{"meta":{"query_hash":"563a0b57cc16","filters":{"venue":"Issues of Forestry Economics"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/563a0b57cc16","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Issues+of+Forestry+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W2347568222","doi":"","title":"Research on China's Citrus Export Trade Influence Factors Based on Gravity Model","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues of Forestry Economics","topic":"Global Trade and Competitiveness","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Prosperity; Gravity model of trade; Population; Business; Geography; Poverty; International trade; Economics; Agricultural economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.08560786929151916,"score_gpt":0.2904822147126617,"score_spread":0.20487434542114258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2347568222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96604544,0.0012056747,0.013765239,0.0013535005,0.000064697575,0.00005928779,0.00024656267,0.000092037146,0.017167589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964934,0.0008025966,0.00067947514,0.000030088002,0.000026164053,0.000012432198,0.00014852322,0.000007665012,0.0017996505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995635,0.00012645574,0.000023036813,0.00009259829,0.00009073759,0.00010376689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987596,0.0007341313,0.00014488523,0.000059999074,0.00017903789,0.00012223223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096545235,0.00053161,0.0005206259,0.002354525,0.00060302735,0.0017820022,0.00053425576,0.00045558726,0.0047341106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020775797,0.00023474741,0.0015374376,0.0023194663,0.00071058166,0.0012662901,0.00062432355,0.00052534696,0.00023808613],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115804854,0.00016952356,0.73899853,0.00032235825,0.0006514679,0.001876069,0.0020849437,0.113694936,0.001407319,0.08744445,0.0055045825,0.047730047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054078362,0.00016734005,0.44949365,0.0001652273,0.00071256014,0.0003207215,0.0025691497,0.5128482,0.0007569222,0.023485463,0.009348529,0.00007821864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04273801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022147896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04273801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001558913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015741679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08497852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2381721497","doi":"","title":"Empirical Analysis of International Competitiveness of China's Wood Forest Products","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues of Forestry Economics","topic":"Global Trade and Competitiveness","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Revealed comparative advantage; Index (typography); Business; Forest product; International trade; Comparative advantage; Product (mathematics); Agricultural economics; Scale (ratio); International market; Forestry; Economics; Forest management; Geography","score_opus":0.019749064649302026,"score_gpt":0.2607735775652896,"score_spread":0.2410245129159876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2381721497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997021,0.00010842259,0.00006765419,0.00004869362,0.0000020058658,0.00000789413,0.00025250996,0.0000022319632,0.0024894804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870896,0.00008175069,0.000051102295,0.000006908277,0.0000037902714,0.000006157095,0.0007455669,9.609618e-7,0.00039479794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950075,0.000059418253,0.000036229558,0.00007066625,0.00016513793,0.00016783048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982317,0.0005578986,0.00044335157,0.00007546006,0.00043962794,0.00025203035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001226428,0.00030046163,0.00028420048,0.0029200118,0.00059640326,0.0011090655,0.00036300925,0.00024728663,0.0030862393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021161987,0.00010958339,0.00046950096,0.004265062,0.00055100565,0.0007528752,0.0004499384,0.00034902093,0.00018101775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053482385,0.00007303926,0.9877209,0.000031596253,0.000057423556,0.00022056553,0.0004442118,0.0020981377,0.00022640632,0.0012308313,0.0005527493,0.007290588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004844174,0.00003566987,0.9942631,0.000013249217,0.000025635212,0.00004225202,0.0010110382,0.003358985,0.00023803793,0.00014454401,0.0008567262,0.0000059272356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055198066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04686478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055198066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019363537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022493836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10975355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2393545231","doi":"","title":"Chinese Wood Furniture Exports Fluctuations Analysis——International comparison based on the CMS model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues of Forestry Economics","topic":"Global Trade and Competitiveness","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Business; Furniture industry; Volatility (finance); Chinese market; International market; International trade; Agricultural economics; Commerce; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.018447165392029823,"score_gpt":0.260627124651038,"score_spread":0.24217995925900818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2393545231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97734773,0.000181473,0.0070365835,0.0003599037,0.000018579078,0.00003787086,0.0011672442,0.00012172895,0.013728853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703205,0.00011568651,0.00051403255,0.00001685951,0.000011212298,0.000015079568,0.0011286366,0.000013335011,0.0011531783],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997658,0.00006021839,0.000012675029,0.00005308733,0.000054733704,0.00005358969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960715,0.00016714376,0.00007194449,0.000028165647,0.0000933384,0.000032306085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007693296,0.00044262543,0.00045275543,0.0012325124,0.0003569863,0.0010111078,0.0006405825,0.00024741492,0.0033850474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012374229,0.00014543135,0.001009157,0.0012405709,0.00030280824,0.0007528286,0.00042044398,0.0003315712,0.0002613587],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042238444,0.00012195855,0.18049958,0.0001508986,0.0003631518,0.0008429227,0.0003275117,0.7445529,0.0015470536,0.038305413,0.0073052207,0.02556106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026619073,0.00006899499,0.06820865,0.0000125061515,0.00011892854,0.000072881296,0.00018484508,0.9260179,0.00042008582,0.0032664174,0.0015743667,0.000027840813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08094856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027286716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08094856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013585945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008991473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16095477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}