{"meta":{"query_hash":"94505b4b76b9","filters":{"venue":"Jindal Global Law Review"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/94505b4b76b9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Jindal+Global+Law+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W3165013747","doi":"10.1007/s41020-021-00144-7","title":"Heteronormativity and hierarchy of relationships: The case of South Asian binational queer couples in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jindal Global Law Review","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heteronormativity; Queer; Gender studies; Immigration; Political science; Family reunification; Refugee; Sociology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.04187951386047898,"score_gpt":0.34332648724738596,"score_spread":0.30144697338690696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165013747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8672208,0.0014000089,0.0009431586,0.031230416,0.000084148545,0.00008613906,0.00007625249,0.000012133759,0.09894684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99171466,0.00052115077,0.00017064968,0.0014637914,0.000007077659,0.00001658738,0.000013749428,0.000008207762,0.0060839914],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959628,0.0009953582,0.000055728113,0.00023430213,0.000453932,0.002298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99610776,0.0011755842,0.00035132805,0.00015785237,0.00068290916,0.0015245293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031559048,0.00024097327,0.00052697764,0.0011850445,0.05657905,0.006932248,0.0021218897,0.0041354625,0.0066762134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056737587,0.00037861263,0.00036606204,0.002609161,0.026814578,0.0024628816,0.0057332874,0.007602973,0.00020169666],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007510459,0.00009777902,0.034130525,0.0000545923,0.000030467134,0.005054939,0.648927,0.0005304725,0.00047590578,0.27890635,0.009593362,0.022123514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003301349,0.000023048999,0.025529098,0.00018778408,0.000037237263,0.00085732614,0.91408336,0.00075952354,0.00023003532,0.015582154,0.04261767,0.000059672053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9838552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9946327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061752282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061752282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11057669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44804627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310256116","doi":"10.1007/s41020-022-00183-8","title":"Examining the living metaphor in the Indian Constitution","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jindal Global Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Constitution; Supreme court; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Constitutionalism; Doctrine; Democracy; Sociology; Law; Constitution of India; Political science; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.060957793058452836,"score_gpt":0.327253691719669,"score_spread":0.26629589866121617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310256116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36483523,0.006330729,0.006018765,0.017877033,0.00049818784,0.00005029988,0.000057535173,0.000049890838,0.6042824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962441,0.0005955017,0.0003421567,0.000521129,0.000031519015,0.000008789788,0.00000756597,0.000007627849,0.0022415796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993874,0.0044891513,0.00010725237,0.00019899961,0.0008270849,0.0005035096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930688,0.0052631414,0.00052346237,0.00034052343,0.0005737038,0.00023034157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051739933,0.00020337578,0.00029229125,0.0030709929,0.008138689,0.0067218076,0.00095164665,0.0013352958,0.0033511112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008091047,0.00013628197,0.00021328272,0.0036932547,0.032230113,0.0036232998,0.004190159,0.0034718798,0.0001824687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009795248,0.000016982018,0.00067411386,0.00006482162,0.0000039526326,0.0002892136,0.08699355,0.00012844049,0.00040539238,0.9043204,0.0019589234,0.0051344214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002124649,0.00009460764,0.010983384,0.00088047754,0.00005458348,0.0010115,0.39431342,0.001212983,0.0013267823,0.223352,0.36664847,0.00010046641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03090782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05253163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03090782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007262623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053715846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061455786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384070204","doi":"10.1007/s41020-023-00196-x","title":"Critical constitutionalism: An inquiry into the past, present, and future","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jindal Global Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Politics; Democracy; Law; Objectivity (philosophy); Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05658166047038281,"score_gpt":0.3959888398842407,"score_spread":0.3394071794138579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384070204","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018105283,0.09935748,0.011091131,0.6003736,0.0045459857,0.000060927807,0.00016165776,0.00005218056,0.26625174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9032157,0.029502181,0.0034496156,0.04234513,0.007623338,0.00017428673,0.00009712357,0.00008507206,0.01350753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871634,0.007278299,0.0004465394,0.0014825924,0.0025739146,0.0010551595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9571821,0.03522921,0.00151309,0.0016469328,0.0034240838,0.0010045669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022517474,0.00034697232,0.0007982403,0.004480223,0.008000939,0.016994588,0.0021028216,0.008005137,0.004587142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044964883,0.00037617068,0.00061796495,0.0034167154,0.05327185,0.010796498,0.0027958266,0.011996167,0.000268024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002572454,0.000005255173,0.000070314105,0.00004332724,0.000002508704,0.00001427069,0.0006071537,0.00003964689,0.000022931948,0.9917129,0.0045884964,0.0028906956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013859081,0.000009961324,0.000426855,0.00045233796,0.000009623986,0.000037708836,0.0017061153,0.00019378192,0.00011701583,0.88762325,0.10939724,0.000012396738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007840302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01075388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022517474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010212837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021413423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11908519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}