{"meta":{"query_hash":"563a0b57cc16","filters":{"venue":"Issues of Forestry Economics"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/563a0b57cc16","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Issues+of+Forestry+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W2347568222","doi":"","title":"Research on China's Citrus Export Trade Influence Factors Based on Gravity Model","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues of Forestry Economics","topic":"Global Trade and Competitiveness","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Prosperity; Gravity model of trade; Population; Business; Geography; Poverty; International trade; Economics; Agricultural economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.08560786929151916,"score_gpt":0.2904822147126617,"score_spread":0.20487434542114258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2347568222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9540521,0.000010061198,0.000016006885,0.00021749652,0.00011120613,0.00016089923,0.000016946065,0.00004360945,0.045371667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993338,0.000012113747,0.00015544445,0.00025457153,0.0001378197,0.000011509978,0.000020911133,0.000022431575,0.000051391326],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988866,0.000011673082,0.00027446935,0.00032890562,0.00016899778,0.00032937256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991942,0.000037529517,0.00014983915,0.0005402186,0.000051129846,0.000027105178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028834437,0.00019103357,0.00025011157,0.00023728942,0.00011658287,0.00007609316,0.000642975,0.000104416504,0.000075493146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004596535,0.00018401886,0.000101900405,0.00015828366,0.00014139565,0.00049651315,0.00010530054,0.00022625671,0.00006092717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046989307,0.00069639005,0.5333004,0.0002019895,0.000037010064,0.000017333216,0.00019597111,0.09951862,0.00005808466,0.36464387,0.00035875625,0.0005016508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038370676,0.00008993593,0.9150694,0.00009750933,0.000012711379,2.5777905e-7,0.0002397563,0.030865014,0.0019649973,0.04896787,0.0020425853,0.0002662567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010095884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004707947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38176897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042940213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040264673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7504071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2381721497","doi":"","title":"Empirical Analysis of International Competitiveness of China's Wood Forest Products","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues of Forestry Economics","topic":"Global Trade and Competitiveness","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Revealed comparative advantage; Index (typography); Business; Forest product; International trade; Comparative advantage; Product (mathematics); Agricultural economics; Scale (ratio); International market; Forestry; Economics; Forest management; Geography","score_opus":0.019749064649302026,"score_gpt":0.2607735775652896,"score_spread":0.2410245129159876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2381721497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98749024,0.000103072714,0.00004851089,0.0012613093,0.00017720257,0.000094296134,0.000035789082,0.000014743761,0.010774838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912757,0.000053419393,0.0003195277,0.000090504436,0.00023705533,0.0000018919087,0.00011633779,0.0000070414503,0.000046629804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907887,0.00000615589,0.00045587515,0.0002146204,0.000108872635,0.00013560025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898434,0.000021887081,0.00045420564,0.00031650014,0.00021324932,0.000009846696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013611642,0.00013175709,0.00047007637,0.00033572785,0.000021492164,0.00003048058,0.0005292613,0.00005724814,0.00011162852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000659708,0.00013475497,0.00017723803,0.00043338802,0.00010005549,0.000415138,0.00010861549,0.0000540228,0.0000050306503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008998133,0.00027283715,0.90771407,0.00008552739,0.0003701314,0.0000016612381,0.000038607897,0.010090941,0.00012562146,0.08082594,0.000024408511,0.00036029617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030037286,0.000029719758,0.9822871,0.000048747544,0.00024341868,5.169356e-7,0.00009889732,0.0030789974,0.0012265632,0.0052974005,0.0072657857,0.00012248052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026237927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009536811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07552854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017553846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002452022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54951483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2393545231","doi":"","title":"Chinese Wood Furniture Exports Fluctuations Analysis——International comparison based on the CMS model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues of Forestry Economics","topic":"Global Trade and Competitiveness","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Business; Furniture industry; Volatility (finance); Chinese market; International market; International trade; Agricultural economics; Commerce; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.018447165392029823,"score_gpt":0.260627124651038,"score_spread":0.24217995925900818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2393545231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96284425,0.000036658188,0.0009056087,0.0063814675,0.0001528072,0.000108022796,0.000018635123,0.000034507593,0.02951803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976897,0.000008201082,0.0003012594,0.001395839,0.00036042146,0.0000057419275,0.00014811294,0.000007114605,0.000083561965],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993077,0.000004290938,0.0002732365,0.0001809701,0.000107136555,0.00012668414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992956,0.000030361916,0.00022846986,0.00035923938,0.00007623865,0.000010095277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000108749875,0.00013885665,0.00022190601,0.00016698078,0.00009135238,0.00014118626,0.0004769553,0.000051834853,0.00018453393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003757186,0.00010660861,0.00016767126,0.00021121278,0.000032696345,0.00032261305,0.000041284773,0.00008886717,0.00003034598],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039459203,0.00018647689,0.1022332,0.0000070032424,0.00011310846,0.0000012848236,0.000031915417,0.814887,0.00001765604,0.081567496,0.00061092875,0.0003045067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019314274,0.000008697012,0.225052,0.000012032068,0.00009098764,1.5675042e-7,0.000085675,0.7455414,0.000029870926,0.024981769,0.003888141,0.00011616646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004551763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000071821756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1228188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019901563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018121744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4347373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}