{"meta":{"query_hash":"d2db70b83818","filters":{"venue":"International Labor Rights Case Law"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d2db70b83818","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Labor+Rights+Case+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W4233439168","doi":"10.1163/24056901-00303002","title":"20 ilo Committee on Freedom of Association: Complaints against the Government of Canada presented by the Canadian Labour Congress (clc) and others, Case No. 3003, Report in which the Committee Requests to be Kept Informed of Developments – Report No. 381, 9–14 March 2017","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Labor Rights Case Law","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Government (linguistics); Political science; Association (psychology); Public administration; Law; Psychology; Human rights","score_opus":0.047980602607340744,"score_gpt":0.38455321147215005,"score_spread":0.33657260886480933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233439168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8103317,0.00005014839,8.579671e-7,0.07790856,0.003219071,0.0019233694,0.0058668973,0.000006634854,0.10069277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98403347,0.000016528375,0.000071966686,0.0028316213,0.00016432715,0.00011739216,0.00008757835,0.000017650082,0.012659494],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99553895,0.00094873545,0.0014372375,0.00027508612,0.0013804864,0.000419507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905979,0.002796857,0.0026726297,0.0009956666,0.0027081165,0.00022882633],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040395497,0.00020999639,0.0004067232,0.000052033978,0.0021236688,0.00006496197,0.0006956957,0.00018608638,0.00011271675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037650606,0.00011926141,0.000035408397,0.00012274153,0.00019583564,0.0002197168,0.00020941312,0.00067773514,0.000005802648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005402419,0.00018047162,0.34353912,0.000430233,0.0008547948,0.018168297,0.008506817,0.00003617728,0.00004635063,0.027944535,0.59955823,0.00019472491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079980114,0.000039826904,0.04107531,0.00047219632,0.000014695924,0.00091826974,0.0010651804,0.00007324592,0.000057620717,0.000053938766,0.95529526,0.00013463109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9823944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99957114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35573703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001432128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026516402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237373834","doi":"10.1163/24056901-00501015","title":"8 Ontario Court of Appeal, Das v. George Weston Limited, 2018 onca 1053 (CanLII), 20 December 2018","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Labor Rights Case Law","topic":"Legal Studies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Appeal; Law; Art; Political science; Art history","score_opus":0.012859983454991964,"score_gpt":0.2872120655739859,"score_spread":0.2743520821189939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237373834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5889417,0.00010545047,0.000006027131,0.0038969389,0.0028518843,0.00026705838,0.00018078451,0.000038217866,0.40371194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90101385,0.00006642257,0.00017513688,0.0005272497,0.0005828883,0.000011058244,0.000053190357,0.000014277092,0.09755591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815893,0.000050421244,0.0003699466,0.00031956474,0.0007379791,0.0003631671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892604,0.000092270704,0.0002079188,0.00023514236,0.00038775586,0.00015086596],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002743862,0.00018343207,0.0002625479,0.00006539758,0.00052874244,0.00008742071,0.00038274817,0.00014025356,0.0035219188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015070724,0.000121280194,0.00013400785,0.00015636234,0.00040804266,0.00044062678,0.00012271495,0.0002126881,0.0006979548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015967729,0.0003711932,0.009823565,0.000017621558,0.00040921208,0.0006417336,0.008411671,0.00002368794,0.00010477486,0.9321018,0.0473402,0.0005948471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055917376,0.00008465937,0.0013663913,0.000045251152,0.000023990175,0.00006581772,0.00023515499,0.000020278077,0.00022674729,0.0022596251,0.9949068,0.00020614751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6406903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94474137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94756657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006138223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019975794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392050912","doi":"10.1163/24056901-10010012","title":"Workers Entitled to Return to Work and Loss of Earnings Compensation Based on Their Jamaican Labor Markets, Tribunal Rules","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Labor Rights Case Law","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HIV Legal Network","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Earnings; Compensation (psychology); Work (physics); Labour economics; Business; Economics; Accounting; Law; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01622734224946438,"score_gpt":0.23630715443190897,"score_spread":0.2200798121824446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392050912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674573,0.00023375713,0.0009930985,0.009822282,0.0008087193,0.00022201001,0.001330969,0.00005284069,0.019079015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99675846,0.0000076268575,0.0007765215,0.00089529896,0.000110923625,0.000029720544,0.000042747433,0.000013178988,0.001365528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913555,0.00001720699,0.00033074568,0.00030783316,0.00007299355,0.0001356426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994155,0.00014681935,0.00011785561,0.00013372654,0.00010510863,0.000080959835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021788804,0.00012418813,0.00019947959,0.00023405402,0.00010342086,0.00012187944,0.000119326935,0.000040233335,0.00081551954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006219214,0.000109584464,0.000051786454,0.00030465884,0.000057264835,0.00009696465,0.000039349427,0.00009540277,0.00018968871],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002664686,0.000057076773,0.026499718,0.000022435423,0.00011761654,0.00011998005,0.00063619844,0.00017783181,0.000008807419,0.9688422,0.0027633256,0.00048835255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054796843,0.000093260685,0.102229975,0.0002513394,0.000007917385,0.000018141194,0.00007848726,0.0018811134,0.0002341107,0.011438378,0.882954,0.00026529026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024058967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034792456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95740384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008899174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012513534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8929367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401177314","doi":"10.1163/24056901-10020016","title":"18Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Osmani v. Universal Structural Restorations Ltd., 2022 onsc 6979, 9 December 2023","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Labor Rights Case Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.012155248591037818,"score_gpt":0.24944833131026567,"score_spread":0.23729308271922786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401177314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42552993,0.00015353509,0.00026151683,0.007287075,0.006901698,0.0003890236,0.00045910914,0.0002611542,0.55875695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837188,0.0000045679776,0.00038232372,0.004278519,0.0017394265,0.00001811829,0.0006159666,0.000028713654,0.009213568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983942,0.00001589549,0.00045042267,0.0003546874,0.0005795469,0.00020527633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989738,0.00008519769,0.00013980843,0.00018949273,0.0005815773,0.000030155088],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013791861,0.00022611293,0.00017351916,0.00033530762,0.0003573591,0.0005428384,0.0003117228,0.00008446143,0.0061813295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003061343,0.00019282158,0.00013548884,0.00034381662,0.00018325688,0.0022814367,0.00011121184,0.00022536467,0.00060866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052185675,0.000049772854,0.00008091453,0.000051475938,0.00015975679,0.0009713294,0.00007821285,0.00013141872,0.0006548774,0.97305727,0.024686284,0.00002649831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004882897,0.000018675875,0.00022859697,0.0000962292,0.000156036,0.00022842077,0.00011149575,0.021208586,0.00067289086,0.024670184,0.9518428,0.00027782682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011342376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036438074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9483871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019178596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008304614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99524117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401177462","doi":"10.1163/24056901-10020017","title":"A Deficiency of Available Remedies in Cases of Labor Trafficking: Ontario’s First Civil Precedent","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Labor Rights Case Law","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0294594359829718,"score_gpt":0.3032932549320054,"score_spread":0.2738338189490336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401177462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7815245,0.0031532603,0.0000066543466,0.001143592,0.0023384544,0.00028576833,0.00027058643,0.00009095576,0.21118626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99178284,0.00004627199,0.00036208637,0.000042289423,0.00016409048,0.00002316315,0.000009868508,0.00001191867,0.0075574624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813116,0.000079577185,0.0004965089,0.00031928095,0.00071376096,0.00025972037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874026,0.00052526896,0.00012114573,0.00018473895,0.00035221776,0.00007634826],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045939165,0.0001378572,0.00022887066,0.00020084967,0.00018100286,0.000094384246,0.00038458596,0.00010063043,0.0025487524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022168907,0.00011531939,0.00008559439,0.00049772655,0.00054571254,0.0004023429,0.00007310422,0.00017970426,0.00006391238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004626835,0.00023810599,0.0025620656,0.00007641926,0.000054893237,0.0035083177,0.13618821,0.00010301308,0.00005732037,0.8553236,0.0017694312,0.00007235558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002303645,0.00006733318,0.00012031227,0.00033134612,0.000026378852,0.00008330628,0.0010732013,0.00010299108,0.0016590549,0.0037057144,0.9924389,0.00016110968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39273426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95797336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9906694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045671687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034572036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404001113","doi":"10.1163/24056901-10030020","title":"30Supreme Court of Canada, R. v. Greater Sudbury (City), 2023 scc 28 (CanLII), 10 November 2023","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Labor Rights Case Law","topic":"Legal and Policy Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Environmental science; Archaeology; Geography","score_opus":0.02320339512720952,"score_gpt":0.3122014871995164,"score_spread":0.28899809207230687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404001113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2626952,0.00037708037,0.000005015212,0.023763493,0.003941958,0.00018972025,0.0025164576,0.00009416691,0.7064169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7937957,0.000010413043,0.000036633654,0.0005325501,0.0012408311,0.000010199112,0.00003759287,0.000012081942,0.20432396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827,0.00007399312,0.00029854037,0.00028017123,0.0007462591,0.00033107432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991026,0.00018654921,0.00006106389,0.00015976827,0.00031490883,0.00017508905],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002546933,0.00015673696,0.00017732002,0.00009450876,0.0003099783,0.00018436716,0.0003302477,0.00010461523,0.01284841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004345507,0.00012081465,0.00008645946,0.00028748112,0.00030154135,0.00036028426,0.000059077553,0.00016253674,0.00022035128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023913357,0.000029469873,0.00018318041,0.000017730925,0.00015220954,0.003058201,0.0018125571,0.00000820242,0.000058745096,0.8439472,0.15063155,0.00007708738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001316914,0.000016053635,0.0001391136,0.00006732115,0.000022086308,0.000064130945,0.00010434169,0.000084275795,0.0014213688,0.006932257,0.9908474,0.0001699755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96521866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9893742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84021586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002842688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005541384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.988054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}