{"meta":{"query_hash":"aaac0c7e56e5","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics"},"cohort_total":68,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":68,"exported":68,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/aaac0c7e56e5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Academic+Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W1135046832","doi":"10.1007/s10805-015-9237-3","title":"Stop Drinking the Kool-Aid: The Academic Journal Review Process in the Social Sciences Is Broken, Let’s Fix It","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.2082210426346617,"score_gpt":0.4105906332708144,"score_spread":0.2023695906361527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1135046832","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015439871,0.0052924496,0.014951087,0.94473326,0.026860466,0.00018186777,0.000085829386,0.001176285,0.005174756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06966148,0.008273561,0.072022304,0.78079677,0.039030228,0.0011700835,0.00025608295,0.003093114,0.025696458],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.705519,0.16506197,0.019426756,0.009864046,0.09189021,0.00823794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.30483395,0.32421243,0.041697748,0.05747383,0.2099278,0.061854295],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30391666,0.0024039906,0.0040444573,0.012424312,0.025432805,0.04863438,0.006348245,0.03102294,0.016292617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6490697,0.0026017483,0.0026446597,0.00807148,0.04618066,0.056112442,0.025289021,0.06889846,0.020229498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031073514,0.00019509131,0.003017681,0.00097262894,0.00037497684,0.00032630403,0.010280364,0.00021868471,0.001029109,0.047941912,0.8087156,0.1266169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032534602,0.00024676116,0.0036845128,0.002761722,0.00023877622,0.000556933,0.013895396,0.0013458936,0.0011855871,0.21372867,0.7612718,0.0007587207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010116936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016321568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6960833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009995473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059583306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8583947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489256316","doi":"10.1007/s10805-008-9063-y","title":"James Ĉoté and Anton Allahar, Ivory Tower Blues: A University System in Crisis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ivory tower; Blues; Economic history; Theology; Humanities; Political science; Art; Art history; Philosophy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0540191129143208,"score_gpt":0.34711683248678316,"score_spread":0.29309771957246233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489256316","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048342094,0.0062431744,0.00093331677,0.89835256,0.0035629163,0.00005327122,0.00007077874,0.00005195775,0.04238992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5882942,0.012190252,0.0017858327,0.18916237,0.0021563824,0.00012224265,0.000072526105,0.00032681992,0.20588934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997399,0.001152475,0.000073943454,0.00023279137,0.00035479895,0.0007870785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927142,0.0016308231,0.0003842037,0.000083261846,0.00094442425,0.004242968],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034935607,0.0004926078,0.0005007164,0.00088719476,0.02981639,0.0154956,0.0018934484,0.01334331,0.030793497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010279264,0.0005984691,0.00027624902,0.0012975136,0.009501106,0.012621229,0.0073855845,0.012199027,0.0023532016],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000147451,0.000079164325,0.003474374,0.00022068074,0.000018595174,0.0029431635,0.095091395,0.00041799145,0.00047277063,0.09738888,0.7852132,0.014532294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034122702,0.00006600649,0.0041322988,0.00042712915,0.0000135452465,0.0008409036,0.38873202,0.0004587263,0.00032742773,0.029278032,0.5755784,0.00011138494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08890444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16873588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99650645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084032295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013726521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1767739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1822264542","doi":"10.1007/s10805-015-9242-6","title":"The Role of Intent on Accounting Students’ Ethical Attitudes Towards Earnings Management","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Earnings management; Earnings; Psychology; Management accounting; Work (physics); Public accounting; Business; Public relations; Actuarial science; Political science; Audit; Engineering","score_opus":0.043617318886607574,"score_gpt":0.3302204668278038,"score_spread":0.28660314794119623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1822264542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974138,0.000035639692,0.000059650032,0.00030879534,0.000013806027,0.0000057223874,0.000009905586,0.0000021322762,0.0021505798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894613,0.000035097113,0.00005579135,0.00007726222,0.0000071150257,0.0000061603487,0.000015607005,0.0000039085476,0.00085289974],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994932,0.0022199263,0.00035153877,0.0002893381,0.0012566362,0.0009506104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92388105,0.039521586,0.016932864,0.0021900714,0.0067187743,0.010755644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007553329,0.00031861983,0.0004244049,0.0012273233,0.0018395983,0.0071307137,0.00079943845,0.001542515,0.007297902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041533787,0.00048703357,0.0005764065,0.0007342394,0.0032780794,0.002065534,0.0024559374,0.0046329717,0.0008861594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090649596,0.003209796,0.93061143,0.00006561344,0.00011015664,0.000272229,0.047087204,0.00019675674,0.0015677969,0.0030137403,0.00076602097,0.0121928165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007803201,0.000684448,0.9232307,0.00014137966,0.00012366685,0.00021190454,0.06747781,0.0012528806,0.0012625067,0.0030846929,0.0023838782,0.00006815803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043196254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008322597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007553329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012290336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029744569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039946258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964815143","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9018-0","title":"Juggling Through Hoops: Implementing Ethics Policies in Applied Language Studies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Information ethics; Discipline; Consistency (knowledge bases); Applied ethics; Context (archaeology); Meta-ethics; Sociology; Research ethics; Nursing ethics; Ethics of technology; Normative ethics; Political science; Epistemology; Social science; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1525999286053652,"score_gpt":0.441410211219308,"score_spread":0.2888102826139428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964815143","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31860134,0.0017854021,0.2212132,0.33847558,0.0018269419,0.0021529344,0.00006184527,0.0009374159,0.1149454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9272642,0.00033701505,0.05387439,0.0103765195,0.00020211593,0.00117534,0.000022869874,0.00026437498,0.0064831544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7431768,0.21222192,0.00811559,0.006751244,0.012452909,0.017281534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5050256,0.38668728,0.021033408,0.0343451,0.028808488,0.024100132],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26720917,0.00090014905,0.0011268406,0.0045369323,0.031993896,0.03587804,0.005142228,0.019539239,0.0059371223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32498303,0.0018288349,0.00083717174,0.0033785177,0.05421029,0.041714277,0.030699063,0.022246737,0.0010081836],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014319368,0.0004611961,0.005701854,0.000341596,0.00003834692,0.00027989584,0.23042575,0.002841107,0.0016169318,0.6759633,0.012569895,0.069616996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015153975,0.00023244327,0.004457356,0.0024910795,0.000069735244,0.00015029381,0.29966062,0.008161075,0.0050303675,0.5944029,0.085018374,0.00017422883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011501675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013669643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98046076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02093148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1345087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90366155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966134375","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9095-y","title":"Health Research in Complex Emergencies: A Humanitarian Imperative","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Health and Conflict Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Compromise; Research ethics; Impartiality; Scrutiny; Engineering ethics; Neutrality; Humanitarian aid; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.797211777837566,"score_gpt":0.6892092806596678,"score_spread":0.10800249717789823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966134375","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023502829,0.008019741,0.002760811,0.9768465,0.0028760068,0.000039819726,0.000011324446,0.00001391039,0.007081612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4824743,0.028502572,0.021807835,0.41798094,0.038801275,0.0008971632,0.000072928306,0.000087782624,0.009375163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8490153,0.1275497,0.0047539077,0.0028178573,0.008404809,0.007458462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.37199503,0.48544663,0.01881469,0.020305937,0.026891602,0.0765461],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.28272972,0.00089428585,0.0020840268,0.0030620787,0.01722698,0.026957283,0.0051969853,0.050416466,0.010578131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2248092,0.0011907576,0.0011922057,0.0023634206,0.092485785,0.028630065,0.02833718,0.0378986,0.0013841605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000271571,0.0004908922,0.003551597,0.0023408607,0.000111050926,0.0015663987,0.039872453,0.001185327,0.0006795212,0.73424566,0.15136738,0.064317375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028680926,0.0003576377,0.0015428783,0.0042471015,0.00003467489,0.0016833534,0.06739919,0.0008701731,0.00028407673,0.67241293,0.2507585,0.00012274526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020602872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00470245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28272972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006976981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09164279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88452196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971358034","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9085-0","title":"Confronting Condescending Ethics: How Community-Based Research Challenges Traditional Approaches to Consent, Confidentiality, and Capacity","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's Health Research Institute; British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's Health; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Cognitive reframing; Informed consent; Research ethics; Constructive; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Process (computing); Law; Social psychology; Medicine; Engineering; Computer science; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.9907431019658851,"score_gpt":0.7288981110496008,"score_spread":0.2618449909162843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971358034","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027098872,0.005339282,0.049793076,0.87916756,0.0022021977,0.00027010107,0.000028127388,0.00006446994,0.036036387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84449154,0.003090705,0.028942842,0.115831874,0.001917524,0.0014014976,0.00003080089,0.000176488,0.0041167117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.46104467,0.4815321,0.0074115796,0.012291462,0.027100116,0.0106201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2771066,0.6551701,0.012360582,0.023711266,0.019295972,0.012355507],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4522609,0.0012241172,0.0037938806,0.0057800408,0.04999546,0.05157923,0.010749462,0.044428356,0.0050478876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.426417,0.0023295316,0.0017772855,0.0050967685,0.27773684,0.06466805,0.03700436,0.052073378,0.00084986334],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025881252,0.00006972747,0.0008421499,0.00025142776,0.000043071315,0.00041936472,0.15997887,0.00015012106,0.0001169377,0.81336117,0.011244235,0.013496988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043793978,0.00002945097,0.0002783554,0.000989499,0.00001939839,0.0003861112,0.07950732,0.00045372683,0.00017616201,0.8935635,0.024480479,0.00007225856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013206432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022346208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95557165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020503627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09563167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67545986},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1971489467","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9027-z","title":"Prepackaged Tour Versus Personal Journey: The Meaning of Informed Consent in the Context of the Teacher-study Group","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Informed consent; Dilemma; Meaning (existential); Process (computing); Qualitative research; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Field (mathematics); Pedagogy; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.24853203603957735,"score_gpt":0.478481374297251,"score_spread":0.22994933825767366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971489467","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32126042,0.0042533795,0.15885018,0.38285625,0.0039320225,0.005149795,0.00024129712,0.00013871376,0.12331795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634914,0.0006678719,0.016385082,0.011754657,0.00034464546,0.003546559,0.00003185114,0.00003759602,0.0037402424],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.6987599,0.28463078,0.0043524387,0.0043715783,0.0043348647,0.0035504347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6000268,0.34879208,0.011559116,0.025236063,0.0057158326,0.008670083],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.22646457,0.00061500806,0.0012487984,0.0010641853,0.010902497,0.010103818,0.0037577976,0.018418131,0.005941027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31372705,0.0009766383,0.0008425038,0.0011060786,0.06282873,0.014878164,0.0097569795,0.020515215,0.00060104084],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006171912,0.00021720046,0.0014959557,0.0003118846,0.000042516276,0.0016453849,0.5078081,0.00023016028,0.0005321272,0.4604352,0.005438153,0.021226136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006335904,0.0006616784,0.0031091871,0.0019384326,0.00007264502,0.0029366508,0.3289463,0.0016125176,0.00164155,0.59107447,0.06713076,0.00024228038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021685462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035788026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98158187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040050666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020691115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9539069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972427259","doi":"10.1023/b:jaet.0000006893.06303.41","title":"The “Ethical” Professor and the Undergraduate Student: Current Perceptions of Moral Behavior among Business School Faculty","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Division of Materials Research; Niagara University","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Accreditation; Social psychology; Business ethics; Higher education; Medical education; Public relations; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.3281117012425074,"score_gpt":0.52354572248922,"score_spread":0.19543402124671266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972427259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99405223,0.00019101612,0.00009671285,0.0036076265,0.00005003544,0.00001175677,0.0000068702443,0.0000034164461,0.0019804193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998187,0.0001863612,0.00008537716,0.0009942891,0.000036548226,0.000009532548,0.0000111126365,0.000003869198,0.00048584293],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869791,0.0069199656,0.0009116345,0.000519274,0.002696118,0.001973953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89635545,0.029113332,0.024877772,0.0014201131,0.010895787,0.037337545],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017423322,0.00026751828,0.0005996862,0.0029637036,0.008542004,0.0075304587,0.001335759,0.0038480214,0.0037917132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060760062,0.0007930691,0.0006012683,0.0012727367,0.008323179,0.0035476983,0.004592344,0.007573506,0.00052611466],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030153434,0.0016292166,0.76042837,0.0000798809,0.000086430504,0.0003925905,0.21033667,0.000085135005,0.0011864922,0.0024598513,0.0025321962,0.020481577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003673358,0.00040066367,0.3796737,0.00014347749,0.000048627437,0.0005226733,0.61039734,0.00043469633,0.0005077936,0.0010431797,0.00672869,0.00006245971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009898989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021157835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036424357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062516807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09214443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980046310","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9097-9","title":"Gaining Institutional Permission: Researching Precarious Legal Status in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Deportation; Vulnerability (computing); Refugee; Political science; Negotiation; Law enforcement; Legal process; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Immigration; Criminology; Computer security","score_opus":0.10900652937826516,"score_gpt":0.4478984911356575,"score_spread":0.33889196175739233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980046310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96230644,0.0007574057,0.00025950646,0.008941241,0.000060297625,0.00019020821,0.00018231313,0.0000035934809,0.027298998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933483,0.0005173392,0.00021295517,0.0009919126,0.000011074589,0.00006287941,0.000060290415,0.0000063941134,0.004788886],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98302656,0.0026729011,0.00053535315,0.0010047266,0.0048680836,0.007892374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9419523,0.015774226,0.0077217096,0.0016671139,0.021083198,0.011801416],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01091796,0.00030239136,0.0008068302,0.004616495,0.03746116,0.011711446,0.004589435,0.0037433554,0.005725538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0713629,0.0006600498,0.000458825,0.008522477,0.016628128,0.00509605,0.008165276,0.008438419,0.00028661214],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002535763,0.00068197347,0.3113971,0.0001771197,0.000046368776,0.0012006667,0.5750488,0.00027119712,0.0002490051,0.06509538,0.011021061,0.034557786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004823247,0.00008432905,0.16376816,0.00042689397,0.000055551613,0.00021971467,0.79883873,0.00048008226,0.0003300205,0.0041834377,0.03148288,0.0000819819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99431545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99625665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1615494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40235084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9724839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981277024","doi":"10.1007/s10805-014-9206-2","title":"Investigating Perceptions of Students to a Peer-Based Academic Integrity Presentation Provided by Residence Dons","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Presentation (obstetrics); Psychology; Residence; Perception; Test (biology); Medical education; Qualitative property; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0998699436681297,"score_gpt":0.4575987969335344,"score_spread":0.3577288532654047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981277024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99206394,0.00008411213,0.00014694787,0.0023452572,0.00009780888,0.000042070205,0.000011962367,0.000009646415,0.005198293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961504,0.00008464027,0.00014955727,0.00068173226,0.00004480526,0.000026126878,0.000011736638,0.0000075815888,0.0028434948],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747751,0.014018351,0.0013176892,0.0010524025,0.0056207543,0.0032158066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8964042,0.027647208,0.022603735,0.0028624658,0.017129518,0.033352952],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016455792,0.00039805594,0.0008025369,0.0014431222,0.010881713,0.012977806,0.0016426438,0.0035683417,0.010189539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090528965,0.0005082507,0.0007559446,0.0008849398,0.004719836,0.0034578652,0.008992518,0.006450932,0.0016089252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009120309,0.005775287,0.31982967,0.0003135283,0.00015094124,0.0019374585,0.62583196,0.00019354862,0.0025041068,0.0043882737,0.00749723,0.030665968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058864058,0.0011398484,0.057109497,0.00014273026,0.000057930243,0.00046434152,0.9270824,0.00033105366,0.00065796584,0.00058839365,0.012300588,0.000066333596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061015654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011159437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99643165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049283323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006995106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08702755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986747908","doi":"10.1007/s10805-014-9210-6","title":"Achieving a Maximum Level of Vaccination for Medical Students: a Rigourous Ethical and Legal Framework Procedure","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Internship; Medical education; Process (computing); Health care; Vaccination; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Medicine; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0827600613121504,"score_gpt":0.4426267137710292,"score_spread":0.3598666524588788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986747908","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0444882,0.0011141467,0.29830232,0.44794923,0.0020850054,0.003866086,0.00023729107,0.00036213515,0.2015956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.710742,0.00034733117,0.21737581,0.043148212,0.0012086639,0.0034859753,0.00004483653,0.00011465843,0.023532538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8255421,0.110987134,0.00992731,0.007975643,0.032882333,0.012685537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84714025,0.10009297,0.009348124,0.015748663,0.018774534,0.008895517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14787816,0.0009954518,0.0018405153,0.0021457297,0.014608818,0.018565327,0.0058664675,0.031323723,0.00411851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17132762,0.0015985857,0.0023213185,0.0009125855,0.039313722,0.009427723,0.011237909,0.028752571,0.001952993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003316813,0.00018695182,0.00068821164,0.000052861684,0.000041500873,0.00024929465,0.004777482,0.00083541125,0.00060489035,0.9752229,0.010008074,0.007299231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119861295,0.00017436921,0.0013609132,0.0005199407,0.000059390673,0.00046431235,0.004535652,0.003931662,0.0019577073,0.9444097,0.042276137,0.00019033419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003966222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055068736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14787816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007457339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048590794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7820638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989859002","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9082-3","title":"Moving Toward Evidence-Based Human Participant Protection","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Participant observation; Human research; Corporate governance; Human rights; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Business; Law; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8824121199937545,"score_gpt":0.6554673319314336,"score_spread":0.22694478806232088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989859002","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046239593,0.0030732024,0.058554705,0.9018211,0.0045465576,0.0004940654,0.000046855148,0.00010639879,0.02673316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17330715,0.0031430426,0.108593315,0.69506747,0.0058843954,0.0023937302,0.0001546202,0.00017609411,0.011280223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.4695378,0.37110868,0.0318508,0.028159693,0.08513212,0.014210923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.17947166,0.60789967,0.027572913,0.07974999,0.07383369,0.031472128],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5592414,0.0016494249,0.0035521714,0.0039836396,0.01005778,0.030425185,0.014865192,0.10709515,0.011422598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6156372,0.0028059313,0.0047465083,0.002533572,0.048167937,0.034645956,0.03758868,0.10924854,0.0042999187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019628955,0.00048833847,0.003414161,0.0011567094,0.000269832,0.0006870339,0.012295576,0.00079262216,0.0014814826,0.84400076,0.065469585,0.06974755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069257023,0.00040970236,0.003487427,0.00640699,0.00019791989,0.0012305884,0.0054945173,0.0021014204,0.0020767825,0.71915543,0.25855252,0.00019411009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036718496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006195588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8929049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010102631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09663395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54353386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989878827","doi":"10.1007/s10805-010-9125-9","title":"Cultural Missteps and Ethical Considerations with Indigenous Populations: Preliminary Reflections from Northeastern Ontario, Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"First Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba; Laurentian University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Mainstream; Indigenous; Silence; Sociology; Public relations; Media studies; Political science; Aesthetics; Law","score_opus":0.08591479552798713,"score_gpt":0.39215737469493434,"score_spread":0.3062425791669472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989878827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77990556,0.0043875603,0.00073733315,0.16554256,0.0006732685,0.00029126945,0.000112546324,0.00001612686,0.048333775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9383307,0.0024972719,0.0008022481,0.03238559,0.00010878691,0.00012491015,0.000029359317,0.00004194129,0.025679063],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817556,0.0066776206,0.00060207694,0.0009777196,0.0031577114,0.0068293293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9522467,0.021168685,0.0024417855,0.0008123171,0.011271321,0.012059275],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016703364,0.00053387193,0.00088389777,0.0014406177,0.119492814,0.0155871445,0.0041963793,0.007818012,0.004052482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026407529,0.0009938669,0.00063638494,0.0032891256,0.033365265,0.0032802098,0.010627899,0.01759626,0.0002526406],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003398754,0.00003630851,0.006609879,0.00007393816,0.0000121848725,0.0011507336,0.97461104,0.000057985377,0.00021516523,0.006442565,0.0075763995,0.0031798966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008609171,0.000009826828,0.00423417,0.00011000274,0.000012139629,0.00011702618,0.97179633,0.000032718468,0.000081044505,0.0005339509,0.023037251,0.000026852209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18522198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35911277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.945027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990115063","doi":"10.1007/s10805-005-0502-8","title":"Challenges to Integrity in University Administration: Bad Faith and Loyal Agency","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Faith; Public domain; Agency (philosophy); Institution; Public relations; Sociology; Administration (probate law); Compromise; Public university; Identification (biology); Face (sociological concept); Political science; Law; Public administration; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.11357915790152757,"score_gpt":0.40727531849214493,"score_spread":0.29369616059061737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990115063","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09367697,0.0031636516,0.0072871973,0.7881396,0.0013274801,0.00004082852,0.000013381302,0.000064989734,0.106285855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726179,0.00046680932,0.00072849623,0.020878429,0.00043866268,0.0000288494,0.0000038369617,0.00005220834,0.0047848728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9376236,0.044130277,0.0015200383,0.0023868822,0.0064204517,0.007918793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.901482,0.046320833,0.007028623,0.0095162215,0.013574713,0.022077706],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04970392,0.0003305423,0.0010156619,0.0014375,0.03197426,0.031938873,0.0024907058,0.017379435,0.0040294877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0850654,0.0007896929,0.0006638767,0.0012203715,0.119422674,0.018806301,0.017161766,0.031470098,0.001037604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007753269,0.00016585688,0.0040946146,0.00006778709,0.000047851903,0.0004771413,0.1449208,0.00035884738,0.00021575057,0.783839,0.04079411,0.024940751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041678086,0.00007319742,0.0018494884,0.00031817122,0.000019016217,0.00038844006,0.13939531,0.00071063364,0.0003401697,0.7362183,0.12055775,0.00008790068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006856536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071860375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98262054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009092256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027971769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26286256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991962083","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9010-8","title":"Academic Citizenship: An Academic Colleagues’ Working Paper","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Royal Military College of Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Abdication; Citizenship; Welfare; Corporate governance; Public relations; Political science; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Public administration; Management; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.17761838179832234,"score_gpt":0.44538561188590886,"score_spread":0.2677672300875865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991962083","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123405576,0.010511408,0.0018313427,0.64859414,0.018096566,0.00006433135,0.00009300901,0.00004393745,0.19735962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8600758,0.0052627744,0.00087704364,0.030155089,0.0061988668,0.0000758569,0.00007920358,0.00011363993,0.09716158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99327576,0.0038499613,0.00025510218,0.0006608645,0.0010883098,0.0008700755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9694661,0.01958341,0.0012151521,0.0014516389,0.0035413464,0.0047423514],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0109963715,0.00044555447,0.00042964445,0.0021782655,0.0148461955,0.020782063,0.0015919048,0.011531622,0.014633549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026503026,0.0003061698,0.0006175858,0.0033078354,0.011471728,0.016675841,0.008548804,0.010135898,0.0016225198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012374656,0.0006328864,0.0041430583,0.00025376523,0.00005824612,0.0019318676,0.15961233,0.00012258525,0.00037419453,0.39993858,0.38685808,0.045950666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006537673,0.000099504105,0.005399728,0.00060658256,0.000047316786,0.0013570028,0.3073545,0.00035527936,0.0008451463,0.08845208,0.5953415,0.00007605503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002983565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039099306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98900366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053796438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060338452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05815506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994627569","doi":"10.1007/s10805-012-9153-8","title":"Examining the Impact of Dons Providing Peer Instruction for Academic Integrity: Dons’ and Students’ Perspectives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Psychology; Academic dishonesty; Mathematics education; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Higher education; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.19444900512084679,"score_gpt":0.47606880678081603,"score_spread":0.28161980165996925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994627569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93799865,0.0004908002,0.0003039005,0.027559938,0.00022195319,0.000030496993,0.000022004655,0.000010545149,0.033361692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971937,0.00013638393,0.000069458954,0.001283679,0.00004839721,0.000011710785,0.00000615359,0.0000053119957,0.0012452686],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9530072,0.027466398,0.0012634133,0.001504502,0.007589619,0.009168761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87707907,0.05717544,0.015992068,0.004180955,0.022437796,0.023134677],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030837482,0.00032980042,0.00080793345,0.0021121528,0.01762941,0.014561195,0.0020953715,0.0052830926,0.006778151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10041451,0.0004274126,0.00087354874,0.001983,0.014358717,0.0064871693,0.016898064,0.009091689,0.00070126564],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005004537,0.0022528772,0.17396967,0.00037090902,0.00013855088,0.0020064851,0.68070537,0.00027135224,0.0011586588,0.06827942,0.016306942,0.05403931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049440314,0.00055697426,0.04348002,0.0002858488,0.00007958284,0.0004908882,0.9168486,0.00019517264,0.0013270696,0.005376369,0.031255085,0.000055015495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052403556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015682112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008860339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019408606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16308612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996950681","doi":"10.1007/s10805-008-9058-8","title":"A Troubled Dance: Doing the Work of Research Ethics Review","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Context (archaeology); Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Work (physics); Qualitative research; Sociology; Dance; Pedagogy; Psychology; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8570439862865543,"score_gpt":0.7029669626209594,"score_spread":0.15407702366559495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996950681","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033385619,0.015280503,0.04406781,0.9077378,0.014082235,0.00027322644,0.00002418867,0.00027231156,0.014923557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27335247,0.018717963,0.24219641,0.41057768,0.029207407,0.0028329086,0.00010592758,0.0021408524,0.020868337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.4016856,0.5447252,0.008778695,0.011063615,0.025733564,0.008013312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2075796,0.65321535,0.012678734,0.035683837,0.03915845,0.051684014],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.46563214,0.0022984233,0.005351359,0.012590633,0.050580103,0.055249438,0.010085306,0.043635767,0.011239049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5781367,0.0033192826,0.002709652,0.006875135,0.15368228,0.054455787,0.03934454,0.086578965,0.0049250266],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002066531,0.00028964708,0.002001867,0.00164538,0.000438245,0.0015240835,0.21595977,0.00084345025,0.00085745804,0.27111116,0.34211725,0.16300502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001424087,0.00010108435,0.0006175071,0.0039672125,0.00008286561,0.0010215883,0.08842463,0.0011055188,0.00029325264,0.59642,0.30754313,0.00028068948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006791225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013920153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9563642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016576666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.088113576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6589707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001267417","doi":"10.1007/s10805-013-9182-y","title":"The Ethics of Ethics Reviews in Global Health Research: Case Studies Applying a New Paradigm","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Global Health and Surgery","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficence; Research ethics; Capacity building; General partnership; Public relations; Global health; Dignity; Accountability; Engineering ethics; Political science; Ethical code; Community-based participatory research; Sociology; Public health; Participatory action research; Medicine; Nursing; Autonomy","score_opus":0.598888911851605,"score_gpt":0.6006446405847162,"score_spread":0.0017557287331112503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001267417","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21304457,0.07569322,0.09084793,0.44235164,0.0022871804,0.0018215481,0.00009723612,0.00007091688,0.17378576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9373376,0.010723607,0.031864904,0.015848538,0.0006443931,0.0013443029,0.000015083531,0.00006116566,0.0021603194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.58394635,0.39218825,0.0056536617,0.002668284,0.012398478,0.003144962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2576861,0.71199983,0.01006675,0.0070227804,0.01058117,0.002643439],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24481745,0.00078413973,0.0013653947,0.005010826,0.013452459,0.023350826,0.0028923769,0.01589555,0.0034651782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34714425,0.0010562264,0.0011477367,0.005053411,0.05609217,0.027330743,0.011757968,0.0121633625,0.00037632673],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024992868,0.0002506923,0.0036652973,0.00208533,0.000069476984,0.0020875265,0.14913538,0.00080841937,0.0002499711,0.79653347,0.0064093536,0.03845512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044114722,0.000469361,0.002568311,0.014163156,0.00021066608,0.004214606,0.23237965,0.0033127181,0.0010863896,0.6032774,0.13773003,0.00014672568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034700227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008146792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98410445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0145962415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028826388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93127453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004180286","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9083-2","title":"The Ethics of Conducting Community-Engaged Homelessness Research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Viewpoints; Research ethics; Ethical issues; Negotiation; Public relations; Informed consent; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.6597622844542826,"score_gpt":0.6201695496986037,"score_spread":0.03959273475567893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004180286","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10768659,0.008778315,0.08245884,0.6514532,0.0064220033,0.008522698,0.00012413657,0.00014049422,0.1344137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8257226,0.0026615022,0.067350715,0.0769778,0.0022894142,0.010822742,0.000055221673,0.000088739194,0.014031473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.30451077,0.6473396,0.017158916,0.0044655204,0.018714512,0.007810691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.33204022,0.539782,0.01610154,0.052473698,0.036410183,0.023192385],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4486427,0.00061238534,0.0013718192,0.0017590424,0.018825427,0.022370147,0.0050604977,0.028444694,0.0026660871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42748106,0.0020959706,0.0009455398,0.0019143642,0.065434776,0.008020321,0.010461314,0.033525813,0.0011040175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057222124,0.0010654413,0.0100918235,0.0013184544,0.00015079825,0.0021677641,0.3953555,0.0007585864,0.0024732985,0.45850563,0.046926033,0.080614515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071433355,0.0008744627,0.011031382,0.008712215,0.00014393039,0.0041376026,0.3349733,0.0027952478,0.0033741572,0.33332402,0.2996358,0.00028360568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050928695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009808951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9715553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062678973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.071696796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67992175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005604407","doi":"10.1023/b:jaet.0000006892.06098.9a","title":"Are University Professors Qualified to Teach Ethics?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Applied ethics; Engineering ethics; Information ethics; Point (geometry); Meta-ethics; Philosophy of business; Sociology; Nursing ethics; Pedagogy; Management; Political science; Public relations; Business model; Engineering","score_opus":0.6183924234101609,"score_gpt":0.5346416535497331,"score_spread":0.08375076986042773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005604407","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4136631,0.008220494,0.0010378778,0.5358292,0.0021458392,0.000040089053,0.0001580096,0.000049023227,0.038856406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9532082,0.0026821725,0.00043460002,0.035698023,0.0014249843,0.000044754554,0.00010518841,0.00003011917,0.0063720066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829722,0.0081044985,0.0005366162,0.0006020119,0.0024473593,0.0053373766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8390847,0.04308452,0.023675008,0.0034330226,0.017841794,0.07288101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016677342,0.00020187309,0.00067404535,0.0021490087,0.0041402606,0.007870184,0.0013579592,0.006736998,0.013466306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.113858625,0.00043306552,0.00042893604,0.0020825674,0.006682503,0.0068443385,0.0029615923,0.0043242406,0.003337562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007143,0.0019798374,0.45275953,0.00032934602,0.00012898495,0.00078815676,0.022628704,0.000287611,0.0009906313,0.052118957,0.20679162,0.2604823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042954815,0.0006617637,0.5537373,0.001408504,0.00013851756,0.0027544445,0.118394524,0.0009524741,0.0014758757,0.065265045,0.2546255,0.00015641509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037290303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011710795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016677342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004648875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014799257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08819926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009566815","doi":"10.1007/s10805-010-9113-0","title":"Going Boldly Where No One Has Gone Before? How Confidentiality Risk Aversion is Killing Research on Sensitive Topics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Harm; Statute; Agency (philosophy); Legislature; Political science; Law; Doctrine; Business; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.526142216288434,"score_gpt":0.5798356312565092,"score_spread":0.053693414968075115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009566815","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20810685,0.0047643874,0.052825756,0.54629034,0.0021644982,0.00011794029,0.000063286585,0.00011612144,0.18555081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9577179,0.0009735629,0.0056600976,0.028984686,0.00031567438,0.00005417322,0.000014940147,0.00006456394,0.0062144743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9322184,0.049109533,0.0017580033,0.003126503,0.009585803,0.004201901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8575349,0.09187426,0.018587051,0.009969411,0.011163124,0.010871252],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06411275,0.00039584658,0.0008210913,0.0020846725,0.009966457,0.0149987,0.0016517256,0.011373064,0.0074682883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21267194,0.00072909635,0.0010169786,0.0012923311,0.030651098,0.015377408,0.0070855645,0.013879956,0.0012771143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027234267,0.00028996047,0.019447688,0.00027588534,0.00036801922,0.0014151749,0.08335741,0.0007884906,0.0016229765,0.7968142,0.024359634,0.07098813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006482897,0.00010271583,0.00485286,0.00054457004,0.00016559742,0.0023035544,0.043218307,0.0012127262,0.0015982306,0.89317626,0.052634273,0.00012601039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041546947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004290654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98862696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005608664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011956212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33906472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013869192","doi":"10.1007/s10805-004-4306-z","title":"Perceptions of Ethical Behaviour among Business Faculty in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Sample (material); Social psychology; Business ethics; Medical education; Public relations; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.3023876591968305,"score_gpt":0.47936192531258504,"score_spread":0.1769742661157545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013869192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992113,0.00018012602,0.00004563995,0.0033045947,0.000027368813,0.000032546617,0.00006623976,0.0000036723213,0.0042268224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99615425,0.00021277588,0.00007507184,0.0008719111,0.000008585522,0.000012644499,0.000038793845,0.0000056761064,0.0026202984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917122,0.0014020056,0.00034501374,0.0004038927,0.0029555017,0.003181328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9418766,0.00783494,0.0058360426,0.0003737174,0.015195396,0.028883446],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004344085,0.00028833526,0.00052058353,0.0032315059,0.024069997,0.008736043,0.0018281605,0.0022551848,0.0059953746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020941937,0.0006356,0.00047766347,0.004046976,0.007210778,0.001281098,0.0030436723,0.0042811288,0.0004169261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036375131,0.0006241962,0.6091843,0.000108253036,0.000054041906,0.00076748006,0.36102426,0.00026584306,0.0012391191,0.0023304075,0.0073857903,0.016652515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026707708,0.00012715171,0.38213474,0.00015952777,0.000017762297,0.00010028089,0.6043685,0.00037669134,0.0002579321,0.00036061427,0.011980705,0.00008940235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9857692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99483335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9977448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.113286525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15981425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8219551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026798583","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9080-5","title":"Epilogue: Master of Health Science (MHSc) in Bioethics, International Stream at the University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Joint (building); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Research ethics; Health science; Political science; Engineering; Medicine; Law; Medical education; Architectural engineering","score_opus":0.6846810566037771,"score_gpt":0.5727844032799991,"score_spread":0.11189665332377796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026798583","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013501378,0.010968738,0.0016302373,0.57940733,0.30001053,0.002092423,0.007476259,0.0010258785,0.096038476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017030656,0.009442485,0.0020097303,0.26706833,0.20862348,0.0032287743,0.003475987,0.00086058327,0.48826003],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930396,0.0030195278,0.0007086663,0.00042588744,0.0017764529,0.0010299475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9270645,0.027535321,0.0032404154,0.0023327507,0.01780393,0.022023125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0126656415,0.0011880078,0.0013534719,0.0033265545,0.0027963906,0.006890082,0.0014071682,0.012007209,0.14713016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06271435,0.0005656365,0.0005996519,0.0021149204,0.001590763,0.0031559318,0.0035351906,0.008018109,0.043626536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060861028,0.000018396684,0.00014501043,0.00020019265,0.0000023240277,0.000060750204,0.000078757315,0.000015408901,0.00006527231,0.00072610856,0.990901,0.007725932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007545625,0.00005305462,0.002772589,0.00040739807,0.0000069716334,0.00012058839,0.00020712834,0.000090017544,0.00022638934,0.001095702,0.99492234,0.000022371374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00514006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010592304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14713016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003383076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011155332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49219942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030326469","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9084-1","title":"Ethics Issues with Private Research Ethics Boards: A Breakout Session at the 2009 NCEHR National Conference","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University; National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Session (web analytics); Private sector; Research ethics; Breakout; Public relations; Institutional review board; Political science; Medicine; Business; Engineering ethics; Law; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.7307501712055149,"score_gpt":0.6752627794533599,"score_spread":0.055487391752155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030326469","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027722312,0.0015550655,0.0024354446,0.89392066,0.06269784,0.00055009563,0.0000915011,0.000110821326,0.010916202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26453084,0.0019847597,0.0065953415,0.57899755,0.032409996,0.0034040266,0.00023219852,0.00069965655,0.11114567],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9415051,0.035578664,0.0019585749,0.0040203505,0.0062958263,0.0106416335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89482397,0.05965836,0.0040214728,0.002592813,0.010336239,0.028567143],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07837186,0.0024575477,0.0020804796,0.0010129344,0.068570636,0.018281402,0.00565957,0.06357288,0.013260859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10066806,0.0024429057,0.0029533613,0.00072010723,0.011895788,0.012042586,0.016356945,0.10307524,0.0030931071],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034826045,0.001237521,0.0015331456,0.00032193257,0.00010364669,0.0033390927,0.08202439,0.0005042516,0.0025740918,0.016301962,0.87695706,0.014754752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027577026,0.00033001884,0.006046031,0.0005997479,0.0000500184,0.00063351745,0.13944145,0.0008664373,0.0012615043,0.007017095,0.84319866,0.00027981584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017677123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060114168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9364271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022991022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024162292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41447496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030744856","doi":"10.1007/s10805-008-9066-8","title":"Issues Involving Informed Consent for Research Participants with Alzheimer’s Disease","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kingston General Hospital; Queen's University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Disease; Alzheimer's disease; Psychology; Medicine; Family medicine; Psychiatry; Alternative medicine; Internal medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.9351254969376624,"score_gpt":0.7169577114856618,"score_spread":0.21816778545200066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030744856","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06775301,0.01840353,0.09921812,0.64609283,0.02757307,0.026962874,0.0007048146,0.00041932802,0.11287254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4794286,0.013316497,0.15193422,0.24763864,0.014302854,0.053058896,0.0010373349,0.0003541441,0.038928896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.4866556,0.4203192,0.055496506,0.0060673105,0.02102903,0.010432307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.36869067,0.5152441,0.018421639,0.053963784,0.03156705,0.012112677],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.43674716,0.0017753121,0.0031702872,0.0028450598,0.013693561,0.014990824,0.008672378,0.056775264,0.009935931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.56464624,0.0034219495,0.0028776203,0.003098169,0.034188017,0.014107411,0.012125497,0.04030793,0.004454806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016397819,0.00076545036,0.004976773,0.0046248226,0.00032956508,0.013648472,0.22989234,0.0006304246,0.0048455684,0.46942768,0.16254388,0.10667529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001772422,0.00093532895,0.0046044425,0.016563006,0.00039916116,0.022971898,0.08647908,0.00338203,0.00497355,0.34805486,0.5093705,0.0004937032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002162424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028805481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9432247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042886273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0565271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69459105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W203245012","doi":"10.1023/a:1025419317512","title":"Social Research in the Advancement of Children's Rights","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Child Therapy and Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Credibility; Foundation (evidence); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.2237327644133949,"score_gpt":0.5194521810689102,"score_spread":0.2957194166555153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W203245012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10465618,0.044508696,0.0049755974,0.25346285,0.0015202861,0.00009042008,0.000045799818,0.000028203724,0.590712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97334945,0.010895959,0.0014144507,0.003735653,0.000873111,0.00009272611,0.0000123782875,0.000014806001,0.009611433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96956706,0.025510037,0.00045841243,0.00067497615,0.0020056237,0.0017840064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89831865,0.09157055,0.0028657082,0.001983245,0.0021797332,0.00308218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03906867,0.0004074803,0.00056750496,0.0031332506,0.009274566,0.009541352,0.0012480541,0.0072265826,0.010011859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048223846,0.00030522668,0.00035930032,0.0025240819,0.056809254,0.0077939993,0.0072318083,0.0065705026,0.000338084],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021566253,0.000055455723,0.0012917017,0.000090537316,0.00000847882,0.00012450223,0.013965035,0.00012228757,0.0000840447,0.962624,0.0041762125,0.017436236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000757145,0.00009663514,0.0048711607,0.0011040145,0.000019017578,0.00033635893,0.045546092,0.00026867582,0.0005454596,0.81573886,0.13137622,0.000021736638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00479112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008143048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03906867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007039592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016443819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20661736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041765548","doi":"10.1007/s10805-007-9034-8","title":"On Doffing the Mask","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Courtesy; Criticism; Task (project management); Quality (philosophy); Simple (philosophy); Common sense; Psychology; Sociology; Public relations; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Management; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.15606626121011402,"score_gpt":0.3622735320230197,"score_spread":0.20620727081290569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041765548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0099747265,0.0080163935,0.014443971,0.2220184,0.008571378,0.000034638713,0.000074912154,0.00014813013,0.73671746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50820935,0.0043974547,0.007058008,0.08614539,0.00508716,0.00013108758,0.00005994756,0.00047757302,0.38843405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970601,0.0012935015,0.00006875952,0.0003294777,0.0006985198,0.0005496155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758255,0.0012415635,0.00011612742,0.0004113056,0.00043896848,0.00020941286],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037302456,0.0005657708,0.0005544678,0.0007566766,0.007052403,0.007296897,0.0011018598,0.008016228,0.020973027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012657314,0.000301771,0.00054411753,0.00041139623,0.02270109,0.011637583,0.005012398,0.00885743,0.0046636304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018045965,0.0000038100359,0.0000529961,0.000009951673,0.0000016890976,0.0000678516,0.0013690104,0.00004207011,0.000084823085,0.9603644,0.031081164,0.006904175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012670863,0.000017414015,0.00012897635,0.00011876794,0.0000036315266,0.00013319263,0.0022241485,0.0002485983,0.00020107691,0.543468,0.45342112,0.000022363663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007088376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010131698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9919838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026960622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002148391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07016176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046822084","doi":"10.1007/s10805-007-9051-7","title":"Qualitative Health Research and the IRB: Answering the “So What?” with Qualitative Inquiry","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Children's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Qualitative property; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.7337959060309328,"score_gpt":0.7422280501717977,"score_spread":0.008432144140864906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046822084","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013785868,0.016586617,0.1872331,0.76277566,0.007075519,0.00246899,0.00022597297,0.00026932097,0.009578875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34489268,0.012591963,0.3196759,0.28762788,0.005630982,0.02555228,0.00023216121,0.00070692867,0.0030893032],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.10614838,0.8555356,0.010985811,0.006301012,0.018870989,0.0021581678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.03994663,0.9207783,0.01111489,0.016417025,0.009373114,0.0023700686],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7053466,0.0024783092,0.008207391,0.0077493154,0.038531907,0.0363722,0.010508361,0.039407667,0.0060737096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7681059,0.0055969027,0.002450911,0.009989694,0.19061166,0.046488393,0.035015803,0.05477307,0.001848705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024783585,0.00023129256,0.0025108617,0.0068401396,0.00024108285,0.00067659764,0.5027693,0.0006828892,0.0007132559,0.39094758,0.043254476,0.050884698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003282848,0.00011847944,0.0006516792,0.012138172,0.00008547347,0.0008127316,0.20881395,0.0030373863,0.00072260236,0.70803607,0.06497582,0.00027934095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008153665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009470487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9605923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02694348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06466622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36336017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048315736","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9011-7","title":"Grey Matter: Ambiguities and Complexities of Ethics in Research","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Research ethics; Confusion; Anonymity; Engineering ethics; Value (mathematics); Informed consent; Ethical issues; Sociology; Qualitative research; Psychology; Population; Epistemology; Political science; Social science; Medicine; Law; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3892142001725453,"score_gpt":0.5230702184353923,"score_spread":0.13385601826284693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048315736","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01624782,0.021307496,0.041798927,0.85875595,0.0021046642,0.00010669933,0.000054801676,0.000055734417,0.059568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8685555,0.0074772895,0.027217478,0.08803673,0.0043235654,0.000437253,0.000035322806,0.0001474467,0.0037693998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7994804,0.16843747,0.005822492,0.006050979,0.01533362,0.0048750406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5421205,0.41742218,0.0075357473,0.014409835,0.012711321,0.005800394],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.22228944,0.0006973463,0.0025940137,0.0039633317,0.019063976,0.023425367,0.005199811,0.025520943,0.0038104227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27909213,0.001351888,0.0011055161,0.0039026835,0.16790733,0.03068756,0.013686839,0.024577025,0.0005410575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019806934,0.0000128226575,0.00029142707,0.000115394236,0.000019150762,0.00019986901,0.022093607,0.00018917625,0.000067324465,0.962462,0.0077151307,0.00681424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018511199,0.0000052698683,0.00018333553,0.0003001913,0.00000796456,0.00010011756,0.006016652,0.00026761543,0.000046288485,0.9750148,0.018022671,0.000016703598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011255805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01205253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9744791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014276577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029252307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9590556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048339357","doi":"10.1007/s10805-005-9005-x","title":"How research ethics boards are undermining survey research on Canadian university students","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Survey Methodology and Nonresponse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Compromise; Survey research; Quality (philosophy); Research integrity; Medical education; Public relations; Scientific misconduct; Psychology; Sample (material); Political science; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Law; Applied psychology; Engineering; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.8855140124169397,"score_gpt":0.668081444994438,"score_spread":0.21743256742250172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048339357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.567436,0.0034898852,0.007490861,0.34759292,0.00161813,0.002206924,0.00065763755,0.00013272671,0.06937491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9530491,0.0012560867,0.0036103008,0.034380455,0.00040783404,0.0009061869,0.00016438462,0.00008738007,0.0061382367],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.3866581,0.45597517,0.017062351,0.010615346,0.08028007,0.04940902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.14816932,0.64291495,0.049162317,0.026310695,0.09376808,0.039674647],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5002137,0.00091517944,0.0018106496,0.0075611444,0.03688795,0.02894819,0.009126561,0.010025977,0.00724175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7298506,0.002145354,0.0015045131,0.01289983,0.020161392,0.008832611,0.012657821,0.012264787,0.0007409006],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010784845,0.00058411394,0.24039045,0.0013908487,0.00031539417,0.0005032149,0.42756304,0.0010647528,0.0008750725,0.06973868,0.09657371,0.15992221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003946312,0.00050422794,0.32580897,0.003939493,0.00062948477,0.00028851096,0.44861403,0.0037197466,0.0022870519,0.02174163,0.19159704,0.000475206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9346245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96186984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.989974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18327284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4523333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94728774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054174233","doi":"10.1007/s10805-005-9002-0","title":"Einstein, Ethics and Science","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Einstein; Politics; Sociology; Public life; Epistemology; Social science; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.19175608530418478,"score_gpt":0.35754985204698786,"score_spread":0.16579376674280308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054174233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01119777,0.22859359,0.009538159,0.21978045,0.0028950449,0.00003773827,0.00019670463,0.00008279557,0.5276779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73526925,0.05067303,0.008440969,0.046936814,0.009963962,0.00018749808,0.00014077392,0.00015224077,0.1482355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842286,0.0009572247,0.00006826498,0.00017396317,0.00027191162,0.0001056459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997931,0.0014195596,0.000112843474,0.00023264426,0.00022038819,0.00008351887],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002977969,0.00053105823,0.0005759271,0.0013670686,0.0038955552,0.0047957315,0.0006119089,0.006111651,0.005750969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005850984,0.00036583128,0.00031313277,0.0012469265,0.016918687,0.0062908046,0.0015649095,0.0052161776,0.0010896334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039715997,0.0000047028184,0.00009166681,0.000013931201,0.0000020409718,0.000010460429,0.0004807924,0.00004524302,0.000021484133,0.9871588,0.010331018,0.0018359458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009877019,0.000004904961,0.00023319869,0.00004994646,0.0000029099897,0.000030868556,0.00044214417,0.00008932692,0.000040361134,0.87063336,0.12845902,0.000004151883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005014137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006577796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028146077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026553052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020421505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057407474","doi":"10.1007/s10805-007-9035-7","title":"Strict Confidentiality: An Alternative to Pre’s “Limited Confidentiality” Doctrine","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Confidentiality; Doctrine; Privilege (computing); Law; Jurisprudence; Duty; Political science; Duty to warn; Sociology","score_opus":0.1493687211564676,"score_gpt":0.47922510962706605,"score_spread":0.32985638847059845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057407474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051538736,0.002714923,0.18432248,0.12950574,0.002237959,0.00023751378,0.00016986669,0.00014876251,0.629124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9184446,0.0006375584,0.02701462,0.023217428,0.0014435138,0.0004158471,0.000046627443,0.00007718133,0.028702697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735684,0.011687476,0.001796795,0.0033045993,0.0073707774,0.0022720054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95998776,0.02268324,0.0024549037,0.009282822,0.004475577,0.0011156108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020085352,0.0004801931,0.001090669,0.0015346885,0.0057136603,0.008069037,0.0033912756,0.013617133,0.007375088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055763453,0.000963233,0.0014906852,0.0013139516,0.028148461,0.015177235,0.0071322294,0.016381044,0.0013101939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001044949,0.0000061925357,0.00006685566,0.000014378166,0.0000045705856,0.000036125584,0.00043691494,0.000059267844,0.00011686285,0.9956291,0.0013838139,0.002235565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027387694,0.000026668456,0.00022372583,0.000085403786,0.00002182103,0.00021622857,0.00025354986,0.0005835499,0.0005745472,0.9806669,0.017292662,0.000027590313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028628963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034143669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020085352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037647197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007937983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10622275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059545875","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9086-z","title":"Protecting Human Dignity in Research Involving Humans","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Nothing; Relevance (law); sort; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.6910183662585482,"score_gpt":0.6950585981818452,"score_spread":0.004040231923297055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059545875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075369336,0.024426082,0.05476836,0.39765507,0.0041472414,0.00095776014,0.00008749477,0.000099847115,0.44248876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.863963,0.008418651,0.0217763,0.074642725,0.002496287,0.0010344795,0.000054876244,0.00005541852,0.027558161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8942588,0.07890725,0.005745403,0.0040234597,0.0120493155,0.0050157625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8266383,0.12320897,0.010154295,0.022248197,0.0077697732,0.009980511],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09803879,0.0007316013,0.0018614774,0.0017046048,0.010200481,0.017967135,0.004390066,0.036059562,0.0069844387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15343812,0.0011220729,0.0012744981,0.0012076009,0.061720718,0.013709296,0.018016044,0.018256312,0.0020966588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015498658,0.0002213191,0.002507593,0.0005886368,0.00013957209,0.0014638837,0.028613523,0.00044052376,0.0013465174,0.9054233,0.010608885,0.048491355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021399016,0.000375933,0.0024209586,0.003972413,0.00013956368,0.0048031374,0.016330699,0.00062748493,0.0016127736,0.8388829,0.13052553,0.00009457834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013556915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024130922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96394044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035696423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025955958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5184849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067197983","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9007-3","title":"Practicing What We Teach – Ethical Considerations for Business Schools","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Cynicism; Public relations; Philosophy of business; Business ethics; Product (mathematics); Business analysis; Business; Business relationship management; New business development; Political science; Business model; Marketing; Electronic business; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.5226695605924452,"score_gpt":0.5427723460260362,"score_spread":0.02010278543359101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067197983","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02078431,0.0072454438,0.01468008,0.8691769,0.002475784,0.00006583171,0.000014683523,0.0000655518,0.08549136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75016195,0.008224342,0.03974716,0.16098827,0.0022800958,0.0002053771,0.00004860042,0.000150796,0.038193356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9639573,0.026191505,0.00097649026,0.0010120866,0.0051478753,0.0027146935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93542784,0.026984004,0.0059122173,0.003400308,0.010779168,0.01749651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035164747,0.00050796475,0.00053744746,0.0011534118,0.011988782,0.013847855,0.0015578617,0.010718934,0.0072186673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058275145,0.00050862436,0.00049320876,0.00078071037,0.017639082,0.008354463,0.0073225284,0.015341926,0.0025424445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040184164,0.00070249883,0.00758565,0.0005029255,0.000068257534,0.0005651336,0.048258495,0.0011512721,0.0017132348,0.5405696,0.2016676,0.19717516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001918266,0.00007068468,0.0034705992,0.001456032,0.000019854726,0.0004900957,0.03926592,0.00055024197,0.0013583888,0.5053067,0.44794407,0.000048216192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030378264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008598926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035164747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005775532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038663935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18597114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070641505","doi":"10.1007/s10805-010-9123-y","title":"Ethical Dilemmas in Community-Based Research: Working with Vulnerable Youth in Rural Communities","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Rural community; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.6427163859664523,"score_gpt":0.5597398828057365,"score_spread":0.08297650316071581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070641505","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33175668,0.0056782765,0.008013192,0.62818974,0.0023741024,0.0006099261,0.00003513831,0.00010043363,0.023242582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9192827,0.003952382,0.009816501,0.059771214,0.0013348791,0.0009795352,0.000023017223,0.00009074502,0.004749066],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.80475837,0.17243227,0.002919788,0.0029806143,0.007198261,0.009710761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69258034,0.203708,0.017301323,0.005527764,0.016014375,0.06486825],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16614914,0.0010145116,0.0018856002,0.002345325,0.08420861,0.031667333,0.0069326577,0.022393566,0.0062463745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17702256,0.0017436292,0.0014554088,0.0024352402,0.07983755,0.0148342345,0.032739375,0.03275262,0.0009677376],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038624625,0.00032188863,0.005699921,0.00025053415,0.000050535135,0.0025654095,0.94772923,0.000093217495,0.00028487988,0.018019753,0.012029614,0.012916426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035024106,0.000079463745,0.0013448956,0.0004986301,0.000021259792,0.0015974928,0.9626622,0.00012353636,0.0000700588,0.018473102,0.0150614185,0.000032854725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009846588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025590165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9776064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011744545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07088399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87869114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071318420","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9094-z","title":"Research on the Ethics of War in the Context of Violence in Gaza","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Just war theory; Proportionality (law); Context (archaeology); Gaza strip; Human rights; Political science; Law; Spanish Civil War; War crime; Criminology; Sociology; International law; Palestine; History; Ancient history","score_opus":0.41982016978801406,"score_gpt":0.45969808210961327,"score_spread":0.03987791232159921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071318420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72375417,0.014507762,0.0012554628,0.06763321,0.00030037732,0.000048944563,0.000035258658,0.0000059836084,0.19245897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99645114,0.0013049264,0.00010901383,0.0006367823,0.000019930709,0.00001830922,0.000004384108,0.0000022093634,0.0014531726],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98269516,0.014227499,0.00036609086,0.00044039692,0.00049117923,0.0017796862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9656474,0.027662907,0.0031604536,0.00076508883,0.0011988753,0.0015651908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012719816,0.00046282585,0.0004920093,0.0024106565,0.024025245,0.014515014,0.0014135708,0.0048233178,0.00446379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028047515,0.00042329906,0.00023282088,0.0035650185,0.038249314,0.0066294805,0.0067344205,0.007337806,0.00025689352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079001045,0.000083782055,0.011973954,0.00017664093,0.000021896036,0.00074909435,0.50353664,0.00023827485,0.0003194015,0.46665195,0.0031041596,0.013065196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014406746,0.000050159328,0.019588511,0.0007379015,0.00001919567,0.00032354507,0.8596483,0.0001313074,0.00038739786,0.054249126,0.06482835,0.000021855198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01972911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03866037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024025245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017239554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014142717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12508231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077595266","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9021-5","title":"Conflict and Convergence: The Ethics Review of Action Research","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Mandate; Research ethics; Divergence (linguistics); Action (physics); Action research; Subject (documents); Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.8694228001024319,"score_gpt":0.7241808917392281,"score_spread":0.14524190836320383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077595266","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071424693,0.12773077,0.030276563,0.7695795,0.010074854,0.00021340845,0.000035711506,0.0000666281,0.054880034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7857023,0.049765278,0.037178967,0.1015982,0.01726264,0.001693827,0.000063973326,0.0002917512,0.0064430954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.3468814,0.60639036,0.008972523,0.0076513654,0.025176894,0.004927481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1600332,0.7848797,0.009170997,0.014845964,0.025319373,0.0057507907],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.45757344,0.0014135729,0.0046228673,0.012617913,0.018180685,0.040613845,0.007670076,0.032247584,0.004797395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5913832,0.0013454331,0.0018379522,0.008088013,0.14045058,0.04132608,0.020920513,0.027906919,0.000672079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052874824,0.000030846582,0.00043318854,0.000712679,0.00006605289,0.00013838937,0.019278286,0.00032459982,0.000027789487,0.9280363,0.019343305,0.031555694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006052656,0.00003681724,0.0003596408,0.0030151121,0.00004293937,0.00017675495,0.011821817,0.00069749175,0.000113238435,0.9107161,0.07290848,0.000051081664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004964911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00450617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9677524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02237086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055638403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6689085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087938750","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9017-1","title":"Oral History and Ethical Practice: Towards Effective Policies and Procedures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Informed consent; Oral history; Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Law; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.05827586340143535,"score_gpt":0.34842299422018463,"score_spread":0.29014713081874927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087938750","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023544138,0.0474517,0.063605696,0.5347063,0.0028293082,0.0003285211,0.00008200552,0.00018405258,0.32726842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8766651,0.02263636,0.042013146,0.02526203,0.0030960527,0.00062825036,0.00007250908,0.00021141864,0.029415188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94700795,0.042700082,0.0021356265,0.0014397386,0.0049734996,0.001743209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8393901,0.13100411,0.008268822,0.0066483337,0.008485097,0.006203545],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.066878416,0.0006195903,0.00082388654,0.005555562,0.01574899,0.041832816,0.0032030086,0.0135420505,0.00842735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1279345,0.00071679195,0.0004157642,0.0043106237,0.11501586,0.026406439,0.011950547,0.012862439,0.0009119466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000640629,0.000021950575,0.00028770795,0.00013461176,0.0000033941233,0.000036699206,0.025058834,0.000086423584,0.000035476824,0.9466048,0.0079885,0.019735197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009544653,0.000012350192,0.00047880615,0.0015080515,0.0000082727365,0.00008344641,0.047226246,0.0002368256,0.0001875733,0.82362473,0.12659489,0.000029277473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008185199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012331401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93312156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011359534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043811124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3536911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093519592","doi":"10.1007/s10805-011-9141-4","title":"Encouraging Active Classroom Discussion of Academic Integrity and Misconduct in Higher Education Business Contexts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Misconduct; Academic integrity; Psychology; Scientific misconduct; Perception; Presentation (obstetrics); Psychological intervention; Higher education; Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.16043992791811768,"score_gpt":0.4030493709071121,"score_spread":0.24260944298899445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093519592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9231462,0.00046293478,0.008910694,0.023326041,0.0007411743,0.00062361103,0.000051770072,0.0005140285,0.04222353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807154,0.00021313442,0.008401151,0.0028210918,0.0002797906,0.00070436095,0.00005604929,0.00008587298,0.006723113],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95009184,0.038991183,0.0013469359,0.0024809062,0.0037321837,0.0033570551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7336463,0.18726069,0.022612898,0.0107366545,0.01093652,0.03480699],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027046809,0.0010595598,0.0011616334,0.0019455724,0.013833836,0.010090863,0.0032971497,0.008929839,0.012245542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13240138,0.0011597235,0.0007187969,0.0006314345,0.003911231,0.0073831524,0.018353334,0.01193909,0.0035951158],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015077704,0.024866384,0.06255748,0.0010252579,0.00013604153,0.0022209676,0.6424543,0.00080856355,0.015220177,0.013867185,0.04201564,0.19332033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009823523,0.0058891494,0.06254536,0.0023394767,0.0002694379,0.0022392548,0.6478656,0.0056674816,0.015966216,0.057509016,0.19830205,0.00042460268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007487993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003112557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99107015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030547758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060832654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14303893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094641390","doi":"10.1007/s10805-012-9172-5","title":"Defending Research Confidentiality “To the Extent the Law Allows:” Lessons From the Boston College Subpoenas","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Law; Pledge; Political science","score_opus":0.36072897760474487,"score_gpt":0.5384027022675052,"score_spread":0.17767372466276032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094641390","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061690524,0.0030260794,0.0026817122,0.9025749,0.00067333516,0.00007381987,0.000014464474,0.000022515165,0.029242653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77230483,0.0027683566,0.002678931,0.20700371,0.0010776923,0.00024862183,0.000019097659,0.0000893517,0.013809446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.89517957,0.08244747,0.0019318429,0.0034338208,0.0063577876,0.010649453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7194163,0.21859717,0.007514358,0.01619607,0.01359028,0.024685731],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15422451,0.00068311975,0.0012830946,0.0017256959,0.048420444,0.030792786,0.0070995064,0.030772,0.007953325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1826414,0.0013626238,0.0008527881,0.001862977,0.09886394,0.02358688,0.025826702,0.042669576,0.0011703344],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012853695,0.00019759334,0.006701744,0.00017714314,0.000080280115,0.0020548415,0.41769993,0.0002335937,0.00056746084,0.47544086,0.05584242,0.040875707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021986726,0.00019221318,0.0073798317,0.0016381454,0.000094349256,0.0010172632,0.38975385,0.0005519108,0.0011300718,0.34493575,0.25291413,0.00017269202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094903484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16856459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.969228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02562988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09393225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8156269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118989750","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9015-3","title":"A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Ethics Board: Studying the Meaning of Farm Life for Farm Children","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Dilemma; Context (archaeology); Normative; Sociology; Meaning (existential); Statement (logic); Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Ethical dilemma; Process (computing); Point (geometry); Law; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.075859855389673,"score_gpt":0.31034131556414063,"score_spread":0.23448146017446764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118989750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8138681,0.0013597312,0.0031051445,0.11291626,0.0008151473,0.00012397795,0.00006346425,0.000025555402,0.06772251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98075795,0.00046002606,0.0009872164,0.007494837,0.000067616966,0.00009747304,0.0000143433645,0.00004849263,0.0100720115],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862046,0.010392968,0.0001734258,0.000555242,0.00083666324,0.0018370422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98414975,0.008061887,0.0015433975,0.0004934197,0.0013805529,0.0043711415],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013194164,0.00042041528,0.0006654946,0.0010257453,0.027884206,0.014916645,0.0020759949,0.006013521,0.005933552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026412703,0.0007222153,0.0006529014,0.001057708,0.043074068,0.015114337,0.009233881,0.018945368,0.00070797524],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015447928,0.00009204542,0.0026630035,0.000032496515,0.0000049916266,0.00031048447,0.96101195,0.00002498507,0.00016882761,0.030481843,0.003329475,0.0018644176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051416596,0.000019223766,0.0014359,0.000058436955,0.0000039541114,0.00012550782,0.9732721,0.000019729969,0.00010131918,0.003965581,0.020980328,0.000012750086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012075239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021888357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010840208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010386192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07865161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309581811","doi":"10.1007/s10805-016-9256-8","title":"Research Ethics Board (REB) Members’ Preparation for, and Perceived Knowledge of Research Ethics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Economic Justice; Political science; Agency (philosophy); Dignity; Mandate; Institutional review board; Ethical code; Human research; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.7895200134646957,"score_gpt":0.7096263880695409,"score_spread":0.07989362539515477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2309581811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92424047,0.0025470115,0.0051639513,0.038048357,0.0007915438,0.0005759466,0.00017838183,0.00008846024,0.028365875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852201,0.0008421075,0.003771103,0.0055805068,0.00019431542,0.00038942927,0.00010828927,0.000065735905,0.0038284843],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8919964,0.07685416,0.010315513,0.0027942755,0.012313152,0.005726481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45945308,0.32534173,0.07379885,0.014687403,0.06655847,0.060160458],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11131062,0.0002846075,0.0006635449,0.002675467,0.0057311,0.008642923,0.0014404737,0.003318705,0.006739149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3824156,0.00088519405,0.00068820553,0.0013193388,0.0054854546,0.004431186,0.0064007575,0.008484493,0.0011567385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091817486,0.0015280748,0.34363657,0.0011478609,0.00033174266,0.00161282,0.52691597,0.00038101195,0.0044052056,0.008988316,0.024175033,0.08595924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002623713,0.000877285,0.33065143,0.0021851496,0.00016590989,0.003122359,0.54250586,0.0013588485,0.002070924,0.009249745,0.10710902,0.00044114198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004265884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007800089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051202206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017134137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5886739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333304710","doi":"10.1007/s10805-016-9257-7","title":"Ethics in Community-University-Artist Partnered Research: Tensions, Contradictions and Gaps Identified in an ‘Arts for Social Change’ Project","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"The arts; Sociology; General partnership; Public relations; Participatory action research; Community engagement; Reflective practice; Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.958899942375165,"score_gpt":0.7455696377607194,"score_spread":0.21333030461444558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333304710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7579296,0.0060328543,0.033867624,0.16644335,0.0012863824,0.0009869415,0.00006293297,0.00013785077,0.033252515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979607,0.0012628853,0.010502119,0.0055146096,0.00013549317,0.0006919932,0.000027631973,0.000081050544,0.0021772394],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.6719016,0.29659072,0.0051185912,0.0065186643,0.010630392,0.009240065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6504502,0.2753528,0.0107259,0.015755432,0.015757319,0.031958316],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27913418,0.00074615376,0.0013638949,0.0035167632,0.05143649,0.037332818,0.0074471957,0.010784237,0.0026105398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16585003,0.0013669664,0.0009715742,0.0046100994,0.09780502,0.025859347,0.045460325,0.017971182,0.0004665311],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023515722,0.00012927754,0.0014612975,0.0001967279,0.000011385698,0.0005229044,0.9581711,0.00010862284,0.00019169405,0.024204131,0.0014943336,0.0134850135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013911658,0.000058502894,0.0010522355,0.0003762203,0.0000071222867,0.00047489995,0.9533988,0.0002810274,0.00026040754,0.016891485,0.027148472,0.000036908044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059734858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0102587445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9892158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016340978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055554755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8889559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2478381396","doi":"10.1007/s10805-016-9263-9","title":"Ethical Evaluations of Business Students in an Emerging Market: Effects of Ethical Sensitivity, Cultural Values, Personality, and Religiosity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Psychology; Personality; Social psychology; Cultural sensitivity; Ethical values; Business ethics; Sensitivity (control systems); Sociology; Political science; Social science; Public relations; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.2685298681223711,"score_gpt":0.5349892805494001,"score_spread":0.266459412427029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2478381396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99933857,0.0000120572595,0.000011086892,0.00008480611,0.0000035533399,0.000005604965,0.0000035616383,4.6124995e-7,0.0005402818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995322,0.000018972407,0.000026351709,0.00005902854,0.0000038245475,0.000006539147,0.000012504503,0.0000015290688,0.00033906003],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996994,0.0014432914,0.00015610538,0.00015370983,0.00062985753,0.0006230314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96318614,0.012573496,0.008264496,0.0009420954,0.0051989974,0.009834765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00688937,0.0004170684,0.0004895894,0.001296455,0.0032185533,0.0062625506,0.0006863467,0.0014501784,0.0032616882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028009351,0.00041461005,0.0005918068,0.00070082635,0.0030018203,0.001900182,0.0020611668,0.0035405566,0.0006020559],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096726534,0.007836588,0.95206344,0.000024248238,0.00009416051,0.00052377116,0.025778193,0.00022742632,0.0008930838,0.00058213173,0.00060389325,0.010405785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012737322,0.001503919,0.85431457,0.000044274184,0.000049566486,0.00030760464,0.13816763,0.0022218658,0.0009497861,0.0011159157,0.0011260321,0.00007143934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006940676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014221957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006940676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020984944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022216938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03643495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788131552","doi":"10.1007/s10805-018-9302-9","title":"Discrepancy between Learning and Practicing Digital Citizenship","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Etiquette; Citizenship; Digital literacy; Curriculum; Psychology; Public relations; The Internet; Digital society; Political science; Pedagogy; Medical education; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Medicine; Law; Politics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.13475145014625445,"score_gpt":0.4652468865616928,"score_spread":0.3304954364154383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788131552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96765107,0.00017745215,0.000830298,0.0039919657,0.000032206295,0.000020642556,0.00007323756,0.000015691887,0.02720744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992669,0.00003109511,0.000087269545,0.00008618663,0.000008836491,0.000006757899,0.000023778142,0.0000037325538,0.0004853929],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911143,0.004868208,0.0005860587,0.00071754795,0.0019019974,0.0008119903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8572999,0.105974875,0.012665298,0.0074929423,0.009910304,0.006656554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01293899,0.00011111396,0.00031007675,0.0016497029,0.0012181255,0.0057874857,0.00087032386,0.0016940362,0.0073166904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10371409,0.00018014562,0.00025725478,0.0013106357,0.004145088,0.0044659073,0.004771994,0.002826896,0.00075377076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011357074,0.001296888,0.61890846,0.00032850154,0.00009339936,0.00033869987,0.1039601,0.0008667608,0.0016787621,0.16543102,0.002535416,0.10342627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011192916,0.00043123928,0.7135479,0.00030684052,0.00007695737,0.0004986792,0.1441058,0.0033827627,0.0025201724,0.11765464,0.017299196,0.000063929074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011914491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011917072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01293899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002378607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026380771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068428755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967722566","doi":"10.1007/s10805-019-09340-6","title":"Plagiarism Intervention Using a Game-Based Tutorial in an Online Distance Education Course","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Educational Games and Gamification","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"Korea Institute of Energy Research","keywords":"Mathematics education; Game Developer; Psychology; Significant difference; Intervention (counseling); Computer science; Multimedia; Game design; Medicine","score_opus":0.11759638860979874,"score_gpt":0.4790997388643708,"score_spread":0.36150335025457203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967722566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98733264,0.00015004168,0.003979917,0.0007447146,0.0002787377,0.0014268899,0.000054138,0.000514826,0.005518225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97822696,0.00023606076,0.011091968,0.00046864964,0.00009148666,0.0017545549,0.00009070877,0.0000318514,0.00800772],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960846,0.00011031255,0.00002455179,0.000095664414,0.000058317586,0.000102794955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837273,0.0005910653,0.000092071015,0.00006318926,0.00010136788,0.0007795257],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078275823,0.00072503515,0.0007356065,0.0006150772,0.0011773815,0.00077761937,0.00089531275,0.0011724595,0.008625883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033729945,0.0002085764,0.0004928577,0.00015988982,0.00039566646,0.0006371311,0.0011131581,0.0018209136,0.0011092584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018839786,0.36539334,0.007567169,0.0013543735,0.00021381912,0.0014510698,0.0048304093,0.0027025095,0.018636981,0.00232974,0.012694603,0.5639862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07001022,0.40087593,0.26419306,0.0028226653,0.00275405,0.004573695,0.016301746,0.08353432,0.053439356,0.018538287,0.08223899,0.0007176192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009104013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022297874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006155892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016016816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028856516},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3013202718","doi":"10.1007/s10805-020-09363-4","title":"The Paradox of Faculty Attitudes toward Student Violations of Academic Integrity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Assiniboine Community College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Academic integrity; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Medical education; Dishonesty; Cheating; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.23761507115590438,"score_gpt":0.47799976303864966,"score_spread":0.24038469188274528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013202718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9549916,0.00021794898,0.00033692486,0.02858002,0.00005225849,0.0000070135325,0.0000352421,0.0000134768325,0.015765551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988446,0.000047704056,0.000023373039,0.0008571317,0.00002495723,0.000001609622,0.0000055124747,0.0000036194847,0.00019133446],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.988808,0.0060561686,0.0004987746,0.00060494314,0.0029820336,0.0010501053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78866535,0.12526287,0.051688075,0.006701327,0.013346406,0.014335948],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013961862,0.00011850671,0.00042776598,0.0018577813,0.0031714465,0.0058086175,0.0010840064,0.0029599231,0.007072889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11298614,0.000278483,0.00031908066,0.0025050414,0.0076473868,0.003635311,0.0031877537,0.0057966867,0.000564307],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001270792,0.0013995306,0.7457081,0.00025574904,0.00024863618,0.0009097978,0.06461955,0.000882906,0.0022704215,0.104170784,0.015055119,0.06320858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019300946,0.00033714363,0.7892704,0.00024119421,0.000111276924,0.0007296567,0.10935614,0.002019243,0.0016556733,0.08422704,0.011747235,0.00011203935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039582714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005546142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028716705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042211283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07383829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022237381","doi":"10.1007/s10805-020-09367-0","title":"An Institutional Self-Study of Text-Matching Software in a Canadian Graduate-Level Engineering Program","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Academic integrity; Similarity (geometry); Plagiarism detection; Matching (statistics); Psychology; Institutional review board; Set (abstract data type); Misconduct; License; Rubric; Medical education; Graduate students; Psychological intervention; Empirical research; Computer science; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Social psychology; Image (mathematics); Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.1450758898708603,"score_gpt":0.39120960639397556,"score_spread":0.24613371652311528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022237381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988538,0.0000127322855,0.00015594992,0.00012896919,0.0000050786425,0.00008221683,0.000014851194,0.000009914695,0.00073652214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997113,0.000031379197,0.0006173968,0.00016599403,0.0000059547165,0.00006249157,0.0000318131,0.000009938956,0.0019619565],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99071455,0.0033008903,0.0003495704,0.0008908525,0.0030615334,0.0016825873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93931246,0.013705521,0.008246193,0.0032018896,0.022048274,0.013485692],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01264985,0.0003815859,0.0005475299,0.0030895008,0.013218405,0.0033584358,0.002249802,0.0009358445,0.0021487877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043706875,0.00049595366,0.00037835955,0.0020616367,0.0053524557,0.0009491538,0.002572338,0.0019568913,0.00036234577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043718572,0.011977883,0.3872156,0.00012751027,0.00003783826,0.00093196344,0.5144655,0.00030872694,0.0029339478,0.0015775773,0.0032108815,0.07677536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095108626,0.005314724,0.4370513,0.00012301118,0.000042549487,0.000409671,0.5320696,0.002319902,0.0037993633,0.0004066698,0.01820971,0.0001583182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.427201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62694275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99906415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022386868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046740633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84942883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163402237","doi":"10.1007/s10805-021-09412-6","title":"Academic Integrity Education Across the Canadian Higher Education Landscape","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Higher education; Medical education; Political science; Library science; Medicine","score_opus":0.09033786103858327,"score_gpt":0.43728614511354813,"score_spread":0.34694828407496486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163402237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30997857,0.010560775,0.001400176,0.4857515,0.001295386,0.00015481938,0.00038993105,0.00012616986,0.19034256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95875895,0.003117759,0.00063756166,0.014452568,0.00016695012,0.000026085323,0.00007813066,0.000050532337,0.022711413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9714475,0.004794858,0.0006594197,0.001689166,0.010247606,0.011161395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86619586,0.02016481,0.005214155,0.0019737831,0.043924604,0.06252686],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019724788,0.00035852962,0.0008085588,0.00520734,0.05021805,0.022971291,0.0034195501,0.0052831955,0.017258346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04695044,0.00067903963,0.00068723294,0.008615299,0.019147996,0.006011794,0.012512103,0.010105863,0.0007113717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003130427,0.0004109765,0.09743822,0.0009517074,0.00012799072,0.0020372865,0.13761927,0.0015433356,0.0012759767,0.34619,0.15684207,0.2552502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000726324,0.0001331417,0.2274629,0.0016879482,0.000070513306,0.00063502666,0.1997811,0.001209166,0.00061331573,0.02568052,0.54234135,0.00031246484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9826151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99547887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2656098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.52589196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8517885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193471211","doi":"10.1007/s10805-021-09435-z","title":"Biomedical Authorship: Common Misconducts and Possible Scenarios for Disputes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Promotion (chess); Publishing; Scientific misconduct; Field (mathematics); Research ethics; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.6851221122734525,"score_gpt":0.6349770259293422,"score_spread":0.0501450863441103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193471211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10154628,0.00586341,0.1080007,0.3856603,0.0022190968,0.0007226768,0.0005717943,0.00024869965,0.395167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94063103,0.0016091069,0.027490482,0.011206497,0.0019066968,0.00047710078,0.0002033321,0.000063636915,0.01641206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91396827,0.051172603,0.0066818316,0.0069322432,0.01392426,0.007320878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7364913,0.21196325,0.015498509,0.014245273,0.014789025,0.007012668],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.077455044,0.0010374972,0.0015927971,0.0054589664,0.015202127,0.02193063,0.005757036,0.040877637,0.017016022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22215754,0.0011038239,0.0022581243,0.0052062506,0.02244697,0.028749814,0.011245229,0.013440801,0.00205121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049626356,0.000053090924,0.0019773012,0.000098359196,0.000024630635,0.0024128866,0.0032115127,0.0006077783,0.00007472753,0.9752921,0.008657571,0.0075403037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048026945,0.000028551467,0.0004591576,0.00034339944,0.000024627814,0.0032385993,0.0039956537,0.0029015809,0.00017146916,0.96514547,0.023585467,0.000058076264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018604333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018212567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95912236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005333619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071248654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4096263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233976765","doi":"10.1023/b:jaet.0000006998.75095.f8","title":"Book Review","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.11796828619088892,"score_gpt":0.4309473478127228,"score_spread":0.31297906162183387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233976765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047987112,0.05828972,0.0009240659,0.058044784,0.052528545,0.00015076676,0.00068234245,0.00045359295,0.8284463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012535653,0.010333802,0.00020593194,0.007148199,0.00567979,0.00003859863,0.00022041395,0.000092323935,0.9750274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904436,0.000109904395,0.000027957694,0.00008163539,0.0006569833,0.00007915777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961927,0.0007414877,0.00017429849,0.00030368642,0.0020357454,0.00055207],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093334756,0.00057646475,0.00081660383,0.0036300402,0.0020011407,0.004552793,0.0011933146,0.0029076915,0.30135804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065734414,0.00036342634,0.00047056866,0.0038100171,0.0009525229,0.002433898,0.0013088288,0.0028122838,0.24759074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028749967,0.0000057517286,0.000019988716,0.00003706705,7.4153854e-7,0.000012270202,0.000008571497,0.000015593023,0.00001654331,0.0016227885,0.9763391,0.02191867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018239915,0.0000025377963,0.00007976526,0.00006998896,0.0000011788529,0.000026273408,0.000017570681,0.000013194038,0.0000144885225,0.00076851016,0.999003,0.0000015812949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066926293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019262863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69864196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027068765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00422883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99652797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290975602","doi":"10.1007/s10805-022-09455-3","title":"Ethical Issues in Research: Perceptions of Researchers, Research Ethics Board Members and Research Ethics Experts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","keywords":"Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.9246870940716804,"score_gpt":0.7868419606354342,"score_spread":0.13784513343624616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290975602","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10241426,0.49768016,0.0032241705,0.36698636,0.0069648623,0.0015707328,0.0002379147,0.00004108138,0.020880489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5638008,0.29663756,0.010451802,0.11883633,0.0021712163,0.0036620602,0.00025138003,0.00014895393,0.0040399027],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.4512362,0.4693062,0.03189618,0.003763673,0.03727036,0.006527438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.27080956,0.614088,0.03266355,0.0063783163,0.054517586,0.021542935],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33106923,0.0006690686,0.0023080101,0.005400826,0.010826907,0.014720636,0.0025137796,0.007820838,0.0032349098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47256932,0.0014201103,0.0019373557,0.0060940403,0.010834545,0.011424078,0.014810079,0.016176313,0.0005447652],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041161472,0.00022845098,0.026385143,0.03459047,0.0009988474,0.00085996836,0.66132146,0.00006320424,0.00047649408,0.012863805,0.061557762,0.2002428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030264468,0.0002621952,0.025530912,0.11616719,0.0006035664,0.0015758424,0.5872575,0.00007948654,0.0002584842,0.0056270063,0.26211023,0.00022492562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007270387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027057434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99217916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013985875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.069068186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82491076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296193289","doi":"10.1007/s10805-022-09458-0","title":"Contract Cheating in Iran: An Overview of Key Issues and a Call to Action","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Scholarship; Legislation; Action (physics); Accountability; Exploratory research; Public relations; Call to action; Business; Political science; Qualitative research; Sociology; Psychology; Marketing; Social psychology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.2809573541461012,"score_gpt":0.49572716345924545,"score_spread":0.21476980931314427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296193289","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041575395,0.37080353,0.0019623733,0.5545635,0.0029262009,0.00014132509,0.00014955772,0.00005477211,0.02782329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48858514,0.42359638,0.0053964662,0.06853356,0.006277222,0.00019510217,0.00025112322,0.000048304533,0.0071166577],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99046654,0.003959095,0.0009294819,0.00043829894,0.0024841677,0.0017224811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769249,0.011631479,0.003919439,0.00037585635,0.005282243,0.001866139],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016555987,0.0004508948,0.00086216774,0.00589106,0.005336717,0.010686107,0.002504379,0.00978414,0.0046681324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019400276,0.00044318932,0.0011610924,0.007578597,0.009287215,0.010966682,0.0033000172,0.009259453,0.00036707093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020969144,0.00060733664,0.04962852,0.006460482,0.00014938526,0.006031343,0.03160392,0.0009551566,0.0003640763,0.20668441,0.14143378,0.55587196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006970729,0.00037845364,0.08041755,0.02206847,0.00020305537,0.011314169,0.12967893,0.0018172178,0.00047567874,0.09909216,0.6542247,0.0002599063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028632816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051955875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99021584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017929498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042861693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13008821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372349141","doi":"10.1007/s10805-023-09476-6","title":"Contract Cheating and Student Stress: Insights from a Canadian Community College","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Bow Valley College","funders":"Bow Valley College","keywords":"Cheating; Stress (linguistics); Community college; Psychology; Political science; Business; Social psychology; Linguistics; Medical education; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0888554506618393,"score_gpt":0.4014505113765932,"score_spread":0.3125950607147539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372349141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656273,0.00044727646,0.00009840706,0.013364012,0.000069343674,0.00005423583,0.000105853214,0.000005856777,0.020227794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921755,0.0005326301,0.000072262046,0.0020444014,0.000027078506,0.000015108572,0.00003798972,0.000010397456,0.0050846078],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467695,0.0012325702,0.000076714,0.0002655577,0.0011092226,0.0026388932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818764,0.0039634346,0.0017768589,0.00030743607,0.0035967126,0.008479221],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037144439,0.00037134136,0.0006194563,0.0027187788,0.0465652,0.012199343,0.0034613553,0.004199966,0.0071166893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012553967,0.0004603976,0.00035921333,0.005429541,0.013551456,0.0028911752,0.0069644717,0.008025497,0.00045170315],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116848714,0.00066413544,0.111719884,0.000063432315,0.000024233155,0.0016360595,0.846035,0.00010596728,0.000316168,0.00980439,0.012345958,0.017167915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008142065,0.000029970997,0.03790754,0.00006574773,0.0000071115974,0.00008650011,0.9488989,0.00007911533,0.000032565433,0.00049070024,0.012366181,0.000027471111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9605257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98698723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07091984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11118053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5145619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388418020","doi":"10.1007/s10805-023-09491-7","title":"The Defining Characteristics of Ethics Papers on Social Media Research: A Systematic Review of the Literature","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Social Media in Health Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women and Children’s Health Research Institute; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Research ethics; Scholarship; Information ethics; Sociology; Meta-ethics; Media ethics; Engineering ethics; Social research; Social science; Informed consent; Applied ethics; Public relations; Political science; Journalism; Media studies; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.7117743619659367,"score_gpt":0.6190236587617237,"score_spread":0.09275070320421297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388418020","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010145921,0.980124,0.0016168674,0.0033166902,0.00053033314,0.002058673,0.0010519903,0.000015971269,0.0011395232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16192222,0.81360584,0.009085668,0.005255757,0.00091192755,0.007324267,0.0014720382,0.00007210326,0.00035023445],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.62822276,0.13666825,0.17281094,0.010210908,0.048996482,0.003090668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.17784448,0.6767172,0.10781627,0.0074668075,0.027502691,0.0026525818],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18884853,0.0015766307,0.0086957915,0.04511756,0.0024785579,0.010792063,0.0028514126,0.0042001135,0.0036483363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.63774675,0.0016943734,0.00806169,0.0426464,0.005602479,0.010656431,0.010136835,0.003006303,0.00032636174],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091734994,0.0000935101,0.03219472,0.77447975,0.01740283,0.00033228713,0.007758314,0.00013820543,0.00029548592,0.003264077,0.0052904505,0.15783308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042810803,0.00021126553,0.026723366,0.9031784,0.03041645,0.000964828,0.0067401705,0.00012529704,0.0002866328,0.0037078243,0.027112726,0.00010499636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031412153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01053949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009435469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028405711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390882283","doi":"10.1007/s10805-023-09499-z","title":"Alexithymia as a Factor in Changing Ethical Positions: An Empirical Study on Student of University Health Services Vocational Schools in Turkey","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alexithymia; Psychology; Empathy; Relativism; Toronto Alexithymia Scale; Clinical psychology; Test (biology); Social psychology; Descriptive statistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.21031761916979805,"score_gpt":0.4691427044464929,"score_spread":0.2588250852766949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390882283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996513,0.000028973776,0.000010079128,0.000058870788,0.000002644038,0.0000028697284,0.0000025701272,1.4850511e-7,0.000242566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99970907,0.000056339963,0.000027658907,0.000045191497,0.0000021675621,0.0000025477066,0.0000061313744,4.520524e-7,0.00015040362],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890566,0.0003785882,0.000072204435,0.000114304436,0.0002813465,0.00024784904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963865,0.0012070858,0.0011307729,0.00009530824,0.0004284066,0.00075192004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010204002,0.00018352155,0.00037074642,0.0008902696,0.0026336482,0.0021802306,0.0005447431,0.0009336633,0.0014760126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049593663,0.0003321524,0.00033378563,0.0008726723,0.002124025,0.00067883485,0.0008128347,0.0021086491,0.00013759086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056079487,0.0011570157,0.9347586,0.000034189616,0.000028623212,0.001727654,0.05675276,0.000027754,0.00043005796,0.0003541155,0.00022517765,0.004447892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012711165,0.00028393514,0.7502426,0.00005318255,0.000040074105,0.0025511198,0.24513136,0.0002359992,0.00021882902,0.00021407423,0.000989571,0.000026562142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009027708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027303902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009027708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012557445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023603938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017950356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391444098","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09513-y","title":"Participants’ Right to Withdraw from Research: Researchers’ Lived Experiences on Ethics of Withdrawal","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University Grants Commission","keywords":"Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.9341552100674787,"score_gpt":0.7093959531298536,"score_spread":0.2247592569376251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391444098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.796999,0.005126828,0.0150341345,0.12843266,0.003385485,0.0005076879,0.00017385624,0.00018375824,0.05015655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98473907,0.00062667904,0.0018422635,0.0074564265,0.00025939787,0.00026511282,0.000040172974,0.00010792943,0.004662867],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7998659,0.1744964,0.0051001897,0.0040578046,0.006777182,0.009702571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7130583,0.22454835,0.014172402,0.009322169,0.015798256,0.02310048],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.102655664,0.0011725471,0.0017923154,0.0020376125,0.0334592,0.025689678,0.0048385393,0.016847748,0.0056120427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22954449,0.0017933429,0.0016178925,0.0017257384,0.054072965,0.017169176,0.027042348,0.030556446,0.0010615091],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035570425,0.00002339536,0.0004979462,0.00005163102,0.000009635908,0.00061166234,0.99115366,0.000022384938,0.00019297382,0.0051527508,0.0009173475,0.0013311245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002618259,0.00004681072,0.00033424507,0.00024924453,0.000010879476,0.0007180289,0.9676865,0.00008309328,0.00020931267,0.004139714,0.026437778,0.000058286114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045590256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062484764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9831523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075208996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01903522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5429015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392236213","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09515-w","title":"Academic Integrity Policy Analysis of Chilean Universities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo","keywords":"Academic integrity; Cheating; Context (archaeology); Academic dishonesty; Misconduct; Public relations; Enforcement; Political science; Higher education; Accreditation; Scarcity; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.07720241088372569,"score_gpt":0.43088336903096636,"score_spread":0.35368095814724065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392236213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79884064,0.0016496148,0.0007495582,0.05072696,0.000057462315,0.00016871889,0.0006242971,0.000021215872,0.14716153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871198,0.00039079782,0.00016724123,0.0013646369,0.000042475975,0.000072723604,0.00012717693,0.0000085975635,0.010706502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98958313,0.0040264316,0.00038722611,0.0004400815,0.0020793509,0.0034838852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95920134,0.024016391,0.0047835247,0.0012664505,0.0068088872,0.0039233463],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012668706,0.00019253015,0.00051575585,0.0036380826,0.0053450097,0.010660273,0.0014721075,0.0026805815,0.013322766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03872992,0.00032832092,0.00045828428,0.005651116,0.0050189183,0.0035575088,0.0054202843,0.0033707765,0.0004919523],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006531235,0.00052510685,0.14465035,0.00056387554,0.00021418188,0.0012488093,0.027353765,0.0045502023,0.0010016322,0.76346344,0.020847056,0.034928422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026630974,0.00036691246,0.5183282,0.0016257692,0.0002897165,0.00036349232,0.16184849,0.009452294,0.0026827597,0.10719712,0.19738537,0.00019361553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122157626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11843143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04464853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056663767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32394928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395047582","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09529-4","title":"Framing Integrity Resolution: An Integrative Approach to Academic Ethics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Academic integrity; Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.16421460897335344,"score_gpt":0.4563299925771124,"score_spread":0.29211538360375894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395047582","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018612945,0.003965516,0.5282268,0.1319106,0.0015827627,0.0003746415,0.00006816563,0.0002848636,0.3149737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78810763,0.0021804373,0.18289499,0.007827933,0.0015449339,0.0007244924,0.00008881802,0.0002596793,0.016371079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9437707,0.0447064,0.001497793,0.0019368146,0.006063971,0.002024283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92684245,0.05487294,0.003174114,0.0054532825,0.0070217736,0.0026355167],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055057086,0.0015457835,0.0016078361,0.008508253,0.015138731,0.028459625,0.005367472,0.012696465,0.008994732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059054654,0.0011310424,0.0016053093,0.0045355265,0.06774039,0.030575585,0.017977528,0.013994878,0.0010823781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067275987,0.000023302648,0.0001310331,0.000051306884,0.000008615339,0.00004589305,0.0114964945,0.00027613196,0.00006839956,0.97878027,0.0015907887,0.0075210463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001092066,0.000013448356,0.00012520533,0.0002805008,0.000021487052,0.00005427876,0.008537163,0.0013831867,0.00021683838,0.96654004,0.022797309,0.000019568493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046104956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055089477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98730356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011815376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020668687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29117322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400598916","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09545-4","title":"Signs of Dysconscious Racism and Xenophobiaism in Knowledge Production and the Formation of Academic Researchers: A National Study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; British Academy; Queen's University Belfast; Leverhulme Trust; Queen's University; Society for Research into Higher Education","keywords":"Sociology; Consciousness; Racism; Politics; Narrative; Ethnic group; Rationality; Representation (politics); Relation (database); Knowledge production; Social science; Epistemology; Media studies; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.288545761863965,"score_gpt":0.5183254171022522,"score_spread":0.2297796552382872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400598916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.987472,0.00013312262,0.00019330587,0.00083797734,0.000013646885,0.000026973741,0.000022292135,0.0000028083277,0.011297762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982767,0.00008428671,0.00009190837,0.00018004452,0.0000069045363,0.00003140276,0.0000070829487,0.000005139841,0.0013165174],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867229,0.0087164305,0.0004931193,0.000960761,0.0013483114,0.0017584976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9694875,0.01902834,0.0036039308,0.0022401956,0.0032164648,0.0024236422],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018739607,0.00022092568,0.00065071136,0.002584962,0.012721726,0.009985469,0.0013563643,0.0013445645,0.0038485515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020157382,0.0006702601,0.0002591716,0.0023333894,0.01937678,0.007060555,0.009518866,0.0036056049,0.00055098906],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029377825,0.000048224654,0.008338014,0.000032837906,0.0000022896572,0.00026259114,0.98664784,0.0000050430313,0.00026356458,0.0017920597,0.00016252787,0.0024155907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029251298,0.00004275511,0.011841509,0.000058128873,0.000002753829,0.00017085172,0.98204213,0.000025251753,0.00014251583,0.00038081387,0.0052813697,0.000008882274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033324555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060048677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9872783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010051349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008436436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099105716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402837766","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09566-z","title":"In Memoriam Fred F. Wilson","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.0861807191589588,"score_gpt":0.4778854101315932,"score_spread":0.3917046909726344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402837766","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015330756,0.0070207496,0.00019935574,0.61389536,0.37555617,0.0000072652515,0.00006908038,0.000035036588,0.003063677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005926465,0.009591914,0.0004776532,0.45553544,0.48264146,0.00005097179,0.00008590648,0.00011058618,0.045579664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972646,0.0005855058,0.00021786454,0.0006929368,0.0010463682,0.00019262449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98469573,0.007346904,0.0008120086,0.00045016356,0.00521628,0.0014790583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004136024,0.0011153298,0.0017913822,0.0011121082,0.0032196108,0.0072759464,0.0023981838,0.007079223,0.0088355215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034664076,0.00046004954,0.00090730796,0.0007034889,0.0034862226,0.0057075797,0.0023446342,0.023343502,0.0078104516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068715585,0.000005504675,0.00003265572,0.000023374385,0.0000037102734,0.000046470137,0.000059465125,0.000011256428,0.000012368676,0.0012967373,0.99603504,0.0024665303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007717065,0.000007406398,0.00025818383,0.00015554397,0.000009019608,0.0002614059,0.00020945245,0.000070561124,0.00007628931,0.004147567,0.99478215,0.00001474387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004800766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075662234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0088355215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032767416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003490113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029557765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404147567","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09583-y","title":"The Role of Stewards of Trust in Facilitating Trust in Science: A Multistakeholder View","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Social Innovation","funders":"HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme; European Commission","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.0967104146766581,"score_gpt":0.4361157299627017,"score_spread":0.3394053152860436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404147567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68131536,0.002805212,0.10680726,0.06627876,0.0003819724,0.00021121776,0.00005120648,0.00013729725,0.14201172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998156,0.00014640561,0.0009475898,0.0003184879,0.000019315472,0.000010567011,0.0000027972644,0.000006410958,0.0003924309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96730185,0.023954103,0.0010658056,0.0019810232,0.0028663126,0.0028308895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89636666,0.066262685,0.013932962,0.008084242,0.007897171,0.0074563404],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029820556,0.00039790323,0.00060455897,0.0024966104,0.005803429,0.013992037,0.0014684191,0.0044164676,0.0033300316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053345196,0.00068623683,0.0007209517,0.00087404164,0.025538571,0.012768044,0.0107294265,0.004517594,0.00036971827],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024695514,0.00021184786,0.035625324,0.00042778303,0.00020723566,0.0026712497,0.23001084,0.0012920042,0.0037663977,0.6885412,0.001962834,0.035036333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001183372,0.0006084095,0.044236626,0.0020846582,0.00048338843,0.0025266535,0.1976867,0.015409057,0.0048448457,0.64229465,0.08936896,0.0003377815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029246162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020824147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056080655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060019423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15770811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408279470","doi":"10.1007/s10805-025-09605-3","title":"Sex and Gender Identity: Data Collection and Language Considerations for Human Research Ethics Committees and Researchers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Sex and Gender in Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Western Sydney University","keywords":"Human research; Data collection; Research ethics; Gender identity; Identity (music); Psychology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7885206986603697,"score_gpt":0.6494212849343131,"score_spread":0.1390994137260566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408279470","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0641446,0.006049866,0.3477011,0.46145207,0.014370349,0.06934507,0.0013776877,0.00050145225,0.035057783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25919142,0.0032992086,0.3932923,0.08010807,0.0047773346,0.25256455,0.00068055786,0.00039788993,0.005688698],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.11044792,0.83257693,0.035623424,0.0036254874,0.014659649,0.0030665996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.16174819,0.61989945,0.037596747,0.08801444,0.0827814,0.009959796],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.752861,0.0012808442,0.002580553,0.0069402093,0.013174741,0.02194938,0.0063893315,0.007712543,0.0068940204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7247771,0.0024828068,0.0019500841,0.009329631,0.031003263,0.017209526,0.01294933,0.016976474,0.0026913558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018760856,0.00086589926,0.016607253,0.0049900278,0.00020663087,0.0020570843,0.42009494,0.00082987477,0.0037474,0.27548715,0.07699564,0.19624193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011698238,0.0015608737,0.013231446,0.033154547,0.0002660495,0.0024310327,0.22954972,0.0049165473,0.008782376,0.23331973,0.47095355,0.0006642389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004702921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007088242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99228746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012302263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07492323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30476642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411131767","doi":"10.1007/s10805-025-09649-5","title":"Academic and Research Integrity in Nepali Universities: A Comprehensive Policy Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Nepali; Academic integrity; Research integrity; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Philosophy; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.16370928838472076,"score_gpt":0.5127499276515928,"score_spread":0.349040639266872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411131767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5142654,0.017815022,0.0023864887,0.29103374,0.00019627577,0.0005033794,0.00045283022,0.000024301673,0.17332253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820602,0.0043303603,0.0006163914,0.0091186315,0.00011937424,0.00024595688,0.000044712433,0.0000073177694,0.0034570063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92885333,0.04394843,0.0026391824,0.0015491742,0.009637843,0.013372049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6080663,0.33479634,0.024236739,0.005012154,0.0153783215,0.0125101805],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05646663,0.0003711766,0.0010574154,0.0062230793,0.017310288,0.023763988,0.002395976,0.01303071,0.007555185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12907803,0.0009497178,0.00071330677,0.00916123,0.017028045,0.013439643,0.012081044,0.0103226025,0.0003819007],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030212733,0.000462749,0.052907202,0.0015880822,0.000214784,0.0011850786,0.039253455,0.0018159329,0.0003698253,0.84639627,0.009327572,0.046177004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022309089,0.0007430518,0.16707778,0.008624988,0.00061738986,0.0015127871,0.22227049,0.0070107677,0.0021544143,0.3930439,0.19632328,0.0003980801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03203877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057511356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9869693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041104525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0961866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29862761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411131873","doi":"10.1007/s10805-025-09650-y","title":"Moral Sensitivity and Beliefs of Medical Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives","funders":"Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Sensitivity (control systems); Virology; Psychology; Medicine; Internal medicine; Outbreak; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.2421121178352932,"score_gpt":0.6055629817756678,"score_spread":0.3634508639403746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411131873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921409,0.00018871725,0.00006532732,0.0034979568,0.00009820924,0.000020257423,0.00001044924,0.0000025441998,0.003975578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976653,0.00011602003,0.000036252357,0.0011841321,0.000029027977,0.000011183163,0.0000063793805,0.0000037322404,0.0009481149],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910712,0.0048480723,0.0002686475,0.00036689447,0.0014437949,0.0020013324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9629566,0.011660734,0.00817072,0.0009911329,0.005455122,0.010765673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010937504,0.00035060817,0.0006253723,0.0014013788,0.009064918,0.010595328,0.0010749497,0.00358635,0.0030548875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054523863,0.0006215904,0.00045098248,0.0007819821,0.012240093,0.0029641702,0.006653194,0.011924974,0.0005298187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023538613,0.00051909924,0.11492898,0.00006952654,0.000041743446,0.00048715872,0.87267077,0.000079888225,0.0012114353,0.0020178673,0.0014056761,0.0063324086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020551237,0.00024675753,0.06191337,0.00011626381,0.000017744986,0.00027539922,0.9290654,0.00015142272,0.00032683733,0.0007531097,0.0070583164,0.000054814744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013835527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01710065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013835527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052189943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058089145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057843685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411532530","doi":"10.1007/s10805-025-09657-5","title":"Correction: Academic and Research Integrity in Nepali Universities: A Comprehensive Policy Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Nepali; Academic integrity; Research integrity; Political science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Library science; Public relations; Philosophy; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.14284122946967148,"score_gpt":0.5002791847549476,"score_spread":0.3574379552852761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411532530","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011652583,0.001292814,0.00095633307,0.5648278,0.41985065,0.00008637846,0.0014674251,0.00024870533,0.010104681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0874468,0.0071497466,0.0063712327,0.49600434,0.15026595,0.00079581985,0.0011948961,0.00093054166,0.24984065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9750494,0.005363858,0.004393148,0.002077712,0.009838248,0.003277682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75292504,0.09820922,0.012911485,0.014872111,0.11182283,0.009259377],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017554672,0.001282237,0.0024528764,0.00435062,0.008736311,0.012259548,0.005068893,0.030542985,0.029596291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26735353,0.0014786109,0.0012707398,0.0060617956,0.0074891816,0.005299388,0.0040786145,0.032296594,0.011992206],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024741716,0.0000065505205,0.00023670946,0.00020808254,0.000024391,0.00028590404,0.0004104831,0.00004626842,0.000022942677,0.004937475,0.99005777,0.003738609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007084722,0.000022076823,0.002300618,0.0020351005,0.00013528673,0.0006623666,0.0020634164,0.00051954907,0.00038946213,0.0069382205,0.98475975,0.000103236656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042419974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059246916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9824453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014649414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04419281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10628945},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4415899068","doi":"10.1007/s10805-025-09696-y","title":"Academic Cronyism and Publication in Journal Special Issues: an Exploratory Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"Tsinghua University","keywords":"Cronyism; Exploratory research; Reciprocal; Citation; Set (abstract data type); Subject (documents); Publishing; Equity (law); Impact factor","score_opus":0.7124622079667812,"score_gpt":0.6626968449371432,"score_spread":0.049765363029637966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415899068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972306,0.00011124209,0.00024523083,0.0002714085,0.000010495265,0.000106199775,0.00005581853,0.0000032713301,0.0019658133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986174,0.0001281773,0.00046632736,0.00007570868,0.000030241406,0.00010424538,0.00005223159,0.0000055406636,0.00052013545],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853136,0.008902176,0.0012055434,0.0009039016,0.0025693022,0.0011055132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.882597,0.073778026,0.028397067,0.003653862,0.0056962566,0.0058777314],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014861653,0.00026887143,0.00070879207,0.006779341,0.0039811865,0.0066116364,0.0010758989,0.0012805918,0.0041753524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063512646,0.00045696207,0.00032770642,0.008405268,0.0052953153,0.004745664,0.005579277,0.0018589392,0.00047837087],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036432964,0.0018052369,0.5495525,0.0006299775,0.000073921095,0.002268491,0.41461068,0.00009594048,0.0013866916,0.0057380595,0.0011373027,0.022336869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004390805,0.00060840504,0.40087408,0.0003307997,0.000047300167,0.0011116993,0.5829329,0.0006662951,0.0007926226,0.002761153,0.009779577,0.000051277395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022116716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027220426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027561935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026827445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07859689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W60732914","doi":"10.1023/a:1025469622261","title":"The Duty to Protect: Privacy and the Public University","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; History","score_opus":0.07460358045830927,"score_gpt":0.39782240156592275,"score_spread":0.32321882110761346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W60732914","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018074097,0.009901264,0.006233948,0.78215957,0.0015694802,0.000027018179,0.000046753627,0.000022802657,0.18196505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85705847,0.0041202917,0.0024393257,0.104227476,0.003712675,0.000083242296,0.000019967827,0.000061962564,0.02827663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762399,0.015942248,0.0007261509,0.0016284998,0.0029132643,0.002549868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95909375,0.030555282,0.002194622,0.003301878,0.0019161167,0.0029383758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025353082,0.00048457785,0.0011850739,0.0010425266,0.017733002,0.025315262,0.0022816088,0.050296005,0.006018014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03584701,0.0007888659,0.0009044076,0.0013886675,0.09118821,0.025815114,0.008904892,0.03457114,0.00096103945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011937215,0.000017188639,0.00015695568,0.0000148822955,0.000004867556,0.000083768624,0.0056236354,0.000054728942,0.000037018952,0.9807192,0.010969736,0.0023059936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024885998,0.000017595728,0.00027769184,0.00017797448,0.000012417507,0.00022077073,0.006822153,0.00022663746,0.00016104034,0.89347935,0.09854848,0.000031002863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0086806705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008961538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050296005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00759532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016479192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13408154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}