{"meta":{"query_hash":"a3e1db71dfa7","filters":{"venue":"Israel Law Review"},"cohort_total":17,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":17,"exported":17,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a3e1db71dfa7","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Israel+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2022904008","doi":"10.1017/s002122371300023x","title":"Transitional Justice Accountability and Memorialisation: The Yemeni Children Affair and the Indian Residential Schools","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Transitional justice; Settlement (finance); Accountability; Ethnic group; Institution; Economic Justice; Political science; Narrative; Sociology; Gender studies; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.020007764812293834,"score_gpt":0.2979301332942987,"score_spread":0.27792236848200486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022904008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7302337,0.01909877,0.0005293842,0.047305457,0.00033489667,0.000053148022,0.00006379995,0.000025158603,0.20235573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939277,0.0014268775,0.000049057355,0.001171816,0.000042779124,0.000015449601,0.00000604947,0.0000031261702,0.003357178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699605,0.0011110668,0.00006888932,0.00012356883,0.00018805555,0.001512429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980552,0.00096870016,0.00052022253,0.00009493673,0.0001691425,0.00019176833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022348473,0.00018094096,0.00022209149,0.0011335214,0.013824094,0.0057848166,0.0009323046,0.0020329927,0.0023769168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041141687,0.00017884355,0.00023326858,0.0017829828,0.02146116,0.0031480123,0.005482108,0.0037045805,0.00010118511],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006726106,0.000057297853,0.012698327,0.00021413185,0.00002047875,0.0028900553,0.15657762,0.00021428528,0.00023416895,0.8001906,0.006246983,0.020588763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042845113,0.00012592436,0.101793386,0.0010280014,0.00009077441,0.0015881339,0.60166353,0.00026773283,0.0014765672,0.04053157,0.25127405,0.00011752819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1432049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23205392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8567951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016163606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011693952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2847427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086088690","doi":"10.1017/s0021223711000021","title":"Is There Ever a ‘Right to One's Own Law’? An Exploration of Possible Rights Foundations for Legal Pluralism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Political science; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Reservation of rights; Law; Pluralism (philosophy); Law and economics; International human rights law; Autonomy; Legal realism; Right to property; Legal profession; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13226115335372748,"score_gpt":0.392984007197022,"score_spread":0.2607228538432945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086088690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05500152,0.011092531,0.09353263,0.2241462,0.0008101963,0.000076069315,0.00006916579,0.00008886299,0.6151828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708018,0.0020806002,0.011203356,0.0045149266,0.0006785103,0.000117029565,0.000024632565,0.000055061344,0.0105241025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98854816,0.006791904,0.0002715935,0.0014760729,0.0017159281,0.0011962801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99017745,0.006963453,0.0005860117,0.0010184186,0.0005799992,0.00067457376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01507956,0.00049352617,0.0008510266,0.0015209623,0.00825515,0.014604623,0.0020410041,0.008436045,0.004722195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010464908,0.00058152433,0.0011810046,0.00087205594,0.09218951,0.022972345,0.009559024,0.0104281055,0.00063163973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.849364e-7,0.0000026453354,0.0000185027,0.000004199288,5.876267e-7,0.0000127882195,0.000765478,0.000033711756,0.000016162187,0.99859506,0.00011410338,0.00043591153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029321534,0.000004070092,0.000032079555,0.000026457596,8.7625585e-7,0.000018511077,0.00052232866,0.00016517086,0.00002497541,0.99199027,0.0072085448,0.0000037826303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031013314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020384213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01507956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006795581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049291505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079749286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093334220","doi":"10.1017/s0021223700000972","title":"The Primacy of Liberty and Proportionality, Not Human Dignity, When Subjecting Criminal Law to Constitutional Control","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Dignity; Law; Proportionality (law); Political science; Criminal law; Constitutional law; Human rights; Constitutional court; Supreme court; Constitution","score_opus":0.13800594516062956,"score_gpt":0.38004659919723377,"score_spread":0.2420406540366042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093334220","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033543747,0.03797753,0.01806969,0.48502722,0.0038592538,0.00013026489,0.00018635986,0.000081016246,0.42112496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8448239,0.016974155,0.0049584103,0.09971291,0.0027328378,0.000125211,0.00007846534,0.00005628448,0.030537993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861276,0.003781942,0.0008567387,0.0017736612,0.0057397885,0.0017203199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635775,0.029774962,0.0016456858,0.001381174,0.0031366122,0.00048410284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01819079,0.00037420852,0.0012821222,0.0018005541,0.0045792754,0.009564552,0.003322513,0.009917237,0.004551492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039912276,0.00044540266,0.00095634535,0.0013602575,0.047417417,0.008330577,0.0037808623,0.010361714,0.0005405562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015652158,0.00000829294,0.00085761194,0.00018459087,0.000019201087,0.00016260242,0.0023733743,0.000090453635,0.00018455234,0.9835765,0.0056075286,0.006919578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039951254,0.000098405995,0.0056451955,0.0012934834,0.00014048713,0.00061009877,0.006841099,0.00031677386,0.0013808577,0.77249193,0.21104436,0.00009733876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0860386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13812344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0860386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009983278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012806412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17107558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139395764","doi":"10.1017/s0021223700000248","title":"Suspending Sovereignty: Reassessing the Interlocking of Occupation, Failed and Fragile State, Responsibility to Protect, and International Trusteeship (Lessons from Lebanon)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Middle East Politics and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Belligerent; Responsibility to protect; State (computer science); International law; Politics; Law; Political science; Territorial integrity; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.0764725498357493,"score_gpt":0.3766211957482509,"score_spread":0.3001486459125016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139395764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3257974,0.09080079,0.004912988,0.19465065,0.0028780508,0.000043520828,0.000029568138,0.000046616107,0.3808403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96862227,0.01171968,0.000684322,0.0054538124,0.0005432071,0.000021119025,0.000008098804,0.00002033877,0.01292702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973954,0.0019063898,0.000030701183,0.00010434664,0.00013833152,0.00042485842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873406,0.0007271666,0.00011856775,0.00006109261,0.00015337222,0.00020570421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004798306,0.00046181842,0.00036196096,0.0012449808,0.011325217,0.013140631,0.0010814731,0.0030860293,0.0023691189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023815427,0.0001766353,0.000264471,0.001045709,0.036947224,0.010067061,0.0066830977,0.004304819,0.0002602733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002857136,0.000033264736,0.0010982116,0.000089380716,0.000005237788,0.0013120009,0.2217294,0.00017922856,0.0002016051,0.74650776,0.005854401,0.022960862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018263287,0.000080853126,0.002093975,0.0011546491,0.0000111577265,0.0005754619,0.34289625,0.00044903564,0.0004549184,0.25315902,0.39905152,0.00005496238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028680148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041126724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028680148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011365443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006554064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08246243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146094808","doi":"10.1017/s002122370001222x","title":"Regulating (Hetero)Sexual Offences in British Columbia, 1885-1940","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Harassment; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sexual assault; Criminal trial; Sentence; Psychology; Criminal law; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Poison control","score_opus":0.025945403352039178,"score_gpt":0.27100257090970276,"score_spread":0.24505716755766357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146094808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3001443,0.2454866,0.0005121694,0.017369313,0.00073485775,0.00033433316,0.0029343655,0.000062106956,0.43242192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6604467,0.11423689,0.0007143197,0.00711522,0.00017451936,0.00012805387,0.0010073312,0.000027575548,0.21614946],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988494,0.00012220474,0.0000603997,0.000104521176,0.00052175164,0.00034172644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964477,0.0005994645,0.00020094364,0.00007341417,0.0023481695,0.0003302449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010526938,0.00021141113,0.00025865567,0.0039694845,0.0058449656,0.0022795321,0.0011098937,0.0013437645,0.00628832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004200255,0.0003475787,0.00014100352,0.005204858,0.0019352067,0.00044757157,0.00082554814,0.0009811827,0.00062707893],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002685137,0.00023641308,0.05504634,0.002936735,0.00009993277,0.004497442,0.023539927,0.0020721317,0.0024986935,0.08204222,0.19827193,0.62848973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032279746,0.00006669168,0.27417108,0.0011010747,0.00008883997,0.0004811125,0.008032984,0.00020730749,0.00079084554,0.0021660398,0.7128032,0.000058601378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98661613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99662834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05024933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05024933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06079791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3645861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318623215","doi":"10.1017/s0021223716000017","title":"The Canadian Charter's Override Clause: Lessons for Israel","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Legislature; Charter; Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Law; State (computer science); Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07008557188768984,"score_gpt":0.363649075735374,"score_spread":0.2935635038476842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318623215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057796136,0.014754386,0.004017512,0.22328335,0.0007743828,0.000069820715,0.0001975483,0.0000747358,0.6990321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8747609,0.011011788,0.0043463605,0.03697563,0.00052866933,0.00004053315,0.000103653394,0.000063499305,0.07216892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954652,0.0007008017,0.00007996818,0.00039353425,0.0021123604,0.0012482292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99480504,0.0020523556,0.00023786715,0.0002519737,0.002141895,0.0005108951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061605987,0.00021065214,0.00036890266,0.001271958,0.009045505,0.008607126,0.0013198659,0.0034166004,0.004065598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008643794,0.00020175762,0.00033551705,0.0016396552,0.013421871,0.0029897445,0.0015168331,0.0049873358,0.00030384527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014101039,0.000008554491,0.0007013558,0.000020762816,0.0000036271354,0.00006313912,0.0014972792,0.0002234458,0.00008588943,0.9639696,0.016404407,0.017007941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006675885,0.000035184912,0.008469929,0.00042596468,0.00004011764,0.00016453974,0.0065550273,0.001720349,0.0009412626,0.19041534,0.79102296,0.00014257475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91286075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93885547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08713925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05858666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.077131204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42507792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322550496","doi":"10.1017/s0021223714000247","title":"Distinction Matters: Rethinking the Protection of Civilian Objects in Non-International Armed Conflicts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Political science; Customary international law; International law; Armed conflict; Argument (complex analysis); Municipal law; Public international law","score_opus":0.07012386273845256,"score_gpt":0.33824227314327016,"score_spread":0.2681184104048176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322550496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10667209,0.03616952,0.018749103,0.12340003,0.0030647814,0.00012771651,0.00008926703,0.0000808377,0.7116467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93810916,0.007891647,0.0029632847,0.02979833,0.0010439898,0.00013477964,0.00007385842,0.000074851225,0.019910142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876989,0.005271094,0.0005618503,0.0017214416,0.0030114336,0.0017353252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899304,0.006688134,0.0008639732,0.0013829486,0.0008674416,0.00026707884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0144311115,0.000430071,0.0008075524,0.002404153,0.0069972854,0.012070008,0.0037308394,0.011011223,0.0035323412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01754106,0.0005081604,0.0009480733,0.0021807472,0.045901544,0.01719433,0.00780952,0.01414749,0.0006462997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005946354,0.000011903606,0.0002495265,0.000040364506,0.0000047153617,0.00006180933,0.005354369,0.000069912494,0.000089586996,0.9844887,0.0019096588,0.0077134683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057021396,0.00009185877,0.0046250387,0.0015463243,0.00006497668,0.0003086377,0.010051632,0.0004015587,0.00076669344,0.7059425,0.2760866,0.000057215206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015973993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016508253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015973993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008088487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009150987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07631987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323996072","doi":"10.1017/s0021223715000230","title":"The ‘Unique Role’ of Government Lawyers in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Public sector; Law; Private sector; Public administration; Population; Work (physics); Politics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.018267270709527578,"score_gpt":0.3250305103093783,"score_spread":0.30676323959985075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323996072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3970111,0.08973447,0.0007549744,0.21810538,0.00064134307,0.00008854793,0.0005657269,0.000052098145,0.2930463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567431,0.020137744,0.00034017622,0.010082607,0.000075073054,0.000011536071,0.00007772436,0.000014274874,0.012517709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510705,0.0006886928,0.00007952697,0.0003791157,0.0013504045,0.0023952248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930646,0.0016009548,0.0006582777,0.00012276397,0.0023750095,0.0021783586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023366595,0.00014151508,0.000477036,0.002072469,0.015222688,0.008431802,0.0015101525,0.00236222,0.0040513757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005975881,0.00029168607,0.00018118888,0.005302041,0.009721358,0.0017190507,0.0024260343,0.0025750436,0.00020262941],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010470368,0.00013906852,0.05820879,0.0010170818,0.0000852503,0.0026919714,0.10727018,0.0010081712,0.0012493521,0.50280136,0.14003775,0.18538645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003840014,0.000049156606,0.118019804,0.0012405468,0.00010902313,0.0006650775,0.14095184,0.0004858299,0.0005850257,0.015013251,0.7227236,0.00011852116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99834776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15339139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15339139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25009915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.981946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586772489","doi":"10.1017/s0021223716000327","title":"Limits on Constitutional Rights: The Marginal Role of Proportionality Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Dignity; Law and economics; Political science; Proportionality (law); Autonomy; Social rights; Fundamental rights; Law; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.0624862405199772,"score_gpt":0.3794631902142362,"score_spread":0.316976949694259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586772489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016542623,0.0119471615,0.3485676,0.045555,0.00093080796,0.00021422305,0.00017226771,0.0001406098,0.5759296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8919911,0.0050325496,0.071789764,0.008093016,0.0022309092,0.0009930439,0.00008683639,0.00026905473,0.019513667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9545489,0.027774615,0.0015557768,0.005544347,0.008884481,0.0016919909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90537673,0.07602995,0.0026195329,0.008778734,0.0061273756,0.0010676548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05079808,0.0009469236,0.0018101869,0.0037250658,0.006738747,0.012543892,0.004528447,0.0057557616,0.0082556065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09261017,0.0010762884,0.0019106523,0.0024695047,0.08325603,0.0295633,0.010459453,0.016474888,0.001031675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016796897,0.0000020102354,0.000026376121,0.000008826136,0.000002324017,0.000007577966,0.00019396142,0.00007299425,0.000009343708,0.99831855,0.00019374272,0.0011625483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050050753,0.0000038003943,0.000027682743,0.000028215709,0.000003680294,0.000014932082,0.00005238718,0.00034713213,0.00003771702,0.9945201,0.0049539288,0.0000053959093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008379328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035841272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05079808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011389299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006692664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2686491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793425435","doi":"10.1017/s0021223717000255","title":"Compensation for Palestinian Refugees: Law, Politics and Praxis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Refugee; Negotiation; Politics; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Palestinian refugees; Praxis; Law; Refugee law; Core (optical fiber); Displacement (psychology); Engineering; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.055502443141263375,"score_gpt":0.36510994206901537,"score_spread":0.30960749892775197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793425435","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05107248,0.5636757,0.0005687395,0.25122052,0.0017084663,0.00003721258,0.00006412671,0.00000909951,0.13164361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6892021,0.21971557,0.0005167869,0.06627482,0.0024415578,0.00005936183,0.000049499246,0.000008034777,0.021732273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966642,0.0017669948,0.00019126432,0.00022922299,0.00060345983,0.0005447616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969072,0.002036344,0.00039305066,0.00009111859,0.00045388125,0.00011850242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008738054,0.00023835142,0.00046418936,0.001830324,0.0036844832,0.0066925054,0.0011311086,0.005615849,0.0029982505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075240997,0.00022165358,0.0002248786,0.002015371,0.011913169,0.0032125667,0.0018727141,0.0035569717,0.00036575858],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003362877,0.000060179238,0.0023845073,0.00085213635,0.000028612258,0.00061900273,0.0069906833,0.00033784047,0.0003818779,0.86291295,0.030184897,0.095213644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006726026,0.000107765176,0.013101533,0.008716789,0.00004136015,0.00080406584,0.030966947,0.00024155679,0.00051908504,0.12288111,0.8224884,0.00006413057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023605244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026045373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023605244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073117577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010961076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053050816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122897509","doi":"10.1017/s0021223700012310","title":"The Status of Arabic in Israel: Refiections on the Power of Law to Produce Social Change","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Hebrew; Legal status; Prima facie; Law; Arabic; Political science; Power (physics); Politics; Ethnic group; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1405444752561408,"score_gpt":0.3537027600262742,"score_spread":0.2131582847701334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122897509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08031404,0.3112656,0.0007926757,0.12387831,0.0010703226,0.00007309257,0.00013231796,0.000017384118,0.4824564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8919816,0.084582224,0.0004041307,0.007486704,0.0008210663,0.000045070665,0.000052894033,0.000010279207,0.014615993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948159,0.003164388,0.0001593773,0.0001920372,0.001194129,0.0004741725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99049485,0.0063093775,0.000782547,0.00016178396,0.0019318857,0.00031958712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076955343,0.00016427143,0.0002951135,0.0031301111,0.0020788081,0.00592682,0.00060113077,0.0017518438,0.004652777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063532162,0.000099272875,0.00013749825,0.0017287708,0.0066997176,0.0019455807,0.0011521012,0.0013331681,0.00041003374],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052970598,0.00010643829,0.0043311594,0.0015332317,0.000046644764,0.0005934808,0.012538912,0.00061488413,0.00044067865,0.8252619,0.026774665,0.12770501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056094654,0.0001657773,0.028588295,0.007212581,0.00009088023,0.00029979827,0.029951887,0.00069240876,0.0011821582,0.100999594,0.83071274,0.000047736256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022135146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032002013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022135146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063207676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075121806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04586065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124474087","doi":"10.1017/s0021223715000187","title":"The Canadian Override: Constitutional Model or<i>Bête Noire</i>of Constitutional Politics?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Knesset; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Politics; Political science; Law; Legislature; Section (typography); Law and economics; Sociology; Parliament","score_opus":0.05925652900322724,"score_gpt":0.3300560492398081,"score_spread":0.2707995202365808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124474087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030565321,0.04875343,0.0027720048,0.21290974,0.0013077869,0.000047311834,0.0002562918,0.00006339705,0.70332474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89869153,0.02058269,0.0017231441,0.02522802,0.0004140907,0.000023994819,0.00010651359,0.000052393214,0.05317778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942272,0.0008399554,0.000076846736,0.0004992443,0.0026950454,0.00166181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666995,0.0009971038,0.00014479639,0.00015435604,0.0015334402,0.0005003354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041226274,0.00034902792,0.00037942687,0.0017027939,0.010602083,0.011034371,0.001936102,0.00363575,0.0050393306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00729869,0.00021703022,0.00027877124,0.0028281251,0.023556387,0.0033565338,0.0014238043,0.0054606185,0.00029982522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007538783,0.000004757258,0.0005409689,0.000050708626,0.000004651189,0.000060219198,0.0020076798,0.00011878683,0.00007335391,0.9680466,0.020168087,0.008916608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003355696,0.000022031214,0.008975715,0.00064404175,0.000053638858,0.00026075845,0.014991353,0.0008921567,0.00053888944,0.14053522,0.8329416,0.00011103021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9723794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98270214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89640564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10359438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.126696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75163335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125166712","doi":"10.1017/s0021223716000029","title":"Juxtaposing Constitution-Making and Constitutional-Infringement Mechanisms in Israel and Canada: On the Interplay between Common Law Override and Sunset Override","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Legislature; Common law; Political science; Constitutional law; Delegation; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Parliamentary sovereignty; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.02927075477351136,"score_gpt":0.3191953073681385,"score_spread":0.2899245525946271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125166712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45961106,0.0033864293,0.006069617,0.016493168,0.00007101307,0.00017268893,0.00019458111,0.00007801276,0.5139235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856193,0.00056441576,0.00083115476,0.0007884426,0.000008994698,0.00001305852,0.000028777788,0.000015898668,0.012129886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909691,0.0010364888,0.00015677096,0.000499747,0.0031862713,0.0041515636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99398154,0.0025240763,0.0004932804,0.00033031567,0.0018614513,0.00080926064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043788864,0.00031704418,0.0004887161,0.003445981,0.0144241825,0.011091574,0.0020544308,0.0029558265,0.0060697156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106779495,0.0004425164,0.00049849786,0.0036493228,0.01618227,0.002767996,0.0039731152,0.003510686,0.00016197954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044379958,0.00003061077,0.008712051,0.00004645935,0.00003341042,0.000551905,0.011025276,0.0016062584,0.00044411607,0.9600098,0.0024617238,0.01503398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000213334,0.00011164792,0.12189759,0.0007237736,0.0004635372,0.00072075665,0.0970788,0.018944515,0.005507476,0.34008572,0.41352472,0.0007281658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9851833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15049432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15049432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13278805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9853062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210263457","doi":"10.1017/s0021223721000273","title":"An Interdisciplinary Dialogue with the Business and Human Rights Literature","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Jurisdiction; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Latin Americans; Legislation; International human rights law; International law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.014357550931447496,"score_gpt":0.2533062785720552,"score_spread":0.23894872764060768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210263457","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003784287,0.108177096,0.004241787,0.7992667,0.00938913,0.000030648003,0.000018313363,0.000021526927,0.075070396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27773678,0.14085452,0.0082005495,0.4782436,0.035317086,0.00030888055,0.000054057775,0.00014415929,0.059140395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9667172,0.026660267,0.0004912972,0.0011297654,0.0032918225,0.0017096562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96057516,0.035409767,0.0007362951,0.0006135028,0.0010244589,0.0016408162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02384814,0.0008137748,0.0014774329,0.0047289953,0.010379111,0.025435202,0.0022480225,0.020616896,0.0048627583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014269058,0.0005405379,0.00072453124,0.005016504,0.038290672,0.024939457,0.009474721,0.022324057,0.000911174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007217692,0.000065443426,0.00016912167,0.00015421203,0.0000074461595,0.00033004905,0.017441597,0.00014145422,0.00013512917,0.91353947,0.05306085,0.014947934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009195287,0.000032649532,0.00032385488,0.0013105264,0.000004022824,0.00028316551,0.03034247,0.00021261194,0.00008385769,0.24957095,0.71780264,0.00002405032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037913315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069961986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025435202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008374531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010242581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12612253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245887729","doi":"10.1017/s0021223700012140","title":"ISR volume 35 issue 2-3 Cover and Front matter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford; University College London; University of Alberta; Università degli Studi di Milano; McGill University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Tulane University; University of Cambridge; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Political science; Computer science; Geography; Engineering; Physics; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Meteorology; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.03325649030705256,"score_gpt":0.22417519629696595,"score_spread":0.1909187059899134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245887729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011265931,0.0033937567,0.00044106663,0.0075528882,0.0059212167,0.0001407513,0.0014170494,0.0007903878,0.9792163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0074098855,0.0024475437,0.0003965042,0.004208103,0.0036719444,0.000057426438,0.0012827362,0.0003385363,0.98018736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977816,0.00015800787,0.00008760794,0.00023863872,0.0014665856,0.00026754625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977685,0.00029874514,0.00008027821,0.00029308596,0.0012528808,0.0003065562],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016262997,0.0007880004,0.0011217827,0.003167424,0.0019530486,0.0076087024,0.0011277561,0.0040580537,0.5661048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033867224,0.0004215805,0.0011416303,0.001655605,0.0009562908,0.0017658016,0.001372604,0.0029792476,0.48079944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003818444,0.00007418968,0.00043286366,0.00013934771,0.000013292384,0.00007817056,0.000031739382,0.0000967805,0.00051892665,0.0054100556,0.9524901,0.0406763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008982457,0.00002295832,0.001460754,0.00013990489,0.00000794545,0.00005519561,0.00003493862,0.00009564673,0.00026256774,0.0008016747,0.99710256,0.0000069258112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075086267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009561987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43389517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028336302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028129325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61889875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249919637","doi":"10.1017/s0021223700012048","title":"ISR volume 35 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford; University College London; University of Alberta; Università degli Studi di Milano; McGill University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Tulane University; University of Cambridge; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Political science; Geography; Physics; Engineering; Mathematics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.03403801593413107,"score_gpt":0.22429064155076864,"score_spread":0.19025262561663758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249919637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010097133,0.003093738,0.00032171948,0.0066142622,0.0065789726,0.00013336306,0.0011540704,0.0007571206,0.9803371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004555112,0.0018383985,0.00026775326,0.003077994,0.0034323263,0.000041158994,0.0009052695,0.00024109046,0.9856409],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982262,0.000109963315,0.000069360205,0.0002333429,0.0011543895,0.00020664382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981073,0.00026332657,0.00006800983,0.00024359557,0.0010249206,0.00029276553],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013602419,0.00088529906,0.0011301236,0.0028178764,0.0020475003,0.007284927,0.0010772881,0.0041568284,0.63015366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003037818,0.000444829,0.0010865419,0.0015599643,0.00090833916,0.0017484932,0.0013762212,0.0029657967,0.5621828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038827686,0.000075663105,0.00038058628,0.0001506218,0.000011624746,0.00008545134,0.000030731782,0.00007651244,0.00056006515,0.004211158,0.9452958,0.0490829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074984478,0.00001984186,0.00120153,0.000118871794,0.000005925547,0.00005384747,0.000028826596,0.00007730939,0.00020652518,0.0005430369,0.99773115,0.0000057792686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005467765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007676725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36984634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024139876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024438528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5275409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311956886","doi":"10.1017/s0021223722000140","title":"Rethinking ‘Jurisdiction’ in International Human Rights Law in Rescue Operations at Sea in the Light of <i>AS and Others v Italy</i> and <i>AS and Others v Malta</i>: A New Right to be Rescued at Sea?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Human rights; Law; Political science; International law; Politics; Covenant; International waters; International human rights law; Right to property","score_opus":0.013823384539268038,"score_gpt":0.2739583864437869,"score_spread":0.2601350019045189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311956886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10601737,0.0097142635,0.014426454,0.3135301,0.0014953826,0.00009889792,0.000082480045,0.000057229154,0.5545778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563425,0.0013051376,0.0015663998,0.029141147,0.0005796923,0.00007512734,0.000021909009,0.00003311928,0.010934936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97697973,0.012156806,0.0010753197,0.002137269,0.0034406823,0.0042101718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774804,0.015932059,0.0013655818,0.0013897214,0.0029481465,0.0008840239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032331217,0.00038401337,0.00073458406,0.0018482589,0.01178375,0.023171527,0.0038009754,0.019330852,0.0024986786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02339883,0.0008211436,0.0009124242,0.0017028344,0.08640514,0.011703942,0.009713177,0.019217148,0.00038043686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047742137,0.000006063781,0.00021346823,0.000014844419,0.0000033524286,0.000120787496,0.0071360045,0.00016365647,0.00009760052,0.9882111,0.0027268224,0.001301622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007591486,0.00009258794,0.0039822375,0.0012818052,0.00008423533,0.00034979833,0.03805782,0.0020723096,0.000978801,0.61012584,0.34264937,0.0002492742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10764569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11349227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10764569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018648198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019596782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21403825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}