{"meta":{"query_hash":"355aa31ef7c8","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research"},"cohort_total":28,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"exported":28,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/355aa31ef7c8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Public+Opinion+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W1971827853","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edm007","title":"Gertrude J. Robinson (2005). Gender, Journalism, and Equity. Canadian, U.S., and European Perspectives","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Journalism; Framing (construction); Public opinion; Newspaper; Perception; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Public relations; Psychology; Law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.23795945604216331,"score_gpt":0.4903997185492861,"score_spread":0.2524402625071228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971827853","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22526658,0.037087154,0.00090906967,0.39511976,0.0033446376,0.00034530813,0.000022761114,0.000025575553,0.33787915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9604559,0.03756072,0.00028275032,0.00014805491,0.0012067045,7.9914076e-7,0.0000025256154,0.000006634279,0.0003359024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969471,0.0008050506,0.00031896675,0.00011876464,0.001354477,0.00045564113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965347,0.0004531723,0.00016104631,0.00009640049,0.0021243333,0.0006303227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018362701,0.000064114865,0.000104158156,0.0007750878,0.00064013334,0.00051879924,0.0007190904,0.000049948227,0.00019436487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002034805,0.000057593123,0.00003855331,0.00019957697,0.0004423948,0.00045600146,0.00029759476,0.0005192745,0.00000770997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009035239,0.00019042725,0.026455093,0.000013813933,0.00037554276,0.00015257315,0.072168425,0.0000016258787,0.00031997604,0.5027794,0.066301554,0.3311512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037992778,0.0000566371,0.046041835,0.00003619434,0.000002250258,0.00007085157,0.04864261,0.000010068058,0.00000633468,0.002273815,0.9024084,0.000071070026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012682199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040448867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83610684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055281754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000754057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99389243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976240950","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edm023","title":"Telephone Number Portability and the Prevalence of Cell Phone Numbers in Random Digit-Dialed Telephone Survey Samples","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Survey Methodology and Nonresponse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Landline; Software portability; Telephone number; Telecommunications; Phone; Telephone line; Telephony; Business; Computer science; Advertising; Computer network","score_opus":0.35011821688308287,"score_gpt":0.5282978177872589,"score_spread":0.17817960090417606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976240950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909228,0.0004474822,0.0008648244,0.003317025,0.0012719247,0.00026522292,0.000051679577,0.000005080991,0.002853922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958755,0.0027108826,0.00062616466,0.000038281283,0.00029944538,0.000004730842,0.000006439971,0.000006241917,0.0004323125],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95325756,0.041147534,0.001472992,0.00032929477,0.0030989258,0.00069370726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9277731,0.06878413,0.00044631292,0.00017197887,0.002631425,0.00019306099],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2702449,0.00009769552,0.00033820668,0.00047704307,0.00017763687,0.00011078078,0.00096889643,0.00014872526,0.0009215794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09062408,0.00007129356,0.00011422821,0.00084265164,0.0020802089,0.00043835715,0.00015842252,0.0006845129,0.000010326043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020867493,0.00036633198,0.96454525,0.000029001616,0.00008338586,0.000021323669,0.005659992,0.0000022346992,0.0004931242,0.0010546084,0.0010764141,0.005800861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004765628,0.000041943593,0.9843783,0.000040822568,0.0000028275406,0.000023018127,0.0022590659,0.0000028196498,0.0011396887,0.0016782391,0.005591783,0.00007586792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0083364565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057095555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1796208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001623676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011675028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996483596","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/12.4.357","title":"SUBNATIONAL AND NATIONAL LOYALTY: CROSS-NATIONAL COMPARISONS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Loyalty; Dominance (genetics); Politics; Political science; Autonomy; Patriotism; National identity; Pluralism (philosophy); Extant taxon; Social psychology; Positive economics; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.36023419752269054,"score_gpt":0.575355634214448,"score_spread":0.21512143669175748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996483596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5793211,0.0006664391,0.00061324454,0.18329175,0.0032080538,0.00043782737,0.0002077508,0.000054666336,0.2321992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453026,0.00014170706,0.00020401926,0.00023298204,0.0025533992,0.000009501277,0.000032701326,0.00000639319,0.0022890086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99330306,0.00078128197,0.0005668815,0.00015950021,0.0048044412,0.00038483582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901091,0.0009262174,0.00015739948,0.000047703776,0.008416253,0.00034335087],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008541931,0.00008079531,0.00013982638,0.0005248016,0.00045973525,0.000686597,0.00050954125,0.00010968646,0.0035626888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029928104,0.00007578402,0.00007847099,0.00037459706,0.00058040576,0.00090889813,0.000045076027,0.00040199657,0.00015832027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007629095,0.0002739406,0.10105143,0.000006669379,0.00011019416,0.0000049705613,0.0006318178,0.00011861371,0.000045133555,0.808256,0.0793068,0.010118174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070106395,0.000088020206,0.11524199,0.00003579999,0.0000014967603,0.00003074745,0.00016525974,0.00046720274,0.000016504113,0.033933852,0.8492116,0.00010650815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074438564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002499382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7743221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005738375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017006778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103438180","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edu023","title":"Examining How Communication and Demographic Factors Relate to Attitudes Toward Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage in Singapore","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Political science; Demographic economics; Demography; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.2992155657358476,"score_gpt":0.49573024758500117,"score_spread":0.19651468184915355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103438180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683193,0.0005183077,0.0007949089,0.025970077,0.0008753651,0.00014809861,0.000011655493,0.000007791003,0.0033545247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997965,0.00091947813,0.0002843517,0.00008515172,0.000253294,0.0000051365473,0.000027292426,0.000012073757,0.0004482414],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969085,0.0012577904,0.00054115534,0.00016449518,0.0008639415,0.00026410658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752593,0.000609754,0.000336271,0.00022679639,0.0011179923,0.00018328107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051652896,0.00009143182,0.00020837838,0.0020356881,0.000086848486,0.00021596951,0.0006879382,0.00012756139,0.00013841542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017824791,0.00008511643,0.00005020025,0.0005177662,0.0001616668,0.0004728424,0.00017590923,0.00055516855,0.0000066035145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005302449,0.00015056456,0.95850617,0.00007517322,0.000073831856,0.0000029689613,0.0029702114,0.000009724659,0.00018847222,0.02011263,0.0048925425,0.012964719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007751002,0.00029224186,0.985548,0.00012537971,0.000003404897,0.000026371323,0.0011139303,0.000056536242,0.000016945633,0.0019217246,0.010042168,0.00007815831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014591704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025985733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02964571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012614734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013493201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34709474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132447334","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edq025","title":"Studying Political Behavior: A Comparison of Internet and Telephone Surveys","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Survey Methodology and Nonresponse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; The Internet; Sample (material); Data collection; Mode (computer interface); Politics; Telephone survey; Telephone interview; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Advertising; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Social science","score_opus":0.6399052661206556,"score_gpt":0.6268757558052701,"score_spread":0.013029510315385462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132447334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883827,0.00011512618,0.00097213895,0.0060105743,0.0027147238,0.000094516065,0.00001274029,0.0000057471516,0.00169171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99814147,0.000055895198,0.0010927973,0.000019250334,0.0005257777,0.0000037829254,0.0000038181943,0.0000046682667,0.00015254262],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9761575,0.020732602,0.00063683355,0.00015675701,0.0018874195,0.00042888476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853108,0.011430565,0.00021006625,0.000093931965,0.0026722865,0.00028234936],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10625792,0.000060618273,0.00021089421,0.0007076704,0.00012674755,0.00013676527,0.0007424081,0.00014265739,0.00054289086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037831288,0.000053958796,0.00006536351,0.00026384305,0.0009817913,0.0003000267,0.00018570792,0.00097557105,0.000007693454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000402844,0.00055591465,0.8988459,0.0000044076805,0.00009741412,0.00001950289,0.004304335,1.2898823e-7,0.003189577,0.0555187,0.0014348893,0.0356264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074983865,0.00029262152,0.95133847,0.000031307798,0.000004040302,0.000057402372,0.00907787,0.00002055587,0.0014780172,0.001436938,0.03542866,0.00008425279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014400565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011810713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06842664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071251416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006280607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9702735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141330991","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edq008","title":"Recent Books in the Field of Public Opinion Research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Normative; Voting; Political science; Turnout; Politics; Political economy; Public administration; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sociology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.420110655954993,"score_gpt":0.5892826537945802,"score_spread":0.16917199783958725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141330991","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39775184,0.00052208296,0.00009554971,0.5490995,0.005728941,0.0005007164,0.000016446123,0.000009898358,0.04627501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99700296,0.00064210955,0.00003492543,0.00015895968,0.0019420555,0.000017958268,0.000007864605,0.000004374793,0.00018882117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99052805,0.0037257639,0.00069848343,0.00014832035,0.0042522755,0.0006471293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896654,0.0037820027,0.00019732268,0.00019416836,0.00591251,0.00024859534],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036779936,0.00006483688,0.00014829189,0.0010066126,0.00027279594,0.00047177816,0.0015517677,0.00016055894,0.0009009238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01939382,0.00004651264,0.00008306765,0.0009478574,0.0004779166,0.00056053366,0.00012553767,0.0016328254,0.000037113678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005899345,0.00046403494,0.04788517,0.000015864887,0.000043750857,0.000008900784,0.0036685085,0.0000011101102,0.0010868307,0.78082097,0.08868392,0.07726194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036230395,0.00028867568,0.013915552,0.00006357586,5.671302e-7,0.000008682719,0.0024054595,0.000025952402,0.00022535241,0.01561373,0.9670322,0.000057951267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004422688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043081087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8783483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021615822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013906718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99183774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2306236944","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edv017","title":"Intended and Reported Political Participation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Onderzoeksraad, KU Leuven; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Politics; Citizenship; Democracy; Library science; Political science; Media studies; Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.5730160136698292,"score_gpt":0.5923505817610405,"score_spread":0.019334568091211257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2306236944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7592954,0.0002322095,0.0011084381,0.19878478,0.0036505691,0.0002257428,0.00000766572,0.000029553663,0.03666562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981229,0.000019444784,0.00008895474,0.00010060074,0.0013671919,0.0000054634124,0.0000052556493,0.0000038271464,0.00028639135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962496,0.000972717,0.00046499004,0.000096863,0.0018009171,0.00041490782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937176,0.00036627095,0.00014985052,0.0000688389,0.004937817,0.000759585],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077794474,0.00004740491,0.00011093011,0.0003389914,0.000112293004,0.00029261038,0.0002553115,0.0000764009,0.000098054676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011689318,0.000040393614,0.00003840174,0.00024584547,0.00033118395,0.00051792525,0.000059936257,0.00026759508,0.000024848969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044393022,0.00011610594,0.054533176,0.0000032808166,0.00005468701,0.000018118046,0.0014554076,0.0000011147598,0.000070085545,0.9277701,0.0100409025,0.0058926605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002003178,0.0008194081,0.06914996,0.00013757662,0.000012524261,0.00011858999,0.009864278,0.00045024074,0.0003101074,0.19620933,0.72068316,0.00024163394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023436078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032427526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73156077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003926517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008972358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325624477","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edu038","title":"Economic Attitudes and Political Identities: Evidence from Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.20351153526939278,"score_gpt":0.49993833444704067,"score_spread":0.2964267991776479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325624477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91563845,0.0002640371,0.00023292372,0.07720996,0.0024658057,0.00006572812,0.000017391905,0.0000055127625,0.004100197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99716437,0.00008605169,0.000037732367,0.000121010395,0.002408901,0.0000023228906,0.000002694599,0.0000029550758,0.00017397887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973363,0.00076625636,0.0003108483,0.000097315824,0.0011564335,0.00033279991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967801,0.0017719546,0.00009126354,0.00006188347,0.0009205824,0.00037421836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033409263,0.000043821048,0.000105433115,0.00014393438,0.00015787015,0.00040142564,0.00041687518,0.0000453041,0.000438045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036105006,0.000039338996,0.000029915202,0.000058868412,0.00023266637,0.0005428404,0.00006519241,0.0002046969,0.000019507956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014523987,0.000023826473,0.35206228,0.000007679304,0.00005460289,0.000004461147,0.00036619316,0.000003702618,0.000062710926,0.6295207,0.01545708,0.0024222007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070945045,0.0002670165,0.5922181,0.00050402235,0.0000063308403,0.000019694247,0.0021405192,0.00035647154,0.00021642224,0.07919627,0.32411996,0.0002457316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.849967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61027825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55032444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078722596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017332677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4796286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477150652","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edv051","title":"The Noise of the Vote Recall Question: The Validity of the Vote Recall Question in Panel Studies in Belgium, Germany, and the Netherlands","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Psychology; Political science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.33126218780331407,"score_gpt":0.5114693507058771,"score_spread":0.180207162902563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477150652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6955261,0.00068749604,0.000044307384,0.30144694,0.0014212138,0.00035034135,0.000008509353,0.000002549035,0.00051252224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976266,0.0010699996,0.0000041069447,0.00007069012,0.00060441496,0.000018705929,3.1142028e-7,0.000003981331,0.0006012051],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908695,0.006461643,0.00067313306,0.00010616517,0.0016086107,0.00028095374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99324685,0.004412397,0.00042313663,0.00020106173,0.0016574081,0.00005912909],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02216227,0.00007326587,0.00016787631,0.00010764072,0.00035102325,0.000114598035,0.0010390073,0.00007845869,0.000008234167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008580776,0.000024336596,0.00010037628,0.00043120288,0.0017711396,0.00024777072,0.00021129572,0.00046269724,0.0000012176993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037941855,0.000172318,0.4901361,0.00003132323,0.00014826684,0.000002152518,0.007526442,0.00004201985,0.0006791671,0.48039976,0.005215388,0.015267676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015947705,0.00015515958,0.87850773,0.00099388,0.000009672469,0.0000134111215,0.0015008243,0.00025184435,0.00030619325,0.080392376,0.036184613,0.00008951598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060769124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016206423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40000737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027532075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037880303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616078708","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edx007","title":"Understanding the Relationship Between Public Opinion and Experience With the Criminal Justice System","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Punishment (psychology); Criminal justice; Prison; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Economic Justice; Theory of criminal justice; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.6155729454085128,"score_gpt":0.5198075160414611,"score_spread":0.09576542936705168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616078708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7021663,0.0006479617,0.059901286,0.2176101,0.0041918852,0.000378489,0.000016461701,0.000032560336,0.015054938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974865,0.00032033675,0.000047222144,0.00003857545,0.0019438606,0.0000111660775,0.0000028398576,0.000006088405,0.00014346806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99609005,0.00088321045,0.00031467405,0.00016446665,0.0022222954,0.00032527195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99419206,0.0029051292,0.00045455847,0.000290539,0.001967832,0.0001899027],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075831017,0.000085063926,0.00012608423,0.00042198563,0.00529662,0.0032008323,0.0017566696,0.000067009794,0.000041137006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051015615,0.00004854748,0.00007653639,0.00034558546,0.0012783388,0.0012862926,0.00021754407,0.0006548406,0.000008389936],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009118007,0.000066948676,0.24715088,0.00006997299,0.00024687307,0.000019425665,0.051888525,0.00001606645,0.000006361794,0.68221325,0.003661581,0.014568933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029681603,0.00010090585,0.0695386,0.00015602625,0.00008929481,0.00007648299,0.9071837,0.00015161693,0.0000016946839,0.00057451305,0.021744348,0.000086010215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011700939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088637986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8552952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054399826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061179855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99783397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963403839","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edz023","title":"Back to the Future: Democratic Responsiveness and the Estimation of Future Public Opinion","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Public opinion; Salience (neuroscience); Vignette; Political science; Observational study; Democracy; Public policy; Public relations; Work (physics); Majority opinion; Public economics; Positive economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Politics; Law; Cognitive psychology; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.10951960916109056,"score_gpt":0.4610676955462914,"score_spread":0.35154808638520085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963403839","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28891975,0.0009745319,0.0009038555,0.69945604,0.0063986965,0.00072912936,0.000013159701,0.0000055627215,0.0025992636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957027,0.00028500627,0.00009159155,0.0002464311,0.0031457355,0.0000128453685,0.000006614137,0.000005543171,0.00050356955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472874,0.0024611359,0.00050031836,0.000121409554,0.0018788843,0.00030948222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541605,0.0012853037,0.00026141314,0.00016097579,0.0026817296,0.00019451861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010605898,0.00007184756,0.00017216176,0.00031939638,0.0002717822,0.0004038207,0.000786375,0.00008701694,0.0003676763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020252976,0.000040167393,0.0000810628,0.00059011485,0.00030411044,0.0005527319,0.000113422015,0.00035558152,0.00008369669],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036954327,0.000082875464,0.00971708,0.000036075482,0.00010998256,7.53783e-7,0.003799683,0.00013651275,0.00008906528,0.9313591,0.024120757,0.030178566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019094301,0.00040575044,0.043421462,0.0002109749,0.0000059093745,0.000026156495,0.007832676,0.0017701936,0.00006951875,0.017103462,0.9270979,0.00014652997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048185894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030623842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9142556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001681334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064557587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40257975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155077293","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edab004","title":"Risk aversion and strategic voting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Preference; Risk aversion (psychology); Social psychology; Personality; Big Five personality traits; Political science; Economics; Voting behavior; Psychology; Microeconomics; Expected utility hypothesis; Financial economics; Law","score_opus":0.30127465557710276,"score_gpt":0.5153871092300542,"score_spread":0.2141124536529514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155077293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94367075,0.00049400266,0.00024921403,0.036630336,0.001677752,0.000059762973,0.000009109767,0.000008031847,0.01720107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998099,0.00032878428,0.00008983437,0.000031028438,0.0011015543,8.625154e-7,0.0000035675137,0.0000024432247,0.00034289778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970765,0.0011254518,0.00024921383,0.00008334376,0.0012313451,0.0002341553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630266,0.00050078507,0.00012579162,0.000039269187,0.0028170897,0.0002143872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045877723,0.00003415586,0.000075889606,0.00018357586,0.00025550084,0.0003797325,0.00019933099,0.000055390174,0.0003729011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002589351,0.000030281155,0.000041666593,0.00023201802,0.00013783904,0.00032035503,0.000059502174,0.00031698443,0.000021582619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000194665,0.00010898119,0.119997755,0.00000903655,0.00007587709,0.00004205452,0.0012766179,0.00000630089,0.00053271774,0.8619752,0.002907878,0.013048119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002630374,0.0006176934,0.10438228,0.00048361445,0.000017163455,0.00018370949,0.025725488,0.0015831197,0.0011173408,0.19890407,0.6639414,0.00041377626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001317074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004927729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6630711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015709143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006155823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40830055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164631268","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edab005","title":"Polling in New Democracies and Electoral Malpractice: The Case of Brazil","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Polling; Malpractice; Variance (accounting); Political science; Demographic economics; Public economics; Political economy; Economics; Law; Computer science; Accounting","score_opus":0.27324880400089313,"score_gpt":0.5579846208075178,"score_spread":0.28473581680662463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164631268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84821516,0.0011110916,0.0001724558,0.14806502,0.0006736415,0.00006919315,0.000003868013,0.0000024072212,0.0016871428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985323,0.00016330018,0.00009641687,0.00006508158,0.0007083786,9.626748e-7,0.000001154033,0.0000025801041,0.00042984178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974669,0.0010993857,0.00035676407,0.000072572104,0.00077265134,0.00023172311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966337,0.0012238984,0.00015149706,0.000057046847,0.0017829265,0.00015092552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046907007,0.000036753834,0.000098617405,0.00022075443,0.0001435865,0.00025326095,0.00022323651,0.00004960026,0.00022896082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005553619,0.000027523885,0.000039696217,0.00043808328,0.00015424649,0.0004712154,0.000057966765,0.00034150569,0.000003274777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007038635,0.00018167298,0.20282532,0.00001975236,0.00009984317,0.0006149747,0.0040806024,0.000013393127,0.001570856,0.7486334,0.0076364493,0.034253363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037541222,0.0007225888,0.20681445,0.00069979153,0.00002398261,0.004776574,0.03471797,0.00092572515,0.00431834,0.11982629,0.62297225,0.00044791924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013996385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014690618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6288071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013312013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015376717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225585611","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edac007","title":"Skin Tones and Polarized Politics: How Skin Color Differences Between Interviewers and Respondents Influence Survey Answers in Bolivia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Respondent; Acquiescence; Social psychology; Psychology; Skin color; Tone (literature); Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.1946902453375123,"score_gpt":0.47694252391577396,"score_spread":0.28225227857826163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225585611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96863186,0.00045077223,0.0000194271,0.029098524,0.0012005188,0.00014630484,0.0000803754,0.000005351299,0.00036684793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982025,0.00080938474,0.000030268817,0.00018473418,0.00038873655,0.000013346127,0.000012133639,0.000006584499,0.00035231662],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928879,0.0042860573,0.00043213987,0.0002263825,0.0017346465,0.00043288193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671483,0.00160626,0.000239499,0.00007979657,0.0011169642,0.00024262111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0106914835,0.00009735395,0.0002594159,0.0011308527,0.00040976604,0.0004724748,0.0010354844,0.00009168835,0.00022692497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035786114,0.00009235811,0.000058581893,0.0005698809,0.0007488249,0.00062487554,0.0004730813,0.0007631927,0.000002370818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001628463,0.00015399259,0.96979445,0.00000622682,0.00011049497,0.00001823015,0.011635192,3.5953263e-7,0.00010989215,0.008131947,0.0019512806,0.007925097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085036404,0.00032059095,0.94845724,0.000036202193,0.0000016464181,0.000014127326,0.017129553,0.000008697705,0.000005670063,0.0033674482,0.02971709,0.000091396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008380063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018193625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029570617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003905964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044418417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99822325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255630299","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edm020","title":"Recent Articles in the Field of Public Opinion Research","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Political science; National election; Democracy; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Section (typography); Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Public administration; Advertising; Politics; Law; Economics; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4949682207055141,"score_gpt":0.604546831841626,"score_spread":0.10957861113611195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255630299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5504307,0.0011470293,0.0005396187,0.41963202,0.0026228058,0.0004340506,0.00000913396,0.000009435238,0.025175173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749,0.0008399642,0.00003772097,0.00015927517,0.0013730603,0.0000074475784,0.0000051824168,0.0000037615853,0.00008359693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98996526,0.0036682647,0.00083718303,0.00014138661,0.004602797,0.00078510126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98874134,0.005214725,0.000190108,0.0001526514,0.005451259,0.00024991474],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.059766367,0.000059449318,0.00013786874,0.0011727101,0.00024398779,0.00034408507,0.0011830413,0.00012033831,0.00048984535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01789619,0.000042940184,0.000074972624,0.0015526764,0.00039862323,0.0005513671,0.000103731465,0.00084533344,0.000033564473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013842882,0.0007426688,0.11156288,0.000020272726,0.00005949149,0.000020988417,0.0074389693,0.0000032971661,0.0005886786,0.622328,0.059505332,0.19759099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005755407,0.00051932584,0.05463548,0.00013218848,8.913481e-7,0.000010860564,0.010759169,0.000031808035,0.000633611,0.021607129,0.9110115,0.000082494924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003620768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003280789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8515062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003998793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008483985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9903765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311402114","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edac031","title":"Environment versus economy policy preferences: follow-up questions reveal substantial heterogeneity within the environmental coalition","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Stern; Environmental policy; Public economics; Face (sociological concept); Economics; Work (physics); Political science; Economy; Sociology; Environmental resource management; Social science","score_opus":0.1001789983966799,"score_gpt":0.3900521272682932,"score_spread":0.2898731288716133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311402114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.968167,0.00011941146,0.0002450384,0.025772868,0.0024442398,0.0004147155,0.00013050385,0.00001129707,0.002694932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983093,0.00012504027,0.00012342792,0.00028708318,0.00038076023,0.00009184781,0.00009547315,0.000012723806,0.0005743364],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99502206,0.0014549339,0.0006473417,0.0003319813,0.0021598719,0.00038382388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986681,0.0002986005,0.000377954,0.00034584207,0.000051548825,0.00025798788],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045006596,0.00015263693,0.00014972806,0.00026289298,0.0007353723,0.00018634897,0.0014108352,0.000053481912,0.008914011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036490313,0.00012713061,0.00017197496,0.00024124095,0.000737115,0.00060968666,0.0010598043,0.0008396777,0.00016262042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006346643,0.012555108,0.59563917,0.0000544516,0.0018245066,0.00014832316,0.023864884,0.043397732,0.012859731,0.05577186,0.15842053,0.08911706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005024756,0.0015831674,0.13989323,0.000014353524,0.000020964057,0.0003031696,0.021396251,0.0008626475,0.0010797343,0.013809466,0.8155035,0.0005087976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041519848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046511897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6570829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049846373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034448205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376140456","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edad013","title":"Who Feels They Can Understand and Have an Impact on Political Processes? Socio-demographic Correlates of Political Efficacy in 46 Countries, 1996–2016","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Tel Aviv University; Canada Research Chairs; Israel Science Foundation; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Political efficacy; Politics; Leverage (statistics); Perception; Survey data collection; Self-efficacy; Political science; Representation (politics); Social psychology; Demographic economics; Inequality; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.1904541259312577,"score_gpt":0.4970058816034405,"score_spread":0.3065517556721828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376140456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9534853,0.00010145205,0.000020823414,0.042415794,0.0003937281,0.00018849589,0.000098033124,0.000011716978,0.0032846744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986437,0.00067100074,0.000007920898,0.00006431077,0.00045936537,0.000002741932,0.00002646078,0.000010131307,0.000114375034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957307,0.0007408776,0.00047459107,0.00018852783,0.0021202008,0.00074508326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955414,0.0016951782,0.00015442725,0.00010186396,0.0019577958,0.00054936035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041401945,0.00010216575,0.00021048424,0.001423728,0.0001999606,0.00033438098,0.0005047058,0.0001446177,0.0000631217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023970068,0.00007879499,0.00008434537,0.00048694733,0.0007928329,0.0003711549,0.00008983615,0.0004893607,0.000004950305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008954121,0.0002731376,0.23209754,0.00002649955,0.00009882169,0.00002414146,0.006824458,0.000027550936,0.000014547173,0.7592738,0.00080948794,0.00044043286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002289747,0.0008526032,0.6871982,0.00037774458,0.000008195861,0.000038988237,0.08332788,0.00041256106,0.00008613934,0.2238369,0.0013622011,0.00020882882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00692214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011000752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5354369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005374882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024883281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380550677","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edad016","title":"Could Fact-checks Intervene Directionally Motivated Reasoning and Mitigate Social Divisions? A Case Study in Hong Kong","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Policy Innovation and Co-ordination Office; City University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Misinformation; Politics; Rhetoric; Social psychology; Social media; Psychology; Political science; Subject (documents); Advertising; Law; Computer science; Business; Linguistics","score_opus":0.34507992133390614,"score_gpt":0.5510207133071157,"score_spread":0.20594079197320952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380550677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98281336,0.00004171942,0.000056645,0.012303637,0.0007033909,0.00021615415,0.000012716744,0.00002898352,0.003823399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99852705,0.00021165874,0.000024944726,0.00004860723,0.0004124764,0.000003677977,0.000010335663,0.0000074393774,0.00075380644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995672,0.0010397948,0.0005874221,0.00014080825,0.0021421541,0.00041784864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687135,0.00060435844,0.00023894163,0.00006254619,0.0019617882,0.00026103287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011806507,0.000088203444,0.00016910654,0.0022535638,0.00057784474,0.00082352816,0.0004380891,0.00009076848,0.00028283097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005696444,0.000080943144,0.00007262167,0.0015296359,0.00020399022,0.0014156048,0.00024930338,0.00064933486,0.00002056787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000309821,0.0015477533,0.3964352,0.000048898604,0.00070391473,0.005772687,0.34804386,0.00010320458,0.00026113284,0.034766216,0.0509137,0.16109361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030696224,0.00036822222,0.5143007,0.00026630398,0.000004223073,0.0005916636,0.4474711,0.0009211442,0.000037934642,0.00093789824,0.031801842,0.00022930723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018466722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073970284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16086431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036027597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056685414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7941301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382355802","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edad022","title":"The Regulation of Pre-election Polls: A Citizen’s Perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Political science; Democracy; Perspective (graphical); Politics; General election; Public administration; Public relations; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.21901807820361877,"score_gpt":0.5337422924496688,"score_spread":0.31472421424605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382355802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61928254,0.00048279023,0.0008343693,0.33500147,0.0072603934,0.0006389114,0.00002724065,0.00006782265,0.036404483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967132,0.0002185165,0.000012327887,0.000013202855,0.0013578839,0.000009330581,0.0000038767575,0.0000042882193,0.001667344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611676,0.0010863575,0.00040405025,0.00008377388,0.0020027857,0.00030627524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929801,0.0010644537,0.00023563465,0.000077710865,0.005518863,0.0001231875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008086311,0.000042422827,0.000089811896,0.00047857847,0.00039535676,0.0002261768,0.0004446302,0.00006426517,0.00011915089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005688213,0.000030897263,0.000086172426,0.0008782764,0.00030514935,0.0003575453,0.000047314854,0.0002487796,0.000031615742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009732917,0.000058358197,0.005214947,0.00000507474,0.00009553497,0.0000012785506,0.0043294993,0.000027282444,0.0012603123,0.95103717,0.027355397,0.010517794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088072714,0.000576948,0.32390258,0.000175527,0.0000066104008,0.000014868166,0.01873903,0.0009886567,0.0011784316,0.26727638,0.38611066,0.00014957639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041634943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009539539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6837608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055387086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000680459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6809733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388001564","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edad027","title":"The Relationship Between University Education and Pro-Immigrant Attitudes Varies by Generation: Insights From Japan","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Immigration; Higher education; Democracy; Political science; Public opinion; First generation; Demographic economics; University education; Economic growth; Development economics; Sociology; Demography; Economics; Law; Population","score_opus":0.2093028651897764,"score_gpt":0.44394668300801265,"score_spread":0.23464381781823626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388001564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9517927,0.00115941,0.0006867965,0.042670753,0.0017996498,0.00021689523,0.00004482337,0.000028798426,0.0016001746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928708,0.0019129413,0.00008500824,0.00002797721,0.0019152834,0.000004093236,0.00024313021,0.000004830228,0.0029359148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969308,0.0010217933,0.00031617217,0.00014828755,0.0014013154,0.00018165352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99564993,0.0016562492,0.00020207015,0.00010089343,0.0022419514,0.00014890514],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028351673,0.000068034955,0.00009153066,0.0004571447,0.0013765659,0.00077131024,0.0005492538,0.00009864004,0.00005037265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003077454,0.00005230664,0.0000494348,0.0006058427,0.00036758606,0.0011001605,0.00006479979,0.000343907,0.000031072945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000306963,0.00010685055,0.360319,0.000004532699,0.00012038587,0.0000013129501,0.017101642,0.0000028818706,0.00032797476,0.41302487,0.18325487,0.025704997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021988148,0.000056254474,0.2755287,0.000037669826,0.0000041423314,0.0000013953853,0.012368233,0.00007535032,0.00005178867,0.00977993,0.7018065,0.000070160626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017909934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039746016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51855165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028257346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001196462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391915594","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edae005","title":"Effects of Gender, Education, Income, Social Rank, Financial Stress, and Shame on Beliefs About the Autonomy of One’s Opinions and Their Expression","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Rank (graph theory); Autonomy; Social psychology; Psychology; Stress (linguistics); Expression (computer science); Political science; Law; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14572413075890675,"score_gpt":0.4925750658364165,"score_spread":0.34685093507750975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391915594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95479536,0.014298242,0.0005796463,0.019800343,0.0071164607,0.00059492624,0.0003535443,0.00001598617,0.0024454794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816465,0.0005452304,0.00005733499,0.00006428851,0.00088464445,0.00004202572,0.000029947023,0.000010197082,0.0002016815],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978736,0.0005301607,0.0006126333,0.0001720626,0.000597865,0.00021365873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977503,0.0007386269,0.00024241151,0.000114775285,0.0010269308,0.00012696507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015303071,0.00009914561,0.00019679338,0.0006943739,0.0001533661,0.000106178035,0.00044419614,0.00011813996,0.00026479174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032383724,0.00006795173,0.0001256886,0.00024716955,0.00031986323,0.000220546,0.0001489622,0.00066520483,0.0000060069265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046747446,0.0037340329,0.019044764,0.0008569494,0.00041617767,0.000010011592,0.013548642,0.0000013144264,0.0012555664,0.42531645,0.062380765,0.47296786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014941987,0.0009478255,0.9189575,0.002665869,0.0000123245045,0.000043910393,0.0017247148,0.00002471094,0.0013753433,0.007213446,0.065411575,0.00012859718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000099700774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007977456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8999127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009764478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010526207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28992838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393345599","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edae011","title":"Stereotypes and Stereotyping: Measuring the Accuracy of Lifestyle-Based Judgments on Political Affiliation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2080671156039473,"score_gpt":0.4129679955338343,"score_spread":0.20490087992988698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393345599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9371707,0.00057874864,0.0004401129,0.056936532,0.0032658584,0.00022341692,0.000010757868,0.000028343758,0.0013455462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988884,0.000060958606,0.000019307427,0.00020580628,0.000726995,0.0000070052774,0.000014725063,0.00000802823,0.000068787274],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980038,0.000094063216,0.0004102541,0.00013507981,0.0011843375,0.00017248535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976251,0.0005501463,0.00017904505,0.0001219226,0.0014952443,0.000028554343],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002497918,0.00007436529,0.00009338117,0.0010122239,0.00009887718,0.0010735904,0.00042906284,0.000039465274,0.00020019952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011829505,0.000052838615,0.0000743672,0.00029555577,0.00011744594,0.0008763106,0.00010535256,0.0003140535,0.00006236912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000345629,0.00048722798,0.069114245,0.00034880068,0.00028928465,0.000018824523,0.00014162796,0.000021617165,0.0027611367,0.32697925,0.010443139,0.5890492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023038492,0.000082185536,0.5733419,0.0018048537,0.00006171538,0.000045914636,0.0012555507,0.009241869,0.0013630477,0.006349066,0.40383992,0.00031014913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005708914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000696038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5887391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008040903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014772319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403084221","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edae048","title":"Perceptions and Concerns About Misinformation on Facebook in Canada, France, the US, and the UK","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misinformation; Perception; Political science; Internet privacy; Psychology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.09485424431888625,"score_gpt":0.4425724550165175,"score_spread":0.3477182106976312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403084221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5473794,0.0014142954,0.00024202303,0.31903774,0.00280855,0.00070020516,0.000061411774,0.0000114468885,0.12834497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99439555,0.0034579437,0.00000662222,0.000707173,0.00037988593,0.0000036721842,0.0000034416375,0.0000020792868,0.001043615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977397,0.000353923,0.00029540822,0.000051465933,0.0013874448,0.00017205704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984401,0.0007963883,0.00007400456,0.000054934604,0.0005293412,0.00010526822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004870342,0.000045955654,0.000069818816,0.00029746417,0.00028673516,0.00086751167,0.00034837937,0.000031233794,0.0006616118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009116057,0.000025384625,0.00002598752,0.00022881666,0.0003848432,0.0006287104,0.00004731821,0.0004383237,0.000019433872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010389777,0.000021150805,0.007749515,0.00002160977,0.00009896039,0.0000069341795,0.088674314,0.00013286097,0.000009210024,0.5158797,0.18433209,0.20296976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070400146,0.000028416829,0.06104896,0.00014339869,0.0000012123724,0.00001755351,0.028231189,0.002068416,0.0000030831532,0.0010589536,0.9066476,0.000047174453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14919712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18059847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72231555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036844233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020520072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85646844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409022959","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edaf003","title":"Elder, Am I Right? Age-Group Differences in Social and Political Interactions in Africa","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Group (periodic table); Political science; Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.3500592051909935,"score_gpt":0.5735592633788086,"score_spread":0.2235000581878151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409022959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6452311,0.00072902546,0.00029821746,0.20834105,0.0045297183,0.00043802956,0.00002721646,0.000018952984,0.14038669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974631,0.00033348968,0.000039122693,0.00014719376,0.00050520524,0.000034705605,0.000006115747,0.000004057446,0.0014669786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969474,0.0011717087,0.0006504911,0.00013777625,0.0006128499,0.0004797646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977665,0.0012742039,0.00011538784,0.000053522544,0.0006999724,0.00009044397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027660872,0.00007938484,0.00021702325,0.0016831296,0.00028797967,0.00006016889,0.0003798468,0.000075787524,0.0003807986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091321685,0.000062938634,0.000050020222,0.00043484956,0.00018951776,0.00029675575,0.00034781164,0.0012817583,0.000009706178],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008559871,0.00030818343,0.57633764,0.000032854667,0.000084863714,0.000038463953,0.0025420203,2.8413185e-8,0.00002444974,0.39571342,0.020417301,0.0044152057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012579599,0.00007394405,0.8517507,0.00042942647,0.0000018297006,0.0000032699986,0.008257298,0.000014698398,0.000002211847,0.051520836,0.086627625,0.000060252674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007988618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015057022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.352232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039209417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002761013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55686736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409646802","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edaf012","title":"Affective Language in the Most Important Issues of the 2019 and 2021 Canadian Elections","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.04680540345786997,"score_gpt":0.41138528647385025,"score_spread":0.36457988301598027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409646802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4313436,0.03130193,0.000015228185,0.31421435,0.004234665,0.0005216075,0.00032125492,0.0000051501356,0.21804222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99571496,0.000950818,0.000005310676,0.00016094443,0.00042930254,0.000004926739,0.000005723955,0.0000024688657,0.002725533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985943,0.00031574123,0.00026777884,0.00007175156,0.00060173345,0.00014868213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983854,0.00029181724,0.00010842962,0.00011390417,0.0010709082,0.000029506338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021045078,0.00005058973,0.00010563091,0.00076340366,0.00018814566,0.00026401028,0.0005668683,0.000019061374,0.00057561795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008762607,0.000027567852,0.00006371013,0.0002549125,0.00034270572,0.00018240894,0.00009367394,0.00033243955,0.000002207582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019160685,0.00017181227,0.024788788,0.000010884441,0.00073470594,0.00003263904,0.05136728,0.000007063062,0.00009822871,0.73960423,0.17295857,0.010206632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007616251,0.00015263175,0.060890105,0.00036688917,0.000030982956,0.000037777856,0.2912031,0.00009323069,0.0002337254,0.010691991,0.63540727,0.00013065859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06833223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32470444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72891223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010599504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043426378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9378718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410373097","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edaf010","title":"Chief executive and cabinet member approval in Hong Kong: a rolling-window Granger causality analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Granger causality; Window (computing); Causality (physics); Political science; Economics; Econometrics; Engineering; Computer science; Mechanical engineering; Operating system; Physics","score_opus":0.19579551721421423,"score_gpt":0.5172165563082344,"score_spread":0.32142103909402014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410373097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92820096,0.0005455843,0.00094301876,0.0542759,0.001110004,0.00026257752,0.00002154351,0.000010449073,0.014629958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984483,0.00011731235,0.000046359786,0.00006481989,0.00041745763,0.000009339663,0.0000077569575,0.0000027481467,0.0008858799],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964501,0.0012423318,0.00048778128,0.00016042995,0.0012990754,0.00036027652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971519,0.0007317809,0.00013514797,0.00007975796,0.0017109581,0.00019043838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006966367,0.00006900881,0.00022203253,0.0013017326,0.00015879028,0.00033322032,0.00035582355,0.00009969171,0.0001408942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026565325,0.000059435264,0.0001030176,0.00147889,0.00026725276,0.0003966688,0.00007896735,0.00042368143,0.0000040043374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008505159,0.00021310695,0.8196097,0.000015804535,0.00055459014,0.000016631639,0.0019519718,0.000066888926,0.00010647772,0.1704667,0.0029572046,0.0039558443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013060159,0.00013452048,0.8999358,0.00020282132,0.0000443595,0.000005182892,0.0026280652,0.0012947578,0.00011184731,0.018365923,0.07578316,0.00018756503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012358202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008405518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15210079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036510237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005533569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410875928","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edaf024","title":"The Direction and Meaning of Left-Right in Postcommunist Societies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Left and right; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.06167734161003801,"score_gpt":0.4434199810815932,"score_spread":0.3817426394715552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410875928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62144965,0.003278572,0.00011367233,0.21703987,0.0034275076,0.00017515323,0.000009507506,0.000007093408,0.15449896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880871,0.009579801,0.000040523755,0.000044420398,0.00016790543,0.0000012752516,7.8137964e-7,0.0000018777785,0.0020762759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985023,0.0003411184,0.00031983264,0.000058622223,0.0006249775,0.00015312553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981776,0.000715959,0.00018894138,0.00006470423,0.0008164945,0.000036301553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063258214,0.000035879006,0.00009289414,0.0002060755,0.0003745001,0.00025918888,0.000575745,0.000047339938,0.000039359933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010887883,0.000024547655,0.00005444482,0.00015101446,0.00049443997,0.00039034846,0.00013626464,0.0003581934,9.18321e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066213484,0.000089903864,0.08672982,0.000012971803,0.00010448259,0.0000023976195,0.011971291,0.0000069164867,0.00014004578,0.80491483,0.017848741,0.07811236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006084746,0.00005430978,0.08677172,0.00018382768,0.0000011762878,0.0000062133445,0.016969152,0.00008484967,0.00013169773,0.10055188,0.7945823,0.0000543699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014151774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021061297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7767336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040433297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056317175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28803897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414863711","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edaf053","title":"Perceived Political Party Divide During the Pandemic: A Framework Linking Attitude Strength Toward COVID-19 Vaccines to Affective Polarization","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"University of Wisconsin Foundation","keywords":"Polarization (electrochemistry); Hostility; Ideology; Politics; Mediation; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.15921543894770385,"score_gpt":0.513889310687435,"score_spread":0.3546738717397312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414863711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70605224,0.00016877643,0.007800246,0.27940556,0.0043711397,0.00037719496,0.000034439367,0.00003849941,0.0017519168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99423283,0.00026049255,0.00019091855,0.0015892544,0.0034351868,0.000017524595,0.0000074135532,0.0000068273375,0.00025957296],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536616,0.0015922685,0.00039906523,0.00017386774,0.0018675266,0.00060111744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922393,0.00474323,0.00012806086,0.00012131642,0.0021857896,0.0005823356],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003507836,0.000096188036,0.00017083957,0.0006592379,0.0007550634,0.00058177335,0.0011316444,0.0001778033,0.0002010485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03575028,0.00007392608,0.00012452483,0.0007643251,0.00028767943,0.00033095424,0.000260847,0.00091421057,0.0000148824865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006525542,0.000105262196,0.58095247,0.000023044151,0.00017831361,0.000009697353,0.020254381,0.000012250075,0.00015992238,0.3930297,0.0015595151,0.003650196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013049558,0.0001660326,0.47795647,0.0005565635,0.00002100241,0.000020763657,0.07221057,0.00004314563,0.0001232021,0.13347831,0.31386647,0.000252506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001690688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046033613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31230694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014736344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026135857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.972372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}