{"meta":{"query_hash":"48b578ed3b5a","filters":{"venue":"Journal of African Law"},"cohort_total":20,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":20,"exported":20,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/48b578ed3b5a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+African+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1977638918","doi":"10.1017/s0021855305000124","title":"IMPROVING TAX ADMINISTRATION: A CASE STUDY OF THE UGANDA REVENUE AUTHORITY","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Tax revenue; Administration (probate law); Business; Tax administration; Public economics; Poverty; Product (mathematics); Internal revenue; Tax reform; Economics; Accounting; Economic growth; Political science; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.04309575270385909,"score_gpt":0.2613735194580236,"score_spread":0.21827776675416452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977638918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99134785,0.00039274216,0.0001896349,0.0012851877,0.00028729846,0.00009771618,0.0000328462,0.0000025716286,0.0063641635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998882,0.000006949018,0.00034534512,0.00007494405,0.00021245085,0.000002032753,5.3818567e-8,0.0000043609584,0.00047185522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992162,0.00002004237,0.0005567691,0.000078817284,0.000048735626,0.00007941645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851847,0.000024290592,0.0011992527,0.00014788753,0.000075687225,0.000034410594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035720508,0.000058122456,0.00022248123,0.00004222882,0.00013917811,0.00002522393,0.00014317693,0.000019717787,0.000039299983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080755664,0.00004681722,0.00008783059,0.00014666327,0.000048572892,0.00013530326,0.000033216937,0.0001322549,0.000005530118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042859023,0.0060911975,0.4237476,0.00015625243,0.0010707655,0.0010995753,0.06716288,0.0010665138,0.00022647309,0.44680697,0.024665812,0.02747739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008030762,0.0051290034,0.22224386,0.00014118197,0.00019643908,0.0055056796,0.080309674,0.0009328873,0.00071000255,0.016842222,0.6589971,0.00096116925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026364898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014002427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6343313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005407959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003108993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19091508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004961051","doi":"10.1017/s0021855306000234","title":"Dead Bodies in Nigerian Jurisprudence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Leukemia & Lymphoma Society of Canada; Institute of Genetics","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Meaning (existential); Disposition; Prioritization; Business; Psychology; Appeal","score_opus":0.017856956670905057,"score_gpt":0.30658521372441366,"score_spread":0.28872825705350863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004961051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9545309,0.00061667577,0.00018061712,0.0020285,0.00020984712,0.00007809969,7.682949e-7,0.000013316031,0.042341303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922752,0.000014123044,0.0064699203,0.00039001618,0.00034634944,3.5760456e-7,3.428665e-7,0.000012198637,0.0004914915],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998817,0.000022617474,0.00051124487,0.00008280294,0.00034831668,0.00021799264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991831,0.0001296746,0.00024582527,0.00012230883,0.00017788248,0.0001411975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078930514,0.000087695276,0.00027636485,0.00020986196,0.00003278745,0.000015974703,0.00009902608,0.000052108368,0.000052055515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023933534,0.00007144938,0.000081694685,0.00018800281,0.00010803604,0.00014275097,0.000020183961,0.00024640048,0.000019533678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034488165,0.0012518652,0.81836635,0.00032826423,0.00032326084,0.008791069,0.028242527,0.000101766454,0.09134728,0.022080319,0.0048496923,0.020868812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025003885,0.001721837,0.88125926,0.0007591158,0.00012611241,0.0020061038,0.0053256014,0.000028268325,0.035010688,0.0027765376,0.06817311,0.0003129999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047988662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002235701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063323416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109335764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007026002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29136214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036099058","doi":"10.1017/s0021855305000021","title":"Constitutional dialogue in Uganda","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Constitutionalism; Constitution; Political science; Parliament; Constitutional review; Appeal; Opposition (politics); Legislature; Politics; Law; Constitutional economics; Democracy; Constitutional court; Supreme court; Constitutional law; Constitutional amendment; Judicial review; Constitutional theory","score_opus":0.02489358992016166,"score_gpt":0.28765272419929133,"score_spread":0.26275913427912967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036099058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09124597,0.0013290202,0.0001782833,0.015152926,0.0005379982,0.000066541,0.0000085893425,0.000010382461,0.8914703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792284,0.00016260294,0.00030536257,0.00051858654,0.0010455467,8.385698e-7,2.200803e-7,9.0117777e-7,0.00004312965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916494,0.000058065056,0.00024062404,0.000049382485,0.0003368456,0.00015012985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995457,0.000097601056,0.00011695726,0.000024843122,0.0001377066,0.00007722444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004996182,0.00004602306,0.0001388946,0.00003958272,0.00027143827,0.000021850989,0.00012446444,0.000032290693,0.000114049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014492006,0.00003823528,0.000064286614,0.00020180448,0.0017430849,0.00021675159,0.000015449677,0.00012127449,0.000023401863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001705127,0.000054804586,0.0036725563,3.7868145e-7,0.000012694818,0.000019214056,0.0018303128,0.000063633335,0.000017308112,0.991655,0.00065495324,0.00200211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035441996,0.0000355129,0.005432778,0.000026810532,0.000010353089,0.000015041484,0.002179241,0.0000010692349,0.00002212925,0.030338563,0.96150804,0.00007604695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018331998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013888193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9613164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016308906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034302377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7749938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052277045","doi":"10.1017/s0021855304481029","title":"Modest harvests: on the significant (but limited) impact of human rights NGOs on legislative and executive behaviour in Nigeria","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Human rights; Political science; Task (project management); Development economics; Economic growth; Public administration; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.027990157871925554,"score_gpt":0.3125772609991776,"score_spread":0.28458710312725205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052277045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96897155,0.00009497117,0.0000077430095,0.0007788021,0.00007283062,0.00019027252,0.000008683282,0.000005296805,0.02986982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994196,0.00023885394,0.00007377653,0.00008929511,0.000103493534,0.0000033241267,4.772481e-7,0.000007517941,0.000063626336],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846566,0.00022273755,0.0004061675,0.0001324063,0.00053278444,0.0002402732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988876,0.0002372567,0.00044505784,0.00010789,0.00017519621,0.0001470207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084157946,0.00013665757,0.0002900473,0.000097765784,0.00041059035,0.000072292976,0.0002240805,0.00008085474,0.000014140736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056600464,0.00008073743,0.00016821972,0.0002611566,0.000556301,0.00018959938,0.00001776623,0.00028658315,0.0000017495926],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028233178,0.00092584477,0.008325926,0.0000054994075,0.0001980491,0.00010428737,0.6860872,0.00046236382,0.0015399209,0.29565,0.0063908296,0.000027753815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039723567,0.006677813,0.521559,0.0009420398,0.0000955311,0.000021786318,0.21943718,0.000006367123,0.0061766417,0.23767282,0.0026192684,0.000819208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032886866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005959968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51323307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005342438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002853578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97355324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063547930","doi":"10.1017/s0021855306000246","title":"The Precarious Place of Labour Rights and Movements in Nigeria's Dual Economic and Political Transition, 1999–2005","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Human rights; Political economy; Political science; Economics; Economic system; Law","score_opus":0.005883119115890405,"score_gpt":0.2575443276585635,"score_spread":0.2516612085426731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063547930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898618,0.00019568976,0.000013399976,0.002270535,0.00013887207,0.00007230425,0.000019909074,0.0000020832574,0.0074253962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991159,0.00006415742,0.00006359978,0.00022604784,0.00015332965,3.7227093e-7,1.9046946e-7,0.0000032262835,0.0003731951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990996,0.00008042094,0.00032513484,0.0000637799,0.00017369972,0.00025733016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941653,0.000183459,0.0001461233,0.000047716654,0.00004897289,0.0001571723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010794188,0.000054877,0.00013534554,0.000051253253,0.00023069531,0.000047438294,0.00008178659,0.00004073014,0.00002634377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017598883,0.000037384412,0.000026691185,0.00005969867,0.00035739868,0.00015186366,0.000012943432,0.00009831117,1.3998925e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074302516,0.000079856596,0.0015017677,0.0000024092444,0.00003725208,0.000013501052,0.013090204,0.000006211023,0.00013981768,0.98456395,0.00018566319,0.00030503876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028780557,0.00052812963,0.13857602,0.00007043699,0.00003269184,0.00002273483,0.03180627,0.000013611833,0.00082495075,0.086785585,0.7382068,0.00025471734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007883155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091919445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8977784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010997129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097692304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072998983","doi":"10.1017/s0221855301001687","title":"LAW AND SOCIAL CHANGE: A SOCIO-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF NIGERIA'S CORRUPT PRACTICES AND OTHER RELATED OFFENCES ACT, 2000","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Religion and Sociopolitical Dynamics in Nigeria","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Political science; Law; Rule of law; Corrupt practices","score_opus":0.036995244928099955,"score_gpt":0.34923493529783917,"score_spread":0.3122396903697392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072998983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83787274,0.0004818475,0.000010846039,0.00830485,0.0002328284,0.0000816628,0.000019454026,0.000014137671,0.15298161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691725,0.00077935826,0.00016896853,0.0012736956,0.00029431694,0.0000017608097,8.2670476e-7,0.000008624098,0.0005551787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980517,0.00043672542,0.0005140846,0.00015316978,0.00054718734,0.0002971047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790984,0.00045633546,0.0011405458,0.000079869824,0.00022287681,0.00019051025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014197903,0.0001226021,0.0005248851,0.00015552466,0.00051120104,0.00015360472,0.0002057364,0.0001910619,0.00021470341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019766974,0.0001025403,0.00019932458,0.000558601,0.0018443023,0.00046409408,0.000036422924,0.00027449385,0.0000013181408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009889135,0.00010585275,0.014020724,0.000010917557,0.00068459444,0.000031716412,0.06401225,0.0000013831121,0.00007027672,0.9202741,0.00012203094,0.0005672909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018023027,0.00072493206,0.02208534,0.000097602904,0.0025313324,0.00008621906,0.13346678,0.0004120644,0.000019551853,0.059042018,0.77897435,0.00075751264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0081538735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060197986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86123204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000997581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001486046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99845093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095735178","doi":"10.1017/s0021855310000045","title":"A Legislative Proposal for Public Participation in Oil and Gas Decision-Making in Nigeria","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues","field":"Energy","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Alienation; Public participation; Natural resource; Political science; Business; Resource (disambiguation); Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.015783414080161113,"score_gpt":0.2843188089294684,"score_spread":0.26853539484930733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095735178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893096,0.00006213982,0.00006413143,0.0011416777,0.00018038387,0.00003295121,0.0000016104385,0.0000038021403,0.009203724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921869,0.000029724224,0.007513249,0.000052086452,0.00013572033,0.000007985419,5.684308e-7,0.000012054864,0.000061690465],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991791,0.000043247463,0.0003450516,0.00009649879,0.00015168104,0.00018440648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994363,0.00020932985,0.00018696846,0.00007206061,0.000027280621,0.00006801968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041155086,0.00008042013,0.00019333627,0.00012291099,0.00003962782,0.000053860535,0.0000826987,0.000056090892,0.00005262605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020615649,0.00006554385,0.000038869577,0.00010517183,0.00010064106,0.0003879894,0.000024009725,0.00018195814,0.0000021949777],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013075471,0.0010523889,0.06381292,0.00005159326,0.0000801525,0.0001465603,0.032934297,0.001079426,0.029448023,0.13711748,0.00024677505,0.7327228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010876294,0.0028017373,0.18736947,0.0008889209,0.00009449631,0.00023524697,0.011646657,0.0056070066,0.005412345,0.54236645,0.23146711,0.0012342994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014145488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024576373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7314885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054790045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032658092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149791402","doi":"10.1017/s0021855309990180","title":"Between Elite Interests and Pro-Poor Resistance: The Nigerian Courts and Labour-Led Anti-Fuel Price Hike Struggles (1999–2007)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Leverage (statistics); Political economy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Incentive; Politics; Law; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.007977606355058961,"score_gpt":0.23224796975448123,"score_spread":0.22427036339942227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149791402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879164,0.0007209302,0.000028890545,0.0023780114,0.00021974627,0.00007848089,0.00004137962,0.000015823613,0.008600308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969217,0.0006274354,0.0007163734,0.00041745315,0.00044810894,0.0000030725907,0.000004011057,0.000027587903,0.0008342191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872005,0.00007725362,0.00048257713,0.00016409697,0.0003022725,0.0002537215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988918,0.0001730704,0.0004594174,0.00020707332,0.00007435089,0.00019431117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039248943,0.00018230587,0.00031874506,0.0000803426,0.00017658295,0.00011052258,0.00021135811,0.00009306727,0.00008215041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040893814,0.00012394834,0.000067211884,0.000089202695,0.00044127,0.00025457627,0.000025043542,0.00037165612,0.0000024557187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041080292,0.00032194625,0.11231264,0.00032181945,0.0009004538,0.00018894428,0.015846461,0.00019948097,0.04181255,0.81872696,0.0028812026,0.006076719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085517066,0.000092453236,0.50701356,0.0000698368,0.00009586525,0.000034357978,0.0007465522,0.000003622039,0.00143307,0.008514131,0.480938,0.00020337194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028564176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003301101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81021285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001964781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003395365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5054466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158284483","doi":"10.1017/s0021855312000162","title":"Corporate Criminal Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Doctrine; Mens rea; Statutory law; Criminal law; Political science; Law; Element (criminal law); Scope (computer science); Strict liability; Business; Legal doctrine; Corporate liability; Criminal liability; Restrictiveness; Liability; Tort","score_opus":0.07952303392305554,"score_gpt":0.28056011074053294,"score_spread":0.2010370768174774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158284483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8662912,0.0000832454,0.00063456764,0.0023434286,0.00015090524,0.00010218839,7.058378e-7,0.000017830656,0.1303759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977944,0.0000016309104,0.00051885727,0.00089299236,0.00035031096,0.000002711531,9.384253e-7,0.0000037218595,0.0004344173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990949,0.000021141033,0.00038575247,0.000099691424,0.00026635616,0.0001321333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981497,0.000046920763,0.00088937953,0.00012971948,0.0007670809,0.000017206943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029357817,0.00009903906,0.0003592015,0.00029413233,0.00013271013,0.00022477962,0.00016038731,0.000017812989,0.00050926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033431123,0.00007267734,0.00019276002,0.0008855937,0.00014189316,0.0008754804,0.00005175346,0.000095649164,0.00015156914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009903286,0.0006057363,0.10702168,0.00013049973,0.0037144737,0.0000749313,0.0022738078,0.002835931,0.0020580702,0.8053659,0.07090805,0.004020587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009339416,0.00010219577,0.82348365,0.000044132878,0.0017709883,0.000011669253,0.009573511,0.006400189,0.00007927384,0.06367975,0.0935419,0.00037881886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018877345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011653885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74168617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025392666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016218777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.557604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159932472","doi":"10.1017/s0021855306000052","title":"DISCRETION, <i>NOLLE PROSEQUI</i> AND THE 1992 GHANAIAN CONSTITUTION","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Accountability; Constitution; Law; Commonwealth; Political science; Subject (documents); Judicial discretion; Power (physics); Judicial review; Separation of powers; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012635526996633837,"score_gpt":0.2999441574947578,"score_spread":0.28730863049812394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159932472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007386942,0.00024372987,0.00090275647,0.25156927,0.0004648037,0.00014085905,0.0000031631093,0.000010534037,0.73927796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968453,0.00003181804,0.00037469954,0.0009256763,0.00043824266,0.0000021331396,6.274713e-7,0.0000018086744,0.0013796726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992243,0.00017253136,0.00023256121,0.000042621916,0.00023732959,0.00009066037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992029,0.00018924914,0.00030584386,0.000052419924,0.00020684785,0.000042751133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012065133,0.00003775589,0.00008263388,0.000038495433,0.00063083955,0.00022648704,0.00009442902,0.000027177088,0.00008609009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021862757,0.00002376928,0.00003539914,0.00029439115,0.0010533872,0.0005948075,0.000005949963,0.00017865664,0.000004271894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025566895,0.000028888808,0.00017437825,0.0000010577332,0.000006777974,0.000001021944,0.0026672021,0.000004842757,0.000025722002,0.98742664,0.009310373,0.00032753084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040870125,0.000018522209,0.00024493926,0.0000080256,0.000022629494,0.000016853299,0.0053813634,0.000004958585,0.000031264488,0.025613323,0.96821076,0.000038660175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078080073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033468984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050699175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040764784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318737055","doi":"10.1017/s0021855316000048","title":"Poverty in the Human Rights Jurisprudence of the Nigerian Appellate Courts (1999–2011)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Poverty; Human rights; Politics; Political science; Law; Population; Sociology","score_opus":0.017242216032806693,"score_gpt":0.27950377613605293,"score_spread":0.26226156010324625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318737055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84924495,0.000059289225,0.000026931573,0.013231922,0.00048175873,0.00018189829,0.0000039635006,0.000005471187,0.13676384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99746317,0.000014157674,0.000060240905,0.00034385163,0.00018968651,7.5447457e-7,2.8172654e-8,0.0000038701123,0.0019242521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822104,0.00030407603,0.00041767603,0.000087783905,0.00074147014,0.00022793835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900997,0.00017359806,0.0004384376,0.00018474537,0.00011817713,0.000075075106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016028992,0.00008143048,0.00018583944,0.00005090075,0.00052746746,0.000046662833,0.0007814214,0.000049455295,0.00040611747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023377936,0.00002808309,0.00011141412,0.00012108618,0.00053669786,0.00017938738,0.0000368561,0.00013599842,0.000016842549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037350626,0.00022063965,0.004128871,0.0000069067178,0.000047853773,0.000057265912,0.051622912,0.0000024831368,0.0016399677,0.90880007,0.032643933,0.0007917634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050315366,0.00009373409,0.033035744,0.00014784378,0.000015948606,0.000011752702,0.0012370562,2.5166779e-7,0.0011063366,0.13815567,0.8255602,0.0001322833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013686407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009437268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7929163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010637046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016436039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5266217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783831649","doi":"10.1017/s0021855317000328","title":"Malleus Maleficarum: Scrutinizing Sorcery in Cameroon","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Anthropological Studies and Insights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Imprisonment; Conviction; Colonialism; State (computer science); Criminology; Criticism; Political science; Ethnography; Naxi; Law; Politics; Subject (documents); Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.04142730046404273,"score_gpt":0.32910156136881913,"score_spread":0.2876742609047764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783831649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3369719,0.0004844274,0.000053435382,0.00647166,0.000535907,0.000053403655,7.672706e-7,0.0000108101885,0.6554177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971254,0.00038918553,0.00044819267,0.0005280931,0.00106768,4.359307e-7,4.731151e-8,0.0000046436976,0.0004363288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988395,0.00013004261,0.0003205758,0.00009106777,0.00031764124,0.00030114973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993293,0.00009923886,0.00023253923,0.000060224615,0.00016412661,0.00011455274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000607549,0.00007046293,0.00022577308,0.000049445818,0.0004890682,0.000039763967,0.00022743152,0.000065245236,0.00088418246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014159697,0.0000497929,0.00008629199,0.0002585119,0.0014615294,0.00016697505,0.000047028425,0.00017933719,0.00002989153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025221866,0.0003452034,0.012381468,0.000007993063,0.000092860086,0.00027984916,0.03330683,0.000005669954,0.000391926,0.90908974,0.015768845,0.028077379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040262815,0.0007497268,0.007260442,0.000055832443,0.00001580509,0.000011472696,0.06348546,0.0000054243446,0.00009170232,0.005179769,0.92258495,0.0001567786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028944772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061526834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9068161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000122109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006408924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9681178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914370821","doi":"10.1017/s0021855318000293","title":"The East African Court of Justice, Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards and the East African Community Integration Process","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Arbitration; Political science; Law; Jurisdiction; Convention; Enforcement; Economic Justice; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.017502270001981755,"score_gpt":0.23951693654899575,"score_spread":0.222014666547014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914370821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22149627,0.00007380076,0.0008099034,0.0046019675,0.00039689985,0.0005921098,0.00001159353,0.000013528514,0.77200395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784845,0.000015008057,0.00008397243,0.0015912506,0.0003055985,0.000007616467,0.000009823812,0.000012457933,0.00012582327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982056,0.00009297167,0.0007755067,0.000085839,0.00068607635,0.00015398918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968779,0.00018280168,0.0016319281,0.00020398229,0.0010820536,0.00002132533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017486871,0.0001526133,0.00030117415,0.00013357446,0.00033830357,0.00018641232,0.0004419215,0.000039856383,0.00008945318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001667263,0.00008470122,0.00013404107,0.00030324096,0.00048188015,0.0008714581,0.00007048064,0.00033064786,0.000004670705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054795184,0.00010317216,0.0002855467,0.000107481486,0.00009299904,4.2516828e-7,0.0013584172,0.0001843521,0.00057446613,0.99617404,0.0003601195,0.00021106066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015934411,0.0019340757,0.009760568,0.0013766806,0.0022164932,0.00008614517,0.31636932,0.10004625,0.0076271673,0.35340494,0.19000457,0.0012394049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005664608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030363223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77635217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049113263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007646894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34540156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946441522","doi":"10.1017/s0021855319000020","title":"Towards a Right to Resist Gross Undemocratic Practices in Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Sovereignty; Political science; Charter; Politics; Popular sovereignty; Human rights; Political economy; Development economics; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.025294546266396097,"score_gpt":0.3225371042561794,"score_spread":0.2972425579897833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946441522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5123373,0.00018499586,0.00002509074,0.018112589,0.00047821194,0.00018510548,0.0000056496,0.000011846446,0.4686592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969315,0.00004308752,0.00062955765,0.0005171635,0.0001881802,0.0000010661788,2.585028e-7,0.0000067528536,0.0016824534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982271,0.000252815,0.00037855053,0.00012806356,0.0006624924,0.00035098035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986982,0.00017865234,0.00057016907,0.00013794185,0.0001885003,0.00022655466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012900284,0.00009141995,0.0002842638,0.00012933179,0.00011967089,0.00016772929,0.00046177997,0.000079293284,0.000156542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005179577,0.000076585806,0.000096965196,0.00061637687,0.00012157416,0.00053549826,0.000045393663,0.0002688696,0.00008171149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033922447,0.00054806704,0.0072365445,0.00004660608,0.00008668231,0.0003372142,0.08685175,0.00029156092,0.00046587514,0.88836396,0.014591154,0.00084138394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006065113,0.0004837435,0.00440397,0.00010534167,0.000039351653,0.000018372544,0.02610518,0.00006367136,0.000015599084,0.04412246,0.923796,0.00023977517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024239365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018266184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90920484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002975822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035608176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965095661","doi":"10.1017/s0021855319000202","title":"The Disputed Constitutionality of the Precedential Practice of the Federal Supreme Court and Its Implications for Oromia Family Law: The Case of Bigamous Marriage in Ethiopia","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Law; Supreme court; Autonomy; Legislation; Political science; Constitutional court; Doctrine; Constitutional review; Constitutional right; Constitutional amendment; Constitution","score_opus":0.017711764509940768,"score_gpt":0.2570648074721686,"score_spread":0.2393530429622278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965095661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97920746,0.0001156688,0.0000016950236,0.018682696,0.00018951594,0.0003437767,0.00012792516,0.00000107826,0.0013302119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999588,0.000053697608,0.000014479203,0.00014024734,0.00006950602,0.0000025936308,9.670953e-7,5.411083e-7,0.00012997646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991609,0.00015461729,0.00036545494,0.000067464214,0.00015004534,0.00010154301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983594,0.0006854011,0.0005873688,0.00007779312,0.00026236934,0.000027669339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007255446,0.00006233141,0.00015324207,0.0000035958483,0.00037757854,0.00003048726,0.00031434392,0.000051748775,0.000006618352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008610706,0.000008827718,0.0001277233,0.00012657269,0.00042860143,0.00011160752,0.00007041431,0.00015419979,1.07977726e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005321556,0.00037647405,0.0069485796,0.00004940522,0.00020016378,0.0000040164023,0.0010302922,0.00008156309,0.15232253,0.8359137,0.0005887285,0.0019523593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021939483,0.00090599316,0.78722554,0.00020295674,0.00026680587,0.0014271677,0.0066986918,0.00018159664,0.012803427,0.027047914,0.16078468,0.00026126183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015389124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045693526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80886585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015507065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045593864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2904067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038539094","doi":"10.1017/s0021855320000121","title":"Assessing the African Union's 2016–19 Human Rights Action Planning Process: Embracing, and De-Coupling from, the Conventional “Ideal”","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Human rights; Process (computing); Action (physics); Action plan; Political science; Strengths and weaknesses; Plan (archaeology); Key (lock); Process management; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Management science; Sociology; Business; Law; Engineering; Computer science; Management; Psychology; Economics; Geography; Social psychology; Computer security","score_opus":0.06473880907757142,"score_gpt":0.36356711735510483,"score_spread":0.2988283082775334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038539094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9490622,0.00033400772,0.0016133136,0.018840468,0.00024968554,0.00015552196,0.0000031501281,0.000030621904,0.029711032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795514,0.0000071648437,0.0003281276,0.0005652503,0.0009916595,0.0000019516558,0.0000012478054,0.0000074465397,0.00014200002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985956,0.0001939197,0.00033114312,0.0001279437,0.000534631,0.00021679158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987534,0.00034306204,0.00049613573,0.00006171995,0.00014835501,0.00019730255],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013937773,0.000098773016,0.00016599838,0.000030849216,0.0026757466,0.00051318866,0.00029335154,0.000049665025,0.00015093954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006881848,0.000051062525,0.00006631424,0.00016381971,0.0003697156,0.0005040065,0.00003173022,0.000338931,0.0000025449506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010783332,0.00015948017,0.011052474,0.00005003813,0.0004625335,0.00015219937,0.37204856,0.0013774416,0.001448354,0.59151286,0.020315964,0.0013122607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010512705,0.00018854655,0.03243871,0.00041592633,0.00017905446,0.00003365294,0.12261743,0.00064845954,0.00033940017,0.15046038,0.69120663,0.00042053877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013234304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006419836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6708907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113986775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035031384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110152378","doi":"10.1017/s0021855320000285","title":"Constitutional Impediments to the Effective Review of Tax Cases in Nigeria by a Specialized Tax Court: Lessons from the United States and Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Context (archaeology); Constitutional court; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.022276913061680857,"score_gpt":0.23470757408565937,"score_spread":0.2124306610239785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110152378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5548181,0.10358379,0.00042427194,0.3191857,0.00065673306,0.00089793844,0.013782221,0.0000047167687,0.0066465535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98626477,0.005345254,0.00003204019,0.0082109375,0.00011238119,0.000007987709,0.000011992714,0.000002283406,0.000012356114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922603,0.00004527848,0.00045166165,0.00009611758,0.00008228963,0.00009859691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900645,0.0003963672,0.00038497,0.000054874366,0.00008584932,0.00007147759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002742157,0.00008263674,0.00034915897,0.000018683468,0.00011382716,0.000020614032,0.00015117537,0.000014067486,0.00006789353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003693571,0.000051552895,0.000048919424,0.00021516846,0.00030403855,0.000059597915,0.000051007057,0.00012776506,0.0000027457133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035665528,0.00012312643,0.03999984,0.00017665596,0.0007771926,0.00011184248,0.0022248281,0.00025208187,0.000041931104,0.5472892,0.40823886,0.0004078046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052773213,0.00009501524,0.0049869684,0.00031134233,0.000022970606,0.0000139020485,0.00056009425,0.000014361674,0.00003194264,0.0012950123,0.99204856,0.00009208218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.346056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16570927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58380973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010764992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013108678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84951437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323043593","doi":"10.1017/s0021855323000049","title":"A Critical Examination of the African Legal Framework for Indigenous Knowledge","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Innovation and Socioeconomic Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Indigenous; Traditional knowledge; Political science; Bioprospecting; Introspection; Promotion (chess); Contempt; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.02428754640451784,"score_gpt":0.2775721643902479,"score_spread":0.25328461798573004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323043593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87291306,0.000044477965,0.003846351,0.010857799,0.0034098255,0.0004423537,0.000012088193,0.00005230062,0.10842176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997349,0.0000012817301,0.00086072134,0.00070956757,0.0007404618,0.0000063678667,0.0000021020153,0.000012320423,0.0003181556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999169,0.000014064915,0.0004205996,0.00006967624,0.0001641126,0.00016255192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987651,0.00019695923,0.0003973532,0.00008801722,0.00054292247,0.000009663398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097634067,0.00007261027,0.00017147137,0.00019275752,0.00018164568,0.00009985963,0.0002368145,0.000051412062,0.000049066777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004496622,0.00005336306,0.00010765276,0.00054350024,0.000105850224,0.00037091304,0.00006252793,0.00013784759,0.000021689017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001861875,0.00006985026,0.00031910685,0.000075183365,0.00003105502,0.0000020255836,0.0018372901,0.000008415953,0.000052313622,0.9903093,0.0027256955,0.004551152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091961335,0.000079647645,0.07946707,0.00019775332,0.0001020222,0.000010101823,0.010864664,0.00058894715,0.00034320678,0.11574952,0.7913778,0.00029964652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021981281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020947913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87455976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006950751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000878795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21760824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392355414","doi":"10.1017/s0021855324000032","title":"Gender-Responsive Public Procurement in Africa: Barriers and Challenges","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Public Procurement and Policy","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Foundation; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Procurement; Empowerment; Promotion (chess); Business; Goods and services; Gender equality; Public sector; Economic growth; Public relations; Public administration; Political science; Marketing; Economics; Market economy; Law; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07598457896983458,"score_gpt":0.2546412816354656,"score_spread":0.17865670266563105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392355414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1057075,0.07509557,0.00010928256,0.18584502,0.0019546244,0.0006684936,0.0000085566935,0.00020051729,0.63041043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973467,0.000513501,0.00006801147,0.00071466126,0.0012056761,0.000008162848,7.086182e-7,0.00002058925,0.00012197805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862576,0.00002428717,0.00040116502,0.00017979613,0.00040990335,0.00035909738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993713,0.0000597064,0.0002079612,0.000105217776,0.0001945523,0.00006128062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012302158,0.00016364506,0.00024512009,0.0008046853,0.0000792274,0.00057807396,0.00025198734,0.000058457343,0.00013123431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024246059,0.0001287594,0.000083321436,0.0005694548,0.00008973747,0.0019567306,0.000119040364,0.0002631205,0.000021872744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007246831,0.00006388491,0.0005998391,0.00045573895,0.00012894454,0.00016015946,0.0015417581,0.0000026117311,0.00024398782,0.9710987,0.014655166,0.010976692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040571622,0.000041437106,0.0009255984,0.00009409539,0.000042945332,0.000024353865,0.0018690693,0.0001542222,0.0000154454,0.02024256,0.97602224,0.00016228839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040825907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000102175734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96136713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086584005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017957555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.557438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414249195","doi":"10.1017/s0021855325100703","title":"How Far Are Kenya’s Courts? Distance as a Barrier to Justice in Kenya","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of African Law","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Population; Distribution (mathematics); Rural area; Information and Communications Technology; Rural population","score_opus":0.02326194269251455,"score_gpt":0.3570913743589067,"score_spread":0.3338294316663922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414249195","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025307827,0.00020390737,0.0010581469,0.5118826,0.0017683835,0.00015095428,0.000009048522,0.00001334704,0.45960575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97402394,0.00003828429,0.00073481444,0.007493144,0.00031130773,0.0000039286006,2.69002e-7,0.0000046352357,0.017389707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889696,0.00016644831,0.0002818219,0.000097426804,0.00036406718,0.00019326544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985435,0.00032931956,0.00032491007,0.00011484949,0.0005355054,0.00015192147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091450696,0.00006947173,0.00016009812,0.00019358683,0.00030359367,0.0004077032,0.00028576766,0.00005313127,0.00016803302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031027251,0.000064098895,0.000050956318,0.0010724966,0.00012743962,0.0008403096,0.000018918243,0.00039643433,0.000016087117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056877932,0.000114566195,0.0013244288,0.000011089902,0.000020952622,0.000022190969,0.014502095,0.000022646225,0.00007901427,0.9313725,0.051416453,0.0010571878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001539761,0.000029138891,0.0021490774,0.000055035904,0.000031496984,0.0000025945506,0.04651356,0.0000024097615,0.00002643392,0.0053544496,0.9456125,0.000069338086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011894751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006785916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9487161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027673444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012103899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39314914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}