{"meta":{"query_hash":"e91648a03dbb","filters":{"venue":"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e91648a03dbb","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Relations+of+the+Asia-Pacific"},"results":[{"id":"W1987872759","doi":"10.1093/irap/lcs002","title":"China's rise and middle power democracies: Canada and Australia compared","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs","funders":"","keywords":"China; Middle power; Power (physics); Political science; Economic history; Ancient history; History; Politics; Foreign policy; Law","score_opus":0.023890818321173006,"score_gpt":0.2944757870278648,"score_spread":0.2705849687066918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987872759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9104376,0.0016609766,0.00009158776,0.004968147,0.00005068623,0.00004036094,0.00023495215,0.000010500302,0.08250516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98688173,0.00086733425,0.00009515597,0.00076160906,0.00000857404,0.000014469197,0.00011309582,0.0000078365,0.011250192],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980281,0.00020587939,0.00004058342,0.00012241068,0.00047010763,0.0011328969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738353,0.00025986275,0.00019031084,0.00008037445,0.0010964883,0.0009893881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001131011,0.00021380723,0.00044092978,0.0030486537,0.010833701,0.0036980973,0.00081392255,0.00084268453,0.0037038834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038447639,0.00021553924,0.00026760448,0.0057262676,0.0038155357,0.0015055914,0.0031662153,0.0016154189,0.00017171867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006886483,0.00031124766,0.2829472,0.00048989203,0.00016147993,0.0034367112,0.42842522,0.0013702605,0.0022570426,0.1533281,0.03223659,0.09434756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039910436,0.00008305177,0.5994468,0.00022034804,0.000059445738,0.0002600386,0.27210146,0.0008330703,0.00049306435,0.003372637,0.122992694,0.000097546006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99308914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07673017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07673017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06780824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55671895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041850252","doi":"10.1093/irap/lcq019","title":"Welfare and Capitalism in Postwar Japan","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific","topic":"Japanese History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Welfare; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Political science; Market economy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0070782292900111385,"score_gpt":0.250062951330947,"score_spread":0.24298472204093588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041850252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55106026,0.15541355,0.00022969962,0.06468063,0.00074966945,0.000015054231,0.00025565177,0.000020580894,0.22757497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9442712,0.039250422,0.00006741441,0.00096370955,0.00053331756,0.000010433698,0.00006759428,0.0000053495773,0.014830562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997682,0.000060741615,0.000009412605,0.000018358189,0.000033602755,0.00010964858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997056,0.00005295383,0.00006871353,0.0000119353845,0.000050690927,0.00011010486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049286307,0.00021697972,0.0001879255,0.00089169247,0.0025101285,0.0040089204,0.00016964175,0.0005608743,0.004170076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007236552,0.00010915391,0.000095715,0.001960772,0.004374548,0.0021027685,0.0022442034,0.0008768887,0.00021673822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002906841,0.00027217562,0.061494708,0.00092839054,0.00011237635,0.0016797063,0.18500778,0.00082581106,0.0021493658,0.4714141,0.12271415,0.15311083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020232721,0.00009615356,0.41790596,0.0010673392,0.000045147568,0.00030055284,0.09621424,0.00020759921,0.00031821104,0.063963376,0.41981798,0.000043258664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03370298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052828874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03370298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003842246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023325568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06701362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114786951","doi":"10.1093/irap/lcr018","title":"Rising States, Rising Institutions: Challenges for Global Governance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multilateralism; Global governance; Corporate governance; Political science; General partnership; International relations; Politics; China; Power (physics); Public administration; Political economy; Foreign policy; Sociology; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.05591391883332691,"score_gpt":0.32233791049612537,"score_spread":0.26642399166279845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114786951","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014199102,0.07042666,0.008192965,0.6546277,0.002613245,0.00004644737,0.00008559982,0.000120906116,0.2496874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8142455,0.057285704,0.006565391,0.06815099,0.004643534,0.00021222851,0.00014096727,0.00016810156,0.04858759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993194,0.003276774,0.00020770926,0.000671589,0.0014847774,0.0011651819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954927,0.0022883797,0.00042498816,0.0004699686,0.0005450582,0.00077884784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008140752,0.00043682425,0.0006506801,0.0011686722,0.0073951203,0.021496026,0.0011962457,0.005509013,0.005345507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007240259,0.00036697576,0.00048220117,0.0026075707,0.044099636,0.020399803,0.008102466,0.008816808,0.00084556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029982027,0.0000042428546,0.000115383846,0.00004985847,0.0000032090215,0.000031336996,0.004995218,0.00027325752,0.000041239266,0.96320266,0.019955372,0.011325167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006065729,0.0000072931466,0.00035449566,0.00014998479,0.0000030629853,0.000032286494,0.006075053,0.00016302787,0.000045955716,0.835991,0.15716435,0.00000753338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010514928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0123831015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021496026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012932313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013540752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09383094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119279222","doi":"10.1093/irap/lcl005","title":"Japan in a Dynamic Asia: coping with the new security challenges
 Yoichiro Sato and Satu Limaye (eds)
 Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, and Oxford: Lexington Books, 2006","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific","topic":"Japanese History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; China; Bilateralism; Political science; East Asia; Development economics; Cold war; International trade; Economy; Economic growth; Geography; Multilateralism; Politics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.011028101924963441,"score_gpt":0.24699668765407184,"score_spread":0.2359685857291084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119279222","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017146382,0.63226247,0.0058147167,0.050780423,0.009878666,0.000038772912,0.00012305612,0.00030035494,0.2836551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05562464,0.58806795,0.007707749,0.0072062123,0.0025935809,0.000069558875,0.00023734214,0.00019988976,0.33829308],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983084,0.00003426171,0.000011827619,0.000022537215,0.00006306226,0.000037523485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982965,0.000033567663,0.000018156814,0.000006801881,0.000032895055,0.00007895059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003999984,0.00070485054,0.00049843726,0.0005183855,0.0015212557,0.0053988774,0.0006124454,0.0012678293,0.007813693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003052654,0.00045320604,0.00036564874,0.0018209551,0.0012959074,0.0059069735,0.0015709418,0.001971478,0.0028570895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002680728,0.00006579115,0.0022590586,0.0011495533,0.000030276327,0.0010179434,0.027676534,0.00042066042,0.0015772119,0.079417035,0.603721,0.2826382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019060119,0.00001386071,0.0015543584,0.00026643567,0.0000147894025,0.00039658428,0.010654665,0.00007844207,0.00009298522,0.0038071254,0.98311126,0.0000075722605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005109801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018582363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007813693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013591893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036891936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026139379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345985350","doi":"10.1093/irap/lcv018","title":"North Korea in South Korea–Japan relations as a source of mutual security anxiety among democratic societies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific","topic":"Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; National security; Political science; Anxiety; Publics; Political economy; Development economics; Perception; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0191273339946582,"score_gpt":0.26426357942324197,"score_spread":0.24513624542858375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345985350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97165585,0.00033452036,0.00034142868,0.0053094025,0.000056998688,0.000012951084,0.000009381703,0.000009092069,0.02227039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99845326,0.000100161735,0.000045450866,0.00032982102,0.00001113848,0.000006537654,0.000005149435,0.000003464709,0.0010448826],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772626,0.0012135113,0.00007205539,0.00015766376,0.00024028888,0.0005902405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974801,0.00071937585,0.00075256795,0.00017014971,0.00024385261,0.0006339567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030485652,0.00026467405,0.00019018578,0.0006727339,0.010283491,0.006141066,0.00046731046,0.0010213733,0.0031565214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028453455,0.00032493702,0.0002387688,0.0009499324,0.0067609334,0.004094905,0.0072358088,0.0033550411,0.00020582501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068222274,0.000057191002,0.032651145,0.000076832635,0.000026998428,0.001821562,0.9274241,0.00006778749,0.0014278559,0.025719075,0.0029463465,0.0077129197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012604263,0.000043815668,0.040127367,0.000069795635,0.000024024213,0.0004436872,0.91160655,0.00018892543,0.00038623024,0.0034095573,0.043643884,0.00004359385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009033195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014928254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010283491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034109305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031365156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024748206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774600234","doi":"10.1093/irap/lcx020","title":"Business as usual? Economic responses to political tensions between China and Japan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"China; Politics; Salient; Economics; Political economy; Contrast (vision); Political science; Market economy; Economy; Law","score_opus":0.05683681095572947,"score_gpt":0.27675973011814853,"score_spread":0.21992291916241907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774600234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938611,0.00007388586,0.000038658687,0.0005064996,0.0000066426346,0.000003934993,0.000017033923,0.0000011103106,0.005491252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994281,0.00004074711,0.000010945224,0.00008583254,0.0000060952234,0.0000024015346,0.000015537054,7.6885067e-7,0.00040966537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924123,0.00018119665,0.000032254004,0.00008461222,0.00013597624,0.0003246665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735105,0.0002931408,0.0013365345,0.00009650315,0.00019072997,0.00073215587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001134008,0.00012439226,0.00025432633,0.00071295135,0.0014274775,0.0025882563,0.00027962305,0.0005652902,0.0038123839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031497797,0.00010191661,0.00017266144,0.0011095606,0.001845618,0.0014074717,0.001780954,0.0007905425,0.00014763954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033877027,0.0001623865,0.9346291,0.000045082485,0.000084587395,0.0012700271,0.031237585,0.00039532714,0.0018269004,0.010436891,0.0015354569,0.018037872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002706032,0.00008187134,0.9302613,0.00002251584,0.000030603554,0.00012469405,0.06082569,0.0008894447,0.00024257583,0.001883424,0.0055839065,0.000026923119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021585407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024708286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021585407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001756488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086125795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042919517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092275544","doi":"10.1093/irap/lcaa009","title":"China’s ‘Coercive Tourism’: motives, methods and consequences","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific","topic":"Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Sanctions; Tourism; Sovereignty; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Political science; Economy; Business; International trade; Development economics; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0394054807386346,"score_gpt":0.3814339977971966,"score_spread":0.342028517058562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092275544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94585156,0.00032889767,0.0022732518,0.0009525224,0.000056612243,0.0009597066,0.00012770813,0.000016554479,0.049433134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893945,0.00023348592,0.0024225279,0.00023601118,0.000027933187,0.00084145967,0.00006150945,0.000008938342,0.0067735873],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573886,0.002914217,0.00013783468,0.00023627072,0.0005305531,0.0004421896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920128,0.004854222,0.0010561168,0.0009636819,0.00084345805,0.0002696899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009361212,0.0004811892,0.00026713902,0.0022599623,0.0036452992,0.0019584005,0.0010091845,0.00082523667,0.0074902773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01010323,0.00023364833,0.00027545108,0.0037943097,0.0054992563,0.0010456125,0.0027357126,0.0008268594,0.00034311987],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000810847,0.0015391774,0.33887607,0.0012496988,0.000086239495,0.0024144305,0.24801375,0.0011389886,0.0030261555,0.19863246,0.006637639,0.19757457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001760345,0.0018051893,0.56248033,0.0011868869,0.0002341791,0.0012154382,0.3113109,0.0076450706,0.012184709,0.023720734,0.07787902,0.00016147457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01974033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033845074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01974033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004970752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043274383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04950738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255206492","doi":"10.1093/irap/lcaa014","title":"Framing middle power foreign policy: trade, security, and human rights frames in Canadian and Australian foreign policy attitudes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign policy; Framing (construction); Middle power; Geopolitics; Political science; Salient; Rivalry; Framing effect; Middle East; China; Political economy; Sociology; Geography; Public relations; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02310701729674109,"score_gpt":0.3123560855691049,"score_spread":0.2892490682723638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255206492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98349285,0.000044232987,0.00012356874,0.00043058972,0.000007109492,0.000033580123,0.0000120858585,0.0000021837557,0.01585376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871147,0.00006127351,0.00010361913,0.00009190246,0.0000017952029,0.000014325777,0.0000073125443,0.0000012864335,0.0010070234],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957722,0.0021294532,0.00008144518,0.00024413373,0.0010345324,0.00073829433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994724,0.0026084415,0.0007368261,0.00024721384,0.0010280473,0.00065538136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007095306,0.0003452869,0.0002654628,0.0012806967,0.009091891,0.0049530216,0.0006545245,0.000949997,0.004166822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01338145,0.0002298021,0.0002541753,0.0013486851,0.007271918,0.001516454,0.0029491293,0.0017827571,0.00011345746],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002720695,0.0004215246,0.09887457,0.000118920274,0.000026307953,0.00034480382,0.8557662,0.00047555866,0.0023264938,0.022780333,0.0011669263,0.017426338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003431007,0.00014866283,0.1410874,0.00016772668,0.000036735408,0.00005974779,0.8384989,0.0010048177,0.0008470427,0.0024123858,0.015625574,0.00007671051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8442515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85134655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15574849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03140565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016100578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31333143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}