{"meta":{"query_hash":"4f2d414bae18","filters":{"venue":"International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4f2d414bae18","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Scientific+Journal+of+Universities+and+Leadership"},"results":[{"id":"W4319594685","doi":"10.31874/2520-6702-2022-14-64-80","title":"Complex Activity & Selective Associativity: the Effectiveness of Elite University Association","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Excellence; Consolidation (business); Homogeneous; China; League; Associative property; Association (psychology); Political science; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Psychology; Politics; Business; Geography; Law; Mathematics; Accounting","score_opus":0.06555712644199384,"score_gpt":0.2951512951490372,"score_spread":0.22959416870704336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319594685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9237253,0.0007324161,0.0032693574,0.00055571436,0.000063535816,0.00005453368,0.00017982947,0.00002264856,0.071396634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987205,0.000066665096,0.0002610651,0.000029547355,0.000030691703,0.000014500832,0.00004781586,0.0000032716434,0.00082602294],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98453516,0.0074311076,0.0011644922,0.0012969781,0.0042046043,0.0013675942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9544012,0.022433005,0.01115519,0.0039919782,0.0032356402,0.004783059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065375306,0.0002536674,0.000476453,0.0025149253,0.0018644212,0.0033787491,0.00079214916,0.0005797024,0.0077221217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026495185,0.00010817637,0.00047512524,0.002884616,0.0030502628,0.0020217183,0.0047737407,0.00052800507,0.0007501381],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008661455,0.00033852467,0.8577435,0.00028262442,0.00035950154,0.00032929462,0.008539281,0.0010828482,0.0008051465,0.025265867,0.0015951742,0.10279207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003548254,0.0005948311,0.9700393,0.00006714768,0.00012883337,0.00027400337,0.007335624,0.0019284671,0.00067065924,0.009673928,0.009215569,0.00003615788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018913614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028162529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077221217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013334462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011320276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03457415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400548179","doi":"10.31874/2520-6702-2024-17-77-97","title":"Integration and differentiation of leadership higher education: lessons for Ukraine from the EU, USA and China","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Position (finance); Political science; European union; Higher education; State (computer science); Ranking (information retrieval); World class; Economy; Geography; Economic growth; International trade; Engineering; Business; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.10682099559984953,"score_gpt":0.328393273708142,"score_spread":0.22157227810829244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400548179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9492237,0.0066354005,0.0005786983,0.004159823,0.00007117795,0.000018109666,0.00008109621,0.0000116907395,0.03922026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948908,0.0021117828,0.000240298,0.00024915225,0.000015675001,0.0000058995456,0.00007076191,0.0000055900955,0.0024099487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914014,0.00027417025,0.000047093163,0.00006596648,0.00017434901,0.00029826132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938035,0.0001548006,0.00011969709,0.000034820354,0.00018088499,0.00012936961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012733204,0.0001708205,0.00038157278,0.001978919,0.0023561802,0.003505913,0.00034653742,0.00029046866,0.0012139203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001577004,0.00008125514,0.00035478608,0.0035365885,0.001637376,0.0020740347,0.002935355,0.000821049,0.00010387155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002345206,0.00014542496,0.35021192,0.00056020456,0.00016377721,0.003644292,0.18743326,0.0019016698,0.0007785206,0.14643134,0.006295487,0.30219966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013859107,0.00014329601,0.6611572,0.0008103559,0.00008887766,0.000623293,0.24755307,0.0019437361,0.0008957031,0.015612912,0.07110955,0.00004816892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11044798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12164037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11044798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059202276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063462243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21961021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117458676","doi":"10.31874/2520-6702-2025-20-52-71","title":"Ranking Support for the Strategic Development of Leading Universities: Lessons from the University Revolution in China","year":2025,"lang":"uk","type":"article","venue":"International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); China; Position (finance); Mainland China; Higher education; Overtaking; Strategic planning","score_opus":0.08986410119337629,"score_gpt":0.32115094965393864,"score_spread":0.23128684846056236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117458676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79446447,0.0024873153,0.003111817,0.033853613,0.00016988347,0.00011434069,0.00008485821,0.00010012826,0.16561353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948155,0.0004907239,0.00046053695,0.00029212073,0.000022111677,0.000013147168,0.000022995444,0.0000067171077,0.00387613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967437,0.0014029732,0.00008408451,0.00012306402,0.0006570272,0.0009889967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954052,0.0018790684,0.00052737736,0.00032154506,0.0009474324,0.00091949094],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054897587,0.00030948134,0.00039756086,0.0026093246,0.005267724,0.0067546116,0.0012218294,0.0011128946,0.0030263541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008641028,0.00013084376,0.00029317374,0.0056515927,0.0060262084,0.003297153,0.0031678411,0.0013851573,0.00020656797],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020755087,0.00020442507,0.092857674,0.0003157703,0.000058458445,0.0018258773,0.08531711,0.0065751337,0.00040060995,0.54109234,0.019294003,0.25185102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015548946,0.0004709978,0.2575516,0.0006484622,0.00010876981,0.00033434437,0.2526544,0.025039308,0.0019266335,0.21208352,0.24878938,0.00023708328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15515733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14910133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99451023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020392101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021014154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3085084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}