{"meta":{"query_hash":"d12bf05f87e5","filters":{"venue":"JCAジャーナル"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d12bf05f87e5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=JCA%E3%82%B8%E3%83%A3%E3%83%BC%E3%83%8A%E3%83%AB"},"results":[{"id":"W303835224","doi":"","title":"投資協定仲裁判断例研究(18)最近の仲裁人忌避申立てに対する判断--Vito G. Gallo v Government of Canada事件における忌避申立てに対する決定(Decision on the Challenge to Mr. J. Christopher Thomas, QC)","year":2010,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"JCAジャーナル","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023330159080194247,"score_gpt":0.2812254961925654,"score_spread":0.25789533711237117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W303835224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051578753,0.0065005072,0.0033277182,0.14055662,0.0015303467,0.00020505086,0.0012536175,0.000085270374,0.7949621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.569464,0.0036345534,0.0046488047,0.061248083,0.0011508523,0.00018827729,0.00035361838,0.00006479011,0.35924697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972313,0.0002617575,0.00012595968,0.00032383925,0.0012811511,0.00077595696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976355,0.00043498666,0.00019354277,0.00006875223,0.0014586515,0.00020867554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025718955,0.00040509482,0.0002638298,0.0010311012,0.006903276,0.0042361612,0.0010147832,0.006454591,0.009616924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049955444,0.000357999,0.0005257359,0.00081777346,0.009212116,0.0016843636,0.0010303687,0.004955269,0.00197327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050585946,0.00002592039,0.0038720623,0.00009802256,0.00002224117,0.0003755482,0.0057757283,0.00013773693,0.0011247278,0.86775637,0.10622086,0.014540139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053632855,0.00006132908,0.011828454,0.00025906443,0.00008097168,0.0002765132,0.0032040337,0.00029513772,0.0023231145,0.09038798,0.8911595,0.00007022461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5184935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71109605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48150653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014056515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019532217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96868443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W378134884","doi":"","title":"判例から見る仲裁法(35)仲裁判断の取消手続と承認・執行手続との関係[Dalimpex Ltd. v. Janicki, 64 O.R. (3d) 737, Ontario Court of Appeal, May 30, 2003]","year":2008,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"JCAジャーナル","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030519824114746793,"score_gpt":0.2802264896142281,"score_spread":0.24970666549948128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W378134884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024707774,0.0028039366,0.002879718,0.03130478,0.0008094177,0.00017693687,0.00066549424,0.00010359063,0.9365484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3879331,0.0021230069,0.005231963,0.037426196,0.000677555,0.00022672869,0.0002896293,0.00005677098,0.5660351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809045,0.00018948663,0.000110408575,0.00033646074,0.00070783397,0.0005653795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990097,0.00022422113,0.0000914073,0.00006906816,0.0005068911,0.000098591976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020458058,0.00044457632,0.00026797445,0.0008348671,0.0064591886,0.004015483,0.0009332493,0.006221782,0.017812937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033263683,0.0005122071,0.0005567107,0.00056692486,0.0048914505,0.0017615075,0.0016713795,0.0046406235,0.0057392595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004392183,0.000036986738,0.002408231,0.000090026144,0.00001791867,0.00055115856,0.006682198,0.00012466106,0.0018816871,0.85736924,0.112697914,0.018096026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030179383,0.000055345045,0.0065358155,0.00016664993,0.000060307586,0.00046553384,0.0024847563,0.00022155866,0.0023997864,0.06536756,0.9221331,0.000079323116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21412446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35599434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78587556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068400875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007780879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42575622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W383816584","doi":"","title":"判例から見る仲裁法(33)投資仲裁と仲裁判断の取消し[United Mexican States v. Metalclad Corp., 2001 BCSC 664, British Columbia Supreme Court; May 2, 2001]","year":2008,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"JCAジャーナル","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030319217237719822,"score_gpt":0.21700443125915786,"score_spread":0.18668521402143803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W383816584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023153221,0.002059224,0.002115243,0.03812246,0.0010488034,0.00019246445,0.00084208004,0.00014774757,0.9323187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3611837,0.0017035459,0.0029532402,0.051066447,0.00083085155,0.00025160046,0.0003025727,0.00005160754,0.5816565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810094,0.00021479104,0.000089744,0.00027712464,0.0007356302,0.0005817522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894947,0.000247575,0.0001067312,0.000072625146,0.0005476963,0.0000759546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00141381,0.00041561917,0.00020368726,0.00079123175,0.0059138266,0.005183112,0.0007315302,0.006950013,0.017363034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031159518,0.00053174276,0.00053210097,0.0006381761,0.0034627686,0.0017059223,0.0014063276,0.005228125,0.0055628777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049172468,0.00003858914,0.0021851377,0.00007863713,0.000013403294,0.0005932466,0.002847778,0.0001989467,0.0014978104,0.78064114,0.19714606,0.014710033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039817383,0.00006135746,0.009855618,0.00020143217,0.000049390856,0.00046313743,0.0018586963,0.00044531393,0.0022336522,0.06670143,0.9179979,0.00009219898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21534479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37967688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7846552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00593346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006533887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42818266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W614083899","doi":"","title":"判例から見る仲裁法(31)仲裁判断の取消しと当事者自治[Noble China inc. v. Lei, 42 O.R. (3d) 69, Ontario Court of Justice, November 4, 1988 ]","year":2007,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"JCAジャーナル","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01871193973247826,"score_gpt":0.29110064006933717,"score_spread":0.2723887003368589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W614083899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02302015,0.001948519,0.0015130806,0.033301104,0.00076850125,0.00021221742,0.00077344436,0.00009143859,0.93837166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27134618,0.0018062134,0.0026334012,0.05129045,0.00054896495,0.00029789578,0.00034892108,0.000042054467,0.6716859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978471,0.00022696328,0.000119274795,0.00031843214,0.00079147064,0.00069669745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988219,0.0002976067,0.00010302997,0.00006679004,0.0005778188,0.00013287537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020016313,0.00042570214,0.00025312474,0.0007011717,0.008776474,0.004206684,0.0009519668,0.007991805,0.02106209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003936153,0.0006789762,0.0005917983,0.0005918082,0.003838366,0.0018409272,0.001845122,0.005124957,0.007389557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006043973,0.00005601074,0.0035797248,0.00010787779,0.000016760472,0.000818104,0.006054883,0.00019632248,0.0018822323,0.7367672,0.23524497,0.015215478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039519713,0.00007960303,0.008371293,0.00018585943,0.000046959067,0.00046822298,0.0023950427,0.00030770336,0.002254133,0.03830553,0.94745666,0.000089536625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24487625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5300036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24487625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067673563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010781735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48690188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}