{"meta":{"query_hash":"c08231e3be14","filters":{"venue":"International business"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c08231e3be14","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+business"},"results":[{"id":"W2352935821","doi":"","title":"Agricultural Trade between China and Canada: Structural Features,Competitive Advantages and Trade Complementarity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International business","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Agriculture; China; International trade; Economics; Index (typography); Agricultural economics; Trade barrier; International economics; Comparative advantage; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.03728968235349793,"score_gpt":0.22361618314698026,"score_spread":0.18632650079348234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2352935821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97015125,0.0013501527,0.00034669662,0.00027461213,0.0000045691645,0.000012772885,0.0014219854,0.000013447054,0.026424384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971102,0.0004803218,0.00025904583,0.000016792408,0.0000036157676,0.0000025996123,0.0005676652,0.0000022173706,0.0015575633],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974066,0.000012575835,0.000007948517,0.0000324938,0.0001055893,0.0001006264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940467,0.00010359607,0.00016322649,0.00001652201,0.00018994343,0.00012203224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016197351,0.00019145703,0.00017859167,0.0038138526,0.0014147696,0.0016974185,0.0002143418,0.0001632278,0.0025794022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069275394,0.00006812741,0.00030955955,0.008649618,0.0008041575,0.00056470913,0.0006020462,0.00022479692,0.00011598513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013082239,0.000026509226,0.9217578,0.000103707374,0.00010009325,0.00094308885,0.0018010603,0.0041703857,0.0014367187,0.023512587,0.0014508497,0.04456634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064440615,0.000018718456,0.97896427,0.000046429468,0.00005378403,0.0002753686,0.0035130798,0.0050714617,0.00046139624,0.0021167202,0.009450404,0.000021865984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8535368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92797023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14646322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010180635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009291568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2946515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2386719276","doi":"","title":"On Legitimacy of Section 337 of US Tariff Law under GATT1994","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International business","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Legitimacy; Tariff; Law; Political science; Panel discussion; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.032978876998176636,"score_gpt":0.2823802948525812,"score_spread":0.24940141785440456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2386719276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24973285,0.0017555848,0.012528055,0.124868535,0.0020209048,0.00020215998,0.00043293697,0.00015606747,0.60830295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713226,0.0005896362,0.0029697616,0.016511993,0.00053224456,0.000112198635,0.00016535677,0.000050921397,0.007745202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9729083,0.008442433,0.0018524483,0.0031619563,0.009648224,0.0039866655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9302587,0.043640945,0.0052157305,0.004682092,0.014760316,0.0014422361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03424486,0.00034812852,0.00053117337,0.0029825382,0.0061426866,0.009415093,0.0017480138,0.009747973,0.0057354923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.098118834,0.0005238306,0.0006483606,0.0017580847,0.017781513,0.006868886,0.004163137,0.011697028,0.0009852533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006333657,0.000034301174,0.0053455452,0.00003672872,0.000021932348,0.00043596688,0.0025385476,0.00030460377,0.000558074,0.9725609,0.010855972,0.0072442195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017090749,0.00020198719,0.019617751,0.0012681759,0.00018851926,0.0006218423,0.0051574344,0.0060726414,0.005865658,0.7520358,0.20857492,0.00022445878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02452905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014313768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03424486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069247275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010619359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18110633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2389366680","doi":"","title":"China’s Selection Strategy of Potential FTA Partners:A Partial Equilibrium Analysis Based on Trade Effect","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International business","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Partial equilibrium; Selection (genetic algorithm); International trade; Product (mathematics); Economics; Distribution (mathematics); Business; General equilibrium theory; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02710630528032445,"score_gpt":0.23806391744919,"score_spread":0.21095761216886555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2389366680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.977738,0.0001467894,0.012771974,0.00040224576,0.000009066563,0.00007845098,0.00031393414,0.000024681978,0.008514812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995187,0.000098996345,0.001264454,0.000032422573,0.000005504963,0.000024290284,0.00019708533,0.0000044044446,0.0031857826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994375,0.00021985597,0.000021799062,0.00009341188,0.00007740557,0.00014996537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986873,0.00076889986,0.00017400528,0.00007154182,0.00016793795,0.00013023695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001617573,0.0002448801,0.00070449593,0.0012481593,0.00078850886,0.0016427337,0.0005840662,0.0005431739,0.007699195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038723953,0.00017961462,0.00094046304,0.0013767771,0.00047763935,0.0011219265,0.00069488306,0.0004953402,0.00029278576],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006792627,0.00028923946,0.4317021,0.00020205921,0.0006887827,0.0030545942,0.001649484,0.2776226,0.0039681434,0.19939645,0.005062954,0.07568432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014234173,0.00028627712,0.15085863,0.000044476194,0.0003972923,0.00031453508,0.0027162381,0.79588085,0.001642995,0.041835207,0.005806712,0.000074437376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03457536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030607766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03457536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012273443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012548245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068748236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}