{"meta":{"query_hash":"67a7c0cdd58a","filters":{"venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly"},"cohort_total":51,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":51,"exported":51,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/67a7c0cdd58a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+and+Comparative+Law+Quarterly"},"results":[{"id":"W1966968079","doi":"10.1017/s0020589310000655","title":"JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING AND TRANSNATIONAL LAW: A SURVEY OF COMMON LAW SUPREME COURT JUDGES","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Precedent; Political science; Majority opinion; Judicial independence; Comparative law; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.09705707278559123,"score_gpt":0.34795742791395806,"score_spread":0.25090035512836684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966968079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99668914,0.0003795262,0.00012230966,0.0003717559,0.000007489667,0.000012722698,0.00003388587,0.0000014743121,0.0023816044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993591,0.00015760913,0.000036792982,0.00008476226,0.0000050365607,0.0000075089997,0.000029867584,0.0000017575712,0.00031757075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936381,0.003344067,0.00043547523,0.00050185766,0.0011173183,0.0009631656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753395,0.010871641,0.0055217305,0.0008194735,0.004558759,0.0028888884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072086817,0.00015906988,0.0004464258,0.0031299847,0.002655746,0.003741757,0.0005421725,0.00094744394,0.003231847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026407316,0.00030671555,0.00018353555,0.0034566512,0.002295662,0.002141393,0.0019102477,0.001302181,0.0004205331],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008819832,0.00020633332,0.64932615,0.00007307004,0.0000436052,0.00059619383,0.32190755,0.0001344828,0.0009311794,0.0037605383,0.0018879839,0.021044757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001583324,0.00028700978,0.49707448,0.00021801573,0.000021248286,0.00072592736,0.4832499,0.00076339045,0.0003131404,0.0017340455,0.015542105,0.00005502867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01889493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030534219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01889493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012045285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013075306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038123548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982156666","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei175","title":"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Index (typography); Convention; Liability; Law; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.04178532391807655,"score_gpt":0.3541998219142938,"score_spread":0.31241449799621723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982156666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018034107,0.033606097,0.0015761642,0.036137316,0.0076971315,0.00011650764,0.003167302,0.0002623498,0.9156337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028184315,0.0069808806,0.0012383031,0.013249791,0.0015944953,0.00011256769,0.0012429132,0.00017915762,0.9472176],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998588,0.00011826832,0.00005860293,0.00023195067,0.00077694526,0.0002262051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920636,0.00007024577,0.000075894626,0.000087662454,0.00046605314,0.00009376169],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001189948,0.0009365201,0.0002978258,0.0015404072,0.0037589564,0.0052439705,0.0015605221,0.004163806,0.04054593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003951888,0.00037064427,0.00041011523,0.0019351284,0.0018894821,0.0032831596,0.0015994073,0.0040370957,0.013739245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001553999,0.000013506298,0.00025761177,0.000033000193,0.0000034378074,0.000026522897,0.00022470539,0.000056995243,0.00011756906,0.12839657,0.85484654,0.016008042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030437477,0.000003956514,0.001019786,0.00009591563,0.0000021530566,0.000021569238,0.000086630316,0.000038799975,0.00010101834,0.005445757,0.9931744,0.000006999288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30337092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45113316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95945406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010224436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011910992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986722370","doi":"10.1017/s0020589314000621","title":"CHOICE-OF-COURT AGREEMENTS, THE ITALIAN TORPEDO, AND THE RECAST OF THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Prima facie; Supreme court; Political science","score_opus":0.08029000003947137,"score_gpt":0.3381065878157076,"score_spread":0.2578165877762363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986722370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07848526,0.0016123398,0.007227236,0.061832745,0.0007608789,0.00009739927,0.00009127644,0.00006609335,0.8498267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9523607,0.00035676057,0.0014919277,0.008995284,0.00027495535,0.00009879023,0.000033664746,0.00003451281,0.036353365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97161204,0.012296078,0.001085961,0.0031104258,0.006057787,0.0058377357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98202366,0.01001621,0.0019322,0.002112896,0.0028157777,0.001099292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015517424,0.00035025738,0.00062189286,0.0020372393,0.01030491,0.017686225,0.0030671412,0.011264666,0.004564601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028950734,0.0005022996,0.0007597919,0.0022160395,0.035944026,0.005957052,0.0082471045,0.016039424,0.0006091067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008397723,0.0000060078532,0.00030428232,0.000008613808,0.000002197448,0.0001392677,0.003401192,0.00014671186,0.000024892835,0.99124545,0.0033069,0.0014060497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008804413,0.00008820599,0.004405075,0.0008828556,0.000058548765,0.0005802711,0.02218061,0.0025198222,0.00080729794,0.48981425,0.4783282,0.00024675354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097844906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111590646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097844906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021691266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015313579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19455075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990658214","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064642","title":"Constitutional Challenges to Sexual Orientation Discrimination","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Statutory law; Lesbian; Legislation; Same sex; Law; Political science; Convention; Human rights; Legislature; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0891685153541418,"score_gpt":0.3677277836966911,"score_spread":0.2785592683425493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990658214","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018260937,0.009146278,0.0044090184,0.63338083,0.004914553,0.00007279829,0.0002119692,0.000051983792,0.32955164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43125746,0.009004402,0.004823267,0.43668362,0.012164825,0.0005186169,0.00031609274,0.00010425114,0.10512745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.987452,0.003557302,0.00064531894,0.0020719818,0.004444633,0.0018288002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880342,0.0076616057,0.0006075516,0.0009587776,0.0013943022,0.0013436159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021562444,0.0004267388,0.000724389,0.001290665,0.013222051,0.014220005,0.004268046,0.02267361,0.01013684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031108988,0.0006546767,0.00085222995,0.0016657638,0.032158982,0.008834469,0.0103571685,0.02316047,0.0013898641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004994357,0.000015113457,0.00013235018,0.000015092027,0.000002002264,0.00007411275,0.0009135502,0.00004971559,0.000076806806,0.9818029,0.012525836,0.0043876115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043684606,0.000034047636,0.0005988454,0.00035239977,0.000009807721,0.00024060656,0.0025059562,0.00018017196,0.00020749496,0.5757808,0.4200159,0.000030354302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017189061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01756629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02267361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008644431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012593923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114034474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999706565","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064228","title":"“Making Public Law, ‘Public’: An Analysis of the Quebec Reference Case and its Significance for Comparative Constitutional Analysis”","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scrutiny; Political science; Supreme court; Politics; Legal profession; Public law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial review; Legal opinion; Constitutional law; Democracy; Subject (documents); Private law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.13756698281138005,"score_gpt":0.3561090799552209,"score_spread":0.21854209714384085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999706565","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056102898,0.013975181,0.0039599594,0.060246248,0.00035242276,0.00013523646,0.00034272939,0.000057444697,0.8648279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9232261,0.0037350063,0.0014279204,0.009338125,0.00022369497,0.00018639684,0.00018144488,0.000065660475,0.061615642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889416,0.004057694,0.00008951534,0.00056416227,0.0025683122,0.0037788735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99494606,0.0023204144,0.0002166424,0.00029630546,0.0018820575,0.00033847892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058346367,0.0005771734,0.0007528734,0.0056862305,0.036873132,0.014929438,0.0044683823,0.009347064,0.014763295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01178847,0.00043245193,0.0006835561,0.0093036685,0.030948067,0.007254634,0.004078634,0.0059071393,0.0006173198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067718306,0.000011018656,0.00024773908,0.00002395288,0.0000043099253,0.00021627193,0.0058276234,0.00013818678,0.000032090848,0.98066527,0.009955907,0.0028708228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000622104,0.000055002045,0.017448096,0.0012386998,0.0001021053,0.0004344413,0.07236792,0.0036303622,0.0005502799,0.3188733,0.5850574,0.00018023972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97522867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98450536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1457238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1457238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.085202724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007324430","doi":"10.1093/iclq/53.4.833","title":"A NEW ERA IN THE LAW OF INTERNATIONAL CARRIAGE BY AIR: FROM WARSAW (1929) TO MONTREAL (1999)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carriage; Law; Convention; Political science; International law; Unification; Engineering","score_opus":0.019973245383035663,"score_gpt":0.30357748500394194,"score_spread":0.28360423962090625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007324430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028099824,0.17841683,0.006363593,0.12138858,0.0040238136,0.00006720325,0.0006045006,0.00008779043,0.6609478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69454765,0.06945788,0.0039358065,0.024961893,0.0030635132,0.000111125955,0.0002393406,0.00015471334,0.20352814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988599,0.00023912887,0.00003421404,0.00019805356,0.0003591705,0.00030959182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999329,0.00020808521,0.000094732,0.00003917827,0.0001924092,0.00013668404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013022269,0.0007177695,0.0002451221,0.0018324694,0.0069242227,0.008542889,0.001104917,0.0032348882,0.009897148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003342424,0.00049174106,0.00025655743,0.004426646,0.021150643,0.008480494,0.0026991346,0.0047905296,0.0007263667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015849992,0.000016565766,0.00047709997,0.00004461906,0.000004134528,0.00009298533,0.006660875,0.000115972885,0.00014140758,0.92580265,0.048938744,0.017689094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010140659,0.000013018281,0.0033454907,0.00018509,0.0000054026495,0.000048909777,0.0016990905,0.00008055964,0.0001802905,0.0396363,0.95477206,0.00002368901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75847036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7548424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75847036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05160571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019477947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4859041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013364851","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei132","title":"Homing Devices in Choice of Tort Law: Australian, British, and Canadian Approaches","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Choice of law; Tort; Law; Damages; Political science; Common law; Kingdom; Conflict of laws; Liability; Biology","score_opus":0.09087728675211142,"score_gpt":0.3248591918843926,"score_spread":0.23398190513228118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013364851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20117721,0.02200835,0.0026320897,0.03867789,0.0003426777,0.00014959277,0.00023149657,0.00003079605,0.7347499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682129,0.009185757,0.0023673798,0.0036570192,0.00007145801,0.0000609502,0.000055029006,0.000020418038,0.016369104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884538,0.0030806686,0.0003781116,0.0008056386,0.0044871042,0.0027946755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98817074,0.0044246265,0.00057325995,0.00039893616,0.0048501636,0.0015823384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00799025,0.00043127165,0.00075984106,0.0103422385,0.01928788,0.013511484,0.00316166,0.004122784,0.0064111953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018706141,0.0004541265,0.0005498603,0.014137546,0.023148453,0.0041273227,0.0051008877,0.0053064763,0.00025190198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004016371,0.000041353687,0.0046635936,0.00013520099,0.000021365766,0.0003248434,0.046671584,0.000397837,0.0001625565,0.9173459,0.006723874,0.023471734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005445261,0.00009466746,0.08354327,0.0026310063,0.00024107224,0.0008337354,0.15060815,0.0053240117,0.00048606968,0.2545193,0.5011844,0.00047984996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98677886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11466812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11466812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06984794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8319794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037167014","doi":"10.1093/iclq/52.4.969","title":"A Role For Tort In Pre-Contractual Negotiations? An Examination Of English, French, And Canadian Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Plaintiff; Mistake; Law; Tort; Negotiation; Database transaction; Business; Liability; Certainty; Unjust enrichment; Work (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Restitution; Economics","score_opus":0.0275917556304269,"score_gpt":0.30762062844209864,"score_spread":0.28002887281167177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037167014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041046415,0.047362246,0.0029476164,0.072524354,0.00030875765,0.000055082197,0.00016951986,0.000053421212,0.83553255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9112207,0.024292387,0.0022596996,0.011050055,0.00034650162,0.000064131455,0.00009494461,0.000053219243,0.05061831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989262,0.0024900322,0.00018886702,0.0005938914,0.0033455717,0.0041196425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937323,0.0026916496,0.00045297976,0.00030657946,0.0021672333,0.00064922904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006415597,0.000604453,0.0005376206,0.0052471883,0.020966707,0.015865697,0.0030808086,0.006441974,0.008379609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013878859,0.00037256576,0.0008295319,0.0057693124,0.032685135,0.007989786,0.00281176,0.0043354523,0.00058892387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060152474,0.00000533438,0.0003482514,0.000018356188,0.0000015633665,0.000059824637,0.005187046,0.00006655266,0.000019188017,0.98713315,0.0029954442,0.004159419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027095459,0.000033227538,0.019874908,0.0010160216,0.000049381895,0.00044537312,0.025941659,0.0011329678,0.0002117982,0.21518816,0.73596936,0.00011007222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9573371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9446187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10767701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10767701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06956677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78125507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051603156","doi":"10.1017/s0020589313000481","title":"<i>RE FLIGHTLEASE</i>: THE ‘REAL AND SUBSTANTIAL CONNECTION’ TEST FOR RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS FAILS TO TAKE FLIGHT IN IRELAND","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Irish; Law; Enforcement; Political science; Test (biology); Common law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05449964257874465,"score_gpt":0.3126494242527124,"score_spread":0.25814978167396774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051603156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35386223,0.00035260795,0.002408318,0.078442596,0.0008896525,0.00022969168,0.000751442,0.00006821238,0.5629952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739974,0.000089190486,0.0007796921,0.0121792685,0.00013967455,0.00005724502,0.00017126427,0.000028349828,0.012557931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97803324,0.004544307,0.0015930096,0.0031745408,0.00531772,0.0073372247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9669161,0.013561384,0.0027064295,0.003195401,0.009215384,0.004405309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022021161,0.00030339137,0.00092722947,0.002204876,0.008142817,0.009261417,0.0032815635,0.006425393,0.010745513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0820108,0.00046963166,0.0010866609,0.0013466638,0.019475715,0.004415692,0.004932674,0.009949393,0.0012088238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005502242,0.0002882303,0.06549614,0.0001165439,0.00015500063,0.0023772805,0.017829612,0.0009909,0.0011104764,0.77799463,0.115320176,0.017770689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006146448,0.00066638936,0.20029075,0.001539042,0.0005657294,0.0020715594,0.15344174,0.008524366,0.008706334,0.31932014,0.3032092,0.0010502049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40270895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4818674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40270895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013862214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029481385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8007299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065967823","doi":"10.1017/s0020589310000308","title":"INCOHERENT AND INEFFECTIVE: THE CONCEPT OF PERSISTENT OBJECTOR REVISITED","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientious objector; Dissenting opinion; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.022652521544093928,"score_gpt":0.3123902001780045,"score_spread":0.2897376786339106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065967823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10940392,0.013285744,0.15148513,0.07731166,0.0011742867,0.00026410795,0.00013998456,0.0001525445,0.6467827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725126,0.0027406996,0.009301721,0.004890405,0.0009787459,0.00025662247,0.0000446486,0.00014219423,0.009132377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791501,0.011816448,0.0011230888,0.0023328399,0.0037206223,0.0018569336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726907,0.017139789,0.003179461,0.0036214825,0.0023744374,0.0009941768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018048927,0.0008653661,0.0014068319,0.005365993,0.006583288,0.012835834,0.004099094,0.010455594,0.0046482747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029611178,0.0009301091,0.0012918678,0.0036911566,0.111433774,0.039019838,0.009993821,0.013799712,0.0005429643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035494534,0.0000044527887,0.000087421206,0.000013423311,0.0000020263308,0.0000396788,0.0015127315,0.000036302925,0.000023218498,0.9973139,0.00016770573,0.000795581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011489827,0.000014894785,0.00018543127,0.00008773625,0.000007996956,0.00014263984,0.0012876681,0.00044665675,0.00007724465,0.98987377,0.007850895,0.00001359712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024371743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014297816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018048927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075546126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006041821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095452964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091500395","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064162","title":"Lockerbie: The Other Case","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International court; Political science; Economic Justice; Action (physics); Diplomacy; Convention; Civil aviation; International law; Aviation; Public international law; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.042713798681219765,"score_gpt":0.3314521153436676,"score_spread":0.2887383166624478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091500395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08365209,0.005077947,0.00077126327,0.091769025,0.001988039,0.000105046056,0.00024118405,0.000068795554,0.8163267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52398145,0.0030317619,0.000514332,0.08477133,0.0007237448,0.00013971796,0.00019388208,0.00006122861,0.38658255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846447,0.00016607516,0.000034578738,0.00022068313,0.00025652332,0.0008576062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989219,0.0002451066,0.000063274565,0.00008020195,0.00014002297,0.0005495841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009580234,0.00038615766,0.0004532166,0.0016953779,0.012235268,0.003817931,0.0014341677,0.008970355,0.031889323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003906996,0.00022752707,0.00067315873,0.0011353056,0.0033748655,0.001995852,0.00355578,0.008827348,0.003436993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018466334,0.00034754592,0.005896114,0.00020408552,0.00005218464,0.023854338,0.018320935,0.00014344996,0.00096031686,0.57306737,0.33536115,0.04160798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009931522,0.000088844936,0.005687814,0.0005653021,0.000059125494,0.010794248,0.0145265795,0.00025392734,0.00092801126,0.014431008,0.95249116,0.000074638054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07922269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15781853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07922269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037570838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005489431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1575231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091946373","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei083","title":"The Enforcement of Jurisdiction Agreements Within The Brussels Regime","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Damages; Context (archaeology); Enforcement; Political science; Subject (documents); Law; Exclusive jurisdiction; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.026511773848800275,"score_gpt":0.3078520052260265,"score_spread":0.28134023137722625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091946373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5051988,0.0025200371,0.012495852,0.0076809055,0.00022020059,0.000116115654,0.00011028241,0.000064845044,0.47159302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911985,0.00020290914,0.0010624381,0.00023776136,0.000037649064,0.000027980383,0.000016173353,0.0000054795546,0.007211087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97108924,0.012321559,0.0018249269,0.0028615783,0.006199318,0.005703367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684739,0.021676539,0.003854816,0.002428793,0.0026272687,0.0009386881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012157982,0.00023700217,0.00076320174,0.002815412,0.007298403,0.010123485,0.0018561612,0.006234587,0.006223539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037945315,0.0005514496,0.00058109744,0.0022728895,0.01286666,0.0033008438,0.0059132464,0.0048301066,0.0007378848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000900414,0.000061350096,0.0030705128,0.00007305557,0.000042862288,0.0009486168,0.0037566551,0.0037306943,0.0009775052,0.9718062,0.002278445,0.013164112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025234374,0.0004125111,0.023245502,0.0015657184,0.0001877697,0.0016076287,0.0107115,0.018043414,0.0045106737,0.7943259,0.1447889,0.000348167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044432145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04070888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044432145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008377197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008433217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08834702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092981200","doi":"10.1093/iclq/51.2.197","title":"Bills of Rights in Common Law Countries","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Criminal Justice Association","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Common law; Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Fundamental rights; Rest (music); Bill of rights; Human rights; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.058675795301434124,"score_gpt":0.3362403487742775,"score_spread":0.27756455347284337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092981200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012091069,0.0028019124,0.005349775,0.013252836,0.0002547285,0.00009687084,0.00020302377,0.000032710082,0.96591717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80058444,0.00408044,0.009966835,0.011978385,0.00046639165,0.00082255097,0.00061336113,0.000063640815,0.17142396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906825,0.0037368746,0.00046760673,0.001099271,0.0019783287,0.002035424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681145,0.0010284648,0.0003257971,0.0006859983,0.00072963163,0.00041861716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064280657,0.00041001613,0.00054648455,0.003097168,0.010316661,0.011799852,0.0011281193,0.0047823656,0.011607751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011183478,0.0004389757,0.0005549306,0.0038898417,0.018737389,0.0078034378,0.0072056255,0.0051408987,0.0013556483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.370499e-7,8.8648875e-7,0.000021206877,0.0000011136294,3.3735708e-7,0.0000038405215,0.00014384344,0.000024145054,0.0000029643732,0.9977344,0.0015466951,0.00052001764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001655866,0.000011099435,0.0007430981,0.00012761388,0.0000054973443,0.0000451031,0.0007760433,0.0002784725,0.00006066138,0.6781784,0.31973726,0.000020237389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053676635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04304655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053676635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010020266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010630809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106728375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097091195","doi":"10.1093/iclq/54.1.161","title":"Reframing Sovereignty? Sub-State National Societies and Contemporary Challenges to the Nation-State","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; State (computer science); Nationalism; Globalization; Political science; Political economy; National identity; Power (physics); Popular sovereignty; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07831570187393198,"score_gpt":0.3217714511584319,"score_spread":0.24345574928449992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097091195","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13731924,0.043414094,0.004498791,0.4177939,0.0011979678,0.000014226097,0.000032246753,0.00003389191,0.39569572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791915,0.007876788,0.00039410187,0.007276937,0.00047915903,0.00001915706,0.000012993354,0.000012212777,0.0047370833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995826,0.0026699887,0.00008866828,0.00036732023,0.00044658937,0.0006014293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791116,0.0012189179,0.0001818235,0.00022118728,0.00017050498,0.00029649775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004572156,0.0002015292,0.00038500308,0.00084474945,0.010000617,0.01288255,0.0011613363,0.005256634,0.003100789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004922291,0.00019308756,0.00022845506,0.0017924468,0.05753216,0.0125062065,0.007377692,0.007427427,0.00022178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020584503,0.0000054700954,0.0001428756,0.000010758184,9.583991e-7,0.000037692003,0.010822948,0.000076784985,0.000021640424,0.98395705,0.0015303679,0.0033913767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004538565,0.0000122800375,0.00083506125,0.00018097431,0.0000021513786,0.00012805017,0.028070524,0.00032134418,0.00004530787,0.84197736,0.12841018,0.000012231148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010089801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015175332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01288255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008553133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005290749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062057614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098660069","doi":"10.1093/iclq/53.3.579","title":"CANADIAN REFLECTIONS ON THE TOBACCO WARS: SOME UNINTENDED CONSEQUE5NCES OF MASS TORT LITIGATION","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Mass tort; Legislation; Tort; Legislature; Political science; Commonwealth; Law; Tort reform; Unintended consequences; Jurisprudence; Harm; Economic Justice; Action (physics); Law and economics; State (computer science); Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.06344834934063906,"score_gpt":0.2925820214590201,"score_spread":0.22913367211838107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098660069","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013701204,0.03382903,0.0002492268,0.7118541,0.0026116066,0.00003658538,0.00056352175,0.000045043937,0.2371097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40314084,0.061397336,0.0011229127,0.3639295,0.0028275964,0.000052077736,0.00036753408,0.00019990545,0.16696236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884729,0.001452631,0.0003246014,0.0010000449,0.005074113,0.0036757365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897481,0.0034708865,0.00064427074,0.00031983628,0.003916652,0.001900104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008302572,0.0007583354,0.0008366693,0.0042355517,0.042314146,0.021569539,0.004274296,0.01794372,0.02595599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017782954,0.0007789804,0.00092874974,0.009884111,0.0250065,0.009504261,0.0057731476,0.016854092,0.001779273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097306074,0.000041600608,0.0017538661,0.00028919673,0.00002248739,0.00116503,0.032991827,0.00024355177,0.00036895796,0.47621435,0.45332238,0.033489455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025741892,0.000015432524,0.0034132355,0.0003473845,0.000018623223,0.00021303802,0.025342586,0.000087401524,0.00023664355,0.019342957,0.95086616,0.00009080351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98880845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20787138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20787138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18894783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9187569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101812110","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300065416","title":"II. Cases Before the Court","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Convention; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.052205784030164175,"score_gpt":0.33955075206880087,"score_spread":0.2873449680386367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101812110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019427296,0.0030705729,0.0020590515,0.0676516,0.0025621464,0.00025946344,0.0004593491,0.00006383342,0.90444666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38160262,0.0028170154,0.0018108974,0.18784639,0.002555268,0.0006324569,0.00041564333,0.0001017146,0.42221802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932768,0.0007201089,0.00019333887,0.0008788256,0.0018275626,0.0031033608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962567,0.0017666884,0.00032064618,0.00030761783,0.0008103344,0.0005379957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043868264,0.0005138117,0.0005352382,0.0017254896,0.016050821,0.010356973,0.0022789706,0.021277197,0.016615244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016835779,0.00074594613,0.0008983728,0.0016617317,0.0068064234,0.0054029524,0.0044106995,0.015871072,0.0042877784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033910677,0.00004478413,0.0009051692,0.00004921812,0.0000068738714,0.0015861433,0.0025330463,0.00012371712,0.00029059013,0.87918717,0.109545834,0.0056935498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006858796,0.000066092565,0.003275694,0.00064806954,0.000030865496,0.0008057215,0.008329616,0.0004298665,0.0011325051,0.14452355,0.8406187,0.0000707251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08628965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11667263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08628965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070845243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010240301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17157477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104515135","doi":"10.1017/s002058931000045x","title":"PUBLIC HEARINGS AT THE WTO APPELLATE BODY: THE NEXT STEP","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Adjudication; Transparency (behavior); Jurisdiction; Openness to experience; Political science; Law; Authorization; Settlement (finance); Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0701482926053307,"score_gpt":0.30383749535654253,"score_spread":0.23368920275121183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104515135","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018117502,0.004827083,0.05035208,0.6267225,0.0064914874,0.0005377461,0.0005394496,0.0008473026,0.2915649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48327616,0.0032845302,0.04054133,0.21601573,0.005682162,0.0006772306,0.00091261626,0.0006880254,0.24892215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98016524,0.00514063,0.00062702416,0.001487182,0.0071669426,0.005413084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9659317,0.013435684,0.0022140662,0.0044758813,0.008916902,0.0050257267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028119946,0.00046388572,0.000703198,0.0010703212,0.00916708,0.019271966,0.0028906749,0.02663295,0.05109767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052544877,0.0006329221,0.0010262951,0.0009877627,0.006110574,0.019801913,0.007488835,0.015951088,0.017730493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009874292,0.00038950235,0.0010597626,0.00017395926,0.000032184627,0.0006596936,0.0022938414,0.0002790097,0.0022088666,0.4975896,0.41347194,0.08174305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007311102,0.00015577841,0.002703183,0.0006280113,0.000033859284,0.00037418085,0.003936299,0.0008841311,0.0017986032,0.20048988,0.78882587,0.00009719002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010745245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009366918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05109767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003969058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021004904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17093873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118490530","doi":"10.1017/s0020589308000389","title":"THE SCOPE OF THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE OF THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law; United Nations Charter; Relevance (law); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.05235978180989796,"score_gpt":0.3203038501892126,"score_spread":0.2679440683793146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118490530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032061756,0.009147293,0.028705003,0.036627617,0.0017046883,0.00017428029,0.00030876911,0.00006785967,0.89120275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9431696,0.0035782238,0.016172016,0.012404848,0.0019602908,0.0007935548,0.000307456,0.00007190613,0.021542137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816775,0.009685477,0.0010451102,0.0012667113,0.004859027,0.0014661794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97694016,0.016424999,0.0017293916,0.0014035592,0.0029930118,0.0005088382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022712756,0.00039757905,0.0006651005,0.0014727447,0.00460189,0.009047746,0.0017930433,0.0065480713,0.0028934993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032324236,0.000557266,0.00053714094,0.001648669,0.016771134,0.007704625,0.002759136,0.008509284,0.000603192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005721091,0.000005009555,0.00007188833,0.000008802488,8.723768e-7,0.000023602757,0.0005959826,0.00010137193,0.000047446953,0.99527067,0.0020585426,0.0018101262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035823465,0.00004904497,0.0015649904,0.0007508906,0.000012109499,0.000110842164,0.0012410071,0.001116286,0.00042544154,0.8682324,0.1263932,0.00006790595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012343736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008435271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022712756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003755016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009767033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12011796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124063117","doi":"10.1017/s0020589309001213","title":"CLIMATE FINANCE AND ITS GOVERNANCE: MOVING TO A LOW CARBON ECONOMY THROUGH SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FINANCING?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Climate Finance; Corporate governance; Emissions trading; Greenhouse gas; Climate change; Business; Leverage (statistics); Abandonment (legal); Finance; Economic policy; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Developing country","score_opus":0.04384114303078949,"score_gpt":0.2795644619666809,"score_spread":0.2357233189358914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124063117","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14015578,0.006353882,0.025134863,0.5494367,0.0007492678,0.00007126265,0.00007859755,0.000066979934,0.27795267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913919,0.00096200383,0.000793875,0.003657677,0.00024851976,0.000018394216,0.000009061177,0.0000069535495,0.0029115344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719244,0.0016331509,0.00006820921,0.00016274222,0.0003867836,0.0005566678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939709,0.002714961,0.0010923636,0.00039758105,0.0008637353,0.00096054043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005752204,0.00014303123,0.00021682668,0.0006742557,0.0014349758,0.009822846,0.00053034443,0.0036430156,0.004293299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01141079,0.00012281784,0.00018796294,0.0007130122,0.011369746,0.005675667,0.0031838,0.0034925963,0.00023010181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061981987,0.000015944535,0.0011257185,0.0000135084465,0.000002956486,0.000033595163,0.00029774784,0.00081685866,0.000044696117,0.98934186,0.00318123,0.0051196995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012325793,0.000015655796,0.0019860296,0.00013617522,0.0000043154446,0.000025500382,0.00087350555,0.0023194992,0.00015567131,0.96217996,0.032281257,0.000010199631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056272894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005933119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009822846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048136595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008486711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0349257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128490749","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei069","title":"Scrutiny and Approval: The Role for Westminster-Style Parliaments in Treaty-Making","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Human rights; Political science; Law; Scrutiny; Treaty; Ratification; Legitimacy; Convention; Prerogative; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.027142110827273656,"score_gpt":0.3194897343308738,"score_spread":0.29234762350360016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128490749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037487354,0.044764042,0.028501024,0.20350815,0.0044962424,0.00038577354,0.0001047849,0.00031567476,0.68043697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8487936,0.00849025,0.0056056716,0.032755267,0.002136953,0.00041416963,0.000087835244,0.00036692873,0.10134933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8286873,0.116804555,0.007508766,0.010247052,0.023632362,0.013119997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.908074,0.06678565,0.007868203,0.00640017,0.008835288,0.0020366171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.083265096,0.00068269344,0.0010990927,0.0044507687,0.012949885,0.035202343,0.0035347205,0.014907715,0.009270728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15510368,0.0016592655,0.00085840194,0.004831785,0.038009733,0.026459694,0.014314602,0.016642097,0.0029972345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010862962,0.000018133795,0.0005490987,0.00019584144,0.000016915632,0.0002301848,0.021810792,0.00015993521,0.00024566735,0.92107713,0.02588888,0.029698871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107075786,0.00009130909,0.0034675933,0.0013954839,0.00007417899,0.00022570464,0.00752876,0.0007203559,0.0014906354,0.2090043,0.77573633,0.00015822316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033583097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083265096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023885516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020609185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44035316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128619142","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei030","title":"II. Legality Of Use Of Force (Serbia And Montenegro v Belgium) (Serbia And Montenegro v Canada) (Serbia And Montenegro v France) (Serbia And Montenegro v Germany) (Serbia And Montenegro v Italy) (Serbia And Montenegro v Netherlands) (Serbia And Montenegro v Portugal) (Serbia And Montenegro v United Kingdom): Preliminary Objections. Judgment Of 15 December 2004<sup>1</sup>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Montenegro; Jurisdiction; Principle of legality; Law; Political science; Unanimity; Declaration; Geography; Ancient history; History","score_opus":0.039834090621929066,"score_gpt":0.27192626353701577,"score_spread":0.23209217291508671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128619142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03977674,0.01724314,0.0017996384,0.05441207,0.0032226562,0.00021609558,0.001601583,0.00005117734,0.8816768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7599623,0.008912371,0.00251045,0.07547027,0.0024521882,0.00064912287,0.0015056948,0.000082330494,0.14845522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99244785,0.0011997462,0.00048803046,0.000860649,0.0020740356,0.0029296423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99388367,0.0031426528,0.00088561984,0.00038015482,0.0014031084,0.00030469793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053458544,0.00050851214,0.0005571271,0.0029172448,0.0075223553,0.008897837,0.0025322721,0.012452045,0.004683767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010315469,0.0006946913,0.0010272313,0.0022072932,0.010122674,0.002828804,0.002332781,0.0067780055,0.001725446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005380564,0.000037580703,0.0029579801,0.00014107562,0.000021313417,0.00069828914,0.005058165,0.00014114048,0.00041592075,0.90324414,0.075406395,0.011824279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066276225,0.00010830616,0.03963454,0.0017071977,0.00008191259,0.0010162306,0.0091033615,0.00046243626,0.0014931584,0.08131619,0.8649081,0.00010228241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15781437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1770081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8421856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069571803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009433419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31379163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130785796","doi":"10.1093/iclq/51.1.17","title":"Judicial Review in ec Law—Some Reflections on the Origins and the Actual Legal Situation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Element (criminal law); Convention; Quarter (Canadian coin); Action (physics); Disadvantage; Order (exchange); Judicial review; Human rights; History; Business","score_opus":0.11902884684881505,"score_gpt":0.37067747424216346,"score_spread":0.2516486273933484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130785796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014689687,0.14108133,0.0081555955,0.41136745,0.0037136013,0.0000656007,0.00006182607,0.00004222159,0.42082268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7412704,0.11793868,0.0057250536,0.074288316,0.014319303,0.00017760693,0.00007336438,0.00014322136,0.046064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749185,0.014013468,0.0012903288,0.0018609144,0.0050026095,0.0029141612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635628,0.025805917,0.0016585472,0.0017554575,0.006277686,0.00093971874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025029661,0.00028820746,0.0006051435,0.0028261878,0.007900423,0.03129737,0.0029691898,0.016499052,0.003649914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040528543,0.0007154142,0.00061560737,0.0048717037,0.04659538,0.016427439,0.003462981,0.013366407,0.0005555787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031380878,0.000006832429,0.000081382335,0.000030118386,0.0000012895954,0.00009186855,0.0013547906,0.000084893654,0.000019956748,0.9876308,0.0066967295,0.0039982316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022305347,0.000026958114,0.0016345694,0.0010025335,0.000006022039,0.00039480432,0.0040873764,0.0006969867,0.00025626685,0.4683395,0.5234677,0.00006494883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048294555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04002653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048294555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022338884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015352599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1620807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132611068","doi":"10.1017/s0020589310000680","title":"JUDICIAL SCRUTINY OF MERGER DECISIONS IN THE EU, UK AND GERMANY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Academic Association for Contemporary European Studies","keywords":"Scrutiny; Context (archaeology); Discretion; Judicial review; Political science; Standard of review; Agency (philosophy); Judicial discretion; Credibility; Law; Relevance (law); Law and economics; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.11478234541187002,"score_gpt":0.34348303404688096,"score_spread":0.22870068863501095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132611068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9678142,0.004134683,0.0005186309,0.0031044686,0.00005031518,0.000029152005,0.00009320113,0.000007432836,0.024247898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855345,0.0003798376,0.000095569005,0.00034918575,0.000020181133,0.0000038483026,0.000026590136,0.0000015608362,0.000569651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98361117,0.0066570984,0.0013391564,0.0015303597,0.0035486668,0.0033135558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94846,0.03414081,0.009535842,0.0013623498,0.0056085647,0.0008924825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013140074,0.00015653245,0.0005919839,0.0046788547,0.0024519584,0.005375448,0.00076310686,0.0029656715,0.0015013067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04940756,0.00024257258,0.00036856593,0.0039538257,0.003926352,0.0018983353,0.0025271405,0.0013000254,0.00016673193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018796711,0.00037077023,0.30916706,0.0014270302,0.0010543723,0.01884703,0.07528911,0.011744859,0.01792251,0.40869457,0.023262985,0.13034004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016928533,0.000502906,0.79638255,0.001594076,0.0007453763,0.0030023174,0.03999746,0.007154156,0.017302698,0.03443208,0.09831146,0.00040558542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036034048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05310365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036034048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006897976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029623203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0716486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137015572","doi":"10.1017/s0020589313000158","title":"COHABITANTS IN PRIVATE LAW: TRUST, FRUSTRATION AND UNJUST ENRICHMENT IN ENGLAND, GERMANY AND CANADA","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Appeal; Law; Political science; Autonomy; Legislature; German; Common law; Private law; Comparative law; Geography","score_opus":0.021783605680763075,"score_gpt":0.28599774731631056,"score_spread":0.26421414163554746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137015572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88882166,0.0030879213,0.0003480341,0.031729303,0.00015306397,0.000080752034,0.00020457199,0.000018117118,0.0755566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901286,0.0006059467,0.00007963633,0.0022829294,0.000009612934,0.000011643627,0.00003414044,0.000007930508,0.0068395752],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98851854,0.0016538567,0.00027914037,0.00079142203,0.0030136437,0.0057433383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873553,0.0041831015,0.00095636107,0.0004429274,0.002812713,0.0042496244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00555537,0.00023062126,0.00061968894,0.0019834237,0.03502003,0.00986684,0.0026738462,0.0042138067,0.0069688265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01599663,0.0004090093,0.00029348614,0.0035160666,0.021290824,0.002691512,0.0054311194,0.005577687,0.00027580847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021759921,0.0002712372,0.060813114,0.00022890104,0.00007529565,0.0051944335,0.44938973,0.00067834655,0.000999514,0.39153558,0.04753648,0.043059774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066360764,0.000056608704,0.10826244,0.0006599978,0.000063545536,0.0007332907,0.66141534,0.0011010548,0.00073788775,0.012205537,0.21446316,0.00023478326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9932336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13484344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13484344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11913405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9783622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138983123","doi":"10.1093/iclq/52.4.1074","title":"Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by Robert J Sharpe, Katherine E Swinton, and Roach Kent, 2nd edn. Toronto: twin Law Inc, 2002. ISBN 1-55221-063-4 Pbk, Np.]","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02046895009650561,"score_gpt":0.28996619938722806,"score_spread":0.26949724929072244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138983123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013861913,0.4389354,0.004849444,0.0699833,0.015606141,0.00052952964,0.028143909,0.0005660282,0.44000006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029217215,0.28832364,0.011874904,0.0068758507,0.0023562133,0.00030439964,0.011885579,0.00058238057,0.64857984],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729794,0.00018282738,0.00014996705,0.00025473256,0.0018172347,0.00029742395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973266,0.00024353807,0.00019079934,0.0001342724,0.0017574914,0.0003473182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026674124,0.0020849502,0.001195122,0.009788368,0.0076458273,0.006796953,0.0025615676,0.0029921632,0.036975313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004392843,0.0014986892,0.0005989641,0.017153412,0.0054365313,0.004581506,0.0016585055,0.0045750304,0.008973017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061101778,0.00000444449,0.00010868325,0.00008118192,0.0000029763635,0.000019255933,0.00024478583,0.000074275034,0.000025661495,0.025728358,0.95402247,0.01968174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033163444,0.0000024222063,0.0015699604,0.00021736594,0.0000034157642,0.00003877301,0.00023287049,0.000043471697,0.00003435013,0.0031131557,0.99472237,0.00001848742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9611212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98480725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057332646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057332646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.091301486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41597944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162354815","doi":"10.1017/s0020589300064186","title":"The Kosovo Crisis and Nato's Application of Armed Force Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Novelis (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Offensive; Political science; Jus ad bellum; Law; Serbian; State (computer science); The Republic; International law; Use of force; International court; Member states; Economic Justice; Sovereignty; Economic history; Public international law; European union; International trade; Engineering; Operations research; History; Politics; Theology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01960039896708949,"score_gpt":0.30214555114826236,"score_spread":0.2825451521811729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162354815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8724933,0.009635342,0.00016339633,0.025231805,0.00027498303,0.000029605977,0.00020362207,0.000010287352,0.09195757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99447304,0.00079789344,0.000027353977,0.0017834168,0.000019477342,0.000009070642,0.00005474368,0.0000038139967,0.002831141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913687,0.000183132,0.000028590604,0.000052022067,0.00006656364,0.0005328904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956983,0.000091365626,0.00014565595,0.000023217019,0.000059638664,0.00011028778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010162015,0.00015853748,0.00025420875,0.00061988685,0.006483605,0.0043174853,0.00048248807,0.0016553932,0.0012586046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020404856,0.00016627375,0.00016150206,0.00081716385,0.006051688,0.0012789591,0.005973395,0.0026479242,0.000100078316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075793517,0.00014244766,0.16641462,0.000277341,0.00014635109,0.0065474673,0.14332427,0.0020001791,0.0029695767,0.5957599,0.042238265,0.03942148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000810342,0.00008223985,0.4903499,0.0006550048,0.000045085555,0.0007394002,0.10618909,0.00067448727,0.0008750559,0.027077146,0.37312692,0.00010464387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32067087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4221548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32067087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010992644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009649666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6376087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167094518","doi":"10.1017/s0020589309001201","title":"ARTICLE 23 OF THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION: A COMPREHENSIVE CODE FOR JURISDICTION AGREEMENTS?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Jurisdiction; Code (set theory); Relation (database); Law and economics; Exclusive jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Programming language; Data mining","score_opus":0.052260574153025874,"score_gpt":0.3436548449102697,"score_spread":0.29139427075724383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167094518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07730599,0.0046572946,0.045037568,0.0841436,0.0029825964,0.00059153116,0.0006972639,0.00040278144,0.7841813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8959472,0.0011581857,0.022279337,0.02554081,0.00095103175,0.00093602313,0.00027910597,0.00010936088,0.052798934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98125964,0.005676685,0.0020838762,0.0015378857,0.0061032115,0.0033386804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812246,0.011097924,0.0021027918,0.0015906094,0.0031913926,0.0007926715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012154175,0.00037844066,0.0009498251,0.0017179742,0.0058877603,0.011791604,0.0019233869,0.010501268,0.0054143006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02868024,0.00067152927,0.0009326409,0.0016019423,0.01330119,0.0032958009,0.0037446537,0.0070677195,0.0013225129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017723996,0.000016899505,0.00037797022,0.00003425048,0.000006201378,0.00012436963,0.0013761724,0.00036675573,0.00033703094,0.9800214,0.013607844,0.0037133435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012784459,0.00016984403,0.006617049,0.0015475474,0.000075703596,0.00052733655,0.0036452126,0.002538948,0.002809171,0.5587339,0.42289326,0.00031427023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034575623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034561444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034575623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00824533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020420475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06874871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167845946","doi":"10.1017/s0020589313000353","title":"DIGGING DEEP: PROPERTY RIGHTS IN SUBTERRANEAN SPACE AND THE CHALLENGE OF CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Context (archaeology); Carbon capture and storage (timeline); Digging; Space (punctuation); Climate change mitigation; Property rights; Caking; Climate change; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Natural resource economics; Geography; Sociology; Archaeology; Economics; Geology; Computer science","score_opus":0.019402742261709852,"score_gpt":0.23761181302733617,"score_spread":0.21820907076562632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167845946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28307626,0.004458916,0.01555629,0.0752222,0.00026612607,0.000031055348,0.000115649236,0.000027463,0.62124604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867003,0.00067848543,0.00060428213,0.0012023667,0.000092642666,0.000016807104,0.000012007749,0.000008679621,0.010684494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979394,0.0007612639,0.000056476398,0.00024343128,0.0003924178,0.00060687633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665326,0.0019521328,0.0002928622,0.00036379267,0.00045834237,0.00027965478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033284905,0.00018277606,0.00034721007,0.0011077446,0.0054080645,0.00939805,0.0011917226,0.0050074775,0.007874002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049755936,0.0002140567,0.00040676226,0.0011396512,0.03174406,0.008716459,0.0061745015,0.003965418,0.00037868644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007922856,0.000007116558,0.00025636549,0.000006536914,0.0000014394658,0.00010289145,0.0012220423,0.00036933864,0.00017203654,0.9947232,0.0007736316,0.0023575472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012001456,0.000024897707,0.0013380244,0.00014232258,0.000007218216,0.00012287404,0.006601991,0.001336141,0.00043785336,0.92653847,0.06341579,0.000022447837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030132059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035972975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030132059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004541848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042524524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059913337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256235904","doi":"10.1017/s0020589315000275","title":"FOREIGN FADS OR FASHIONS? THE ROLE OF COMPARATIVISM IN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Dignity; Political science; Comparative law; Law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; International human rights law; Common law; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.09201827566361949,"score_gpt":0.3557104540449946,"score_spread":0.2636921783813751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256235904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1506112,0.0075416267,0.037400715,0.09066108,0.000675212,0.000071295144,0.000069620815,0.000092508504,0.7128768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930956,0.00043625123,0.0016897875,0.0016613138,0.00013042943,0.000029888794,0.000010387436,0.000019029045,0.0029273734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.969022,0.024850596,0.00047112608,0.002111908,0.0017951387,0.0017493811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686771,0.024042588,0.0017251094,0.0032307915,0.0014251249,0.0008993394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034398295,0.00030133573,0.00080346706,0.0026009046,0.00758222,0.015863955,0.0020160165,0.0046926048,0.0070641395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033438075,0.00035360391,0.00068414264,0.0019860258,0.07768215,0.025032235,0.010124843,0.004901336,0.0003764132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058566516,0.0000036490117,0.000099575554,0.0000087347025,0.0000020500222,0.000016194266,0.0021832094,0.000042744938,0.000012274365,0.99615186,0.00024031133,0.0012335328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012794963,0.000019667377,0.00027479627,0.000098285695,0.000007342332,0.000037717542,0.005695538,0.000268636,0.00010504529,0.97607386,0.017397808,0.00000851922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003614088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002669726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034398295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007872386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003955441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18191779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294835859","doi":"10.1017/s0020589314000608","title":"Transparency in International Law, edited by Andrea Bianchi and Anne Peters [Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013, 642pp, ISBN 978-1-107-02138-9, £90.00 (h/bk)]","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"King's University College","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.01632909760284116,"score_gpt":0.21802757934562464,"score_spread":0.2016984817427835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294835859","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00050983176,0.8618589,0.002883642,0.03768631,0.0055849673,0.000020268288,0.00036667284,0.00017028241,0.090919204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032972712,0.84115094,0.0052673374,0.0068776323,0.010070915,0.00011382962,0.0005961601,0.00039172635,0.10255874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987539,0.00037372825,0.000096912634,0.00015140549,0.00050502684,0.00011898696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982672,0.00097595726,0.0002222691,0.00013404037,0.00029563348,0.00010487931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020190964,0.0014498382,0.0012793142,0.0034955568,0.0017676415,0.0074949823,0.0010065731,0.0032943133,0.022158906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00490697,0.0013868298,0.0006871609,0.0065083196,0.0037251103,0.008656163,0.0018692049,0.005113569,0.0080608055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022901493,0.000017253995,0.00014490292,0.0005837886,0.000014402593,0.000072724244,0.00077806984,0.0003593635,0.00016238034,0.10995467,0.7946049,0.09328464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009512722,0.00000857044,0.0011297202,0.0014951539,0.000009274263,0.00021057519,0.00032150908,0.00028416468,0.00009445073,0.074086905,0.9223289,0.000021235399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013693123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020480001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022158906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046321405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005586843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074128866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2533991149","doi":"10.1017/s0020589316000373","title":"LEGAL TRANSFERS OF RESTRICTIVE IMMIGRATION LAWS: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Parallels; Immigration policy; Immigration law; Race (biology); Limiting; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Refugee; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Economics; Gender studies; Engineering","score_opus":0.02869526770183347,"score_gpt":0.3109104977525129,"score_spread":0.28221523005067944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2533991149","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22660844,0.01927036,0.008100986,0.02934084,0.00066096627,0.00007247745,0.00014377947,0.000040211373,0.71576196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9704906,0.009371606,0.000869102,0.0014555913,0.00039015542,0.000042234708,0.00004102126,0.000022126651,0.017317576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980165,0.0009042206,0.00007781547,0.0002740751,0.0003047064,0.00042266407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976495,0.0014035413,0.00032112538,0.00016246333,0.0003438112,0.00011963118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030019146,0.00023317033,0.00020703963,0.0027998046,0.008493528,0.0053761774,0.000992155,0.0029756054,0.0048678494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060438346,0.00030339253,0.00014672661,0.0023101026,0.024104742,0.0059005152,0.0032639818,0.005291916,0.0002735834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006770842,0.000022642364,0.0007881522,0.000039898114,0.0000019475567,0.00035561074,0.033788648,0.00017067564,0.00009741791,0.9532457,0.0012554488,0.0102272555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017375987,0.0001096802,0.011558986,0.0017930161,0.000017759097,0.0017997368,0.06805671,0.001296083,0.0011890974,0.17321205,0.7408706,0.00007889805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03421952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031669617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03421952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011946376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040762057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08667743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555203996","doi":"10.1017/s0020589316000397","title":"THE WORKING METHODS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL: MAINTAINING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CHANGE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Accountability; Security council; Political science; Public administration; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Public relations; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.17607311396929334,"score_gpt":0.4253756158066775,"score_spread":0.24930250183738414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555203996","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05031843,0.0054371697,0.16543636,0.5004177,0.0039317505,0.001086299,0.00008472098,0.0005986648,0.27268896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.903139,0.0013187884,0.070418715,0.01224289,0.0004418431,0.0012130268,0.000053902193,0.0001910895,0.0109807905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6878389,0.26213178,0.008102426,0.005998207,0.030280448,0.005648314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73914915,0.16122822,0.014550457,0.03793122,0.03547176,0.011669285],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.24112445,0.0006418457,0.00057245546,0.00478469,0.015651494,0.025045643,0.0037876195,0.008631561,0.0033776043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24582814,0.00073350297,0.00056739245,0.0034985526,0.061959583,0.01972952,0.017767712,0.01103268,0.00061185064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023121615,0.00010511018,0.0029128254,0.00019676496,0.0000183528,0.00018033468,0.08544179,0.00078352384,0.0002857673,0.80055565,0.023519348,0.085977465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043986736,0.00013256243,0.0040908563,0.0031163443,0.00002392293,0.00018282332,0.07430167,0.0029744871,0.00099472,0.42152908,0.49246803,0.00014145205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01697509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011128837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24112445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022395903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06399602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9358287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590322391","doi":"10.1017/s0020589317000021","title":"TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY BANISHMENT: CITIZENSHIP STRIPPING IN COMMON LAW NATIONS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Law; Political science; Revocation; Common law; Stripping (fiber); Sociology; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.054645302665129465,"score_gpt":0.34068087475087,"score_spread":0.28603557208574054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590322391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4702713,0.0019168749,0.0031645198,0.021844434,0.0003335233,0.00006895204,0.00005199484,0.00004087767,0.50230753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96950936,0.00028182685,0.00029702563,0.0026066552,0.000033215347,0.000017377235,0.000012497032,0.000011417091,0.027230613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586135,0.0013624744,0.0001318582,0.00045938187,0.0008152518,0.00136975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99471563,0.0022812504,0.0005526468,0.00077984843,0.0011282723,0.00054228137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006671917,0.000145031,0.00031317066,0.000987297,0.013070151,0.0053267074,0.0011540102,0.0041574556,0.004655269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008522851,0.0002504741,0.00030396983,0.0009213937,0.029681029,0.0033835776,0.005094559,0.0070194756,0.0002140885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023847777,0.0000398905,0.0017988206,0.000030913692,0.000005261578,0.00034039308,0.05429145,0.00015566684,0.00035219148,0.92847866,0.0044547846,0.010028194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043741766,0.00013667994,0.031150326,0.00056197075,0.000037040194,0.00041687547,0.0771512,0.0012661417,0.0030770942,0.12819894,0.7578009,0.00015901394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34966522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4744441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34966522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018283928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012857906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6952599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606851650","doi":"10.1017/s0020589317000161","title":"JAPANESE APPROACHES TO EXTRATERRITORIALITY IN COMPETITION LAW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Economic Zones and Regional Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Royal Irish Academy; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Extraterritoriality; Competition law; Competition (biology); Context (archaeology); Commission; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; International trade; Economics; Jurisdiction; Market economy; Geography","score_opus":0.2585119866204537,"score_gpt":0.27620314277997227,"score_spread":0.01769115615951855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606851650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22254553,0.010718071,0.03906784,0.028502557,0.00045249044,0.000060747807,0.00007157192,0.000065887376,0.6985153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812843,0.0015513604,0.0029145044,0.0019062279,0.00016514293,0.000028764123,0.000014362673,0.000013062406,0.012122218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963381,0.001441781,0.0002841135,0.0006655077,0.00074412377,0.0005264167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954476,0.0015357039,0.00088981027,0.00060413196,0.0011873763,0.00033548372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004294906,0.000285482,0.00032330918,0.0019536614,0.0029905704,0.0052333926,0.0008870457,0.0025841468,0.003911192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00461071,0.00026868796,0.0004675624,0.0022243615,0.011705343,0.0038278531,0.003767437,0.0031531833,0.00027658106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008522963,0.000013000492,0.0008401201,0.000043900814,0.0000072887424,0.00020253063,0.0031039922,0.0004332553,0.00032054735,0.9887289,0.001146586,0.0051514637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035236953,0.00013240078,0.013171774,0.00037103263,0.000110534296,0.00076836685,0.007328372,0.005832428,0.0014327513,0.7464134,0.22428948,0.00011422655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01472943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02015022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01472943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064457385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032936807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046767294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767604562","doi":"10.1017/s0020589317000458","title":"SELF-DEFENCE AGAINST NON-STATE ACTORS: ARE POWERFUL STATES WILLING BUT UNABLE TO CHANGE INTERNATIONAL LAW?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); International law; Customary international law; Law; Politics; Self defense; Law and economics; Public international law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05123218250217359,"score_gpt":0.3325977371017578,"score_spread":0.2813655545995842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767604562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22454436,0.0011509402,0.017461203,0.098141514,0.00035908757,0.00004652918,0.000039269744,0.000060279424,0.65819675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920373,0.00014787499,0.0005596661,0.0034598613,0.000047820085,0.000018725419,0.000008111699,0.000010036184,0.0037106825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949543,0.002694019,0.0001755243,0.0007153876,0.0006276231,0.000833099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98976725,0.005624956,0.0011274733,0.0015558419,0.0011085473,0.00081598497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010448679,0.00017588102,0.00038294247,0.0008809751,0.00405757,0.008933943,0.0010054762,0.004190531,0.005501784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014205769,0.00021213864,0.00033658728,0.000717339,0.044366248,0.008766959,0.0064843427,0.006865341,0.000548197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009234616,0.000013128242,0.0012642712,0.000016211447,0.000004809809,0.00006594263,0.0074588843,0.00008274562,0.00014343539,0.98492175,0.0016539539,0.0043656393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001612092,0.000047205398,0.0042483807,0.00030252006,0.000022800756,0.00016747341,0.023293829,0.0008951717,0.00076574844,0.8984723,0.071726084,0.00004229895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024462373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031054723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010448679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019334401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001842042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055258572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782410272","doi":"10.1017/s0020589317000537","title":"SHELTERING GOVERNMENT SUPPORT TO ‘GREEN’ ELECTRICITY: THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; European union; Government (linguistics); Politics; International trade; Renewable energy; Energy subsidies; Business; Parallels; Economics; Public economics; Energy policy; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.018433364126074894,"score_gpt":0.2725625140534778,"score_spread":0.25412914992740293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782410272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16174568,0.035491657,0.0024545717,0.23732255,0.0010822377,0.000017798646,0.00009445946,0.000021833015,0.5617693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718311,0.0048400215,0.00054719084,0.016759848,0.0002941537,0.000015668273,0.000023526609,0.000009219781,0.005679208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949425,0.0027137222,0.00018940959,0.00043183428,0.0008555123,0.00086700544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99278706,0.0047285925,0.001025551,0.00034896773,0.0005987922,0.000511008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007899787,0.00016786982,0.000365006,0.001253744,0.002605935,0.013860082,0.00094616885,0.0100804465,0.0036525438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106879985,0.00014958045,0.0003658278,0.0020003992,0.011787577,0.0050232084,0.0033889571,0.0038389496,0.00019369514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002391494,0.000014618602,0.00096990005,0.000024165709,0.000007689597,0.00011167889,0.0009153822,0.00032988316,0.000047444428,0.9875745,0.0037913867,0.0061894488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004437508,0.00006232142,0.016623795,0.002293836,0.00005053324,0.0002072321,0.012055538,0.0015090842,0.00048636962,0.6870261,0.27956456,0.00007625592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009760989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012491917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013860082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048142835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048807436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041778564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801151102","doi":"10.1093/iclq/52.3.802","title":"V. Cases Before the Court","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.042222435399085365,"score_gpt":0.33279588842687097,"score_spread":0.2905734530277856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801151102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027657293,0.0022282654,0.0023288927,0.050686218,0.0013946409,0.00020245879,0.000379175,0.0001084419,0.9150145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4557051,0.0017140745,0.0014499751,0.14521158,0.0015011206,0.00033721176,0.00025549877,0.000107910695,0.39371756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99379927,0.0008772509,0.00018316682,0.0007329048,0.0017073,0.0027000855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995946,0.0017661307,0.00029691227,0.00036852335,0.001173079,0.0004492707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004370668,0.0004910385,0.00046305577,0.0012835286,0.014716607,0.008759152,0.0018571307,0.016451677,0.014910649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017237833,0.0006695617,0.0007766803,0.0013869988,0.004820444,0.0034686446,0.002928171,0.01236637,0.0027120602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004085245,0.000030371675,0.0012044465,0.000033714186,0.000012653024,0.001328214,0.0020602134,0.00014675323,0.00048247885,0.8677861,0.119904056,0.006970173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010353895,0.000059691603,0.003940719,0.00033321066,0.000048606886,0.0007400961,0.0033295657,0.0005885446,0.0012907746,0.11949981,0.86999017,0.000075279364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19565217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27492294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19565217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008856852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01467666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3890267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991665903","doi":"10.1017/s0020589319000447","title":"RECONCEPTUALISING THE LEGAL RESPONSE TO FOREIGN FIGHTERS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Neutrality; Terrorism; State (computer science); Law; Security council; Foreign policy; Phenomenon; International law; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.039695336884428514,"score_gpt":0.33798990198459705,"score_spread":0.29829456510016855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991665903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10777623,0.0026130534,0.02850991,0.1874117,0.0021265033,0.00025007527,0.000069657435,0.0001535456,0.67108935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678624,0.0005854567,0.0042721825,0.010302247,0.00043782327,0.00012863084,0.000029422796,0.00005293594,0.016328806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97262865,0.017369406,0.0012261225,0.001738369,0.0037804132,0.0032569687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97455966,0.015478919,0.0018286249,0.002067392,0.0048498046,0.0012156467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028544424,0.00033364657,0.0004960584,0.0034973193,0.009064485,0.01418307,0.0036290023,0.0125214625,0.0069802096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0442271,0.00037159436,0.0005166651,0.0015546276,0.041553125,0.008020078,0.01094941,0.0077035706,0.00068771583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048996862,0.000017582699,0.00030501166,0.000026805046,0.0000024116766,0.00011845228,0.016555212,0.00019763739,0.000109751534,0.9747877,0.003111987,0.0047625774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004467892,0.000081289305,0.0025952514,0.0010583531,0.000027392565,0.00031067326,0.088771746,0.003040553,0.0010213125,0.5544909,0.34846842,0.00008936256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017923446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01794077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028544424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013953401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021846494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15095913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993230620","doi":"10.1017/s0020589319000459","title":"THE DUTY TO COOPERATE IN THE CUSTOMARY LAW OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Obligation; Harm; International law; Political science; Notice; Law; Environmental law; Duty to protect; Customary international law; Normative; International court; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Public international law; Sociology","score_opus":0.016441861996019394,"score_gpt":0.27228434745206975,"score_spread":0.2558424854560504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993230620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024063371,0.0031991086,0.07867908,0.08778512,0.001903428,0.00025147604,0.00021203487,0.00023008727,0.80367625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88027304,0.0016189753,0.021374874,0.05086119,0.0018221239,0.0006769911,0.00012961675,0.00020546651,0.043037698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9418203,0.01690681,0.006784485,0.008515232,0.020866573,0.005106613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9492204,0.030216927,0.0026259688,0.008565225,0.007945219,0.0014262162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055740025,0.00067841733,0.0016409375,0.0019054471,0.0112716155,0.021200549,0.004968936,0.023925293,0.0046095503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049133748,0.001522837,0.0017660495,0.0019168961,0.057455074,0.013525563,0.0130154425,0.029357048,0.0011113712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026011842,0.000010402039,0.00008704447,0.000009420547,0.0000030161923,0.000038705028,0.00062920194,0.0001257311,0.000056472367,0.9964275,0.0017213846,0.0008885219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003060627,0.000035320983,0.00052280474,0.0003395884,0.00003409616,0.00019218188,0.0006361975,0.0012832675,0.0003502946,0.90887815,0.08759919,0.00009835245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024685252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020551765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055740025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008826247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02158832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29478496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016639784","doi":"10.1017/s0020589320000093","title":"PASSPORTS, THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL, AND NATIONAL SECURITY IN THE COMMONWEALTH","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prerogative; Commonwealth; Statutory law; Political science; Law; Denial; National security; Politics","score_opus":0.0784037260624742,"score_gpt":0.345930562693594,"score_spread":0.2675268366311198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016639784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16256244,0.005214932,0.003797549,0.042964682,0.00023609027,0.000034699995,0.00009420722,0.000015483318,0.78507984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798432,0.0011500762,0.00031387823,0.00090588,0.000052269308,0.0000151583645,0.000014060246,0.0000050942995,0.017700363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972063,0.0011602348,0.00012990524,0.0002117368,0.00055800646,0.00073383405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968003,0.0014939453,0.00045977996,0.00026184207,0.00046408654,0.0005200518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023859048,0.0001378288,0.00030546074,0.0014568501,0.0054465956,0.008435734,0.0007287453,0.0027902075,0.00788024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053371014,0.00024178195,0.0002739927,0.0016984823,0.036473308,0.0052560433,0.007374669,0.003052343,0.00022329688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032902844,0.0000061868413,0.0007508523,0.000007726335,0.0000018605574,0.000081387385,0.003769198,0.00009383528,0.00002381391,0.9927632,0.00077230355,0.0017262794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017803219,0.000036395748,0.01404697,0.0005618235,0.00002509141,0.0003771169,0.03223312,0.0007076258,0.00020353304,0.7235538,0.22817585,0.000060954895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24214657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29927716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24214657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009512933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011470749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48147422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3040093363","doi":"10.1017/s0020589320000123","title":"THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND THE RIGHT TO LIFE","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Human rights; Political science; Law; Right to life; Quarter (Canadian coin); Environmental law; Consolidation (business); Geography; Business","score_opus":0.02962111536867059,"score_gpt":0.2888174152393788,"score_spread":0.25919629987070825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040093363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01074234,0.02398471,0.0023062907,0.3902165,0.004063411,0.00015824728,0.00020759377,0.000053475705,0.5682675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.550599,0.011281556,0.0034801892,0.20624448,0.003131358,0.00044094687,0.0002136159,0.00012191316,0.22448693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98879623,0.0045612287,0.000526237,0.001692473,0.0026433696,0.0017805926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913634,0.0048495354,0.0006455284,0.00057662453,0.0017771715,0.0007877191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009004169,0.0004153797,0.0004983378,0.0010918773,0.009760887,0.012745098,0.0018260578,0.018536698,0.008392524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016200949,0.00039788315,0.0004267844,0.0014034436,0.021705104,0.0046128416,0.0044098916,0.0140599515,0.0011897201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014225059,0.000014120146,0.00041112138,0.000063267864,0.0000052697765,0.0001701404,0.0020674386,0.00015608195,0.000252238,0.9061046,0.08387225,0.006869159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024027486,0.000032008415,0.002651145,0.0007162256,0.000015618085,0.00013346942,0.0026266482,0.00022123224,0.00042090862,0.09019717,0.9028963,0.00006527064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2676474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2258325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2676474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017593762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03108762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.532179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092409353","doi":"10.1017/s0020589320000354","title":"FOREIGN INVESTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES AND CONTRIBUTORY FAULT IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Treaty; Compensation (psychology); Consistency (knowledge bases); Fault (geology); Investment (military); Business; Foreign direct investment; Investment arbitration; Law and economics; International arbitration; Law; International investment; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Psychology; Seismology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04795132605533763,"score_gpt":0.25502624699687193,"score_spread":0.2070749209415343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092409353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3852885,0.0033902014,0.025879597,0.026427906,0.00094074913,0.00011447071,0.00002819166,0.00007119961,0.5578592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936487,0.00022783136,0.0004736932,0.00073477527,0.00009401254,0.000015535585,0.00000409861,0.000006464539,0.004794847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839288,0.008029725,0.0011564343,0.0010337176,0.0032506285,0.0026006727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96914715,0.020124549,0.0036203482,0.0023375973,0.0037218295,0.001048435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025744144,0.00037762368,0.00047801354,0.0024328562,0.0062483256,0.011036093,0.0013751226,0.005425639,0.0035914911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052035555,0.000354348,0.00048124196,0.0014484415,0.0139194,0.0069783097,0.006358718,0.006432529,0.00030613213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029306022,0.000022577322,0.0034804551,0.000025741801,0.000009863498,0.0006547166,0.007393453,0.0007698635,0.00018122737,0.9778416,0.0015061778,0.008084876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101632126,0.00013901443,0.013327593,0.00095416524,0.00010652093,0.0022634186,0.023265978,0.0068602874,0.0027402246,0.85502493,0.09508565,0.00013050446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054549244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044343397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025744144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051812236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006316265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13614964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118708210","doi":"10.1017/s0020589320000512","title":"Negotiated Settlements in Bribery Cases: A Principled Approach, edited by Tina Søreide and Abiola Makinwa [Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2020, 384pp, ISBN 978-1-78897-040-2, £110 (h/bk)]","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human settlement; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.035369531403028225,"score_gpt":0.3063289879147936,"score_spread":0.2709594565117654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118708210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008209534,0.26240027,0.027386699,0.09568902,0.0030349593,0.00032388803,0.00019648905,0.000106732296,0.60265243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5779575,0.21370545,0.024040727,0.0085019935,0.0042284206,0.0014766114,0.0004900481,0.00028075205,0.16931851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885838,0.008096809,0.0004005085,0.0005651696,0.0015172542,0.0008363554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945815,0.003907581,0.0005492631,0.0003388039,0.00036440603,0.00025829577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008941111,0.0010080852,0.0015053835,0.0032010954,0.0067619546,0.01995625,0.004722222,0.009059235,0.014710764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013765172,0.0016397724,0.00092176953,0.0056657614,0.031748347,0.020111144,0.009470443,0.009221059,0.002187525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001016631,0.000047314243,0.00012052551,0.00026354834,0.0000089390605,0.00009083291,0.0065761977,0.0007360154,0.00003351024,0.9167368,0.050634757,0.024741463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002322872,0.00001689102,0.00080752687,0.0028685231,0.000011382916,0.00022024909,0.011519221,0.00085948734,0.00008178943,0.6504687,0.33308408,0.00003888454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0087400945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013874174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01995625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012131016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011541464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088017106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124660054","doi":"10.1017/s002058931100042x","title":"INTERNATIONALISATION AND CONSTITUTIONAL BORROWING IN DRAFTING BILLS OF RIGHTS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre for Engineering Research and Development; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Indigenous; Internationalization; Context (archaeology); Political science; Key (lock); Northern ireland; Indigenous rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Focus (optics); Law; Public administration; Sociology; Business; International trade; Geography; Computer science; Ethnology","score_opus":0.08964935228637383,"score_gpt":0.32107300415363627,"score_spread":0.23142365186726244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124660054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30177835,0.0014998858,0.025772775,0.011485276,0.00013079192,0.00019443476,0.000041360337,0.00006339104,0.6590338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896151,0.00020130217,0.0019984015,0.00028859163,0.000024695419,0.000036766283,0.000012730723,0.000030408171,0.0077920537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96113837,0.025182279,0.0015630873,0.0024842464,0.005840733,0.0037913409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94012487,0.04210774,0.0044629886,0.006605961,0.0053518796,0.0013465263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044168185,0.00023061222,0.0004917268,0.0024335715,0.011564508,0.0100487685,0.0019155017,0.0024006525,0.0054237735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07625385,0.00044806566,0.00031601332,0.002745574,0.04429501,0.006017298,0.006980616,0.006144294,0.00031817303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019364394,0.000023800536,0.002635277,0.000051141964,0.0000064608666,0.00034319525,0.10338669,0.00051153626,0.0004999399,0.8732493,0.0012678918,0.018005356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005440204,0.0001576779,0.022188773,0.0010841236,0.000043094453,0.0009655544,0.21338312,0.0024633897,0.00252215,0.34468168,0.41231248,0.00014357669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040550746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04756338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044168185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01719156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01256053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23358649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229542000","doi":"10.1093/iclq/50.3.632","title":"Pragmatism Rules","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Enforcement; Convention; Political science; Civil procedure; Pragmatism; Schedule; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Economics; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047062230425255897,"score_gpt":0.34246835315150387,"score_spread":0.295406122726248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229542000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040133856,0.0011479402,0.05487414,0.018922634,0.001065365,0.00030252198,0.00050290406,0.000347115,0.918824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51633203,0.0018571897,0.08785043,0.025491662,0.00253357,0.0026126509,0.0010639814,0.000768167,0.36149034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98380554,0.0041349125,0.0015115242,0.004231722,0.0048514456,0.0014648644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900933,0.0039041163,0.00058293424,0.0026395167,0.0025141903,0.00026587467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0137036815,0.00087864336,0.0009811461,0.0020643312,0.007840577,0.010244099,0.0039063985,0.006903786,0.030678764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032833353,0.00085153437,0.0015663219,0.0016168677,0.012013585,0.010152038,0.006054818,0.0106535815,0.011517673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005731749,0.000004566856,0.00003848612,0.000016022102,0.000002902333,0.000028162605,0.0003452946,0.00007759862,0.000035598696,0.9890745,0.007882708,0.002488384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002253907,0.0000075987177,0.00007199576,0.00010018917,0.000008946692,0.00009283612,0.00018727712,0.00047592644,0.00021207216,0.86173165,0.13707356,0.000015389847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004134622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004182502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030678764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053061186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054764766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102630734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287310028","doi":"10.1017/s0020589322000240","title":"REVISITING THE LEGALITY OF TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW DURING COVID-19","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"COVID-19 epidemiological studies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; International Health Regulations; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Solidarity; Proportionality (law); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; International law; Law; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine; Outbreak; Politics","score_opus":0.3106735596728564,"score_gpt":0.4438547724766831,"score_spread":0.13318121280382667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287310028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1527204,0.011561825,0.018649459,0.12132423,0.001572642,0.00018077993,0.0005273994,0.000045281133,0.6934179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806865,0.0021980098,0.0023577146,0.007934036,0.00039276376,0.0000961454,0.000118417505,0.000022653763,0.006193708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98068607,0.010779,0.0013917271,0.0015505076,0.0030956275,0.0024970826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9494138,0.034132447,0.005167561,0.003617206,0.0067876386,0.0008813724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02664291,0.00017919038,0.00043480974,0.002968415,0.006295988,0.010579344,0.002127707,0.0039255503,0.005941182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04930781,0.0004305811,0.00041457335,0.002759485,0.028484361,0.009222553,0.007222906,0.007127841,0.00038013107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004130588,0.000011847958,0.0010569235,0.000026813976,0.000002058505,0.00007694721,0.0045459317,0.000071128714,0.000029456216,0.98984027,0.0020182012,0.0023164381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027023289,0.00009753908,0.01824728,0.0038052257,0.000040778814,0.0005093842,0.055276163,0.0014367271,0.0006055173,0.56850773,0.35135546,0.000091188034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05174155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04275095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05174155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070458082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012874062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14090282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367316018","doi":"10.1017/s002058932300012x","title":"NET ZERO EMISSIONS AND FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS: EFFORTS AT INTEGRATING CLIMATE GOALS BY THE UNITED KINGDOM AND AUSTRALIA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"New Zealand Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Free trade; Climate change; International trade; Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; Negotiation; Liberalization; Parliament; European union; General partnership; Emissions trading; Political science; Enforcement; Greenhouse gas; Business; Kyoto Protocol; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.10808952092075122,"score_gpt":0.3037109109912649,"score_spread":0.19562139007051368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367316018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26603547,0.05234557,0.0087758675,0.11442765,0.0016534994,0.0002475543,0.000078276506,0.00007132161,0.5563647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9453563,0.0093907155,0.004901054,0.0087422775,0.00012355488,0.00007337389,0.000035538797,0.000033968132,0.031343296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98322463,0.008138339,0.0009621684,0.00076289434,0.0046226536,0.0022893455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910222,0.004469243,0.0006890284,0.0005643871,0.002295121,0.00096007314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013960101,0.00027310595,0.00041984458,0.0015325317,0.0047314465,0.009013015,0.0010351415,0.0048024403,0.0020244073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016515648,0.00043600428,0.0005348886,0.002031515,0.004007881,0.004830478,0.008750164,0.0034842372,0.00022928513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010886796,0.000067693385,0.003299021,0.0006422373,0.000043084954,0.0011141663,0.04043555,0.003637582,0.0015243562,0.87004805,0.014236171,0.06484322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060713122,0.00021263941,0.023795292,0.0027608862,0.0000796223,0.00053336035,0.026473904,0.0049486584,0.0021512164,0.074536614,0.86428547,0.00016172603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11530593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13509592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11530593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013311701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024629496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22926956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389648687","doi":"10.1017/s0020589323000532","title":"REGULATING TRANSNATIONAL DISSIDENT CYBER ESPIONAGE","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universitetet i Oslo","keywords":"Human rights; Espionage; Political science; Law; State (computer science); Democracy; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05238225661906652,"score_gpt":0.34531525429221865,"score_spread":0.2929329976731521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389648687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20642383,0.0018404885,0.047188725,0.018331323,0.0008666241,0.00045336242,0.000085510175,0.00040080852,0.7244094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597953,0.00040627475,0.0039850147,0.005952006,0.00010720264,0.00018786824,0.000035813344,0.00004702707,0.029483542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98997283,0.0027403163,0.00073619053,0.0017054284,0.0025808916,0.0022644368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885982,0.0052381693,0.0011823644,0.0021004772,0.0022523296,0.0006283453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010672828,0.00039881276,0.0003121429,0.0017316575,0.004835856,0.007953356,0.0020759068,0.0056234053,0.007936545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01520572,0.00033778907,0.00066877756,0.0008449958,0.0114348,0.0055446774,0.011530487,0.006542246,0.001009157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040548137,0.0001818684,0.0049083773,0.00014990634,0.000022372551,0.0007351774,0.016605303,0.00082806405,0.0044648647,0.92900646,0.0063380403,0.036719084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008030033,0.0005128078,0.016304553,0.0025379024,0.00017583637,0.001500539,0.048773084,0.0046081254,0.02019138,0.35862717,0.54645723,0.0002310479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008427023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010185966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010672828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003673462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063773007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05644393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405549352","doi":"10.1017/s0020589324000381","title":"EXIT RIGHTS, SEAMLESS BORDERS AND THE NEW CARCERAL STATE","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Criminology; Computer security; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.041294236425959314,"score_gpt":0.34983944841237136,"score_spread":0.30854521198641205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405549352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31070644,0.0028832816,0.010678418,0.018425534,0.0002188493,0.000034996723,0.000040217456,0.000038369544,0.65697396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927563,0.00026884393,0.00035326398,0.00047006685,0.000027794393,0.000009709078,0.000008207072,0.00000469068,0.0061012562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768543,0.00088358455,0.00009768788,0.00035271488,0.00035844144,0.0006221171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977806,0.00077203335,0.00043876012,0.00037169532,0.00028217662,0.00035476705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027847625,0.00015371651,0.0002674053,0.00079118845,0.004370025,0.009104917,0.0010283657,0.002470265,0.006173557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037668021,0.00016879577,0.0002991374,0.00063373457,0.036695685,0.0057527306,0.00905067,0.0037854917,0.000294571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005855299,0.0000046843334,0.0003004863,0.000010583605,9.583148e-7,0.00007729826,0.0041085975,0.00008417608,0.000037580583,0.99328506,0.00027547838,0.0018091641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025689083,0.00009235797,0.0038013468,0.00075722445,0.000017842773,0.00080893136,0.04716127,0.0009657415,0.00055909384,0.7576468,0.18811254,0.00005114305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047748145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005443954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009104917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002803424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023846135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020652592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413254345","doi":"10.1017/s0020589325100821","title":"Internationality Overreach in the Interpretation of Uniform Private Law Conventions: The <i>Contra Proferentem</i> Rule and the CISG","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"European and International Contract Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Convention; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Relevance (law); Conflict of laws; Underpinning; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.0285058520107497,"score_gpt":0.3365693171446842,"score_spread":0.3080634651339345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413254345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21265246,0.002446425,0.12289937,0.032518107,0.0008395287,0.00016132035,0.000071129325,0.00011280561,0.62829876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871157,0.00023686355,0.00594955,0.0020732407,0.00016104469,0.00007878201,0.000017060991,0.000043629134,0.0043239705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9622357,0.022927854,0.002192874,0.0036329993,0.0069810986,0.0020295552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9654548,0.020756748,0.0027498468,0.0063812295,0.004064621,0.00059261237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03214517,0.00030979014,0.001119004,0.0015606215,0.0045549027,0.013620573,0.0018999865,0.0059640137,0.002081431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043319248,0.00052457285,0.00072759023,0.0015776309,0.05161377,0.010354115,0.008697353,0.009603354,0.00030899252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003538048,0.0000037144894,0.00009957591,0.000005060872,0.0000016583305,0.000023981687,0.002132925,0.000111772715,0.000037275786,0.9961887,0.00028363804,0.0011082275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021966845,0.000025938129,0.0006000728,0.00013152798,0.000012912203,0.00008769468,0.0029085071,0.0018432933,0.0005497292,0.9703198,0.02346323,0.000035362486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006489973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035600099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03214517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061301766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006752047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17000192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416194669","doi":"10.1017/s0020589325101012","title":"The International Seabed Authority, the Problem of Disregard and the Case for Administrative Accountability","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Accountability; Delegation; Jurisdiction; State (computer science); Administrative law; Process (computing); International law; Core (optical fiber)","score_opus":0.028786323557218982,"score_gpt":0.3291889563334191,"score_spread":0.3004026327762001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416194669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074317686,0.007065259,0.015337123,0.42504385,0.0013562612,0.00006311514,0.000045449466,0.00006858445,0.4767027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971573,0.0012128993,0.0016166803,0.017122233,0.0005269019,0.00008193918,0.000013794611,0.000052140367,0.0078004138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93873435,0.039698977,0.0023046064,0.0035262138,0.010485048,0.005250815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93388146,0.048585366,0.004180265,0.0043471367,0.006550451,0.0024553218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054413658,0.00032393733,0.0007007799,0.002904486,0.017908067,0.020701606,0.003036823,0.013680951,0.003233777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06444641,0.00066764717,0.0007725025,0.0027173092,0.09836353,0.018493652,0.013125532,0.016947787,0.00045029173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033728575,0.000005269055,0.00025517517,0.000011304572,0.0000020920668,0.00006586969,0.004023014,0.00010269373,0.000020807443,0.9918777,0.0020323426,0.0016004352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001931845,0.00002641199,0.00120594,0.00047532766,0.000019141953,0.00015191326,0.011534331,0.0007563692,0.0002447258,0.86372304,0.12179706,0.000046404908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030323872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01880886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054413658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016200174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021096772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2877704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}