{"meta":{"query_hash":"5dcce802a3ea","filters":{"venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5dcce802a3ea","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Journal+of+the+Legal+Profession"},"results":[{"id":"W1992979416","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2014.896803","title":"Access to justice: is legal services regulation blocking the path?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Immigration; Legal profession; Political science; Context (archaeology); Service (business); Legal research; Business; Public administration","score_opus":0.02747622200407651,"score_gpt":0.3019361381302178,"score_spread":0.2744599161261413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992979416","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15864137,0.007957189,0.011176105,0.59109306,0.0007190041,0.00008129056,0.00028732378,0.00011342876,0.22993122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95846933,0.0025686254,0.0007220633,0.030481402,0.0007251231,0.000040819403,0.00004719521,0.00002765244,0.0069177775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865041,0.0030324927,0.00041785627,0.0017686045,0.004526367,0.0037507152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599379,0.021410866,0.007516222,0.001693226,0.0051410925,0.004300758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070111416,0.00016251885,0.0007698389,0.0018291222,0.0039759525,0.008855416,0.0017321273,0.0057071303,0.02028376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03576077,0.00034591922,0.00085566135,0.0014916855,0.015462581,0.011479035,0.0049662893,0.0063069165,0.0010574512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006667663,0.0002396716,0.028713344,0.0001880603,0.000048414044,0.00037437907,0.0034028436,0.00039030134,0.00049215654,0.9073689,0.013064515,0.045650765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107912645,0.00017718755,0.06856269,0.0015863781,0.00014327263,0.00067266996,0.010410148,0.0021726126,0.0012587033,0.7645414,0.15022562,0.0001414067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07230877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059786584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07230877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010600674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017370496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14377576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005639902","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2014.987780","title":"The making of the Canadian legal profession: a hybrid heritage","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Corporate governance; Indigenous; Law; Legal service; Adversarial system; Power (physics); Political science; International Legal English Certificate; State (computer science); Neglect; Service (business); Sociology; Comparative law; Management; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.028011926504160276,"score_gpt":0.3907726011147516,"score_spread":0.3627606746105913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005639902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06560058,0.009719721,0.0039462317,0.109418906,0.0013882809,0.00010568985,0.00047808138,0.0001600707,0.8091824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8668551,0.008670902,0.004790941,0.008646624,0.00026908325,0.000047274312,0.00017738802,0.000110700006,0.11043198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99504423,0.0005159266,0.0000745422,0.0004826798,0.0023805099,0.0015020749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580765,0.00045580714,0.0001374386,0.00018719779,0.0018983003,0.0015136099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027612296,0.00041748866,0.0003858125,0.0041655977,0.035748128,0.014214265,0.0015527235,0.0027111473,0.011335324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043319254,0.00038612416,0.0003765201,0.005082913,0.025637131,0.002929799,0.0040063737,0.003996376,0.00074445945],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030852527,0.000028116017,0.0027340073,0.00009083044,0.000010711932,0.00034357797,0.03857842,0.0003385976,0.00044601038,0.86222386,0.05138298,0.043791935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000107469195,0.000017456654,0.007925854,0.00024202775,0.000016141565,0.00020998258,0.026952969,0.0004049142,0.00020687385,0.028572418,0.93537056,0.00007008975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17967094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17967094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2845153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9514654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012170552","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2014.977792","title":"Corporate lawyers and their clients: walking the line between law and business","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Line (geometry); Law; Business; Political science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.05079369631470559,"score_gpt":0.37526455453641777,"score_spread":0.3244708582217122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012170552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85837096,0.003615884,0.009015983,0.066540144,0.00008352798,0.000066013024,0.00002769485,0.000094849755,0.06218497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939826,0.0006944991,0.0011605842,0.0019134021,0.000017486433,0.000028064971,0.000007221414,0.000015443899,0.0021805828],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.976538,0.01762496,0.0003299367,0.0010690013,0.0024451006,0.0019929835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98434573,0.010171002,0.0020709878,0.00057447836,0.0008651645,0.0019726153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010779737,0.00031992322,0.0006829665,0.001950967,0.017470898,0.021221243,0.0019923882,0.006115719,0.0056950883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025164876,0.0009998835,0.000161736,0.002219909,0.024464961,0.016220903,0.010848986,0.005792533,0.00093736907],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029885454,0.00010544287,0.01718095,0.000055439043,0.000008834553,0.0009941095,0.8928704,0.00008993738,0.00035883227,0.05538787,0.0029730825,0.02994523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013781473,0.000046879468,0.004707474,0.0002230613,0.000008835759,0.00091399497,0.9441887,0.00042203997,0.00016972669,0.027865069,0.021412397,0.000027989592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011429175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013962189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021221243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069152606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008166829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0570094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016860751","doi":"10.1080/09695950802439734","title":"Gender, race, bias and perspective: OR, how otherness colours your judgment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Sydney","keywords":"Impartiality; Judgement; Tribunal; Normative; Objectivity (philosophy); Jury; Argument (complex analysis); Neutrality; Law; Perspective (graphical); Commission; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08545973364575674,"score_gpt":0.37778023339192407,"score_spread":0.29232049974616736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016860751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13399687,0.029024681,0.017249959,0.3113365,0.006570138,0.00005478082,0.00014155474,0.00007466699,0.50155073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95436674,0.0047083884,0.0020551572,0.01878278,0.0015542743,0.00004030035,0.000028640472,0.00010101734,0.018362598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865002,0.008641218,0.00025786634,0.001008728,0.0022269527,0.0013649333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98993355,0.006298451,0.0008548543,0.0005273125,0.0012641791,0.0011216131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013653053,0.0004494536,0.0007903716,0.0018097477,0.008080033,0.012169293,0.0012778236,0.0031368006,0.006328355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022389155,0.00020192236,0.0004837342,0.001401776,0.045492824,0.01254345,0.005370772,0.004474353,0.00097361056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047948655,0.000013318328,0.0037591015,0.00014062338,0.000020858748,0.00033092115,0.19748226,0.00005127859,0.00044178966,0.75722295,0.0151629485,0.025325986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019525432,0.00006889174,0.0048047574,0.0011866431,0.000028607428,0.0006169621,0.21085016,0.00015040512,0.0004124519,0.47906607,0.30273676,0.000058712343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01418067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017631138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01418067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00372956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033632575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07220513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036981745","doi":"10.1080/09695950600961517","title":"Lawyers on the move: the consequences of mobility for legal careers","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Capital (architecture); Value (mathematics); Inequality; Order (exchange); Sociology; Legal profession; Social mobility; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Geography; Economics; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.02404905397379019,"score_gpt":0.34152698572127455,"score_spread":0.31747793174748434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036981745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823989,0.0003284076,0.00045303654,0.0058444464,0.000020925574,0.000009778779,0.00018452363,0.000006205476,0.010753689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994174,0.00007092953,0.000037729933,0.00005482709,0.00001008449,0.000002745381,0.000021003574,8.208885e-7,0.00038440662],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982546,0.0007756998,0.000052513482,0.00017551886,0.00016932786,0.00057237165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98574257,0.006673105,0.0042031393,0.00041428857,0.0006335578,0.002333411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012437298,0.000116561896,0.00027992713,0.0007064632,0.0023965735,0.0022774998,0.0006740598,0.0010909655,0.013585563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015951762,0.00009949615,0.00027135736,0.0013900124,0.0022844109,0.002262976,0.0032212238,0.0012848733,0.000554969],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007417151,0.00069791643,0.7967056,0.00017347364,0.00019174279,0.001997017,0.029799052,0.007959904,0.00084135425,0.09651599,0.007862125,0.056514166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014876905,0.00038537147,0.76496327,0.0003484265,0.00018707769,0.00060139893,0.13820969,0.006079373,0.0005815169,0.06870852,0.019706305,0.00008024838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015867848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028120603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015867848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020610646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011859105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045448244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041716378","doi":"10.1080/09695950701616481","title":"Co-optation, competition and resistance: mediation and divorce professionals in Israel","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Resistance (ecology); Competition (biology); Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.02260516369696811,"score_gpt":0.3877659618718257,"score_spread":0.3651607981748576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041716378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917389,0.0008094371,0.00015993285,0.0029407307,0.000017127564,0.000018422325,0.00000886616,0.0000034218033,0.0043030777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99892825,0.0003045706,0.000049585535,0.00018275969,0.000004846981,0.0000093463295,0.0000055391124,0.000001375508,0.0005137543],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929778,0.0044871746,0.00020620096,0.0003554328,0.0008895355,0.0010838668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98880565,0.0064766295,0.0013749831,0.00023577808,0.0008333556,0.0022735111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007902442,0.00021511098,0.0005312058,0.0016172379,0.008281285,0.005255657,0.0014669123,0.0019308102,0.005198176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016323153,0.00040858047,0.00020409083,0.0013140548,0.0060231164,0.0028490843,0.006266421,0.0028717893,0.00027473035],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009353534,0.0004743186,0.10272292,0.00008622058,0.000018797415,0.0012942039,0.8567781,0.000081812344,0.0002877623,0.0102337925,0.0016976463,0.02623094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024482248,0.00007665093,0.022757733,0.00019746443,0.00000796686,0.0004932717,0.966692,0.00034450073,0.00016610358,0.001573637,0.0076412787,0.000024850291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02609374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029689288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02609374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056986185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007158341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051883757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060122821","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2013.771121","title":"Government lawyers and the training of senior civil servants. Maintaining law at the heart of the French state","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Systems and Institutions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; State (computer science); Law; Legitimacy; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Legal education; Government (linguistics); Civil servants; Administration (probate law); Public administration; Social science","score_opus":0.017153807495571848,"score_gpt":0.2537152872087604,"score_spread":0.23656147971318855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060122821","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3339236,0.027039878,0.0012940841,0.3606529,0.0011986416,0.000052064923,0.00009164716,0.00014227319,0.275605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9325269,0.0033042945,0.0004672043,0.01150637,0.0003186151,0.000010506935,0.000029949462,0.000014786831,0.05182142],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975406,0.00095496705,0.000037937,0.000116652984,0.0003395759,0.0010102298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99247736,0.0013574322,0.00087920256,0.00013686222,0.00087385275,0.0042753504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022058946,0.0001709991,0.00011331031,0.0009176618,0.0062821545,0.003829994,0.00040595132,0.0020793334,0.014289139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050928215,0.00015133084,0.00011679633,0.0006483405,0.0049426877,0.0012729227,0.001728324,0.0016232746,0.0015225665],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105489606,0.0005240341,0.060366787,0.0004153793,0.000015384543,0.001553906,0.08339299,0.00039698306,0.0021000542,0.3022787,0.1666952,0.38215503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024100558,0.00018568872,0.109484725,0.00051997916,0.000008472234,0.00081301975,0.06446896,0.00022631258,0.00037485585,0.015586348,0.80827886,0.000028754504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07751491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16569768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07751491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008690147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016326284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15412748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060698953","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2013.771123","title":"Is access to the profession access to justice? Lessons from Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Economic Justice; Diversity (politics); Legal service; Perception; Political science; Representation (politics); White (mutation); Law; Public relations; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.12712855926517452,"score_gpt":0.5099555952967334,"score_spread":0.3828270360315589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060698953","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2988777,0.028678937,0.00045697184,0.46523067,0.0007544941,0.00016383355,0.0016724656,0.000042252283,0.20412274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94997025,0.019332008,0.00046076352,0.014436481,0.00013819241,0.000034678593,0.00031784843,0.00003075648,0.015278996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99304396,0.0007014566,0.00015828559,0.0003723275,0.0016346291,0.004089387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98253137,0.003394459,0.0005555864,0.00023829364,0.008624278,0.004656036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004272553,0.00043140035,0.0009899838,0.0024348777,0.020136144,0.007799447,0.0027092772,0.0025285508,0.007955482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014181975,0.0003507262,0.0006221318,0.00616991,0.0076090517,0.004123651,0.0032277592,0.0043611065,0.0003385846],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005269261,0.00043416407,0.11209456,0.0018789303,0.0001756366,0.0049199583,0.19140613,0.0020018732,0.0008870176,0.20993157,0.2666394,0.20910385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012299033,0.00016256965,0.18232659,0.0038642983,0.00023790912,0.0006959127,0.43200654,0.0015429439,0.0004777803,0.026423847,0.35180965,0.00032893647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99901175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21587436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21587436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3392901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9094746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067675120","doi":"10.1080/09695950802439700","title":"Judging gender: difference and dissent at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04017584042655902,"score_gpt":0.3342294302716749,"score_spread":0.29405358984511587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067675120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76822555,0.004112438,0.0014062593,0.07528732,0.0006792026,0.000069495705,0.00048177724,0.000040783103,0.14969711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987706,0.000501115,0.00027004036,0.0031937705,0.00007640978,0.00000971408,0.0000467941,0.000015238092,0.008180809],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97765666,0.0035604632,0.0005207662,0.001705957,0.011015379,0.0055409227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96787953,0.013122912,0.002309259,0.0007560206,0.011429181,0.004503067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011953735,0.00029269926,0.00062255526,0.0036329287,0.040875115,0.009209261,0.001926367,0.0032719185,0.004292551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059365854,0.00031309752,0.00035600766,0.0054053543,0.018177148,0.0022935998,0.0043198657,0.0048865764,0.00028124222],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028287809,0.000098668635,0.09545974,0.00016546917,0.000113203045,0.0017334656,0.4479807,0.0007510492,0.0018138173,0.2985262,0.07902883,0.07404598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059622525,0.00011311735,0.23960237,0.000682221,0.00013555118,0.00050003047,0.42775774,0.0023849045,0.0040267473,0.05143324,0.27282348,0.00048104775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9725937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09567921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09567921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08843958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6942045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323674988","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2015.1113971","title":"Early legal careers in comparative context: evidence from Canada and the United States","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Race (biology); Value (mathematics); Capital (architecture); Political science; Comparative case; Sociology; Legal profession; Law; Gender studies; Geography","score_opus":0.054818361773509426,"score_gpt":0.3956026218112003,"score_spread":0.3407842600376909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323674988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97923785,0.0050415276,0.00014130019,0.002035459,0.000060502043,0.00003601116,0.0014892255,0.0000042976308,0.0119538205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928478,0.0037243292,0.00015847542,0.00059424667,0.000018789984,0.000019575551,0.0010635479,0.0000076219094,0.0015654671],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499965,0.0006785744,0.00015980098,0.00045956342,0.0015790957,0.0021233396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97112083,0.0046438775,0.004267004,0.00060159503,0.013121111,0.006245576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039007936,0.00026594894,0.0008408453,0.00597647,0.013676523,0.0042311214,0.0022775906,0.00097391394,0.004925667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020177163,0.0003954097,0.0003808391,0.017480304,0.0027802691,0.0019120987,0.0041171727,0.0020101345,0.0003003843],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022166477,0.00021983635,0.8771198,0.00022851212,0.00012563774,0.0005199833,0.07142895,0.0001384255,0.00010723791,0.0041274014,0.007611947,0.03815068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013123936,0.000032101423,0.89721435,0.0005257062,0.000048633443,0.00012319154,0.09071382,0.0001000242,0.0000862775,0.00024974532,0.010865698,0.000027366721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.991627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031872507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031872507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05972467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23125231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529283850","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2016.1238382","title":"<i>Lawyers’ Empire: Legal Professions and Cultural Authority, 1780–1950</i>: a review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Systems and Institutions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Law; Legal profession; Political science; Legal practice; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.05050733555140098,"score_gpt":0.36727809319105204,"score_spread":0.31677075763965107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529283850","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011362623,0.99720937,0.000023125951,0.0016565085,0.00022290769,9.0735546e-7,0.000010366205,0.0000012442476,0.00076194707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003603406,0.994497,0.00006309372,0.0010078264,0.0004649492,0.0000036253089,0.000021426002,0.0000016071141,0.00033697515],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876595,0.00036713868,0.00016049384,0.00015198164,0.00048697475,0.00006751287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99490744,0.0033451072,0.00073085533,0.00007320498,0.0008210628,0.00012233856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018066587,0.00053089217,0.0008751024,0.006243087,0.000797526,0.0029573264,0.00070507894,0.0018394461,0.004034033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006128381,0.00036271315,0.00048170277,0.0121051455,0.0025265529,0.005010479,0.0015036244,0.0019876852,0.0007683922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006424861,0.00003730476,0.0024187034,0.037970774,0.00022800562,0.00015326242,0.0023693508,0.0002660056,0.00029525007,0.056447145,0.1352119,0.76453805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071193986,0.000039433853,0.009749317,0.05867297,0.0001296059,0.00045435835,0.0018980925,0.000069431284,0.0001514514,0.008373862,0.9204304,0.000023989847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012193467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025617016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012193467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032571694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008967336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024245024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796348969","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2018.1456435","title":"Parental-leave policy for male lawyers in Helsinki and Montreal: cultural and professional barriers to male lawyers’ use of paternity and parental leaves","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université TÉLUQ","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ella ja Georg Ehrnroothin Säätiö","keywords":"Ethos; Statutory law; Parental leave; Outreach; Work (physics); Sociology; Law; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.08361816594048224,"score_gpt":0.37580334360763384,"score_spread":0.2921851776671516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796348969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953768,0.00015629991,0.00008112034,0.0013411301,0.000006420872,0.000015236264,0.000027180724,0.0000023510945,0.0029933378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977791,0.00009871283,0.00006797042,0.00016042918,0.0000025942413,0.0000063356515,0.000014995178,0.0000014762312,0.001868325],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696904,0.00074772094,0.00006169545,0.0002591742,0.0006532934,0.0013091367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924028,0.0023985736,0.0014402054,0.00013103563,0.0009520021,0.0026754322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026329572,0.00014328925,0.00018730655,0.00071041274,0.0144286305,0.003174434,0.001521058,0.0007062602,0.004818939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068654614,0.00026771243,0.00012378914,0.0009724286,0.004104094,0.0008662757,0.0018236092,0.0010560427,0.00013369955],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012267008,0.00022510276,0.5065057,0.000078447185,0.000024162546,0.002443521,0.43364415,0.00028100386,0.0029190113,0.007214381,0.0044545215,0.042087276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000097671,0.00007316186,0.47706306,0.000116969306,0.00001228874,0.0003123818,0.50479794,0.00036380472,0.0005372707,0.00021138978,0.016464403,0.00003759813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93233275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.982577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067667246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03500943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041457932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25401235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2859687744","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2018.1490292","title":"Mystery shopping: demand-side phenomena in markets for personal plight legal services","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Negotiation; Competition (biology); Business; Contingency; Marketing; Quality (philosophy); Service (business); Tort; Competition law; Liability; Law; Economics; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.023119528025788455,"score_gpt":0.26051461890098276,"score_spread":0.2373950908751943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2859687744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9171174,0.0005401956,0.009712247,0.008167545,0.000040028226,0.0002112356,0.0004549814,0.0000689375,0.06368741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802303,0.000095012205,0.00047034182,0.00025264756,0.000047206155,0.000029688254,0.00006180669,0.000009348775,0.0010109136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987348,0.00047449162,0.000061009978,0.00021565138,0.0002520583,0.00026212115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97514945,0.016964318,0.004523855,0.0011328518,0.0010464772,0.0011830513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027422535,0.0002109621,0.0010431112,0.0009994559,0.0019935388,0.0051599685,0.0017474231,0.0029647818,0.024158003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016387746,0.000706813,0.0010771849,0.0011762752,0.0038828403,0.00961752,0.002464343,0.002962226,0.0007810948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024226813,0.0022890763,0.10763019,0.0004788181,0.00013515721,0.0030724788,0.009924413,0.0070659732,0.004462997,0.830475,0.00964814,0.02239512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012996139,0.00069550617,0.17946886,0.00013721213,0.00017706279,0.0015709059,0.018840514,0.12965903,0.0015126636,0.6517431,0.014563901,0.00033162933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060740896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060838796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024158003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002579049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011851821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08081657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093866784","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2020.1830098","title":"From partners to team leaders: tracking changes in the Canadian legal profession","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Legal profession; Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Perception; Public relations; Tracking (education); Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Engineering; Computer science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.13424230186723862,"score_gpt":0.46413658331281477,"score_spread":0.32989428144557614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093866784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634655,0.0016246063,0.0011024772,0.0038600944,0.00011566988,0.00025931973,0.0018957624,0.0000882476,0.02758829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986358,0.0011255501,0.0015742964,0.00044048813,0.000027332135,0.00011475531,0.00090649776,0.000034424887,0.009418811],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99007726,0.0010772628,0.00026770832,0.0011585699,0.0057665077,0.0016527098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96222043,0.0045189224,0.0061030006,0.00079756865,0.020728167,0.005631787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070845746,0.00041233856,0.00039029343,0.013914092,0.01122783,0.0066673905,0.0030242025,0.0013744824,0.0045740986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03209441,0.00045809997,0.00029038556,0.012314146,0.0032028637,0.0029665444,0.005974343,0.00190151,0.0006507889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001847248,0.00010327282,0.4085214,0.00039576928,0.000039444723,0.00053536985,0.43640026,0.00022273447,0.0012378057,0.004854573,0.016394677,0.13111003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010354238,0.00006330533,0.5219432,0.00025110916,0.000023213846,0.0001615843,0.40881303,0.00080619205,0.00059613376,0.0005308422,0.06671473,0.00008630832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9731626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98738664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9374652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062534794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09401282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4537238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396673988","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2024.2347390","title":"“I’ve never met a barrister that sounded like I do”: accents, barristers and Bourdieusian capital","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Trent University; Nottingham Trent University","keywords":"Habitus; Sociology; Social capital; Social psychology; Cultural capital; Psychology; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.015182708508426263,"score_gpt":0.338416966550549,"score_spread":0.3232342580421227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396673988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98544055,0.00016288045,0.00015728697,0.0010241708,0.000008066308,0.0000034633456,0.000004349563,0.0000013839178,0.013197853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99914336,0.000047866317,0.000020971238,0.000064791166,0.0000038339663,0.0000013122958,0.0000015700748,9.758852e-7,0.0007153242],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703884,0.00174923,0.000076776276,0.00018092006,0.00043202582,0.00052219024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99435544,0.002708376,0.0014067775,0.00028358062,0.00037105245,0.00087477354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029725726,0.00013023619,0.0002346091,0.0011600461,0.0053154463,0.0061053666,0.00050198275,0.00068049046,0.0031495404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075813513,0.00023609686,0.000092477545,0.00079897733,0.018913329,0.0027473583,0.0043118005,0.0018914866,0.00030081818],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011448063,0.0001363783,0.14605391,0.000037032965,0.000014671391,0.0010258764,0.7942248,0.00008876615,0.00081524363,0.03749117,0.0009822767,0.019015392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010104809,0.00012776082,0.20015796,0.00019710122,0.000014340943,0.0005495087,0.78059846,0.00017968328,0.00036611018,0.0073209754,0.010432369,0.000045579858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030686159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03737768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030686159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027231392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015570171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06101513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398266979","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2024.2356084","title":"Much ado about hallucinations: a brief assessment of the judicial response to large language model (LLM) hallucinations in the United States and Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.018252501043522756,"score_gpt":0.3511880407876327,"score_spread":0.33293553974410994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398266979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8792762,0.012383625,0.0007160243,0.056249835,0.00067380886,0.0006077359,0.00086976396,0.00004874438,0.049174268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97229475,0.011443397,0.00038961406,0.011123651,0.000257083,0.00005246116,0.00034583037,0.000024550984,0.0040686494],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99256563,0.0017660287,0.00058378716,0.00031902222,0.0035856066,0.0011798708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755363,0.0043666097,0.0019190182,0.00038084446,0.015417336,0.0023798763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005491769,0.00032017645,0.0004256575,0.003146205,0.009127189,0.0041166195,0.001579003,0.0017985043,0.0013347886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031745914,0.00032143807,0.00036459236,0.003859539,0.0038817483,0.0012431241,0.0025349644,0.0024706903,0.00019742337],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062123564,0.00043201077,0.27981693,0.0012903034,0.000113281974,0.008632973,0.41291642,0.00050608,0.0026016268,0.005156852,0.036887195,0.25102508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026921301,0.0002919678,0.36376703,0.0009494472,0.00005227303,0.002064238,0.57721984,0.0003102359,0.0006375627,0.00064952526,0.053903732,0.000127263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8850853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9598065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114914715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03162775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04445412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23118287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400726203","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2024.2379794","title":"Navigating the legal landscape: large language models and the hesitancy of legal professionals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025157232295542186,"score_gpt":0.40645339245864887,"score_spread":0.3812961601631067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400726203","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29743817,0.00644331,0.20814115,0.33562496,0.00062339276,0.00015284707,0.00019654873,0.0008788024,0.15050074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95734674,0.0014489399,0.029980581,0.00623486,0.00027688823,0.00008689499,0.00009745969,0.00024133218,0.004286383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9679252,0.024518894,0.0008789639,0.0015238269,0.0045083985,0.00064477185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82723206,0.1464935,0.008566936,0.010953363,0.0049601095,0.0017939726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032468554,0.0003791367,0.00053888885,0.0029954978,0.005974151,0.017441086,0.0018032008,0.0051029865,0.0046277037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14017048,0.0006812941,0.0005185933,0.0020904078,0.01965283,0.035695586,0.011055408,0.0064005055,0.00113146],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008066695,0.00007240779,0.007957383,0.00016671183,0.00002428637,0.0006235804,0.061561387,0.0023835874,0.0004895239,0.8227053,0.009336101,0.09459912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026032825,0.000049561735,0.0014107527,0.0004539597,0.000026093649,0.0007978517,0.02375803,0.018254511,0.000502204,0.8939945,0.060654067,0.00007244842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042602024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005342645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032468554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003821636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004963312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17171222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404997835","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2024.2433482","title":"“Democratizing punishment”? Federal prosecutors’ new anticorruption project and the Brazilian penal field","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Punitive damages; Context (archaeology); Language change; Political science; Accountability; Criminology; Law; White-collar crime; Politics; Punishment (psychology); Criminal justice; Sociology; Criminal law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01919646227889803,"score_gpt":0.37137126430513767,"score_spread":0.35217480202623963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404997835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7397124,0.004209403,0.0033241736,0.08828034,0.00021949814,0.000058470203,0.0000518039,0.000042489122,0.16410144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597746,0.000540493,0.00038082854,0.00093042245,0.000026646145,0.000013775119,0.000008399917,0.00001024428,0.0021118468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99061906,0.006047389,0.0001631013,0.00063748617,0.0011895178,0.0013434163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878226,0.0053853896,0.002117103,0.0011937142,0.0020787974,0.0014025362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009192343,0.00022247915,0.00033202325,0.0017128902,0.010888524,0.0066088815,0.0010177915,0.0019982774,0.0024238073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021865403,0.000287577,0.00020831962,0.0018834003,0.01608153,0.0038950746,0.004519895,0.002522973,0.00021182334],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035645728,0.00009058689,0.025542995,0.0001516621,0.00001182352,0.00054156984,0.42646208,0.00024803556,0.0009399647,0.46643174,0.010217613,0.06932631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025491241,0.000100792706,0.102910414,0.001648699,0.000040805502,0.0007474355,0.412884,0.0016316029,0.0010629261,0.06981017,0.40905866,0.00007914857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063329205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09483124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063329205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010571805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014382423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12592119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}