{"meta":{"query_hash":"af7544ed0ba2","filters":{"venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion"},"cohort_total":73,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":73,"exported":73,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/af7544ed0ba2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+for+the+Scientific+Study+of+Religion"},"results":[{"id":"W1662897256","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12087","title":"Compassionate Conservatives? Evangelicals, Economic Conservatism, and National Identity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Protestantism; Conservatism; Sociology; Politics; Individualism; Solidarity; Poverty; Political science; National identity; Religious identity; Political economy; Gender studies; Law; Religiosity","score_opus":0.05990858753995195,"score_gpt":0.4039518175740941,"score_spread":0.34404323003414217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1662897256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98077506,0.00022781675,0.0014374899,0.011218048,0.0039654435,0.000549404,0.000012891903,0.000018535111,0.0017953354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624354,0.0003904609,0.00016277445,0.00032691137,0.00021282276,0.000017849377,0.0000016087246,0.000005608543,0.0026384539],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998418,0.00027609133,0.00036227264,0.0001787373,0.00059719523,0.00016774384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976086,0.0012831127,0.00034070908,0.00012238213,0.00054148986,0.00010371627],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044322857,0.00007829237,0.00016217066,0.000092889735,0.0032361604,0.00049174065,0.0003152939,0.000045707213,0.00003412151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007922346,0.000055564313,0.00012170553,0.00017838566,0.0005738892,0.00040491248,0.000047948746,0.00016088379,0.000017751585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008015652,0.000365938,0.009683439,0.000012279429,0.00018027241,4.00913e-7,0.024836302,0.00027716442,0.0004238653,0.21475136,0.74782836,0.0015604302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013671484,0.00023606072,0.019097872,0.000047905713,0.000071996554,0.000013261706,0.020106599,0.004477333,0.000035871864,0.07185109,0.8825396,0.00015532075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010778921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020425254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14290027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011176876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001778104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1852253396","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12010","title":"Close Ties, Intercessory Prayer, and Optimism Among American Adults: Locating God in the Social Support Network","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prayer; Religiosity; Interpersonal ties; Optimism; Social psychology; Psychology; Social network (sociolinguistics); Social media; Political science; Theology; Law","score_opus":0.03194991907473543,"score_gpt":0.36117287885368543,"score_spread":0.32922295977895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1852253396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902191,0.00051246345,0.00007809862,0.00494931,0.0020537644,0.0010864661,0.0000017018283,0.000011672775,0.0010874129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99782324,0.00034574233,0.00007615199,0.00028759628,0.0006584643,0.000058558202,0.0000014319726,0.00000936119,0.0007394447],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748945,0.00067271036,0.000539441,0.00027677434,0.0005907846,0.0004308526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983203,0.0005429158,0.00056231464,0.00022776412,0.00027047825,0.00007624372],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006631176,0.00012395445,0.000246773,0.00011169419,0.002711786,0.0004924919,0.00072056043,0.000068467336,0.000014565398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025230076,0.0000741782,0.000100913385,0.00063715386,0.0014148534,0.0002302067,0.000063905776,0.00034456054,0.0000046321343],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000143814,0.00048675417,0.057834573,0.000020167434,0.00007572329,0.0000037338941,0.58831066,0.000092723814,0.000019071122,0.0011382989,0.32698408,0.024890434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019085549,0.0012118549,0.1783404,0.00012456645,0.00009208762,0.000026139482,0.77735806,0.00021784996,0.0000044719286,0.012656047,0.027755192,0.00030478078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01633867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012722193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29922888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047981866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007895175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99858654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966541637","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2004.00245.x","title":"Transcendence and the Moral Self: Identity Integration, Religion, and Moral Life","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Religious identity; Psychology; Moral reasoning; Moral disengagement; Social psychology; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral development; Altruism (biology); Identity (music); Moral psychology; Epistemology; Religiosity; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04859969370211387,"score_gpt":0.3642612227081757,"score_spread":0.3156615290060618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966541637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718219,0.004692601,0.0018639758,0.016688617,0.0034504035,0.0010961497,0.0000037546167,0.000027772758,0.00035483684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948381,0.003937191,0.00016629609,0.00034437908,0.0003187675,0.000020651189,7.574479e-7,0.000008366486,0.00036547912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976469,0.0003994649,0.00054375135,0.00032369656,0.0007878981,0.00029828504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983846,0.00035542584,0.0003404525,0.00029351233,0.00046836198,0.00015767671],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070345807,0.00014070988,0.00026753618,0.00013378385,0.0037064357,0.0006964219,0.0005585973,0.000089875844,0.0000033656115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054998643,0.00007869144,0.00014364842,0.0005269099,0.0015984612,0.00045986008,0.000042143216,0.00027775776,0.0000029172604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011320869,0.0009949146,0.02084115,0.0000471153,0.00030402993,0.00000743041,0.42384803,0.00023445155,0.00024390283,0.45608544,0.09377278,0.0024886872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013400518,0.0011324789,0.037831083,0.00016007209,0.0006478731,0.00014763926,0.08844935,0.00018078307,0.00009192165,0.83926076,0.018220983,0.00047656542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008090163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011519799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3831753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048729842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001745472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969035548","doi":"10.1046/j.1468-5906.2003.00199.x","title":"The Political Activity of Evangelical Clergy in the Election of 2000: A Case Study of Five Denominations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Politics; Protestantism; Power (physics); Sociology; Explanatory power; Political communication; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04352986840190211,"score_gpt":0.40087213591557636,"score_spread":0.35734226751367426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969035548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99610555,0.000100829806,0.00008942954,0.0011238614,0.00093827187,0.0009609457,0.0000044208273,0.000002643902,0.0006740259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993751,0.00008572049,0.0000128789925,0.0000097714055,0.00004343975,0.00002164876,1.319807e-7,0.000004028654,0.00044726685],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973541,0.00097257236,0.00053261337,0.0001360101,0.0007749485,0.00022975182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996517,0.002015099,0.0004736666,0.00026753347,0.00067709206,0.000049591687],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004234563,0.00007461765,0.00019037725,0.00013107387,0.0018091489,0.00008489895,0.0003648804,0.000050264924,0.0000044513513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013510522,0.00003980587,0.00020168225,0.00088653807,0.00048750048,0.000113230875,0.000022039385,0.000257282,6.0687535e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055103976,0.018947504,0.009173963,0.000035062494,0.00062309863,0.000022441436,0.86601037,0.0011506404,0.003461433,0.06532176,0.030261049,0.0044416417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010435028,0.0011589512,0.0033523494,0.000023176235,0.00014900349,0.00010644205,0.98631245,0.0003426189,0.000675581,0.0033144327,0.0034562035,0.00006531264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011545754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022872372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12030206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001310654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024255396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969036633","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00379.x","title":"Class and Congregations: Class and Religious Affiliation at the Congregational Level of Analysis","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Crandall University","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Social class; Sociology; Class analysis; Unit (ring theory); Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Mathematics education; Politics","score_opus":0.072897216882943,"score_gpt":0.38430612701795464,"score_spread":0.31140891013501165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969036633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98988605,0.000905683,0.0017275873,0.004799698,0.001364113,0.0006593986,0.000025345003,0.0000087017825,0.0006234417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99292696,0.0012682432,0.00009308636,0.000076531614,0.00009489853,0.000009542917,0.000005073103,0.000005062619,0.0055206185],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810916,0.00016146664,0.0005443132,0.00019817248,0.00079351274,0.00019338372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964959,0.0016731805,0.00063380756,0.00020621212,0.0009044199,0.00008649463],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005048708,0.000091377646,0.0001999067,0.0002339876,0.0031847532,0.0002445801,0.00022820437,0.00007200017,0.000013299865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067417027,0.000056389697,0.00019868769,0.0009783782,0.00090110226,0.0001785247,0.000051852374,0.00015811449,0.0000015174434],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079013343,0.0009773857,0.10309472,0.00005606417,0.0041122264,0.0000037976913,0.35042778,0.0032077827,0.0047610966,0.08011939,0.44214553,0.010304092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00467972,0.0009415469,0.133184,0.000118653195,0.003897173,0.000067991336,0.4853432,0.006656303,0.001670875,0.02033094,0.3425517,0.0005578842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011083733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011324027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13491541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011248624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009810271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969257386","doi":"10.1111/0021-8294.00043","title":"The Personality Characteristics of Methodist Ministers: Feminine Men and Masculine Women?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Gender Roles and Identity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Eysenck Personality Questionnaire; Personality; Psychoticism; Neuroticism; Christian ministry; Population; Psychology; Masculinity; Value (mathematics); Femininity; Appeal; Social psychology; Big Five personality traits; Gender studies; Extraversion and introversion; Sociology; Demography; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Law","score_opus":0.05322030118019433,"score_gpt":0.35896794771506235,"score_spread":0.305747646534868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969257386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99206054,0.0009563625,0.00014122271,0.004615639,0.001274467,0.00041023706,0.000009613792,0.000004193804,0.00052773766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98975635,0.002878968,0.000077790144,0.000013199263,0.0001678883,0.000011876894,4.8131017e-7,0.0000040895316,0.0070893597],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840915,0.0002001972,0.00039129207,0.00014906863,0.00060732145,0.00024296409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863833,0.00032396094,0.0004043539,0.00018292251,0.00038290667,0.00006752196],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071704956,0.00007743609,0.00021688557,0.000051472245,0.0034599165,0.00030449824,0.00034819604,0.000024721228,0.00000447567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055437844,0.000042321546,0.00009670691,0.00026655837,0.0004103983,0.000082190854,0.00008724179,0.000094415,5.9790773e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008603462,0.0011425209,0.069248274,0.000088613546,0.0009061042,0.000005454934,0.7739441,0.00000862633,0.00065183366,0.0017528048,0.10000577,0.051385563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008764681,0.0004765591,0.055987775,0.00002434282,0.00015622877,0.000009632579,0.7648254,0.00007069604,0.000019096224,0.0020678986,0.17538829,0.00009759026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051853136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005764043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07538253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005039568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005233225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978036655","doi":"10.1111/1468-5906.00118","title":"Religion and Paranormal Belief","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs","field":"Psychology","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paranormal; Church attendance; Religious belief; Psychology; Attendance; Social psychology; Belief system; Belief in God; Parapsychology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Variance (accounting); Religious studies; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Religiosity; Medicine; History; Law","score_opus":0.04435052307561688,"score_gpt":0.336242951323009,"score_spread":0.29189242824739214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978036655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98316896,0.006551023,0.00019160556,0.00027810148,0.0044899615,0.00054905785,0.0000049688783,0.000016031143,0.004750271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97620565,0.0005773756,0.00004867435,0.00007214577,0.00020952715,0.000032371823,7.331177e-7,0.00001066414,0.022842864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984549,0.00008128385,0.00044446377,0.0002765371,0.00042052355,0.0003222367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989818,0.00016865789,0.0002865465,0.0003399606,0.00012721452,0.00009581931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011346323,0.00012999632,0.00019991027,0.00015693245,0.0011946283,0.00017589102,0.0003666698,0.000058677648,0.00011840092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046105517,0.000078628254,0.00011997339,0.00028667346,0.00023745389,0.00015055321,0.000041654344,0.00019147717,0.000054581185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011290826,0.003964772,0.014163051,0.000037032358,0.00048010476,0.00005651048,0.092069134,0.00023058815,0.00434937,0.0119324075,0.8059092,0.065678746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006531672,0.0055751316,0.012240467,0.00006773017,0.00024002619,0.0010285646,0.012553911,0.0017736624,0.0006324005,0.0016371512,0.957268,0.0004512974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012199617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026436128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15135878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014902563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000074325553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91882354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980551641","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2004.00232.x","title":"Give Me that Ol' Time Hormonal Religion","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Piety; Protestantism; Feminization (sociology); Phenomenon; Generalization; Sociology; Gender studies; Religious studies; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.03736242035206034,"score_gpt":0.34917307150816806,"score_spread":0.31181065115610773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980551641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97377676,0.0008646219,0.001175365,0.0113722775,0.0071319994,0.0012750772,0.000010397214,0.00006429952,0.004329223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846352,0.001307613,0.00018323126,0.00018395425,0.00042838958,0.000025704585,0.0000030511067,0.00001548862,0.013217408],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974427,0.0001556031,0.00044590895,0.00028085784,0.0012805875,0.00039430495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980774,0.00037483807,0.0004559121,0.00031221425,0.0006065484,0.0001730667],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002890897,0.00014608707,0.00023022921,0.00017729856,0.0048072417,0.000578175,0.0006777825,0.00010110915,0.000039480747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036028758,0.00009971387,0.0004385302,0.00060230773,0.00047634178,0.00036303146,0.000057359815,0.0003347327,0.00011115739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029528223,0.0015579049,0.00051151245,0.00001250021,0.0004086872,0.000011575329,0.14980464,0.0019251296,0.006747104,0.021613909,0.8150248,0.0020869758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042491774,0.0015776496,0.0012383068,0.00019958154,0.0004212119,0.000100564226,0.09273709,0.0002727095,0.0020538871,0.06580934,0.8308029,0.00053756987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015364873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048723083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05706754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002836407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002900498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997280460","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01598.x","title":"Orthodoxy Niches: Diversity in Congregational Orthodoxy Among Three Protestant Denominations in the United States","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Crandall University","funders":"","keywords":"Orthodoxy; Diversity (politics); Protestantism; Sociology; Niche; Identity (music); Ecological niche; Gender studies; Religious studies; Anthropology; Theology; Ecology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Biology","score_opus":0.1503182842868457,"score_gpt":0.3667854377306173,"score_spread":0.21646715344377157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997280460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948238,0.000054412183,0.0005856298,0.0013057844,0.00097067247,0.0014466844,0.0000077118475,0.000010090553,0.00079520646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989312,0.00019235724,0.00017206844,0.00006823437,0.00004359569,0.000053716667,0.000004967099,0.000004955484,0.00052889396],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978812,0.0005002551,0.00043880675,0.00018274559,0.00074614846,0.00025088136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778163,0.0010912997,0.00035284032,0.00021070002,0.00050604,0.000057515288],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066086478,0.00009303227,0.00014139392,0.00031906218,0.0033151356,0.000221544,0.00070796977,0.000057508787,0.000029794799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007735972,0.00005759141,0.00014322135,0.0013637141,0.0005244881,0.000301368,0.000086296044,0.00033678196,0.0000034327686],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010322083,0.0010233171,0.48178467,0.000006860995,0.00006434939,0.000007911645,0.49485183,0.0007079666,0.000017826083,0.010738815,0.010324677,0.0003685442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013854573,0.00037520117,0.44371736,0.00008793732,0.0000904157,0.000008620456,0.51311034,0.0018506921,0.000019953924,0.028390558,0.010780663,0.00018279393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018642047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07774076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059098713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014310497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013918607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99798244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000356121","doi":"10.1111/1468-5906.00185","title":"Constitutional Privilege and Constituting Pluralism: Religious Freedom in National, Global, and Legal Context","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of religion; Sociology; Law; Politics; Christianity; Hegemony; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Human rights; Philosophy; Religious studies","score_opus":0.029583078380985308,"score_gpt":0.3331002933462641,"score_spread":0.30351721496527884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000356121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9507699,0.004563503,0.00084454124,0.0021720263,0.0034464914,0.0010304815,0.000082065926,0.000017627586,0.03707338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988165,0.00032199244,0.0002915497,0.00012020364,0.00011720876,0.000009356137,0.0000012770718,0.0000020346242,0.00031985936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982994,0.00017829708,0.0003873893,0.00021131664,0.0006586859,0.00026490167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998439,0.0006319254,0.00023582613,0.000085694715,0.0004888226,0.00011870248],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026730215,0.000103103754,0.00018623492,0.000079376296,0.0021913403,0.0002874513,0.00016697776,0.00005029034,0.000006061213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015452842,0.00007857399,0.000053743213,0.00033265303,0.0054022972,0.00023326212,0.00003299724,0.00014727916,0.0000012151831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022208551,0.000070165945,0.009901901,0.000003842656,0.000026363812,0.0000057680063,0.001028901,0.00014731371,0.000011433666,0.9826975,0.0058933403,0.00019126011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018395116,0.0001582106,0.00061179,0.00008294458,0.00006121433,0.00031259496,0.016871395,0.00008945304,0.000010626195,0.015791832,0.9639851,0.00018536882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020385112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028372444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96690565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015896719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001514256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001886981","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2006.00326.x","title":"The Sense of Divine Control and Psychological Distress: Variations Across Race and Socioeconomic Status","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Socioeconomic status; Sense of control; Race (biology); Psychology; Stressor; Association (psychology); Social psychology; Distress; Demography; Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.030415892502506998,"score_gpt":0.3807023658762256,"score_spread":0.3502864733737186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001886981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99014115,0.002484838,0.00049135985,0.0043710973,0.0017006802,0.0005350475,0.000047298436,0.0000067342958,0.00022178766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777985,0.001129596,0.000031488427,0.00003476226,0.00019381061,0.000010474008,0.0000012764897,0.0000043217165,0.0008144397],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984742,0.00031624362,0.00044433874,0.00020700562,0.00026389604,0.00029430745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783885,0.0012515518,0.0004308419,0.00020308499,0.0002084731,0.00006721851],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039733187,0.0000824877,0.00020004546,0.000036746358,0.0033492849,0.00030317903,0.0002000213,0.00006436351,0.0000031488746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021362801,0.000046149038,0.000084810774,0.000120167846,0.0013446012,0.000083468985,0.000032441123,0.00012950154,0.0000010313323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001955143,0.003859915,0.3099388,0.0000515525,0.0006563839,0.000008583746,0.19206172,0.00040016306,0.0027858317,0.069366395,0.3891977,0.029717818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072959894,0.0013921233,0.76643497,0.000030864125,0.00025757067,0.00005156319,0.061528478,0.00029863746,0.000019600255,0.08802743,0.074380875,0.00028190267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023194975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006486598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45649618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024299787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002334576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007856141","doi":"10.1111/0021-8294.00037","title":"Religion and Partisanship in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Political science; Survey data collection; Politics of the United States; Liberal Party; Multivariate analysis; Political economy; Religious studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.040594272821894796,"score_gpt":0.3441186682647868,"score_spread":0.303524395442892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007856141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98981994,0.00063697976,0.00004747591,0.004635569,0.0029356622,0.00044481145,0.000001470129,0.000005223331,0.001472869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925546,0.0029552733,0.000018631144,0.0001281855,0.000107837,0.0000105148,3.589876e-7,0.0000048726106,0.0042197327],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985447,0.00014414416,0.00034358393,0.0001565019,0.0005576135,0.00025346145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893713,0.000431631,0.00018742189,0.0001482567,0.0001922239,0.000103345315],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018588506,0.00007029301,0.0001345806,0.00008933535,0.0015282477,0.00020414956,0.00024966762,0.000033099714,0.0000152039465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003122266,0.00004981084,0.00006974942,0.00049450254,0.00014991772,0.00014263525,0.000022779934,0.00019214438,0.000002590771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017444954,0.00036798257,0.15000315,0.000010515179,0.000072564915,0.000022375598,0.06067968,0.0006142472,0.00023038231,0.0068211197,0.77511257,0.005890984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012340107,0.0002375717,0.018691886,0.000080047095,0.00006269514,0.000048575323,0.13340618,0.00059228134,0.00004142651,0.008806519,0.836608,0.00019080086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8117507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97030467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15855393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000293528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054673996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009431768","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2007.00343.x","title":"Spirituality and the Current Adjustment of Adult Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Spirituality; Psychology; Sexual abuse; Mood; Attribution; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.03481947790362584,"score_gpt":0.36839562452709096,"score_spread":0.33357614662346513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009431768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871363,0.0044825645,0.00034736903,0.0009927757,0.0055294298,0.0011397687,0.000011974572,0.000006773161,0.00035306066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977929,0.001631437,0.000037602964,0.00005072672,0.00030418736,0.0000071236095,0.0000010248053,0.000006621727,0.00016838452],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969718,0.00051570655,0.00093468965,0.0002527034,0.0010124245,0.00031266868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967975,0.0010399147,0.00089160836,0.00039117955,0.0007778107,0.00010200066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013377334,0.00012436176,0.0003620896,0.00016022063,0.0011190978,0.00006381861,0.0005945254,0.00006157039,0.0000045463044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053422933,0.00006800822,0.0001814197,0.0005109359,0.0017806095,0.00009228782,0.00005033783,0.00023406192,8.4622934e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018778334,0.00472696,0.04709503,0.00014784142,0.00047701193,0.0000014959651,0.7935004,0.0000584134,0.00029948808,0.030424803,0.040126413,0.08126432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02020112,0.0035785064,0.39758173,0.00034826045,0.0011117983,0.000040060655,0.46956453,0.000062684405,0.00082172477,0.04659237,0.059450667,0.00064656354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005964745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015782116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3504867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030552557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010368402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90169495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010961768","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01666.x","title":"Religion, Religious Tradition, and Nationalism: Jewish Revival in Poland and “Religious Heritage” in Québec","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, University of Michigan","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Religious pluralism; Religious identity; Religious controversies; Nationalism; Judaism; Religious philosophy; Lived religion; Pluralism (philosophy); Religious studies; Social science; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Negotiation; Theology","score_opus":0.028888225440998047,"score_gpt":0.33267681829574347,"score_spread":0.3037885928547454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010961768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97092384,0.015687954,0.00003396519,0.009857496,0.0021070743,0.0008972731,0.0000075230832,0.000019361525,0.00046549912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855311,0.013163993,0.00007220531,0.0002175616,0.0002909429,0.0000411099,0.0000027949393,0.000014476246,0.00066579564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976086,0.000294587,0.00070502504,0.00028188594,0.00069173623,0.00041817134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981841,0.00077267113,0.00034072407,0.00020117636,0.0003022097,0.00019911982],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041841776,0.00015999158,0.00029830748,0.0003530421,0.0013877639,0.00035090928,0.0002696295,0.00011458954,0.000004798557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000796727,0.00012481223,0.00012396599,0.00073063455,0.00045158487,0.0004856313,0.00004554342,0.0003678814,0.0000033593278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022202524,0.0013338773,0.22579657,0.00005640739,0.0001117339,0.000010900599,0.31969348,0.00008720905,0.0004467267,0.0111641,0.43887967,0.0021972968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007892256,0.00094844366,0.12357879,0.00063480146,0.00028079862,0.00041714255,0.19143112,0.00035842904,0.00007852972,0.052585937,0.62083346,0.0009602725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021483237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031594116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1819538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024590493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023953576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014430749","doi":"10.1111/1468-5906.00115","title":"A Longitudinal Study of Religious Doubts in High School and Beyond: Relationships, Stability, and Searching for Answers","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Infallibility; Mainstream; Social psychology; Psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Scale (ratio); Developmental psychology; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.11763163377612246,"score_gpt":0.38467602799948425,"score_spread":0.2670443942233618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014430749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922253,0.0020551847,0.00013917098,0.0018363129,0.0012092491,0.0023512158,0.000008524238,0.000010274199,0.00016476403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873185,0.0007106381,0.00017468067,0.000019106328,0.000113141985,0.000042592612,7.77531e-7,0.0000104146475,0.00019678066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717456,0.00065716077,0.00072370627,0.00041721226,0.0006829143,0.00034441875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733794,0.0014202336,0.0003978558,0.00031340137,0.0003770813,0.00015351831],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00923183,0.00013336587,0.0003396513,0.00038101626,0.002049821,0.0002433055,0.0003518852,0.000088612076,0.00000681844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011232705,0.000100074765,0.00008467085,0.0006099383,0.00056046183,0.00022858809,0.00006760509,0.0003406805,7.3048966e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004122481,0.0019635505,0.75025034,0.000052330837,0.00010840702,0.000003608322,0.2276216,0.00007521866,0.000094462586,0.001362092,0.016456285,0.0015998422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012513678,0.0061233793,0.5190103,0.0001381573,0.00037570877,0.000041241354,0.38861257,0.00048232192,0.000029630348,0.06928044,0.002941306,0.00045126062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00582427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019451365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23124005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006783398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057288995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017915142","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2008.00436.x","title":"The Education‐Contingent Association Between Religiosity and Health: The Differential Effects of Self‐Esteem and the Sense of Mastery","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Religiosity; Psychology; Attendance; Association (psychology); Anxiety; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Attribution; Self-esteem; Mental health; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.037407010903136764,"score_gpt":0.3539413113696679,"score_spread":0.31653430046653114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017915142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97622496,0.0049852403,0.00005647729,0.014027239,0.003250259,0.0013447722,0.0000032563944,0.000006367959,0.00010143135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99281275,0.005919003,0.000018182525,0.000089910885,0.0003604391,0.000016413309,5.880182e-7,0.0000058173596,0.00077691016],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969074,0.0012770724,0.0006356346,0.00018612135,0.0007443043,0.00024947093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99441844,0.003515922,0.0012572532,0.0002990101,0.00044158276,0.00006778414],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008379029,0.0001041609,0.0003115543,0.000068527326,0.0044035926,0.00013955135,0.0003588372,0.000072414216,5.4828445e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059020927,0.000046298574,0.00014802326,0.00028760455,0.0009559209,0.0000692794,0.00007167263,0.00022039263,3.9854038e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000522987,0.0012951809,0.30314922,0.00019979052,0.0010286205,9.839814e-7,0.47551206,0.0000075976395,0.00023917841,0.007764446,0.19862236,0.011657558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055114636,0.0014272863,0.89405143,0.00024017763,0.000889807,0.00005590436,0.047989998,0.00004567573,0.0003120359,0.019016173,0.03021798,0.00024209156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003277469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012292705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59090215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060480677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021277588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022178759","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12162","title":"SACRED DIVORCE: RELIGION, THERAPEUTIC CULTURE, AND ENDING LIFE PARTNERSHIP. By KathleenE. Jenkins. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2014. ix + 236 pp. $80.00 cloth, $27.95 paper.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Citation; Sociology; Media studies; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.049725389310933205,"score_gpt":0.32605156817904507,"score_spread":0.27632617886811184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022178759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48232856,0.34555233,0.005138651,0.036541294,0.05314293,0.0102425665,0.00010717504,0.0007664586,0.06618001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8240787,0.12298156,0.00016943637,0.00064274285,0.0009754277,0.000006597328,0.000013246459,0.00004386877,0.051088408],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670416,0.00048181933,0.0005301228,0.00048401792,0.001257375,0.000542509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972753,0.00040519435,0.00061938894,0.00040553728,0.0006238042,0.000670806],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002943655,0.00025546466,0.00036338184,0.00008816266,0.0035004437,0.0008197981,0.00082180684,0.00019450703,0.00001846564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049154344,0.00019022322,0.00033493844,0.00060233276,0.00062230753,0.00068731187,0.000090050584,0.0004688295,0.00001492434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016768478,0.00028629153,0.00096433435,0.000007174179,0.00018886695,0.0000017416612,0.03173006,0.000056950234,0.00071101927,0.0034161587,0.9621916,0.0002781366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00211694,0.0003390772,0.000071567425,0.00005304045,0.0002312969,0.000009584732,0.041440275,0.00006844436,0.0001993805,0.0017757074,0.9534593,0.00023534696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012789594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086755434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34175014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002748345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008877792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030544080","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01546_4.x","title":"QUEER WOMEN AND RELIGIOUS INDIVIDUALISM by Melissa M. Wilcox","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Individualism; Citation; Sociology; Gender studies; Library science; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016908116515315284,"score_gpt":0.33664059666727086,"score_spread":0.3197324801519556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030544080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860883,0.0005389981,0.00006985562,0.0051383567,0.006619185,0.0006200077,0.000013065928,0.00002712366,0.000885105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891056,0.0015034075,0.00009198078,0.00020278686,0.0002896412,0.000040654795,0.0000014991995,0.00001197893,0.00875248],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802953,0.0001399212,0.00039370154,0.0002421018,0.0008292542,0.0003654853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824524,0.00049691927,0.0003394477,0.00027609558,0.00042744982,0.00021485357],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004151959,0.0001168221,0.00019206783,0.00012097945,0.0035610602,0.00075186475,0.0005066591,0.0001077664,0.000034535646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006289741,0.00007969272,0.00013697619,0.00039248288,0.00058757036,0.00025286246,0.000059235874,0.0004871726,0.000008474524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003184158,0.0002254212,0.0011280439,0.0000039480674,0.00008896241,9.1257004e-7,0.18163368,0.0000043998384,0.0029512655,0.0017947451,0.8103139,0.0018228784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007696477,0.00024194775,0.00043698362,0.000012135439,0.000051131654,0.00002042161,0.07023579,0.000029166693,0.00010600077,0.009899729,0.9180648,0.0001322843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013042834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090915454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11139789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006514715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012439907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99773616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034498118","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01594.x","title":"BUDDHAYANA: LIVING BUDDHISM by Anil Goonewardene","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"South Asian Cinema and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Buddhism; Mount; Citation; Sociology; Library science; Philosophy; Computer science; Theology","score_opus":0.051018735955330685,"score_gpt":0.24514024150575014,"score_spread":0.19412150555041946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034498118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97645575,0.002115121,0.00011067985,0.0002476821,0.008057928,0.000577202,0.000024329309,0.000036667043,0.012374643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9468909,0.000030083906,0.000030863008,0.000037836002,0.0004882645,0.000012803271,0.0000014707144,0.000014893349,0.052492876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877506,0.00004528084,0.000352339,0.00019683066,0.00039387392,0.00023663281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896514,0.00008461271,0.00029172777,0.0002652208,0.00031818644,0.000075079006],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008619554,0.00013004919,0.0001832711,0.00009275596,0.0019083922,0.00036895365,0.00042621995,0.000031583793,0.00048751142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008276997,0.00007357203,0.00016898697,0.00008142365,0.00020643926,0.00015897791,0.000045413217,0.00016410647,0.000028596964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000586227,0.0005408538,0.00039549428,0.000015497428,0.00013928745,0.000002961483,0.27123708,0.000003241677,0.00048283525,0.0038819192,0.7218956,0.0013466176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012910375,0.0014680832,0.0007569579,0.00015245745,0.00041201423,0.00005079533,0.23434679,0.000053582968,0.0005138895,0.0040730815,0.75655115,0.000330184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020459217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038583422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04011823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017742334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023240984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040784458","doi":"10.1111/1468-5906.00183","title":"The Myth of Pluralism, Diversity, and Vigor: The Constitutional Privilege of Protestantism in the United States and Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Pew Charitable Trusts","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Pluralism (philosophy); Mythology; Protestantism; Citation; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Law; History; Political science; Classics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025222931648354097,"score_gpt":0.2883319935130499,"score_spread":0.2631090618646958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040784458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934637,0.000544546,0.00006987764,0.0041499436,0.00046789844,0.0006225495,0.000043264252,0.0000011022943,0.0006371223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921227,0.00043137465,0.000014541198,0.000115484254,0.0000187827,0.0000039512593,8.6076403e-7,0.0000010648093,0.00020166555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986151,0.00031007788,0.0002302608,0.00007712125,0.00061914837,0.00014827777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978681,0.001444977,0.00025991927,0.00011190466,0.00028147514,0.000033582262],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029146995,0.00005444077,0.0000983565,0.000044205834,0.004463944,0.000065470376,0.00032396193,0.000015720296,0.000001433514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004250799,0.000023406437,0.000029866582,0.00030164263,0.0046310527,0.000056487406,0.00007804908,0.00011348162,2.8223036e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002407388,0.000056573735,0.016153263,0.000005860122,0.000036562134,0.0000013917447,0.011925904,0.00015172503,0.000012239462,0.96482533,0.0067387,0.000068369525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011375996,0.00029884887,0.01332169,0.000087155866,0.0001561529,0.000057865018,0.16269548,0.00011453902,0.000073566946,0.022289818,0.7996291,0.00013821262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25368756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19424267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9425355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038950475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008819549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99807775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050959364","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01618.x","title":"The Religious Composition of the Chinese Diaspora, Focusing on Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Diaspora; Buddhism; China; Mainland China; Geography; Census; Demography; Sociology; Gender studies; Population; Archaeology","score_opus":0.019833544584997413,"score_gpt":0.3012241341616274,"score_spread":0.28139058957663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050959364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98987204,0.0010093333,0.00004245895,0.0018807503,0.006267903,0.0005662321,0.0000044636586,0.000003802885,0.00035298942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986727,0.00024890728,0.000008139511,0.000046553494,0.00043714626,0.000006833096,5.302576e-7,0.000005112243,0.0005740823],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842376,0.00021766931,0.00035644046,0.000098001154,0.0006527326,0.00025137942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829775,0.00058949087,0.0005030122,0.00027784365,0.0002660709,0.0000658539],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038321759,0.00007655899,0.00012207382,0.00004201671,0.004724476,0.00013506862,0.0005101631,0.000027969221,0.0000033887256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027302283,0.000034406712,0.000121055935,0.00036742323,0.00026377937,0.00013670472,0.000036834103,0.00013846316,0.0000010595087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033124836,0.001011885,0.14265151,0.000028428049,0.00024127352,7.140725e-7,0.37984228,0.002199016,0.0013137984,0.005916344,0.46010187,0.0063616107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031868247,0.00089377735,0.42716914,0.00030606712,0.0005227322,0.000033508382,0.29389152,0.00073343544,0.0031834221,0.028165981,0.24121347,0.000700105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21562776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62009144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40446368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014450024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002562567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99657124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051165549","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2000.tb00014.x","title":"Not in My Backyard: Studies of Other Religions in the Context of SSSR—RRA Annual Meetings","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Judaism; Context (archaeology); Religious studies; Latin Americans; Comparative religion; Gender studies; Sociology; History; Anthropology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.056795369473268645,"score_gpt":0.3933794088829302,"score_spread":0.3365840394096616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051165549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98932135,0.0009918094,0.0000053012327,0.005388658,0.0011045669,0.00081385573,0.000019731835,0.000005655242,0.0023490875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945287,0.0023361186,0.000037898473,0.00021944426,0.000081227394,0.00002562336,4.310922e-7,0.0000068535373,0.0027636958],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723715,0.0004666162,0.00086998014,0.00019490086,0.0009590545,0.00027228743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972731,0.0012926799,0.0004993496,0.00028519344,0.00060878444,0.00004093292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006689672,0.0001128747,0.00034656478,0.00020314586,0.00092901214,0.000077268654,0.0006811144,0.00007255478,0.00003468214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074129424,0.00006645418,0.00028479405,0.0009982891,0.00083008036,0.00018702738,0.000030824373,0.00030843142,0.000005391853],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028042376,0.0010470336,0.0037929944,0.000022446342,0.00015085668,0.0000020754283,0.7980819,0.0004042776,0.0005993505,0.004189615,0.18829654,0.0031324932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014240247,0.00045152378,0.0022095235,0.00022624477,0.000078722325,0.000006250243,0.8264802,0.000050645987,0.0003266219,0.002630464,0.16599908,0.000116699906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006141284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006662967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028398309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081767415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013130189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9283826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071614180","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01640.x","title":"Identity as a Determinant of the Overreporting of Church Attendance in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Religiosity; Attendance; Identity (music); Church attendance; Social psychology; Psychology; Religious identity; Survey data collection; Demography; Sociology; Political science; Law; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.037954680641789786,"score_gpt":0.37844315944367024,"score_spread":0.34048847880188043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071614180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99324787,0.00029257886,0.000028320921,0.0004848131,0.00497386,0.00038665388,0.0000027817273,0.000001414523,0.0005817382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874866,0.00010825221,0.00001545143,0.00002399393,0.00006904725,0.000005917557,9.065652e-8,0.0000033209285,0.0010252709],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980052,0.00015145156,0.0006012545,0.00008890389,0.0009236379,0.00022955787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998157,0.0002982442,0.0009641579,0.00021541328,0.00031099148,0.000054151908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036253799,0.00005591703,0.00016591456,0.000053437394,0.0009220531,0.000044461718,0.00045578575,0.000025447835,0.000012062356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008889208,0.00003284761,0.00017363543,0.00055291754,0.00020554438,0.00025074428,0.000058680827,0.00016872476,4.852657e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006762677,0.00074615,0.81860864,0.000048336067,0.000113664726,0.000002286786,0.12760489,0.00039383752,0.0069573233,0.0038202724,0.0394178,0.0022191806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011718828,0.0001931369,0.64011645,0.00041240914,0.00017642965,0.00005256469,0.31772205,0.00031054486,0.0046095154,0.0035444375,0.03146955,0.00022099567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76767826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80366427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19011718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025397606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076314626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70917803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073914248","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01596_1.x","title":"Continuing the Conversation on Canada: Changing Patterns of Religious Service Attendance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Service (business); Conversation; General Social Survey; Sociology; Survey data collection; Library science; Public relations; Political science; Media studies; Social science; Law; Business; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.0443386840493302,"score_gpt":0.3074355279786326,"score_spread":0.2630968439293024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073914248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98965865,0.00013611779,0.0003286255,0.003715941,0.0049494677,0.00064810517,0.000009158613,0.00001000471,0.0005439247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806297,0.00025114993,0.000016501097,0.00027646206,0.00013996597,0.000014239504,8.297194e-7,0.00000727479,0.0012306158],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829894,0.00015929586,0.00038508992,0.00015109892,0.0007543907,0.0002511797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797016,0.00043816015,0.00057817367,0.00025540614,0.0007009507,0.000057159392],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022742029,0.00008681329,0.00015149548,0.00009071791,0.0017031354,0.000094106224,0.00051930617,0.000036432713,0.000014869282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021193162,0.00005209161,0.00013503796,0.00048084778,0.000121950914,0.00010737229,0.000034000197,0.00019394056,0.0000023678276],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018366009,0.0003543817,0.011265269,0.000030858082,0.00022506823,0.0000034230175,0.8958791,0.00032055523,0.00052794616,0.0044997903,0.084445484,0.002264463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014408135,0.0005009305,0.007921136,0.00037439095,0.0002427209,0.0000148234485,0.8980897,0.00093724456,0.001820925,0.0012228023,0.08718696,0.0002475425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35553706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40635937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05082232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012611707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019682462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080318005","doi":"10.1111/0021-8294.00088","title":"Tolerant (In)civility? A Longitudinal Analysis of White Conservative Protestants’ Willingness to Grant Civil Liberties","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Crandall University","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Civil liberties; White (mutation); Political science; Law; Civil rights; Conservatism; Politics","score_opus":0.10450612085176111,"score_gpt":0.3172914303350634,"score_spread":0.2127853094833023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080318005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988008,0.00066103286,0.005984558,0.0031783667,0.00073950127,0.0011967445,0.00005444128,0.0000053197696,0.00017202138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986645,0.00017486725,0.00011573086,0.000070423564,0.000031843618,0.00006398458,0.0000016571425,0.000007991078,0.00086898915],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801165,0.000049866463,0.0011402215,0.00033578934,0.0001607981,0.0003016876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984635,0.00015760775,0.00067716005,0.00038242686,0.0002385948,0.00008067554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038183616,0.00012244128,0.0005830628,0.00095884746,0.0005028407,0.00008940663,0.00036673484,0.000033684086,0.000021072081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002700948,0.00009539686,0.00022769775,0.0023646741,0.00009603417,0.00014550779,0.00009266736,0.00012646643,0.000003774521],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006919165,0.0013530359,0.917669,0.00013341592,0.0011692648,0.00001100405,0.04907594,0.018304845,0.000033046672,0.008485419,0.0017299481,0.0013431552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021236874,0.0015742962,0.90509784,0.00022215921,0.00040754085,0.000009783052,0.004767284,0.022182336,0.000062594685,0.015487275,0.047706008,0.0003591906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003419408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011369493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04597606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090319205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003500276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63444436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085136611","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01526.x","title":"Religious Involvement, Beliefs About God, and the Sense of Mattering Among Older Adults","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Attendance; Social psychology; Church attendance; Psychology; Psychosocial; Metropolitan area; Sociology; Religiosity; Medicine","score_opus":0.019279997877657246,"score_gpt":0.3277922596856238,"score_spread":0.30851226180796654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085136611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881561,0.0014278507,0.00008005573,0.0026276174,0.0059713167,0.0012259238,0.000005344012,0.000013933083,0.0004918592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972614,0.0012588607,0.00005873488,0.00015232817,0.00038317623,0.000024297226,8.484613e-7,0.000012438002,0.0008478842],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997681,0.00031161366,0.0006627598,0.00029725855,0.00071150705,0.00033585334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755186,0.0006371429,0.00067745475,0.00047138942,0.0005533459,0.000108829474],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071646464,0.00013898197,0.00029958828,0.0001550021,0.0020873563,0.00027113952,0.0005394394,0.00010298945,0.000012346068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040749816,0.00007841452,0.00017312699,0.00043408,0.0020034043,0.00013706811,0.00009146014,0.0003560317,0.000002976556],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011496291,0.0010707717,0.08748154,0.0001454738,0.000373585,0.000010135962,0.6446677,0.000039401915,0.0025818716,0.007182341,0.24865511,0.006642429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03678168,0.002157205,0.38626304,0.0013102321,0.0011564652,0.0002667304,0.35565096,0.0005067335,0.0016549408,0.06116149,0.15173362,0.0013569024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008213078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0125930235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29878148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001655333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006360977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086529178","doi":"10.1111/1468-5906.00154","title":"Quest Religion and the Problem of Limited Compassion","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Compassion; Social psychology; Religious orientation; Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Value (mathematics); Style (visual arts); Religious belief; Salient; Identity (music); Orientation (vector space); Epistemology; Theology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.056939993988941826,"score_gpt":0.3557725182007575,"score_spread":0.29883252421181566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086529178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718793,0.0060422006,0.00021708308,0.013612749,0.0026903185,0.0015516245,0.0000037307523,0.000020072539,0.0039828992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930566,0.003956315,0.00012373265,0.000116429015,0.00023326783,0.000019334213,6.939898e-7,0.000008586045,0.0024850208],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974692,0.00063460734,0.0006362811,0.00024337946,0.0007492901,0.00026724229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975969,0.00086478476,0.0006426045,0.0003250819,0.00048337152,0.000087255845],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00631566,0.00011468015,0.00029741848,0.00016454978,0.0024285316,0.00020235921,0.0005559863,0.000084789855,0.000012240753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024371505,0.00005933506,0.00016986395,0.0005732247,0.0014445232,0.00012472515,0.000054974906,0.00021649434,0.000004520481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007160498,0.0011936623,0.0063819615,0.000048665763,0.00016303848,0.0000023052075,0.14889833,0.000090005546,0.00049120234,0.045104247,0.78651285,0.010397684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015694058,0.0028220792,0.011116653,0.000473829,0.00069837377,0.00011461338,0.058476146,0.001489172,0.0002623991,0.12054647,0.78774154,0.0005646594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030334005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019335307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09042218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029615147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032334254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092676722","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01669.x","title":"Religion and the Acceptability of White‐Collar Crime: A Cross‐National Analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Collar; White-collar crime; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Structural engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.03773239820380942,"score_gpt":0.40462138440369305,"score_spread":0.36688898619988364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092676722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879035,0.0013255752,0.0007448782,0.0028215193,0.0026209867,0.00087964354,0.000012694926,0.000011819606,0.0036794357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99660784,0.0007781958,0.00010779053,0.00008030302,0.00021734736,0.000023622053,0.0000014257632,0.0000050259455,0.0021784762],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973731,0.0004297287,0.00058506004,0.00017291315,0.0011806613,0.00025854094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967201,0.0010945435,0.00058969646,0.0002684414,0.0012201078,0.00010713139],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010602035,0.00009647835,0.0002736668,0.00018701876,0.0045593497,0.00030837272,0.00043372766,0.000067566776,0.00006787312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014340207,0.000053310312,0.00050934317,0.0013177368,0.0012075388,0.00035568708,0.00008772725,0.00019623313,0.0000022077343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009754533,0.0021402296,0.3076396,0.000038870625,0.0025828644,3.0123422e-7,0.41146606,0.0017506531,0.00018218302,0.08137291,0.18932697,0.0025239254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006783406,0.0004604917,0.46254772,0.000029777424,0.004056351,0.00002235078,0.16776052,0.002583505,0.00028954228,0.02967412,0.32531986,0.00047234568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011485612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050268957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24370554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009636034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013503205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097293541","doi":"10.1111/0021-8294.00034","title":"Disciplined Litigation, Vigilant Litigation, and Deformation: Dramatic Organization Change in Jehovah's Witnesses","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Successor cardinal; Millenarianism; Political science; Law; Consolidation (business); Sociology; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.041333768193406215,"score_gpt":0.35995606466699315,"score_spread":0.3186222964735869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097293541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872827,0.00021871546,0.0011764936,0.008494078,0.0016776539,0.0009378169,0.0000026442258,0.000022220043,0.00018768654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997532,0.0011741242,0.00007494025,0.0000862517,0.0002377735,0.00003998169,0.000009827151,0.000007814659,0.0008372801],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985155,0.00013878528,0.00048332187,0.00015096825,0.0005210073,0.0001904165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983716,0.00027606843,0.00034997964,0.00014692653,0.00077569013,0.00007971717],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018735355,0.000086719454,0.00014349884,0.00018381895,0.0024978926,0.0005225989,0.00021490439,0.000054119548,0.000023237688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060990587,0.00006147135,0.00005491396,0.0012659663,0.00022713862,0.0007353926,0.000030187839,0.000126613,0.000005189649],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008329605,0.00097505003,0.14628692,0.000075837124,0.000108351975,0.000003999382,0.80018944,0.0006049971,0.00049210456,0.02397347,0.021045268,0.006161288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005761603,0.0008833585,0.22315593,0.0008215396,0.00034956002,0.00018572425,0.5932964,0.008746174,0.00043898125,0.059870593,0.10569594,0.0007942031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008063173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021118044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20689303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111548834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009504072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107280236","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12124","title":"THE NEW EVANGELICAL SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT. Edited by BrianSteensland and PhilipGoff. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. xiii + 321 pp. $99.00 cloth, $29.95 paper.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Crandall University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Sociology; Media studies; Theology; Library science; Art history; Art; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03224688623597563,"score_gpt":0.3047647218605094,"score_spread":0.2725178356245338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107280236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.639752,0.042870708,0.007304079,0.21545394,0.051466726,0.008368061,0.00013617238,0.00038544813,0.03426289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7512629,0.055150878,0.00022214309,0.0007317992,0.007631074,0.000013882229,0.000018691822,0.00006292225,0.1849057],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974555,0.0005474116,0.00037088734,0.0003113124,0.000900498,0.00041442557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787617,0.00094348314,0.00039031924,0.00025978984,0.00027081024,0.0002594208],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032046605,0.00015744715,0.00022715163,0.000040077288,0.008638141,0.00082845165,0.00070485286,0.00011933746,0.000032635926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039844305,0.00010318492,0.00026119978,0.00033233722,0.0005553723,0.00029515795,0.00010585435,0.00045297478,0.0000079562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011241519,0.000105293315,0.00012256982,0.0000030919982,0.00010481004,3.8584358e-7,0.014947291,0.000009034472,0.0001518714,0.002626144,0.9764266,0.0053904713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013332382,0.00016955644,0.00018637713,0.000016676227,0.00013580218,0.00000393423,0.032660633,0.00016688067,0.000014274085,0.0011607762,0.9640322,0.00011969735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027824445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018713047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21472214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011757346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023392405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110617990","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12006","title":"The Longevity Effects of Religious and Nonreligious Participation: A Meta‐Analysis and Meta‐Regression","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Hazard ratio; Religious belief; Longevity; Meta-regression; Demography; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Gerontology; Confidence interval; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.06164179670537851,"score_gpt":0.39397982126677006,"score_spread":0.33233802456139155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110617990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94940877,0.041740723,0.0005373882,0.0053193714,0.0012507507,0.0015881977,0.0000027638976,0.0000135354685,0.00013847215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99277234,0.006272441,0.000079103054,0.00011292399,0.00010016291,0.00013181564,5.5979757e-7,0.0000081907365,0.0005224659],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972043,0.0007140367,0.00062996545,0.00033582418,0.00077911664,0.0003367262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99548787,0.002604794,0.0007197449,0.00044649464,0.0005995528,0.00014156004],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050809495,0.00017999164,0.0007497266,0.00021576456,0.002776958,0.00043948082,0.00043567547,0.000092650596,0.000007627924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005961693,0.00008146242,0.00063939067,0.00088066503,0.0010787048,0.00018240622,0.00008552302,0.00017358817,0.0000022202996],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009983208,0.003447566,0.028880946,0.00047374802,0.36474046,0.000021258253,0.2515626,0.00056114997,0.0021007508,0.011840902,0.31458887,0.020783449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040912284,0.0031182268,0.07381057,0.000044070177,0.7300498,0.00004681666,0.024574423,0.0005757349,0.0013071886,0.13258815,0.028911378,0.0008824165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010791306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00804233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36530936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016477165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045763754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99852127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112780906","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01682.x","title":"“Practical Divine Influence”: Socioeconomic Status and Belief in the Prosperity Gospel","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Socioeconomic status; Gospel; Social status; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science; Economics; Economic growth; Demography; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043010342055473036,"score_gpt":0.397925491746054,"score_spread":0.35491514969058097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112780906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98975307,0.000683712,0.000026777016,0.0059946943,0.0019789028,0.0008985024,0.0000029971154,0.0000061855562,0.0006551894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982109,0.0008099625,0.00007126149,0.0001709212,0.00022836847,0.00003579903,5.559194e-7,0.00000464764,0.00046755845],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982299,0.00033371014,0.00034203753,0.00014023295,0.00056867517,0.00038540113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853677,0.0007074759,0.00023681036,0.00019117566,0.00021399898,0.000113790855],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007870914,0.00008206946,0.0001399843,0.000068010246,0.0024891237,0.00045264943,0.00027653365,0.00005516574,0.000025176967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070887286,0.00004689987,0.000112006106,0.00023166733,0.00050190603,0.0005388784,0.000045634868,0.00035920335,0.000011322764],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010024742,0.0020454421,0.3546305,0.000013249271,0.00013788207,0.0000011570514,0.4791469,0.00008568675,0.00017379063,0.026810843,0.133846,0.0030083102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016429648,0.0003732076,0.31401834,0.00003253606,0.00021724436,0.000037131933,0.34283158,0.0002882294,0.000023126384,0.0064005367,0.33392075,0.00021435013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015229472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015469028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20007475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001317296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014841263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122610059","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2008.00405.x","title":"Increase or Decrease? The Impact of the International Migratory Event on Immigrant Religious Participation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Religiosity; Demographic economics; Event (particle physics); Sociology; Work (physics); Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04390872177519698,"score_gpt":0.36521739246827906,"score_spread":0.32130867069308205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122610059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935554,0.0010097715,0.000048157635,0.0013754806,0.002866743,0.0010029108,0.000009535495,0.000010984337,0.00012097096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995554,0.00341606,0.000024200908,0.000097814314,0.00024239338,0.000044473465,0.0000015340697,0.000009701746,0.00060988014],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969205,0.00035364938,0.0006217949,0.00021707935,0.0015965829,0.00029035305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737,0.00071965175,0.00069513824,0.00041001063,0.00066402217,0.00014120036],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004051499,0.00014350832,0.00019770474,0.00010161668,0.00330126,0.00013698547,0.0010265736,0.000057528527,0.000018440629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014382387,0.000058122885,0.000523216,0.00060919597,0.00060518505,0.0001095763,0.000082871986,0.00020170744,0.0000050271265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078425044,0.0012070704,0.016315026,0.0000056913204,0.00034134992,0.000004472299,0.2929113,0.002061788,0.00042943147,0.0001816133,0.68536234,0.00039570825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0075409845,0.0035436517,0.6357018,0.00050041644,0.00064846827,0.00016402215,0.26874632,0.0019523463,0.0031657168,0.012883815,0.064377084,0.0007753934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019838039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023796489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6209852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031339403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009652532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99799633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125722073","doi":"10.1111/1468-5906.00187","title":"Religious Life Under Theocracy: The Case of Iran","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Theocracy; Religiosity; Islam; Islamization; Faith; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Social science; Scale (ratio); Sociology of religion; Political science; Religious studies; Law; Epistemology; Theology; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05650379152619751,"score_gpt":0.379402288141327,"score_spread":0.3228984966151295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125722073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9810932,0.0013127115,0.0009007238,0.0062284605,0.005942273,0.0009470039,0.0000051636234,0.000017282093,0.0035531824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522144,0.0011733345,0.00005514943,0.00019819413,0.00014067598,0.00001643723,2.7755092e-7,0.000010340501,0.0031841784],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785733,0.00052294816,0.0005451045,0.00018518962,0.00060888735,0.00028052743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971003,0.001238189,0.00054336514,0.00042149448,0.00057418743,0.00012247727],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053756908,0.000108772234,0.00020175286,0.00010363268,0.0044195545,0.00028843968,0.00051503355,0.00006497744,0.00003367165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011176963,0.000058187532,0.0003759803,0.00070224324,0.0006682074,0.0001422369,0.000029366762,0.00028646906,0.000008493577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012727287,0.0011619707,0.00078037847,0.000016959695,0.00046847152,0.00002992613,0.23543347,0.0014591286,0.0006459852,0.11714348,0.6409717,0.0017612624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013140597,0.00045721346,0.0001726587,0.00004640803,0.00031291452,0.00040138816,0.6425693,0.00019225283,0.00022644344,0.05211296,0.30200884,0.00018552094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002031433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019329876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40713584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006569399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025504656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99687654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128172718","doi":"10.1111/0021-8294.00018","title":"Canada's Mythical Religious Mosaic: Some CensusFindings","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Christianity; Multiculturalism; Census; Protestantism; Monopoly; Mythology; Sociology; Emigration; Religious diversity; Religious studies; Diversity (politics); Gender studies; Ethnology; Political science; History; Law; Theology; Demography; Population; Anthropology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021566615984288703,"score_gpt":0.3261865498300726,"score_spread":0.3046199338457839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128172718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690705,0.00070049375,0.000026690435,0.020645464,0.0065062954,0.00080775155,0.000021923932,0.000032335247,0.0021885585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692147,0.0021008858,0.00004914756,0.0006450024,0.0005125825,0.000018805087,0.000002610028,0.000013429518,0.027442887],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973561,0.00017538243,0.00050449255,0.00025228882,0.0012806625,0.00043106475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832934,0.0005004592,0.0002573021,0.00029114663,0.00041622613,0.00020553955],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022336135,0.00012501852,0.00021272499,0.000085371255,0.004730556,0.0004417464,0.00065695075,0.00008798868,0.00011126316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033454533,0.00008698284,0.00025158294,0.000518564,0.00035014728,0.0001926674,0.00002586655,0.0004057074,0.000020258813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000640345,0.00019923403,0.00020535986,0.0000032746725,0.00007048295,0.0000057491534,0.019206926,0.0002357835,0.00006402706,0.0019797995,0.9744718,0.0034934985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056452275,0.00016389949,0.00019487196,0.000025456877,0.00006772087,0.000023198996,0.020401571,0.00012931474,0.000038029888,0.0035914148,0.97467977,0.00012025739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40718794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2715461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13564186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030922217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008997224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99656516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131624667","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2012.01643.x","title":"Group Size and the Trajectory of Religious Identification","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Religious identity; Population; Social psychology; Identification (biology); Group (periodic table); Sociology; Statistics; Psychology; Demography; Religiosity; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03890270084149617,"score_gpt":0.36231801915481776,"score_spread":0.3234153183133216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131624667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808858,0.008362434,0.00030094883,0.002177141,0.006729855,0.0009885866,0.0000033994938,0.00001119133,0.0005406378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965551,0.0018914796,0.0000461818,0.00006769609,0.00045501758,0.0000235103,5.6808483e-7,0.000008096757,0.00095234474],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756694,0.0006346009,0.0006241921,0.00018221652,0.000692823,0.00029925766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969668,0.001592155,0.00066525594,0.00036031535,0.00032236867,0.000093116476],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013440779,0.00009785037,0.00024081582,0.0001060628,0.0018899024,0.00016069337,0.0005226056,0.00007358396,0.0000066863195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090033107,0.000054109943,0.00018084794,0.00042017855,0.0014319161,0.00019584192,0.000037211834,0.00016631681,0.0000032867054],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014964516,0.0019809206,0.031363096,0.000078237565,0.00041490793,9.115876e-7,0.6251876,0.000028061313,0.006140814,0.056245457,0.26834604,0.00871751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016577546,0.0015799262,0.24449648,0.00017693092,0.001588278,0.00013460507,0.33481768,0.00007420357,0.0009221167,0.14600983,0.25285107,0.000771371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021466757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094483874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29036993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031248423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046757108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134672891","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01524.x","title":"“Do Unto Others”: Effects of Priming the Golden Rule on Buddhists’ and Christians’ Attitudes Toward Gay People","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Compassion; Psychology; Social psychology; Priming (agriculture); Gautama Buddha; Religiosity; Outgroup; Prejudice (legal term); Ingroups and outgroups; Homosexuality; Golden Rule; Theology; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Buddhism","score_opus":0.032043323210845805,"score_gpt":0.363224433273108,"score_spread":0.3311811100622622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134672891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878757,0.0004723325,0.000049068734,0.0013658623,0.008109327,0.0006461582,0.0000017536356,0.000009218789,0.0014705787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742097,0.0001514885,0.00003537676,0.000045327513,0.0004374797,0.000016935483,1.9861753e-7,0.0000075506814,0.0018846596],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986071,0.00017660021,0.00027134523,0.00020188422,0.0005178922,0.00022515816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983364,0.00084762473,0.0003198857,0.00023135942,0.00020030075,0.00006447545],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002672825,0.00009460615,0.00019614224,0.000089259775,0.0016414856,0.00019232623,0.0005591041,0.000070908834,0.00001855022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006308801,0.000051748353,0.00012573334,0.00027711166,0.00062820036,0.00008307913,0.000049770384,0.00025918995,0.000003667384],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005897701,0.0022542519,0.05642241,0.00018618685,0.0004891795,0.0000043199298,0.71260107,0.000020216134,0.07374953,0.034852337,0.08200086,0.0368299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006580984,0.0063482886,0.4588531,0.00064506667,0.00077898864,0.00005037786,0.24301772,0.0000918444,0.0066852327,0.034536064,0.24159174,0.00082057616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015121266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00307164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46958333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028910248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053392934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160173287","doi":"10.1111/1468-5906.00181","title":"The Religious, the Paranormal, and Church Attendance: A Response to Orenstein","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Paranormal; Church attendance; Attendance; Religious belief; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Medicine; Religiosity; Political science; Law; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.027558506432802016,"score_gpt":0.35353248387783576,"score_spread":0.32597397744503376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160173287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98241514,0.0078946985,0.00018774932,0.0022376059,0.0052010766,0.0011131986,0.0000045655206,0.000010295042,0.00093566807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770102,0.00042512215,0.000045586745,0.00018242422,0.00010553643,0.000116661075,1.8816336e-7,0.000013347974,0.022100948],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757695,0.0005741611,0.0005083222,0.00031112073,0.0005700938,0.000459334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753255,0.0011608511,0.00028582942,0.00068485615,0.0002268534,0.00010904934],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075059147,0.00015599457,0.00019148467,0.00010003391,0.0034263432,0.000400645,0.0007281861,0.000049718095,0.000015669477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046751753,0.00006453612,0.00012980727,0.0005926414,0.00046607977,0.00007262446,0.00007268736,0.00027826338,0.000029148872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011571666,0.000866724,0.003688204,0.000012038058,0.00042500635,0.000032417265,0.12234707,0.00040214675,0.012185516,0.011031273,0.8206602,0.01677779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015807601,0.0017841216,0.00694682,0.00002756889,0.000068547604,0.00040003724,0.027014336,0.000040740008,0.0003579725,0.0009288813,0.9607042,0.0001460069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009789555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009423606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14004406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002649319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006200461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99787104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163294436","doi":"10.1111/1468-5906.00158","title":"Revisiting the Social Sources of American Christianity 1972–1998","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Crandall University","funders":"","keywords":"Christianity; Political science; Sociology; History; Religious studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05068552075119663,"score_gpt":0.3642777850078498,"score_spread":0.31359226425665315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163294436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853623,0.0007899113,0.00023286085,0.0091361925,0.0019615518,0.000478714,0.0000064384694,0.000016261296,0.0020157879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957876,0.0008542644,0.000046608824,0.00007882976,0.0007759294,0.0000089555815,3.0949764e-7,0.000006640426,0.0024408232],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802953,0.0003163824,0.0004485221,0.0001461076,0.0008170285,0.00024242407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788976,0.00068623695,0.0008040943,0.00019138794,0.00037152873,0.00005700997],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031696775,0.00008449889,0.00020750033,0.000074476215,0.0068223136,0.0003098057,0.00061265664,0.000032751082,0.000031450134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054302876,0.000048351605,0.00034659574,0.000729933,0.001076205,0.00011609337,0.00004431978,0.00026569574,0.000010490225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006532856,0.00056262297,0.0042004744,0.000023445042,0.0003187193,0.0000018506448,0.48158434,0.00013693464,0.00057692424,0.004193202,0.45669553,0.05164064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056625565,0.00027591555,0.0033633003,0.000060751252,0.00020850552,0.000012573573,0.41170672,0.0007177886,0.00009124694,0.0013472188,0.58150023,0.00014951447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022414867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003551247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12480469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006085954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004297467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99447066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175179899","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12218","title":"God, Yoga, and Karate","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Martial arts; Appeal; Studio; The arts; Sociology; Key (lock); Aesthetics; White (mutation); Relation (database); Gender studies; Political science; Art; Visual arts; Law","score_opus":0.07710090983883312,"score_gpt":0.3671414125781571,"score_spread":0.29004050273932397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175179899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925134,0.0005888986,0.00005057625,0.0015477997,0.003655069,0.00034844072,0.0000023407056,0.000010232461,0.0012832405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987404,0.00015201206,0.000046029774,0.000024133824,0.0002703509,0.000008691955,4.7516585e-7,0.0000033952178,0.0120908925],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897814,0.000093624985,0.00016719285,0.00010755019,0.00049177674,0.00016170031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915636,0.00009951913,0.00015256659,0.000082129314,0.00039548683,0.00011394116],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00244548,0.000052389205,0.00009840006,0.00003831846,0.001978447,0.00030472106,0.00023423303,0.00003259036,0.0000045040674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031184722,0.000030138297,0.000057260775,0.00028118253,0.00029782948,0.00015147973,0.000033841163,0.00008681995,0.0000049132623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032876543,0.0006695877,0.010231772,0.000014367318,0.0001998332,0.0000064835194,0.51361513,0.00024358036,0.00073272147,0.03262804,0.40048087,0.04084885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019906538,0.0007695189,0.003881368,0.000030813626,0.00016706406,0.000014245701,0.321744,0.00056628167,0.000035577123,0.056583796,0.61400986,0.00020680508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086454337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015023497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21352899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043996028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007773685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338294541","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12226","title":"A CULTURE OF FAITH: EVANGELICAL CHURCHES IN CANADA. By SamReimer and MichaelWilkinson. Montreal: McGill‐Queen's University Press. 2015. xii + 284 pp. $100.00 cloth, $32.95 paper.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Queen (butterfly); Faith; Sociology; Theology; Media studies; Art history; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029769066432213956,"score_gpt":0.29876915770034596,"score_spread":0.269000091268132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338294541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729983,0.009177175,0.0000324361,0.0094578,0.003075182,0.0014999369,0.00023033094,0.000025536146,0.0035033054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858425,0.007734205,0.000069044334,0.0000820575,0.000081285885,0.000005090095,0.0000039977513,0.000010324376,0.0061714696],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801236,0.00026798632,0.00035686872,0.00025036425,0.0008278535,0.00028455944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846154,0.00025105788,0.00034693602,0.00019730005,0.00050982524,0.00023332669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012615118,0.00012811774,0.0002679326,0.000054624954,0.0009840542,0.00008707635,0.00042317205,0.0000918826,0.0000057513644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028313271,0.000091657916,0.00012335858,0.00040677792,0.00031692206,0.00026490417,0.000071591254,0.00028937883,0.0000011897653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012209688,0.00018963889,0.0011988296,0.0000065654567,0.00007920268,0.0000033719782,0.022639485,0.00009098326,0.00019412322,0.00027986785,0.9748442,0.00035158847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011084472,0.00017460715,0.00088389986,0.00003819101,0.00007927323,0.0000056148124,0.14833169,0.00016570515,0.00008944757,0.00029788495,0.8487114,0.00011384964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8815321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54272914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33880293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046726706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054269825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75686485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460308131","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12246","title":"The Religion of the Educated Classes Revisited: New Religions, the Nonreligious, and Educational Levels","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Secularization; Census; Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Sociology of religion; Demography; Social science; Geography; Gender studies; Religious studies; Statistics; Mathematics; Population; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03996450542328877,"score_gpt":0.3715523257300654,"score_spread":0.33158782030677664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460308131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68269247,0.009836301,0.00031015565,0.29037312,0.012453482,0.0026327225,0.000029067132,0.00003060257,0.0016420843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95255154,0.016728286,0.00005298476,0.00034582432,0.00068104366,0.000039577044,9.369275e-7,0.000018007237,0.029581776],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666893,0.00058771664,0.0008254761,0.00031492734,0.0012040165,0.00039891683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99290127,0.0041470234,0.0009932794,0.00076948886,0.00103774,0.00015119673],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004506086,0.00018558756,0.00023986155,0.000100732446,0.008098215,0.00057493063,0.001394449,0.000100773315,0.00001662015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028010462,0.00006752765,0.00040973577,0.0009589343,0.0013978301,0.000231411,0.00014978279,0.00033721337,0.000013354981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006585509,0.00015913835,0.0019569227,0.0000069001508,0.00011532101,1.1860823e-7,0.01180185,0.0000122786805,0.0009897584,0.019295694,0.9618462,0.0037499778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088993914,0.00022556432,0.010048743,0.0002979178,0.0002554837,0.00004430768,0.021446211,0.000016348264,0.0002927546,0.048222493,0.9180778,0.00018238963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002381679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018228305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2900273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015683062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010430545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517110611","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12258","title":"Race, Religion, and Anti‐Poverty Policy Attitudes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stanford Bio-X; Philippine Rice Research Institute; University of Oxford; Yale University; University of Cambridge; University of Akron; Princeton University; York University","keywords":"Poverty; Disadvantaged; Politics; Ethnic group; Inequality; Government (linguistics); Solidarity; Race (biology); Sociology; Public opinion; Diversity (politics); Welfare; Political science; Gender studies; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.029392688962024467,"score_gpt":0.37387802582648677,"score_spread":0.3444853368644623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517110611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9606765,0.00088689994,0.0007652727,0.030765658,0.0043611485,0.00080709,0.00000993906,0.000040074592,0.0016874328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733898,0.008150748,0.000070478185,0.00026594216,0.0004617435,0.000013876814,3.2173642e-7,0.000010249449,0.017636819],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981901,0.00016479398,0.0003954157,0.00024388872,0.00069192314,0.00031388534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980315,0.00068361167,0.0003292,0.00027226398,0.00053095893,0.00015249722],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024424975,0.00011126809,0.0002007168,0.00019301889,0.003554744,0.0004097959,0.00041360687,0.00006995966,0.000015753834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010441757,0.000057065874,0.00020147582,0.000522845,0.0005417833,0.000336632,0.000064541666,0.00013682614,0.000016231605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008199357,0.0004561873,0.012909126,0.0000108317245,0.00016371395,0.0000019265508,0.023185963,0.0000141514965,0.0042306357,0.026277762,0.9251806,0.00748707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014674875,0.0003043228,0.0069803633,0.00012376298,0.00008922496,0.000028554086,0.009834627,0.00001756404,0.0002440508,0.010209631,0.9705197,0.00018070727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016710595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084438483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045339063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012340758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021446949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571357502","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12281","title":"Trans‐Congregational Triadic Closure: Churchgoers’ Networks Within and Beyond the Pews","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Sociology of religion; Social psychology; Phenomenon; Epistemology; Psychology; Social science; Political science; History; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.032220638084860295,"score_gpt":0.3334080768229168,"score_spread":0.3011874387380565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571357502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9314343,0.0013542783,0.0040724427,0.049579687,0.010334252,0.0014886705,0.000011244272,0.000025966487,0.0016991975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988472,0.0012099267,0.000041957068,0.00019396977,0.00043794428,0.000026091759,5.2136795e-7,0.0000076252663,0.00960998],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814653,0.00030106175,0.00041777082,0.00019358803,0.000706114,0.00023490746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777204,0.0012557985,0.00034515283,0.00017492432,0.0003503079,0.00010178658],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050985347,0.0000959858,0.00014931458,0.00007253493,0.004431686,0.00041644875,0.00042842166,0.00006580078,0.00003691297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039289164,0.000042199485,0.00021946002,0.00038998577,0.0008015293,0.00023540335,0.000023463488,0.00021439088,0.000003000516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041173137,0.00050919235,0.003913346,0.000007741466,0.0005012487,0.000002406291,0.19413212,0.0005980045,0.0016350945,0.046666868,0.7338533,0.01776896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057810657,0.00093817816,0.0066650556,0.00012616799,0.00048131784,0.00007162845,0.16816078,0.0013981181,0.000095662355,0.03790251,0.7780048,0.00037470012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018614843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078905467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057037726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063013926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013810412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99686444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586521938","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12307","title":"Secularization and the Wider Gap in Values and Personal Religiosity Between the Religious and Nonreligious","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Nuffield College, University of Oxford; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Religiosity; Secularization; Spirituality; Sociology; General Social Survey; Sociology of religion; Population; Secularism; Religious values; Religious studies; Social psychology; Gender studies; Social science; Political science; Demography; Psychology; Theology; Islam; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028171195996928078,"score_gpt":0.33539812395870267,"score_spread":0.3072269279617746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586521938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96771115,0.0036933038,0.0005113006,0.025897963,0.0008982396,0.0010642352,0.00000520726,0.000013828315,0.00020478443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808723,0.017772065,0.000029018294,0.00019595773,0.00019645227,0.000025228306,4.7680274e-7,0.000009621843,0.0008988808],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978035,0.00054212334,0.00043709745,0.00028894027,0.00065188366,0.00027645804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665564,0.0024140647,0.00032658514,0.00021744068,0.00028998425,0.00009626752],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005670546,0.00013725256,0.0002421355,0.00010409532,0.003605116,0.0005454598,0.00031084678,0.00008657833,0.000001788194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009196802,0.000057525802,0.00012660086,0.0003635097,0.0017259297,0.00020790828,0.000105324616,0.00025130526,0.0000015226996],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086631847,0.00034398062,0.13600132,0.000042928146,0.0005583207,0.0000073389624,0.58653986,0.00002450305,0.00083039206,0.013045111,0.2409145,0.0208254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023714563,0.0015625351,0.12714697,0.00088121643,0.0015460805,0.00032176418,0.27949017,0.0014333592,0.00024788096,0.4209154,0.14161178,0.0011282794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021422885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010118304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40787026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006699327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008090609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99769205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611176864","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12319","title":"Becoming a Religious None: Irreligious Socialization and Disaffiliation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":223,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Ambrose University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Socialization; Sociology; Phenomenon; Population; Qualitative analysis; Social psychology; Religious studies; Qualitative research; Psychology; Social science; Demography; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05507444989759027,"score_gpt":0.40762762608377995,"score_spread":0.3525531761861897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611176864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803803,0.0006273529,0.0016043065,0.0077852225,0.007354473,0.0010301052,0.000005290681,0.000032065345,0.0011809098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99321634,0.003358036,0.00011513543,0.000068073605,0.0004129115,0.000024321886,0.0000017314574,0.000011735512,0.0027916913],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998283,0.00013664107,0.00041724986,0.00023577221,0.0006670792,0.0002602136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997737,0.00037016615,0.0008381357,0.00038404053,0.00056311104,0.000107567925],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027631798,0.00010975296,0.00019164699,0.00010771728,0.014025394,0.0016735708,0.00055686344,0.00008663341,0.000005041361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013709277,0.000082041486,0.00018517018,0.00016259981,0.0005537319,0.00042288704,0.00007682973,0.0001869436,0.0000054680595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023206415,0.0009828261,0.019856736,0.000037828948,0.00034781327,0.0000050097583,0.42457882,0.00030801992,0.0011382136,0.017937211,0.5143338,0.020241687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007404101,0.0012934845,0.03589022,0.00034987312,0.00095557165,0.00006592621,0.29627213,0.0048046494,0.0003025684,0.07424559,0.57750124,0.0009146478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002832373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027199346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1283067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001147311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013420283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753378098","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12339","title":"COMING OF AGE IN JEWISH AMERICA: BAR AND BAT MITZVAH REINTERPRETED. By Patricia KeerMunro. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2016. xiii + 211 pp., $90.00 cloth, $27.95 paper.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judaism; Citation; Art history; Sociology; History; Media studies; Library science; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.019202348601035132,"score_gpt":0.2873231251115884,"score_spread":0.26812077651055327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753378098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92872596,0.014832862,0.0010281851,0.0033184981,0.0056238533,0.0017054413,0.00013716036,0.0000336892,0.044594362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98587334,0.0052455347,0.0001696828,0.000046891837,0.00012784461,6.415959e-7,0.0000021990024,0.000007907708,0.008525956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823856,0.000208856,0.00037956325,0.00026006994,0.0005710743,0.00034189163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814934,0.00044985552,0.0006488523,0.00035639852,0.00021201171,0.00018355367],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012714777,0.00013336528,0.0003186335,0.00007412648,0.0023941433,0.00026578348,0.00083944725,0.00006974505,0.000013763395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005070303,0.00010764672,0.00014355152,0.00019091305,0.0021148552,0.00039996114,0.00014939721,0.00022901158,0.000001378672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005094107,0.000562731,0.022594078,0.000044008346,0.00031408828,0.000045376335,0.015054728,0.00023987902,0.002899816,0.035609588,0.9144763,0.007650043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018971292,0.0004565324,0.0021932179,0.00022096887,0.00023075797,0.000009892223,0.009130022,0.00016355056,0.00022421069,0.0009401356,0.98424816,0.00028542613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044800416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019096637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0697719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013878716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009868017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779689168","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12362","title":"Religious Intermarriage in Canada, 1981 to 2011","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada; University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Endogamy; Religious identity; Sociology of religion; Sociology; Attendance; Identity (music); Descriptive statistics; Church attendance; Census; Gender studies; Religiosity; Ethnic group; Demography; Political science; Social psychology; Social science; Anthropology; Psychology; Population; Law","score_opus":0.03878253261902365,"score_gpt":0.3692410408501747,"score_spread":0.330458508231151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779689168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730652,0.00016814917,0.0000922763,0.011692633,0.011583967,0.00083231163,0.0000073473966,0.000007199605,0.0025509042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924081,0.00038872843,0.000041100506,0.00018640317,0.00020500846,0.000024801175,3.8068225e-7,0.000007752184,0.006737701],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817723,0.00011498953,0.0004319359,0.00021136751,0.00073150464,0.00033294424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982486,0.00027530093,0.00041880863,0.0005352693,0.00035068826,0.0001713615],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024617093,0.00009477416,0.00019261951,0.00012789117,0.00453956,0.0006668432,0.0012318328,0.000038717306,0.000027366275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083295663,0.00006808984,0.00014708853,0.00015223295,0.00018153156,0.00021681603,0.000102474274,0.00024852777,0.000020898553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008080743,0.00015883734,0.012267206,0.0000040268055,0.000047700487,0.000010684544,0.048282966,0.00019969698,0.00017261914,0.00061837735,0.9352348,0.0029223098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015155146,0.00032548726,0.028949792,0.00013014444,0.000067791516,0.000015128273,0.121195674,0.0002415922,0.00014928106,0.0031002318,0.844036,0.00027337557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9178075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9808698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09119878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005383537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093597465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808225057","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12504","title":"Presidential Address: Going Public: The Art and Science of Researching Domestic Violence and Religion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential address; Negotiation; Vulnerability (computing); Sociology; Presidential system; Public engagement; Media studies; Dissemination; Key (lock); Public relations; Political science; Social science; Law; Public administration; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.05082325785119431,"score_gpt":0.3966750722949557,"score_spread":0.3458518144437614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808225057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931548,0.0013649876,0.0005909397,0.00046118512,0.0016383535,0.0007764498,0.0000030803544,0.000010508335,0.0019996439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99718475,0.0021151328,0.0001260282,0.000017729048,0.00021133959,0.000010655067,1.579066e-7,0.0000057930984,0.00032842136],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972854,0.00024798873,0.00039108994,0.00031011744,0.001345201,0.00042015687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997465,0.00072959607,0.00033928797,0.0003108925,0.001029435,0.00012576074],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012886248,0.00009364627,0.00015839726,0.00027696005,0.006447584,0.00092633266,0.0009001529,0.00003395641,0.000004067919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022157524,0.000053101703,0.00005252923,0.0008965071,0.0055839536,0.0005399213,0.00028747818,0.00020711248,0.0000035205253],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019380971,0.0017190045,0.0437063,0.00040717283,0.00038537488,0.000021882595,0.34718487,0.0002560979,0.14841363,0.20677564,0.11574481,0.13344713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011473634,0.013728577,0.19326356,0.010287216,0.0013749079,0.00062989106,0.26048252,0.032679684,0.03345389,0.3412983,0.098938614,0.002389208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005566771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025241464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14955725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038054575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030618944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808372302","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12513","title":"Assessing the Validity of Data Synthesis Methods to Estimate Religious Populations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Estimation; Identification (biology); Scale (ratio); Population; Bayesian probability; Econometrics; Statistics; Small area estimation; Grouped data; Data source; Computer science; Geography; Data mining; Mathematics; Sociology; Demography; Economics; Cartography","score_opus":0.35313033394628135,"score_gpt":0.5751917386411997,"score_spread":0.2220614046949183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808372302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9237758,0.0005072324,0.0540152,0.00849743,0.010548806,0.0011879242,0.000023132241,0.000027018687,0.0014174923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97942567,0.000083495484,0.019312095,0.00009509332,0.0006628122,0.000017531445,0.0000022045774,0.000013235433,0.00038784833],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632543,0.0014534782,0.00071408146,0.00037464188,0.0007978835,0.00033447676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99488807,0.0023297535,0.0006556476,0.0011929102,0.00082078134,0.00011281728],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023283074,0.00011920564,0.00028874588,0.00018953576,0.0042755064,0.0005294487,0.0019614212,0.00007375035,0.000012581799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004270714,0.00006853955,0.00014357163,0.00096084236,0.0009068682,0.00036481014,0.00021533263,0.00016457388,0.0000073607216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015761795,0.0011063144,0.021561997,0.000035000943,0.00028028365,0.0000022384284,0.11251715,0.00036483028,0.002231034,0.006425766,0.79147416,0.06384362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017534117,0.0020612578,0.0928908,0.00045658436,0.0021360288,0.000090698515,0.1174539,0.0034313893,0.0024201924,0.17486326,0.6015572,0.00088527566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00367147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004419336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18991695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045513378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016867518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808854438","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12502","title":"The Powerful Other: How Divine Control Shapes the Relationship Between Personal Control and Psychological Distress","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health","keywords":"Association (psychology); Psychology; Control (management); Social psychology; Mental health; Sense of control; Clinical psychology; Psychiatry; Psychotherapist; Computer science","score_opus":0.08778997377401258,"score_gpt":0.39718810753836137,"score_spread":0.30939813376434877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808854438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9398842,0.0022027541,0.0011438271,0.052253373,0.002898005,0.001074553,0.000038651826,0.000016617538,0.00048805858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99612147,0.00012713787,0.0000076289048,0.0002753961,0.0014618683,0.00002091863,7.1587715e-7,0.000009020087,0.001975876],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971249,0.0009904924,0.00039926817,0.00031241716,0.0007672207,0.00040567075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993139,0.005587767,0.00044711438,0.0002926751,0.000415167,0.00011823199],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008188936,0.00014287973,0.00023816423,0.000064034335,0.0081228865,0.00083537115,0.0008487069,0.000108457665,0.000011310201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016194591,0.00006234048,0.0001836671,0.00032976,0.0030956694,0.000121151184,0.000034308498,0.0003349965,0.000008449168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008242668,0.00049346103,0.66554016,0.000007063784,0.000327425,0.0000017405141,0.056470122,0.000002747424,0.0000770572,0.012675277,0.2553791,0.00820157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036164173,0.0015737201,0.79588336,0.00003213162,0.0002751416,0.00001908538,0.026186284,0.000096348296,0.0000017786882,0.025083322,0.14705157,0.00018081184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048415936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026966706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13034323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030130457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032806394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886412645","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12541","title":"Countermovement Mobilization and State Raids on Minority Religious Communities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Countermovement; State (computer science); Politics; Ideology; Collective action; Political economy; Political science; Mobilization; Social movement; Sociology; Criminology; Development economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03806499737541039,"score_gpt":0.3384311816414424,"score_spread":0.300366184266032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886412645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930422,0.0016455691,0.00040103932,0.0004141692,0.0032666405,0.0008578718,0.00000529303,0.000020229394,0.00034703445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99045074,0.008139653,0.000120527424,0.00013320563,0.00020347827,0.000021527858,0.0000020127015,0.000007678953,0.0009211908],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998023,0.00022700663,0.00040606115,0.00017746727,0.00089418003,0.00027234002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819356,0.00035694242,0.00031728804,0.00027407386,0.0007660787,0.00009205909],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042630476,0.00011940832,0.0001753839,0.0001277644,0.0043360614,0.00046327733,0.0003893563,0.00004629438,0.000006551068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012902287,0.00008129411,0.0000888625,0.00033417813,0.00087774533,0.00013878274,0.00006833162,0.00013404901,0.000004742291],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015932794,0.00038849178,0.002810747,0.000016871587,0.000093992705,7.021634e-7,0.6921064,0.00007748462,0.0000991765,0.0005234156,0.30248478,0.0012385853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029730748,0.003682136,0.014311734,0.00018391857,0.00016580209,0.0000103696175,0.7577841,0.00067855266,0.00048078343,0.037461054,0.1818541,0.00041436206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006884379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034606054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1206307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014618244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001358079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894671703","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12554","title":"Religious Identification, Switching, and Apostasy Among Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland: Individual and Cohort Dynamics Between Two Censuses 2001–2011","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health and Social Care Research and Development Division; Queen's University; Economic and Social Research Council; Public Health Agency; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Protestantism; Apostasy; Faith; Ethnic group; Religious identity; Population; Socioeconomic status; Identity (music); Northern ireland; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Demography; Geography; Ethnology; Law; Theology; Negotiation; Social science; Islam","score_opus":0.030533199305421324,"score_gpt":0.3558902446407433,"score_spread":0.325357045335322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894671703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963106,0.0004480817,0.00020569855,0.0008288805,0.0008232346,0.0012469573,0.000025005074,0.00001714661,0.000094377974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975876,0.001718477,0.00008667187,0.000023049472,0.00017343654,0.00002478235,0.0000051164234,0.000012874377,0.0003679806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980266,0.00019091391,0.00054216135,0.0003272432,0.000593974,0.00031911378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982971,0.0003689063,0.00047009796,0.00021349081,0.0004958687,0.00015456197],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004268392,0.00013590149,0.00023105415,0.00021152792,0.0026394976,0.00069454935,0.00028196437,0.000085609616,0.0000017409963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044223774,0.00010214879,0.000054619726,0.0003467438,0.00085757516,0.00028524632,0.000089253954,0.00028356977,0.0000020692587],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025545505,0.00009818072,0.92516255,0.0000077175,0.0000769577,0.0000012765307,0.068212464,0.0000045299184,0.000051310726,0.00015655017,0.0037036468,0.0024992772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016084223,0.00041776773,0.93107337,0.00010406149,0.00029861872,0.0000371223,0.05436419,0.000799275,0.00004101184,0.006866156,0.0041144243,0.0002755853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006805066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06577955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05897449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009615322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010223144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905519476","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12561","title":"FROM SINGLE TO SERIOUS: RELATIONSHIPS, GENDER, AND SEXUALITY ON AMERICAN EVANGELICAL CAMPUSES. By Dana M. Malone. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2018. vii + 240 pp. $99.95 cloth, $28.95 paper.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Historical Gender and Feminism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Citation; Media studies; Religious studies; Art history; Sociology; Classics; Library science; History; Philosophy; Gender studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.07082948810609394,"score_gpt":0.3188119364159698,"score_spread":0.24798244830987584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905519476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93830377,0.020127615,0.0033258086,0.0057242303,0.011050864,0.0030941486,0.0001986998,0.00017517869,0.01799966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99054134,0.002834847,0.00049381517,0.0001533218,0.00082933076,0.0000027368167,0.0000051493557,0.000019265204,0.005120195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742645,0.00041739477,0.00036071878,0.0005152694,0.0008765785,0.00040355898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803877,0.0006314975,0.00032476618,0.00036592406,0.00024865987,0.00039039814],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015507981,0.00018229226,0.0003174736,0.000062665385,0.0045443126,0.00022340623,0.0005183045,0.000082289625,0.000012301916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000489366,0.00014198553,0.00011252036,0.00063575705,0.0010246214,0.00020751655,0.00012873005,0.00028790062,0.000016719929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026232214,0.0003670794,0.0015585297,0.0000035550954,0.00010636412,0.000002267979,0.09908534,0.0000073035712,0.0007628508,0.0001015362,0.89393723,0.0038055964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090370706,0.0014831598,0.0029714252,0.000023995597,0.00023602214,0.0000023810817,0.0973594,0.00003157453,0.00011093708,0.0007613213,0.8958298,0.000286288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023605414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002898257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052237544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031984726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024807462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2923638604","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12595","title":"Beyond “Heartless Conservative” and “Bleeding Heart Liberal” Caricatures: How Religiosity Shapes the Relationship Between Political Orientation and Empathy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Religiosity; Biology and political orientation; Politics; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Psychology; Orientation (vector space); Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.060691227237926026,"score_gpt":0.3720670818813579,"score_spread":0.31137585464343187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2923638604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96191245,0.00039319432,0.00007292265,0.03496565,0.0012748349,0.0008673993,0.0000090304575,0.000015571599,0.0004889282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968577,0.0001301282,0.00007876852,0.00026420882,0.00021624439,0.000019056726,0.0000020095642,0.000007886568,0.0024239756],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982511,0.0003157871,0.00028821145,0.0002514491,0.0006057001,0.00028779494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957288,0.0033516923,0.00023411267,0.00016750257,0.00037587414,0.00014201959],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002739467,0.00010754133,0.00019698749,0.00009873208,0.004049399,0.00083387946,0.00022259279,0.00008789861,0.0000036416216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090466347,0.00006533538,0.0001195399,0.00042397072,0.00057139946,0.00035632716,0.000057338617,0.00038494627,0.0000032510393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004825747,0.00008857342,0.74406064,0.000018779516,0.000084400046,3.5272146e-7,0.0915163,0.000008704207,0.00019908031,0.09401914,0.06982524,0.00013054193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001178572,0.00046445546,0.67247987,0.00010092302,0.0002501315,0.000026010845,0.2393142,0.00017953309,0.00006198178,0.04693902,0.03879147,0.00021385174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069845375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021581225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1477979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073793984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101966376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987102866","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12625","title":"Bringing the State Back in Secularization: The Development of <i>Laïcité</i> in the French Third Republic (1875–1905)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Secularization; Agency (philosophy); Secularity; Ideology; State (computer science); Grassroots; Political science; Sociology; Centralized government; Political economy; Law; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.030276379550551444,"score_gpt":0.32729188763771594,"score_spread":0.2970155080871645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987102866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98761725,0.00028401383,0.0003765503,0.004602521,0.0021796848,0.0013409982,0.0000014687847,0.000005630631,0.0035918662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99541044,0.00015659846,0.000083498126,0.00015980218,0.000050455394,0.000026293828,9.393002e-7,0.000006197139,0.0041057467],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997264,0.0005615487,0.00068248314,0.0001895458,0.0010161997,0.0002861897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978421,0.0009342274,0.00047578645,0.00039621047,0.00032038442,0.000031307336],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011222255,0.00009876285,0.00016413158,0.00012653886,0.0018121152,0.00046368057,0.0010233244,0.00004294769,0.000025301893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041397035,0.00004403483,0.00016162447,0.0013486291,0.00024105562,0.00019485307,0.00006566507,0.00039372273,0.000012372094],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003415261,0.0005074922,0.014624156,0.000021513448,0.00011156065,0.000001102902,0.9304104,0.0038970578,0.00052378466,0.004780667,0.042782124,0.002306026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017509545,0.00020157406,0.038742818,0.00026258972,0.00006132619,0.00001772814,0.52053493,0.0017053797,0.00044956457,0.008573384,0.4274448,0.00025496175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016715951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008708673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40987545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011165032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003346427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093402754","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12681","title":"Racial Diversity in U.S. Congregations, 1998–2019","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Ethnic group; Racial diversity; Quarter (Canadian coin); White (mutation); Sociology; Economic Justice; Gender studies; Religious diversity; Demography; Race (biology); Demographic economics; Geography; Political science; Ethnology; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.07041695654670417,"score_gpt":0.3652864266856509,"score_spread":0.29486947013894677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093402754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804611,0.00021191192,0.00030287012,0.013767926,0.0037438993,0.00068576226,0.000009479895,0.000017003942,0.0008000482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99757683,0.0003505172,0.00003889653,0.00023590484,0.0002372048,0.000005036591,0.0000012984995,0.0000034957102,0.0015508014],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864906,0.00015009829,0.00028477566,0.00014940064,0.00059295027,0.00017370093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906987,0.00028857525,0.00021703324,0.00010514196,0.00021786027,0.00010154915],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001621277,0.000060078313,0.0001288521,0.00007855602,0.0036865787,0.00023032613,0.00043596813,0.00004342314,0.000021023516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005302991,0.000044269313,0.00016708246,0.0005920387,0.00022161024,0.00020669012,0.00009373206,0.00021371977,0.000029509773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015943419,0.00045340427,0.0147687895,0.000006998559,0.000078624806,0.0000035499863,0.38575998,0.0005419091,0.00022082379,0.004085919,0.5915004,0.0024202007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020299098,0.00047236457,0.003708337,0.000032708536,0.00009778877,0.0000030476826,0.14861359,0.00088619976,0.000055421475,0.0035457378,0.8403884,0.00016649681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016353579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018698162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24888802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008280253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011255754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131540551","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12713","title":"We Do Not Think It Means What They Think It Means: A Response to Thunström et al","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06452641565594298,"score_gpt":0.39395785995266525,"score_spread":0.3294314442967223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131540551","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45299277,0.0017053005,0.00022735949,0.53304344,0.010099549,0.0011100882,0.000023005932,0.00003129013,0.00076721463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90963966,0.013150179,0.0008369917,0.042469557,0.0005241597,0.0000470908,0.0000034130933,0.00004424706,0.03328473],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947274,0.0013285893,0.00076108536,0.00047009296,0.0019919924,0.00072084065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99552286,0.0023733014,0.00036107778,0.00060096866,0.00076734653,0.00037442436],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018133633,0.00019711784,0.00039238605,0.00021304995,0.0042419196,0.0023408234,0.0009737883,0.000096838696,0.000104961655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030326494,0.00013048151,0.0003482633,0.0007146159,0.00021912101,0.00073698437,0.00018506592,0.00044756386,0.00004027114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089200266,0.00036734127,0.00027444016,0.000028928616,0.00010693959,0.000027570703,0.4406933,0.00032532736,0.00020679306,0.004406413,0.54789674,0.0047742208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007147919,0.00025354276,0.0006196415,0.00032606907,0.000059421425,0.000016089529,0.35156336,0.000059998976,0.000083293926,0.0029519144,0.64320767,0.00014420087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013211201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016597286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49057385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022075867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010435294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99869484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140781012","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12720","title":"Religion Protected Mental Health but Constrained Crisis Response During Crucial Early Days of the COVID‐19 Pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Mental health; Public health; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Distress; Population; Outbreak; Political science; Development economics; Environmental health; Sociology; Demography; Psychology; Psychiatry; Medicine; Virology; Economics; Nursing; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.07011414347887662,"score_gpt":0.3939462780194277,"score_spread":0.3238321345405511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140781012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96955055,0.0012662992,0.00015558764,0.02219571,0.0049394015,0.0017127049,0.000048213216,0.000029372668,0.00010219054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969728,0.00069116097,0.00007823278,0.0003994868,0.0002486927,0.000027544067,0.000002317042,0.000014060444,0.0015657194],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99448127,0.0024351436,0.0009704775,0.00043145096,0.0012031046,0.00047854125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996977,0.00058129564,0.0010194267,0.00055457134,0.0006229144,0.00024481962],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010001019,0.00016489874,0.00039063735,0.00020278443,0.005163137,0.00022869339,0.0007900615,0.00012909873,0.000019296824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020262178,0.00010775141,0.0003583125,0.0010777052,0.00093067245,0.00012954901,0.00011868164,0.00037480844,0.0000025100576],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010288416,0.0024012567,0.059109062,0.00020710609,0.00059032236,0.0000298215,0.5214917,0.00020971468,0.088788606,0.0024212317,0.3129048,0.0015579542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.027839335,0.006057712,0.21364577,0.00083447393,0.0006563925,0.0016199714,0.49360228,0.00006312306,0.006532479,0.04074882,0.20690371,0.0014959177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075793625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005682832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15453671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028843607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014701444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153597763","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12721","title":"A Tale of Decline or Change? Working Toward a Complementary Understanding of Secular Transition and Individual Spiritualization Theories","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Spiritualities; Secularity; Phenomenon; Transition (genetics); Sociology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Spirituality; Psychology; Law; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20539775214709705,"score_gpt":0.3977583127222433,"score_spread":0.19236056057514628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153597763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9733074,0.00089297845,0.019738732,0.0037845958,0.001502947,0.0006173015,0.000026578082,0.0000075294593,0.00012198201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847585,0.0009967261,0.00025249133,0.000073354764,0.00009424083,0.00000720914,0.000009068831,0.0000045869233,0.00008644914],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986175,0.00018265955,0.0003852681,0.0001201853,0.00057287887,0.00012156552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988992,0.00031238524,0.00033960244,0.00009216776,0.0003172911,0.000039354993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019627574,0.000060939605,0.00017060105,0.00010195395,0.0011053494,0.00013814683,0.0001424046,0.00003563042,0.000023976112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015640985,0.000043208358,0.000119920456,0.0005215025,0.00032272478,0.00016272391,0.000040545598,0.00008241806,9.0918796e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003558684,0.00080131175,0.003327252,0.00011483502,0.00048767278,0.000005368348,0.9378195,0.0001899321,0.0027173613,0.04400878,0.007409801,0.002762329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016627068,0.0005069794,0.0006687887,0.00032459648,0.0003378578,0.00002625151,0.9576038,0.0004356682,0.0014341827,0.028859597,0.00802976,0.00010977921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004335361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001516785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025168518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052145755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010932386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8501566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200354907","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12758","title":"Religion‐State Interaction at the Local Level: Key Findings from a Survey of Religion and Local Elected Officials","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); State (computer science); Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Public administration; Quarter (Canadian coin); Context (archaeology); Religiosity; Political science; Corporate governance; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.05997752824033093,"score_gpt":0.3611649880980634,"score_spread":0.3011874598577325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200354907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98566926,0.001402997,0.005371031,0.002499855,0.004110723,0.0006663312,0.00007346822,0.000023325092,0.00018304327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902992,0.0045571756,0.000054506825,0.0001583549,0.000113500246,0.000015460186,0.000027741336,0.00001986809,0.004754175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607456,0.0009893004,0.0009565577,0.00043645554,0.001158179,0.00038494694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941843,0.0026541897,0.00076512335,0.0004211558,0.0018300263,0.00014518003],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046045426,0.00019735804,0.00040686628,0.00015493768,0.0033176437,0.00047338766,0.0004785844,0.00013541667,0.00003544152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017934364,0.00012990023,0.0003135294,0.0012143622,0.00093713554,0.000280337,0.00016232528,0.00046538303,0.000015050555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017497162,0.0012806351,0.011982229,0.000034699544,0.0008386714,0.00001678597,0.10721022,0.0023331307,0.016481062,0.0015804769,0.84591126,0.01058113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009276557,0.002644523,0.14631511,0.0012692178,0.0016023086,0.0003347085,0.21477003,0.008992094,0.04292968,0.021795914,0.54837257,0.0016972682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041321427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.090683505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29753864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000319485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004228175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207075526","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12782","title":"2021 SSSR Presidential Address: Religion as Social Location—Global and Comparative Perspectives","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Buddhism; Christianity; Hinduism; Scholarship; Comparative religion; Islam; Sociology; Sociology of religion; Argument (complex analysis); Sikhism; Social science; Religious studies; Environmental ethics; Political science; Anthropology; Law; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.05785094927665852,"score_gpt":0.4046382853944998,"score_spread":0.3467873361178413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4207075526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97985315,0.0025173635,0.00023376213,0.007093326,0.004721122,0.0012494873,0.000027682663,0.000023689838,0.004280431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99335337,0.0005705732,0.00002679567,0.00006194621,0.000440136,0.00007654697,0.000003289251,0.000005430978,0.0054618884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973715,0.0005316885,0.00038148666,0.00030245646,0.0011504558,0.000262432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998222,0.00030270428,0.00043468125,0.00016137745,0.0007851877,0.000094057374],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002123297,0.000115728515,0.00021067302,0.00010268426,0.012078629,0.00055231637,0.00045641913,0.00004454333,0.00011878119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026807986,0.000094493684,0.00020445748,0.00083553296,0.00058917067,0.0002714653,0.00014741672,0.00032041836,0.000008217397],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038344736,0.0008008694,0.0007123396,0.00000626585,0.00025024556,0.0000027827627,0.4204949,0.00074405805,0.00013613811,0.051762197,0.5241181,0.00058859034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010837432,0.0006573974,0.0019304653,0.000014274562,0.00015877519,0.00003187165,0.8029571,0.00018247368,0.000025180696,0.0104840305,0.18232098,0.00015370769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027626317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013654904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38246217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034593788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003509894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235744629","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2004.00256.x","title":"BOOK REVIEWS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religious Tourism and Spaces","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Religious studies; Theology; Blessing; Mysticism; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03573349701552317,"score_gpt":0.3548490542916377,"score_spread":0.3191155572761145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235744629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65138227,0.29559055,0.0024832129,0.014639809,0.020916563,0.005701479,0.0000059017357,0.00007800565,0.0092022205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7477036,0.14955083,0.0006506438,0.000851373,0.0021274602,0.00009339726,0.0000014652569,0.000032450058,0.09898875],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983365,0.00013636479,0.00039968747,0.00017650165,0.00067745947,0.0002734663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988868,0.00014195342,0.00037045582,0.00026998046,0.00023099993,0.000099767625],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047517545,0.000087386325,0.00020581168,0.00011965091,0.0032607394,0.00035477153,0.00059384626,0.000041766154,0.000017255164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038308793,0.000050578397,0.00020564445,0.0004042533,0.00031553037,0.0002037258,0.000032816923,0.00014234544,0.000031245803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023166845,0.00017846897,0.000078815254,0.000006118797,0.00002139042,0.000002054024,0.024433676,0.00013700865,0.000107613676,0.001022032,0.971673,0.0023166414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005767141,0.00024473292,0.000044658096,0.00004821953,0.00005651005,0.000005422035,0.005401415,0.0000035312269,0.000078745135,0.0073890593,0.9860828,0.00006819429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009460183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009098474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14603972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073136194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001591414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99803686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246618451","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00279.x","title":"BOOK REVIEWS","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Theological Perspectives and Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Faith; Poetics; Religious studies; Sociology; Reading (process); Publishing; Homosexuality; Gender studies; Theology; Art; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Poetry; Literature","score_opus":0.07276283763266055,"score_gpt":0.4135627206351525,"score_spread":0.3407998830024919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246618451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5069051,0.32900196,0.0017912572,0.08569257,0.015997823,0.0061626993,0.000007315352,0.00008598819,0.054355282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88280916,0.022037303,0.00045665662,0.000743137,0.0016119201,0.0000262841,2.6378333e-7,0.000007942511,0.092307314],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987267,0.00029793443,0.00027436053,0.0001367727,0.00038397615,0.00018021096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872184,0.0005229026,0.0003548337,0.00016317035,0.00017334612,0.00006390262],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061896145,0.000056893205,0.00013866396,0.00005576734,0.002505223,0.00024477366,0.00042202498,0.000028524246,0.00025955323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095329434,0.000030136209,0.00014126026,0.00024154338,0.00027688223,0.00034132652,0.000029405723,0.00014613586,0.000036967904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010043448,0.00043546126,0.00010918529,0.0000036774827,0.000035797602,6.466844e-7,0.038647473,0.000075013384,0.000149631,0.009833003,0.9123432,0.038266454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022373008,0.00020507598,0.00011750254,0.000010715667,0.000043369215,0.0000026922244,0.010233166,0.000019885785,0.000016887912,0.0027276147,0.98635626,0.000043085296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013962791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042801516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37590408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049527625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000404926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99879336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310187242","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12819","title":"RELIGION AT THE EDGE: NATURE, SPIRITUALITY, AND SECULARITY IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST. Edited by PaulBramadat, PatriciaO'Connell Killen, and SarahWilkins‐Laflamme. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press, 2022, vii + 266pp. $89.95 hardcover, $34.95 paperback.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ambrose University","funders":"","keywords":"Secularity; Spirituality; Religious studies; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01005035053253533,"score_gpt":0.20157807031400396,"score_spread":0.19152771978146862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310187242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9519622,0.041465838,0.0000028963645,0.0025611126,0.0024946735,0.00083094375,0.0005557544,0.000010274171,0.000116325544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9272999,0.05663778,0.0000046769424,0.00017759447,0.0002731632,0.000016780568,0.00006500394,0.000016256974,0.015508799],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974279,0.00042333597,0.000492693,0.00042283267,0.00093752076,0.00029574658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982973,0.00041441282,0.00052894105,0.000330663,0.00036227785,0.00006645715],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001981236,0.00016726679,0.00041237622,0.00002588906,0.010853889,0.000487997,0.0005800603,0.000074917385,0.000076525095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000811366,0.00012074481,0.0002675634,0.00033119373,0.0006963917,0.00018464246,0.00046867225,0.00068994425,4.8129954e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009743778,0.00042171316,0.0021576057,0.000030612606,0.00016547795,0.000013766776,0.01968542,0.00002312548,0.000021013002,0.000093520095,0.97649026,0.00080005254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001225241,0.0003927288,0.0011181441,0.000023328355,0.00035098637,0.000015898804,0.06564069,0.00008508645,0.000001285135,0.0015002965,0.92946774,0.0001785822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08133531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48835382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4070185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038284858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028592793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9904339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376875497","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12856","title":"Race, Religion, and Global Solidarities: W. E. B. Du Bois and “The Black Church” as a Contested Category","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies; Louisville Institute; Society for the Scientific Study of Religion; Yale University","keywords":"Gender studies; Solidarity; Sociology; Politics; Salience (neuroscience); Black church; Context (archaeology); Ambivalence; Identity (music); Religious studies; Political science; Law; Anthropology; African american; History; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Art","score_opus":0.018150101450920296,"score_gpt":0.306635683785814,"score_spread":0.28848558233489374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376875497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9824468,0.002868004,0.000064457614,0.0075974646,0.0024979524,0.0010111801,0.000010867002,0.000049473892,0.0034538272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795562,0.0063533466,0.000016728478,0.00022702508,0.00030401326,0.000023612694,0.000001245179,0.000010517225,0.013507298],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978472,0.00033938367,0.00038786812,0.00029100693,0.0007799172,0.00035460884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803495,0.0008015808,0.000386554,0.00023944103,0.00039225057,0.00014522392],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005825088,0.00013380092,0.00029921616,0.000080804224,0.0052818833,0.00049522484,0.0004163299,0.00006284053,0.0000055516125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093804346,0.00008143093,0.00016645799,0.00089318684,0.0043596025,0.00017237269,0.00009377762,0.0001919072,0.000011326408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026134448,0.00010542725,0.0026967635,0.000018322733,0.000116934054,0.000005786357,0.14604333,0.000028105931,0.0000726376,0.009361394,0.8396838,0.0016061607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042878715,0.00049128535,0.004133865,0.00006256953,0.000249313,0.0000477933,0.36094794,0.00051873067,0.000008759913,0.023465624,0.60554475,0.00024152077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044195256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010383467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23413906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011656239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024042935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377027924","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12851","title":"Divine Relations as a Basis of Subjective Social Status During Later‐Life: Direct and Moderating Effects","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"SSS*; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Consciousness; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.03485289539499497,"score_gpt":0.3674002158345057,"score_spread":0.33254732043951074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377027924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994732,0.00046285777,0.00004550215,0.0011108271,0.0018861345,0.00066240877,0.0000092628425,0.000028301229,0.0010626812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978965,0.00027157075,0.00002500892,0.00001518717,0.00021640006,0.000020658732,0.0000014698504,0.000009776363,0.0015434262],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807423,0.00041148128,0.0004026192,0.00023583803,0.00055316853,0.0003226799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981092,0.0010058733,0.00035754353,0.00013417026,0.00029803516,0.00009517442],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032105977,0.00009567277,0.00024780858,0.0002581297,0.0038922126,0.00017495603,0.00019034046,0.000072311035,0.000005473224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012087834,0.00007077557,0.00012873241,0.00081846694,0.0003737302,0.00015252449,0.00005725265,0.0001525942,0.000004086872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070694817,0.0008161809,0.16972703,0.00018297175,0.0006975324,0.000013096339,0.76307374,0.00090906717,0.009542375,0.0037832267,0.04621792,0.0043298975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050390484,0.0013628146,0.8541301,0.00020422984,0.00047500368,0.000014103412,0.100378215,0.0006288171,0.0017507665,0.032868013,0.002727575,0.00042133656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024475185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017999763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68440306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050052215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010978189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378070605","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12862","title":"Masculinity, Femininity, and Reported Paranormal Beliefs","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Scheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Paranormal; Femininity; Psychology; Masculinity; Expression (computer science); Gender identity; Social psychology; Gender role; Psychoanalysis; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.0837826158958662,"score_gpt":0.39502775149007463,"score_spread":0.3112451355942084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378070605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98915267,0.000705302,0.00007572588,0.00032312956,0.0070434194,0.0005770254,0.000007494329,0.000040372168,0.002074842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97852755,0.00022788059,0.000032943655,0.000033159162,0.00023468478,0.000049629485,0.0000035726043,0.000012603813,0.020877974],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806803,0.00010231392,0.0006067376,0.00031945325,0.00053433294,0.00036914815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985296,0.00032312685,0.00041588573,0.00042968141,0.00019415034,0.00010756792],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033571753,0.00013302032,0.0002412089,0.0002363818,0.0013330108,0.00019399195,0.00041427647,0.00006627215,0.00005090947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001585278,0.000082541665,0.00014538219,0.0007814893,0.0002706287,0.00012328885,0.00014321611,0.00022322296,0.00005218748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002327153,0.0037498488,0.09438047,0.000096407435,0.0019356243,0.00045382598,0.22975881,0.00065406854,0.0053032697,0.0073975637,0.59670746,0.057235472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012625258,0.0076221605,0.3929633,0.00016351622,0.0007300282,0.002569718,0.11389053,0.0017272172,0.00075412454,0.007685414,0.45835975,0.00090900995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016106712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058504436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29858282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011726394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003588527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389640086","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12901","title":"Religiously Unaffiliated Youth in Europe: Shifting Remnants of Belief and Practice in Contexts of Diffused Religion and Cohort Decline","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Cohort; Sociology; Demography; Psychology; Social psychology; Gender studies; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.03808510461718154,"score_gpt":0.37339735148820186,"score_spread":0.33531224687102035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389640086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994847,0.0010512285,0.000014564633,0.0017171387,0.000937446,0.0009320497,0.0000099059,0.000017007827,0.00047368128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824641,0.016938277,0.00006440247,0.00005154466,0.000035912253,0.000008748518,0.0000034270827,0.00001283521,0.00042076156],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712044,0.00053121266,0.0009936506,0.00029316373,0.00077378826,0.00028776436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958227,0.0021927706,0.00086405355,0.00022217122,0.0008113005,0.000087004555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008731976,0.00012440879,0.0003792766,0.000433352,0.00065252546,0.00012229703,0.00029793076,0.000090999085,9.946529e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007242748,0.00009429609,0.00008619656,0.002202934,0.00044457745,0.00025441902,0.000121009485,0.0002860029,0.0000011751442],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022045043,0.0026918207,0.30017236,0.0001883456,0.0003702894,0.0000438858,0.6335993,0.0010267195,0.010422672,0.0037343954,0.038778394,0.006767353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01857783,0.0034628867,0.26200715,0.0028948244,0.0010112525,0.00007668347,0.67451906,0.003486256,0.0011933768,0.00950826,0.022292113,0.00097030686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006629218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051438995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040919796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053070533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000146743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408309775","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12949","title":"Antiracism as Inclusivity: The Racial Justice Paradigm of White Progressive Churches","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Lilly Endowment","keywords":"White (mutation); Economic Justice; Sociology; Gender studies; Racism; Criminology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023506014189104595,"score_gpt":0.3687976644441521,"score_spread":0.3452916502550475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408309775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97487015,0.0038710423,0.00051973335,0.0064780237,0.006942083,0.0013775852,0.00000796496,0.000018525592,0.0059148907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896017,0.00035275132,0.00007678349,0.0001285195,0.0003354084,0.00002318048,5.0244336e-7,0.000006492795,0.009474675],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775517,0.00037360913,0.0004271633,0.00022677312,0.00093154795,0.00028575223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768764,0.0007282152,0.0007413751,0.00032699376,0.000454513,0.00006128952],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050281696,0.000111523594,0.00026341487,0.00011743176,0.009295042,0.00017414129,0.00086719374,0.000058190773,0.000011894394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009306689,0.00006432871,0.0002652058,0.0010251006,0.002104242,0.00016692159,0.0001502082,0.00025905774,0.000002461487],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038594822,0.0012587206,0.003352004,0.000088486624,0.0004101132,0.000006195208,0.73471135,0.00024148703,0.000874935,0.015944526,0.22042811,0.022298101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012923875,0.0005892013,0.0028013836,0.00016689369,0.00091368286,0.0000076004317,0.30909738,0.00021933799,0.0002878553,0.012611772,0.6718127,0.00019980916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003695353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022919691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45138457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011609093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005960267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99199474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408742791","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12960","title":"The Weak(ening) Link Between Religiosity and Morality: Evidence from Five Western Countries","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Crandall University","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Morality; Link (geometry); Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Law; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.06458944101581071,"score_gpt":0.4024156974650127,"score_spread":0.337826256449202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408742791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93726605,0.0109684635,0.0004889494,0.04481556,0.0053003477,0.0008402571,0.000014799246,0.000022837494,0.00028273638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871922,0.0061498387,0.00004228725,0.00019946664,0.00074684416,0.000018406794,0.0000013926385,0.0000072079415,0.005642324],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972247,0.00059610076,0.0006307827,0.0003909155,0.0007882622,0.00036927746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949534,0.003393222,0.0004775265,0.00050997664,0.00057573617,0.000090127396],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007835898,0.00014840502,0.00031619245,0.00011915991,0.0065926076,0.001056334,0.0009862792,0.00012149936,0.000002487741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011099688,0.00008787541,0.00015064179,0.00049415906,0.0013616281,0.00024395074,0.00014993694,0.00031892522,0.0000059733943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043823864,0.00010577855,0.57083285,0.000030738967,0.0004252353,0.000002867136,0.08292548,0.000025854457,0.000052349027,0.0033045604,0.3296186,0.012237442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016200528,0.0005729648,0.27566925,0.0005367726,0.00065993256,0.000004809067,0.042491354,0.000050755774,0.00009165928,0.077252865,0.6007431,0.00030648193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015919084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011890041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29516357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007298348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018594331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408744336","doi":"10.1111/jssr.12950","title":"Burning Bodies: Religion, Race, and Migrant Funerary Practices in the Early 20th‐Century Pacific West","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); American west; Immigration; Ethnology; History; Sociology; Geography; Gender studies; Archaeology","score_opus":0.028862851006823325,"score_gpt":0.3430780851020912,"score_spread":0.31421523409526786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408744336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719942,0.009661634,0.000018583942,0.0120308725,0.0039089886,0.0010569382,0.0000040317227,0.000015303815,0.0013094019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99223316,0.0048049074,0.000027734808,0.00009103151,0.00023017978,0.00003157984,9.869204e-7,0.0000065967597,0.0025738347],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751985,0.00055326225,0.00049219065,0.00030841172,0.0007755281,0.00035078128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719495,0.001579103,0.00064272934,0.00030387213,0.00021906629,0.00006028014],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006906364,0.00013512591,0.00023508117,0.00031449515,0.0037394012,0.0010053427,0.0006509615,0.00007213586,0.00000389016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009942146,0.000078995516,0.00012766903,0.0008593384,0.0004499109,0.00038052537,0.000065945685,0.0003832612,0.0000028320128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055190193,0.0009174532,0.058625475,0.00005350775,0.00018308865,0.000030096753,0.78224885,0.000067156994,0.00035629154,0.0026874868,0.14857744,0.0057012397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013817756,0.00036943913,0.03530316,0.00018485861,0.00021609654,0.000017727216,0.16041622,0.000060731167,0.00001886327,0.0057116146,0.7961645,0.00015500186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004054427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007218343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64758706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058972833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002062633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416955488","doi":"10.1111/jssr.70012","title":"Policing (Im)Modesty in Modest Fashion: Islamic Feminist Renegotiations of Modesty in Influencer Culture","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Influencer marketing; Islam; Negotiation; Complicity; Feminism; Ethnography","score_opus":0.03177066974408322,"score_gpt":0.3673174921159829,"score_spread":0.3355468223718997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416955488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99261457,0.0002672281,0.0004128222,0.00066246395,0.0017611388,0.00076358166,0.000008709571,0.000009216556,0.0035002725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968537,0.00031648506,0.00011501338,0.0000665329,0.00008204837,0.000025332367,0.0000016978839,0.0000060670736,0.0025331017],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791646,0.00019820529,0.0006656802,0.00025674573,0.0006244844,0.00033840424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874115,0.0002743129,0.0003542758,0.00028106075,0.0002958839,0.000053311967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031938422,0.00012059734,0.00027850972,0.00047575438,0.0010161361,0.00012881403,0.00057098333,0.000108625645,0.000003250853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054165925,0.00008729622,0.0001255892,0.0014396122,0.00033401625,0.0001782225,0.00006495188,0.00029830946,0.000001004006],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016096495,0.001435071,0.14774211,0.00008992493,0.00008485738,0.000004733864,0.7790731,0.02416594,0.0059999833,0.024486078,0.013882755,0.0028744806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006102065,0.0006421078,0.09891086,0.0010813747,0.00030199354,0.000012139937,0.8019308,0.0075435187,0.0012618094,0.07117671,0.010468105,0.00056855317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002597677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023434423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04883125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019879955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005409557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99438536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}