{"meta":{"query_hash":"5dcce802a3ea","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5dcce802a3ea","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+the+Legal+Profession"},"results":[{"id":"W1992979416","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2014.896803","title":"Access to justice: is legal services regulation blocking the path?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Immigration; Legal profession; Political science; Context (archaeology); Service (business); Legal research; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.02747622200407651,"score_gpt":0.3019361381302178,"score_spread":0.2744599161261413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992979416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8611865,0.00020656631,0.0009997528,0.12548918,0.008359601,0.00034924832,0.000027534148,0.0000128666225,0.003368721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872947,0.000010720898,0.00040731815,0.0072692703,0.00135487,0.000008816065,0.0000067332535,0.00001594036,0.0036316486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841046,0.00007170026,0.0008122623,0.0001795628,0.00035963996,0.00016635597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783087,0.00012495398,0.0011357213,0.00022533818,0.00061453786,0.00006857391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006584328,0.0001362183,0.00018770888,0.0001859431,0.00034507102,0.0005049527,0.0012141535,0.00009172417,0.0005491453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012948913,0.00008085427,0.00016816767,0.0002342722,0.000036085108,0.001573479,0.0003463002,0.00034785538,0.00025851533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011831098,0.0006460826,0.26769006,0.00024720927,0.00074888737,0.000018720868,0.007901491,0.011852061,0.011468819,0.4388086,0.22517109,0.03426388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000701028,0.000055601402,0.77516025,0.00072211825,0.00003243717,0.00006894071,0.000321786,0.008786105,0.001826451,0.07448483,0.13759111,0.00024934675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002771013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008370216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5074702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060924485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60127556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005639902","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2014.987780","title":"The making of the Canadian legal profession: a hybrid heritage","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Corporate governance; Indigenous; Law; Legal service; Adversarial system; Power (physics); Political science; International Legal English Certificate; State (computer science); Neglect; Service (business); Sociology; Comparative law; Management; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.028011926504160276,"score_gpt":0.3907726011147516,"score_spread":0.3627606746105913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005639902","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13307948,0.00007171967,0.00007295366,0.7877755,0.022132928,0.0002847288,0.0000066107864,0.000009207764,0.05656683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98331827,0.000008045533,0.00010351392,0.0040903967,0.001286297,0.000004810764,6.233978e-7,0.000009010957,0.011179042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969844,0.0010135206,0.0005196347,0.00008771291,0.0011798646,0.00021483925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971315,0.00034718364,0.0010327493,0.00024142118,0.0011849401,0.00006217227],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029723882,0.00008904804,0.00010880139,0.000091980255,0.0020141215,0.00041714404,0.0017565386,0.00007295923,0.000117638694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003279222,0.00004229828,0.00015989515,0.00030805563,0.00029511182,0.00084820646,0.00014702618,0.0010203576,0.000010215597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002445483,0.00021810479,0.015519427,0.000016759031,0.0001931682,0.000011730398,0.021307541,0.00009409273,0.00166712,0.7545995,0.1797193,0.026408682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002182435,0.000016195985,0.007067651,0.00030559825,0.000016469508,0.000035201283,0.0050840485,0.00007193872,0.0005008077,0.0035030022,0.9831139,0.0000669732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025387187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09864145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8502388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003884983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034565376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012170552","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2014.977792","title":"Corporate lawyers and their clients: walking the line between law and business","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Line (geometry); Law; Business; Political science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.05079369631470559,"score_gpt":0.37526455453641777,"score_spread":0.3244708582217122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012170552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6194171,0.00009155163,0.0006522044,0.35806945,0.004389834,0.00010120528,0.000004318587,0.00000989345,0.017264444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937708,0.000047481397,0.000114842296,0.003739419,0.0012555369,0.000001199758,0.0000013406085,0.000004951963,0.0010644314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987947,0.00043285167,0.0002618517,0.00006727503,0.000354661,0.000088703586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799293,0.0004991361,0.0006568747,0.00007807181,0.00072772946,0.000045248413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018803686,0.000062428386,0.00008538678,0.00004818859,0.0006226503,0.0003325372,0.0004005577,0.000048863345,0.000021366286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009758904,0.00003043905,0.000030238813,0.00018010598,0.00026656242,0.0008238399,0.00010232191,0.0004309053,0.0000022866889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011657537,0.00010217244,0.02889941,0.000011058445,0.00013941198,0.0000018117388,0.02291603,0.000028202074,0.00096021494,0.87430316,0.003893129,0.06862881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004810866,0.000027258573,0.031644464,0.000219589,0.000027815195,0.000024221397,0.005589095,0.000073175375,0.00028794105,0.03171399,0.92981815,0.00009323414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006856768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019451887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.925925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044548604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018123878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47889858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016860751","doi":"10.1080/09695950802439734","title":"Gender, race, bias and perspective: OR, how otherness colours your judgment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Sydney","keywords":"Impartiality; Judgement; Tribunal; Normative; Objectivity (philosophy); Jury; Argument (complex analysis); Neutrality; Law; Perspective (graphical); Commission; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08545973364575674,"score_gpt":0.37778023339192407,"score_spread":0.29232049974616736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016860751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83270746,0.00087428786,0.00007157925,0.15157288,0.00468114,0.00017481527,0.00000521095,0.00001583382,0.009896763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96748316,0.0008835077,0.00019113164,0.0008656404,0.0009724995,0.000001856704,2.3929815e-7,0.0000067033875,0.029595261],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982647,0.00030048675,0.00016267928,0.000093829185,0.0010448009,0.00013352682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878323,0.000076232485,0.00034430219,0.000065149674,0.0006583583,0.00007270583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069773436,0.00008023507,0.00011794187,0.000014670323,0.00065013586,0.00010463814,0.000549295,0.00011583776,0.00010997911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033627485,0.000042299318,0.00012848119,0.00010421409,0.00028785676,0.00042206398,0.000101208796,0.00040348424,0.0000030498093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014987089,0.0008428395,0.05198152,0.000025309031,0.00084550487,0.00041625934,0.43592235,0.000091915266,0.003913423,0.2495307,0.25072783,0.0042036194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024148289,0.00013116933,0.026185533,0.00038682975,0.00006422536,0.000593407,0.22954078,0.00003816267,0.0013668571,0.011007565,0.72797173,0.00029888607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001677235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009054538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47724393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028082545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039939577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5000385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036981745","doi":"10.1080/09695950600961517","title":"Lawyers on the move: the consequences of mobility for legal careers","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Capital (architecture); Value (mathematics); Inequality; Order (exchange); Sociology; Legal profession; Social mobility; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Geography; Economics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.02404905397379019,"score_gpt":0.34152698572127455,"score_spread":0.31747793174748434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036981745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8724007,0.00016925752,0.00005744689,0.1125938,0.004615175,0.00032604925,0.000014392271,0.000005911347,0.00981729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99591315,0.000017151613,0.00001952628,0.00084896846,0.0013013217,0.000008010546,6.591829e-7,0.0000044839235,0.0018867358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821424,0.00039284796,0.00032013337,0.00007134602,0.0008639005,0.00013751582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802315,0.0008442664,0.0005004751,0.0000977511,0.0005100426,0.000024311103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016945247,0.0000704439,0.00010900866,0.000024317758,0.0005139299,0.00008312629,0.0010208837,0.000069723406,0.000039340026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047342805,0.000029468769,0.00024554486,0.000105524836,0.0007026479,0.00019230899,0.00006237634,0.00031331222,0.0000013150402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084669364,0.00023008509,0.004598478,0.000008590671,0.00014925966,0.000006085079,0.009353628,0.00085617724,0.0030559702,0.9267811,0.049630772,0.0044831177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025350417,0.0005489468,0.053908933,0.0011625778,0.00018108869,0.000036509293,0.10453387,0.00038905832,0.030582625,0.42287907,0.38274208,0.0005001859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002615148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061138626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5039021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013514259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002929205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3953339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041716378","doi":"10.1080/09695950701616481","title":"Co-optation, competition and resistance: mediation and divorce professionals in Israel","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Resistance (ecology); Competition (biology); Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.02260516369696811,"score_gpt":0.3877659618718257,"score_spread":0.3651607981748576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041716378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95342284,0.0002966745,0.00075957034,0.034389816,0.0018719631,0.00019310169,0.0000031222191,0.0000067760047,0.009056105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960408,0.000083348306,0.00032226983,0.00045795168,0.00044856567,0.0000016210136,0.000003426898,0.000004364567,0.002637635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982562,0.0003605303,0.00041229834,0.000085889355,0.00076888275,0.00011621945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860656,0.0004981464,0.00040025564,0.000049323648,0.00037891054,0.000066784756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029838036,0.0000615023,0.000095869436,0.00016611328,0.000308514,0.00007429558,0.00021034856,0.0000952769,0.000032234413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001196013,0.000042740496,0.000027827828,0.00013168124,0.00012585788,0.00058129284,0.000037609498,0.00032336946,0.0000017895179],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007460184,0.00022131838,0.22993046,0.00003541263,0.000048077098,0.000046730584,0.038217936,0.0000115866305,0.0041916915,0.7135312,0.0033781822,0.009641362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025778501,0.000063909014,0.8288504,0.0013254363,0.000025367834,0.000031977754,0.06124654,0.00009103186,0.0013007603,0.060359906,0.04385616,0.00027065695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013567111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018229665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6531713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013990737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016119525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23728713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060122821","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2013.771121","title":"Government lawyers and the training of senior civil servants. Maintaining law at the heart of the French state","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Systems and Institutions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; State (computer science); Law; Legitimacy; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Legal education; Government (linguistics); Civil servants; Administration (probate law); Public administration; Social science","score_opus":0.017153807495571848,"score_gpt":0.2537152872087604,"score_spread":0.23656147971318855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060122821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95298046,0.00020929726,0.00006153354,0.029613385,0.003981443,0.0001944512,0.000010581996,0.0000037706031,0.012945105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99618196,0.0000054330817,0.000018568455,0.001824393,0.0007715827,0.0000031591014,4.8144454e-7,0.0000076084375,0.0011868345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837035,0.00010243379,0.00046475575,0.00006168585,0.0008558248,0.00014495935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998583,0.00011896738,0.00092717697,0.00015938593,0.00019989115,0.000011540899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016667275,0.00009451783,0.00016693103,0.00002283497,0.00036921844,0.000087342356,0.00055430696,0.00003095469,0.000043580236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014686013,0.00003481031,0.00017094464,0.00010088178,0.00029184297,0.0008099098,0.000523499,0.0002868305,0.0000027904305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013090629,0.00040180044,0.22664163,0.00022911564,0.0010365334,0.0000074374675,0.016608613,0.0026278982,0.021634942,0.69425243,0.028943067,0.006307443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052279676,0.00003971627,0.18167923,0.003022938,0.0002991545,0.00022279091,0.010570613,0.0023651998,0.004663573,0.005559535,0.7860433,0.0003059622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015143281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054568966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7571002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008867014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041196363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2839767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060698953","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2013.771123","title":"Is access to the profession access to justice? Lessons from Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Economic Justice; Diversity (politics); Legal service; Perception; Political science; Representation (politics); White (mutation); Law; Public relations; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.12712855926517452,"score_gpt":0.5099555952967334,"score_spread":0.3828270360315589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060698953","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23911518,0.00004237402,0.00029123048,0.7288971,0.026510812,0.0002894104,0.00002834397,0.0000074636637,0.004818088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9364811,0.000014988827,0.00016904413,0.054451518,0.004387458,0.000016686732,0.0000032041305,0.000011172426,0.0044648196],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969903,0.0005473673,0.00047233977,0.00012408748,0.0015740623,0.00029183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718064,0.00050833815,0.0006198756,0.00024087059,0.0011966275,0.00025365542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014730059,0.00011580574,0.00012779237,0.00012474645,0.001020139,0.00085027516,0.003046421,0.00007801941,0.00076949084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024818091,0.000064454354,0.00007978089,0.00060701626,0.00004473386,0.0031501038,0.00058035523,0.00081480783,0.00004939393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015189649,0.00016339096,0.02173016,0.0000045765446,0.000078638615,0.000002971475,0.023859292,0.00008284632,0.0005340743,0.008942826,0.93613935,0.008310008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015804233,0.000008362213,0.08518549,0.0002111149,0.000046467616,0.000005003649,0.008097145,0.0000074590903,0.0015676884,0.00047783912,0.9041306,0.000104815794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33431846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20534149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69736594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006273452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003446954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8425385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067675120","doi":"10.1080/09695950802439700","title":"Judging gender: difference and dissent at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04017584042655902,"score_gpt":0.3342294302716749,"score_spread":0.29405358984511587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067675120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96446306,0.00011278543,0.00005127358,0.03105476,0.0018550063,0.000058652415,0.0000033345075,0.0000012240303,0.0023999265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994783,0.0000808522,0.000016891421,0.00019160617,0.00023818904,5.073943e-7,3.9387024e-7,0.0000025690372,0.004685999],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867743,0.00015736687,0.00020548515,0.000048016205,0.00081393105,0.00009779314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925655,0.000107262975,0.0002732325,0.00006185021,0.0002548428,0.000046269608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031437582,0.000041513227,0.0000660496,0.00002236358,0.0004184819,0.000018883744,0.0003400847,0.000022983844,0.000028842098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001344059,0.000020755793,0.00004455853,0.000035778514,0.00016806759,0.000077398036,0.0001187719,0.00013666834,2.1834096e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029770637,0.00022411408,0.764819,0.000037220307,0.00038484225,0.00012239807,0.08463934,0.00075399113,0.03092681,0.06310794,0.051004928,0.003681658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006561155,0.00002583642,0.94944775,0.00018556089,0.00003149036,0.00022557966,0.015499892,0.00036238894,0.010130033,0.006830894,0.016478658,0.0001257887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06461825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047262453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18462871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016138772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055270904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9701225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323674988","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2015.1113971","title":"Early legal careers in comparative context: evidence from Canada and the United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Race (biology); Value (mathematics); Capital (architecture); Political science; Comparative case; Sociology; Legal profession; Law; Gender studies; Geography","score_opus":0.054818361773509426,"score_gpt":0.3956026218112003,"score_spread":0.3407842600376909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323674988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68592167,0.00008471772,0.000039553357,0.31139895,0.0020957165,0.000085710184,0.000008557996,0.00000200594,0.00036311368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956078,0.000088169945,0.000025017896,0.0025343157,0.00028817705,0.0000032790854,0.0000011649532,0.000002859692,0.0014492464],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979964,0.00080160843,0.0003332484,0.00007191712,0.00069445797,0.0001024001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965266,0.0021148429,0.0004571164,0.00007879606,0.000774914,0.00004773271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010682618,0.00006213271,0.00010791014,0.000079625665,0.00023414017,0.00019338435,0.00057762134,0.000033836353,0.00008312641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017867316,0.000027434282,0.000034375593,0.00022179553,0.00029146124,0.0011500588,0.00006630397,0.00040396964,0.0000023066068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048194043,0.00023573168,0.32159942,0.000007323194,0.0005379787,0.000075872194,0.31701234,0.00024648293,0.0028349918,0.23744065,0.09923533,0.015954481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043581743,0.000052995732,0.28167853,0.002001614,0.000049130093,0.000018185725,0.08514784,0.00015455527,0.0013392572,0.008887074,0.6160648,0.00024781615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9354727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7631164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5168295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003697409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018332541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3252114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529283850","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2016.1238382","title":"<i>Lawyers’ Empire: Legal Professions and Cultural Authority, 1780–1950</i>: a review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Systems and Institutions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Law; Legal profession; Political science; Legal practice; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.05050733555140098,"score_gpt":0.36727809319105204,"score_spread":0.31677075763965107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529283850","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003247504,0.9483418,0.00003494843,0.022181183,0.016332693,0.00090833014,0.000028722825,0.000035255784,0.0121046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018196771,0.9818247,0.000037345788,0.00211439,0.0078118523,0.00004081494,0.00002149674,0.000046740166,0.006282991],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650294,0.00019810219,0.0015477199,0.00031153142,0.0011318739,0.00030782112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995581,0.00008732244,0.0029575778,0.00033836113,0.0009857105,0.000050032202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011497578,0.00046711715,0.0012143254,0.00029448397,0.00050714397,0.0006258945,0.001676449,0.00028793392,0.0001458514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006172686,0.00020765401,0.00092544925,0.0003689295,0.00016609089,0.003273084,0.0011524928,0.0012462276,0.00016931153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004874588,0.0002132141,0.000102571066,0.021857131,0.0006314668,0.00016540014,0.0000485529,2.765225e-7,0.000021360027,0.10394452,0.31223556,0.56073123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030759483,0.000009086036,0.000019032104,0.18797542,0.0004396919,0.000413078,0.000021598893,0.000002534403,5.545818e-7,0.0002898572,0.8102841,0.00023746685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001650663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002352152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56049377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002434904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004985342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84678847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796348969","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2018.1456435","title":"Parental-leave policy for male lawyers in Helsinki and Montreal: cultural and professional barriers to male lawyers’ use of paternity and parental leaves","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université TÉLUQ","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ella ja Georg Ehrnroothin Säätiö","keywords":"Ethos; Statutory law; Parental leave; Outreach; Work (physics); Sociology; Law; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.08361816594048224,"score_gpt":0.37580334360763384,"score_spread":0.2921851776671516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796348969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98813933,0.000036094367,0.000016237871,0.010214829,0.00097053236,0.00023931175,0.00006938204,0.0000032066687,0.00031110187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99737924,0.000060182192,0.00021650209,0.00049839786,0.0003034972,0.0000023255561,0.0000023847574,0.0000044285184,0.001533027],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986991,0.00027213662,0.00028440534,0.0001335766,0.00044033947,0.00017040956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990828,0.00010593538,0.00026340576,0.000055776338,0.00031276295,0.00017933628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059002487,0.000093982635,0.00015864767,0.000111807094,0.0003460552,0.00009656569,0.00024989378,0.00008303633,0.000039959745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048761477,0.000063723564,0.00005755531,0.000081506674,0.00038774154,0.00073217344,0.00026879436,0.00017098383,6.359658e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010216975,0.00009411996,0.94297963,0.000029244015,0.00006088662,0.000007430902,0.044789676,0.000005910608,0.0023048196,0.0028856061,0.0031138994,0.0027070635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021739842,0.00029678785,0.9134952,0.00068082183,0.000032392963,0.000069457674,0.06998861,0.000103796614,0.002493149,0.0023552047,0.00810247,0.00020812081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055426345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029881708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029484442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000114155664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001799275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83788425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2859687744","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2018.1490292","title":"Mystery shopping: demand-side phenomena in markets for personal plight legal services","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Negotiation; Competition (biology); Business; Contingency; Marketing; Quality (philosophy); Service (business); Tort; Competition law; Liability; Law; Economics; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.023119528025788455,"score_gpt":0.26051461890098276,"score_spread":0.2373950908751943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2859687744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9542651,0.0005656815,0.0008980241,0.008202004,0.013356117,0.00031400303,0.00006763877,0.000009100697,0.022322306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925184,0.00003157597,0.00009859921,0.001052969,0.004522281,0.000009902542,0.000003874837,0.000021346943,0.0017410233],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825627,0.000051569514,0.0011142341,0.00022016473,0.00011859831,0.00023915117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832225,0.000083484854,0.0012089512,0.00012507434,0.00019358199,0.000066641376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013718011,0.0001276512,0.00037451307,0.0002595994,0.000140196,0.00017960917,0.00076184014,0.00011007305,0.00010839856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080936654,0.00011522874,0.00024316944,0.00008046913,0.00008960506,0.0007750461,0.00014923417,0.0002346914,0.000060304257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0069661234,0.0012726745,0.54475266,0.0005444955,0.0018133414,0.00010300591,0.021033958,0.00017862827,0.0034644501,0.38811764,0.020977061,0.010775958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010851692,0.0006543565,0.15467925,0.0030562873,0.00005029498,0.00039856427,0.0028916786,0.033373516,0.0020976828,0.10685535,0.6838988,0.00119249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020478312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021717537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6629218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003369651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007394595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46988913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093866784","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2020.1830098","title":"From partners to team leaders: tracking changes in the Canadian legal profession","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Legal profession; Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Perception; Public relations; Tracking (education); Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Engineering; Computer science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.13424230186723862,"score_gpt":0.46413658331281477,"score_spread":0.32989428144557614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093866784","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1840767,0.0000261701,0.000032169573,0.8013835,0.0042642015,0.00024168473,0.0000072322737,0.000007862243,0.009960484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9606247,0.000008052338,0.00016102764,0.035336655,0.0028863263,0.000009129793,0.000004304268,0.000008315193,0.0009614794],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749523,0.0007365475,0.00036655794,0.00012706917,0.0010519824,0.00022262159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985638,0.00027498015,0.00036827606,0.000110753106,0.0005037043,0.00017844474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014644117,0.0000945178,0.000115490235,0.00017172481,0.0005871894,0.00051381794,0.0012871264,0.000102537786,0.00021555589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023517127,0.00005629924,0.00007137954,0.0005544092,0.00009657834,0.0011262867,0.00006188778,0.0011336901,0.000037646245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038025595,0.000246326,0.0144013725,0.000009348643,0.00009491956,0.000073881,0.6100808,0.00020107267,0.0036880178,0.04190599,0.30714548,0.021772586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000302179,0.000037327984,0.006964059,0.00023549877,0.000012797484,0.0000069880634,0.11858967,0.00003971018,0.00052407186,0.00069157535,0.8724997,0.0000964467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14717065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33771318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.776548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041749098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025284828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8585084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396673988","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2024.2347390","title":"“I’ve never met a barrister that sounded like I do”: accents, barristers and Bourdieusian capital","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Trent University; Nottingham Trent University","keywords":"Habitus; Sociology; Social capital; Social psychology; Cultural capital; Psychology; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.015182708508426263,"score_gpt":0.338416966550549,"score_spread":0.3232342580421227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396673988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8773203,0.0038921281,0.0001654486,0.073639244,0.02846259,0.0003026192,0.000026111564,0.000052124647,0.016139453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98627937,0.00026066368,0.0001297887,0.0018634428,0.0012770387,0.000002183796,0.0000011884047,0.000010899613,0.010175409],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981977,0.00025675452,0.00024548746,0.00013973459,0.0009812101,0.00017913136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999352,0.00007996268,0.00017106366,0.00008923473,0.00019659223,0.0001111912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007692067,0.000109390436,0.00012621615,0.00002518617,0.00040165643,0.00069981825,0.00067362486,0.00014098654,0.000313086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008074427,0.00006296102,0.00024032893,0.000097322336,0.00021511898,0.0012936363,0.00019742607,0.0005569944,0.000013838237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059451134,0.00024214206,0.019279703,0.00011025136,0.0017147666,0.00046647314,0.39815944,0.000030809584,0.0034530186,0.16334127,0.3893355,0.023272086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009017335,0.00006390143,0.0039438056,0.0012850887,0.00012278004,0.00020158668,0.081867024,0.000046815974,0.00039274938,0.021627186,0.8892667,0.00028057775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000913244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005731435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49993125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001842336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023222424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67483634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398266979","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2024.2356084","title":"Much ado about hallucinations: a brief assessment of the judicial response to large language model (LLM) hallucinations in the United States and Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.018252501043522756,"score_gpt":0.3511880407876327,"score_spread":0.33293553974410994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398266979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91005325,0.00028695943,0.00010847212,0.084828876,0.0027973712,0.00023594023,0.00017846836,0.0000036807853,0.0015069844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925682,0.000023214447,0.000047223715,0.0046835304,0.00028560293,0.000008534731,0.00000927155,0.0000074950353,0.002366932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840367,0.00035774612,0.00039198514,0.000079346726,0.00064810616,0.00011916873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992067,0.00024230669,0.0001814848,0.00011292661,0.0002182061,0.000038329785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010753751,0.00007932369,0.00009345686,0.00016805151,0.00026801627,0.0001268848,0.00046632206,0.000024783656,0.00007612127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009098385,0.00003822011,0.000056739373,0.000094956755,0.00004466307,0.00016244237,0.00009520098,0.00040419435,5.485845e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014128962,0.0008707121,0.0055585015,0.0002691474,0.00022804372,0.00008441223,0.17993827,0.003943309,0.0007347779,0.6931923,0.1107513,0.003016351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041537336,0.00059369823,0.16886292,0.00813505,0.00016196676,0.0001846857,0.13546613,0.1395589,0.00031803237,0.022263158,0.5197796,0.0005221074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074386135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35995406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67092913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001870473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008250472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9317776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400726203","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2024.2379794","title":"Navigating the legal landscape: large language models and the hesitancy of legal professionals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025157232295542186,"score_gpt":0.40645339245864887,"score_spread":0.3812961601631067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400726203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.814017,0.0039238897,0.0013023961,0.16307923,0.008709754,0.00051352964,0.00003110357,0.00003284412,0.008390258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948707,0.00008817378,0.000095916075,0.0007322087,0.0014224964,0.000007751474,0.0000013336081,0.000014709211,0.0027666818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966939,0.0008840717,0.00064866303,0.00014191681,0.0013941338,0.0002372804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978424,0.0009891771,0.0004920277,0.00017329118,0.0004471548,0.00005598389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004010119,0.00012777303,0.00020385355,0.000043670865,0.00068829255,0.00035272833,0.0012530952,0.000100616315,0.00013057489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000675154,0.000054396416,0.00023600587,0.00022896855,0.0005127712,0.001110348,0.00032386914,0.0011894343,0.000007884975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034467698,0.00010654204,0.0006312183,0.000027397862,0.0001734489,0.00006534529,0.05456649,0.00028212526,0.0010207281,0.9269062,0.005743422,0.010132355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034084031,0.0002434266,0.0015384528,0.018348057,0.0004959842,0.00074201607,0.3813872,0.07377226,0.023062587,0.24967562,0.24629934,0.0010266771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094358146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043881248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67723066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008392364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044301033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5293859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404997835","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2024.2433482","title":"“Democratizing punishment”? Federal prosecutors’ new anticorruption project and the Brazilian penal field","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Punitive damages; Context (archaeology); Language change; Political science; Accountability; Criminology; Law; White-collar crime; Politics; Punishment (psychology); Criminal justice; Sociology; Criminal law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01919646227889803,"score_gpt":0.37137126430513767,"score_spread":0.35217480202623963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404997835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82877576,0.00096702646,0.0051546274,0.1485068,0.012116071,0.00034904483,0.0000018852858,0.000032512668,0.0040962594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911437,0.00026216713,0.00017239753,0.0006393374,0.0019926461,0.0000026352452,5.1659424e-7,0.0000057615844,0.0057808287],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985133,0.00029434502,0.00029196142,0.00010269547,0.00067561335,0.00012210148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991652,0.00032807523,0.00018415217,0.000074121665,0.00020338155,0.00004511279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009652253,0.000077553035,0.00011173586,0.0001203324,0.00057280314,0.00081734307,0.00042442768,0.000057206966,0.00006379879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005026673,0.00003903677,0.00018277313,0.00021295287,0.0001160122,0.00058996753,0.00010655729,0.00044623957,0.000004990427],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019814353,0.00020479261,0.0067032124,0.00009393731,0.0008564135,0.00018003714,0.16178876,0.00008611404,0.0032566648,0.16550556,0.06355076,0.5957923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039040472,0.000520929,0.0039430144,0.0064762556,0.0016452416,0.0012162362,0.47636172,0.012059233,0.0029920426,0.044711906,0.44540855,0.00076080667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037537494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009844907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5950315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111882386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048421344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7881658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}