{"meta":{"query_hash":"67a7c0cdd58a","filters":{"venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly"},"cohort_total":51,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":51,"exported":51,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/67a7c0cdd58a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+and+Comparative+Law+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1966968079","doi":"10.1017/s0020589310000655","title":"JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING AND TRANSNATIONAL LAW: A SURVEY OF COMMON LAW SUPREME COURT JUDGES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Precedent; Political science; Majority opinion; Judicial independence; Comparative law; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.09705707278559123,"score_gpt":0.34795742791395806,"score_spread":0.25090035512836684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966968079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73558307,0.00026252144,0.00046641537,0.0009015863,0.0003559278,0.00016117161,0.00018039157,0.000024995838,0.26206392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992251,0.000013361621,0.00026806357,0.00034800346,0.00009551416,0.000012214937,0.000014989322,0.0000029046562,0.000019888015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875563,0.00014779482,0.00029382147,0.00020695524,0.0004482626,0.00014755629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988465,0.0005269422,0.00010505253,0.00004966508,0.0004102265,0.00006163809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037742726,0.00011972809,0.00025326782,0.00003769336,0.00055032416,0.000057416226,0.0001838692,0.000053954453,0.00014908474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010110441,0.00010956738,0.000044197743,0.00008329298,0.0017889515,0.00031073383,0.00002591503,0.00008875042,0.0000050815297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016127885,0.00011586664,0.009466194,0.0000015486733,0.000091896574,0.0000025768718,0.01269446,7.463876e-7,0.000015126126,0.976381,0.000070360984,0.0009989179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045215155,0.00022493622,0.23541676,0.00004853194,0.000021905225,0.000004256562,0.003667044,0.00006473928,0.00004121825,0.75358975,0.006275765,0.00019292124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044283792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29972854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26364198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003001989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004709245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9620804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982156666","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei175","title":"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Index (typography); Convention; Liability; Law; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.04178532391807655,"score_gpt":0.3541998219142938,"score_spread":0.31241449799621723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982156666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7992364,0.00003397924,0.006213681,0.004441781,0.0007980344,0.00019611139,0.000013192022,0.00008582127,0.18898101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954038,0.00000921098,0.00062841154,0.0013769562,0.00091906206,0.000017056847,0.000030551273,0.0000049717737,0.0016099694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786323,0.00013034523,0.00043138058,0.00033976103,0.00084723573,0.00038803037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984765,0.0004343819,0.00017420066,0.00008793395,0.0006153956,0.00021156545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001192258,0.00016884366,0.00018946904,0.00011241747,0.00091879006,0.000330296,0.0003737768,0.000083783176,0.000076583194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015533566,0.00016620549,0.000078161895,0.00013210122,0.0006020091,0.001197637,0.00002079053,0.00016011055,0.000023224842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001684971,0.000108280874,0.0051479167,0.0000011144458,0.000060474824,0.000012413296,0.043823063,0.0000033579856,0.0007474706,0.9465038,0.00004392207,0.00337967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022310142,0.00074542256,0.176526,0.000065232685,0.000025389954,0.000026851161,0.0855166,0.00031859885,0.002543388,0.30152643,0.42971766,0.0007574303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018052744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11119116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6449774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015642033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042917665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9884861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986722370","doi":"10.1017/s0020589314000621","title":"CHOICE-OF-COURT AGREEMENTS, THE ITALIAN TORPEDO, AND THE RECAST OF THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Prima facie; Supreme court; Political science","score_opus":0.08029000003947137,"score_gpt":0.3381065878157076,"score_spread":0.2578165877762363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986722370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8939133,0.00021040757,0.00010493978,0.017219903,0.00054439873,0.00029076388,0.0000139186695,0.000006941326,0.08769539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979674,0.000009061695,0.000013823216,0.00013025528,0.00017802622,0.000008791296,0.0000019197769,0.0000014069603,0.0016892864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914056,0.00018948535,0.00017673982,0.00008454198,0.0003453952,0.00006327747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993331,0.00017166273,0.00016940462,0.00008866026,0.00020898091,0.00002818832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045146496,0.000055385703,0.00009829753,0.000012078535,0.00022667581,0.000061469225,0.00019334028,0.000023587152,0.00003292923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013161402,0.000027220492,0.00003858285,0.00006610748,0.0007843449,0.00016101902,0.000020904694,0.000054701097,0.0000016679187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007830878,0.000028191509,0.0031733033,0.0000017143808,0.000056813,6.323288e-8,0.07422786,0.0000051680477,0.00007619403,0.91745496,0.00085795805,0.00403945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024534627,0.0003389026,0.18256608,0.0000867244,0.00006820647,0.0000041164303,0.042348698,0.0016604027,0.00038432254,0.09617276,0.6737456,0.00017076998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006171589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068172915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8212822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017448185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028220931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9329637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990658214","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064642","title":"Constitutional Challenges to Sexual Orientation Discrimination","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Statutory law; Lesbian; Legislation; Same sex; Law; Political science; Convention; Human rights; Legislature; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0891685153541418,"score_gpt":0.3677277836966911,"score_spread":0.2785592683425493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990658214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68834054,0.00018688235,0.00018906443,0.014637825,0.00035826012,0.0002444911,0.00002917296,0.000056172677,0.2959576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996054,0.000044190434,0.00026036205,0.0003145754,0.00030719183,0.00004731231,0.000021479163,0.000001300412,0.0029496185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906784,0.00008687478,0.00014163247,0.00021405707,0.00035547506,0.0001341217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995774,0.00008343644,0.000033706026,0.00003782673,0.00018310116,0.00008454958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012125593,0.00009070764,0.0001062744,0.000016224934,0.0005122184,0.00010458352,0.000112656235,0.00003298708,0.00055031944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008144979,0.00007803439,0.000021819971,0.000053471464,0.000586986,0.00040906123,0.00000826686,0.000056258148,0.00019066305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030138879,0.000044767185,0.0001341005,0.000001674277,0.00003112378,0.0000010236863,0.09923552,0.0000111906775,0.000046462836,0.8626726,0.00028178,0.0375096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067323045,0.0004024695,0.043107778,0.000035340745,0.000019833713,0.000004102432,0.12748986,0.00013827268,0.00006286776,0.014518697,0.8131876,0.0003599352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021270635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007246777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84815395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009461971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014800256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6025612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999706565","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064228","title":"“Making Public Law, ‘Public’: An Analysis of the Quebec Reference Case and its Significance for Comparative Constitutional Analysis”","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scrutiny; Political science; Supreme court; Politics; Legal profession; Public law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Legal opinion; Constitutional law; Democracy; Subject (documents); Private law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.13756698281138005,"score_gpt":0.3561090799552209,"score_spread":0.21854209714384085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999706565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9409108,0.00023191131,0.00045480722,0.0015272995,0.000110802735,0.00027351797,0.00079139246,0.000018393157,0.055681054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774075,0.0000068313097,0.00005145374,0.00023676241,0.000057409947,0.00003497798,0.00005606216,0.0000014485627,0.0018142994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987817,0.00021655114,0.00026371866,0.00027868338,0.00029613002,0.00016322834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989897,0.00019344005,0.00015096742,0.000107615044,0.0004369398,0.0001213162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024757462,0.00010015756,0.00030829874,0.0003030333,0.0011878161,0.00053824094,0.00024760506,0.000051137085,0.0007407055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000069495677,0.000096054406,0.00012726997,0.0006288421,0.0023847916,0.0006814359,0.000010145403,0.000089431924,0.000003543727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002563351,0.00006349833,0.00058533065,0.0000023156551,0.0009486715,0.000004015869,0.016142517,0.000064305874,0.000018343908,0.981121,0.00007157736,0.00095276115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009638425,0.00026570898,0.032451108,0.000030711268,0.0020107024,0.00002615439,0.03486248,0.019145913,0.000025032741,0.010621903,0.89895076,0.00064569595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25320545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9868957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9704991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019664566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028564574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9135841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007324430","doi":"10.1093/iclq/53.4.833","title":"A NEW ERA IN THE LAW OF INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR: FROM WARSAW (1929) TO MONTREAL (1999)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carriage; Law; Convention; Political science; International law; Unification; Engineering","score_opus":0.019973245383035663,"score_gpt":0.30357748500394194,"score_spread":0.28360423962090625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007324430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7669378,0.00011726395,0.0017096357,0.022674177,0.0010438792,0.00038873625,0.00037406257,0.00003162688,0.2067228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630666,0.000010089023,0.0004579504,0.0018725804,0.00045114948,0.000027223961,0.00012402268,0.00000479563,0.0007455106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844044,0.00011034933,0.0003353078,0.0002560874,0.0006929634,0.00016487102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993319,0.00017595854,0.00012228177,0.000096767006,0.00018718991,0.00008590597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022035802,0.00013513456,0.00017651083,0.00006220481,0.00014935559,0.00013112878,0.0005734071,0.000060897146,0.0001500637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009668,0.00011160474,0.000068943875,0.00010924545,0.00016031961,0.0004401494,0.000023604915,0.00014547237,0.00004429813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009416866,0.000118982556,0.00052039436,6.8924294e-7,0.00006101129,0.0000049616247,0.04750935,0.000060216862,0.00040486438,0.9480608,0.0015206554,0.0016439178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004340319,0.0007151791,0.049816262,0.00019494713,0.000037055728,0.000007459615,0.026706541,0.00029142763,0.0018667633,0.3669825,0.54840165,0.0006399094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2772805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20922223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5810783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014074527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075932694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8052074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013364851","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei132","title":"Homing Devices in Choice of Tort Law: Australian, British, and Canadian Approaches","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Choice of law; Tort; Law; Damages; Political science; Common law; Kingdom; Conflict of laws; Liability; Biology","score_opus":0.09087728675211142,"score_gpt":0.3248591918843926,"score_spread":0.23398190513228118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013364851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8163194,0.00008449164,0.000010443459,0.0016545302,0.000037499412,0.00009511117,0.000034857978,0.000005990044,0.18175767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998453,0.0000025006661,0.0001266668,0.000084953965,0.00010988375,0.000016071735,0.000011736172,0.0000016282582,0.001193555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948037,0.000028547953,0.00014285339,0.00012689455,0.00010914796,0.00011220976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997695,0.000049016373,0.00004540201,0.000032309665,0.00004418181,0.00005960851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008752368,0.000049404698,0.000092599636,0.000026278683,0.00015337103,0.00012918463,0.00010251113,0.000030649484,0.000027264694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000011282634,0.000055232806,0.00001460372,0.000053662017,0.0002457024,0.00022242365,0.0000064922383,0.000051722975,0.000002232098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017907286,0.000024749497,0.019235142,0.000002758102,0.0000072462244,0.0000012972549,0.0025450175,0.0000054369434,0.000024422294,0.97727877,0.000103912076,0.0007694629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039487015,0.000052453423,0.5003105,0.000053529293,0.000007689985,0.000004031757,0.007803494,0.00033075787,0.00007276901,0.030549023,0.4602219,0.00019900259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.904851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9467297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037912592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003480298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22523285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037167014","doi":"10.1093/iclq/52.4.969","title":"A Role For Tort In Pre-Contractual Negotiations? An Examination Of English, French, And Canadian Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Plaintiff; Mistake; Law; Tort; Negotiation; Database transaction; Business; Liability; Certainty; Unjust enrichment; Work (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Restitution; Economics","score_opus":0.0275917556304269,"score_gpt":0.30762062844209864,"score_spread":0.28002887281167177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037167014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84804565,0.000046660756,0.00018045945,0.00017618803,0.00008676441,0.0002990803,0.00007154626,0.000008222957,0.1510854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991527,0.0000027828996,0.00029235258,0.00009884635,0.0000892932,0.00007559464,0.000026839249,0.0000021488422,0.00025939944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994109,0.0000745353,0.00015738561,0.00013888003,0.00010835715,0.00010993241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994331,0.000118043354,0.000055416458,0.000048006023,0.00025371902,0.00009171824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022418809,0.00005730249,0.00009258857,0.000043784017,0.00017410444,0.00007737699,0.00008201019,0.00003945546,0.000030411647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022025146,0.00005896235,0.000015382813,0.000053117157,0.00014945256,0.00038856087,0.0000025968702,0.00004579159,7.2380493e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037134876,0.00004569162,0.00081288035,0.0000012324779,0.000007983462,8.1374075e-8,0.063400336,0.0000062363065,0.000049891994,0.934678,0.000014095257,0.0009798319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013218065,0.00047673806,0.282361,0.000026829966,0.000017957676,0.0000011156116,0.035070796,0.0023773096,0.00029400707,0.098381296,0.5793568,0.0003143516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21007884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8453054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83629674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050907587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007282939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79518133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051603156","doi":"10.1017/s0020589313000481","title":"<i>RE FLIGHTLEASE</i>: THE ‘REAL AND SUBSTANTIAL CONNECTION’ TEST FOR RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS FAILS TO TAKE FLIGHT IN IRELAND","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Irish; Law; Enforcement; Political science; Test (biology); Common law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05449964257874465,"score_gpt":0.3126494242527124,"score_spread":0.25814978167396774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051603156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93927675,0.00002783505,0.0007473742,0.0014744732,0.00015750439,0.000438318,0.000070500486,0.000009333962,0.05779791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993912,0.00002487647,0.00005943722,0.00017019718,0.00014178109,0.000054140328,0.00002448741,0.0000023671705,0.00013152687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934435,0.0000535823,0.00018695564,0.00015041672,0.00016326967,0.00010139838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940974,0.00030649832,0.00007534539,0.000036964375,0.00011837502,0.00005310093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002746662,0.000074473326,0.00012174309,0.000041376326,0.00020678036,0.00010082246,0.000058357058,0.00003263762,0.000051304763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010989371,0.000057851146,0.000020112378,0.000050123304,0.0001434262,0.00019801223,0.000008892966,0.000039372713,0.0000017130052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031842978,0.00011491499,0.008267305,0.000014713121,0.000056389363,4.965682e-7,0.046336696,0.000004084256,0.0007762884,0.92367387,0.000271255,0.020165559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010046752,0.00738373,0.10042128,0.00041495223,0.00014293668,0.0000089652485,0.1098721,0.0076063233,0.0046759713,0.26132137,0.49710748,0.0009981415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032793104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022976581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6623525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001883103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010532767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065967823","doi":"10.1017/s0020589310000308","title":"INCOHERENT AND INEFFECTIVE: THE CONCEPT OF PERSISTENT OBJECTOR REVISITED","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientious objector; Dissenting opinion; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.022652521544093928,"score_gpt":0.3123902001780045,"score_spread":0.2897376786339106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065967823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9277399,0.00007208419,0.000020524947,0.0010016334,0.00035783034,0.00017414885,0.000025683155,0.000011459336,0.07059669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99768513,0.0000020780371,0.000041174964,0.00014736215,0.000258532,0.000013966434,0.000007721007,0.0000020585614,0.0018419526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927634,0.00009617526,0.00014693818,0.00013542034,0.00026056665,0.00008456038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934494,0.00020828762,0.000085895444,0.00005967653,0.00025492994,0.00004626677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016865447,0.000076644974,0.00011929667,0.00002618194,0.00029022302,0.00008916843,0.00017600531,0.00003434144,0.0002837681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006697742,0.000050076585,0.00006327766,0.000023515237,0.0007868947,0.0001499043,0.000016642793,0.00013370367,0.000006934009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024429512,0.000033662156,0.00024744804,0.0000015774963,0.00007728223,5.911842e-7,0.018995622,5.739702e-7,0.000386153,0.9797074,0.00009817989,0.00042708128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027178614,0.0017411611,0.069707274,0.00017293412,0.00013617802,0.000034178614,0.017346637,0.0013407418,0.0025428738,0.4530569,0.4504562,0.0007470556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001662104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004434699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5266505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016677652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002219216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31070617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091500395","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064162","title":"Lockerbie: The Other Case","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International court; Political science; Economic Justice; Action (physics); Diplomacy; Convention; Civil aviation; International law; Aviation; Public international law; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.042713798681219765,"score_gpt":0.3314521153436676,"score_spread":0.2887383166624478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091500395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52198094,0.000027662127,0.000023918139,0.0029626014,0.00018453343,0.000080565864,0.000014977222,0.000023089222,0.4747017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377485,0.000002175646,0.000035360656,0.0011166631,0.00052529946,0.000016165961,0.0000034100017,0.0000028899337,0.060549524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999231,0.00010449303,0.00013232004,0.00014250561,0.000262731,0.00012699462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963427,0.00010487474,0.000033553464,0.00006949762,0.00010713657,0.00005067193],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014831933,0.000080091966,0.00007826282,0.000017142293,0.0007024626,0.00020229584,0.00021110738,0.000029527198,0.0058635054],"category_scores_gemma":[8.8330364e-7,0.00005269346,0.0000422669,0.000023731578,0.00045510803,0.00022395246,0.000005148687,0.00008767357,0.0003833422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021711301,0.00003107622,0.000016994049,3.6668774e-7,0.000036369238,0.00004847423,0.016291318,0.0000022407633,0.0000035318444,0.9804653,0.0006038037,0.002478817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018520991,0.00005613949,0.00020072464,0.0000072465823,0.0000055429437,0.000104504674,0.0014518595,0.00015415919,0.000014619488,0.19179425,0.8059349,0.00009084033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009967993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02548735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8053311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029054432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019175879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091946373","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei083","title":"The Enforcement of Jurisdiction Agreements Within The Brussels Regime","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Damages; Context (archaeology); Enforcement; Political science; Subject (documents); Law; Exclusive jurisdiction; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.026511773848800275,"score_gpt":0.3078520052260265,"score_spread":0.28134023137722625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091946373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5159933,0.00020243302,0.0004943388,0.006315762,0.0009593448,0.00031065365,0.000013957542,0.000027703165,0.4756825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949402,0.00001482655,0.000017646656,0.00009408588,0.00027338017,0.000019525052,0.0000070900187,0.0000017050762,0.004631547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908566,0.00009761425,0.00023480773,0.00010139884,0.00038286622,0.000097669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945664,0.0001213651,0.00017125194,0.000078082885,0.00015058658,0.000022058754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036939318,0.00006524921,0.00007549955,0.000016422156,0.0006753606,0.00012630215,0.00018417444,0.000023957518,0.00006234679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000019513368,0.000038537702,0.00004060901,0.000059685564,0.00039773807,0.00015792336,0.000011226071,0.000062945874,0.000008511566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032650118,0.000029936231,0.0003277343,6.402286e-7,0.000035428995,2.2924385e-7,0.012731026,0.000010846201,0.000111001136,0.9843721,0.00071939075,0.0016290137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047011583,0.00028427382,0.011499581,0.000024548417,0.000021585312,0.0000018909685,0.014478519,0.0007866415,0.0005603086,0.094045445,0.87771046,0.000116638366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014254525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015918083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8903267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033665114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025289575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99230963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092981200","doi":"10.1093/iclq/51.2.197","title":"Bills of Rights in Common Law Countries","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Criminal Justice Association","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Common law; Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Fundamental rights; Rest (music); Bill of rights; Human rights; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.058675795301434124,"score_gpt":0.3362403487742775,"score_spread":0.27756455347284337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092981200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54335326,0.0003015661,0.000013091979,0.0013994323,0.00022143763,0.00010679378,0.00002793095,0.000014148882,0.4545623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980668,0.000033967284,0.000044170392,0.00028245623,0.00011033331,0.000018606614,0.000004983182,0.0000017936715,0.0014369064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889696,0.000115825394,0.0003096818,0.00017191865,0.00036244572,0.00014316215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930537,0.00025713263,0.00010839566,0.00006389194,0.00022223328,0.00004296871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001391891,0.000108664135,0.0002575171,0.00006195065,0.00023280377,0.000066470646,0.00021202104,0.000034977704,0.0005686697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000019467475,0.00009330027,0.000046659956,0.000085108986,0.0008185724,0.0003805786,0.000019300744,0.00008470818,0.000058367277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025585818,0.00011376486,0.0021831833,0.0000019117097,0.000047851107,0.000003159095,0.021216571,0.0000029528362,0.000028699993,0.9755286,0.0007284497,0.00011927947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067778357,0.0002858699,0.0054399846,0.00007572253,0.000007906394,0.0000022719312,0.0037612726,0.00044994708,0.00044270733,0.22175391,0.7668896,0.00021304427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021128481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.118183546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76616114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052243427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000071063328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9853899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097091195","doi":"10.1093/iclq/54.1.161","title":"Reframing Sovereignty? Sub-State National Societies and Contemporary Challenges to the Nation-State","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; State (computer science); Nationalism; Globalization; Political science; Political economy; National identity; Power (physics); Popular sovereignty; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07831570187393198,"score_gpt":0.3217714511584319,"score_spread":0.24345574928449992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097091195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59933686,0.0020126812,0.0005087456,0.06074809,0.00059816206,0.00044282712,0.00020420364,0.000060291102,0.33608815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966643,0.0001006869,0.00004975863,0.0013727057,0.0002564577,0.000034741945,0.0000042441147,0.0000036125934,0.0015135327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988207,0.00008753949,0.00019193112,0.00020664273,0.0005226946,0.00017047397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932826,0.00019056756,0.00008496238,0.0000479346,0.00024762505,0.000100681435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036063776,0.00010296242,0.00012958255,0.000022775243,0.00042128348,0.00019468628,0.00016503608,0.00003054643,0.000010482841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019767158,0.00007796964,0.00003265493,0.000051898867,0.0003307224,0.00035792796,0.000022907807,0.00009458726,0.000028196022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016023885,0.000022748518,0.00004494327,0.0000035981022,0.000034327815,0.0000015031111,0.034921423,0.00001320587,0.000032062137,0.9632428,0.0005810196,0.0010863451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000501791,0.00015660946,0.0082865795,0.00007135354,0.000002647234,0.000004660587,0.009361769,0.00006743838,0.00012097071,0.6561467,0.32508484,0.00019463165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004830465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007852774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39732742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010593345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009897467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.730225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098660069","doi":"10.1093/iclq/53.3.579","title":"CANADIAN REFLECTIONS ON THE TOBACCO WARS: SOME UNINTENDED CONSEQUE5NCES OF MASS TORT LITIGATION","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Mass tort; Legislation; Tort; Legislature; Political science; Commonwealth; Law; Tort reform; Unintended consequences; Jurisprudence; Harm; Economic Justice; Action (physics); Law and economics; State (computer science); Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.06344834934063906,"score_gpt":0.2925820214590201,"score_spread":0.22913367211838107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098660069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35973722,0.000033378576,0.0003852348,0.034571253,0.0007508646,0.00023389055,0.000040622494,0.00005339778,0.60419416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99623847,0.000003226332,0.000037254948,0.002945987,0.0002652803,0.000027682312,0.000033161647,0.0000038664143,0.0004450808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937624,0.000011097675,0.00018117117,0.00014128177,0.00017060674,0.000119627344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953157,0.000034483535,0.00010833169,0.00008791826,0.00021656873,0.000021129363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007484705,0.00009792097,0.00010232276,0.00011910254,0.0002284899,0.00017768236,0.00014569525,0.00003028442,0.00015488907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006090605,0.000073376315,0.000049411134,0.00012807774,0.00018628419,0.0005773568,0.000008162023,0.000092248476,0.00010506807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001648377,0.000040229614,0.00013983925,0.0000024980457,0.000046528712,0.0000013662407,0.00020005675,0.000052703497,0.0004363663,0.99827147,0.00053166196,0.0002608131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084835355,0.00015793131,0.0066559575,0.00012598708,0.000038077844,0.000008390371,0.010767582,0.0009057654,0.00067845,0.46345904,0.5160594,0.000295032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044075716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08876238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63650125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099565965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050976887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96228987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101812110","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300065416","title":"II. Cases Before the Court","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Convention; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.052205784030164175,"score_gpt":0.33955075206880087,"score_spread":0.2873449680386367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101812110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68363756,0.00003060057,0.000051067367,0.009017842,0.00045536793,0.00009660144,0.000013747466,0.000030059291,0.30666712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9620941,0.000003839825,0.000029069035,0.0007726304,0.0007209135,0.000018328237,0.0000122529445,0.0000026698483,0.036346167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914527,0.000068104135,0.00013997403,0.00014496961,0.00035875215,0.0001429303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995141,0.00009995538,0.000056412046,0.00006706204,0.0002078811,0.000054569562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014687657,0.00008635394,0.00009110337,0.000025645491,0.00113123,0.00016972134,0.00028598757,0.00003075139,0.00076331384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000035016112,0.000056435216,0.00004735664,0.000029413335,0.00048135716,0.00027534144,0.000017667058,0.00009074757,0.00008722769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002137754,0.000042637737,0.00027767112,3.202908e-7,0.000038565515,0.000016339536,0.018582758,9.616065e-7,0.000004675233,0.9794234,0.0010695005,0.0005217928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016848238,0.00018204378,0.0026784937,0.0000098901155,0.000006336689,0.000030090085,0.00224604,0.00009977275,0.000008683618,0.3062515,0.6882426,0.00007608378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035047727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04003195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68717307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042767926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024455447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97748494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104515135","doi":"10.1017/s002058931000045x","title":"PUBLIC HEARINGS AT THE WTO APPELLATE BODY: THE NEXT STEP","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Adjudication; Transparency (behavior); Jurisdiction; Openness to experience; Political science; Law; Authorization; Settlement (finance); Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0701482926053307,"score_gpt":0.30383749535654253,"score_spread":0.23368920275121183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104515135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5896494,0.00005368653,0.000093422226,0.18369037,0.0010505937,0.00025579843,0.0000098822975,0.00006242815,0.22513445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885672,0.0000048518427,0.000028314733,0.001600167,0.00039315104,0.00001456599,0.000007650508,0.0000054216243,0.009378686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989796,0.00013179272,0.00015461548,0.00018053206,0.00037684568,0.00017658964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992917,0.00023652933,0.000082770355,0.00014406334,0.0001691749,0.0000757283],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027407415,0.00009877069,0.00009327736,0.000020785785,0.0010363166,0.0006105038,0.00045904037,0.000039166014,0.001286991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000108143295,0.000057555255,0.000039219336,0.00013608756,0.00090749975,0.00038966595,0.000044509143,0.00021340126,0.0002681694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072667385,0.000023258564,0.0014098575,4.7465122e-7,0.000032222022,6.8011747e-7,0.009243683,5.201538e-7,0.0007329838,0.9842892,0.003549849,0.000709965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017190336,0.000031691783,0.0109903235,0.000003059702,0.000005891234,0.0000063971843,0.0023225485,0.00016982523,0.00019251602,0.008572607,0.9774373,0.00009591289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013416815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05154986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97571665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033363318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031867345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118490530","doi":"10.1017/s0020589308000389","title":"THE SCOPE OF THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE OF THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law; United Nations Charter; Relevance (law); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.05235978180989796,"score_gpt":0.3203038501892126,"score_spread":0.2679440683793146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118490530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85896516,0.00005444725,0.00004157721,0.0072571826,0.0006404509,0.00021510907,0.000038190574,0.000008079052,0.1327798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948317,0.00006188055,0.000016081629,0.00020559182,0.00011583865,0.00001367824,0.000005408895,0.0000023010027,0.0047475616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887073,0.00019910565,0.00024130107,0.000093137314,0.0005038794,0.000091865404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881977,0.00032147183,0.0002063465,0.00012133277,0.00050973444,0.000021350554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018179949,0.000067772635,0.000085133346,0.00006307311,0.00093930966,0.000037784917,0.00049546745,0.00002918185,0.000045264213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002757922,0.000034954868,0.00008153654,0.00036149024,0.00092864357,0.00016978252,0.000029020268,0.000093832736,0.000006115853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001635109,0.000041665557,0.0018648849,0.0000011274217,0.000040584382,1.1727944e-7,0.010194131,0.00001041306,0.00038915724,0.9867362,0.00060839107,0.00009702211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009538393,0.00017191957,0.24402195,0.00014696199,0.000033047214,0.000011344664,0.0064109904,0.0006193246,0.008496773,0.05385884,0.68504685,0.00022813215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047416007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013786866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9328773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028179433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006990471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7693395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124063117","doi":"10.1017/s0020589309001213","title":"CLIMATE FINANCE AND ITS GOVERNANCE: MOVING TO A LOW CARBON ECONOMY THROUGH SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FINANCING?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Climate Finance; Corporate governance; Emissions trading; Greenhouse gas; Climate change; Business; Leverage (statistics); Abandonment (legal); Finance; Economic policy; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Developing country","score_opus":0.04384114303078949,"score_gpt":0.2795644619666809,"score_spread":0.2357233189358914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124063117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85238,0.0007555137,0.0000863682,0.0046602525,0.00017826282,0.00015852916,0.00006723685,0.000023561292,0.14169028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966791,0.00016378966,0.00056787557,0.0015337685,0.000097249715,0.000015645095,0.00000803202,0.00000597682,0.00092852913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904865,0.000022279688,0.00036750076,0.00027977518,0.000044058277,0.00023773067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952,0.0000688841,0.00019217978,0.000101226484,0.00006382615,0.000053879136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019940373,0.00016218133,0.00033738906,0.000050909177,0.00022597828,0.00019209515,0.00019413575,0.000057378846,0.000034197285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011389041,0.0001917061,0.000046506084,0.000103795566,0.00004280005,0.0004892696,0.00004084226,0.00014059222,0.000050974773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007224272,0.000050056053,0.0009393145,0.0000052537175,0.000024853602,0.000003179826,0.0109641515,0.0000073153114,0.000047405778,0.98584884,0.00015820301,0.0018791656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015287696,0.0009138341,0.23193878,0.00017091855,0.0000071098643,0.000011068813,0.0012262551,0.0039012348,0.00040528318,0.6969857,0.062081233,0.00082979404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002782252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000518501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28886312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099834506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000418554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7817548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128490749","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei069","title":"Scrutiny and Approval: The Role for Westminster-Style Parliaments in Treaty-Making","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Human rights; Political science; Law; Scrutiny; Treaty; Ratification; Legitimacy; Convention; Prerogative; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.027142110827273656,"score_gpt":0.3194897343308738,"score_spread":0.29234762350360016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128490749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8265771,0.0001358276,0.0005579798,0.0023776728,0.00024024486,0.00037552608,0.000035825597,0.000021484026,0.16967832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759686,0.0000035522805,0.00019546901,0.00022638969,0.00027356757,0.000078497505,0.000022503584,0.0000033554336,0.001599797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992452,0.00006653491,0.00017714524,0.00016854645,0.00020824584,0.0001343047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959403,0.00017097408,0.00008125358,0.0000399361,0.00009403561,0.000019752713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020830358,0.00008280203,0.00009786547,0.000036008758,0.00028285466,0.00019389663,0.00012896408,0.000033590917,0.000018146027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000040568734,0.00006427851,0.00002983334,0.00004337905,0.0001790128,0.00026235014,0.00001064834,0.000055180415,0.0000050532576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039565497,0.000055350378,0.005629562,0.0000014789255,0.000014552007,6.270992e-7,0.006069662,0.0000062087674,0.000087918525,0.9841479,0.0000837793,0.0038634127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016965432,0.00033524973,0.0582626,0.00009639404,0.000019353585,0.00000582423,0.019157033,0.00684032,0.00025020883,0.38393256,0.5290683,0.00033559196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006540744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02665685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6002153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000493418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016426315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128619142","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei030","title":"II. Legality Of Use Of Force (Serbia And Montenegro v Belgium) (Serbia And Montenegro v Canada) (Serbia And Montenegro v France) (Serbia And Montenegro v Germany) (Serbia And Montenegro v Italy) (Serbia And Montenegro v Netherlands) (Serbia And Montenegro v Portugal) (Serbia And Montenegro v United Kingdom): Preliminary Objections. Judgment Of 15 December 2004<sup>1</sup>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Montenegro; Jurisdiction; Principle of legality; Law; Political science; Unanimity; Declaration; Geography; Ancient history; History","score_opus":0.039834090621929066,"score_gpt":0.27192626353701577,"score_spread":0.23209217291508671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128619142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9735002,0.015005116,0.00022947656,0.0029978051,0.00069646485,0.002873272,0.0015599182,0.00021096205,0.002926806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983651,0.0031069764,0.0015921403,0.0012142981,0.0006464819,0.0003191676,0.0003112862,0.00024139257,0.008917249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860034,0.0010882558,0.0040678927,0.0036167044,0.002986108,0.0022376617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98951995,0.0016537242,0.0024227516,0.0013182655,0.003144792,0.0019404857],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001668136,0.0027552645,0.003900705,0.0012271836,0.0026366916,0.0013131695,0.0013034538,0.001265078,0.00012825924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002551114,0.0025952782,0.00051905843,0.0008813738,0.004673258,0.0041612317,0.0009800696,0.0016686348,0.0000033120407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025305726,0.0072023505,0.36682782,0.0042491844,0.0137316575,0.0014491292,0.119731225,0.0027321836,0.036242377,0.38275543,0.019540366,0.020232573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024321858,0.009445972,0.78408384,0.0049916673,0.0028032104,0.0014501561,0.025714763,0.07618066,0.005031004,0.027860295,0.030030526,0.0080860555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33624357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4750465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41725603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005565162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056030357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130785796","doi":"10.1093/iclq/51.1.17","title":"Judicial Review in ec Law—Some Reflections on the Origins and the Actual Legal Situation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Element (criminal law); Convention; Quarter (Canadian coin); Action (physics); Disadvantage; Order (exchange); Judicial review; Human rights; History; Business","score_opus":0.11902884684881505,"score_gpt":0.37067747424216346,"score_spread":0.2516486273933484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130785796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06756917,0.0019632664,0.000014119292,0.068701126,0.000430361,0.00035185294,0.000016261483,0.000023709328,0.86093014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98822993,0.0014531941,0.000008343424,0.007839279,0.00037870428,0.000041475338,0.0000033445274,0.0000028596032,0.0020428628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887675,0.00032299076,0.00020216616,0.00016261265,0.00032411693,0.00011133973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992493,0.0004720236,0.00007710602,0.00006402976,0.00010875237,0.000028801118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003982117,0.000094948635,0.00014312986,0.000026087497,0.0006085787,0.00014915186,0.00018343955,0.000018708512,0.0001945191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003175513,0.00005529624,0.000042504184,0.00007297866,0.0007897941,0.0003141073,0.000016954797,0.0001609903,0.00008081586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030216752,0.000040738698,0.000012089236,0.0000019887118,0.000033692853,0.0000014442891,0.010492355,0.0000010613982,0.000005465274,0.9870643,0.0018566157,0.0004600362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006762093,0.00017723386,0.0011254963,0.00018913494,0.00001712579,0.000004616643,0.0033530563,0.00031387145,0.000008394678,0.050436363,0.94356894,0.00012954252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035377836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015768131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9417123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006626105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009384479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8798988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132611068","doi":"10.1017/s0020589310000680","title":"JUDICIAL SCRUTINY OF MERGER DECISIONS IN THE EU, UK AND GERMANY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Academic Association for Contemporary European Studies","keywords":"Scrutiny; Context (archaeology); Discretion; Judicial review; Political science; Standard of review; Agency (philosophy); Judicial discretion; Credibility; Law; Relevance (law); Law and economics; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.11478234541187002,"score_gpt":0.34348303404688096,"score_spread":0.22870068863501095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132611068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5363791,0.00012255918,0.000017842662,0.0008604813,0.00014876961,0.00006765598,0.00000990494,0.0000045625266,0.46238914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881613,0.00007996261,0.00010644718,0.00046761605,0.00009948796,0.000007812177,0.0000016905552,0.0000017314175,0.0004191129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991957,0.00013240657,0.00019749308,0.00012049914,0.00026166704,0.000092238064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951744,0.00021272454,0.00007019661,0.000047553916,0.00012477061,0.000027321681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029157038,0.00006649802,0.000111081004,0.000041168238,0.0001697569,0.000033910816,0.00021184499,0.000018154227,0.00012978991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015651309,0.000046329453,0.000029307826,0.00006178677,0.00051834603,0.00013402435,0.0000212453,0.00007050252,0.00001422897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003070137,0.000052061612,0.0019444363,3.7751198e-7,0.000025985164,0.0000030266997,0.056736026,9.2228994e-8,0.000056432833,0.9400112,0.00044269496,0.00069693563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008346036,0.00048199206,0.56111884,0.000093653165,0.000022582451,0.000008443815,0.04977221,0.000096818505,0.00011911979,0.10787444,0.27931005,0.0002672569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002768474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072110994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8321368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009868966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012246717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41851228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137015572","doi":"10.1017/s0020589313000158","title":"COHABITANTS IN PRIVATE LAW: TRUST, FRUSTRATION AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT IN ENGLAND, GERMANY AND CANADA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Appeal; Law; Political science; Autonomy; Legislature; German; Common law; Private law; Comparative law; Geography","score_opus":0.021783605680763075,"score_gpt":0.28599774731631056,"score_spread":0.26421414163554746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137015572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97197074,0.000053280306,0.000012782409,0.0032067646,0.000054413307,0.00022560351,0.000015445732,0.000005846491,0.024455111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992026,0.000020516713,0.00004903688,0.00029334836,0.000053241798,0.000059669714,0.000007205166,0.0000017272274,0.00031264132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993399,0.000053000178,0.00017146868,0.00016008437,0.00015553462,0.00012003926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997341,0.00007039494,0.000045777466,0.00003935322,0.00004374607,0.00006662731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000099678226,0.000072525785,0.000101515834,0.000024585286,0.00012518301,0.00013156126,0.000074995805,0.000028747858,0.000043748652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001845195,0.00006667436,0.00000615392,0.000045591605,0.00013895988,0.00036094326,0.000013642218,0.000082657294,0.0000036858278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008053572,0.00003577607,0.035752002,0.0000025841848,0.0000075021735,0.000002106964,0.009245947,0.0000020431598,0.00013730343,0.9536165,0.000050595325,0.0011395584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012015669,0.00010598463,0.78608686,0.00003363693,0.0000043380965,0.0000033237293,0.0067980415,0.001500836,0.000044367778,0.054478284,0.14950843,0.0002343326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7739384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97255814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8991383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007751403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043773874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27189013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138983123","doi":"10.1093/iclq/52.4.1074","title":"Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by Robert J Sharpe, Katherine E Swinton, and Roach Kent, 2nd edn. Toronto: twin Law Inc, 2002. ISBN 1-55221-063-4 Pbk, Np.]","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02046895009650561,"score_gpt":0.28996619938722806,"score_spread":0.26949724929072244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138983123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5972773,0.0039879307,0.00012797283,0.0036862716,0.0005400613,0.00041580596,0.0002671257,0.000031784566,0.39366576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99373966,0.000059870406,0.00013425908,0.00045161965,0.00012219517,0.0000170571,0.000021000636,0.0000061625933,0.005448173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986393,0.00013431939,0.00029316932,0.00033917412,0.00030999805,0.00028404055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918795,0.00010608942,0.000101430356,0.00010681359,0.00019934507,0.00029837165],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025572637,0.00018976929,0.0002757465,0.00003036378,0.0003775655,0.0001922291,0.00019748292,0.00008127915,0.0010379435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005471388,0.00016908681,0.000036565103,0.000052212872,0.00061646075,0.00066398864,0.00001641598,0.00010344596,0.000014417593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043201824,0.000090814196,0.0010201901,0.000010163913,0.00008211453,0.0000070397973,0.020696186,7.9078035e-7,0.00038038957,0.9632704,0.013886906,0.00051176746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006386083,0.0003842409,0.001528152,0.00005954651,0.00002869938,0.000020615375,0.00417055,0.00016519519,0.00025231004,0.020083794,0.97233266,0.00033564368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7692775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9323243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011140332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054298827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162354815","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064186","title":"The Kosovo Crisis and Nato's Application of Armed Force Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Novelis (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Offensive; Political science; Jus ad bellum; Law; Serbian; State (computer science); The Republic; International law; Use of force; International court; Member states; Economic Justice; Sovereignty; Economic history; Public international law; European union; International trade; Engineering; Operations research; History; Politics; Theology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01960039896708949,"score_gpt":0.30214555114826236,"score_spread":0.2825451521811729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162354815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88684946,0.00009743476,0.00009739606,0.0030319523,0.00009454386,0.00018174516,0.000018577044,0.000010577889,0.10961829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951422,0.000028994755,0.000028938708,0.00025040505,0.000118596174,0.000028974842,0.000009714084,0.0000025757117,0.0043895985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904513,0.00010465634,0.00025605678,0.00014196645,0.00034673,0.00010547888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992172,0.00024151297,0.00013982665,0.0000935152,0.00027359094,0.000034355253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025740048,0.000078198456,0.00011853374,0.00002174049,0.00059502624,0.00012617347,0.00028429859,0.00003209179,0.00008064147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000034579612,0.00004663639,0.00004788971,0.00003989747,0.00066009245,0.00019815943,0.0000106359585,0.00007447297,0.0000056469235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005334351,0.000031835338,0.00013394908,0.0000017296853,0.000054693643,2.0891375e-7,0.009013997,0.0000031553884,0.00006458983,0.9858086,0.00021006251,0.00462383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006528149,0.00024294485,0.013234197,0.0000291331,0.00001821782,0.000004227687,0.0065694074,0.0014166719,0.0005947447,0.77448016,0.20257129,0.00018617869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002057333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055667064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21132843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020939386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026992582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45765212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167094518","doi":"10.1017/s0020589309001201","title":"ARTICLE 23 OF THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION: A COMPREHENSIVE CODE FOR JURISDICTION AGREEMENTS?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Jurisdiction; Code (set theory); Relation (database); Law and economics; Exclusive jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Programming language; Data mining","score_opus":0.052260574153025874,"score_gpt":0.3436548449102697,"score_spread":0.29139427075724383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167094518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94992584,0.00007438244,0.0023634841,0.008979312,0.00051025744,0.00043698307,0.000047859732,0.000028827433,0.037633024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802244,0.0000056513886,0.0001407153,0.0003671818,0.00020027714,0.000012968328,0.0000071813943,0.0000015491025,0.0012420255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992728,0.00006291736,0.00019253328,0.00012377056,0.00025090735,0.00009702415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940175,0.000078864054,0.00012470187,0.00007181784,0.00028771927,0.000035162055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010536737,0.00006421069,0.000105072155,0.000021700143,0.00032470172,0.000056882727,0.00012375119,0.000032903976,0.00004774311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000029684156,0.00005082214,0.00006285007,0.0000750929,0.00018145371,0.0002138809,0.000005976179,0.000043087384,0.000004321405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009597084,0.000091114365,0.00046467816,0.0000021996962,0.00004043202,1.2278502e-7,0.022186235,0.000020047464,0.0035384907,0.9653968,0.0007376914,0.0074261934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015026889,0.0007764778,0.23190337,0.000064443055,0.00004181322,0.0000028967522,0.0080517875,0.0029940407,0.0031056446,0.13471383,0.61664337,0.00019963204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024605897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001284594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.830683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003100262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021762986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24973759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167845946","doi":"10.1017/s0020589313000353","title":"DIGGING DEEP: PROPERTY RIGHTS IN SUBTERRANEAN SPACE AND THE CHALLENGE OF CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Context (archaeology); Carbon capture and storage (timeline); Digging; Space (punctuation); Climate change mitigation; Property rights; Caking; Climate change; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Natural resource economics; Geography; Sociology; Archaeology; Economics; Geology; Computer science","score_opus":0.019402742261709852,"score_gpt":0.23761181302733617,"score_spread":0.21820907076562632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167845946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8845705,0.00006989187,0.0000401294,0.005093704,0.000056184523,0.00019338122,0.0000015731969,0.0000061224296,0.109968536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905163,0.0000067913256,0.0000453401,0.00010082467,0.00001445499,0.000026505539,0.0000019524764,0.0000011061572,0.0007513744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949837,0.00006109585,0.00012921494,0.00014479188,0.000097630975,0.00006887668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999785,0.00006429345,0.00005320337,0.000053787,0.000015898639,0.00002783539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000068551,0.00007602427,0.00010797703,0.000016364838,0.000059431368,0.000039032693,0.00006273776,0.000022788894,0.00029272263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000017015442,0.000039798862,0.000012364428,0.000025953883,0.00037697615,0.00019169478,0.000024274597,0.00009442563,0.0000063024213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031298996,0.00029415858,0.016758548,0.00001764409,0.00008925463,0.000015211705,0.11327605,0.00019683247,0.0027888734,0.86081105,0.00027982815,0.005159559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006795859,0.0012527206,0.40916672,0.00016570222,0.000040727224,0.00017371053,0.01701153,0.21924998,0.0006295358,0.31533703,0.029325362,0.00085113605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016126564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016168477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54547405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016763795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000015549334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9904251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256235904","doi":"10.1017/s0020589315000275","title":"FOREIGN FADS OR FASHIONS? THE ROLE OF COMPARATIVISM IN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Dignity; Political science; Comparative law; Law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; International human rights law; Common law; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.09201827566361949,"score_gpt":0.3557104540449946,"score_spread":0.2636921783813751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256235904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42356467,0.0001245419,0.000039296578,0.00060399825,0.00010579866,0.00013568623,0.000012763467,0.000012165256,0.57540107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924797,0.00000164661,0.00003171306,0.00013310093,0.0001505669,0.000030052712,0.000005721296,0.0000013487269,0.00039785707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901265,0.0001404693,0.00022667265,0.00013591466,0.00035175742,0.0001325215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994545,0.00014336247,0.00008363695,0.00005554207,0.00020615471,0.00005680685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022704701,0.00009190777,0.00018766831,0.000029718864,0.0005095569,0.000058765538,0.00022905241,0.000031587595,0.000045088727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003444318,0.00005697064,0.000035747256,0.000104438965,0.0012618203,0.00022334716,0.000023512866,0.000088853565,0.000015020613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000388806,0.00007893091,0.0019441218,4.1170924e-7,0.000036382888,0.0000020663642,0.021647094,0.000005881857,0.000032157954,0.97591174,0.00017192507,0.00013040166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041883416,0.00019981063,0.0031992213,0.00002432598,0.0000066257358,0.0000019800427,0.025147848,0.00007247819,0.0001052083,0.82275677,0.14796591,0.000100985395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054686572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25231934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57568336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045106495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045472338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95160836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294835859","doi":"10.1017/s0020589314000608","title":"Transparency in International Law, edited by Andrea Bianchi and Anne Peters [Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013, 642pp, ISBN 978-1-107-02138-9, £90.00 (h/bk)]","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"King's University College","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.01632909760284116,"score_gpt":0.21802757934562464,"score_spread":0.2016984817427835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294835859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28400952,0.00020687,0.0017240084,0.008379803,0.0018722967,0.00044756322,0.00027298598,0.00013187106,0.70295507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98806775,0.000047091977,0.00010257146,0.005611601,0.0007632032,0.000013099543,0.00055416103,0.000015387815,0.0048251334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982238,0.000052506668,0.00044705762,0.0005425953,0.00046256295,0.0002715171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991772,0.000083407474,0.0002524056,0.00013922274,0.0002922218,0.00005554903],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001988961,0.0003191391,0.00031469547,0.00020639873,0.00019019244,0.0004819063,0.00041729384,0.00008622106,0.00012792875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000069993766,0.00032361018,0.000081897204,0.0001392571,0.0002746954,0.0023354255,0.00006195446,0.00022211089,0.00006866718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022200208,0.00023553462,0.0012437205,0.000021648762,0.00011192094,0.000011180217,0.000181644,0.000016923233,0.0005703183,0.9554979,0.04165884,0.00022834484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028853663,0.00014274662,0.009077174,0.00010152585,0.0000341986,0.000011067268,0.00047642362,0.030686188,0.00021527243,0.0019076337,0.95394105,0.00052134215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051846066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012108843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9535903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006825881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013251322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2533991149","doi":"10.1017/s0020589316000373","title":"LEGAL TRANSFERS OF RESTRICTIVE IMMIGRATION LAWS: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Parallels; Immigration policy; Immigration law; Race (biology); Limiting; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Refugee; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Economics; Gender studies; Engineering","score_opus":0.02869526770183347,"score_gpt":0.3109104977525129,"score_spread":0.28221523005067944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2533991149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7766823,0.0002094129,0.019741595,0.0093613705,0.0007789357,0.0003686504,0.00007505024,0.000066174194,0.19271652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99542075,0.000057083114,0.00012179254,0.00006725322,0.00024554814,0.000026670737,0.0000062523645,0.0000034746388,0.004051165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988263,0.00017378735,0.00026697866,0.00022692494,0.00037904215,0.00012692726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989965,0.0001564297,0.00011010227,0.00006752732,0.00060046365,0.000068962894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017105907,0.00010903821,0.00017519975,0.00008328836,0.00019393383,0.000050561426,0.00014057558,0.00006520344,0.00012601074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019768911,0.00007746453,0.00007690763,0.000110301036,0.0002904447,0.0007420698,0.0000038102605,0.000066892884,0.000013032929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001278512,0.000079159436,0.00022874855,0.0000010779191,0.000043372325,7.488407e-7,0.057093535,3.8452035e-7,0.0022515368,0.9370879,0.0007931713,0.0022925395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002878685,0.0037399146,0.012943651,0.00018786048,0.000080670565,0.000009914444,0.14454626,0.00034535697,0.0067540687,0.21311797,0.6146213,0.00077439455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017857583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046224434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72396994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048533498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000088657274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98868257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555203996","doi":"10.1017/s0020589316000397","title":"THE WORKING METHODS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL: MAINTAINING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CHANGE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Security council; Political science; Public administration; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Public relations; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.17607311396929334,"score_gpt":0.4253756158066775,"score_spread":0.24930250183738414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555203996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9367172,0.00016341374,0.0010675592,0.025494337,0.0005975295,0.00043263828,0.00006713611,0.00001478377,0.035445366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945337,0.00006721609,0.00007846988,0.0001795585,0.00008087166,0.000022402926,0.0000023156385,0.0000015595565,0.000114267204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875355,0.00043769207,0.00019785628,0.00008256345,0.00042017573,0.00010819218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844015,0.0008066331,0.0001985409,0.00008932742,0.0004459303,0.000019423529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010586582,0.00005766828,0.000079785365,0.00003664134,0.0005754232,0.000050905404,0.00033040883,0.000024056078,0.000020176836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031326017,0.000025927673,0.00004958204,0.00032667324,0.00058696,0.00013138623,0.000029826635,0.000060733055,8.555427e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009565418,0.000010627649,0.0013221279,7.0559776e-7,0.000036810183,4.9627744e-8,0.07285446,6.2431405e-7,0.00008513119,0.9213161,0.00008411018,0.0042797043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005902665,0.000143138,0.019143512,0.000097696895,0.000033765948,0.0000016071181,0.24470721,0.0007238728,0.00028938786,0.21957618,0.514559,0.00013438551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0098146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11296298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7017399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007939438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066576016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99677914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590322391","doi":"10.1017/s0020589317000021","title":"TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY BANISHMENT: CITIZENSHIP STRIPPING IN COMMON LAW NATIONS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Law; Political science; Revocation; Common law; Stripping (fiber); Sociology; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.054645302665129465,"score_gpt":0.34068087475087,"score_spread":0.28603557208574054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590322391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44296506,0.000031762924,0.000017499899,0.0025402582,0.0006899313,0.00015703261,0.000045454097,0.000025523459,0.5535275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956424,0.000012869926,0.00005139293,0.00034622953,0.0003908203,0.000031490865,0.00003309608,0.0000050008734,0.0034866803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986932,0.00009486298,0.00028261784,0.00025615064,0.00044861488,0.00022453212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992074,0.00017951828,0.0001806375,0.00015500501,0.00018767334,0.000089780726],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002468174,0.00013364859,0.00018859914,0.00008882735,0.0022152015,0.0007958711,0.00057642604,0.0000632235,0.00030946615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006656242,0.00013002455,0.000059995913,0.000025819038,0.00064135646,0.0006154653,0.000031577398,0.00016661429,0.00006467892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026192756,0.00007074606,0.0013880145,0.0000029836892,0.000045904053,0.000011719151,0.0091273,0.0000031903664,0.000010920101,0.98905635,0.00011429222,0.00014241433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009521515,0.00010364538,0.02233674,0.00013708118,0.000009622658,0.0000034143209,0.0018060904,0.00019386517,0.00006624786,0.8148568,0.15925924,0.00027507625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009596183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20419206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5526774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014631845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032257725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606851650","doi":"10.1017/s0020589317000161","title":"JAPANESE APPROACHES TO EXTRATERRITORIALITY IN COMPETITION LAW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Economic Zones and Regional Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Royal Irish Academy; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Extraterritoriality; Competition law; Competition (biology); Context (archaeology); Commission; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; International trade; Economics; Jurisdiction; Market economy; Geography","score_opus":0.2585119866204537,"score_gpt":0.27620314277997227,"score_spread":0.01769115615951855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606851650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7707872,0.000061550265,0.00012543514,0.0043599294,0.0012944377,0.00014980666,0.00006624052,0.0000093521385,0.22314605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982109,0.000004651079,0.00027932593,0.00030875154,0.00026749732,0.00004531754,0.000022253073,0.000004144131,0.0008571307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917436,0.00001137738,0.000352316,0.00030428288,0.00003307278,0.0001246179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956703,0.000020824287,0.00016438663,0.00016468989,0.000018428425,0.00006464325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001962953,0.00010886739,0.0002483965,0.000050971965,0.000173193,0.00027435305,0.00026042335,0.000042244163,0.00007224296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000019574136,0.00011324925,0.000038564966,0.000014612067,0.00012353573,0.00034966407,0.000036790843,0.00007147398,0.00021367428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033317054,0.000067783105,0.0034973957,0.0000043003106,0.000026867407,0.0000025044633,0.0031651645,0.00001213423,0.000009976881,0.99300754,0.00006021241,0.00011281464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015405909,0.00024070796,0.31529924,0.000069088266,0.0000024051062,0.000013169738,0.0016170226,0.001880407,0.00006843516,0.49972615,0.17901058,0.000532204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038977994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043460885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4932814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006529147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000047281155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5892333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767604562","doi":"10.1017/s0020589317000458","title":"SELF-DEFENCE AGAINST NON-STATE ACTORS: ARE POWERFUL STATES WILLING BUT UNABLE TO CHANGE INTERNATIONAL LAW?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); International law; Customary international law; Law; Politics; Self defense; Law and economics; Public international law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05123218250217359,"score_gpt":0.3325977371017578,"score_spread":0.2813655545995842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767604562","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7412691,0.000024492494,0.00019500646,0.004641619,0.001835887,0.0003410131,0.00015155424,0.00009287435,0.25144845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847241,0.000035186855,0.00033130127,0.001500366,0.0010398587,0.000060587212,0.00006168578,0.000012222752,0.012234687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980616,0.0000765767,0.00032188548,0.00045567713,0.0007318297,0.00035240874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984462,0.00011429312,0.0003232389,0.000201547,0.00069704384,0.00021767542],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027843242,0.00023786548,0.00025876192,0.00009463259,0.001509725,0.0013208113,0.0010627313,0.00006855938,0.00018453039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001148593,0.00021886129,0.00009055908,0.00002828591,0.00043002807,0.001562472,0.00009600252,0.00020824745,0.00028908282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007586366,0.00013059405,0.0011813741,0.000005965403,0.00015896067,0.00003002827,0.034226798,0.000019282654,0.00007113171,0.9634508,0.00027989192,0.0003692984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011764689,0.0004157328,0.013156195,0.00029386522,0.000022362574,0.0000058874343,0.006473639,0.0027823616,0.0007170704,0.1903077,0.7838071,0.00084164133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006923502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020512875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7835272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018549645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040365383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782410272","doi":"10.1017/s0020589317000537","title":"SHELTERING GOVERNMENT SUPPORT TO ‘GREEN’ ELECTRICITY: THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; European union; Government (linguistics); Politics; International trade; Renewable energy; Energy subsidies; Business; Parallels; Economics; Public economics; Energy policy; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.018433364126074894,"score_gpt":0.2725625140534778,"score_spread":0.25412914992740293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782410272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21339978,0.00003301013,0.005710121,0.26349327,0.0007502268,0.00075831683,0.000022717275,0.0001255157,0.515707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99374896,0.00000370488,0.000056930192,0.0021726952,0.000551152,0.000005291751,0.000004816394,0.000007942636,0.0034484891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986352,0.00050666253,0.00016522822,0.00017540342,0.00038769134,0.00012982528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999545,0.00013782596,0.00007185093,0.00008475071,0.00009769578,0.000062907406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006458689,0.00009142433,0.00009494312,0.000023914363,0.00068123935,0.00028971647,0.00026258483,0.000012488723,0.00019227527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012639715,0.00005910806,0.000014636324,0.0003534609,0.0005538268,0.00020376475,0.00003623292,0.00007695828,0.000049422],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017736405,0.000019800262,0.0007461619,7.843182e-7,0.00003241294,9.243582e-7,0.034733057,0.0000011940994,0.0002678694,0.95929694,0.0010562037,0.0038269246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012149535,0.0002891366,0.08198171,0.000025552346,0.000036181988,0.000012650298,0.007848692,0.00026003103,0.0013257093,0.006913641,0.89980435,0.00028741045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005536478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010890019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9523833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062290805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015574164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6076886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801151102","doi":"10.1093/iclq/52.3.802","title":"V. Cases Before the Court","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.042222435399085365,"score_gpt":0.33279588842687097,"score_spread":0.2905734530277856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801151102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43422326,0.00006538244,0.0003491406,0.007817844,0.00083152147,0.0001566977,0.00002122335,0.000033500794,0.5565014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930533,0.000004376601,0.00007390277,0.0006344518,0.0002517777,0.000019064833,0.000009410032,0.0000023134078,0.005951411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991884,0.00013412359,0.00012608281,0.00012239181,0.00031376505,0.000115200746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995173,0.00013482566,0.00005958564,0.000053300468,0.00019305808,0.000041937772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022875344,0.00007111739,0.00007201227,0.00001913776,0.0004976434,0.00015825836,0.00015817911,0.000028224531,0.0003065728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001568655,0.000050109124,0.000037415753,0.00004654239,0.00028133145,0.00024675555,0.0000050611934,0.00007422448,0.00006634532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006797312,0.000026246975,0.0009777533,4.017936e-7,0.000025866038,0.0000031186767,0.010161393,0.0000016272952,0.0000110693245,0.9875567,0.000692801,0.0005362079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020636851,0.00012355948,0.003958228,0.000009698521,0.000007217167,0.00001720243,0.009714352,0.000082635095,0.0000812023,0.12524396,0.860467,0.000088571695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024010574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017424516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86231273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004126914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030408883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97232896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991665903","doi":"10.1017/s0020589319000447","title":"RECONCEPTUALISING THE LEGAL RESPONSE TO FOREIGN FIGHTERS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Neutrality; Terrorism; State (computer science); Law; Security council; Foreign policy; Phenomenon; International law; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.039695336884428514,"score_gpt":0.33798990198459705,"score_spread":0.29829456510016855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991665903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9198998,0.00003084435,0.0003056945,0.009884097,0.0009844704,0.00023241664,0.00002413697,0.000034135835,0.06860438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915804,0.0000020451544,0.000024761861,0.0034099042,0.00031716484,0.000022097092,0.000003252508,0.000004217003,0.004636147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998674,0.0003097136,0.00019024184,0.00023361301,0.00034167033,0.00025077426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911135,0.0004597477,0.00005196497,0.00012913794,0.00012119042,0.00012663334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040977696,0.000112952504,0.00014067511,0.000036998004,0.00028140214,0.0002602866,0.00037148257,0.000042751355,0.00039405606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000126877485,0.00008193338,0.000055471683,0.00007803369,0.0002913971,0.0003957914,0.00002163856,0.00012300121,0.0003569754],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047535228,0.000035576293,0.0005735323,0.0000019103913,0.000042572872,0.0000055756886,0.30586612,0.0000044417397,0.00044840397,0.68788916,0.0019351526,0.00272224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043771748,0.0006127422,0.005152144,0.00007970667,0.0000087838425,0.0000062284344,0.44700685,0.00023012425,0.00013315005,0.011306849,0.53475106,0.00027462462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018440225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011056903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6765823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007125935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046110923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45883155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993230620","doi":"10.1017/s0020589319000459","title":"THE DUTY TO COOPERATE IN THE CUSTOMARY LAW OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Obligation; Harm; International law; Political science; Notice; Law; Environmental law; Duty to protect; Customary international law; Normative; International court; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Public international law; Sociology","score_opus":0.016441861996019394,"score_gpt":0.27228434745206975,"score_spread":0.2558424854560504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993230620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7453414,0.000016575541,0.000018080324,0.0020025654,0.00023030824,0.00026539926,0.000012946828,0.0000067297597,0.25210595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98811054,0.000001817978,0.000022290771,0.011295796,0.00014817425,0.000032333126,0.000036386842,0.0000039794886,0.00034867003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991178,0.000029319524,0.0002522296,0.00015310528,0.00033145596,0.00011609333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962306,0.00008861116,0.00010802794,0.000109966815,0.000060989318,0.000009328979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023738408,0.00011698286,0.00011928763,0.000045836783,0.00012158752,0.00027650926,0.00031381295,0.000018346978,0.0003040174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000011730397,0.00006559978,0.000053108528,0.00007495389,0.00011206911,0.0005869163,0.000037358845,0.00010039888,0.00021946669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070495065,0.00010815465,0.0032728463,0.0000028971663,0.00003984117,0.0000013832334,0.00041861535,0.00005839923,0.0013613136,0.99395394,0.00055118493,0.00016095316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002360903,0.00062121893,0.4388967,0.000081825,0.000026907786,0.000014479461,0.0053479183,0.024670502,0.0003746929,0.046028018,0.48106757,0.0005092844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073167693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079426495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9479259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039913568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009041056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33287773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016639784","doi":"10.1017/s0020589320000093","title":"PASSPORTS, THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL, AND NATIONAL SECURITY IN THE COMMONWEALTH","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Commonwealth; Statutory law; Political science; Law; Denial; National security; Politics","score_opus":0.0784037260624742,"score_gpt":0.345930562693594,"score_spread":0.2675268366311198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016639784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6449947,0.00012900097,0.00075657095,0.20281659,0.00020317442,0.0005579832,0.000095382624,0.00002416714,0.15042247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881523,0.000013901779,0.000028817882,0.011468789,0.00027714274,0.000017601433,0.000010815207,0.0000014691456,0.000029130964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909306,0.00023254767,0.00012776202,0.00014014471,0.00031833388,0.00008815354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996061,0.0001813005,0.00004073161,0.0000380813,0.000077143966,0.000056671168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043713904,0.000059806815,0.00007192924,0.000016614682,0.00031210587,0.00015688535,0.000213756,0.000016318914,0.000031168787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015431986,0.000036592133,0.000013733646,0.0000932694,0.0001733302,0.00019072216,0.000015955244,0.00013758028,0.0000183238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000447154,0.00002773194,0.00022432636,0.0000033901497,0.000007697941,0.000004991771,0.13544251,0.0000016081087,0.000019752793,0.86045235,0.0030016636,0.00076926075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043818282,0.0005458549,0.03122206,0.00002863907,0.00001724986,0.000013058431,0.17210314,0.00084206735,0.00003136319,0.061780967,0.7327786,0.0001987947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017616878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009685405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79867136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017904345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019703139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5404683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040093363","doi":"10.1017/s0020589320000123","title":"THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND THE RIGHT TO LIFE","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Political science; Law; Right to life; Quarter (Canadian coin); Environmental law; Consolidation (business); Geography; Business","score_opus":0.02962111536867059,"score_gpt":0.2888174152393788,"score_spread":0.25919629987070825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040093363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79891497,0.00011078844,0.00013104873,0.069001354,0.00014881956,0.0005727394,0.000025542759,0.00002430371,0.13107044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99626863,0.0000053530475,0.000010973629,0.0021718643,0.0003267589,0.000049862927,0.0000034048508,0.0000020646944,0.0011610823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924755,0.00018596785,0.00012022395,0.0001328341,0.00020975016,0.00010365006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996763,0.00010384776,0.00004458586,0.00004975504,0.000006302043,0.00011921295],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013539636,0.00007591707,0.000085917614,0.0000064304904,0.0016069792,0.0001654284,0.0001752836,0.000022018334,0.00009921054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000020585944,0.000042476575,0.000027294112,0.000025915546,0.0008428004,0.00012039253,0.0000272782,0.00009550322,0.000068297486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006020773,0.000016376984,0.00013147133,4.890305e-7,0.000029606013,5.1851504e-7,0.022904906,0.0000010585627,0.00016699753,0.9756453,0.0006527967,0.00039029057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058017334,0.00018317658,0.0032638076,0.0000040478812,0.0000073537117,0.0000012370069,0.0027775744,0.00011347936,0.00012779984,0.031789593,0.9610588,0.000092935516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024193747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004185903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.960406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023028162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003633853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092409353","doi":"10.1017/s0020589320000354","title":"FOREIGN INVESTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES AND CONTRIBUTORY FAULT IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Treaty; Compensation (psychology); Consistency (knowledge bases); Fault (geology); Investment (military); Business; Foreign direct investment; Investment arbitration; Law and economics; International arbitration; Law; International investment; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Psychology; Seismology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04795132605533763,"score_gpt":0.25502624699687193,"score_spread":0.2070749209415343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092409353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7227923,0.00009963922,0.0001728483,0.0064142146,0.00017654522,0.00029077491,0.000013650636,0.000058926933,0.26998106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92909503,0.000003708441,0.00012038348,0.070100024,0.0003998123,0.000042939268,0.000070355825,0.000006276324,0.00016146079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989196,0.000028061875,0.00033740327,0.00030274244,0.0002578333,0.00015435719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954915,0.00006201155,0.00013076278,0.00005901475,0.00016687503,0.000032200987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015789818,0.0001685707,0.00019085068,0.00011123614,0.00009547325,0.0003040219,0.00012591138,0.000044262993,0.00009451965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002166341,0.00015598384,0.000034302968,0.000101975835,0.00019053725,0.0013882437,0.000036967816,0.00014092142,0.00006362589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015999105,0.00004798017,0.0019875807,0.0000151744325,0.000028831457,0.000005228488,0.001115821,0.000009984854,0.00074004446,0.99519116,0.0006326053,0.00006559029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038858638,0.00043571173,0.024226725,0.00010082541,0.000031075255,0.000010779257,0.007923335,0.06712718,0.0006544231,0.57914656,0.31575096,0.0007065885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051544065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065541256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41604462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043061584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002012539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63608366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118708210","doi":"10.1017/s0020589320000512","title":"Negotiated Settlements in Bribery Cases: A Principled Approach, edited by Tina Søreide and Abiola Makinwa [Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2020, 384pp, ISBN 978-1-78897-040-2, £110 (h/bk)]","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human settlement; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.035369531403028225,"score_gpt":0.3063289879147936,"score_spread":0.2709594565117654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118708210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.936782,0.00022869334,0.00020252894,0.0027642671,0.0006340149,0.00031405923,0.00011485981,0.000041090174,0.058918457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907035,0.00007913025,0.0004799845,0.0008068208,0.0001836669,0.00006474597,0.00023436564,0.000007989249,0.007439792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982484,0.0001990976,0.0004614595,0.0004932421,0.00029360998,0.00030418157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992722,0.00013680515,0.00015261582,0.00010535569,0.00017262861,0.00016038268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032835494,0.00020337675,0.00031056005,0.000066692395,0.0002348028,0.00028202613,0.00018908193,0.00008944655,0.00059766945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021053118,0.00021071866,0.00005350567,0.00016853404,0.00021662889,0.00028291752,0.00007028607,0.0001803434,0.000065898676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018164652,0.0049210507,0.09639555,0.00017890698,0.0020589621,0.00086388947,0.26692745,0.00010245064,0.0079294555,0.48714274,0.061844226,0.06981885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037195205,0.0002791739,0.05209084,0.0001312222,0.000031374708,0.00011177561,0.030528646,0.0037318177,0.00019511003,0.0019067591,0.9064049,0.00086884457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019967468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070057223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8445607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002086355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014148297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8592858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124660054","doi":"10.1017/s002058931100042x","title":"INTERNATIONALISATION AND CONSTITUTIONAL BORROWING IN DRAFTING BILLS OF RIGHTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre for Engineering Research and Development; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Indigenous; Internationalization; Context (archaeology); Political science; Key (lock); Northern ireland; Indigenous rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Focus (optics); Law; Public administration; Sociology; Business; International trade; Geography; Computer science; Ethnology","score_opus":0.08964935228637383,"score_gpt":0.32107300415363627,"score_spread":0.23142365186726244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124660054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6973323,0.00018586553,0.00092644704,0.00034642924,0.00034585028,0.00011079989,0.000021752541,0.000014772006,0.30071574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994065,0.000014846652,0.00031748693,0.00007730377,0.00010970529,0.000011972872,0.0000059175204,8.6465565e-7,0.00005540283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921995,0.00006366466,0.00023158042,0.00014779426,0.00023931827,0.00009766749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995195,0.000117199015,0.00008530692,0.000025953297,0.00021419472,0.000037818307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020478615,0.00007409426,0.00013324714,0.0000779363,0.00023012355,0.000026822012,0.000090484464,0.000032235963,0.0000998405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015036501,0.000067284855,0.000024179766,0.0000750596,0.0025234225,0.0003538145,0.00001852053,0.00006142229,0.000004519336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027328102,0.000048686194,0.019267023,0.0000011474195,0.000032112333,0.0000023592581,0.025403095,0.0000011287025,0.00006882175,0.95469713,0.000011487661,0.00043966857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008213469,0.0001375924,0.09973583,0.00015308007,0.000014923877,0.0000068291706,0.011735781,0.00018707161,0.00037119188,0.8717066,0.014888437,0.00024132627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013826636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007320786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30207416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038244267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041359068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229542000","doi":"10.1093/iclq/50.3.632","title":"Pragmatism Rules","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Enforcement; Convention; Political science; Civil procedure; Pragmatism; Schedule; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Economics; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047062230425255897,"score_gpt":0.34246835315150387,"score_spread":0.295406122726248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229542000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.498924,0.00007696262,0.00044258614,0.0042234627,0.00028519562,0.00006755864,0.000005954703,0.000041466814,0.49593285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99433875,0.00005029058,0.000120543154,0.0002989393,0.00033073517,0.000011504234,0.00000811924,0.000001829863,0.004839285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939007,0.000055294982,0.00011350052,0.00011813493,0.00021682105,0.000106204774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970007,0.000056815814,0.000044938995,0.000042912143,0.00009508692,0.000060172453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000117454925,0.000059784055,0.00008107351,0.00002703935,0.00027993554,0.00013971943,0.000106273015,0.000030046886,0.00046210946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000020264417,0.000055583812,0.000027305196,0.000039122493,0.00018165984,0.00029957935,0.0000069339885,0.00005362767,0.00010173987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016046723,0.00003287036,0.0007754628,4.7886846e-7,0.000020511128,0.000003797332,0.019155458,4.083316e-7,0.000058174355,0.9648222,0.00044827865,0.014666328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020711798,0.00008589681,0.011646814,0.0000110420015,0.0000039724773,0.000006123835,0.0037088126,0.00014233531,0.000012607289,0.03838968,0.9457006,0.00008502493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033792285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060571097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9452523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023325445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015228963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51084054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287310028","doi":"10.1017/s0020589322000240","title":"REVISITING THE LEGALITY OF TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW DURING COVID-19","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"COVID-19 epidemiological studies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; International Health Regulations; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Solidarity; Proportionality (law); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; International law; Law; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine; Outbreak; Politics","score_opus":0.3106735596728564,"score_gpt":0.4438547724766831,"score_spread":0.13318121280382667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287310028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87648857,0.00020656509,0.009689693,0.057894338,0.0006817057,0.0004559613,0.00035954535,0.00010111755,0.054122504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99667174,0.000007005222,0.0003060221,0.0020046486,0.000207512,0.000104366285,0.0000151572785,0.0000052147157,0.0006783107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982816,0.0003496814,0.00051309576,0.00028444364,0.00042417878,0.0001470244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713594,0.002210553,0.0002995666,0.00016147242,0.00012971762,0.00006275174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006223213,0.00014275567,0.00028584566,0.00004317692,0.00082211033,0.000048071306,0.0004091002,0.000025087007,0.00039389706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014458482,0.00010507722,0.00010785072,0.00011204434,0.00032371,0.0001284071,0.00018357139,0.00027271552,0.000003422275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082618484,0.000078127414,0.0016501795,0.0000175218,0.00019846707,0.000004109472,0.002716171,0.00029222897,0.00028806966,0.99421674,0.00036881646,0.00008697541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010341768,0.00019275656,0.04342331,0.000025488554,0.000046921756,0.000059810627,0.014173095,0.0014285307,0.000111011264,0.90034735,0.038901452,0.00025610632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017268407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003978387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12018319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002322429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030247547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6323091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367316018","doi":"10.1017/s002058932300012x","title":"NET ZERO EMISSIONS AND FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS: EFFORTS AT INTEGRATING CLIMATE GOALS BY THE UNITED KINGDOM AND AUSTRALIA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"New Zealand Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Free trade; Climate change; International trade; Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; Negotiation; Liberalization; Parliament; European union; General partnership; Emissions trading; Political science; Enforcement; Greenhouse gas; Business; Kyoto Protocol; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.10808952092075122,"score_gpt":0.3037109109912649,"score_spread":0.19562139007051368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367316018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900054,0.0002428216,0.000048129463,0.0029546309,0.00021164514,0.00011779803,0.00045882392,0.00002317459,0.0059376103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976508,0.00014980152,0.00002298103,0.00032481045,0.000060149334,0.00002561478,0.000087800305,0.00000523262,0.0016728038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992087,0.000017017552,0.00031852108,0.0002405498,0.00003270999,0.00018249049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995823,0.00011520114,0.00015105672,0.0000787774,0.000012270041,0.00006041952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017832874,0.00012911114,0.00023810881,0.00005169694,0.0004349208,0.00013660596,0.000121225756,0.000040573443,0.000068628746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006067523,0.00010315856,0.000033362176,0.00007217851,0.00017403696,0.00013999881,0.00007908033,0.0000915598,0.00003904723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029215988,0.000025083888,0.076474875,0.000009312983,0.00019673964,0.0000022452302,0.008321731,0.000005319967,0.000041106603,0.8869565,0.027543906,0.00039393085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002638448,0.00042551634,0.24850468,0.00008797013,0.000029201796,0.000019536805,0.0067053167,0.0057234755,0.00005296509,0.21961625,0.5155408,0.0006558297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017565424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006789659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6673403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003367517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000015831439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42066842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389648687","doi":"10.1017/s0020589323000532","title":"REGULATING TRANSNATIONAL DISSIDENT CYBER ESPIONAGE","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universitetet i Oslo","keywords":"Human rights; Espionage; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Democracy; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05238225661906652,"score_gpt":0.34531525429221865,"score_spread":0.2929329976731521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389648687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72128665,0.00006802408,0.00026091226,0.027167335,0.0006615877,0.00018804194,0.00005210534,0.00020262606,0.2501127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99530184,0.000010037597,0.00005664955,0.00020514696,0.00025455287,0.000032259875,0.00004209954,0.0000035642931,0.0040938174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889237,0.000087131404,0.00017735307,0.00020415852,0.00045685377,0.00018214351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995009,0.00019267276,0.000050572107,0.00005136282,0.0001365789,0.000067943954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023982093,0.000096099764,0.00012563687,0.00006214713,0.0006479435,0.00013759347,0.00015167918,0.000037497866,0.00017137454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007252048,0.00009261084,0.000058615013,0.00016935769,0.00035343066,0.0003219754,0.000019161722,0.00008678778,0.00007182737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012910774,0.000024326962,0.0004443316,0.0000016945125,0.00005056341,0.0000040326395,0.067221954,0.000009216531,0.000037959508,0.92965305,0.00082762627,0.0017123579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006638518,0.00010901402,0.06483859,0.000028131233,0.000017599898,0.0000037442987,0.08374129,0.0008895321,0.000061049504,0.44150302,0.40779617,0.0003480157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059609424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008796083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48815003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040436145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023476667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49835235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405549352","doi":"10.1017/s0020589324000381","title":"EXIT RIGHTS, SEAMLESS BORDERS AND THE NEW CARCERAL STATE","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Criminology; Computer security; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.041294236425959314,"score_gpt":0.34983944841237136,"score_spread":0.30854521198641205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405549352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49410617,0.00454436,0.0126617905,0.044660114,0.0024559367,0.00078317866,0.000120137905,0.00026150828,0.4404068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943245,0.00014919096,0.00006051674,0.0002942597,0.00035075433,0.000007643013,0.000008530582,0.0000026815912,0.00480193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930066,0.00013970456,0.00010462789,0.00016369938,0.00019120838,0.00010008135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967116,0.00015127388,0.00002309994,0.000045960373,0.000048235455,0.000060285834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021317082,0.000070922855,0.00008017004,0.00004024085,0.00032251002,0.00049153715,0.00011952891,0.000015761518,0.00006546023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000028775817,0.000045966946,0.0000242154,0.000077272125,0.00046520925,0.00037708358,0.000016003769,0.00011123583,0.00004605741],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008733854,0.0000062399768,0.0000051067072,0.000005682407,0.00004165135,0.000007804884,0.048804265,0.0000013871395,0.000018611641,0.93525094,0.0029483943,0.0128225945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044064375,0.0001060046,0.00018756987,0.000043379616,0.000030118617,0.000008616627,0.013773569,0.001121996,0.000028498176,0.14360043,0.8405514,0.00010776835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018585688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0120837055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83760303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015282554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003059823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9879496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413254345","doi":"10.1017/s0020589325100821","title":"Internationality Overreach in the Interpretation of Uniform Private Law Conventions: The <i>Contra Proferentem</i> Rule and the CISG","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Convention; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Relevance (law); Conflict of laws; Underpinning; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.0285058520107497,"score_gpt":0.3365693171446842,"score_spread":0.3080634651339345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413254345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40659502,0.000510254,0.0017726301,0.022619842,0.0005572557,0.0008741791,0.0000512672,0.000021020165,0.56699854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99573016,0.00005337235,0.000019510422,0.0027489876,0.000072320014,0.00006811118,0.000019496143,0.000002554383,0.0012854782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824464,0.00066435756,0.0004102633,0.00017306689,0.0003879666,0.000119715005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847054,0.00094253005,0.0001883096,0.0001285231,0.00024983502,0.000020276253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012997942,0.000112576934,0.00017131638,0.000045170997,0.00034171192,0.00025724823,0.00058178423,0.000032904518,0.0000362309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043568994,0.000060482253,0.00007548181,0.00011949408,0.0014203386,0.00037928447,0.00004401903,0.00021880803,0.000004926328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021736902,0.00007843242,0.00045914808,0.0000048989914,0.00009338119,6.3885517e-7,0.014487742,0.0000059593594,0.000027087674,0.9839518,0.000058555364,0.00061500765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040156944,0.00016077433,0.047826152,0.00028925127,0.00006581579,0.0000063534085,0.023354944,0.00778446,0.00009096265,0.6821273,0.23404102,0.0002372878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024770119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007396661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5891351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004505199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003460645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5233297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416194669","doi":"10.1017/s0020589325101012","title":"The International Seabed Authority, the Problem of Disregard and the Case for Administrative Accountability","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Accountability; Delegation; Jurisdiction; State (computer science); Administrative law; Process (computing); International law; Core (optical fiber)","score_opus":0.028786323557218982,"score_gpt":0.3291889563334191,"score_spread":0.3004026327762001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416194669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7845256,0.00018506114,0.0013115096,0.04651144,0.00061880896,0.001470495,0.00026154006,0.000024491002,0.1650911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958623,0.000007909046,0.00041131326,0.00042039956,0.00006170581,0.00024105445,0.00001184665,0.0000031465563,0.002980294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988699,0.0001314324,0.0003353348,0.00025489848,0.0002824539,0.00012599301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979022,0.0016307828,0.00015047267,0.00015031097,0.0001397123,0.000026479658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006655329,0.00013755569,0.00015865912,0.000012790642,0.00048516953,0.00025304843,0.00055312255,0.000033521323,0.00009517394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021755262,0.000068565736,0.00007248333,0.00006164204,0.0018212666,0.00022719822,0.00017226329,0.000135465,0.000005843406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053885585,0.00006273888,0.0017190333,0.000005194389,0.00017812026,0.0000028631594,0.0029853943,0.000010623185,0.000093451155,0.9883001,0.0014332698,0.0046703704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003214196,0.00038308086,0.01847745,0.000057743466,0.000086374486,0.00019109357,0.011365713,0.01936616,0.0010928963,0.6837326,0.26176435,0.00026829095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023657384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00884794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30456743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006984134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017192728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67105323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}