{"meta":{"query_hash":"b51829a8fa9f","filters":{"venue":"International Social Security Review"},"cohort_total":24,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":24,"exported":24,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b51829a8fa9f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+Social+Security+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1574707994","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-246x.2012.01430.x","title":"A disarmingly simple idea? Practical bottlenecks in the implementation of a universal basic income","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Basic income; Computer science; Economics; Mathematical economics; Management science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Epistemology; Philosophy; Market economy","score_opus":0.0519225715924233,"score_gpt":0.4575510213189334,"score_spread":0.4056284497265101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574707994","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11981157,0.015120969,0.12893434,0.66545486,0.0023260433,0.0014342199,0.00020894827,0.0006085902,0.06610046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9107788,0.004533981,0.044559084,0.031389136,0.0009245591,0.0014290642,0.00005691034,0.00015008755,0.006178234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93006957,0.049808,0.0028856893,0.0031538405,0.009468364,0.004614622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88295233,0.08665602,0.007648773,0.009507212,0.010255092,0.0029805363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1253926,0.000529424,0.0012865076,0.0017901899,0.0028516187,0.0097785415,0.004422397,0.007190553,0.0057685324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18246622,0.00079000375,0.00093570177,0.0010879672,0.017822769,0.02244438,0.01067459,0.011931965,0.0006259108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109963425,0.000118781856,0.0013151094,0.0004199808,0.000041912037,0.00013262124,0.0016461617,0.0022811193,0.0003427283,0.95308757,0.006753293,0.033750873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040574605,0.0011017972,0.0064027705,0.0034208181,0.00012889918,0.00033425898,0.006583944,0.008039648,0.0027079277,0.8126997,0.15796861,0.00020585384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005495857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002821157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1253926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007746313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020838166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6631474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982863360","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-246x.2008.00316.x","title":"Pension reform in China","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Social security; China; Scope (computer science); Pension; Business; Population; Population ageing; Economic growth; National Pension; Old Age Security; Finance; Actuarial science; Economics; Political science; Birth rate; Market economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02137686230563043,"score_gpt":0.3287190330908254,"score_spread":0.307342170785195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982863360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9116522,0.015037367,0.0003045905,0.017607385,0.00025393825,0.00018027468,0.00067055906,0.00007764824,0.054215994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807568,0.0036054293,0.00018346166,0.0009600271,0.00009996721,0.000043695483,0.0003424155,0.0000048213296,0.014003432],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891675,0.00014524242,0.00006204614,0.00006803345,0.00020717384,0.0006007714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994856,0.00003860856,0.00011360118,0.00004623621,0.00011930089,0.00019673951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017722449,0.00027695153,0.00031995613,0.0030124423,0.002224864,0.0018635597,0.00062019797,0.00091586896,0.0039639226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016220841,0.000110173474,0.00042288285,0.0023505588,0.0008661415,0.0009744245,0.0019464699,0.0005732657,0.0001922891],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003729641,0.00056433206,0.3073414,0.0011880988,0.000285209,0.0024650977,0.019897643,0.0051744753,0.0035579102,0.28085798,0.04117836,0.33711654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009419412,0.00020767783,0.70352095,0.00034321955,0.000083261206,0.00019946124,0.0046469145,0.0024843754,0.0010844287,0.005539383,0.28174603,0.00005010036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.121541366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12544988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121541366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009717498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026134372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24166787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993801184","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-246x.2007.00280.x","title":"Social protection and poverty in Azerbaijan, a low‐income country in transition: Implications of a household survey","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Social protection; Government (linguistics); Economic growth; Poverty reduction; Development economics; Population; Social assistance; Economics; Public economics; Business; Socioeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05943330227424065,"score_gpt":0.3663454323552734,"score_spread":0.30691213008103274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993801184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991617,0.0056990674,0.00011774303,0.0004557128,0.00001422058,0.000038155817,0.00035912183,0.0000021039484,0.001696903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99451435,0.004753994,0.00023611702,0.00006757799,0.000014195341,0.000019511188,0.00019314197,4.5795508e-7,0.00020059987],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993407,0.00042202606,0.000024694284,0.00002861417,0.0000792971,0.00010462437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940073,0.00022646347,0.00020489086,0.000017706841,0.00008414736,0.000066121196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013387084,0.00016465454,0.00024171626,0.0014220868,0.00035545471,0.0006649538,0.00038437193,0.00028608332,0.0005974643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020138726,0.00010066945,0.00020747438,0.0023102225,0.00029564239,0.00047402913,0.00047503333,0.00027122986,0.000079870115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007148629,0.00014105531,0.9703259,0.00029912515,0.00012790758,0.0003049033,0.0024099099,0.00054215733,0.00023320898,0.0008272129,0.0007056948,0.024011385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005787995,0.000104707506,0.99341315,0.00013938124,0.00006249051,0.00012782306,0.0042272285,0.0003518688,0.00007532965,0.00014645891,0.001341314,0.000004433588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07834662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10587956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07834662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009509877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001651968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15578115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030091852","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-246x.2007.00303.x","title":"Designing a social security pension system","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Actua; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Social security; Pension; Poverty; Sustainability; Pension system; Public economics; Business; Economics; Economic growth; Finance; Market economy","score_opus":0.029025193623792325,"score_gpt":0.2694210122675323,"score_spread":0.24039581864373996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030091852","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2505928,0.0012878876,0.5744261,0.00870357,0.00045548068,0.0011039844,0.00041991792,0.0013674191,0.16164285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87005794,0.00062098063,0.10962426,0.00025846288,0.00006159645,0.00033531402,0.00019240147,0.00006228046,0.018786797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846387,0.0008473039,0.0000865337,0.00012275446,0.0003143893,0.00016526533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992187,0.00020061257,0.000080755584,0.00017487563,0.00021218696,0.00011294481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022575068,0.0003151249,0.00025630218,0.0005971922,0.0013603204,0.0024472147,0.00064818724,0.0010159289,0.00906016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032425264,0.00027273153,0.000532735,0.00032862782,0.0010460569,0.0023912007,0.0020681473,0.00052861037,0.0013658863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013768084,0.00021124202,0.008377875,0.00035700048,0.000087970475,0.0004902254,0.0023946208,0.099039055,0.0056024627,0.7770932,0.010099219,0.09610951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023484978,0.0007742518,0.0040167123,0.00066490687,0.00019174846,0.0006548326,0.0037145913,0.24609378,0.008696989,0.3449722,0.38988814,0.000097017444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003018542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024188499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00906016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014624225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023146174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03030932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034446925","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-246x.2005.00227.x","title":"Welfare to What? After Workfare in Toronto","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Workfare; Welfare; Work (physics); Psychological intervention; Social assistance; Quality (philosophy); Labour economics; Face (sociological concept); Job loss; Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Unemployment; Sociology; Medicine; Engineering; Nursing; Market economy","score_opus":0.0180036119555692,"score_gpt":0.37831907336447357,"score_spread":0.36031546140890436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034446925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68102175,0.15288427,0.00022156976,0.04624684,0.0005865286,0.00012908122,0.0024344183,0.000029379953,0.116446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9325242,0.040333465,0.00012667746,0.0015821365,0.000084721156,0.000031599135,0.0006557685,0.000009019505,0.024652397],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992329,0.00014493812,0.000033944954,0.000045474342,0.00020345465,0.00033929307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882394,0.0001030864,0.00018448113,0.000033838704,0.00034121884,0.00051344413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007140944,0.00016131645,0.00022812419,0.0005837515,0.0027894499,0.0017516578,0.0005545888,0.00043359282,0.0050052637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001374396,0.00013374354,0.00021297627,0.0027620331,0.00091730646,0.00053658214,0.00091704604,0.0004275269,0.00021388306],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054315495,0.0001696149,0.23673354,0.005329937,0.0002989839,0.0064121387,0.120930895,0.0015113668,0.002208539,0.06939016,0.21730691,0.33916482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003987395,0.000117360694,0.6795648,0.0013823163,0.0001076759,0.00040208173,0.05943962,0.00022160762,0.00032108123,0.0009841938,0.2573801,0.000039302886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9801523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99322975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045888647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045888647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055320982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33294702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077053097","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-246x.2008.01321.x","title":"Lone mothers, workfare and precarious employment: Time for a Canadian Basic Income?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Workfare; Basic income; Context (archaeology); Social security; Income Support; Labour economics; Economics; Political science; Sociology; Welfare; Geography; Market economy; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.045382292068701285,"score_gpt":0.38456024598015925,"score_spread":0.339177953911458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077053097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3948448,0.15291384,0.0004135714,0.27164006,0.0013958807,0.0000701918,0.00047146712,0.00002108133,0.17822914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.925349,0.057197336,0.00033071337,0.004456499,0.00014281327,0.000019539582,0.00008232421,0.000007654424,0.01241407],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988726,0.00019961174,0.00002583896,0.000052998534,0.00032204812,0.00052689336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976041,0.00038490834,0.00028515168,0.000052272073,0.0006754179,0.0009982496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020020828,0.00016382046,0.00043243956,0.0010314923,0.005748668,0.003955529,0.0010175519,0.00095401745,0.0067842747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038368113,0.00015806637,0.0001907064,0.001713558,0.00413624,0.0014638397,0.0018765392,0.0012889482,0.00018480096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003027021,0.00018253924,0.14891364,0.0027733766,0.000073382085,0.0030188467,0.14286603,0.00029568042,0.0010571157,0.1900664,0.109943226,0.4005071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003528981,0.000096295924,0.28133494,0.0041662124,0.00007234145,0.0006603712,0.3764615,0.00017741532,0.00024625583,0.008773754,0.32790846,0.00006711419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9503801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9847114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97184175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028158246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.086660124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20430332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120507540","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-246x.2006.00237.x","title":"Principles and Practicalities for Measuring Child Poverty","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Social Issues and Policies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Child poverty; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Set (abstract data type); Convention; Ideal (ethics); Stock (firearms); Poverty reduction; Public economics; Economic growth; Political science; Development economics; Economics; Computer science; Human rights; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.06749093053411762,"score_gpt":0.3839220630672876,"score_spread":0.31643113253317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120507540","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009386917,0.020934947,0.6996942,0.059722215,0.001522482,0.0020508256,0.0015719385,0.0003216572,0.20479484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12938362,0.017752701,0.82557726,0.0073440676,0.0007909917,0.00642414,0.00057481945,0.00012489011,0.012027408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9192888,0.059284214,0.0044739572,0.0028830294,0.013067977,0.0010019869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96040976,0.02549954,0.0037179173,0.003274564,0.006563612,0.00053462316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060028423,0.001730788,0.0012619501,0.008772024,0.0034119987,0.0073697837,0.0041236905,0.0037661095,0.0047786683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06949728,0.0010174371,0.0013080935,0.0094903605,0.020733565,0.008853386,0.007886357,0.008314764,0.0018387553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017613558,0.00006124364,0.0039065983,0.0006984215,0.00002961323,0.00014441072,0.0066982736,0.0015104245,0.00021428362,0.91387415,0.010197627,0.06264739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013178184,0.00008042325,0.0043294406,0.0018299865,0.000021672786,0.00043625673,0.005562639,0.0014889928,0.0005851421,0.79313964,0.19243419,0.00007837855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010578302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0099081015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060028423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005374079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077861454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3174644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139453286","doi":"10.1111/issr.12008","title":"Actuarial balance sheets as a tool to assess the sustainability of social security pension systems","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Actua","funders":"","keywords":"Balance sheet; Social security; Balance (ability); Sustainability; Pension; Financial security; Pension system; Actuarial science; Business; Economics; Environmental economics; Finance; Medicine","score_opus":0.023615971269614948,"score_gpt":0.35674666263605154,"score_spread":0.3331306913664366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139453286","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11593427,0.04804142,0.6754995,0.005241944,0.0023178877,0.0009103497,0.0059613576,0.0014245079,0.1446689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7822564,0.019442812,0.1857884,0.00023803752,0.00086153706,0.00087159494,0.0020860357,0.0001501997,0.0083049955],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98424757,0.010207465,0.0009151165,0.0002837544,0.0042178943,0.0001281731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96534395,0.019508181,0.0056914617,0.002595404,0.006523103,0.000338033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035064865,0.0012480493,0.00066258945,0.01643301,0.00062094023,0.0037688657,0.0010942229,0.00078980427,0.0055621313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05011621,0.00041642683,0.00077832444,0.008125539,0.001242025,0.004104053,0.0019041536,0.0012345716,0.0008793582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034683093,0.00014651395,0.019263612,0.0018638959,0.00081027474,0.00020812028,0.0014742956,0.1201574,0.0014397413,0.34137505,0.021851897,0.49106234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009388879,0.0011393903,0.061436933,0.0062228683,0.0006330043,0.00060389366,0.004208572,0.17719372,0.0056903055,0.49977323,0.24253811,0.0004661422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012374729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010107119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035064865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013938939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012607883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18544292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509037380","doi":"10.1111/issr.12101","title":"The interaction of pillars in multi‐pillar pension systems: A comparison of Canada, Denmark, Netherlands and Sweden","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Council of Forest Industries","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Incentive; Private pension; Pillar; Earnings; Labour economics; Business; Economics; Public economics; Finance; Market economy; Engineering","score_opus":0.17397918154033584,"score_gpt":0.45046034995298095,"score_spread":0.27648116841264514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509037380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98528844,0.00092793745,0.0006199047,0.00059113064,0.000024933948,0.00008523057,0.0018924247,0.000026955426,0.010543035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953041,0.0003409776,0.00082490226,0.000044678523,0.000003486012,0.00002484492,0.0010633161,0.000008596104,0.002385176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987478,0.00030095037,0.00006191059,0.000112386915,0.0004115181,0.0003654849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975304,0.0010394973,0.0002760765,0.00011083389,0.0007139481,0.0003292448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016968724,0.00032271142,0.00081236043,0.0013955868,0.0014281913,0.0035808047,0.001057365,0.0005324008,0.0031821162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046193404,0.00029475612,0.0010210105,0.002636087,0.0006737909,0.00064257986,0.001157385,0.0007136471,0.00015582313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014926211,0.00053455366,0.5000528,0.00066482835,0.0018306002,0.0011054312,0.0022609455,0.38793135,0.0009351726,0.044861794,0.008819867,0.04951016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046516908,0.0004583604,0.67198735,0.00043680423,0.0009904745,0.00021015637,0.017670007,0.26794335,0.0010759919,0.0069498336,0.031519905,0.0002925848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94978344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9455233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050216556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020014836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015910579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14521849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765609143","doi":"10.1111/issr.12141","title":"<b>Does trust increase willingness to pay higher taxes to help the needy?</b>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Solidarity; Interpersonal communication; Welfare; Public economics; Welfare state; Social trust; State (computer science); Willingness to pay; Business; Economics; Demographic economics; Social psychology; Political science; Microeconomics; Psychology; Market economy","score_opus":0.04935172235231678,"score_gpt":0.3077957619150579,"score_spread":0.25844403956274115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765609143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969488,0.0002502421,0.00012668212,0.0005427379,0.0000106396765,0.0000075767684,0.000117825366,0.000001678326,0.0019938669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995134,0.00008978875,0.00003964585,0.00002542683,0.0000070719557,0.000002940039,0.00005818067,4.9210166e-7,0.00026313053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918634,0.00039246093,0.0000654446,0.00008877737,0.00010753102,0.00015950193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97561115,0.00961027,0.0115956655,0.00092318305,0.0011009685,0.0011588224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019932522,0.00012779086,0.00026085932,0.0005005589,0.00035390962,0.0009734923,0.00022153444,0.00064079557,0.006887211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012730939,0.00013831512,0.00042504809,0.00067811325,0.00062778726,0.0005436657,0.0004816848,0.00075552874,0.00037800494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012470676,0.00013353422,0.992172,0.000053464373,0.00014339363,0.00007672966,0.00073564256,0.00020956376,0.0000918713,0.0007611044,0.00043829306,0.005059627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001163967,0.00009646751,0.99598867,0.000046759455,0.000060958962,0.00007939091,0.002029387,0.00043923914,0.00007932137,0.0004009193,0.0007623647,0.0000048549746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009557039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070797196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009557039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004074053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005201418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023039997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795350275","doi":"10.1111/issr.12161","title":"Analysis of the implementation of a social protection initiative to admit the poorest of the poor to mutual health funds in Burkina Faso","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Reforms","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut de Readaptation Gingras Lindsay de Montreal; Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Mutual aid; Christian ministry; Social protection; Political science; Action (physics); Economic growth; Service (business); Acknowledgement; Business; Public relations; Public administration; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.062492338019068595,"score_gpt":0.3695554516149004,"score_spread":0.30706311359583177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795350275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762706,0.0071075703,0.00045309524,0.007482071,0.000036363777,0.00043755196,0.00031192214,0.00000600625,0.0078949025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672216,0.0015335009,0.00023155745,0.00053757196,0.000013785919,0.00012138928,0.00007764543,0.0000016425645,0.0007608427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870811,0.007934853,0.000341813,0.00024379259,0.0008845672,0.0035138694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828486,0.008411022,0.004362934,0.00032156732,0.0021723926,0.0018834658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0153185185,0.00028452065,0.0005261239,0.0018143998,0.0018890199,0.0026378678,0.00096684723,0.0013783147,0.0021509174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022933746,0.00025062056,0.00042490728,0.0024275307,0.0012852204,0.001161441,0.002433471,0.0011766606,0.000078621655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027569304,0.003161798,0.5919819,0.005169575,0.0018057188,0.0042285672,0.034839038,0.011082981,0.0029118517,0.108845994,0.00937047,0.22384533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005129252,0.0023657412,0.8894022,0.003174603,0.00071439333,0.0003121255,0.05688879,0.0044592307,0.0013435937,0.0035010418,0.037251,0.00007433068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1158574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13086696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1158574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015466131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019071063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23036605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896186508","doi":"10.1111/issr.12176","title":"Measuring and reporting obligations of social security retirement systems: Actuarial perspectives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Actua","funders":"","keywords":"Social security; Pension; Accounting; Actuarial science; Sustainability; Business; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.08863690484161917,"score_gpt":0.38764707820395,"score_spread":0.2990101733623308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896186508","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13587765,0.035229377,0.37143335,0.17816849,0.0038164936,0.00048725322,0.002903885,0.00038019987,0.27170333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9324373,0.008354654,0.045201506,0.0028836427,0.0044273427,0.000267467,0.00052752864,0.000068003035,0.0058325394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9031969,0.06740638,0.0060733194,0.0031985806,0.018100798,0.0020240124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8112263,0.12272967,0.026111327,0.010829003,0.026749238,0.0023544745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.076681845,0.0009780737,0.0007257357,0.009531143,0.002484645,0.013660517,0.0030640226,0.0031067894,0.0040814104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12882769,0.00064685737,0.001036487,0.0070356806,0.0076849526,0.0155638065,0.0075245094,0.004343776,0.00055190234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026586235,0.000101919635,0.012868592,0.00024437686,0.000066401255,0.00007484413,0.002493068,0.0095900865,0.00015590528,0.91289467,0.008947225,0.05253632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013209984,0.00021778054,0.032644972,0.0029644533,0.000071637456,0.00040265877,0.008067673,0.06852234,0.0017560387,0.77108634,0.11394522,0.0003076319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075708865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004294186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076681845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007267434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052278894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4055372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896520525","doi":"10.1111/issr.12181","title":"Towards a fair assessment of social security liabilities under pay‐as‐you‐go and partially funded schemes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Actua","funders":"","keywords":"Social security; Actuarial science; Business; Public economics; Social Security Act; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06289540540529426,"score_gpt":0.5106326495495562,"score_spread":0.44773724414426197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896520525","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054261178,0.31059268,0.26226512,0.17405804,0.009130005,0.0013719347,0.0018270157,0.00022798014,0.18626614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77010435,0.10759173,0.100195654,0.008774119,0.0035372183,0.0017037599,0.0008602443,0.000111316716,0.0071215397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.82442886,0.13129248,0.008141275,0.0026840214,0.03140093,0.00205251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8534496,0.08024612,0.014937963,0.010929598,0.039246216,0.0011905488],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19942655,0.000929861,0.0018931824,0.01208677,0.0013789593,0.01159064,0.0035174484,0.0036475428,0.0031581616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2360078,0.00057788956,0.0015602509,0.007859298,0.008634866,0.012543509,0.0070862393,0.004922132,0.0005662614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005131021,0.00005235561,0.0029701837,0.0020909824,0.00023232405,0.000037871574,0.0016898863,0.0032796862,0.00015202002,0.8483353,0.012069285,0.12903874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005487785,0.00029215548,0.01592351,0.029185692,0.00035955347,0.00016412525,0.006631898,0.009047573,0.00090244703,0.7393488,0.19794582,0.00014352344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071820817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066396752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19942655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059207072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017157119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896831445","doi":"10.1111/issr.12178","title":"Measuring and reporting the actuarial obligations of the Canada Pension Plan","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Actua","funders":"","keywords":"Accrual; Pension; Context (archaeology); Asset (computer security); Balance sheet; Accounting; Sustainability; Business; Actuarial science; Balance (ability); Plan (archaeology); Finance; Economics","score_opus":0.08427088386283539,"score_gpt":0.34274659056135365,"score_spread":0.25847570669851827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896831445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39942122,0.055874143,0.016185451,0.033414908,0.0011130503,0.0009697292,0.02398873,0.0005385607,0.4684942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477898,0.015223622,0.008847165,0.00051137025,0.00016354516,0.000094945244,0.0040215,0.000037089998,0.023310982],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98295677,0.0014360929,0.0004645388,0.0002920094,0.013946456,0.000904186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664606,0.0025715467,0.0026166763,0.0006698211,0.026429359,0.0012520973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009094636,0.00030637364,0.00019963583,0.008880475,0.0019888282,0.004502693,0.0012416862,0.00039113578,0.001758489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027818406,0.00017073417,0.00017804487,0.007077353,0.0014256748,0.0009035889,0.00140185,0.0008058747,0.0002896948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001445893,0.000081663435,0.13720275,0.0010641646,0.00017453579,0.00029529908,0.007440879,0.0122995945,0.001694204,0.110917345,0.16135575,0.5673291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015809961,0.00009148843,0.51926506,0.0021655269,0.00011496371,0.0001842663,0.007879399,0.008904854,0.003902505,0.0057142465,0.45155978,0.00020205046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97002554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97011775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04377849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04377849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09600993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31763667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897694284","doi":"10.1111/issr.12180","title":"Accounting for social benefits: The search for a past event","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Standards Association","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Social accounting; Accounting; Liability; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Social security; Public sector; Sustainability; Business; Event (particle physics); Public relations; Economics; Political science; Accounting information system; Engineering","score_opus":0.08292588239492664,"score_gpt":0.33047005689076686,"score_spread":0.2475441744958402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897694284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13538902,0.062027387,0.124159746,0.32870042,0.0064720167,0.00017803303,0.0007138906,0.00022665011,0.3421328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946819,0.01690642,0.014724112,0.004883879,0.0032795742,0.000073474315,0.00029872396,0.00007873019,0.012936062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98642087,0.0057706335,0.0008945351,0.0008528561,0.005379068,0.00068205426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9563786,0.027073301,0.006114789,0.002862008,0.0061121364,0.0014592092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020216336,0.00030522814,0.00055295386,0.005750751,0.0038149832,0.015138653,0.0017163884,0.0031830478,0.006114873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054286905,0.00044544874,0.00060271623,0.005085675,0.0091264695,0.020097598,0.0042651086,0.0058685984,0.00046968044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010329334,0.000011779181,0.0014124386,0.000049509978,0.000004460158,0.00006885668,0.0008071471,0.0005621969,0.00003407837,0.96240765,0.0073297177,0.02730185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061459095,0.00002250766,0.004283054,0.0011937,0.000016122189,0.00016834174,0.0028525915,0.0050088293,0.00025382702,0.85449064,0.13164982,0.000054385466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00745993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006331195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020216336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071229194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006761903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106915474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897916604","doi":"10.1111/issr.12175","title":"Introduction: Quantifying and reporting social security obligations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Actua","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Social security; Equity (law); Pension; Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Public economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Finance; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.0609486773841878,"score_gpt":0.3445716026871455,"score_spread":0.2836229253029577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897916604","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005476527,0.6237674,0.020234274,0.121460706,0.040173437,0.00033698147,0.0036022554,0.00030143184,0.18464701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14501706,0.6271624,0.028075952,0.032380432,0.068291694,0.0010007427,0.0051351315,0.0004392076,0.09249743],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951508,0.0021022712,0.00041448243,0.0003544916,0.0018394317,0.00013856425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98741686,0.0074761505,0.0012631919,0.00047377925,0.0032257875,0.00014420884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006800755,0.00062123,0.00048392286,0.0046340823,0.00092206773,0.0037568004,0.0008863494,0.0026860812,0.014129924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02464342,0.0003060945,0.00040494773,0.0037971875,0.002043889,0.003749777,0.0018726742,0.0030153522,0.0029370498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004068116,0.000030365687,0.0008768451,0.0035430244,0.00003931861,0.00006660263,0.0011965065,0.0009071556,0.00035176054,0.24763164,0.56250465,0.18281154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064345613,0.00004186416,0.0027578026,0.0063139675,0.000017392427,0.00010324864,0.0004349775,0.00026332017,0.00025181985,0.029382896,0.9604011,0.000025139094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042308443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002735598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014129924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00224953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025214038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047269344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943563177","doi":"10.1111/issr.12204","title":"Effective retirement age from employment and full‐time employment, and the impact of the 2008 crisis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Retirement age; Economics; Labour economics; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Financial crisis; Pension; Finance","score_opus":0.06050695915122488,"score_gpt":0.4133380155657614,"score_spread":0.3528310564145365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943563177","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018182652,0.9714002,0.00045380153,0.001680474,0.0003321971,0.000031823118,0.0013681734,0.0000062341323,0.006544444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20181453,0.7929297,0.0006248775,0.0005916515,0.00055505615,0.00008672674,0.0018307886,0.0000052053765,0.0015614618],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982425,0.00085967703,0.00018758752,0.0001076826,0.00048233444,0.00012032513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956358,0.00205806,0.0009079239,0.000073603536,0.0011787718,0.00014576214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005612785,0.00032492244,0.0006820835,0.0031536839,0.00015232382,0.0007897177,0.0004403575,0.0004723631,0.0018783442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009946495,0.00013382928,0.0008507866,0.0021926954,0.00020600525,0.0007702337,0.00061141315,0.0006157465,0.00034705616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087775,0.00016707438,0.10241933,0.04153624,0.0032356617,0.00026570947,0.00085573946,0.005982199,0.0003902199,0.021344993,0.055443767,0.7674813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009466991,0.0009959482,0.5753406,0.049111143,0.002548096,0.0007975644,0.002073477,0.0016282592,0.00060549576,0.006584932,0.36013338,0.00008637081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066731684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010254916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066731684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010025258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020428998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02968365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110916954","doi":"10.1111/issr.12250","title":"Mortality analysis of persons with disabilities in Argentina by age, sex and duration of benefit, 2015–16","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social security; Demography; Duration (music); Population; Payment; Pension; Medicine; Gerontology; Geography; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.04868141239796313,"score_gpt":0.3877136321622969,"score_spread":0.33903221976433373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110916954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6920095,0.23698966,0.0014437797,0.0034865676,0.0004432333,0.00014099217,0.053694006,0.000060298586,0.011731898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89698625,0.06859329,0.0010440414,0.0002738484,0.00034123356,0.00020038903,0.03033455,0.00001576287,0.0022108015],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995919,0.00013108544,0.00006066682,0.00006643024,0.00008850859,0.000061412735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995022,0.0000803996,0.00019334853,0.000016801354,0.00016579429,0.00004150997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000975114,0.00031216315,0.0004938217,0.0018031751,0.00018378178,0.0003139497,0.0002147065,0.00013876085,0.0013319617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016165453,0.00007951726,0.0007464037,0.0018636386,0.00010227078,0.00017128402,0.0003244399,0.00030002138,0.00014045669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076751166,0.000105266845,0.82920766,0.0041571,0.0014284711,0.00014212074,0.00044798004,0.0008010169,0.00035610906,0.0013695756,0.02939341,0.13182381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003126186,0.00012373707,0.97529185,0.0014722582,0.0005531617,0.0001724536,0.0005624139,0.00037986878,0.00011489476,0.0001727779,0.021115294,0.0000101409305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04853814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06541802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04853814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008290388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011364088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252911284","doi":"10.1111/1468-246x.00119","title":"Book Notes","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Welfare; Health care; Politics; Political science; Economic history; Humanities; Sociology; Economics; Art; Law","score_opus":0.06250813719663806,"score_gpt":0.3895205991155981,"score_spread":0.32701246191896005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252911284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029003844,0.017442798,0.0008345936,0.0045747724,0.005573025,0.000098369776,0.0034534435,0.0007014597,0.9670314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000907062,0.006302792,0.0006116127,0.0011181441,0.0007284616,0.00004680305,0.0020515074,0.00033016238,0.9879034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998992,0.00006954242,0.000055666573,0.00022185977,0.000582095,0.00007885134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852633,0.00024123614,0.000069551505,0.00019505831,0.0007559558,0.00021180388],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005508938,0.001042098,0.0012031181,0.0034924985,0.002175525,0.007815619,0.0019159646,0.0020499679,0.6923127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037686795,0.0005628604,0.00080457603,0.0057977918,0.00067378517,0.0049528102,0.0024650875,0.0024902497,0.63000417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000081397975,0.000016932243,0.000066437344,0.00015860541,0.0000021137073,0.000040041803,0.000078953126,0.000046420744,0.00009050803,0.006520629,0.90866536,0.08430583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012224117,0.0000022346378,0.00006486085,0.00009529145,7.1560623e-7,0.000030087018,0.000038765913,0.000009415967,0.0000140043785,0.00056154974,0.99917954,0.0000023261364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006872947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01295247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30768728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023152374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037567646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379882442","doi":"10.1111/issr.12323","title":"The role of mutuals and community‐based insurance in social health protection systems: International experience on delegated functions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Reforms","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Delegation; Social protection; Context (archaeology); Social security; Politics; Authorization; Political science; Business; Public administration; Economic growth; Economics; Computer security; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.0807400908883551,"score_gpt":0.33498785477930965,"score_spread":0.25424776389095455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379882442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43179914,0.19533002,0.007857423,0.05311488,0.00046920005,0.0002175862,0.0001014057,0.000026134197,0.31108418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723518,0.02345038,0.000658827,0.0008664702,0.00007177976,0.00004218564,0.000017488655,0.0000079394895,0.002533225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791743,0.01599858,0.0008887201,0.0006057338,0.0018363429,0.0014962531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631971,0.030757334,0.0023258738,0.0011915142,0.0018273325,0.0007009579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0320435,0.00021530446,0.0004618433,0.0023426462,0.0035055468,0.0073397686,0.00080612703,0.001846357,0.0029700722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020965392,0.00023968982,0.0002971015,0.0034303295,0.013691783,0.006458084,0.0072975494,0.0020944802,0.00013206994],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005183403,0.00005050636,0.004149781,0.0014434558,0.000030252666,0.00041550794,0.18892823,0.0007583661,0.00026578977,0.7089808,0.0036297766,0.09129573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042786312,0.00024388616,0.026955688,0.012494219,0.000075898395,0.00072663685,0.24481508,0.001010032,0.0011341516,0.06922493,0.64320964,0.00006706313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008655537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008185576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0320435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011074427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011384941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16946423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386913232","doi":"10.1111/issr.12336","title":"Pension financialization and collective risk sharing in Canada and Finland","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Financialization; Pension; Asset (computer security); Economics; Asset allocation; Statutory law; Investment (military); Labour economics; Economic policy; Finance; Political science; Portfolio; Politics","score_opus":0.027639049347229157,"score_gpt":0.24813314102331555,"score_spread":0.22049409167608638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386913232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9112772,0.053205673,0.00025065008,0.0031678278,0.000097708515,0.000029567427,0.002194944,0.000008349872,0.029768057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98747164,0.009633239,0.00011850561,0.000092762144,0.00002457249,0.0000059988206,0.0006521711,0.0000022522495,0.0019987833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988267,0.00010919028,0.000050290386,0.00008995325,0.0005275076,0.00039642857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965822,0.00053224183,0.0007144744,0.00010750515,0.0014734704,0.0005901133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020056674,0.00017893735,0.0004172973,0.0024411748,0.002131079,0.0027832706,0.0006110598,0.00039842518,0.0027352832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047160187,0.00009240157,0.00040059714,0.005243351,0.00089372497,0.0005425745,0.0012238782,0.0004912908,0.00006807234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079459656,0.00015178026,0.6561143,0.0012994574,0.0009593256,0.0010834576,0.01332736,0.0070080315,0.000476492,0.06842131,0.017375408,0.2329885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003093554,0.00005786291,0.94019735,0.001017255,0.00027323945,0.0002064013,0.009218218,0.0014462832,0.00032050966,0.003002782,0.044162847,0.000066258086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9693504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9764979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030649602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023397995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041523334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16976517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396225510","doi":"10.1111/issr.12354","title":"Flirting with a basic income in Canada: Were the lessons worth the risk of popular backlash?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Basic income; Flirting; Conditionality; Public opinion; Shock (circulatory); Income Support; Pandemic; Political science; Welfare; Welfare state; Social policy; Economics; Payment; Public economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Sociology; Law; Finance; Medicine","score_opus":0.04092274180833033,"score_gpt":0.39650637675588735,"score_spread":0.355583634947557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396225510","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037497357,0.5419355,0.0003592643,0.35237923,0.0035846415,0.00007134641,0.001022997,0.00002710751,0.06312254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37382153,0.5465422,0.0010049285,0.054837488,0.0009624648,0.000054823555,0.0004722315,0.00004067122,0.02226363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997324,0.00042184448,0.00007853192,0.00011726716,0.0011178486,0.0009405287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926761,0.0009773143,0.00030710208,0.00009205765,0.0044901636,0.0014573276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005246105,0.00029343716,0.0005676421,0.0015190467,0.0050033713,0.005388456,0.0017147069,0.00208135,0.0045585274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0082977405,0.00017834238,0.00031024087,0.004202304,0.003920054,0.001552892,0.0013621307,0.0035848133,0.00027156883],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034040082,0.00012759803,0.007900635,0.007206285,0.00015768775,0.0007781141,0.013256447,0.0010049829,0.00063924695,0.17568314,0.4516043,0.3413011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006727147,0.00008564127,0.02563335,0.008899838,0.00012938898,0.0001647005,0.021068025,0.00027151647,0.00040241118,0.0063530863,0.93682665,0.000098231016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096006274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.096006274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34045088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69657755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405010892","doi":"10.1111/issr.12371","title":"Gender, social protection systems and street‐level bureaucrats","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.15665919219893712,"score_gpt":0.4213786834303744,"score_spread":0.26471949123143723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405010892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8110774,0.0010832169,0.0038441024,0.006878559,0.00007382386,0.000034512916,0.00007744544,0.000024537405,0.17690629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99776816,0.00007929027,0.00012882508,0.000090165246,0.000010896908,0.0000056114086,0.0000050581175,0.0000024636115,0.0019093617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578863,0.0021492145,0.0001301158,0.0003493943,0.0005728083,0.001009933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958126,0.0015166649,0.0012266581,0.00030498693,0.00035856187,0.00078061456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034056844,0.00014436926,0.0001544155,0.0013477287,0.0057333796,0.005146201,0.0005319503,0.0007598946,0.006941645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047098743,0.00012763205,0.00016867075,0.0009451313,0.019968124,0.002159026,0.0045577292,0.00084773905,0.0003066489],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042214946,0.00007539844,0.05819156,0.000052989206,0.000008324142,0.00019283307,0.10416804,0.000519174,0.0004839167,0.81275904,0.0018599774,0.021646542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031842636,0.00017722868,0.18121856,0.000977311,0.000020684249,0.00044880333,0.2544355,0.0019300613,0.0012580808,0.3509378,0.20848046,0.000083687766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010372933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014300917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010372933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005769394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034131166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041860044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417221158","doi":"10.1111/issr.70011","title":"Integrating social protection and occupational health services: A scoping review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Social Security Review","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université TÉLUQ; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social protection; Occupational safety and health; Social determinants of health; Public health; Health policy; Health care; Value (mathematics); Global health","score_opus":0.10397388610972567,"score_gpt":0.5581332572791226,"score_spread":0.45415937116939686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417221158","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027682757,0.99776065,0.000102669925,0.0008230488,0.00013030933,0.00006110751,0.00005739966,0.0000033559577,0.0007845341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029876067,0.99634016,0.0001950646,0.00020567844,0.00006187513,0.000090201036,0.000045677363,0.0000016392283,0.00007222217],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99261993,0.0031956802,0.0018878831,0.0003807342,0.0015029197,0.00041298973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96339566,0.028673135,0.0035203819,0.0004413298,0.0034605854,0.0005089625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011889209,0.0012754975,0.0027067158,0.019320477,0.0010695211,0.0044240705,0.001680441,0.002836364,0.0053024935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040284906,0.00089470303,0.0035768936,0.020824764,0.001251089,0.0029847454,0.002775527,0.0015101294,0.0005317293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079420446,0.000075087635,0.0011617331,0.48469898,0.0015681377,0.00016699021,0.001156575,0.0004211137,0.000120433826,0.0049589425,0.012181228,0.49341136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001646757,0.00004694262,0.0017112268,0.9134455,0.002019338,0.0001582823,0.0007571377,0.00009066973,0.000059507078,0.0008410728,0.08083855,0.000015264519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016086482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025678203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019320477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059873243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02908933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06287688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}