{"meta":{"query_hash":"7a3616718fa3","filters":{"venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy"},"cohort_total":28,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"exported":28,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7a3616718fa3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+for+the+History+of+Analytical+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W1023034389","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v2i5.41","title":"José L. Zalabardo (ed.), Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.05773464985225875,"score_gpt":0.2446517427807221,"score_spread":0.18691709292846337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1023034389","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00050913286,0.9684986,0.00087376125,0.0068848147,0.0014504241,0.0000036935244,0.00008668508,0.00004682557,0.021646058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013602721,0.9303596,0.0021509835,0.00135271,0.0020938138,0.000021516216,0.00014169494,0.00010674805,0.05017025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968505,0.000059433572,0.000028922661,0.000070673006,0.00010971393,0.000046148383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996507,0.00018185042,0.000055985864,0.000025304014,0.000050898034,0.000035226225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010178414,0.0014004296,0.0009920553,0.0032437872,0.0010151409,0.0034636213,0.0007662318,0.0018300471,0.017805949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013753414,0.000989584,0.00045762424,0.0039950265,0.0025333527,0.005944258,0.001301012,0.0021701728,0.0073988666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000884404,0.00003343155,0.00044215182,0.0021343946,0.00004132897,0.00018683751,0.004495083,0.00039529143,0.00039970316,0.11581876,0.55171853,0.32424602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009148883,0.000008829873,0.0010857901,0.0012459306,0.000019331517,0.00037036903,0.0006599693,0.00007676734,0.00021982712,0.04814804,0.94813937,0.000016739066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008720324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016551804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017805949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017899768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020258364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059566855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1559823779","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v3i3.39","title":"American Pragmatism and the Vienna Circle: The Early Years","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Pragmatism; Empiricism; Period (music); Relation (database); Epistemology; Convergence (economics); Philosophy; Aesthetics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.061333317273882366,"score_gpt":0.25354523029002224,"score_spread":0.19221191301613988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1559823779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13336183,0.025401587,0.015442928,0.102676824,0.0013186213,0.000025841677,0.000036435133,0.00009581498,0.72164017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97362435,0.0023306198,0.0021516378,0.003614916,0.00031094498,0.00002777762,0.0000105370245,0.000029217668,0.01789998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99400085,0.0038395578,0.00014674806,0.0005002792,0.00092548784,0.00058716076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99215466,0.0052676927,0.0005186049,0.0007505445,0.00073139824,0.0005770264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008265709,0.00020812209,0.0002852657,0.0018907676,0.008841269,0.010486815,0.00070038094,0.0038913833,0.0030857318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014420379,0.00031365233,0.00026184085,0.0023206694,0.029993294,0.010393767,0.0043302705,0.008122826,0.00046002143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062396402,0.0000046331056,0.000092582515,0.000004866082,6.904811e-7,0.000012179606,0.0038247318,0.000034454508,0.000014664364,0.9920293,0.0009885612,0.002987103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009689641,0.000017445296,0.00094441004,0.00011583734,0.0000028358654,0.000059405622,0.0031909274,0.00043699637,0.00016460854,0.82888645,0.16615643,0.000014910203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006291756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074588247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010486815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076844185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052337726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05575466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597121812","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v2i10.2424","title":"Pushing Wittgenstein and Quine Closer Together","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Quine; Philosophy; Epistemology; Naturalism; Grammar; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06509764413507453,"score_gpt":0.25010176801045997,"score_spread":0.18500412387538545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597121812","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015959494,0.05022739,0.0752814,0.47328115,0.0051334654,0.00004806947,0.00013657044,0.00024831403,0.37968418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74202275,0.017789964,0.04022839,0.09625446,0.00753017,0.00029051388,0.00012290414,0.0006776982,0.09508312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994899,0.0024651624,0.00018278041,0.00084553007,0.0011472732,0.0004603883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948553,0.0029665264,0.00040078536,0.0006061466,0.00077284675,0.00039839256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077891066,0.0008913072,0.0012829872,0.0036213638,0.0063393987,0.009484132,0.0015998678,0.00440766,0.00734349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0148020815,0.00045486822,0.0009908883,0.0020820503,0.034124132,0.022031685,0.0067930226,0.0110687455,0.0012983691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044058324,0.0000041960757,0.000028845687,0.0000136555145,0.0000036250965,0.00001883886,0.0009575154,0.000049685168,0.000013915752,0.99313086,0.0037318307,0.0020426654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031711274,0.00000352948,0.00003685555,0.000040367882,0.000001960538,0.000017683353,0.00045195574,0.00011211814,0.00002898199,0.95802855,0.041269433,0.0000053630106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006725951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007719268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009484132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060268603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039243125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043728173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1906870716","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v3i9.65","title":"Davidson on Practical Knowledge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Generality; Epistemology; Confusion; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Neglect; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.3285005292270333,"score_gpt":0.36358061654876184,"score_spread":0.035080087321728515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1906870716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034188733,0.037249085,0.009704903,0.3877181,0.0050662532,0.000036081274,0.00013778466,0.00008044753,0.5565885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54832315,0.028036227,0.012288272,0.12067467,0.00680753,0.00024703416,0.00020779541,0.00035907797,0.28305635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965252,0.0017267453,0.00013028558,0.00063789194,0.0006885071,0.0002913052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99660814,0.0018073184,0.00014051556,0.00041351136,0.0007597333,0.00027077307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036049935,0.0006101208,0.0006708404,0.001119358,0.0061351256,0.0059330966,0.0012923946,0.005263391,0.0063811904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007057303,0.00044095606,0.0005188559,0.0009915697,0.023875145,0.0070224483,0.003962748,0.008625634,0.0022527515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058574237,0.0000031556215,0.00003698675,0.00002292122,0.0000021236085,0.000022615151,0.0013979576,0.00006198393,0.000016877597,0.9642211,0.03034043,0.0038680576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073616266,0.0000052256037,0.00007336183,0.00008622811,0.0000022665859,0.000031180913,0.0008533172,0.00009804593,0.000044004315,0.66950476,0.32928696,0.0000072833723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012884533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012801886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012884533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008594281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044732867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062356114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982487169","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v2i5.40","title":"Ernst Mally’s Anticipation of Encoding","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Encoding (memory); Object (grammar); Class (philosophy); Subject (documents); Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09641324690311019,"score_gpt":0.2715803223288513,"score_spread":0.17516707542574111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982487169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02824014,0.0173181,0.06007082,0.38470358,0.004161611,0.000056821482,0.00029370573,0.00037979396,0.50477535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84499025,0.00629078,0.012861493,0.030968914,0.002213908,0.00012198345,0.00013450054,0.0003431655,0.10207502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967506,0.0016186581,0.00011889651,0.0005487243,0.0007034997,0.00025954653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974269,0.0014857525,0.00014857604,0.00036015685,0.00041545578,0.00016311227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026174234,0.0004078133,0.0003749232,0.000932321,0.0028877023,0.0060261893,0.00061123574,0.0038798868,0.005143555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010584856,0.00037659123,0.00041809166,0.00086797395,0.02056145,0.012931089,0.0042610886,0.0071129412,0.001136648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019910185,0.000004653497,0.000060984567,0.000014147048,0.0000015965626,0.00003113872,0.0013146218,0.000103948,0.00007881024,0.98742795,0.008120916,0.0028212524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011014584,0.000008397236,0.000087772336,0.00005973344,0.0000031730954,0.0000545707,0.0004121248,0.00028560654,0.0003279043,0.8713159,0.12741956,0.000014268577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006752258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050307857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006752258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006639295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003076759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04817176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998274712","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v2i3.21","title":"On the Paradox of Gestalt Switches: Wittgenstein’s Response to Kohler","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Calgary","funders":"Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London; King's College London","keywords":"Gestalt psychology; Nothing; Appeal; Epistemology; Philosophy; Perception; Cognitive science; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08324922563821739,"score_gpt":0.25537026475398983,"score_spread":0.17212103911577242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998274712","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028899325,0.02761534,0.026582632,0.77775747,0.005681833,0.000033890323,0.0001212759,0.00017736814,0.1331309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80339295,0.011024314,0.008988062,0.1420809,0.0050009736,0.000102787846,0.000068791924,0.00027138568,0.029069856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750215,0.0011610998,0.00007775505,0.0004414443,0.0006023172,0.00021527907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577254,0.003160102,0.00021456277,0.0003021806,0.00039166503,0.00015890847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052924706,0.0005358316,0.0006852863,0.0013702596,0.003234616,0.00491965,0.0013247291,0.007431678,0.0034312247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014730288,0.00034224745,0.0006852223,0.0012039256,0.026615625,0.015082451,0.004196812,0.0123123955,0.0008042909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019855126,0.00000937296,0.000054492484,0.000020515776,0.0000052481155,0.00005590521,0.0012840442,0.00015904708,0.00005494114,0.97987205,0.015410287,0.0030542559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007952932,0.0000046353216,0.000050565526,0.00003071049,0.000002057926,0.000048096335,0.0004823354,0.0003029598,0.00009488472,0.975958,0.023006568,0.000011274272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027733715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017804947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007431678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036680712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013886244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027989626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036359931","doi":"10.4148/jhap.v2i1.1709","title":"WHAT DID RUSSELL LEARN FROM LEIBNIZ?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Philosophy; Hegelianism; Griffin; Intellect; Dialectic; Epistemology; Theology; Classics; History","score_opus":0.07000538672030356,"score_gpt":0.24684246444577218,"score_spread":0.17683707772546864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036359931","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003835454,0.2819131,0.015259572,0.56680614,0.013868862,0.000016397533,0.00020489765,0.00025227852,0.11784322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31736585,0.34884283,0.019424433,0.17626117,0.04807406,0.00013170211,0.00037097748,0.0007842487,0.08874481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950553,0.0021045767,0.000259576,0.00072314276,0.0015242851,0.0003331757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99323314,0.00383651,0.00027795773,0.00078467,0.0013385863,0.00052909733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007274004,0.0009079311,0.0016177947,0.002846176,0.00324512,0.009259383,0.0013819508,0.0056066513,0.005680841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017838603,0.00051266165,0.00082747533,0.0025788099,0.023941595,0.026246466,0.0035587146,0.011542982,0.003735193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021703541,0.000011651165,0.00020495473,0.00014494959,0.0000141347955,0.00008862813,0.0017399832,0.00012232653,0.00005618824,0.90942144,0.056549706,0.031624302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000103451275,0.000013534565,0.0001834491,0.00032204195,0.0000045569054,0.00011522706,0.0008250578,0.00014887562,0.00011818727,0.67303085,0.3252003,0.000027534754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005021405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035566995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009259383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006471116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035979233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046951413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086990893","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v2i6.47","title":"Early Russell on Types and Plurals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Epistemology; Aside; Class (philosophy); Philosophy; Abandonment (legal); Linguistics; Reflexive pronoun; Law","score_opus":0.060290304298173336,"score_gpt":0.24700248444801992,"score_spread":0.18671218014984658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086990893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020595677,0.028057959,0.077592105,0.027632842,0.0018439303,0.000054640157,0.00026133994,0.00029793745,0.8436637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8270871,0.015376666,0.03449079,0.00876111,0.0032873275,0.00015181514,0.00019264048,0.0004958262,0.11015673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546,0.0021208029,0.00018680043,0.00061807083,0.0012300315,0.0003843051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971342,0.0017531568,0.0001494291,0.00031878753,0.00045822386,0.00018623941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041021802,0.0006767726,0.0009002953,0.0028841456,0.0042245327,0.0066532944,0.0010935445,0.002391168,0.003954825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052851858,0.0006399052,0.0007687415,0.0025436976,0.023626404,0.011018444,0.0034913318,0.0055707092,0.0010753609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007158094,0.000002175418,0.000037696933,0.00001453087,0.0000013351538,0.000014023425,0.00095766207,0.000063545514,0.000029580111,0.9952643,0.0013806921,0.0022272945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008785982,0.000009800012,0.000098475924,0.000060620205,0.0000030187934,0.00005331054,0.00037139867,0.00019910162,0.00009011382,0.928814,0.07028172,0.000009715869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071297144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005152586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007309034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007309034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024020222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053031027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091657296","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v2i8.971","title":"Bentham’s Contextualism and Its Relation to Analytic Philosophy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Quine; Philosophy; Epistemology; Empiricism; Relation (database); Philosophy of language; Analytic philosophy; Naturalism; Narrative; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Contemporary philosophy; Metaphysics; Linguistics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.09759828300321263,"score_gpt":0.2650578147840869,"score_spread":0.16745953178087428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091657296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03632657,0.057372004,0.1310032,0.105778925,0.0019421701,0.00008075118,0.00017856601,0.00017023782,0.6671476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9378374,0.010803678,0.02174004,0.0071978173,0.001816091,0.00013246352,0.00005270653,0.000121811354,0.020298017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952247,0.0032382025,0.00012362002,0.00054959994,0.00059689046,0.00026701466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943137,0.004275906,0.00025138707,0.00039059328,0.0005593702,0.00020903941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003809867,0.0005359637,0.00059005007,0.0025554737,0.005704628,0.0063391044,0.0010841591,0.0020698209,0.0030194276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058661387,0.0004524944,0.00057736103,0.0020117834,0.036817763,0.006401925,0.0037884384,0.004868974,0.0004062527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028163067,0.0000012961428,0.00002193757,0.000010800476,0.000001124707,0.000008942244,0.001033404,0.000048896643,0.000012454803,0.9974612,0.0003873582,0.0010097516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005757839,0.0000064199226,0.0001014723,0.0000470954,0.0000033116212,0.000025146355,0.0005752236,0.0002112935,0.00004221258,0.96041286,0.03856294,0.0000062061704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00977022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008652563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00977022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007358152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032359308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053387344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345931439","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v2i9.2298","title":"Bipolarity and Sense in the Tractatus","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0778688509778052,"score_gpt":0.25792311023261905,"score_spread":0.18005425925481383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345931439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08819003,0.006034247,0.13218118,0.015713207,0.00072122295,0.000077654615,0.00026479946,0.00024819185,0.75656945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97095,0.0014504624,0.008876436,0.0010103394,0.000242861,0.00010255322,0.00011613613,0.00012404598,0.017127214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972784,0.0014150296,0.00015242015,0.00046330068,0.0004206682,0.00027021923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999017,0.00043359675,0.00011521884,0.00018521123,0.00016571903,0.00008318061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021437295,0.00043636977,0.00047373874,0.0018644184,0.0036379704,0.0065344004,0.0005685231,0.0018723016,0.004578052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031259032,0.00032867512,0.00060320925,0.0018626765,0.026844308,0.010866541,0.0034027225,0.0030623013,0.0007754379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004128722,7.958514e-7,0.00003484529,0.000005432069,0.0000011631766,0.000009628477,0.00060424197,0.00004052959,0.000034435056,0.9983425,0.0002880288,0.00063424074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045530155,0.0000041633452,0.00012361746,0.00001579615,0.0000028157467,0.00003319832,0.00035649547,0.00016686949,0.000048696464,0.98941153,0.009827759,0.0000046402215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003082237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022866651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065344004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004954707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012399968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03594911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412287738","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v4i5.2946","title":"The Subterranean Influence of Pragmatism on the Vienna Circle: Peirce, Ramsey, Wittgenstein","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Path (computing); Art history; Art","score_opus":0.06584189367175726,"score_gpt":0.2543744801365697,"score_spread":0.18853258646481247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412287738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12281641,0.08707681,0.012036723,0.16764362,0.0010100644,0.000023785835,0.000037573598,0.00007568579,0.60927933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685931,0.010147215,0.0015954662,0.0033911625,0.0005274344,0.000029030005,0.000007662708,0.000044841796,0.015664093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981047,0.0012801887,0.00003492074,0.00016366437,0.00029293174,0.00012366164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959557,0.0029920326,0.00024894124,0.00029628893,0.00030814932,0.00019890835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002987947,0.00023023524,0.00031150552,0.0012710268,0.005092401,0.0072868727,0.00042658974,0.002135522,0.002186575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008453929,0.00026979434,0.00016474248,0.0015952877,0.033313908,0.009118767,0.0028029694,0.0046882774,0.000330272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001102559,0.000006895493,0.00007665789,0.000019378065,0.0000013786726,0.000024800953,0.007888574,0.000059411217,0.00002258624,0.9859802,0.0022395253,0.003669535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009545568,0.000007907518,0.00030039638,0.00013377857,0.000003217289,0.000050862258,0.0040263683,0.00016554538,0.000092794726,0.94541436,0.049786463,0.000008836242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051755277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050512343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072868727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004720712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032347192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034251392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2574063561","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v5i1.2957","title":"“The Tragedy of Verbal Metaphysics” by Leon Chwistek","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Education and Cultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Tragedy (event); Phenomenology (philosophy); Humanities; Literature; Epistemology; Art","score_opus":0.10774099453798029,"score_gpt":0.36832711613877483,"score_spread":0.26058612160079453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2574063561","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023429208,0.33992574,0.015222383,0.28021163,0.011915622,0.000051496743,0.00019950951,0.00029973141,0.3287447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70888567,0.08878965,0.0058440827,0.042706884,0.011943653,0.00019102091,0.00024952748,0.00051888975,0.14087062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901986,0.00050631166,0.000024993957,0.00011425756,0.00025006654,0.00008441006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992716,0.00046547188,0.00006338032,0.000049519535,0.00011801994,0.000031964042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010113062,0.0005754563,0.0003007832,0.0009986388,0.0024697904,0.0034993226,0.00049149856,0.0012856378,0.002677803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003313884,0.00025787583,0.00018809509,0.001066767,0.010698132,0.004938018,0.0015669372,0.0040232157,0.0008308522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003929758,0.000012799102,0.00025394396,0.00016908863,0.000009322083,0.00013144997,0.014645668,0.0001820722,0.0002203925,0.72274303,0.22447708,0.037115786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012231476,0.000015178713,0.0008780929,0.00056077883,0.0000075360613,0.00022743993,0.0037962114,0.00026720422,0.00044201824,0.17207189,0.8217001,0.000021398884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007851746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008173549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007851746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029320286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016979065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021273434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606728466","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v5i4.2963","title":"On Operator N and Wittgenstein’s Logical Philosophy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Epistemology; Philosophy; Completeness (order theory); Logical consequence; Operator (biology); Reading (process); Analytic philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12398411497059898,"score_gpt":0.28626748582688655,"score_spread":0.16228337085628758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606728466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047321007,0.011096793,0.38395786,0.0257074,0.0008108447,0.000054874097,0.00014676248,0.00034834942,0.53055614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89213556,0.0050139856,0.059779666,0.0047060275,0.0011330419,0.0001966868,0.00013039862,0.00021374333,0.036690865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980508,0.0010071925,0.00007989667,0.00027408323,0.00043072223,0.00015727361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762577,0.0016830469,0.00017025946,0.0002551847,0.00018089627,0.00008476571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004852803,0.00048308593,0.0005672303,0.0018306664,0.0025307802,0.0028489772,0.0010534785,0.0015259316,0.0034554966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005667304,0.00024467052,0.00074904907,0.0017795628,0.019529732,0.012411798,0.0029339527,0.0026810875,0.0005859863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030089484,0.0000012834568,0.000015661255,0.0000061379856,7.9346137e-7,0.0000102198,0.00023047077,0.00007762416,0.000027048764,0.99834657,0.0003513253,0.00092986255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001687772,0.0000039511315,0.000032812794,0.000009776543,9.2964916e-7,0.000017467975,0.00007822581,0.0003280133,0.00004790803,0.99171066,0.007765214,0.0000034177922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021241333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013234995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004852803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028795567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016253825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02566439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616329343","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v5i5.3206","title":"Ryle on the Explanatory Role of Knowledge How","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Åbo Akademi; Universitetet i Oslo; Université de Montréal","keywords":"Intellectualism; Epistemology; Possession (linguistics); Framing (construction); Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.18700933372943965,"score_gpt":0.30468931881527667,"score_spread":0.11767998508583702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616329343","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044302773,0.0271714,0.07469923,0.42726168,0.0014965074,0.000104839004,0.00024614044,0.00020095702,0.42451644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94716346,0.0063433084,0.010012141,0.0136107085,0.0009315869,0.00016063784,0.00006669098,0.000096915035,0.021614514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960284,0.0029982165,0.00006832837,0.00036888543,0.00028729785,0.0002488522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899601,0.00824648,0.00039166334,0.00054661813,0.0006141753,0.00024100285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004577059,0.000563815,0.0007995097,0.002022238,0.0044969833,0.008016107,0.0012114126,0.00429441,0.0042271493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010134257,0.00031228072,0.0006597762,0.001550841,0.037236426,0.012089474,0.004092273,0.0066325245,0.00082739495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008080546,0.0000029794048,0.000049505485,0.000020536925,0.0000016396317,0.000035282697,0.0020192228,0.00015542445,0.000016781263,0.9944957,0.0021681658,0.0010266715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009508853,0.000006936606,0.00012426017,0.00012689273,0.0000055254422,0.00004266655,0.0015941617,0.0005306099,0.000105309075,0.95751435,0.039931018,0.00000879957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004673209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030529872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008016107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003274372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026584184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024206102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791915364","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v6i4.3018","title":"Why “is at”? —On Quine’s Objection to Carnap’s Aufbau in “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Quine; Epistemology; Empiricism; Philosophy; Reductionism","score_opus":0.08484851059869275,"score_gpt":0.3062632904374991,"score_spread":0.22141477983880636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791915364","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030459953,0.012768614,0.126253,0.46495622,0.004973789,0.00009250496,0.00023819764,0.0004083142,0.35984936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87149316,0.0035376127,0.02308078,0.06273604,0.0027563411,0.0002601356,0.00011308037,0.0003914423,0.035631426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563867,0.0021268593,0.00013032818,0.0009302546,0.00087046303,0.00030341768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99433196,0.0035707399,0.00029661265,0.0007499746,0.0008704157,0.00018030935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063049854,0.00068164157,0.00083450525,0.0019112927,0.005846404,0.005684451,0.0017554616,0.005167763,0.005495708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01075068,0.0004794809,0.0010502792,0.0008679925,0.052793276,0.010729381,0.0044799233,0.008612986,0.0013317524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011589421,0.0000035843643,0.00006904093,0.000019103953,0.0000057444495,0.000055177516,0.0014580007,0.00009595638,0.00004981447,0.9904081,0.005385107,0.0024388023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008971159,0.000008086114,0.00014388695,0.00004026565,0.000004710107,0.000076763856,0.00068400026,0.00040327737,0.00015626215,0.9587535,0.039702553,0.00001767248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008979342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004268279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008979342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004103211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016856879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03334433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803293235","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v6i6.3234","title":"Roman Ingarden’s “The Logical Attempt at a New Formulation of Philosophy: A Critical Remark”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Statement (logic); Philosophy; German; Epistemology; German philosophy; Classics; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10884019230058882,"score_gpt":0.2915171479133399,"score_spread":0.18267695561275105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803293235","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039729592,0.10492518,0.009796267,0.46312684,0.023798067,0.0000576365,0.00021944543,0.00009660752,0.394007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39125335,0.043477233,0.011369757,0.20836358,0.019630745,0.00034897376,0.00030804297,0.0006245928,0.32462373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99494284,0.0025752122,0.00017458739,0.00070869515,0.0013338681,0.00026474276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978313,0.0012716609,0.0001621847,0.00012415533,0.0005228635,0.000087840715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003586176,0.0010095942,0.00050711905,0.0016549936,0.0035736642,0.006054893,0.0012431939,0.004390825,0.005940216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01114948,0.00037930772,0.0004868841,0.0011778387,0.014595268,0.007900535,0.0026105177,0.010656692,0.0024275535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034936205,0.000006177967,0.00005716681,0.00011669026,0.0000062772374,0.000084759435,0.0050385897,0.000074369105,0.0001164528,0.7963644,0.19214357,0.005956546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011293938,0.0000080300915,0.00019563152,0.00030331258,0.0000055169803,0.00011344333,0.0012158438,0.00008564067,0.00024104594,0.13308363,0.86472046,0.000016138154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067691705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006408647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067691705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051460615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027014306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037337422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804199312","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v6i6.3233","title":"Verification: The Hysteron Proteron Argument","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Positivism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument map; Sociology; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.09114550703331133,"score_gpt":0.26821347944404783,"score_spread":0.17706797241073652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804199312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1539453,0.005123148,0.1285066,0.26559266,0.0033631015,0.00012448497,0.0001471099,0.0005333435,0.44266436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741484,0.00044250084,0.0042889714,0.008162131,0.00063094107,0.000057996775,0.000022643524,0.00012112906,0.012125384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99159545,0.004318219,0.00019996171,0.001159974,0.0019119516,0.0008143283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861049,0.01060702,0.0006677118,0.0012916143,0.0009629204,0.0003658827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01243356,0.0003717916,0.00073294534,0.0015558618,0.00624813,0.00482479,0.0014868007,0.0073359828,0.007122623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029298613,0.00039865915,0.0010086668,0.0006056816,0.027946059,0.0119118225,0.0059348405,0.008635083,0.0011465733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002469652,0.000007026683,0.00015776069,0.00001958349,0.0000058938454,0.00025589578,0.0014517921,0.00010767714,0.00010034001,0.9937676,0.0022583706,0.0018433743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045052697,0.000017006789,0.00017161905,0.00007369933,0.00000973277,0.00025326767,0.00089058693,0.0012192945,0.0005112562,0.97012603,0.026664212,0.000018189956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019046403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011242373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01243356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038098723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026586927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065755725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935779267","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v7i2.3484","title":"Davidson’s Meta-Normative Naturalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Naturalism; Holism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Realism; Section (typography); Computer science","score_opus":0.09785169156550004,"score_gpt":0.3339332810371495,"score_spread":0.23608158947164942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935779267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008291185,0.006570145,0.18234628,0.07609513,0.0013283739,0.00012959715,0.0005912538,0.0002801324,0.724368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79670256,0.004944291,0.12223066,0.0135342255,0.0013830044,0.0005545542,0.00044636882,0.00032021015,0.05988411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99496573,0.0026416967,0.0002574923,0.0007798023,0.0011314651,0.0002238348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970487,0.0012682615,0.0001520838,0.000586162,0.0007482975,0.00019648604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005838956,0.00079386675,0.0009087568,0.0020548296,0.0036738107,0.006499662,0.0020937696,0.0029850618,0.0045117475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00550013,0.0006606288,0.001070971,0.0012900518,0.020806354,0.0053203497,0.0033726147,0.0059681255,0.0012449862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003511016,0.0000024027777,0.000023286442,0.000015676625,0.0000034076147,0.000009646574,0.00032669425,0.00016275894,0.000017538783,0.99706286,0.0013824006,0.0009898309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006745685,0.0000019295846,0.00002985612,0.000017636527,0.0000023843122,0.000009881663,0.000099144985,0.00032429924,0.000026140002,0.9834578,0.016020147,0.000004155634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065485775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008682744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009193603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009193603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004401851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06670457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936876674","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v7i2.3487","title":"Davidson’s Answer to Kripke’s Sceptic","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Skepticism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Spell; Possible world; Expression (computer science); Linguistics; Computer science; Theology","score_opus":0.07046300645665159,"score_gpt":0.2634671555289809,"score_spread":0.19300414907232932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936876674","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014412614,0.013417548,0.061426934,0.5415512,0.0037446325,0.00006264364,0.00032703375,0.00015219946,0.36490518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72915536,0.012874634,0.04458171,0.11818866,0.002853276,0.00036779777,0.00026892035,0.00037281564,0.0913368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954182,0.0019610124,0.00019361476,0.0009075346,0.0012509099,0.0002686194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99644226,0.0018718843,0.00016406743,0.0004587381,0.0008173681,0.0002456664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005025814,0.0006694538,0.0008366669,0.001400599,0.006029677,0.004446562,0.0019613972,0.005672651,0.0049296697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009508096,0.0006123713,0.00060861284,0.0015145491,0.04246916,0.007458687,0.005237694,0.010141521,0.0018559925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012236294,0.0000025129318,0.000036885664,0.000026731366,0.0000037305706,0.000035455956,0.0025124648,0.00008787686,0.000030179364,0.982105,0.012831589,0.0023152523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001536391,0.0000057070265,0.00005219011,0.00007360069,0.0000033696033,0.000053654523,0.0017060969,0.00018386167,0.000071129114,0.9138275,0.08399378,0.000013750544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017757688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01640344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017757688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00860009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006378863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062398255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940015673","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v7i2.3882","title":"Donald Davidson: Looking Back, Looking Forward (Volume Introduction)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of compositionality; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Normative; Skepticism; Hundredth; Proposition; Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Sociology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.03561882285118454,"score_gpt":0.24757738075972957,"score_spread":0.21195855790854504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940015673","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037785794,0.2747331,0.0014731066,0.5249162,0.102979526,0.00003052208,0.00047913878,0.00013378364,0.09487678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024605079,0.27826998,0.006073011,0.294854,0.06179643,0.00019069306,0.0010567013,0.0009506852,0.33220348],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977319,0.0007803847,0.0001297404,0.00032738523,0.00085108797,0.00017934028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689734,0.0011867951,0.00012339633,0.00017005048,0.0013155084,0.0003068976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002808621,0.0008149023,0.0008102668,0.0025499882,0.0046969163,0.009567313,0.0015550177,0.005421266,0.023425823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008060181,0.00083477166,0.0005492407,0.0033686433,0.004288727,0.0093951505,0.0031239677,0.007928184,0.013845511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010416257,0.0000051842853,0.000055299468,0.00014175725,0.0000033943295,0.00003171604,0.0006574487,0.000023107363,0.000039264087,0.037225466,0.94624346,0.015563556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001721295,0.0000015896044,0.000048643586,0.00020231953,0.0000012292662,0.000023421882,0.00037536104,0.000008157482,0.000017226344,0.008879984,0.99043465,0.0000057598813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023536988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04037062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023536988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074889017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005241735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07836717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982075692","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v7i6.4041","title":"Steven Methven, Frank Ramsey and the Realistic Spirit","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06134845670814749,"score_gpt":0.2633295546944678,"score_spread":0.2019810979863203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982075692","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017828203,0.8112449,0.00025050563,0.1393674,0.030817496,0.000009194839,0.00007942529,0.000019715804,0.018033095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01231678,0.8107685,0.0005298733,0.04120416,0.04111857,0.000040751278,0.00018161257,0.000111534675,0.09372825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903345,0.00038780266,0.00006160897,0.00014938084,0.0003288603,0.000039045546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597836,0.0021604507,0.00020101265,0.000090659414,0.0013302854,0.00023928392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013178593,0.00092727446,0.00078686065,0.0021951788,0.0017241365,0.0027180149,0.00076272007,0.002415714,0.020504896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063379332,0.00054519373,0.00031946175,0.0021052794,0.0024264627,0.004822013,0.0013312369,0.0055575995,0.009271916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013677301,0.0000053162307,0.000051403116,0.00033694017,0.0000056637577,0.000033433465,0.00028147694,0.000048134272,0.000032463377,0.01697122,0.9627357,0.019484513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059768777,0.0000032856046,0.00034067957,0.0006538504,0.0000032786838,0.00010001234,0.00041666284,0.000023342162,0.00002140933,0.005357777,0.99306667,0.000006938863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076651205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016842853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020504896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017157512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020631028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06859571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989871563","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v7i7.3932","title":"“Die Maschine als Symbol ihrer Wirkungsweise”: Wittgenstein, Reuleaux and Kinematics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Analogy; Temptation; Philosophy; Epistemology; Symbol (formal); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05394800044472965,"score_gpt":0.2495133056554814,"score_spread":0.19556530521075177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989871563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041160423,0.06574514,0.09524121,0.041081186,0.0014851376,0.000036157882,0.00015367604,0.00019720843,0.7548999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9137253,0.01252735,0.014140113,0.0031017747,0.0009423591,0.00008052637,0.000052097603,0.00013728942,0.055293232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920964,0.00037355983,0.000023359515,0.00017697035,0.00013952004,0.000077025004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955136,0.0002730267,0.000053960423,0.00006196159,0.000042570915,0.000017125567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013757856,0.00066438684,0.00032807625,0.0014558058,0.0019321053,0.0033758488,0.00070536527,0.0024332171,0.0027787043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022842893,0.00034298905,0.0004709651,0.0012501755,0.034290172,0.0071016885,0.0013819298,0.0024516946,0.00079421856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021323867,9.0826217e-7,0.000020715546,0.0000057693223,8.6508436e-7,0.000009853965,0.0005924594,0.00007648401,0.00002015603,0.9974617,0.00061401527,0.001194967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041473845,0.0000054613233,0.000110799876,0.000039231705,0.0000026446385,0.00005353754,0.00023445154,0.00019072047,0.00013130897,0.94832575,0.050895344,0.0000065228296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003956762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027425142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003956762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034107117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012112838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024746537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013869377","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v8i3.4142","title":"Russell’s Use Theory of Meaning","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Utterance; sort; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.18146347687355693,"score_gpt":0.2609168037774762,"score_spread":0.07945332690391929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013869377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008927748,0.01229339,0.23672968,0.019476186,0.00085645006,0.00008179801,0.00031999784,0.00041629333,0.72089845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8229349,0.008262802,0.10159105,0.0061307554,0.0019959705,0.00043807307,0.00032770986,0.00051405694,0.057804555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99317944,0.0032384398,0.00034741714,0.0010027551,0.001826664,0.00040539954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808407,0.000994031,0.00013083169,0.0003231908,0.00036671522,0.00010110728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055689425,0.0011057219,0.0011217806,0.0047643166,0.0029588705,0.007264693,0.0022919737,0.0033954084,0.0034306538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005270646,0.0008403603,0.0013394917,0.0033551333,0.027613463,0.014910425,0.0034384094,0.005620463,0.0013088301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002326101,0.0000016369006,0.000014245902,0.000012524672,0.0000022583777,0.000009102599,0.00039978797,0.00006373978,0.000020793357,0.9973126,0.00079884235,0.0013620113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003936829,0.000005545522,0.00004551838,0.00002317038,0.000004288154,0.00004016868,0.00011692735,0.00027202893,0.00006383469,0.9789467,0.020471975,0.0000059300924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002914899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017614648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007264693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00476129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018352809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03454578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382334501","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v9i2.4029","title":"Transfinite Number in Wittgenstein's Tractatus","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Transfinite number; Construct (python library); Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.08586731756871553,"score_gpt":0.27293802248894894,"score_spread":0.18707070492023342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382334501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04876463,0.005196067,0.34737545,0.007264759,0.00052577676,0.000049393453,0.00027657836,0.0006605526,0.5898868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9070448,0.0019364896,0.044639066,0.001458368,0.00033220326,0.00016004313,0.00020982292,0.00040502998,0.04381416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987618,0.00050628505,0.0000708636,0.00026056205,0.00028994592,0.00011066569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993856,0.00029890248,0.00006126308,0.00012944273,0.00009328951,0.00003148721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016993573,0.00033566807,0.00036625055,0.0013538426,0.0021134114,0.0037481082,0.0005797725,0.0013764866,0.0049926485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029756355,0.00021545375,0.0006192612,0.0015044286,0.0112271905,0.008355375,0.0017904335,0.002200002,0.0011217138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029504938,8.2736614e-7,0.00001578541,0.000004283962,6.8122927e-7,0.000008540282,0.00019354315,0.000068064495,0.000032309963,0.9985341,0.00029078606,0.00084816513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002343821,0.00000567219,0.00006402055,0.000010263803,0.0000020839354,0.000043106153,0.000077836994,0.00043078643,0.00013749459,0.9794973,0.019723734,0.0000053598533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016451261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014080751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049926485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025402447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008210107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018430829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382619738","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v8i8.4451","title":"Fraser MacBride, On the Genealogy of Universals: The Metaphysical Origins of Analytic Philosophy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Problem of universals; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Analytic philosophy; Genealogy; History; Contemporary philosophy","score_opus":0.14126531556546254,"score_gpt":0.27200669899123386,"score_spread":0.13074138342577132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382619738","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006010576,0.8418523,0.0010124181,0.13564913,0.002613845,0.000011258648,0.00010915165,0.000022520011,0.018128283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03287579,0.90765214,0.0016917718,0.028017558,0.0071143396,0.00006307883,0.00012485393,0.000094179195,0.022366317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983006,0.0007807118,0.00008501182,0.00021995528,0.00053051935,0.00008326735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926944,0.0053958776,0.00020324811,0.00020460928,0.0013185804,0.00018331544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003486125,0.001073923,0.0011144775,0.003649855,0.004013029,0.0050251014,0.0019262816,0.0049171275,0.009172417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013185842,0.00087950693,0.00045319542,0.0044078734,0.016659806,0.019363457,0.0020605186,0.008472247,0.00220274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039627455,0.000022068707,0.00028170427,0.0006811752,0.000034735083,0.00015806932,0.0056010606,0.00029615423,0.0001405808,0.4059036,0.55189073,0.034950487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003152533,0.000010679248,0.0021781428,0.0023826875,0.000022627317,0.00023065868,0.0034429438,0.00014266849,0.0001985785,0.3321547,0.65915954,0.000045242567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058946922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10138197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058946922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056321686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005018337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11720759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382814509","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v10i5.4902","title":"Two Poles Worlds Apart","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Education and Cultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Narodowe Centrum Nauki","keywords":"Mainstream; Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Art history; Classics; History; Theology","score_opus":0.10972612725427167,"score_gpt":0.3644038900372326,"score_spread":0.25467776278296095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382814509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021009114,0.032126613,0.020929752,0.06621087,0.003831311,0.000076229226,0.000106835934,0.00025598804,0.85545325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7565088,0.022846362,0.007802453,0.02488186,0.0020606846,0.00025044015,0.00018137266,0.00060373376,0.1848643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700004,0.0014505356,0.00007255487,0.00042989655,0.000536001,0.0005110359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896884,0.0004367899,0.000079831334,0.00015631558,0.00013729362,0.00022101097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023044024,0.0009221173,0.00090286596,0.0022456143,0.009076821,0.01736096,0.00097140763,0.00447601,0.021978466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004069952,0.000648733,0.0005439309,0.0016046828,0.017441798,0.02230979,0.014022424,0.008094209,0.0066837943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027160559,0.000008431733,0.000098468096,0.000062427745,0.000004571514,0.00018687369,0.016311606,0.000033429318,0.000089230416,0.962933,0.009092064,0.011152855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012542332,0.00001432494,0.00019661126,0.000368997,0.0000059644826,0.00023528526,0.01670353,0.000083652594,0.0001124748,0.33479315,0.6474624,0.000011076837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021022193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028763628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021978466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004824165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003015534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07352531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385516657","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v11i3.5412","title":"Rules and Self-Citation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; License; Action (physics); Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09111233652279875,"score_gpt":0.27787415572574786,"score_spread":0.1867618192029491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385516657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047444914,0.009418258,0.18607375,0.076432034,0.0032471605,0.00015702832,0.00021710017,0.0007523295,0.6762574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9181939,0.003105765,0.020585923,0.004784068,0.0023224805,0.00019736323,0.00013559959,0.0003557057,0.050319202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989682,0.00429667,0.0008456326,0.0016185343,0.0028997946,0.0006572742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9627882,0.022382585,0.0026554812,0.0073052864,0.004153386,0.0007150297],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012269606,0.00035251808,0.00070299726,0.00342293,0.005132896,0.009795205,0.0030470614,0.004898314,0.007706885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04383523,0.00037653683,0.0008930648,0.0027717852,0.023438867,0.016882181,0.0049598794,0.0045162668,0.0021405292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036960964,0.000004456762,0.00010831688,0.000016850663,0.000002662879,0.000017863724,0.0011873377,0.00006290179,0.000020670295,0.99429893,0.0013276871,0.0029485635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070311235,0.000007050179,0.00009145777,0.00005300378,0.000004030248,0.000058341873,0.00043095034,0.00045513327,0.0002451847,0.9556126,0.043024212,0.000011037484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002297152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018499829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003396036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028155767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064888656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391664910","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v11i6.5380","title":"An Interpretation of the Gray's Elegy Argument","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; McMaster University","keywords":"Elegy; Gray (unit); Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Linguistics; Chemistry; Poetry; Medicine","score_opus":0.04890612467237474,"score_gpt":0.3342563286391657,"score_spread":0.28535020396679095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391664910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066991255,0.005720809,0.13221677,0.14640233,0.0026223676,0.00008222894,0.00026309444,0.00037473388,0.64532644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93584263,0.0011724127,0.0140918875,0.013657667,0.0013034767,0.00008289689,0.000082206454,0.00028256464,0.0334843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703574,0.0011823165,0.00008538041,0.00057116605,0.00085150823,0.0002739403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964424,0.00203934,0.00027447607,0.00048090797,0.0005342903,0.00022857261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044429516,0.0006504745,0.0006371281,0.0020017037,0.0033917523,0.0040528923,0.0013488553,0.00349458,0.008256571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010851499,0.00037951677,0.0007514639,0.0012344957,0.022813499,0.007829753,0.0062783393,0.0059052575,0.00079737854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006289488,0.0000033512408,0.00004712755,0.0000103934035,0.0000026014602,0.00004544135,0.00051407557,0.000053695076,0.00006307403,0.9964856,0.0016114039,0.0011569684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015577565,0.00001593375,0.0001430837,0.000034642337,0.000009700847,0.00008040265,0.0003365884,0.0004116574,0.00016353407,0.96543205,0.033348028,0.000008905675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024903067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001634612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008256571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035333314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018444055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02762103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}