{"meta":{"query_hash":"a79f5c8664af","filters":{"venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science"},"cohort_total":12,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"exported":12,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a79f5c8664af","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+for+General+Philosophy+of+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W2042566227","doi":"10.1007/s10838-009-9074-4","title":"How Scientific Is Scientific Essentialism?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Essentialism; Epistemology; Philosophy of science; Context (archaeology); Face (sociological concept); Philosophy; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.04790178020497761,"score_gpt":0.3434511361927821,"score_spread":0.2955493559878045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042566227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84062856,0.00093200663,0.0042592483,0.05714048,0.022608148,0.00063898525,0.000111090354,0.00007108457,0.0736104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99017596,0.0000033439144,0.0033329295,0.0007767237,0.0011853762,0.000005538859,0.0000023468283,0.000009937534,0.0045078555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959952,0.00006085803,0.00050212524,0.00093051017,0.0015439315,0.00096734514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728364,0.000060836206,0.00042311265,0.00071783736,0.00092381355,0.0005907794],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035304294,0.0002393187,0.0003244301,0.0007646189,0.0029755346,0.0016471153,0.0021505042,0.000097470205,0.00019453274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002632542,0.00018933274,0.00033577398,0.0026363246,0.010559004,0.0013620891,0.00009654182,0.0002977175,0.00003955642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005682368,0.00019452086,0.000012345711,0.0000058582136,0.0000086999535,0.0000071720106,0.0007708217,0.000006918799,0.15185559,0.83865166,0.003580962,0.004848632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053333584,0.00048602233,0.00062387076,0.00003446658,0.000023574848,0.00011566486,0.00007313488,0.00028085735,0.03810407,0.9504037,0.009068997,0.00025233746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002010288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.8227294e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1495474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075274525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003063446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075706844","doi":"10.1007/s10838-014-9243-y","title":"The Role of Justification in the Ordinary Concept of Scientific Progress","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Stalemate; Epistemology; Scientific progress; Appeal; Positive economics; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.08410257148655181,"score_gpt":0.3204544316997594,"score_spread":0.2363518602132076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075706844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99107754,0.00021698883,0.00005746921,0.0062994706,0.00087051926,0.00020961222,0.000009093095,0.000002359437,0.0012569497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990135,0.000011763584,0.000655724,0.00011385285,0.00014395145,0.0000074102054,4.2347543e-7,0.0000026377359,0.000050756487],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836445,0.000109330555,0.00039662627,0.00021272946,0.0007074225,0.00020943055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887085,0.00019193815,0.00042798542,0.00023879422,0.00022524307,0.000045198878],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026301048,0.00006905598,0.00012132315,0.00014856995,0.0006773421,0.000047921483,0.0012080017,0.000023731916,0.000002437849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003326368,0.000036803573,0.00008249924,0.00065559876,0.005636967,0.00023531316,0.000048615777,0.0001190411,9.40418e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007971963,0.00019986992,0.00035056085,0.000012359929,0.000001616154,3.2711765e-7,0.00045943953,0.00029162984,0.748546,0.22772913,0.00027365756,0.022055702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041115275,0.00059017004,0.011024589,0.00005483464,0.000008750159,0.000054640153,0.00017284101,0.0036063814,0.51933736,0.46194032,0.0027187131,0.00008028796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002200081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.7649706e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23421118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001677269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000083324376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769414228","doi":"10.1007/s10838-017-9382-z","title":"Facts and Values in Pragmatism and Logical Empiricism: Addressing the Eclipse Narrative","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Empiricism; Epistemology; Narrative; Philosophy of science; Value (mathematics); Philosophy; Eclipse; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.17387314824285172,"score_gpt":0.34888344926151615,"score_spread":0.17501030101866444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769414228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9588202,0.00063206174,0.0000075319545,0.00682439,0.0011510254,0.0001614906,0.000011664232,0.000004778611,0.03238684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972587,0.000072459334,0.00037263334,0.00037718183,0.0015155205,0.0000030068804,1.9203439e-7,0.0000045490287,0.00039572033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988336,0.00003550004,0.0002664879,0.00023449886,0.00038261,0.0002473308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908763,0.00006932051,0.0003552966,0.00018717536,0.00017614283,0.00012442392],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012129266,0.00011889922,0.00020278373,0.00017611147,0.0052301586,0.0007022487,0.0005873471,0.000023663888,0.000022636268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023533512,0.00007064539,0.000050111197,0.00003858388,0.008646218,0.0013712562,0.00011810798,0.0001945474,7.772933e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006780948,0.00009145599,0.00067072466,0.00004697909,0.000012967313,0.000012810268,0.17530957,0.00002486928,0.0032185467,0.81249756,0.0016067344,0.006439967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005254143,0.00028829163,0.013136056,0.00013365882,0.000013086554,0.00005281558,0.0031438642,0.000805571,0.00015907024,0.97678095,0.0047762436,0.00018498489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004704896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000082319006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1721657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034827197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001137936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972193038","doi":"10.1007/s10838-019-09472-8","title":"Cultural Blankets: Epistemological Pluralism in the Evolutionary Epistemology of Mechanisms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Language and cultural evolution","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociocultural evolution; Philosophy of science; Evolutionism; Evolutionary epistemology; Sociology; Pluralism (philosophy); Social epistemology; Explanatory power; Darwinism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0356604807049528,"score_gpt":0.33300075372512633,"score_spread":0.2973402730201735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972193038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98296267,0.00035037188,0.00007609833,0.0071390267,0.0008994558,0.00037618366,0.000009535632,0.0000069849293,0.008179687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99612784,0.00005561741,0.0026991332,0.00033321348,0.0003543395,0.0000062820027,0.0000022413637,0.0000025446539,0.00041879338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812925,0.00020801279,0.0003958146,0.000186259,0.0007412967,0.0003393792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898624,0.00010516258,0.00031511605,0.00013176368,0.00038749413,0.00007420783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022373823,0.00009194431,0.00021840386,0.00011752825,0.0005210207,0.00003400854,0.00087815925,0.00009039671,0.00006672777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028817792,0.000051202696,0.00015808533,0.0005969854,0.0015544931,0.0005662896,0.00004477152,0.0001681693,0.0000059961244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061208695,0.000080642945,0.0008723997,0.000018072458,0.000007120423,0.000005893683,0.008966771,0.00016648875,0.043451726,0.94541615,0.0005818587,0.00037166802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010687289,0.0010171571,0.025051633,0.00011185719,0.000025454128,0.00023832395,0.016744394,0.000507897,0.0017064485,0.9507029,0.0025336277,0.00029159244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040403695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004170918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04174528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013913032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021605144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57275945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158056354","doi":"10.1007/s10838-020-09548-w","title":"Should We Strive to Make Science Bias-Free? A Philosophical Assessment of the Reproducibility Crisis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Reproducibility; Philosophy of education; Epistemology; Philosophy of technology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology; Social science; Positive economics; Higher education; Sociology; Economics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.19547335108770034,"score_gpt":0.35485285754858864,"score_spread":0.1593795064608883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158056354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74672633,0.0004350781,0.00022622167,0.19436556,0.007203173,0.0007350796,0.00031819913,0.000033366137,0.04995696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98995984,0.000025896392,0.0062980456,0.0015925163,0.0016685216,0.000012600833,5.515958e-7,0.0000124208,0.00042962588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944196,0.00009175267,0.00093143486,0.0012772643,0.0026671686,0.0006127903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99393183,0.000105344996,0.00064352603,0.0020375007,0.0028512292,0.0004305723],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065567074,0.00025053418,0.00047834803,0.0005176715,0.0033800788,0.00032044924,0.0035004024,0.00004942743,0.00012461188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022059472,0.00017377127,0.00042090262,0.0014108466,0.011667384,0.001030664,0.0008604703,0.0004427513,0.0000022874538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046601042,0.00034867896,0.00017360951,0.000068622176,0.000016182294,0.0000046495647,0.0046286415,0.0003389007,0.07834196,0.9135995,0.0015639091,0.00086875656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005419179,0.0006503828,0.002160594,0.00017226113,0.000052983363,0.000059094153,0.00089827063,0.0003384026,0.044739027,0.9392049,0.010848789,0.00033341683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033143402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040847804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24323346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031566262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025412624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210703163","doi":"10.1007/s10838-021-09575-1","title":"Revisiting the Basic/Applied Science Distinction: The Significance of Urgent Science for Science Funding Policy","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Social science education; Science education; Science policy; Political science; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Science studies; Politics; Basic research; Science, technology, society and environment education; Scientific enterprise; Sociology; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1956155136819922,"score_gpt":0.44881573451334655,"score_spread":0.25320022083135435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210703163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79150724,0.00040308147,0.0044514416,0.18913509,0.00246334,0.003693672,0.00007357718,0.000025736937,0.00824682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99162483,0.00003939719,0.0028438629,0.0033140415,0.0019654343,0.00010367461,4.7119318e-7,0.000010316373,0.000097986456],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99083525,0.00004366307,0.0007330469,0.00060101284,0.00593303,0.0018539751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928203,0.0005506775,0.0006845676,0.0006241302,0.0021573189,0.0031630048],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.043407623,0.0001579379,0.0003244305,0.0010967162,0.012057103,0.00020128093,0.0028640835,0.000018530951,0.00003086665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0526632,0.000089005356,0.00015044729,0.009542997,0.02749155,0.0006787659,0.00060607627,0.0005808396,5.939216e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029546864,0.00006486139,0.00014878248,0.00015982521,0.0000046694586,0.0000017897057,0.00058494054,0.0003558106,0.82030743,0.13851814,0.00028370222,0.039274592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006955891,0.008596827,0.034106642,0.0010204407,0.00019593671,0.0016358157,0.0061096083,0.06592124,0.64311194,0.16682096,0.06445702,0.0010676859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037734455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.6711166e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20011757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014742526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056619417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280623825","doi":"10.1007/s10838-022-09616-3","title":"Rebuttal to Douglas and Elliott","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Challenges","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rebuttal; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of education; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Higher education; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14456349448551603,"score_gpt":0.470453959452878,"score_spread":0.32589046496736196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280623825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9578257,0.0007153746,0.000102913575,0.031215299,0.004704989,0.00059767463,0.000050593466,0.0000129924065,0.0047744364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99238044,0.000064703025,0.0023738083,0.0016553159,0.0022391363,0.00006534757,5.895971e-7,0.000011084592,0.0012095978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808437,0.00015417823,0.00049586414,0.0002253069,0.000594111,0.00044616358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878585,0.00009540477,0.00025947363,0.0001573135,0.00031965968,0.0003822777],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003118106,0.00008544588,0.0002118304,0.00027200542,0.0038851842,0.000012233406,0.0003660204,0.000040159724,0.000058872927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012359029,0.00007049317,0.00004791475,0.0004007684,0.00020135181,0.00015397264,0.00024338458,0.000521312,0.0000051635952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091718335,0.00041990302,0.007431275,0.0015888972,0.000068624606,0.000038736962,0.05312554,0.0008230177,0.115989916,0.69921273,0.09040177,0.029982425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028926618,0.005301707,0.011580977,0.0003897573,0.000021984071,0.0002722721,0.015806187,0.000679987,0.0005289477,0.21422149,0.7477163,0.0005877065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007025868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010366043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65731454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017261998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005973276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310022035","doi":"10.1007/s10838-022-09632-3","title":"Daniel S. Brooks, James DiFrisco, and William C. Wimsatt (Eds.): Levels of Organization in the Biological Sciences","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of science; Philosophy; Philosophy of education; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Higher education; Law","score_opus":0.10268733305448388,"score_gpt":0.2796053491573694,"score_spread":0.17691801610288552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310022035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808614,0.0011265882,0.00003081676,0.0049286685,0.00089150574,0.00023480355,0.00008445453,0.000008128311,0.011833598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983107,0.000056711724,0.00052681955,0.0006174428,0.00034590825,0.000005706826,7.7360687e-7,0.000004038072,0.00013192721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832064,0.000078264835,0.0003851744,0.0002551834,0.0007220524,0.00023869582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914247,0.000104683335,0.00033686438,0.000115667084,0.00024281748,0.000057486115],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023892468,0.00010622926,0.00019248485,0.0003394798,0.0030403752,0.00012272314,0.0010809185,0.000016559225,0.00008478768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018714405,0.00006855339,0.00005336648,0.00058844953,0.007469665,0.00065978436,0.00014836164,0.00018400386,4.6323046e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030318326,0.00017015586,0.0006381433,0.000022052105,0.0000054057537,0.0000021075007,0.019880878,0.00044736543,0.026382284,0.94989645,0.0014215687,0.0011032538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009162898,0.0030955817,0.0062786527,0.00006325989,0.000023185437,0.00016702188,0.006919074,0.0005729927,0.0027488223,0.9400775,0.038732152,0.0004054953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002377689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006352094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03731058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041868865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021412024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323926222","doi":"10.1007/s10838-022-09635-0","title":"The Role of Quantum Jumps in Quantum Ontology","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Quantum process; Quantum probability; Open quantum system; Quantum operation; Quantum discord; Quantum; Quantum algorithm; Quantum dissipation; Quantum dynamics; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Theoretical physics","score_opus":0.026437195924065234,"score_gpt":0.30540258113727814,"score_spread":0.2789653852132129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323926222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99486077,0.00012678333,0.0014461372,0.0019510416,0.00042751757,0.00016481537,0.000030632506,0.0000055194523,0.0009867724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946463,0.000026945172,0.00018814665,0.0000118315975,0.0002507275,0.000018597078,0.0000017945839,0.0000059353274,0.000031379393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989393,0.000016380158,0.00037299676,0.00014440334,0.00024370886,0.00028322806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992313,0.00008425153,0.00026406036,0.00017619434,0.00017492966,0.00006930625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009224082,0.000074931195,0.00015617046,0.00016772271,0.00043302815,0.000027651358,0.0005566074,0.000018534714,0.0000071166937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020897438,0.00005242595,0.0001131158,0.00072003,0.00038168594,0.00011899015,0.000060558836,0.00012382257,0.0000048488578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102390795,0.000037565736,0.00062520546,0.0000027489596,0.0000057920747,1.2376393e-7,0.00007794139,0.00017213284,0.048266828,0.948394,0.00012427798,0.0022831692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017085823,0.00008479673,0.00092469825,0.000013599242,0.000004264781,0.0000014387264,0.00027765543,0.08805043,0.008547808,0.9002335,0.0016369158,0.000054034965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049990485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002891711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0878783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014631067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015923151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33305463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399811180","doi":"10.1007/s10838-023-09669-y","title":"The Ontology of Causation: A Carnapian-Pragmatist Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Pragmatism; Ontology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.040605025309935906,"score_gpt":0.3584393326745564,"score_spread":0.3178343073646205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399811180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20998919,0.0076243607,0.024241744,0.022452595,0.014315128,0.0008153367,0.000104590144,0.00006251027,0.72039455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99539816,0.000030434769,0.0032535654,0.00010626567,0.00074415375,0.000016339498,6.200703e-7,0.0000073982524,0.00044308486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816215,0.00008173908,0.00050255173,0.00030854758,0.00055363966,0.0003913752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998742,0.00033056393,0.00021183846,0.00029078266,0.0002627463,0.00016206084],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024915142,0.0001182309,0.0002083622,0.00018461535,0.00067575247,0.000095716125,0.0010175288,0.00006259891,0.000049953287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022024705,0.00007090877,0.0001753746,0.00085863436,0.0048960047,0.0002775132,0.00006681217,0.0002445499,0.000008706819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005364576,0.0000495843,0.000015465463,0.000026801064,0.000027913586,0.000005605577,0.0006377432,0.000038979153,0.0060827127,0.9873094,0.000397348,0.005354803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019534066,0.00034865297,0.0006585151,0.00003330068,0.000023780154,0.00038030217,0.00008769637,0.0020616197,0.0011285028,0.99286276,0.0021233475,0.00009618195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013572158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012228671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.785409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050042923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002115351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401540350","doi":"10.1007/s10838-024-09680-x","title":"Back to Reichenbach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Quantum Mechanics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Perimeter Institute; Western University","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Underpinning; Philosophy of science; Epistemology; Relation (database); Agency (philosophy); Cosmology; Philosophy; Physics; Computer science; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.034884623537252,"score_gpt":0.3255611561682164,"score_spread":0.2906765326309644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401540350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6777277,0.00027589966,0.26360655,0.015681868,0.0028884255,0.0005943889,0.00016656988,0.000022909246,0.039035667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877319,0.0000021800952,0.010241132,0.00010127514,0.0012431202,0.000011752158,0.0000015149245,0.0000080707105,0.0006591018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922806,0.0000037268883,0.00019485732,0.00017920497,0.00020623175,0.00018790583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995106,0.000016153766,0.000047341244,0.00012457083,0.00014318245,0.00015814707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037539907,0.00006950277,0.000091898866,0.00013532143,0.0002585838,0.00012639714,0.000339317,0.000010387915,0.00015183906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004244608,0.000055622477,0.00010763139,0.00051171693,0.00010288094,0.00019212712,0.000042298383,0.00009064363,0.0000748437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002655201,0.00001957802,0.000010744554,0.00000738689,0.0000074151394,1.214906e-7,0.000058796846,0.000061815066,0.07001206,0.92293155,0.0032739902,0.0036138727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006942782,0.00009173987,0.00002515741,0.00003795675,0.000008513528,0.0000038013193,0.00002057925,0.0066832905,0.017206922,0.95179594,0.023973193,0.000083469145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005188577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.255982e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31000414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019450637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014305786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22682188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413470032","doi":"10.1007/s10838-025-09723-x","title":"Pluralistic and Monistic Tendencies in the Life Sciences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for General Philosophy of Science","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Monism; Philosophy of science; Philosophy of education; Epistemology; Philosophy of technology; Philosophy; Nomothetic and idiographic; Social science; Sociology; Higher education; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0867901704991153,"score_gpt":0.30648218225311946,"score_spread":0.21969201175400416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413470032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6851009,0.0053219986,0.00014302423,0.045346215,0.0035477898,0.0005309702,0.000041483392,0.00002374612,0.25994387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970152,0.000057237678,0.0004922125,0.0015598112,0.00043168996,0.000007665319,1.7785618e-7,0.0000021479552,0.00043385013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986035,0.000030852327,0.00032743774,0.00023759699,0.00051880535,0.00028176128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929476,0.00016152025,0.000153447,0.000118924945,0.00019639819,0.000074943935],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001956309,0.000108315464,0.00017086124,0.0005023271,0.0029609806,0.00029493988,0.0009987126,0.000018243913,0.000017372573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038788494,0.00006722028,0.00006486217,0.00036953785,0.01254587,0.00072289945,0.000059613372,0.00015634875,0.0000011406041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013579401,0.00003354963,0.00007089923,0.000028841952,0.0000030315975,0.0000013842155,0.00457421,0.00006430517,0.00091001194,0.9931184,0.0009072801,0.00027450066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026120475,0.0003115204,0.0012383255,0.00009747843,0.000020597596,0.000017498056,0.0022084455,0.0011891428,0.0000787843,0.98257506,0.011877957,0.00012397308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000067686706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004246571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31191432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035481222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000383799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99833703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}