{"meta":{"query_hash":"a20e35ef0b46","filters":{"venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science"},"cohort_total":19,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":19,"exported":19,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a20e35ef0b46","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Japanese+Journal+of+Political+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W2086720394","doi":"10.1017/s146810991000006x","title":"Apichai W. Shipper, Fighting for Foreigners: Immigration and its Impact on Japanese Democracy, Cornell University Press, 2008, 216 pp, $35.00 hbk, ISBN-13: 978-0801447150","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Japanese History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Democracy; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.018848922224642458,"score_gpt":0.2871704041532692,"score_spread":0.26832148192862676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086720394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884248,0.00008525476,0.00003353406,0.0016105997,0.00042006606,0.0002917174,0.000017429802,0.00003153733,0.009085081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99772924,0.000020815938,0.00014339299,0.00025102103,0.0006273284,0.0000017369708,0.0000014445993,0.000010200303,0.0012147968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970414,0.0001895442,0.00039982898,0.00039656027,0.00085636997,0.001116285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691916,0.0005702796,0.00031064174,0.00020138564,0.00072545226,0.0012731056],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026875983,0.00023375997,0.0003348725,0.00014063939,0.0018621637,0.0002041686,0.00078807166,0.00020501591,0.00014377202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020895815,0.00016973271,0.00021218238,0.00055049814,0.001319956,0.0018704812,0.00006928276,0.00053520536,0.0000138002515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001002779,0.0007003904,0.008841877,0.00008097683,0.000058988036,0.00010612766,0.066435985,0.00023477907,0.13167658,0.7869248,0.0029008316,0.0010359053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014873262,0.009656957,0.34727615,0.0009243112,0.0008877728,0.0026568912,0.37680256,0.025269693,0.02851507,0.12979418,0.057312153,0.006031028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014911703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000639347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6571306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038973565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056531426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086861882","doi":"10.1017/s1468109901000251","title":"Japan's Multimember SNTV System and Strategic Voting: A Rejoinder","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Proportional representation; Duverger's law; Electoral system; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Split-ticket voting; Politics; Geography; Engineering; Democracy","score_opus":0.062055878944513615,"score_gpt":0.36483389494708574,"score_spread":0.30277801600257215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086861882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96985894,0.000018679937,0.00005841026,0.0026094841,0.00016253394,0.00009870146,4.1269143e-7,0.000025497997,0.02716731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990009,7.8683865e-7,0.00018031562,0.00015900546,0.00045614046,0.00000210457,5.815657e-8,0.000004866718,0.00019582603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971177,0.00021944036,0.0004808474,0.00017935346,0.0009303585,0.0010723314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767804,0.0002484106,0.00015796942,0.000093842296,0.00050435046,0.0013173893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030977244,0.000100784375,0.00022226575,0.00012778015,0.00061046885,0.00020889587,0.00027960047,0.00006794509,0.00007220699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008059399,0.00007311992,0.000061927756,0.0006381251,0.0011991066,0.0006349679,0.000033844834,0.00017392774,0.00002807531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013940045,0.000042742337,0.036009688,0.00001020357,0.000002987054,0.000020153406,0.0016525768,0.0000064465016,0.0035627447,0.9585172,0.000005737139,0.00015559928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025498092,0.001305192,0.8358127,0.0004997295,0.00013798205,0.0023363205,0.08942451,0.017749036,0.0016254631,0.045715,0.0017273044,0.0011169639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007089365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005147835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91280216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035622375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035995367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107791665","doi":"10.1017/s1468109910000125","title":"Political Science in Japan: Looking Back and Forward","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Bureaucracy; Enlightenment; Political economy; Democracy; Normative; Voting; Sociology; Law; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.021211215334203688,"score_gpt":0.3584116071597992,"score_spread":0.3372003918255955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107791665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93243545,0.0000052195464,0.0000060120597,0.0137263285,0.0005364701,0.00008413725,6.664398e-7,0.000009921217,0.053195808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978754,0.0000049142764,0.0005365936,0.00075425685,0.0007417338,0.0000013317604,1.5847224e-8,0.0000042548636,0.00008149737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956252,0.00007086297,0.00044790606,0.00025207756,0.0013859995,0.0022179459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970705,0.00044096392,0.000114922346,0.00013102547,0.0004928031,0.0017497767],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006639298,0.000119404955,0.00026763743,0.00041813505,0.0013154797,0.00023971956,0.0008276621,0.000084062944,0.00003695331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008793562,0.00008329523,0.000070896065,0.0016387695,0.01509076,0.0013891989,0.00021114631,0.0005008354,0.000015327227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007380266,0.00004496152,0.04672186,0.000003512896,0.00000148337,0.000006263842,0.006110754,2.401264e-7,0.010669163,0.93594205,0.0000036498623,0.0004886894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004621785,0.00013680938,0.7710473,0.000033214856,0.0000094575735,0.00013000789,0.044613525,0.000067739624,0.0022540796,0.18086992,0.00015902329,0.00021676281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035156677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010794385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7550721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032972658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013388945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112067299","doi":"10.1017/s1468109908003204","title":"Daniel P. Aldrich, Site Fights: Divisive Facilities and Civil Society in Japan and the West, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 2008, 254 pp. (hardcover), $39.95, ISBN 978-0801446191","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Japanese History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic history; History","score_opus":0.017483905752629893,"score_gpt":0.22860557748176855,"score_spread":0.21112167172913865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112067299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98482496,0.0012068839,0.000015164772,0.0022531443,0.00013684828,0.00017763957,0.000021844571,0.000017798773,0.011345704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99452895,0.000994893,0.00006424649,0.00049527414,0.00015657872,0.0000010791885,4.6023194e-7,0.000004653128,0.0037538633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971723,0.00037161724,0.00035527567,0.00034470376,0.00089800695,0.0008581063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801725,0.0005825597,0.00019160549,0.00018290496,0.00033814058,0.0006875244],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020862669,0.00019062613,0.00036673437,0.00005016021,0.0017695988,0.00012411145,0.00065141823,0.0001286103,0.00007789604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087399385,0.0001256314,0.00014722288,0.0005865583,0.009167035,0.0014850994,0.00017899448,0.00048103274,0.000008372186],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041019046,0.0003479173,0.06329671,0.00006369871,0.000057649348,0.0002054889,0.4222131,0.00009261546,0.00203379,0.49029297,0.020846007,0.00013985277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063581136,0.0005125759,0.4702541,0.00017219785,0.00014390332,0.0011657907,0.31866524,0.0011057886,0.0002490936,0.012540781,0.1877205,0.0011119319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064940536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011771385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47775218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034140662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046816657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115903227","doi":"10.1017/s1468109901240298","title":"Dominic Lieven, <i>Empire: The Russian Empire and Its Rivals</i>, London: John Murray, 2000","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Scottish History and National Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Art; Art history; Humanities; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.033290368127089964,"score_gpt":0.28153385727642927,"score_spread":0.2482434891493393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115903227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9506309,0.00038613015,0.0000023410084,0.009236717,0.00053447805,0.000065558,0.0000032764995,0.000010594113,0.039130006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99428916,0.00002881046,0.000019089783,0.0017370293,0.00083357765,0.000001622251,1.7307724e-7,0.0000049948176,0.0030855683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981482,0.00008144781,0.00038546577,0.0001621863,0.00073454366,0.00048814176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878424,0.00025925075,0.00015058221,0.00013110787,0.00024713864,0.0004276894],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001518086,0.00010826547,0.00017562114,0.00014296726,0.0009902531,0.00029687633,0.00051269133,0.000027121156,0.0010321763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005127535,0.00006527982,0.00008894651,0.00019399123,0.0015412346,0.001187971,0.00006836326,0.00022935061,0.00007987773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043754517,0.000097887125,0.0011829028,0.000005675726,0.000009112124,0.00005380778,0.0052463636,0.0000018429682,0.0005817315,0.99182427,0.00067149644,0.00028115054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027623053,0.0009696107,0.3569584,0.00019689178,0.00016464778,0.005204108,0.008582301,0.00050151435,0.0022693411,0.11587704,0.50565296,0.00086088566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017422409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002468922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87594724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014414164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028954464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124408945","doi":"10.1017/s146810991300025x","title":"Scale Matters: Addressing the Limited Robustness of Findings on Negative Advertising","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Negativity effect; Salient; Robustness (evolution); Negativity bias; Psychology; Scale (ratio); Social psychology; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.0489447767629273,"score_gpt":0.3481151102899814,"score_spread":0.2991703335270541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124408945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96886724,0.0000040794826,0.000040353952,0.027791375,0.0004540146,0.000121433746,8.5790407e-7,0.00000892133,0.002711735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973604,0.0000016404027,0.0004944363,0.001625634,0.00045196927,0.0000024138812,4.1029036e-8,0.000004877347,0.00005858163],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972339,0.00024570324,0.00039378612,0.00011950343,0.0011775048,0.00082957034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967175,0.0017044662,0.00019151949,0.00012311047,0.0006749789,0.00058842514],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013502806,0.00009030948,0.00020539842,0.0001444209,0.00075646595,0.00018318623,0.00068741746,0.00005656221,0.00014813649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003955578,0.000050618168,0.000095658026,0.00083835225,0.0040713376,0.0008566834,0.000051609746,0.0002452373,0.000017690209],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013900758,0.000836128,0.07129328,0.00007414347,0.00006294203,0.000023635046,0.39146143,0.0004431423,0.15292493,0.36809805,0.0022259755,0.012417329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010186875,0.00062310003,0.45964867,0.0006906691,0.00007218779,0.00007328959,0.4332611,0.0011222311,0.07468969,0.027900875,0.00045012287,0.0004493964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026027786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050090606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38835537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002538943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004051192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136872585","doi":"10.1017/s1468109900210189","title":"Stephen D. Krasner, <i>Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy</i>, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; Sovereignty; Political science; Law and economics; Media studies; Economic history; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Sociology; History; Law","score_opus":0.011154273837877484,"score_gpt":0.2685407826134265,"score_spread":0.257386508775549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136872585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83859736,0.000038156435,0.00002201643,0.0021724529,0.00015183719,0.000121284946,0.000005054378,0.00003786559,0.15885395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965177,0.00014172665,0.00082734606,0.0004984428,0.000263154,2.0880032e-7,3.597735e-7,0.0000061795317,0.001744857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963124,0.00024727773,0.00038625766,0.00028487344,0.0015264273,0.0012427906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997616,0.00020027162,0.00015950958,0.0002455482,0.0004971382,0.0012815407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020414,0.00015113357,0.000298794,0.00010127954,0.0008628183,0.00019645039,0.0014086013,0.00009607511,0.0006782496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085398386,0.00012881467,0.00013254331,0.0009905428,0.0020366334,0.0014786079,0.00012356376,0.00032867995,0.000057158166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013178513,0.00026474323,0.00366925,0.000007779447,0.000014121418,0.00012368384,0.004153803,0.000049424438,0.0015383846,0.9880873,0.00032734816,0.0016323979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006451631,0.0012277117,0.1226679,0.00022024255,0.00026059774,0.0007172077,0.059957284,0.0020478757,0.0033079574,0.061883178,0.7393244,0.0019339992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004635313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000217301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9262041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006954601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009370053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7504061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142324611","doi":"10.1017/s1468109908003198","title":"Legislative Party Switching and Executive Coalitions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Cabinet (room); Scrutiny; Divided government; Politics; Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0647449134727198,"score_gpt":0.374071767996226,"score_spread":0.30932685452350617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142324611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97198224,0.000011348887,0.00034749162,0.0046075745,0.00011285891,0.00007029666,0.000001004194,0.000011429609,0.022855727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903953,0.000002365935,0.00025485054,0.00027153763,0.00026822177,0.0000019163383,5.9602556e-8,0.0000024122403,0.00015912365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979404,0.00019878747,0.00032358724,0.00012057107,0.0006909222,0.0007257236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797046,0.0004558699,0.000109297835,0.00006590684,0.000448362,0.0009501231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017558703,0.00006634766,0.00015913135,0.000097312215,0.0011131258,0.00006379853,0.00018148245,0.00003553265,0.00003611861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023597116,0.000048735863,0.000047163852,0.00046361357,0.0018445458,0.00091949926,0.000028264627,0.0001503122,0.0000097504135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007733891,0.000040407343,0.03577139,0.0000016906146,0.0000030955823,0.000013537534,0.016490296,0.000002260268,0.0052794362,0.9423085,0.000027132039,0.000054521508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006892705,0.000505515,0.8512015,0.0000759318,0.000030276238,0.00048013948,0.018708298,0.00034279513,0.0035870487,0.12187187,0.0021703893,0.00033701374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005831902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031807792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82043666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019654822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004553447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.881613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147316863","doi":"10.1017/s1468109904001367","title":"The Impact of the Electoral System on Government Formation: The Case of Post-Communist Hungary","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council; Faculty of Arts and Sciences","keywords":"Incentive; Legislature; Electoral system; Government (linguistics); Distribution (mathematics); Communism; Perspective (graphical); Politics; Political economy; Economic system; Political science; Public administration; Multi-party system; Economics; Market economy; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.026708260025630808,"score_gpt":0.35475927824291614,"score_spread":0.32805101821728533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147316863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99029374,0.0000142670015,0.000016475626,0.0060295556,0.00015208517,0.00016457638,0.0000050344574,0.000003788026,0.0033204637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975014,4.8087276e-7,0.000010213185,0.00008209491,0.00013438278,0.0000023150037,3.5770267e-8,0.000002554294,0.00001775759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973418,0.00043651354,0.0005356311,0.00006294865,0.0010615737,0.00056154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979151,0.00070878246,0.00035844336,0.0002570278,0.00047483912,0.00028582578],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035338674,0.00007691773,0.00015533161,0.00002319882,0.0013200222,0.00008980696,0.0007414458,0.000033152428,0.000007750646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015339538,0.000029863148,0.0001877102,0.0005242216,0.0017589782,0.00032366437,0.000054931766,0.00019759893,0.0000029223354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004265922,0.00008080634,0.0027225534,0.000009961976,0.000009602618,0.000008859396,0.0035666071,0.00021269702,0.0072354414,0.98595065,0.000011916038,0.00014823771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016815967,0.0042666025,0.81356144,0.0006353825,0.00012068087,0.0027488435,0.09379778,0.0015040992,0.050856754,0.0302603,0.00016198587,0.00040453704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035785016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030628454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9556904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011713635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058406015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149868285","doi":"10.1017/s1468109910000290","title":"Simon Andrew Avenell, Making Japanese Citizens: Civil Society and the Mythology of the Shimin in Postwar Japan, University of California Press, 2010, 356pp.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Japanese History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Civil society; Content (measure theory); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Law; Classics","score_opus":0.02744926502792834,"score_gpt":0.25568933980026093,"score_spread":0.2282400747723326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149868285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893766,0.00023231612,0.000008162547,0.0015971393,0.00019020225,0.00015811312,0.000009160177,0.000006009829,0.008422299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927086,0.000051125335,0.00013980099,0.0002609777,0.000055236003,4.1366712e-7,7.889344e-8,0.0000040659734,0.00021742286],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975579,0.00053431175,0.00041904836,0.00019486425,0.000720024,0.0005738999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984535,0.00034034697,0.00038537616,0.0002218251,0.00036331758,0.0002356213],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037938347,0.000120788536,0.00034912254,0.00005635167,0.00059665105,0.000021355416,0.00103449,0.00012915576,0.000117948475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009897993,0.00007025815,0.00019389488,0.00058374275,0.009156763,0.00039011153,0.0001893559,0.00036550386,0.0000026270347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006967028,0.00041563375,0.048016615,0.000088666566,0.000047218797,0.000038274105,0.67919666,0.00004718495,0.011662762,0.25881764,0.0007322463,0.00024040724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042536124,0.00039878022,0.43470293,0.00043647937,0.00024248647,0.00034072617,0.5229526,0.00051962945,0.0025439265,0.02892787,0.004120433,0.0005605157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054688836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019615588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38668633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015303835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034981917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99353975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156826366","doi":"10.1017/s1468109908003393","title":"Apology: A Small Yet Important Part of Justice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Indigenous; Political science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.032259231732284205,"score_gpt":0.35177899948786734,"score_spread":0.3195197677555831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156826366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908635,0.000056259658,0.0000324812,0.001655879,0.0007984101,0.000047145324,0.0000021955673,0.000007920862,0.006536207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902457,0.0000036321323,0.00031032492,0.00041882557,0.00010084895,5.7439973e-7,1.4314527e-7,0.0000035197475,0.00013757832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980733,0.00006107434,0.0006416854,0.00015992901,0.00036059765,0.0007034205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986094,0.00013289365,0.00026715372,0.00019519294,0.00027477893,0.00052057975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012714425,0.00009480497,0.0002526608,0.00018213145,0.0001002582,0.000015080067,0.00046521952,0.00009061888,0.00036195543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039752034,0.00006147903,0.00010764693,0.00049116154,0.00091545476,0.00013665439,0.000026611306,0.00026473083,0.000024077757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001602065,0.0008253153,0.013546549,0.000007772439,0.000019039144,0.00038668158,0.0020196585,0.00001441017,0.065801725,0.91544694,0.00012389178,0.0016478177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001392713,0.0025900772,0.959537,0.00009287122,0.00025650515,0.0038751469,0.006470967,0.00006959547,0.008745076,0.01627599,0.00043220876,0.00026180566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011836746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029043265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9459905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057839035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016466135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39631584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160912321","doi":"10.1017/s1468109909990077","title":"Electoral Rights beyond Territory and beyond Citizenship? The Case of South Korea","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Political science; Politics; Democracy; Citizenship; Political economy; Suffrage; Scrutiny; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.013838665820741915,"score_gpt":0.30420409585650365,"score_spread":0.29036543003576176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160912321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892571,0.000038035894,0.00006997563,0.002341027,0.00013530276,0.00007412355,0.0000021266103,0.0000064814417,0.008075802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988953,0.0000020172965,0.00022771755,0.00041277774,0.00036462836,4.894149e-7,1.5003633e-7,0.0000016633747,0.00009525536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982765,0.00017626562,0.00036496503,0.00012731574,0.0005953561,0.00045959593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986446,0.00020126898,0.00017429645,0.000109084205,0.00043544656,0.00043531394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021944682,0.00008144198,0.000155072,0.00012653008,0.00079866796,0.00012753648,0.00031089396,0.000049420974,0.000048867565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000874046,0.000045332003,0.00006578458,0.00039279863,0.00177321,0.0005135514,0.000014021857,0.00016743765,0.0000018933572],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018835952,0.000044077162,0.0018480889,0.0000019300187,0.000003931864,0.00004495779,0.031502698,0.0000011839129,0.009613191,0.95607734,0.00013160378,0.00071215874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011035103,0.0018331473,0.20388411,0.0000649977,0.00010338953,0.0030648094,0.06257742,0.0007901178,0.021963404,0.70290506,0.0012159308,0.00049410376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018504158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023942813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25317228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011493698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003229571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6533466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166912878","doi":"10.1017/s1468109914000279","title":"Toward an Integrated Theory of Emotions/Passions, Values and Rights in International Politics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Dimension (graph theory); International relations; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027496140424782625,"score_gpt":0.35121270042303143,"score_spread":0.32371655999824883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166912878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866604,0.00000912811,0.00061992643,0.002198352,0.00022908881,0.000029787763,0.0000023908199,0.000007560608,0.010243359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833995,0.000007987222,0.0012450091,0.0001552366,0.00018554278,4.688717e-7,3.3384032e-7,0.0000016002639,0.00006385126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980686,0.0003416133,0.00036203302,0.00012318334,0.0007514202,0.0003532044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835014,0.0004453892,0.00012929388,0.00007279419,0.0005586514,0.00044373475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004402361,0.00006257839,0.00014093868,0.00028859847,0.00021884903,0.00007231288,0.00054017804,0.000041812647,0.0000806184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004499018,0.000044600132,0.00004015398,0.0003214342,0.0015772707,0.00076096767,0.000049914586,0.00016360907,0.000001632055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011778419,0.00010825885,0.0055092657,0.0000013499662,0.0000027928625,0.0000018245405,0.0050131525,0.0000072007983,0.0017753341,0.98707306,0.000012220384,0.00048374807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047690334,0.00021933675,0.3282255,0.00010046879,0.000009059741,0.00006277454,0.015068977,0.0019498739,0.0021129893,0.6493453,0.0022914405,0.00013737877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031227916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000138359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3377278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021980592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022588175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58115196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171624459","doi":"10.1017/s146810990000205x","title":"Japan's Multimember SNTV System and Strategic Voting: The ‘<i>M</i> + 1 Rule’ and Beyond","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Context (archaeology); Electoral system; Political science; Duverger's law; Rule of law; Political economy; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Split-ticket voting; Politics; Democracy; Geography","score_opus":0.03151293713637386,"score_gpt":0.3285605351759466,"score_spread":0.2970475980395727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171624459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9632394,0.000037909944,0.000003771666,0.005672756,0.00009220433,0.00010314289,9.761513e-7,0.000014411069,0.030835485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897426,0.000001939609,0.000088484645,0.00038751142,0.0003182963,0.000002221737,5.051441e-8,0.00000380765,0.00022342455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977174,0.00022481478,0.00038086632,0.00015901368,0.0007114446,0.00080649205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982707,0.00043427304,0.000095310636,0.0000904599,0.00022620721,0.0008830878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028266946,0.00009401274,0.00018182251,0.000052875588,0.0008899788,0.0002772182,0.00026420856,0.00005152736,0.00010732341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038055182,0.00005514736,0.000041329793,0.00038289602,0.0019793217,0.00048945716,0.000025784619,0.00017075769,0.000018834951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012261359,0.000027151966,0.008987339,0.000011013605,0.0000040516397,0.0000053399635,0.0039938055,0.0000056027097,0.001960797,0.9843741,0.0000069769667,0.00061156997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028398864,0.0014672797,0.7620322,0.000414367,0.0002519756,0.0019749217,0.11403732,0.013694558,0.002694146,0.09557255,0.00371302,0.0013077317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050609973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023477076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8888015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013654878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019686985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76507473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507249429","doi":"10.1017/s1468109916000177","title":"Societal pessimism in Japan, the United States, and The Netherlands","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pessimism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Mood; Argument (complex analysis); Perspective (graphical); Positive economics; Political science; Economic history; Psychology; Sociology; History; Social psychology; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04377755936310976,"score_gpt":0.38771134432865717,"score_spread":0.3439337849655474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507249429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9375948,0.000053951026,0.0000654804,0.054807905,0.00010009825,0.00007838536,0.0000012688251,0.000004667789,0.007293473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980774,0.000019414356,0.000018391687,0.0013313486,0.00010923376,0.0000038851667,5.908452e-8,0.0000029519917,0.00043731675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980373,0.00035370555,0.0002844712,0.00016949883,0.00048361617,0.00067145395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785274,0.0014223361,0.00007693447,0.00017497869,0.00016240143,0.00031060178],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037329528,0.00008003896,0.00015317282,0.000111625726,0.00018874826,0.000059410228,0.0006483092,0.000039580802,0.00032677286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008245554,0.000024240926,0.00006270984,0.0007065854,0.004975987,0.00016237487,0.000093940645,0.00031543977,0.000023125789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007199599,0.00025125654,0.049317498,0.0000019936806,0.000024514731,0.000058344052,0.011580595,0.0000024067692,0.0044271057,0.9289908,0.0005106943,0.0041148574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026126304,0.0002792721,0.9031209,0.000014639992,0.000004376731,0.0003751159,0.012815719,0.00010370224,0.0000764556,0.07998704,0.0005387434,0.000071435985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005952715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011666922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8538034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007455705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050472714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214589528","doi":"10.1017/s1468109922000032","title":"H Jentzsch (2021) Harvesting State Support: Institutional Change and Local Agency in Japanese Agriculture Toronto: University of Toronto Press","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); State (computer science); Agriculture; Political science; Regional science; Media studies; Public administration; Sociology; Geography; Social science; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.024469878820025017,"score_gpt":0.25856327390873374,"score_spread":0.23409339508870872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214589528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993401,0.00017651616,0.000017918994,0.00047889678,0.00018242977,0.00014270733,0.000007722154,0.000007395356,0.0055854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946773,0.000016599466,0.0000388411,0.00018688446,0.0002046607,8.353537e-7,0.0000014500888,0.0000028994573,0.000080087746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981752,0.000046883393,0.00030557666,0.0001892022,0.0007116579,0.00057147385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916315,0.00004861118,0.00019826127,0.00008888841,0.00035734294,0.0001437279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013475263,0.00011174633,0.00021913827,0.00003409291,0.0004501149,0.000090330825,0.00041897016,0.000028454273,0.0002654842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004264718,0.00009408044,0.000069222995,0.0002746132,0.00066617125,0.003678374,0.00033476885,0.00016320114,8.04677e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011212288,0.004067348,0.27908814,0.001040601,0.000099841964,0.0016389873,0.15183851,0.0032552185,0.007394317,0.5272231,0.0005468498,0.022685828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009677105,0.0001541125,0.86499095,0.000034677694,0.000037875878,0.000085046064,0.12788036,0.0012063719,0.000019980478,0.0022301585,0.0021460697,0.00024668762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.183717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010024124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5859028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096906675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001780658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8217187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246512084","doi":"10.1017/s1468109909990181","title":"Daniel P. Aldrich, Site Fights: Divisive Facilities and Civil Society in Japan and the West, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008, 254 pp. (hardcover), $39.95. ISBN 978-0801446191","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Japanese History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economic history; Political science; History","score_opus":0.011650363211205203,"score_gpt":0.22996598962371742,"score_spread":0.21831562641251223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246512084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98444355,0.00048996496,0.000010813989,0.0029224404,0.0002550885,0.00018177989,0.000025179625,0.000017796536,0.01165342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960709,0.00029686518,0.00008379558,0.00046984723,0.00021474455,0.0000011851154,4.772233e-7,0.000004939549,0.002857209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997302,0.0003012965,0.0003425827,0.00035334364,0.00083864824,0.0008621616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785095,0.0006408664,0.0001982753,0.00021162801,0.0003553175,0.00074293726],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028942092,0.00019253549,0.00034738384,0.00004959976,0.0013695587,0.0002280484,0.00074537523,0.00016234267,0.00012021278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011945078,0.00012544903,0.0001401281,0.00051805185,0.008208285,0.001502899,0.00019905686,0.0007603313,0.000008825834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024679577,0.00023979443,0.035710234,0.000049492097,0.00003798224,0.00006115892,0.19697572,0.000024529925,0.0077990512,0.74934626,0.009286856,0.00022213199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058536157,0.00043567392,0.3850336,0.00014116724,0.00017489021,0.00053063896,0.29584363,0.001211269,0.00045160626,0.02522669,0.28394932,0.0011479137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064829625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003743426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72411954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020696635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042631725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312156059","doi":"10.1017/s1468109922000329","title":"Japan: the harbinger state","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Cambridge; Harvard University","keywords":"Skepticism; Scholarship; Geopolitics; Politics; Political science; State (computer science); Foreign policy; Political economy; Development economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029902105416848953,"score_gpt":0.3502697330162604,"score_spread":0.32036762759941145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312156059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9271478,0.000020895475,0.0000043271975,0.04112419,0.00053256785,0.000068895475,0.0000014998739,0.000011787049,0.03108801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673927,0.000007330538,0.000034473782,0.0020666881,0.00050787866,0.000004493736,1.8353576e-8,0.0000028727677,0.000636968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997073,0.00024754545,0.00027084825,0.000099357174,0.0014601774,0.0008490591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987639,0.00037333573,0.00013641056,0.00009700958,0.00024214036,0.0003871782],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005152002,0.0000619145,0.00013013258,0.00009370212,0.0044947434,0.000093520124,0.00089825597,0.0000124676435,0.00014925256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017333116,0.000034067063,0.000099813944,0.0010069074,0.0030820193,0.00037506985,0.00022127402,0.00030094132,0.000010537781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017952669,0.000063903644,0.0031105832,0.0000011235803,0.000009938075,0.000009116614,0.0707695,0.00003216492,0.0010634951,0.9238552,0.00023713557,0.00082987297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055475754,0.00043439653,0.17369364,0.000009102966,0.000030072915,0.00016265729,0.45474243,0.0000695789,0.0007065913,0.35523692,0.014064676,0.00029518126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002425523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010310118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5686183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034109535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060210173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313494493","doi":"10.1017/s1468109922000378","title":"How incumbent politicians respond to the enactment of a programmatic policy: evidence from snow subsidies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Japanese Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University College London; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi; Dartmouth College","keywords":"Regression discontinuity design; Subsidy; Work (physics); Public economics; Economics; Business; Market economy","score_opus":0.08773826369575716,"score_gpt":0.4093624493698911,"score_spread":0.3216241856741339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313494493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8771374,0.000018387023,0.0001206117,0.12183314,0.00019765449,0.00029195298,0.000005816129,0.000023374669,0.00037162466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982037,0.000004382913,0.00018744203,0.0004423086,0.0007796742,0.00001854876,2.4507358e-7,0.0000062583813,0.00035743293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549854,0.00049997494,0.000577769,0.00019717253,0.0018332108,0.0013933597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955252,0.0021337064,0.00022590879,0.00025662957,0.0007177171,0.001140883],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047241948,0.000121951205,0.00029428786,0.00032785058,0.00054800743,0.00029038763,0.0008676724,0.00005087625,0.000025505438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018179525,0.00006725781,0.00012434246,0.0025637974,0.0013629625,0.0006863556,0.00011718242,0.00015584358,0.000044593766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000777967,0.00013710828,0.025770273,0.000029128234,0.000026216469,0.00002103765,0.051042546,0.00004991887,0.030577231,0.88977885,0.00021872685,0.0022711665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000525658,0.0016038712,0.7778561,0.00092546747,0.00009753385,0.00002880905,0.0694891,0.00064690213,0.031253822,0.113086745,0.0040060547,0.00047990456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044220254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004617559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7766921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062268006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011626132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9900908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}