{"meta":{"query_hash":"48b578ed3b5a","filters":{"venue":"Journal of African Law"},"cohort_total":20,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":20,"exported":20,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/48b578ed3b5a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+African+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1977638918","doi":"10.1017/s0021855305000124","title":"IMPROVING TAX ADMINISTRATION: A CASE STUDY OF THE UGANDA REVENUE AUTHORITY","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Tax revenue; Administration (probate law); Business; Tax administration; Public economics; Poverty; Product (mathematics); Internal revenue; Tax reform; Economics; Accounting; Economic growth; Political science; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.04309575270385909,"score_gpt":0.2613735194580236,"score_spread":0.21827776675416452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977638918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662852,0.00055243575,0.0022740425,0.004951141,0.00005137998,0.00024356751,0.000048123573,0.000024879664,0.02556921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863347,0.0011016759,0.00272979,0.0006486587,0.000030410241,0.000115216564,0.000030043198,0.000024094617,0.008985338],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917802,0.005717479,0.0002162226,0.0002204355,0.0006317833,0.0014338404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909436,0.004591391,0.0011437925,0.00044871424,0.0012466413,0.0016258291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006022894,0.00047909285,0.0005497875,0.0024371454,0.0225983,0.005470538,0.0023975244,0.0046588783,0.0043769637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01700709,0.0006056675,0.0005480719,0.0035979042,0.0049652387,0.0044736224,0.0046463534,0.0051581156,0.0006856557],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045392057,0.004661375,0.07331811,0.0006135632,0.00012148963,0.07897977,0.53436923,0.0070819356,0.00208224,0.18325984,0.02376556,0.09129297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013204517,0.0012287458,0.027490254,0.00052992895,0.000070867536,0.010929337,0.7552363,0.007579865,0.0023228729,0.010077626,0.18426292,0.00013913045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02468255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050790988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02468255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007625647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057763592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05532825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004961051","doi":"10.1017/s0021855306000234","title":"Dead Bodies in Nigerian Jurisprudence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada; Institute of Genetics","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Meaning (existential); Disposition; Prioritization; Business; Psychology; Appeal","score_opus":0.017856956670905057,"score_gpt":0.30658521372441366,"score_spread":0.28872825705350863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004961051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13146497,0.045147806,0.008929939,0.13048954,0.0048995693,0.00016146082,0.00005293892,0.000058048838,0.67879575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92022127,0.005261061,0.0022911152,0.027888287,0.0007123756,0.000082167826,0.000014485388,0.000034297293,0.043494977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99228466,0.00362149,0.0009487277,0.0008007975,0.0013250852,0.001019302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912936,0.006815731,0.0005293686,0.00024226186,0.00067003974,0.00044892367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0121316165,0.00040753075,0.0006560079,0.001504763,0.024623558,0.011660961,0.0011967357,0.012656932,0.0026134416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0094589675,0.00089624606,0.00023356905,0.0008616422,0.030114101,0.0035608339,0.006237309,0.012610032,0.0004530166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009632744,0.000024410141,0.0004941883,0.0001230671,0.0000028364275,0.0020672728,0.06838712,0.00007576299,0.00053478364,0.91645014,0.005691537,0.0061392616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023668434,0.00009432551,0.0019130487,0.0019060766,0.000018709565,0.002319299,0.06420873,0.00047019718,0.0009757208,0.19819595,0.72979194,0.00008225373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011116575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022482492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024623558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053333817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006776847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06415892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036099058","doi":"10.1017/s0021855305000021","title":"Constitutional dialogue in Uganda","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Constitutionalism; Constitution; Political science; Parliament; Constitutional review; Appeal; Opposition (politics); Legislature; Politics; Law; Constitutional economics; Democracy; Constitutional court; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Constitutional amendment; Judicial review; Constitutional theory","score_opus":0.02489358992016166,"score_gpt":0.28765272419929133,"score_spread":0.26275913427912967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036099058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12812793,0.05860093,0.017022802,0.053252053,0.0016700092,0.0001772487,0.00013614932,0.00011435308,0.7408986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601353,0.0069768894,0.0024026304,0.0027901663,0.00021442141,0.00014138466,0.000040325835,0.000038801583,0.027260125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98812217,0.007956058,0.00036545735,0.00081406016,0.001130588,0.0016115565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99370265,0.004483962,0.00050171587,0.00034600915,0.0005147098,0.0004510037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00856539,0.00038231577,0.00046318886,0.0026494889,0.026293108,0.011152298,0.0012839346,0.005510126,0.007721047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014958717,0.0005328681,0.0003243465,0.0036966042,0.029818954,0.012176771,0.012188534,0.0054442897,0.0006940538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001136777,0.0000075121684,0.00029378038,0.00012092454,0.00000346143,0.00048885547,0.061860073,0.00018791438,0.000099266166,0.92187864,0.0031369538,0.011911293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000143230645,0.000031022024,0.0010740185,0.00073021866,0.000008420529,0.000535167,0.041897796,0.00022810261,0.00030805732,0.17246598,0.78267074,0.0000360993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017433824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016606372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026293108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020664744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010410126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14993393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052277045","doi":"10.1017/s0021855304481029","title":"Modest harvests: on the significant (but limited) impact of human rights NGOs on legislative and executive behaviour in Nigeria","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Human rights; Political science; Task (project management); Development economics; Economic growth; Public administration; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.027990157871925554,"score_gpt":0.3125772609991776,"score_spread":0.28458710312725205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052277045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9484652,0.0010210228,0.00010805892,0.0038310708,0.000079739606,0.000015727062,0.000018947207,0.0000024190192,0.04645791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950251,0.0007193536,0.000046114932,0.00057524885,0.000018009627,0.0000069730318,0.000008399459,0.0000029423582,0.0035977683],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999113,0.00038451864,0.000026472642,0.00007767368,0.00016451204,0.00023388653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975368,0.0014050003,0.00047622994,0.000096241514,0.0001361327,0.0003495895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002434807,0.0001218142,0.00014315103,0.00040564648,0.0029841382,0.002538404,0.00025409728,0.0005428766,0.0048082713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032535843,0.000113827205,0.00007421553,0.00048848276,0.0041570454,0.0016624058,0.0025547005,0.001376867,0.00024462945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030119412,0.0003665436,0.3124703,0.0006710965,0.000034103687,0.0040938556,0.4787883,0.00027101563,0.005635798,0.0682307,0.008213214,0.12092385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010189093,0.00029201622,0.25308284,0.00081984565,0.000021658738,0.0005189756,0.65256643,0.00012121023,0.0011337805,0.004152155,0.08725597,0.000024965124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005776874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021528436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005776874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011927902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020555367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016085267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063547930","doi":"10.1017/s0021855306000246","title":"The Precarious Place of Labour Rights and Movements in Nigeria's Dual Economic and Political Transition, 1999–2005","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Human rights; Political economy; Political science; Economics; Economic system; Law","score_opus":0.005883119115890405,"score_gpt":0.2575443276585635,"score_spread":0.2516612085426731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063547930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.926677,0.0011024397,0.00022959457,0.00595859,0.00011076916,0.00002742069,0.000026495352,0.00000261595,0.0658651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953375,0.00021995066,0.0000788582,0.00022102412,0.00000933571,0.000012436728,0.000008731675,0.0000010890424,0.0041110776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921405,0.00021880271,0.000042219654,0.00006356268,0.00007083906,0.00039054823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916315,0.00029980132,0.00026234967,0.0000320431,0.000068773836,0.00017384761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015670857,0.00013196847,0.00013695522,0.0008376756,0.005904874,0.00391083,0.0003503905,0.0014824513,0.002615629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025028368,0.00018012125,0.00008978399,0.0007579745,0.005226503,0.0020397594,0.0031244606,0.002356884,0.00015117535],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038760563,0.00021665706,0.07477075,0.00025590547,0.000009907734,0.0040996647,0.2614843,0.00036556594,0.0018785895,0.58279055,0.0054658996,0.06827465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042084772,0.00015904968,0.18097675,0.0012290372,0.00001911218,0.00092776265,0.5662618,0.00060434785,0.0016527041,0.018820226,0.22926806,0.000039044473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024990216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061211184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024990216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006490784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042757983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04968947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072998983","doi":"10.1017/s0221855301001687","title":"LAW AND SOCIAL CHANGE: A SOCIO-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF NIGERIA'S CORRUPT PRACTICES AND OTHER RELATED OFFENCES ACT, 2000","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Religion and Sociopolitical Dynamics in Nigeria","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Political science; Law; Rule of law; Corrupt practices","score_opus":0.036995244928099955,"score_gpt":0.34923493529783917,"score_spread":0.3122396903697392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072998983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54833794,0.007850521,0.0015978115,0.049980853,0.00028354072,0.00012024638,0.00016244667,0.000011411106,0.39165518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99205095,0.0027145548,0.00023779276,0.0007025689,0.0000608449,0.00003842926,0.00003583429,0.0000036729286,0.004155317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993893,0.00024338029,0.00002169918,0.000024749073,0.00016956625,0.00015130299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859244,0.0007874731,0.0003008932,0.000030431476,0.0001499056,0.00013884417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000752618,0.00017171836,0.00012192296,0.0027832098,0.0058836504,0.0052748597,0.00036652107,0.0017662024,0.0022252812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024405979,0.00012781365,0.0001234406,0.0026633383,0.008231106,0.0027010594,0.0014067099,0.0016712332,0.000122028694],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017543493,0.00014685428,0.018742234,0.000069966874,0.0000048895904,0.0010945422,0.05357792,0.00078475213,0.00019284604,0.9033309,0.005667158,0.016370386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016817556,0.00009036836,0.18456385,0.0009310958,0.00001450378,0.00072854717,0.34977943,0.004064704,0.00040000095,0.2007935,0.25857815,0.00003905861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036370926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07281844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036370926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008858321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052044303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072318435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095735178","doi":"10.1017/s0021855310000045","title":"A Legislative Proposal for Public Participation in Oil and Gas Decision-Making in Nigeria","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues","field":"Energy","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Alienation; Public participation; Natural resource; Political science; Business; Resource (disambiguation); Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.015783414080161113,"score_gpt":0.2843188089294684,"score_spread":0.26853539484930733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095735178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07566335,0.0034447263,0.044851866,0.34889495,0.006046819,0.002625345,0.00019285965,0.00028624327,0.5179938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8178665,0.0017627953,0.033459064,0.060499873,0.0023153825,0.0031439345,0.00012483027,0.000072329414,0.08075528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9636708,0.019531436,0.002864136,0.0029522972,0.005199808,0.0057814564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9702166,0.019731212,0.0020055736,0.0015164317,0.0046498403,0.0018804593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.062026948,0.0007545023,0.00068045966,0.0022542775,0.012247659,0.015314571,0.0033908468,0.024895648,0.0063648997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035334762,0.0011614105,0.0013867775,0.0013279693,0.017039094,0.007922389,0.008768886,0.01813697,0.0010398082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020623916,0.00011249313,0.00043464702,0.00006785462,0.000005982267,0.00038887563,0.005173098,0.00046419175,0.00033156847,0.9821217,0.00692101,0.00395785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034197874,0.00041560305,0.0033855687,0.0021864735,0.00015013595,0.0008716986,0.020587659,0.0060370355,0.0027123142,0.2889159,0.67409176,0.00030384053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010681688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012297994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062026948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010225392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034927715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32803375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149791402","doi":"10.1017/s0021855309990180","title":"Between Elite Interests and Pro-Poor Resistance: The Nigerian Courts and Labour-Led Anti-Fuel Price Hike Struggles (1999–2007)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Leverage (statistics); Political economy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Incentive; Politics; Law; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.007977606355058961,"score_gpt":0.23224796975448123,"score_spread":0.22427036339942227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149791402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82550603,0.004134501,0.00027375412,0.02688118,0.00020123877,0.00003671652,0.00003338381,0.000004260318,0.14292893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954234,0.00056314963,0.000026389298,0.0010776864,0.000042744687,0.000007141958,0.000004392574,0.000002186491,0.002853036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973488,0.00096394954,0.00010000325,0.00019532947,0.00032165958,0.0010703228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99193007,0.0052077426,0.0015396944,0.00015758915,0.00048175576,0.0006830971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004334277,0.000165502,0.0002595529,0.0021929636,0.014313586,0.010107386,0.00050533033,0.0038990446,0.0042410493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007928754,0.00023891043,0.00011547011,0.0018410621,0.01603021,0.0028000723,0.0036779426,0.0066180318,0.00016595838],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012858323,0.00018157955,0.034957465,0.00016538557,0.000017608703,0.003054118,0.29607612,0.00016612062,0.0005968028,0.6288655,0.010465518,0.025325168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004144716,0.00016469687,0.12347506,0.0013223882,0.000030714793,0.0009916744,0.6252889,0.0005601063,0.0012705572,0.042052887,0.20472285,0.00007882394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024630569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06058917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024630569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077317217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004080424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056097806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158284483","doi":"10.1017/s0021855312000162","title":"Corporate Criminal Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Doctrine; Mens rea; Statutory law; Criminal law; Political science; Law; Element (criminal law); Scope (computer science); Strict liability; Business; Legal doctrine; Corporate liability; Criminal liability; Restrictiveness; Liability; Tort","score_opus":0.07952303392305554,"score_gpt":0.28056011074053294,"score_spread":0.2010370768174774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158284483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26320797,0.020476637,0.0012482975,0.0072983224,0.00014684572,0.00006547129,0.0001556285,0.00001022572,0.7073906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884411,0.0063298964,0.00024529328,0.00030395234,0.00007500539,0.000032142845,0.000049656068,0.000005146372,0.004517791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941187,0.002539383,0.00013984507,0.00027131086,0.0021907222,0.0007400802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98753846,0.0070031662,0.0013268897,0.00026772742,0.0032984798,0.0005652993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003315568,0.00017954184,0.00031191888,0.013599774,0.0040027257,0.0045106555,0.0006587706,0.0013964309,0.010159502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011450037,0.00013700068,0.00030563903,0.011410741,0.006197561,0.0036647636,0.0029668137,0.0014910394,0.0003229943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048006066,0.00014140076,0.017682426,0.00031446616,0.000035852398,0.00091452576,0.01408391,0.0007850183,0.000080710684,0.9018075,0.009018848,0.055087384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070293594,0.00037658028,0.21621692,0.003953906,0.00017080473,0.0028374298,0.13820858,0.0050868504,0.00058320747,0.16728175,0.46511513,0.00009859772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020335691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027277349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020335691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010471833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041235434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075978816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159932472","doi":"10.1017/s0021855306000052","title":"DISCRETION, <i>NOLLE PROSEQUI</i> AND THE 1992 GHANAIAN CONSTITUTION","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Accountability; Constitution; Law; Commonwealth; Political science; Subject (documents); Judicial discretion; Power (physics); Judicial review; Separation of powers; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012635526996633837,"score_gpt":0.2999441574947578,"score_spread":0.28730863049812394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159932472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09612377,0.02045831,0.0090317195,0.14329268,0.0025066368,0.0002910209,0.0011534004,0.00011866338,0.72702384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79342407,0.0038232328,0.006695345,0.044065986,0.00059140305,0.00043223612,0.0004058276,0.000055860506,0.15050602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975211,0.00069563143,0.00017063724,0.00032035485,0.0006356931,0.0006564904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985862,0.00054287695,0.0003980409,0.00011052559,0.0002099176,0.0001524635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017386557,0.00026392087,0.0002088355,0.00047133,0.0032326533,0.0029624414,0.00042799462,0.0031909568,0.0073314384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058510257,0.00022466171,0.00021301892,0.0007558017,0.0068423813,0.0018045437,0.0020996341,0.0036660067,0.00083293975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004174342,0.0000131975685,0.0015609182,0.00007806556,0.0000035604442,0.00038665035,0.0041109915,0.00014691977,0.00048377312,0.94870126,0.03349111,0.0109818345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007280698,0.000057120047,0.010928137,0.000403546,0.000015268042,0.00047374982,0.0017225466,0.00016728662,0.00051457586,0.11937174,0.86623037,0.000042885717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080692746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12805009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080692746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054303156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009621572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1604461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318737055","doi":"10.1017/s0021855316000048","title":"Poverty in the Human Rights Jurisprudence of the Nigerian Appellate Courts (1999–2011)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Poverty; Human rights; Politics; Political science; Law; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.017242216032806693,"score_gpt":0.27950377613605293,"score_spread":0.26226156010324625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318737055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8420966,0.011753593,0.00053156645,0.026026808,0.00030030214,0.000051248942,0.00009065533,0.0000038139042,0.119145386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992407,0.0013650006,0.00011487664,0.0014537856,0.000047235102,0.000017025002,0.000011290548,0.0000027662293,0.0045810663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99457306,0.0023959526,0.00044335972,0.00044802477,0.00095211255,0.001187653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838831,0.011097831,0.0023307493,0.00036092088,0.0018307552,0.00049664645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009429058,0.00012982653,0.0002624064,0.0022320175,0.009724057,0.006601388,0.00056893285,0.0033724892,0.0014566559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021683076,0.00047059738,0.00016950691,0.0027827306,0.0064188326,0.003323279,0.002662053,0.005418688,0.000099217425],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017677981,0.00014816188,0.04616782,0.00026449614,0.000023724851,0.003454264,0.1986274,0.0005180361,0.0010103344,0.70358413,0.010731993,0.0352929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035592155,0.00021167436,0.3084069,0.003917096,0.000057854642,0.0022332089,0.20691615,0.0014211978,0.0020838678,0.03444705,0.44010854,0.00016089273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061572973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13098083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061572973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012285727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00758175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12242913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783831649","doi":"10.1017/s0021855317000328","title":"Malleus Maleficarum: Scrutinizing Sorcery in Cameroon","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Imprisonment; Conviction; Colonialism; State (computer science); Criminology; Criticism; Political science; Ethnography; Naxi; Law; Politics; Subject (documents); Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.04142730046404273,"score_gpt":0.32910156136881913,"score_spread":0.2876742609047764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783831649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97764504,0.004044471,0.00032256174,0.0025086063,0.00009250419,0.00009835889,0.00006911996,0.000003576475,0.015215705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957023,0.0015936606,0.00020899544,0.0003193432,0.000022016762,0.000019372314,0.0000151585045,0.0000030009276,0.0021162482],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987313,0.0007513134,0.000030932813,0.00007930227,0.00009873008,0.00030840162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869126,0.0007358631,0.00028405574,0.000037032638,0.00014615424,0.000105602376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002029195,0.00045570388,0.00035421966,0.0032180639,0.009173691,0.0024642937,0.00097341585,0.0011270468,0.004908761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003310975,0.00028225195,0.00013120283,0.0023374264,0.008191725,0.0022208095,0.0029724948,0.0012602793,0.0001807311],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008382852,0.00006271093,0.034029033,0.00074559025,0.000009087753,0.017407827,0.88454664,0.00011473484,0.0023970127,0.026233617,0.0027806123,0.03158931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017645956,0.000034150882,0.026800089,0.00054838764,0.000005069404,0.0014840785,0.9398228,0.000087328175,0.0004062627,0.00073459506,0.030063793,0.000011774853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043064196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09632104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043064196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004055659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032682228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08562708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914370821","doi":"10.1017/s0021855318000293","title":"The East African Court of Justice, Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards and the East African Community Integration Process","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Arbitration; Political science; Law; Jurisdiction; Convention; Enforcement; Economic Justice; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.017502270001981755,"score_gpt":0.23951693654899575,"score_spread":0.222014666547014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914370821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30061862,0.00585143,0.005007691,0.05590561,0.00042572818,0.00019447542,0.000047314075,0.000024355291,0.63192475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98681647,0.0005586282,0.00058303704,0.0025999246,0.000082741615,0.00004625393,0.0000058647724,0.0000065641943,0.009300548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874206,0.005203839,0.0005490809,0.0009020413,0.0023781336,0.0035462673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803064,0.013242006,0.0018482173,0.0006395372,0.0023221998,0.0016417595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016726883,0.00024032439,0.00040691238,0.0029385611,0.019306343,0.015017245,0.0014231901,0.0076544606,0.0071120486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031355422,0.00044421433,0.00033115895,0.002607305,0.02038027,0.0058239917,0.008732241,0.008522078,0.0003340747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000095052865,0.000023364246,0.0010014311,0.000014231318,0.0000037248237,0.00037016682,0.004581625,0.00016252544,0.00012454343,0.9887166,0.0017642669,0.0032279936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014748973,0.00017966823,0.02332769,0.00182036,0.00007886092,0.001053859,0.054911654,0.0048870617,0.0018183708,0.64498305,0.2665382,0.00025369122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049637612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07227326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049637612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011991363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019161722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098697364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946441522","doi":"10.1017/s0021855319000020","title":"Towards a Right to Resist Gross Undemocratic Practices in Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Sovereignty; Political science; Charter; Politics; Popular sovereignty; Human rights; Political economy; Development economics; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.025294546266396097,"score_gpt":0.3225371042561794,"score_spread":0.2972425579897833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946441522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1718395,0.004793835,0.020110127,0.13624333,0.00079999876,0.00014991162,0.000052878073,0.00007634432,0.6659341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751603,0.00057316513,0.002120722,0.009183573,0.00013427889,0.0000542302,0.00000963908,0.000013965879,0.012750061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910193,0.0047914353,0.00035247306,0.0007668654,0.0012320824,0.0018378276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928127,0.003896146,0.0010176962,0.00087991665,0.00078565243,0.00060786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01118257,0.00023787284,0.00028688853,0.0007752861,0.004987388,0.006735276,0.0007504223,0.0050546043,0.0031030655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0149545865,0.00023263025,0.00021952932,0.00041712506,0.032252636,0.0039429283,0.006678408,0.0068255262,0.0004115802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005400056,0.000009455637,0.0002794817,0.000020127998,0.0000017663492,0.00009530638,0.008492642,0.000076917524,0.00035384457,0.98543733,0.0016477333,0.0035801507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003223744,0.00007039061,0.0016381902,0.00071850966,0.000011110998,0.00051288784,0.013863968,0.00041162793,0.0016385277,0.72699636,0.25406414,0.000042100037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030356364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003286138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01118257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023668038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046253256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059139848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965095661","doi":"10.1017/s0021855319000202","title":"The Disputed Constitutionality of the Precedential Practice of the Federal Supreme Court and Its Implications for Oromia Family Law: The Case of Bigamous Marriage in Ethiopia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Supreme court; Autonomy; Legislation; Political science; Constitutional court; Doctrine; Constitutional review; Constitutional right; Constitutional amendment; Constitution","score_opus":0.017711764509940768,"score_gpt":0.2570648074721686,"score_spread":0.2393530429622278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965095661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5485785,0.0027361554,0.024004182,0.03533979,0.00050659035,0.00018806208,0.00016181411,0.000047267775,0.38843766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99444133,0.00018888552,0.0009239675,0.000926754,0.00006061882,0.000027903345,0.0000057448083,0.0000037906675,0.0034210414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924148,0.0036159458,0.0003319517,0.0009553511,0.00086211413,0.0018198729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899407,0.007153159,0.00076465786,0.0007848113,0.00090832997,0.00044835336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013725883,0.0001573995,0.00057014695,0.0010036181,0.010108149,0.008985004,0.0017565916,0.006186135,0.003811395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014138933,0.0004827071,0.00043517543,0.0010674162,0.018178217,0.003749515,0.0029563718,0.006500915,0.0002523765],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009053433,0.000010514614,0.00034482803,0.0000073951473,0.0000031446195,0.00028374317,0.0011208231,0.00023584119,0.00015137183,0.9966329,0.0003813227,0.00081906415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014999764,0.00017464467,0.005702936,0.00055268867,0.00015280765,0.0009609782,0.015188046,0.007277893,0.0025262642,0.8862878,0.080841325,0.00018452875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031814978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041370664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031814978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009792107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009950336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07259023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038539094","doi":"10.1017/s0021855320000121","title":"Assessing the African Union's 2016–19 Human Rights Action Planning Process: Embracing, and De-Coupling from, the Conventional “Ideal”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Human rights; Process (computing); Action (physics); Action plan; Political science; Strengths and weaknesses; Plan (archaeology); Key (lock); Process management; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Management science; Sociology; Business; Law; Engineering; Computer science; Management; Psychology; Economics; Geography; Social psychology; Computer security","score_opus":0.06473880907757142,"score_gpt":0.36356711735510483,"score_spread":0.2988283082775334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038539094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6390867,0.00087875203,0.06311717,0.036333494,0.0003035722,0.0017648565,0.00018901716,0.00015435345,0.258172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806214,0.00013303736,0.01628518,0.0004896223,0.00000960488,0.0002287112,0.000030686202,0.000013772453,0.0021880148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9455121,0.03731814,0.002448083,0.001830884,0.009935736,0.0029551124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93671364,0.044045918,0.004824999,0.003006729,0.009237544,0.0021710775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.102646224,0.00026269676,0.00036197307,0.0024943277,0.007124808,0.012204964,0.001332977,0.0024193989,0.0032370293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11115228,0.000437035,0.00040260554,0.0026018498,0.011899476,0.008149874,0.0070558866,0.004363078,0.00030560695],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093030096,0.00019900796,0.022105314,0.00036678225,0.000024828156,0.0003301171,0.097273394,0.006357772,0.0007958224,0.76489466,0.0040545003,0.10350474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071587834,0.0006782731,0.07228545,0.0026387384,0.000055150653,0.0003449999,0.38285378,0.029927826,0.0050291205,0.33239722,0.1734803,0.0002375918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03337242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03296266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102646224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022063356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049221262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54285157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110152378","doi":"10.1017/s0021855320000285","title":"Constitutional Impediments to the Effective Review of Tax Cases in Nigeria by a Specialized Tax Court: Lessons from the United States and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Context (archaeology); Constitutional court; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.022276913061680857,"score_gpt":0.23470757408565937,"score_spread":0.2124306610239785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110152378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71754867,0.0028531058,0.001913303,0.070887566,0.00029489066,0.00042502844,0.00024725826,0.00006878822,0.20576149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864857,0.0010252394,0.0012597857,0.004122807,0.00003177775,0.00004072871,0.000053169926,0.000016118898,0.0069645904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98255825,0.0031131078,0.0007917217,0.0011710433,0.0053717163,0.0069941827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9279615,0.0292266,0.0033909865,0.0023948373,0.025249455,0.011776533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016810384,0.00019855796,0.00045464362,0.0022503692,0.028126072,0.012124887,0.0022722257,0.003837143,0.0045290617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05277686,0.00065038964,0.00036113153,0.002668869,0.008340352,0.0022974636,0.0041368725,0.0057879323,0.00023872577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007021224,0.0008660597,0.1308155,0.00042704714,0.00023537136,0.00930157,0.07332863,0.0076109963,0.003906305,0.56828797,0.07233426,0.13218418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006514709,0.00039906957,0.25869885,0.0019210953,0.0004896852,0.0020613873,0.21669707,0.013257394,0.0046747597,0.050317835,0.44986624,0.00096515025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98191524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09867374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09867374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2183834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7159314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323043593","doi":"10.1017/s0021855323000049","title":"A Critical Examination of the African Legal Framework for Indigenous Knowledge","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Innovation and Socioeconomic Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Indigenous; Traditional knowledge; Political science; Bioprospecting; Introspection; Promotion (chess); Contempt; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.02428754640451784,"score_gpt":0.2775721643902479,"score_spread":0.25328461798573004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323043593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084578946,0.0124606835,0.019678699,0.32590014,0.0017833178,0.00020920172,0.00013329959,0.0000326152,0.5552231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969557,0.002016107,0.004752875,0.012729273,0.0004421815,0.00020978427,0.000020261552,0.000016630021,0.01025587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823516,0.010419871,0.0008076007,0.0013599823,0.0029313127,0.0021296698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95323217,0.039035108,0.0020671147,0.0015221197,0.0032672742,0.00087621226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03709856,0.00034454462,0.000655866,0.0035555486,0.023545185,0.013751592,0.0025103348,0.010261873,0.004514796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042726155,0.00045573126,0.00042876048,0.003674467,0.07728509,0.014465523,0.009652628,0.0145993335,0.00026104043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010210608,0.0000017792559,0.000031461703,0.000008973291,3.0449814e-7,0.000051647577,0.0058481465,0.000021509697,0.000015920388,0.99294853,0.0005585159,0.00051225745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001164034,0.000017928027,0.00062412105,0.0010849689,0.000010381745,0.00024297099,0.047006972,0.000772768,0.00036070475,0.72652507,0.22330108,0.000041520685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024905117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020733798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03709856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016387338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022234067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19619828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392355414","doi":"10.1017/s0021855324000032","title":"Gender-Responsive Public Procurement in Africa: Barriers and Challenges","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Public Procurement and Policy","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Procurement; Empowerment; Promotion (chess); Business; Goods and services; Gender equality; Public sector; Economic growth; Public relations; Public administration; Political science; Marketing; Economics; Market economy; Law; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07598457896983458,"score_gpt":0.2546412816354656,"score_spread":0.17865670266563105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392355414","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2945467,0.020808714,0.0064962567,0.5197162,0.0010299878,0.00027611866,0.00014636839,0.00004608005,0.15693359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671962,0.007674203,0.0016133884,0.0151972035,0.00021859589,0.00013788958,0.000024668307,0.000021937058,0.00791586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98253125,0.009492471,0.00071539544,0.0005230679,0.002375717,0.004362151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96309316,0.02608532,0.0035057084,0.00074007065,0.002917388,0.0036582614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0255852,0.00035771754,0.0004894086,0.0014215906,0.00749809,0.0096521,0.0020837868,0.0028669746,0.015286891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032591637,0.0004264385,0.00033026733,0.0026771827,0.010127395,0.008241779,0.008864762,0.0045347773,0.00066860515],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007172179,0.00020495823,0.015946265,0.0017609459,0.000021410751,0.0030993626,0.08815481,0.00078222365,0.0010769786,0.73766756,0.02493077,0.12628296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003313849,0.00013266486,0.017350541,0.008029993,0.000029669163,0.0020227984,0.40911576,0.0010269218,0.0011261065,0.1493745,0.41166157,0.00009623147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01771649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016430944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0255852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009958924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029822417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1353091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414249195","doi":"10.1017/s0021855325100703","title":"How Far Are Kenya’s Courts? Distance as a Barrier to Justice in Kenya","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Population; Distribution (mathematics); Rural area; Information and Communications Technology; Rural population","score_opus":0.02326194269251455,"score_gpt":0.3570913743589067,"score_spread":0.3338294316663922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414249195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9563708,0.0018292646,0.00037925603,0.004396545,0.00003254632,0.000038959308,0.00029060108,0.000004611003,0.036657386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99760133,0.0008603243,0.00018006157,0.00014314009,0.000007072995,0.0000126877685,0.000046341906,0.0000016213818,0.0011474366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990079,0.0003787326,0.000054866123,0.00007832019,0.00020816203,0.00027197727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760747,0.0008290197,0.0008554526,0.00003632684,0.0003254316,0.00034632406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065009773,0.00012890837,0.00023382239,0.0011001287,0.0041552554,0.002597951,0.00049572915,0.0005116306,0.008461014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004189085,0.00014148487,0.00011875297,0.0023520107,0.0016887238,0.002125851,0.001875325,0.0007991787,0.00037090693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019712451,0.000289901,0.7391536,0.0010846719,0.0001318581,0.0047100885,0.08456018,0.0014915932,0.0017632697,0.05482249,0.013041691,0.09875354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017256905,0.00019212943,0.6888152,0.0016617429,0.00009116462,0.0014340784,0.25028974,0.001343832,0.0005293897,0.0046648867,0.050874464,0.00008620417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.116560794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28175816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116560794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031085755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032125178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23176467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}