{"meta":{"query_hash":"aaac0c7e56e5","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics"},"cohort_total":68,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":68,"exported":68,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/aaac0c7e56e5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Academic+Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W1135046832","doi":"10.1007/s10805-015-9237-3","title":"Stop Drinking the Kool-Aid: The Academic Journal Review Process in the Social Sciences Is Broken, Let’s Fix It","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.2082210426346617,"score_gpt":0.4105906332708144,"score_spread":0.2023695906361527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1135046832","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031369206,0.04277249,0.00020406036,0.91648465,0.0009280017,0.00038102487,6.0945246e-7,0.0000148742265,0.007845057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6373683,0.05536836,0.00004238721,0.2969008,0.009885036,0.000007686205,0.0000011059223,0.000028011207,0.0003983169],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960532,0.00021745948,0.0009574943,0.00015361315,0.0022642943,0.00035393643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967183,0.00066993985,0.0015977086,0.00010633708,0.0008911935,0.000016529086],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024030384,0.00020045371,0.0003073701,0.00018484973,0.0018287568,0.0003855138,0.0024330893,0.00024256232,0.00007928227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043482427,0.000090315974,0.00013467165,0.0015057756,0.0004590848,0.0014926989,0.00034155065,0.006569438,0.000035264882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002960378,0.000025727193,0.03926516,0.00053103437,0.00008919102,0.000014763996,0.023238659,0.00020215781,0.0000068026784,0.03203625,0.90273774,0.0018229338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058407686,0.000024791545,0.0063348175,0.001961878,0.0003249,0.000106234715,0.02931552,0.00017101754,0.0000047609396,0.08297785,0.8779492,0.00024498813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001770549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021394782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6195839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000680677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030083256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489256316","doi":"10.1007/s10805-008-9063-y","title":"James Ĉoté and Anton Allahar, Ivory Tower Blues: A University System in Crisis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ivory tower; Blues; Economic history; Theology; Humanities; Political science; Art; Art history; Philosophy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0540191129143208,"score_gpt":0.34711683248678316,"score_spread":0.29309771957246233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489256316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764917,0.0021989974,0.00008043361,0.017122023,0.00047447757,0.000058878126,0.0000013524383,0.00001124939,0.003560899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711106,0.02581555,0.0005275029,0.00087603944,0.00019943797,1.748084e-7,1.4833033e-7,0.0000036536055,0.0014668945],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861205,0.00029932032,0.0002798008,0.000091165166,0.0005612675,0.00015637637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989303,0.00038168524,0.0002881817,0.00004680419,0.00022629897,0.00012678356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027444044,0.000061693936,0.00016174688,0.00011865893,0.00026443676,0.000011254895,0.00020704263,0.0003579811,0.000022558534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036186105,0.000058576872,0.000036267505,0.00024730567,0.0001614054,0.00046136449,0.000025964868,0.0013925752,0.000004841197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011970796,0.00006897211,0.20274064,0.000116162686,0.000053575008,0.00024579873,0.70232135,0.00002641763,0.00013987487,0.026657816,0.067081116,0.00042858615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007166206,0.000048473168,0.08134731,0.0006974555,0.000023763863,0.00010498714,0.19891518,0.000004168041,0.0001217952,0.00115342,0.71665126,0.00021554151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007596539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011593306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64957017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039380667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015379642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60501236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1822264542","doi":"10.1007/s10805-015-9242-6","title":"The Role of Intent on Accounting Students’ Ethical Attitudes Towards Earnings Management","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Earnings management; Earnings; Psychology; Management accounting; Work (physics); Public accounting; Business; Public relations; Actuarial science; Political science; Audit; Engineering","score_opus":0.043617318886607574,"score_gpt":0.3302204668278038,"score_spread":0.28660314794119623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1822264542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92238516,0.001137233,0.011087617,0.036316432,0.0020389284,0.00052311696,0.0000014838168,0.00010073563,0.026409281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99001634,0.00096802483,0.0003648191,0.0062688277,0.0016384627,0.000006128382,0.0000011572766,0.0000478259,0.0006883919],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945521,0.00011552314,0.0012167863,0.0002730299,0.0033742336,0.00046835598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780708,0.0005691567,0.019783,0.000300491,0.0012235704,0.000052978074],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013762681,0.0002819594,0.00042609643,0.00030304847,0.0003354237,0.0002882263,0.0019455442,0.0005388265,0.000022059987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030664768,0.00020349628,0.0002102894,0.0005202454,0.0002727938,0.00074947893,0.0011870692,0.008082735,0.00009808492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007436659,0.00028936306,0.56205064,0.00080632395,0.0009040141,0.00009772306,0.0037160995,0.0031884846,0.00044442437,0.23204973,0.023035944,0.17267361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014096808,0.0001288441,0.15213928,0.0015330204,0.00027056603,0.000016098607,0.005477795,0.00028993894,0.00020974525,0.015719524,0.8224269,0.00037859683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007773212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009406171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.799391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019351947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115372255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99420565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964815143","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9018-0","title":"Juggling Through Hoops: Implementing Ethics Policies in Applied Language Studies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Information ethics; Discipline; Consistency (knowledge bases); Applied ethics; Context (archaeology); Meta-ethics; Sociology; Research ethics; Nursing ethics; Ethics of technology; Normative ethics; Political science; Epistemology; Social science; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1525999286053652,"score_gpt":0.441410211219308,"score_spread":0.2888102826139428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964815143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71893674,0.07471369,0.00024717467,0.033008974,0.0014391957,0.0002824865,0.00003549608,0.000098238124,0.17123802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98651785,0.0049513443,0.0007668622,0.002863625,0.0036834765,0.0000051340794,0.0000039144725,0.00003288501,0.0011749342],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996902,0.00022373223,0.0013038474,0.00017959355,0.0008970787,0.00049374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641407,0.0018975098,0.0009843429,0.000159826,0.00051139697,0.000032867025],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005488714,0.00024365724,0.00063663995,0.00031067085,0.00056890125,0.000106426116,0.00041484422,0.0003048097,0.00010704474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017861867,0.00018931123,0.00019356704,0.0001566276,0.0006740632,0.0003904269,0.00020549959,0.005928599,0.000009221301],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013815471,0.00003242294,0.00072399224,0.00013627125,0.00027781943,0.000038158465,0.60400134,0.00023422574,0.00051482755,0.3899347,0.0036926023,0.0003998255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006439714,0.00005332842,0.00015856035,0.0006226767,0.00031041962,0.000018173707,0.86425877,0.000014934753,0.0009845903,0.054693837,0.077901304,0.00033946824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070556084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050741825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33524087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012661451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017940582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966134375","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9095-y","title":"Health Research in Complex Emergencies: A Humanitarian Imperative","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Health and Conflict Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Compromise; Research ethics; Impartiality; Scrutiny; Engineering ethics; Neutrality; Humanitarian aid; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.797211777837566,"score_gpt":0.6892092806596678,"score_spread":0.10800249717789823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966134375","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074666545,0.0054159714,0.00011695076,0.9096274,0.00060320465,0.0006237293,0.000008263708,0.000018290782,0.008919665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83229876,0.021447605,0.00069368357,0.14239976,0.0020078626,0.000014683669,0.0000032214675,0.00002065024,0.0011137795],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926291,0.003129784,0.001951908,0.00016679442,0.0010760128,0.0010464197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942203,0.003109487,0.0007185738,0.0001590341,0.0013724557,0.00042013248],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025731143,0.00013604344,0.00058955746,0.00052449363,0.0017900679,0.0000052546316,0.00041096853,0.00070252287,0.00012798516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042426223,0.00010916898,0.0000703127,0.00067472376,0.000151855,0.00018410975,0.00008241451,0.023655891,0.000062153784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002420935,0.00010251583,0.008691872,0.00046946353,0.00003149691,0.000035842862,0.8489362,0.000011349451,0.0004917178,0.030012926,0.10215996,0.008814591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011861593,0.0012631011,0.11308146,0.0013656894,0.000005245534,0.000015871565,0.064391665,0.00003741515,0.000005068315,0.009004269,0.8095057,0.00013837666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033818153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003451384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7845445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070390844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050663697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99950945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971358034","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9085-0","title":"Confronting Condescending Ethics: How Community-Based Research Challenges Traditional Approaches to Consent, Confidentiality, and Capacity","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's Health Research Institute; British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's Health; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Cognitive reframing; Informed consent; Research ethics; Constructive; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Process (computing); Law; Social psychology; Medicine; Engineering; Computer science; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.9907431019658851,"score_gpt":0.7288981110496008,"score_spread":0.2618449909162843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971358034","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3114321,0.00024800812,0.0038572992,0.68216646,0.00041332134,0.0005537906,0.000052487743,0.000024979583,0.0012515791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9292447,0.00085525645,0.005036174,0.06402371,0.00071205304,0.0000130059425,0.0000034745408,0.000014973284,0.000096629614],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9714038,0.023769524,0.0014476106,0.00023994035,0.0022340713,0.000905065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9317977,0.06459743,0.0010690766,0.00025868005,0.0015272818,0.00074983685],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13022727,0.00018113294,0.00048595428,0.0006431789,0.0036534448,0.00006358907,0.00070847385,0.001191388,0.00004730119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04676482,0.00017004837,0.00006793312,0.00040179637,0.00084604434,0.00046056908,0.00012676705,0.038594726,0.00001106197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017799767,0.00009932539,0.005598517,0.0022612114,0.00004915143,0.000010025849,0.64626604,0.00004163794,0.005121539,0.31571433,0.023678387,0.0009818607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006816581,0.002110265,0.06035448,0.008199132,0.00010277727,0.0002518734,0.49122825,0.00049199775,0.0019280104,0.21865676,0.20891218,0.0009476971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001794978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034677904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6181427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042330346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004974934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99764365},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1971489467","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9027-z","title":"Prepackaged Tour Versus Personal Journey: The Meaning of Informed Consent in the Context of the Teacher-study Group","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Informed consent; Dilemma; Meaning (existential); Process (computing); Qualitative research; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Field (mathematics); Pedagogy; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.24853203603957735,"score_gpt":0.478481374297251,"score_spread":0.22994933825767366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971489467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9267789,0.00022239145,0.000008677604,0.06008001,0.0007132223,0.00021866552,7.710126e-7,0.0000023518821,0.011975014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978703,0.00015703673,0.000040892297,0.0009544119,0.00048363628,0.000001961454,1.6261433e-7,0.000004681365,0.00048687268],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943582,0.003440188,0.0007415263,0.000064706706,0.0012275263,0.00016785995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98656493,0.010831869,0.0019360131,0.000103559716,0.0005399993,0.000023649485],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021146823,0.00008050987,0.00017900254,0.00008191211,0.00052720046,0.00003840689,0.00072746933,0.00021753808,0.00007911143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024652155,0.000039783707,0.00010388933,0.00053591724,0.00067995273,0.00027319812,0.000037550482,0.00531488,0.0000012504524],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019710905,0.00016639025,0.07730835,0.00001557873,0.000058813886,0.0000011001111,0.8820605,0.000021708027,0.00025934092,0.032399427,0.007184436,0.00032719164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089487614,0.0001411866,0.07640202,0.00014078281,0.000054445565,0.000008721854,0.87716657,0.000007792628,0.00007309898,0.00070118776,0.04435306,0.000056239587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012840347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005007452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07109145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012335183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002069498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972427259","doi":"10.1023/b:jaet.0000006893.06303.41","title":"The “Ethical” Professor and the Undergraduate Student: Current Perceptions of Moral Behavior among Business School Faculty","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Division of Materials Research; Niagara University","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Accreditation; Social psychology; Business ethics; Higher education; Medical education; Public relations; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.3281117012425074,"score_gpt":0.52354572248922,"score_spread":0.19543402124671266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972427259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8528997,0.001965829,0.0014634106,0.14086084,0.002356976,0.00029460146,0.000006070695,0.000005404819,0.00014721674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874779,0.01096731,0.00027374434,0.000501247,0.0002472197,0.000016722583,7.8623805e-7,0.000011908805,0.0005031454],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99261653,0.0021069848,0.0016880382,0.00022399827,0.0031050467,0.00025939566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979514,0.012679574,0.0019364308,0.0004365765,0.0052541425,0.00017929207],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038048726,0.0001664544,0.00039415658,0.00016502621,0.0010374305,0.00025808992,0.0012195392,0.00075786846,0.000028236982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06479849,0.000075345146,0.00016238308,0.00092589034,0.00223313,0.0004741066,0.00015994406,0.011182086,0.00000922066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013640447,0.00020120355,0.57784593,0.000073919065,0.00007044832,0.0000025117108,0.02213226,0.00028883162,0.00022205146,0.38408682,0.008694932,0.0062446883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007897347,0.000024232293,0.6542631,0.00024895265,0.00013284256,0.00005007132,0.013753963,0.000036031295,0.000032867745,0.32711926,0.0034392378,0.00010972238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021531285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056747762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14035958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006993275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013202707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980046310","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9097-9","title":"Gaining Institutional Permission: Researching Precarious Legal Status in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Deportation; Vulnerability (computing); Refugee; Political science; Negotiation; Law enforcement; Legal process; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Immigration; Criminology; Computer security","score_opus":0.10900652937826516,"score_gpt":0.4478984911356575,"score_spread":0.33889196175739233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980046310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9686071,0.0041033356,0.00024875387,0.017740384,0.00093657745,0.00009372931,0.0000071261325,0.0000064716373,0.008256479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937479,0.0007350261,0.00037051912,0.004333749,0.0005149305,9.582802e-7,0.000002809813,0.000006468446,0.00028766686],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973513,0.0004397014,0.0007922771,0.00013586343,0.0008082102,0.00047264565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983087,0.0006807566,0.00031704817,0.00010313355,0.0002099802,0.00038038913],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028827752,0.00009944087,0.00020792818,0.00021816982,0.00019677255,0.0000151296135,0.00024102848,0.00037133563,0.00013197398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014801628,0.00008748499,0.000042229658,0.00023205661,0.000045806897,0.00023412472,0.000014149876,0.008363655,0.000004608337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023027442,0.00025718554,0.2913956,0.00019343894,0.00013019456,0.0030698234,0.2616316,0.007801753,0.0010302323,0.19659159,0.0491239,0.18647191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026474476,0.00045666873,0.7542178,0.00068848487,0.000018810435,0.0011595716,0.0072776405,0.000370207,0.000065390734,0.008570002,0.22425099,0.00027698756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3508411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43971545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46282217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075470156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013160158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981277024","doi":"10.1007/s10805-014-9206-2","title":"Investigating Perceptions of Students to a Peer-Based Academic Integrity Presentation Provided by Residence Dons","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Presentation (obstetrics); Psychology; Residence; Perception; Test (biology); Medical education; Qualitative property; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0998699436681297,"score_gpt":0.4575987969335344,"score_spread":0.3577288532654047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981277024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8401012,0.00017174183,0.018554447,0.13958675,0.0004950238,0.00036049754,0.00002313964,0.00003288865,0.0006743145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98601156,0.00056806416,0.006191118,0.005511656,0.0008011983,0.0000076579,0.0000052291166,0.000016989687,0.0008865505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99187446,0.0026212826,0.001346591,0.00024471365,0.0034859919,0.00042694135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911421,0.0050455574,0.0013113911,0.00015905977,0.0018476307,0.0004942639],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028668258,0.00018238628,0.0004117872,0.00028081774,0.0005738351,0.000053605265,0.0015602299,0.0030225778,0.000052537154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07920896,0.00016866704,0.00015240541,0.0006258478,0.00061911496,0.000717876,0.00011300674,0.026333662,0.000016728522],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015697308,0.00012859367,0.39775923,0.00025163087,0.00008476218,0.0000026015236,0.30796325,0.0007465545,0.08838932,0.04374175,0.1578356,0.002939741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058255666,0.0025181426,0.12441221,0.015264155,0.001077516,0.00008782734,0.26132116,0.0037775119,0.052197866,0.3245397,0.20623027,0.002748081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015556988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023078547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28079796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027581546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018542118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986747908","doi":"10.1007/s10805-014-9210-6","title":"Achieving a Maximum Level of Vaccination for Medical Students: a Rigourous Ethical and Legal Framework Procedure","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Internship; Medical education; Process (computing); Health care; Vaccination; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Medicine; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0827600613121504,"score_gpt":0.4426267137710292,"score_spread":0.3598666524588788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986747908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67852217,0.0013074911,0.10035865,0.21863307,0.0005618156,0.00028612267,0.0000048989914,0.000016492975,0.0003093209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852381,0.002393715,0.0038749883,0.0068141255,0.001511315,0.000002860074,3.7579906e-7,0.000013172082,0.00015138507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99645966,0.0004964827,0.0007085128,0.00013644509,0.0019580065,0.00024088826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944717,0.0039121527,0.00063471193,0.000074031195,0.00067778,0.00022961911],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015514041,0.00010356555,0.000332884,0.00011448614,0.00036839774,0.00005901889,0.0006486045,0.0021073103,0.000036145484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050307844,0.00008717652,0.00010824076,0.00017503364,0.000053346936,0.0003066328,0.00008276238,0.006917646,7.326577e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007850602,0.0003240786,0.13258286,0.0012978386,0.00028382437,0.000039423932,0.11705268,0.000029723575,0.0005922522,0.6787573,0.019515224,0.04873974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005873153,0.002063414,0.21285085,0.0056181955,0.0005357776,0.00039639318,0.01519709,0.00041702588,0.00043094627,0.56207466,0.19371979,0.00082271977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031173127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014234154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3067159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067240624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009144669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989859002","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9082-3","title":"Moving Toward Evidence-Based Human Participant Protection","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Participant observation; Human research; Corporate governance; Human rights; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Business; Law; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8824121199937545,"score_gpt":0.6554673319314336,"score_spread":0.22694478806232088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989859002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.620334,0.0017754382,0.005601816,0.37124664,0.00029905452,0.00036705108,4.5505942e-7,0.00003999706,0.00033550835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842483,0.0030218484,0.0015251677,0.0097184675,0.0011303053,0.0000034115067,4.0012085e-7,0.000017075243,0.00033502886],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944423,0.00052392756,0.0013997469,0.00021387682,0.0029782127,0.00044193488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98708034,0.009378493,0.0005483528,0.00029583293,0.0022382366,0.0004587559],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03617718,0.00014142151,0.0004655789,0.00025951612,0.00019570252,0.000030842304,0.00039157955,0.0019831064,0.00008367525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13701642,0.00009674376,0.00025607419,0.00024939713,0.00027214224,0.00030453652,0.00005101489,0.033834342,0.000023266071],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018656389,0.00039688745,0.005070832,0.0016422229,0.00015460809,0.0003913541,0.007066828,0.00059778633,0.95579106,0.016314058,0.0007481323,0.009960585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005366184,0.016463855,0.043847345,0.040432703,0.0008991412,0.0007543728,0.0015110563,0.0018117812,0.3882815,0.49589694,0.0040879487,0.00064718595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014872955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053056847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56750953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025271374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025053865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989878827","doi":"10.1007/s10805-010-9125-9","title":"Cultural Missteps and Ethical Considerations with Indigenous Populations: Preliminary Reflections from Northeastern Ontario, Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"First Nations Health and Social Secretariat of Manitoba; Laurentian University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Mainstream; Indigenous; Silence; Sociology; Public relations; Media studies; Political science; Aesthetics; Law","score_opus":0.08591479552798713,"score_gpt":0.39215737469493434,"score_spread":0.3062425791669472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989878827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9758636,0.00025509775,0.000046833215,0.018957056,0.0014599205,0.00022245124,0.000011607548,0.000011706232,0.0031717478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99068606,0.0014233504,0.0042133643,0.00113313,0.001172985,0.0000011326381,0.000008756857,0.000010874219,0.0013503614],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979481,0.00038681008,0.0005240828,0.00014098702,0.00071340054,0.00028660646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712795,0.001057008,0.00045179907,0.00010491446,0.00091476744,0.00034355457],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015654621,0.00011358452,0.0001945426,0.0000816048,0.0064224317,0.00007090596,0.00015659639,0.0010102382,0.00011253693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020973023,0.000082735394,0.00003323427,0.00012953508,0.0003932509,0.0002619911,0.0000021617716,0.008753611,0.0000013719324],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003762793,0.000027757307,0.029475981,0.000010548949,0.00003452471,0.000015809932,0.93037486,0.000022999193,0.00003019441,0.0396112,0.00031137554,0.000047096375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007667098,0.00044489402,0.12748444,0.00030218298,0.00027190425,0.00089267595,0.072016895,0.000010045427,0.000094835945,0.045847792,0.7513455,0.0005220924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85835797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041506722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08840659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990115063","doi":"10.1007/s10805-005-0502-8","title":"Challenges to Integrity in University Administration: Bad Faith and Loyal Agency","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Faith; Public domain; Agency (philosophy); Institution; Public relations; Sociology; Administration (probate law); Compromise; Public university; Identification (biology); Face (sociological concept); Political science; Law; Public administration; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.11357915790152757,"score_gpt":0.40727531849214493,"score_spread":0.29369616059061737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990115063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7672957,0.000920813,0.0002885968,0.22549458,0.00034914046,0.00006108381,9.3868056e-7,0.000005442308,0.005583685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821304,0.014519707,0.0019613744,0.0007732143,0.0002171654,1.6735511e-7,9.999589e-8,0.000002004826,0.00039584402],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990734,0.00013411988,0.00020141467,0.00008132251,0.00039509384,0.00011467814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999332,0.00016125299,0.00015132768,0.00003519143,0.00017203606,0.00014820544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022297478,0.00004722765,0.00009703254,0.00007621397,0.00012870716,0.000012412002,0.0001730131,0.00027821635,0.000017582879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007042572,0.000045963872,0.00001966762,0.00017442256,0.000085624895,0.0002583377,0.000019471086,0.0016308166,0.0000056160425],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009418315,0.00010673494,0.02832745,0.000030411224,0.00001860514,0.00007448056,0.63141954,0.00004658495,0.00006757904,0.32529438,0.0014548791,0.013065195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006306716,0.00017424318,0.57138044,0.00037383716,0.000010039291,0.000023870258,0.043141853,2.544792e-7,0.0001423195,0.034910016,0.3490313,0.00018117143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021008255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002217435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5882777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002908563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025629755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70851773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991962083","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9010-8","title":"Academic Citizenship: An Academic Colleagues’ Working Paper","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Royal Military College of Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Abdication; Citizenship; Welfare; Corporate governance; Public relations; Political science; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Public administration; Management; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.17761838179832234,"score_gpt":0.44538561188590886,"score_spread":0.2677672300875865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991962083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7671277,0.01077167,0.00063073024,0.166066,0.0060632797,0.0004162039,0.000007770576,0.0001506299,0.04876599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587249,0.020025095,0.001056052,0.00624216,0.008096176,0.0000053544636,0.0000037479124,0.000037884936,0.005808637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99434114,0.0017115606,0.0013228517,0.00025846905,0.001743227,0.00062276865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99536604,0.0023039717,0.0012663245,0.00018290001,0.0004679743,0.0004127671],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016081199,0.00020725542,0.00035203292,0.00026069608,0.0011002886,0.00008385331,0.0010300385,0.0020036546,0.0004427508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029355134,0.00019560364,0.00016106205,0.00064176595,0.000397006,0.0010602068,0.000069202,0.017169459,0.000057272322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002210281,0.00014265957,0.09003327,0.00006848333,0.0001848634,0.0000637446,0.12707941,0.0010106239,0.009687927,0.40839487,0.3478888,0.015224309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005577993,0.00007970858,0.014003,0.00035234884,0.00011324993,0.00004345943,0.01629074,0.000010224982,0.00021725493,0.08135866,0.88662195,0.00035162034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027963653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000096931086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5387331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044360597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015700491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994627569","doi":"10.1007/s10805-012-9153-8","title":"Examining the Impact of Dons Providing Peer Instruction for Academic Integrity: Dons’ and Students’ Perspectives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Psychology; Academic dishonesty; Mathematics education; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Higher education; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.19444900512084679,"score_gpt":0.47606880678081603,"score_spread":0.28161980165996925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994627569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97621,0.0039323214,0.0016975305,0.016534155,0.00070657214,0.00030838622,0.000014383334,0.000014184545,0.0005824496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884832,0.007753508,0.00087801216,0.00023186674,0.0023814817,0.0000047276,7.648222e-7,0.000014797954,0.0002516586],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962959,0.0009673628,0.0007504543,0.00014444407,0.0013721694,0.00046961123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928105,0.00473777,0.0010939102,0.000092663984,0.0010376043,0.00022756502],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.031521153,0.0001706612,0.00036218762,0.00020273823,0.0007460341,0.000048132933,0.0007501011,0.0026326322,0.000019220513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022113102,0.00011087764,0.00019615343,0.0002913758,0.0008698337,0.0012197351,0.00011029209,0.022756964,9.4583623e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017123613,0.000039739214,0.2733938,0.00004803411,0.00022583589,6.308816e-7,0.6663655,0.000015970458,0.0022426345,0.0506249,0.003076276,0.0037954384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016613898,0.00054498925,0.102364905,0.001031412,0.00045078315,0.00036396596,0.8124574,0.000101401856,0.0011837762,0.060004134,0.019349877,0.00048598656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005339823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001808051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17102891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037491685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094655657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996950681","doi":"10.1007/s10805-008-9058-8","title":"A Troubled Dance: Doing the Work of Research Ethics Review","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Context (archaeology); Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Work (physics); Qualitative research; Sociology; Dance; Pedagogy; Psychology; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.8570439862865543,"score_gpt":0.7029669626209594,"score_spread":0.15407702366559495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996950681","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0653917,0.16501363,0.00065206503,0.7564031,0.00073930813,0.0009695602,0.0000034525199,0.000026399308,0.010800773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.227791,0.7509316,0.0039232937,0.013823668,0.0011295769,0.0000068988193,7.1997357e-7,0.000039583665,0.0023536636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97894543,0.004687717,0.003082198,0.00034966163,0.012155729,0.00077927153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.684523,0.29315293,0.0019240275,0.0013881831,0.018303953,0.0007079256],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2009176,0.0001831412,0.0009777802,0.00031227848,0.00057251524,0.000012129957,0.0014954736,0.0034879094,0.00010841225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43815622,0.00011042457,0.00045437954,0.0019884862,0.0033229024,0.00016580096,0.00041331892,0.15587159,0.00003311109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010682819,0.0017386914,0.1020462,0.123507716,0.0025554458,0.003775841,0.11418136,0.00020892397,0.020129303,0.27565458,0.33282384,0.012695275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007275994,0.0042794393,0.016504291,0.38282576,0.00090869056,0.0069173477,0.0039270734,0.000045146993,0.007717998,0.183404,0.38548386,0.0007103694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019187377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009915325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74257946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002384841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012645944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001267417","doi":"10.1007/s10805-013-9182-y","title":"The Ethics of Ethics Reviews in Global Health Research: Case Studies Applying a New Paradigm","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Global Health and Surgery","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficence; Research ethics; Capacity building; General partnership; Public relations; Global health; Dignity; Accountability; Engineering ethics; Political science; Ethical code; Community-based participatory research; Sociology; Public health; Participatory action research; Medicine; Nursing; Autonomy","score_opus":0.598888911851605,"score_gpt":0.6006446405847162,"score_spread":0.0017557287331112503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001267417","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0706009,0.30665305,0.00020410903,0.6199484,0.00093982974,0.001382331,0.000005339974,0.000011539382,0.00025454676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25981176,0.7013242,0.0018622954,0.035854556,0.0008979465,0.000026095833,0.0000010234133,0.000022924727,0.0001991745],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871277,0.00584286,0.003193806,0.00024353889,0.0024987087,0.0010933419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9579605,0.03470515,0.002313147,0.0005866396,0.002967734,0.0014668322],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11308409,0.00022254267,0.0012396253,0.0002282427,0.0006492371,0.000023551058,0.0003859087,0.0016642574,0.000008332706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10893984,0.00013720024,0.00024530155,0.0011236622,0.00075796316,0.00021008497,0.00014945539,0.039599072,0.000021967835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016019202,0.00036233512,0.045354325,0.018228456,0.0005077171,0.0031865402,0.1445823,0.00008390058,0.00013933238,0.09343278,0.4906868,0.2018336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032481528,0.00191036,0.005945836,0.024589581,0.00013766096,0.024151586,0.039368086,0.00013561088,0.000043515243,0.23843051,0.66164523,0.0003938811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016917076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007686205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5840938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009014924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013462262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004180286","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9083-2","title":"The Ethics of Conducting Community-Engaged Homelessness Research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Viewpoints; Research ethics; Ethical issues; Negotiation; Public relations; Informed consent; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.6597622844542826,"score_gpt":0.6201695496986037,"score_spread":0.03959273475567893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004180286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9585781,0.003279769,0.000108171414,0.034759395,0.00096005725,0.00024033633,0.0000043605564,0.000018634795,0.0020511353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98452395,0.013408118,0.00013825463,0.00068450894,0.0009820941,0.0000034920208,0.0000010886055,0.000022847675,0.0002356551],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90547055,0.08982055,0.0018804611,0.00010874656,0.00199505,0.0007246436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8644831,0.1291774,0.001405762,0.00035090322,0.004404952,0.00017785422],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2531332,0.00014968768,0.00075633987,0.00021225489,0.015904177,0.000023167227,0.0013608822,0.0023684618,0.00002164353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10487417,0.00009950571,0.00014694732,0.000683045,0.0007553032,0.0002698371,0.00019714837,0.21380307,0.000010875159],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013275468,0.000063157335,0.004995611,0.00039352145,0.00005136273,0.000009082649,0.9408712,0.000011911652,0.004379974,0.044435352,0.00029207746,0.0043640425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005628698,0.00023717266,0.0045926217,0.0014783813,0.000026669308,0.0000024757574,0.916862,0.0000073923043,0.0011181864,0.06788302,0.0071206954,0.00010849942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031748426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006376765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2114346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019437207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024691988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005604407","doi":"10.1023/b:jaet.0000006892.06098.9a","title":"Are University Professors Qualified to Teach Ethics?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Applied ethics; Engineering ethics; Information ethics; Point (geometry); Meta-ethics; Philosophy of business; Sociology; Nursing ethics; Pedagogy; Management; Political science; Public relations; Business model; Engineering","score_opus":0.6183924234101609,"score_gpt":0.5346416535497331,"score_spread":0.08375076986042773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005604407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.569099,0.0005346453,0.017506134,0.4017865,0.005938007,0.00024300815,0.0000082416545,0.00002585563,0.004858595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976684,0.0010223122,0.0042300415,0.010564489,0.0004730051,6.58339e-7,3.4897704e-7,0.00001748866,0.0070076752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918307,0.0030508027,0.0011290491,0.000313347,0.0033646342,0.00031146107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724041,0.01972697,0.0022034587,0.00045310982,0.004850292,0.00036207362],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.062994674,0.00015267813,0.00039769796,0.00060590287,0.0005475052,0.000094901225,0.0013907264,0.0016647789,0.00014934578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21666989,0.00011976804,0.00015372848,0.0014232692,0.00022643003,0.00057954906,0.000106463536,0.014496912,0.0001228787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003782173,0.00034783757,0.04331082,0.00021175091,0.0000972621,0.00008376144,0.16587782,0.0018428921,0.0022575199,0.5560518,0.22733955,0.0022008019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048413096,0.00008774132,0.01096697,0.00054266566,0.000039432143,0.0000893823,0.0888163,0.000013186782,0.0009778282,0.2354417,0.6622649,0.00027580166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012344906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056134286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43492532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019254809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023926874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009566815","doi":"10.1007/s10805-010-9113-0","title":"Going Boldly Where No One Has Gone Before? How Confidentiality Risk Aversion is Killing Research on Sensitive Topics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Harm; Statute; Agency (philosophy); Legislature; Political science; Law; Doctrine; Business; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.526142216288434,"score_gpt":0.5798356312565092,"score_spread":0.053693414968075115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009566815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73399717,0.0002565603,0.0007285072,0.2610225,0.0015421788,0.0003440022,0.00002221684,0.000024522353,0.0020623545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95432323,0.021644264,0.005434809,0.0042020646,0.006106443,0.0000018368931,0.0000036768968,0.00006209274,0.00822161],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98898464,0.0015590881,0.001270856,0.0005076815,0.0068940995,0.0007836062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9421991,0.042550407,0.0011516003,0.00083027536,0.012319685,0.0009489288],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07192368,0.00024554456,0.0007537523,0.00047312945,0.00076745043,0.00015245314,0.0006956562,0.004831919,0.00020837071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15553315,0.00020645856,0.0003767062,0.0004972917,0.0016680983,0.00031095708,0.00039494605,0.12352604,0.00020944077],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015768776,0.002626227,0.12251956,0.0093290275,0.0033357288,0.0025785172,0.09325926,0.00007761402,0.50657475,0.10648146,0.107330516,0.030118575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015601563,0.014938176,0.044360787,0.03354474,0.0013918028,0.0013013363,0.015444294,0.0036658267,0.22241724,0.33791155,0.30780563,0.001617063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018034055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004118919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28415748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035170617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003478031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013869192","doi":"10.1007/s10805-004-4306-z","title":"Perceptions of Ethical Behaviour among Business Faculty in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Sample (material); Social psychology; Business ethics; Medical education; Public relations; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.3023876591968305,"score_gpt":0.47936192531258504,"score_spread":0.1769742661157545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013869192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9272267,0.000105346895,0.0019992623,0.069313295,0.0011567487,0.000052931075,0.000012334859,0.0000024402736,0.0001309133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651986,0.00060162815,0.0012982569,0.0012864697,0.00021413938,0.000001234555,0.0000021351802,0.000009676424,0.000066604916],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941939,0.0003461131,0.0018526958,0.00019846953,0.003172563,0.00023624214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904951,0.0036499056,0.001291031,0.0002583643,0.004134951,0.00017064338],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01373527,0.0001284964,0.000421976,0.00039766182,0.00013113195,0.00003974467,0.0010054267,0.0012438002,0.00009613164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036771636,0.00009596937,0.000096438795,0.00145612,0.00035108658,0.00043389192,0.00008978321,0.01136605,0.0000049091395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029362363,0.000073671574,0.9555421,0.000038444898,0.0000104564515,0.000025134947,0.012685023,0.02061458,0.00094854407,0.00694259,0.0020886844,0.0010014481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034898022,0.000018991972,0.9177205,0.00037975164,0.000017480284,0.00006150488,0.00967411,0.000025865591,0.00025227762,0.07109367,0.00030098102,0.000105861305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36431012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6618616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29755148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068035175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016048644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99091476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026798583","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9080-5","title":"Epilogue: Master of Health Science (MHSc) in Bioethics, International Stream at the University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Joint (building); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Research ethics; Health science; Political science; Engineering; Medicine; Law; Medical education; Architectural engineering","score_opus":0.6846810566037771,"score_gpt":0.5727844032799991,"score_spread":0.11189665332377796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026798583","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4519703,0.0037967484,0.001252295,0.5401295,0.001004476,0.00061802025,0.0000771508,0.000008953131,0.0011425627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9237017,0.06812268,0.0047174552,0.0019590228,0.00018684338,2.6081332e-7,0.0000041817816,0.000015837517,0.0012920082],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430066,0.00038832932,0.0015069697,0.00026370672,0.0031569218,0.00038343793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98082644,0.012733333,0.0015452887,0.0003740338,0.0042606904,0.00026021726],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04217171,0.00012866245,0.00057003647,0.00018738615,0.00027369388,0.000004889519,0.0010053575,0.001243715,0.0001183881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03932503,0.000095477895,0.00023517829,0.00028190546,0.008315365,0.00023708011,0.0004596783,0.011622921,0.000002151875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0069349343,0.0017127129,0.56445444,0.0053581293,0.0006550278,0.00016497792,0.14528511,0.0006586237,0.018863445,0.23437211,0.013878748,0.007661755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.030383771,0.011867403,0.49258015,0.029929573,0.00048168036,0.0017665208,0.15708713,0.003788509,0.068781585,0.15513547,0.046865813,0.0013323915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017447462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054465076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53817046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011635317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00983126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030326469","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9084-1","title":"Ethics Issues with Private Research Ethics Boards: A Breakout Session at the 2009 NCEHR National Conference","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University; National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Session (web analytics); Private sector; Research ethics; Breakout; Public relations; Institutional review board; Political science; Medicine; Business; Engineering ethics; Law; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.7307501712055149,"score_gpt":0.6752627794533599,"score_spread":0.055487391752155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030326469","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09651211,0.004193493,0.0007288003,0.88696486,0.00031628014,0.0005706039,0.000020327701,0.000044091696,0.010649406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79422057,0.116414644,0.0068092463,0.053157657,0.0028752945,0.000011239815,0.0000091593665,0.00008635301,0.026415858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9703092,0.00504126,0.001969945,0.0006153196,0.0210307,0.0010335692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81201303,0.15443997,0.0012849999,0.0009624711,0.03036208,0.0009374186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17115042,0.0003489956,0.0007751465,0.000477293,0.0014374498,0.00014465631,0.0016622555,0.0075520133,0.0002798771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33915102,0.0002023328,0.00025198472,0.0011317877,0.003345803,0.00040368715,0.0004937994,0.19107626,0.000083304476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011982281,0.0010141111,0.016217655,0.0028293633,0.0007988114,0.0010539492,0.098187156,0.00074152363,0.04200804,0.68493897,0.13593705,0.0042910664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051134466,0.0065985536,0.024710992,0.021184562,0.00026466165,0.0022440269,0.0051054084,0.00045398375,0.013256966,0.70997655,0.21036752,0.00072330754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058178553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024470928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83380723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022847688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030744856","doi":"10.1007/s10805-008-9066-8","title":"Issues Involving Informed Consent for Research Participants with Alzheimer’s Disease","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kingston General Hospital; Queen's University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Disease; Alzheimer's disease; Psychology; Medicine; Family medicine; Psychiatry; Alternative medicine; Internal medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.9351254969376624,"score_gpt":0.7169577114856618,"score_spread":0.21816778545200066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030744856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7630723,0.025288256,0.00023334856,0.20935161,0.0003341848,0.0010743605,0.00001377245,0.000033397613,0.0005987735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85594034,0.1306228,0.006046144,0.004090989,0.0011958866,0.000027839023,0.0000034217485,0.000050750325,0.0020218382],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922296,0.0005191431,0.0013421803,0.000255574,0.0047782697,0.0008752644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8519073,0.13632517,0.0006213099,0.0005221409,0.00885135,0.0017726998],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03168259,0.00016806614,0.0005503525,0.00037676856,0.0004619247,0.000024728935,0.0005267319,0.0012350167,0.000043825792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35140267,0.00011560501,0.00018904738,0.00042433254,0.0020252536,0.00026854893,0.00017142952,0.024213249,0.00002199803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.036994975,0.0013288984,0.6558335,0.008418174,0.0024669524,0.0038736018,0.052503135,0.00023969797,0.0050912695,0.10498296,0.12714761,0.0011192195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.031153144,0.02171609,0.21797092,0.053171508,0.0029050724,0.0035526827,0.020063153,0.0015223661,0.026908733,0.49322152,0.12605792,0.0017568546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030863575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012853452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43786258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020591027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026953015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W203245012","doi":"10.1023/a:1025419317512","title":"Social Research in the Advancement of Children's Rights","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Child Therapy and Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Credibility; Foundation (evidence); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.2237327644133949,"score_gpt":0.5194521810689102,"score_spread":0.2957194166555153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W203245012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94564265,0.0034660061,0.00025690862,0.03526739,0.000587383,0.00023089779,0.0000018976205,0.0000030783456,0.014543785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99700034,0.0011231931,0.0002166579,0.0011476914,0.00029062948,0.0000027669541,4.2212685e-7,0.0000063513353,0.00021193399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965229,0.0016311388,0.0006256218,0.00009703631,0.000876812,0.000246509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982447,0.0010939153,0.00030859638,0.00011366728,0.00020372268,0.000035366145],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013335885,0.00007427294,0.00018380454,0.00019976735,0.00015444233,0.0000056588187,0.00040766466,0.00040664503,0.0001345899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021483035,0.000047164045,0.00007541533,0.0003551916,0.00018313085,0.00006093982,0.000017697912,0.0056291204,0.000010833683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031495342,0.00030264445,0.00810066,0.00001576698,0.00013950943,0.0000327918,0.10941684,0.00001119477,0.0002482434,0.87057066,0.007099061,0.0037476677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044293464,0.00060533575,0.15318313,0.00029290246,0.000030362447,0.0005414231,0.007099944,4.1043867e-7,0.0024948113,0.38860252,0.44247162,0.00024816062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013862478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000069506254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48196813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006720092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002263112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99666494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041765548","doi":"10.1007/s10805-007-9034-8","title":"On Doffing the Mask","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Courtesy; Criticism; Task (project management); Quality (philosophy); Simple (philosophy); Common sense; Psychology; Sociology; Public relations; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Management; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.15606626121011402,"score_gpt":0.3622735320230197,"score_spread":0.20620727081290569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041765548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66541284,0.0027379072,0.00086510705,0.14115272,0.0026554132,0.00008219942,0.0000029770245,0.000039488263,0.18705133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903687,0.00039031514,0.00008524463,0.0061645242,0.0013171379,1.6850174e-7,4.977131e-7,0.0000074891645,0.0016659137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987969,0.0001753702,0.00039592086,0.000041490443,0.0004622864,0.00012803347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641114,0.0026732136,0.00039353417,0.0001663707,0.00030731436,0.00004841081],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012213933,0.000057826473,0.00008758599,0.00009972489,0.0004918208,0.0002687927,0.0006913097,0.00018748356,0.00006844349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029002076,0.000033460743,0.000070180875,0.000036869584,0.00013912166,0.00066938973,0.000041174488,0.007992783,0.000016431959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038453512,0.000014894072,0.00012862826,0.0000054778857,0.00002099692,0.0000033563795,0.09193423,0.00002318206,0.00013627982,0.88557863,0.017994031,0.004121841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002224942,0.000108355154,0.00077878905,0.00018065957,0.000024133209,0.000035938538,0.009456155,0.000021102544,0.0001399836,0.1020777,0.8868694,0.00008533126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016484752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000477421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8688753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045599118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000955339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99429584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046822084","doi":"10.1007/s10805-007-9051-7","title":"Qualitative Health Research and the IRB: Answering the “So What?” with Qualitative Inquiry","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Children's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Qualitative property; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.7337959060309328,"score_gpt":0.7422280501717977,"score_spread":0.008432144140864906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046822084","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1084464,0.018897258,0.017159449,0.8511508,0.0015448972,0.0009581848,0.0000027344438,0.000020766613,0.0018194998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82131374,0.07463142,0.0047720433,0.0951162,0.0032270292,0.00002748938,0.0000012724835,0.000073708696,0.0008371017],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.86865056,0.12010478,0.0033099116,0.00041637325,0.0059558623,0.0015624965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.49104527,0.50193465,0.002491293,0.00039585968,0.0036542597,0.0004786919],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5723822,0.00019521266,0.00057341164,0.00023753723,0.005481863,0.00007136309,0.0009137904,0.0012717767,0.000028968801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16687627,0.00009008549,0.00006711548,0.000808948,0.008890339,0.0010318994,0.00033628137,0.11353047,0.000021609376],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010804618,0.000018095981,0.00006954659,0.00025466154,0.00008328101,0.000010147904,0.77537024,0.0000030066221,0.000016807959,0.2185292,0.0035466857,0.001017876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014309206,0.00041246583,0.0002783959,0.0024010963,0.000022966746,0.00004504224,0.74596024,0.000007989556,0.000009251876,0.22978103,0.019572387,0.00007821557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028469507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036753988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7560346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043307818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004567123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048315736","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9011-7","title":"Grey Matter: Ambiguities and Complexities of Ethics in Research","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Research ethics; Confusion; Anonymity; Engineering ethics; Value (mathematics); Informed consent; Ethical issues; Sociology; Qualitative research; Psychology; Population; Epistemology; Political science; Social science; Medicine; Law; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3892142001725453,"score_gpt":0.5230702184353923,"score_spread":0.13385601826284693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048315736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87417954,0.0045303623,0.000054782005,0.111012354,0.00015426219,0.00012853504,0.000013063047,0.000005016637,0.0099220695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911637,0.0036274565,0.0006618704,0.0033551576,0.0005368162,0.0000010327632,0.0000028964728,0.000014982258,0.00063609594],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99669176,0.0006804758,0.0009798431,0.000106011925,0.0012256469,0.00031628838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952529,0.0030779007,0.0003297296,0.00012613062,0.0010188458,0.00019446731],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013986801,0.0000937222,0.00043580384,0.00046613347,0.00008669752,0.000018263012,0.00015587614,0.00066709873,0.0001016092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033778944,0.00007601569,0.00006811534,0.0002576914,0.00069586904,0.00015084508,0.000062290674,0.009818082,0.0000033779445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011901458,0.00049091806,0.5429748,0.008958266,0.00012052128,0.00024991477,0.034510795,0.00008376865,0.001438888,0.35433638,0.052010335,0.003635255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003514587,0.001108798,0.6490864,0.0055193333,0.00009517714,0.00083179056,0.023719665,0.00016202527,0.00041698417,0.27170128,0.043612033,0.00023190657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096875476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006899093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11698414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091974194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018715907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99246633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048339357","doi":"10.1007/s10805-005-9005-x","title":"How research ethics boards are undermining survey research on Canadian university students","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Survey Methodology and Nonresponse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Compromise; Survey research; Quality (philosophy); Research integrity; Medical education; Public relations; Scientific misconduct; Psychology; Sample (material); Political science; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Law; Applied psychology; Engineering; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.8855140124169397,"score_gpt":0.668081444994438,"score_spread":0.21743256742250172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048339357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7703935,0.0003804741,0.00006469748,0.22556704,0.0006180959,0.00013739687,0.000021056178,0.000011379906,0.0028063734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829466,0.0053329193,0.00052561925,0.0014444267,0.0009956511,3.6305863e-7,0.0000012866744,0.00001733165,0.008735857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7107214,0.28030452,0.0004932722,0.00038126583,0.0066717244,0.0014278549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80759805,0.186693,0.00029623433,0.00022747998,0.0043258476,0.00085937156],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6459479,0.0001237525,0.0003146868,0.001438416,0.0036637497,0.00014292593,0.0019830011,0.0030225653,0.000050824434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37594453,0.00012431105,0.0000944907,0.0017831952,0.001965753,0.00046574324,0.00017406164,0.04050153,0.000036933707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007937573,0.00020127666,0.6092721,0.00005064505,0.00025952424,0.00092818995,0.27906355,0.00018585849,0.00018309274,0.029879449,0.06770309,0.0043356284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005927673,0.0002696595,0.49934205,0.00032842,0.000013654351,0.000016458966,0.12468916,0.0000046973423,0.00011942853,0.0026253937,0.37180108,0.00019722112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05563579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6647768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.609141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020405783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016742684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054174233","doi":"10.1007/s10805-005-9002-0","title":"Einstein, Ethics and Science","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Einstein; Politics; Sociology; Public life; Epistemology; Social science; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.19175608530418478,"score_gpt":0.35754985204698786,"score_spread":0.16579376674280308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054174233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48138854,0.013944342,0.00016214364,0.30617568,0.003557796,0.00012328269,0.000009491433,0.00005412941,0.1945846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98603,0.0018165002,0.00060196413,0.008392304,0.0021127285,2.346415e-7,5.844713e-8,0.000005845167,0.0010404098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823374,0.00008450163,0.00039173508,0.00012778166,0.00096180907,0.00020044672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819916,0.0005729785,0.00034193744,0.0000898264,0.0006200914,0.00017601869],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008228375,0.00008764765,0.00015095383,0.0002327488,0.0014156279,0.00010258827,0.0005405885,0.00022347223,0.00009460939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019264147,0.000069666945,0.000046856934,0.00007462065,0.0042361347,0.0014437807,0.00006763251,0.0070031686,0.000019971065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011167276,0.000013178961,0.000025989424,0.000022410808,0.0000045559377,0.0000036251101,0.1582858,0.000014484131,0.0022220265,0.83547795,0.0011356685,0.0027831255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020106131,0.00015401744,0.0000886165,0.00015246171,0.00001909784,0.000109423934,0.0030346403,0.0000656324,0.0005234002,0.054059923,0.9414608,0.00013093484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007568573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003705179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94032514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081548176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008136025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057407474","doi":"10.1007/s10805-007-9035-7","title":"Strict Confidentiality: An Alternative to Pre’s “Limited Confidentiality” Doctrine","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Confidentiality; Doctrine; Privilege (computing); Law; Jurisprudence; Duty; Political science; Duty to warn; Sociology","score_opus":0.1493687211564676,"score_gpt":0.47922510962706605,"score_spread":0.32985638847059845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057407474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93429756,0.0005279416,0.024946934,0.032354947,0.0026760013,0.00034131866,0.000010456207,0.000048249367,0.0047966205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907519,0.0014535757,0.0006284563,0.0035306686,0.002748641,9.919561e-7,0.0000013879528,0.000014118875,0.0008702202],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947882,0.0010867799,0.001162529,0.00024255205,0.002164262,0.0005556374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99413365,0.0025318514,0.0008540172,0.00019568011,0.0015109678,0.00077381806],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028903576,0.00016802011,0.00037703713,0.00031560878,0.00048848725,0.00015275329,0.0010765532,0.0006539647,0.00018072083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075647635,0.00015904821,0.00016429777,0.0005597023,0.00040974043,0.001050117,0.00009896763,0.0038353312,0.000026011368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027984113,0.00036119763,0.015702965,0.00016987958,0.00039056485,0.0004359037,0.5037791,0.00051812327,0.017012797,0.4207852,0.014496497,0.023549356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017346623,0.0013906403,0.029561786,0.0009575599,0.000528186,0.00022423832,0.08195405,0.000047467856,0.02095748,0.05022383,0.81142175,0.000998328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007449761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004788808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7969253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000273769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081224955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059545875","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9086-z","title":"Protecting Human Dignity in Research Involving Humans","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Nothing; Relevance (law); sort; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.6910183662585482,"score_gpt":0.6950585981818452,"score_spread":0.004040231923297055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059545875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82801336,0.0013876698,0.0005073026,0.13753839,0.00091610395,0.000788666,9.124082e-7,0.000046728237,0.030800901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98613065,0.0012994318,0.0013635085,0.008713996,0.0020288178,0.000007972222,4.7598584e-7,0.000024636996,0.00043051533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96707326,0.026634496,0.0022460057,0.0002533187,0.0028622255,0.000930709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93857557,0.05702625,0.0014643607,0.0003186567,0.0022717607,0.0003434071],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24310194,0.00015004868,0.0004370147,0.00063330744,0.0034803387,0.000022689825,0.00095965137,0.0029736133,0.00011994661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.316337,0.00012956579,0.00008164328,0.0008037202,0.00041490348,0.0006829496,0.00021816324,0.2492181,0.00005271341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043079816,0.000463653,0.09369457,0.0018408952,0.000066963956,0.00044099847,0.37573764,0.00007240694,0.09744123,0.40792245,0.016849354,0.0050390465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001348885,0.0005338909,0.023785012,0.006743957,0.000022168297,0.000031314925,0.04369009,0.000039226055,0.00035978068,0.9112307,0.011998017,0.0002169981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016365497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017665421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50330824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077104213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021380715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99832076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067197983","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9007-3","title":"Practicing What We Teach – Ethical Considerations for Business Schools","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Cynicism; Public relations; Philosophy of business; Business ethics; Product (mathematics); Business analysis; Business; Business relationship management; New business development; Political science; Business model; Marketing; Electronic business; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.5226695605924452,"score_gpt":0.5427723460260362,"score_spread":0.02010278543359101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067197983","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03060671,0.0027972742,0.056630045,0.9061675,0.0033914556,0.0001858648,0.0000035455741,0.000015144263,0.00020248046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87846977,0.015623811,0.07315157,0.027198138,0.004815232,0.000010400738,0.0000014754412,0.000029880945,0.00069971604],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939709,0.0007665353,0.0020192505,0.0003065842,0.0026197603,0.00031701542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91674495,0.06970704,0.0021818413,0.0004065292,0.010708709,0.00025089973],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04411781,0.0001720527,0.0004389687,0.00047473414,0.00069409696,0.00097327714,0.0006965437,0.0020614192,0.00015517975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36203212,0.0001264484,0.00017110257,0.0007367773,0.00024019639,0.0037649623,0.00008588527,0.015444237,0.00006379846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031095117,0.00031575697,0.0029828523,0.00022607783,0.00015604167,0.000016399279,0.057133514,0.019360218,0.010461991,0.38190627,0.43448418,0.092645735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059147435,0.000057856694,0.0013573949,0.0008713188,0.00007884722,0.0004972293,0.013029696,0.0009164559,0.0011103535,0.7627034,0.21856055,0.00022543769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000055569494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003336864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8789694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016094679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040147705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070641505","doi":"10.1007/s10805-010-9123-y","title":"Ethical Dilemmas in Community-Based Research: Working with Vulnerable Youth in Rural Communities","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Rural community; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.6427163859664523,"score_gpt":0.5597398828057365,"score_spread":0.08297650316071581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070641505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94648343,0.00016435115,0.000056305777,0.049785957,0.00052323105,0.0004231584,0.0000040625896,0.00002105956,0.0025384706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807359,0.0006304881,0.0018479046,0.016408214,0.00023709047,0.000025817646,0.000014525921,0.000032957058,0.00006707743],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96810675,0.027636008,0.0017562152,0.00007104959,0.0013754208,0.0010545307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95610553,0.041339017,0.00062901306,0.00056895736,0.0009749477,0.000382507],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.104226544,0.00020255931,0.0005801974,0.0011197953,0.0029878966,0.000022475253,0.0013381646,0.0027735725,0.00009545834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007948261,0.00016108422,0.000053089425,0.0010270667,0.00064447254,0.00018550077,0.0004365822,0.29741102,0.00001265542],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010749848,0.0001779372,0.527147,0.00063767174,0.00001185038,0.000023743916,0.46488786,0.00015623475,0.00013163006,0.0040929713,0.0007238083,0.00093434774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064496086,0.00064006477,0.07021845,0.016525706,0.000019631316,0.00002938321,0.85925454,0.00023493636,0.00006404557,0.017472468,0.028675314,0.00041583815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009188791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077446125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45692852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050909823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066841342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071318420","doi":"10.1007/s10805-009-9094-z","title":"Research on the Ethics of War in the Context of Violence in Gaza","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Just war theory; Proportionality (law); Context (archaeology); Gaza strip; Human rights; Political science; Law; Spanish Civil War; War crime; Criminology; Sociology; International law; Palestine; History; Ancient history","score_opus":0.41982016978801406,"score_gpt":0.45969808210961327,"score_spread":0.03987791232159921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071318420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7444785,0.0023746735,0.000015133043,0.24618238,0.00031100618,0.00022537675,0.000009509893,0.0000034100376,0.006399971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836614,0.010772749,0.000014562757,0.0050770603,0.00037619768,0.000001442869,5.5250615e-7,0.000006137587,0.00008986861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951894,0.002092845,0.00096647046,0.00010355507,0.0014359327,0.00021177177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862837,0.011740173,0.00058283034,0.00023067981,0.0011327699,0.000029819641],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038014416,0.00009015887,0.00024299909,0.00029739243,0.00021479838,0.000020705316,0.000833602,0.00061657035,0.00003697553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070662373,0.000050182265,0.00008220968,0.00017678356,0.0010957184,0.00015654345,0.000024489464,0.019377992,0.0000051196284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009207738,0.00007105046,0.00016040106,0.00006400891,0.0000056789995,0.0000027808007,0.38006738,0.000043829463,0.00055260386,0.6164981,0.00125773,0.001184332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072238286,0.0009110921,0.006650315,0.005671715,0.000029926607,0.000016200202,0.45385265,0.00014628889,0.004378098,0.5024108,0.025041409,0.00016908113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026124308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006998154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24110532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054550186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049189845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077595266","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9021-5","title":"Conflict and Convergence: The Ethics Review of Action Research","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Mandate; Research ethics; Divergence (linguistics); Action (physics); Action research; Subject (documents); Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.8694228001024319,"score_gpt":0.7241808917392281,"score_spread":0.14524190836320383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077595266","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07924468,0.2232746,0.00032153726,0.69138527,0.0006265573,0.00062480255,0.0000062618346,0.000012104741,0.0045041945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19428049,0.7956112,0.00042110396,0.007356174,0.00076159573,0.000002559454,0.0000011277717,0.000017051538,0.0015487034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888248,0.0026557858,0.0017998463,0.00021274803,0.0061367876,0.00037001813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8540805,0.13181113,0.0011268398,0.00054055505,0.012143934,0.00029703273],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15160945,0.00011364131,0.00051840686,0.00019113973,0.00025230978,0.000013795717,0.0005019166,0.0024912334,0.000112357695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23791629,0.00006953635,0.00016970954,0.00058358605,0.002185727,0.00012428494,0.00018701672,0.07591505,0.000009999167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001884833,0.0004969476,0.043205258,0.14655767,0.0005798839,0.00023290791,0.01160148,0.000019516388,0.07362395,0.5277844,0.18718278,0.00683035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028227225,0.002635455,0.02718264,0.13576122,0.00057663623,0.0018795661,0.003520785,0.00011064842,0.025265714,0.3142939,0.4856055,0.00034522358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000107287626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036042777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6840291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011291674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004689926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99880373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087938750","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9017-1","title":"Oral History and Ethical Practice: Towards Effective Policies and Procedures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Informed consent; Oral history; Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Law; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.05827586340143535,"score_gpt":0.34842299422018463,"score_spread":0.29014713081874927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087938750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62694085,0.120073326,0.0001656462,0.18773803,0.0022179426,0.0005480915,0.000023694236,0.0000940659,0.062198333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838311,0.0022442252,0.000356573,0.0076633664,0.0019634888,0.000004055836,0.0000011501456,0.000025878759,0.0039101476],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792403,0.00054406014,0.00054674124,0.00016874951,0.00061387545,0.00020255215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971141,0.0011566152,0.00070561183,0.00008036326,0.00082619855,0.00011706484],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002722205,0.00018760034,0.0004162906,0.00028427647,0.0003147033,0.000054565808,0.00015012953,0.0006334963,0.000101457874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040195477,0.00014685454,0.00010342759,0.00004737999,0.0014907869,0.00048351948,0.000047001227,0.0062213205,0.000003835165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004980326,0.00012030855,0.001250815,0.0005072571,0.00039897818,0.00008840536,0.4088887,0.000020949787,0.0024891049,0.34697974,0.23488665,0.003871049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006354944,0.0004915143,0.0020945577,0.00019002463,0.0004588297,0.00023770318,0.014897713,0.000025042407,0.00020730375,0.013987869,0.966501,0.00027295173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058331306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006172677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73161435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034900988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005186332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99607134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093519592","doi":"10.1007/s10805-011-9141-4","title":"Encouraging Active Classroom Discussion of Academic Integrity and Misconduct in Higher Education Business Contexts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Misconduct; Academic integrity; Psychology; Scientific misconduct; Perception; Presentation (obstetrics); Psychological intervention; Higher education; Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.16043992791811768,"score_gpt":0.4030493709071121,"score_spread":0.24260944298899445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093519592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90557075,0.0032048654,0.0002096716,0.07848394,0.0023740348,0.00023694932,0.000008341252,0.000015204459,0.009896227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873978,0.009043866,0.00060183223,0.0010725112,0.0007342706,0.0000021418086,0.0000012818026,0.000012356397,0.0011339277],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664974,0.0010799434,0.0009628001,0.00019552436,0.00079382013,0.00031819116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654704,0.0011302009,0.0011720344,0.00009339275,0.00085634255,0.00020098824],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008472675,0.00017050203,0.0004272918,0.00033312282,0.00020491327,0.000012915493,0.0005812534,0.0035245167,0.00016382159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004963063,0.00011888427,0.00007904107,0.00049175223,0.00071774056,0.001218828,0.000079661215,0.028865842,0.0000027175913],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007034236,0.00024043667,0.13026062,0.00029679548,0.000103833685,0.000017349459,0.581311,0.0000052255255,0.013385025,0.20106767,0.0051347357,0.06747391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014983282,0.00017433321,0.30180404,0.006226531,0.0002145153,0.00010951269,0.13639994,0.000020300444,0.0074191126,0.49059978,0.05480848,0.00072513876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001739613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018861439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44491103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024899605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027027628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094641390","doi":"10.1007/s10805-012-9172-5","title":"Defending Research Confidentiality “To the Extent the Law Allows:” Lessons From the Boston College Subpoenas","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Law; Pledge; Political science","score_opus":0.36072897760474487,"score_gpt":0.5384027022675052,"score_spread":0.17767372466276032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094641390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5594077,0.009814395,0.0004994003,0.42306283,0.0034140158,0.0005235996,0.00007069776,0.000011623202,0.0031957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749103,0.0012978396,0.00005572541,0.019541256,0.0035209742,0.000020504536,0.0000028049722,0.000021443546,0.00062910566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992273,0.0045261607,0.00086543564,0.00017740161,0.0014123393,0.00074568036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880086,0.010126449,0.00047956238,0.00054664473,0.0004950459,0.0003436875],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03609541,0.00014638712,0.00023642713,0.00007174282,0.0015909352,0.000059055055,0.0012947391,0.00064303033,0.00036123962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019292766,0.000068797504,0.0001611799,0.0003833021,0.00045716128,0.00018975048,0.00013427784,0.011770556,0.00022046531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026543232,0.00007228629,0.00755946,0.000013407371,0.0001467156,0.0000058454775,0.19016072,0.000012914475,0.0003420166,0.58171195,0.21923482,0.0004744138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061424536,0.000121513665,0.117071964,0.00014533201,0.000109456305,0.00018247003,0.05681574,0.000009064152,0.00026206518,0.015914258,0.8086226,0.00013129278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033997942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037139233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5893878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013503249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037536697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118989750","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9015-3","title":"A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Ethics Board: Studying the Meaning of Farm Life for Farm Children","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Dilemma; Context (archaeology); Normative; Sociology; Meaning (existential); Statement (logic); Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Ethical dilemma; Process (computing); Point (geometry); Law; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.075859855389673,"score_gpt":0.31034131556414063,"score_spread":0.23448146017446764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118989750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7360002,0.00030959322,0.0000619982,0.26270595,0.0001798954,0.0004617336,0.0000058257533,0.000009323026,0.0002654806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98836285,0.0002250244,0.00014696094,0.010254625,0.0008181273,0.000009448962,0.0000019457527,0.0000022933518,0.00017871708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711883,0.0006744268,0.0007557579,0.0001698612,0.00094988424,0.0003312452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900795,0.0085826125,0.00060387136,0.00009371989,0.0005653862,0.00007487063],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014772459,0.00016945023,0.00026959224,0.000019539555,0.0012424669,0.000085373365,0.0011570661,0.00045045835,0.000009931471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007046368,0.00004040356,0.0002281517,0.00035714195,0.00016212801,0.000084514846,0.00016864915,0.004816164,0.000001703118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020266215,0.00049814535,0.19104885,0.0002453869,0.0009116282,0.000009269307,0.15453286,0.0059177256,0.11287209,0.36462006,0.030686127,0.13663124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006826135,0.0011094625,0.76848906,0.000547522,0.00017275418,0.000032182685,0.047042474,0.00019123363,0.0072392845,0.09734258,0.076600164,0.0005506545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002354786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042084247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5774402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006736236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012409296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99747974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309581811","doi":"10.1007/s10805-016-9256-8","title":"Research Ethics Board (REB) Members’ Preparation for, and Perceived Knowledge of Research Ethics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Economic Justice; Political science; Agency (philosophy); Dignity; Mandate; Institutional review board; Ethical code; Human research; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.7895200134646957,"score_gpt":0.7096263880695409,"score_spread":0.07989362539515477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2309581811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57689935,0.0070569213,0.0026272903,0.40322667,0.0009247459,0.0017455589,0.000038078084,0.00004368125,0.0074376734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8700057,0.11358333,0.0058963876,0.0008546889,0.0015560075,0.000026886979,0.0000024328663,0.00008627194,0.007988291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709243,0.011342618,0.003317344,0.00089098816,0.012027989,0.0014967471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39278212,0.5531431,0.0009981092,0.001076556,0.050803445,0.001196713],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3386615,0.00027233284,0.0009782806,0.0013478423,0.000849186,0.00005423001,0.0011422866,0.010670878,0.000095179086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6378446,0.0001857145,0.00033857336,0.0011330553,0.006077803,0.00043186988,0.00072181365,0.1149857,0.000030345009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015433646,0.00095130823,0.01032896,0.017241683,0.00085533253,0.000090126196,0.2546775,0.000014499614,0.27475873,0.39865488,0.021108812,0.0058845384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009892677,0.0135510005,0.009896954,0.031845883,0.0003083782,0.00039916474,0.018965801,0.0003158003,0.029646317,0.81796896,0.066629775,0.00057927327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010128396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052676647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5781422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069090584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020379921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333304710","doi":"10.1007/s10805-016-9257-7","title":"Ethics in Community-University-Artist Partnered Research: Tensions, Contradictions and Gaps Identified in an ‘Arts for Social Change’ Project","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"The arts; Sociology; General partnership; Public relations; Participatory action research; Community engagement; Reflective practice; Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.958899942375165,"score_gpt":0.7455696377607194,"score_spread":0.21333030461444558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333304710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92601055,0.00030066608,0.00036832583,0.07206041,0.00021716136,0.0006809512,0.000028359773,0.000016785858,0.00031679167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935514,0.004521107,0.0006323486,0.00046932275,0.00046433584,0.000015769512,9.52449e-7,0.00001530114,0.00032948938],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9713712,0.025765639,0.00056166004,0.00017622643,0.0013553483,0.0007699562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975254,0.02285774,0.00027260842,0.00013730093,0.0011760468,0.00030232346],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11766824,0.000100723926,0.0003246095,0.0008188805,0.002201288,0.00006228804,0.00059748575,0.0010976777,0.000007126674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058828637,0.000085854816,0.000067314686,0.0008032582,0.0020147332,0.0010856695,0.00014954139,0.011251072,0.0000014676912],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095076975,0.00036520793,0.032654468,0.00015066632,0.000042432814,0.00008784319,0.79959375,0.0000011041612,0.020081302,0.13111214,0.0026820456,0.012278284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007727095,0.0016102963,0.15858573,0.002790976,0.00008629533,0.000027190523,0.36569756,0.00019618752,0.0010906075,0.14252828,0.3190063,0.00065345777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015625942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02444529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43389618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005347755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002428137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2478381396","doi":"10.1007/s10805-016-9263-9","title":"Ethical Evaluations of Business Students in an Emerging Market: Effects of Ethical Sensitivity, Cultural Values, Personality, and Religiosity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Religiosity; Psychology; Personality; Social psychology; Cultural sensitivity; Ethical values; Business ethics; Sensitivity (control systems); Sociology; Political science; Social science; Public relations; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.2685298681223711,"score_gpt":0.5349892805494001,"score_spread":0.266459412427029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2478381396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9159638,0.00047310817,0.0028826378,0.07973226,0.0007624265,0.00012652256,0.0000054997276,0.0000045816823,0.00004911901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99430716,0.003173144,0.0010275069,0.0011732829,0.00025576164,0.0000014458174,5.523593e-7,0.000011436656,0.000049713002],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98699164,0.005221283,0.0019151306,0.0003659983,0.005241656,0.00026431077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95101845,0.039743945,0.0016927256,0.00034530292,0.0069979005,0.00020169307],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07603071,0.00017953337,0.0006642433,0.0004681282,0.00016606567,0.000065263426,0.0007262903,0.0023252242,0.000027040312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15425944,0.000110193316,0.00012444555,0.0009792008,0.000966364,0.0006713426,0.00031742823,0.007879044,0.0000016002703],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046446288,0.00038874435,0.8517657,0.0006542779,0.00008460233,0.00002489309,0.044386607,0.000253089,0.078010246,0.013305576,0.0026821843,0.007979657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086376915,0.00011287458,0.8658191,0.0020462049,0.00007206827,0.00008706215,0.0013135769,0.00020725038,0.0019675326,0.12729904,0.00006474746,0.00014676055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000107734435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013407225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11399346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011305819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010278182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788131552","doi":"10.1007/s10805-018-9302-9","title":"Discrepancy between Learning and Practicing Digital Citizenship","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Etiquette; Citizenship; Digital literacy; Curriculum; Psychology; Public relations; The Internet; Digital society; Political science; Pedagogy; Medical education; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Medicine; Law; Politics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.13475145014625445,"score_gpt":0.4652468865616928,"score_spread":0.3304954364154383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788131552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96139,0.00037222344,0.00023597642,0.022760475,0.0006452965,0.000045945366,0.0000020104221,0.000020200181,0.014527842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899402,0.0011407194,0.00029425678,0.0003956866,0.007748587,2.1294599e-7,3.471531e-7,0.000009987221,0.0004699469],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982611,0.00040029993,0.0003562193,0.00007567542,0.0006270914,0.00027960062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939691,0.0048940037,0.0004680835,0.000032613832,0.0003766504,0.0002595646],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026740648,0.00007097456,0.00018597367,0.00007001226,0.0006234465,0.00009478234,0.00016259147,0.00053527206,0.000019454264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03033093,0.00006382898,0.00005272838,0.00015391991,0.0008057316,0.00038910285,0.000039686438,0.003873699,0.000009945044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015271804,0.0000045285633,0.71581686,0.000018182276,0.000060166825,0.000010388859,0.24089925,1.2426571e-7,0.00011433854,0.033125613,0.0007575299,0.009177738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000710691,0.0005627506,0.02188296,0.0006426547,0.00024398911,0.000067187284,0.18357693,0.000004481164,0.00065353926,0.284014,0.50723404,0.00040679323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005427394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010251297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6939339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006738583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000551072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967722566","doi":"10.1007/s10805-019-09340-6","title":"Plagiarism Intervention Using a Game-Based Tutorial in an Online Distance Education Course","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Educational Games and Gamification","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"Korea Institute of Energy Research","keywords":"Mathematics education; Game Developer; Psychology; Significant difference; Intervention (counseling); Computer science; Multimedia; Game design; Medicine","score_opus":0.11759638860979874,"score_gpt":0.4790997388643708,"score_spread":0.36150335025457203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967722566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98402566,0.0011829942,0.00309497,0.0047681625,0.0066745533,0.0001490215,0.000008322826,0.0000069024936,0.000089407506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99539685,0.00005887268,0.0014830077,0.0008783454,0.0016991303,0.0000030066335,0.000035615492,0.000017388642,0.0004277831],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981317,0.0004197836,0.0007549305,0.00016782984,0.0003721736,0.00015357099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980308,0.00034714397,0.0008848261,0.00018952273,0.00046063948,0.0000870969],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002290647,0.00010398453,0.00018931387,0.00019669824,0.000024399367,0.000020967567,0.0002609512,0.00070246164,0.00016540878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003153117,0.00010167869,0.000088639434,0.0002097725,0.000053122072,0.00031824745,0.000009461479,0.003553842,0.00001701269],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002586787,0.0092956275,0.7021155,0.0004458401,0.00017168385,0.000013809602,0.06572813,0.009187279,0.019959342,0.12394985,0.0039680153,0.06257814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005092376,0.000949555,0.8922944,0.0024276008,0.00018503741,0.00015063141,0.022141581,0.0072777877,0.00024612134,0.016648564,0.052019853,0.000566473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007315668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038177383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19017893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000239757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010068881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998745},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3013202718","doi":"10.1007/s10805-020-09363-4","title":"The Paradox of Faculty Attitudes toward Student Violations of Academic Integrity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Assiniboine Community College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Academic integrity; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Medical education; Dishonesty; Cheating; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.23761507115590438,"score_gpt":0.47799976303864966,"score_spread":0.24038469188274528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013202718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67562014,0.006064434,0.004148555,0.30992067,0.0010863341,0.00038821643,0.00007756685,0.00003312869,0.0026609795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97270095,0.023946472,0.00063455827,0.0016908905,0.0009159562,0.0000015288629,0.0000017600485,0.000010045448,0.00009781657],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946056,0.0012115691,0.0016085231,0.0001619202,0.0020685706,0.00034379147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99205256,0.004557796,0.0018082488,0.00011501035,0.0011846374,0.00028174766],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01383504,0.00016249916,0.0005008241,0.000079063,0.0004999166,0.000022212123,0.0017625001,0.0028730505,0.00004289726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017717537,0.00011160814,0.00028912292,0.00048303642,0.0011365546,0.00042673963,0.00015732425,0.032142773,0.00000786966],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029497777,0.00008770444,0.19984205,0.0002083697,0.00040762877,0.000006968275,0.48193944,0.00027825122,0.0048430064,0.2880574,0.019972041,0.004062162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002229536,0.0010427646,0.12125602,0.002523121,0.00082656904,0.000058970196,0.26298434,0.00044613396,0.011755438,0.138855,0.45701528,0.0010068499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027191653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005931436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43704322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012925762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016804283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022237381","doi":"10.1007/s10805-020-09367-0","title":"An Institutional Self-Study of Text-Matching Software in a Canadian Graduate-Level Engineering Program","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Academic integrity; Similarity (geometry); Plagiarism detection; Matching (statistics); Psychology; Institutional review board; Set (abstract data type); Misconduct; License; Rubric; Medical education; Graduate students; Psychological intervention; Empirical research; Computer science; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Social psychology; Image (mathematics); Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.1450758898708603,"score_gpt":0.39120960639397556,"score_spread":0.24613371652311528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022237381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852236,0.00014543744,0.00091533543,0.012907436,0.00025925614,0.0002943309,0.00001237898,0.000041903004,0.00020032577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991474,0.0002811564,0.006625694,0.0010259211,0.00057485624,0.0000029765258,0.0000014524114,0.000010014333,0.0000039737865],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729174,0.00042535248,0.0007310974,0.00013726267,0.0010295842,0.00038497485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803585,0.00059411064,0.0003595858,0.00005705214,0.00037173534,0.00058166374],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006934199,0.0001206525,0.00029270552,0.00024685802,0.00027944686,0.00002952909,0.000674111,0.001369935,0.000013417393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064032245,0.000117064286,0.000065311375,0.0005392159,0.00011644952,0.00060822105,0.000028960481,0.014140937,0.0000025961297],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052933327,0.0002568059,0.08277044,0.00016016662,0.00010671942,0.00014079039,0.87945575,0.009562554,0.00018905033,0.023294812,0.00032768707,0.0036822855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007908378,0.005237187,0.21599916,0.0047618235,0.00063311524,0.00040461426,0.53807384,0.023766791,0.00047347057,0.038767118,0.16082983,0.0031446866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12023316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09029874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34138194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034496552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041728746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163402237","doi":"10.1007/s10805-021-09412-6","title":"Academic Integrity Education Across the Canadian Higher Education Landscape","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Higher education; Medical education; Political science; Library science; Medicine","score_opus":0.09033786103858327,"score_gpt":0.43728614511354813,"score_spread":0.34694828407496486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163402237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16647619,0.016109679,0.00006087816,0.74752456,0.011373297,0.00019562904,0.000019517687,0.000025624022,0.058214605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9238009,0.012578728,0.00041470394,0.036187597,0.007568258,0.000005588589,0.000011763999,0.000017309536,0.019415177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960406,0.00143689,0.00070050184,0.00018177558,0.0011334487,0.0005067996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995152,0.0015252945,0.0006215762,0.00017647188,0.0020336127,0.0004910648],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01345602,0.0001484253,0.00023486515,0.00011993128,0.0016625496,0.00012682618,0.0010046901,0.0047008474,0.000519234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008665985,0.00011355203,0.0001496561,0.00062639575,0.00046176542,0.0006276045,0.00005704608,0.04341111,0.000057472855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024727009,0.00005531366,0.02995764,0.000041738906,0.00006332437,0.000008067079,0.12562168,0.000011617903,0.00024298773,0.4854296,0.33524206,0.023301216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009411677,0.000011648929,0.009051465,0.00026280986,0.00004534026,0.000092771996,0.034962863,0.0000037762793,0.0001404673,0.075784996,0.8794061,0.00014363101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05849984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11479364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7573247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074864906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04658421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193471211","doi":"10.1007/s10805-021-09435-z","title":"Biomedical Authorship: Common Misconducts and Possible Scenarios for Disputes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Promotion (chess); Publishing; Scientific misconduct; Field (mathematics); Research ethics; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.6851221122734525,"score_gpt":0.6349770259293422,"score_spread":0.0501450863441103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193471211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79700583,0.013347685,0.00028805947,0.18609717,0.0026475554,0.00022923361,0.00010056882,0.000026464391,0.00025745036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96441054,0.0070441263,0.001377827,0.024305282,0.0018456767,0.0000071038885,0.00001959643,0.00002663571,0.0009632024],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968337,0.00119116,0.00087642326,0.00022216077,0.0003594885,0.0005170785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931211,0.0047108936,0.00041363467,0.00010631998,0.00058807526,0.0010600064],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059166304,0.0001920585,0.0004561741,0.00011318984,0.00041965343,0.000027214452,0.00031553645,0.0031101657,0.0002374647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042108563,0.00016559698,0.0001334644,0.00024932474,0.00053661497,0.00022719252,0.00011478135,0.01759683,0.0000074451227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039853384,0.0017344282,0.097380124,0.00523381,0.0019226319,0.0020887703,0.029952856,0.00034312985,0.51063937,0.08012013,0.14551193,0.12108746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045717033,0.00065499573,0.0019675035,0.00059635576,0.00069640187,0.0025017934,0.002206916,0.0027437818,0.10231261,0.051594853,0.8296748,0.00047828018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000029033824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004942959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6841629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007540193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011762667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233976765","doi":"10.1023/b:jaet.0000006998.75095.f8","title":"Book Review","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.11796828619088892,"score_gpt":0.4309473478127228,"score_spread":0.31297906162183387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233976765","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030942392,0.9636514,0.00018580645,0.029108724,0.0004316482,0.00011212468,0.0000032725563,0.000021980128,0.006175592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010605401,0.80240965,0.0011350916,0.19190322,0.00035634666,0.0000011064938,4.1053406e-7,0.000069274196,0.0030643677],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962406,0.0009859358,0.0011550611,0.00011250662,0.0012145923,0.0002913077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656785,0.00092637417,0.0013276637,0.00020178988,0.00072868244,0.00024761938],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014651583,0.00015385092,0.00045188633,0.00014096155,0.00008309814,0.000010021543,0.0004630335,0.00067839556,0.0012239012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017795086,0.00012249946,0.00022519067,0.00036476387,0.00013181743,0.0004871319,0.000025559548,0.013169541,0.0011706738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102612275,0.000014317594,0.00014429403,0.0004088105,0.000038879363,0.000031823212,0.0002933624,0.000008555053,0.0020457641,0.0034087847,0.9934681,0.00012702066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032110274,0.000059970494,0.00004755002,0.0050369184,0.00014699325,0.0015394392,0.000029411685,0.0000014148212,0.0017415426,0.0029629944,0.9879824,0.00013029945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":3.69469e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.4603576e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1627945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016573018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009179984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4290975602","doi":"10.1007/s10805-022-09455-3","title":"Ethical Issues in Research: Perceptions of Researchers, Research Ethics Board Members and Research Ethics Experts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","keywords":"Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.9246870940716804,"score_gpt":0.7868419606354342,"score_spread":0.13784513343624616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290975602","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014745719,0.7405572,0.00001592783,0.24817815,0.0014060137,0.0024503453,0.00006990905,0.000035465797,0.0071395105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00022353543,0.9860054,0.0021220513,0.0033195112,0.003202002,0.0006287943,0.000031097356,0.00036988722,0.0040977215],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.19765311,0.72893655,0.011599644,0.0023795362,0.05351712,0.005914001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.15909743,0.8101343,0.0033135265,0.002366256,0.022790305,0.002298213],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","open_science","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8477365,0.00091245625,0.0048819683,0.009192936,0.011615448,0.00014896355,0.00692209,0.052456122,0.003687086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.88937426,0.0007813775,0.0008073516,0.009587964,0.019848496,0.0008156273,0.008592446,0.8326184,0.00016706316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007246225,0.00046500575,0.00024365718,0.1217581,0.00047662065,0.00079453137,0.49806,0.000006040378,0.00003754271,0.11588021,0.2252368,0.036316883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065329025,0.0007269928,0.000014631546,0.066651605,0.00013691348,0.00012859543,0.15681252,0.000009607706,0.0000011176018,0.06387389,0.71058977,0.00040106828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044279895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018105231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78016233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006479172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.091217965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296193289","doi":"10.1007/s10805-022-09458-0","title":"Contract Cheating in Iran: An Overview of Key Issues and a Call to Action","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Scholarship; Legislation; Action (physics); Accountability; Exploratory research; Public relations; Call to action; Business; Political science; Qualitative research; Sociology; Psychology; Marketing; Social psychology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.2809573541461012,"score_gpt":0.49572716345924545,"score_spread":0.21476980931314427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296193289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9456647,0.005907581,0.00007193893,0.04716543,0.0003440411,0.00011816015,0.0000072027656,0.000006569669,0.000714353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98170525,0.013908311,0.0006143388,0.0031707361,0.00044203582,0.0000017229263,5.6225235e-7,0.000006206158,0.0001508313],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700916,0.0012839062,0.000569681,0.00009810099,0.0008508418,0.00018828259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981013,0.0011174574,0.00044894018,0.000047921458,0.00015148873,0.00013288647],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016932696,0.000069250935,0.000262699,0.00015261523,0.0002950739,0.000013576442,0.00030979727,0.0007901354,0.00009010485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004146119,0.000067326146,0.000047399542,0.00028603495,0.000108442604,0.0003972987,0.000058097245,0.011326996,6.8197147e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003331511,0.00009609534,0.048572782,0.00016455038,0.00004462889,0.000029706922,0.84787446,0.00067274243,0.013910487,0.06448742,0.002882865,0.020931104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018653934,0.0014156466,0.05155358,0.001643856,0.00013735367,0.00025622552,0.2248606,0.0010336296,0.0022368657,0.06800073,0.64632833,0.00066781015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043551573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009462044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6434455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001748187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035537014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372349141","doi":"10.1007/s10805-023-09476-6","title":"Contract Cheating and Student Stress: Insights from a Canadian Community College","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Bow Valley College","funders":"Bow Valley College","keywords":"Cheating; Stress (linguistics); Community college; Psychology; Political science; Business; Social psychology; Linguistics; Medical education; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0888554506618393,"score_gpt":0.4014505113765932,"score_spread":0.3125950607147539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372349141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9653595,0.0011593654,0.000017570832,0.027189294,0.00056700455,0.00010730907,0.00009201882,0.000023417602,0.005484503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98998696,0.006121515,0.0001183339,0.0027785318,0.000790499,9.632012e-7,0.0000050515628,0.000008661397,0.00018951533],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963228,0.0019134138,0.0005183655,0.000085884225,0.00083469984,0.00032483973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99235255,0.0063646156,0.00036860816,0.000085663494,0.00036195066,0.00046663138],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009301829,0.000105936066,0.0002709915,0.0002125723,0.0015579745,0.000049935097,0.0006130172,0.00216855,0.000041597978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007424794,0.00009469727,0.000059107304,0.00035928166,0.00035417778,0.00035678365,0.000068101144,0.023254381,0.000013443022],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035210756,0.000030320709,0.08672005,0.000032614666,0.00016834371,0.00014349581,0.8322395,0.000052644085,0.0005795468,0.067876995,0.010836081,0.0012851795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010949286,0.00014190405,0.15175375,0.001391621,0.00014298418,0.000028655752,0.5759646,0.0003515972,0.00027990324,0.12165339,0.14675824,0.00043837682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32886896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4539037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25627488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027922116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018811641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388418020","doi":"10.1007/s10805-023-09491-7","title":"The Defining Characteristics of Ethics Papers on Social Media Research: A Systematic Review of the Literature","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Social Media in Health Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women and Children’s Health Research Institute; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Research ethics; Scholarship; Information ethics; Sociology; Meta-ethics; Media ethics; Engineering ethics; Social research; Social science; Informed consent; Applied ethics; Public relations; Political science; Journalism; Media studies; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.7117743619659367,"score_gpt":0.6190236587617237,"score_spread":0.09275070320421297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388418020","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000015664978,0.96013063,1.13451456e-7,0.029796511,0.0077127037,0.0020863016,0.000056490764,0.00000952363,0.00019206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000033511802,0.99585336,0.000016566617,0.00065786537,0.0031730316,0.00015493478,0.0000065837053,0.000051951636,0.000052185074],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9624745,0.026434349,0.0041982355,0.00021247033,0.0061006574,0.00057975424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7123293,0.27279153,0.010046644,0.00043598248,0.004189422,0.00020707176],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.123312265,0.00027450192,0.0026385274,0.00029892492,0.001702462,0.00006136293,0.0025210227,0.003812549,0.000006132936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6595774,0.0001481492,0.0009295272,0.0030248493,0.001714294,0.00009363707,0.00016010182,0.035207983,0.000011066856],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004584504,0.000011322741,0.0000022647205,0.82497376,0.00010844083,0.0000021099274,0.13360979,1.2011409e-8,1.10399796e-7,0.022540856,0.0010101099,0.01773663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030060457,0.000023645043,0.000017810089,0.74390906,0.00072544115,0.000006983641,0.0063829706,2.6066129e-8,1.105586e-7,0.0014465386,0.24736877,0.000088582856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003550714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006891297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5362652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007948371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017232232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390882283","doi":"10.1007/s10805-023-09499-z","title":"Alexithymia as a Factor in Changing Ethical Positions: An Empirical Study on Student of University Health Services Vocational Schools in Turkey","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alexithymia; Psychology; Empathy; Relativism; Toronto Alexithymia Scale; Clinical psychology; Test (biology); Social psychology; Descriptive statistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.21031761916979805,"score_gpt":0.4691427044464929,"score_spread":0.2588250852766949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390882283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9252796,0.00013790997,0.00003482663,0.073991485,0.0003008477,0.00016458692,0.000014647381,0.0000102473705,0.000065823544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99036884,0.00040567276,0.000091741626,0.008979954,0.00011316047,7.8724446e-7,0.000001194878,0.000006649109,0.000032008596],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677926,0.0012643336,0.00055324036,0.00025629715,0.00093362265,0.00021321514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846816,0.0010091802,0.00021929892,0.00008717027,0.0000723516,0.00014384721],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003415419,0.00010979831,0.00024002022,0.0008838278,0.00009125219,0.000018050088,0.00042254388,0.00043186947,0.000016717762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028483954,0.00009515672,0.000061798855,0.00073305727,0.000082941864,0.00029128452,0.00007344127,0.007465789,0.00001264397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023472717,0.0074113086,0.5845674,0.00074228726,0.0001298675,0.0017859455,0.3227159,0.0054300297,0.030268949,0.042272236,0.00061624165,0.0017125054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011988414,0.0022633972,0.96606094,0.0027812617,0.000012546834,0.00018032444,0.019427327,0.0004005136,0.000621908,0.006551204,0.0003475468,0.00015418038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046555488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023637707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3814935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032648645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005605249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99482405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391444098","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09513-y","title":"Participants’ Right to Withdraw from Research: Researchers’ Lived Experiences on Ethics of Withdrawal","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University Grants Commission","keywords":"Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.9341552100674787,"score_gpt":0.7093959531298536,"score_spread":0.2247592569376251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391444098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.749038,0.0033424704,0.00025637605,0.24347878,0.0020138067,0.0005682775,0.000024569634,0.000046020825,0.0012317094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777702,0.004848087,0.0017305434,0.012213336,0.0022968869,0.00007268741,0.0000027333354,0.000070489725,0.0009949999],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95782954,0.031053115,0.0029603497,0.00059042696,0.006005937,0.0015606473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89229685,0.10075558,0.0010604869,0.00062241586,0.0039436505,0.0013210162],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12073683,0.00027946613,0.00078395475,0.0009028948,0.001297211,0.000067381916,0.0014412323,0.0029499205,0.00078287564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13694754,0.00020808597,0.00016390068,0.0015074244,0.0011276633,0.0007868562,0.00047141642,0.0732032,0.00049820886],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012945085,0.00011353335,0.0048538805,0.0012746257,0.00017916138,0.00022250658,0.95865685,0.00003337157,0.0036233927,0.007875771,0.02094006,0.0009323501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010240488,0.002954329,0.00567738,0.023584163,0.000107810694,0.000022753142,0.6243599,0.00020711143,0.006652334,0.030812759,0.30410105,0.0004963346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020258252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000547949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3342969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077094726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014355631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392236213","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09515-w","title":"Academic Integrity Policy Analysis of Chilean Universities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo","keywords":"Academic integrity; Cheating; Context (archaeology); Academic dishonesty; Misconduct; Public relations; Enforcement; Political science; Higher education; Accreditation; Scarcity; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.07720241088372569,"score_gpt":0.43088336903096636,"score_spread":0.35368095814724065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392236213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67235696,0.015534553,0.0062350417,0.26056844,0.0025686554,0.00019314738,0.00016029124,0.00013337753,0.042249534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638191,0.030128838,0.0003080194,0.0014424322,0.001972417,2.7552537e-7,0.000003841137,0.000012347051,0.00231274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591225,0.0011220106,0.0009451161,0.00017931485,0.0014635079,0.0003777694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99458325,0.0038034525,0.00060900126,0.00011691688,0.00063984166,0.0002475311],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01608388,0.00016188387,0.0005608883,0.0018003406,0.00031671772,0.000036168818,0.0010691556,0.004271906,0.00022621319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048577455,0.0001409418,0.0005476166,0.003012319,0.0009806195,0.0008123726,0.00009223394,0.04048825,0.000013421517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050276427,0.000013167205,0.0029756597,0.000096219694,0.0013149334,0.00002721618,0.19438565,0.00020687665,0.0005175418,0.78784764,0.009646685,0.0029181163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038550573,0.00019250596,0.00426926,0.0020215244,0.0047491845,0.00007399585,0.19888665,0.0016417314,0.0012418687,0.18089119,0.60501724,0.00062931975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002966315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022039936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6069565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000615951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061104656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395047582","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09529-4","title":"Framing Integrity Resolution: An Integrative Approach to Academic Ethics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Academic integrity; Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.16421460897335344,"score_gpt":0.4563299925771124,"score_spread":0.29211538360375894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395047582","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074234225,0.029568266,0.37894508,0.42256,0.012379154,0.0011606837,0.000100211444,0.00061022886,0.080442145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8958478,0.035490036,0.030168695,0.020683117,0.013487645,0.000016789567,0.000015210671,0.00009433131,0.004196383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99027026,0.0040965173,0.0014555493,0.0005112872,0.0028690072,0.00079738436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897218,0.007342981,0.000518832,0.00022812648,0.0013871519,0.0008011544],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05363696,0.00035589837,0.0005921754,0.00060795376,0.0011872827,0.00020404806,0.0019222844,0.012311733,0.00007338719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034410957,0.0002879886,0.00030232794,0.0013927075,0.0010220304,0.0019245137,0.00017802711,0.15440993,0.00007474621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094118186,0.000033319928,0.0001707936,0.00012488679,0.00007923321,0.000023757395,0.46827695,0.00015005188,0.00061428023,0.5020024,0.023594862,0.004835362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021242279,0.0003195651,0.00011338756,0.0029655623,0.00016109027,0.00022146228,0.11895289,0.0022864116,0.00054545177,0.16025372,0.7133821,0.0005858859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008657263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022839499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82161355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087722763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059711603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400598916","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09545-4","title":"Signs of Dysconscious Racism and Xenophobiaism in Knowledge Production and the Formation of Academic Researchers: A National Study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; British Academy; Queen's University Belfast; Leverhulme Trust; Queen's University; Society for Research into Higher Education","keywords":"Sociology; Consciousness; Racism; Politics; Narrative; Ethnic group; Rationality; Representation (politics); Relation (database); Knowledge production; Social science; Epistemology; Media studies; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.288545761863965,"score_gpt":0.5183254171022522,"score_spread":0.2297796552382872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400598916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94512564,0.009153707,0.00007304259,0.0437846,0.0005110611,0.00037073434,0.0000017044324,0.0000050664426,0.000974444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98377806,0.015523617,0.00006645786,0.000060346774,0.00028010271,0.0000060002726,2.0437272e-7,0.000004353917,0.00028082932],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701464,0.0013989409,0.00060092204,0.00009137708,0.0007849039,0.000109200366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965499,0.0025433544,0.00032822974,0.000043007178,0.000483204,0.000052283227],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027932337,0.000053373977,0.00015011888,0.0002702071,0.0001704608,0.000027934064,0.00015675099,0.00022919077,0.000010358318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007835976,0.000038193357,0.00002800261,0.00043414216,0.00047340576,0.0007265026,0.00004466044,0.0032325326,9.4056844e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015758433,0.00011312044,0.003022262,0.00025946522,0.00006211101,0.0000016268377,0.9459864,0.000081143284,0.0021777474,0.03736359,0.0031122603,0.0076627117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037484947,0.00085952855,0.030114662,0.0030514998,0.0002646075,0.00010720111,0.7072104,0.0008733612,0.0015900743,0.18695027,0.06485663,0.0003732608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000106506035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014088447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23877597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013070846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009419234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402837766","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09566-z","title":"In Memoriam Fred F. Wilson","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.0861807191589588,"score_gpt":0.4778854101315932,"score_spread":0.3917046909726344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402837766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08543243,0.20555855,0.0147199035,0.20604189,0.18809555,0.00040612696,0.000018373978,0.0001951203,0.29953206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9510449,0.008248475,0.0008819053,0.009206579,0.015476851,0.0000073979245,8.13327e-7,0.000075088305,0.015057992],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763495,0.00040509782,0.0009102299,0.00027583385,0.00043185405,0.0003420318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772906,0.0015833238,0.00026130443,0.00017107518,0.000113360555,0.00014189369],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036010733,0.00015861786,0.00036909114,0.0005160794,0.000047217745,0.000011324053,0.000554316,0.001885327,0.0010153479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009944717,0.00013484538,0.00016816446,0.00052427314,0.0002665822,0.00028152473,0.000042530275,0.016222587,0.00028684858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020706114,0.000067747176,0.0006127849,0.000044019558,0.000132556,0.000721223,0.052976735,0.000011593563,0.00062426075,0.34606063,0.59577805,0.0027633118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060523127,0.00022063628,0.001089543,0.00022111338,0.000050535295,0.0011270614,0.0022500807,0.000024812167,0.00002711373,0.16743848,0.82677466,0.00017073259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021340022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026488337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86561245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004200765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002324148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404147567","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09583-y","title":"The Role of Stewards of Trust in Facilitating Trust in Science: A Multistakeholder View","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Social Innovation","funders":"HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme; European Commission","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.0967104146766581,"score_gpt":0.4361157299627017,"score_spread":0.3394053152860436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404147567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97503537,0.0071566585,0.00012066544,0.009263125,0.00049473566,0.00019359477,0.000004322349,0.0000075616167,0.007723967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98550737,0.013502355,0.0004142923,0.000111790105,0.00007362693,0.0000017887642,7.082121e-8,0.0000042097618,0.0003845135],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733335,0.00038182718,0.0008006808,0.00010717344,0.0011539333,0.0002230293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998443,0.0009042325,0.0002867102,0.00007907333,0.00022149466,0.00006550521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020315187,0.000064164014,0.00019358065,0.00031590217,0.00017292978,0.00004453259,0.00052548264,0.00020946855,0.000036525777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033092217,0.00004502386,0.00007888418,0.0009991877,0.0010043005,0.00035485282,0.00005968945,0.0021338244,0.0000024575845],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003580239,0.000050471976,0.010424441,0.000236691,0.000020164787,0.00000956446,0.6406311,0.00060019776,0.0074363025,0.109322354,0.00028377213,0.23094916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063297944,0.00012744305,0.025013566,0.002113857,0.000032573105,0.0000057798616,0.66110325,0.0031569793,0.00062569766,0.033154245,0.2738503,0.0001833563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006015615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082008704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27356654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022233739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010401466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9270524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408279470","doi":"10.1007/s10805-025-09605-3","title":"Sex and Gender Identity: Data Collection and Language Considerations for Human Research Ethics Committees and Researchers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Sex and Gender in Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Western Sydney University","keywords":"Human research; Data collection; Research ethics; Gender identity; Identity (music); Psychology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7885206986603697,"score_gpt":0.6494212849343131,"score_spread":0.1390994137260566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408279470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7375564,0.031328812,0.0012068287,0.22825776,0.00023510389,0.0007646772,0.00004040559,0.000017550428,0.0005924898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737323,0.016797092,0.003061375,0.004901562,0.00032492913,0.0000060791012,0.000013014519,0.000015146582,0.0011484902],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974973,0.00092183816,0.00043188414,0.00023249039,0.00069334015,0.00022312382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880167,0.010445529,0.00010597632,0.0002505817,0.0009949742,0.000186196],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023078673,0.000081249214,0.00025064647,0.00040601313,0.00094413647,0.00008353516,0.00013011278,0.00079931895,0.0000064329597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023587028,0.00007215832,0.00002011324,0.00024671864,0.00050200766,0.00026177187,0.00024294641,0.009094401,1.5943648e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009861983,0.00018520924,0.20801704,0.014854426,0.0013101831,0.00019665815,0.3798625,0.0000041605326,0.035910808,0.15367566,0.19271798,0.012279182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065388153,0.0012536302,0.06326452,0.0017981867,0.00050207507,0.0017304681,0.17427412,0.001215473,0.002812935,0.7194463,0.02684937,0.00031407762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001787992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037502166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5657707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007650712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013058705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99319166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411131767","doi":"10.1007/s10805-025-09649-5","title":"Academic and Research Integrity in Nepali Universities: A Comprehensive Policy Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Nepali; Academic integrity; Research integrity; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Philosophy; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.16370928838472076,"score_gpt":0.5127499276515928,"score_spread":0.349040639266872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411131767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7423671,0.0052984036,0.0008771994,0.2323229,0.00034190237,0.00018421002,0.0000129303335,0.000019103814,0.018576229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951573,0.042199098,0.00031755766,0.0036696729,0.00055257557,9.4075875e-7,0.0000012018272,0.000005719208,0.0016802185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933028,0.0037247327,0.00080069544,0.00022907322,0.0013786722,0.0005639856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890288,0.009130599,0.00036365076,0.00012217138,0.0011208298,0.00023391032],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020804817,0.00014106907,0.0005207254,0.003078166,0.00066522864,0.00004617714,0.0009589743,0.0046853214,0.000031411877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010128062,0.00013404271,0.00016881035,0.004919259,0.0016500646,0.0005680752,0.00022827779,0.0582147,0.0000034010723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020473034,0.00002622111,0.047627877,0.000092494294,0.00043755904,0.00004538422,0.2341573,0.00012806665,0.00051725184,0.70779645,0.0067881336,0.0021785323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009674882,0.00009450424,0.022137947,0.001146926,0.00040136487,0.000020461353,0.4652787,0.00041506995,0.00021856902,0.2584941,0.25050905,0.0003157881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012216582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010858322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44930235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008626746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063888677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411131873","doi":"10.1007/s10805-025-09650-y","title":"Moral Sensitivity and Beliefs of Medical Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives","funders":"Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Sensitivity (control systems); Virology; Psychology; Medicine; Internal medicine; Outbreak; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.2421121178352932,"score_gpt":0.6055629817756678,"score_spread":0.3634508639403746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411131873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67344904,0.0017358946,0.0015363364,0.32104647,0.0012711495,0.00024109537,0.000005550918,0.000020173336,0.0006942936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.913891,0.018692497,0.00017501111,0.066106796,0.0006295539,0.0000033499548,3.8074703e-7,0.000012941936,0.00048845395],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808986,0.012331845,0.0017597934,0.00020221608,0.0043985127,0.00040899275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9104483,0.08667107,0.0014456976,0.00026226754,0.0006555604,0.00051708333],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12623776,0.00014607985,0.0004866841,0.00016819283,0.0012479102,0.000010733905,0.0009900468,0.0027335845,0.00008904856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25189304,0.00009565909,0.000087306435,0.00031149184,0.0011359581,0.00019668273,0.0009738558,0.06279522,0.000005487873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024663945,0.000057472353,0.9400575,0.0019356441,0.00017630491,0.00010741387,0.019911392,0.000019290155,0.0008573306,0.029984113,0.0063950773,0.00025183082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011782674,0.0002885039,0.542243,0.011938577,0.00073918974,0.0018562457,0.0511301,0.00038214476,0.00021833194,0.302663,0.07619745,0.0005608068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019030776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020263417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3978145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032315313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047148587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411532530","doi":"10.1007/s10805-025-09657-5","title":"Correction: Academic and Research Integrity in Nepali Universities: A Comprehensive Policy Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Nepali; Academic integrity; Research integrity; Political science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Library science; Public relations; Philosophy; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.14284122946967148,"score_gpt":0.5002791847549476,"score_spread":0.3574379552852761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411532530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6692873,0.0063787997,0.0020117026,0.27802908,0.0019082226,0.00027075052,0.000012514303,0.000035115114,0.042066474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9534444,0.037938412,0.0001898838,0.0031826945,0.0008080534,0.0000011133562,0.00000128033,0.000005746534,0.004428421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938473,0.0034349258,0.0007498697,0.00022321755,0.0012535005,0.0004911499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880713,0.010033795,0.00036339465,0.000111575704,0.0012084323,0.00021149074],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017365638,0.0001355021,0.00048136528,0.0028274448,0.0007633488,0.00004686828,0.00076551316,0.004349234,0.000037992144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010989075,0.00013129138,0.00016101275,0.005186873,0.0014595954,0.00056090986,0.00018220732,0.0576289,0.0000034280306],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004065777,0.000046930458,0.081785865,0.00011284587,0.00070119486,0.000064023225,0.35859346,0.0003994269,0.00047651283,0.5061369,0.04582638,0.0054498627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087475625,0.00011260798,0.024805058,0.0013227696,0.00040010764,0.00003904881,0.52633137,0.0010998152,0.0002246234,0.11485469,0.32962108,0.00031409145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012964674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014130542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39128223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009812464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006149239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948496},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4415899068","doi":"10.1007/s10805-025-09696-y","title":"Academic Cronyism and Publication in Journal Special Issues: an Exploratory Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"Tsinghua University","keywords":"Cronyism; Exploratory research; Reciprocal; Citation; Set (abstract data type); Subject (documents); Publishing; Equity (law); Impact factor","score_opus":0.7124622079667812,"score_gpt":0.6626968449371432,"score_spread":0.049765363029637966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415899068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95505214,0.006154464,0.0009772072,0.034719285,0.0018875136,0.00022381697,0.0000031669863,0.000006291893,0.00097610947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784048,0.015421092,0.0005169414,0.001626889,0.0027608448,0.000002911982,4.0569904e-7,0.0000125989045,0.0012534704],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98391587,0.0021939322,0.0027943058,0.0004677414,0.010094456,0.00053371536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98277324,0.0071031987,0.0014538502,0.0003975693,0.0076590534,0.0006130554],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16184552,0.00017165353,0.00052474893,0.06003019,0.000366308,0.0016227989,0.0033796187,0.0009190139,0.00013880788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15477401,0.00012215356,0.00010495307,0.06470926,0.0002778191,0.0036173018,0.00059049536,0.013756087,0.000022490876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023987144,0.00050160894,0.64564097,0.000017793414,0.00005878337,0.000105233645,0.029100223,0.00008194243,0.0012358268,0.0055245385,0.098929286,0.21856393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038022927,0.0013946617,0.47033674,0.00023049381,0.00004635461,0.0002876647,0.06413088,0.0010349556,0.00041461704,0.20861289,0.24929486,0.00041360204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007749487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027219909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21815033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003041868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018919759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W60732914","doi":"10.1023/a:1025469622261","title":"The Duty to Protect: Privacy and the Public University","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; History","score_opus":0.07460358045830927,"score_gpt":0.39782240156592275,"score_spread":0.32321882110761346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W60732914","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21012524,0.0014444506,0.00049835,0.77074695,0.001115199,0.00035084755,3.7153052e-7,0.000010375743,0.015708217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99198735,0.003770523,0.0004987218,0.0012757224,0.00035053943,5.647366e-7,1.9096078e-8,0.0000036075198,0.0021129672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975702,0.001490589,0.00018024602,0.000060145754,0.0005315646,0.00016723142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969016,0.0022333122,0.00025136716,0.00009890911,0.0003879082,0.00012692028],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014811102,0.000044214277,0.00008144925,0.00004018549,0.0012323576,0.00008767992,0.00056506693,0.00024197613,0.000010754914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026064612,0.00002487873,0.00003671999,0.00031364767,0.0007156071,0.00033030863,0.00003756386,0.0027311295,0.0000052600853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029012843,0.0000067504257,0.0010826822,0.0000032726493,0.000014014546,0.0000011830531,0.14709716,0.000002105361,0.00003304138,0.8471753,0.0030901185,0.0014653652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019973039,0.000015479152,0.0004456592,0.000017492108,0.000011864681,0.0000105515755,0.019631077,0.0000012748175,0.00004949168,0.04245022,0.93713164,0.0000355213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009359448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000118621385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9340415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016771413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011183606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}