{"meta":{"query_hash":"0e5048029529","filters":{"venue":"International journal of engineering education"},"cohort_total":25,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":25,"exported":25,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0e5048029529","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=International+journal+of+engineering+education"},"results":[{"id":"W160141526","doi":"","title":"Product-Based Learning in an Overseas Study Program: The ME110K Course*","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capstone; Curriculum; Creativity; Context (archaeology); Teamwork; Capstone course; Engineering; Work (physics); Product (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Course (navigation); Study abroad; Engineering management; Medical education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.0165513021063308,"score_gpt":0.3354406144028945,"score_spread":0.3188893122965637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W160141526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9534181,0.00037196372,0.0030094946,0.00287506,0.00047217123,0.00043573207,0.00020430837,0.00022039948,0.03899273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8018169,0.0010903006,0.026807554,0.002811563,0.00035228865,0.00070527947,0.0016132096,0.00023605414,0.16456677],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944586,0.00012626094,0.000017639446,0.00007862415,0.0001260308,0.00020554735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783486,0.000094124516,0.00004222379,0.00004690201,0.0001067584,0.0018752309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022561916,0.0008865995,0.00036665055,0.0003612579,0.0025004928,0.0028635988,0.0011675495,0.00086183345,0.012676754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085029344,0.0003001301,0.00036838255,0.0003042302,0.0006192154,0.0010042776,0.0025087104,0.0017281643,0.00295889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018295405,0.071262546,0.047966033,0.0004136278,0.00003372371,0.0036318768,0.043697566,0.0012585375,0.038962714,0.0050031096,0.10073346,0.6852072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010204604,0.03581746,0.21772894,0.00042713434,0.000050059392,0.0030143445,0.048196074,0.005574254,0.024127236,0.0044138916,0.6594533,0.00017689096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018452369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008141075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012676754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001298622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002447371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04240793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W207344739","doi":"","title":"Exploring Concept Maps as Study Tools in a First Year Engineering Biology Course: A Case Study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Educational Assessment and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Concept map; Metacognition; Mathematics education; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Psychology; Cognition; Physics","score_opus":0.18115093753929645,"score_gpt":0.4262291290206801,"score_spread":0.24507819148138366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W207344739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968892,0.00006111221,0.0016691795,0.00021832818,0.0000071522563,0.00013107584,0.000020069408,0.0000134356105,0.0009905287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892846,0.00030260094,0.008249633,0.00008096496,0.000011727373,0.00013034118,0.00004237212,0.000017312523,0.0018805582],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582493,0.0024317869,0.00012758723,0.0002957165,0.0007833941,0.0005365561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819916,0.0122714285,0.0010328485,0.00072552945,0.0014619209,0.0025167295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007299305,0.0008801651,0.0005889292,0.0020095455,0.0033715325,0.0032363245,0.0023713275,0.0021106899,0.0016270656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020589512,0.0005420953,0.0005479528,0.0015057026,0.002198714,0.0022020726,0.0026580999,0.0022123125,0.00044284156],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008377701,0.0287476,0.13465609,0.0010694371,0.00010486213,0.046324763,0.587257,0.0052278186,0.013528912,0.006343733,0.0036777088,0.1722243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004077432,0.014671265,0.13460684,0.0007268285,0.00015894724,0.030812852,0.70034677,0.023783006,0.03226026,0.007418845,0.05444465,0.00036194202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026093333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061443755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007299305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022071786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017346712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03860289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182838545","doi":"","title":"An approach for improving design and innovation skills in engineering education: the multidisciplinary design stream","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Graduation (instrument); Accreditation; Engineering education; Medical education; Engineering; Residence; Engineering management; Function (biology); Engineering design process; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Mechanical engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.021014166336019605,"score_gpt":0.3033704115346466,"score_spread":0.282356245198627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182838545","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26916367,0.0058947764,0.32455707,0.085033305,0.0023305677,0.008518272,0.00022948328,0.00224357,0.30202943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40614912,0.0050333687,0.508593,0.011287304,0.0006505201,0.0035676304,0.0002340487,0.0003785934,0.06410635],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99098784,0.0029126983,0.0003493775,0.0010037813,0.004192138,0.0005541932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99087334,0.0018246111,0.0007002218,0.0013115468,0.0030307304,0.0022595052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007937449,0.0010605898,0.0009128442,0.004758586,0.003536281,0.0076850173,0.0020814748,0.0026619153,0.008722303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009042347,0.00063639286,0.0011813702,0.002209037,0.0025128962,0.00531187,0.014027731,0.00517388,0.0039197374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013015396,0.0044383705,0.00728731,0.0014292169,0.00006879044,0.00020805965,0.010760969,0.0010836405,0.0063736723,0.0392365,0.02174556,0.90723765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006280671,0.006473211,0.05370919,0.005160438,0.0002534873,0.0025787074,0.034118507,0.015594704,0.022708107,0.2442942,0.6142795,0.00020184249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012295827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031721157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008722303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003966152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019319478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041977704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336042886","doi":"","title":"Sustainable Design in a Second Year Engineering Design Course","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Engineering Education and Curriculum Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Creativity; Sustainability; Sustainable design; Engineering; Engineering ethics; Engineering management; Obligation; Engineering design process; Engineering education; Test (biology); Social responsibility; Design education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Political science; Business; Public relations; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.005272219447351546,"score_gpt":0.23222300276201474,"score_spread":0.2269507833146632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336042886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8110972,0.0015973063,0.02035356,0.011571666,0.0034694874,0.0022246388,0.0008943373,0.001188933,0.14760292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5286514,0.0023487462,0.05684585,0.007994495,0.0006031138,0.0014421386,0.0018735392,0.00029316082,0.39994746],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987374,0.0001710729,0.00004925922,0.0001822547,0.0003831497,0.0004768277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971847,0.00013169112,0.0000931695,0.00010359945,0.00041942133,0.0020674649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021324859,0.0016472656,0.00087913324,0.0010233812,0.0036006575,0.004045333,0.0016710868,0.002196676,0.015831856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018071325,0.00075558526,0.00092823355,0.00071569777,0.0009333565,0.0010111631,0.0025841985,0.002396522,0.0052573173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010584407,0.039055873,0.042644087,0.0010136147,0.00006142261,0.004847316,0.025391895,0.009505322,0.047601208,0.015796091,0.28750584,0.52551883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031379884,0.011229845,0.065105125,0.0006005224,0.00005113927,0.0034413072,0.0134347705,0.0054357294,0.031237176,0.009030324,0.85995656,0.00016367859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037884617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019943317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015831856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047118664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008472339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05296284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564913021","doi":"","title":"Sustainable Design Throughout the Curriculum Using Case Studies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Work (physics); Engineering management; Sustainable development; Engineering; Key (lock); Quality (philosophy); Sustainable design; Engineering design process; Engineering education; Engineering ethics; Construction engineering; Computer science; Sustainability; Mechanical engineering; Pedagogy; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.02575354657623103,"score_gpt":0.36129593617222716,"score_spread":0.33554238959599614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564913021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41837114,0.0068934653,0.29053485,0.006029958,0.00025072668,0.003922988,0.00041668655,0.0003741097,0.27320614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60460997,0.008633024,0.34616125,0.0005438806,0.000048097027,0.0014643426,0.0003552957,0.00010767958,0.038076587],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810209,0.014204574,0.0006588024,0.0005501021,0.0029794842,0.00058614265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981824,0.014098617,0.0007806729,0.001431437,0.0014008492,0.00046437248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011999557,0.00090514455,0.00054487586,0.0028420365,0.0024226638,0.0068044956,0.0021252453,0.002113877,0.003984629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014847969,0.0005114614,0.0005584049,0.0041826335,0.003058686,0.004473531,0.0042755078,0.0015465991,0.00072303275],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017589943,0.0026582158,0.008394386,0.001909882,0.00007582582,0.0053092544,0.09336451,0.048414104,0.0075052637,0.24693501,0.018425684,0.56683195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001541329,0.0012800979,0.005236377,0.0043965657,0.00009458705,0.003641113,0.064787306,0.035272595,0.016960956,0.080591135,0.7873834,0.00020174104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033640969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00944705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011999557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037487044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029547052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06346053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588482525","doi":"","title":"Potential of ICTs and pedagogical approaches to improve remote laboratory","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Experimental Learning in Engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualization; Virtual Laboratory; Set (abstract data type); Work (physics); ICTS; Engineering management; Investment (military); Engineering; Multimedia; Computer science; Information and Communications Technology; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.02697123360776926,"score_gpt":0.27031657467679165,"score_spread":0.2433453410690224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588482525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13874556,0.010394997,0.39521933,0.03399859,0.0013375677,0.0010995232,0.00019824653,0.0043181865,0.41468793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70264286,0.011382319,0.19537804,0.0038814237,0.00087154366,0.0008988039,0.00034364578,0.00046212572,0.084139265],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610484,0.0023395205,0.0001305512,0.00027249355,0.00065076485,0.0005019088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948965,0.002360595,0.00041512522,0.00077567075,0.0006750458,0.00087708654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032940095,0.00083708245,0.00024535053,0.0015920459,0.001400459,0.006608797,0.002110495,0.0020794442,0.019366436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006979602,0.00022186842,0.0005955762,0.0016386635,0.0019914252,0.0059491005,0.005675704,0.0018007528,0.0039500343],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015098658,0.0016048889,0.003444251,0.0017166111,0.000045315806,0.0012789068,0.009277532,0.0052956967,0.0115611525,0.101208754,0.019584944,0.8448309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022510307,0.0015243217,0.008474599,0.0021808846,0.000118860946,0.0015187656,0.022948293,0.015066816,0.013916212,0.093097985,0.8407848,0.00014346994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011714502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015148016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019366436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016013941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002946726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06478721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608251582","doi":"","title":"Outcomes-Based Assessment in Action: Engineering Faculty Examine Graduate Attributes in their Courses*","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Engineering Education and Curriculum Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Summative assessment; Formative assessment; Accreditation; Variety (cybernetics); Curriculum; Medical education; Checklist; Engineering education; Equity (law); Engineering; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Engineering management; Computer science; Medicine; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.034037611860261656,"score_gpt":0.3203715234734486,"score_spread":0.28633391161318694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608251582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86356986,0.0007294605,0.06283948,0.0097472,0.00058145483,0.0067645884,0.0003709121,0.0005850211,0.054812007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91159934,0.00049268035,0.07853006,0.00084184005,0.000057752786,0.004405661,0.0003085327,0.000066602806,0.003697611],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.92233515,0.05717551,0.0034409473,0.001852341,0.012722349,0.0024737553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91809916,0.034778103,0.011279357,0.0042840857,0.025553524,0.0060056774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.091901645,0.00082634063,0.00083131593,0.0050453064,0.003361893,0.0053272913,0.0019437345,0.0011592557,0.001558795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11839222,0.00040276445,0.0007181201,0.0025532977,0.0030678923,0.0042028963,0.0077250153,0.0026436136,0.0005397581],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040153248,0.006168306,0.22151238,0.00070798653,0.00012437519,0.00017872713,0.10272667,0.0014070639,0.0027570103,0.007972031,0.008155916,0.647888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044718146,0.006316879,0.59866077,0.0023948012,0.00018625378,0.00031335733,0.25779906,0.011166882,0.015853334,0.036002617,0.070321865,0.0005370002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008693807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017306387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091901645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078495545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016052976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48602813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789925554","doi":"","title":"Introducing PBL in Engineering Education: Challenges Lecturers and Students Confront","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Problem and Project Based Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Facilitator; Problem-based learning; Medical education; Popularity; Psychology; Focus group; Pedagogy; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.014155001225613893,"score_gpt":0.33986858749922183,"score_spread":0.3257135862736079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789925554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83941936,0.012549785,0.035007108,0.069591425,0.0016532581,0.0007126273,0.00004039679,0.0003878739,0.040638186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700871,0.0042791124,0.006894134,0.006598158,0.00048775843,0.00027429615,0.000039616778,0.00008846179,0.011251343],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9471647,0.03823245,0.0013101039,0.0020280185,0.00803365,0.0032310493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9690215,0.019335262,0.0024615503,0.001748683,0.0031163476,0.004316568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027534766,0.0006981798,0.00071479194,0.00081271114,0.007934885,0.015334927,0.00265921,0.0038971305,0.0030659342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039906282,0.0005997679,0.0006671336,0.0006761434,0.006309974,0.007989782,0.01049997,0.007405019,0.0014719429],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013362772,0.0011783045,0.015599511,0.0009090854,0.000034969686,0.0013329877,0.60542303,0.0004554029,0.00456189,0.0070985737,0.0068160896,0.35645652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010801612,0.0015096822,0.016927851,0.0015522899,0.000053091466,0.0034369412,0.828337,0.0008634893,0.0038844051,0.011889902,0.13125658,0.00018073362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011922369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024102586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027534766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003346579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058994466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940373090","doi":"","title":"Professional integration of international engineering graduates in Canada: exploring the role of a co-operativeeducation program","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Higher Education and Employability","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Immigration; Exploratory research; Focus group; Engineering education; Professional development; Pedagogy; Higher education; Medical education; Cultural diversity; Soft skills; Psychology; Public relations; Engineering; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Engineering management; Social psychology; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.02258248624312259,"score_gpt":0.33057806278919305,"score_spread":0.30799557654607046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940373090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938857,0.00019620672,0.00010366875,0.000780375,0.000018139432,0.000033822376,0.000017138957,0.0000025923775,0.004962265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958346,0.00036513232,0.00020973125,0.00043192666,0.0000067216797,0.000019824247,0.000035319117,0.0000036216647,0.00309311],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967007,0.0005108251,0.000045857378,0.00018723743,0.000778402,0.001776959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953334,0.0005774961,0.00039496415,0.00006974357,0.0011810504,0.002443362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025714966,0.00034710518,0.0004215737,0.0014150228,0.021115284,0.004826354,0.0013165816,0.0009995512,0.0026845478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041211843,0.00033734864,0.0002891708,0.0019690571,0.004247956,0.0011913015,0.0059901257,0.002520091,0.00017200284],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011228472,0.00041365344,0.1383809,0.00011318545,0.000011331781,0.0013851527,0.81231546,0.00005950001,0.0016778596,0.0025867685,0.0013913189,0.041552555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005558704,0.00008781227,0.07933857,0.00007980893,0.000008166924,0.00012569076,0.9109793,0.0000835684,0.00017053806,0.00008812385,0.009015379,0.000017467943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9414621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9825178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9652064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034793634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.099072084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25244665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948775394","doi":"","title":"Boundary play and pivots in public computation: new directions in STEM education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary (topology); Computation; Space (punctuation); Code (set theory); Computer science; Source code; Open source; Discipline; Boundary-work; Public space; Software; Work (physics); Open source software; World Wide Web; Sociology; Data science; Human–computer interaction; Engineering; Programming language; Architectural engineering; Mathematics; Social science; Mechanical engineering; Operating system","score_opus":0.02173309488492257,"score_gpt":0.31719256409387153,"score_spread":0.29545946920894894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948775394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21962968,0.011001256,0.3124122,0.100219,0.0014567368,0.00022369855,0.000107687,0.0012989737,0.35365072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687959,0.0011471664,0.015815692,0.0014912352,0.00025196248,0.00016281981,0.00003898604,0.00029956174,0.011996756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99007356,0.0063130693,0.00019908269,0.001076138,0.0013690044,0.0009691156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98354936,0.010582514,0.00076404563,0.0022327013,0.00072931615,0.0021421693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010494146,0.0007868123,0.0008550986,0.0020161066,0.009418656,0.02095653,0.003180601,0.004851877,0.018855866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016036233,0.0005874363,0.00072157313,0.0015521751,0.050589252,0.030907014,0.023406895,0.006454652,0.0019751827],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008302062,0.00008284788,0.0011486253,0.00019216415,0.0000053159674,0.00016896566,0.073417395,0.00042136287,0.00062807347,0.87990344,0.0027984756,0.041150272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048432586,0.0000968351,0.00086291105,0.00050571014,0.000008286913,0.00022850862,0.066417545,0.00206617,0.0016674707,0.7182737,0.20977917,0.000045182376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00157382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023367829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02095653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005631891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058112117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06307918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952003544","doi":"","title":"Quality Assurance of Engineering Education in Canada: its suitability for graduates working in global markets","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Engineering Education and Curriculum Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Quality assurance; Engineering education; Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Engineering management; Order (exchange); Engineering; Engineering ethics; Political science; Business; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science; Operations management; Finance","score_opus":0.009058459160874744,"score_gpt":0.2664826682707206,"score_spread":0.25742420910984587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952003544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5571836,0.012628745,0.018176269,0.07138536,0.00060066965,0.0006817481,0.0014843971,0.00075385557,0.33710536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737999,0.003594798,0.007163639,0.0012219597,0.00004802395,0.000059405364,0.0003512754,0.000054992244,0.01370606],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926529,0.000714423,0.00019705217,0.00036407108,0.0047381637,0.001333337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98648006,0.001179068,0.0010070658,0.0004505928,0.008808421,0.0020747765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004992189,0.00021437183,0.00019307285,0.0014881216,0.005569331,0.0069434373,0.0009447023,0.0007924843,0.003328715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014160706,0.00014925346,0.00034247135,0.0039955485,0.0021384503,0.0010943083,0.0018040636,0.0010075523,0.000387151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021564077,0.00026760818,0.21660882,0.0007725387,0.000037391394,0.0005032769,0.009116006,0.003987626,0.0040034587,0.054722853,0.044586737,0.665178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000398895,0.0002139533,0.77369064,0.0008215453,0.00003941669,0.00032902422,0.011489278,0.00681034,0.002606916,0.0048688604,0.1989821,0.00010794206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9700585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98181605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9410586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058941435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14999159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42765206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954191209","doi":"","title":"Quality assurance for engineering education in a changing world","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Engineering Education and Curriculum Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Credibility; Quality (philosophy); Engineering education; Quality assurance; Engineering; Creativity; Engineering ethics; Globalization; Engineering management; Political science; Operations management","score_opus":0.0076080004937053546,"score_gpt":0.283843320113928,"score_spread":0.27623531962022263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954191209","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017353464,0.10933219,0.14161791,0.4871052,0.012215489,0.0011679997,0.0007247708,0.0035800282,0.2269029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.439637,0.0858788,0.2641958,0.09713937,0.009035661,0.0022081176,0.0023447145,0.0014598343,0.09810076],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92993695,0.02429052,0.004649491,0.0038447645,0.03481676,0.0024614662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8652093,0.029507607,0.018034132,0.02409245,0.051797476,0.011359031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046856906,0.0010099323,0.0010397547,0.002849217,0.0049178437,0.01399115,0.002323589,0.005020971,0.016537014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08289932,0.00048174866,0.0007543097,0.0035665042,0.008786594,0.0064628404,0.0071968706,0.008539525,0.0071820957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007927091,0.00034028263,0.008739927,0.0019948042,0.00008611902,0.0001454442,0.0031943405,0.0009750572,0.0023671892,0.19862069,0.2994663,0.48399058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004281936,0.00024741222,0.014995623,0.0041274107,0.00004879596,0.0005115697,0.0016744286,0.0012119362,0.0012616122,0.07759701,0.8982008,0.00008067913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064739953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004353777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046856906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008786663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030113572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24780601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955277991","doi":"","title":"Canadian Approach to Global Evaluation of Engineering Education and Services","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Engineering Education and Curriculum Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Globalization; Perspective (graphical); Licensure; Plan (archaeology); Engineering management; Engineering education; Engineering; Political science; Engineering ethics; Business; Computer science; Geography; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.005597405744099978,"score_gpt":0.2472329252503562,"score_spread":0.24163551950625622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955277991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003878779,0.015359152,0.00978083,0.034540482,0.0014464237,0.00033224304,0.0017538595,0.00029624943,0.9326119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39180776,0.054859873,0.083575904,0.017091272,0.0009930185,0.0011428896,0.003659806,0.0005728346,0.44629666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98169637,0.0031466135,0.0007188811,0.0011604979,0.011075076,0.0022025323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98642457,0.00092450576,0.00028843342,0.00050502084,0.010804698,0.0010526741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00884605,0.0013705128,0.00085585786,0.019676695,0.008621402,0.012277224,0.0022668347,0.0020089995,0.017879192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014530853,0.00047633174,0.0010429914,0.01743295,0.0058892565,0.0032653923,0.004962455,0.0037439635,0.0015845002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022035505,0.000028815792,0.0017813204,0.0004133752,0.000028976783,0.00013941711,0.0016520714,0.0014866457,0.00018788519,0.7488605,0.138501,0.1068979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008600051,0.000019109839,0.007986427,0.0006404704,0.000034659362,0.00015369258,0.0020157197,0.0012655786,0.00020434822,0.030483885,0.95711917,0.00006819768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9626852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9716804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8450513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15494868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22206587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98013973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024256634","doi":"","title":"Effect of personality traits in team dynamics and project outcomes in engineering design","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientiousness; Agreeableness; Big Five personality traits; Openness to experience; Extraversion and introversion; Engineering education; Personality; Psychology; Engineering; Teamwork; Project management; Project-based learning; Applied psychology; Knowledge management; Engineering management; Computer science; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Systems engineering; Management","score_opus":0.014514399154463196,"score_gpt":0.2957161430693349,"score_spread":0.28120174391487174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024256634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991825,0.000030993426,0.00006590494,0.000024966816,0.0000049525347,0.0000053648882,0.000013104094,0.0000019221043,0.0006702138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994436,0.00001976447,0.00006692996,0.000008191751,0.0000026539537,0.0000049257465,0.000023899778,0.0000015103757,0.00042854482],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730384,0.0013185121,0.00018031284,0.00016950749,0.0006860525,0.00034171875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97083884,0.0123982355,0.0070750182,0.0012570375,0.001479207,0.0069517363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028993837,0.00028739282,0.00015956465,0.00055786787,0.0006058265,0.0013025469,0.0002714019,0.00039483525,0.0020801271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015401815,0.00018100445,0.0005456918,0.00034217973,0.00059213117,0.00041601216,0.0009183699,0.00073292584,0.00032036088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029544026,0.0005240673,0.98883796,0.000011302702,0.00006587645,0.00008316857,0.0010230148,0.00021066697,0.00031206288,0.000042217616,0.000111592824,0.008482559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004260681,0.00025069836,0.9985436,0.0000077176355,0.0000075316343,0.00004112978,0.0006654557,0.0002641758,0.00006708124,0.00003072404,0.00011247105,0.0000051484667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037263897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006388866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037263897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066409755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005971165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015333533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026027571","doi":"","title":"An exploratory study of teamwork processes and perceived team effectiveness in engineering capstone design teams","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capstone; Teamwork; Medical education; Psychology; Engineering education; Team effectiveness; Engineering; Capstone course; Work (physics); Knowledge management; Engineering management; Computer science; Medicine; Management; Operations management","score_opus":0.01641308027955839,"score_gpt":0.2823711912486734,"score_spread":0.265958110969115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026027571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994765,0.0000177346,0.00012848359,0.000022990167,0.0000012018779,0.000051300274,0.00001238143,0.0000013496204,0.00028807667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984908,0.00006463269,0.0005079083,0.000038684553,0.000002935239,0.00011685166,0.00004592143,0.0000021294509,0.0007300374],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957183,0.0017465075,0.00017348317,0.00031987994,0.00102236,0.0010194243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887116,0.003990276,0.0017330819,0.00045821894,0.002389054,0.002717777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067963507,0.0005662493,0.0004489616,0.0015952049,0.006159311,0.0022697935,0.0012262079,0.00059368124,0.0015394819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010129657,0.00074372586,0.000355653,0.0011819212,0.002170372,0.0011924431,0.0021115025,0.0016666808,0.00020704656],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026722963,0.005571231,0.40607095,0.00017749543,0.000056877703,0.0006400981,0.550095,0.0002778452,0.0021038854,0.00047202155,0.0007599441,0.03350749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034859597,0.0016013446,0.49870494,0.0000907915,0.000022706881,0.00016593383,0.49364066,0.0007693545,0.0010367623,0.00018198998,0.0037065193,0.000044156808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09188569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22653426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09188569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005263328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007823417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1827017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026531908","doi":"","title":"Comparison of student evaluation of teaching results when stratified by protocol, course content, and course structure","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Protocol (science); Set (abstract data type); Course (navigation); Course evaluation; Significant difference; Content delivery; Data set; Computer science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Medical education; Statistics; Engineering; Medicine; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Higher education; Pathology","score_opus":0.22379243038811716,"score_gpt":0.5486883596094423,"score_spread":0.32489592922132515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026531908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953022,0.00008339615,0.0028426645,0.00002272264,0.000019217312,0.00026951844,0.00014392588,0.00005972333,0.0012565794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99567384,0.000055519573,0.002678801,0.00003523873,0.000020471018,0.00037467654,0.00033002117,0.000029720319,0.0008017255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96498615,0.017145941,0.003541133,0.0016098192,0.011570702,0.0011462963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.882929,0.07561737,0.01442426,0.010516143,0.014537723,0.0019755247],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03334752,0.00036306548,0.0006352694,0.0019459511,0.00041519644,0.00097444624,0.0004488897,0.00029329676,0.0021290306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0811627,0.00018861608,0.0006287082,0.0014652496,0.000550124,0.00059854495,0.0011785851,0.00036694095,0.0006161806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006249698,0.0016920359,0.7823467,0.00027803465,0.00060821086,0.00009252398,0.00551868,0.00080143387,0.01088355,0.00029491173,0.0009128115,0.19032152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006935206,0.0075013107,0.9791988,0.000036197645,0.00011565629,0.00009630426,0.0015620004,0.0014864499,0.008426722,0.00022556142,0.0012495646,0.000032114323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051499857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013741467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96665245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084470597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007352238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1763606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026733225","doi":"","title":"Survey of approaches for including the impact of technology on society in canadian engineering undergraduate curricula","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Biomedical and Engineering Education","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Curriculum; Engineering ethics; Multidisciplinary approach; Perspective (graphical); Technology and society; Engineering; Interface (matter); Engineering management; Engineering education; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.023216187519913445,"score_gpt":0.2795399885751454,"score_spread":0.25632380105523195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026733225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8332824,0.020707605,0.007772079,0.021637544,0.00056881923,0.001644899,0.0021272632,0.00026438452,0.111995086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.948239,0.025517063,0.010941353,0.0021012225,0.000055031214,0.0005171805,0.0014516052,0.0000733079,0.011104309],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97707784,0.0030068296,0.0014727602,0.00085812935,0.015085638,0.002498832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.942712,0.008882221,0.004909796,0.0015542965,0.033075497,0.008866171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016490959,0.00054972095,0.00038252614,0.0076081194,0.0072388984,0.004203022,0.0026795047,0.0008728885,0.004333341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043707956,0.00047389884,0.0007781932,0.014343481,0.002072839,0.0018906927,0.004510103,0.0012212982,0.00052746537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016385414,0.0003259948,0.31863272,0.0032830653,0.00008577343,0.00022708133,0.044855744,0.0005995505,0.0029337772,0.009857691,0.022738408,0.5962963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002663542,0.00018058858,0.75740844,0.0023262533,0.00008619348,0.0002323833,0.06654917,0.0008216299,0.001211629,0.00083568966,0.17020996,0.00011149533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8241532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92903465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9437853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05621471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1377819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40786815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034162777","doi":"","title":"Integration of local industry theme examples in process control education: a case from north-eastern quebec","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Mineral Processing and Grinding","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Multidisciplinary approach; Process (computing); Engineering; Controller (irrigation); Control (management); Process control; Computer science; Manufacturing engineering; Engineering management; Industrial engineering; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Social science","score_opus":0.01879892909559432,"score_gpt":0.25680125181892977,"score_spread":0.23800232272333544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034162777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94320744,0.00033904062,0.0028791858,0.0030554351,0.00003883253,0.00017251424,0.00013729396,0.00012400353,0.05004614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685545,0.00019413093,0.001923535,0.00040050622,0.000005343478,0.000036297828,0.00010432227,0.000028187531,0.028753133],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850935,0.00047055373,0.000026066753,0.00011530183,0.0002932672,0.0005854486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997433,0.0005117472,0.00009006363,0.00010032187,0.0008239175,0.001040997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013152437,0.00032841298,0.00021741774,0.00050011365,0.008796607,0.0024466794,0.0014587145,0.0017993477,0.0074862796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002185778,0.00023976686,0.00026942263,0.0014517301,0.0014693512,0.00063706434,0.0014178536,0.0012943342,0.0005808652],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013883247,0.009782125,0.21470322,0.00087119243,0.00015061435,0.054949563,0.13665834,0.06474392,0.017516905,0.043542888,0.05610645,0.39958653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004063316,0.0020687813,0.20542164,0.0005701396,0.0001395548,0.0045934548,0.27581155,0.056636594,0.010069177,0.0029087162,0.44110188,0.0002722736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93551797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9835302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06448203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03157423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024795739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22908819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034286319","doi":"","title":"Predictors of student’s engagement and persistence in an innovative PBL curriculum: applications for engineering education","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Experimental Learning in Engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); Curriculum; Student engagement; Medical education; Psychology; Engineering education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Engineering; Medicine; Engineering management","score_opus":0.00975144252483483,"score_gpt":0.29410475282115206,"score_spread":0.2843533102963172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034286319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993765,0.000043352196,0.00018703223,0.00007305258,0.0000022207196,0.0000061487253,0.00001423722,0.0000031671334,0.00029438306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939895,0.000037156555,0.00015663379,0.000007893911,0.0000052867786,0.000007960226,0.000064818865,0.0000020496007,0.00031931116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988777,0.000284646,0.00010639122,0.00008265568,0.00043236674,0.00021629216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865811,0.004895392,0.0031770866,0.00044123468,0.0015914683,0.0033136706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018648303,0.00022349178,0.00022030095,0.00071345805,0.00037775026,0.0012452726,0.00035967835,0.00052466034,0.003115481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01533479,0.00011807244,0.000270333,0.00054426154,0.00026884582,0.0005145376,0.0010279989,0.00097223726,0.00051310187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006261437,0.00042696562,0.9814973,0.000016378703,0.00002172766,0.00003795107,0.00053027616,0.00011138866,0.0003636227,0.000030004163,0.00009837142,0.016803404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059602353,0.00028670896,0.9972389,0.000013905622,0.000010420572,0.00009962862,0.0009952853,0.00058815145,0.00032092587,0.00006850046,0.00036636204,0.0000053222107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083781895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00140188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003115481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022457005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047887026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010422289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036108386","doi":"","title":"Assessment of transition from mechanical engineering to mechatronics engineering in turkey","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Mechatronics Education and Applications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mechatronics; Turkish; Curriculum; Engineering; Engineering education; Engineering management; Quality (philosophy); Mechanical engineering; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Electrical engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.005841250493859756,"score_gpt":0.27060813401761025,"score_spread":0.2647668835237505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036108386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99103785,0.00042452378,0.0006494043,0.0002955632,0.000023158138,0.00005329555,0.00013805817,0.000040752864,0.0073375306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983955,0.00019581533,0.00048129997,0.000038194135,0.000003819306,0.000019181934,0.00013559412,0.000006247342,0.0007243824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978004,0.00032823582,0.0003115265,0.00017541507,0.00091655774,0.00046776282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952708,0.00051698874,0.0009484475,0.00009509663,0.0018862077,0.00128239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021183447,0.00025566787,0.00024930428,0.0024644062,0.0008038369,0.0020810796,0.0005733225,0.0006776252,0.0026213413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072920597,0.00017529553,0.0004014263,0.0023779687,0.0005033483,0.001185806,0.002053938,0.0006766072,0.0005570419],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092208077,0.0005968853,0.7123737,0.001022716,0.00006851561,0.0018550282,0.022157049,0.005137015,0.01010035,0.005545905,0.0034870855,0.23673375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010612387,0.0006107225,0.9548992,0.00018284321,0.000021299647,0.0004820508,0.024800733,0.0017395503,0.0024335391,0.00047166794,0.014311068,0.000036674082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046808026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040643625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046808026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030186623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029106638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021902025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041910135","doi":"","title":"Practicum-education experiences: post-interns' views","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Practicum; Internship; Mentorship; Medical education; Psychology; Competence (human resources); Experiential learning; Professional development; Pedagogy; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02166161047645705,"score_gpt":0.4219375774661165,"score_spread":0.40027596698965945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041910135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933062,0.0003252812,0.00005825428,0.0016837253,0.00010106991,0.00001372394,0.000028391896,0.0000064692726,0.004476771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942595,0.0003805077,0.000036229205,0.0007653733,0.000055225828,0.000019331736,0.000037160196,0.0000048522247,0.004441854],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983193,0.00050089153,0.00006457458,0.00008380434,0.00028188532,0.0007494266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98977995,0.001963102,0.0010569679,0.00014840468,0.001440586,0.0056109936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032305785,0.0003521308,0.0003539815,0.0008131136,0.0052330275,0.0036748424,0.00087622716,0.00172529,0.0035356258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007450114,0.00027431708,0.0003323824,0.00046040266,0.0024791874,0.0018729067,0.0034205597,0.0037138138,0.00057147007],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020822046,0.0009067204,0.15263426,0.00014375139,0.000021369651,0.0023601851,0.80835277,0.000054977223,0.0020477658,0.00090035563,0.00548416,0.026885478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068827867,0.00040404347,0.062248997,0.00007013644,0.000008213386,0.00059765147,0.9249831,0.00002903798,0.00029426016,0.000056718378,0.011282369,0.000018547866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012390341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027485307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012390341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018621864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024350293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024636447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042132238","doi":"","title":"Assessing the impact of career and family choices in mid-life: striking the right balance for women engineers in their 40’s","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Career Development and Diversity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gender equity; Balance (ability); Equity (law); Career development; Qualitative research; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies; Political science; Social psychology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.020577101199776404,"score_gpt":0.3277650473950014,"score_spread":0.307187946195225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042132238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989592,0.000081316626,0.000027711505,0.0002988673,0.0000032385751,0.000004232156,0.00001633612,4.81621e-7,0.0006086986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905604,0.00013656986,0.00012300473,0.00011096582,0.0000024971189,0.00000853,0.000027015145,7.144459e-7,0.00053464924],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990792,0.00035720368,0.000019420077,0.00003962436,0.00011441581,0.0003900902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974693,0.0005843958,0.00051348226,0.00005898356,0.00048444094,0.0008894068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030992432,0.0002279922,0.00021556062,0.0007502714,0.0035372896,0.0016317284,0.00056743657,0.00055592746,0.0012573244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053633037,0.00021398302,0.0002325101,0.00050754606,0.0013642509,0.00078632805,0.0019525199,0.00072408427,0.00020717432],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023004232,0.00020782989,0.7027347,0.00005440933,0.000023428383,0.0006739275,0.25548974,0.00008357851,0.0013422288,0.00036870272,0.001001937,0.037789546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006202206,0.00016407183,0.6002618,0.000059004884,0.000008539118,0.00015331595,0.39407918,0.00007208095,0.0003596799,0.00022115986,0.004599615,0.000015335112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1336892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40926516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1336892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032743115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005811388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26582205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043813089","doi":"","title":"Canadian engineering students’ motivation in the contextof a shift toward student-centered teaching methods in an outcome-based education","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Engineering Education and Curriculum Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Perception; Outcome (game theory); Task (project management); Mathematics education; Intrinsic motivation; Outcome-based education; Control (management); Cognition; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Computer science; Curriculum; Mathematics","score_opus":0.026093175809635483,"score_gpt":0.3703783478304405,"score_spread":0.344285172020805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043813089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974317,0.000085548825,0.00007171689,0.000435243,0.000011511605,0.000028858622,0.00004266472,0.00000414778,0.0018884949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756324,0.00013168498,0.00018310742,0.00008740078,0.0000033049387,0.000013973113,0.00006734045,0.00000271506,0.0019471219],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980913,0.00022000293,0.000034920075,0.00015091106,0.00094370334,0.0005592451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964425,0.00026213878,0.00035043806,0.00006415869,0.00096345757,0.0019172651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022466187,0.0002541947,0.00028547004,0.0008050324,0.0064010276,0.0028290611,0.00070704607,0.00043691669,0.0024869293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004053468,0.00021736902,0.0004159196,0.0011506403,0.0010752698,0.00043402438,0.0012608711,0.0012031604,0.00015903529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037587844,0.0019088153,0.8432369,0.000140541,0.000064921354,0.00042314967,0.03371259,0.00041998966,0.002353885,0.0026092615,0.005724623,0.109029375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031961343,0.00018508684,0.976607,0.0000544391,0.00002314668,0.000052696847,0.014328397,0.00061691407,0.000662508,0.00021504036,0.0071782903,0.000044560602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9380314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.980433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9380314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03058905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049438667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22194016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044215693","doi":"","title":"Rubrics for assessing oral communication in the capstone design experience: development, application, analysis and refinement","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Engineering Education and Curriculum Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Capstone; Accreditation; Quality (philosophy); Test (biology); Engineering; Medical education; Metric (unit); Quarter (Canadian coin); Computer science; Engineering management; Psychology; Mathematics education; Medicine; Operations management","score_opus":0.015594656710805017,"score_gpt":0.3088477442670927,"score_spread":0.2932530875562877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044215693","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20723897,0.0049643316,0.65163314,0.0022030224,0.0017854049,0.0578112,0.0046450794,0.007672606,0.062046323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08964113,0.0018346746,0.8730536,0.00028625393,0.00012834523,0.02595477,0.0018759863,0.00065472326,0.006570508],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95309514,0.018065387,0.008910516,0.00092232367,0.018269392,0.00073728146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86525524,0.055266824,0.0097139925,0.007641732,0.060592398,0.0015297922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044736344,0.0021101024,0.0015604196,0.01292916,0.0017835263,0.0020359356,0.0027579584,0.0011998055,0.0046690456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14083433,0.000921047,0.0022109593,0.005190289,0.0017061383,0.001954673,0.0029807906,0.0022566016,0.0031089229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066369126,0.0010041329,0.019804234,0.00419435,0.00009539606,0.00033957325,0.009777048,0.0032104515,0.0166663,0.007103683,0.04375111,0.89339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008982796,0.0074865245,0.35413328,0.00839399,0.0005202777,0.005690045,0.02897828,0.06143687,0.074645884,0.025097089,0.43108013,0.0016393253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002182027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049463706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044736344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020612343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005604929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23659122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044908654","doi":"","title":"An experiment in integrating communication into the biosystems engineering design trilogy","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of engineering education","topic":"Biomedical and Engineering Education","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capstone; Technical communication; Trilogy; Toolbox; Communication skills; Process (computing); Engineering; Set (abstract data type); Curriculum; Engineering design process; Engineering education; Professional communication; Engineering management; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Psychology; Pedagogy; Medical education; Mechanical engineering; Electrical engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.010078494917155121,"score_gpt":0.2789088964630466,"score_spread":0.2688304015458915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044908654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873635,0.000070700815,0.0029860807,0.00039435615,0.0002459147,0.0018399088,0.00027361733,0.00015993691,0.0066659614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92938226,0.00022273826,0.03972445,0.0015254996,0.00019499355,0.012120688,0.000708351,0.00013857396,0.015982421],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99457246,0.0025746573,0.0004896404,0.0009466203,0.00094307866,0.00047352462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94858915,0.041776463,0.0024752254,0.003758724,0.0010842182,0.0023162537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008396926,0.0013301945,0.0010133239,0.0004983943,0.0013671675,0.0031307943,0.0030473438,0.0037572638,0.019500954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03120394,0.0010689915,0.0007012452,0.00048019332,0.0020811083,0.0039069774,0.0024715543,0.004091974,0.0020505416],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.1715256,0.3948478,0.015464105,0.0034704115,0.0002960233,0.001778919,0.048126083,0.00647839,0.17323785,0.018137075,0.009810249,0.15682755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.071463555,0.6343606,0.058148343,0.0007597049,0.0007568636,0.00067019806,0.013467738,0.036732648,0.07946547,0.03693208,0.06637095,0.00087175466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005247669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000504961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019500954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009198223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014230452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065237164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}