{"meta":{"query_hash":"a79f5c8664af","filters":{"venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science"},"cohort_total":12,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"exported":12,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a79f5c8664af","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+for+General+Philosophy+of+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W2042566227","doi":"10.1007/s10838-009-9074-4","title":"How Scientific Is Scientific Essentialism?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Essentialism; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Philosophy; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.04790178020497761,"score_gpt":0.3434511361927821,"score_spread":0.2955493559878045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042566227","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036868945,0.026935155,0.05507578,0.62247926,0.0085924445,0.00006339059,0.00031238902,0.0002719492,0.24940059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94282585,0.0098988,0.008922341,0.022279736,0.008267649,0.0001205129,0.00013309217,0.00019177778,0.0073602614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988204,0.0059894277,0.0006829738,0.0011985763,0.0031713273,0.00075362745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91183376,0.064093426,0.0044426466,0.006931243,0.00907854,0.0036203298],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022678573,0.0005965047,0.0020530957,0.0044248393,0.005060183,0.009879235,0.0018709307,0.0068987436,0.0069961026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064282894,0.0006385588,0.0008890819,0.0025544078,0.05187223,0.025036221,0.0060942164,0.010472614,0.0011393538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017892702,0.00001582158,0.00029626602,0.00009496271,0.000020603786,0.000018735824,0.00049469934,0.000083442945,0.00003611831,0.99149394,0.0036275827,0.0037998382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006195716,0.0000024771791,0.00008570755,0.000020930893,0.0000040190534,0.000011546246,0.000083490915,0.00005754072,0.000020010759,0.9959628,0.0037428006,0.000002536831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015020825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010701081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005130766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006025974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11993718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075706844","doi":"10.1007/s10838-014-9243-y","title":"The Role of Justification in the Ordinary Concept of Scientific Progress","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Stalemate; Epistemology; Scientific progress; Appeal; Positive economics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.08410257148655181,"score_gpt":0.3204544316997594,"score_spread":0.2363518602132076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075706844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085687324,0.013577868,0.26369998,0.16631767,0.0039968225,0.00012729137,0.00020357207,0.00021327364,0.46617612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9664568,0.0011457747,0.022925027,0.004043379,0.0014716149,0.00010825235,0.000028116612,0.0000706615,0.003750373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98617864,0.008219796,0.00079415407,0.0014417416,0.0027298022,0.0006359142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9560616,0.032126047,0.0019958105,0.0048013744,0.003570715,0.0014443699],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02314266,0.00053427205,0.0012102044,0.00310415,0.0043503717,0.008868123,0.0027220803,0.00842529,0.0043449146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03947516,0.0007524151,0.0010715955,0.0017175815,0.072591655,0.021062197,0.004718956,0.008704411,0.00034757704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005831515,0.0000034180184,0.000040219653,0.00001537568,0.0000038582652,0.000010119781,0.0002319422,0.0000758117,0.00003176004,0.9986173,0.0002170618,0.0007472741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000767148,0.00000308915,0.000061076134,0.000009964132,0.000002668627,0.000012499047,0.000036993886,0.00024266193,0.000020626556,0.9983742,0.0012241086,0.000004446344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017663462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016380154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99564964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003854263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032404189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12239158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769414228","doi":"10.1007/s10838-017-9382-z","title":"Facts and Values in Pragmatism and Logical Empiricism: Addressing the Eclipse Narrative","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Empiricism; Epistemology; Narrative; Philosophy of science; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Eclipse; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.17387314824285172,"score_gpt":0.34888344926151615,"score_spread":0.17501030101866444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769414228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19411807,0.006415324,0.07830532,0.15008822,0.00058386225,0.000052941265,0.00014586025,0.00013344052,0.570157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99056166,0.0006078918,0.003378143,0.0010778778,0.00011801311,0.000030408042,0.00002654491,0.00008687926,0.0041126506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99395245,0.0040313406,0.00018455034,0.0004383499,0.00083453243,0.00055872375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96129787,0.031580728,0.0014771644,0.0029603743,0.0018828575,0.00080110965],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013016569,0.00049643253,0.00087427563,0.0024278667,0.007671143,0.013136031,0.0018987048,0.006973712,0.0046506072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029917167,0.00058090145,0.0006104119,0.0027885484,0.06357189,0.02972915,0.009119193,0.011501029,0.00041352815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008180285,0.0000041127832,0.000107735,0.00001088772,9.953553e-7,0.00002959863,0.007961211,0.000041689917,0.000013425321,0.9904289,0.00035687804,0.001036405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013142608,0.00000640863,0.00018769187,0.00008285577,0.000004276329,0.00007022589,0.008883754,0.0005714374,0.0001021316,0.9772839,0.012788073,0.000006108489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005065506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054907766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9923289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007331956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069544106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06883901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972193038","doi":"10.1007/s10838-019-09472-8","title":"Cultural Blankets: Epistemological Pluralism in the Evolutionary Epistemology of Mechanisms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Language and cultural evolution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociocultural evolution; Philosophy of science; Evolutionism; Evolutionary epistemology; Sociology; Pluralism (philosophy); Social epistemology; Explanatory power; Darwinism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0356604807049528,"score_gpt":0.33300075372512633,"score_spread":0.2973402730201735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972193038","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14656146,0.00743547,0.4841146,0.16471665,0.0018923668,0.00013140634,0.00019923318,0.00017972648,0.19476922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96852803,0.00063833717,0.026181564,0.0022054233,0.0004524229,0.00011305477,0.00004038395,0.00008268109,0.0017580852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799172,0.014874666,0.0008759748,0.0016268039,0.0018660285,0.0008392617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9479802,0.03851703,0.0019583113,0.0068527358,0.0031153774,0.0015763111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037367262,0.00069721066,0.0021671166,0.0039088316,0.007659979,0.012566776,0.00446106,0.0071190554,0.004162254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04740035,0.0010219729,0.0014636159,0.0025436273,0.09853621,0.03218057,0.011131257,0.012103862,0.0002950865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000787822,0.0000070401297,0.00009928728,0.000019647157,0.000008778017,0.000030003572,0.0026114946,0.00026565001,0.00002938035,0.99542624,0.00019426958,0.0013004185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056199674,0.000001861168,0.000031033673,0.000018691626,0.0000031027057,0.0000127292715,0.000430658,0.00037376073,0.000021673923,0.9981851,0.0009118733,0.0000037694856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030147228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024798114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037367262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049891933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005791564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19761938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158056354","doi":"10.1007/s10838-020-09548-w","title":"Should We Strive to Make Science Bias-Free? A Philosophical Assessment of the Reproducibility Crisis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Reproducibility; Philosophy of education; Epistemology; Philosophy of technology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology; Social science; Positive economics; Higher education; Sociology; Economics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.19547335108770034,"score_gpt":0.35485285754858864,"score_spread":0.1593795064608883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158056354","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033746813,0.019309212,0.03847595,0.9297503,0.003937086,0.00009846742,0.000046110807,0.00010391141,0.004904324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45995873,0.020250775,0.110233516,0.3791104,0.025657903,0.0013457913,0.00010187369,0.00039582813,0.0029451926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.52191854,0.33913743,0.027954953,0.024363037,0.08225606,0.0043698987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.19334723,0.6690002,0.035597153,0.057122204,0.040578574,0.0043545994],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5806302,0.001348253,0.0053227274,0.009396561,0.008081302,0.02208074,0.008835396,0.024496147,0.0024885386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6825575,0.0016832142,0.0034235094,0.0059248367,0.1082345,0.056631662,0.014662993,0.033260398,0.0011958582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016709365,0.00006545678,0.0024174177,0.0014021134,0.0005691827,0.00016909764,0.009877301,0.0011803933,0.00039128735,0.9279256,0.018325651,0.037509266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083358165,0.0000428369,0.000456272,0.0005322652,0.000052475658,0.00008387762,0.0006958459,0.0009868657,0.00025944767,0.98282814,0.01392329,0.000055256714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026909309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017956765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41936982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012448979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019554006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5171577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210703163","doi":"10.1007/s10838-021-09575-1","title":"Revisiting the Basic/Applied Science Distinction: The Significance of Urgent Science for Science Funding Policy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Social science education; Science education; Science policy; Political science; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Science studies; Politics; Basic research; Science, technology, society and environment education; Scientific enterprise; Sociology; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1956155136819922,"score_gpt":0.44881573451334655,"score_spread":0.25320022083135435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210703163","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009226897,0.007320924,0.010666062,0.91523695,0.0036712328,0.000027393362,0.000065177635,0.000026611193,0.053758785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7897417,0.00622637,0.009891381,0.1729087,0.0141646145,0.00017646278,0.00003773808,0.000106301544,0.0067466446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817317,0.0094990935,0.00076867,0.0020256713,0.0046093557,0.0013654354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9019704,0.08149289,0.0030309155,0.0035244206,0.006061684,0.0039197304],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049023546,0.0005569291,0.0018818849,0.0023550203,0.005526486,0.013913503,0.0033856167,0.019687744,0.0069315773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06857956,0.0006404427,0.00085554394,0.0017527812,0.06818505,0.02492924,0.0066163987,0.029023195,0.0005850401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001206928,0.000010376287,0.00007962839,0.000037058868,0.000004633642,0.000017112501,0.0002606732,0.00010951359,0.00004532228,0.99434656,0.003380697,0.0016962668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027099926,0.0000054937204,0.00014995511,0.00007436708,0.00000635958,0.000012934208,0.00024879572,0.00032339373,0.00005834273,0.987422,0.011662723,0.000008433611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006291363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070121842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01054393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021185534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2592644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280623825","doi":"10.1007/s10838-022-09616-3","title":"Rebuttal to Douglas and Elliott","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Challenges","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rebuttal; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of education; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Higher education; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14456349448551603,"score_gpt":0.470453959452878,"score_spread":0.32589046496736196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280623825","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022388338,0.0016239772,0.0005302312,0.9787965,0.017422045,0.000005483252,0.000023808192,0.00002318433,0.0013508844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008904695,0.0012215917,0.0010737998,0.9715043,0.012024153,0.000042552754,0.000012613118,0.00004592392,0.005170439],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9710834,0.008294408,0.0023826053,0.0052270484,0.01158038,0.0014321388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8878722,0.057834093,0.005016992,0.0048825145,0.038401835,0.005992408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03575366,0.0015316015,0.0021609715,0.0018681695,0.008804868,0.013087669,0.0082945,0.03267308,0.004080808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1471949,0.00089095946,0.0013460122,0.0022506488,0.027722316,0.015128257,0.007855447,0.06028401,0.004052409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048987185,0.000017285465,0.00016871601,0.00010575734,0.000021854794,0.0001462783,0.0029957364,0.00008357275,0.000110033696,0.089414,0.9026603,0.004227438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050044895,0.00004161409,0.00073134084,0.0010837604,0.000053901706,0.00031702156,0.0053978227,0.00050261064,0.00060186343,0.12463536,0.8664278,0.00015681259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025603538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021600986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03575366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009590819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01667657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18908566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310022035","doi":"10.1007/s10838-022-09632-3","title":"Daniel S. Brooks, James DiFrisco, and William C. Wimsatt (Eds.): Levels of Organization in the Biological Sciences","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Philosophy of education; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Higher education; Law","score_opus":0.10268733305448388,"score_gpt":0.2796053491573694,"score_spread":0.17691801610288552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310022035","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007508529,0.922415,0.0043890355,0.038597833,0.0043645073,0.000015867234,0.00013459715,0.000102935104,0.029229391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0061025294,0.950479,0.004428669,0.0017242301,0.002007773,0.000019483066,0.00015724955,0.00004659023,0.03503449],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994894,0.00008586605,0.000039766794,0.00009618596,0.00025852857,0.000030208352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985537,0.0007294584,0.00013815553,0.00004887015,0.0002739252,0.000255908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014891409,0.0012513227,0.0011866834,0.002265171,0.0012147317,0.004712812,0.0008396812,0.0016635038,0.017129023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016980901,0.0009601698,0.00040266503,0.0033353535,0.0019686888,0.00650791,0.0012848361,0.003406811,0.010129642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078169476,0.000047380046,0.00095524976,0.0016344292,0.000028984143,0.00007514159,0.0012410021,0.0006825316,0.0005677827,0.055072196,0.43906036,0.5005567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011091695,0.000016350059,0.002356446,0.0013134866,0.00003212459,0.0004364415,0.0008344926,0.00042643587,0.00035611162,0.035832733,0.9583501,0.000034376942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0102067515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026466615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017129023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00221356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034345833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057302356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323926222","doi":"10.1007/s10838-022-09635-0","title":"The Role of Quantum Jumps in Quantum Ontology","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Quantum process; Quantum probability; Open quantum system; Quantum operation; Quantum discord; Quantum; Quantum algorithm; Quantum dissipation; Quantum dynamics; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Theoretical physics","score_opus":0.026437195924065234,"score_gpt":0.30540258113727814,"score_spread":0.2789653852132129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323926222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15888047,0.0060184165,0.32552114,0.062268957,0.0017287047,0.00011445191,0.0004518711,0.00033722943,0.44467878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720294,0.0008494412,0.01870549,0.0012637122,0.000559005,0.000073640746,0.000059714355,0.00010248518,0.0063571236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715495,0.0014592462,0.00014515934,0.0004445302,0.000508617,0.00028743962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98755175,0.008567479,0.0005545876,0.0018030116,0.00083290465,0.000690277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006162946,0.00028574478,0.0009158865,0.001754217,0.003906799,0.0058577224,0.0019113801,0.003877945,0.008455551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013678956,0.0006785529,0.0008385098,0.0015725693,0.030798122,0.025268367,0.0040042414,0.0064215823,0.00048317338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022904967,0.0000012994103,0.000021865175,0.0000039539646,8.7361326e-7,0.0000059230506,0.00017475974,0.00003893022,0.000017747449,0.9993368,0.000094519055,0.0003010239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052415653,0.0000019280653,0.000039696803,0.000004766782,0.0000016722113,0.000009735871,0.000099068166,0.0004067289,0.000018610594,0.99835855,0.0010508992,0.000003143978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003771543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023597495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008455551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025042694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021552192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03259313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399811180","doi":"10.1007/s10838-023-09669-y","title":"The Ontology of Causation: A Carnapian-Pragmatist Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Pragmatism; Ontology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.040605025309935906,"score_gpt":0.3584393326745564,"score_spread":0.3178343073646205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399811180","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015658112,0.016109943,0.63019264,0.052301567,0.0017330437,0.00011991535,0.00041078118,0.00019363021,0.28328025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72194034,0.008745213,0.23103233,0.005415174,0.002617546,0.00045872925,0.00027955126,0.00024064604,0.029270489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758387,0.0013278592,0.00013095219,0.00033864338,0.0004729673,0.00014578698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975746,0.0013483166,0.00017718984,0.00038396026,0.0003829148,0.00013299234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004836127,0.0008357713,0.0014765405,0.00393824,0.0038767902,0.0052751377,0.0028718235,0.0036313082,0.0051051145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005232454,0.00086253916,0.0018635873,0.0028856476,0.027913205,0.0126876095,0.0039767227,0.006690664,0.00078417297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013445032,0.0000022549154,0.00001289444,0.0000085634165,0.000002607096,0.000008413256,0.00011513292,0.00013226038,0.000012446078,0.99887866,0.0002710054,0.000554389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030150202,0.0000019644517,0.000022032049,0.000008150132,0.0000020595269,0.000014003486,0.000037063553,0.0004008525,0.000013770458,0.996197,0.0032969785,0.0000030603803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006426747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059194863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006426747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046376335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003923001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03364849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401540350","doi":"10.1007/s10838-024-09680-x","title":"Back to Reichenbach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute; Western University","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Underpinning; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Relation (database); Agency (philosophy); Cosmology; Philosophy; Physics; Computer science; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.034884623537252,"score_gpt":0.3255611561682164,"score_spread":0.2906765326309644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401540350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003950642,0.11773123,0.014225508,0.10649506,0.043824267,0.00005302521,0.000988665,0.00040607346,0.7123255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08596687,0.02787488,0.0062128473,0.024077112,0.0136181265,0.00011043981,0.00029363652,0.000752474,0.84109354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993388,0.00018800121,0.00004445751,0.0001897497,0.00018090784,0.00005804394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936444,0.0001977847,0.00005576736,0.00012827649,0.00020520628,0.00004864979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009193776,0.0010520607,0.0009364149,0.002400165,0.002856314,0.0036433667,0.0005874668,0.0022673039,0.034440313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040630233,0.00044396502,0.00048330327,0.0016586857,0.0042435857,0.0071584424,0.0024694954,0.005581375,0.017561221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017705872,0.000008466827,0.000056925477,0.000079300014,0.000009926469,0.000018664088,0.00020194311,0.000064906555,0.00009105111,0.84836775,0.13344958,0.01763373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007741151,0.0000087833,0.00015727466,0.00011592481,0.000007665937,0.00006551089,0.00006184962,0.0000914734,0.0001236953,0.5522993,0.44705003,0.000010722534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021561699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025820215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034440313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032696286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011778319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11521429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413470032","doi":"10.1007/s10838-025-09723-x","title":"Pluralistic and Monistic Tendencies in the Life Sciences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Monism; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of education; Epistemology; Philosophy of technology; Philosophy; Nomothetic and idiographic; Social science; Sociology; Higher education; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0867901704991153,"score_gpt":0.30648218225311946,"score_spread":0.21969201175400416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413470032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3693179,0.0049287225,0.037846647,0.07177938,0.0007298928,0.00006881763,0.00012983986,0.00013730768,0.5150616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926732,0.00023887797,0.0028503677,0.00094236183,0.0001993872,0.000019317651,0.000013804663,0.000024521736,0.0030380588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945832,0.002876773,0.00031333856,0.00070204557,0.0010444081,0.0004801833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876552,0.007397004,0.0012307899,0.0013521154,0.001187168,0.0011776669],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011881471,0.00017490737,0.0006033582,0.0024877624,0.005650143,0.008976113,0.0009882672,0.0022056745,0.0021161947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012658893,0.00040589637,0.00045439755,0.0020749914,0.04733036,0.0069592632,0.004831782,0.003925625,0.0001720586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014054978,0.00000964588,0.0004979422,0.000018668183,0.0000066168773,0.000025148878,0.0056611593,0.000091452646,0.000097054755,0.9914321,0.00041519027,0.0017308482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012930106,0.00000639543,0.0010560313,0.000015744983,0.000006170547,0.00004063045,0.0015602725,0.00026874855,0.00007391086,0.9893104,0.0076415897,0.000007149773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035017163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078048436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99434984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004714895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003568681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06283599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}