011921702,0.00076872995,0.00018316656,0.00093548355,0.00022732437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962939,0.0004532468,0.00044714983,0.0001332795,0.0025038882,0.00016855705],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005343257,0.0002187508,0.00041967217,0.00022037962,0.00024977024,0.00020528643,0.0006069625,0.00008115641,0.001484726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077939394,0.00015494529,0.00028933003,0.000047234575,0.00065803726,0.0004369044,0.00018700566,0.0006664918,0.00015777774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100864905,0.0001874071,0.00007294034,0.000017830622,0.0010851024,0.000067281435,0.004226661,0.000013469117,0.00019405212,0.98952293,0.0009345933,0.0035768498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006730819,0.00018942382,0.00019506272,0.00012370961,0.000044585413,0.000050930215,0.00116087,0.000024972835,0.000097330274,0.9510594,0.046201654,0.0001789705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004248593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007251417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66915256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015923528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006932448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008237334","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2011.629368","title":"Physicalists Have Nothing to Fear from Ghosts","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Physicalism; Nothing; Epistemology; Philosophy; A priori and a posteriori; Reflection (computer programming); Metaphysics; Computer science","score_opus":0.10483252335589299,"score_gpt":0.45226960440078273,"score_spread":0.34743708104488974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008237334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9329962,0.0048585287,0.00040430113,0.0440666,0.0075575267,0.0000772527,0.00003231978,0.000017918937,0.009989345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877882,0.00006024739,0.00052728783,0.0034767601,0.007930932,0.000006248938,0.0000013700184,0.000010514005,0.00019844352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985057,0.000060290153,0.00043431972,0.0001312532,0.00062056776,0.00024786763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988222,0.00025703118,0.00022750373,0.00009844329,0.00039810658,0.00019669201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023267056,0.00013587961,0.00029003274,0.0000959804,0.000060471662,0.000030567735,0.00046408153,0.000057770936,0.00032954343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002653663,0.000099767254,0.00016366369,0.00006528631,0.000101583275,0.00026430667,0.0001620332,0.00025890121,0.00031254138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004243964,0.005184916,0.117397875,0.000017750273,0.012242135,0.0013511027,0.32341868,0.00019663922,0.018213658,0.4260805,0.022773817,0.06887895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005244716,0.0014712317,0.33927622,0.00061947206,0.000264989,0.00059209456,0.013050651,0.00004247597,0.004839424,0.103306286,0.53003955,0.0012528526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006455007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026998096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50726575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009277275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010093086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40683907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027360481","doi":"10.1080/09672550500169232","title":"A Substantivist Construal of Discourse Ethics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Construal level theory; Epistemology; Philosophy; Discourse ethics; Sociology; Linguistics; Social science","score_opus":0.20264126375258967,"score_gpt":0.4932450579785083,"score_spread":0.29060379422591864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027360481","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18131736,0.0021227726,0.00026285546,0.77775353,0.0017638654,0.00007720254,0.000041058436,0.000018534789,0.036642823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921519,0.0015204225,0.0005536503,0.0013790746,0.00434088,9.039934e-7,5.834686e-7,0.000006607962,0.000045978475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971995,0.00027092462,0.0006620463,0.00010684251,0.001544988,0.00021571734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955161,0.0017389862,0.0004066523,0.00007257296,0.0021065723,0.00015911109],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00184927,0.0001110353,0.00033088445,0.0001288818,0.00020054088,0.000029760635,0.0005643681,0.00015872125,0.00006197883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005914799,0.00008888441,0.00021649132,0.00012332576,0.0028063739,0.00031477684,0.00009426967,0.00084832014,0.000012723243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010488472,0.00019377406,0.0005801075,0.000009751713,0.00040793404,0.000037974012,0.010380742,0.000017488257,0.00007735443,0.98608285,0.00021218027,0.0018949674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006112361,0.00012348298,0.00042755713,0.00021341827,0.00006292362,0.000026200318,0.0038624627,0.0000070309015,0.00036976702,0.979457,0.01470701,0.00013187499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038090693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009321609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8108345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001762094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037281789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056775528","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2013.767523","title":"Wittgenstein, Non-Factualism, and Deflationism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05963912155101302,"score_gpt":0.2949242781024614,"score_spread":0.23528515655144838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056775528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6497678,0.002446909,0.0001445326,0.30315173,0.0023371163,0.0003256488,0.000035431432,0.00004345379,0.041747358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937693,0.00030237302,0.00028585442,0.0014202372,0.0039058386,0.000015188175,0.0000024322176,0.000012326788,0.00028646115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880284,0.000024595625,0.0005119233,0.00013047417,0.00040657405,0.00012360731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801546,0.00017347964,0.00029994675,0.00008643508,0.0013270596,0.000097613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013041633,0.00014271429,0.000247628,0.00013621306,0.00021005701,0.00020616263,0.0002700418,0.000037881997,0.00041091244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110378416,0.00010561839,0.00010780204,0.000027069955,0.0004930117,0.00051389006,0.00009801355,0.00019531314,0.00011985641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031738608,0.00012567815,0.00020808693,0.000014847656,0.00086017366,0.000024767376,0.014579368,0.000009139406,0.0005090312,0.9713479,0.0052788416,0.007010385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006645082,0.00016472129,0.0011957891,0.00008316833,0.000056030276,0.00009173718,0.0018334012,0.00003988148,0.00019202678,0.9603891,0.035105865,0.0001837634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018453304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000066502207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34400147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038111844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020458547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4499203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058747057","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2013.857815","title":"Experimental Philosophy: An Introduction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08823016672647294,"score_gpt":0.32438009122522327,"score_spread":0.23614992449875033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058747057","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35955992,0.002688424,0.00003329179,0.5862387,0.013644193,0.00025046503,0.00002254811,0.00008901294,0.037473463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95391107,0.000050279006,0.00014076951,0.0013159519,0.04435372,0.000011783218,0.0000054276643,0.000017477949,0.00019352612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827254,0.00007256936,0.00061267056,0.0001956343,0.0006812412,0.00016535376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795055,0.000092458235,0.00032029804,0.00012897444,0.0013668406,0.00014089982],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017512756,0.00019010119,0.000321616,0.00017798491,0.00017670187,0.0001830056,0.00046887342,0.00004552962,0.002225877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017058085,0.00013794446,0.00020934499,0.000033823944,0.00056756043,0.0012621457,0.000110584566,0.00031718318,0.00016960336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011922433,0.00056295097,0.000020524187,0.0000059471804,0.00053282536,0.000036575013,0.0035090838,0.000010690515,0.0013146522,0.98590386,0.0062182127,0.0017654333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006948836,0.00065685157,0.00007672255,0.000035697263,0.00003337648,0.00007439438,0.0013911211,0.000026384228,0.0013069296,0.9256605,0.0698483,0.00019486708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001128317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003592754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5943511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012464805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018612172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068806593","doi":"10.1080/09672550802008765","title":"Comments on Hales:<i>Relativism and the Foundations of Philosophy</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Luck; Epistemology; Philosophy; Adjudication; Relativism; Naturalism; Axiom; Mathematics; Law; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.11520759642764607,"score_gpt":0.39256400566044974,"score_spread":0.2773564092328037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068806593","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3536643,0.0035411732,0.00050502503,0.42272076,0.003476164,0.0002718548,0.000037711976,0.000019114552,0.21576388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996337,0.0005538699,0.00008992046,0.0021397818,0.0008236375,0.00000612809,6.6828665e-7,0.0000066076527,0.00004236664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826723,0.00021050427,0.0005685514,0.00014625251,0.00067615137,0.0001312776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972969,0.0015982706,0.00042013853,0.00013642182,0.00047100493,0.00007721235],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059465144,0.00013056774,0.00033765906,0.00011288755,0.00018340058,0.000010969951,0.0005125402,0.000051923755,0.00008105491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069012755,0.000074187425,0.00016787507,0.00012476188,0.0028754745,0.00011886498,0.00013999079,0.00034278922,0.00002493773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007838129,0.00027469805,0.00079586345,0.0000028128204,0.0006725322,0.00007078817,0.0017828427,0.0000076943625,0.000019281315,0.9946962,0.00026457894,0.0006289103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002528418,0.00032118944,0.0060184896,0.00008581725,0.000040591436,0.00029138598,0.00009389787,0.0000103110215,0.00004625594,0.98986596,0.000621945,0.000075740514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004874497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.7768277e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6426727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035766774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018973184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086898372","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2014.979325","title":"The Good of Friendship at the End of Life","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Value (mathematics); Performativity; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14082140326376905,"score_gpt":0.32352731478096053,"score_spread":0.18270591151719148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086898372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45203322,0.029008875,0.0000080557365,0.39281836,0.0057619847,0.00011599767,0.00008555369,0.00000938755,0.12015857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99615484,0.0003562225,0.00001032103,0.00046622255,0.0027298646,0.0000018556048,8.0655315e-7,0.0000057049124,0.00027416617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848914,0.00012638996,0.0006080427,0.0000678006,0.0006090929,0.00009952644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665153,0.0011084296,0.0006501639,0.00011256856,0.0014167376,0.0000605796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086362084,0.000100685465,0.0002704296,0.00005206874,0.00018763736,0.000019274157,0.0006235525,0.00003373531,0.00019509002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093641767,0.00004705892,0.0001950513,0.000022084283,0.0021235805,0.00010038298,0.0001961083,0.0002210774,0.000012275102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005558747,0.000084943735,0.0007532714,0.000006221721,0.0011190985,0.000007505955,0.0063542286,0.000015943364,0.000018332921,0.9877845,0.0026844896,0.0006155864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063634705,0.00033672628,0.00039324668,0.00004968388,0.00006222047,0.000026267013,0.0018761886,0.0000030396097,0.0001688688,0.9129887,0.083400026,0.000058687427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001229046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008554078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5441216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003831062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006287942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7824421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089784413","doi":"10.1080/09672550903164392","title":"The Matter of Fact in Literature","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Philosophy; Criticism; ROWE; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Poetry; Skepticism; Face (sociological concept); Literature; Linguistics; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.0654230267257346,"score_gpt":0.3338711939228501,"score_spread":0.2684481671971155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089784413","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31794333,0.014152341,0.0000069942685,0.63642114,0.003197891,0.00008742149,0.000024328687,0.000008611745,0.028157936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944845,0.0015940124,0.000022057347,0.0019098172,0.0016514027,5.276526e-7,6.070634e-7,0.0000039182914,0.00033317084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989163,0.00004632597,0.0004777025,0.000062616404,0.00040233848,0.00009467295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858433,0.00023469394,0.00023897756,0.00006153415,0.00085620256,0.000024274781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003520438,0.000085103566,0.00018997054,0.00009502043,0.00009042758,0.0000904159,0.0003310592,0.000031976564,0.000060250342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018568122,0.000047497237,0.00013029437,0.000018771752,0.0003595425,0.0001547247,0.000033820885,0.00035790107,0.00001146316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016957916,0.00018682281,0.0017086017,0.000010179668,0.00023839762,0.00008138835,0.031620163,0.000015184423,0.00005422532,0.958569,0.004231737,0.0031147385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042148543,0.0002223352,0.0036185728,0.00033953506,0.000012347466,0.00003240721,0.0012463598,0.000003895851,0.000079662466,0.9441377,0.04980766,0.00007803044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000024725869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004792524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67654115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029834822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014587744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19368811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780193615","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2018.1415699","title":"Agamben’s Coming Philosophy: Finding a New Use for Theology","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.3212102864943231,"score_gpt":0.4858920907652394,"score_spread":0.16468180427091633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780193615","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29380697,0.001979358,0.0046690777,0.5509675,0.013411629,0.00052117056,0.00008297972,0.000064752865,0.13449652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899685,0.00053272594,0.0011132333,0.0014126818,0.0065859957,0.0000034299549,6.992567e-7,0.000008208258,0.00037452756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985873,0.00013247345,0.00040951086,0.00014088806,0.00044081692,0.0002890082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966679,0.0017616218,0.0005213908,0.00013731064,0.0007253673,0.00018637197],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095587363,0.00011876658,0.00034759362,0.000094778894,0.0009229552,0.0001349561,0.001001289,0.00013878042,0.00007690511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012795669,0.00009601978,0.0002554956,0.000019390533,0.0012042767,0.00057867315,0.00020382684,0.00027862005,0.000010277401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032610237,0.000044699587,0.0020117622,0.0000031525653,0.0005487325,0.000057464986,0.0007828545,0.000004782775,0.000010420862,0.9945192,0.00035000127,0.0013408469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008789648,0.000101763915,0.0041916883,0.00008348766,0.00004694271,0.000020725229,0.0001807107,0.000008845278,0.00004088399,0.9875793,0.0067667128,0.00009998101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007307139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003214131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6961615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017288099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016592818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781867789","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2018.1415694","title":"Wilfrid Sellars and the Foundations of Normativity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.09456226524818263,"score_gpt":0.3468717373048951,"score_spread":0.2523094720567125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781867789","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3438425,0.0036544444,0.00030602803,0.5552959,0.004839113,0.00019964238,0.00007580941,0.000021374659,0.091765195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944197,0.0006459923,0.00005152991,0.0012501633,0.0035935289,0.0000017455029,6.0676206e-7,0.0000056247336,0.000031117142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987592,0.00011824375,0.0004866352,0.00007303375,0.0004815129,0.0000813835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966641,0.0009340606,0.0003948078,0.000077333876,0.0018889413,0.00004077152],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009577914,0.00009398282,0.00027065,0.00008777856,0.00023053122,0.00006139309,0.00031592316,0.000030290137,0.0001364196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009181019,0.00005177041,0.00013053208,0.000028610186,0.0041722897,0.00020211493,0.00015447506,0.00026727663,0.000008924739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025434472,0.000058988364,0.000032581003,0.00000885152,0.00060449576,0.0000043100704,0.009366602,0.0000011895967,0.000022691645,0.9886024,0.00012430847,0.0009192472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091800967,0.00015043751,0.000092745744,0.00007429832,0.000055200166,0.000027547592,0.0005705251,0.00004180106,0.00006822202,0.9847648,0.013179529,0.000056881734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011924372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036396767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6505772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022433143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030626852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080527152","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2020.1812967","title":"Responses to naturalism: critical perspectives from idealism and pragmatism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Pragmatism; Naturalism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Intersection (aeronautics)","score_opus":0.11579467621130099,"score_gpt":0.3707562326392472,"score_spread":0.25496155642794616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080527152","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22244325,0.0075160176,0.00006264983,0.7661524,0.0020765474,0.00007264476,0.00011266626,0.000024516243,0.0015392888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817352,0.00048674888,0.0008565876,0.007966921,0.008914525,0.0000052080236,0.0000027229407,0.000011664438,0.000020400856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985823,0.00011005002,0.0004672325,0.00018881813,0.0005271026,0.00012450796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975553,0.00093449326,0.00016938012,0.00006217649,0.0010852844,0.0001933659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018849147,0.00015063437,0.00029914174,0.000118458345,0.00016940474,0.00018731983,0.00032112192,0.00004064842,0.00025428677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003899755,0.00011695184,0.000094132105,0.00003559457,0.00041815257,0.0003028938,0.00015704473,0.00029674877,0.000031077754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035215137,0.000045800552,0.00006651804,0.000011496134,0.00042216879,0.00006793218,0.12543887,0.0000020533957,0.00019285978,0.8673028,0.0051276344,0.00096972776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047961457,0.00037495667,0.0016049752,0.00019763088,0.000084357256,0.000047254496,0.015955862,0.000019145826,0.00009162653,0.95831394,0.022619512,0.00021110116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026464508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008947955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75929195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059942373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034841723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47691575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211127453","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2021.1992479","title":"“Charles Taylor Responds”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Secularity; Sociality; Subjectivity; Morality; Capitalism; Politics; Political subjectivity; Epistemology; Sociology; Critical theory; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Religious studies","score_opus":0.15662930107860257,"score_gpt":0.4417852016112992,"score_spread":0.2851559005326966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211127453","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052306972,0.009040565,0.00016993159,0.87357616,0.00488268,0.000051562554,0.00002559778,0.000032800668,0.059913747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854888,0.0031607912,0.0004432801,0.0038395836,0.006791268,0.0000014866146,0.0000011486031,0.0000074328414,0.00026623107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760306,0.00031422862,0.00048618452,0.0001339872,0.0012321601,0.0002303782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956644,0.0010641771,0.0002036887,0.00008334435,0.0027877367,0.00019664959],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010718327,0.00010232061,0.00027169165,0.00010619192,0.00025360813,0.00007620461,0.00049077603,0.00011590042,0.00018721235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008939528,0.00008569391,0.00022841692,0.0001640835,0.00071741926,0.00028326828,0.0001503581,0.00046171766,0.000042674965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010187585,0.00012795388,0.00026684496,0.000005632889,0.00045609893,0.0006536742,0.0031157464,0.00000596123,0.00023673971,0.9917174,0.0009575559,0.0023545453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003375812,0.00005020196,0.00030868765,0.000072559764,0.00003145483,0.000050180264,0.0016213595,0.0000017446979,0.00040797488,0.9123767,0.08464567,0.000095889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001676371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003641132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9331818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020332412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002780911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309767496","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2022.2148229","title":"Spinoza and the Philosophy of Love","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0785813972591514,"score_gpt":0.30581475664917307,"score_spread":0.22723335939002165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309767496","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11112027,0.020847823,0.0000139504455,0.79443187,0.0069825384,0.00029936424,0.0002579163,0.000018560591,0.06602771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99192524,0.0006693335,0.000026429063,0.0029923287,0.0041657165,0.000005227842,0.0000019160502,0.0000107997175,0.000203004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978262,0.00020670054,0.00072383165,0.00012978396,0.00096318364,0.00015029905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980659,0.0006927201,0.00044725812,0.00010311875,0.0006150322,0.000075978576],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060831674,0.00014877332,0.0004388771,0.00012632148,0.0002093524,0.000038877068,0.00057048025,0.000020678512,0.0009585787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036033275,0.0000868148,0.00029924585,0.000046890058,0.0017051229,0.00012972286,0.0004891738,0.0004694567,0.000010090204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078407524,0.0001981601,0.00006953366,0.000017255103,0.00085863087,0.000039577335,0.004862957,0.000015923903,0.000009776521,0.9919074,0.0007626028,0.0004740721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019073607,0.00030149453,0.00006147849,0.000045048888,0.00008585637,0.00010127988,0.0012156754,0.000018619505,0.000022504419,0.9156096,0.08053644,0.000094660085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010277577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012974473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88080496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060648854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024187753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362604429","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2023.2199029","title":"Rousseau and the Spirit of Autonomy: A Pathos of Vigour","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministry of Colleges and Universities","keywords":"Pathos; Autonomy; Vitality; Politics; Feeling; Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Social contract; Aesthetics; Energy (signal processing); Philosophy; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.07587791507187186,"score_gpt":0.3174018759750636,"score_spread":0.24152396090319173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362604429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6925891,0.005567655,0.00002451153,0.2887601,0.002021221,0.00015529245,0.000055223176,0.000025215153,0.010801656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963785,0.0014945273,0.000043226737,0.00038111588,0.0013098223,0.0000032279338,9.4056014e-7,0.0000069450143,0.0003816932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878657,0.000051736308,0.0005424905,0.00007077637,0.00045993816,0.00008846689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986239,0.0003193916,0.0003864058,0.00006372121,0.00057745725,0.000029110626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050058,0.00008941379,0.00033068593,0.00012841732,0.00007750502,0.000029087214,0.00027477674,0.000021382524,0.000071308685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021410073,0.00004832747,0.00015994173,0.000041497166,0.0006812006,0.00012466495,0.00014329409,0.00012805357,0.0000063114726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005378379,0.00013903469,0.00093073695,0.00005966139,0.0017307135,0.000070063325,0.04029993,0.00003835802,0.00016002884,0.94835156,0.004800545,0.0028815353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035119746,0.00039752154,0.0025136804,0.00039133223,0.00018951218,0.00003972049,0.0061886893,0.0001882581,0.0004216485,0.8836032,0.10238762,0.00016681704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011334737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001007722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30378938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028859753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031535677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2509912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390611859","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2023.2300546","title":"Philosophy as Dialogue","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Humanities; Sociology","score_opus":0.1337487715887487,"score_gpt":0.3471556465420032,"score_spread":0.2134068749532545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390611859","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097185545,0.0021122263,0.000011526709,0.58367795,0.017005308,0.00017434549,0.00011168904,0.00020822769,0.2995132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9760618,0.00075734616,0.000020788306,0.0021552308,0.020028649,0.000006078902,0.000009089661,0.000019782385,0.00094122015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796486,0.000063619445,0.0006607923,0.000176139,0.00091657136,0.00021803942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784726,0.00046941478,0.0003268894,0.000115649695,0.0011141489,0.00012663109],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036111678,0.00019463558,0.00039223736,0.00035981892,0.00020508144,0.00010970867,0.00060776423,0.00005495053,0.0005409407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008022327,0.00014184027,0.00035870873,0.00011297107,0.000619451,0.00035427036,0.00021910742,0.00037192242,0.0013402512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016526181,0.00012906929,0.000043506217,0.000013050952,0.00087160827,0.0005367549,0.003444026,0.000015939797,0.000048348997,0.98063916,0.012215909,0.0018773943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054805266,0.00021689758,0.000070659466,0.00010353282,0.000039985935,0.0000480905,0.00036823243,0.000009200755,0.0000553271,0.8359481,0.16245478,0.00013714853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000051241336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007862222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87887627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081217724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031744883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404464264","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2024.2418619","title":"Schelling’s Metametaphysical Critique of Hegel","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1132134972055257,"score_gpt":0.38269788466052457,"score_spread":0.26948438745499886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404464264","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22547214,0.10836681,0.0012786534,0.5608069,0.024053339,0.00029066662,0.0003145809,0.00018020361,0.07923675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99122626,0.001436912,0.00013494135,0.0008154386,0.006293118,0.0000028051722,0.0000015891385,0.000018178524,0.00007073743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980668,0.000088059984,0.00074428023,0.00015657065,0.00080964825,0.00013463812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971718,0.00085949595,0.0002004816,0.000090740396,0.0015974671,0.00008000901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007191628,0.00016245281,0.0004514787,0.0002623994,0.00007010689,0.000112946254,0.00045525742,0.00006261588,0.00024252798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060599635,0.0001115017,0.00047894192,0.00005570863,0.00094413524,0.00031716042,0.00012033964,0.00064989465,0.000028075265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010823211,0.00016462286,0.000003133302,0.00007600811,0.0019083318,0.00017126714,0.0038977482,0.000011945641,0.00044047544,0.99094087,0.00020354212,0.0020738537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020347704,0.00019528969,0.0000072192847,0.0004338506,0.00011934954,0.00003376623,0.0004461323,0.00009294582,0.0006730665,0.9648244,0.032860156,0.0001103688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007379568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047836265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76575416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049972896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007348591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45469075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406051495","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2024.2444978","title":"Two Philosophies of ‘As If’: Vaihinger and Maimon on the Use of Fictions in Science and Metaphysics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphysics; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Doctrine; Theology","score_opus":0.20690589167227377,"score_gpt":0.34159818652732094,"score_spread":0.13469229485504716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406051495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8959229,0.0044994564,0.0000044068915,0.08958796,0.0014337366,0.000090815265,0.000038485818,0.000008168932,0.008414095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979844,0.0009338146,0.000054671757,0.00039647942,0.0005882018,0.0000020821574,1.3706021e-7,0.000004504842,0.00003570669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985936,0.000033982236,0.00039087838,0.00014267048,0.00074968406,0.00008916964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983403,0.0006327849,0.00018101199,0.000070593574,0.000736595,0.000038708917],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058611966,0.00010038678,0.00022281619,0.0004240941,0.00018799295,0.000114244205,0.0002775694,0.000014931635,0.000027372544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005112466,0.00006132352,0.00006985144,0.00012744855,0.0035540494,0.00067890075,0.00012088386,0.00023060903,0.0000017606587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053124284,0.00007465888,0.00006017301,0.00002031799,0.00014790738,0.000018713125,0.00924174,0.00003881684,0.0006944515,0.9886665,0.00015602898,0.0008275905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023478929,0.0003672165,0.00055561855,0.0005404351,0.00005415957,0.0000327686,0.0012051187,0.000214548,0.00040344588,0.9851236,0.01116889,0.000099443685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035695553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020037902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102061525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057036388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006318108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411420836","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2025.2519272","title":"“Epistemic Blame and Positive Epistemic Norms: On Ichikawa’s <i>Epistemic Courage</i> ”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Philosophical Studies","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Courage; Blame; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.06230323943560859,"score_gpt":0.3444219502833311,"score_spread":0.28211871084772255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411420836","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42616785,0.01322435,0.00012716958,0.48148617,0.009642659,0.0003481975,0.0002119207,0.00006769027,0.068724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882479,0.0022006293,0.000049168088,0.0048560603,0.002582745,0.000007355111,0.000007864412,0.000019072135,0.0020292348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773574,0.00018227733,0.0009288853,0.00028948893,0.00061723695,0.00024636046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99644166,0.0011533237,0.0005908846,0.00015504773,0.0015639246,0.00009515606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006755048,0.00030167063,0.00068109104,0.00029694452,0.0003133342,0.00014018998,0.00049330737,0.00011707371,0.000033530912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000537613,0.00022929476,0.00028675343,0.000053151387,0.0013260649,0.00025139368,0.00017786841,0.0008363679,0.000024827606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040376806,0.00021422128,0.00040131586,0.00009200178,0.0020411327,0.00015086983,0.007692497,0.000014368033,0.00034542658,0.9848881,0.0021834767,0.0015728717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016857049,0.0005562994,0.0007373487,0.0016089262,0.00026149338,0.0001789378,0.0037016773,0.00001839013,0.0003417718,0.97506475,0.015526115,0.00031856383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003759482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000100904035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024317123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010577713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9350369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}