{"meta":{"query_hash":"a3e1db71dfa7","filters":{"venue":"Israel Law Review"},"cohort_total":17,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":17,"exported":17,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a3e1db71dfa7","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Israel+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W2022904008","doi":"10.1017/s002122371300023x","title":"Transitional Justice Accountability and Memorialisation: The Yemeni Children Affair and the Indian Residential Schools","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Transitional justice; Settlement (finance); Accountability; Ethnic group; Institution; Economic Justice; Political science; Narrative; Sociology; Gender studies; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.020007764812293834,"score_gpt":0.2979301332942987,"score_spread":0.27792236848200486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022904008","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.125056,0.5876706,0.00019307862,0.20438701,0.002009418,0.0051444443,0.000098915014,0.00013730647,0.07530319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708467,0.022240592,0.000031984153,0.0054949396,0.0012519641,0.000051141225,0.0000051824322,0.000004859025,0.0000726116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843115,0.00071190053,0.00020403642,0.00018352937,0.00030885445,0.00016051481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993066,0.00030593926,0.000079782796,0.0001743114,0.00007477594,0.000058556845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028572686,0.000093505114,0.00022130559,0.000006681543,0.0011479998,0.00015585503,0.00017434992,0.000037653514,0.000023637429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002795447,0.00005129094,0.000058262118,0.00010051685,0.00092493417,0.00020188912,0.00005182772,0.00012835636,0.00002182866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013310069,0.000009103183,0.0021552148,0.00025819018,0.000041716266,1.8396076e-7,0.0019057302,4.9526548e-8,4.830605e-7,0.98265904,0.00087837566,0.012078585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031785015,0.000054198525,0.052792035,0.001875019,0.0021302833,0.000034165332,0.014607838,0.000003963965,0.000004968315,0.061959438,0.86278284,0.00057674554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029799114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012740067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9206996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014559571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040254115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88296026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086088690","doi":"10.1017/s0021223711000021","title":"Is There Ever a ‘Right to One's Own Law’? An Exploration of Possible Rights Foundations for Legal Pluralism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Political science; Human rights; Fundamental rights; Reservation of rights; Law; Pluralism (philosophy); Law and economics; International human rights law; Autonomy; Legal realism; Right to property; Legal profession; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13226115335372748,"score_gpt":0.392984007197022,"score_spread":0.2607228538432945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086088690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03561111,0.038018417,0.0063414667,0.03302869,0.0023617994,0.011110999,0.00021008588,0.0003620267,0.8729554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96052,0.0024274555,0.01149361,0.011651146,0.0008854749,0.0005494968,0.000095913136,0.0000320665,0.012344797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986612,0.00013839865,0.00036106282,0.00018765221,0.00034323675,0.00030840014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914205,0.000049091424,0.00013191135,0.0002491265,0.00022026189,0.00020753627],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074686744,0.0001213432,0.00028320352,0.00002766284,0.000763914,0.000093631956,0.00021989095,0.00006136888,0.0014546654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014290185,0.000082974235,0.0001068863,0.00017426786,0.000121418096,0.0020647622,0.000022492824,0.00004806828,0.00024275467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002843966,0.00009104451,0.0000135845,0.00014458457,0.000018879146,2.0170482e-7,0.00436672,1.2307031e-7,0.000008439943,0.9911432,0.0031510969,0.0010592643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010914313,0.00004236645,0.00005577532,0.0005877853,0.00005122935,2.47552e-7,0.000090496724,4.6419015e-7,0.00024179897,0.03278513,0.9658826,0.00015294482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061033256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020500721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96273154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000779814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104141356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093334220","doi":"10.1017/s0021223700000972","title":"The Primacy of Liberty and Proportionality, Not Human Dignity, When Subjecting Criminal Law to Constitutional Control","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Dignity; Law; Proportionality (law); Political science; Criminal law; Constitutional law; Human rights; Constitutional court; Supreme court; Constitution","score_opus":0.13800594516062956,"score_gpt":0.38004659919723377,"score_spread":0.2420406540366042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093334220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04883169,0.046687536,0.0005134936,0.027850412,0.0005742697,0.0042363564,0.00008135518,0.00016322693,0.8710617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929872,0.0013072913,0.0003398459,0.0049498775,0.00011115191,0.00004813032,0.000002248746,0.0000052870114,0.00024897975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998256,0.00028584566,0.0004635324,0.00023202653,0.0004894444,0.0002731063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998843,0.00030458363,0.00020185861,0.00020277481,0.0002915862,0.00015617556],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023527385,0.000120997836,0.00030126254,0.000010988192,0.0013279197,0.00006724416,0.0003226076,0.00004272353,0.00014505023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032166144,0.00008385177,0.00010245999,0.00008652644,0.00240095,0.00026086587,0.00009957781,0.00012278876,0.000027443186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001766705,0.000040265404,0.00090417924,0.00048394946,0.00001679233,0.0000031427235,0.00073140784,2.737116e-8,0.0000603187,0.99598986,0.0003847804,0.0013676101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002862394,0.00012774863,0.0031242396,0.0026379204,0.00040429464,0.000023034143,0.00041709197,5.334886e-7,0.00032962224,0.04528648,0.9470611,0.0003016536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022778405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01452068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9507034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042166772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016178089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139395764","doi":"10.1017/s0021223700000248","title":"Suspending Sovereignty: Reassessing the Interlocking of Occupation, Failed and Fragile State, Responsibility to Protect, and International Trusteeship (Lessons from Lebanon)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Middle East Politics and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Belligerent; Responsibility to protect; State (computer science); International law; Politics; Law; Political science; Territorial integrity; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.0764725498357493,"score_gpt":0.3766211957482509,"score_spread":0.3001486459125016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139395764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93986666,0.017426243,0.0005275217,0.006169952,0.00025846987,0.001509102,0.00013683799,0.00005192684,0.034053277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935684,0.0042558555,0.0007299074,0.0010729381,0.00008825547,0.000027661095,0.000006365942,0.00000865438,0.00024192214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842405,0.00045619524,0.00035609465,0.00026548732,0.00029885312,0.00019934488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890393,0.00041898357,0.00017972723,0.00021820526,0.00016815646,0.00011100653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015454385,0.0001088257,0.00027171383,0.00002082909,0.00058677304,0.00010071325,0.00022218497,0.000049290255,0.00017697546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067684636,0.00008366474,0.00006641073,0.00016260605,0.00038480453,0.00021650238,0.00012448468,0.00014428415,0.0000033884583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031507,0.0000484345,0.03000954,0.00035023424,0.00007499454,0.0000045143133,0.01611583,0.0000012591137,0.000068655696,0.9384391,0.00037199937,0.014483982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016571494,0.0001770823,0.13686913,0.01969267,0.0003191439,0.000029067545,0.015005105,0.00038569327,0.00059817947,0.21649882,0.60733724,0.0014306986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005380377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019934336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7219402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008013524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013587085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8133557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146094808","doi":"10.1017/s002122370001222x","title":"Regulating (Hetero)Sexual Offences in British Columbia, 1885-1940","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Harassment; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sexual assault; Criminal trial; Sentence; Psychology; Criminal law; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Poison control","score_opus":0.025945403352039178,"score_gpt":0.27100257090970276,"score_spread":0.24505716755766357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146094808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2880876,0.32037354,0.0000032828957,0.0033101416,0.00096265675,0.0010952022,0.000032781594,0.00014787706,0.3859869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6111414,0.26809964,0.000314971,0.015755408,0.0011941075,0.00015363972,0.000029593362,0.00005317234,0.103258096],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985734,0.00021841805,0.0003195124,0.0002432346,0.00031087841,0.0003345613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948066,0.00005732152,0.000101715654,0.00016419237,0.00004763819,0.00014845954],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008427871,0.000054839024,0.00027711733,0.00004538098,0.0009008227,0.0007597372,0.00026397334,0.0000713959,0.0014059062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016319365,0.00011086193,0.00007361739,0.00049510866,0.00054761686,0.00031456532,0.000026250702,0.00013160547,0.00017194245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002355418,0.00014403324,0.039970003,0.0017984372,0.00003021447,0.00049526937,0.001842203,0.0000012711513,0.000008877686,0.045975495,0.20696376,0.7027681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008715729,0.000011158428,0.005190863,0.0015199275,0.000015808955,0.000012782165,0.00023569245,7.8605007e-7,3.578591e-8,0.00033115843,0.99245673,0.00013791809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78549296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040276223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028932636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318623215","doi":"10.1017/s0021223716000017","title":"The Canadian Charter's Override Clause: Lessons for Israel","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Legislature; Charter; Political science; Politics; Supreme court; Law; State (computer science); Judicial review; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07008557188768984,"score_gpt":0.363649075735374,"score_spread":0.2935635038476842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318623215","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000091923815,0.15371227,0.000056124263,0.47693783,0.00090975646,0.0011444179,0.00016338968,0.000059957947,0.36692435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7122546,0.24495043,0.000057694895,0.035249054,0.001375343,0.0005577546,0.0000057287293,0.000018415401,0.005531007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988498,0.00009022081,0.00019657738,0.00017513506,0.00024505105,0.0004432161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990995,0.00032030087,0.00006870387,0.0001654093,0.0001591578,0.00018693184],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008316452,0.00010069109,0.00019720763,0.000010796048,0.003403899,0.00006420357,0.0003074101,0.00005043137,0.00005468503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032289315,0.00005313683,0.00013452802,0.00012313444,0.00083043694,0.00011845661,0.00002660881,0.000050189417,0.00029029293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013208345,0.0000037601833,0.0001047525,0.0000223522,0.000023287987,9.883441e-7,0.00003163318,4.5128634e-9,0.0000023174928,0.95306736,0.022035852,0.024706377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007913272,0.000009012066,0.0003592352,0.00071766134,0.000040436098,6.830069e-7,0.000071527254,6.6767946e-8,0.0000025595489,0.027814645,0.9708035,0.000101523394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5782469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9772983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94876766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021554533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005779674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322550496","doi":"10.1017/s0021223714000247","title":"Distinction Matters: Rethinking the Protection of Civilian Objects in Non-International Armed Conflicts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Political science; Customary international law; International law; Armed conflict; Argument (complex analysis); Municipal law; Public international law","score_opus":0.07012386273845256,"score_gpt":0.33824227314327016,"score_spread":0.2681184104048176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322550496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097640574,0.004064067,0.000495992,0.05854068,0.005830459,0.004055451,0.000021743392,0.0001363019,0.82921475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99467295,0.00029605802,0.000052255018,0.0030349283,0.0004039877,0.00006739466,0.000010039609,0.00000685862,0.0014555104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870235,0.000204077,0.00029550417,0.00014296967,0.0005221892,0.00013290047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999338,0.000054257198,0.0001948325,0.00012473743,0.00024230912,0.00004588739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001411421,0.000076962264,0.00015749935,0.000033302385,0.00015887707,0.000045073644,0.00028524798,0.000048315444,0.00012269912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000116063144,0.000054036456,0.00006591323,0.00009220314,0.00018808107,0.00021691389,0.000027668671,0.00013822345,0.00006669264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000096303,0.000029721006,0.00006696978,0.00013199955,0.000013499109,0.000002531251,0.0022208458,0.0000025868885,0.000016720158,0.99659854,0.0005187485,0.00038817668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035631916,0.000036190984,0.00095133,0.0033119498,0.000029940129,0.0000050085177,0.00016401891,0.00006055365,0.00013110062,0.0515771,0.9432298,0.00014669268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011745851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020656781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94502145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016094555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007160157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99721366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323996072","doi":"10.1017/s0021223715000230","title":"The ‘Unique Role’ of Government Lawyers in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Public sector; Law; Private sector; Public administration; Population; Work (physics); Politics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.018267270709527578,"score_gpt":0.3250305103093783,"score_spread":0.30676323959985075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323996072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018823384,0.022556903,0.0000041583903,0.3517998,0.0003263783,0.0004202354,0.000017152192,0.000006998899,0.6229861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9369179,0.05207258,0.000040949515,0.008850904,0.000039954477,0.000044209377,3.9330368e-7,0.0000037227012,0.002029376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991291,0.00020695754,0.00020316668,0.00005837075,0.00029530787,0.00010706788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919224,0.00046113197,0.00012154524,0.0001364477,0.00005522398,0.000033392458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091308105,0.000034486504,0.0000818052,0.0000028224945,0.00013110277,0.00001294067,0.0001654986,0.000012548699,0.00020372629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004932712,0.000018722529,0.000018886489,0.00019848319,0.00007884566,0.00015036577,0.0000114864515,0.000060814225,0.0000141346845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.979799e-7,0.0000068334707,0.0008629304,0.000021703085,0.000003551046,1.7258749e-7,0.00012256078,2.1422213e-8,0.000015551033,0.9635651,0.0063990294,0.029001808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026637026,0.0000018332092,0.0003964345,0.00031265785,0.000004936333,1.421293e-7,0.0007957938,8.4876746e-8,0.000045596964,0.00089560676,0.99748963,0.000030656534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9749955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99680537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045354548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015390427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27301955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586772489","doi":"10.1017/s0021223716000327","title":"Limits on Constitutional Rights: The Marginal Role of Proportionality Analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Dignity; Law and economics; Political science; Proportionality (law); Autonomy; Social rights; Fundamental rights; Law; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.0624862405199772,"score_gpt":0.3794631902142362,"score_spread":0.316976949694259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586772489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019927902,0.07000636,0.000019354013,0.050467182,0.00031437544,0.0016247934,0.000119560566,0.00006193556,0.85745853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919855,0.0063697947,0.00008974764,0.00080551085,0.00014597955,0.00004508053,0.000008461752,0.0000016476342,0.0005482564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985061,0.00022976026,0.00028809038,0.00018631537,0.00061358744,0.00017611113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987907,0.00012941318,0.0003949831,0.00034713282,0.0002780374,0.000059729424],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010774514,0.00010307037,0.00035620594,0.000009469489,0.002878368,0.00006683693,0.00048371186,0.00004403038,0.00033066582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039662208,0.000054519925,0.00029991593,0.00014754194,0.0032890993,0.00017039815,0.000052999065,0.000108278175,0.000082285784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031727968,0.000040166728,0.0058503016,0.00006880784,0.00026040865,9.117495e-7,0.00014921797,0.0000014485316,0.000002615309,0.9922047,0.0005908591,0.00082736195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069627415,0.0000107304795,0.046167832,0.0003820937,0.00061059394,3.4241341e-7,0.00011015384,0.0000022424636,0.000021532825,0.0040733796,0.9484492,0.000102280406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016645206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009017662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98813134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008107271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065984525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793425435","doi":"10.1017/s0021223717000255","title":"Compensation for Palestinian Refugees: Law, Politics and Praxis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Refugee; Negotiation; Politics; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Palestinian refugees; Praxis; Law; Refugee law; Core (optical fiber); Displacement (psychology); Engineering; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.055502443141263375,"score_gpt":0.36510994206901537,"score_spread":0.30960749892775197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793425435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01281383,0.36352614,0.0003285408,0.011590869,0.00091484946,0.0028662186,0.0000889357,0.00021462423,0.607656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95160675,0.02161585,0.0024694223,0.02018237,0.0013900432,0.00012250709,0.000018482313,0.000023747576,0.0025708356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991839,0.000089952926,0.00018577187,0.00016350664,0.0001362135,0.00024065046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941945,0.00010222362,0.00008154272,0.000121014105,0.00018620281,0.00008955241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005324704,0.000083241226,0.00021370016,0.000008051984,0.0006066093,0.000041613122,0.000090290196,0.000039867482,0.0000083176155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001762659,0.00007208382,0.00004591981,0.000073319134,0.00064377073,0.000109748835,0.000030311006,0.00003404645,0.00006616515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.885083e-7,0.000008852397,0.0005536756,0.000442261,0.000010552994,2.5919587e-7,0.00030175195,1.0121751e-9,0.0000013057683,0.9791249,0.00042171916,0.019133838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011031433,0.000062353145,0.00020961459,0.0008794928,0.000057021676,0.0000011793747,0.00024022181,9.350545e-7,0.0000059609683,0.008468745,0.9898709,0.00009324068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018179445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01725651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002295631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030790507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9629537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122897509","doi":"10.1017/s0021223700012310","title":"The Status of Arabic in Israel: Refiections on the Power of Law to Produce Social Change","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Hebrew; Legal status; Prima facie; Law; Arabic; Political science; Power (physics); Politics; Ethnic group; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1405444752561408,"score_gpt":0.3537027600262742,"score_spread":0.2131582847701334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122897509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025543153,0.37097898,8.0535364e-7,0.053553138,0.00054562616,0.0022788688,0.0000388525,0.000036819303,0.5470237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93881047,0.053490818,0.000007349305,0.00624821,0.00017165465,0.00018371135,4.615501e-7,0.000009897767,0.0010774488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847555,0.00032717825,0.00030601013,0.00016523252,0.0003307882,0.00039522405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992337,0.00019028463,0.00014087462,0.00024613514,0.00013284285,0.000056120527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082272955,0.00009817263,0.00028289208,0.000017192424,0.0005202924,0.000017408345,0.0002534565,0.0000359056,0.000028200959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033103264,0.000056065717,0.000108915,0.00043371032,0.00042091208,0.00007435211,0.000056432607,0.00012067492,0.00008830441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030294975,0.00006713141,0.00050568517,0.000116203424,0.000017017936,4.230507e-7,0.004211996,3.143279e-8,0.0000044804747,0.97491837,0.0013620183,0.018793637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006806117,0.000062261606,0.0014091831,0.000765955,0.000024781446,2.164152e-7,0.0021755954,1.2075097e-7,0.000018847582,0.0007599598,0.9946351,0.0000798957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012746459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061090413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000607558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021171161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99382776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124474087","doi":"10.1017/s0021223715000187","title":"The Canadian Override: Constitutional Model or<i>Bête Noire</i>of Constitutional Politics?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Knesset; Supreme court; Legitimacy; Politics; Political science; Law; Legislature; Section (typography); Law and economics; Sociology; Parliament","score_opus":0.05925652900322724,"score_gpt":0.3300560492398081,"score_spread":0.2707995202365808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124474087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010672935,0.063163795,0.0010735118,0.059251614,0.0007277001,0.0006718585,0.0006999744,0.00005029792,0.8742545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9401366,0.04885479,0.00015746096,0.00898547,0.0003469559,0.000060022026,0.000007561788,0.000004032562,0.0014470811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821603,0.00011748843,0.00039837338,0.00020136213,0.00059285865,0.0004738837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862033,0.00042524826,0.00012834849,0.00017453289,0.00038113762,0.00027042528],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076135504,0.00014165882,0.0002829345,0.000023597611,0.003269999,0.00003791849,0.0003423333,0.000074169984,0.00024736408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005737958,0.0000747829,0.00014936794,0.00017810127,0.018663349,0.00018693758,0.000052965883,0.00008833147,0.00019847328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040376553,0.000011623841,0.00032217326,0.00003124822,0.000042155152,0.0000049530368,0.00001821069,0.0000027825433,0.000003852325,0.98971325,0.008989705,0.0008560072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013275148,0.0000075002554,0.000057316698,0.0009582539,0.000054204866,0.000008311654,0.000025678088,0.000002945686,0.000005517878,0.08116243,0.91745204,0.00013305013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18021151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66889066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9400299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038773174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006507857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125166712","doi":"10.1017/s0021223716000029","title":"Juxtaposing Constitution-Making and Constitutional-Infringement Mechanisms in Israel and Canada: On the Interplay between Common Law Override and Sunset Override","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Legislature; Common law; Political science; Constitutional law; Delegation; Judicial review; Separation of powers; Parliamentary sovereignty; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.02927075477351136,"score_gpt":0.3191953073681385,"score_spread":0.2899245525946271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125166712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24444821,0.15451017,0.0018129008,0.1261356,0.0013780275,0.004367453,0.0008055083,0.0001666926,0.46637544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778191,0.013155766,0.000041047482,0.008850345,0.00007811504,0.000031928583,0.0000026359364,0.000003580543,0.000017477345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848616,0.00019777377,0.00034966556,0.00029812136,0.00037276268,0.00029549337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987494,0.0008461303,0.00012429731,0.00011986184,0.000060952607,0.00009938351],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088577165,0.00018466146,0.00038359687,0.000024203442,0.0011818261,0.00006868911,0.00012939339,0.000052273543,0.000021692093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019710281,0.00011651216,0.000034302262,0.0001000966,0.004403876,0.0001952668,0.00014882264,0.00012805636,0.000004465084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005677662,0.000008231677,0.010497713,0.00006398779,0.00003660973,0.00001224717,0.000051648425,2.1628239e-7,0.00001435892,0.98737186,0.00028578326,0.0016516857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006527012,0.000061239,0.0066816127,0.018333988,0.0002161676,0.000028461422,0.0010493817,0.000002138491,0.00007222322,0.15550399,0.8168016,0.00059646997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6493724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8734071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8318679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029032596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031184757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99830556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210263457","doi":"10.1017/s0021223721000273","title":"An Interdisciplinary Dialogue with the Business and Human Rights Literature","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Jurisdiction; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Latin Americans; Legislation; International human rights law; International law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.014357550931447496,"score_gpt":0.2533062785720552,"score_spread":0.23894872764060768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210263457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80923545,0.062820695,0.00004154474,0.019058881,0.00079566246,0.0030256386,0.000051875206,0.00053359737,0.10443665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899004,0.0000869218,0.000013503787,0.008141204,0.0008108495,0.00013097891,0.00030607966,0.00002884419,0.00058119674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989802,0.000045878038,0.00020475373,0.00034069878,0.00023246837,0.00019599195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991891,0.000015087932,0.0001838262,0.000467904,0.00012804524,0.000016055175],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003275582,0.00021491374,0.00029416409,0.000050090322,0.0024815989,0.00043847354,0.00041479486,0.000023174047,0.00032583656],"category_scores_gemma":[5.028413e-7,0.00011401598,0.000051776296,0.00049342867,0.0001444194,0.00083826465,0.00052190595,0.0002469014,0.000033576183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015051607,0.00007343377,0.00009201228,0.001243894,0.000019040273,0.00011512624,0.000053005664,0.000002099636,0.000010929895,0.99023324,0.007758295,0.0003838753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002357071,0.00003476575,0.0015301248,0.000978528,0.00016019201,0.000047117446,0.00002024222,0.000009685384,6.448205e-7,0.050213538,0.9465068,0.00026267997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053709967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005142033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94001967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000152352795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000069593775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245887729","doi":"10.1017/s0021223700012140","title":"ISR volume 35 issue 2-3 Cover and Front matter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford; University College London; University of Alberta; Università degli Studi di Milano; McGill University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Tulane University; University of Cambridge; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Political science; Computer science; Geography; Engineering; Physics; Mathematics; Mechanical engineering; Meteorology; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.03325649030705256,"score_gpt":0.22417519629696595,"score_spread":0.1909187059899134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245887729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00097527617,0.19234645,0.000045467725,0.0020281437,0.00093917164,0.0002245304,0.00013880513,0.000021133257,0.803281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0073346305,0.13550909,0.00022587908,0.019539248,0.00017957807,0.00003485712,0.000011780167,0.0000225566,0.8371424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880165,0.000009061097,0.00046857676,0.00043525075,0.000023860368,0.00026157463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993812,0.000014583299,0.00017711642,0.00033217607,0.000014976343,0.000079970545],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041364192,0.00014937295,0.0005481492,0.00003843942,0.00012229533,0.00008260934,0.00016249684,0.000043807697,0.10805466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014897815,0.00015260978,0.000109172055,0.00007159712,0.000102773316,0.00025039673,0.00011634972,0.00006887553,0.44033924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022251497,0.000024120942,0.014622575,0.00030196126,0.000054208977,0.0000048036004,0.00005123563,9.528711e-7,1.7298441e-7,0.05394243,0.9300369,0.00095842604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016886655,0.000009637277,0.0014914797,0.00019871844,0.000018755052,0.000009288273,0.000018341882,0.00004751193,4.318888e-7,0.00063340034,0.9972069,0.00019663846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052349403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016229258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33228457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041503627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003739102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8927607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249919637","doi":"10.1017/s0021223700012048","title":"ISR volume 35 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford; University College London; University of Alberta; Università degli Studi di Milano; McGill University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Tulane University; University of Cambridge; Yale University","keywords":"Front cover; Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Front (military); Action (physics); Content (measure theory); Political science; Geography; Physics; Engineering; Mathematics; Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.03403801593413107,"score_gpt":0.22429064155076864,"score_spread":0.19025262561663758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249919637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009429211,0.19193175,0.0000445336,0.0019711002,0.00090893434,0.00022030046,0.00014212482,0.000020564428,0.80381775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0075743976,0.13152593,0.00022254957,0.019501798,0.00017022753,0.000034869787,0.000011856949,0.000022120796,0.84093624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988221,0.000008841078,0.00046059533,0.00042824983,0.000023298862,0.0002569282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993915,0.000014541677,0.00017401659,0.0003270385,0.000014641747,0.00007827223],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040745345,0.00014645689,0.0005399212,0.00003757721,0.0001192707,0.000081142876,0.00015946425,0.00004291033,0.11170498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014988388,0.00014956806,0.000107229185,0.000070018534,0.00010136876,0.0002455751,0.00011445965,0.00006750559,0.44423577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021312312,0.000023455697,0.0146782985,0.0002937703,0.00005296487,0.0000045844577,0.000050075763,9.29276e-7,1.6809813e-7,0.05181175,0.9321603,0.0009215667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001632575,0.000009416369,0.0014928951,0.00019710993,0.000018437397,0.00000900597,0.000017444943,0.00004637556,4.2176927e-7,0.00063481834,0.997218,0.00019282007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051582995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001560262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3325308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040818453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000036573413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88910705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311956886","doi":"10.1017/s0021223722000140","title":"Rethinking ‘Jurisdiction’ in International Human Rights Law in Rescue Operations at Sea in the Light of <i>AS and Others v Italy</i> and <i>AS and Others v Malta</i>: A New Right to be Rescued at Sea?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Israel Law Review","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bar Association","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; Human rights; Law; Political science; International law; Politics; Covenant; International waters; International human rights law; Right to property","score_opus":0.013823384539268038,"score_gpt":0.2739583864437869,"score_spread":0.2601350019045189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311956886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87040055,0.0048396937,9.2408214e-7,0.019146377,0.00007738743,0.0011073701,0.000051820294,0.000016536225,0.10435933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98032784,0.0009728885,0.0003093824,0.015110962,0.000031044496,0.00015035411,0.000040500407,0.000024000365,0.003033005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979108,0.0003667035,0.00050822267,0.00046173332,0.0005425945,0.00020996944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994822,0.000097583455,0.00007027456,0.00025387853,0.000013248965,0.000082810366],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010414968,0.00018373785,0.00029331443,0.00006910474,0.00036279403,0.00005754126,0.00036269438,0.000050987655,0.0017434638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002708897,0.00014985797,0.000040995656,0.00031019546,0.00021625885,0.00030313633,0.0005751794,0.00024265623,0.000029753137],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001972952,0.00035183583,0.036905758,0.00035837415,0.000078270554,0.00022395805,0.015871655,0.0011177202,0.006608818,0.9307559,0.007133083,0.00039731915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010866048,0.00017293938,0.00510074,0.0010611241,0.000033925735,0.00016279407,0.0001164308,0.00020933918,0.0008915674,0.009420858,0.98139554,0.0003481456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08585143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34991023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039016205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000121353705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}