{"meta":{"query_hash":"7a3616718fa3","filters":{"venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy"},"cohort_total":28,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":28,"exported":28,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7a3616718fa3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+for+the+History+of+Analytical+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W1023034389","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v2i5.41","title":"José L. Zalabardo (ed.), Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.05773464985225875,"score_gpt":0.2446517427807221,"score_spread":0.18691709292846337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1023034389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008070777,0.0044884374,0.001952146,0.052699193,0.01044262,0.0011173878,0.00017674713,0.0001765511,0.92087615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699854,0.00005219586,0.00017805948,0.0017001358,0.00941339,0.000035905407,0.0000074825903,0.000068519716,0.018558877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977316,0.000100711986,0.00086447905,0.00033510695,0.00056152366,0.00040656273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974755,0.0005333873,0.0005450008,0.0006436586,0.0005152331,0.00028719017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007021139,0.00033642695,0.0005514705,0.00023765182,0.00088360393,0.00009816275,0.000791149,0.0001075736,0.00087549665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015384296,0.00023671813,0.00080801843,0.000073743206,0.0014897982,0.0003283426,0.000061413906,0.0005538794,0.00020756683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015562604,0.00017294992,0.000011016968,0.000058286594,0.0002254862,0.0000020228883,0.0021682973,0.000027162063,0.000046154968,0.8926008,0.103838354,0.0006938685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065481465,0.00042807768,0.000032084874,0.000051340616,0.00025611246,0.000015855887,0.00005142062,0.0006059676,0.0000076753595,0.3776327,0.6200452,0.0002187813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022897622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004626553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96191466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026308422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012724166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9653085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1559823779","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v3i3.39","title":"American Pragmatism and the Vienna Circle: The Early Years","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Pragmatism; Empiricism; Period (music); Relation (database); Epistemology; Convergence (economics); Philosophy; Aesthetics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.061333317273882366,"score_gpt":0.25354523029002224,"score_spread":0.19221191301613988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1559823779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065265775,0.037783157,0.00050766795,0.17693958,0.022696873,0.0017709145,0.00009105738,0.000109731984,0.69483525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878374,0.00008693272,0.000023610186,0.0021214804,0.0019596252,0.0000115016455,4.6444148e-7,0.000018172846,0.007940833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857914,0.00014115049,0.00038225544,0.0001560542,0.0005154732,0.00022594567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983953,0.0005042117,0.00036461715,0.00033437874,0.00022990502,0.00017158763],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015647243,0.0001361512,0.00031491023,0.000105155545,0.0006786188,0.00009241447,0.00064567005,0.000021862099,0.00006394079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020878558,0.00006659162,0.00027377333,0.000063039144,0.007805247,0.0002177221,0.000055878234,0.0003880952,0.000023027447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002884481,0.00005457919,0.000010874286,0.000010958901,0.00012036437,0.000003826951,0.03923506,0.000008181932,0.0000020354855,0.85904074,0.098135084,0.003089837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008697221,0.0002284475,0.0003057369,0.000015693213,0.00017709097,0.000023018834,0.0009644791,0.0005808587,1.0264955e-7,0.23705143,0.75968075,0.00010265067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023412514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006496214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9225716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023749193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001919906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597121812","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v2i10.2424","title":"Pushing Wittgenstein and Quine Closer Together","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Quine; Philosophy; Epistemology; Naturalism; Grammar; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06509764413507453,"score_gpt":0.25010176801045997,"score_spread":0.18500412387538545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597121812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03659474,0.00736957,0.002771688,0.10363753,0.0063580647,0.0009446997,0.00007509768,0.00010892943,0.84213966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783876,0.000029656449,0.00017180793,0.001429858,0.0035881759,0.0000105214385,0.0000019781648,0.000028306471,0.01635209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900657,0.000048080783,0.00039455504,0.00015916616,0.00021202063,0.00017962058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988914,0.00034138316,0.00022320918,0.00024737074,0.0001725089,0.00012411186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005116591,0.00014830037,0.00026438286,0.00009663864,0.00045299134,0.000053070456,0.00024974457,0.000046771496,0.00031574644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090474285,0.00009715871,0.00022516823,0.00002617681,0.0008036199,0.00017155879,0.000031594405,0.0002546387,0.000018554128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006932527,0.00006211853,0.000008035679,0.00003435993,0.00010173674,6.0788443e-7,0.0029811803,0.000011764919,0.000087997374,0.96297187,0.032446057,0.0012249337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004012211,0.00018104074,0.000015997632,0.000026540805,0.00013228804,0.000012043652,0.000106103325,0.0009039688,0.000006366263,0.29506797,0.7030427,0.00010379465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011065827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009498546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94179285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008238172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003721215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3962017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1906870716","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v3i9.65","title":"Davidson on Practical Knowledge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Generality; Epistemology; Confusion; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Neglect; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.3285005292270333,"score_gpt":0.36358061654876184,"score_spread":0.035080087321728515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1906870716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005731725,0.002225921,0.00031165406,0.06824773,0.009353341,0.00022497581,0.000024336767,0.000034537465,0.9190043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97079474,0.0000330119,0.000060482824,0.0022568246,0.006223018,0.000007943816,0.0000024426574,0.00003579894,0.020585729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852794,0.00012909115,0.00046235186,0.00017319665,0.00046760865,0.00023980602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725735,0.00130064,0.00023779488,0.00029102282,0.00058434653,0.00032883388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016277214,0.00017669937,0.00032883367,0.00014319463,0.00029001103,0.00004641108,0.00033903297,0.00009361463,0.00039690055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011248394,0.00010705236,0.0004043762,0.00003352516,0.001278287,0.00017381889,0.000045819394,0.00082856236,0.00017020576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050413015,0.00033438677,5.122425e-7,0.000021553264,0.00010878488,0.0000073669253,0.003355257,0.000012876961,0.0000023414989,0.8652065,0.13018137,0.0002649536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044795944,0.00050186657,7.331143e-7,0.00002722355,0.00009275178,0.000011912081,0.00010311703,0.00078521564,0.0000012031273,0.5025919,0.49535772,0.00007837139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000051389848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053360204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9702216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004387415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044610616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47099018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982487169","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v2i5.40","title":"Ernst Mally’s Anticipation of Encoding","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Encoding (memory); Object (grammar); Class (philosophy); Subject (documents); Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09641324690311019,"score_gpt":0.2715803223288513,"score_spread":0.17516707542574111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982487169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020577036,0.0023428213,0.0017722937,0.0064105256,0.013334095,0.00032410666,0.000035553076,0.00003892445,0.9551647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898442,0.00002667298,0.00007679265,0.00035044563,0.0022043518,0.0000026905702,0.000001353652,0.0000140310385,0.007479456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986859,0.000052715284,0.00053137395,0.00013838551,0.00040591462,0.00018572882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986233,0.00029248625,0.0004356495,0.00022574388,0.00032226232,0.00010053784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087709154,0.00012505191,0.00031787486,0.00023259205,0.00038077807,0.00002050575,0.00040922058,0.00003381344,0.00044151882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019177744,0.0000861334,0.00035898408,0.00003723679,0.0012506364,0.00023258287,0.000023723522,0.00019977108,0.000013329672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001014288,0.00011560564,0.00002630086,0.00007716179,0.00006348623,7.5474065e-7,0.0053585237,0.00009292706,0.00027420555,0.96889716,0.02441974,0.00057269476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005098823,0.0004035836,0.00008884986,0.00007295648,0.00020979614,0.0000048625593,0.00017686005,0.0064305114,0.000016937518,0.13423227,0.8577026,0.00015085487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027228514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020483407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9692672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024458303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000113142865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4834321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998274712","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v2i3.21","title":"On the Paradox of Gestalt Switches: Wittgenstein’s Response to Kohler","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Calgary","funders":"Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London; King's College London","keywords":"Gestalt psychology; Nothing; Appeal; Epistemology; Philosophy; Perception; Cognitive science; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08324922563821739,"score_gpt":0.25537026475398983,"score_spread":0.17212103911577242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998274712","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3098674,0.0015992281,0.0005814684,0.42425156,0.004136128,0.0031580469,0.00017939243,0.00007181845,0.25615495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799357,0.000008268791,0.000053225893,0.0027916427,0.0009466171,0.000063574626,9.424018e-7,0.000027237767,0.016172778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850404,0.00009326868,0.0006047025,0.00017416399,0.00039827163,0.00022556845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705285,0.0015119889,0.00033616158,0.0005268804,0.0004114403,0.00016067411],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007172516,0.00018692919,0.00031930124,0.00016149336,0.00044042128,0.000043537853,0.00057988876,0.000051161674,0.0014857523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029699862,0.000099927165,0.00042176645,0.00007010899,0.0008144368,0.00012623916,0.000039223647,0.0003168465,0.00019365965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006587721,0.00016891505,0.0000013875108,0.00002100747,0.00014464073,7.5560484e-7,0.005357129,0.00006836512,0.00054445025,0.79881763,0.19397594,0.0002410269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004065874,0.0008159908,0.0000770427,0.00007999045,0.00013907452,0.000007949392,0.0005871831,0.00029295767,0.0000698831,0.45631847,0.5410417,0.00016317156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002271398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033526885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6700683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017543943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000118587785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036359931","doi":"10.4148/jhap.v2i1.1709","title":"WHAT DID RUSSELL LEARN FROM LEIBNIZ?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Philosophy; Hegelianism; Griffin; Intellect; Dialectic; Epistemology; Theology; Classics; History","score_opus":0.07000538672030356,"score_gpt":0.24684246444577218,"score_spread":0.17683707772546864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036359931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02471212,0.042828992,0.00034150714,0.06083839,0.06880031,0.0011341821,0.000096542746,0.00015078597,0.80109715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88253814,0.00045627405,0.00009011016,0.0030451003,0.008308863,0.000020779245,0.0000072066946,0.00004870411,0.10548483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982284,0.000061020062,0.0005798797,0.00026291818,0.0005356533,0.0003321445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982406,0.00040137616,0.00034466313,0.00039115525,0.0003747155,0.00024752828],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040198548,0.00022632076,0.00041401177,0.00020973322,0.0007195868,0.00022363395,0.00074436923,0.00005996923,0.0057972847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008540152,0.00014879297,0.00056526915,0.000043377688,0.0018165538,0.0012934499,0.000048190475,0.0004577425,0.00045446286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011748438,0.00026151788,0.000015121555,0.000034977886,0.00022798074,0.0000059225094,0.014633772,0.00002859752,0.00012089027,0.45761678,0.52482605,0.0021108782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035592366,0.00016103337,0.00003807963,0.000044397053,0.00013134348,0.0000043463483,0.00069472374,0.00085150095,0.0000029385385,0.28311238,0.7144394,0.00016391586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023864112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048884544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.857826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047505737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017050665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086990893","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v2i6.47","title":"Early Russell on Types and Plurals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Epistemology; Aside; Class (philosophy); Philosophy; Abandonment (legal); Linguistics; Reflexive pronoun; Law","score_opus":0.060290304298173336,"score_gpt":0.24700248444801992,"score_spread":0.18671218014984658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086990893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024151463,0.0037070413,0.00012165143,0.01295377,0.008217854,0.00025719404,0.000024668452,0.000042754637,0.9505236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96861523,0.00004362195,0.000029182756,0.0014117459,0.002762891,0.0000030101867,5.97864e-7,0.000016868169,0.027116876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989841,0.00004573449,0.00030992963,0.00016357984,0.0003074146,0.00018926928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896044,0.00035807805,0.0001899178,0.000203589,0.00014458311,0.00014339076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005494959,0.00014039315,0.00026813117,0.00017453995,0.0005061681,0.00004632672,0.00029886223,0.000033726054,0.00030194374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001107226,0.00008805918,0.00022053826,0.000023336308,0.0012788867,0.00017129014,0.000019666275,0.00024652336,0.00004602659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012767542,0.00006493688,0.000006548639,0.000024727251,0.000051599392,0.0000011120909,0.0036813135,0.000010563831,0.000020119349,0.9394938,0.055807043,0.00071059534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033014073,0.0004891611,0.00006192506,0.000028309385,0.00009247942,0.0000049060213,0.000043263757,0.00061863055,0.0000018422405,0.22144948,0.7767718,0.00010810068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020867068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009191064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94446373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016475967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005658144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47121114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091657296","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v2i8.971","title":"Bentham’s Contextualism and Its Relation to Analytic Philosophy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Historical Philosophy and Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Quine; Philosophy; Epistemology; Empiricism; Relation (database); Philosophy of language; Analytic philosophy; Naturalism; Narrative; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Contemporary philosophy; Metaphysics; Linguistics; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.09759828300321263,"score_gpt":0.2650578147840869,"score_spread":0.16745953178087428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091657296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015552545,0.009228491,0.0051653143,0.122040614,0.01791246,0.0015215221,0.000102396996,0.00013701899,0.82833964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859695,0.000023962932,0.000060299488,0.0023662464,0.0028638092,0.000008777923,0.0000018772587,0.00002271273,0.008682856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981565,0.00009564293,0.00063888,0.0002982772,0.00052365207,0.00028703772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980403,0.00063056167,0.0003007685,0.0002737442,0.00039919827,0.00035542864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010116949,0.00021895762,0.00043441282,0.00029136523,0.0006979423,0.000055961853,0.00044145473,0.00007108413,0.00031687363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064846367,0.0001506571,0.00032548848,0.00009349485,0.0006272006,0.00034166992,0.00005243258,0.00035343884,0.00005605408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013944981,0.00007161595,0.0000040936734,0.00004160477,0.00006488764,0.0000012988494,0.0042157113,0.000082367435,0.000041825235,0.97142386,0.023545064,0.00036823936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005034904,0.0005741707,0.00004863653,0.00005653479,0.0001721729,0.000010529376,0.000057879013,0.0076699723,0.000002181321,0.36869597,0.6220096,0.00019891898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011392064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000066652174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9704169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037637568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006842916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6143618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345931439","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v2i9.2298","title":"Bipolarity and Sense in the Tractatus","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0778688509778052,"score_gpt":0.25792311023261905,"score_spread":0.18005425925481383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345931439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082260795,0.010625897,0.0007758448,0.22214358,0.004492351,0.0013680339,0.00011595456,0.000054336957,0.67816323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99563605,0.000034796827,0.00003569356,0.0014062114,0.001491618,0.000007325341,0.0000011165055,0.00000896543,0.0013782487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920356,0.000081440434,0.00029930053,0.00010273728,0.00017775601,0.00013517817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988793,0.00064531126,0.00013883664,0.0002003921,0.000079077225,0.00005706139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074760895,0.00009701724,0.00017424554,0.00008238881,0.0003462609,0.00004257823,0.00019333037,0.00003393033,0.000070271424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009926799,0.000052577678,0.00015656912,0.000030536125,0.00070656167,0.00010847678,0.0000132327195,0.0003248748,0.000006217672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060484585,0.00009685523,0.000011411049,0.000020003512,0.000028676122,0.0000014219322,0.0055978876,0.0000048581805,0.000011515971,0.97761315,0.015794473,0.000759282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002926692,0.0001251842,0.00017186528,0.0000115228995,0.00007189939,0.000024561203,0.00020625959,0.00083941757,6.96774e-7,0.3470514,0.6511453,0.000059233942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023373668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024164836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91337526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005595846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003164446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2663194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412287738","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v4i5.2946","title":"The Subterranean Influence of Pragmatism on the Vienna Circle: Peirce, Ramsey, Wittgenstein","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Path (computing); Art history; Art","score_opus":0.06584189367175726,"score_gpt":0.2543744801365697,"score_spread":0.18853258646481247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412287738","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32078302,0.007737454,0.00069283275,0.420312,0.016540026,0.0020361333,0.0001728119,0.00007978531,0.23164596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992139,0.0001732712,0.000009315415,0.00091876043,0.0013143765,0.000019329764,7.08117e-7,0.000020986472,0.0054042833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998263,0.0001675341,0.0006831019,0.00015163439,0.000481,0.00025375083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959885,0.0023882003,0.0006437857,0.0005331181,0.00035864796,0.000087737266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013036333,0.00017233667,0.00026514605,0.00009301645,0.00093461975,0.00004642159,0.0007796365,0.000052003015,0.00029317723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005896236,0.00007016494,0.00033788866,0.000049885355,0.0020105776,0.0002494741,0.00003870081,0.0002975998,0.000035326342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022380926,0.00010376044,0.000006944333,0.0000384937,0.00016318963,8.4849046e-7,0.005322813,0.000024999377,0.00018383125,0.9508008,0.039277565,0.0038529593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048585722,0.00043882424,0.0004975697,0.0002744779,0.00016391554,0.000016325115,0.00032661366,0.00015578614,0.00003969535,0.62642616,0.3710285,0.00014627984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015572983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000101754185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67135596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021839427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015526082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7408057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2574063561","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v5i1.2957","title":"“The Tragedy of Verbal Metaphysics” by Leon Chwistek","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Education and Cultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie","keywords":"Metaphysics; Philosophy; Tragedy (event); Phenomenology (philosophy); Humanities; Literature; Epistemology; Art","score_opus":0.10774099453798029,"score_gpt":0.36832711613877483,"score_spread":0.26058612160079453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2574063561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015398274,0.028787812,0.00017741464,0.21936457,0.014225853,0.0006223717,0.0000366327,0.000023539526,0.72136354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633462,0.00069162797,0.000013671544,0.00015636712,0.00075743167,0.00000401595,4.4842346e-7,0.000005259121,0.035025015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999048,0.0000723542,0.0002682238,0.000076494536,0.00038019705,0.0001547621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867755,0.00031487603,0.0004630673,0.0002046484,0.00025562965,0.00008420117],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000864637,0.00007355874,0.00019321032,0.000014893255,0.0024940474,0.0000436504,0.00064931833,0.000035685694,0.000046065794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005415276,0.00003931504,0.0003391939,0.00003454784,0.0018166937,0.00015057449,0.000022417942,0.00017021885,0.000003766018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011273107,0.0001444101,0.00010711413,0.00001777018,0.00035804565,4.198552e-7,0.00885229,0.0000015728172,0.00014135058,0.49578327,0.48888814,0.005592883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023015798,0.000074506024,0.00038446966,0.000012876615,0.00015005261,5.629552e-7,0.0021212504,0.000016826685,0.000013421095,0.06582408,0.9311106,0.00006116975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000115313116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042252672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9479479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022341029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013002807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99880457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606728466","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v5i4.2963","title":"On Operator N and Wittgenstein’s Logical Philosophy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Epistemology; Philosophy; Completeness (order theory); Logical consequence; Operator (biology); Reading (process); Analytic philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.12398411497059898,"score_gpt":0.28626748582688655,"score_spread":0.16228337085628758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606728466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021043193,0.003244394,0.00014090339,0.10777649,0.005956567,0.0009184086,0.00018443738,0.00006206779,0.86067355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98459023,0.00007251987,0.000063182764,0.0016566213,0.0037897544,0.000021380478,0.000002298111,0.00002946731,0.009774539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986484,0.000037894555,0.00047399098,0.00026855947,0.0003301645,0.0002409641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981086,0.00033047542,0.0004367748,0.00066004705,0.00024938086,0.00021472605],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003812564,0.00023467652,0.00038673682,0.0001085715,0.0020782102,0.00019416293,0.0006954416,0.00007929087,0.00040807275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002190197,0.00014761447,0.00035175146,0.000013767289,0.00228231,0.00027746675,0.00007823386,0.00041174577,0.000045973215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022672904,0.00015261167,0.000007647676,0.0000325908,0.00013733609,0.0000062612285,0.00096451765,0.000008737309,0.000026135272,0.9605772,0.037406445,0.00045376777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079007045,0.0005253493,0.00006179771,0.00007147416,0.00015797751,0.000019393097,0.000050767958,0.00036379573,0.0000067236874,0.5971489,0.40062383,0.00017992944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009440162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004015916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96354705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013873728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008237438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616329343","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v5i5.3206","title":"Ryle on the Explanatory Role of Knowledge How","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Åbo Akademi; Universitetet i Oslo; Université de Montréal","keywords":"Intellectualism; Epistemology; Possession (linguistics); Framing (construction); Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Sociology; Linguistics; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.18700933372943965,"score_gpt":0.30468931881527667,"score_spread":0.11767998508583702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616329343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013306586,0.009008215,0.000056896817,0.04817478,0.010770414,0.00040285502,0.000073376475,0.00001918081,0.9181877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655019,0.00006292097,0.000009888239,0.0003882981,0.0022345204,0.0000050610392,6.2635837e-7,0.000017068005,0.031779703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911845,0.00008855229,0.00028443252,0.00011316235,0.0002353232,0.00016007994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770725,0.0007880811,0.0005541436,0.0005489896,0.0003324217,0.00006911367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094233244,0.00012953785,0.00032051292,0.000070857706,0.0009786519,0.000045256398,0.00074381335,0.00006172398,0.00017864144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039766534,0.00006872226,0.00048157657,0.0000080381915,0.0023687985,0.00013474566,0.000043931588,0.00045988854,0.000015270121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009302829,0.00013443247,0.000013320337,0.000042846303,0.00019262951,0.0000010495959,0.005970489,0.0000019801066,0.00004658049,0.9124932,0.08060264,0.00040777697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002559034,0.00023521564,0.000054759825,0.000048060418,0.00016079661,0.0000022410663,0.0007510958,0.00020923809,0.00004046217,0.32501063,0.6731575,0.000074056086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014320781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034246073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95219535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011026263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012731859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8727937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791915364","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v6i4.3018","title":"Why “is at”? —On Quine’s Objection to Carnap’s Aufbau in “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Quine; Epistemology; Empiricism; Philosophy; Reductionism","score_opus":0.08484851059869275,"score_gpt":0.3062632904374991,"score_spread":0.22141477983880636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791915364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095780335,0.0019159999,0.00019702924,0.033712853,0.020322487,0.0007842088,0.00011504135,0.00004922924,0.8471228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759464,0.000015904032,0.00003723326,0.0060708327,0.0035248394,0.000007916874,0.0000011937464,0.000024890587,0.014370764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981465,0.00006135906,0.00066384964,0.00026548022,0.0005693156,0.00029353175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850523,0.00019453543,0.00034338006,0.0003514149,0.00042520955,0.00018019558],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006699677,0.00019989163,0.0004281866,0.0006297068,0.00047717322,0.000020341899,0.0004799083,0.000042963904,0.0010451704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011796496,0.00014327848,0.00039145187,0.00012940374,0.0014370087,0.0001925414,0.000049923736,0.00027880643,0.00006543153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011909917,0.00038081766,0.0000755737,0.00006039989,0.00011304941,0.0000065960967,0.03738942,0.000087306886,0.00039469666,0.2328796,0.72697014,0.0004513854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078971154,0.0013125496,0.000113128546,0.0000867348,0.000098884,0.000009061205,0.0002306428,0.00049904664,0.0000625156,0.058511216,0.93809843,0.00018805392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036080112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012901627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8801661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012224636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016817899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803293235","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v6i6.3234","title":"Roman Ingarden’s “The Logical Attempt at a New Formulation of Philosophy: A Critical Remark”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Statement (logic); Philosophy; German; Epistemology; German philosophy; Classics; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10884019230058882,"score_gpt":0.2915171479133399,"score_spread":0.18267695561275105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803293235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019406112,0.008048271,0.0013917389,0.09695949,0.019286232,0.0011297046,0.0001084257,0.00010765708,0.85356236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973153,0.000023910865,0.00013000776,0.0015696152,0.00880245,0.000006855977,0.0000028623072,0.000030047519,0.01628127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741876,0.000113726586,0.0009235304,0.00031171346,0.000840871,0.00039137734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729455,0.0007835246,0.0004832552,0.0005121103,0.0006489031,0.00027765293],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010531032,0.00026722992,0.0005275272,0.00025083806,0.0013117492,0.000046688023,0.0008518534,0.00012171191,0.0019576563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005667759,0.00015742957,0.00071918324,0.00008474714,0.004502201,0.00033986734,0.00011598913,0.00054955913,0.00006644569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057155377,0.000156711,0.00002025111,0.00006292871,0.00010802772,0.0000041051985,0.00679003,0.0000065518375,0.00009421729,0.80377,0.18822265,0.00019294678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000542564,0.00079386303,0.00008718036,0.00007706066,0.0002537145,0.00003398538,0.00010126903,0.0011328766,0.000008946592,0.4015386,0.59525794,0.00017199524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005641114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011988333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95374686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085363036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033874068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804199312","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v6i6.3233","title":"Verification: The Hysteron Proteron Argument","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy, Science, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Positivism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Argument map; Sociology; Argumentation theory","score_opus":0.09114550703331133,"score_gpt":0.26821347944404783,"score_spread":0.17706797241073652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804199312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071951747,0.006567282,0.00091070245,0.07129641,0.032130186,0.0015008047,0.00004963339,0.00007977115,0.88027006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955297,0.000022517599,0.000041179974,0.0015487076,0.00801837,0.00002718528,0.0000014084961,0.000018859066,0.035024777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986473,0.00006237126,0.0004345808,0.00018113048,0.00044982418,0.00022484726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868244,0.00013275715,0.0003181124,0.00041489242,0.0003519235,0.000099899444],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076280924,0.00014803906,0.00021184623,0.00010781661,0.0011681071,0.00006244708,0.00068969675,0.000030395906,0.0008071937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056533194,0.00007852225,0.00028819146,0.00003889223,0.0029838998,0.00022235954,0.000032465312,0.00025222794,0.00010159973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023239058,0.00015648302,0.000003944607,0.000037679038,0.00011037066,0.0000013076741,0.015549991,0.000005668733,0.000092522474,0.6943143,0.2884398,0.0010555277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029260066,0.0004773066,0.000027998185,0.000027911681,0.00011216986,0.000009009279,0.00023831586,0.00050297286,0.000009849049,0.08766785,0.91053003,0.000103952494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018130282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023938252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9481018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049372425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015518464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935779267","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v7i2.3484","title":"Davidson’s Meta-Normative Naturalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Naturalism; Holism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Realism; Section (typography); Computer science","score_opus":0.09785169156550004,"score_gpt":0.3339332810371495,"score_spread":0.23608158947164942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935779267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005568012,0.0095151,0.001268361,0.030063547,0.015306387,0.0006435997,0.000049712035,0.00004140805,0.93754387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97662896,0.000015017251,0.00012983261,0.0019994292,0.00058966345,0.000013420391,0.0000013325252,0.000016850954,0.020605503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823797,0.0001667309,0.00052576844,0.00025149516,0.00047009173,0.0003479751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977624,0.0010316898,0.0003338169,0.00046110968,0.00020207441,0.00020895242],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011668663,0.00019925521,0.0005256893,0.00012927665,0.00015028783,0.000015397456,0.00080874027,0.00012049847,0.0047987895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017738994,0.00010993317,0.0009240453,0.00016935417,0.0008316225,0.00020887773,0.000056763125,0.0006104787,0.0004443594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033068442,0.00011892953,0.000010294918,0.00001523482,0.001135072,0.0000060429566,0.00095887034,0.000019492176,0.000053534375,0.9647196,0.03241371,0.0002185556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075583084,0.0004163348,0.00022884323,0.000013768359,0.0011089493,0.00007198196,0.000061532664,0.00058947434,0.000007964553,0.79145664,0.2051201,0.0001685803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007133064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.072326e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97106093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028476282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000730091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936876674","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v7i2.3487","title":"Davidson’s Answer to Kripke’s Sceptic","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Skepticism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Spell; Possible world; Expression (computer science); Linguistics; Computer science; Theology","score_opus":0.07046300645665159,"score_gpt":0.2634671555289809,"score_spread":0.19300414907232932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936876674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026675634,0.0019110681,0.00054038945,0.08722548,0.013990183,0.0016421196,0.00014032953,0.000084542706,0.8677902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8966767,0.000009816831,0.00014019299,0.0027160747,0.0032405998,0.000020407468,0.0000030445747,0.000031531174,0.09716159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987912,0.000026549726,0.00044531302,0.00019447326,0.00030949162,0.00023295602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987498,0.00022063646,0.00018299998,0.00039661018,0.0002668915,0.00018308287],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031227333,0.00016157159,0.0002968607,0.00015725785,0.0002915585,0.000048954622,0.00047114675,0.000044905242,0.0027139767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049106467,0.00010915296,0.00040019662,0.00005107003,0.000352798,0.00017113582,0.000036551683,0.00026769564,0.00073421927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116216885,0.00011258215,0.000011485285,0.000035762405,0.00011282124,0.0000010864683,0.003929336,0.000063626656,0.00011001345,0.77893144,0.21624398,0.00033167104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039143907,0.00034093877,0.000029173721,0.00003909743,0.00012836483,0.000008280488,0.00018166778,0.00035590108,0.000005149294,0.12209894,0.8762755,0.00014558493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000074393897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005049553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8700011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025497293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103222555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940015673","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v7i2.3882","title":"Donald Davidson: Looking Back, Looking Forward (Volume Introduction)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of compositionality; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Normative; Skepticism; Hundredth; Proposition; Philosophy of language; Philosophy; Sociology; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.03561882285118454,"score_gpt":0.24757738075972957,"score_spread":0.21195855790854504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940015673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014312208,0.008568387,0.0018763555,0.20696774,0.07988468,0.0013400043,0.00006451059,0.000108327404,0.6868778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8674411,0.000062615814,0.00022440036,0.0015405209,0.019899385,0.000012120256,0.0000143748475,0.00004915795,0.1107563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983609,0.00006153016,0.0006247474,0.00024208626,0.00042151942,0.0002892165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984679,0.0002606927,0.00044591862,0.0003780143,0.00032891706,0.00011852978],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007421865,0.0002039958,0.00036834486,0.0002067072,0.00043605207,0.00008589772,0.00043599616,0.000070042166,0.007743692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011156661,0.00014859108,0.00046634878,0.000052370764,0.00048571892,0.0005839214,0.000043580567,0.0004784707,0.00051061815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001714003,0.00012122292,0.000048431877,0.00012539736,0.00022368901,0.000001012341,0.004689338,0.0001739748,0.000026322145,0.65018976,0.34337047,0.00085899717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040969922,0.00019959499,0.00002884417,0.000059239617,0.00018127839,0.000026428823,0.000284062,0.0014967568,0.0000045302263,0.22348465,0.77366495,0.0001599825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001234852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000039418765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8531289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000509628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001501713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99316335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982075692","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v7i6.4041","title":"Steven Methven, Frank Ramsey and the Realistic Spirit","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06134845670814749,"score_gpt":0.2633295546944678,"score_spread":0.2019810979863203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982075692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01612148,0.029603086,0.00081570813,0.27534902,0.027127909,0.0019323376,0.00010951154,0.000063618856,0.6488773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774555,0.00016563127,0.00005332224,0.0020791427,0.0025656524,0.000013257024,0.0000037068503,0.000021129837,0.017642679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988847,0.000110025474,0.000433793,0.00013284774,0.00027306454,0.00016559513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981191,0.0010447793,0.00029744295,0.00028476742,0.00017615619,0.00007772175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011024266,0.00013603146,0.0003203168,0.00008655317,0.00039071174,0.000060351413,0.0003298938,0.000047107842,0.00075842056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002099262,0.000071432034,0.00027610853,0.000027739949,0.001114278,0.00019242361,0.00003309146,0.00034288553,0.00003615716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032155443,0.000045889556,0.000007696808,0.00006671917,0.00016359963,5.803116e-7,0.0057254676,0.000018204404,0.000002607938,0.9407605,0.052350692,0.00053648074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090666243,0.00011382219,0.000036446356,0.00003791112,0.0002426668,0.0000128283145,0.00027692766,0.0013691065,4.892875e-7,0.5491784,0.4477459,0.0000788646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000066012886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006161366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.961334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013117441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009339637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83041734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989871563","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v7i7.3932","title":"“Die Maschine als Symbol ihrer Wirkungsweise”: Wittgenstein, Reuleaux and Kinematics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Analogy; Temptation; Philosophy; Epistemology; Symbol (formal); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05394800044472965,"score_gpt":0.2495133056554814,"score_spread":0.19556530521075177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989871563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15067159,0.019717682,0.00057550886,0.08633058,0.010421907,0.003161258,0.00028431238,0.00016780177,0.72866935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528955,0.00015978626,0.00026762128,0.0014059809,0.0025101763,0.000018454813,0.0000067316873,0.00005078058,0.042684942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984512,0.000041863077,0.0006684895,0.00023240095,0.0003522641,0.0002538017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983008,0.0003792236,0.00040077535,0.00044254863,0.00030372196,0.0001729621],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044198043,0.00023797096,0.0004805325,0.00015547393,0.0003938277,0.00006559236,0.00036980823,0.00007332105,0.00093410484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007567185,0.00015733395,0.00035362708,0.000040062943,0.0007566011,0.00023497725,0.00005672647,0.00037596375,0.000095574476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001604462,0.00015584056,0.000023009536,0.00020930366,0.00032761556,0.0000038998537,0.0043009296,0.000044894725,0.0002642494,0.9494449,0.04470155,0.00036335347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010238427,0.00040075998,0.000038540988,0.00011658016,0.00042753405,0.00003709517,0.00042714024,0.0021603853,0.000018487846,0.33104977,0.6640316,0.00026826025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000074125583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004033871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8022239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001300968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000087479886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013869377","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v8i3.4142","title":"Russell’s Use Theory of Meaning","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Utterance; sort; Philosophy; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.18146347687355693,"score_gpt":0.2609168037774762,"score_spread":0.07945332690391929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013869377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010674854,0.0065882965,0.006919743,0.12374316,0.005629287,0.0013742078,0.00042585388,0.00013956228,0.844505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922249,0.000027238792,0.00014632246,0.0015217377,0.0020115373,0.000004669539,0.000002164568,0.000021857042,0.0040396294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989593,0.000050014394,0.00049679267,0.00012515912,0.00023470637,0.00013405205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985265,0.000560837,0.00034529262,0.0001938874,0.000243271,0.00013022684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028987537,0.00012299108,0.00028816628,0.000067533845,0.00024372726,0.000025982552,0.00034413429,0.000035405545,0.00062916504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018919531,0.000082337494,0.00041203393,0.00004101178,0.00077627995,0.00020554595,0.00002897856,0.0002460057,0.00001612764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021068445,0.00006754493,0.0000033658687,0.00004885075,0.00017000304,0.0000012584305,0.009891947,0.00004426332,0.00010170423,0.95628375,0.032919206,0.0002574443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033077283,0.00022506957,0.000006415926,0.000027849455,0.00025017065,0.000003793074,0.00034491805,0.0006962575,0.000025364625,0.43454802,0.56344867,0.00009270243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000036001843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.002716e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000656085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007956033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6888916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382334501","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v9i2.4029","title":"Transfinite Number in Wittgenstein's Tractatus","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Transfinite number; Construct (python library); Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.08586731756871553,"score_gpt":0.27293802248894894,"score_spread":0.18707070492023342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382334501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016383369,0.0059440928,0.00038841701,0.051993985,0.005160586,0.0005042175,0.00014613687,0.000043549444,0.9194356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762074,0.00010137474,0.00012192839,0.000986504,0.0018362525,0.000017193863,0.0000070617475,0.000027399896,0.020694882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986937,0.00005525275,0.00057261146,0.00018334782,0.000262909,0.00023220325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988127,0.00035857185,0.00016878685,0.00026525639,0.00027975548,0.000114936585],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029135266,0.00015493383,0.00031973852,0.00009393245,0.00025438415,0.00004007189,0.000250421,0.000058812835,0.0017501512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006619382,0.00011499593,0.00044292564,0.00007879076,0.0005633425,0.0001837576,0.000014292728,0.00040256517,0.000050597642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012439849,0.00031620325,0.000018969391,0.000049537797,0.00012465041,0.000031507876,0.0057745064,0.00004327602,0.00008607659,0.9643922,0.028297355,0.00074134173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007581636,0.00006696082,0.000044871493,0.000044384084,0.00013455526,0.000052546162,0.0003614511,0.00029296905,0.000020334122,0.25418875,0.74389833,0.00013667525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011618382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035323847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.959824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019001284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022649014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382619738","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v8i8.4451","title":"Fraser MacBride, On the Genealogy of Universals: The Metaphysical Origins of Analytic Philosophy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Problem of universals; Metaphysics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Analytic philosophy; Genealogy; History; Contemporary philosophy","score_opus":0.14126531556546254,"score_gpt":0.27200669899123386,"score_spread":0.13074138342577132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382619738","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10003444,0.008995794,0.000947173,0.542758,0.00919628,0.0018094224,0.00031326743,0.00006094488,0.33588466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99151415,0.00007804341,0.000015977188,0.004521264,0.0020756603,0.00000309248,0.0000015128436,0.000017387945,0.0017729133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817795,0.00011515263,0.0006259101,0.00018900436,0.0006752264,0.00021678438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763083,0.00093758194,0.0005652045,0.00036343213,0.00034541253,0.0001575485],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073593203,0.00018554607,0.00054947427,0.00013842245,0.00038262882,0.000009772051,0.0008918116,0.000042155236,0.0009013862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002797942,0.0000843441,0.00067953713,0.00013867217,0.0037576645,0.00012639721,0.000040150633,0.00045099948,0.000018418406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036552764,0.00014759963,0.000006469613,0.00006411983,0.00036216632,0.0000053812278,0.007426451,0.00016048111,0.00019096864,0.89260614,0.098451816,0.00021287834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007095406,0.0012451257,0.000020375679,0.000071387636,0.000786002,0.0000032709202,0.0014909623,0.0030681156,0.00007089494,0.047644973,0.94476455,0.00012480016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047538484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010073666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89147973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000256195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002463934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382814509","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v10i5.4902","title":"Two Poles Worlds Apart","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Education and Cultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Narodowe Centrum Nauki","keywords":"Mainstream; Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Art history; Classics; History; Theology","score_opus":0.10972612725427167,"score_gpt":0.3644038900372326,"score_spread":0.25467776278296095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382814509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007089892,0.016265556,0.00008146126,0.2933002,0.0146552855,0.00041705652,0.000018190143,0.000046121884,0.6681262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89766574,0.00014967045,0.0000689125,0.0024211407,0.0017313297,0.000019034649,9.686344e-7,0.000007803696,0.09793541],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989667,0.00012640891,0.0002169645,0.00008092099,0.00044632514,0.00016267804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930394,0.00022750467,0.00015306748,0.00008494406,0.00013250417,0.00009806037],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085010316,0.00006169898,0.0001402678,0.00005557303,0.0017914062,0.000013320217,0.00033706304,0.0000135613145,0.0014177503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017046947,0.000042120024,0.00024746865,0.00014321551,0.0005004938,0.00007045734,0.000040974755,0.00023493686,0.000007955624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055549706,0.00010347336,0.00013072212,0.000004211441,0.00008792845,8.845833e-7,0.009734653,0.000059991715,0.000009690569,0.4916674,0.4975051,0.0006404181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020002248,0.00005965478,0.00009237622,0.0000034530635,0.000062632476,0.000003186507,0.006861973,0.00003679027,4.2151694e-7,0.06486089,0.9277603,0.00005831175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009695355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053588723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8905758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008068672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023867744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385516657","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v11i3.5412","title":"Rules and Self-Citation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Skepticism; Epistemology; License; Action (physics); Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09111233652279875,"score_gpt":0.27787415572574786,"score_spread":0.1867618192029491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385516657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16930619,0.015342908,0.0007338931,0.18745674,0.04721476,0.0014216342,0.00019018774,0.00055642606,0.57777727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856969,0.00030870817,0.00015065492,0.0005049942,0.0031164594,0.0000132067935,0.000010353001,0.00001979662,0.01017894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932307,0.00003093851,0.00026042422,0.0000863324,0.00017784667,0.00012138251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991503,0.00039455522,0.00014867402,0.000104749415,0.00013876564,0.00006300882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046128867,0.00008155407,0.00013611974,0.00016974396,0.00037405864,0.000036404508,0.0001292771,0.0000290366,0.00016282912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001117697,0.000055622346,0.000121500045,0.000035507343,0.00031751703,0.00020969057,0.000015996775,0.00013397317,0.000044884215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031857166,0.000053808475,0.0000059131307,0.000056355948,0.00008458239,9.028871e-7,0.01142931,0.00001034296,0.00000533235,0.8637549,0.123759426,0.0008072692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018430366,0.00009350141,0.00014914556,0.00001902888,0.00010354475,0.0000061635415,0.00032109037,0.0023877819,7.221625e-7,0.5855104,0.41116497,0.000059342347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005957281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017575476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8163907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011069812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006127818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28769946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391664910","doi":"10.15173/jhap.v11i6.5380","title":"An Interpretation of the Gray's Elegy Argument","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and Theoretical Science","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; McMaster University","keywords":"Elegy; Gray (unit); Argument (complex analysis); Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy; Linguistics; Chemistry; Poetry; Medicine","score_opus":0.04890612467237474,"score_gpt":0.3342563286391657,"score_spread":0.28535020396679095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391664910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21569645,0.0032963033,0.019278383,0.08587274,0.04678346,0.0020869193,0.0001472277,0.00018866328,0.62664986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976647,0.000009624625,0.000028126102,0.0004514424,0.00037397596,0.0000081248445,0.0000010324352,0.000011037187,0.0014519504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858534,0.0001762689,0.00045356472,0.00016783919,0.00039200566,0.00022500615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854904,0.00047265054,0.00029326024,0.00043183827,0.00013237825,0.00012082731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011396658,0.00010935708,0.00022387387,0.00011627948,0.00016055908,0.000007602877,0.00079891825,0.00006798214,0.00028187988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020551003,0.00005763466,0.00038602302,0.00030871018,0.0010094933,0.00009792393,0.00004414098,0.00027979937,0.00003358629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035811184,0.00017788803,0.0000545003,0.000015434485,0.000106626896,0.0000026249627,0.0013256137,0.00021228148,0.00041601167,0.98696697,0.008660467,0.0017034858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045654175,0.00053707644,0.0019042554,0.000038603022,0.00014829753,0.000017676719,0.00011833459,0.010657697,0.000052116542,0.97309935,0.012878276,0.00009177573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006711832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.7348315e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78196824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016108077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006497756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.371952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}