{"meta":{"query_hash":"eb65894d8b2e","filters":{"venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour"},"cohort_total":37,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":37,"exported":37,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/eb65894d8b2e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+for+the+Theory+of+Social+Behaviour"},"results":[{"id":"W1503377415","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12020","title":"Genocide Reconsidered: A Pragmatist Approach","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Pragmatism; Perplexity; Epistemology; Intentionality; Sociology; Event (particle physics); Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.052854431970191254,"score_gpt":0.33815562613843375,"score_spread":0.2853011941682425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503377415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.747764,0.0011289472,0.016795782,0.02432271,0.0027223236,0.0027680688,0.00017059238,0.00011667194,0.20421094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97884774,0.000045028457,0.0011261365,0.00037998208,0.00094008853,0.000051884657,0.000001043718,0.000016219587,0.018591847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851674,0.00031435036,0.00031662296,0.000092904396,0.00035565728,0.00040373142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984749,0.0007012323,0.0003251534,0.00009820542,0.00027082502,0.00012970659],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022648715,0.00009797791,0.00020733284,0.000028563407,0.0016695943,0.0001323529,0.00043990905,0.00011214183,0.0006955811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062306476,0.00006843051,0.00025313682,0.00009355783,0.0006437447,0.0002382179,0.000030159445,0.00027207905,0.000024423574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032211457,0.000044135162,0.000577323,0.000008211902,0.000050721497,8.125492e-7,0.017059347,4.6389738e-7,0.0001273853,0.9581338,0.009349744,0.014615855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006606933,0.00007244171,0.048557516,0.000018670391,0.0001960563,0.000027261345,0.036093198,0.000008769533,0.0001539347,0.8640707,0.049892027,0.00024870422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077257375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047361147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23108381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000917195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001902497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569229451","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00429.x","title":"Subject Positioning and Deliberative Democracy: Understanding Social Processes Underlying Deliberation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Subject (documents); Sociology; Citation; Democracy; Columbia university; Library science; Media studies; Law; Political science; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.10297532038800421,"score_gpt":0.3835916077470493,"score_spread":0.2806162873590451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569229451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819631,0.00009485626,0.008569929,0.0064469683,0.0013875973,0.00037346967,0.000021760097,0.000035696205,0.0011066472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99738073,0.00005130404,0.00032089444,0.00015641381,0.0017473832,0.000010173677,0.0000036305776,0.000021812277,0.0003076672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998551,0.00032030648,0.00030085744,0.0001131347,0.00036696217,0.00034774293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997518,0.0015987288,0.000333399,0.000039790433,0.00041532636,0.00009474326],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001750168,0.00012468365,0.0002040278,0.00007169733,0.0084357215,0.00027344047,0.00019705942,0.00019875815,0.000060871025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076006574,0.00010386855,0.00013090314,0.0002012341,0.00081564946,0.00035502436,0.0000226077,0.00048862817,7.502741e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001076994,0.000040283725,0.002209145,0.000021653632,0.00007326155,0.000001480508,0.26664418,7.432021e-7,0.0024389655,0.72405976,0.00030407807,0.004098748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005254316,0.00006645512,0.004119554,0.000022583888,0.00028750734,0.000012701162,0.34198412,0.0000057439593,0.0006922819,0.65168107,0.00042172224,0.00018082968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000085316235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050438923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07533994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015216242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048848294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99285513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570193755","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12065","title":"Contingency, novelty and choice. Cultural evolution as internal selection","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Novelty; Agency (philosophy); Contingency; Sociocultural evolution; Variation (astronomy); Epistemology; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Sociology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Intentionality; Action (physics); Creativity; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Social science; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022375429322558076,"score_gpt":0.33640365266487665,"score_spread":0.31402822334231856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570193755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9791889,0.00019751755,0.014979102,0.0013533098,0.00086206367,0.00023439676,0.0000070073,0.000027476957,0.0031502245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940181,0.00004606634,0.00008790165,0.0000670027,0.001513497,0.000008950344,0.0000019706824,0.000008221884,0.004248318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986184,0.000574566,0.00024852157,0.00010015013,0.00025643155,0.0002019198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998839,0.00041755082,0.00026521407,0.000040246017,0.00037736312,0.00006058187],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003580243,0.00008940267,0.00013649231,0.00004396855,0.0025903156,0.000088354805,0.00019103731,0.000102577585,0.00013969177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069271354,0.00006578388,0.00012779904,0.00011004776,0.00042572065,0.00037048303,0.000021241254,0.00023261202,0.0000045999336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028179947,0.000052757714,0.00881583,0.0000048822412,0.000040538285,1.0605111e-7,0.010775268,0.000010098475,0.0030582985,0.96481675,0.00045144442,0.01169223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021070247,0.0007504955,0.30720073,0.00008709089,0.0005271906,0.00008410656,0.042019717,0.00034164882,0.0008019961,0.6224731,0.023163341,0.00044353757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030159962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031049905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34234363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012974264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008765236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1928208366","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12060","title":"Social Psychology from Flat to Round: Intersubjectivity and Space in Peter Sloterdijk's <i>Bubbles</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Social Representations and Identity","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Intersubjectivity; Epistemology; Critical psychology; Psychology; Dramaturgy; Sociology; Social cognition; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Social science; Cognition; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037676057921373365,"score_gpt":0.39327392149326956,"score_spread":0.3555978635718962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1928208366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98500556,0.00006719661,0.0069525456,0.0028270325,0.0017777088,0.00029915004,0.00003864016,0.00001325495,0.0030189417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973249,0.0000057987572,0.00010971954,0.0004622368,0.0010815354,0.00003531498,0.0000026409994,0.000026441025,0.0009514188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829584,0.00065002864,0.0003515012,0.00022885078,0.0001748739,0.0002988965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987681,0.0006676446,0.00024916287,0.00014532628,0.00009916064,0.000070598166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016868504,0.00014464866,0.0003388548,0.00012367577,0.0005595058,0.00007586454,0.00029803973,0.00017537017,0.0002132454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015269544,0.000121111945,0.00023041997,0.00015075496,0.00022856367,0.00012874843,0.00006703056,0.00039789148,0.000017251077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008136276,0.0011510174,0.29513857,0.000024890856,0.00092971657,0.000027057293,0.19515838,0.000004082534,0.015607461,0.2769124,0.059554987,0.14735518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001665047,0.00018295397,0.8713225,0.0000099023355,0.000139001,0.000013497465,0.008001384,0.0000016525764,0.00009221213,0.11621578,0.0022053658,0.0001507101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000541856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004376702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5761839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007093857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019884725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49388015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006448553","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00402.x","title":"Autism, Empathy and Questions of Moral Agency","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Autism Spectrum Disorder Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Moral agency; Psychology; Autism; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Agency (philosophy); Moral disengagement; Moral development; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral psychology; Social psychology; Morality; Simulation theory of empathy; Developmental psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05699926194520103,"score_gpt":0.3573106849300636,"score_spread":0.3003114229848626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006448553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99149305,0.0002676775,0.00079913373,0.0063329255,0.0001787255,0.00027743203,0.00004516281,0.000015117784,0.00059078715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889547,0.00012893316,0.00008053733,0.00007338957,0.000058364407,0.0000047688177,2.9781916e-7,0.000011636777,0.0007466323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987821,0.00023419262,0.000294841,0.000118714896,0.00032168376,0.0002484451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992652,0.00029108842,0.00023936115,0.00011537869,0.000025874162,0.00006307414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009445701,0.000094792915,0.00019110164,0.00009415706,0.00066655857,0.000032700777,0.0003595968,0.000059774367,0.000088169225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024406695,0.00006847986,0.0001614859,0.00017089561,0.00038351887,0.00013683403,0.000042343025,0.0003059116,0.0000018524818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019669102,0.00020339312,0.00078986894,0.000007632632,0.000008507203,0.000006811849,0.006010928,0.0000033272272,0.036065266,0.94115365,0.00013597477,0.015417964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005036239,0.00038974796,0.24155982,0.000015150288,0.000064168744,0.00006417222,0.000606868,0.000023330176,0.010715733,0.7459271,0.00004578438,0.0000845339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001037714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019058472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24076995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002696967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007121072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5126697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045643456","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00394.x","title":"Does Interpretation in Psychology Differ From Interpretation in Natural Science?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Conceptualization; Natural (archaeology); Psychology; Natural science; Behavioural sciences; Human science; Social psychology; Sociology; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01897928380950514,"score_gpt":0.39273183877586193,"score_spread":0.3737525549663568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045643456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97064996,0.0009164377,0.01056306,0.004081973,0.00873834,0.00035168653,0.000018258732,0.000016886086,0.0046634194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981775,0.000030365607,0.00014107024,0.0008150616,0.00038805342,0.000016259115,0.000002693533,0.000011464717,0.0004175073],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983118,0.00033318353,0.0005566343,0.00028314276,0.00019127739,0.00032394365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989124,0.00045566674,0.00033942942,0.00015069447,0.000099832105,0.000041996107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001671476,0.00013766307,0.00029868248,0.00036053482,0.00022801271,0.000018010513,0.0006274977,0.0002177787,0.00026274167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021510068,0.00008225321,0.00015777988,0.00032509727,0.00069885695,0.00018635634,0.000023119203,0.0009764545,0.0000075819617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012689022,0.0011151618,0.023106018,0.0000042399606,0.000108823806,0.000027335444,0.23802407,0.000009972148,0.010441216,0.2393116,0.0028377613,0.47232476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012009927,0.00019147656,0.57415134,0.000019858518,0.000037882266,0.000012822806,0.00796312,0.000051995623,0.00003224688,0.41606456,0.00016978092,0.00010392366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003368001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019234622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5510453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030012077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004003022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42422634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047177233","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5914.2005.00278.x","title":"Perspectival Selves in Interaction with Others: Re‐reading G.H. Mead's Social Psychology","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Reading (process); Psychology; Sociology; Library science; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07064565124404813,"score_gpt":0.45011448201549525,"score_spread":0.3794688307714471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047177233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9444524,0.00012787689,0.001674648,0.03755924,0.00096994167,0.00043601272,0.0000151565055,0.00004532142,0.01471939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99641865,0.000052047046,0.00033720417,0.00038705138,0.0022401628,0.000023263647,0.0000010550397,0.00002705979,0.0005135093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977917,0.0008346647,0.00038189164,0.0001796783,0.00034326996,0.00046878424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981719,0.0011641841,0.0002873237,0.0000792117,0.0002260454,0.00007129755],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037103924,0.00013855129,0.00031461183,0.00011312305,0.0014641164,0.000060329596,0.00040389292,0.0002498052,0.0004745131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000453905,0.00010323402,0.00023785453,0.00019552722,0.0013585695,0.00028160342,0.000023723587,0.00065950054,0.0000057509646],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013618929,0.0003076851,0.0026334974,0.0000066029256,0.00011229302,0.000006961439,0.36320814,0.000009335307,0.00084218336,0.60204,0.0026599795,0.026811415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002244564,0.00035393695,0.026986523,0.000049115355,0.00027260536,0.00004202277,0.78989786,0.000010215734,0.00015500259,0.1611194,0.018519199,0.00034954216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021023853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071596156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44092062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004673344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013171788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115658982","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5914.2010.00443.x","title":"Authenticity, Community, and Modernity","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Citation; Sociology; Library science; Media studies; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08179630603265138,"score_gpt":0.3912404577666179,"score_spread":0.30944415173396655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115658982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849985,0.000037632784,0.0006735622,0.0039019939,0.0008987071,0.00019687934,0.000036001147,0.000018588891,0.009238087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983049,0.000014958435,0.00007437987,0.00012256822,0.00075525563,0.0000050086787,7.1055547e-7,0.0000104703195,0.00071176206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984065,0.0008667872,0.00020570689,0.000056760517,0.00024396837,0.00022025734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975952,0.0018725203,0.000123573,0.00011422386,0.00018084535,0.00011366187],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076733134,0.00008262765,0.00016439089,0.000034867928,0.004933318,0.000099806835,0.00047094666,0.00012756402,0.00024754409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069820497,0.000060681923,0.00017774962,0.00006815717,0.0016057612,0.00013644155,0.00008141963,0.0010013105,0.0000023716887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108349406,0.00011389751,0.0006885622,0.000006810177,0.000023553319,5.0362416e-7,0.028091194,1.4088552e-7,0.0007499204,0.96496826,0.000083914674,0.005164895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025739256,0.000050602033,0.0035585123,0.0000060505754,0.00012473711,0.000007952089,0.013822706,0.0000026200214,0.00016027616,0.9787745,0.0031553907,0.00007925917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010937601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011364499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014268488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014727779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046164885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99636215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138437561","doi":"10.1111/1468-5914.00148","title":"Is the Self a Kind of Understanding?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Social Representations and Identity","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Sociology; Library science","score_opus":0.10953663746966602,"score_gpt":0.41002929927886644,"score_spread":0.3004926618092004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138437561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829357,0.00025993152,0.0034919707,0.0031858862,0.0015487837,0.00034963863,0.000039172643,0.00001153793,0.008177381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954865,0.000047267404,0.000024205916,0.000115671784,0.0004067248,0.000011549254,5.9008454e-7,0.0000137467505,0.00389375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989924,0.00021905267,0.00030631406,0.00007631876,0.00023025367,0.00017566617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987204,0.0005737012,0.00038694558,0.00014635743,0.0001435368,0.000029027944],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014503893,0.00007611875,0.00016365675,0.000049984825,0.0008387209,0.000032354437,0.00034391508,0.00008260216,0.0012219802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064176544,0.000045800323,0.00036507432,0.00018052588,0.00026856243,0.00006361092,0.000027779603,0.00021390928,0.0000079565825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006207586,0.00040268828,0.04452944,0.000007753753,0.0006908682,0.0000052216697,0.07423429,0.0000011714063,0.00024870905,0.84785503,0.027332691,0.00407138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012875539,0.00015848127,0.30741775,0.0000116046895,0.00067200215,0.000059937003,0.1592745,0.000002562959,0.0001349007,0.52749693,0.0033737512,0.000110002235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009866971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015811254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32035807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006915944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046698293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141087681","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12061","title":"Understanding My Culture Means Understanding Myself: The Function of Cultural Identity Clarity for Personal Identity Clarity and Personal Psychological Well‐Being","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Identity (music); Cultural identity; Personal identity; Social psychology; Identity formation; Psychology; Multiculturalism; Normative; Sociology; Self-concept; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Feeling","score_opus":0.25923882087819966,"score_gpt":0.4155764779306752,"score_spread":0.15633765705247554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141087681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88436836,0.00023858674,0.11121977,0.0010480774,0.0018162994,0.00052377186,0.00007205529,0.000023110431,0.0006899788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981712,0.000053606906,0.00007373756,0.00015722224,0.0008336786,0.000019207722,0.000012906917,0.00001830613,0.000660117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997711,0.00059255544,0.0005118544,0.00029611267,0.0004816169,0.00040686099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835074,0.0006190223,0.0005983188,0.0001086899,0.00023153979,0.00009166279],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003667328,0.0002580477,0.00043977995,0.000056131623,0.0025956065,0.00023371707,0.00040429074,0.0003452466,0.00029558814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015846895,0.00014136918,0.00067955203,0.00015853447,0.0007974247,0.000548619,0.000073282434,0.0008031498,0.0000015918665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015010942,0.00019546653,0.008696537,0.00005881767,0.00040197972,7.740955e-7,0.07946507,8.503502e-7,0.0011027479,0.90540713,0.0026059353,0.00056362496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017810281,0.000604681,0.16661419,0.0000496093,0.00093797065,0.00006363407,0.2776993,0.0001671503,0.000016522587,0.5516936,0.00014773304,0.0002245936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037743874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009439602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3537135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002443569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017996384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749765223","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12145","title":"What Hindu <i>Sati</i> can teach us about the sociocultural and social psychological dynamics of suicide","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sociocultural evolution; Psychology; Power (physics); Social psychology; Identity (music); Shame; Sociology; Interpretation (philosophy); Aesthetics","score_opus":0.0798465825633327,"score_gpt":0.4051943466318124,"score_spread":0.3253477640684797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749765223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857557,0.00034453097,0.00006753499,0.010754431,0.0020670139,0.0004025956,0.00017896024,0.000012243053,0.00041703455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99447817,0.00007393623,0.000046068923,0.00024100533,0.0006172313,0.00003236231,0.000011741727,0.000028062228,0.00447141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982939,0.00034656614,0.00051208795,0.00020129523,0.00027355255,0.000372636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981451,0.00024276327,0.0009793125,0.00033476375,0.00023638771,0.00006165868],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019735773,0.00021101105,0.00040265618,0.000038906313,0.0035049107,0.00024130776,0.0008999916,0.00028837603,0.00019463233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060722603,0.00011667824,0.00041786814,0.000039346996,0.0015747915,0.0002185083,0.00011327698,0.0007278787,0.000002368922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015175166,0.0012224899,0.17565455,0.000038636335,0.00064273516,0.00002922451,0.06898121,0.0000011706562,0.0027175331,0.516247,0.00863649,0.22431149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013687873,0.00027735916,0.9406204,0.000024200588,0.0005872136,0.00011275378,0.04215883,0.0000020718617,0.000060727958,0.014324283,0.0002877256,0.00017564849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021610408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023700483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76496583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007058377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030390947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99779236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886917788","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12182","title":"Revisiting Fromm and Bourdieu: Contributions to habitus and realism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Habitus; Subjectivity; Sociology; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Field (mathematics); Social science; Philosophy; Cultural capital","score_opus":0.023459619992358433,"score_gpt":0.3715248933267956,"score_spread":0.34806527333443715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886917788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.979976,0.00038502508,0.00060393556,0.016239462,0.0005940798,0.00033954176,0.00014980034,0.000021828202,0.0016903181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954329,0.00013587861,0.00015058818,0.00026849058,0.0025289396,0.000008011096,0.0000016605017,0.000008171053,0.0014653563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902284,0.00022920525,0.00020759653,0.00009279998,0.00019455845,0.0002529922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998883,0.00035645047,0.00017183431,0.000045106528,0.00041290367,0.00013067508],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023336092,0.00008011837,0.0001811716,0.000024756167,0.0041703396,0.0001229485,0.00016394419,0.00009687228,0.000039945535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068529195,0.0000564883,0.00010330734,0.0001053504,0.0007381263,0.00009524381,0.000048984784,0.00015669253,0.0000020621133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001503784,0.000021089963,0.0029482932,0.0000061718124,0.000068179936,0.000001383467,0.08133888,1.3393753e-7,0.0006672074,0.8608014,0.0023915353,0.051605366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001230094,0.00030074455,0.18210888,0.0001146885,0.0006116724,0.000027924625,0.20066354,0.0000097211,0.0001245164,0.5691407,0.045267526,0.00039998366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037584428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034017873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29166067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006725046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005966905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895215135","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12186","title":"From Performativity to Representation <i>as</i> Intervention: Rethinking the 2008 Financial Crisis and the Recent History of Social Science","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Performativity; Sociology; Premise; Conflation; Positivism; Economic sociology; Representation (politics); Epistemology; Intervention (counseling); Positive economics; Social science; Economics; Political science; Politics; Psychology; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.05523864294663019,"score_gpt":0.39531420190724526,"score_spread":0.3400755589606151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895215135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9470723,0.0004310256,0.001497838,0.04231643,0.003913869,0.0006839015,0.000048086386,0.000016520753,0.0040199906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99661326,0.000104503575,0.000097157776,0.0008836272,0.0018737582,0.00002260685,0.0000010909895,0.000008441839,0.00039552434],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699235,0.0013583775,0.00048224564,0.00015911835,0.0007057568,0.00030216906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965062,0.0019135618,0.0004907312,0.00014617498,0.00087538245,0.00006791566],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013606196,0.00010073776,0.0002684592,0.00005121334,0.0037000622,0.000068208836,0.0007986789,0.00012645214,0.00028999607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004372927,0.000058432823,0.00026152912,0.0002667037,0.009662771,0.0002533805,0.00017345932,0.00040529796,0.000002736507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008160791,0.000052433104,0.00014783426,0.0000043712826,0.000026591604,3.8932464e-7,0.59406704,1.9298415e-7,0.00028858296,0.3687676,0.01960347,0.016225416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011957041,0.00019705841,0.013748514,0.000031967404,0.0003133681,0.0000055255173,0.26328444,0.000007598007,0.0005510463,0.6911079,0.029412309,0.00014452923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014700232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021732059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3307826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041917377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046816678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905285388","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12192","title":"Alienation in a four factor world","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Sociology; Epistemology; Action (physics); Capital (architecture); Set (abstract data type); Social science; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.0973751179953441,"score_gpt":0.38971409204572693,"score_spread":0.29233897405038284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905285388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9824578,0.00010712089,0.00090066076,0.0040547964,0.0017944342,0.00055826904,0.000027527483,0.000055231852,0.010044162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932438,0.0000282434,0.00014857418,0.0002747237,0.001983967,0.000019590372,5.851457e-7,0.000022798524,0.0042776773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748653,0.0010763285,0.00041827216,0.00014244148,0.00044114888,0.00043526542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975076,0.0015857553,0.00039572662,0.00010522224,0.00031632796,0.00008942176],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062582097,0.00012848008,0.00026496456,0.00014381198,0.0016406652,0.0000681181,0.00062693574,0.00017735043,0.00083431805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011084086,0.0000905254,0.0002947463,0.00037508894,0.0013787949,0.0002096965,0.000051233357,0.00040648913,0.000026140855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004768535,0.00013821626,0.00953,0.000004763762,0.00005566209,0.0000038127985,0.05651512,0.0000014786,0.0006512696,0.9151616,0.001663312,0.01579788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010801514,0.00020603694,0.1404795,0.000034732846,0.000087071894,0.000003724122,0.0364892,0.0000047785215,0.00039082085,0.8034035,0.017571842,0.0002486482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010047719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005823955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13094951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026347084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014853911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909482174","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12199","title":"Ideal football culture: A cultural take on self‐determination theory","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Booth University College; Ambrose University","funders":"","keywords":"Deci-; Self-determination theory; Psychology; Cognitive reframing; Nature versus nurture; Social psychology; Individualism; Cultural psychology; Ideal (ethics); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.030921097739228156,"score_gpt":0.3419646702806681,"score_spread":0.31104357254144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909482174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787851,0.00015107811,0.0006012054,0.00044060042,0.0036046563,0.0007287257,0.000044150875,0.000059454505,0.015585012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734072,0.000008877055,0.000115559495,0.00047775195,0.00067930424,0.000032739543,0.000015608592,0.000030699834,0.025232235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826145,0.00040998528,0.00048864743,0.00019391174,0.00034833886,0.00029764103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984657,0.00039430827,0.00060796936,0.00019830691,0.00026523476,0.00006847965],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021191977,0.00019591283,0.00029113455,0.000076734024,0.00047951253,0.000051597017,0.00039258946,0.00021547453,0.0026153617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066088214,0.00012380166,0.00040867022,0.00011294942,0.00012534077,0.00013595432,0.00002220221,0.0004734356,0.00008267985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002344327,0.000811681,0.005222018,0.00002213409,0.00026037233,0.0000108161175,0.10033043,0.0000042981715,0.00088245684,0.83004516,0.01724004,0.04282625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022106612,0.0059227995,0.3308009,0.00017926234,0.0017076224,0.0005872932,0.21117212,0.000030004603,0.001316549,0.3075673,0.11697054,0.0016389966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004013973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.37006e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52247787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008978716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003404971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945926723","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12213","title":"The role of social representations in the construction of power relations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Social Representations and Identity","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Power (physics); Sociology; Emancipation; Epistemology; Relevance (law); Perspective (graphical); Social relation; Dynamics (music); Social science; Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020999336771297967,"score_gpt":0.3689132139063506,"score_spread":0.3479138771350527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945926723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98287666,0.00019086692,0.00016008763,0.0012942523,0.0010370953,0.0004818433,0.00005470534,0.000003895297,0.013900612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803895,0.000012557671,0.00003418608,0.000014123296,0.00015378286,0.000029180392,0.0000030962717,0.000010110449,0.001704037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838954,0.00056387583,0.0005267819,0.000084249965,0.00028503983,0.00015053246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749994,0.0013464396,0.0006823805,0.00017671728,0.00028114577,0.000013357768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019590433,0.0000713104,0.0001783214,0.00007357456,0.000830618,0.000028152957,0.00036982298,0.00009814132,0.0005401434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018847892,0.000042902604,0.00032742022,0.00027543536,0.00049077475,0.00010540852,0.0000270672,0.00029383955,0.000008721714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023988214,0.0001461886,0.07440139,0.0000023247144,0.00012668339,2.3081755e-7,0.04094286,0.000005487341,0.0007008938,0.8786193,0.0011434067,0.0036713346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050233654,0.000050850187,0.5702614,0.000004062531,0.0001231804,0.000008170515,0.22713518,0.0000018607024,0.000105592306,0.20105198,0.0007162738,0.000039062048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018144806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044602373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6775673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033055403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067065426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6388526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006613007","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12237","title":"Subhumanism: The re‐emergence of an affective‐symbolic ontology in the migration debate and beyond","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Humanity; Refugee; Sociology; Dialectic; Racism; Ontology; Contempt; Politics; Epistemology; Race (biology); Immigration; Social psychology; Psychology; Gender studies; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.0581824711942446,"score_gpt":0.34825931890950096,"score_spread":0.2900768477152564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006613007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872186,0.00045057887,0.0001581078,0.010367977,0.00037592874,0.00041361555,0.000012532566,0.000005604615,0.000997038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986286,0.00031413903,0.000029222238,0.00046744337,0.00045133135,0.000016093412,0.0000012714852,0.0000074360255,0.00008443479],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806637,0.0010480196,0.00026971617,0.00010209886,0.00030136495,0.00021241099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880356,0.000663592,0.00028447018,0.0000835166,0.00010570062,0.000059180475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039501153,0.000087509085,0.0001902307,0.000029442575,0.0010181817,0.000032684406,0.00048945216,0.00009102609,0.000059266946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002661599,0.000047322123,0.000121704055,0.00015424163,0.00062879536,0.00012563437,0.000022876642,0.00027317097,5.760771e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017305806,0.000078370715,0.0035563542,0.000008460375,0.000029049042,0.000002720792,0.8904914,0.0000018878574,0.001386086,0.09141292,0.0006180979,0.012241591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049462606,0.0003311908,0.08595804,0.000006672539,0.00019156224,0.000009288771,0.83242786,0.000012852623,0.00053343887,0.07882175,0.0011172312,0.00009547882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003034773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004184002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082401685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016468683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001116851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7831133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033446390","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12242","title":"The right tool for the job: problems and solutions in visualizing sociological theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Visualization; Vagueness; Resource (disambiguation); Epistemology; Perception; Representation (politics); Sociology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Management science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Fuzzy logic","score_opus":0.08624017911238162,"score_gpt":0.35655485505775025,"score_spread":0.2703146759453686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033446390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8162053,0.0063971146,0.010027107,0.15874867,0.0019430302,0.0042864773,0.00017907588,0.00010165068,0.0021115406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99614996,0.00069735013,0.0000429102,0.0005159877,0.0012509096,0.000116555246,0.0000015781113,0.000014060576,0.0012107182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802303,0.0007674016,0.00036915424,0.00012869659,0.00027648924,0.00043521816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948936,0.0045318413,0.00027021504,0.000060472896,0.00017750094,0.00006638776],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006643528,0.00012719115,0.00021704638,0.000012600912,0.008410184,0.00017908771,0.0005754694,0.00016237113,0.000036218047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011876527,0.00005732449,0.00034097835,0.0001597933,0.001474421,0.00014677332,0.00007687538,0.00042810856,0.0000011893461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021665389,0.000028012302,0.0007131848,0.0000062187232,0.000066861954,4.5006445e-7,0.049046442,0.000009800825,0.00013519377,0.93624026,0.0010511995,0.012485716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000734235,0.00015551553,0.018816981,0.000019024586,0.00027777845,0.0000035264684,0.16519299,0.00014862836,0.000008757813,0.792127,0.022327576,0.00018798168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044814886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022189043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17994459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000827662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011318601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034882419","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12239","title":"Reconceptualizing the generation in a digital(izing) modernity: digital media, social networking sites, and the flattening of generations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Sociology; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Late modernity; Set (abstract data type); Aesthetics; Social science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1281661460599685,"score_gpt":0.325173514385056,"score_spread":0.19700736832508747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034882419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849274,0.00077248854,0.002638592,0.009746529,0.00059103983,0.000460844,0.00006414467,0.000012483451,0.0007864573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955331,0.000120688805,0.000040358314,0.00029500283,0.0038313447,0.000015187671,0.000013863644,0.000016195003,0.00013424002],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821687,0.00039172737,0.00054232,0.00013065858,0.00044767183,0.00027074976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790925,0.0012616008,0.00051184144,0.00006856547,0.0001803339,0.00006841648],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00333988,0.000121303696,0.0002935089,0.000035008816,0.0022555343,0.00033790866,0.00036673268,0.000107484,0.000019544445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085928204,0.000071242335,0.00024584585,0.00019954052,0.0009711105,0.00036433496,0.00006617041,0.0003684152,6.1508683e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017312677,0.000036024103,0.0045084096,0.0000061568867,0.00008604822,0.0000013784825,0.8898063,0.0001004263,0.0004102529,0.0548604,0.0015446937,0.048466805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034211164,0.000094819145,0.0056514638,0.00003830878,0.0004930584,0.000013368811,0.89837,0.0022610836,0.00024305763,0.08344434,0.00557833,0.0003910155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003398259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019514552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048075788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004597225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017336846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048715937","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12248","title":"Towards a critical realist epistemology?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Epistemology; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Relativism; Ontology; Sociology; Realism; Social epistemology; Interrogation; Epistemology of Wikipedia; Subaltern; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.10530467780523514,"score_gpt":0.4282358199638523,"score_spread":0.3229311421586172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048715937","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16423409,0.0011488064,0.04104597,0.74922585,0.0055980342,0.0012587629,0.00046081239,0.00020106859,0.03682658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99467444,0.000060890612,0.0005262402,0.0019379274,0.0023549357,0.000018558512,0.0000023327805,0.000021131895,0.00040353576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745446,0.0010480011,0.00044074253,0.00015627824,0.00041955817,0.0004809285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581945,0.0032556737,0.00016209419,0.00009218176,0.00040382406,0.0002667511],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003877664,0.00012192435,0.00035347042,0.000026076415,0.0019694522,0.0000629563,0.0006841668,0.00026284173,0.0005280151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008509337,0.00009203623,0.0004279448,0.00015015205,0.003269088,0.00010447707,0.000070000504,0.0005263507,0.000010817911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021450398,0.00004547473,0.00021886468,0.0000133639105,0.000034335,0.000014007617,0.03759919,3.1955167e-7,0.00012431447,0.9515997,0.005323549,0.004812344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005359006,0.0002757255,0.0037561513,0.000012941755,0.00035461658,0.000030600902,0.09847141,0.0000051983343,0.00008086164,0.8675631,0.028726544,0.00018693424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018184553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027821556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83044034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011142123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003013883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097200473","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12261","title":"Theories as modern myths: Giving up the pursuit of good theory to focus on good theorizing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ambrose University","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Focus (optics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06300311861396675,"score_gpt":0.28060380476496644,"score_spread":0.2176006861509997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097200473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57906705,0.003047468,0.010819615,0.099049605,0.009923892,0.002967227,0.00093992066,0.00023351482,0.29395172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924931,0.000016188702,0.000025983389,0.0016282588,0.0018702698,0.000024331675,7.947265e-7,0.000037746267,0.0039033568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773157,0.0003994716,0.00052971434,0.00022625407,0.0007429067,0.00037009284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749595,0.0013182112,0.0005530125,0.00023798493,0.00026371004,0.00013110758],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040340093,0.00025074728,0.0004049178,0.00008840907,0.0030404604,0.00023961089,0.001621894,0.00007070223,0.00065643457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003856226,0.00014431098,0.00051435543,0.00009512764,0.0014990804,0.00029639318,0.00015081595,0.0005161866,0.000023709987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079495396,0.00006092104,0.0000070378796,0.000016041888,0.00008285866,0.0000015336043,0.19823702,0.000015972375,0.0014899657,0.7887106,0.00036889664,0.010214203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040651788,0.00080565456,0.00010844529,0.000059697002,0.00021191708,0.000007731042,0.073711485,0.000006917749,0.0018232961,0.9114299,0.011234302,0.00019416072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001461663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015376903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.413426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058875437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011183682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99825746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134845612","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12264","title":"The construction of social reality as a process of representational naturalization. The case of the social representation of drugs","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalization; Objectification; Social reality; Epistemology; Sociology; Process (computing); Object (grammar); Representation (politics); Social representation; Social constructionism; Structuring; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08210024124871379,"score_gpt":0.4997301169093354,"score_spread":0.4176298756606216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134845612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98422575,0.00014794013,0.00018180774,0.012722079,0.00091091794,0.000939543,0.00019033843,0.0000053345575,0.00067628064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989324,0.0000678713,0.00006932494,0.00012428143,0.00028890438,0.00004917469,0.000018182587,0.000013262694,0.000436595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947958,0.0028754366,0.0014027259,0.000106102154,0.00059392105,0.00022600206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909657,0.0032289724,0.0029396287,0.000245257,0.0025854434,0.000034966823],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044608065,0.000113480484,0.00037478676,0.00004773543,0.004872066,0.0000092467635,0.00043365388,0.00016972555,0.000119151366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015211123,0.00006121848,0.00036172083,0.0004989664,0.0009609619,0.0000966684,0.0001598497,0.00070551195,2.791387e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002644107,0.00036248847,0.021272011,0.00086400664,0.00042461863,0.0000032706992,0.38058564,0.000027330878,0.0012392108,0.5737614,0.0042091473,0.014606756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016818852,0.00005105078,0.16165803,0.00013032772,0.0003702623,0.0000822857,0.62118804,0.000019965617,0.004486503,0.20999883,0.00023840836,0.000094388066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060555525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026613133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3637626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011116135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017357259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135410317","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12276","title":"Emotions, personhood and social ontology: A critical realist approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Epistemology; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Critical theory; Ontology; Constitution; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Realism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07983515031028451,"score_gpt":0.4071509882988535,"score_spread":0.327315837988569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135410317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65430546,0.0031588164,0.03076247,0.26783288,0.0047588204,0.001169016,0.00069292134,0.00016795953,0.03715163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99535394,0.00011128416,0.0012695,0.00051528733,0.0015263272,0.000021921647,0.000009579348,0.000020041,0.0011721129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972086,0.0013704473,0.00036250582,0.00019956047,0.00037267458,0.00048619392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680763,0.0023147704,0.0001367886,0.000090294336,0.0005256163,0.00012491569],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035769052,0.00013026928,0.00036909227,0.00003995557,0.004107587,0.00011103446,0.00031098377,0.00034209015,0.00021741155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002604904,0.00010810222,0.00034702095,0.0001288366,0.003395918,0.00012093576,0.00007237082,0.0005558318,0.0000015715439],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070179805,0.00015648086,0.00033853666,0.0000187122,0.000052710933,0.000009150902,0.06271687,7.311288e-8,0.0001043883,0.9306216,0.0022442474,0.003667015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006549852,0.00007478084,0.013211564,0.000010754531,0.0005010387,0.000119121665,0.43000653,0.0000045363613,0.000019562565,0.5476097,0.007600799,0.00018662807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001193609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011124571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38301194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013158291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034948514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146506616","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12280","title":"Debating ethical nominalism in Early Enlightenment thought on China","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of King's College","funders":"","keywords":"Nominalism; Enlightenment; Universalism; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy; Relativism; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05935979418168738,"score_gpt":0.3092899873389791,"score_spread":0.24993019315729173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146506616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618124,0.0002969747,0.000058623336,0.024504578,0.0017148174,0.00021526219,0.000100440324,0.000014990911,0.011281949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920528,0.000027253172,0.000058110767,0.0011833594,0.0025849326,0.000014507041,0.0000051760735,0.000022380209,0.0040514804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983182,0.00037028416,0.000471133,0.00014631117,0.00036476745,0.00032929465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987373,0.0007565832,0.00017568661,0.0001148341,0.00012855101,0.00008705391],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012556519,0.00015596843,0.00029303678,0.00004882721,0.0008016945,0.00011620975,0.0002509273,0.00013890429,0.00092541904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018980495,0.00009971902,0.00038542037,0.000045674697,0.00030470546,0.000068718255,0.00005323665,0.0010085088,0.000012449362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025340286,0.0002631138,0.00013106545,0.000013558538,0.00004951486,0.000029372291,0.018275246,0.0000013984409,0.00007825352,0.9777839,0.00036281106,0.0027583286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013079359,0.0003555314,0.012064749,0.0001477954,0.00020988753,0.000038750193,0.0074679446,0.000009816263,0.0013786221,0.9385055,0.038248327,0.00026519873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002227115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017555845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039278492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007080148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044953726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160932027","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12279","title":"Getting real about nominalism again: Special forum introduction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Nominalism; Epistemology; Universalism; Enlightenment; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.033427710143264795,"score_gpt":0.36920599903227524,"score_spread":0.33577828888901046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160932027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8517489,0.00058451557,0.0023432332,0.10846498,0.015200682,0.0005815286,0.00009792574,0.000068297726,0.020909948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9458022,0.0003945495,0.00045838437,0.00043926053,0.047248468,0.000019442296,0.000012015857,0.000033882323,0.0055918097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738574,0.00090324227,0.0004957563,0.00019603215,0.00046613472,0.00055309595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973178,0.0014241579,0.00033211592,0.00014093162,0.00066526915,0.000119709046],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004716501,0.00013127399,0.000321113,0.00004690472,0.0028692726,0.000110754925,0.00040722522,0.00025232512,0.00081312173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023983263,0.00011083028,0.00045716367,0.00017871373,0.0012223759,0.00017487873,0.00007472387,0.0005299149,0.0000075438757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015598923,0.00007990796,0.00049993186,0.000007557181,0.000058092377,0.000013890887,0.03615952,0.0000019876484,0.0011735231,0.91338617,0.01847009,0.029993331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008052917,0.00009946805,0.011326131,0.000022157257,0.00038914187,0.000056437293,0.3055687,0.000002800478,0.0007494964,0.537238,0.14346407,0.00027830942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013988401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025599636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37614816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027875285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037484092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177064620","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12281","title":"Nominalist visualities and classical social theory: An examination of Durkheim and Weber","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Emile Durkheim and Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Nominalism; Epistemology; Problem of universals; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.05629651930197533,"score_gpt":0.37702592510441824,"score_spread":0.3207294058024429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177064620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957949,0.00044733958,0.00016468218,0.0016045191,0.00033139964,0.00013061811,0.00005635895,0.000009900373,0.0014603174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965522,0.00017188866,0.000060709415,0.00008835459,0.00081042893,0.000008480056,0.000006201311,0.000014308863,0.002287384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971138,0.0018956439,0.00033573576,0.00013916446,0.00027493856,0.00024067171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979064,0.0012513482,0.0003281075,0.00006255585,0.00037286495,0.00007875566],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055380203,0.000111347064,0.00032377022,0.000046444275,0.0019070228,0.000067290166,0.00017823266,0.00024021167,0.00013421125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004248534,0.00008909326,0.00015884831,0.00009009658,0.002171846,0.00019686687,0.000051610616,0.00025358883,2.9597308e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013967583,0.00009408627,0.0022683467,0.000017203147,0.00006471443,0.0000026820567,0.11597543,6.518773e-8,0.0007878403,0.8686608,0.00010379336,0.011885346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089987187,0.000154008,0.28568056,0.000018713044,0.0004122884,0.000022221015,0.42961016,0.000003607601,0.0004639081,0.281373,0.0011801558,0.00018149732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003591254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010186469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58728784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004938569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018338356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204187844","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12323","title":"Tastes, emotions, and social cohesion: Toward a cultural theory of social exchange","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Proposition; Cohesion (chemistry); Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Sociology; Social exchange theory; Psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04240761385172035,"score_gpt":0.27313553043632915,"score_spread":0.2307279165846088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204187844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96464664,0.0031411205,0.003726404,0.019593729,0.0019448639,0.0007786365,0.00012479855,0.00007694842,0.005966877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936867,0.00008549474,0.000074196956,0.0004585267,0.0027291696,0.000009582971,0.000033653356,0.000025047912,0.002897662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988536,0.00007884322,0.00038128824,0.00013466118,0.00034028277,0.00021132987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986466,0.00014084487,0.0005303359,0.000049900762,0.00062373525,0.000008550451],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012763855,0.00016071468,0.00031971696,0.00013117134,0.0017842484,0.0001481902,0.00022315403,0.000081400234,0.00074561517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013983875,0.00011798537,0.00025382944,0.00041111634,0.0003371914,0.00036588017,0.0002562408,0.00016137076,0.0000049841765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028176833,0.00017583238,0.0049871975,0.00034712395,0.0003459602,0.000005935817,0.006798655,6.6282456e-7,0.00040866868,0.9460395,0.026110277,0.014498447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002995492,0.00005293997,0.48783422,0.000076588134,0.0023246272,0.00001636466,0.11148863,0.000014000427,0.0002476842,0.34331095,0.051087607,0.00055090024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000071237832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008630351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60272855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029660867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024825673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297819726","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12360","title":"A Motivational Theory of Roles, Rewards, and Institutions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Psychology; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Key (lock); Cognition; Nothing; Cognitive psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.03357215957109448,"score_gpt":0.26078250360011007,"score_spread":0.22721034402901558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297819726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9565368,0.0020558925,0.019651258,0.007522797,0.0016857659,0.0009901923,0.00016051668,0.00005799793,0.01133875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997857,0.00001941886,0.000062575506,0.0003187149,0.00051305967,0.000017658154,0.000014074921,0.000011329529,0.0011862111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992593,0.000034899018,0.0002458497,0.000072579875,0.00028445318,0.00010290816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992454,0.0001503531,0.00035827412,0.00005012885,0.00019086787,0.000004962821],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015739664,0.000078007724,0.00013876244,0.00012073965,0.0018547113,0.0000398468,0.000219465,0.000017475131,0.0005324307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014970668,0.00005923544,0.000100487574,0.00022793791,0.00022002126,0.00021645975,0.00025473753,0.00012531197,0.0000010386245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014145667,0.00007833749,0.0124755725,0.000026991285,0.000098673474,5.480323e-7,0.00041897193,0.00007198774,0.00007260736,0.9807189,0.004211912,0.0016840416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093692134,0.000033310716,0.19826771,0.000014642931,0.00049611664,0.0000057642255,0.014223075,0.00002982195,0.00002568867,0.74785864,0.037961964,0.00014635819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008525347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037674781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23286027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025161535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028195784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319794027","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12371","title":"Toward a sociological theory of social pain","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Situational ethics; Action (physics); Sociology; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Sociological theory; Epistemology; Cognition; Sociological imagination; Social psychology; Social science; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.10135539719046394,"score_gpt":0.3777845212585298,"score_spread":0.27642912406806586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319794027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9597476,0.0008777364,0.0055209934,0.015911734,0.0035282476,0.0016615558,0.0002928908,0.00026784115,0.012191401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99273694,0.0001465096,0.000032155494,0.00026909634,0.0026420334,0.000042281023,0.0000059188474,0.000030379742,0.0040946896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946131,0.0031330932,0.0006660429,0.00019059742,0.0007371008,0.0006600327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99503714,0.003611872,0.00066961197,0.00010875233,0.0004582982,0.00011435561],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023854261,0.00020045385,0.00061950635,0.000116562536,0.0035250685,0.00007200645,0.0008480905,0.00039801508,0.00046942613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020189653,0.00014867257,0.0010917787,0.0004327597,0.0019464155,0.00014688051,0.00007385058,0.00054695946,0.000016221244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006232581,0.00012248039,0.0009329299,0.000024168248,0.0001946998,0.0000066059506,0.18457356,0.0000017429788,0.00045040174,0.7710438,0.0066119465,0.035414457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001140826,0.00020966596,0.01922517,0.000021553888,0.00038136946,0.000001920852,0.33112264,0.000006383662,0.000054114247,0.6349693,0.01260314,0.0002639216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000623723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003743134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14654909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001517376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003894151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319971673","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12373","title":"Re‐envisioning Human Agency: A Commentary on, and Alternative to Gantt, Yanchar, and Parker's Hermeneutic‐Phenomenological Approach","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Social Representations and Identity","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Gantt chart; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; Hermeneutics; Sociology; Phenomenology (philosophy); Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Philosophy; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.09925126352537618,"score_gpt":0.41349784132993284,"score_spread":0.31424657780455667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319971673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940779,0.00009376323,0.00022983878,0.0024849596,0.00046056818,0.00040028468,0.000051209474,0.000021203965,0.002180232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977427,0.000050254897,0.00006556875,0.00064065965,0.000412382,0.00005764027,0.0000056297613,0.000018271268,0.001006866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988134,0.0003088611,0.00026864218,0.00018729984,0.00017991952,0.00024187844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991372,0.00043536865,0.00017658893,0.0001058324,0.000059522154,0.00008546258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013355425,0.00011622853,0.00021491264,0.000103009595,0.0012974651,0.00006234776,0.00019697721,0.000074337026,0.00017415515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006447785,0.00008577611,0.000101772486,0.00015417105,0.00023786102,0.000059831153,0.000105444575,0.00026047375,0.0000071105574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021331643,0.0012694098,0.063276574,0.000042619304,0.0014390298,0.00008209579,0.3107711,0.000048939834,0.0020925424,0.44928873,0.080167525,0.08938826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001438211,0.0005985178,0.68814915,0.000021745976,0.00021937833,0.0000146995235,0.09917786,0.000013709208,0.000042722684,0.20947556,0.00065637886,0.00019205717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006621596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000694219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62487257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038537924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008255856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99791837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324136364","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12379","title":"Constructing the Anti‐Vaxxer: Discursive analysis of public deliberations on childhood vaccination","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Deliberation; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Focus (optics); Focus group; Public discourse; Psychology; Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Law; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.05622519369102877,"score_gpt":0.37028407944520847,"score_spread":0.31405888575417973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324136364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98547536,0.00003775987,0.00035504717,0.011454871,0.0011372635,0.00031091325,0.00014604228,0.000023914441,0.0010588526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998713,0.00007290139,0.000018613848,0.0000729812,0.0007320117,0.000015576916,0.000015708181,0.000010725954,0.00034847876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980972,0.00066995336,0.00036435403,0.000082686194,0.0004927051,0.00029312106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962395,0.002634065,0.00051111396,0.000100519545,0.00045023317,0.00006457081],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002877586,0.00008603716,0.00025650222,0.00023964458,0.0027784344,0.0000880026,0.0003991823,0.00009771044,0.00013201138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015870011,0.00005412147,0.00048079065,0.0013076948,0.00042641838,0.00013298473,0.000025968224,0.00024201431,0.0000026500384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012825188,0.000070384434,0.032531753,0.000002752546,0.00063953095,4.5534145e-7,0.11133729,0.000030148603,0.000034616507,0.83496183,0.00053786073,0.019840552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036164676,0.0000613766,0.32851976,0.0000114830955,0.0022932412,0.0000011878839,0.5738181,0.00003994097,0.0002264175,0.09397004,0.0005806805,0.00011613578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009663913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026627307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7409918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099784265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023184065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381594434","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12383","title":"Durkheim and realism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Emile Durkheim and Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Direct and indirect realism; Realism; Epistemology; Prima facie; Philosophical realism; Metaphysics; Sophistication; Philosophy; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Aesthetics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06264085053142984,"score_gpt":0.38340521777933556,"score_spread":0.3207643672479057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381594434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98726547,0.00028454073,0.0000781609,0.007458852,0.0011845411,0.00021586669,0.00003653702,0.000052029838,0.0034239972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99156815,0.0007264069,0.000024027126,0.0001323851,0.0009703237,0.0000131625975,0.0000025945606,0.000013111168,0.0065498324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877995,0.000401008,0.00021704941,0.00008506785,0.00021895283,0.00029795393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985366,0.0010146985,0.00017626562,0.00006326585,0.00013494668,0.00007423945],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048560584,0.00007329004,0.0001777695,0.000059424758,0.0024858809,0.000039135477,0.00027373273,0.00015252792,0.00009076989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036582048,0.00005284745,0.00016983617,0.00016158825,0.00086069613,0.0000808553,0.000039348233,0.00022263045,0.00000720664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000797658,0.000020596985,0.005023678,0.0000063724433,0.00006166932,0.00000501875,0.09152389,9.102825e-7,0.00019837332,0.8861397,0.0079664625,0.008973572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007022091,0.000074609976,0.12397739,0.000014206068,0.00021025249,0.00001230045,0.1922045,0.0000036406764,0.000048986745,0.6566481,0.02593606,0.00016776826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000116028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044648426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2294916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034207413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009656356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386190863","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12391","title":"Relationship course theory: An interdisciplinary integrative proposition to address the complexification of interpersonal relationships","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Proposition; Friendship; Sociocultural evolution; Psychology; Epistemology; Interpersonal communication; Sociality; Temporalities; Interpersonal relationship; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.11168287357079437,"score_gpt":0.4775121856066466,"score_spread":0.3658293120358522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386190863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9085506,0.00009830653,0.07926943,0.007369546,0.0015229919,0.0013961074,0.0002460455,0.00006330927,0.0014836153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952848,0.000001969858,0.00016116796,0.00003469155,0.0002846258,0.00012091152,0.00012261173,0.00003071486,0.003958502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971929,0.0015708169,0.0005739773,0.00016516165,0.00027997294,0.0002171324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961883,0.002539599,0.00059568754,0.00025224697,0.00036010458,0.000064106345],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053698746,0.00015757335,0.0002157743,0.00019168615,0.0020619049,0.000039191254,0.0005135482,0.00016600575,0.00016331249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002072328,0.00009228293,0.00026371167,0.0004989342,0.00050743716,0.0001883654,0.00008831986,0.0007534114,0.000033686763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012395144,0.00021450862,0.03065377,0.000008360308,0.00016451889,9.753844e-7,0.125146,0.00016428606,0.00013244817,0.83790857,0.0019981535,0.0023689198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003730169,0.00027409114,0.5795977,0.00004453057,0.0003614434,0.000017888744,0.17335077,0.0003212108,0.000018837129,0.24550503,0.000035097077,0.00010038008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004465919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021692002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59240353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008989607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006468266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387844566","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12395","title":"Neither individualism nor anti‐individualism: The coevolution of social systems and psychic systems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Individualism; Psychic; Methodological individualism; Epistemology; Sociology; Social system; Systems theory; Social psychology; Social science; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07508405824203587,"score_gpt":0.3950049782790985,"score_spread":0.31992092003706263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387844566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839834,0.0010140912,0.00031259697,0.007875471,0.004175635,0.0010212318,0.0005634296,0.00006245585,0.0009916703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99625397,0.00021914241,0.000008731813,0.00007389846,0.0020243474,0.00005991951,0.000010812095,0.000035099085,0.0013140782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951925,0.0024289382,0.00073345593,0.0001917842,0.0008736358,0.0005796289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954376,0.0031503306,0.0007229569,0.00015428045,0.00043388907,0.000100942336],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013075868,0.00018991191,0.0005417017,0.00012386216,0.0039069885,0.00016266525,0.0007501185,0.00039249705,0.00003882905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008322106,0.00012317358,0.0003389208,0.00043757173,0.0026540768,0.0001555172,0.000105719184,0.0005900879,0.0000067857513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008523282,0.00006437403,0.0042897803,0.00006352729,0.00020154254,0.0000023683288,0.12427977,0.00001306056,0.00022165419,0.8600757,0.009732085,0.00097092264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016148655,0.00021667064,0.19582778,0.0001142674,0.0011519362,0.000045170094,0.67656606,0.000058353995,0.000020422362,0.0987829,0.025185427,0.00041614327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008091412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057611218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7612928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109241155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020388729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390110471","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12406","title":"Social cognition and the origin of concepts in Durkheim's sociology of knowledge","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Critical Realism in Sociology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Argument (complex analysis); Cognition; Intentionality; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08485803168255139,"score_gpt":0.4557998684311949,"score_spread":0.3709418367486435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390110471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99068743,0.00038758072,0.00006338468,0.006080378,0.00052549463,0.00039219068,0.0000643718,0.0000125878005,0.0017865852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987978,0.00026718105,0.000011728345,0.00004730429,0.0005076849,0.000027091286,0.000003594013,0.000011666049,0.00032600353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707365,0.0017353334,0.0005341685,0.00010214916,0.0002376768,0.0003170153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99286216,0.0062926714,0.00039823755,0.00005683764,0.00035164677,0.000038432612],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008408344,0.000095946096,0.00046112871,0.00008239108,0.0009099021,0.000009322332,0.00035052342,0.000260279,0.000074382966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015998565,0.00006339569,0.00028342317,0.00024664582,0.0108730635,0.000064048014,0.00006730446,0.00036748446,0.000001989062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040425346,0.00005374456,0.00138951,0.000019069648,0.00005048142,9.030923e-7,0.18941545,4.3349064e-7,0.00041932007,0.80505985,0.0005526141,0.0026343688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023297064,0.00006974891,0.036122452,0.000022963006,0.00022898387,0.0000024268693,0.20646667,0.000005328376,0.0001460893,0.7538493,0.0006721622,0.00008415452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015999345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011027546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05121054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060010967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021868269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390636664","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.12410","title":"Plantness, Animalness, and Humanness: plant placement within animacy and adjacent scales","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Animal and Plant Science Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Akademie Věd České Republiky","keywords":"Animacy; Categorization; Perception; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Scale (ratio); Cognitive science; Similarity (geometry); Object (grammar); Social psychology; Computer science; Geography; Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience; Cartography","score_opus":0.049532149853602686,"score_gpt":0.3517753408664533,"score_spread":0.3022431910128506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390636664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921687,0.0039883032,0.00017198404,0.001149978,0.001853198,0.00023733023,0.00021182316,0.000020901476,0.00019776182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806696,0.0001227651,0.000041328396,0.00004185473,0.0005259207,0.00002094404,0.000010177012,0.000013675999,0.0011563617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903935,0.00011161645,0.00027931063,0.0001809726,0.00017833007,0.00021044408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938464,0.0002932958,0.00015320291,0.000059076778,0.000043471584,0.00006632033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00164379,0.00012986465,0.00017539249,0.00007300953,0.00069942785,0.00012433849,0.00016113969,0.00007521864,0.00019449563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019988229,0.000081782135,0.00006767894,0.00007695818,0.0003541414,0.00013793365,0.000034075027,0.00024025877,0.000005940079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020867032,0.00027473024,0.013865328,0.00015700956,0.00026830097,0.00004904344,0.07528765,0.0000028732775,0.004660063,0.8713939,0.016443852,0.015510512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014970727,0.0010995157,0.73949623,0.0003571048,0.00081108307,0.00200144,0.15772516,0.00015024017,0.00070263847,0.08676884,0.008786178,0.0006044822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023452878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020991078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7846251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025946943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048674956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5379504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413852284","doi":"10.1111/jtsb.70012","title":"Simulated Sense‐Making or Social Knowledge? Artificial Intelligence and the Boundaries of Representation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour","topic":"Embodied and Extended Cognition","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Sense (electronics); Commonsense knowledge; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Political science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11743074948043701,"score_gpt":0.4054441571092379,"score_spread":0.2880134076288009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413852284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9507207,0.00043800933,0.024877304,0.007727408,0.003520483,0.0015435164,0.00010682481,0.00006775896,0.010997944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991155,0.000032919223,0.000026470076,0.00012148234,0.00023583295,0.0000066010625,7.2458687e-7,0.000009146093,0.00045131848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985786,0.00048419222,0.00045400104,0.00013096601,0.00018729054,0.00016492521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723756,0.0020578133,0.00038827912,0.0000748956,0.00022683709,0.000014620689],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014750527,0.000101731785,0.00023230234,0.000081448736,0.0023193213,0.0001472673,0.00019084832,0.000077250465,0.00002672844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013165541,0.000057845165,0.0001838005,0.00027638784,0.0016071103,0.00011603782,0.000067959714,0.00026221294,9.1963733e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039692936,0.00007680715,0.00002393788,0.000025362167,0.000033736396,0.0000020436792,0.014265876,0.000020907695,0.0036496895,0.9236015,0.00010400098,0.054226816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049387844,0.000058470087,0.00035935998,0.00004495336,0.0002711921,0.000018857574,0.011231859,0.0005173391,0.031857137,0.95495707,0.0001181801,0.00007171949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000070430087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011552322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054155096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027919785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013378725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}