{"meta":{"query_hash":"d015bf766327","filters":{"venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government"},"cohort_total":21,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":21,"exported":21,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d015bf766327","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=JeDEM+-+eJournal+of+eDemocracy+and+Open+Government"},"results":[{"id":"W1868511033","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v4i1.113","title":"Digital Citizenship and Activism: Questions of Power and Participation Online","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Open government; Citizenship; Government (linguistics); Political science; Power (physics); Digital government; Field (mathematics); Open data; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Digital transformation; Law","score_opus":0.04333716286793272,"score_gpt":0.3633895615131074,"score_spread":0.3200523986451747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1868511033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9774095,0.0003398667,0.000022980577,0.00320432,0.00019477923,0.00017049082,0.00006258587,0.000002811866,0.018592658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982604,0.00048110343,0.00017893301,0.0001759454,0.00016601688,0.0000025517559,0.0000013190584,0.0000052132123,0.0007285204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903256,0.00008357172,0.00023206089,0.00007782341,0.00037499782,0.00019899261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906003,0.0004043642,0.00022125719,0.00005349046,0.000040224197,0.0002206556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035736605,0.0000718083,0.00019498008,0.000013860923,0.0001810955,0.00008781509,0.000082083476,0.00005929487,0.000050849118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039461936,0.00006359248,0.000024566047,0.000053445598,0.00021055268,0.0005505913,0.00009675934,0.00008865371,7.440403e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111096975,0.00036111218,0.9004686,0.000032911605,0.0001003372,0.0000015837284,0.021511491,6.5308393e-7,0.0005686313,0.03340589,0.0012576687,0.042180058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010060157,0.00032330272,0.91539466,0.00018736403,0.00013588385,0.000008813118,0.04226111,0.000019460858,0.00091016287,0.010645205,0.028867938,0.00024005672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000116472824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027634598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041940004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049583894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005257443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2593226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1903266278","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v3i1.54","title":"Open Access to Research. Changing Researcher Behavior Through University and Funder Mandates.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Publication; Publish or perish; Order (exchange); Computer science; Political science; Public relations; Internet privacy; Open science; Business; World Wide Web; Publishing; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.9088351936069975,"score_gpt":0.6643610912524123,"score_spread":0.24447410235458522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1903266278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8194308,0.00043680595,0.0011958926,0.0101680625,0.0002729027,0.0022648324,0.00017493668,0.0000053357044,0.16605037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96919566,0.0014088576,0.0031469832,0.000495916,0.000044895853,0.0000114344075,0.000001216347,0.000016521375,0.025678506],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887709,0.00059040403,0.00059392076,0.00086270814,0.008331152,0.00085090025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948934,0.0019878892,0.00032451187,0.00068897725,0.0013393693,0.0007658578],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034889948,0.00016405545,0.00047259708,0.0059199072,0.0008814982,0.008212751,0.009660737,0.000101158425,0.0027753923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003710955,0.00012285504,0.000067127556,0.031497117,0.0002778994,0.006022451,0.033336535,0.0005196099,0.000063470776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016636968,0.0011153268,0.5430528,0.000031341842,0.00012382191,0.00034975572,0.0033220656,0.000005130519,0.0010788678,0.01178982,0.14487731,0.29259008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018964997,0.0009930055,0.63898,0.00011114353,0.000024642539,0.000037555725,0.017047375,0.00020140543,0.0030816512,0.013421818,0.3238422,0.00036274735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019536547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016410832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29222733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003252364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000281629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180113591","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v7i1.358","title":"Open Data and Official Language Regimes: An Examination of the Canadian Experience","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Open data; Open government; Government (linguistics); Jurisdiction; Outsourcing; State (computer science); Business; Public relations; Private sector; Public administration; Political science; Computer science; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.09678208132160897,"score_gpt":0.3748352109114317,"score_spread":0.2780531295898227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180113591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.818206,0.00023012055,0.000004038956,0.0073088147,0.00024009556,0.00050242926,0.00009559674,0.0000021932701,0.17341068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99580985,0.000103767525,0.00022006758,0.0006488576,0.00011871673,0.0000034468374,0.0000056035924,0.000005954539,0.0030837231],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804884,0.0002680426,0.0002721511,0.0002251699,0.0009991633,0.00018661973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987717,0.00009525674,0.00039915077,0.00038108436,0.00006793096,0.00028487973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002801769,0.00009043199,0.00019686746,0.000016556189,0.00042167297,0.0005590078,0.002612689,0.00006550784,0.00014760376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002435273,0.00006648063,0.000015011952,0.00014059633,0.00022354061,0.0022215832,0.0015792135,0.00009905873,9.4938673e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005250892,0.0006417616,0.25180215,0.000078614044,0.00019654454,0.000026698319,0.4262885,0.00002043882,0.0005412722,0.068595536,0.023030695,0.2282527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016024625,0.00030108343,0.18542776,0.00019547106,0.00006685663,0.000009627635,0.5038803,0.0005891159,0.0006642801,0.00091201527,0.30602512,0.0003259151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22536851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4954673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28299442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021816537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006568111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7797898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197498005","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v7i2.392","title":"Transparency and Open Government: Reporting on the Disclosure of Information","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"Public Procurement and Policy","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Open data; Open government; Publishing; Government (linguistics); Business; Accounting; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07680373940109007,"score_gpt":0.2874051807682981,"score_spread":0.210601441367208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197498005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35608292,0.0001711347,0.00015366172,0.031026965,0.00032302187,0.0013455757,0.00004832001,0.000010125327,0.6108383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958855,0.00011127629,0.00012313778,0.0029387036,0.00020554702,0.000016348255,0.000006183732,0.000010572729,0.00070272025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973937,0.000024488752,0.001125821,0.00016389266,0.0010819051,0.00021014312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665225,0.00007769939,0.002892528,0.0002379542,0.000095397285,0.000044198336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027426197,0.00018255314,0.0003846611,0.000031809177,0.00018992755,0.0008664421,0.00077031663,0.000052258067,0.00011615353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044997313,0.00011849189,0.000056621222,0.00017427218,0.000054393706,0.004537472,0.0008555113,0.00016843314,0.000008420548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026313527,0.00085576734,0.30926937,0.00091387186,0.00061005,0.000017331398,0.0029460122,0.00014666401,0.0008961217,0.33502066,0.15098087,0.1957119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041827485,0.0003384411,0.08681116,0.000797017,0.0002389995,0.00002099918,0.006946266,0.0014572095,0.0011496416,0.018736575,0.878778,0.00054296234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003481826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031378575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7277971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008032889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060178554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8355121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243149016","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v4i1.94","title":"What’s There Not to ‘Like’? Sustainability Deliberations on Facebook","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions","keywords":"Deliberation; Affordance; Vision; Politics; Sustainability; Argument (complex analysis); Public sphere; Sociology; Mediation; Ideal (ethics); Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.04448963756416842,"score_gpt":0.38264128642260603,"score_spread":0.3381516488584376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243149016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8373349,0.00019385062,0.00008147899,0.07429025,0.00292327,0.001968628,0.00003293597,0.000013824376,0.083160885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98070735,0.00039051808,0.00018101647,0.0056755953,0.0005749026,0.00003235393,7.035911e-7,0.000010552427,0.012427015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979747,0.00026717386,0.00031817544,0.00015152311,0.0008461184,0.00044229394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985361,0.00055018923,0.00017818098,0.00016622119,0.000118355885,0.00045096333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010891174,0.00012438835,0.00024759036,0.00001902151,0.00058130216,0.00033140916,0.00034936296,0.00009163128,0.0005106244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045090966,0.00010838218,0.00007171796,0.00009789957,0.000117415984,0.0010772448,0.00016958987,0.00017337796,0.000047096866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008766145,0.0017218308,0.13369237,0.00010356771,0.000280168,0.000015153973,0.2617493,0.00009905343,0.00065614516,0.3351779,0.08818133,0.17744657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045631916,0.0002306752,0.026146667,0.00009052159,0.000044388707,0.0000016189723,0.17787777,0.000005645199,0.0012537834,0.0050148843,0.7886517,0.00022602861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047108327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018506101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7004704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005791494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027251866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5590979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260834005","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v3i2.65","title":"Why some governments are ‘less’ open: Sketching out Models of Information Management","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Open government; Bureaucracy; Government (linguistics); Politics; Control (management); Business; Public administration; Open data; Public relations; Process management; Knowledge management; Public economics; Computer science; Political science; Economics; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0646043085137793,"score_gpt":0.30061572430393174,"score_spread":0.23601141579015245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260834005","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11944125,0.00028350914,0.00093654,0.006169501,0.00081745646,0.0016986046,0.00013384451,0.00001543956,0.87050384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870523,0.0016756901,0.0032308286,0.004284882,0.00010177133,0.000027235055,0.0000046877562,0.00001705851,0.0036055376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962362,0.00016966154,0.0008501065,0.0002469463,0.0021217493,0.0003753511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766034,0.00009496211,0.0016428578,0.0003049631,0.00008429284,0.00021257735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020045522,0.00022402275,0.0004880842,0.000045417382,0.0004206313,0.00050324004,0.0019065264,0.00010858691,0.0005152434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003501133,0.00020098891,0.000101470745,0.0001470479,0.00013120697,0.008621297,0.0016569953,0.00017683288,0.000012000738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022183997,0.0019299387,0.08533739,0.0008497521,0.0013286192,0.00003276691,0.0800541,0.0001951018,0.000114365386,0.6830074,0.040446997,0.10448517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0074608247,0.0007341864,0.05563259,0.001668926,0.00048350135,0.000007011098,0.43068516,0.001297676,0.0020571402,0.11390106,0.3847141,0.0013578252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029877436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006823107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86761105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038298755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079559286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.819609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262305043","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v4i2.137","title":"Democratic Process in Online Crowds and Communities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"Open Source Software Innovations","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Crowds; Reputation; Democracy; Collective action; Citizen journalism; Public relations; Peer production; Participatory culture; Action (physics); Social media; Sociology; Process (computing); Crowd psychology; Online forum; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Knowledge management; Internet privacy; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Media studies; World Wide Web; Social science; Communication; Computer security; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.029330726384417305,"score_gpt":0.3109519718096865,"score_spread":0.2816212454252692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262305043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867452,0.00045522433,0.00470611,0.0042012306,0.00015674125,0.00036405138,0.000014810097,0.000011833589,0.003344798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98419785,0.00013447767,0.014227899,0.0010948664,0.000044889937,0.000010171254,0.0000018229942,0.000009985566,0.00027800316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984203,0.000104499224,0.0005351388,0.00014743708,0.0004970895,0.0002955442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886525,0.00028606656,0.00033915672,0.00031931067,0.00006622207,0.00012400463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093710783,0.00015884238,0.00032884898,0.00006095734,0.00018477178,0.0002865333,0.00095430145,0.000054557706,0.000037131456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006437154,0.00013856209,0.00002502617,0.00030527433,0.00008664645,0.002419961,0.0010137737,0.00028895677,0.0000025637744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079195524,0.0012185307,0.8993279,0.00017165043,0.00009327722,0.000012185256,0.013018864,0.00014670168,0.00026782742,0.019205417,0.0013940935,0.06506436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003513616,0.00057783135,0.92907417,0.0010018819,0.000055205808,0.00040788107,0.020419825,0.015143003,0.0015741807,0.018552478,0.008792706,0.00088719936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000067533874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049578695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06417716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084925756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006540287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56503975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267400405","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v2i2.29","title":"E-democracy remixed: Learning from the BBC's Action Network and the shift from a static commons to a participatory multiplex","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Civic engagement; Public sphere; Commons; Context (archaeology); Political science; Citizen journalism; Public relations; Democracy; Politics; Public service; The Internet; Sociology; Collective action; Public administration; Media studies; Law; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.06181900151579009,"score_gpt":0.3518737302836745,"score_spread":0.2900547287678844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267400405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9441991,0.0001910018,0.00011052398,0.051173985,0.0012794563,0.00067815307,0.000034379977,0.000010372578,0.0023230556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99448276,0.00030509036,0.0004950226,0.0030184418,0.0012897225,0.00002871648,0.0000024768988,0.000015045989,0.00036275503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997306,0.00087610853,0.00042613668,0.00021726471,0.00077787123,0.00039662595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930354,0.0059956717,0.00041947272,0.00021634849,0.000043172877,0.0002899748],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017708949,0.00015649026,0.00036762297,0.000008260534,0.0016709516,0.00041049326,0.00054136524,0.000111601854,0.00025609814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014524794,0.000098949306,0.000076829245,0.00012158782,0.00048009795,0.00032146488,0.00033514533,0.00072033727,0.000012137032],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011681115,0.0001546096,0.77402383,0.000010764213,0.0003617476,0.000011187304,0.14786662,0.0001807399,0.00077353104,0.012106378,0.01817616,0.045166295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032361199,0.00015740046,0.5261275,0.00021573115,0.00037513062,0.000002326253,0.10901499,0.001061554,0.00019652097,0.06560095,0.29362735,0.00038438177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017024267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013597226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2754512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083066436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015059247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270713136","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v6i3.227","title":"What’s in a name? A comparison of ‘open government’ definitions across seven Open Government Partnership members","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Open government; General partnership; Government (linguistics); Accountability; Political science; CLARITY; Meaning (existential); Public relations; Public administration; Open data; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.10199322051515183,"score_gpt":0.40385579746658157,"score_spread":0.3018625769514297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270713136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32575554,0.000588019,0.00004878092,0.02633565,0.000909065,0.0028523186,0.00031508924,0.000014419032,0.64318115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865053,0.002774829,0.00089733,0.001885494,0.00015751985,0.00010705912,0.000009677614,0.000037966834,0.0076248166],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919015,0.0008284689,0.0015510301,0.00069599046,0.004165746,0.0008572368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569726,0.0011375952,0.0020234475,0.00059365213,0.00009189447,0.00045614754],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006617611,0.00042169375,0.00124926,0.000022094255,0.00076986366,0.0029089625,0.004297374,0.00023210097,0.0013715492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002862875,0.00039616245,0.00018382548,0.00041415138,0.00039808854,0.005336338,0.004031809,0.00046387207,0.000019441744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042248257,0.006139681,0.503643,0.0004394092,0.0010681263,0.000032884094,0.11038558,0.0005164293,0.000563867,0.17408,0.044858307,0.15404792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004380547,0.00067363854,0.02148697,0.0010855424,0.00013336656,0.000005556187,0.29983237,0.0006440001,0.0010031958,0.005243565,0.66481096,0.0007002718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006641406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02486417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6607498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014105489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029044045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280030105","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v2i2.40","title":"To “e-” or not to “e-”: Re-locating innovation in “electronic” decision-making","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; ICTS; E-democracy; Information and Communications Technology; Sustainability; Knowledge management; Making-of; Management science; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Management; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.03345929797378827,"score_gpt":0.40086864981259274,"score_spread":0.36740935183880447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280030105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97354376,0.000009701281,0.00035119132,0.011944133,0.0007354849,0.00058068795,0.000007660187,0.000005649176,0.012821719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887705,0.000043232612,0.005476294,0.004696036,0.0004155699,0.000013808691,3.1866097e-7,0.000011587195,0.0005726759],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780124,0.000086090964,0.00059494696,0.00020929493,0.0008694199,0.00043901213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982275,0.0010687417,0.0002798465,0.00014155246,0.00011570485,0.00016667947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018965726,0.00011298634,0.00027091324,0.000087286775,0.00032933394,0.00020048357,0.00049755396,0.000104721636,0.00030555602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004286229,0.00009912099,0.000028764449,0.00072875613,0.000046491074,0.00035358264,0.00024820337,0.00035616415,0.000015330454],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018054555,0.0003250313,0.073656626,0.000031446667,0.00005519402,0.000030786723,0.07829625,0.0001044833,0.013938331,0.12580024,0.008316592,0.6976396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024873817,0.001255042,0.11140455,0.0015834325,0.00006231768,0.000016570888,0.16434059,0.00021583601,0.008426768,0.038488913,0.6706191,0.0010995069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070088636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007064384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69654006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003457429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046792754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51313263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509086872","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v8i1.370","title":"Assessing the Use of Government Open Data and the Role of Data Infomediaries The Case of Nova Scotia’s Community Counts Program","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Nova Scotia; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Open data; Nova scotia; Open government; Government (linguistics); Linked data; Incentive; Literacy; Data science; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Political science; Geography; Semantic Web; Economics","score_opus":0.18687443264057862,"score_gpt":0.4166078146260615,"score_spread":0.22973338198548288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509086872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88925815,0.0014277742,0.0000624275,0.038127158,0.00040615175,0.0028461544,0.0025292337,0.000005880104,0.065337084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975672,0.001057493,0.0005849097,0.00033001084,0.000061733925,0.0000041769213,0.0000062571444,0.0000075338303,0.00038069807],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971469,0.0007615603,0.0005730296,0.00016818188,0.001173705,0.00017663272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994403,0.0030624145,0.0012152297,0.0011799678,0.000077062585,0.00006229793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007032742,0.00012292412,0.00035405508,0.000006877908,0.0004925576,0.0006372508,0.004188468,0.000053793498,0.0001960615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006442481,0.00005309662,0.000032926517,0.00012809521,0.0014358418,0.0031168726,0.0068016774,0.00019910136,8.620433e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010378006,0.0011404001,0.18224794,0.00016972226,0.0010028357,0.000011979588,0.016953459,0.0000033329154,0.00035779236,0.048762187,0.025965663,0.7223469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034197308,0.0002923609,0.030270405,0.00076437026,0.0004664222,0.00005151103,0.21247427,0.0010059854,0.0006908959,0.0038428365,0.7464324,0.0002887831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0241014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014135931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7220581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006946197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019332451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9823972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581306059","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v8i2.414","title":"Open or Closed? Open Licensing of Real-time Public Sector Transit Data","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"Transportation and Mobility Innovations","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Open data; Real-time data; Global Positioning System; Openness to experience; Transit (satellite); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Public transport; Transport engineering; Engineering; World Wide Web; Telecommunications; Geography","score_opus":0.09017034028354912,"score_gpt":0.3115166954050352,"score_spread":0.22134635512148607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581306059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81110185,0.00016881534,0.008044116,0.022089893,0.0007839108,0.004779023,0.0038608324,0.00008193366,0.14908962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903146,0.00064335275,0.005611473,0.00025508032,0.000049113096,0.000011963815,0.000037944705,0.00003566141,0.0030407857],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981957,0.000046000725,0.0008230928,0.00028912432,0.00042102128,0.00022504039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864256,0.0001962001,0.00028682104,0.00064342614,0.00009266763,0.00013830853],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009293308,0.00017826552,0.00049337,0.000039673072,0.00010285613,0.0003230308,0.0022071933,0.00007134784,0.0018684032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005920268,0.00012331674,0.000039313378,0.00021360132,0.00005373589,0.0025885,0.00063298445,0.00011343378,0.000011896085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030750013,0.0017096355,0.017704146,0.0006327983,0.0024084072,0.00007119954,0.0023582673,0.00062927435,0.47733748,0.016071832,0.10242333,0.3755786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02183379,0.0013146286,0.27424756,0.0029742671,0.00062259607,0.00014761825,0.003028915,0.005881748,0.05850097,0.0017116839,0.6277772,0.0019590252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014649663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030167692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52535385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106032974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001630281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784393216","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v9i1.468","title":"Beyond Ambiguity: A Practical Framework for Developing and Implementing Open Government Reforms","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Open government; Transparency (behavior); Public relations; Facilitator; Accountability; Government (linguistics); General partnership; Ambiguity; Political science; Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Salience (neuroscience); Public administration; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.08740157147675369,"score_gpt":0.43379934384057994,"score_spread":0.34639777236382624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784393216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17422587,0.0003683855,0.0033898617,0.21447411,0.001262202,0.0041374913,0.0002619637,0.000020631933,0.6018595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9187322,0.0026521136,0.06682528,0.0044558938,0.00069097074,0.00010815229,0.000004757584,0.000042546104,0.0064880336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962561,0.00012061109,0.00069501885,0.0004855566,0.0017834258,0.0006592767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968042,0.00070009,0.0016758334,0.00044016808,0.000095283795,0.00028442979],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050586504,0.00025646304,0.00056096754,0.000013934635,0.003227876,0.0039047438,0.0018036058,0.0001697761,0.00023550735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009012997,0.00021361612,0.00008977841,0.000065507156,0.00026343254,0.0035794715,0.0036807177,0.0002857506,0.0000030894253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074112933,0.00022173156,0.057537794,0.00013941656,0.00037203202,0.000014314556,0.0040439977,3.8641727e-7,0.00015376914,0.8078275,0.005290838,0.123657115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028284504,0.00040280638,0.034674946,0.0006060982,0.0001733298,0.000015711816,0.045086846,0.00010432882,0.0011046828,0.12452914,0.78984743,0.0006262351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018251594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002275257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78455657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006180297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033934432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99806976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810981524","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v7i2.406","title":"International Challenges to Transformational Government: Enhanced Project Management Identifies Need for Existential Change","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Transformational leadership; Mindset; Existentialism; Government (linguistics); Change management (ITSM); Business; Process management; Political science; Public relations; Knowledge management; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.2620223684405182,"score_gpt":0.41504053358993254,"score_spread":0.15301816514941435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810981524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21500392,0.00077706005,0.03432774,0.048396826,0.009581959,0.009842179,0.00070044067,0.00004935653,0.68132055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96670157,0.0019693363,0.006878398,0.0009221145,0.000419045,0.00040107686,0.0000108669565,0.000021997741,0.022675624],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949372,0.00007105182,0.0009881922,0.00044729552,0.0032881522,0.0002681082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985149,0.0001970529,0.00060756254,0.00028960206,0.0002364418,0.00015443936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002948627,0.00021318883,0.00039201922,0.00014405933,0.00017934327,0.0006317866,0.0012004516,0.00005192497,0.00028495697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016582319,0.00017152033,0.00013969977,0.0002468401,0.00004954918,0.002081528,0.000694187,0.000096156735,0.000035151126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036270428,0.0003403861,0.0017017572,0.00015950158,0.0004958257,0.0000057113252,0.00829022,0.0001298089,0.0003918982,0.018339865,0.047066394,0.9194516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045179143,0.00058540935,0.007707207,0.0002037225,0.00008985649,0.00002565881,0.03228411,0.0021407444,0.0019315685,0.005551916,0.9445454,0.00041647867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018983965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036186117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91903514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022079743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004293349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6994396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995444494","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v11i1.541","title":"A Case Study of New England Open Data Portals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Open data; Open government; Agency (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Reuse; State (computer science); Business; Public relations; Public administration; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.1143118519751542,"score_gpt":0.39121205268589704,"score_spread":0.27690020071074284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995444494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8938275,0.00016446049,0.0000031847337,0.002657613,0.00033066908,0.0014892456,0.00007420452,0.0000038069402,0.101449296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852698,0.00023629391,0.0002611737,0.00041154254,0.00019912238,0.0000041961257,0.000005101224,0.000012969817,0.013599832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968985,0.00024731347,0.000677063,0.00041247057,0.0014836172,0.00028105342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770355,0.00035175338,0.00094329467,0.0006801741,0.00006258082,0.0002586735],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032864443,0.00017153338,0.0005599948,0.0000240295,0.00027242518,0.0005909637,0.0029473729,0.000077998564,0.0021043338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010631901,0.00014128377,0.000042406013,0.00019534543,0.00006285685,0.0025129882,0.0033576523,0.00016839973,0.000012328075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009007106,0.0021884239,0.8652795,0.0000899945,0.0007223093,0.000608073,0.050244275,0.000018520645,0.00018479703,0.004000808,0.024318727,0.051443845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012017666,0.0018617483,0.029507749,0.00024652338,0.0002924486,0.00025509734,0.5173542,0.00016077967,0.00015422645,0.00091363624,0.43668297,0.00055299595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03727261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016401127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8357718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009738187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000367695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116677346","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v12i2.598","title":"Improving Monitoring and Evaluation in the Civic Tech Ecosystem","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Sustainability; Monitoring and evaluation; Resource (disambiguation); Knowledge management; Business; Computer science; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.19997569517397656,"score_gpt":0.4570129682412581,"score_spread":0.2570372730672815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116677346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97547936,0.00037459604,0.0002925747,0.015215677,0.00020282128,0.00073935045,0.0000074636614,0.0000023457396,0.007685828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985519,0.00015422759,0.00044239435,0.0006315652,0.00011385884,0.000019362536,3.716638e-7,0.0000047400017,0.00008156569],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99552315,0.00038871617,0.0007527612,0.0002772333,0.002914427,0.00014370863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836445,0.00066301244,0.00056624075,0.0001993388,0.00012291143,0.00008402044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011036989,0.00010907789,0.00026480344,0.00003685758,0.00016809792,0.00056682876,0.00062425336,0.00003871249,0.00022156435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059938023,0.000065353146,0.00003753619,0.0002758275,0.000018549172,0.00089257135,0.00030879423,0.00018840979,0.000012439044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022231122,0.00010693574,0.3404376,0.00005521388,0.0000351289,0.0000071867116,0.0063878517,0.0012985811,0.004442611,0.00056931225,0.0013240874,0.64511317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003850775,0.0007986282,0.63970035,0.0003089861,0.00009769869,0.000051651215,0.056990173,0.26978505,0.0034273805,0.0033639197,0.021270888,0.0003544962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020309111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029125476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6447587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010482439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012749141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54659426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200266356","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v13i2.645","title":"Coproducing spatial information: Exploring government approaches and motivations at the local level","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"E-Government and Public Services","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Coproduction; Government (linguistics); Geospatial analysis; Local government; Public relations; Open data; Process (computing); Information sharing; Knowledge management; Open government; Business; Key (lock); Data sharing; Knowledge sharing; Political science; Public administration; Computer science; Geography; Computer security","score_opus":0.13425572191612645,"score_gpt":0.28775492896387334,"score_spread":0.1534992070477469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200266356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69555575,0.0010905743,0.0034865988,0.092531934,0.0009410159,0.0009937785,0.00019457689,0.000017675622,0.2051881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99266773,0.001139181,0.0004063663,0.0011614659,0.00024541543,0.00002788045,0.0000063026355,0.000008342847,0.0043372875],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712074,0.0001624666,0.00046737786,0.0002308543,0.0017483105,0.0002702586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987624,0.00036637878,0.00043457767,0.00022109262,0.00006806352,0.00014747915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014753374,0.00015468927,0.00024955603,0.0000100573,0.0011022988,0.0005595394,0.0003854419,0.0000622656,0.00052011095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001931526,0.000118387026,0.000057564677,0.00015872731,0.00023712318,0.002136804,0.00091081794,0.00018205434,0.000007943709],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000504234,0.00045078478,0.22055385,0.00024087382,0.00059143914,0.000018841672,0.057302196,0.00067132455,0.00040368296,0.07671236,0.013121933,0.6294285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017404902,0.00013078912,0.16422957,0.00024391251,0.00012627717,0.000031888005,0.24950698,0.0010886298,0.0055738613,0.00093111617,0.5759453,0.0004511824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014569135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029462152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6289773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005545738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017435288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84781027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402927908","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v16i1.872","title":"Direct democracy and AI as a way to revitalize the health of the Federal Commonwealth","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Cornerstone; Commonwealth; Limiting; Political science; Functional illiteracy; Corporate governance; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Public administration; Politics; Law; Engineering; Management; History; Economics","score_opus":0.04853095682370495,"score_gpt":0.36845799413902364,"score_spread":0.3199270373153187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402927908","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38811255,0.0010027679,0.00038098128,0.58820707,0.0012649598,0.002155221,0.0001532682,0.000023872326,0.018699331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503422,0.001157266,0.00011621192,0.044996783,0.000080239864,0.000016648464,4.149235e-7,0.000020738826,0.0032695092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689,0.00040602242,0.000824963,0.00041745967,0.001137926,0.00032359996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978316,0.0010571105,0.0004730995,0.0004033041,0.000046498746,0.00018842358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016166585,0.00019616011,0.00041029192,0.000041125677,0.00080153043,0.00037798987,0.00082749006,0.00004704318,0.00011654165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008176493,0.00011172597,0.00008486555,0.00048299556,0.00036550718,0.00037120612,0.0010402115,0.00056144485,0.000009648786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010298055,0.0013043272,0.006808532,0.0019340882,0.00030849586,0.00009629722,0.00846609,0.000053515876,0.24293303,0.28128436,0.280274,0.17550744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028117176,0.0044807754,0.0472312,0.0057081296,0.00015172565,0.0006328344,0.0024028975,0.0012915905,0.25055158,0.0711333,0.6125801,0.0010240991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000119672324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044112483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56222963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016208457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022147682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6164805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403105781","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v16i3.912","title":"Election administrators' perceptions of verifiable online voting and its use in local elections","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Brock University","keywords":"Verifiable secret sharing; Voting; Spoilt vote; Perception; Local election; Ballot; Political science; Internet privacy; Computer science; Computer security; Group voting ticket; Law; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.01802710132143283,"score_gpt":0.2828443165121445,"score_spread":0.26481721519071166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403105781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88901216,0.00040365753,0.10896365,0.0008115281,0.00021626339,0.00016302134,0.000015498414,0.000012679042,0.00040152326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973543,0.00020758584,0.0017793336,0.00008968904,0.000049052505,0.0000026363523,0.0000017019752,0.0000073588626,0.00050831574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985783,0.00006959465,0.00052580057,0.00028777734,0.00035504642,0.00018346078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994643,0.00014395916,0.0001738625,0.00007999393,0.000060374674,0.000077558856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051292544,0.00012484589,0.00027522695,0.00008043561,0.00010795935,0.0003546321,0.00027492782,0.00005875727,0.000041245792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046200275,0.000109243774,0.00007329835,0.0003345039,0.000029630412,0.001090904,0.00021564368,0.0002745025,0.0000018748917],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044442777,0.0029717195,0.03957923,0.0008363261,0.0012619583,0.000263923,0.0072941924,0.053218994,0.021402996,0.71202093,0.0057684807,0.15493682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029448536,0.0003331137,0.009442887,0.0003721195,0.000038347076,0.00010685045,0.00091342255,0.98557895,0.00089476147,0.000048808815,0.001829497,0.00014672572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008059678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034626422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012273212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102398386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4454832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414328544","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v17i3.1033","title":"Strengthening democracy: The capacity of AI-powered insights for enhancing policy deliberation and transparency","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Deliberation; Accountability; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Democratic governance; Democracy; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.03325443587505143,"score_gpt":0.36755448942103736,"score_spread":0.3343000535459859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414328544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81357455,0.0009685813,0.004289895,0.14126691,0.00033248117,0.0012822041,0.000052206684,0.000008655776,0.03822452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948257,0.0018219592,0.0007276436,0.0018595277,0.00012171871,0.0000073961896,9.000287e-7,0.000006561442,0.0006285938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836564,0.00018377966,0.0005617038,0.00016878442,0.00050094747,0.00021915468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831223,0.00086306175,0.00040107252,0.00011678837,0.00021002666,0.00009678653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001680781,0.000120478886,0.0003226724,0.00003813098,0.0011279806,0.0002801974,0.0003355507,0.00012223159,0.000015040887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007340636,0.00009031507,0.000079659694,0.00017127603,0.00025067918,0.00074320583,0.00009238275,0.00024884817,1.2989976e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042912134,0.00025373377,0.005048227,0.00022131146,0.00036063604,0.0000010219323,0.08894765,0.0000669451,0.013312728,0.83249503,0.0017427173,0.057120875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003594321,0.00073596643,0.029535314,0.0013921311,0.00038400263,0.0000028867253,0.054360237,0.0007675608,0.023691205,0.82038224,0.06458332,0.00057081296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018768972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004321499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18125115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013305576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005023907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86756295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414329387","doi":"10.29379/jedem.v17i3.1094","title":"Insights from the www.openbydefault.ca database project","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Conceptualization; Work (physics); Open government; Open data","score_opus":0.032127119432785144,"score_gpt":0.2570353483727383,"score_spread":0.22490822893995313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414329387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059308432,0.0003096971,0.000062402,0.008001991,0.00049656234,0.0006578766,0.0007369781,0.000007622314,0.93041843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447589,0.00028205846,0.00015773383,0.0046145786,0.0002604373,0.000029524088,0.00006797407,0.000009979855,0.049818795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987008,0.000055955723,0.0003864733,0.00023987985,0.0004718608,0.00014504978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913186,0.00033350097,0.00021480014,0.0002428246,0.000031441097,0.000045552493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013254932,0.00016477359,0.00024967914,0.000026405793,0.00043649913,0.0007327757,0.00064104295,0.000011249271,0.0004823017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023851613,0.000097383636,0.00008444945,0.000042175194,0.00017022814,0.00088255014,0.0007527958,0.00015805528,0.000053191892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025605303,0.00033529414,0.00020409963,0.000039271603,0.00034759843,0.000015960115,0.0012816523,0.000006506174,0.00005824323,0.825331,0.15406936,0.018054998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007156177,0.000118825796,0.0098479325,0.00033229133,0.0000926344,0.0000014634684,0.0033378839,0.0001588063,0.00009137824,0.05892701,0.9262328,0.00014333341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050441176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025654217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8854505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043345688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006315692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7066173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}