{"meta":{"query_hash":"d409d2d31aa4","filters":{"venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation"},"cohort_total":35,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":35,"exported":35,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d409d2d31aa4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+for+Nature+Conservation"},"results":[{"id":"W1987444639","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2011.10.002","title":"Reframing the conception of nature conservation management by transdisciplinary methodology: From stakeholders to stakesharers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Transdisciplinarity; Cognitive reframing; Sociology; Axiology; Ontology; Stakeholder; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Anthropocentrism; Civil society; Management science; Knowledge management; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Public relations; Politics; Engineering; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06586355074501858,"score_gpt":0.3052399394796057,"score_spread":0.2393763887345871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987444639","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08039781,0.008424695,0.41078857,0.23973201,0.0028765544,0.00052305596,0.00005425325,0.000102000544,0.2571011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94979197,0.0014237132,0.03285251,0.008180408,0.00032352828,0.00061140215,0.000019596098,0.0000923741,0.006704573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9338686,0.055280637,0.0015335332,0.0025644538,0.00436016,0.0023926087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96050864,0.028863454,0.0016715953,0.003088193,0.00320554,0.0026625646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05137562,0.0012376303,0.0012923459,0.004718615,0.01354523,0.026597492,0.0055881785,0.014271505,0.0033154716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03186558,0.0010571313,0.0010032672,0.0036109572,0.10659204,0.035425015,0.015562295,0.017605115,0.00027221013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043545765,0.000019890698,0.00017676322,0.000050109804,0.000005542623,0.00009042339,0.03385361,0.00016298391,0.00012078957,0.9621713,0.00053293665,0.0028113143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012965882,0.00002643136,0.00024202712,0.00048400552,0.0000124991575,0.00021885063,0.06794441,0.0014294559,0.00021165394,0.88427204,0.0451219,0.000023749042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061179083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067235217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05137562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01187749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014542841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27170348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013822145","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2014.08.012","title":"An assessment of the efficiency of protection status through determinations of biodiversity hotspots based on endemic bird species, Taiwan","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"National Science Council","keywords":"Endemism; Biodiversity hotspot; Species richness; Biodiversity; Geography; Ecology; Global biodiversity; Biology","score_opus":0.01635859319702344,"score_gpt":0.2926725147139891,"score_spread":0.27631392151696565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013822145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995962,0.000028517325,0.00014259423,0.000004100665,3.628907e-7,0.0000029319049,0.000034952853,0.0000014286428,0.00018898776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997174,0.00001399788,0.0001585869,0.0000010276058,5.2974457e-7,0.0000021133174,0.000049945615,3.4969526e-7,0.000055955967],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996954,0.00010688068,0.000040345945,0.00006370607,0.000057993264,0.00003562484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985562,0.0005686172,0.00039199172,0.000119115524,0.00024592635,0.00011820344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010617459,0.00020763704,0.00014590917,0.0014572109,0.00025874595,0.00043705082,0.00025847473,0.00022555265,0.00035138085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001673346,0.00014712645,0.00022776343,0.00084174954,0.0003081729,0.00047368993,0.0003427395,0.00012722852,0.00005156618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013252284,0.00003312983,0.98861396,0.000022907254,0.00006761405,0.00006804376,0.00037955763,0.0013869177,0.0021508078,0.000075502256,0.00003847766,0.0070305513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051326238,0.00013301661,0.9940402,0.000004060882,0.0000612495,0.000059864557,0.0004984407,0.0044564907,0.00053797464,0.00009681854,0.00010041875,0.0000064451856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008044044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015916547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008044044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026837178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01599443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060117754","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2014.07.004","title":"A decision-support tool to facilitate discussion of no-take boundaries for Marine Protected Areas during stakeholder consultation processes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Stakeholder; Marine protected area; Vulnerability (computing); Environmental resource management; Boundary (topology); Trawling; Marine spatial planning; Government (linguistics); Business; Environmental planning; Computer science; Environmental science; Ecology; Economics","score_opus":0.025907617454294558,"score_gpt":0.251811893341068,"score_spread":0.22590427588677345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060117754","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023715802,0.00014372122,0.8516567,0.003396092,0.00042677758,0.0054703844,0.009572989,0.066111356,0.03950615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041033145,0.000069808026,0.9462338,0.00033169123,0.0000528998,0.003082552,0.002379025,0.0011947541,0.0056222817],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99086714,0.005291051,0.0011460289,0.0007970192,0.0014593937,0.0004393481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9221317,0.06303864,0.0025876807,0.00368793,0.0059823575,0.0025717802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021003997,0.0024394628,0.001412596,0.0059346296,0.002093133,0.005257746,0.003314073,0.003190729,0.0732199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054083377,0.0011973133,0.0013059729,0.002536244,0.00090499286,0.0051277946,0.005206964,0.0026378012,0.015212455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025243876,0.0028049862,0.0065088705,0.0024341017,0.00023831493,0.002518116,0.011897492,0.026000297,0.016057773,0.04003991,0.24656364,0.64241207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023581616,0.0007676326,0.0058495537,0.0016904152,0.00022471776,0.0007643978,0.0059266174,0.39998445,0.018711794,0.080769226,0.4823037,0.000649451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019683598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048069553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0732199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020202037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033609632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24494493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064813434","doi":"10.1078/1617-1381-00017","title":"Land use history, plant rarity, and protected area adequacy in an intensively managed forest landscape","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Forest Service; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Biodiversity; Geography; Threatened species; Land use; Edaphic; Environmental resource management; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem; Agroforestry; Environmental protection; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.036079258207257235,"score_gpt":0.23689165253736824,"score_spread":0.200812394330111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064813434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998728,0.00001110333,0.000006553051,0.000012244311,3.5627826e-7,4.841596e-7,0.000011811049,3.3887451e-7,0.00008429002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998684,0.0000067781784,0.000012253778,0.000006554466,0.0000016629456,8.2665485e-7,0.000023655391,5.2069936e-7,0.0000793753],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999723,0.000105238,0.000022345646,0.000042448766,0.000024563364,0.00008228972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739945,0.00090663705,0.0007250572,0.00012763939,0.00011618818,0.00072511873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069145655,0.00010474366,0.00020677786,0.0007938966,0.0006500017,0.0006531377,0.000484092,0.0004534482,0.002185697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022013707,0.00019597907,0.0001827811,0.00068991294,0.00072363584,0.00054312113,0.00047770859,0.00041623772,0.00015685667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003182789,0.00018641475,0.99712723,0.0000027552915,0.000042162792,0.00021802324,0.0002028579,0.00024871816,0.000582976,0.00007906285,0.000061624734,0.00092989136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007858277,0.00010168431,0.9984718,0.0000012765981,0.000014859735,0.00020277608,0.00035239404,0.000678928,0.0000379147,0.00008747204,0.000040252162,0.0000027957303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016997352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05540191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016997352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004912473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028805857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033796787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142522375","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2014.03.007","title":"Using species distributions models for designing conservation strategies of Tropical Andean biodiversity under climate change","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Ecology; Biological dispersal; Geography; Biodiversity; Species richness; Endemism; Environmental niche modelling; Climate change; Niche; Species distribution; Range (aeronautics); Agroforestry; Ecological niche; Environmental science; Biology; Population; Habitat","score_opus":0.13254720914704413,"score_gpt":0.31233899043408586,"score_spread":0.17979178128704174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142522375","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40881106,0.00041133512,0.5767576,0.0013668265,0.00010628082,0.00016244264,0.0007487958,0.00052827457,0.011107352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93587697,0.00020636716,0.06151137,0.00013574591,0.000031997948,0.00017523675,0.00019755456,0.000088666035,0.0017759575],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997501,0.00013907635,0.000011540388,0.00004194604,0.000022070286,0.000035343837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747723,0.0020109985,0.0001997306,0.00005844152,0.00013697258,0.00011663267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011985113,0.0005256713,0.00055971945,0.0009557488,0.0006567642,0.0010674207,0.0010315763,0.00092775305,0.003275972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006291303,0.00074176106,0.000849573,0.00069608603,0.00048318354,0.001478649,0.00076176086,0.0007745558,0.00017676671],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009246929,0.000010545228,0.0014221248,0.00000749227,0.000017584776,0.000009870518,0.000015351266,0.9944194,0.00008225467,0.0017501896,0.00009426831,0.0021615995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050167682,0.0000058774253,0.00022522388,0.000003426095,0.000008686819,0.000004041094,0.000020517771,0.9970061,0.0000429268,0.0025287839,0.0001461915,0.0000032058972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03529864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04260267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03529864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021529428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016724436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07018638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149468564","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2013.01.001","title":"Influence of water temperature and net tending frequency on the condition of fish bycatch in a small-scale inland commercial fyke net fishery","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; University of Ottawa; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Canadian Wildlife Federation; Johns Hopkins University; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"Bycatch; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Net (polyhedron); Scale (ratio); Environmental science; Biology; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.008261975067463758,"score_gpt":0.22289288831665163,"score_spread":0.21463091324918787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149468564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9999156,0.0000056493304,0.000005178163,0.00000302948,6.991481e-7,6.8840984e-7,0.000015996435,2.991136e-7,0.0000527874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99980825,0.000007976073,0.000014292219,0.00000686908,0.0000012411866,0.0000017236476,0.000035824258,7.786163e-7,0.00012317521],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999081,0.000020350542,0.00000816873,0.000025157406,0.000010522462,0.000027704387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995159,0.00014245597,0.00009150909,0.000019831607,0.000047557765,0.000182768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023114892,0.00017490085,0.00023849693,0.0002727388,0.00045674978,0.00032601872,0.0001884994,0.00025577442,0.0013424526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006333964,0.00016921217,0.00023388548,0.0001986515,0.0004854225,0.00021344506,0.00021762575,0.00027759338,0.00016876825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016104535,0.00034646143,0.98401695,0.000008612769,0.00006198018,0.00036832984,0.00033629726,0.00014396415,0.011632264,0.000014606031,0.00008488767,0.0013750709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003074924,0.00012249402,0.99945074,4.5348466e-7,0.000008348901,0.000040014005,0.00014018477,0.00011488891,0.00010131768,0.0000037291413,0.000013063835,0.0000015848501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026637599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061984006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026637599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057571166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032634274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052965105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792149880","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2018.01.004","title":"The missing link: A case for increased consideration for plant-pollinator interactions for species at-risk recovery in Ontario","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Liber Ero Foundation; Rogers Family Foundation; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","keywords":"Pollinator; Pollination; Biology; Ecology; Habitat; Native plant; Introduced species; Pollen","score_opus":0.07194550177245941,"score_gpt":0.2683055952772606,"score_spread":0.19636009350480121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792149880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66466415,0.003378484,0.006933363,0.26582775,0.0007684013,0.00030922456,0.0014508248,0.00014861758,0.056519214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98392695,0.00081748184,0.003529811,0.0053799665,0.00010446293,0.000048128506,0.00013637404,0.00004276655,0.0060139443],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951668,0.0013617298,0.0003122015,0.0004760911,0.001269264,0.001413897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97929364,0.00608067,0.0030791336,0.0013198687,0.005654268,0.004572435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057769977,0.00021348191,0.0005460042,0.00092167954,0.008669701,0.0025638773,0.0030766157,0.0025092426,0.010327875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026658049,0.00030576377,0.000491761,0.001315651,0.0023347149,0.002349955,0.0028876034,0.0037174996,0.00024488708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005111609,0.00024109567,0.5710165,0.0010258005,0.00032854461,0.009695002,0.058685537,0.0025511873,0.0024349126,0.0271726,0.08523788,0.24109982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000876671,0.0001951799,0.63663906,0.0020774703,0.00038138824,0.0028676242,0.109852746,0.0065558734,0.0013630302,0.030362977,0.20937802,0.00023890301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9497694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9888704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050230622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022328857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056793794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16200793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793600694","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2018.01.003","title":"Visual and acoustic sensors for early detection of biological invasions: Current uses and future potential","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Universidad de Oviedo; University of Victoria","keywords":"Identification (biology); Remote sensing; Computer science; Invasive species; Habitat; Ecology; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.039107417600165194,"score_gpt":0.29913981947435636,"score_spread":0.2600324018741912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793600694","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029537486,0.8982387,0.027443994,0.011446159,0.0011264174,0.00011878002,0.00053388224,0.00029229905,0.031262364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20465563,0.71256846,0.054886036,0.004288022,0.002756147,0.0001598029,0.0006018259,0.0000869358,0.019997185],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898034,0.00024168762,0.00006917688,0.00023236446,0.00036664953,0.00010977553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99478793,0.0027464824,0.00048520774,0.0001609795,0.0016363086,0.00018305272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004483021,0.001132379,0.0008119831,0.0024480682,0.00030934685,0.0023916024,0.00097642525,0.0015939662,0.006762083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031421266,0.00042013123,0.00079024234,0.0016264437,0.0010793225,0.0030774625,0.00087442185,0.0011750321,0.0012377412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000339923,0.00012784025,0.014365402,0.0018386442,0.000111514666,0.00006923106,0.00011966789,0.00048580932,0.015613071,0.0021420466,0.005353,0.9594337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017265661,0.004342788,0.17655557,0.009578661,0.0021693562,0.004585564,0.003939742,0.012779851,0.07430531,0.02528959,0.6856159,0.00066503196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036327853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009531425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006762083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006925846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010644773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023708701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951240414","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2019.125717","title":"Structured and unstructured citizen science: Seven decades of expanding bird populations in central Ontario, Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Woodpecker; Wildlife; Finch; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Relative species abundance; Breeding bird survey; Biology; Fishery; Zoology; Habitat","score_opus":0.01990471774167073,"score_gpt":0.2769338262219747,"score_spread":0.25702910848030397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951240414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872295,0.0014226931,0.00020792568,0.0042728633,0.000041180698,0.000059475264,0.0015884418,0.000011913364,0.0051660296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99314934,0.0009288026,0.00034567423,0.00076553685,0.000017440676,0.000029177125,0.0006631497,0.000008124479,0.00409289],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986897,0.00012576143,0.00005312758,0.00016051081,0.0005016296,0.0004693306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937071,0.0008456402,0.00072034023,0.0002852406,0.002651163,0.001790514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001529768,0.00015654619,0.000294009,0.0012165653,0.004630224,0.0026699074,0.0013343341,0.00085579464,0.0016703536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039137546,0.00024240473,0.0002095152,0.00308653,0.0034677628,0.0013075529,0.0023375044,0.001100817,0.00015688241],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032656212,0.00016279765,0.82378334,0.0003366105,0.00014590568,0.00089394895,0.0799673,0.00061640196,0.0013776387,0.0027889777,0.012883606,0.076716945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060603156,0.00002752777,0.9510284,0.00007839218,0.00001568171,0.00005805773,0.03609605,0.00022655488,0.00007418017,0.00016207137,0.012208347,0.0000185558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99396366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99806994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03286162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03286162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061372187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23842883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972585250","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2019.125747","title":"Towards a set of national forest inventory indicators to be used for assessing the conservation status of the habitats directive forest habitat types","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Infrastructure Canada; Horizon 2020; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; European Commission; U.S. Forest Service; Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS; National Foundation for India; Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación","keywords":"Habitats Directive; Habitat; Environmental resource management; Forest inventory; Intact forest landscape; Forest management; Conservation status; Biodiversity; Geography; Set-aside; Economic shortage; National forest; Habitat conservation; Natura 2000; Nature Conservation; Forest ecology; Ecology; Environmental science; Forestry; Ecosystem; Biology","score_opus":0.03823811023257516,"score_gpt":0.29141760615708767,"score_spread":0.2531794959245125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972585250","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17017393,0.0022975658,0.7256119,0.002615665,0.00041165866,0.0030900382,0.030924758,0.0026981984,0.062176246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20028976,0.00094947737,0.7635522,0.00020678462,0.000048117414,0.0027726141,0.029948074,0.00018565368,0.0020474032],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931427,0.002162709,0.0012575377,0.0009126839,0.0021506252,0.00037368594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97981447,0.0031195518,0.0029133598,0.0015970382,0.011672209,0.0008832561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012775613,0.0015850277,0.0013742894,0.013196356,0.001212392,0.006305458,0.0017486613,0.0010042293,0.002324646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026302405,0.0005508255,0.001336126,0.011574466,0.0007722007,0.00440187,0.0026142932,0.002375043,0.0015129974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003513446,0.0009069164,0.22174808,0.0021242003,0.0004327576,0.00037102378,0.0024933685,0.021063872,0.0067899544,0.069566734,0.026637381,0.64751446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017511536,0.0011520413,0.48703483,0.006790921,0.000851426,0.0008448122,0.012317133,0.15324438,0.016648341,0.098977335,0.22138198,0.00058174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011909981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009515642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013196356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036821684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008262329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067564726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986233404","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2019.125756","title":"Governing from images: Marine protected areas as case illustrations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Universidad de La Laguna","keywords":"Marine protected area; Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Livelihood; Tourism; Environmental resource management; Business; Geography; Political science; Ecology; Public relations; Agriculture; Economics","score_opus":0.008871483220158188,"score_gpt":0.23912662038948096,"score_spread":0.23025513716932278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986233404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07356174,0.0013947428,0.014577995,0.026106102,0.00080361427,0.00045366207,0.00023475154,0.00015546537,0.8827119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87326455,0.0011704457,0.019353826,0.0038935351,0.00026761953,0.00039664772,0.0001646167,0.00029917108,0.101189554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514693,0.0025600672,0.0001644385,0.00031869212,0.001174723,0.00063524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924119,0.005082064,0.00045834374,0.0010172292,0.00049295207,0.00053744414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038627817,0.0003267104,0.00020725728,0.001158978,0.0055903704,0.007809638,0.0018488175,0.005244819,0.026221212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025545122,0.0003091879,0.00041294293,0.0010707873,0.005559204,0.00540015,0.0044779866,0.0035300595,0.0020066346],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008263783,0.00021674777,0.004906287,0.00024348678,0.000014495793,0.0077465996,0.01928317,0.0013906986,0.0012764969,0.7481452,0.112728104,0.10396616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041993197,0.00007142126,0.0048629646,0.0010611566,0.00003269111,0.007162097,0.026343945,0.003222429,0.0027578722,0.10014554,0.85422534,0.00007260245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006074069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013763548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026221212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018799513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018261386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087718725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032421824","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125861","title":"Rapid defaunation of terrestrial mammals in a protected Neotropical cloud forest remnant","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Operation Wallacea; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast; Department for Employment and Learning, Northern Ireland","keywords":"Defaunation; National park; Endangered species; Population; Geography; Poaching; Ecology; Habitat destruction; Cloud forest; Odocoileus; IUCN Red List; Wildlife; Biology; Habitat; Montane ecology","score_opus":0.020905017155518017,"score_gpt":0.2516599070208733,"score_spread":0.2307548898653553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032421824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99980515,0.000010851657,0.0000055756295,0.00001243693,8.1786266e-7,0.0000016757925,0.00003666401,6.54307e-7,0.00012622506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99976236,0.00001351932,0.00002960318,0.00001010322,0.0000016079342,0.00000278813,0.000068389236,7.094853e-7,0.00011100161],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989235,0.000014838419,0.000006395859,0.000024237668,0.000016130038,0.00004599124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995183,0.00005696375,0.0001601203,0.00003832222,0.000083086576,0.00014320495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031967566,0.00014316782,0.00016998923,0.0007677758,0.0010057118,0.0004550538,0.00053346955,0.00033489708,0.0015482096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070499966,0.0001520932,0.00017793351,0.0005202343,0.0008860408,0.00025360234,0.0007850145,0.00030677055,0.00011956528],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024053475,0.00007424662,0.99238586,0.00001312154,0.00003494752,0.0007818771,0.00112644,0.00019427504,0.0027575342,0.000070364236,0.00018251268,0.0021382628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000246465,0.000016979184,0.99898106,0.0000016164108,0.0000029398748,0.0001033368,0.000705274,0.00009735937,0.000020602476,0.0000072381113,0.00005991082,0.0000013175974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16879615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40744412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16879615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012058084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076794595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33562732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112180694","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125948","title":"Recreational fisheries activities and management in national parks: A global perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Recreation; Fishing; National park; Recreational fishing; Fishery; Fisheries management; Geography; Environmental resource management; Business; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics","score_opus":0.01888218079964856,"score_gpt":0.2786696014119597,"score_spread":0.25978742061231114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112180694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6053312,0.26193315,0.0012906964,0.08798917,0.00073425047,0.000031948388,0.0017504421,0.00003954928,0.040899623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8785473,0.114591725,0.00067976874,0.003290848,0.0007679962,0.000016114916,0.00031099442,0.0000087179205,0.0017865022],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996076,0.00013116054,0.00003253096,0.000045373195,0.000052092513,0.00013128444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988242,0.00027802054,0.00036306432,0.000026883496,0.00020505172,0.00030278563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075452134,0.00029850606,0.0003487126,0.002090036,0.0008652396,0.0029505405,0.00046483846,0.0010275195,0.0030174544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012108242,0.00019225517,0.00039735378,0.0044418024,0.0018496502,0.0031811844,0.0017282934,0.0011145555,0.00013979434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024804682,0.00031763996,0.6643965,0.0019409843,0.0003895687,0.0009994204,0.0076170517,0.0034481846,0.0010065835,0.021700768,0.019307606,0.2786277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061657447,0.00016629335,0.9148365,0.001715324,0.00017358456,0.0010438911,0.02394389,0.0006940761,0.00013193054,0.005198001,0.052052017,0.00003831088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051560126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2187872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051560126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001756794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021982864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10252005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3115026528","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125952","title":"Illegal wildlife trade is threatening conservation in the transboundary landscape of Western Himalaya","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development","keywords":"Wildlife trade; Wildlife; Livelihood; Poaching; Patrolling; Overexploitation; Wildlife conservation; Law enforcement; Context (archaeology); Geography; Business; China; Environmental planning; Natural resource economics; Enforcement; Environmental resource management; Environmental protection; Fishery; Ecology; Political science; Agriculture; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04111468557116226,"score_gpt":0.28995907128752263,"score_spread":0.24884438571636036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3115026528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99721354,0.00005641073,0.000033491713,0.00017291454,0.00000168332,0.0000019731572,0.000021509806,9.3540075e-7,0.0024975336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995177,0.00007948022,0.000030979172,0.000018195155,0.000004057105,0.0000012933816,0.000016974423,4.4300768e-7,0.0003309838],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997056,0.000098572156,0.000012769713,0.000022000315,0.000062158295,0.00009883412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989542,0.0002708117,0.00039804957,0.000038815688,0.00017026228,0.00016781231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020521946,0.00014395783,0.000085684434,0.001012505,0.001985677,0.0018224568,0.00029517402,0.00039295905,0.0032123516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012295101,0.00011270846,0.00009633363,0.0014776967,0.0011070068,0.0009304588,0.0008184548,0.0004616833,0.0001607301],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115622686,0.00006791652,0.96920884,0.00004922275,0.000037627724,0.002229961,0.010725718,0.00047488374,0.0014961297,0.0022490364,0.0006781668,0.012666864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001968604,0.000030256682,0.96432066,0.000023059749,0.000021520755,0.0004584652,0.03257908,0.0005620475,0.00018209618,0.0005791272,0.0012367581,0.0000049075034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054194003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14439031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054194003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012339484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093596266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10775709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121957246","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2021.125970","title":"Conditioned food aversion reduces crow nest predation: An improved framework for CFA trials","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Capilano University; Langara College","funders":"University of Cape Town","keywords":"Predation; Nest (protein structural motif); Predator; Ecology; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Zoology","score_opus":0.04895192714069761,"score_gpt":0.3524010962973512,"score_spread":0.3034491691566536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121957246","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48747265,0.00043359736,0.49023575,0.00090410054,0.00032124558,0.00034236384,0.00068742764,0.0008396635,0.018763317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9354973,0.00010435349,0.058803823,0.00029424948,0.00009808077,0.00033641316,0.00017654893,0.0002545876,0.0044346806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772793,0.0011181168,0.00012368843,0.0004942647,0.00031734948,0.00021864237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935912,0.0031950083,0.0006174786,0.0016131457,0.0005278039,0.00045548624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004599425,0.0010136444,0.0018672985,0.0007703214,0.00039138232,0.0018759926,0.0027289419,0.0017881051,0.012049765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019264758,0.0005165514,0.0009250151,0.00043249317,0.0011855599,0.0021975364,0.0014536786,0.002337113,0.0006151086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013281571,0.005064496,0.0220666,0.0009475106,0.0008675713,0.00042742203,0.00033860267,0.15253514,0.21433426,0.31286246,0.005861156,0.27141312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007863557,0.0026899213,0.022314899,0.000087793866,0.00036720344,0.000293607,0.00004987829,0.82155925,0.014629808,0.13419223,0.0028738512,0.00015522829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020980593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030800148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012049765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080613623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013047247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040310502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144701722","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2021.125998","title":"Biased baselines? Differences in manual and computer-based modelling of blue-winged teal (Spatula discors) habitat suitability","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Geography; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.052075626987619125,"score_gpt":0.28452103258441275,"score_spread":0.2324454055967936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3144701722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97792155,0.00010062223,0.019307181,0.00011958912,0.000021714524,0.000014530652,0.00044736307,0.0002972569,0.0017703435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973091,0.0000132175965,0.0022554642,0.000017035409,0.000002963208,0.000008575603,0.0002528936,0.000046655816,0.00009415444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985531,0.00085265195,0.000069476475,0.00027019464,0.00016435431,0.00009017045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957474,0.0025544337,0.00030772074,0.0007512249,0.00052846904,0.00011086518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003661337,0.0001759337,0.0003145252,0.0003491389,0.00021925758,0.00131665,0.0005582955,0.0005829369,0.0012970682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014934118,0.0001898897,0.0004097598,0.00048115433,0.0002456396,0.0011536442,0.00048897654,0.0003600609,0.0004660235],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014927381,0.00043598269,0.4793504,0.00023105521,0.00066005083,0.00018274573,0.001601266,0.37909386,0.032387424,0.005077684,0.003765732,0.09572107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111367495,0.000282758,0.47488827,0.000055380053,0.000089667315,0.00018304294,0.00043639203,0.5100109,0.0074185794,0.004092879,0.0023492468,0.00008155422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006465949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073582362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006465949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042491156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037771155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019363225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163900488","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126009","title":"High extinction risk and limited habitat connectivity of Muñoa’s pampas cat, an endemic felid of the Uruguayan Savanna ecoregion","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; University of Oxford; Neotropical Grassland Conservancy; Panthera","keywords":"Ecoregion; IUCN Red List; Threatened species; Critically endangered; Geography; Endangered species; Data deficient; Near-threatened species; IUCN protected area categories; Ecology; Population; Habitat destruction; Habitat; Protected area; Conservation status; Population viability analysis; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.011269678046424822,"score_gpt":0.23712792227729057,"score_spread":0.22585824423086576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163900488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998103,0.000015156585,0.000010650959,0.00001649744,3.6152022e-7,7.662871e-7,0.000009769416,4.1407964e-7,0.00013626274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9999013,0.000007759959,0.00001690282,0.0000046393297,5.421121e-7,9.067575e-7,0.000014257811,3.4766447e-7,0.00005328367],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998086,0.000063026826,0.000010608223,0.000048574726,0.000022263725,0.000046954017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994312,0.00010525435,0.00022128793,0.00002665997,0.00004783497,0.00016790316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027655074,0.0001761966,0.00015748943,0.00073582487,0.0007300176,0.0004869994,0.00043212512,0.00040076542,0.001886859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013251089,0.00014942378,0.00016176807,0.0003339556,0.00058065896,0.00036330492,0.00066557416,0.00039595886,0.00011227552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001058382,0.00007899317,0.9939803,0.000009664532,0.000042019863,0.00071799307,0.0011225304,0.0001328234,0.0010391674,0.00014023128,0.00009049049,0.0025399812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025410009,0.000061000075,0.9953809,0.000007845352,0.000018654482,0.0013259066,0.00186608,0.0010363819,0.000060607388,0.00011092133,0.00012513169,0.000004071994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019334022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05545575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019334022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047555953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022517919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03844297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200112695","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126117","title":"The value of flagship and umbrella species for restoration and sustainable development: Bale monkeys and bamboo forest in Ethiopia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Primate Behavior and Ecology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"California State University, Fullerton; People's Trust for Endangered Species; Rufford Foundation","keywords":"Threatened species; Bamboo; Flagship species; Biodiversity; Habitat; Agroforestry; Arboreal locomotion; Ecology; Geography; Habitat destruction; Endangered species; Umbrella species; Range (aeronautics); Biology","score_opus":0.033793326250887386,"score_gpt":0.33221569925253475,"score_spread":0.29842237300164737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200112695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976307,0.00035044365,0.000017803735,0.00029375756,0.0000067080055,0.000001052355,0.000008352142,2.8166224e-7,0.0016908759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996014,0.00012520411,0.000026994781,0.000028798893,0.0000027649348,5.739849e-7,0.0000022734168,2.1588161e-7,0.00021171349],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99977905,0.000101103156,0.00000510761,0.000014278805,0.00001626637,0.000084216714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964607,0.00008086451,0.00009216197,0.000007438701,0.000029374878,0.00014401806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055804756,0.00014692318,0.000112981135,0.0005300165,0.001591466,0.0010423462,0.00032244175,0.00032988467,0.002124481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008143694,0.00011491179,0.000056459532,0.00038940262,0.0014602551,0.00058961863,0.000517806,0.00041531638,0.00007643814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004765829,0.00028859387,0.8869389,0.00013112268,0.000099520934,0.0020595647,0.046479095,0.0003650702,0.003276467,0.0085158255,0.0014119345,0.049957346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012168839,0.00013571845,0.8366869,0.00011398316,0.00004096535,0.0007362468,0.15313329,0.0004599864,0.00027736407,0.0014794598,0.0069098054,0.000014000104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021758968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092008814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021758968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008974005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049759325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043264627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200260605","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126122","title":"Recovery of plains rough fescue grasslands on reclaimed well sites","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Rangeland and Wildlife Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Revegetation; Land reclamation; Grassland; Environmental science; Species richness; Topsoil; Native plant; Ecological succession; Plant community; Vegetation (pathology); Disturbance (geology); Agronomy; Ecology; Agroforestry; Introduced species; Biology; Soil water; Soil science","score_opus":0.013348689996756289,"score_gpt":0.2550857180165071,"score_spread":0.2417370280197508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200260605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99956566,0.000019336312,0.000012883758,0.0000136567005,0.0000010058968,0.000003152911,0.00009866735,0.0000017985761,0.00028400117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991235,0.000019190815,0.000051894374,0.000009328058,0.0000010632681,0.0000030775366,0.00019072212,0.0000010183405,0.000600195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975365,0.000039591214,0.000013591323,0.000043224492,0.000041999985,0.00010804666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991258,0.00009845741,0.00029868516,0.00007573415,0.00014595341,0.00025547674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003163392,0.00015288244,0.00021169674,0.0009549137,0.0006844355,0.00056765834,0.00048413436,0.0003165751,0.002129372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086309784,0.000112070804,0.00018498042,0.00054513477,0.00050623214,0.000360594,0.0005151407,0.00023214857,0.0002195695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004650409,0.00020681409,0.9768928,0.000041976054,0.000077196,0.0006629895,0.0016307419,0.00020900823,0.0077735414,0.00009851678,0.0005435059,0.0113979215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012282884,0.000021343843,0.9990689,0.000003191588,0.0000029667106,0.00003515617,0.0006009638,0.000041015108,0.00007457389,0.0000047227845,0.00014471948,0.0000012238219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072793014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29698032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072793014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080371555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061587326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14473861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220935876","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126159","title":"Current capacity, bottlenecks, and future projections for offsetting habitat loss using Mitigation and Conservation banking in the United States","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Habitat conservation; Environmental science; Current (fluid); Environmental resource management; Habitat destruction; Natural resource economics; Business; Geography; Ecology; Geology; Economics; Oceanography; Biology","score_opus":0.024606346521594897,"score_gpt":0.2802344913673572,"score_spread":0.2556281448457623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220935876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95821613,0.0021165158,0.006114164,0.010814059,0.00016654798,0.00006408144,0.011735611,0.00027824083,0.010494693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99418926,0.0007080112,0.0016013419,0.0002571326,0.000018193941,0.000049479,0.001989202,0.000011890803,0.0011754243],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993278,0.00016376511,0.000038443755,0.00009034528,0.0001212178,0.00025839137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764293,0.00041576297,0.00047470845,0.000070716545,0.0007685193,0.0006272645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019410418,0.00041096547,0.00038497153,0.0014939188,0.00069420395,0.001492133,0.0016707464,0.0009862004,0.005442769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036946377,0.00037223526,0.00080729317,0.0017111477,0.00064689806,0.0033999858,0.001172015,0.0013335262,0.00043695103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067214883,0.00070950255,0.60352945,0.00036041564,0.0003789896,0.00044056243,0.0007354701,0.22719498,0.0011613984,0.03339982,0.04861395,0.0828033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010577975,0.000336673,0.54292715,0.0006094448,0.00045984314,0.0005329799,0.007637716,0.39355454,0.0013273937,0.027873905,0.024457602,0.00017707782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13767163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19109114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13767163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004277922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045165517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27374065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283032187","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126214","title":"Folk taxonomy and scientific nomenclature: Working together for conservation of fishery resources in Brazil","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Hydro (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Taxonomy (biology); Nomenclature; Fishery; Threatened species; Geography; Taxon; Salience (neuroscience); Common name; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.024906164828488186,"score_gpt":0.2464014317081266,"score_spread":0.2214952668796384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283032187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38716125,0.054666158,0.13695826,0.14778215,0.0049515436,0.0013221076,0.0035713608,0.0012681059,0.26231903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.860345,0.012889767,0.11167238,0.0038271786,0.0005738778,0.00046502042,0.001179747,0.0003586805,0.008688512],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98655164,0.0059144027,0.0026064266,0.0009631904,0.003274716,0.0006896348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95203817,0.01264815,0.008790787,0.0063585155,0.017499758,0.002664655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018204771,0.0003451109,0.0007638035,0.011669184,0.007013377,0.009807914,0.0022477915,0.001417184,0.0026906852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04959965,0.00031322084,0.0006287082,0.013100973,0.0061615766,0.009587712,0.004846842,0.0017136175,0.00035086548],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007662583,0.00005733533,0.10206702,0.0023488493,0.00011331639,0.0006822132,0.079995096,0.0013438285,0.004029871,0.3143223,0.026491757,0.46847185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001963177,0.0001107667,0.09390835,0.008580801,0.00022724319,0.0014719174,0.10442445,0.005347375,0.0016910479,0.16828912,0.6157781,0.00015132203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07137413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08103707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07137413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010352327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032071207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14191735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306967469","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126292","title":"Local vehicles add nitrogen to moss biomonitors in a low-traffic protected wilderness area as revealed by a long-term isotope study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Lichen and fungal ecology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Alberta Parks","keywords":"Moss; Environmental science; Wilderness; Term (time); Nitrogen; Environmental protection; Geography; Ecology; Chemistry; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.014447164927303207,"score_gpt":0.2644546689242393,"score_spread":0.2500075039969361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306967469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99988997,0.000005739729,0.000019317164,0.0000030131519,3.885034e-7,5.5003136e-7,0.000011583972,6.261203e-7,0.00006883844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99954116,0.000009933502,0.0000746376,0.000004244754,6.791891e-7,0.00000115012,0.000034780285,9.0471667e-7,0.00033255274],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99995077,0.0000070113606,0.0000024574804,0.00001839965,0.000009207281,0.000012095773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998939,0.000010931565,0.000025352689,0.0000063300595,0.000035544825,0.0000278811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011751398,0.00013154044,0.00013903924,0.00037603965,0.0005654546,0.0003194447,0.0002708123,0.00027249215,0.00035518236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013304155,0.00013226831,0.000077224635,0.00022741492,0.00040130157,0.0002386352,0.00022973593,0.00015678519,0.000082722065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029759764,0.00013726638,0.93254006,0.000011366925,0.00003320165,0.00040732874,0.0008393643,0.0002062917,0.06127295,0.0000336219,0.00006402789,0.0041570216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002721837,0.00009727832,0.9962494,0.0000025148017,0.000017729591,0.00009706592,0.00089193275,0.00069582346,0.0017661423,0.000020539324,0.0001561826,0.0000028286383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03339646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14844364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03339646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038142642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025631074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066404104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313574899","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126327","title":"Where to invest in road mitigation? A comparison of multiscale wildlife data to inform roadway prioritization","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; Alberta Conservation Association; Mount Royal University","funders":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; National Wildlife Federation; Alberta Environment and Parks; Alberta Conservation Association; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation","keywords":"Wildlife; Prioritization; Fencing; Environmental resource management; Transport engineering; Wildlife conservation; Environmental science; Business; Environmental planning; Computer science; Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.04578041634221242,"score_gpt":0.36077263355943623,"score_spread":0.3149922172172238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313574899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97555155,0.0005886122,0.009220071,0.00088304386,0.0000418421,0.00015088524,0.0070313625,0.00011896594,0.0064136083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810059,0.00016587002,0.014843919,0.00011076969,0.000015683012,0.00010547745,0.0034744053,0.000034082048,0.00024393314],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965096,0.0017026827,0.00036623311,0.0005258638,0.0006640466,0.00023154385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98446447,0.007950518,0.0023559013,0.0020840862,0.0026979726,0.00044703545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072952774,0.00031575764,0.00056969334,0.0038861928,0.00031961288,0.0016651859,0.00064149103,0.0006370312,0.0013046172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023627074,0.00020538941,0.0005021596,0.003845027,0.00041200538,0.0025294842,0.0019087774,0.00046249927,0.0002736191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005020466,0.00022599843,0.87789774,0.00034686408,0.0005853016,0.00010648994,0.0015726424,0.0069291843,0.004249373,0.0028514892,0.0021450268,0.102587946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043978158,0.0002367836,0.95464545,0.0002301811,0.00024821926,0.000100796016,0.0045746276,0.026228847,0.0021078768,0.0022436006,0.00926053,0.00007900366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016765356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038920615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016765356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091317337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008216031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03858161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4364374129","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126406","title":"Assessing high conservation value areas for rare, endemic and threatened (RET) species: A study in high altitude Changthang landscape of India","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"WWF-India; Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change; United Nations Development Programme; Pancreatic Cancer Canada Foundation","keywords":"Threatened species; IUCN Red List; Environmental resource management; Citizen science; Geography; Habitat; Rare species; Identification (biology); Species distribution; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.02488637932941817,"score_gpt":0.29140794132193576,"score_spread":0.2665215619925176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4364374129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99955195,0.000015285848,0.000028588382,0.000017358425,9.238622e-7,0.0000055108626,0.000031769796,0.0000013402715,0.00034725582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99947304,0.000033903154,0.00010707879,0.000015025192,0.0000012795392,0.0000045775632,0.000044099037,9.0938136e-7,0.00032007266],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978024,0.000042666637,0.000012207188,0.00003821692,0.000027872826,0.000098850076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949574,0.00013313707,0.0001407234,0.000022489323,0.00006914244,0.00013875667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019867139,0.00026308277,0.00018893881,0.0011548618,0.0014119617,0.0008805114,0.0008288967,0.00040110212,0.0014040933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050203275,0.00026288794,0.00028702946,0.0015681194,0.0009331782,0.0004861129,0.00059352425,0.00041159632,0.00013330733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012001013,0.00036808586,0.9649021,0.00010554629,0.000072878385,0.0031587507,0.017957456,0.0003653015,0.004327724,0.00040355077,0.00033610122,0.007882574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043438813,0.00018733238,0.9660582,0.000013190671,0.00004150184,0.0009855666,0.0315953,0.00034051354,0.00021379854,0.0000846551,0.00046397944,0.000011458068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08019913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26215217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08019913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009917718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010090331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1594646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389060559","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126522","title":"Exotic pet trade in Canada: The influence of social media on public sentiment and behaviour","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Animal and Plant Science Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife trade; Animal welfare; Wildlife; Harm; Public opinion; Social media; Business; Political science; Geography; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.05436035724640865,"score_gpt":0.31731437805845175,"score_spread":0.2629540208120431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389060559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815108,0.00042144072,0.00016295706,0.0024578471,0.000042593725,0.00003687572,0.0024853342,0.000016901335,0.012865217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965293,0.0002988329,0.00014241849,0.00026535816,0.000012407038,0.00001069533,0.0006372077,0.000011220375,0.002092617],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915886,0.000117836375,0.000024785595,0.00010714942,0.0003243999,0.0002669701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995458,0.00081648515,0.0008447942,0.00011680545,0.0018100968,0.0009538526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089544413,0.00029920213,0.00025241886,0.0017306645,0.004506067,0.0032696258,0.00052430143,0.00043633042,0.0043484103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004338877,0.00020058239,0.0002812559,0.0031748172,0.0016460245,0.00089876447,0.0013703385,0.0008591518,0.00028804925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018572052,0.0000805581,0.92815346,0.000119547534,0.00006981064,0.00027691762,0.038962584,0.00018934108,0.001078201,0.0008599521,0.008691493,0.0213325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052249,0.000014806433,0.95717454,0.00006715329,0.000029972807,0.000036640573,0.034231573,0.00049512426,0.00015954845,0.00008584295,0.0076700426,0.000029427634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026705815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026705815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027000714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19376516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389502251","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126539","title":"Peri-urban forest margins are important stopover sites for moult-migrating songbirds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Kenneth M. Molson Foundation; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Canadian Wildlife Federation","keywords":"Understory; Habitat; Geography; Moulting; Ecology; Feather; Predation; Biology; Canopy","score_opus":0.020012407187637582,"score_gpt":0.28707206950588804,"score_spread":0.26705966231825046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389502251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99866796,0.00010266935,0.00013551256,0.000019485364,0.000004876747,0.0000034210777,0.00007394227,0.0000072477633,0.0009848829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99942315,0.000037610123,0.00014001683,0.0000059443023,0.000004424387,0.0000022478546,0.000080369784,0.0000024895057,0.00030383843],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988425,0.000025864783,0.000005115777,0.000023036559,0.00001797166,0.000043713204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953175,0.000060497823,0.00020375453,0.000020802989,0.000059419755,0.0001237184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014023238,0.00016665389,0.00016078143,0.00072698196,0.0008465496,0.000699031,0.00024761126,0.0001953753,0.006278325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004044148,0.00013934213,0.00011556286,0.00057064195,0.0003451214,0.00036684124,0.00045316,0.00014886686,0.00059908285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024782107,0.00007346411,0.98044926,0.00006835752,0.000041694006,0.00025735423,0.0005548867,0.00011441052,0.0047799996,0.00017802468,0.00054854236,0.012686151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033653491,0.00002967856,0.997077,0.000009149381,0.000016725073,0.00013800201,0.0017775409,0.00010355467,0.00016393459,0.00005558912,0.00062345836,0.0000021217402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004879854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049333006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006278325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015014905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002500394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021003127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396536154","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126626","title":"Enhancing tree species conservation in Burkina Faso through indigenous knowledge","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"African Botany and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Rufford Foundation","keywords":"Ethnobotany; Traditional knowledge; Agroforestry; Indigenous; Geography; Livelihood; Fabaceae; Conservation status; Combretaceae; Ecology; Biology; Agriculture; Medicinal plants","score_opus":0.030510270439409324,"score_gpt":0.27772616480909934,"score_spread":0.24721589436969002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396536154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9660631,0.0037838889,0.0010453119,0.006991072,0.000040877207,0.00007871027,0.000046871355,0.00001091293,0.021939225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996651,0.001082188,0.00089223316,0.00024587137,0.0000068013237,0.000012391029,0.000006202014,7.079704e-7,0.0011026413],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995453,0.00023259365,0.000016550295,0.000023329798,0.00004630477,0.00013587266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885607,0.00040512404,0.00018730405,0.000044374927,0.0001429791,0.00036408732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013233935,0.00013812257,0.000093698975,0.0007126307,0.0022282826,0.0015647857,0.00037360896,0.0003733088,0.002472682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020925924,0.00008789782,0.000054949447,0.00057313405,0.00087287725,0.0014671317,0.0016724691,0.00043651368,0.00010064449],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041745536,0.0010674461,0.3188324,0.0016105816,0.00011877014,0.0038280303,0.08563369,0.0009955928,0.023112424,0.031546433,0.003730492,0.52910674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023436053,0.0010207845,0.57404274,0.0038278562,0.00030945268,0.0025861363,0.19802691,0.003172666,0.0062541603,0.018698428,0.1917424,0.00008413886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043910146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14152919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043910146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017520915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056842226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08730912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402338740","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126723","title":"Projected distribution shifts of resident monarch butterflies and consequences for migratory monarchs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Geography; Distribution (mathematics); Ecology; Physical geography; Biology","score_opus":0.027753571019994903,"score_gpt":0.30974581939226875,"score_spread":0.2819922483722738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402338740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99742633,0.00017863237,0.00037982015,0.00027910806,0.000009178346,0.0000046519804,0.0010378957,0.000029757217,0.0006546707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983809,0.00014851334,0.00033162514,0.00006620293,0.000004313224,0.000005461987,0.0008057588,0.000002934468,0.0002542064],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998927,0.000022402935,0.0000050132367,0.000026260668,0.000015468033,0.000038148642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999648,0.000044503635,0.000094644565,0.000019913983,0.00009527359,0.000097763324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051096093,0.00039948986,0.00018827451,0.00041672564,0.00044373528,0.00051170035,0.00035085477,0.00052226166,0.0017984137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007107361,0.0001518945,0.0006254045,0.00037005765,0.00022946228,0.00035391166,0.00038158754,0.0003090258,0.00019724577],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001315578,0.000028224573,0.9725902,0.000041239196,0.00008529344,0.00022488958,0.00014010826,0.01686032,0.0034192277,0.00027488038,0.0010286175,0.0051755323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081361595,0.00006881458,0.97965175,0.000018507315,0.000046086523,0.00012471472,0.0006810643,0.017519537,0.0004081442,0.00018890157,0.0012718844,0.000012464568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1431676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23023246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1431676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014048705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008475516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28466856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405775257","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126819","title":"Mammal species occupancy in a Honduran cloud forest: A pre- and post-COVID-19 comparison","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Operation Wallacea","keywords":"Occupancy; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Geography; Cloud forest; Mammal; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Ecology; Biology; Outbreak; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.03439938770502851,"score_gpt":0.37939956972573136,"score_spread":0.3450001820207028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405775257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992448,0.000052563217,0.000013559037,0.000011028256,0.0000024891424,0.0000047081676,0.00047608753,0.0000011511253,0.00019354907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875057,0.000054214026,0.00003390347,0.000011668843,0.0000040339137,0.000008762293,0.001019481,0.0000013091804,0.000116114905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997234,0.000027999225,0.00002503504,0.000070839495,0.000040193725,0.00011255583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990513,0.00008267777,0.00034313,0.000055855682,0.00014528887,0.00032176278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000353353,0.00024535754,0.00018829784,0.0010177866,0.00054259156,0.00062895,0.00052510836,0.0003905577,0.0009969377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000909237,0.000198589,0.0003598109,0.0010761285,0.0004326851,0.0006134786,0.0007598718,0.00037982606,0.00017907252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051348987,0.00002340883,0.99828124,0.000009977038,0.000023428036,0.00006828818,0.00039383915,0.000040664465,0.00016374236,0.000008617271,0.000053957683,0.00088165276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.793079e-7,0.000019045676,0.99943477,0.000002195593,0.000003114784,0.000027489956,0.0004038331,0.000038213588,0.000008041369,0.0000017354911,0.00005970384,0.0000011678612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14082654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30752236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14082654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009889317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043604375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28001362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410255976","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126959","title":"Body condition of translocated African elephants (Loxodonta africana) in a semi-arid environment: Effects of seasonality, age-sex, and management interventions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Arid; Seasonality; Psychological intervention; African elephant; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.008275085341263264,"score_gpt":0.264592794743863,"score_spread":0.25631770940259974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410255976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99989164,0.000012543187,0.000008167007,0.000007585579,6.7932945e-7,0.000001557485,0.000033813874,3.4072028e-7,0.000043683605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997435,0.00001789174,0.00003579541,0.000007799605,8.77003e-7,0.000007258247,0.00005958887,3.6227192e-7,0.00012691543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998814,0.00003847393,0.0000064820697,0.000027355936,0.000012836396,0.000033429566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997662,0.000036193,0.00010903438,0.000015432674,0.000015267708,0.000057881054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021490843,0.00013911776,0.00013718486,0.00019966325,0.00030673662,0.00023687455,0.00011260683,0.00017570921,0.0010964407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064162887,0.00007735252,0.00014737906,0.00018944356,0.00026186628,0.00026562077,0.00028241644,0.00023944795,0.00009263086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008408212,0.000478729,0.98480356,0.00002416621,0.000068278925,0.00016509317,0.00079249026,0.00008620554,0.005728022,0.000022068816,0.00010435139,0.006886322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005033627,0.0003500485,0.99894553,0.000003843838,0.000011606234,0.000038670514,0.00040829423,0.00005593511,0.00009645117,0.000008626419,0.000074394346,0.0000014331696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038100171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01619481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038100171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023709438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014720237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0075756907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411715618","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127001","title":"Improving data reliability in community science projects with post-validation criteria","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Scientific Computing and Data Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre For Cold Ocean Resources Engineering; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Mississauga; University of Toronto","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Reliability engineering; Data science; Engineering","score_opus":0.14639644153746295,"score_gpt":0.4574366153937676,"score_spread":0.31104017385630467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411715618","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088538736,0.0049078213,0.7469524,0.013435804,0.0029998077,0.10407079,0.0072403452,0.004097792,0.027756581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17849578,0.0007869226,0.6798445,0.0020765685,0.000276269,0.13125321,0.004216691,0.00094991486,0.0021000998],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.27054995,0.3988187,0.22663558,0.019397298,0.07905587,0.0055426564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.043511566,0.5836208,0.058994696,0.09007113,0.22096622,0.0028356477],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6988523,0.0023066006,0.003690494,0.021328952,0.0069568576,0.0109323915,0.008039293,0.0046096905,0.0059754592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.87786484,0.0027507714,0.0060180025,0.01672821,0.007406536,0.012119107,0.015697828,0.0059623914,0.0021856606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00257292,0.0009428099,0.082382545,0.0644601,0.0021236776,0.0012025699,0.11461062,0.006230723,0.010943418,0.055888645,0.048007656,0.61063427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021808723,0.0027691284,0.12617818,0.091944054,0.003361417,0.0012996993,0.03366782,0.04736442,0.049188763,0.12839772,0.51178104,0.0018668431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047787814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008527636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3011477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008822306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04935456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37136877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412535478","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127035","title":"Socioeconomic predictors of pastoralist tolerance towards large carnivores in northern Tanzania","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Lethbridge","funders":"Canadian Anthropology Society; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Lethbridge","keywords":"Tanzania; Pastoralism; Geography; Socioeconomic status; Carnivore; Socioeconomics; Ecology; Livestock; Environmental health; Biology; Environmental planning; Medicine; Population; Forestry; Sociology","score_opus":0.004500485594945729,"score_gpt":0.24480861659831366,"score_spread":0.24030813100336793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412535478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99991345,0.000013230897,0.0000048949373,0.000009839816,2.424449e-7,8.9035694e-7,0.0000139644735,2.2740562e-7,0.000043269974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99991155,0.00001446351,0.000011933654,0.0000026987077,5.0062e-7,0.0000015283716,0.000018011462,1.3592587e-7,0.00003921023],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999861,0.000039719635,0.00001222979,0.000019134577,0.000015852942,0.000051940606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990717,0.00014916334,0.00050397,0.00003440747,0.00005213554,0.00018844724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035012685,0.00016865565,0.00012453574,0.0004051518,0.00044367375,0.0003503252,0.00014270374,0.00016075582,0.00129692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012923293,0.00015343828,0.00016903432,0.00035641447,0.00036574758,0.00023413672,0.00048281794,0.00025618027,0.000096258875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002279597,0.000019324267,0.9976776,0.000005718745,0.000009360061,0.00009122084,0.0009796008,0.000050916544,0.00019110455,0.000019308698,0.00003469006,0.00089826173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.217531e-7,0.000023041197,0.9988427,0.0000034871903,0.0000028107397,0.000029791772,0.000976618,0.000072635194,0.000010434087,0.0000063762463,0.000030370267,0.000001039142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03261043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08083052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03261043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036113465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024164969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06484121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414838143","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127124","title":"Nesting dynamics of hawksbill and leatherback turtles: a four-year photo-identification study in Martinique","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Turtle Biology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Martinique; Population; Habitat; Nest (protein structural motif); Nesting (process); Nesting season","score_opus":0.01222083674567753,"score_gpt":0.2770059806620628,"score_spread":0.26478514391638525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414838143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999569,0.00006742458,0.000044076194,0.000008800656,0.0000016290915,0.000010943427,0.00012560163,0.000002349104,0.00017011428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985468,0.00009246925,0.00019711505,0.000017823279,0.0000035606565,0.000022266693,0.00030289416,0.0000016865031,0.00081540085],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998888,0.000017379418,0.0000050818494,0.000033170705,0.00001489343,0.000040602237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997451,0.000029866414,0.00008955384,0.000015147966,0.00004333094,0.00007702962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002794237,0.0004000863,0.00021957495,0.0008408978,0.0005698753,0.00035275053,0.00028270172,0.00038669253,0.0007588668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030487275,0.00023318364,0.00034718987,0.00027219043,0.0003929115,0.00024043371,0.0003772646,0.00026400868,0.00018141394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016547149,0.00017112918,0.98191434,0.000055044315,0.00006438482,0.0009069403,0.0037744448,0.00016780118,0.0069266395,0.000030443005,0.00026810027,0.0055552754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015717167,0.000059387086,0.99916136,0.0000034298819,0.0000046149526,0.000079504935,0.00039242665,0.000046588484,0.00004521854,0.000001352017,0.00020234723,0.000002154778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17438988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3929152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17438988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013986343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005566953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34674966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415069956","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127127","title":"Altered movement patterns in wolverines with missing paws","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wildlife Conservation Society Canada","funders":"Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Protection de la nature et des Parcs; R. Howard Webster Foundation; Alberta Conservation Association; Weston Family Foundation; Echo Foundation; Schad Foundation; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Movement (music); Population; Biological dispersal; Home range; Exploratory analysis; Poison control","score_opus":0.007428959070931879,"score_gpt":0.25713653221333593,"score_spread":0.24970757314240405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415069956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997485,0.000024334022,0.00005516466,0.000005278419,8.467511e-7,0.0000026084554,0.00006892216,0.0000023204311,0.000092058006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989434,0.000039327755,0.00021737137,0.000015114543,0.0000014052348,0.000006111844,0.00029657016,0.0000022039076,0.0004784695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999182,0.000009446772,0.00000747324,0.000031989945,0.000011696665,0.000021168415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977344,0.000016448465,0.00010889872,0.0000141415685,0.000032236454,0.000054908585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00006982501,0.00015305921,0.00021626757,0.00049741304,0.00023054342,0.00022624404,0.00017044449,0.0002918769,0.0011067621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033514493,0.00012316405,0.00013795923,0.00026299272,0.00023937399,0.00013680356,0.00018438716,0.00019568532,0.0001865816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016020742,0.00006752472,0.96708304,0.000023173141,0.00004583423,0.0008970266,0.000674472,0.000132845,0.025092194,0.000019827994,0.00014781691,0.0056560845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.998956e-7,0.00008250465,0.9988589,0.0000029261153,0.00000411996,0.00040296643,0.00025614863,0.000099531186,0.00018174798,0.000005393721,0.00010248666,0.0000022328131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007204002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026886087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007204002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016546066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000811219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014324129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417085616","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127188","title":"Genetic diversity hotspots of trematodes (Platyhelminthes) in Mexico and their overlap with protected natural areas","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for Nature Conservation","topic":"Parasite Biology and Host Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología","keywords":"Genetic diversity; Natural (archaeology); Diversity (politics); Species diversity; Population genetics; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.008245582779620009,"score_gpt":0.27748079334845815,"score_spread":0.26923521056883815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417085616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996767,0.000065067194,0.000029419598,0.000011509931,5.5716254e-7,0.0000016318733,0.00009958342,0.0000018347522,0.0001136191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994324,0.00010192608,0.00013887537,0.0000051432944,0.0000021440728,0.000005653266,0.00025622334,6.434187e-7,0.0000569025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99990153,0.000012854956,0.000007641353,0.00004414707,0.00001253952,0.000021325683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968386,0.00004005828,0.00020375174,0.000015803374,0.000024270961,0.000032159624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019085265,0.0001106461,0.00015107391,0.001057484,0.00037652443,0.00030693057,0.00011828284,0.00011926375,0.00043454848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003913137,0.00007921619,0.00012908255,0.0008710626,0.00028924743,0.00013621702,0.00034524547,0.00012302355,0.000030098101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007469643,0.000011581955,0.99198323,0.000023081757,0.000039245722,0.000082222905,0.00051121967,0.00012892706,0.0020036467,0.00007250924,0.00007319532,0.004996441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002458815,0.000008927751,0.99946576,0.000004428168,0.000009544678,0.00003485054,0.00021202094,0.000074423086,0.00004418725,0.000013747455,0.00012837957,0.0000011102668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018925898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038729228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018925898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003445627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024263827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03763151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}