{"meta":{"query_hash":"af7544ed0ba2","filters":{"venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion"},"cohort_total":73,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":73,"exported":73,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/af7544ed0ba2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+for+the+Scientific+Study+of+Religion"},"results":[{"id":"W1662897256","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12087","title":"Compassionate Conservatives? Evangelicals, Economic Conservatism, and National Identity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Protestantism; Conservatism; Sociology; Politics; Individualism; Solidarity; Poverty; Political science; National identity; Religious identity; Political economy; Gender studies; Law; Religiosity","score_opus":0.05990858753995195,"score_gpt":0.4039518175740941,"score_spread":0.34404323003414217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1662897256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94666046,0.00058144087,0.0001469227,0.0071187196,0.00004933102,0.0000064561573,0.000011724477,0.0000030892518,0.045421902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828005,0.00011903297,0.000038045586,0.00040817694,0.000006640696,0.0000024069411,0.0000037301018,0.0000016565253,0.0011402916],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847156,0.00085755746,0.000015341257,0.00009306953,0.00016575007,0.00039662074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978703,0.00076136907,0.0004884288,0.000099219644,0.00018368804,0.0005969398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022198777,0.00014657405,0.00022475084,0.00076394214,0.008284352,0.00570373,0.0005375617,0.0009711846,0.0029646885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036126322,0.0001203549,0.00010114652,0.00071860856,0.017340155,0.0030978716,0.002811149,0.0016840701,0.00013951935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007767714,0.00016843465,0.073943056,0.00004698367,0.000018974377,0.00037674792,0.8341653,0.000043745134,0.00039858805,0.069443464,0.0038097848,0.017507304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009177248,0.000024064955,0.045821797,0.00009704931,0.000008922803,0.00009476366,0.9302522,0.0000545892,0.00012293787,0.0049749045,0.018524181,0.000015411812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07726306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18649447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07726306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003848877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15362668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1852253396","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12010","title":"Close Ties, Intercessory Prayer, and Optimism Among American Adults: Locating God in the Social Support Network","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prayer; Religiosity; Interpersonal ties; Optimism; Social psychology; Psychology; Social network (sociolinguistics); Social media; Political science; Theology; Law","score_opus":0.03194991907473543,"score_gpt":0.36117287885368543,"score_spread":0.32922295977895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1852253396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99962854,0.00004526394,0.000013048153,0.0000733812,0.0000016970001,0.000002250436,0.000022788765,3.523562e-7,0.00021273668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997373,0.000057741225,0.000027415823,0.000021956597,0.0000033064416,0.0000033957992,0.00003608763,2.520661e-7,0.00011244968],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998204,0.000065718494,0.000015349417,0.000026517067,0.000034821736,0.00003724884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856526,0.00021500801,0.000669708,0.00006387203,0.00008648159,0.00039968168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046776125,0.0001280723,0.00015051932,0.0003970889,0.0006643431,0.00059504056,0.00018174395,0.00040397092,0.0018910159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025184469,0.00017055488,0.00018737423,0.000458482,0.0002854507,0.0006606108,0.00064951315,0.00072494254,0.00012350736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005004678,0.00019127801,0.9945298,0.000007589942,0.000029184319,0.00003779513,0.0014059459,0.000020573818,0.00011146236,0.000039338363,0.00010086625,0.0034761506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038419494,0.000068675356,0.9962937,0.000009032331,0.000017833452,0.000050958148,0.003224462,0.000117004114,0.000025343981,0.00005144198,0.00013506474,0.0000026291175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061450484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016990064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061450484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021969328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024964538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012218595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966541637","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2004.00245.x","title":"Transcendence and the Moral Self: Identity Integration, Religion, and Moral Life","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Religious identity; Psychology; Moral reasoning; Moral disengagement; Social psychology; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral development; Altruism (biology); Identity (music); Moral psychology; Epistemology; Religiosity; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04859969370211387,"score_gpt":0.3642612227081757,"score_spread":0.3156615290060618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966541637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897662,0.0014239119,0.00045996736,0.0007968409,0.000013104136,0.000006189601,0.00001751423,0.0000037235684,0.0075124567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99909425,0.0002680214,0.00021201248,0.000048165584,0.000010309497,0.0000037290413,0.000011707575,0.0000010440134,0.00035073626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995078,0.00026944428,0.000013001018,0.000035196816,0.00012120021,0.000053454496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959985,0.0014617682,0.0011109634,0.00020165379,0.00032497616,0.00090211007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014911601,0.00028254435,0.00031913634,0.0009164001,0.00068310974,0.002161971,0.00041630314,0.00042172224,0.003126789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063455356,0.00011771472,0.00019217636,0.0006397686,0.002254419,0.001292573,0.00138228,0.0012134365,0.00017370124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003329894,0.0011514041,0.8083789,0.00015830291,0.0001875837,0.0009294445,0.029124396,0.0005516932,0.0017452814,0.029879961,0.0011636385,0.12639645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022257034,0.00011492642,0.9629003,0.00009468314,0.000036794467,0.00055437506,0.0076249945,0.0010317119,0.0002635026,0.025319666,0.0020124188,0.000024354447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017868995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037835196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003126789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072261837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006744939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010460198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969035548","doi":"10.1046/j.1468-5906.2003.00199.x","title":"The Political Activity of Evangelical Clergy in the Election of 2000: A Case Study of Five Denominations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Politics; Protestantism; Power (physics); Sociology; Explanatory power; Political communication; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04352986840190211,"score_gpt":0.40087213591557636,"score_spread":0.35734226751367426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969035548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99757224,0.000058431706,0.000050888448,0.0002074029,0.000005811197,0.000013368907,0.000015787766,0.0000011762019,0.0020747622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980994,0.00011872881,0.000109194465,0.00009816631,0.000009593807,0.00001777124,0.00003180575,0.0000034784925,0.0015117532],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974632,0.0014598414,0.00005771392,0.00011371392,0.00014589824,0.000759639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974132,0.0010944033,0.00045379647,0.00009883194,0.00018574513,0.00075404916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022409854,0.00032390244,0.00035466856,0.0015508486,0.011986122,0.0025808048,0.0009611506,0.001823743,0.002777806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043354114,0.0003489797,0.00027219017,0.0011967135,0.0020363873,0.0011816365,0.0023874308,0.0019395597,0.00045196223],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036716028,0.00094626297,0.1786218,0.000112510315,0.00002260966,0.016668703,0.7788816,0.0001195141,0.001739503,0.0030105878,0.0018294598,0.017680384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017945737,0.00026679735,0.12353762,0.000054229018,0.000011402643,0.0032840366,0.86107445,0.00020933675,0.0006044393,0.00015685493,0.010760587,0.000022367638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030068591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.106745064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030068591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024864303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010702162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059787095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969036633","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00379.x","title":"Class and Congregations: Class and Religious Affiliation at the Congregational Level of Analysis","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Crandall University","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Social class; Sociology; Class analysis; Unit (ring theory); Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Mathematics education; Politics","score_opus":0.072897216882943,"score_gpt":0.38430612701795464,"score_spread":0.31140891013501165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969036633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917275,0.00023549984,0.0010314689,0.00036359625,0.000036443445,0.000023096942,0.000083668136,0.0000073882406,0.0064915135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917465,0.000050225117,0.0002725199,0.00002863906,0.000021443937,0.00001893813,0.00003170551,0.000005836484,0.00039600494],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625504,0.0024014653,0.00012213239,0.0002821897,0.0005459201,0.0003933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864747,0.0089367535,0.0019435834,0.0008606892,0.0005843149,0.0011999477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034321523,0.00020763943,0.00048209113,0.0010748259,0.0012318909,0.0020388025,0.000611904,0.00035602413,0.012277039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015141632,0.00009744825,0.0007068712,0.0015179478,0.0016994704,0.0016131457,0.0022697872,0.0011522537,0.00039844203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059531484,0.00026854267,0.96039206,0.00007830622,0.00078989175,0.00014753679,0.0076032514,0.00026344357,0.0007392588,0.008340139,0.0008437424,0.019938527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022814464,0.00032942323,0.9860284,0.000053073963,0.00021892354,0.000096125616,0.0072588976,0.0012021129,0.000361362,0.0024125609,0.0019939377,0.000022402444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005077396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005293354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012277039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005213629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005323706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04107076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969257386","doi":"10.1111/0021-8294.00043","title":"The Personality Characteristics of Methodist Ministers: Feminine Men and Masculine Women?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Gender Roles and Identity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Eysenck Personality Questionnaire; Personality; Psychoticism; Neuroticism; Christian ministry; Population; Psychology; Masculinity; Value (mathematics); Femininity; Appeal; Social psychology; Big Five personality traits; Gender studies; Extraversion and introversion; Sociology; Demography; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Law","score_opus":0.05322030118019433,"score_gpt":0.35896794771506235,"score_spread":0.305747646534868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969257386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988172,0.00015319714,0.00002152345,0.0001349685,0.000010899131,0.0000032644862,0.000027511407,8.461891e-7,0.0008304933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987287,0.00009594534,0.000046943085,0.00006715884,0.000008881126,0.0000039537827,0.000025674284,7.388184e-7,0.0010219433],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997156,0.00009939554,0.00001360454,0.00002423089,0.000071391,0.00007571291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998657,0.00015143743,0.00057908247,0.00004162739,0.000101011836,0.0004698748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007419385,0.00012260534,0.00013677031,0.00044225893,0.0005649374,0.00078675454,0.00010694884,0.00022212813,0.002429893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002375295,0.0001895386,0.00011192524,0.00037609038,0.00042715782,0.00026588683,0.00034675954,0.0003619401,0.00043904345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011589033,0.000050934323,0.97564995,0.000025149839,0.000015316085,0.00016540143,0.01100682,0.000014716571,0.000902536,0.0001086859,0.0007349009,0.011209652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049660734,0.000077340424,0.9924499,0.000009092889,0.0000025864658,0.00028947162,0.005547339,0.000026336602,0.000046040477,0.000024067174,0.0015195207,0.0000033852084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032275948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008893196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032275948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031126384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022811355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008128822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978036655","doi":"10.1111/1468-5906.00118","title":"Religion and Paranormal Belief","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs","field":"Psychology","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paranormal; Church attendance; Religious belief; Psychology; Attendance; Social psychology; Belief system; Belief in God; Parapsychology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Variance (accounting); Religious studies; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Religiosity; Medicine; History; Law","score_opus":0.04435052307561688,"score_gpt":0.336242951323009,"score_spread":0.29189242824739214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978036655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963748,0.00011824987,0.000075207,0.00010268046,0.000003085128,0.00001082561,0.00006394952,0.0000014217807,0.0032497046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992755,0.00011412518,0.00009546124,0.000014931567,0.0000013312358,0.0000029114408,0.000046757883,6.203381e-7,0.00044843048],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996043,0.000057974263,0.0000137005,0.000028321356,0.0002002449,0.00009557821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967722,0.0007514934,0.001049563,0.00019923114,0.0005029281,0.000724463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072395767,0.00014449694,0.00016171194,0.00064443017,0.0011549196,0.00071065617,0.0003872979,0.00024026366,0.0038462928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005786739,0.00013397202,0.0001922156,0.0004886765,0.0012632675,0.00026103944,0.0006511543,0.0009518036,0.00011318105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052085634,0.00012273947,0.98581266,0.000023534736,0.000030433974,0.00007070943,0.003553353,0.000095803516,0.00033994217,0.0010019147,0.00016743987,0.00872928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030096912,0.000022883281,0.99752885,0.000019953257,0.000009444172,0.00009925903,0.0014146225,0.0001246314,0.00004269745,0.0002497412,0.00047988896,0.000005017379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42949423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63111824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42949423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020090635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003123874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8539886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980551641","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2004.00232.x","title":"Give Me that Ol' Time Hormonal Religion","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Piety; Protestantism; Feminization (sociology); Phenomenon; Generalization; Sociology; Gender studies; Religious studies; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03736242035206034,"score_gpt":0.34917307150816806,"score_spread":0.31181065115610773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980551641","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013119939,0.033297434,0.00194998,0.6564316,0.05544687,0.000041763302,0.0004695572,0.0003515731,0.2388912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16361715,0.016569473,0.0020917444,0.26567352,0.01041393,0.000056919645,0.00019873351,0.00028381654,0.5410947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993979,0.00021599118,0.000015860825,0.00006682391,0.00017211371,0.00013129997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826247,0.00031212613,0.00015646731,0.00013510288,0.00043324858,0.00070058677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095101,0.00030563146,0.00037392607,0.0005423258,0.00392279,0.0038852715,0.0003807429,0.0022029767,0.06655518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005848203,0.00017338336,0.0004018942,0.0004036029,0.002658325,0.0031681708,0.0025435477,0.0056532035,0.018082336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012188429,0.000088581335,0.0056427293,0.00016548873,0.00003528129,0.00083601574,0.015562346,0.000033720138,0.001028748,0.053883232,0.8100282,0.112573795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009146871,0.000038860024,0.0010583963,0.00014834531,0.000008102426,0.00052970555,0.0060940953,0.000010066185,0.00012240946,0.0050940267,0.9868727,0.000014099962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050190277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009731365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06655518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013594513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010643192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22264922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997280460","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01598.x","title":"Orthodoxy Niches: Diversity in Congregational Orthodoxy Among Three Protestant Denominations in the United States","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Crandall University","funders":"","keywords":"Orthodoxy; Diversity (politics); Protestantism; Sociology; Niche; Identity (music); Ecological niche; Gender studies; Religious studies; Anthropology; Theology; Ecology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Biology","score_opus":0.1503182842868457,"score_gpt":0.3667854377306173,"score_spread":0.21646715344377157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997280460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99951875,0.000037746966,0.00003434086,0.00004440411,0.0000012407752,0.0000019768925,0.000014048828,4.689557e-7,0.00034704898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998221,0.000025211972,0.000038388524,0.00001811261,0.0000013152302,0.0000026723694,0.000026068137,5.1771576e-7,0.00006571302],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926394,0.00036755513,0.0000430307,0.0000771831,0.0001010105,0.00014727036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726033,0.0008180465,0.00083127804,0.00019025504,0.00035029114,0.00054975104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017440402,0.000113591916,0.00019904511,0.0014970311,0.002115339,0.001325663,0.0003880885,0.00032112747,0.0010033973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036986293,0.00015899845,0.0000996535,0.0010558793,0.0018267009,0.0010397037,0.0027704518,0.0006217711,0.00007931037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017537644,0.0001187374,0.84032035,0.00003405987,0.000041021634,0.00017577596,0.13879474,0.00005779149,0.0018612292,0.0012558266,0.00037054907,0.016794546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053962276,0.00006142826,0.83639944,0.000032927528,0.0000074321356,0.00013603317,0.161309,0.00018000064,0.00019261111,0.00036935214,0.0012970297,0.00000947117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012681243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04672604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012681243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069001055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000634308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02521485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000356121","doi":"10.1111/1468-5906.00185","title":"Constitutional Privilege and Constituting Pluralism: Religious Freedom in National, Global, and Legal Context","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of religion; Sociology; Law; Politics; Christianity; Hegemony; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Human rights; Philosophy; Religious studies","score_opus":0.029583078380985308,"score_gpt":0.3331002933462641,"score_spread":0.30351721496527884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000356121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23614562,0.01291633,0.008573857,0.064691655,0.00026661562,0.000032677377,0.000097098,0.000038502112,0.67723775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942676,0.000946285,0.0004775117,0.0012242978,0.000070893555,0.000009254851,0.000014545461,0.000009818636,0.0029798355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702317,0.0013175126,0.00006574207,0.00036555107,0.00052798475,0.00070013653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977837,0.0012226616,0.00020088673,0.00025768793,0.00022137427,0.00031365003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028122987,0.00023659939,0.00042262007,0.0013920082,0.009207781,0.010756985,0.00092079386,0.002525697,0.0026322196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035619535,0.00016867432,0.00028762745,0.0018695927,0.0632902,0.0066536665,0.0069145206,0.0046559586,0.00010510624],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037164734,0.0000047994486,0.0006010045,0.000008897086,0.0000018401246,0.00007685368,0.008497172,0.00009387974,0.00004035758,0.988374,0.000431734,0.0018656823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015103691,0.000020944633,0.006667519,0.00024725185,0.000023363244,0.00024406523,0.030250942,0.0005615923,0.0003224689,0.8481972,0.11341733,0.000032212447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13497701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.196558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13497701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01592732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009437667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26838273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001886981","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2006.00326.x","title":"The Sense of Divine Control and Psychological Distress: Variations Across Race and Socioeconomic Status","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Socioeconomic status; Sense of control; Race (biology); Psychology; Stressor; Association (psychology); Social psychology; Distress; Demography; Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.030415892502506998,"score_gpt":0.3807023658762256,"score_spread":0.3502864733737186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001886981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995665,0.00006340845,0.000024508021,0.00002544749,0.0000015245054,0.0000012292659,0.000031677435,5.0459266e-7,0.00028515322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99980754,0.00003543558,0.00002215627,0.000008241052,0.0000023728023,0.0000013686208,0.000043695887,3.6114088e-7,0.00007880291],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997366,0.000087229244,0.000019202425,0.0000374302,0.000059392274,0.00006023759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983955,0.00030000816,0.000760349,0.000073745774,0.00015135766,0.0003189869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045603825,0.00012585752,0.00017171605,0.00064211426,0.00036391817,0.00047997825,0.00016144247,0.0002022108,0.0014114926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026415272,0.000100192134,0.00018889019,0.00050510134,0.00040808515,0.0003589087,0.00065362646,0.00032322377,0.00012601544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044776447,0.000025228364,0.99750453,0.0000033840108,0.000024077573,0.000024898185,0.0004541699,0.000012788075,0.00019013272,0.000027580076,0.000028832366,0.0016597318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.122915e-7,0.00001927269,0.9995229,0.0000016699599,0.0000039665724,0.00003105426,0.00031069622,0.00003215991,0.00001474919,0.00001285096,0.00004913683,9.910096e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055621313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011412194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055621313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016617405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015232063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011059523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007856141","doi":"10.1111/0021-8294.00037","title":"Religion and Partisanship in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Political science; Survey data collection; Politics of the United States; Liberal Party; Multivariate analysis; Political economy; Religious studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.040594272821894796,"score_gpt":0.3441186682647868,"score_spread":0.303524395442892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007856141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99129605,0.00066062383,0.000040300176,0.0005325951,0.000016507234,0.00002023064,0.001109096,0.000006485672,0.0063181883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99743575,0.0003293709,0.000040520245,0.000090702684,0.000006291332,0.00000684869,0.00042514066,0.0000041813328,0.0016611645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988481,0.00010504006,0.00004006665,0.00012396745,0.0003039496,0.00057885755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965064,0.00023697295,0.0005390952,0.000112920345,0.0012672031,0.0013374693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007741023,0.0001611074,0.0003514877,0.0021675436,0.0074831974,0.0015475361,0.000674142,0.00042066904,0.0048721037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030097896,0.00022995948,0.00033906236,0.003723852,0.0010270493,0.00031275654,0.0010064418,0.00061755016,0.00033035455],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014416229,0.000048794755,0.9712182,0.00004529757,0.00006905672,0.00015149314,0.011604956,0.00013803397,0.00028782798,0.0010191308,0.004364321,0.010908649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005805613,0.0000102577,0.9888571,0.000024296756,0.000008914042,0.000040967498,0.0069297943,0.0001729812,0.000043821332,0.0000719421,0.00382078,0.000013439125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9907369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01741482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01741482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013264642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12635398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009431768","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00343.x","title":"Spirituality and the Current Adjustment of Adult Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Spirituality; Psychology; Sexual abuse; Mood; Attribution; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.03481947790362584,"score_gpt":0.36839562452709096,"score_spread":0.33357614662346513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009431768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999551,0.00017821434,0.000010973516,0.00005372759,0.0000027069195,0.0000027671508,0.00003837519,5.247493e-7,0.0001617333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996126,0.00017950674,0.00002206847,0.00003046768,0.0000031214495,0.0000028831573,0.000063508094,3.160198e-7,0.000085577005],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997297,0.000098662844,0.000035048855,0.00002055964,0.00005494683,0.00006104397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982835,0.00022749866,0.00087649847,0.000059164606,0.00015424188,0.00039915225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049845723,0.00017153114,0.00025949153,0.00053999876,0.0006232618,0.0006161935,0.00015943294,0.00033454288,0.0012606449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033732702,0.00016627708,0.00023819876,0.0005065606,0.0004655247,0.00048448064,0.00058372034,0.00072868966,0.00014000859],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006302451,0.000098099736,0.99441636,0.000014992234,0.000040017207,0.00007883865,0.001351872,0.000017901737,0.00019371728,0.000016522548,0.000062235624,0.0036464692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003176136,0.00014303425,0.99732685,0.000008556263,0.000011319134,0.00030135273,0.0019203838,0.00004013705,0.000038975686,0.000019101304,0.00018402132,0.000002947632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038014632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009866472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038014632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019647767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021678535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0075587034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010961768","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01666.x","title":"Religion, Religious Tradition, and Nationalism: Jewish Revival in Poland and “Religious Heritage” in Québec","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, University of Michigan","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Religious pluralism; Religious identity; Religious controversies; Nationalism; Judaism; Religious philosophy; Lived religion; Pluralism (philosophy); Religious studies; Social science; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Negotiation; Theology","score_opus":0.028888225440998047,"score_gpt":0.33267681829574347,"score_spread":0.3037885928547454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010961768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843328,0.00078335876,0.000048903785,0.0015375541,0.000014421809,0.000009489168,0.000041237,0.0000026297423,0.013229673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962374,0.00034960613,0.000035892048,0.00015524561,0.0000026838238,0.000004864706,0.00002657077,0.0000028047027,0.0031848566],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913305,0.00026205918,0.000021166565,0.000051173018,0.000097709715,0.00043484825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899846,0.00029024816,0.00015570424,0.000039250634,0.0002451619,0.00027118114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013349875,0.00015072254,0.0003169807,0.0015076129,0.012458855,0.002997189,0.0009421792,0.0007816781,0.0030160518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017116349,0.00018100254,0.00018256599,0.002340491,0.0062061194,0.0012773679,0.0026068117,0.0017204981,0.00011482744],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032535137,0.00023786693,0.23330392,0.0001992533,0.00010556641,0.0058009336,0.62866217,0.00047976195,0.0015596207,0.071559906,0.0071444903,0.05062112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038508086,0.00005528299,0.42103302,0.00015793102,0.000043757354,0.00050478155,0.5163775,0.00050627365,0.00048340813,0.0016230224,0.05910651,0.000070030364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97270346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9921152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039374854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039374854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020890769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28568596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014430749","doi":"10.1111/1468-5906.00115","title":"A Longitudinal Study of Religious Doubts in High School and Beyond: Relationships, Stability, and Searching for Answers","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Infallibility; Mainstream; Social psychology; Psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Scale (ratio); Developmental psychology; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.11763163377612246,"score_gpt":0.38467602799948425,"score_spread":0.2670443942233618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014430749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99967754,0.0000616331,0.000023034803,0.00003064363,0.0000024986177,0.000006896056,0.00006643986,0.0000013906902,0.00012986848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927837,0.000064284366,0.000055843877,0.00003383241,0.000003448432,0.000012964262,0.00021085874,0.0000015501155,0.00033883192],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992586,0.00021700366,0.000070040995,0.000084140855,0.00017987475,0.00019038534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939983,0.0008656442,0.0021638072,0.00038844257,0.0010063354,0.0015774004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021189817,0.00024687295,0.0005178894,0.0015862128,0.0018619223,0.0015465174,0.00054055743,0.0009099863,0.0011577482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071279113,0.0006856605,0.0005227034,0.0015333147,0.00067769265,0.001402974,0.0009542125,0.0023107962,0.00043859964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005806511,0.00032301078,0.9939955,0.000006873024,0.000024551708,0.00006303251,0.0036775444,0.0000116339725,0.00020249753,0.000039112478,0.00009576112,0.0015024369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055789424,0.00023944236,0.99470264,0.000008078406,0.000012845322,0.00012502712,0.0043283748,0.00008780228,0.000059153208,0.00003191085,0.00039080696,0.000008357534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021992214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028083527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021992214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066177786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04372841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017915142","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2008.00436.x","title":"The Education‐Contingent Association Between Religiosity and Health: The Differential Effects of Self‐Esteem and the Sense of Mastery","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Religiosity; Psychology; Attendance; Association (psychology); Anxiety; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Attribution; Self-esteem; Mental health; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.037407010903136764,"score_gpt":0.3539413113696679,"score_spread":0.31653430046653114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017915142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994241,0.000078492005,0.00003827128,0.000048402875,0.0000011969194,0.0000049244572,0.00013208887,8.3345543e-7,0.000271769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955136,0.000048188085,0.000055271044,0.000013036995,0.000001648698,0.0000041216804,0.0001662174,5.6703675e-7,0.00015960858],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996099,0.00009008184,0.000022815258,0.000049410748,0.00009810049,0.00012985882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980198,0.00054648175,0.00061458326,0.00015925267,0.00020202546,0.00045776824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008133577,0.00023833553,0.00025025188,0.0007949504,0.0007047561,0.0007474159,0.00045251663,0.00034255738,0.0017220597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029431148,0.00015704478,0.00041429538,0.0009983131,0.00082056486,0.0002655747,0.0010033844,0.0005654918,0.00012006124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020918738,0.000012675363,0.99844766,0.00000324664,0.00002407787,0.0000146571265,0.0004722649,0.000011884246,0.000077414654,0.00002332239,0.000027325439,0.0008644568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.824615e-7,0.0000139890335,0.99952304,0.0000016469933,0.0000046738855,0.000009326512,0.0003522907,0.000041375824,0.000013863553,0.000006751487,0.000031578395,8.3083404e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50118047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69768244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50118047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019154925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023873025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99652654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022178759","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12162","title":"SACRED DIVORCE: RELIGION, THERAPEUTIC CULTURE, AND ENDING LIFE PARTNERSHIP. By KathleenE. Jenkins. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2014. ix + 236 pp. $80.00 cloth, $27.95 paper.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Citation; Sociology; Media studies; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.049725389310933205,"score_gpt":0.32605156817904507,"score_spread":0.27632617886811184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022178759","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012312909,0.9426471,0.00023286877,0.04518887,0.0020116398,0.000011801546,0.00003944849,0.000022375994,0.008614638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05983083,0.90043527,0.0011703062,0.008212289,0.0024705636,0.000060716393,0.000086393884,0.00003398292,0.027699605],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994411,0.00034604326,0.000024692596,0.000035212455,0.00011182313,0.00004113998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989097,0.0005594455,0.00014164828,0.00003980586,0.00009246062,0.00025695044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013437452,0.00081141543,0.0005844418,0.0012189002,0.0017969134,0.003409911,0.0009865327,0.0016419268,0.010558587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033848463,0.00065472594,0.00031381325,0.0019667456,0.0047433493,0.0052431496,0.0025413951,0.0046697855,0.001711313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075039236,0.000104420484,0.0018435153,0.0014464136,0.000046778,0.00029891363,0.010449196,0.00016257471,0.00019405037,0.036417183,0.5454288,0.40353307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003604401,0.00008808776,0.014136782,0.0053161653,0.000042942993,0.0020764223,0.02940785,0.00026856503,0.00015150152,0.052471112,0.89595526,0.000049292357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014044982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041744992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014044982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022674517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00316904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03532195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030544080","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01546_4.x","title":"QUEER WOMEN AND RELIGIOUS INDIVIDUALISM by Melissa M. Wilcox","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Individualism; Citation; Sociology; Gender studies; Library science; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016908116515315284,"score_gpt":0.33664059666727086,"score_spread":0.3197324801519556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030544080","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006635524,0.13687263,0.00009769981,0.83095205,0.010960451,0.000015811076,0.000088601526,0.000012615298,0.014364649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22069824,0.39114237,0.000573601,0.24431759,0.054357685,0.000106599255,0.00014009248,0.00008082226,0.08858307],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990375,0.0005642037,0.000033829096,0.00010695927,0.00018002867,0.0000774629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992382,0.0059163948,0.00039386042,0.000089467176,0.00064004125,0.00057830795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033261029,0.00055720384,0.00085672515,0.0009520915,0.0038844761,0.0033136855,0.00087629096,0.0032096165,0.00451018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00748606,0.0003326772,0.00032484843,0.001111439,0.003172464,0.004295562,0.0016143143,0.007209354,0.0010537293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008930686,0.00010425469,0.002832977,0.0002840766,0.000027467779,0.00029935187,0.008382238,0.00007962731,0.00011295897,0.02703082,0.9292063,0.031550635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058863545,0.00013346737,0.015953818,0.0020709666,0.000053543554,0.000725018,0.027317632,0.0002543765,0.00026585156,0.020592725,0.93249124,0.00008250208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024864303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04454199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024864303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013663019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002684715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04943919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034498118","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01594.x","title":"BUDDHAYANA: LIVING BUDDHISM by Anil Goonewardene","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"South Asian Cinema and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Buddhism; Mount; Citation; Sociology; Library science; Philosophy; Computer science; Theology","score_opus":0.051018735955330685,"score_gpt":0.24514024150575014,"score_spread":0.19412150555041946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034498118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06287696,0.2925214,0.0011532952,0.24098197,0.035662584,0.000063112515,0.00020818521,0.00014283849,0.36638966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.529421,0.07905517,0.0013698811,0.043857656,0.011344454,0.00010486473,0.00015187335,0.00042649778,0.33426863],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995435,0.0002418963,0.0000116590445,0.00006375632,0.00007026484,0.00006885167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995515,0.0001902072,0.000032009215,0.00003063284,0.000050130675,0.00014539805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008719811,0.00066922867,0.00052141683,0.00059933675,0.010374118,0.004418362,0.0008118539,0.0015902846,0.0050441143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011150037,0.00021686844,0.00017090896,0.0006161013,0.0065121124,0.003391688,0.0043051913,0.007906259,0.0015275351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120441466,0.00014251692,0.0009293151,0.00048325173,0.000033867975,0.0013192425,0.22723217,0.00010972462,0.0015002656,0.33789685,0.37508756,0.05514477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007605282,0.000021696469,0.0009589305,0.00025126073,0.000007667958,0.0005082982,0.029243024,0.00004454064,0.00021139198,0.012166015,0.9565641,0.00001551013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072946628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023490911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010374118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023624585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016745212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017140925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040784458","doi":"10.1111/1468-5906.00183","title":"The Myth of Pluralism, Diversity, and Vigor: The Constitutional Privilege of Protestantism in the United States and Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Pew Charitable Trusts","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Pluralism (philosophy); Mythology; Protestantism; Citation; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Law; History; Political science; Classics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025222931648354097,"score_gpt":0.2883319935130499,"score_spread":0.2631090618646958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040784458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69441694,0.0018172687,0.0007964892,0.09085535,0.00019549967,0.000040817595,0.00024519584,0.000024222518,0.21160813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955959,0.00018066805,0.00008618957,0.0014175241,0.000020862451,0.000005341263,0.0000153597,0.000009083802,0.0026691447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993551,0.0012234405,0.00013615319,0.000496109,0.0015912701,0.003001994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99119747,0.0019549592,0.00053055596,0.0003772355,0.0021534774,0.0037864153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051582945,0.00017437167,0.0005493425,0.0018238358,0.035465054,0.0140203005,0.0022663309,0.0032239733,0.0037725791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012138955,0.00031108555,0.00032980167,0.0025009247,0.049793914,0.0031110959,0.005997316,0.0062228814,0.0001286889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011139502,0.00006843339,0.030258108,0.000036224486,0.000049802828,0.00024613747,0.11020208,0.00052130345,0.00041669284,0.8213873,0.015592868,0.021109678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015495605,0.00006703255,0.1648638,0.0004563272,0.000113961585,0.00032008524,0.30632553,0.0013353659,0.00080438267,0.2808527,0.24445194,0.00025396326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97411627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98981047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06907842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06907842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14603287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5012014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050959364","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01618.x","title":"The Religious Composition of the Chinese Diaspora, Focusing on Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Diaspora; Buddhism; China; Mainland China; Geography; Census; Demography; Sociology; Gender studies; Population; Archaeology","score_opus":0.019833544584997413,"score_gpt":0.3012241341616274,"score_spread":0.28139058957663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050959364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843509,0.0010158574,0.00005351771,0.00032359696,0.000010924335,0.000036245616,0.0064470796,0.000008995741,0.007752896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926368,0.0017629042,0.00014303594,0.00008900516,0.0000047232775,0.000013119101,0.002379029,0.0000066988946,0.0029646144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968565,0.000013065747,0.000017661829,0.00004197679,0.000071363465,0.00017035153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991239,0.00003446174,0.000117624535,0.000022646089,0.0004006229,0.0003006846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019069221,0.00027487916,0.00018075471,0.003649916,0.0030576496,0.0010213723,0.0005166585,0.00016919443,0.0037457675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009227735,0.00014255414,0.00032692318,0.0066195084,0.00058519124,0.0003297812,0.0006433305,0.00033566295,0.00024005599],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011308399,0.000038800696,0.9530324,0.00013975905,0.00007728481,0.00026308314,0.0060787913,0.00025136798,0.0012284566,0.0013270634,0.0052563045,0.03219355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034498948,0.000013396049,0.9913079,0.00003529951,0.000014701937,0.00010494678,0.0046420875,0.000132693,0.00015500828,0.000042478547,0.0035342714,0.0000137678735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017117579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017117579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025229394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124197304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051165549","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2000.tb00014.x","title":"Not in My Backyard: Studies of Other Religions in the Context of SSSR—RRA Annual Meetings","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Judaism; Context (archaeology); Religious studies; Latin Americans; Comparative religion; Gender studies; Sociology; History; Anthropology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.056795369473268645,"score_gpt":0.3933794088829302,"score_spread":0.3365840394096616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051165549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95714134,0.0030748467,0.00009241538,0.008681863,0.0002756302,0.000023984616,0.00008988542,0.0000062863314,0.030613685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99480164,0.0013023965,0.000045883025,0.0005942463,0.0002281995,0.000024176026,0.000060626793,0.0000060820876,0.0029369195],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969414,0.0020091094,0.00008039792,0.00011822136,0.00030941598,0.0005414094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906729,0.00300947,0.002219392,0.00028582505,0.0005498546,0.0032625438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054914877,0.00022795003,0.00044060627,0.0021892576,0.0053836284,0.004694877,0.00069741835,0.0011622416,0.00780467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01075281,0.00024233307,0.00024002256,0.0023184866,0.002603948,0.0032221472,0.0040345024,0.0024494193,0.0006080394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033772853,0.000658854,0.20484787,0.000450509,0.00011638519,0.0008906138,0.7186037,0.00010923663,0.0009379309,0.017781075,0.012790657,0.042475447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019642395,0.000118444914,0.34929892,0.00030321808,0.000023686496,0.00015967396,0.61079407,0.00006531064,0.000097307086,0.0012133536,0.03788359,0.000022882086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014012373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030499388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014012373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002334916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024005943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029042065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071614180","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01640.x","title":"Identity as a Determinant of the Overreporting of Church Attendance in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Religiosity; Attendance; Identity (music); Church attendance; Social psychology; Psychology; Religious identity; Survey data collection; Demography; Sociology; Political science; Law; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.037954680641789786,"score_gpt":0.37844315944367024,"score_spread":0.34048847880188043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071614180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99253285,0.00039748586,0.000109654,0.0009904519,0.000020063299,0.000028124705,0.00051984814,0.000007974497,0.0053934488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984951,0.00021310427,0.00011072101,0.00007268606,0.0000029043824,0.000004444847,0.0001679319,0.000004870405,0.00092835573],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754363,0.00030552316,0.00011351374,0.00024789994,0.0008237735,0.0009656097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99243873,0.0007677214,0.0014261768,0.0003737752,0.0026545739,0.0023390222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017723739,0.00020042506,0.00037615208,0.001757741,0.0062017064,0.0018293746,0.0014392171,0.00044432044,0.00391334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0092666475,0.0002774693,0.00047653884,0.0036208818,0.0015076869,0.00035529872,0.001816076,0.0010567703,0.00016565704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013057508,0.0000623816,0.97231007,0.000039088893,0.00006622988,0.00020722106,0.00708721,0.00022741423,0.000303681,0.0014535625,0.0019533231,0.0161593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004854822,0.000013508579,0.99026054,0.00005252902,0.00002243661,0.0000728425,0.007319382,0.00037925458,0.00012314848,0.000116838295,0.0016155785,0.000019134488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99513465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035502933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035502933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05288267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25759304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073914248","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01596_1.x","title":"Continuing the Conversation on Canada: Changing Patterns of Religious Service Attendance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Service (business); Conversation; General Social Survey; Sociology; Survey data collection; Library science; Public relations; Political science; Media studies; Social science; Law; Business; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.0443386840493302,"score_gpt":0.3074355279786326,"score_spread":0.2630968439293024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073914248","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0117625315,0.009934588,0.00021551123,0.9682934,0.004309993,0.000010444977,0.000520666,0.000024217075,0.0049285586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21993227,0.02118292,0.0013668168,0.7339063,0.0052657602,0.000067661946,0.0006538247,0.0002895682,0.017334767],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901293,0.003255914,0.00032559963,0.0009143985,0.0028926018,0.0024820955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.953983,0.018722342,0.0020725096,0.0008716858,0.015069562,0.009280941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012936841,0.0005317349,0.0011099512,0.0034831562,0.01720032,0.011185623,0.003770164,0.008567766,0.0049840426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040500432,0.0006185819,0.00069534744,0.009972732,0.011028425,0.008869552,0.0038881404,0.01407734,0.0005258396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109230576,0.000033577737,0.032637786,0.00023406088,0.00009803577,0.00045301637,0.05609259,0.00015710283,0.00023630487,0.019752802,0.85898125,0.03121427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046045443,0.000044340042,0.080885954,0.0010567339,0.00007440474,0.00023871518,0.17151372,0.00040807566,0.0003760911,0.004964796,0.740093,0.00029810215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07105585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07105585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10819256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5155487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080318005","doi":"10.1111/0021-8294.00088","title":"Tolerant (In)civility? A Longitudinal Analysis of White Conservative Protestants’ Willingness to Grant Civil Liberties","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Crandall University","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Civil liberties; White (mutation); Political science; Law; Civil rights; Conservatism; Politics","score_opus":0.10450612085176111,"score_gpt":0.3172914303350634,"score_spread":0.2127853094833023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080318005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994954,0.000038627757,0.00001938288,0.00014244355,0.0000037539826,0.000002178379,0.000051003575,5.484794e-7,0.00024653072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993106,0.00003901171,0.000022467797,0.00007112136,0.000005041463,0.000005531633,0.00009943044,7.164567e-7,0.0004461423],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945706,0.00018223216,0.000038699098,0.000070001275,0.000071172835,0.00018084938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99374205,0.0009535033,0.0027068653,0.00040305583,0.00050175603,0.0016926575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022809587,0.00012117424,0.00021362219,0.0007413504,0.0011689606,0.0011445273,0.00038602014,0.0008309927,0.0027599272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053234315,0.00021568808,0.00027512718,0.0007203714,0.0005333279,0.00083185715,0.0007130417,0.0017778195,0.0005285935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079805606,0.0002222589,0.99327385,0.000003849269,0.000027988393,0.00006837159,0.0035414915,0.000020518366,0.00017129771,0.00012834366,0.0002309545,0.0022312882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040765876,0.00011626876,0.99297005,0.000009871795,0.000011524492,0.00007186368,0.005986422,0.00012974566,0.000048112135,0.00008715606,0.0005588485,0.0000061070023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0108951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018623631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0108951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003693306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005224917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021663368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085136611","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01526.x","title":"Religious Involvement, Beliefs About God, and the Sense of Mattering Among Older Adults","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Social psychology; Church attendance; Psychology; Psychosocial; Metropolitan area; Sociology; Religiosity; Medicine","score_opus":0.019279997877657246,"score_gpt":0.3277922596856238,"score_spread":0.30851226180796654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085136611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99946445,0.00005726111,0.000017245948,0.000037018253,0.0000019615063,0.000006540219,0.00019314147,6.843683e-7,0.00022173004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992918,0.00008356308,0.00006900232,0.00003524919,0.0000063255243,0.000010526531,0.00033308004,5.4349505e-7,0.0001699849],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998117,0.000054274267,0.000034064662,0.000029707757,0.000038596783,0.000031641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998102,0.0002819425,0.0009781179,0.00010071107,0.00019111639,0.00034610435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007760031,0.00016736843,0.00021351122,0.0007554085,0.0005345772,0.0005106535,0.00026542356,0.00038130424,0.0010533119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002458067,0.00019078843,0.00023659354,0.0007403186,0.000245424,0.00047790963,0.000503708,0.0007533575,0.00015146898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001956005,0.000049827206,0.9984817,0.000006543978,0.000016904147,0.000019073954,0.0004177489,0.000009326378,0.00006776583,0.00001276799,0.000060711085,0.00083796756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012880075,0.000026588768,0.99936336,0.0000029149808,0.000004747142,0.000025550838,0.00045069255,0.00003202019,0.000009122891,0.0000072971297,0.000075501244,9.787055e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021089315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051840417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021089315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002776924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024899121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04193312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086529178","doi":"10.1111/1468-5906.00154","title":"Quest Religion and the Problem of Limited Compassion","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Compassion; Social psychology; Religious orientation; Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Value (mathematics); Style (visual arts); Religious belief; Salient; Identity (music); Orientation (vector space); Epistemology; Theology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.056939993988941826,"score_gpt":0.3557725182007575,"score_spread":0.29883252421181566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086529178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.983976,0.00043381608,0.0009886026,0.0033004151,0.00002519152,0.000009018862,0.000007328592,0.0000045339266,0.011254968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993013,0.000058389473,0.00016079824,0.00017906174,0.000010539569,0.0000055833257,0.000003360396,0.0000016968605,0.00027931237],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977452,0.001463245,0.00007425608,0.0002056311,0.00028965826,0.0002220148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906148,0.0052992944,0.0021034025,0.0007542594,0.00034358638,0.000884558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026053255,0.00016979579,0.00034621416,0.0008140194,0.0013438117,0.0020042774,0.00064544467,0.0013529011,0.0033971337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014593066,0.0002507159,0.00033558073,0.00043247832,0.008932043,0.0014475625,0.0023181492,0.0022733998,0.00014397719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017003381,0.0019880654,0.46801916,0.00036124463,0.00020443441,0.003801568,0.065935776,0.0009535723,0.011498627,0.27580974,0.0027885756,0.16693893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045797706,0.0009627101,0.4955133,0.00037083583,0.000106315274,0.009296273,0.060917325,0.0049677114,0.0025068175,0.41500974,0.009776402,0.00011468036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071054266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009083334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033971337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092707435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006624004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0137783885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092676722","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01669.x","title":"Religion and the Acceptability of White‐Collar Crime: A Cross‐National Analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Collar; White-collar crime; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Structural engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.03773239820380942,"score_gpt":0.40462138440369305,"score_spread":0.36688898619988364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092676722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99964976,0.000021026959,0.00003715323,0.00001764271,0.0000024828737,0.0000019457043,0.000051667474,5.5986925e-7,0.00021772494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995542,0.00003479504,0.00005027195,0.000013934199,0.00000269692,0.0000057858656,0.00015917674,0.0000017268322,0.00017733179],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901295,0.00044755524,0.00007460349,0.00014109406,0.00016399461,0.00015986939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636036,0.0008982211,0.0013332333,0.0004560736,0.00041704034,0.0005350879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015404446,0.00020323426,0.00040432558,0.0005811686,0.0009899437,0.00076826295,0.00043877278,0.00040020703,0.0024400186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003131342,0.00027647984,0.00070128764,0.0006442675,0.0006222474,0.00042696545,0.0012022892,0.0011336964,0.0002836807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005033593,0.00011562252,0.99757785,0.000005434409,0.0002576783,0.00004270399,0.0006728687,0.000059828722,0.00012987472,0.00007745395,0.00009619702,0.00091415236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000255349,0.00004605793,0.99812347,0.0000058851742,0.000040900944,0.000058316757,0.0012243434,0.00025751404,0.000059773247,0.00001808491,0.0001589448,0.0000040094415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023153195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034383796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023153195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033117915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003569218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04603684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097293541","doi":"10.1111/0021-8294.00034","title":"Disciplined Litigation, Vigilant Litigation, and Deformation: Dramatic Organization Change in Jehovah's Witnesses","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Successor cardinal; Millenarianism; Political science; Law; Consolidation (business); Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.041333768193406215,"score_gpt":0.35995606466699315,"score_spread":0.3186222964735869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097293541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98971075,0.00026778848,0.00007252162,0.005153482,0.000048149523,0.000010190196,0.000007507763,0.0000021127883,0.004727599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818474,0.00016361664,0.000031742442,0.0005113583,0.000022916616,0.0000058150417,0.000005400629,0.0000017028063,0.0010726394],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982436,0.000618162,0.000046341418,0.00013241562,0.0001807256,0.00077879586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99623775,0.0011231052,0.00084340083,0.0002143077,0.00017078963,0.0014106375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021283613,0.00015828642,0.00020399452,0.00083808805,0.013017464,0.0041956105,0.0010126415,0.002743195,0.002919752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007248922,0.00026815283,0.00016409249,0.00078247336,0.010508495,0.00253299,0.0063995146,0.0043955217,0.00010996944],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000987658,0.00030687757,0.07314849,0.0000718483,0.000031797437,0.013275691,0.8087289,0.00017667307,0.0017704989,0.06979677,0.0074887327,0.025105078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020221813,0.000097775715,0.09922309,0.00012994726,0.000011421762,0.0024272266,0.8511219,0.00016048289,0.00058402616,0.006658524,0.039527778,0.000037702514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017811086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036826253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017811086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002979378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027286005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035414815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107280236","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12124","title":"THE NEW EVANGELICAL SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT. Edited by BrianSteensland and PhilipGoff. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. xiii + 321 pp. $99.00 cloth, $29.95 paper.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Crandall University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Sociology; Media studies; Theology; Library science; Art history; Art; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03224688623597563,"score_gpt":0.3047647218605094,"score_spread":0.2725178356245338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107280236","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022197901,0.83115023,0.0015091455,0.07112115,0.009677607,0.00004132754,0.00024122022,0.00013666518,0.08390289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.090584464,0.71915954,0.004287533,0.014635433,0.0058165095,0.00037800716,0.00056844123,0.00037214457,0.164198],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985703,0.0008623965,0.000058100726,0.00011271598,0.000239505,0.00015700457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998965,0.00039600852,0.0001330329,0.00007940772,0.00012336228,0.00030318782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018049309,0.0010875962,0.0008261714,0.0015758413,0.0024018784,0.0071218363,0.0010960136,0.0023863749,0.018984353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029066785,0.0009276527,0.000541319,0.0020032541,0.005374834,0.007711295,0.0057189474,0.0055314125,0.0042456975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055021417,0.00008425872,0.00061385246,0.001665157,0.000027855378,0.00015867331,0.010117792,0.000118466836,0.0002376523,0.06234016,0.6336728,0.29090846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007640472,0.000019786376,0.0012530643,0.0014389091,0.00000592215,0.0002930277,0.00432783,0.000045042758,0.0000987769,0.021128664,0.9713634,0.000017932669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051357015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017227327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018984353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002864853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004485213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06350899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110617990","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12006","title":"The Longevity Effects of Religious and Nonreligious Participation: A Meta‐Analysis and Meta‐Regression","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Hazard ratio; Religious belief; Longevity; Meta-regression; Demography; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Gerontology; Confidence interval; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.06164179670537851,"score_gpt":0.39397982126677006,"score_spread":0.33233802456139155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110617990","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050314557,0.94230944,0.0047341636,0.00050783524,0.0004076757,0.00028760868,0.00084712973,0.00011206314,0.0004796484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7199261,0.26735198,0.008491551,0.0007758972,0.0004855206,0.0009546101,0.0012965128,0.00008939592,0.00062835205],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.98897445,0.006863569,0.002014267,0.0011808241,0.0007271242,0.0002397168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966619,0.026823586,0.0027174582,0.0020642106,0.0014640279,0.00031176602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022781683,0.0024226683,0.009771683,0.00465988,0.0007221223,0.0026248305,0.0017452036,0.0019085702,0.002101442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048160568,0.0014633726,0.046102725,0.00479344,0.00062331674,0.0013854983,0.001199818,0.0024187705,0.0002363187],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00315864,0.000030285815,0.014509277,0.02391112,0.94994104,0.00013421863,0.00006087372,0.00061135786,0.00028058287,0.00009451605,0.0002936039,0.0069744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046126128,0.00020440567,0.0070940433,0.0015688306,0.9892959,0.00008987441,0.000027926542,0.00035544322,0.00015741937,0.00018633761,0.0005442657,0.000014227196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039459635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006248568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022781683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012613642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013235235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120482504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112780906","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01682.x","title":"“Practical Divine Influence”: Socioeconomic Status and Belief in the Prosperity Gospel","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Socioeconomic status; Gospel; Social status; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science; Economics; Economic growth; Demography; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043010342055473036,"score_gpt":0.397925491746054,"score_spread":0.35491514969058097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112780906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99730384,0.00009662309,0.00003916459,0.0004299902,0.000005360258,0.0000023410066,0.00005738339,8.253449e-7,0.0020644816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996916,0.000035861576,0.00001764291,0.000020848069,0.000005547756,9.416817e-7,0.00003848358,5.004058e-7,0.00018851634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946064,0.00024785293,0.000041788222,0.000054848184,0.0000959859,0.00009882978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939879,0.0017109356,0.0026552067,0.00025334267,0.00031221856,0.0010803622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001265019,0.00012834638,0.00013488301,0.0005391139,0.00061540265,0.0008725247,0.00029767904,0.00043961994,0.0045442693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061807465,0.00008633023,0.00026222633,0.0005702779,0.0011578861,0.00055018405,0.000800941,0.00074690784,0.00028454806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049850274,0.00006633775,0.9960691,0.0000061827004,0.000028932378,0.000059327293,0.00089301984,0.00003639334,0.0000705122,0.00042378876,0.00013048205,0.0021661192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029808566,0.000045287285,0.99777395,0.000011908983,0.000011067159,0.000041648254,0.0013355102,0.00016325322,0.000031363455,0.0001909982,0.0003890654,0.0000029093985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010942915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022813382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010942915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003432162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003502664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021758437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122610059","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2008.00405.x","title":"Increase or Decrease? The Impact of the International Migratory Event on Immigrant Religious Participation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Religiosity; Demographic economics; Event (particle physics); Sociology; Work (physics); Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04390872177519698,"score_gpt":0.36521739246827906,"score_spread":0.32130867069308205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122610059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99393713,0.00043987963,0.00002829221,0.0013245165,0.000014797976,0.000006448169,0.00021065358,0.00000231408,0.004035889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991021,0.00020330156,0.000030860545,0.00015512737,0.0000149109765,0.0000033895437,0.00010385668,0.0000015897429,0.0003849426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993259,0.00023930684,0.000023942177,0.00007211842,0.00008826859,0.00025046492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703383,0.00077972043,0.001006113,0.00016594637,0.00031222042,0.00070211757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010422653,0.00012254655,0.00021992737,0.00037669516,0.0005985832,0.0009404935,0.00040097078,0.00053732475,0.004847873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005239935,0.00009234325,0.0004486409,0.0005686225,0.0007807877,0.00050551124,0.00068585237,0.000872639,0.00029049246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014242817,0.000121825615,0.9867792,0.000027626313,0.000069483154,0.0001005567,0.0010037735,0.00004630399,0.000239741,0.00024523537,0.00049810956,0.010725819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.788702e-7,0.000021550304,0.9986291,0.000007554804,0.000010323829,0.000014912492,0.0010765124,0.000016634325,0.000017834303,0.000009570152,0.00019389689,0.0000010893217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12276611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23906867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12276611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011801987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013629235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24410307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125722073","doi":"10.1111/1468-5906.00187","title":"Religious Life Under Theocracy: The Case of Iran","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Theocracy; Religiosity; Islam; Islamization; Faith; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Social science; Scale (ratio); Sociology of religion; Political science; Religious studies; Law; Epistemology; Theology; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05650379152619751,"score_gpt":0.379402288141327,"score_spread":0.3228984966151295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125722073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91683924,0.0023242442,0.0001781607,0.013653673,0.00015798288,0.000027644073,0.00003216671,0.000005531588,0.06678149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995596,0.0013077029,0.00012279308,0.0007896124,0.00010096061,0.0000051248803,0.000016923277,0.0000034765385,0.0020574213],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905723,0.00036948477,0.0000116293595,0.000046685742,0.00012744217,0.00038746442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992735,0.00021495785,0.00015035586,0.0000335464,0.000104823266,0.00022289732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015402393,0.00025714835,0.00030385828,0.0010141544,0.009674784,0.0029517233,0.0011007163,0.0022554037,0.0028381112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017690843,0.00017516973,0.00039683786,0.001796221,0.0058935126,0.0020580147,0.0022183585,0.0039593657,0.00028032882],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002424077,0.0007611685,0.07612792,0.00021772858,0.00006436321,0.033226952,0.41332746,0.00071973674,0.0007588321,0.39164472,0.020007394,0.06290132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012804099,0.00025262806,0.10631119,0.0003310733,0.000058983762,0.006593639,0.7056068,0.0015538811,0.00023891809,0.028061999,0.15079162,0.00007124414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09549783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16306353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09549783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006444511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038674816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18988395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128172718","doi":"10.1111/0021-8294.00018","title":"Canada's Mythical Religious Mosaic: Some CensusFindings","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Christianity; Multiculturalism; Census; Protestantism; Monopoly; Mythology; Sociology; Emigration; Religious diversity; Religious studies; Diversity (politics); Gender studies; Ethnology; Political science; History; Law; Theology; Demography; Population; Anthropology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021566615984288703,"score_gpt":0.3261865498300726,"score_spread":0.3046199338457839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128172718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9395211,0.0039872634,0.00030015619,0.009599821,0.000047956797,0.000105035964,0.018494645,0.000035379067,0.027908778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99036825,0.002902784,0.00030594663,0.00048822621,0.000019368497,0.000022454356,0.0030917365,0.000016417529,0.0027847928],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880767,0.000118950586,0.000061695806,0.00010028994,0.0005063015,0.00040515795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935638,0.00050419633,0.0009538742,0.00024733652,0.00392159,0.00080914196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012327413,0.00017859048,0.0002531332,0.005026131,0.0052359123,0.00217661,0.0011224011,0.000365168,0.0035912574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051206723,0.00022620326,0.00019345096,0.012310778,0.0014616555,0.00085137377,0.0014971416,0.00064609,0.00020187926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013047481,0.00005738217,0.8356802,0.000446732,0.000051768842,0.000590136,0.058840994,0.00019891371,0.0007293086,0.007376173,0.040483773,0.05541411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044630847,0.000011312185,0.9314337,0.00010170555,0.000014033631,0.00016063183,0.03724713,0.0002093005,0.00013360503,0.00022730711,0.03043428,0.000022539702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027691428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027691428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03577386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20091629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131624667","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01643.x","title":"Group Size and the Trajectory of Religious Identification","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Religious identity; Population; Social psychology; Identification (biology); Group (periodic table); Sociology; Statistics; Psychology; Demography; Religiosity; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03890270084149617,"score_gpt":0.36231801915481776,"score_spread":0.3234153183133216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131624667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983321,0.00015124184,0.00017966444,0.00022141801,0.000005596629,0.0000076130987,0.0001220212,0.0000057734924,0.0009746296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990996,0.00006483506,0.00014360904,0.000012292045,0.0000029893895,0.0000060177367,0.00014419667,0.0000023158861,0.0005241918],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995629,0.0001664438,0.000017786218,0.00008100103,0.00006997978,0.000101983445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932151,0.0016439821,0.0025639753,0.00042565083,0.0006370846,0.0015142083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001414193,0.000110712266,0.00015435395,0.0008687281,0.0007511689,0.0009133792,0.0004219605,0.00053323695,0.0049049864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010864486,0.00016692489,0.0002498354,0.0005912923,0.00046068997,0.00089831377,0.0010060784,0.0009957402,0.00046076925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024292986,0.00013114122,0.9856614,0.000010350541,0.000044518118,0.00008402536,0.0023087352,0.00023117305,0.00030483835,0.00081675773,0.0004036184,0.009760504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041597245,0.00009212216,0.996828,0.000010347191,0.0000066047187,0.00008425925,0.0014330903,0.0004932743,0.000059266826,0.00046235736,0.00052045775,0.0000060613625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014152899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013569571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014152899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005465416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004919525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028141022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134672891","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01524.x","title":"“Do Unto Others”: Effects of Priming the Golden Rule on Buddhists’ and Christians’ Attitudes Toward Gay People","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Compassion; Psychology; Social psychology; Priming (agriculture); Gautama Buddha; Religiosity; Outgroup; Prejudice (legal term); Ingroups and outgroups; Homosexuality; Golden Rule; Theology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Buddhism","score_opus":0.032043323210845805,"score_gpt":0.363224433273108,"score_spread":0.3311811100622622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134672891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996092,0.000045165874,0.00039657654,0.00012369236,0.00006109701,0.00009950739,0.00002483231,0.00001870709,0.003138274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99606127,0.00009299507,0.0019521764,0.00031280206,0.000057122652,0.00029228497,0.000042030526,0.000038341266,0.0011509053],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884474,0.0005547988,0.00006250598,0.00029591538,0.00012697655,0.00011502432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98574096,0.010955934,0.0016308741,0.0005040847,0.0002835228,0.0008846043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017673697,0.0007473016,0.00051230233,0.00020372434,0.00067182694,0.001083563,0.00050772075,0.0010914515,0.0070877788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012530068,0.00076393667,0.0002600649,0.00015597879,0.0011280027,0.0009808429,0.0010623275,0.0016991994,0.00053657906],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.094352774,0.025391536,0.02861871,0.0018502587,0.00031888607,0.00090598036,0.043281395,0.0009598736,0.7464061,0.007452615,0.0017880425,0.048673835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015804231,0.06401575,0.6402243,0.0008501088,0.0016306321,0.0016172373,0.011444069,0.01248772,0.22239286,0.020983774,0.008152457,0.00039685963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011842619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010348852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070877788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039060402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049515185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023710966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160173287","doi":"10.1111/1468-5906.00181","title":"The Religious, the Paranormal, and Church Attendance: A Response to Orenstein","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Paranormal; Church attendance; Attendance; Religious belief; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Medicine; Religiosity; Political science; Law; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.027558506432802016,"score_gpt":0.35353248387783576,"score_spread":0.32597397744503376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160173287","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12652576,0.004872626,0.003650692,0.8475819,0.004377531,0.0000706845,0.00021895462,0.000042075262,0.012659838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64794576,0.006853787,0.0038635277,0.3268848,0.007367683,0.000260721,0.00016456471,0.000058820784,0.0066002584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99488395,0.0028752645,0.00025733706,0.0006408083,0.0011967998,0.00014582188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9287049,0.061730564,0.0030025195,0.0016037622,0.0038078942,0.0011502954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012472503,0.0004939017,0.0005740205,0.0015313406,0.0031475618,0.0029918645,0.0018769267,0.00916252,0.0040766685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036588464,0.0004017488,0.0006504705,0.0019082923,0.0080357,0.005775053,0.0040518474,0.009515324,0.00038469123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006452775,0.0008497939,0.08727087,0.00074154104,0.00025411687,0.0040258486,0.23876093,0.0009525753,0.0020204366,0.25588462,0.3388888,0.06970516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003956658,0.0006776972,0.08232463,0.0014689324,0.0001719958,0.007728622,0.37130803,0.004485429,0.0016633037,0.19994745,0.32935232,0.0004759645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028477872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031692386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012472503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016241024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013925086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06596166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163294436","doi":"10.1111/1468-5906.00158","title":"Revisiting the Social Sources of American Christianity 1972–1998","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Crandall University","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Political science; Sociology; History; Religious studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05068552075119663,"score_gpt":0.3642777850078498,"score_spread":0.31359226425665315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163294436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97136396,0.0015426566,0.00015679699,0.004375988,0.000079044556,0.000010580271,0.00019444096,0.0000026940363,0.022273853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960343,0.001181187,0.00010092995,0.00031460688,0.00008978566,0.000011216043,0.00016900522,0.0000052171185,0.0020937768],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962354,0.00014449783,0.000014261425,0.000034951445,0.000114886425,0.000067760186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996899,0.0010501436,0.00089860515,0.00017182979,0.0007341301,0.00024644882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012706001,0.00011916997,0.00010735101,0.0018403253,0.0028387832,0.0013448456,0.0004424219,0.00032913606,0.0027728323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004677771,0.00012103196,0.00005809177,0.0031125587,0.0020014914,0.0012237243,0.0013662337,0.0009344238,0.00022227835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017396109,0.00020354043,0.4794052,0.00017839669,0.000041788662,0.00067146856,0.3566405,0.00019684345,0.0011105768,0.02945101,0.01021879,0.12170786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058055916,0.00002718216,0.81871086,0.00012774179,0.000009758532,0.00017730979,0.1263451,0.0001131164,0.00024386494,0.0012762909,0.052950945,0.000011994401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07375847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17816778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07375847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033978699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019171168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1466583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175179899","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12218","title":"God, Yoga, and Karate","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Martial arts; Appeal; Studio; The arts; Sociology; Key (lock); Aesthetics; White (mutation); Relation (database); Gender studies; Political science; Art; Visual arts; Law","score_opus":0.07710090983883312,"score_gpt":0.3671414125781571,"score_spread":0.29004050273932397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175179899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98528427,0.00030767717,0.00010549054,0.00039736764,0.000009847613,0.0000084855465,0.00027956942,0.0000028884692,0.013604346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956376,0.00034872734,0.00019123303,0.00009948429,0.000012058793,0.000011432278,0.00020551794,0.0000027262893,0.0034910887],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999819,0.000042543266,0.00000835091,0.00003758578,0.00003838636,0.000054219414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993988,0.00011430963,0.0002781813,0.00003345894,0.000052642412,0.00012259107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016629229,0.00008385287,0.00015772822,0.00084505376,0.0013440273,0.0010268791,0.00027371646,0.00022611163,0.01104208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001229441,0.000102230035,0.0001239804,0.0015639301,0.00076901074,0.00088896934,0.0009992998,0.00041285795,0.0007597013],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015201065,0.00020617037,0.92076993,0.00013128828,0.000047737252,0.00022516938,0.022085475,0.00008879784,0.0006439823,0.011505551,0.0023755017,0.041768365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066302164,0.00006578635,0.9442173,0.000043755004,0.0000169439,0.00016824256,0.039826777,0.00013526807,0.00011002137,0.0008044911,0.014598334,0.0000063987613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017746411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049983278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017746411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004393468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057077606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036939442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338294541","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12226","title":"A CULTURE OF FAITH: EVANGELICAL CHURCHES IN CANADA. By SamReimer and MichaelWilkinson. Montreal: McGill‐Queen's University Press. 2015. xii + 284 pp. $100.00 cloth, $32.95 paper.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Queen (butterfly); Faith; Sociology; Theology; Media studies; Art history; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029769066432213956,"score_gpt":0.29876915770034596,"score_spread":0.269000091268132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338294541","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042911913,0.67401046,0.00035169482,0.2132024,0.005363577,0.000107178224,0.0011867199,0.00007398095,0.0627921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5818548,0.30226618,0.0009895572,0.009057034,0.00066959666,0.00006909148,0.00048097692,0.000104812985,0.104507916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914086,0.00016531842,0.000022124357,0.00005926039,0.00029729374,0.00031506002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836046,0.00018497887,0.00014042073,0.00003193563,0.00051176595,0.0007704029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011501504,0.00084228796,0.00055742456,0.0017498703,0.017252332,0.0066589443,0.0020537574,0.002198917,0.0093052555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023062252,0.000707731,0.00025189787,0.0058948766,0.00944573,0.0024176696,0.003034615,0.003254421,0.00053732324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008829169,0.0000764087,0.008401644,0.0013616876,0.000038348117,0.0008729798,0.1546609,0.00025122188,0.0003835556,0.037614256,0.62855273,0.16769794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014913504,0.000026241047,0.0467838,0.0019455886,0.000027445727,0.00045301672,0.18369764,0.00011757282,0.00016540877,0.0026655607,0.7640315,0.00007131124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9929523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99859864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08525602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08525602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14076164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6185786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460308131","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12246","title":"The Religion of the Educated Classes Revisited: New Religions, the Nonreligious, and Educational Levels","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Secularization; Census; Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Sociology of religion; Demography; Social science; Geography; Gender studies; Religious studies; Statistics; Mathematics; Population; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03996450542328877,"score_gpt":0.3715523257300654,"score_spread":0.33158782030677664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460308131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963928,0.00024571628,0.000047839545,0.00043535294,0.0000041513426,0.000001912808,0.000023137753,5.288894e-7,0.0028486017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99962926,0.000071653834,0.000018823717,0.000019279207,0.000004953525,7.7196955e-7,0.000011598946,4.857676e-7,0.00024305016],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995395,0.00015470141,0.000020908446,0.000044943165,0.00011416109,0.00012585943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950552,0.0015941854,0.0016336294,0.00022731813,0.00034950775,0.0011402005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010530731,0.00008895173,0.00017553757,0.0012801309,0.0007911748,0.0015512428,0.0004010696,0.00023985421,0.0027906003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006077902,0.00009803226,0.00014235215,0.0011411639,0.002914701,0.0012650767,0.0013724869,0.001054029,0.00014655253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006965686,0.00008101703,0.96584284,0.000021552054,0.000026536798,0.0001168429,0.01521067,0.000043102522,0.0003111665,0.0037053304,0.00021633075,0.014354902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020037432,0.0000151555505,0.9937298,0.000012887778,0.0000038942535,0.000032467084,0.0053404197,0.00003921873,0.000032833384,0.0002765812,0.0005121044,0.000002605468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042430792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10946888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042430792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009525157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062331196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08436763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517110611","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12258","title":"Race, Religion, and Anti‐Poverty Policy Attitudes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stanford Bio-X; Philippine Rice Research Institute; University of Oxford; Yale University; University of Cambridge; University of Akron; Princeton University; York University","keywords":"Poverty; Disadvantaged; Politics; Ethnic group; Inequality; Government (linguistics); Solidarity; Race (biology); Sociology; Public opinion; Diversity (politics); Welfare; Political science; Gender studies; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.029392688962024467,"score_gpt":0.37387802582648677,"score_spread":0.3444853368644623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517110611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964858,0.00006419257,0.000029546763,0.0002680078,0.000007401746,0.0000035628154,0.000024370005,7.3227204e-7,0.0031163706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913543,0.000056860048,0.000023083365,0.0000738136,0.000008427112,0.0000044129674,0.000020361675,8.2515766e-7,0.00067676185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994978,0.00028382917,0.000020939502,0.000036155514,0.000079260484,0.00008199335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99637955,0.0013208295,0.0011872158,0.00013200661,0.0002851101,0.0006954254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015983422,0.00007727849,0.000101894744,0.0005802374,0.00082578696,0.000803989,0.00013239235,0.00032163947,0.0060949153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052573746,0.000089229456,0.00017904384,0.0003051624,0.0004660844,0.00050386885,0.0004060715,0.0005470995,0.0003699559],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092201604,0.00029716417,0.9903571,0.0000076145443,0.000026871992,0.000084099884,0.0032498762,0.000031335032,0.0002202372,0.0005197739,0.00028200267,0.0048317723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054676084,0.00009181377,0.993509,0.000019086541,0.000016148453,0.00008421553,0.0049068574,0.00010612419,0.000086173524,0.00017197146,0.0009986433,0.0000043990317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005263443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010635232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060949153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030587573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026534565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020389497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571357502","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12281","title":"Trans‐Congregational Triadic Closure: Churchgoers’ Networks Within and Beyond the Pews","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Sociology of religion; Social psychology; Phenomenon; Epistemology; Psychology; Social science; Political science; History; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.032220638084860295,"score_gpt":0.3334080768229168,"score_spread":0.3011874387380565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571357502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935486,0.00020539225,0.0009699032,0.0004657598,0.000007171369,0.000017406936,0.00008797273,0.0000046690807,0.00469302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992756,0.00008682592,0.00019067097,0.000023691586,0.0000034602356,0.00001072271,0.000047984184,0.000001518427,0.00035946636],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930084,0.00034251434,0.000034756544,0.00012313736,0.00007628976,0.00012250229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99607074,0.0012516755,0.001358942,0.00038737454,0.00028853057,0.00064271694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010028066,0.00012093288,0.00017599996,0.0010659513,0.0016753003,0.0015208254,0.00045754417,0.00032613997,0.0042633875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074560894,0.00014846498,0.00012865357,0.0012092262,0.0011076011,0.0033872875,0.0026732413,0.0006245655,0.0001678218],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017216489,0.00014198762,0.7519722,0.000099382305,0.00008207384,0.00057177374,0.18157646,0.00036140435,0.001411262,0.009660791,0.0014798787,0.05247059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000818596,0.00009958267,0.77213675,0.00014572518,0.000039898096,0.0005762284,0.21255712,0.0017985789,0.00031658864,0.0035956774,0.008700238,0.000025339761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018708177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034044363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018708177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008305344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006425131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037198544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586521938","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12307","title":"Secularization and the Wider Gap in Values and Personal Religiosity Between the Religious and Nonreligious","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Nuffield College, University of Oxford; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Religiosity; Secularization; Spirituality; Sociology; General Social Survey; Sociology of religion; Population; Secularism; Religious values; Religious studies; Social psychology; Gender studies; Social science; Political science; Demography; Psychology; Theology; Islam; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028171195996928078,"score_gpt":0.33539812395870267,"score_spread":0.3072269279617746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586521938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984432,0.00012340548,0.000027084165,0.00010029092,0.0000020136063,6.3493286e-7,0.000023591127,5.175824e-7,0.001279302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99968696,0.00008530436,0.000015314634,0.000017414413,0.0000034408683,6.5342766e-7,0.000037854377,5.476739e-7,0.00015258818],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996636,0.00014420394,0.000015400996,0.000052248673,0.00005612772,0.00006850088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980988,0.00044100586,0.00095575297,0.00012369806,0.0001245816,0.0002562028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005054744,0.00009958937,0.00016147572,0.0004832358,0.00041746077,0.00083270564,0.0001744302,0.00016220984,0.0043987073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020561197,0.00008772841,0.00012097105,0.00085969816,0.0012306636,0.00070058095,0.0010188309,0.0005244079,0.00018473822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040203344,0.000036142676,0.9805711,0.000017295728,0.000047136284,0.00007599032,0.008312158,0.000052094914,0.0004316253,0.0011772143,0.00016466856,0.009074344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.9365176e-7,0.000010852844,0.99592316,0.0000074893583,0.0000037077027,0.00003317216,0.0033845012,0.000032289496,0.000029752155,0.00012118445,0.00045203028,0.000001104159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059658173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015111122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059658173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030829516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000298421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014715135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611176864","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12319","title":"Becoming a Religious None: Irreligious Socialization and Disaffiliation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":223,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Ambrose University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Socialization; Sociology; Phenomenon; Population; Qualitative analysis; Social psychology; Religious studies; Qualitative research; Psychology; Social science; Demography; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05507444989759027,"score_gpt":0.40762762608377995,"score_spread":0.3525531761861897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611176864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99605286,0.0001054075,0.00011804257,0.00067028945,0.0000076167034,0.000006416477,0.000009664865,0.000001686014,0.0030279898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994861,0.000069279915,0.00004103748,0.00007567379,0.0000039059682,0.000003310829,0.0000070247906,0.0000010274856,0.0003126241],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980361,0.00087278296,0.00007282981,0.00013833263,0.00041715908,0.00046287908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956136,0.001323928,0.0015559006,0.0002077155,0.00043223187,0.0008666425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020991855,0.0001524783,0.00023551141,0.0010025158,0.0045964895,0.0024860094,0.00068132335,0.000592958,0.0017811058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00614306,0.0001581048,0.00014837031,0.0009080228,0.009877556,0.0018603711,0.0040508583,0.0016139062,0.00007942844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003750076,0.00003893661,0.1368049,0.000044453354,0.000008438061,0.0003743819,0.8466376,0.000033439188,0.0008955015,0.0057008057,0.00040015116,0.009023985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015889906,0.000019272251,0.13824469,0.00003617057,0.0000033493056,0.00013980518,0.8579668,0.000048467162,0.00010562654,0.00049997476,0.0029260146,0.000008263185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0707228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15397498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0707228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003798019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036682524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14062232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753378098","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12339","title":"COMING OF AGE IN JEWISH AMERICA: BAR AND BAT MITZVAH REINTERPRETED. By Patricia KeerMunro. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2016. xiii + 211 pp., $90.00 cloth, $27.95 paper.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judaism; Citation; Art history; Sociology; History; Media studies; Library science; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.019202348601035132,"score_gpt":0.2873231251115884,"score_spread":0.26812077651055327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753378098","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01551434,0.605848,0.00023003212,0.27409607,0.022094212,0.000012171831,0.00040784804,0.0000343182,0.081763044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5622974,0.23594981,0.0011000877,0.06155846,0.020858424,0.000056729412,0.0006381749,0.00016823284,0.117372684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956316,0.00017336842,0.000017245216,0.000046918412,0.00007208499,0.00012722405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996542,0.00012602739,0.000056821897,0.000014708801,0.00008125657,0.00006692249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010222333,0.00066659274,0.0004277992,0.0013320321,0.007153313,0.0042553465,0.0007921699,0.0028902846,0.00967451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015364139,0.00042562222,0.00027390258,0.0018346031,0.0060562184,0.0044659986,0.0021182226,0.004013464,0.0016771676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113711525,0.000047580605,0.0049727275,0.000477957,0.000029260827,0.0004490448,0.054636404,0.000057161116,0.00018664177,0.15857224,0.6732145,0.10724278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013272925,0.000021790433,0.013706634,0.0010006211,0.00001727336,0.00037452078,0.031038562,0.000052897074,0.00007002307,0.015037341,0.9386499,0.000017142207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06432222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16903944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06432222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003515313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002496247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12789565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779689168","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12362","title":"Religious Intermarriage in Canada, 1981 to 2011","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada; University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Endogamy; Religious identity; Sociology of religion; Sociology; Attendance; Identity (music); Descriptive statistics; Church attendance; Census; Gender studies; Religiosity; Ethnic group; Demography; Political science; Social psychology; Social science; Anthropology; Psychology; Population; Law","score_opus":0.03878253261902365,"score_gpt":0.3692410408501747,"score_spread":0.330458508231151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779689168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98714256,0.00072590815,0.000060633767,0.0008719701,0.000030996296,0.000032764037,0.007683193,0.000010755969,0.0034413508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921376,0.0007715736,0.000108267646,0.00011955541,0.000012154918,0.000016245282,0.0037764714,0.0000040492155,0.0030540302],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924785,0.00004899871,0.00003798559,0.00009448361,0.00024462162,0.0003259938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745506,0.00010144155,0.0004952925,0.00006824507,0.0012564976,0.00062355737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061204954,0.00021384982,0.0003197256,0.0019441682,0.0035955699,0.0010379466,0.0011763166,0.00036685157,0.0024045703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002640294,0.00018522504,0.0004218841,0.004427722,0.00047566474,0.00038714512,0.0011809967,0.0009398669,0.00029202417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007623561,0.00005476057,0.9810137,0.000053839347,0.000037403843,0.00015197191,0.0032957254,0.00013479858,0.00015164631,0.00031955194,0.0033971083,0.011313165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002036261,0.0000077809555,0.9948356,0.000018459572,0.0000064636806,0.000028084582,0.00284872,0.00014448566,0.00004299369,0.000013078953,0.0020464333,0.000005881433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99764675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03672025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03672025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03649862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26642525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808225057","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12504","title":"Presidential Address: Going Public: The Art and Science of Researching Domestic Violence and Religion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential address; Negotiation; Vulnerability (computing); Sociology; Presidential system; Public engagement; Media studies; Dissemination; Key (lock); Public relations; Political science; Social science; Law; Public administration; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.05082325785119431,"score_gpt":0.3966750722949557,"score_spread":0.3458518144437614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808225057","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00835452,0.06110165,0.0033577494,0.7966837,0.029515222,0.00004223084,0.00021969507,0.000102481135,0.10062269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54656214,0.16481553,0.01003318,0.13752778,0.07212789,0.0005180399,0.00031426986,0.0003653061,0.06773587],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904484,0.0075149545,0.00027159732,0.00042283974,0.0010329264,0.0003092668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9620386,0.029530697,0.002018293,0.0017396234,0.002922022,0.0017507885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013207277,0.0003391299,0.00056610955,0.0019200433,0.006199303,0.010383927,0.000809489,0.005531053,0.017339278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034932073,0.00020469632,0.0002795876,0.0020912248,0.014984995,0.008725544,0.004012425,0.008649606,0.002327626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052224557,0.0001574184,0.002987416,0.00090889604,0.00003380535,0.00022217829,0.030495336,0.000120474346,0.00039680782,0.40278414,0.43572965,0.12611172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008628278,0.000065283486,0.002019568,0.0022823508,0.000024778956,0.00024076545,0.01889252,0.00015940267,0.0005955878,0.08013029,0.8955438,0.000037103095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011266259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018391913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017339278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018176533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027232235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069847584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808372302","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12513","title":"Assessing the Validity of Data Synthesis Methods to Estimate Religious Populations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Estimation; Identification (biology); Scale (ratio); Population; Bayesian probability; Econometrics; Statistics; Small area estimation; Grouped data; Data source; Computer science; Geography; Data mining; Mathematics; Sociology; Demography; Economics; Cartography","score_opus":0.35313033394628135,"score_gpt":0.5751917386411997,"score_spread":0.2220614046949183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808372302","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11409846,0.021220515,0.6456837,0.007436977,0.005050587,0.18825036,0.004111113,0.00063002144,0.013518268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36491314,0.0018041701,0.44345483,0.001876584,0.00035179593,0.18572693,0.0009823693,0.00019589106,0.0006943067],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.0856851,0.7579219,0.098860614,0.011101259,0.0454846,0.00094649557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.02966815,0.8680466,0.030556139,0.033426773,0.037784766,0.00051753945],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8271827,0.0028837782,0.005773974,0.014444356,0.0052181724,0.007930948,0.00627662,0.005462403,0.007147457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9379186,0.0029655613,0.010633597,0.012395518,0.011982045,0.006492697,0.009839263,0.005679112,0.0008437603],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015486217,0.0020837323,0.13110739,0.1313906,0.07932174,0.00070488424,0.061204188,0.017480666,0.0021381509,0.109013915,0.013182215,0.43688637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.030963514,0.024677739,0.11997577,0.18611203,0.06858215,0.0011851619,0.0404802,0.15804805,0.019786779,0.21314189,0.13509601,0.0019508047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004898258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003958706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17281729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015301395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01363937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21311456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808854438","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12502","title":"The Powerful Other: How Divine Control Shapes the Relationship Between Personal Control and Psychological Distress","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health","keywords":"Association (psychology); Psychology; Control (management); Social psychology; Mental health; Sense of control; Clinical psychology; Psychiatry; Psychotherapist; Computer science","score_opus":0.08778997377401258,"score_gpt":0.39718810753836137,"score_spread":0.30939813376434877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808854438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99810046,0.00009854857,0.0002038061,0.00024431443,0.0000063654957,0.0000042702673,0.000024134686,0.0000021698256,0.0013159347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997075,0.000024658508,0.000062968546,0.000025902369,0.000002173738,0.000002157198,0.000013383936,0.0000015786824,0.00015954937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989919,0.0005544915,0.000037800106,0.00015267113,0.00012960947,0.0001335662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938763,0.002716435,0.0014345582,0.0006229315,0.00024769196,0.0011020121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011597018,0.0001880836,0.00019558014,0.00050579826,0.0007076039,0.0021045562,0.00045249567,0.00053620635,0.0045260787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009211463,0.00022047998,0.00034107303,0.00043460008,0.0013065073,0.0007587127,0.0011004736,0.0010738443,0.00017484467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024071406,0.00029528586,0.98756,0.000015123589,0.00012623386,0.000105134815,0.003249589,0.0001557048,0.00092509773,0.0009152242,0.00019344702,0.006218482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006454555,0.00006456805,0.99594396,0.000019055346,0.000023684608,0.00006810667,0.002235547,0.0005104898,0.00011996225,0.0007370653,0.00026288966,0.000008179313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060757883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008902834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060757883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004466486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044400714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015141249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886412645","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12541","title":"Countermovement Mobilization and State Raids on Minority Religious Communities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Countermovement; State (computer science); Politics; Ideology; Collective action; Political economy; Political science; Mobilization; Social movement; Sociology; Criminology; Development economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03806499737541039,"score_gpt":0.3384311816414424,"score_spread":0.300366184266032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886412645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98967665,0.0002099099,0.00011507226,0.00046463415,0.000008376058,0.0000090779495,0.000024965542,0.0000023372763,0.0094889775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99934417,0.00006576453,0.00003433234,0.000026746315,0.000005743154,0.000004004495,0.000009255894,4.5709817e-7,0.0005094922],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862444,0.00068770885,0.000040177696,0.000119147415,0.00017976762,0.00034884922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99454653,0.0017372379,0.002316918,0.00026814317,0.0004036388,0.0007274976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016158873,0.00009471671,0.00016458234,0.0013064799,0.002222158,0.0014831178,0.0004256543,0.000452265,0.006333917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046412293,0.00008862779,0.00011756553,0.00074948533,0.002285259,0.0010576143,0.0034567956,0.0006841459,0.000251968],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003014689,0.00033086588,0.7264072,0.00022045338,0.000072575815,0.00067427923,0.112550594,0.00040791227,0.0028048828,0.03363987,0.0019640515,0.1206259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001857403,0.00017437185,0.8388905,0.00019282731,0.000025198508,0.00023245733,0.13733098,0.0007811883,0.00081373786,0.0025001576,0.019018149,0.000021857648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065046856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015031492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065046856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015865004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000981205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021189094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894671703","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12554","title":"Religious Identification, Switching, and Apostasy Among Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland: Individual and Cohort Dynamics Between Two Censuses 2001–2011","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health and Social Care Research and Development Division; Queen's University; Economic and Social Research Council; Public Health Agency; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Protestantism; Apostasy; Faith; Ethnic group; Religious identity; Population; Socioeconomic status; Identity (music); Northern ireland; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Demography; Geography; Ethnology; Law; Theology; Negotiation; Social science; Islam","score_opus":0.030533199305421324,"score_gpt":0.3558902446407433,"score_spread":0.325357045335322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894671703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982863,0.00011556657,0.000028511697,0.00008672333,0.000008271517,0.00001121553,0.0011095845,0.0000024426483,0.00035134377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977514,0.00011590663,0.00004605789,0.000037325575,0.0000058409123,0.000022226986,0.0011349659,0.0000040863265,0.0008821434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992192,0.00016809374,0.00006489639,0.00017405163,0.00011801443,0.00025565128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648356,0.0003332081,0.0015771379,0.00030192523,0.00061599136,0.00068810716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013866726,0.00019272817,0.00031323815,0.000995357,0.00067451823,0.0011215744,0.00086666405,0.00047574862,0.0015498439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033532572,0.0003322769,0.000570095,0.0012550672,0.00055990915,0.0008568125,0.0016272252,0.0010462193,0.00046292073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064329746,0.00003194926,0.9965659,0.0000110360115,0.00003232673,0.000055421442,0.0014116565,0.000026194368,0.00008645935,0.000022184237,0.00037487745,0.0013176219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010586673,0.00001626814,0.9973671,0.000009768209,0.0000046746554,0.000033088596,0.0022579757,0.00003396928,0.000015267457,0.0000048810193,0.00025164476,0.000004315367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17711847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3299597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17711847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015103928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009187624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35217506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905519476","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12561","title":"FROM SINGLE TO SERIOUS: RELATIONSHIPS, GENDER, AND SEXUALITY ON AMERICAN EVANGELICAL CAMPUSES. By Dana M. Malone. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2018. vii + 240 pp. $99.95 cloth, $28.95 paper.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Historical Gender and Feminism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Citation; Media studies; Religious studies; Art history; Sociology; Classics; Library science; History; Philosophy; Gender studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.07082948810609394,"score_gpt":0.3188119364159698,"score_spread":0.24798244830987584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905519476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79193234,0.09183189,0.00012786897,0.07351417,0.0023154998,0.000052765834,0.0011606679,0.00006240174,0.03900246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92383355,0.043747537,0.0001399628,0.003379034,0.0005585494,0.00007310284,0.0002789674,0.00004190519,0.027947318],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994006,0.0002787831,0.000021476726,0.000041708077,0.00014494848,0.00011250297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760735,0.0006782208,0.00047554905,0.0000579279,0.00032099363,0.00085993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013970275,0.00037696207,0.00046709267,0.0010880682,0.003983492,0.0023958029,0.0008329517,0.0009996812,0.017024461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040479237,0.0006334423,0.0002654891,0.0018988249,0.0022863562,0.0038773315,0.0029670731,0.0029117297,0.001709888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020431881,0.00059461326,0.21540578,0.0006597719,0.000053155076,0.0006207377,0.34274268,0.00007228179,0.0009820996,0.0047981623,0.25015968,0.18370672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009784659,0.00015123887,0.4001251,0.00085696223,0.000022748432,0.0004302324,0.5140186,0.00004963344,0.0001459956,0.001044526,0.08310262,0.00004249983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15140414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010959682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018740381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08598858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923638604","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12595","title":"Beyond “Heartless Conservative” and “Bleeding Heart Liberal” Caricatures: How Religiosity Shapes the Relationship Between Political Orientation and Empathy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Religiosity; Biology and political orientation; Politics; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Psychology; Orientation (vector space); Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.060691227237926026,"score_gpt":0.3720670818813579,"score_spread":0.31137585464343187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923638604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99850744,0.000053116513,0.00006377156,0.0001308581,0.0000033666984,0.0000023730188,0.00001609213,6.724675e-7,0.0012223442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997726,0.000023760473,0.000030683805,0.000024810826,0.000002507411,0.0000020706993,0.000013079837,8.747798e-7,0.00012967823],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882156,0.000649174,0.000052786098,0.00012774947,0.0001774477,0.00017139858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878883,0.0044930843,0.0048930203,0.00063869316,0.0005775694,0.0015093419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017182032,0.00016001091,0.00023878951,0.00068602787,0.00070518843,0.0019722288,0.0003179647,0.00067796046,0.0049029156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009078922,0.00018588568,0.00036782722,0.0004559535,0.0014677284,0.000762997,0.0013981395,0.0011213826,0.00021948222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015713972,0.00017065377,0.9850027,0.000023852615,0.00011637964,0.00009777865,0.007774616,0.00007197036,0.0009171803,0.0008080722,0.00016530759,0.004694414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003534935,0.000043999167,0.9916134,0.000023673423,0.000018810953,0.000054232536,0.0073389285,0.00017650145,0.00010407171,0.00041207115,0.0002046732,0.000006255985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00328232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00599878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049029156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049912045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046283338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016401947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987102866","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12625","title":"Bringing the State Back in Secularization: The Development of <i>Laïcité</i> in the French Third Republic (1875–1905)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Secularization; Agency (philosophy); Secularity; Ideology; State (computer science); Grassroots; Political science; Sociology; Centralized government; Political economy; Law; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.030276379550551444,"score_gpt":0.32729188763771594,"score_spread":0.2970155080871645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987102866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9231654,0.0027729948,0.00050564564,0.003357928,0.00003911851,0.000012938257,0.0001013711,0.000021472248,0.07002319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997259,0.00016045538,0.00006131636,0.000067454224,0.000006197009,0.000001613666,0.000014097006,0.000002911324,0.0024269528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909246,0.00033573556,0.000016007121,0.00008303843,0.00007718045,0.00039569658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990324,0.00035677943,0.00022072402,0.00007335919,0.00019475426,0.00012209806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018561657,0.00018415488,0.00019152788,0.001040776,0.0040794923,0.0024819695,0.0003244241,0.0005696893,0.0039189705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016863581,0.000106496685,0.00021280091,0.0009921191,0.005854768,0.0010428418,0.0013707665,0.0011381436,0.0001589319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025180215,0.000093739334,0.06309386,0.00016565279,0.000048845413,0.0016532467,0.30717987,0.0011802586,0.002284303,0.5118615,0.00658469,0.10560229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002321906,0.00025000554,0.32301432,0.0004125174,0.000034452543,0.0007086223,0.11000438,0.0013164915,0.0029212362,0.009454662,0.55176914,0.00009093343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28450114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3346157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28450114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018380582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004242798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5656903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093402754","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12681","title":"Racial Diversity in U.S. Congregations, 1998–2019","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Ethnic group; Racial diversity; Quarter (Canadian coin); White (mutation); Sociology; Economic Justice; Gender studies; Religious diversity; Demography; Race (biology); Demographic economics; Geography; Political science; Ethnology; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.07041695654670417,"score_gpt":0.3652864266856509,"score_spread":0.29486947013894677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093402754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850702,0.00034248308,0.0000902417,0.0016786957,0.00007141001,0.000028554701,0.009233416,0.000010067597,0.0034748504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920542,0.00024648168,0.00014677444,0.0002660968,0.000034590656,0.000065521,0.006294106,0.0000045996476,0.0008876226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993704,0.00015811677,0.00006538366,0.00010750919,0.00014026403,0.00015838313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951533,0.00047102862,0.0022955893,0.00024461848,0.00095381803,0.0008816295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011563882,0.00014746466,0.00012536859,0.0010819955,0.0011223706,0.00082759565,0.00070341316,0.0003764376,0.0033806523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005407064,0.00013232786,0.00023383889,0.0015951344,0.00036460345,0.0009495418,0.0014596885,0.0010241697,0.00040657388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049513143,0.00008067985,0.98697877,0.00003491005,0.00005505615,0.000043382286,0.0014366255,0.00009698521,0.00011311362,0.00038068765,0.0056671062,0.0050631952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021634548,0.000019424964,0.99465275,0.000028476301,0.0000064114006,0.00002868087,0.002440213,0.00008691347,0.00005172971,0.000029111201,0.0026501273,0.0000039926585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10177713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18346654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10177713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011006974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088063435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20236945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131540551","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12713","title":"We Do Not Think It Means What They Think It Means: A Response to Thunström et al","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06452641565594298,"score_gpt":0.39395785995266525,"score_spread":0.3294314442967223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131540551","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030235556,0.00070291135,0.000068844565,0.98787934,0.0107685,0.0000046910245,0.000024482944,0.000009120766,0.0002397404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020550885,0.0004305081,0.00013795894,0.9902019,0.006678634,0.000018019917,0.000011711053,0.000027100106,0.00043902197],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96497416,0.015512812,0.0043865927,0.004423637,0.0074755424,0.0032272513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7534367,0.17659883,0.012938014,0.005678661,0.03370102,0.0176468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04003591,0.0014193545,0.0024031412,0.0021507926,0.0210571,0.01622369,0.006785705,0.086076595,0.012559797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1914393,0.0020212363,0.002751007,0.0026128737,0.015316822,0.014791119,0.01266244,0.122693345,0.006886999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050621733,0.00005248479,0.0010861238,0.00019347068,0.000053443604,0.0004950408,0.008955584,0.000033336717,0.00014223698,0.0030071249,0.97775686,0.008173757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013418368,0.00006933094,0.0016415314,0.0019880137,0.000094044364,0.0019193955,0.03957223,0.00027615274,0.0004018597,0.008326115,0.9453437,0.00023362426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012613399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019890714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086076595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010671131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022309743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21173269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140781012","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12720","title":"Religion Protected Mental Health but Constrained Crisis Response During Crucial Early Days of the COVID‐19 Pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Mental health; Public health; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Distress; Population; Outbreak; Political science; Development economics; Environmental health; Sociology; Demography; Psychology; Psychiatry; Medicine; Virology; Economics; Nursing; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.07011414347887662,"score_gpt":0.3939462780194277,"score_spread":0.3238321345405511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140781012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99379396,0.00009738195,0.00014366859,0.0022113137,0.000027857217,0.00001079554,0.000068347406,0.000002422206,0.0036442894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99942243,0.000033552325,0.000043165073,0.0002784289,0.00000937576,0.0000040083087,0.000015015694,0.0000011546176,0.00019293012],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990415,0.00043135436,0.00003215699,0.00005681015,0.00006590136,0.00037224405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936765,0.001153938,0.002083884,0.00033341584,0.00031816692,0.0024340637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013719591,0.00008623066,0.00017967456,0.00022640436,0.0014076668,0.0011803726,0.00028409265,0.0005346307,0.00392575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008060428,0.0001434522,0.00015286509,0.00024082717,0.0012508831,0.0009840656,0.0017966955,0.0014138477,0.00020206682],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014636009,0.00089901336,0.8852655,0.00014970436,0.00017421346,0.0007899749,0.03700503,0.0005006705,0.0040374314,0.006455576,0.004868767,0.058390293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040968003,0.00026730372,0.9602574,0.00010915501,0.000022331833,0.00015860875,0.030957565,0.00026252135,0.00024513685,0.0018386466,0.0058183176,0.000021997901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009058002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030106714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009058002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001273577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023198118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018010557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153597763","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12721","title":"A Tale of Decline or Change? Working Toward a Complementary Understanding of Secular Transition and Individual Spiritualization Theories","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Spiritualities; Secularity; Phenomenon; Transition (genetics); Sociology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Spirituality; Psychology; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20539775214709705,"score_gpt":0.3977583127222433,"score_spread":0.19236056057514628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153597763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6645236,0.023648715,0.020458413,0.19777349,0.00086682185,0.0001732286,0.00021943322,0.00007039453,0.09226587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99241954,0.0020740824,0.002033996,0.0023170938,0.0002458495,0.00006946543,0.000079522215,0.000007553907,0.00075294933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941299,0.0035358362,0.0002298125,0.0008135642,0.0007124106,0.00057858945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95774525,0.028986773,0.0049701994,0.002903657,0.0032755034,0.0021185423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018123634,0.00042992568,0.001162962,0.005130233,0.0025743456,0.008645596,0.002564991,0.0020082796,0.007394098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02357679,0.00032660575,0.0005978155,0.004060442,0.023175223,0.025234083,0.010721944,0.0070441132,0.0003214902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012448557,0.00046289456,0.10916575,0.0007187778,0.0001867351,0.000480708,0.10730509,0.0005586038,0.00034487603,0.7002421,0.003603193,0.07680675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043777334,0.00022698856,0.10082232,0.0019557255,0.00012331012,0.00044685806,0.28431556,0.0046041524,0.00037004173,0.5839704,0.023045622,0.00007514219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053359014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006347189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018123634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028360107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037139354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09584814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200354907","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12758","title":"Religion‐State Interaction at the Local Level: Key Findings from a Survey of Religion and Local Elected Officials","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); State (computer science); Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Public administration; Quarter (Canadian coin); Context (archaeology); Religiosity; Political science; Corporate governance; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.05997752824033093,"score_gpt":0.3611649880980634,"score_spread":0.3011874598577325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200354907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99926895,0.00002474666,0.00003262537,0.00006271845,0.0000011854947,0.0000062372987,0.00011686324,0.0000011129737,0.00048556566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956995,0.000030599622,0.000035259272,0.00003099897,0.0000030483716,0.000013830582,0.000108424174,0.0000012459282,0.00020666324],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872917,0.0007363509,0.0000714563,0.00011884305,0.00011094973,0.00023327017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995355,0.0013068933,0.0016325187,0.0002693914,0.00053980143,0.000896533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013790256,0.00011436729,0.0002447074,0.0012731786,0.0011501806,0.0011317244,0.00037674938,0.0003803792,0.0031897998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047296057,0.0001963696,0.00022404031,0.001696659,0.0006647079,0.00064114714,0.0011833885,0.00059178675,0.0004681435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030180056,0.0000853348,0.991169,0.000020257643,0.000018414808,0.00006922641,0.0058274954,0.000022307839,0.00019521263,0.000038577145,0.00021167692,0.0023124323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015429172,0.000045783123,0.97827667,0.000009049524,0.0000072312077,0.00002981885,0.02122156,0.000045681638,0.000032557586,0.00001509704,0.00031168855,0.000003429974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022614399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049946193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022614399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004710401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047248675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044965506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207075526","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12782","title":"2021 SSSR Presidential Address: Religion as Social Location—Global and Comparative Perspectives","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Buddhism; Christianity; Hinduism; Scholarship; Comparative religion; Islam; Sociology; Sociology of religion; Argument (complex analysis); Sikhism; Social science; Religious studies; Environmental ethics; Political science; Anthropology; Law; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.05785094927665852,"score_gpt":0.4046382853944998,"score_spread":0.3467873361178413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4207075526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053587165,0.05215849,0.000710488,0.3735351,0.012244914,0.000021084315,0.0010895381,0.000046026522,0.50660723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79044414,0.05296636,0.0011595953,0.011186845,0.009457137,0.00004345595,0.0006419199,0.00006268576,0.13403788],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995701,0.00022255177,0.000017811264,0.00004585215,0.000069914786,0.000073770745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989656,0.00044856084,0.00011807813,0.000033728156,0.00022114498,0.00021281264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011145794,0.0002164359,0.00027574404,0.0013818956,0.0022105733,0.004074781,0.00028381706,0.0019794106,0.047312316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012342515,0.00007094007,0.000120620185,0.0025290041,0.0020173362,0.0022084666,0.0016107493,0.0015629178,0.0046890783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008036152,0.00015006236,0.023249349,0.0007759103,0.000018708031,0.00052994746,0.017567735,0.0003580833,0.00070781604,0.38216427,0.39994568,0.17445199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068353525,0.000062462874,0.029536808,0.001090075,0.000011840135,0.00038594118,0.026966624,0.00021497032,0.0001737378,0.014987781,0.92654526,0.000017639057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072630183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014137372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047312316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014628647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016677752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15827549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235744629","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2004.00256.x","title":"BOOK REVIEWS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religious Tourism and Spaces","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious studies; Theology; Blessing; Mysticism; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03573349701552317,"score_gpt":0.3548490542916377,"score_spread":0.3191155572761145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235744629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045269504,0.14230935,0.0014115032,0.014025904,0.02301425,0.00018034548,0.00330337,0.0007485703,0.81455404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022067542,0.0646769,0.0012394236,0.0073448652,0.005746139,0.000121913814,0.002964675,0.0004692855,0.9152301],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987147,0.0001578156,0.00008082677,0.00025852633,0.00068517425,0.000103032864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850744,0.00032124188,0.00008880467,0.00015921594,0.00068911194,0.00023425536],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006202065,0.0010063421,0.0012328223,0.0032278248,0.0015252989,0.006947143,0.0023228398,0.0025203174,0.49885523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034040986,0.00045460745,0.00078186655,0.0044807782,0.00086751714,0.003574425,0.0023858277,0.0027072255,0.41363505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012173672,0.000022405804,0.000047766516,0.0004994169,0.0000042381976,0.000067199886,0.00009159733,0.000038646696,0.00012020829,0.0047401325,0.8901089,0.104247324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018052009,0.0000031869783,0.000053434618,0.00019590152,0.0000013853925,0.00006796926,0.000036533434,0.000005728312,0.000015085817,0.00054561556,0.99907124,0.0000020506704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00381903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007392842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49885523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023276426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040785796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7148222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246618451","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00279.x","title":"BOOK REVIEWS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Theological Perspectives and Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Faith; Poetics; Religious studies; Sociology; Reading (process); Publishing; Homosexuality; Gender studies; Theology; Art; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Poetry; Literature","score_opus":0.07276283763266055,"score_gpt":0.4135627206351525,"score_spread":0.3407998830024919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246618451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004356847,0.20634496,0.0017954308,0.023359515,0.04637192,0.00026898514,0.004582784,0.0011140578,0.7157267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023343398,0.10015801,0.0015517762,0.011473369,0.012826303,0.00014223794,0.0038352532,0.0004925023,0.8671861],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867094,0.00015012496,0.00009466177,0.00020852312,0.0007679258,0.000107870896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722505,0.00054241624,0.00015169363,0.00025070994,0.0014205568,0.00040950993],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008052361,0.00094856217,0.0012948595,0.0036022163,0.0011672259,0.0059170765,0.0025447058,0.002736916,0.5176084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051709632,0.0004773747,0.0008755086,0.0040982417,0.00073534437,0.0033135784,0.0019216054,0.0025383618,0.4476023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013828106,0.000022106187,0.000039226274,0.0005130391,0.000004320884,0.00006066093,0.000038450366,0.000038602848,0.00011675363,0.0024904222,0.90087223,0.09579035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024348526,0.0000045576317,0.00005562582,0.0002442029,0.0000020879338,0.000090083544,0.000022108788,0.000005856168,0.000019224373,0.00048315857,0.9990683,0.0000023877992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035592183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058157593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5176084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00200707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038963566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68807304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310187242","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12819","title":"RELIGION AT THE EDGE: NATURE, SPIRITUALITY, AND SECULARITY IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST. Edited by PaulBramadat, PatriciaO'Connell Killen, and SarahWilkins‐Laflamme. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press, 2022, vii + 266pp. $89.95 hardcover, $34.95 paperback.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ambrose University","funders":"","keywords":"Secularity; Spirituality; Religious studies; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01005035053253533,"score_gpt":0.20157807031400396,"score_spread":0.19152771978146862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310187242","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042346423,0.93326575,0.0003654116,0.016446063,0.0022707288,0.000013792461,0.00036498913,0.000019377281,0.043019194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034989204,0.8805855,0.0011163716,0.0019344704,0.00090190506,0.000027682643,0.0003971712,0.000036166315,0.080011465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987626,0.0000366606,0.0000059357167,0.0000107174155,0.000054389697,0.000016083653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996594,0.00008998653,0.000040953928,0.000014293309,0.00009836214,0.00009694685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004581301,0.0007623207,0.00049195415,0.0010678957,0.0018289369,0.0028616958,0.0005727316,0.0006681214,0.013750078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007153633,0.000447834,0.00018231115,0.004347399,0.0019922687,0.0024295708,0.0009832254,0.0019441249,0.0015624386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005238024,0.00007027335,0.0064171036,0.0016284157,0.00003344397,0.00026643788,0.008936858,0.0002875879,0.00026664708,0.01623521,0.541972,0.42383355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071379113,0.0000127270205,0.024290131,0.0034572347,0.000024183379,0.00036500476,0.012262374,0.00011787808,0.00013814424,0.011569672,0.94774014,0.000015472047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2742756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5215193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7257244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031934467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010786969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5453583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376875497","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12856","title":"Race, Religion, and Global Solidarities: W. E. B. Du Bois and “The Black Church” as a Contested Category","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies; Louisville Institute; Society for the Scientific Study of Religion; Yale University","keywords":"Gender studies; Solidarity; Sociology; Politics; Salience (neuroscience); Black church; Context (archaeology); Ambivalence; Identity (music); Religious studies; Political science; Law; Anthropology; African american; History; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Art","score_opus":0.018150101450920296,"score_gpt":0.306635683785814,"score_spread":0.28848558233489374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376875497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8358528,0.005938883,0.0008896421,0.039310966,0.00014725036,0.000020808118,0.000018891593,0.0000036975794,0.11781696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754024,0.0005575408,0.00010769369,0.00046070982,0.000027188958,0.0000072707835,0.0000022081867,0.0000019954252,0.001295109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998425,0.0011517461,0.000013379991,0.000078927085,0.00011714063,0.00021387091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873346,0.000782896,0.00014988588,0.000049489376,0.0000983844,0.00018596102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031346658,0.00021442826,0.000250302,0.0016077223,0.01075766,0.005901203,0.0005201322,0.0015457179,0.0034170875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020440044,0.00012348215,0.00012467786,0.0010889776,0.022158684,0.00418888,0.004313924,0.0015774259,0.00009835043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042674015,0.00008496055,0.016374456,0.000065261775,0.000010550319,0.00041587223,0.31130093,0.00014861466,0.0004200423,0.6502918,0.0036050153,0.017239768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014389965,0.00006999909,0.029328605,0.0005128505,0.000020528123,0.00028571984,0.7500303,0.00052496913,0.00052677107,0.09927728,0.119380094,0.000028447252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016270988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036575302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016270988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042243605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020890129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032352567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377027924","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12851","title":"Divine Relations as a Basis of Subjective Social Status During Later‐Life: Direct and Moderating Effects","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"SSS*; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Consciousness; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.03485289539499497,"score_gpt":0.3674002158345057,"score_spread":0.33254732043951074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377027924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977208,0.00034968767,0.00016572782,0.00026377416,0.000020665098,0.000019111618,0.00015634616,0.0000040989485,0.0012997733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990202,0.00011507239,0.00016608599,0.000038758215,0.000009190909,0.00002663879,0.00008785157,0.00000396679,0.00053219136],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998406,0.0008064306,0.000056418696,0.00030167738,0.00015904059,0.00027048375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917527,0.004010466,0.0015349338,0.0006812693,0.00055363565,0.001467029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024814068,0.00058151747,0.00047613788,0.00061751896,0.0013768027,0.0016158303,0.00086951826,0.0007106748,0.004542958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011628921,0.00027514083,0.00056417764,0.00071119476,0.0013514562,0.0010823945,0.0019919493,0.0014488617,0.00017447212],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007896757,0.00074290857,0.9759285,0.00006921272,0.00034201553,0.00012436484,0.008409157,0.000113355076,0.0011847469,0.00096301845,0.00035161423,0.010981529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008693381,0.00014432438,0.99662375,0.000023030825,0.00005802785,0.000018429037,0.0022724012,0.00012761216,0.00013043822,0.0002738636,0.00031234242,0.0000071407912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02894014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04327198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02894014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010871512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011634877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057543397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378070605","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12862","title":"Masculinity, Femininity, and Reported Paranormal Beliefs","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Scheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Paranormal; Femininity; Psychology; Masculinity; Expression (computer science); Gender identity; Social psychology; Gender role; Psychoanalysis; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.0837826158958662,"score_gpt":0.39502775149007463,"score_spread":0.3112451355942084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378070605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987915,0.0000832708,0.000030638697,0.000036784255,0.0000017188628,0.0000044171697,0.00005610464,7.7573253e-7,0.0009947361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999713,0.00006122818,0.00003290321,0.0000061703954,0.0000010055588,0.0000016563108,0.000029096269,3.8713327e-7,0.00015453613],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995937,0.000076295095,0.000029187615,0.000033430948,0.00018025865,0.00008712857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965604,0.0007237174,0.0016489924,0.00016418846,0.00040088288,0.00050197943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009788568,0.0001359453,0.0001541898,0.0007755817,0.000920653,0.00069793663,0.00029370308,0.00020260758,0.0034186582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005561087,0.000130025,0.00014892934,0.00047268544,0.0011318227,0.0002630672,0.0004906057,0.00041130628,0.00010065659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002597997,0.000025985893,0.9947543,0.000013035225,0.000013222254,0.000047053967,0.002377965,0.000021336878,0.0002223127,0.00013622375,0.000058522986,0.0023039633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014368895,0.000026780772,0.99496585,0.000023976429,0.000007240175,0.00014461942,0.004332717,0.00005491553,0.00008061797,0.00008198316,0.00027533833,0.000004566618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08843071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15186329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08843071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066341186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010489253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17583197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389640086","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12901","title":"Religiously Unaffiliated Youth in Europe: Shifting Remnants of Belief and Practice in Contexts of Diffused Religion and Cohort Decline","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Cohort; Sociology; Demography; Psychology; Social psychology; Gender studies; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.03808510461718154,"score_gpt":0.37339735148820186,"score_spread":0.33531224687102035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389640086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994425,0.0001138379,0.00002970214,0.00004068138,0.0000028404932,0.0000010194743,0.000032474258,5.653347e-7,0.0003363797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99974483,0.000060789796,0.000021414022,0.000011269502,0.0000026170076,8.6661976e-7,0.000052365165,5.671746e-7,0.000105285675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935275,0.00021238792,0.000051576368,0.0001148402,0.00010726202,0.0001611544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706775,0.0006427329,0.001168237,0.00027126327,0.00038197,0.00046797175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022481435,0.000112615104,0.00025302847,0.00102801,0.00050090376,0.0013781794,0.0003611131,0.00026222557,0.0011662685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039463625,0.000102908234,0.00019611961,0.0010603206,0.0010073435,0.00078152696,0.0015160952,0.0005984714,0.00010540766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067714325,0.000030125319,0.9831701,0.0000127914345,0.000030578925,0.000076849385,0.010235388,0.00003321784,0.00024117787,0.00034858627,0.00008964251,0.005663928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011588195,0.00002090367,0.9895431,0.000014057475,0.0000047133412,0.000029888432,0.00996292,0.00003557177,0.00003874481,0.000051724102,0.000295051,0.0000023043046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017989086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023595141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017989086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057280913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048200795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035768807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408309775","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12949","title":"Antiracism as Inclusivity: The Racial Justice Paradigm of White Progressive Churches","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lilly Endowment","keywords":"White (mutation); Economic Justice; Sociology; Gender studies; Racism; Criminology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023506014189104595,"score_gpt":0.3687976644441521,"score_spread":0.3452916502550475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408309775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7263114,0.0006285697,0.0052167317,0.029879684,0.00022937798,0.000059606664,0.000018042972,0.000013981088,0.23764259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969343,0.00005090564,0.00031780638,0.00087528053,0.000023515297,0.000013919787,0.0000019440254,0.0000042913744,0.0017778908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99462503,0.0035328942,0.0000586205,0.00040086554,0.0006345152,0.000748193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725866,0.0007929321,0.00043335254,0.00023968569,0.00044796438,0.0008274118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005751604,0.00020854974,0.0001857071,0.0013025264,0.018328248,0.006966777,0.0010308238,0.0016065454,0.0029427598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038055424,0.00019113765,0.00018123412,0.00046147453,0.050385226,0.0034690138,0.0062815654,0.002967591,0.0001267282],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036369576,0.00012045415,0.007368206,0.00003685336,0.000009600351,0.00031466232,0.45491344,0.00007928618,0.0010428833,0.52415377,0.0019708301,0.0099536255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037061458,0.0001331728,0.025893744,0.0002911231,0.000024254694,0.00031254045,0.65026295,0.0008611166,0.00080608134,0.2082881,0.113039516,0.00005034617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04111861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09900115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04111861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005851916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00706796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08175856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408742791","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12960","title":"The Weak(ening) Link Between Religiosity and Morality: Evidence from Five Western Countries","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Crandall University","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Morality; Link (geometry); Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Law; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.06458944101581071,"score_gpt":0.4024156974650127,"score_spread":0.337826256449202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408742791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984585,0.00019198582,0.00004538475,0.000029670973,0.0000057317366,0.0000063648345,0.00012644925,6.224349e-7,0.0011352064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944335,0.00015884958,0.000057972557,0.000020530635,0.0000035839216,0.00000423794,0.00019147455,0.0000010023267,0.000118864875],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989673,0.00047544698,0.00013338316,0.000150245,0.00014225116,0.00013133993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906132,0.002677658,0.0032667886,0.0008034521,0.0019169053,0.0007219338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025844122,0.00020862155,0.0002936902,0.0017406655,0.00077889126,0.0009186149,0.00027062566,0.0002633902,0.0015110177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047425907,0.0002061363,0.00035570542,0.0028857354,0.0011223669,0.00043691025,0.0008476527,0.00039649924,0.00021319166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004951894,0.000030451547,0.9943382,0.000037137983,0.00009114426,0.00007674114,0.002091283,0.000023139553,0.00013753439,0.00008123929,0.00011340501,0.0029301562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033168706,0.000034460652,0.9966646,0.000029315686,0.000032727534,0.00003904025,0.002743259,0.00002965432,0.00005232195,0.0000148995305,0.00035357405,0.000002849809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061760094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09729401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061760094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042188488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006253696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122801244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408744336","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12950","title":"Burning Bodies: Religion, Race, and Migrant Funerary Practices in the Early 20th‐Century Pacific West","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); American west; Immigration; Ethnology; History; Sociology; Geography; Gender studies; Archaeology","score_opus":0.028862851006823325,"score_gpt":0.3430780851020912,"score_spread":0.31421523409526786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408744336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827344,0.0006675045,0.000047694815,0.0008761663,0.000016836122,0.000005032599,0.000017305938,0.0000017403032,0.015633257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99599177,0.00078744465,0.000037790167,0.00011438762,0.000008189595,0.000003962746,0.000008812748,0.0000029012149,0.0030447522],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961436,0.00012690351,0.000008772481,0.000030739157,0.00005752171,0.00016158768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993765,0.0002043711,0.000127156,0.0000220829,0.0001135917,0.00015647364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009546884,0.00016972491,0.00020687013,0.0012042129,0.0062275985,0.0026036333,0.00037647615,0.0003862891,0.0028316546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013251316,0.00014455275,0.00006485217,0.0010983051,0.008026385,0.0016375717,0.0021566194,0.0012492072,0.0000952047],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014099283,0.000013854787,0.018845944,0.000029015036,0.000002622404,0.00029807608,0.9700622,0.00000758788,0.00020983156,0.0035773478,0.000398933,0.006540483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011831545,0.000013429566,0.046144962,0.00009789594,0.0000034845486,0.00011853433,0.938746,0.000012688209,0.00010405397,0.00030039434,0.014451949,0.000005428069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3295279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5548478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3295279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029739917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002970404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6552197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416955488","doi":"10.1111/jssr.70012","title":"Policing (Im)Modesty in Modest Fashion: Islamic Feminist Renegotiations of Modesty in Influencer Culture","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Influencer marketing; Islam; Negotiation; Complicity; Feminism; Ethnography","score_opus":0.03177066974408322,"score_gpt":0.3673174921159829,"score_spread":0.3355468223718997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416955488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95117354,0.00013883298,0.0011581316,0.0029607397,0.00007242414,0.000019139274,0.000010556142,0.000012569283,0.044454105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819094,0.00003606753,0.00011366423,0.0001438131,0.000010842344,0.000004337717,0.0000024321205,0.0000043340697,0.0014935205],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967655,0.0021156492,0.000047988153,0.00018778913,0.0003306238,0.000552528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596417,0.0016921541,0.00096430467,0.0003454365,0.00043698386,0.0005968796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031133562,0.00024391772,0.00018744839,0.00077027373,0.011371697,0.0040008784,0.0006370649,0.0008057734,0.0025595047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060576512,0.00022587871,0.00015460819,0.00042404176,0.021394141,0.0015825921,0.003783437,0.0020871041,0.00022279819],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037407,0.000037636768,0.0199487,0.000023063461,0.0000062036656,0.0005524942,0.94986004,0.00004238587,0.0012239688,0.017568192,0.0009527735,0.009747012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040434766,0.00006036607,0.018657327,0.000060057362,0.000005996628,0.00029273127,0.9474203,0.00017116487,0.0006028872,0.0024317726,0.030274555,0.000018764365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02039134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035272866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02039134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002458862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021560662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040545285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}