{"meta":{"query_hash":"355aa31ef7c8","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research"},"cohort_total":28,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"exported":28,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/355aa31ef7c8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+Public+Opinion+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W1971827853","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edm007","title":"Gertrude J. Robinson (2005). Gender, Journalism, and Equity. Canadian, U.S., and European Perspectives","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Journalism; Framing (construction); Public opinion; Newspaper; Perception; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Public relations; Psychology; Law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.23795945604216331,"score_gpt":0.4903997185492861,"score_spread":0.2524402625071228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971827853","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000629706,0.7448781,0.00031198436,0.19972932,0.008311514,0.000012944037,0.00010458102,0.000023859668,0.045997996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.073068164,0.7335695,0.0014003862,0.061949976,0.007714059,0.00006159907,0.00017532452,0.00010280527,0.12195825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960453,0.00081430736,0.0001317566,0.00033561265,0.0019599549,0.00071301335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942774,0.0023828791,0.00031155298,0.000105636966,0.0018974937,0.0010249633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040488024,0.0013542598,0.0010693861,0.0049076453,0.0136657795,0.015249417,0.0019306946,0.0070862593,0.008160721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007376187,0.0007724462,0.00060906314,0.011013067,0.013944207,0.009092712,0.0020654132,0.00665442,0.0018451728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024735182,0.0000245077,0.0006896662,0.00043016113,0.00000995616,0.00014005273,0.010061242,0.00007722969,0.000068090456,0.14016658,0.7810744,0.06723336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010803294,0.000008043377,0.0027175918,0.0014861544,0.000014228669,0.0001625927,0.0071535567,0.000039124156,0.000050401683,0.019993294,0.96833795,0.000026397425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79227316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.861756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20772684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045716897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059778787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41790032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976240950","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edm023","title":"Telephone Number Portability and the Prevalence of Cell Phone Numbers in Random Digit-Dialed Telephone Survey Samples","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Survey Methodology and Nonresponse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Landline; Software portability; Telephone number; Telecommunications; Phone; Telephone line; Telephony; Business; Computer science; Advertising; Computer network","score_opus":0.35011821688308287,"score_gpt":0.5282978177872589,"score_spread":0.17817960090417606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976240950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99503845,0.00022540276,0.001465063,0.00017917332,0.000028627379,0.00015544568,0.0014403822,0.000011129705,0.0014564433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967224,0.00015071314,0.00080534565,0.00020630771,0.00002629761,0.00023214698,0.0013805073,0.000009950406,0.00046633417],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806215,0.010978548,0.002023365,0.0020901265,0.0033817952,0.00090458215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96222234,0.016364742,0.013796177,0.0034821637,0.0031336052,0.0010009675],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011396243,0.00024959518,0.0004949961,0.0023715792,0.00069195684,0.0011661296,0.0011800774,0.0010603358,0.0036646205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054218628,0.0004358405,0.0004615878,0.0028815686,0.0010737323,0.001677764,0.0012304562,0.0014106238,0.00085793174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010039419,0.00010079347,0.9954456,0.000051595573,0.0000847375,0.00007547354,0.0009244284,0.00005529171,0.00024768402,0.0003224871,0.00052023435,0.0020714037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008048402,0.00018627905,0.9958391,0.000032920558,0.000028111599,0.00045949628,0.001730469,0.000576498,0.0002020843,0.00023980877,0.00068347936,0.0000137731795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052323076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040485486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9886038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005137642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032348058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060269833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996483596","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/12.4.357","title":"SUBNATIONAL AND NATIONAL LOYALTY: CROSS-NATIONAL COMPARISONS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Loyalty; Dominance (genetics); Politics; Political science; Autonomy; Patriotism; National identity; Pluralism (philosophy); Extant taxon; Social psychology; Positive economics; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.36023419752269054,"score_gpt":0.575355634214448,"score_spread":0.21512143669175748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996483596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99237305,0.00027211703,0.00017484085,0.00009275106,0.0000149406105,0.0000069046378,0.00009566839,0.0000015421515,0.006968093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989411,0.00012334979,0.000066727596,0.00004858885,0.0000068954137,0.000007889649,0.0002491732,0.0000026983728,0.0005535226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981679,0.00085985294,0.000109765155,0.00020162425,0.0002797754,0.00038121952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934018,0.0027345186,0.00091432047,0.0005922469,0.0014636138,0.000893493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035202927,0.0001267641,0.00042423504,0.002163979,0.001103117,0.0020291014,0.000520609,0.0004381828,0.0071675135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010096832,0.00013166279,0.00043238184,0.0022655062,0.0011825388,0.0022641928,0.0032408256,0.00086856424,0.0005829289],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042068932,0.00024817663,0.9447209,0.00009633977,0.00045643578,0.00015825502,0.020713968,0.00021437094,0.0006924494,0.007862247,0.00077884784,0.023637202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006347264,0.0001430327,0.9709325,0.000045139368,0.00008589384,0.000086559994,0.025729526,0.00035142194,0.00017795105,0.0008932849,0.0015368989,0.000011473687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010606281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02135384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010606281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041422114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023977757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103438180","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edu023","title":"Examining How Communication and Demographic Factors Relate to Attitudes Toward Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage in Singapore","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Political science; Demographic economics; Demography; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.2992155657358476,"score_gpt":0.49573024758500117,"score_spread":0.19651468184915355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103438180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99743974,0.00024546336,0.000039669838,0.0004495506,0.000012076727,0.000007753749,0.00013748147,0.0000011378859,0.0016670502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876237,0.00034965022,0.00004138212,0.0001043187,0.000011963168,0.000010951909,0.0001849101,0.0000023361476,0.0005322641],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878615,0.00040673724,0.00019543199,0.00011773424,0.00031382355,0.0001801527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99161106,0.0017750126,0.0038480163,0.0002566197,0.0012199738,0.0012892856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017146834,0.00025733572,0.00032055183,0.00091508956,0.00096347206,0.0019673964,0.00044070918,0.0005814659,0.004911284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006669326,0.00029171945,0.0005835774,0.0014452821,0.000595897,0.001356487,0.0013792298,0.0015551804,0.00069804746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021674574,0.000053772157,0.9890169,0.000023252844,0.00004043628,0.00017916416,0.0064407755,0.000016878981,0.000057009885,0.00009269207,0.00026390885,0.003793692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024330097,0.00008517299,0.9769279,0.000057462064,0.00002520373,0.00020911403,0.021209894,0.00020687122,0.000056910154,0.00007618732,0.0011274321,0.00001547128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020448836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03165504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020448836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000872014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012036987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040659606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132447334","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edq025","title":"Studying Political Behavior: A Comparison of Internet and Telephone Surveys","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Survey Methodology and Nonresponse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; The Internet; Sample (material); Data collection; Mode (computer interface); Politics; Telephone survey; Telephone interview; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Advertising; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Social science","score_opus":0.6399052661206556,"score_gpt":0.6268757558052701,"score_spread":0.013029510315385462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132447334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9675185,0.0013745119,0.013038667,0.00069205445,0.00007590807,0.0005044712,0.0012179456,0.000057224155,0.015520703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98917514,0.0010440573,0.0065732524,0.00035074964,0.00005392863,0.00048474385,0.0009820694,0.000026884318,0.0013092116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96311736,0.030508382,0.00091966556,0.00085436116,0.003994521,0.0006056416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95023125,0.035345685,0.005251049,0.0025161814,0.0058805756,0.00077524356],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02015256,0.00022617953,0.00049326377,0.0037088876,0.00048163938,0.0016299628,0.0005861983,0.00062969135,0.002858972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.082687214,0.00022866164,0.00043534185,0.0058531533,0.00066572806,0.0014806103,0.00090508856,0.00038545055,0.00040272818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015944503,0.0005012451,0.8142194,0.0006358162,0.0007302719,0.00012164014,0.008987099,0.001396832,0.0013512892,0.0042060334,0.0019607083,0.16429512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011425445,0.00092494447,0.9768156,0.00023735131,0.00015866593,0.00016571816,0.007983316,0.003822232,0.000558143,0.0010253905,0.0081597185,0.000034769022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042690296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07157207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97984743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016007295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018430611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10657817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141330991","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edq008","title":"Recent Books in the Field of Public Opinion Research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Normative; Voting; Political science; Turnout; Politics; Political economy; Public administration; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sociology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.420110655954993,"score_gpt":0.5892826537945802,"score_spread":0.16917199783958725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141330991","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000724288,0.7051178,0.003530787,0.05072702,0.0351932,0.000052189534,0.0009951253,0.00019258203,0.20346695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008124446,0.68616015,0.009087639,0.03783384,0.06398544,0.00024440218,0.002120302,0.0003062866,0.19213746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841535,0.00034973695,0.0001393468,0.0001900149,0.0008121847,0.00009332774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892865,0.007985162,0.000531122,0.0003805034,0.0013297449,0.00048691427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001921997,0.0012625945,0.0017693765,0.008974438,0.0017170903,0.005119562,0.001069917,0.002942547,0.062800966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00893575,0.00078035786,0.000974268,0.023288509,0.0024956604,0.0051603774,0.0017796229,0.0044627604,0.02445177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019195391,0.000060266375,0.00047588663,0.0010312746,0.000024974606,0.00004892524,0.00036708053,0.00017976317,0.00010864782,0.029762132,0.8156826,0.15223923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076014758,0.00000741256,0.0009360445,0.00076277566,0.0000088898905,0.00008547869,0.0001774458,0.00006818069,0.000018336274,0.01218119,0.98573697,0.000009665543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028943964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008380509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062800966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025108305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002040972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21009016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2306236944","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edv017","title":"Intended and Reported Political Participation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Onderzoeksraad, KU Leuven; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Politics; Citizenship; Democracy; Library science; Political science; Media studies; Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.5730160136698292,"score_gpt":0.5923505817610405,"score_spread":0.019334568091211257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2306236944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96934354,0.00061559945,0.002061577,0.00030687646,0.00012275262,0.00019783677,0.005052329,0.000040307325,0.022259211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98980355,0.00028201446,0.0013036798,0.000088058776,0.000072283496,0.00040506787,0.0035300928,0.00001770961,0.004497519],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959936,0.0017694666,0.00052505813,0.00054244854,0.0008584276,0.00031093837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818555,0.0069053434,0.005763295,0.0017656423,0.0020940702,0.0016161688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040551797,0.00038313653,0.00050990615,0.0017923844,0.0004341576,0.0017370725,0.0006252755,0.0007642705,0.01125346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024235243,0.0001959443,0.0007291944,0.001184777,0.0006829857,0.00091387244,0.0014449499,0.0012775054,0.002171867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049626885,0.0006118047,0.9634312,0.00046814978,0.00043207392,0.00016736117,0.004078947,0.00043867723,0.0008917008,0.002839419,0.002291223,0.023853227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028252269,0.00032475905,0.98845136,0.00012199133,0.00010263769,0.00035616715,0.002413715,0.00060001184,0.00056242396,0.0016564765,0.0053404295,0.00004185445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010686213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018951414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01125346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003584264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002790672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037646532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325624477","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edu038","title":"Economic Attitudes and Political Identities: Evidence from Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.20351153526939278,"score_gpt":0.49993833444704067,"score_spread":0.2964267991776479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325624477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.976728,0.0012319139,0.00014745633,0.001435899,0.00002815394,0.00006177688,0.0036807437,0.000006031312,0.016680017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99127114,0.0014135622,0.00020786382,0.0003450524,0.000014402639,0.000023297576,0.002239293,0.000014238741,0.0044711162],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674326,0.00045390707,0.00015397527,0.00039618465,0.0014142852,0.000838411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823131,0.0035032297,0.0028268348,0.0007963586,0.008540996,0.0020194878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031245989,0.00030268644,0.000902475,0.002346037,0.007617212,0.002515247,0.0016723799,0.0006798698,0.0080113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011603846,0.00036591027,0.00050543924,0.010453725,0.002336177,0.00068040163,0.0017243623,0.0013247682,0.00069225987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061220396,0.00032429936,0.9351472,0.00031820068,0.00018680988,0.00032570932,0.019244496,0.00021638522,0.00027068358,0.0042763883,0.0105587505,0.028518785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052731553,0.000032489475,0.982263,0.00013770517,0.000075591604,0.000040811763,0.0093339,0.00023476411,0.00013051259,0.0002346249,0.007436122,0.000027742164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026434101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026434101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04138801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19179374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477150652","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edv051","title":"The Noise of the Vote Recall Question: The Validity of the Vote Recall Question in Panel Studies in Belgium, Germany, and the Netherlands","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Psychology; Political science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.33126218780331407,"score_gpt":0.5114693507058771,"score_spread":0.180207162902563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477150652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.985959,0.0014727602,0.0049231322,0.0011506241,0.00007722939,0.00008055554,0.0005457066,0.000011882066,0.0057792244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984359,0.000120159915,0.00038531303,0.0001434853,0.00003417139,0.000056661956,0.00055928173,0.000011007659,0.00025401489],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9273242,0.05870612,0.0028332714,0.004739873,0.004904732,0.0014918583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6151476,0.33567214,0.024134662,0.015499903,0.008607264,0.00093848846],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09059175,0.00032280193,0.0011165114,0.0020540818,0.0011574825,0.0029879853,0.0015754963,0.0017116406,0.0019159584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23831671,0.00045166098,0.0011825052,0.0029205186,0.0027976658,0.0019070457,0.0023359205,0.0011532453,0.00031759174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001206601,0.00011399496,0.94898844,0.0003712917,0.0011228694,0.000161039,0.014965726,0.0024646746,0.00038648237,0.004886797,0.0014729439,0.023859099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007302347,0.0001875803,0.9672619,0.00056829944,0.00060773117,0.00016199202,0.01225641,0.0060676667,0.0014684721,0.005426284,0.005843544,0.00007714772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032453187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022768151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9094083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001454427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011026683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4791007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616078708","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edx007","title":"Understanding the Relationship Between Public Opinion and Experience With the Criminal Justice System","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Punishment (psychology); Criminal justice; Prison; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Economic Justice; Theory of criminal justice; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.6155729454085128,"score_gpt":0.5198075160414611,"score_spread":0.09576542936705168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616078708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99113,0.000221181,0.00017336739,0.0007182802,0.000009624071,0.0000040169134,0.000037157162,0.0000013537723,0.0077050817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99965847,0.00009091235,0.000021582251,0.00003796066,0.0000076111187,0.0000013051064,0.000019180901,7.0812865e-7,0.00016235729],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975057,0.0012771218,0.00012781574,0.0001714901,0.000463572,0.00045438492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98281384,0.009451356,0.0045678155,0.0004113014,0.0016983246,0.0010572381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002369589,0.00011329562,0.00018877964,0.0013371679,0.0006274801,0.0024030167,0.00027305778,0.0005615866,0.0047746035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012734752,0.00013036629,0.00023142988,0.000896325,0.0009915441,0.0016394951,0.0010132418,0.00084729685,0.00020032455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007806375,0.00026855292,0.95135826,0.00005673845,0.00007661689,0.0001659519,0.024455998,0.000091527516,0.00032463437,0.001391656,0.00046672957,0.021265332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020563393,0.00007717548,0.95669,0.00004737422,0.00001846027,0.00010427423,0.040760495,0.00025228242,0.00008178274,0.0005347498,0.0014217282,0.0000096638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005244971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072705764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005244971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007597096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050307706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015972614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963403839","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edz023","title":"Back to the Future: Democratic Responsiveness and the Estimation of Future Public Opinion","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Public opinion; Salience (neuroscience); Vignette; Political science; Observational study; Democracy; Public policy; Public relations; Work (physics); Majority opinion; Public economics; Positive economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Politics; Law; Cognitive psychology; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.10951960916109056,"score_gpt":0.4610676955462914,"score_spread":0.35154808638520085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963403839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96820134,0.00020587993,0.0027318147,0.0016542074,0.000023765333,0.000035645447,0.00009439319,0.000015857688,0.027037064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992693,0.000044627002,0.00021987788,0.00009500781,0.000008338714,0.0000066111143,0.000024517256,0.0000029177102,0.0003287269],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932811,0.0041649677,0.00017906,0.00062327733,0.0013149835,0.000436677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9519903,0.032208145,0.008164782,0.0026304487,0.0038370986,0.0011693214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012812055,0.0001636659,0.00029492646,0.00092379836,0.0014346635,0.0029482841,0.00038013197,0.0007877012,0.0039980505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06546733,0.00020129915,0.00021270028,0.00079148135,0.0029243396,0.0012382919,0.0011298761,0.0016277737,0.00028065188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019725051,0.00082416553,0.6929559,0.00040655848,0.00038047618,0.0003007566,0.09607643,0.0076700947,0.011678661,0.06427747,0.0036605636,0.119796455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005149227,0.0003661861,0.91751504,0.00014066702,0.00011295294,0.000087620545,0.031973988,0.007982215,0.0026476895,0.028082395,0.010886837,0.0001528399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054092698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038556073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054092698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028516909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014664088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10755569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155077293","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edab004","title":"Risk aversion and strategic voting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Preference; Risk aversion (psychology); Social psychology; Personality; Big Five personality traits; Political science; Economics; Voting behavior; Psychology; Microeconomics; Expected utility hypothesis; Financial economics; Law","score_opus":0.30127465557710276,"score_gpt":0.5153871092300542,"score_spread":0.2141124536529514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155077293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883636,0.00026222377,0.0012004763,0.00026248896,0.000010557071,0.000008857609,0.000054405915,0.0000051919656,0.009831994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993963,0.00004716385,0.00007671015,0.000013915545,0.0000068487366,0.0000016180068,0.00001864366,7.008098e-7,0.00043819143],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999008,0.0005412885,0.000053880198,0.000097670556,0.00015672998,0.00014250353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98093134,0.010953258,0.005835835,0.0006890973,0.00056510797,0.0010253629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017404427,0.000169083,0.0002496418,0.0006481437,0.00034986794,0.0011467444,0.00016286588,0.00040135303,0.007812954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010957789,0.00008955619,0.0002850183,0.0006686144,0.0005719251,0.00035071583,0.0005622915,0.0006942195,0.0005255122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003071863,0.00022840558,0.9561574,0.00007535357,0.0002053823,0.00017640124,0.00084944227,0.0025716517,0.0010132861,0.012714014,0.0005714912,0.025129974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022285183,0.00026340992,0.9667845,0.000048613758,0.00008622324,0.0004215819,0.0014930278,0.006166792,0.00049027125,0.021548076,0.0026486986,0.000026604755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008528701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010797067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007812954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026732805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015109639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026136935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164631268","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edab005","title":"Polling in New Democracies and Electoral Malpractice: The Case of Brazil","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Polling; Malpractice; Variance (accounting); Political science; Demographic economics; Public economics; Political economy; Economics; Law; Computer science; Accounting","score_opus":0.27324880400089313,"score_gpt":0.5579846208075178,"score_spread":0.28473581680662463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164631268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98603755,0.000586635,0.0006748066,0.003711199,0.000016131164,0.00004732706,0.00023827847,0.000010643152,0.0086773895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99954337,0.000071389186,0.000081818835,0.000068342895,0.000005139339,0.0000051170773,0.000029367548,0.0000017864057,0.00019366285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951485,0.002243827,0.00029712188,0.00045939686,0.0008095133,0.0010416247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95326686,0.028256651,0.010774385,0.0035327221,0.0028053948,0.0013639772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009063526,0.00014408802,0.00050762977,0.001604261,0.0024974213,0.0018225785,0.0008351755,0.00088423514,0.0034689563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047231708,0.00023653825,0.0003461739,0.0026918151,0.0029634489,0.0011968525,0.0019068633,0.0014358958,0.00018305668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107866734,0.00013749657,0.90989673,0.00024548706,0.000115806586,0.0022375076,0.033871498,0.00097215525,0.00058022945,0.022974635,0.0019141171,0.026946532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052617925,0.0000936216,0.9306898,0.00038369594,0.00013124877,0.0008740098,0.03723213,0.005340369,0.000751324,0.006560784,0.017845118,0.000045245903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17438197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20050298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17438197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044610975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002316315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34673393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225585611","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edac007","title":"Skin Tones and Polarized Politics: How Skin Color Differences Between Interviewers and Respondents Influence Survey Answers in Bolivia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Respondent; Acquiescence; Social psychology; Psychology; Skin color; Tone (literature); Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.1946902453375123,"score_gpt":0.47694252391577396,"score_spread":0.28225227857826163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225585611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977469,0.00009531566,0.00011433464,0.00020683276,0.0000025182073,0.000007707434,0.000026214635,9.1812734e-7,0.0017992321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997503,0.00003409773,0.000033091736,0.000030448491,0.0000012755671,0.0000056103977,0.000013385529,9.2255834e-7,0.00013083954],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.991342,0.0068438575,0.00014077316,0.00039467445,0.00030681895,0.0009719594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876177,0.007701008,0.0029813612,0.00064355653,0.00062885566,0.0004276545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008292449,0.00017960451,0.00030413363,0.0010841985,0.0018874786,0.0024559258,0.0006550905,0.0003479646,0.0020911759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017104218,0.0003445898,0.00021256202,0.0015640275,0.0031509688,0.00088241335,0.0030054417,0.00091688224,0.0001796732],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019911454,0.00009939007,0.8991915,0.00006121277,0.00007555287,0.000119640485,0.08443151,0.00022530038,0.0006536714,0.0024769718,0.00036328917,0.012102775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008616176,0.000049621744,0.9149967,0.00010714218,0.000029117558,0.000027525943,0.08198504,0.00044046715,0.0002883084,0.0006912743,0.0013650978,0.000011091003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069013946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06588491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069013946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041727955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012842573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1372245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255630299","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edm020","title":"Recent Articles in the Field of Public Opinion Research","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public opinion; Political science; National election; Democracy; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Section (typography); Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Public administration; Advertising; Politics; Law; Economics; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4949682207055141,"score_gpt":0.604546831841626,"score_spread":0.10957861113611195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255630299","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019591379,0.7592102,0.0024776717,0.09913622,0.11136084,0.000044325865,0.00023221948,0.000048474933,0.025530878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012915384,0.7126274,0.0029490783,0.029596187,0.23111658,0.00009732066,0.00044552927,0.000084412975,0.010167982],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919482,0.0019318332,0.00093010475,0.0012676752,0.0034268433,0.00049536943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8709828,0.09699838,0.005381928,0.0025158739,0.019841494,0.0042795553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009961833,0.0010148218,0.0019827397,0.015856355,0.0026740944,0.010473652,0.0018692039,0.009536163,0.023561329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04570942,0.00087476434,0.0014404771,0.041908022,0.0039993986,0.008099524,0.002239278,0.007930619,0.005291913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020543816,0.00026299382,0.0024137297,0.014366082,0.00020177999,0.00043744963,0.0016161499,0.0005160584,0.0006413705,0.049985424,0.44030163,0.48905194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025417832,0.000059870807,0.0037773915,0.005000982,0.000081895065,0.00034013615,0.0009797392,0.00027943798,0.00016007795,0.012101782,0.97714955,0.00004374694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016462973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003611467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023561329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044655725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045272005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07882047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311402114","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edac031","title":"Environment versus economy policy preferences: follow-up questions reveal substantial heterogeneity within the environmental coalition","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Stern; Environmental policy; Public economics; Face (sociological concept); Economics; Work (physics); Political science; Economy; Sociology; Environmental resource management; Social science","score_opus":0.1001789983966799,"score_gpt":0.3900521272682932,"score_spread":0.2898731288716133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311402114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99383694,0.000077531135,0.0022579294,0.00032776615,0.000025456648,0.00019721196,0.00034804104,0.000016599493,0.0029124964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917319,0.000122021615,0.0045601064,0.0005846253,0.000028114151,0.0009613074,0.0005373077,0.000010941134,0.0014636249],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960698,0.0018989203,0.00045729274,0.00036892435,0.00074909045,0.00045594844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97062826,0.018325476,0.0051430613,0.0024503355,0.0024705725,0.0009822072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0096844705,0.0005034325,0.00046414734,0.0012224067,0.000999583,0.0014782096,0.0004947527,0.0019300726,0.0049774353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025324812,0.00022879314,0.00065758254,0.0007739161,0.00081522466,0.0018372044,0.002547182,0.0017790266,0.00124392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011438426,0.0020194422,0.8043163,0.00049462327,0.00036504288,0.00046674782,0.08295298,0.0012289481,0.014731767,0.0047661834,0.004098698,0.08341544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001350718,0.001044178,0.8709132,0.00025582765,0.00009848834,0.0004415427,0.08666348,0.0033191491,0.008227212,0.009336973,0.019423332,0.00014147129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082310487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011978254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0096844705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005288669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043936833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05121702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376140456","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edad013","title":"Who Feels They Can Understand and Have an Impact on Political Processes? Socio-demographic Correlates of Political Efficacy in 46 Countries, 1996–2016","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Tel Aviv University; Canada Research Chairs; Israel Science Foundation; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Political efficacy; Politics; Leverage (statistics); Perception; Survey data collection; Self-efficacy; Political science; Representation (politics); Social psychology; Demographic economics; Inequality; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.1904541259312577,"score_gpt":0.4970058816034405,"score_spread":0.3065517556721828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376140456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950435,0.0001423713,0.00006435115,0.00062339666,0.000012997151,0.000004003555,0.00013015316,0.0000017185248,0.003977443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993612,0.00009784002,0.00002069426,0.000054502878,0.000008481835,0.0000038673415,0.00009471076,0.0000012588679,0.0003573415],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869245,0.00052378565,0.000083091436,0.00011047159,0.00018782767,0.00040235094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940019,0.0015190303,0.0027466568,0.00032405515,0.00054462673,0.00086366915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030324545,0.00012370241,0.00025471946,0.000857158,0.00082028576,0.001924601,0.00019290447,0.00042099642,0.004551367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008064829,0.00017002554,0.00022916714,0.00088026817,0.0014977604,0.0011598892,0.0012335553,0.0011595412,0.00052394293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064883076,0.00008035467,0.96206,0.000046264933,0.00004284364,0.0001046677,0.02348404,0.0001188562,0.00021067093,0.0011735398,0.0012551479,0.011358815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002983676,0.000038584305,0.964716,0.000053350286,0.000007747323,0.0000621853,0.031005848,0.00009007899,0.00007539628,0.00027698113,0.0036610705,0.000009638297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00494306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072830557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00494306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004577839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036651056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016037405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380550677","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edad016","title":"Could Fact-checks Intervene Directionally Motivated Reasoning and Mitigate Social Divisions? A Case Study in Hong Kong","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Policy Innovation and Co-ordination Office; City University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Misinformation; Politics; Rhetoric; Social psychology; Social media; Psychology; Political science; Subject (documents); Advertising; Law; Computer science; Business; Linguistics","score_opus":0.34507992133390614,"score_gpt":0.5510207133071157,"score_spread":0.20594079197320952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380550677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982333,0.000028408187,0.00010221999,0.00022013183,0.00000641036,0.00004587484,0.00000776202,0.0000016658452,0.0013541961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986625,0.000067293506,0.00033380586,0.00007812693,0.0000041024487,0.000026279735,0.000007255593,0.0000017980085,0.0008189174],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972972,0.0018882988,0.00008007624,0.00013319828,0.00014514047,0.00045602903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917578,0.004752589,0.0010356826,0.0007567385,0.00068464567,0.0010124922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005376356,0.00040668435,0.00031206495,0.0005485284,0.006752453,0.0022513545,0.000841991,0.000946639,0.002628837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068624653,0.00030673135,0.0003224144,0.0005761071,0.0035644784,0.0012320082,0.0016008614,0.0012822383,0.00023428677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010673362,0.005735905,0.33802742,0.00046405877,0.00013310883,0.026677044,0.567149,0.0017064549,0.004231971,0.007620484,0.0027053973,0.044481773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024145059,0.002971835,0.17317522,0.00031328885,0.00015505996,0.0014008974,0.78915447,0.0040603457,0.004945787,0.0013340712,0.022126276,0.00012129949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.115160935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19363987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115160935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005446479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006014672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22898126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382355802","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edad022","title":"The Regulation of Pre-election Polls: A Citizen’s Perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Political science; Democracy; Perspective (graphical); Politics; General election; Public administration; Public relations; Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.21901807820361877,"score_gpt":0.5337422924496688,"score_spread":0.31472421424605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382355802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7578841,0.0017903298,0.008916261,0.047610033,0.00037782875,0.0002075633,0.00080455194,0.000071758426,0.18233767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99507445,0.00022964443,0.00042654976,0.0018280211,0.000116600764,0.00002850903,0.00010002415,0.000013868773,0.0021822578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752653,0.013655467,0.0009754042,0.0015616731,0.00482401,0.0037181657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88075554,0.07730873,0.015271839,0.0062795486,0.016827691,0.0035566024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026913904,0.00014417268,0.00046773202,0.0025282574,0.0038748204,0.007789534,0.0009270806,0.0015867876,0.0059309117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063783154,0.0002727752,0.0004291064,0.0029986026,0.0053605977,0.0024201423,0.0016298696,0.0024591333,0.0005401243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080958835,0.00045754312,0.56474775,0.0007957791,0.00024031744,0.0007419564,0.113444,0.0011620865,0.0077600614,0.1726261,0.020571295,0.11664352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005991436,0.00026333722,0.7258633,0.00047724516,0.00013593693,0.00017339423,0.08199024,0.0019712849,0.0044999365,0.01866511,0.16576727,0.00013313083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08373464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12202932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08373464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047059306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006053435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16649449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388001564","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edad027","title":"The Relationship Between University Education and Pro-Immigrant Attitudes Varies by Generation: Insights From Japan","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Immigration; Higher education; Democracy; Political science; Public opinion; First generation; Demographic economics; University education; Economic growth; Development economics; Sociology; Demography; Economics; Law; Population","score_opus":0.2093028651897764,"score_gpt":0.44394668300801265,"score_spread":0.23464381781823626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388001564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993224,0.000047008678,0.00001830957,0.00007587471,0.0000018203356,0.0000014562352,0.000016451864,2.718135e-7,0.0005164583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956125,0.00010522891,0.000028808337,0.00006471846,0.0000034604097,0.0000027439671,0.000035499535,7.1838684e-7,0.00019756328],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970776,0.00010432924,0.000022183638,0.00003591983,0.000037338854,0.000092466384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986664,0.00037707228,0.00037065515,0.00007397559,0.00028926122,0.00022266908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013690189,0.00019502205,0.0003300492,0.00082848174,0.0015686847,0.0013970941,0.00023970811,0.00038220917,0.0020248988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002063625,0.00015583473,0.00033005862,0.0012363078,0.00073186803,0.00078917574,0.0014803708,0.0004597665,0.00019237236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011943594,0.00011622456,0.9480585,0.000056973593,0.00005489463,0.0003236753,0.04361598,0.00004804865,0.00077416573,0.00037259137,0.00029379854,0.00616576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009680229,0.00008552387,0.9001545,0.000039745977,0.00006937515,0.00007827444,0.09806137,0.00019061519,0.00012324024,0.00017595362,0.00099535,0.00001639315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03561794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07052344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03561794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006251944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060301553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070821285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391915594","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edae005","title":"Effects of Gender, Education, Income, Social Rank, Financial Stress, and Shame on Beliefs About the Autonomy of One’s Opinions and Their Expression","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Rank (graph theory); Autonomy; Social psychology; Psychology; Stress (linguistics); Expression (computer science); Political science; Law; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14572413075890675,"score_gpt":0.4925750658364165,"score_spread":0.34685093507750975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391915594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993936,0.00002197481,0.0000310249,0.000044742632,0.0000031690643,0.0000043201735,0.000025840383,5.3132936e-7,0.00047471977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997167,0.000020820098,0.000031754425,0.00001423339,0.0000034247655,0.000006141346,0.000025377414,4.7256103e-7,0.00018105944],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858105,0.0008103395,0.000064213535,0.00010651046,0.00025301432,0.00018502204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97798073,0.014574502,0.0045946375,0.0007189035,0.00082670787,0.0013045686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029274279,0.00021802826,0.00024300824,0.0003716073,0.0006569627,0.001022302,0.00022736202,0.0003222045,0.0044773826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013249702,0.00017294615,0.00039333364,0.00027309972,0.00090036896,0.00042888022,0.0006746813,0.0007387189,0.00023050056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044439198,0.0005047513,0.9908505,0.000013338632,0.00009029042,0.000074613345,0.0025029455,0.000051960553,0.0005759751,0.00016894552,0.00013034696,0.004591866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068504237,0.00025799128,0.9967828,0.000009441583,0.00002197542,0.000028664768,0.002388437,0.00018066107,0.00012135141,0.000088931476,0.00010893193,0.0000039530432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031932176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052501904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044773826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039214754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046662716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015481889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393345599","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edae011","title":"Stereotypes and Stereotyping: Measuring the Accuracy of Lifestyle-Based Judgments on Political Affiliation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2080671156039473,"score_gpt":0.4129679955338343,"score_spread":0.20490087992988698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393345599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99626285,0.0000839323,0.0011120411,0.00003336098,0.000008161149,0.00001880299,0.0002561252,0.000012548495,0.0022121484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987614,0.000040873612,0.00064427,0.000023436176,0.0000083612085,0.000015292911,0.0002727693,0.000005547364,0.00022812432],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979614,0.0009613536,0.00019435838,0.0003057867,0.00046361733,0.00011340847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97380924,0.011768351,0.008219881,0.002557621,0.0029605697,0.00068437855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037250007,0.00024385772,0.00029561418,0.0015313034,0.00034749834,0.0011909759,0.00033298024,0.000591531,0.002494788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027335206,0.00015789554,0.00029919588,0.0008931418,0.00049502845,0.00083052967,0.00084211054,0.00049100525,0.0007396054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050272216,0.00013515998,0.9696229,0.00006792325,0.00015874316,0.00003097419,0.0019726304,0.0006160708,0.0027789748,0.00026103426,0.00047531683,0.02337761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009436886,0.000088163884,0.99232036,0.000022054155,0.000030667266,0.0000926027,0.0016832537,0.0035112947,0.0012657102,0.00053356786,0.0004160419,0.000026869908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030641304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039807647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037250007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003063409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012717345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019699931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403084221","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edae048","title":"Perceptions and Concerns About Misinformation on Facebook in Canada, France, the US, and the UK","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misinformation; Perception; Political science; Internet privacy; Psychology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.09485424431888625,"score_gpt":0.4425724550165175,"score_spread":0.3477182106976312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403084221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99251586,0.0003256684,0.000057895133,0.0012344891,0.000015131624,0.000016528902,0.00015873156,0.0000034473326,0.0056721987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863017,0.00034246486,0.000038754173,0.00019580233,0.000006750437,0.0000047678195,0.00006245775,0.0000020550772,0.0007167632],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751556,0.0005931684,0.000091432805,0.00014069663,0.001201586,0.00045752956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98484266,0.004516945,0.0035365282,0.00033154557,0.004574796,0.0021975478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026555336,0.00020558239,0.00026300954,0.0019870384,0.0034148537,0.0037861697,0.00037611168,0.0006959905,0.0027313007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011543123,0.00013069762,0.0002376815,0.0022254663,0.0024465907,0.0012137515,0.0013617364,0.00095674413,0.0001583909],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019138031,0.00008901454,0.8497345,0.00011612697,0.00006253346,0.00046032353,0.12189999,0.0003255518,0.00056666543,0.0018290133,0.003766973,0.020957846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008569661,0.0000622282,0.7965291,0.00020809825,0.000028730552,0.0001486522,0.18679497,0.00051507854,0.000348145,0.00020602385,0.015078211,0.000072242656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90799016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9199526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09200984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013823158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011320023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18510336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409022959","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edaf003","title":"Elder, Am I Right? Age-Group Differences in Social and Political Interactions in Africa","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Group (periodic table); Political science; Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.3500592051909935,"score_gpt":0.5735592633788086,"score_spread":0.2235000581878151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409022959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983901,0.0001209464,0.000051422707,0.00015926831,0.0000057242205,0.000008829959,0.00007360731,4.9752356e-7,0.0011896238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960905,0.0001069769,0.000037771082,0.0000361372,0.0000071311906,0.000013945612,0.000030502139,6.781175e-7,0.00015773022],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986971,0.0007933106,0.000069274625,0.000087356966,0.00014068231,0.00021229152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952998,0.00212774,0.0017545144,0.00015860522,0.00033465444,0.00032469712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001983908,0.00013312188,0.00018111167,0.00079281104,0.0007894171,0.0006539,0.0001890509,0.0003007422,0.003918511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009787106,0.00011511072,0.00011193718,0.0008340719,0.0005240021,0.000719915,0.00076224486,0.0003537622,0.00022572798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095795585,0.000089742825,0.9617228,0.00007057241,0.000029594774,0.00010442507,0.025107076,0.000046067973,0.00053935434,0.0004362691,0.0004988468,0.011259525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029148396,0.000066043176,0.9700797,0.000033922337,0.0000063068583,0.00007699772,0.028152233,0.000085181746,0.00012583128,0.00016631412,0.0011984671,0.000006033545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00580136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010551679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00580136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043242823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026164742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013108671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409646802","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edaf012","title":"Affective Language in the Most Important Issues of the 2019 and 2021 Canadian Elections","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.04680540345786997,"score_gpt":0.41138528647385025,"score_spread":0.36457988301598027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409646802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9501732,0.0007554388,0.0003450255,0.002816427,0.00015693546,0.00006396016,0.0011227316,0.000017482047,0.044548776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938651,0.00039224047,0.00035874106,0.00045699737,0.00003961428,0.000046325094,0.0004837977,0.000024288785,0.0043329853],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966864,0.000821969,0.00013789376,0.00021955607,0.0014959798,0.00063814654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98484796,0.0051858104,0.0024064612,0.00033072484,0.005611095,0.0016179992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004448895,0.00035271727,0.0003111351,0.003990959,0.0071768546,0.0055742315,0.0007199792,0.0009952162,0.0045325067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02004281,0.00025700373,0.00032383666,0.0042870864,0.0036870297,0.0020571835,0.0025399101,0.0019127405,0.00044083863],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044664537,0.00010335105,0.101055086,0.00045296914,0.00003677049,0.00046419722,0.83704466,0.00020670357,0.0032935247,0.009940491,0.015932802,0.031022852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024881476,0.000047028538,0.3700566,0.00045964256,0.00005023532,0.00012939973,0.529291,0.00047818382,0.00081119314,0.00095202104,0.09752701,0.00017285354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91485894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9412753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08514106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032889362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017762793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23863018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410373097","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edaf010","title":"Chief executive and cabinet member approval in Hong Kong: a rolling-window Granger causality analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Granger causality; Window (computing); Causality (physics); Political science; Economics; Econometrics; Engineering; Computer science; Mechanical engineering; Operating system; Physics","score_opus":0.19579551721421423,"score_gpt":0.5172165563082344,"score_spread":0.32142103909402014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410373097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982393,0.00006454662,0.0005759365,0.0000941465,0.00001209636,0.000016196367,0.00032966578,0.000009839664,0.0006582459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863017,0.000036180227,0.00012303171,0.0000120068435,0.00000741899,0.0000095143505,0.0003027993,0.0000034343345,0.00087541377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984944,0.0006494448,0.00009536588,0.00023988314,0.00012828576,0.00039259554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904947,0.0051341704,0.0020184708,0.00048400334,0.0010781883,0.000790359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037725235,0.00042751283,0.0008093135,0.0013326857,0.0007056456,0.0018283284,0.0005484432,0.0003801972,0.006972285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059767314,0.00026823953,0.000847064,0.0019643782,0.00077034783,0.0006913273,0.0008774846,0.00083369645,0.000615288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003675188,0.00017639145,0.9819827,0.000059110615,0.0004217081,0.00087909953,0.0013147399,0.0044507473,0.00034967234,0.0012216314,0.0011699087,0.0076068337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033521195,0.00018649553,0.96650076,0.000024125993,0.0002938635,0.00006191936,0.003981608,0.026649004,0.0002847891,0.0003622347,0.001587236,0.00003448189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23102945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13601363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23102945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016983278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024458088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45936942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410875928","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edaf024","title":"The Direction and Meaning of Left-Right in Postcommunist Societies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Left and right; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.06167734161003801,"score_gpt":0.4434199810815932,"score_spread":0.3817426394715552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410875928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94995177,0.0002263159,0.0012295672,0.0014187206,0.000024221834,0.000008972282,0.00015631283,0.0000070463143,0.04697702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938595,0.000022246146,0.00008139754,0.000038085953,0.000004825674,0.0000021934745,0.000020145248,0.0000012637696,0.0004439326],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980556,0.0008626003,0.0001136175,0.00030994823,0.00023205925,0.0004262772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953505,0.0009669409,0.0017835388,0.00047134713,0.00059741584,0.0008303359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015828159,0.00008640798,0.00019530991,0.0013693437,0.0018301072,0.0024415872,0.00030529097,0.0005072724,0.0066294214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054668807,0.00007919088,0.0001175105,0.0015580092,0.0048370087,0.0022462425,0.0022264586,0.00070797384,0.00044644196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004901376,0.00016849765,0.6355505,0.0001734122,0.000060828024,0.000640565,0.08293117,0.0006688422,0.0028658826,0.2044258,0.003456128,0.0685683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034881574,0.00016233842,0.81263065,0.00020469273,0.000024192033,0.00022480775,0.08452298,0.0012222325,0.0009777677,0.06548309,0.03445397,0.000058412636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069008702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015596461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069008702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009774184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052884145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022177577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414863711","doi":"10.1093/ijpor/edaf053","title":"Perceived Political Party Divide During the Pandemic: A Framework Linking Attitude Strength Toward COVID-19 Vaccines to Affective Polarization","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Public Opinion Research","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"University of Wisconsin Foundation","keywords":"Polarization (electrochemistry); Hostility; Ideology; Politics; Mediation; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.15921543894770385,"score_gpt":0.513889310687435,"score_spread":0.3546738717397312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414863711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905629,0.00011327641,0.0010243636,0.00041610075,0.000018305333,0.000022209335,0.000048728547,0.0000028221439,0.007791216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99967635,0.00004154037,0.0001219572,0.000036113073,0.0000072355137,0.00000964661,0.000017898403,5.765043e-7,0.00008872008],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922466,0.00045658808,0.000033129014,0.00007007088,0.0000968755,0.00011866944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634343,0.0013496636,0.0014473377,0.00016372182,0.00028277104,0.00041299209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014191774,0.00021234689,0.00014619634,0.0008202216,0.0007478886,0.0016653008,0.00018275618,0.00039489605,0.003060235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052591506,0.00015130918,0.00030988405,0.00043560792,0.0010914365,0.0006530993,0.001153348,0.0009916127,0.00016464684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018659336,0.00038772318,0.9674339,0.000070642476,0.00012085024,0.00020281655,0.009418472,0.00026997642,0.0017727012,0.004003228,0.00036813316,0.015764955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000934674,0.00009271248,0.98612356,0.000045844172,0.00003898964,0.000095957745,0.0093722455,0.000959523,0.00023092526,0.0021140128,0.00090362027,0.000013238209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011137578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019049403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003060235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041716045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037299967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010237455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}