{"meta":{"query_hash":"cee81ad47bd4","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change"},"cohort_total":112,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":112,"exported":112,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cee81ad47bd4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Agrarian+Change"},"results":[{"id":"W1486479486","doi":"10.1111/joac.12048","title":"Why Beautify the Plaza? Reproducing Community in Decentralized Neoliberal <scp>P</scp>eru","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Peasant; Poverty; Livelihood; Government (linguistics); Position (finance); Decentralization; Politics; Economic growth; Political science; Economics; Agriculture; Market economy; Geography","score_opus":0.03579125042557675,"score_gpt":0.2247718300428438,"score_spread":0.18898057961726705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486479486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.682103,0.0018490137,0.009476059,0.053313408,0.000099017154,0.00009912581,0.000042354306,0.00013726577,0.25288078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914043,0.00015151255,0.00045825014,0.00068582664,0.000018077275,0.00002581225,0.0000067871742,0.000012513574,0.007236927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987204,0.00079674483,0.000011520698,0.00012896427,0.00008580735,0.00025656878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992818,0.0001692527,0.00012953932,0.00015496525,0.00008608893,0.0001783981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015344006,0.00016047726,0.00015929193,0.0004644381,0.0075125224,0.004460346,0.0007197672,0.0012183251,0.0058452645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002449713,0.00014836082,0.0001246586,0.0005517414,0.0155355865,0.0035478417,0.006562518,0.0011840324,0.00041324043],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005961757,0.00009822819,0.010634886,0.00016559205,0.000011871491,0.00120489,0.17442402,0.00037262405,0.00160927,0.737076,0.013204769,0.06113822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078343066,0.00023520073,0.032838337,0.00035091006,0.000018733319,0.0009445478,0.21796413,0.0013182699,0.001203672,0.23307893,0.51192206,0.00004679292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059059607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018494355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075125224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026758448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016256062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019554377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493680424","doi":"10.1111/joac.12109","title":"Transnational Farmland Investment: A Risky Business","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Work (physics); Politics; Business; Investment (military); Market economy; Agribusiness; Political economy; Economics; Law; Political science; Agriculture","score_opus":0.08086801921757795,"score_gpt":0.2298598217306762,"score_spread":0.14899180251309824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493680424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35252717,0.009115237,0.031704787,0.12636721,0.00044528712,0.000049884893,0.00009547645,0.00011251313,0.47958246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98325366,0.0024603338,0.0015144261,0.0024922404,0.00009265467,0.00002031645,0.000023764685,0.000031091597,0.010111562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826837,0.0008018637,0.000046669702,0.00018798136,0.0003979197,0.0002972183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977843,0.0010023774,0.00030750188,0.00035932954,0.00021989689,0.0003266414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029970848,0.00023278224,0.0002978616,0.00038635998,0.0026366324,0.010213586,0.00055066467,0.0029501352,0.00431317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005059492,0.0002074198,0.00022163881,0.00076256925,0.0119569795,0.011673442,0.006074694,0.0033775065,0.0005175785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002439429,0.00002990539,0.0031120272,0.000030429506,0.000016497961,0.00032905518,0.005755206,0.0008569297,0.00038803654,0.9612167,0.004525888,0.0237149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008044981,0.000051506366,0.003651401,0.000373221,0.000016388314,0.00040750444,0.026818791,0.002455822,0.0006076314,0.79679286,0.1687835,0.000033392487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014611572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021031708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010213586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020332935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018996078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015850306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500445260","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2012.00377.x","title":"The Antinomies of ‘Financial Inclusion’: Debt, Distress and the Workings of <scp>I</scp>ndian Microfinance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Microfinance and Financial Inclusion","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Microfinance; Financial inclusion; Financialization; Narrative; Unbanked; Inclusion (mineral); Agrarian society; Politics; Technocracy; Economics; Political economy; Financial services; Political science; Sociology; Market economy; Finance; Economic growth; Social science","score_opus":0.027706822113251282,"score_gpt":0.21615666466589237,"score_spread":0.18844984255264108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500445260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6875993,0.004267827,0.008943856,0.07739251,0.00013033416,0.00001975336,0.000074862735,0.00002957925,0.22154191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698204,0.00044083435,0.00033244616,0.00032035826,0.000031982698,0.000005446631,0.000005497396,0.000004789119,0.00187661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986804,0.0007563386,0.000042292668,0.000091042115,0.00025104996,0.00017889109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974089,0.0014818889,0.0005323393,0.00016828247,0.00020325028,0.00020538976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023834398,0.00016851194,0.00020488868,0.0012243434,0.0036696175,0.0062457384,0.0005600319,0.001219425,0.0028398186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004956181,0.000119646495,0.00012628453,0.0014263781,0.026090816,0.0064724586,0.0049021877,0.0022034727,0.00011780086],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004686863,0.000026030184,0.0038642425,0.000042208994,0.0000037510838,0.00019594302,0.04424771,0.00018095362,0.0002245022,0.93453306,0.0014552705,0.0151793575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020672258,0.00005939696,0.025106294,0.00040925472,0.000014056041,0.0005759166,0.091266274,0.00180741,0.00095182576,0.71326685,0.1664653,0.000056754325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005419035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005766881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062457384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003775381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001863981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027392507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540428044","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00343.x","title":"The Changing Political Economy of Occupational Health and Safety in Fisheries: Lessons from Eastern Canada and South Africa","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission; Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Overfishing; Occupational safety and health; Politics; Globalization; Fishery; Economic growth; Business; Political science; Agriculture; Economy; Geography; Economics; Fishing","score_opus":0.16240719661281186,"score_gpt":0.3768460063078809,"score_spread":0.21443880969506904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540428044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665809,0.0027107846,0.00011582333,0.00878561,0.000029963267,0.000038167607,0.00014482129,0.0000024399806,0.021591475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933381,0.002852712,0.00010893641,0.0007457552,0.0000072776206,0.000013270639,0.00004692115,0.000004135747,0.0028829554],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879587,0.00016125472,0.000027094404,0.00007253944,0.00015294163,0.0007901851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983985,0.00040168568,0.00014710732,0.000036682253,0.00043457956,0.00058155996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012278266,0.0002985778,0.00033684794,0.0016041916,0.012709741,0.0040149605,0.0007194984,0.0006928074,0.0034193161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002151507,0.00023249988,0.0002545303,0.0038266403,0.00406234,0.0013466509,0.0031643165,0.0015968652,0.00012327015],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027436673,0.00020655019,0.3450753,0.00047399473,0.00010939058,0.004020267,0.51562,0.00068959023,0.0017548271,0.039348666,0.00759248,0.08483459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026129785,0.000028776112,0.29490364,0.0006383472,0.000059705893,0.00019464274,0.669061,0.00030793328,0.0003096909,0.0027405228,0.031675506,0.00005410825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99232906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061394367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061394367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08344444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44544935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1547413416","doi":"10.1111/joac.12024","title":"Does ‘Landlordism’ Still Matter? Reflections on Agrarian Change in<scp>I</scp>ndia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"South Asian Studies and Conflicts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Feudalism; Scrutiny; Scholarship; Agrarian reform; Power (physics); Political economy; Politics; Caste; Political science; Communism; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; History; Agriculture; Archaeology","score_opus":0.08514031088013492,"score_gpt":0.3377638700395061,"score_spread":0.2526235591593712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1547413416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60280925,0.0052270503,0.00083573,0.11243273,0.00020964576,0.000016447697,0.000034577715,0.000010783927,0.2784238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99262345,0.00054090266,0.00007069564,0.0014158856,0.000034973626,0.000004063883,0.0000047545686,0.000004309822,0.0053009167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988373,0.00048283223,0.00003083742,0.00010460338,0.00013506289,0.0004094716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999225,0.00041886207,0.00011317065,0.000053490054,0.000081282284,0.000108232955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002288243,0.0001319272,0.00024169416,0.000655122,0.007995472,0.007110449,0.00072557526,0.0015085139,0.0035189046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018890072,0.0001327839,0.00016791192,0.001411217,0.030087238,0.0042302134,0.0045833373,0.0032365029,0.0001896109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003007346,0.00004847863,0.0034926403,0.00006577336,0.0000042204215,0.0007642099,0.2887797,0.00008190296,0.0008184561,0.68790025,0.0035427494,0.014471575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014671687,0.000041708186,0.018474983,0.00017014692,0.000007429543,0.00040129942,0.5476983,0.00019306077,0.0010131901,0.114056155,0.31790563,0.000023395012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018804414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034114122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018804414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009150472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029854819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06639165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555046564","doi":"10.1111/joac.12110","title":"Finance for Agriculture or Agriculture for Finance?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Financialization; Agriculture; State (computer science); Economics; Finance; Capital (architecture); Private sector; Food systems; Politics; Business; Food security; Political science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.10116140357123064,"score_gpt":0.2581596897927591,"score_spread":0.15699828622152845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555046564","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022567628,0.102577314,0.0018912274,0.66629523,0.0050491826,0.000013222728,0.00043335633,0.000044921042,0.20112783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81305176,0.0723752,0.001212172,0.05487579,0.009109068,0.000037618203,0.00044854646,0.00003291642,0.048856962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993587,0.00025773485,0.000018159482,0.000078397774,0.000104276805,0.00018281437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981111,0.00089940056,0.00034617752,0.000083148305,0.00022022249,0.00033993067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012286877,0.00016768424,0.00030581566,0.0010318727,0.0011986478,0.004345098,0.0004580489,0.0026303665,0.020754319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041681794,0.00006612765,0.00017324423,0.0020037498,0.004958477,0.0056874277,0.001014193,0.0019126456,0.0014814093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034796605,0.000035361365,0.00376245,0.00012897684,0.0000064137957,0.00008184401,0.0007828107,0.00008282976,0.000053155174,0.8518942,0.08988333,0.053253848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016423706,0.000034818793,0.010632377,0.00079918234,0.00000733698,0.00023887113,0.0028842296,0.0002901659,0.00007814768,0.26875225,0.71625143,0.000014727325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006849202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056519653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020754319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029540847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024342767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06943005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556550322","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00344.x","title":"The Political Economy of Marine Stewardship Council Certification: Processors and Access in Newfoundland and Labrador's Inshore Shrimp Industry","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Stewardship (theology); Business; Shrimp; Sustainability; Fishery; Fishing; Resource (disambiguation); Politics; Economics; Political science; Ecology; Management","score_opus":0.11508991939588183,"score_gpt":0.29916991367385004,"score_spread":0.18407999427796823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556550322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9545753,0.0001327577,0.00008629157,0.0058371434,0.000011341044,0.000017190947,0.000037552498,0.0000036721037,0.039298777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951633,0.00007332409,0.000016764929,0.00036657762,0.000008588252,0.000005854713,0.000013970892,0.000002252505,0.004349439],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963582,0.0005505411,0.000054589662,0.00018268837,0.00047568773,0.0023781494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99089795,0.003174941,0.0020024218,0.00014556963,0.0008183683,0.0029606973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017897187,0.000079948215,0.00016324509,0.0014772578,0.009726592,0.007361479,0.0008024731,0.0017169417,0.01150943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072441124,0.00029400425,0.00012934524,0.0013739184,0.009153438,0.0023854703,0.0048081665,0.002776451,0.0003053268],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047268663,0.00118921,0.53034514,0.000099458666,0.000051718434,0.004877483,0.1739859,0.0015068748,0.001510453,0.20978513,0.016498582,0.05967745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008153656,0.00013858663,0.65975314,0.0001700047,0.000029051798,0.00027416833,0.2730293,0.0013793979,0.00040522136,0.007825886,0.05684781,0.000065948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6427887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85575134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3572113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028541852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015269903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71862996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566227071","doi":"10.1111/joac.12096","title":"Rural Economies and Transitions to Capitalism:<scp>G</scp>ermany and<scp>E</scp>ngland Compared (<i>c</i>.1200–<i>c</i>.1800)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies","funders":"University of Leicester","keywords":"Proletariat; Capitalism; Peasant; Ideology; Agrarian society; Feudalism; Period (music); Scholarship; Economics; Economy; Market economy; Sociology; Political science; Agriculture; Geography; Economic growth; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06358951341983463,"score_gpt":0.22718281026632398,"score_spread":0.16359329684648935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566227071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92443407,0.016826967,0.00020466164,0.0042437264,0.000053509168,0.0000073213623,0.000118713695,0.0000035438795,0.05410741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99419045,0.003836463,0.00007722158,0.00014467644,0.00002993853,0.000004430178,0.00005276591,0.0000024370802,0.0016616631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999907,0.000026309299,0.0000024241806,0.000016158267,0.000011598829,0.00003654392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997433,0.00011243298,0.000087322805,0.00000689315,0.000016529704,0.00003350681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018688108,0.000087287815,0.00011256152,0.001155336,0.00053846475,0.0017991979,0.00013899776,0.0002788058,0.002069951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052881724,0.000052818785,0.00006732322,0.0022743877,0.002215388,0.0013085552,0.0008815927,0.0006230958,0.00008823466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004441062,0.00025929452,0.11057091,0.00082594965,0.00007049327,0.0023713566,0.13618414,0.0016472373,0.0015601368,0.5905587,0.013738264,0.1417694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031071537,0.000094565985,0.63901305,0.000777715,0.000030876723,0.00045437363,0.13464704,0.00063520606,0.0006301354,0.049550343,0.17410861,0.000027083273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014507397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03200411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014507397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001863699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072522304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028845906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570068248","doi":"10.1111/joac.12094","title":"Can the State Foster Food Sovereignty? Insights from the Case of<scp>E</scp>cuador","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Food sovereignty; Sovereignty; State (computer science); Agrarian society; Institutionalisation; Politics; Political science; Agriculture; Food policy; Food security; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Economic system; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.06283510953159996,"score_gpt":0.21817695792341668,"score_spread":0.15534184839181672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570068248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5558505,0.002196835,0.0023004275,0.040736638,0.00011156671,0.000055408425,0.000030161433,0.000012365272,0.39870602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931698,0.00047927003,0.00023113718,0.00080022257,0.000025922438,0.000018269753,0.000008436895,0.0000049602763,0.0052619576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988814,0.00055053225,0.00002049617,0.000087829314,0.00008322009,0.0003764945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884784,0.0007105857,0.00015431525,0.000055214023,0.00011450152,0.00011746986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021184776,0.00015997553,0.00031399372,0.0005460578,0.007312487,0.0051214667,0.0009003917,0.0026168409,0.00582479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034448595,0.000174846,0.00022966869,0.0007082769,0.008763731,0.0030073938,0.003674776,0.0031178305,0.00013884237],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003578746,0.000047665104,0.0023827746,0.000058099857,0.000007720031,0.0035446687,0.027381193,0.00074525,0.00026164306,0.9572803,0.0027110688,0.005543843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012137246,0.000117929594,0.012656639,0.0007053307,0.000063484666,0.0017030645,0.2301581,0.007828078,0.0012530736,0.37827718,0.36703762,0.00007823364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037528664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0472259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037528664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007054353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029862514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074620426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1667802647","doi":"10.1111/joac.12058","title":"Landownership Distribution, Socio‐Economic Precariousness and Empowerment: The Role of Small Peasants in <scp>M</scp>aresme County (<scp>C</scp>atalonia, <scp>S</scp>pain) from 1850 to the 1950s","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Historical and socio-economic studies of Spain and related regions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Agrarian society; Empowerment; Distribution (mathematics); Collective action; Politics; Economic growth; Geography; Political science; Economics; Agriculture; Archaeology","score_opus":0.023537332932940955,"score_gpt":0.19842407690184674,"score_spread":0.1748867439689058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1667802647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99799913,0.00020486378,0.0000125398565,0.000104407714,0.0000023392183,0.0000017409393,0.00010093894,6.493805e-7,0.0015733028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906653,0.00012923553,0.000013093605,0.000009433965,0.0000035414062,0.0000016180729,0.000093114875,4.423156e-7,0.000682918],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984205,0.000027924038,0.0000041608264,0.00002321134,0.00001112671,0.00009157651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994098,0.0001297154,0.00018619614,0.000019186504,0.00006680144,0.00018821155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033930276,0.000096738855,0.00011858934,0.0008818662,0.0005997316,0.0007753016,0.0003070441,0.00021769363,0.0022450436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082622137,0.00006480568,0.00010346515,0.0007841487,0.00084196485,0.0004241889,0.0008122648,0.00031185526,0.00019491998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010590631,0.00012409233,0.9716806,0.000029263832,0.00002073093,0.0003606213,0.014136815,0.00016226033,0.00018318035,0.0007743857,0.0008616406,0.011560469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016619662,0.000028131079,0.9901736,0.000012259742,0.0000031481,0.000029052191,0.0077568516,0.00004236694,0.000030585717,0.00007641097,0.0018438479,0.000002002885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07937385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1646892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07937385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012259387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046597977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15782368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1859014568","doi":"10.1111/joac.12131","title":"Food Sovereignty and <i><scp>F</scp>ome <scp>Z</scp>ero</i>: Connecting Public Food Procurement Programmes to Sustainable Rural Development in <scp>B</scp>razil","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Food security; Food sovereignty; Livelihood; Economic growth; Business; Restructuring; Food systems; Agriculture; Economics; Finance; Geography","score_opus":0.057423254052770156,"score_gpt":0.2310608507610285,"score_spread":0.17363759670825835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1859014568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91125274,0.0006572426,0.0005823949,0.010768595,0.000019666046,0.00002870519,0.000019048246,0.0000048966017,0.07666672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877423,0.00008872434,0.000051371262,0.00020018665,0.0000029065025,0.000008159981,0.0000049505065,0.0000017644772,0.0008677069],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958444,0.0025752203,0.00006820977,0.00019092977,0.00030989363,0.0010112849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779797,0.0009962551,0.00053124735,0.00017428193,0.00019194996,0.00030828945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052841627,0.00013339329,0.00021615809,0.0004900054,0.006639433,0.004547601,0.0005390867,0.001065325,0.002301242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004010318,0.00016685073,0.00014879506,0.0007370095,0.01714229,0.0026290545,0.008430298,0.00220977,0.00009689673],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015162534,0.00016606922,0.034380604,0.00019388813,0.000017069553,0.000688066,0.6478505,0.00026399153,0.0017437423,0.2562491,0.002820959,0.055474367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041816533,0.00023158331,0.11224233,0.00040828847,0.000022186237,0.00037496127,0.7414248,0.00033777056,0.0008810193,0.019968987,0.124009445,0.000056816105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019733557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037051983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019733557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037127163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047078584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03923738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1907988119","doi":"10.1111/joac.12123","title":"Introduction to a Symposium on Global Finance and the Agri‐food Sector: Risk and Regulation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Financialization; Speculation; Investment (military); Private sector; Financial services; State (computer science); Value (mathematics); Economics; Finance; Political science; Economic growth; Politics","score_opus":0.026030635202905453,"score_gpt":0.20170901209619096,"score_spread":0.17567837689328553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1907988119","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016404773,0.16552913,0.0030182481,0.35087058,0.36896142,0.000113245624,0.00064204255,0.00013903345,0.10908586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021340413,0.12601022,0.0026177194,0.12967671,0.46554267,0.0002423403,0.0006667356,0.00032217117,0.25358102],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989802,0.00031472862,0.00006827646,0.00016524739,0.00030491748,0.00016661365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977755,0.0010773101,0.00014778078,0.000091742724,0.00043417257,0.000473512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002015483,0.0017454564,0.0011389761,0.0016295615,0.0026873644,0.006444505,0.0015503435,0.007669078,0.034477074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033581199,0.00047719883,0.0018572701,0.0015278741,0.002765245,0.006017869,0.0042457157,0.011307969,0.010222434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033079486,0.00004674325,0.00012703685,0.00020589207,0.000008833339,0.00011044902,0.00048815404,0.0001477791,0.0003399193,0.037127987,0.9462266,0.0151375355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039675665,0.000021403568,0.00022225254,0.00024721152,0.0000041338235,0.000054969514,0.00025635035,0.00004464232,0.00003120691,0.008073218,0.9910314,0.000009245883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002297597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003551834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034477074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027732186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022794984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11533731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1909340223","doi":"10.1111/joac.12065","title":"Organization and (<scp>D</scp>e)mobilization of Farmworkers in <scp>Z</scp>imbabwe: Reflections on Trade Unions, <scp>NGOs</scp> and Political Parties","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"African studies and sociopolitical issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Demobilization; Politics; Agrarian society; Redistribution (election); Mobilization; Agriculture; Political science; Political economy; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.05244734290793571,"score_gpt":0.3244150718124496,"score_spread":0.27196772890451393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1909340223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93792,0.0007564123,0.0007072397,0.010621564,0.000045374654,0.000033523283,0.00001420768,0.000007928017,0.04989367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912453,0.00031822285,0.00012882685,0.0005046591,0.000011679315,0.000019336943,0.0000052957607,0.0000058779447,0.0077607757],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975311,0.0011366154,0.000029517963,0.00014123818,0.00013413979,0.0010274225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989422,0.00035109482,0.00022651248,0.000041738593,0.00006212517,0.00037629527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027305733,0.000165343,0.00025174182,0.0011560714,0.012559117,0.0062851855,0.0006908772,0.0018316262,0.005421958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019741482,0.00022536886,0.00011035475,0.001073806,0.015930744,0.0022198448,0.006831716,0.0015654498,0.00046087158],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003402934,0.00009758215,0.01719145,0.00007426144,0.000004742836,0.0009543492,0.88726634,0.00009245591,0.0011862702,0.07405822,0.0022531631,0.016787145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007068419,0.000031552,0.0255697,0.000114819166,0.0000028225627,0.00017186992,0.9108692,0.000056526293,0.00022015268,0.005459593,0.057487283,0.000009290978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017018272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034769565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017018272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004105211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005466145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03383839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924021091","doi":"10.1111/joac.12124","title":"Derivatives for Development? Small‐Farmer Vulnerability and the Financialization of Climate Risk Management","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Business; Context (archaeology); Climate risk; Agriculture; Agricultural productivity; Risk management; Natural resource economics; Crop insurance; Financialization; Economics; Climate change; Finance","score_opus":0.06519077078133029,"score_gpt":0.25423965980972096,"score_spread":0.18904888902839068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924021091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40990603,0.015859477,0.013651035,0.1768853,0.0006502869,0.00005709071,0.00010926062,0.00008289801,0.38279867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884586,0.0027560317,0.0008308851,0.0012309896,0.00008991316,0.0000102037675,0.000009728195,0.000008391606,0.006605236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994837,0.00022309416,0.000016669468,0.000050992763,0.00010045366,0.00012503462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866366,0.0005315759,0.00029756778,0.0001171044,0.0001420985,0.0002478575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013100929,0.00022630444,0.00016088203,0.00050243107,0.0015427191,0.0043173865,0.00043309652,0.0013710329,0.0065504108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004319603,0.00008604208,0.0001276368,0.00046870345,0.0078083896,0.005549985,0.0027808049,0.0018366247,0.00023545642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005034058,0.000058550446,0.004946958,0.00008598606,0.0000113030155,0.00042622164,0.008466287,0.0010220776,0.001086305,0.9245428,0.0063160057,0.052987173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022533233,0.00014808685,0.016661039,0.0005977697,0.000019933334,0.00077368366,0.020833464,0.0026518551,0.0020507919,0.6164972,0.33968395,0.00005973557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019490673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027943037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065504108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024351813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002108356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02191329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1942082060","doi":"10.1111/joac.12025","title":"The Political Economy of Agricultural Statistics and Input Subsidies: Evidence from <scp>I</scp>ndia, <scp>N</scp>igeria and <scp>M</scp>alawi","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Subsidy; Agriculture; Economics; Politics; Government (linguistics); Agricultural economics; Public economics; Political science; Market economy; Geography","score_opus":0.05061393999902293,"score_gpt":0.2525865411219718,"score_spread":0.2019726011229489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1942082060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9205608,0.0028239652,0.0013761392,0.014587117,0.00005824726,0.000052132495,0.00081855315,0.00002034219,0.05970271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957748,0.0010014573,0.00012310935,0.000714311,0.000047802307,0.000015959447,0.00029590135,0.000008584699,0.0020180384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99388933,0.0029253634,0.00022456454,0.0006050688,0.0016775312,0.0006781624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87748176,0.07338417,0.038935024,0.0033082697,0.005403224,0.0014874837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073821913,0.00011190421,0.0003778711,0.0015864937,0.0008057595,0.0022427987,0.00051831483,0.0006299639,0.0064268145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03840037,0.00017236352,0.00034589908,0.0037825473,0.003591114,0.001255448,0.0015604872,0.001349169,0.00052422273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006934101,0.00041030956,0.8704968,0.00046389728,0.0004263201,0.00038189368,0.0058801016,0.0016781702,0.00041670306,0.05053999,0.008259165,0.060353205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007016141,0.00016227768,0.95121884,0.0002182084,0.00014144396,0.00008173214,0.0053443275,0.0014349495,0.0006845751,0.006178658,0.03443345,0.00003128427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021182273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02358693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021182273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022436813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023474388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042117953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1955163175","doi":"10.1111/joac.12023","title":"Maize Diversity and the Political Economy of Agrarian Restructuring in Guatemala","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Food security; Restructuring; Food systems; Agriculture; Agrarian society; Sustainability; Food sovereignty; Sustainable agriculture; Environmental degradation; Agricultural biodiversity; Liberalization; Economics; Business; Natural resource economics; Agricultural economics; Market economy; Geography","score_opus":0.03050553807379692,"score_gpt":0.18919702751390308,"score_spread":0.15869148944010616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1955163175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97958976,0.0006430806,0.00006206553,0.004484914,0.0000053744716,0.0000057856137,0.00007389572,0.0000048064526,0.015130363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995022,0.00012172995,0.000012853819,0.000063085434,0.000004019401,0.000001869598,0.000008713135,8.0683407e-7,0.00028461922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995098,0.00014680928,0.000005723742,0.000028719023,0.00003340857,0.0002756021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999495,0.000110082925,0.0002039934,0.00002080526,0.000033035427,0.00013705452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005035717,0.00008403802,0.00012568699,0.0009864842,0.00193365,0.0019276417,0.00028244444,0.00040447398,0.003461229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010714439,0.00009524374,0.000095126285,0.0015640083,0.0025161994,0.00051291066,0.0020807707,0.0004162371,0.000090967056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006940476,0.00017072339,0.39135396,0.00029007174,0.00014502044,0.00482433,0.055381168,0.0037861236,0.009177608,0.45167628,0.0067523764,0.0757483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026246908,0.000050425046,0.93304247,0.00007887063,0.000021181515,0.00029980385,0.019097414,0.0018259224,0.00032983552,0.014063437,0.03114317,0.00002112114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057822596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12678538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057822596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005762992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011929974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114972055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984205361","doi":"10.1111/1471-0366.00021","title":"Commercial Farm Workers and the Politics of (Dis)placement in Zimbabwe: Colonialism, Liberation and Democracy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"African studies and sociopolitical issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Democracy; Nationalism; Farm workers; White (mutation); Colonialism; Political science; Political economy; Economic growth; Sociology; Law; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.04902209528533054,"score_gpt":0.33268852425389867,"score_spread":0.28366642896856814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984205361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97823113,0.001781141,0.00009197967,0.0053297738,0.000014726687,0.000009234694,0.000010310714,0.0000015375164,0.014530194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981268,0.0003914672,0.000023318184,0.00016655882,0.0000049504024,0.000004170693,0.0000023597315,0.0000010493418,0.0012792723],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987692,0.0004475327,0.000026570628,0.00006333552,0.0000692947,0.00062408124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904114,0.00042207015,0.00028083374,0.000029677614,0.00005428522,0.0001719865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015297593,0.00018269676,0.00015386667,0.00089203444,0.011285967,0.004549145,0.0004255374,0.0008839521,0.004061665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025507512,0.00026604047,0.00006281745,0.0015122477,0.014172598,0.0017418625,0.0034904645,0.0013493976,0.000147232],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007815595,0.000041956806,0.03310749,0.000087212466,0.0000072042226,0.0011154816,0.8864851,0.000050778635,0.0016255192,0.053778738,0.0014354388,0.022186907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029471841,0.00007037248,0.15704367,0.00032461024,0.0000120538225,0.00037777566,0.7520404,0.0001344985,0.00043264008,0.0079499595,0.08155993,0.000024693265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11334505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23976994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11334505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007933842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027032336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22537065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036126825","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00175.x","title":"Whose Rules Rule? Contested Projects to Certify ‘Local Production for Distant Consumers’<sup>1</sup>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Context (archaeology); Production (economics); Business; Certification; Agriculture; Natural resource economics; Economy; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.07370054546412146,"score_gpt":0.23696604605298452,"score_spread":0.16326550058886308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036126825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054805968,0.0014446136,0.039159283,0.16500767,0.0018795199,0.00021250437,0.00017270142,0.0003584044,0.7369593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83644414,0.00072080403,0.014459005,0.015067447,0.00049110217,0.00022299685,0.00016410906,0.0005030663,0.1319273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98822427,0.0042466405,0.00064884947,0.002742054,0.0019931362,0.002145039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97687316,0.0074259476,0.0019741245,0.0060477,0.005214209,0.0024649838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023386803,0.00035945876,0.0005380941,0.00092962274,0.009648896,0.01962689,0.0026875776,0.0068863793,0.02008186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027412726,0.0006375992,0.0005771707,0.0010675448,0.029207578,0.012194954,0.0049110046,0.007360187,0.004200219],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030735246,0.00003572751,0.0027127785,0.000040259412,0.000014992054,0.00018130329,0.006083424,0.00022003704,0.00041447283,0.93853205,0.03266246,0.019071843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046786685,0.000042357024,0.004718007,0.00020995643,0.000031586616,0.00021280025,0.015699117,0.0010739685,0.0016008022,0.3864583,0.5898103,0.000095965086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032559577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049690444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032559577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008307568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009974521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12368274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042432009","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2006.00127.x","title":"Continuity and Discontinuity in the Post‐Roman Economy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Medieval Literature and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Peasant; Empire; Agrarian society; Autonomy; Roman Empire; Economy; Power (physics); Reinterpretation; Late Antiquity; History; Economics; Sociology; Ancient history; Agriculture; Archaeology; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.02545766995873042,"score_gpt":0.20953423773899252,"score_spread":0.1840765677802621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042432009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72314227,0.009573388,0.0021600807,0.006890854,0.000070591916,0.000021369986,0.00008220745,0.000019509156,0.25803974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99636686,0.0007087129,0.00022513892,0.00012102035,0.000019059746,0.000006775021,0.000014165473,0.000004854715,0.002533353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986363,0.0004926718,0.000060940347,0.00016246158,0.00022448943,0.00042309018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995678,0.00013391468,0.000097738994,0.000072777184,0.00005409125,0.000073663716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016092585,0.00011637964,0.00027350461,0.001853122,0.003465175,0.00694517,0.00070236315,0.0008236658,0.0024246052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002410902,0.0002608178,0.00020719566,0.00266959,0.013780225,0.004656206,0.0040116324,0.0015637842,0.0002069015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000465624,0.000027533268,0.0046758843,0.000023274306,0.000008689438,0.00025315065,0.026497459,0.000340342,0.00012539793,0.95628464,0.00056907977,0.011147891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058400783,0.00008733224,0.06307622,0.0003003687,0.000019990159,0.00064918294,0.055378113,0.0013321893,0.00053738424,0.65677184,0.22174886,0.000040138344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052712085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005583353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00694517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057382067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015471876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041633844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046722357","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00167.x","title":"Transnational Agrarian Movements: Origins and Politics, Campaigns and Impact","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Politics; Transformative learning; Sociology; Political economy; Social movement; Alliance; Ideology; Viewpoints; Political science; Law; Agriculture; History","score_opus":0.04442150060548448,"score_gpt":0.23852836729617424,"score_spread":0.19410686669068977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046722357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.327125,0.0204529,0.004620472,0.054494467,0.0029115202,0.00006165058,0.00012514503,0.00006808295,0.59014076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96156794,0.0086737545,0.0011361004,0.0013673615,0.00091629307,0.000043012908,0.000054408894,0.00004625442,0.026194898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877065,0.00067956035,0.0000430248,0.000100858146,0.00021379993,0.00019210263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967012,0.0023530265,0.00036019387,0.00018084657,0.0002083986,0.00019627376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016717814,0.00020089497,0.00023002678,0.0013282266,0.0019535571,0.006587784,0.00041049917,0.0009336241,0.0072459234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039677806,0.0001284583,0.0001639064,0.002580947,0.004700991,0.0042905034,0.0031933922,0.0014648073,0.00040862625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008564321,0.00014960562,0.016172685,0.00046619817,0.000022480266,0.0004164027,0.10559332,0.00024771196,0.00071790157,0.6738408,0.02867953,0.17360772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013065518,0.00012853311,0.03853092,0.0005992073,0.000024297584,0.000413173,0.17074461,0.0005701869,0.0007529302,0.07674626,0.7114472,0.000029731551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009577647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027145685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072459234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017072083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011131342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024240017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063149090","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2004.00088.x","title":"Restructuring and Redundancy: The Impacts and Illogic of Neoliberal Agricultural Reforms in Jamaica","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Agriculture; Economics; Development economics; State (computer science); Sovereignty; Economic policy; Food sovereignty; Business; Economic growth; Natural resource economics; Political science; Food security; Geography; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.020110424723904247,"score_gpt":0.20790247759256134,"score_spread":0.18779205286865708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063149090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.980121,0.00041896588,0.00006186888,0.003827619,0.000007606689,0.000013846742,0.000038944112,0.0000051236025,0.015504918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818474,0.00028797364,0.00003453027,0.00023771188,0.000008063553,0.0000029060338,0.000017990478,0.0000014469844,0.0012246456],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992473,0.00021830705,0.000023951987,0.00006344856,0.000117524694,0.00032942012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985719,0.00039561244,0.0003901186,0.00012916612,0.00023878264,0.000274422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011241998,0.00011605848,0.00018570357,0.00079756096,0.002794826,0.0027684711,0.00052548165,0.0005999188,0.001623698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033936307,0.00009544685,0.00011581923,0.0013613189,0.0044061937,0.0010334541,0.0023849618,0.000995606,0.00007071057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006999872,0.0004771491,0.49737445,0.00047612362,0.00014638121,0.012538162,0.11638322,0.011985121,0.0070002265,0.121904425,0.0141254375,0.21688923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006444475,0.00019032191,0.8407362,0.0002464654,0.000061665676,0.00069096114,0.08901643,0.0032090724,0.0013605995,0.01365745,0.050729416,0.000036869063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20262812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31593764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20262812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008006523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056574694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40289742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077501324","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2004.00081.x","title":"Explaining the Diversity of Southeast Asian Shrimp Aquaculture","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Shrimp; Shrimp farming; Agriculture; Aquaculture; Diversity (politics); Politics; Geography; Fishery; Economy; Development economics; Economics; Political science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology","score_opus":0.05179858080990841,"score_gpt":0.22816823928435245,"score_spread":0.17636965847444405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077501324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99318475,0.00046338304,0.0006840466,0.000111414854,0.0000042247493,0.00000788919,0.00011900814,0.000008609468,0.0054166443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897456,0.00024316888,0.00041718874,0.000022699784,0.0000038495,0.000005426367,0.00011666703,0.0000051640177,0.00021142236],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989636,0.00035709556,0.00010783265,0.00024243451,0.00015640362,0.0001725649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729794,0.00092647376,0.0005814297,0.00037279626,0.00048132916,0.00033993874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017541009,0.00022803832,0.000411949,0.0025836013,0.0011347088,0.001357638,0.0004899972,0.00021955883,0.0018795326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003077985,0.00022163459,0.00024273265,0.0038427426,0.001432158,0.0007479054,0.0024462035,0.000508218,0.00024768847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009783678,0.00003259825,0.9553351,0.00006686571,0.000111608504,0.00037048696,0.0096831,0.00070681446,0.003683571,0.002582045,0.0002352457,0.027094806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010564215,0.000054752643,0.96674645,0.00008823016,0.00006565168,0.0007651462,0.0176452,0.0026822977,0.000702354,0.0055001136,0.005717108,0.000022147759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008029567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01879498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008029567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006290738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005079391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0159657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098201916","doi":"10.1111/1471-0366.00066","title":"Aboriginal Labour and the Pastoral Industry in the Kimberley Division of Western Australia: 1960–1975","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Livestock; Unemployment; Economic shortage; Commodity; Recession; Economics; Geography; Economy; Economic growth; Market economy; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.028987410145562272,"score_gpt":0.27853387447507894,"score_spread":0.24954646432951666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098201916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916168,0.0019081382,0.000041219144,0.00027197917,0.000011278632,0.000007244551,0.00010826759,0.0000011518421,0.0060339263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98276687,0.0045860903,0.00017300445,0.000108698245,0.000032997952,0.000014470477,0.00031145674,0.0000022065967,0.012004208],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982446,0.000027847913,0.000010750609,0.000021799497,0.00003310149,0.00008203392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966455,0.000041747066,0.000095377356,0.000009654743,0.00006296908,0.00012584962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025808613,0.00014116979,0.00009723494,0.0015657516,0.0019015027,0.0005445178,0.00022594223,0.0002474961,0.0022888505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007308387,0.00017198251,0.000092345814,0.0022139044,0.0007616948,0.00062732975,0.0008507809,0.00046206612,0.00035130462],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025440936,0.00016239026,0.713133,0.00040804065,0.00003139962,0.0023837497,0.20911749,0.0005709891,0.0020006248,0.006659543,0.0034841122,0.061794307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019343356,0.000041732645,0.9663866,0.000066557564,0.0000060376233,0.00016747705,0.015891977,0.00006735812,0.000111455294,0.000106533094,0.017147072,0.0000052561936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5451967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8075203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5451967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032842704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019412681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9149634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120334263","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00201.x","title":"Agricultural Land, Gender and Kinship in Rural China and Vietnam: A Comparison of Two Villages","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Entitlement (fair division); China; Dominance (genetics); Geography; Vietnamese; Land tenure; Position (finance); Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Livelihood; Development economics; Agriculture; Political science; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.05842508475382562,"score_gpt":0.33674389931859966,"score_spread":0.27831881456477403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120334263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996253,0.00003922653,0.000009893674,0.000018733295,9.120066e-7,0.0000036194613,0.000012727765,2.1829831e-7,0.00028923346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956614,0.000065204906,0.000020833408,0.000017170221,0.0000010463228,0.0000072467033,0.000026967993,5.5958964e-7,0.00029484835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996805,0.000106360116,0.000012893413,0.000040502364,0.000037447313,0.00012228987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992895,0.00018641571,0.00013483917,0.000023309753,0.00009040819,0.00027549115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004721966,0.00021289506,0.00032389566,0.0010718968,0.0017263932,0.00076243194,0.00031441188,0.00023828211,0.0016092377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013364581,0.00020876124,0.0001553896,0.0014717262,0.001232908,0.000673754,0.0009891711,0.00027111403,0.00011501044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026800908,0.00028118683,0.8248538,0.00010613494,0.000039337512,0.0025209584,0.15629202,0.00009362116,0.0015475826,0.00086506474,0.00022252237,0.012909707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024219818,0.00034150356,0.8005385,0.000032361055,0.00001935323,0.0005624042,0.19650328,0.00014671352,0.00016935424,0.00020348417,0.001445185,0.000013723575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09076252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17022751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09076252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016315823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013217725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18046844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122361773","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2008.00170.x","title":"La Vía Campesina and its Global Campaign for Agrarian Reform","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Framing (construction); Land reform; Externalization; Political science; Agrarian society; Agrarian reform; Political economy; Sociology; Politics; Law; Agriculture; Geography","score_opus":0.06126566356134848,"score_gpt":0.23668666835610966,"score_spread":0.1754210047947612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122361773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07909505,0.03006588,0.0011072455,0.14933561,0.0023250054,0.00010101531,0.00023287923,0.00012275724,0.7376145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6665714,0.007499897,0.002088312,0.014370315,0.0015315049,0.0001680635,0.00022672252,0.0000845277,0.30745932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911445,0.00036473377,0.000012651945,0.00010693263,0.00014987157,0.0002514088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993437,0.0003052493,0.00008045212,0.00005850996,0.00007453417,0.0001375335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016955619,0.00034486142,0.00026614754,0.0006446181,0.0022233995,0.0038720767,0.00036641763,0.0021664463,0.015765615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016267706,0.00018034672,0.00016674036,0.0007171107,0.003416068,0.001329015,0.003392431,0.0031305307,0.00097436685],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029539465,0.00015218277,0.007606346,0.0007200932,0.00003444693,0.00088823534,0.017487802,0.0004959892,0.003391589,0.57170093,0.24244958,0.15477744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014692877,0.000029769755,0.007240556,0.00010604599,0.0000053101735,0.00008747523,0.0013675868,0.00006728721,0.00023542102,0.003163445,0.98767453,0.0000080205855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017042281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031051341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017042281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004994326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003057395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05274123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127009208","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00273.x","title":"The Accelerating Biophysical Contradictions of Industrial Capitalist Agriculture","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":358,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Food security; Economics; Productivity; Subsidy; Food systems; Industrialisation; Natural resource economics; Market economy; Business; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.05582573787438884,"score_gpt":0.22232783037124654,"score_spread":0.1665020924968577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127009208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53063947,0.008365743,0.0055204504,0.09791561,0.0003640687,0.0000252327,0.00019102471,0.00009934621,0.35687906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99083483,0.002435263,0.0008040209,0.001991918,0.00011622517,0.000011138909,0.000024705278,0.000016018077,0.0037658662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881506,0.00033681176,0.000038142833,0.00017709086,0.00036659485,0.00026634656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999173,0.00027964826,0.00022740729,0.00012559713,0.00010054673,0.00009382207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019550445,0.0001846146,0.00024924893,0.0010176809,0.0045197536,0.006030818,0.00051466096,0.0013937153,0.002888452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021716035,0.00017851165,0.000174816,0.0013451645,0.021264574,0.004473707,0.004446123,0.0028729746,0.00029076345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052704647,0.000023845821,0.0027695254,0.000066467655,0.00000818939,0.0004246733,0.028297246,0.00030191513,0.0012864328,0.9498127,0.00414302,0.012813174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032404747,0.000045657373,0.016222294,0.00022025847,0.000014559776,0.0006742965,0.039116807,0.0005271307,0.0010550725,0.6145279,0.32752296,0.000040688596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003909357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006042205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074270684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074270684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022246165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053887367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127094755","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2012.00382.x","title":"Supermarket Expansion in <scp>T</scp>urkey: Shifting Relations of Food Provisioning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Restructuring; Provisioning; Subsistence agriculture; Agriculture; Capital (architecture); Scale (ratio); Market economy; Industrial organization; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.041925988932949486,"score_gpt":0.22378409038881303,"score_spread":0.18185810145586354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127094755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94499904,0.00020613623,0.0003414505,0.00045545946,0.000019036768,0.000022820172,0.00005650234,0.0000193238,0.05388018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98830414,0.00025356642,0.00027074764,0.000083501785,0.000008309992,0.000011805364,0.000051867813,0.000015344882,0.011000688],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994548,0.0001099593,0.000009184513,0.00008744442,0.000059135138,0.000279513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925035,0.00011709523,0.00019817142,0.000059915197,0.00011224783,0.00026215744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004641969,0.00020349487,0.00015486036,0.000950313,0.0034847786,0.003735296,0.0007002615,0.00065590296,0.020052899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073380326,0.00022250501,0.0002911504,0.0017426129,0.0021906078,0.0044930317,0.0036456059,0.00069381436,0.0011937898],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021476878,0.0011810374,0.29315507,0.00089076976,0.00009364093,0.029828858,0.21712829,0.0022725526,0.035693232,0.15231028,0.026304154,0.23899436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004208416,0.00045378957,0.46831483,0.00027435934,0.000048721555,0.0041113794,0.3348985,0.0016404955,0.0037072918,0.0057022143,0.1807126,0.00009375093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029588759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091647774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029588759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045558023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023591928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06708366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131010889","doi":"10.1111/1471-0366.00024","title":"The Question of Market Dependence","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Agrarian society; Relations of production; Reproduction; Relation (database); Property (philosophy); Economics; Competition (biology); Neoclassical economics; Economic system; Market economy; Production (economics); Political science; Agriculture; Politics; Law; Microeconomics; Ecology","score_opus":0.0827356796570568,"score_gpt":0.23167285631857878,"score_spread":0.14893717666152198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131010889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2420383,0.011173062,0.025676847,0.1670395,0.0006161432,0.000030368756,0.00029459808,0.00007155997,0.5530597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784371,0.0018554212,0.0006648658,0.0034044194,0.00073451735,0.000021705242,0.000044104214,0.000039326365,0.01479865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884987,0.00037675886,0.000031075582,0.00029485323,0.00022068685,0.00022681252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959448,0.0022358047,0.0003893133,0.00055161107,0.00049557054,0.0003829339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019002336,0.0001783388,0.0004144441,0.00063801854,0.0017140368,0.0035893042,0.0009884537,0.0025896158,0.010702337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007843894,0.00020298094,0.0003516965,0.00067069207,0.015375235,0.011090449,0.003184381,0.003643289,0.00091432704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010212908,0.000011664485,0.00050590746,0.000011080827,0.000004159283,0.00004277737,0.00036858098,0.0001083745,0.00007274851,0.9919733,0.0026793927,0.0042117564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010465159,0.000010396789,0.0016849772,0.000030113815,0.0000037056361,0.000116993775,0.0004602855,0.0007011752,0.00014783123,0.9627237,0.034101285,0.00000906135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036874553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014290506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010702337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018527155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001105545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0358029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135652798","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2007.00163.x","title":"Rural ‘Community’, Chiefs and Social Capital: The Case of Southern Ghana","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Microfinance and Financial Inclusion","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Sociology; Inequality; Cohesion (chemistry); Promotion (chess); Political economy; Social inequality; Community development; Capital (architecture); Perspective (graphical); Economic growth; Development economics; Political science; Social science; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.0564787441429379,"score_gpt":0.24542643213584953,"score_spread":0.18894768799291162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135652798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742211,0.0011238592,0.00017545128,0.0095713055,0.000021700958,0.000028358583,0.000027692335,0.00000491833,0.014825559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99523914,0.000896235,0.00013596792,0.000472729,0.000016124746,0.000016648837,0.000011936325,0.0000029797732,0.0032082342],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993788,0.00033877452,0.000008376069,0.000026791282,0.000021316873,0.00022593174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998664,0.0005331185,0.00027147893,0.00002676117,0.000053328804,0.00045133318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075709814,0.00029517768,0.00027609366,0.00067764614,0.008624638,0.0019224507,0.000866918,0.0018978528,0.0055264127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001636607,0.00027428856,0.0001277732,0.0018453433,0.006200172,0.0021805076,0.0025336805,0.0014155606,0.00026158508],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022142276,0.00043966042,0.06695344,0.0004054943,0.000029387998,0.07237529,0.68804157,0.0009575353,0.0012960605,0.13358699,0.0107589,0.024934316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010980233,0.00014285756,0.045498893,0.0004601768,0.0000357692,0.0046276213,0.8616677,0.00088821765,0.00019746143,0.011894181,0.07444903,0.000028222166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.124999285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26530653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124999285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060915947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002967389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24854344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138635841","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2012.00368.x","title":"Illegal Evictions? Overwriting Possession and Orality with Law's Violence in<scp>C</scp>ambodia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Orality; Endogamy; Expropriation; Kinship; Barter; Law; Property law; Property rights; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics; Economics; Market economy; Ethnic group","score_opus":0.03438736004293071,"score_gpt":0.2372561143050462,"score_spread":0.20286875426211548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138635841","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7965289,0.0005068337,0.0018316797,0.01287272,0.00009292563,0.000020325422,0.00003062276,0.000015647243,0.18810026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975592,0.000074153286,0.00006157856,0.0002469253,0.00001585679,0.000004391847,0.0000036701904,0.000004974062,0.0020291966],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631613,0.0018043541,0.00014143094,0.00026220983,0.00056281144,0.000913041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98920715,0.006092273,0.0025106098,0.0009270739,0.00067537325,0.00058766094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030023055,0.00012338646,0.0002952351,0.001134148,0.008158618,0.009204694,0.00085129705,0.0018318483,0.0058862087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01678582,0.0002949872,0.00014207783,0.0010347497,0.03526275,0.006585634,0.0073778215,0.0039735436,0.00031301245],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021941636,0.000072515795,0.015425411,0.000041017047,0.0000048984325,0.0007738625,0.61056393,0.00006681869,0.00029753114,0.35794052,0.0023564075,0.012435176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009333129,0.00003986199,0.026772505,0.0003745718,0.000010041713,0.0008510308,0.83585614,0.00035765316,0.0005958433,0.067633145,0.06746081,0.000039113846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015195883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021338718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015195883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032184676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002485612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030214846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152572340","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2010.00286.x","title":"Review Essay: Land, Labour and Agrarian Transition in Vietnam","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Vietnamese; Agrarian society; Wage; Wage labour; Economics; Poverty; Sign (mathematics); Development economics; Agriculture; Labour economics; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.021296418651171795,"score_gpt":0.2254473768393024,"score_spread":0.20415095818813062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152572340","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008193232,0.8714871,0.00013780624,0.08215359,0.038115114,0.000014063863,0.00011657735,0.000005272139,0.0071512577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010184215,0.9050677,0.00015504204,0.022086065,0.04169832,0.000019134704,0.0001354787,0.000009713786,0.020644493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975556,0.000079465935,0.000020593101,0.000044851993,0.00007573355,0.000023877663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878687,0.0006838232,0.00010952758,0.000016041984,0.0003054329,0.00009834107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006776,0.0005761099,0.00097165664,0.0012308729,0.00068668986,0.0019568577,0.0009322792,0.002303393,0.013825902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017476194,0.00017041068,0.00029013597,0.0027263267,0.0014710152,0.00258455,0.0007034202,0.0014720843,0.0017972052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005060048,0.000040816125,0.00059443637,0.004763625,0.00004135184,0.00037503435,0.00061418634,0.00026471147,0.0002511959,0.007560705,0.9131693,0.072274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016405294,0.000051708786,0.002569592,0.0037244018,0.000027777834,0.0006420499,0.0013996848,0.00008695143,0.000080223894,0.0031136768,0.9882741,0.000013425361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008248438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01378235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013825902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001854894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021947203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04625225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157258309","doi":"10.1111/joac.12081","title":"Agrarian Change and Ethnic Politics: Restructuring of Hmong and Shan Labour and Agricultural Production in<scp>N</scp>orthern<scp>T</scp>hailand","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Agrarian society; Ethnic group; Politics; Agriculture; Promotion (chess); Agricultural productivity; Political science; Development economics; Economic growth; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.04820316963535446,"score_gpt":0.27819914860854855,"score_spread":0.2299959789731941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157258309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960175,0.0000405073,0.000018172464,0.00018873456,0.000001300885,0.0000011234389,0.0000032911682,2.0779072e-7,0.0037290857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871516,0.000043034845,0.000021217724,0.000023335111,8.845221e-7,0.0000013987612,0.000003163698,4.6783833e-7,0.0011913416],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998062,0.00007299699,0.00000367533,0.000016310585,0.00001703317,0.00008369401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999845,0.00004307318,0.000046259323,0.000008854777,0.000011222271,0.000045527286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038085543,0.00007876364,0.00007052444,0.00035754777,0.0025175512,0.0011239451,0.00021766206,0.00024056304,0.0017038422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003180999,0.00008080858,0.0000439595,0.00088088657,0.0028650437,0.00062976696,0.0010376435,0.00036720585,0.000076569966],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009592733,0.00010350704,0.23352177,0.00005146606,0.0000074177415,0.0016893896,0.7128069,0.00022115052,0.002838285,0.027930506,0.00081667094,0.019917104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005060218,0.000033375472,0.32537496,0.000041020285,0.0000038928133,0.00023460508,0.6558476,0.00033028395,0.0004999553,0.0017114646,0.01590799,0.000009757976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06262898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2514317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06262898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029425665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018189454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124528885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158770205","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00243.x","title":"Contemporary Discourses and Contestations around Pro‐Poor Land Policies and Land Governance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Mainstream; Corporate governance; Land use; Terrain; Political science; Land management; Land reform; Land tenure; Land development; Geography; Economics; Law; Agriculture; Cartography","score_opus":0.04980213356877724,"score_gpt":0.2526564474880001,"score_spread":0.20285431391922285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158770205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39823323,0.016685247,0.015055834,0.25241116,0.00054238917,0.0000468905,0.00008742713,0.000057596484,0.3168802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990373,0.0025147737,0.0007714973,0.0024470785,0.00016422907,0.000023738861,0.000012928154,0.000018592731,0.0036741972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904158,0.006505496,0.00025561542,0.000689243,0.0012001133,0.00093372626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98714614,0.010859471,0.0008522469,0.00035467287,0.0003956226,0.0003918397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014721183,0.00032971866,0.00051157206,0.0023216775,0.011126824,0.010611006,0.0011288734,0.0055312654,0.0031352576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009573956,0.0003386098,0.0002348853,0.0033645367,0.061619483,0.010809206,0.006578921,0.004749424,0.00022219573],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000094928055,0.0000072069884,0.0003636661,0.00006204756,0.0000024230708,0.000109887944,0.15698521,0.00013361512,0.00017953989,0.83741426,0.0011948711,0.0035377818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000146652255,0.00003093371,0.0029439968,0.0005117117,0.000010658408,0.00025645987,0.29805243,0.00071573147,0.0005442547,0.42508638,0.27179572,0.00003710573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005286592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066514355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014721183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011015778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026574717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07992542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163760501","doi":"10.1111/joac.12060","title":"Alternative Trade: Legacies for the Future, by GavinFridell. Black Point and Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing, 2013. Pp. iv+169. $CAN 24.95 (pb). ISBN 978‐1‐55266‐587‐9","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Publishing; Agrarian society; Politics; Sociology; Library science; Media studies; History; Political science; Law; Computer science; Agriculture; Archaeology","score_opus":0.033300159359876264,"score_gpt":0.2495127431962242,"score_spread":0.21621258383634795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163760501","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005315963,0.9634141,0.00043430412,0.018831607,0.0024810378,0.000008778589,0.00021771742,0.0000345459,0.014046415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018582808,0.8843651,0.0014011674,0.0034635924,0.0016037514,0.00002025375,0.00052937254,0.00012564303,0.089908235],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996772,0.000058767528,0.000021464833,0.00006594612,0.00011424577,0.00006234128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966,0.000078672725,0.000036375,0.000023907143,0.00012772036,0.00007336833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007762734,0.0019911285,0.00075390795,0.002235245,0.0017181181,0.004931974,0.0014443102,0.0020070844,0.0172031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001572254,0.0006995331,0.00036308973,0.0056884657,0.003038894,0.0066538462,0.0024661173,0.002666376,0.0053719105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058806905,0.000022173723,0.0005373452,0.0010252845,0.00002349298,0.00015566483,0.0014610639,0.00046931277,0.00028110846,0.025858218,0.7632727,0.20683475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004137809,0.000005574555,0.0013035644,0.00090100605,0.0000074926184,0.00017820697,0.0010469031,0.000100964826,0.00007799405,0.010446143,0.98591864,0.000009429197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25015032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38282546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7498497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077417768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008787624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4973886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165061219","doi":"10.1111/joac.12106","title":"Political Responses to Dam‐Induced Resettlement in Northern Uplands <scp>V</scp>ietnam","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Hydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Resistance (ecology); State (computer science); Hydropower; Political science; Geography; Political economy; Sociology; Ecology; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.10667529434204664,"score_gpt":0.4288568938131051,"score_spread":0.32218159947105846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165061219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965514,0.00002946311,0.00002357314,0.00015033862,0.000003721594,0.0000054907887,0.0000083565465,0.0000010602892,0.0032265263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987198,0.00003721082,0.00002616945,0.000029286206,0.0000021959838,0.0000064817427,0.000010224381,0.000001161277,0.0011674595],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996668,0.00014361563,0.000007636935,0.000027165916,0.0000392999,0.00011550156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959666,0.0001444923,0.00013096836,0.000016631779,0.00002531515,0.0000859941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000481275,0.00008552713,0.00012312988,0.00026941646,0.0018368283,0.00078404706,0.00030956249,0.00033985992,0.0026375742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012191667,0.000110284374,0.000057716283,0.00037564838,0.0022940875,0.00031396167,0.0016818533,0.0005416718,0.00008989158],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043399903,0.0002465016,0.33032688,0.00025890538,0.00004225736,0.013007566,0.5652558,0.0013218656,0.015601899,0.011846986,0.004741364,0.056916006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013905917,0.00017074555,0.62773556,0.00009265789,0.0000095127925,0.000602782,0.3472209,0.0004387027,0.0010523333,0.00081733934,0.02182719,0.000018367893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032916423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15302926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032916423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019075822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009451065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065449655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167501000","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2007.00156.x","title":"Land Reform, Rural Social Relations and the Peasantry","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Food sovereignty; Agrarian reform; Land reform; Sovereignty; Agrarian society; Political economy; Agrarian system; Vision; Power (physics); Politics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Economy; Food security; Law; Agriculture; History","score_opus":0.025485417482079276,"score_gpt":0.22123901852536615,"score_spread":0.19575360104328687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167501000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021724721,0.15712474,0.0029717234,0.22979195,0.0027745669,0.000039958068,0.000040610816,0.0000717937,0.58545995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6300779,0.05396037,0.0011926715,0.019939143,0.002683447,0.000089108085,0.000048441958,0.00006876132,0.29194018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924266,0.00042373923,0.00001197052,0.0000594377,0.00013113843,0.00013112366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973077,0.00014334825,0.000026814216,0.000018696217,0.000028378288,0.000052047184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076576974,0.00026724857,0.00032368203,0.0005669673,0.0042488817,0.005407354,0.00059025903,0.0018117168,0.0045009195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010594487,0.00010198739,0.00016526073,0.0012816607,0.013487581,0.004065849,0.0019280922,0.0023365805,0.00046102234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007638834,0.000016819266,0.00012074261,0.00006379294,0.0000024138792,0.00007040127,0.012361691,0.00009378233,0.00009386205,0.93986225,0.03236874,0.014937902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009517339,0.000032444623,0.0006498924,0.00016453766,0.0000026287653,0.000066851215,0.011028132,0.000097610835,0.000078377554,0.15652964,0.83133376,0.0000065954428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018547218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053764554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034558333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039009094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180153050","doi":"10.1111/joac.12134","title":"‘One Stone Is Enough to Drive Away a Hundred Birds’: Peasants, Land and Resistance in Contemporary Afghanistan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Peasant; Afghan; Resistance (ecology); Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Ontology; Political science; Sociology; Political economy; Law; Epistemology; Ecology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.16198499204011593,"score_gpt":0.34214951377875624,"score_spread":0.1801645217386403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180153050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3028222,0.21023834,0.0011090325,0.15159707,0.0016381133,0.000032423788,0.00006556479,0.000039918814,0.33245736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.937912,0.028486658,0.00031121264,0.005623916,0.00045956497,0.000026319201,0.000026248492,0.000014521696,0.027139716],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995333,0.00025537558,0.000014699283,0.000028639997,0.00008072549,0.0000874442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995982,0.00027211723,0.00004365342,0.0000139520325,0.000034835688,0.000037307105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053795916,0.00029342403,0.00022010758,0.0009872039,0.0077800835,0.0050767963,0.00044243038,0.0018201735,0.0025406107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009104546,0.00015193723,0.00010329135,0.0024474917,0.014729021,0.0036820688,0.0012964655,0.0022700625,0.00026732983],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029634213,0.000039809027,0.0026156367,0.00026142888,0.000010108461,0.0014847186,0.5348096,0.00017049735,0.00044997374,0.3791176,0.037613016,0.04339799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008025841,0.000052526022,0.008898247,0.00055190036,0.000006458984,0.0008532403,0.39885336,0.000084379775,0.0002096809,0.045553792,0.54490495,0.000023449524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016001645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038282882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016001645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034436258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016231934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03181702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W226328719","doi":"10.1111/joac.12252","title":"Food security, obesity, and inequality: Measuring the risk of exposure to the neoliberal diet","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Food security; Inequality; Consumption (sociology); Psychological intervention; Development economics; Individualism; Distribution (mathematics); Economic inequality; Economics; Public economics; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Geography; Psychology; Market economy; Social science","score_opus":0.07184427052316768,"score_gpt":0.2858134419963904,"score_spread":0.21396917147322275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W226328719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990021,0.0003178119,0.0021486222,0.00087361154,0.000014402114,0.00001728135,0.0002606895,0.0000051679076,0.0063415975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993511,0.00006565188,0.00035742935,0.000030458634,0.000008903761,0.000009236682,0.00006445965,8.110521e-7,0.00011202365],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986891,0.0007250593,0.0000753303,0.000101895756,0.00028966283,0.0001188741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99078345,0.0035403015,0.0039780675,0.0004986509,0.0004884566,0.0007109363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023218356,0.00021283499,0.0001616882,0.002279146,0.0004652106,0.0011946566,0.00032924025,0.00040725563,0.0016038128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009802788,0.00008719564,0.00027012377,0.0019584014,0.0015194309,0.0009926246,0.0017032584,0.00082641986,0.000085862244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041547268,0.000060000104,0.99037874,0.000010396597,0.000054847096,0.00001622974,0.00029573077,0.00078672543,0.000050278377,0.0028279796,0.00018205012,0.0052954606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033363049,0.000096533986,0.98531795,0.000058946873,0.00002991182,0.00009042809,0.0014911882,0.005482271,0.00024516735,0.0060883863,0.001080712,0.000015178363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00434009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054731634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00434009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007850163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044843333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0122792125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323549333","doi":"10.1111/joac.12154","title":"Perspectives on Natural Resources in the Global Economy: Polity Series Review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Water Governance and Infrastructure","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks","funders":"","keywords":"Appropriation; Polity; Natural resource; Government (linguistics); Discipline; Commodity; Resource (disambiguation); Politics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Social science; Political economy; Public administration; Law; Market economy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027547642589858392,"score_gpt":0.2975196317968501,"score_spread":0.2699719892069917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323549333","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019998167,0.9771748,0.00019771121,0.0068815667,0.0011563676,0.000002457664,0.000026033062,0.0000045507695,0.014356513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038633072,0.99061006,0.00013859908,0.0014016646,0.0015477948,0.000008299125,0.000040335824,0.000005738354,0.0023841858],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945194,0.00016057743,0.00004216427,0.00008717223,0.00019002071,0.00006809236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998582,0.0009257166,0.00014052197,0.000050416835,0.00021177267,0.0000896849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001039277,0.0007001881,0.00084429316,0.0045554177,0.00082475954,0.0039705965,0.0006335618,0.0019150448,0.0078040934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021807784,0.00026225083,0.00039446296,0.011652022,0.0034886752,0.0055739437,0.0018507413,0.0026413866,0.0016491887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035082077,0.00006180328,0.00055629876,0.012044752,0.00007539942,0.0003258331,0.0014407877,0.0013164823,0.000550039,0.26394302,0.28389928,0.4357513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021716585,0.000008975113,0.0006509275,0.004158636,0.00001060932,0.00014386498,0.00045405974,0.00006636848,0.0000623149,0.017367803,0.9770667,0.0000075943326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049074357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056998157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078040934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029215144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042118323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026107311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346278523","doi":"10.1111/joac.12164","title":"Poisoned, Dispossessed and Excluded: A Critique of the Neoliberal Soy Regime in Paraguay","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Peasant; Agriculture; Panacea (medicine); Poverty; Economics; Agribusiness; Human capital; Development economics; Agricultural biotechnology; Economic growth; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.02565963278286093,"score_gpt":0.2231897289380177,"score_spread":0.19753009615515676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346278523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19149299,0.018583437,0.005185677,0.34181178,0.00054842414,0.000044353626,0.00007169473,0.000056919584,0.44220468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97137207,0.0023235616,0.00050473417,0.014390722,0.00013162417,0.00003453078,0.0000075246817,0.000027165988,0.011207928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991372,0.00043646837,0.000020436903,0.00015045039,0.00009441991,0.00016095932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994771,0.00025417822,0.00006874731,0.000054317712,0.00009154378,0.00005420232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018519582,0.00026280023,0.00032917593,0.00050570694,0.00781573,0.0042528883,0.0010385707,0.0032448098,0.002514369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002206323,0.0001906864,0.00026137067,0.00058433966,0.020895533,0.003738969,0.003472129,0.005744309,0.00016596407],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003522051,0.000011138507,0.00078021677,0.000040773753,0.000008710299,0.0003615099,0.017781556,0.00034137163,0.0002944666,0.9691459,0.003406651,0.007792457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042227766,0.000059608767,0.0051210686,0.00038555727,0.000026737773,0.00038134604,0.025034973,0.0014703434,0.0007880422,0.65318763,0.31344834,0.000054108405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073130466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07232721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073130466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009595086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040516355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14540958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346776360","doi":"10.1111/joac.12161","title":"The <i>Red de Semillas Libres</i>: Contesting Biohegemony in Colombia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Commodification; Technoscience; Intellectual property; Sovereignty; Narrative; Ethnography; Sociology; Food sovereignty; Political science; Social science; Agriculture; Law; Economy; Anthropology; Biology; Economics; Food security; Ecology","score_opus":0.015974467416802567,"score_gpt":0.28436596825426524,"score_spread":0.26839150083746266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346776360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6876624,0.004460852,0.004100398,0.010272233,0.00014075816,0.00010359128,0.00014772305,0.00011433435,0.2929977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907376,0.00039011077,0.00046860555,0.00023385775,0.000006541661,0.000021067679,0.000023487639,0.000017806908,0.008100964],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903935,0.00042422675,0.000019833271,0.0001271404,0.000111273715,0.0002781688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852306,0.0008408105,0.00016754739,0.000093856856,0.00009987838,0.00027481845],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013310765,0.00028869614,0.00031414643,0.0007949193,0.0076340307,0.005625542,0.00064383657,0.0010279126,0.0055745095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023920701,0.00019206645,0.000090756344,0.000854116,0.0069871573,0.0024147572,0.003701899,0.0012441712,0.00017244293],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024338653,0.0000816263,0.018879268,0.0005443359,0.000015617836,0.0043489938,0.5038472,0.0007599764,0.004267214,0.37614894,0.012025698,0.07883782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026116051,0.000068368456,0.021841928,0.00041436907,0.000023848612,0.0009485849,0.33112395,0.001028593,0.0012250695,0.017975759,0.6252317,0.00009171982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10602638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20672835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99236596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011070218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004606141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21081847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346997066","doi":"10.1111/joac.12159","title":"Transgenic Crops in Latin America: Expropriation, Negative Value and the State","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Latin Americans; Neoliberalism (international relations); Agriculture; Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Political science; Economics; Political economy; Law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.022888117124542556,"score_gpt":0.20177274863101524,"score_spread":0.17888463150647269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346997066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23776487,0.068779215,0.012533481,0.19697398,0.0018105956,0.00005033487,0.00010013598,0.00009069526,0.48189682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9382673,0.02755704,0.0021606626,0.0073104696,0.00060667616,0.000065302505,0.000046178167,0.000043189084,0.023943245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993061,0.00037162512,0.00002229217,0.00007295087,0.00010584913,0.00012114467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989907,0.00062440214,0.00015126789,0.000080434904,0.00009282215,0.00006044426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021711704,0.0002748063,0.00024343446,0.00072177325,0.0025282297,0.005342909,0.00051615987,0.0017501493,0.0021363217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001977474,0.000118166834,0.00035020028,0.0016391105,0.012558904,0.003568011,0.0025222145,0.002542059,0.000104460865],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019128005,0.000020265914,0.0018889199,0.00009345464,0.0000055748806,0.00040484467,0.019371133,0.00024577772,0.0010381562,0.9507458,0.004991404,0.02117559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016287848,0.000057252197,0.0076353266,0.00060095935,0.000019905025,0.00054264924,0.028581731,0.0004737716,0.0017601659,0.32101429,0.6392527,0.000044897668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003265085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034593956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005342909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004962869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017873743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036008358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518409997","doi":"10.1111/joac.12182","title":"Repossession, Re‐informalization and Dispossession: The ‘Muddy Terrain’ of Land Commodification in Turkey","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Land titling; Land grabbing; Commercialization; Cadastre; Land registration; Land reform; Modernization theory; Economic growth; Land tenure; Economy; Political science; Agriculture; Geography; Economics; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.037725325496272014,"score_gpt":0.23338745271494105,"score_spread":0.19566212721866905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518409997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9652295,0.0007785148,0.0010923711,0.0004679279,0.000010605111,0.0000089338655,0.000022844622,0.000011248244,0.03237808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863064,0.00012143512,0.00017793686,0.000013503501,0.0000014520191,0.0000020718105,0.000007990525,0.000003599071,0.001041403],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991035,0.0003752573,0.00003876673,0.00013653857,0.00011465749,0.00023132311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995345,0.0001607767,0.00012767535,0.00008682597,0.00004368433,0.000046498088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010569113,0.00024070025,0.00019473735,0.0008306199,0.0026085218,0.0029811617,0.0005728271,0.0004841222,0.0020617398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008165778,0.00024281254,0.00015330227,0.0010766904,0.008275495,0.0027079605,0.0029826418,0.00052035484,0.00016180293],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002400084,0.00008286523,0.06415303,0.0002769796,0.00003301238,0.006189801,0.52782124,0.0018698595,0.0040097153,0.2696559,0.0029090706,0.1227585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021975493,0.00018581822,0.17442179,0.00043875483,0.000038122023,0.0040201074,0.6022369,0.0032062556,0.0030141247,0.0290163,0.18330225,0.000097560354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013578624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020779049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013578624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050620562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015701349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036727965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523675081","doi":"10.1111/joac.12184","title":"Challenging Southeast Asian Development: The Shadows of Success, by JonathanRigg. London: Routledge, 2016. Pp. Xxii + 253. $160.00 (hb); $59.95 (pb). ISBN 10:0415711584 and ISBN 13:9780415711586","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Asian Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Agrarian society; Library science; History; Media studies; Classics; Art history; Sociology; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.028017764895597045,"score_gpt":0.2516841388061453,"score_spread":0.22366637391054828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523675081","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030641144,0.88897544,0.0003372871,0.08493991,0.0026326533,0.000011955666,0.0000953033,0.0000411026,0.019902226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0747144,0.8674051,0.00080743735,0.008114477,0.002276598,0.00005490238,0.00014500858,0.000072080606,0.046409942],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995555,0.00022250759,0.00003129413,0.000044217817,0.00007342827,0.000072947165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999193,0.00030127208,0.000092448485,0.00004144516,0.00015358794,0.0002183314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019664771,0.0015060223,0.0005110876,0.0012170214,0.0029267778,0.0050598066,0.00083203707,0.0018958,0.008834569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023227183,0.00053376786,0.00037273808,0.0034102194,0.0071374583,0.008796488,0.0034204894,0.0029467833,0.0018616803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059385253,0.000046029007,0.0034402474,0.0023209827,0.000046039462,0.0007661752,0.041666735,0.0003763507,0.000327518,0.049377665,0.6988518,0.20272104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007718395,0.00003156542,0.0079476535,0.0036529945,0.000026846361,0.0006239368,0.053051222,0.00017649504,0.0002664546,0.04242315,0.8917566,0.000035323625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044739038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09964056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044739038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034370292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009863379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08895725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528701691","doi":"10.1111/joac.12189","title":"Discipline, Governmentality and ‘Developmental Patrimonialism’: Insights from Rwanda's Pyrethrum Sector","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Elite; Governmentality; Capitalism; Political science; Entrepreneurship; Political economy; Incentive; State (computer science); Sociology; Public administration; Economics; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.04309328823453189,"score_gpt":0.26575969469694943,"score_spread":0.22266640646241753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528701691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.912665,0.0027391778,0.0004915892,0.00956056,0.000030182435,0.000016617278,0.000013533892,0.0000049662503,0.07447837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973953,0.00074909965,0.00006922194,0.0002158474,0.00001104666,0.0000059377935,0.000003954224,0.0000036181332,0.0015460515],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986362,0.00088580034,0.00002064748,0.00004652183,0.000051453684,0.00035950023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982346,0.0013408081,0.00021824705,0.00004491301,0.000055569966,0.00010583189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022123535,0.00021046866,0.00024112863,0.0012243656,0.005919455,0.004904761,0.0006511267,0.0014462322,0.0021401462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018302683,0.00025163984,0.00012567213,0.0014432507,0.01292546,0.0037666555,0.0027658157,0.0019618976,0.00019934442],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027645823,0.00004945412,0.0066493712,0.0001094554,0.0000045382103,0.0021114654,0.77908665,0.00015389046,0.0007733384,0.19868748,0.0012107753,0.011136032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000903038,0.000045034332,0.021686,0.00037230682,0.000009239593,0.00058061874,0.904654,0.00029683032,0.00040836283,0.017242176,0.05468006,0.000016405951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0129872095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023843877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0129872095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005878992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028721977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04265523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561207071","doi":"10.1111/joac.12199","title":"Migrant Agricultural Workers in Local and Global Contexts: Toward a Better Life?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Geopolitics; Agriculture; Construct (python library); Politics; Ideology; Migrant workers; Sociology; Work (physics); Political science; Order (exchange); Political economy; Economic growth; Business; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.04002310370074885,"score_gpt":0.27771267799953137,"score_spread":0.2376895742987825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561207071","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03130369,0.6846794,0.00089331245,0.18594223,0.011360569,0.000029333385,0.00015049482,0.00007655176,0.08556447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23870687,0.57769006,0.0028960998,0.07773301,0.012380431,0.00021504847,0.0002721232,0.0001934673,0.0899129],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993693,0.00035642693,0.000032198666,0.000058231453,0.000091436275,0.00009239304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901056,0.000636127,0.00010915832,0.000052652882,0.00008717272,0.000104238694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012220511,0.0006408909,0.00075917697,0.0012932232,0.003144345,0.007574287,0.0006212747,0.0026569094,0.0058247154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019033672,0.00021154947,0.0004196797,0.0032447358,0.005454037,0.008303197,0.002526554,0.003503094,0.0009869203],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007405975,0.000057821697,0.0026033605,0.0030468241,0.000062007486,0.00093921844,0.3124416,0.00018695771,0.00058494386,0.19366652,0.29462892,0.19170782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049424857,0.0000306327,0.0021457248,0.0022540144,0.000016276897,0.00027613482,0.08847778,0.000028163653,0.00007606391,0.008930759,0.897744,0.000015439828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002984114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008012937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007574287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022889911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023678478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019485593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582850234","doi":"10.1111/joac.12201","title":"Revisiting the World Bank's land law reform agenda in Africa: The promise and perils of customary practices","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Waterloo","funders":"World Bank Group","keywords":"Land law; Customary land; Corporate governance; Law reform; Land reform; Land tenure; Political science; Politics; Law; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.10296731046680903,"score_gpt":0.28318528083994415,"score_spread":0.18021797037313514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2582850234","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029957019,0.01108714,0.0012937374,0.9294573,0.0013276385,0.000053742086,0.000042297208,0.000015007187,0.026766043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78137255,0.019430617,0.0059053637,0.17824106,0.0018072265,0.00020738701,0.00005814874,0.00004231976,0.012935185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98190844,0.010930222,0.0007518539,0.0005725959,0.0024018104,0.00343513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9634353,0.025737377,0.0021909475,0.0010446815,0.00431767,0.0032740147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03947997,0.000433542,0.0007967345,0.0026003467,0.009784984,0.019626288,0.0017359094,0.017746886,0.0052445577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031606447,0.000537991,0.0004264066,0.0031446933,0.02550815,0.012399937,0.0091179265,0.016754912,0.00037876677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044267403,0.00014001135,0.0018422909,0.00046101084,0.000011045868,0.0008764491,0.02012671,0.0008177444,0.00082233234,0.8937267,0.04628885,0.03484261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009525736,0.0001398251,0.006697254,0.0044533946,0.00003021906,0.0002769402,0.05787358,0.0012047989,0.0012134189,0.18274261,0.7451383,0.00013446118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035535164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048741013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03947997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017900186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04480754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20879257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599548027","doi":"10.1111/joac.12211","title":"A coup foretold: Fernando Lugo and the lost promise of agrarian reform in Paraguay","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Politics; Agrarian reform; Context (archaeology); Political economy; State (computer science); Capitalism; Democracy; Conceptualization; Land reform; Political science; Sociology; Economy; Geography; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.038340020739302046,"score_gpt":0.23186980894833537,"score_spread":0.19352978820903333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599548027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8328344,0.003968343,0.0005628898,0.05585006,0.00019344153,0.000021045744,0.00003774372,0.000016346405,0.10651575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99553525,0.0002790125,0.00007374366,0.00061205204,0.000017450311,0.0000044956296,0.0000043542145,0.0000027010549,0.0034708905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995491,0.00021940818,0.000005511803,0.00003823039,0.000026663673,0.00016107022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997036,0.00010337623,0.000054266693,0.000024465398,0.000043298944,0.000071028175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009447171,0.00011060696,0.0001715313,0.00027554223,0.0042681354,0.0020433618,0.00037727488,0.0011093218,0.0024852303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011850089,0.00010745362,0.00009642718,0.00030798436,0.0041835885,0.0009243887,0.0019016683,0.001595625,0.000092406146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055585813,0.00013538962,0.024900984,0.00024927044,0.000032276424,0.005724937,0.17139079,0.0016669671,0.0048031644,0.7185397,0.015133612,0.056867015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050877417,0.0003143524,0.11555271,0.0006587535,0.000040550247,0.0012303562,0.21368815,0.0020591025,0.0028524231,0.10249117,0.56096035,0.00010128812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048881456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1038435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048881456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007546406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021972489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0971939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601932887","doi":"10.1111/joac.12203","title":"Neo‐developmentalism and a “<i>vía campesina</i>” for rural development: Unreconciled projects in Ecuador's Citizen's Revolution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Food sovereignty; Agrarian society; Developmentalism; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Agrarian reform; Economic growth; Agriculture; Economics; Food security; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.05619954509241996,"score_gpt":0.2455968535545178,"score_spread":0.18939730846209785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601932887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4952,0.013310704,0.00454633,0.114240035,0.00024592935,0.00006609593,0.00003904769,0.000048214337,0.37230358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99084175,0.0010383035,0.0005794249,0.0007327296,0.00003404099,0.000024915584,0.0000059195168,0.0000058542305,0.0067370473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924433,0.00045036306,0.000014270378,0.000052521453,0.00003957131,0.00019891682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930537,0.00036564484,0.00009603929,0.0000838416,0.00007216275,0.0000769434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021623003,0.0001659663,0.00012782181,0.00047605578,0.0028040747,0.0036517652,0.00041664756,0.0008903349,0.002536228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017540817,0.000079811936,0.000111305264,0.00052720145,0.009951225,0.0020056206,0.002535631,0.0013338729,0.00007070208],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002351503,0.00002963317,0.001189186,0.000047663387,0.0000019208967,0.00026069913,0.016719159,0.00017884215,0.00021767445,0.95848644,0.0027127224,0.020132596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032645978,0.00008576268,0.010951434,0.00032989102,0.000011216578,0.00035419865,0.057107005,0.001197673,0.000855531,0.1933267,0.7357251,0.000022871538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006495503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065687066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069304947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069304947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026437757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050284505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754929876","doi":"10.1111/joac.12217","title":"Gender Challenges, Volume 1: Agriculture, Technology, and Food SecurityBinaAgarwalNew Delhi: Oxford University Press. 2016. Pp. 400 + xxiii. US$235/Rs. 6,595 (three‐volume set, pb). ISBN: 978‐0‐19‐809982‐6Gender Challenges, Volume 2: Property, Family, and the StateBinaAgarwalNew Delhi: Oxford University Press. 2016. Pp. 456 + xix. US$235/Rs. 6,595 (three‐volume set, pb). ISBN: 978‐0‐19‐809983‐3Gender Challenges, Volume 3: Environmental Change and Collective ActionBinaAgarwalNew Delhi: Oxford University Press. 2016. Pp. 426 + xxi. US$235/Rs. 6,595 (three‐volume set, pb). ISBN: 978‐0‐19‐809984‐0","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"New delhi; Library science; Political science; Media studies; History; Sociology; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06549114490818783,"score_gpt":0.2084733541565697,"score_spread":0.14298220924838187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754929876","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009537954,0.71714824,0.0009268376,0.019098144,0.008845777,0.00005458398,0.0032694312,0.00037035215,0.24933285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0076022474,0.35884637,0.0010781323,0.002343983,0.0017358721,0.00009428816,0.003321366,0.00043988653,0.6245378],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989073,0.00014572985,0.00010880802,0.00017912706,0.0004913006,0.00016771244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989441,0.00033049434,0.00013742488,0.00012791902,0.00023518802,0.00022490112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011638929,0.0021851552,0.0020180917,0.0023411247,0.0011207445,0.0070778728,0.0016915076,0.0022969653,0.24236432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020438791,0.0012105273,0.0007250134,0.0064188843,0.0017489217,0.005638638,0.0034173897,0.0041792444,0.08929196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049420007,0.000029901486,0.00037508213,0.0015961314,0.000018907433,0.00009771741,0.00056927965,0.00021406599,0.00045120044,0.008169574,0.7791992,0.20922956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003740997,0.000010263141,0.0010194923,0.00086484954,0.0000060306165,0.00015318651,0.000560796,0.000020919302,0.00009270176,0.0027459199,0.99451077,0.0000114688355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020406047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03882378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24236432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036811067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005785335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8107894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763709736","doi":"10.1111/joac.12224","title":"Migration and agrarian transformation in Indigenous Mexico","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Collective action; Agrarian society; Argument (complex analysis); Ethnography; Rationality; Political economy; Corporate governance; Sociology; Peasant; Political science; Development economics; Geography; Agriculture; Anthropology; Politics; Law; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.06772973661815664,"score_gpt":0.34059475976092923,"score_spread":0.2728650231427726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763709736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932636,0.00017572925,0.000039214123,0.00026790044,0.0000037474751,0.000005274888,0.000007852517,0.0000012754739,0.006235315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899715,0.00019513727,0.000057882775,0.000025463794,0.0000024068331,0.0000043631558,0.0000064484743,5.9607845e-7,0.00071064034],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997186,0.00009585716,0.0000068758177,0.000028913923,0.00002059984,0.00012912393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997875,0.00004941491,0.0000892868,0.0000140225375,0.000026787773,0.00003298005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052775326,0.000116010015,0.000115066934,0.0004404146,0.0034559157,0.0013300412,0.00030240836,0.00024984303,0.001722404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076599786,0.000068637746,0.00008376903,0.00070555316,0.002147969,0.0006087071,0.0021503863,0.00042663017,0.000037057103],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017789418,0.00022180921,0.20054977,0.00027598074,0.000030397467,0.003849221,0.7092648,0.00031478863,0.0026141072,0.033431385,0.0013048989,0.047964986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010936609,0.00007494915,0.31284738,0.00012406857,0.000018787925,0.0004301844,0.65046704,0.00016936667,0.00037503074,0.0019724732,0.033497125,0.000012623135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06004502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13205048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06004502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023305214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014049474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119391024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768590041","doi":"10.1111/joac.12240","title":"The politics of agrarian change in Bolivia's soy complex","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Agrarian society; Legitimacy; Politics; Agrarian system; Capital (architecture); Context (archaeology); Political economy; Economic system; State (computer science); Capital accumulation; Legitimation; Socialism; Political science; Economics; Market economy; Law; Communism; Geography; Human capital","score_opus":0.11245901841222301,"score_gpt":0.28083313963890133,"score_spread":0.16837412122667833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768590041","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78906983,0.005872022,0.0008138307,0.012075081,0.00007335758,0.00005409023,0.00014859268,0.000027997274,0.19186509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952579,0.00028833447,0.00010796272,0.00022780198,0.000009965632,0.0000063644115,0.000016322721,0.000003246571,0.0040821135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989618,0.00029489218,0.000017721191,0.000093574934,0.00010838021,0.0005236491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995952,0.00012285664,0.000108294014,0.00003594957,0.000047129528,0.00009052214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013204337,0.00016441169,0.0002454151,0.0010181561,0.0044642054,0.005352649,0.0006190573,0.00082658214,0.0030167673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001145264,0.00018748987,0.0001627077,0.0012465774,0.00915346,0.0009584868,0.0050250036,0.0015538076,0.000108305896],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025543346,0.000081319275,0.03177878,0.00023848764,0.00007342381,0.0016280507,0.04460122,0.003767368,0.0034527385,0.87306124,0.0055930074,0.035469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015835787,0.00020159007,0.22994497,0.000762637,0.000101206475,0.00047768457,0.08668961,0.0029264502,0.0029343073,0.09614999,0.57953894,0.00011426482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12918893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13838403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12918893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022211244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004366572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2568739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789610845","doi":"10.1111/joac.12253","title":"From feudal colonization to agrarian capitalism in Mallorca: Peasant endurance under the rise and fall of large estates (1229–1900)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Peasant; Agrarian society; Capitalism; Feudalism; Nobility; Wage labour; Economic history; Agrarian system; Economy; Political economy; Agriculture; Geography; Political science; Economics; Archaeology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.044778055055490644,"score_gpt":0.23948228709612487,"score_spread":0.19470423204063422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789610845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90326095,0.0026631716,0.00008639457,0.0027154244,0.000056324276,0.00001472203,0.00004807473,0.000016902119,0.09113804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982818,0.0005157077,0.000043108,0.00036754386,0.000029600555,0.0000045964325,0.000025405843,0.000008646796,0.016187355],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996989,0.00004673284,0.0000041401518,0.000053343807,0.000032113403,0.00016480767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999876,0.000015113959,0.000020082121,0.000007861985,0.000014668692,0.00006635084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036483412,0.00020422747,0.00019447129,0.00068028487,0.005609771,0.0034088483,0.000500698,0.0008220346,0.0046796342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004045351,0.00014072144,0.00012188578,0.000614077,0.0056451783,0.0009035045,0.0028684826,0.0012164545,0.0003108407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081767765,0.00036507827,0.06772756,0.0003775878,0.00006054827,0.013332189,0.5735412,0.0002692658,0.0054532257,0.19247572,0.021337163,0.124242716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000671907,0.00022606037,0.3310353,0.0004949302,0.000020696772,0.0018425452,0.12603189,0.00020201452,0.000871717,0.007137626,0.53199387,0.00007626886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16460076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3660923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16460076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00900902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025202264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32728535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789771193","doi":"10.1111/joac.12254","title":"Socio‐economic transitions and everyday life changes in the rural world: Pyrenean households and their contemporary economic history","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; World Health Organization","keywords":"Subsistence agriculture; Agrarian society; Commodification; Tourism; Industrialisation; Everyday life; Agriculture; Rural area; Livelihood; Economic growth; Economy; Geography; Economics; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.05439365501202079,"score_gpt":0.21898285890367414,"score_spread":0.16458920389165335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789771193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99046856,0.0015786802,0.000051072246,0.00078214606,0.000011296448,0.000003912745,0.00005177786,0.0000018998601,0.007050673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99825865,0.0008278458,0.000021354028,0.000038251666,0.0000060747866,0.0000026083367,0.000019455527,6.6490674e-7,0.00082505104],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973387,0.000084747146,0.000009087772,0.000035868325,0.000027079557,0.0001093954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980634,0.000044513614,0.00006046806,0.000009741503,0.000021317981,0.000057717294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003589087,0.00011512664,0.00016103996,0.00086201954,0.003276145,0.0023095994,0.00029667918,0.00034415346,0.0025331008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006166109,0.00011760276,0.00006456868,0.0015988422,0.0027841812,0.0016886154,0.0018078147,0.0005037841,0.00010838546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012586021,0.00014785446,0.1450602,0.00023597058,0.000042828928,0.0026635348,0.77438116,0.00024894622,0.0014024442,0.027227933,0.0018070014,0.046656206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004138177,0.00007974076,0.4855457,0.00013700752,0.000009541449,0.00047364004,0.44867364,0.00012414306,0.00014732275,0.002261723,0.06251537,0.00002797747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05677755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09282278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05677755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002390416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053461717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11289412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800912360","doi":"10.1111/joac.12265","title":"Capitalist food production and the rise of legal adulteration: Regulating food standards in 19th‐century Britain","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Food processing; Production (economics); State (computer science); Political science; Business; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.030803177161710157,"score_gpt":0.30771126243334784,"score_spread":0.2769080852716377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800912360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9443253,0.0005541024,0.0006895544,0.0022558626,0.000012400987,0.000006612686,0.00004385434,0.000011595348,0.05210068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870884,0.00007441745,0.000052372252,0.000034017186,0.0000029017258,0.0000012354665,0.0000059552044,0.0000016535491,0.0011187013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892694,0.00026086942,0.000044592613,0.00013269899,0.0002817972,0.00035317286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982578,0.0005127377,0.00048705252,0.00020269609,0.00034611532,0.00019358612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013027274,0.000074284355,0.00016025477,0.0011103261,0.001988378,0.0024820785,0.0004072762,0.00070650456,0.0025677814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003022965,0.00017612235,0.000104913786,0.0012903609,0.01133458,0.00092954753,0.0020304266,0.00086714525,0.00012616561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002568835,0.00009971238,0.09962154,0.00014130042,0.000033266144,0.001228925,0.13071273,0.0022072687,0.004718779,0.6933684,0.0025206357,0.06509056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050579805,0.00012558464,0.7850738,0.0002391139,0.000016897706,0.00029839,0.02305151,0.001749856,0.0015369364,0.06569459,0.122083046,0.00007966577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08344425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12559874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08344425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008676068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021310172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1659171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802947902","doi":"10.1111/joac.12268","title":"The political ecology of rice intensification in south India: Putting SRI in its places","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Livelihood; Scope (computer science); Food security; Political ecology; Politics; South asia; System of Rice Intensification; Paddy field; Business; Ecology; Economic growth; Political science; Development economics; Agriculture; Sociology; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.06641454269700678,"score_gpt":0.26546680700124037,"score_spread":0.1990522643042336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802947902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9266316,0.00028869865,0.00065220136,0.0056420187,0.000021905562,0.000015422766,0.000030949057,0.000008585249,0.06670861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908173,0.00007654936,0.000056785728,0.00009779838,0.000005533833,0.0000035197831,0.000004446479,0.0000025841325,0.00067116757],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985483,0.000714573,0.000022880886,0.00010020988,0.0001234811,0.0004905866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980246,0.0010624254,0.0004163725,0.000109108005,0.00013028216,0.0002572092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096577103,0.00013232078,0.00016505789,0.0012993123,0.0038537944,0.005256091,0.0005095473,0.0005747725,0.004607105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00134592,0.00016997465,0.00013234488,0.001653618,0.011877014,0.0011205405,0.004859038,0.001404714,0.00018883418],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002749635,0.00022128697,0.13570699,0.00035614832,0.000058514335,0.002844597,0.41539326,0.0013270802,0.0073853806,0.39591458,0.0030489517,0.037468117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021741364,0.00014052073,0.31111628,0.00017557573,0.000042903597,0.00052316353,0.5963305,0.0012001387,0.0012293487,0.027108494,0.062062524,0.00004872113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012442491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026147535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012442491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040969905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003010306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02972585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2874299775","doi":"10.1111/joac.12289","title":"The disappearance of water buffalo from agrarian landscapes in Western China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Ottawa; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Livelihood; Modernization theory; China; Agrarian society; State (computer science); Sustainability; Cash crop; Ethnic group; Geography; Land tenure; Political science; Economic growth; Economy; Agriculture; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.011886981297705206,"score_gpt":0.2167487699212163,"score_spread":0.2048617886235111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2874299775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991873,0.000048182155,0.000023223874,0.00008112154,0.0000015074819,0.0000028866205,0.0000140142665,6.6012694e-7,0.00064106303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993862,0.000068003785,0.000028752384,0.00003276443,0.0000025177208,0.0000030182468,0.000018713672,6.6805916e-7,0.0004594193],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997892,0.000036084817,0.0000097280235,0.00004471631,0.00004659593,0.0000737007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995234,0.000050471193,0.00019792843,0.000028385797,0.0000980703,0.00010175937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051745964,0.00014022022,0.00018719886,0.00076410157,0.0019383564,0.00073021237,0.00036709488,0.00023014678,0.0013659741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051550445,0.000106756066,0.00008970953,0.0013245966,0.0021585443,0.0008052637,0.001000953,0.0003425941,0.000048557304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011094175,0.00006438095,0.88838273,0.00009888928,0.000038132413,0.0028796967,0.07383791,0.0000977122,0.005808153,0.0012575479,0.00069590437,0.026728092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022836198,0.000034919794,0.9540814,0.000016110134,0.0000076031138,0.00017439082,0.042629093,0.000103732964,0.00031880324,0.00020506718,0.0024190845,0.000007622615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09102496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23810247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09102496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014744013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014701546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18099028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894565937","doi":"10.1111/joac.12294","title":"Financiers in the forests on Vancouver Island, British Columbia: On fixes and colonial enclosures","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Context (archaeology); Indigenous; Negotiation; Capital (architecture); State (computer science); Politics; Dirt; Land tenure; Deregulation; Economics; Economy; Finance; Political economy; Market economy; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.020513305235992055,"score_gpt":0.20855031967512958,"score_spread":0.1880370144391375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894565937","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799483,0.0005783081,0.000041043146,0.0020175322,0.000015950445,0.000018723893,0.00010424333,0.000003920181,0.017271876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924819,0.0003778825,0.00004645085,0.00016560151,0.000004207298,0.0000039415045,0.000043279655,0.0000030125952,0.0068737627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994103,0.00006180354,0.0000134727625,0.00003699567,0.00009546784,0.00038206406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986349,0.00015051334,0.0001851427,0.000026573493,0.0003080541,0.0006948041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005424287,0.0001299919,0.00018620606,0.0009699946,0.009867571,0.004287453,0.0006781856,0.00061722536,0.005539458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014242708,0.00019003912,0.000055109347,0.0015270218,0.003280528,0.000615288,0.0016693749,0.0010523199,0.00014946282],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034580534,0.00026182563,0.5926028,0.00020131272,0.000055845612,0.007270951,0.22581321,0.00067937607,0.0025761256,0.03910169,0.032175366,0.09891581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014134861,0.00005099498,0.55245686,0.00023873404,0.000018745339,0.0002840959,0.36402616,0.00034478895,0.00030202407,0.00089762383,0.08132933,0.00003652533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95507807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99126786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044921935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027328074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020117674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19827998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920968442","doi":"10.1111/j.1471-0366.2006.00117.x","title":"Book Reviews","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CONQUEST; Battle; Independence (probability theory); Agribusiness; Economic history; History; Political science; Geography; Economy; Ancient history; Economics; Agriculture; Archaeology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05312690892661249,"score_gpt":0.236143090293598,"score_spread":0.18301618136698553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920968442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037307933,0.21434088,0.00105783,0.013302079,0.035996627,0.0001646506,0.003989967,0.0009326184,0.7298423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013747662,0.08033089,0.0011006476,0.005470594,0.008096588,0.00007994364,0.0031094304,0.00034725753,0.90009],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907815,0.00006703105,0.000052436753,0.00016377495,0.0005746561,0.000064017746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980154,0.00024943467,0.000107402855,0.000114048235,0.0012511124,0.00026255858],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054448773,0.0011289084,0.0012773679,0.0039469814,0.0010793189,0.0050160023,0.0017493564,0.0017152636,0.4625108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029322878,0.00050917856,0.00067118445,0.005476591,0.0004677991,0.002942481,0.0014261792,0.0020695126,0.48148307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061041546,0.000010905404,0.000029036572,0.00031156893,0.000002541733,0.00003100522,0.000025629644,0.000035511166,0.000098802186,0.0010723775,0.9251535,0.07322318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018294605,0.0000037707805,0.00006118518,0.00020262976,0.0000019385323,0.00005646774,0.000019696748,0.000007746272,0.000017502787,0.0002525407,0.99937207,0.0000026425482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004088291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008433037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4625108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015112198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002871284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7666631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965133459","doi":"10.1111/joac.12334","title":"“The enchantment of property”: Arthur Young, enclosure, and the cottage economy in England, 1770–1840","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Dominance (genetics); Poverty; Agricultural revolution; Agriculture; Proletarianization; Industrial Revolution; Leasehold estate; Political science; Economy; Economics; History; Law; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.031903380824591106,"score_gpt":0.19595355587908375,"score_spread":0.16405017505449265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965133459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73905826,0.041421216,0.000678554,0.061009526,0.00069672376,0.000025668605,0.00029906348,0.000009191172,0.15680182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94015604,0.0065830387,0.000112092326,0.0014302372,0.00019399243,0.000007812796,0.000024983048,0.000009594483,0.051482227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949646,0.00018034427,0.000023912307,0.00007133643,0.00008503049,0.00014286462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990388,0.00041260998,0.00018175089,0.000031708816,0.00012252529,0.00021256757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009131225,0.00010992708,0.00015028282,0.0006508457,0.0030368087,0.0024828329,0.00026945295,0.0009759645,0.0062892525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017148792,0.00020118785,0.000065113425,0.00086541683,0.0060149427,0.002506275,0.0015719755,0.0014202881,0.00028389393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016030401,0.00006427408,0.017868,0.00022297604,0.000013071515,0.0027609833,0.33991167,0.00038296264,0.00078120537,0.5502207,0.05707036,0.030543396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010055162,0.000056671874,0.052220818,0.00040506411,0.0000051257025,0.00047354124,0.044888064,0.00013434787,0.0002801206,0.011554051,0.8899301,0.00004197362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19031098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3828449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19031098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009482443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021861077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37840652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980636780","doi":"10.1111/joac.12345","title":"Environment, labour and capitalism at sea: ‘Working the ground’ in Scotland, by Penny McCallHoward. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 2017. Pp. 248. £80. ISBN: 978‐1‐7849‐9414‐3","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Capitalism; Citation; Agrarian society; Common ground; Sociology; Library science; History; Media studies; Political science; Law; Archaeology; Agriculture; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03752453326639109,"score_gpt":0.24711225143907634,"score_spread":0.20958771817268523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980636780","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003658496,0.9262054,0.00021228786,0.056030028,0.005012448,0.000012383828,0.00017924827,0.000024384286,0.008665273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11856624,0.8212234,0.00075817463,0.008850415,0.008071085,0.00004768657,0.0003674785,0.000049637005,0.042065978],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993655,0.00019356508,0.000038477923,0.0000773367,0.00016196413,0.00016315271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991528,0.00035379347,0.00015733845,0.00002639932,0.00010072627,0.00020895185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014825545,0.0020545705,0.0009817249,0.0021081425,0.0020499337,0.0058304477,0.001353822,0.002961046,0.008720893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025998014,0.0008092711,0.0004994027,0.004497688,0.0053739497,0.0072804634,0.0029155796,0.0021430657,0.0013719964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015143058,0.00007020477,0.0030629286,0.0026951998,0.00006422286,0.00074663706,0.02027465,0.0004842235,0.0003308177,0.029487392,0.71542764,0.2272046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003004638,0.000112348534,0.023764472,0.0045894366,0.000036884227,0.0007682924,0.026847376,0.00022233749,0.0001251357,0.023439458,0.919992,0.00007212771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1030403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20422271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1030403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005870804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005099402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20488107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980901872","doi":"10.1111/joac.12338","title":"Agrarian class struggle and state formation in post‐colonial Pakistan, 1959–1974: Contingencies of <i>Mazdoor Kisan Raj</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Peasant; Agrarian society; State (computer science); Leasehold estate; Political economy; Colonialism; Politics; Power (physics); Class conflict; Ruling class; Political science; Intervention (counseling); Land tenure; Development economics; Agrarian reform; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Law; Agriculture","score_opus":0.02772710261968516,"score_gpt":0.2915398067559755,"score_spread":0.2638127041362904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980901872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99523455,0.00014752426,0.000029828854,0.00040730543,0.000011388583,0.000007062274,0.00009251866,0.0000013286676,0.0040685413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991836,0.000077002434,0.000008848632,0.000028304985,0.0000067034894,0.0000030320584,0.000037238216,4.806783e-7,0.00065480726],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996076,0.000051819945,0.0000121451085,0.000028716084,0.000030299525,0.0002694956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990044,0.0002088121,0.0003136375,0.00003139701,0.00016247651,0.00027928612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055651116,0.00012308903,0.00017054316,0.0012821851,0.004223434,0.002468718,0.0004066855,0.00052467186,0.0057007535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011320971,0.00019321723,0.000120812656,0.0015369912,0.00360069,0.0009995206,0.0015648172,0.0015333885,0.0003922917],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045800942,0.0005100188,0.8419065,0.00006749924,0.000041145813,0.0017434134,0.1039336,0.00038263522,0.00071068143,0.01694461,0.0036142597,0.029687561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012355388,0.00012467675,0.925862,0.00003313538,0.000009435066,0.0001628879,0.05956479,0.00013669708,0.00029859264,0.0006701828,0.013108159,0.00001712504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13464984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23590234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13464984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044297804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017846929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2677322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009582995","doi":"10.1111/joac.12359","title":"Labour, nature, and exploitation: Social metabolism and inequality in a farming community in mid‐19th century Catalonia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad","keywords":"Wage labour; Economics; Agriculture; Inequality; Wage; Labour economics; Division of labour; Livestock; Hoarding (animal behavior); Commodity; Child labour; Consumption (sociology); Sociology; Ecology; Market economy; Biology","score_opus":0.03596625636852757,"score_gpt":0.2641771116934445,"score_spread":0.22821085532491692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009582995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99851173,0.00023215047,0.000014246759,0.000104206716,0.0000021272547,0.000001908356,0.000025687586,3.2949433e-7,0.0011075903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99941254,0.00012291856,0.000021028725,0.000020575435,0.000002149318,0.0000016600615,0.000019753059,3.643768e-7,0.000399124],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968255,0.00010361035,0.000011347157,0.000040610514,0.000029718823,0.00013222852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997402,0.000068507965,0.000058750666,0.00001566428,0.00004691388,0.00006998025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006368203,0.00017052902,0.00023414163,0.001275701,0.0018397754,0.0015902581,0.00051657995,0.00037281765,0.0012183575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042351076,0.000111641806,0.00010971816,0.0008837849,0.0017580161,0.00041242878,0.0019392541,0.00035008098,0.000093005605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003903173,0.00033391232,0.66031504,0.00017014494,0.00009173423,0.0027095934,0.27434337,0.00074234087,0.002272965,0.007888692,0.0019425799,0.0487993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007731677,0.000059063314,0.9061668,0.00008406895,0.000009997855,0.00016185794,0.0870605,0.0002947541,0.00007055496,0.0005526305,0.005518106,0.0000141009305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19029525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27999198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19029525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00439552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007582801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37837523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013104521","doi":"10.1111/joac.12360","title":"From a free gift of nature to a precarious commodity: Bees, pollination services, and industrial agriculture","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Insect and Pesticide Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outreach; Pollination; Pollinator; Agriculture; Ecosystem services; Dialectic; Commodity; Ecology; Biology; Political science; Sociology; Business; Economic growth; Economics; Ecosystem; Market economy","score_opus":0.0676744461219687,"score_gpt":0.25796260465902593,"score_spread":0.19028815853705722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013104521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41247246,0.02715735,0.0043412144,0.25509176,0.00045319568,0.000031113228,0.000087042456,0.000038977276,0.3003269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98973316,0.0028213726,0.0004034278,0.0020723082,0.000063295556,0.0000039159668,0.0000073303618,0.0000067508568,0.004888645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952805,0.00024546924,0.000008497161,0.00003665853,0.00007517668,0.00010619522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988844,0.0006194171,0.00012983923,0.00004488896,0.00014801134,0.00017351689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012775024,0.0001663662,0.00014795664,0.00092668895,0.004898544,0.007605071,0.0005319291,0.0015213094,0.003875888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013386594,0.00007951423,0.000091461465,0.0009991351,0.023661265,0.003328315,0.0023708222,0.001704093,0.00013918795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003841976,0.0000677056,0.010645544,0.00012486715,0.0000066645075,0.00060725724,0.09341115,0.00038927264,0.0007801935,0.8548888,0.00961509,0.029425109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011257856,0.0000414881,0.024419501,0.0004904393,0.000011251394,0.00042187967,0.38146275,0.0010285294,0.0008560076,0.31663105,0.2745879,0.00003796857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1318298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24571937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1318298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009464178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007153676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26212496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034814005","doi":"10.1111/joac.12371","title":"Qualifying tradition: Instituted practices in the making of the organic wine market in Languedoc‐Roussillon, France","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Wine Industry and Tourism","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Wine; Commodification; Agrarian society; Organic product; Fair trade; Ethnography; Sociology; Economy; Marketing; Business; Political science; Geography; Economics; Law; Food science","score_opus":0.11829687872475483,"score_gpt":0.28104512197288367,"score_spread":0.16274824324812884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034814005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97810787,0.00040983138,0.0010420351,0.0006869641,0.000023064536,0.000032669464,0.000021569405,0.000015826421,0.019660147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99762374,0.00006891218,0.00032293328,0.000040307288,0.0000055580863,0.0000047027847,0.000007591354,0.00000628851,0.0019199875],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974251,0.0016059739,0.000040356605,0.00028037946,0.0002519355,0.00039631655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997292,0.0013579306,0.00039930627,0.0001547043,0.00024098871,0.00055502326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035983606,0.00022420098,0.00024846403,0.0013603871,0.007727757,0.005482594,0.0007800767,0.0007062918,0.0037424858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032805484,0.00014818255,0.00017474851,0.0010516904,0.010092816,0.0017858001,0.0031346837,0.0007922688,0.00013778963],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010584406,0.0001314273,0.022225544,0.00010611826,0.000012282207,0.0024207379,0.8736781,0.00026735693,0.0037852507,0.051718913,0.001189487,0.04435897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013483112,0.00015733714,0.060426954,0.00019632849,0.00001297555,0.0005401725,0.8037767,0.00047139844,0.00087557733,0.003512654,0.12996483,0.000051599804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08995723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16972479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08995723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009036354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037014086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17886728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036275077","doi":"10.1111/joac.12374","title":"Glyphosate—A love story. Ordinary thoughtlessness and response‐ability in industrial farming","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wenner-Gren Foundation","keywords":"Glyphosate; Agriculture; Agricultural revolution; Complicity; Agency (philosophy); Business; Natural resource economics; Political science; Political economy; Environmental ethics; Economics; Sociology; Agronomy; Biology; Law; Social science; Ecology","score_opus":0.09224659227597595,"score_gpt":0.23606201366470334,"score_spread":0.14381542138872738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036275077","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08249969,0.036504842,0.0018321188,0.7731215,0.005369513,0.000025691215,0.00007379638,0.000075015,0.10049778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88676107,0.009675965,0.0004895364,0.08158593,0.0031493425,0.000034361245,0.000024954723,0.000058166737,0.01822074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786216,0.0015252545,0.000037749724,0.00014059151,0.00022116356,0.00021310858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671066,0.0020775935,0.0003496241,0.00016756976,0.00018761108,0.00050687924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029814225,0.00036186766,0.00032181185,0.0006595725,0.007711467,0.005826386,0.0005555792,0.0035798908,0.0031407243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037348843,0.00016452599,0.0002454963,0.00044135645,0.03376473,0.0061121443,0.004229227,0.00828749,0.0004562735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000185409,0.00013196985,0.0028045198,0.00021341523,0.00003077885,0.002789852,0.3830402,0.000103500584,0.0012700759,0.46315625,0.11281241,0.033461675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053845702,0.00015065295,0.0029611706,0.00034763094,0.000012107295,0.0033066492,0.20634377,0.0002419578,0.00046778726,0.11751328,0.6685466,0.00005457475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029518534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031211537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007711467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029249026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001212429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021221757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119342957","doi":"10.1111/joac.12404","title":"Disrupting deportability: Transnational workers organize, by Leah F.Vosko. London and New York: Cornell University Press. 2019. pp. ix + 173. $26.95 (pb). ISBN 978‐1‐5017‐4214‐9","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04892001286522852,"score_gpt":0.23281173117393378,"score_spread":0.18389171830870527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119342957","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009804594,0.78228635,0.0004604996,0.18587247,0.010484092,0.000018152055,0.0001440874,0.0000781156,0.019675838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025080198,0.7639997,0.001505959,0.038233172,0.009328587,0.00010197046,0.00036826252,0.00017924317,0.16120294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942845,0.00018906094,0.00004077511,0.00008586049,0.00016436007,0.000091448055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915373,0.00033377743,0.0001086828,0.000027735281,0.00016085271,0.00021531638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001785909,0.0014970418,0.00060107576,0.0013107811,0.002141231,0.003898615,0.0011753859,0.0031599337,0.01297344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018213304,0.00064844923,0.0004417167,0.0019799608,0.0031001125,0.0067358376,0.0030593697,0.0039007694,0.005600455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015259902,0.000017183287,0.00030403136,0.00029435655,0.000009330771,0.0000530552,0.0020315447,0.0000795243,0.000075861055,0.0044568013,0.9324791,0.060183924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004143719,0.000011368345,0.0013431181,0.0008902399,0.0000062230097,0.00012833998,0.0058396887,0.000061813844,0.000047463975,0.00515965,0.9864966,0.000011320979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023837335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03957812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023837335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022977982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003551532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047397137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125556432","doi":"10.1111/joac.12406","title":"‘Milk actually comes from a cow’: Ontario dairy farmers' reactions and interventions with consumers' milk rifts as third‐party alienation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Distancing; Psychological intervention; Commodification; Business; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Economy; Medicine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Nursing; Law","score_opus":0.03787444092664058,"score_gpt":0.23369436588058398,"score_spread":0.1958199249539434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125556432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926917,0.00008920274,0.00008168189,0.0014752912,0.000017043209,0.000022892233,0.0000066649873,0.0000054891075,0.0056100287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651295,0.00014923619,0.00012098719,0.00032708843,0.0000061503038,0.000033830605,0.000006224897,0.00000367291,0.0028399096],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978817,0.001178309,0.000032115368,0.00010984656,0.00027090177,0.00052711467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965042,0.0018539357,0.0005363791,0.00013801233,0.00030164793,0.0006659675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026778753,0.00029336417,0.0002856353,0.00035468512,0.00876802,0.0021067606,0.00077589805,0.0014328818,0.0045290357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005591081,0.0002321251,0.000262916,0.0004610843,0.0069166,0.0008917361,0.0038247998,0.0015590488,0.00018746466],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012726274,0.0001474879,0.014340427,0.0000739392,0.0000073018387,0.00083014066,0.97261727,0.000039532664,0.0023801175,0.00072723563,0.00096535875,0.007743856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017552391,0.00019107647,0.024519142,0.00006644924,0.0000104409455,0.000077749304,0.9563484,0.00007657815,0.00040013494,0.00023895018,0.018035943,0.000017635142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22691096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4001341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77308905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010390442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064473357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45118034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126402147","doi":"10.1111/joac.12410","title":"Agrifood field analysis and sociocultural brokerage. Mexico and the United States: 1950–2016","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología","keywords":"Sociocultural evolution; Field (mathematics); Corporate governance; Agriculture; Value (mathematics); Social capital; Capitalism; Cultural capital; Political science; Creativity; Economic geography; Regional science; Economy; Sociology; Economic growth; Economic system; Geography; Social science; Economics; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.026193051360820462,"score_gpt":0.2550113173188922,"score_spread":0.22881826595807175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126402147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95149475,0.002473201,0.0009975996,0.0031992614,0.00006063048,0.00004017509,0.00084748055,0.000016717197,0.040870115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918677,0.0010627089,0.0006614049,0.0000731526,0.00003289476,0.00002361752,0.00029143546,0.0000065262097,0.005980529],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997435,0.0000958388,0.000010296854,0.000054365468,0.000039290848,0.000056647496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988807,0.0004267433,0.00033743997,0.00006984285,0.00018552059,0.000099751436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011694779,0.000096055504,0.00010319734,0.0026630177,0.003349185,0.0019088627,0.0003849119,0.00028696898,0.0040540895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002081978,0.000087458124,0.000085415064,0.003758246,0.0018884104,0.00182106,0.001280393,0.00051380513,0.000087010914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023537812,0.00013123012,0.36242458,0.0002328996,0.000041179184,0.0016756366,0.36317194,0.0006918062,0.00059007783,0.1266392,0.018472364,0.12569368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051597767,0.000041994346,0.5448131,0.00026933043,0.000019979076,0.00017742538,0.24749342,0.00085968047,0.00049017364,0.006538623,0.19927213,0.000019047557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20552287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29645917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20552287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008684734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001750396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4086532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131381003","doi":"10.1111/joac.12416","title":"The subversive practice of counting bodies: Documenting violence and conflict in rural Brazil","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; State (computer science); Agrarian society; Resistance (ecology); Rural area; Political science; Publishing; Sociology; Public administration; Public relations; Social science; Agriculture; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.019847107535715044,"score_gpt":0.24726196093089275,"score_spread":0.2274148533951777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131381003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8889186,0.0038472684,0.012018948,0.011759617,0.00011955044,0.000259796,0.00010936773,0.00003346759,0.08293347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950121,0.00084180664,0.002381566,0.00021598199,0.000011007441,0.000040964664,0.0000139656395,0.0000063400826,0.0014761816],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807537,0.015345422,0.0006867477,0.0006793922,0.0019783645,0.00055641896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9524542,0.03557416,0.0051948447,0.003017357,0.0029587168,0.00080073444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017683344,0.00021377746,0.00026867772,0.0036693052,0.004973262,0.004654204,0.0010944392,0.0008548562,0.0015521641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04045715,0.00031534038,0.0001192268,0.0032402433,0.013307637,0.0028698114,0.004928049,0.0010516358,0.000131895],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001753607,0.0000212061,0.016513497,0.00028622316,0.000005858966,0.0003982947,0.9050627,0.000094107294,0.0021256239,0.022209425,0.0006908574,0.052574746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005373611,0.00006898923,0.027936041,0.002008041,0.000018748093,0.00067760074,0.83227545,0.0003700642,0.002251134,0.00702643,0.1273257,0.000036504156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020221712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041914597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020221712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048042005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010983399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09351957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133907513","doi":"10.1111/joac.12417","title":"Land and livelihood in the age of COVID‐19: Implications for indigenous food producers in Ecuador","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Livelihood; Indigenous; Poverty; Agrarian society; Food security; Sharecropping; Government (linguistics); Agriculture; Business; Wage; Economic growth; Economics; Agricultural economics; Geography; Labour economics","score_opus":0.06454512798681585,"score_gpt":0.26085300031871056,"score_spread":0.19630787233189473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133907513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672058,0.0049495455,0.0000923157,0.01676339,0.000036207384,0.00000640073,0.000049408227,0.000002993651,0.010894043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973098,0.0014546516,0.000041619507,0.00035300196,0.00001857598,0.0000066171747,0.000014441595,0.0000015177294,0.0007997606],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995301,0.00017053729,0.000010028673,0.00003044251,0.000027569165,0.0002314766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893624,0.00033780455,0.00026792486,0.000030315521,0.00012282332,0.00030497764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008125807,0.00014848806,0.00021075261,0.00060559704,0.0028496278,0.0032283266,0.00085013063,0.00066811946,0.0057060374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002475684,0.00008168492,0.00013357658,0.0009354772,0.003390152,0.0031189362,0.0037600785,0.00106767,0.00012652608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003131928,0.00045268165,0.33769104,0.00062628626,0.00007113424,0.018084418,0.4187171,0.00066426466,0.002027005,0.08292914,0.008424108,0.1299996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010365787,0.00009627891,0.24503314,0.00040706436,0.000025375588,0.0006774055,0.71110964,0.00025026136,0.00028145424,0.0049061244,0.037180845,0.000022024711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04236279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06924854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04236279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033187005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016551889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08423239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165910152","doi":"10.1111/joac.12434","title":"Differentiated agrarian vulnerabilities and generalized national responses to COVID‐19 in the Upper West Region of Ghana","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Vulnerability (computing); Geopolitics; Poverty; Development economics; Economic growth; Pandemic; Politics; Geography; Political science; Socioeconomics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Agriculture; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.1591541674515072,"score_gpt":0.3095513238658477,"score_spread":0.1503971564143405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165910152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839304,0.0003843615,0.00026151378,0.0049794917,0.00000842034,0.000010203402,0.00009183771,0.0000022849306,0.010331384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99918157,0.00022967903,0.000057225257,0.000099450976,0.0000021256913,0.0000044339313,0.000013449629,0.000001231438,0.00041079108],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956495,0.00021392934,0.000009503597,0.000026195115,0.000022802315,0.00016260179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992281,0.00029132696,0.00028266202,0.000023615255,0.000038674887,0.00013558986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059882435,0.00009077582,0.00012786387,0.00022418027,0.0010735549,0.0014768414,0.00017979572,0.00042127699,0.0038997189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016337843,0.0000959054,0.000071248,0.00074352324,0.0017037393,0.001392386,0.0015761384,0.0006895301,0.00010197543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026528718,0.00019037072,0.47963172,0.0002760666,0.0000672941,0.010421511,0.29170835,0.0044152755,0.0018483512,0.16132157,0.0072492217,0.042605057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001467125,0.00007049846,0.44179267,0.00029357977,0.000016203701,0.0007556579,0.49119043,0.0017494435,0.00027420025,0.033800256,0.030011637,0.000030777916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040656403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075495295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040656403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030634431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010796064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080839455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3178510266","doi":"10.1111/joac.12441","title":"Ocean frontier assemblages: Critical insights from Canada's industrial salmon sector","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Coastal and Marine Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Ocean Frontier Institute","keywords":"Frontier; Resource (disambiguation); Scholarship; Politics; Assemblage (archaeology); Geography; Environmental resource management; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0362302830289852,"score_gpt":0.21762876251091293,"score_spread":0.18139847948192772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3178510266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83843815,0.0020249442,0.0011954653,0.012485841,0.000070659604,0.00011533174,0.0005170491,0.000021813592,0.14513072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99209434,0.0010528221,0.0005747791,0.0005772288,0.000011216128,0.000022645365,0.0001320402,0.00001927103,0.0055157277],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976184,0.00052777014,0.000050878476,0.00018395964,0.0005327416,0.0010862364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950612,0.0018716571,0.0003832921,0.00021439845,0.0016212261,0.00084827974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033864072,0.00039318614,0.00037832165,0.0055812853,0.026208682,0.011099181,0.0017170658,0.0012320001,0.0047406573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051286025,0.0002470957,0.00023715498,0.008194096,0.019975077,0.0034301255,0.00694616,0.0027504445,0.0001746707],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007659597,0.00004619952,0.03650004,0.00017610767,0.000019583293,0.0024246268,0.750142,0.0008411019,0.0007323516,0.17127986,0.011766434,0.025995212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034424654,0.0000097429,0.023412295,0.00015975597,0.000008697797,0.000088439,0.91956073,0.00038423372,0.00015978828,0.006405939,0.049789485,0.000017571323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9762296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12272606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12272606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08695573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89044404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191473233","doi":"10.1111/joac.12444","title":"Litigating for legality: Nature conservation, commercial fisheries and disputed territoriality in Ukraine's Danube Delta","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Principle of legality; Territoriality; Commons; Fishing; Political science; State (computer science); Political ecology; Politics; Natural resource; Corporate governance; Geography; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.03348207455952308,"score_gpt":0.24514748180218046,"score_spread":0.21166540724265737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191473233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99181694,0.00025531265,0.00008151734,0.0011556718,0.0000065734976,0.00000621457,0.000017230637,0.0000014589943,0.006659083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991314,0.000103510174,0.000026888685,0.00014598375,0.0000021272963,0.0000041038666,0.000009644184,5.511489e-7,0.0005758073],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980404,0.0005961153,0.00016399285,0.00020405893,0.00038200672,0.0006135489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945188,0.0029252823,0.0014888281,0.0001487048,0.0004721657,0.00044622185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002328807,0.00009100281,0.00019595044,0.0012682478,0.006210741,0.0042355354,0.00065981015,0.0014131005,0.0018190624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050775814,0.0001594071,0.000188631,0.0011135723,0.0053051272,0.0017366442,0.0042572687,0.0018713109,0.0000879774],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006428684,0.00020467505,0.6978924,0.00020001424,0.00006595311,0.016440863,0.1912167,0.0015662592,0.0010128393,0.062913366,0.0034348597,0.024987657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008454036,0.000060796487,0.48704597,0.0005066543,0.000043993547,0.0028568127,0.47607023,0.0014608931,0.0010611381,0.007826144,0.023013474,0.00004533606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08979642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15435116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08979642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008973496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008334864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1785475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209158677","doi":"10.1111/joac.12460","title":"Cashing in or driving development? Cross‐border traders and maize contract farming in northeast Laos","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Subsistence agriculture; Contract farming; Agrarian society; Commercialization; Vietnamese; Context (archaeology); Agriculture; Commodity; Business; Production (economics); Geography; Agroforestry; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.07593577238418661,"score_gpt":0.39654879413716115,"score_spread":0.32061302175297457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209158677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971215,0.000079190526,0.00001559104,0.0004613818,0.000002094037,0.0000017405666,0.000011966157,3.90361e-7,0.002305971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993274,0.000104063736,0.000015390076,0.00002709166,0.000001573994,0.0000023882067,0.000006516885,3.7897638e-7,0.00051519973],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996928,0.000108899396,0.000008378285,0.000027819031,0.000017881432,0.00014429192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992323,0.00029055015,0.00025229523,0.000015726433,0.000038680948,0.00017044698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006620586,0.00009003931,0.000108147484,0.00036204242,0.001610661,0.0018645355,0.00030288013,0.00037813812,0.0044452725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010039428,0.00010485178,0.000060671595,0.0006191662,0.0015602078,0.0014092327,0.0011939564,0.00052693166,0.00010767589],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010315392,0.00025040252,0.6893246,0.00008040557,0.000011711024,0.0018316783,0.27198973,0.00017661505,0.0010837028,0.018123914,0.0008474677,0.016176557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045449888,0.000042133594,0.2073036,0.000085386906,0.0000064898527,0.00018417224,0.7835896,0.00022241891,0.0001816988,0.0011095621,0.0072612553,0.000009126726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027795644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07650681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027795644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013104166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014941208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05526769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200291939","doi":"10.1111/joac.12472","title":"Land reform and peacebuilding in Côte d'Ivoire: Navigating the minefield","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Land Rights and Reforms","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Peacebuilding; Politics; Land reform; Agrarian reform; Political science; Government (linguistics); Civil society; Political economy; Public administration; Development economics; Economic growth; Sociology; Law; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.03600061330453285,"score_gpt":0.23687696515050033,"score_spread":0.20087635184596747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200291939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95016634,0.0019129914,0.0007987345,0.0052171056,0.00005662107,0.00008198055,0.000028856892,0.0000057792,0.04173163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99594575,0.00045242824,0.0002975412,0.00015718845,0.0000037984303,0.000012994528,0.000005731549,0.000003819747,0.0031208438],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998086,0.0010629133,0.000029716897,0.00009102646,0.00012720126,0.0006031938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988502,0.000578672,0.00015977233,0.000042343207,0.000126149,0.0002428962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018055066,0.00025166263,0.0003304383,0.0010035669,0.01011792,0.005717693,0.00081104395,0.0014684113,0.0037279408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022571448,0.00025768485,0.00012690367,0.0019729242,0.009716838,0.0017728354,0.0039038998,0.0017669584,0.00013256882],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010770475,0.00024547044,0.033966407,0.00054803235,0.000022853856,0.028108457,0.76583445,0.002481115,0.005115183,0.118379176,0.0036078123,0.041583348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011776373,0.00007645845,0.02601538,0.00039290477,0.000006505727,0.0008989667,0.89678377,0.00033110077,0.0007332641,0.0026800656,0.07205165,0.000018100354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17142135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38219735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17142135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015823945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00838793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34084713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213104931","doi":"10.1111/joac.12481","title":"The moral economy of defence of territory and the political economy of extractivism in the Polochic valley, Guatemala","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Moral economy; Banner; Agrarian society; Livelihood; Resistance (ecology); Economy; Paternalism; Indigenous; Politics; Political economy; Political science; Agrarian system; Economic system; Economics; Geography; Agriculture; Law","score_opus":0.03324637984710185,"score_gpt":0.21381477185462724,"score_spread":0.1805683920075254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213104931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98220587,0.00016599993,0.00012625923,0.0013516005,0.0000035046096,0.000005846525,0.0000130025155,0.0000020484458,0.016125832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99979943,0.00001609047,0.000010768924,0.00002140619,5.6029603e-7,0.0000015576414,0.0000012013493,4.4491108e-7,0.00014857211],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998931,0.0006347759,0.000011939815,0.000055002085,0.00005460326,0.00031263466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998946,0.00042329542,0.00029642307,0.00005673612,0.00008233452,0.00019526278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092064554,0.00008276507,0.00012742812,0.00054746284,0.0039119055,0.0033175256,0.00035581732,0.0003516241,0.0017637014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013879006,0.00009999542,0.000055167657,0.0009091586,0.014296273,0.00077031157,0.0030037044,0.0006379174,0.000042940806],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000207978,0.00009814029,0.18701473,0.00021125801,0.000032820128,0.001974879,0.49373847,0.0008022894,0.0032246383,0.2851583,0.002055799,0.025480656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027456761,0.00007168179,0.5312283,0.00015752447,0.000017842753,0.0003499021,0.39157608,0.0011334327,0.00042538988,0.03623301,0.038747262,0.000032049244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060747247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12491775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060747247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073547955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002210202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12078732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221119198","doi":"10.1111/joac.12483","title":"Peasant and indigenous autonomy before and after the pink tide in Latin America","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Peasant; Neoliberalism (international relations); Indigenous; Autonomy; Latin Americans; Politics; Restructuring; Political economy; Political science; Paternalism; Sociology; Development economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.01706477924442508,"score_gpt":0.19375601838859788,"score_spread":0.17669123914417278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221119198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9092383,0.0025043092,0.00027624183,0.0069022,0.000045966903,0.000016225647,0.000019027502,0.0000073504757,0.08099041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961423,0.0002773167,0.00004695101,0.000177135,0.000009919288,0.0000036398915,0.000004370103,0.0000022353363,0.0033362033],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890983,0.00031870624,0.000023464685,0.00013112611,0.000115934345,0.0005008773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990243,0.0003183035,0.00014770955,0.0000751613,0.00017744835,0.000257192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002248875,0.00012044595,0.00023436343,0.00061702274,0.0047539677,0.002919741,0.0004470701,0.000610263,0.0024132242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022143798,0.000086625114,0.0001365135,0.00075873116,0.01024672,0.0016938774,0.0040347134,0.0012809961,0.00006083833],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018110925,0.00009051961,0.043961667,0.00016832848,0.0000298717,0.002157085,0.6606554,0.00036046913,0.002714378,0.23518966,0.0019706509,0.052520916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032946104,0.00013349984,0.18645613,0.00041651656,0.000024671823,0.00038814463,0.50259537,0.00021070681,0.0007591575,0.025001207,0.283929,0.00005274643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08233336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14178842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08233336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008860691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004255223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16370827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229033967","doi":"10.1111/joac.12487","title":"Caste, diversification, and the contemporary agrarian question in India: A field perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Caste; Diversification (marketing strategy); Agrarian society; Agriculture; Oppression; Wage labour; Agrarian system; Economics; Perspective (graphical); Wage; Development economics; Geography; Labour economics; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.03159755272621192,"score_gpt":0.22376541437501,"score_spread":0.19216786164879807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229033967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9452066,0.0034256836,0.00021571256,0.003074474,0.000023324543,0.000007948994,0.00008183169,0.000006118139,0.047958348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99892694,0.00046630643,0.000028846838,0.0000595494,0.000013454769,0.0000013111861,0.000009112221,8.1834213e-7,0.00049353874],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995171,0.00022063365,0.000008936175,0.00003987392,0.000038897753,0.00017459168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990439,0.0005852742,0.00015233917,0.000035330766,0.000052784857,0.00013046699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005948056,0.00015241637,0.00022701675,0.0030898254,0.003660544,0.004209585,0.0006282425,0.00034609338,0.004364292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074486685,0.00011246562,0.00011581692,0.0046957238,0.008814283,0.0011949543,0.002421478,0.0008568138,0.0001288452],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014655043,0.00022176378,0.2631816,0.00031884143,0.000040716917,0.0017434709,0.36997706,0.00075382466,0.0010638863,0.3089501,0.0022565094,0.051345695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066790653,0.00007890954,0.38333473,0.0002648906,0.000018460565,0.00050658756,0.5574572,0.00041079876,0.0002093807,0.02689947,0.030782286,0.000030721883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035585426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0549084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035585426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024976674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001366622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070756614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282546311","doi":"10.1111/joac.12500","title":"Autonomy in agrarian studies, politics, and movements: An inter‐paradigm debate","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wageningen University and Research","keywords":"Autonomy; Agrarian society; Politics; Capitalism; Sociology; Social movement; Political science; Political economy; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Agriculture","score_opus":0.06776954469409548,"score_gpt":0.2622755845113116,"score_spread":0.19450603981721615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282546311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055779852,0.06601622,0.020409673,0.6598388,0.0046466775,0.000059468817,0.00005315257,0.000048107446,0.193148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94452286,0.021709282,0.004621625,0.01697883,0.00455944,0.00013342025,0.000031946558,0.00007265108,0.0073698144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98496985,0.011282572,0.00027101874,0.00086830347,0.0018457714,0.0007624747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722701,0.024096532,0.00096617115,0.0007850536,0.0009512198,0.00093098544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024267966,0.00040696628,0.0008394103,0.0029203754,0.007650361,0.017468795,0.0020957543,0.0073680393,0.003080277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00890618,0.00030098687,0.00049298734,0.0038574024,0.07769066,0.013836666,0.008486258,0.008727747,0.00033359474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038550315,0.000008153819,0.000056206332,0.00003360772,0.0000012297238,0.000024394169,0.00886244,0.000039488023,0.00002124289,0.98724735,0.0014483852,0.0022537448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000134705515,0.000016461394,0.00028402364,0.00036603594,0.0000030374993,0.000061620325,0.019115003,0.00031631417,0.000085483254,0.86768514,0.112042,0.000011436594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016318533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013686364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024267966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009317897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059570777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1283428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285084943","doi":"10.1111/joac.12502","title":"Ocean and land grabbing in Ghana's offshore petroleum industry: From the agrarian question to the question of industrialization","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Volkswagen Foundation","keywords":"Agrarian society; Industrialisation; Petroleum industry; Politics; Petroleum; Economy; Natural resource economics; Economics; Agriculture; Geography; Political science; Market economy; Engineering","score_opus":0.03551482685209749,"score_gpt":0.23690188972343165,"score_spread":0.20138706287133418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285084943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90140295,0.003355043,0.000978889,0.025126923,0.000026393469,0.000010943936,0.000057012454,0.0000029830278,0.06903881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980804,0.0007195085,0.00007345337,0.00014400728,0.000012876581,0.0000026581224,0.000006396048,9.702468e-7,0.0009597729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976116,0.00012373476,0.0000059284143,0.000016752467,0.00001956876,0.00007286406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991265,0.0004320449,0.00026005108,0.000016890013,0.00006191044,0.00010262533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043219808,0.00010681115,0.0001116435,0.0006540402,0.0014960079,0.0018340024,0.00018920147,0.0006687753,0.005411176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012130752,0.00007241637,0.000064697866,0.0014912745,0.0069374717,0.0020817302,0.0014966741,0.000757826,0.00012037063],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009500697,0.00012487906,0.09847026,0.00021188705,0.0000121670855,0.0030128192,0.061992377,0.0018335347,0.0011509585,0.7967787,0.0048513594,0.031466026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002869116,0.000057560035,0.23148908,0.000456255,0.0000139972835,0.0007217089,0.39900503,0.0027390092,0.0006096874,0.28670135,0.07815043,0.000027313405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01885308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029041294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01885308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021951986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012044843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037486672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285731491","doi":"10.1111/joac.12503","title":"(Landlord) Theory from the South: Empire and estates on a Punjabi Frontier","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Jackman Humanities Institute, University of Toronto; International Development Research Centre; Wenner-Gren Foundation","keywords":"Colonialism; Agrarian society; Frontier; Scholarship; Empire; Sociology; Modernization theory; Hegemony; Landlord; Political economy; Law; Political science; Agriculture; Politics; History","score_opus":0.03360902252597572,"score_gpt":0.19822467515626513,"score_spread":0.1646156526302894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285731491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45113742,0.0018537769,0.0036001026,0.012409047,0.00009859263,0.00003668333,0.000030405747,0.000019008748,0.530815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933489,0.00027015258,0.00046365923,0.00019237147,0.000009107012,0.000008905428,0.0000051373568,0.00000444647,0.005697205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932134,0.00039381735,0.000016551227,0.00007193969,0.000077759105,0.00011861643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992793,0.00034351207,0.000069843,0.000103085804,0.00008416748,0.00012005229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011457861,0.00018488396,0.00025515503,0.001177777,0.007652936,0.0050111283,0.00067777216,0.000692131,0.008063571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014078586,0.00019237895,0.00014443316,0.0015492735,0.023193553,0.0032465374,0.0040790173,0.0021499372,0.00026961588],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014871816,0.000044656164,0.0030887807,0.000040594266,0.000003427355,0.00035448643,0.058644395,0.0004083185,0.00008998067,0.92699414,0.0016550539,0.008661346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055124914,0.00011720202,0.02054433,0.000509114,0.0000191394,0.000845526,0.19603425,0.003434477,0.00030228798,0.5216227,0.25647917,0.000036638903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015716694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03204899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015716694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046014227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024458251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033385813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308566832","doi":"10.1111/joac.12523","title":"Paying for ecological services in Ecuador: The political economy of structural inequality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Livelihood; Agrarian society; Carbon sequestration; Politics; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Payment for ecosystem services; Political science; Ecosystem services; Geography; Natural resource economics; Economics; Ecology; Agriculture","score_opus":0.04449380736150065,"score_gpt":0.24793895857562165,"score_spread":0.203445151214121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308566832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9599183,0.00066940556,0.00022927186,0.008924165,0.000015092697,0.000012162881,0.000035686124,0.0000028908255,0.030193035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992086,0.00013527506,0.000025240342,0.00010649053,0.000009865304,0.000004877675,0.0000070038386,7.588676e-7,0.0005018668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992385,0.00025780464,0.000012623769,0.00005632386,0.000064223095,0.00037056734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845517,0.00068320084,0.00043724617,0.00005281668,0.00012444319,0.00024699158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011973612,0.0000984589,0.0001733751,0.00090375764,0.0023300182,0.0031278667,0.0006206817,0.0006821387,0.0074139503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003610659,0.00009582322,0.000077224126,0.00116796,0.0030523618,0.0014676627,0.0029335304,0.0008170962,0.00009100758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038848742,0.00051794,0.25391042,0.00023379373,0.00006543673,0.003246818,0.08377932,0.0018861891,0.00094405195,0.5508813,0.008029934,0.096116275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014323129,0.0001751644,0.6161224,0.0005744351,0.000059985858,0.00046022786,0.2198873,0.0069219074,0.00045010468,0.08856023,0.0665951,0.0000498639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026148662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028174363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026148662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00407008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012089498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051992953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321433779","doi":"10.1111/joac.12535","title":"The social reproduction of natural resource extraction and gendered labour regimes in rural Turkey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsistence agriculture; Natural resource; Reproduction; Livelihood; Agricultural productivity; Economics; Agriculture; Restructuring; Economic growth; Business; Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.02743337550278225,"score_gpt":0.25305802236598224,"score_spread":0.2256246468632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321433779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901725,0.00026069436,0.000057221798,0.00019846033,0.00000534957,0.0000035116907,0.000021841308,0.0000015194395,0.009278791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924433,0.00006231309,0.000016020063,0.000011006333,0.0000014976773,0.0000016445348,0.000004374532,4.233887e-7,0.00065840076],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995584,0.00016550742,0.000012714672,0.000051794268,0.00004520869,0.00016639686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996867,0.00008110468,0.00011700779,0.000019834335,0.00003322332,0.000062113875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006106319,0.00017112552,0.00011005651,0.0007182313,0.0018447075,0.0012619542,0.00032136758,0.000255173,0.0028014185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005648373,0.0000831332,0.00008101993,0.0005644237,0.003090087,0.00054945797,0.0014827782,0.00022415868,0.00015700991],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041871125,0.00030647172,0.30887762,0.00017083809,0.00003562465,0.0049916306,0.51419115,0.0009561559,0.004896358,0.05394759,0.0027090022,0.108498946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013728577,0.00019864268,0.48126104,0.00011704834,0.000011169336,0.001024776,0.47253907,0.00050116266,0.0008957542,0.004350759,0.039053343,0.000033442484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008521433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016839743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008521433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024289745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009273081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017623544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362622504","doi":"10.1111/joac.12542","title":"Amplifying invisibility: COVID‐19 and Zimbabwean migrant farm workers in South Africa","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Invisibility; Migrant workers; Xenophobia; Workforce; Scrutiny; Pandemic; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); State (computer science); Economic growth; Farm workers; Power (physics); Development economics; Sociology; Socioeconomics; Immigration; Geography; Law; Economics; Agriculture","score_opus":0.14090362388895503,"score_gpt":0.3409239648776771,"score_spread":0.2000203409887221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362622504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99018455,0.00054685154,0.000072052964,0.0040469915,0.000018567649,0.000011212401,0.000015981557,0.000001471374,0.0051023117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983979,0.00038057496,0.000030107467,0.00027605527,0.00000917999,0.0000060998323,0.00000476902,0.0000012675099,0.0008940613],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898595,0.0003550437,0.000024939014,0.00005097738,0.000089105946,0.00049402635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916124,0.0003113507,0.0002773648,0.00003006986,0.000051944662,0.00016802261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013140817,0.00021263256,0.00018050963,0.0008695058,0.0063321074,0.0026792765,0.0004486546,0.0010950248,0.005830182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023238533,0.0002260821,0.00011351286,0.00095860043,0.0061144354,0.0017439615,0.0056586047,0.001353312,0.00015740383],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070301896,0.000042827523,0.06481404,0.00014371172,0.000009616935,0.0020116474,0.9018924,0.000044135,0.0022778653,0.011434432,0.0015140816,0.015744912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008371639,0.00006462463,0.08363716,0.00030138175,0.0000076197093,0.00032181325,0.8827062,0.00007991844,0.00021657786,0.0019004645,0.030738818,0.00001712503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055228256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09425615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055228256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028102132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018164072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10981357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365146828","doi":"10.1111/joac.12541","title":"Discipline and resistance in southwestern Ontario: Securitization of migrant workers and their acts of defiance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canada Auto Workers; Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia; Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Securitization; Agriculture; State (computer science); Resistance (ecology); Business; Migrant workers; Farm workers; Economic growth; Development economics; Economics; Geography; Finance","score_opus":0.055746483421179056,"score_gpt":0.24100733229386284,"score_spread":0.1852608488726838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365146828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98761255,0.0005134172,0.000036698708,0.0040514,0.00002108298,0.00002279505,0.00008591054,0.0000028405268,0.0076534916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957378,0.00050321297,0.00004185786,0.00053594436,0.000007671833,0.000011791495,0.00003492702,0.0000023161283,0.003124409],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986727,0.00023372372,0.0000479108,0.00009170332,0.00026227187,0.0006918021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720025,0.0003016169,0.0008858516,0.00009630488,0.00059027015,0.0009257524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008931371,0.00016570112,0.00022306238,0.0008471855,0.011733216,0.002123343,0.000999694,0.0008902874,0.003290026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024551991,0.00022577017,0.00013763705,0.0016770444,0.0048679253,0.0006566294,0.0025569727,0.0014258812,0.00015133791],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008547307,0.00006734153,0.42164087,0.00009519201,0.0000145027525,0.0020912427,0.54678154,0.00005679747,0.00081953924,0.0025851857,0.006809096,0.01895319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051165866,0.00003178793,0.41838986,0.00016428408,0.000006052045,0.00026102108,0.5637043,0.000066500004,0.00008490681,0.00019902323,0.017065415,0.000021740028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98459595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99502724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04150776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04150776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049667038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3011613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376140524","doi":"10.1111/joac.12546","title":"Migrant farmworkers: Resisting and organising before, during and after COVID‐19","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Windsor Clinical Research","funders":"","keywords":"Solidarity; Pandemic; Expropriation; Resistance (ecology); Agriculture; Work (physics); Politics; Power (physics); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Economic growth; Political economy; Sociology; Business; Development economics; Geography; Economics; Law; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.05298139262011672,"score_gpt":0.30141740240417014,"score_spread":0.24843600978405342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376140524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97718674,0.0003332085,0.00032405846,0.0093564335,0.00018456408,0.0000305064,0.000011957455,0.0000133229005,0.012559236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995447,0.00014568612,0.00014127037,0.00067479035,0.000051294748,0.000024631001,0.000009464995,0.000008434139,0.003497454],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569064,0.0025232912,0.00007317407,0.00024210846,0.00028681807,0.001184079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954268,0.0015194512,0.0009424802,0.0002550193,0.000454906,0.0014013641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006471474,0.0002907052,0.0003470985,0.00079151074,0.015121635,0.005764653,0.0011428065,0.0029572602,0.0038595027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00849246,0.0002874161,0.00022530912,0.0004825644,0.008979961,0.0024060179,0.0058736443,0.0030293697,0.0004445467],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068577196,0.00007939556,0.012057311,0.00005612646,0.0000070991205,0.000615083,0.96853906,0.00005631041,0.00092802953,0.0042600655,0.003483046,0.0098499805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052577498,0.00009272704,0.010275181,0.000070566086,0.000003016805,0.00007348707,0.9641537,0.000040198527,0.00010148366,0.0010196362,0.024151517,0.000013185248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068382155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014592832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015121635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023734097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033950566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03422481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378905668","doi":"10.1111/joac.12550","title":"‘There will be no law, or people to protect us’: Irregular Southeast Asian seasonal workers in Taiwan before and during the pandemic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Vulnerability (computing); Work (physics); Informal sector; Pandemic; Migrant workers; Economic growth; Sociology; Development economics; Political science; Criminology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Law; Economics","score_opus":0.0354824659481517,"score_gpt":0.2805575202139136,"score_spread":0.24507505426576193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378905668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99737,0.0001956058,0.000060397615,0.0011569819,0.000044411536,0.000007180925,0.00001902588,0.000002806483,0.0011434825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871254,0.0001618464,0.000041682502,0.00029941704,0.000016534394,0.000008857585,0.000013744487,0.0000036264962,0.00074165995],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890614,0.00061286706,0.00005098478,0.00008104738,0.0000700002,0.00027896452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836034,0.00054591097,0.00038688886,0.000108350505,0.00014449455,0.00045398533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019968133,0.00035927293,0.00041562982,0.00051780127,0.006954789,0.0031673743,0.000681051,0.0016022124,0.0019631707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003135624,0.00044621964,0.0002569719,0.00057926157,0.007370886,0.0024365704,0.0037867797,0.0023897383,0.00018763311],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026570868,0.000015687312,0.013964039,0.000035205114,0.0000053920044,0.0008062866,0.9824724,0.000015974032,0.0004119755,0.0003037501,0.00051687815,0.0014258764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.540867e-7,0.00002113681,0.0054304507,0.0000265311,0.0000016570776,0.00010269335,0.9925695,0.000011649657,0.00003222542,0.00004775302,0.0017496697,0.000005811475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019882288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03877228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019882288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014747321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015834725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03953314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379742994","doi":"10.1111/joac.12557","title":"Distress in the fields: Indian agriculture after economic liberalization, By R.Ramakumar (Ed.), Tulika Books. 2022. pp. xxiv+484. INR 1500 (hbk). ISBN: 978‐81‐950559‐0‐6","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalization; Agriculture; Distress; Economics; Economic history; Political science; Agricultural economics; History; Medicine; Market economy; Archaeology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.013759728607287988,"score_gpt":0.20334392003215152,"score_spread":0.18958419142486352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379742994","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058655785,0.833467,0.00053444225,0.063999146,0.0048249625,0.000022450777,0.00016789848,0.00010150824,0.09101697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11700871,0.7283545,0.0009414597,0.011757571,0.0023412614,0.00004842077,0.00033062403,0.000074237,0.13914326],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996306,0.000079041834,0.00001907566,0.000048316015,0.00012335197,0.00009959487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965656,0.00013284152,0.00005017976,0.00001777137,0.00006444764,0.00007819769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004841286,0.0006827771,0.00036025196,0.0011480526,0.0018362725,0.008619915,0.0008226877,0.0016697111,0.006815461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00110406,0.00044941824,0.00031432227,0.0049327514,0.0030603877,0.00502849,0.0017669685,0.0034165585,0.0025790771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047894784,0.000057410634,0.0015812548,0.00097651104,0.0000145440745,0.00038028407,0.011111436,0.0005823919,0.00034852623,0.09544658,0.64514124,0.24431193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034048696,0.000014008028,0.00534641,0.0008757912,0.000006993665,0.00021408361,0.007110473,0.00008001483,0.00008984382,0.012833012,0.9734115,0.000014514959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03308501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04170342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03308501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006950687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009378585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06578487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386086675","doi":"10.1111/joac.12560","title":"A framework for understanding land control transfer in agricultural commodity frontiers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Commodity; Agriculture; Control (management); Order (exchange); Space (punctuation); Globe; Scale (ratio); Economics; Economic system; Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Industrial organization; Business; Computer science; Market economy; Geography; Management; Finance","score_opus":0.11225893830436967,"score_gpt":0.25705212320098947,"score_spread":0.1447931848966198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386086675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030594012,0.006535227,0.41036066,0.033262856,0.00041856672,0.0003941261,0.00028639968,0.0001607352,0.5179873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90577453,0.002620454,0.07262639,0.0012419587,0.00027014053,0.00068131747,0.00012279178,0.00009051397,0.016571866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967415,0.0018639212,0.000090217916,0.00043663292,0.00038994107,0.00047783117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714416,0.001752011,0.0003448041,0.00023725806,0.00030259884,0.00021902936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058762063,0.0010539799,0.00072812184,0.0040816935,0.005043617,0.010335105,0.0036537691,0.005381963,0.011543342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004725789,0.00047415096,0.0012749485,0.0034645773,0.04155451,0.013667985,0.0051659225,0.0045019644,0.00085527496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015039773,0.0000049026353,0.00005774191,0.000008694418,0.0000015204931,0.000032211545,0.0008676403,0.00075737,0.000031023454,0.9973532,0.00017846825,0.00070569443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066778607,0.000012453514,0.0002223629,0.00007719495,0.000004366203,0.000043638487,0.0030455934,0.006931567,0.00007013381,0.9707308,0.0188437,0.000011571962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014011872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009100573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014011872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011404584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00447645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082746446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386712386","doi":"10.1111/joac.12564","title":"Blaming the victim or structural conditioning? COVID‐19, obesity and the neoliberal diet","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Overweight; Obesity; Argument (complex analysis); Pandemic; Food sovereignty; Population; Restructuring; Development economics; Inequality; Food security; Political science; Environmental health; Geography; Medicine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Economics; Agriculture; Law","score_opus":0.07685888734183789,"score_gpt":0.32378733166312884,"score_spread":0.24692844432129096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386712386","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39729455,0.017845714,0.0014332596,0.52378887,0.00070287986,0.000012919236,0.00017075893,0.000015736921,0.05873529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849637,0.0042068255,0.00020526288,0.00863338,0.00033749835,0.000005866235,0.000029323232,0.000005030737,0.0016130656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925405,0.0004007802,0.000015010186,0.000075249016,0.00006684469,0.00018809197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977245,0.00071307475,0.00081436505,0.00013465213,0.00013877879,0.00047465082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015965907,0.00011566119,0.00020654986,0.00061993615,0.0017442901,0.002642432,0.00046701657,0.0015100979,0.007330533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033843992,0.00008439177,0.00012797682,0.00076885836,0.007701873,0.002055666,0.0021835258,0.0022175247,0.00016021213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019625352,0.0002742771,0.1596122,0.00031038048,0.000108711494,0.0009833238,0.026256923,0.00027816385,0.00032287193,0.71200174,0.03906388,0.060591362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005197692,0.00014280171,0.27769554,0.0029042077,0.000096511285,0.0015717413,0.12831272,0.0011561023,0.00046213315,0.36240095,0.22513953,0.000065768545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007864955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011587276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007864955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017879988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012818048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02452308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387060120","doi":"10.1111/joac.12566","title":"How to differentiate peasant classes in capital‐intensive agriculture?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Peasant; Subsistence agriculture; Livelihood; Capital (architecture); Agriculture; Index (typography); Economics; Reproduction; Construct (python library); Social reproduction; Economic system; Social capital; Sociology; Geography; Social science","score_opus":0.05067449310339541,"score_gpt":0.22887675656778175,"score_spread":0.17820226346438633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387060120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96556014,0.0003625554,0.002918386,0.00073773356,0.00003090907,0.000034178425,0.00021098579,0.000015354835,0.030129828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987864,0.000040216994,0.00041509725,0.000031477364,0.0000071371683,0.000008139406,0.000046803238,0.0000030237134,0.0006617404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990103,0.00026616346,0.000051830433,0.0001640965,0.00023558186,0.00027205475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982132,0.0006273597,0.00030167663,0.0001933015,0.00038051332,0.00028403377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018626757,0.0002081461,0.00034773676,0.0037419968,0.0011424626,0.00306238,0.0005650233,0.00033187607,0.0035159627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005307732,0.00008119101,0.0002617567,0.0029778925,0.0025052417,0.002120524,0.0016012022,0.00060728425,0.0006573873],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038504982,0.00013018647,0.70049137,0.00014687779,0.000093562456,0.00032501903,0.03171029,0.0011203659,0.0022901949,0.045783803,0.0021744613,0.21534884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016084865,0.00015934592,0.8744696,0.00014921716,0.000019948931,0.00019161761,0.06364777,0.0025945057,0.0011467885,0.04132971,0.016218692,0.000056696645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007504243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014472867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007504243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011509532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005797785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014921129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396619431","doi":"10.1111/joac.12588","title":"‘Women stay behind and grow the food’: Agricultural productivity and the interstices of petty commodity production and reproductive labour in Tanzania","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"African history and culture studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Commodity; Agriculture; Productivity; Economics; Agricultural productivity; Agricultural economics; Production (economics); Labour economics; Market economy; Geography; Economic growth; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.035181299369374586,"score_gpt":0.2601811466943046,"score_spread":0.22499984732493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396619431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898324,0.0006763395,0.000108145345,0.0023274051,0.0000115755065,0.0000026208152,0.000030899704,9.556843e-7,0.00700969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994879,0.000100841484,0.000022077906,0.000045742512,0.000005456739,0.0000014824687,0.0000044576627,5.247942e-7,0.00033145188],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995241,0.00024025835,0.000009918585,0.00003563776,0.000036468136,0.00015359708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989015,0.0005261107,0.0003574168,0.000030818144,0.0000649342,0.00011916547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009704881,0.000119476834,0.00012152787,0.00055862125,0.0016315954,0.0013650046,0.00033010961,0.00027777208,0.0032384312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024439783,0.00014640308,0.000081559294,0.0010004888,0.0034190852,0.00096494146,0.0012419043,0.00058243406,0.00011300656],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020403789,0.00008862777,0.39203534,0.00018248163,0.000036864254,0.0017187801,0.4842745,0.00034380882,0.0013804814,0.08356555,0.0042226,0.03194685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001290587,0.00012497048,0.65577817,0.00020055461,0.00002386168,0.0003273797,0.31402242,0.00037373818,0.00026280773,0.0069118994,0.021943724,0.000017567907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025875984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06077553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025875984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018070955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011235564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05145073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398184125","doi":"10.1111/joac.12587","title":"Reassessing Soviet industrialization as primitive <i>Soviet</i> accumulation: Social reproduction, collectivization and peasant women's revolts under Stalin","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Soviet and Russian History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Peasant; Industrialisation; Reproduction; Social reproduction; Economic history; Political science; Development economics; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Biology; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.13757243762460972,"score_gpt":0.38201644956838304,"score_spread":0.24444401194377333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398184125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98167545,0.00026726496,0.00014840605,0.0009931399,0.000012964633,0.0000029681592,0.0000056775384,0.000005457677,0.016888645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936575,0.000046955825,0.0000124549015,0.000020679065,0.0000037527761,9.648659e-7,0.0000014548643,9.5113717e-7,0.0005469289],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942386,0.0002645759,0.0000109325965,0.000042823547,0.0000425168,0.00021530004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996259,0.00017782397,0.00009009068,0.000036293266,0.000018421391,0.000051344607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015269781,0.00016968655,0.0001985288,0.00066672266,0.005449386,0.0039835298,0.0003560586,0.00053231453,0.0013742573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078426005,0.00012828349,0.000100835554,0.00068274623,0.016001876,0.0015560915,0.004026241,0.0011150239,0.00006940148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007526347,0.000047529185,0.01736204,0.000036140475,0.000004853565,0.0009126605,0.8179317,0.00015082606,0.0015089794,0.14695421,0.0007555913,0.0142602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015884923,0.0001747549,0.076374866,0.000093052164,0.000008819664,0.0003866314,0.84876204,0.00018444967,0.0016626948,0.017560756,0.05475456,0.000021512476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008565733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017488431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008565733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037328105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019583856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027083576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401775397","doi":"10.1111/joac.12604","title":"The rise and fall of community development in rural Turkey, 1960–1980","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Turkey's Politics and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Commercialization; Industrialisation; Turkish; Economic growth; Government (linguistics); Political science; Rural area; Competition (biology); Politics; Distribution (mathematics); Development economics; Economics","score_opus":0.057413345437567674,"score_gpt":0.31938189397113376,"score_spread":0.2619685485335661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401775397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819264,0.0031414626,0.00011913213,0.0010125284,0.000055628712,0.000022145516,0.00043968935,0.000015281594,0.013267773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99710125,0.00064241193,0.000068877336,0.000048566697,0.00001729852,0.0000101918,0.00013400517,0.0000019777858,0.0019753177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946123,0.00009883107,0.00002316774,0.000073989504,0.0000648443,0.00027802205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992907,0.00007951917,0.00016095549,0.00002484152,0.00021482325,0.0002292404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005470307,0.00027667973,0.00013794292,0.0016850149,0.0012389856,0.0008619435,0.00044246894,0.00044576093,0.0030466137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009163949,0.00013890408,0.00011323006,0.0014247918,0.0012834418,0.00047549588,0.001315473,0.00056263537,0.00027860544],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014929866,0.00072392717,0.50625217,0.001048907,0.0000800967,0.005466876,0.04765779,0.0026622766,0.0046919,0.04342833,0.026252296,0.3602424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034110315,0.00022690505,0.8957737,0.00014765837,0.00001889135,0.00072000735,0.027284544,0.0005386846,0.00093044015,0.0009424336,0.07335595,0.00002660908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053658415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074738726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053658415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062942756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027739475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106692195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402332690","doi":"10.1111/joac.12554","title":"Issue Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam; Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; University of Exeter; Lunds Universitet; Aligarh Muslim University; University of New South Wales; University of Sussex; University of Toronto; Jawaharlal Nehru University; University of Denver; University of Oxford; Harvard University; Yale University","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.07058487655095896,"score_gpt":0.2351495083039003,"score_spread":0.16456463175294134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402332690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003719377,0.0006911581,0.00079202,0.00506735,0.017812805,0.00061667647,0.07118541,0.002434434,0.90102816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012128054,0.00043768223,0.00032865012,0.0013663028,0.0015306477,0.00016155864,0.017606916,0.0006237272,0.97673166],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988049,0.00013577667,0.00009783975,0.00016643737,0.00063020777,0.00016472123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937875,0.00097567437,0.00024044666,0.0007129623,0.0030098415,0.0012735346],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013708253,0.0010368174,0.0014826462,0.0030593302,0.0013807814,0.005035946,0.001845475,0.00210917,0.9470785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009783137,0.00051456405,0.00079616305,0.0029381826,0.00037835806,0.0029318668,0.0018434268,0.0017661056,0.8870026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030393861,0.000018734796,0.000042742202,0.00012624278,0.0000014656757,0.000012809339,0.000007717085,0.000016468706,0.00006619146,0.0007017778,0.9826627,0.016312776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001636054,0.00001628414,0.00023373021,0.00010142533,0.0000017912325,0.00002068612,0.000020169326,0.000035791152,0.000082538616,0.00048085433,0.9989862,0.0000041126095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022468476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041911006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052921474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012091334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020904883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075486064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403513626","doi":"10.1111/joac.12607","title":"The conservation‐extraction nexus in ocean Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction: Tension or co‐constitution?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Jurisdiction; Constitution; Extraction (chemistry); Political science; International law; Environmental resource management; Law; Environmental science; Engineering; Chemistry","score_opus":0.03325592776879398,"score_gpt":0.3080654724883753,"score_spread":0.2748095447195813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403513626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5158791,0.0034597602,0.01917556,0.062809765,0.00042235057,0.000043409105,0.00007639102,0.000037019567,0.3980966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972608,0.0003803232,0.00041938658,0.00057283754,0.000051212723,0.000012445001,0.00001177833,0.000011202983,0.0012798689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975303,0.0011127971,0.00008133082,0.00035992908,0.00039155013,0.0005240644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611276,0.0023345877,0.0005104064,0.00038818488,0.00029308832,0.00036105374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003944695,0.00014143024,0.00034265438,0.0012695761,0.0052512116,0.012679686,0.00088753604,0.0015793188,0.0066116084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007150388,0.00017072605,0.0002274004,0.0020197288,0.037666544,0.012320812,0.008776088,0.0036708517,0.00021627438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015403513,0.00001473232,0.0026510605,0.000031754877,0.000006606085,0.000107269334,0.016237166,0.0002498131,0.00019484393,0.9726051,0.0009167055,0.0069695665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008785395,0.000020018751,0.010121436,0.00033466372,0.000012842043,0.00012752143,0.092288435,0.0011022366,0.00038354847,0.82302326,0.072549485,0.000027668066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033869108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005452873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012679686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036287282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030821885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026328385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408310641","doi":"10.1111/joac.70008","title":"Tastes for Luxury: How Dietary Aspirations Underpin Food Regimes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Culinary Culture and Tourism","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Food security; Economics; Business; Geography; Agriculture","score_opus":0.11835530993383848,"score_gpt":0.26176314495076736,"score_spread":0.1434078350169289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408310641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9578955,0.00022181604,0.0012177634,0.0006580251,0.000010987734,0.000006110663,0.0000201357,0.0000046144796,0.039964978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931395,0.000058711565,0.0001325269,0.00001954794,0.0000027450967,0.00000129372,0.000004055775,0.0000020904276,0.00046503352],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994986,0.00022090433,0.000013726056,0.00008239263,0.00007542293,0.000108903994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988159,0.00045295813,0.00026754738,0.00010192735,0.00017244792,0.00018926934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012813581,0.00008450644,0.00010783958,0.0008416577,0.001181004,0.003987427,0.0003172498,0.00044554047,0.0031348045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028495844,0.0001397337,0.000108778295,0.0006898183,0.007113978,0.0013295056,0.0014567926,0.0007579358,0.00021903505],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038759373,0.00022446478,0.34603527,0.00010136842,0.000059066355,0.000887516,0.28444043,0.0011116567,0.005568961,0.27125987,0.0014584357,0.08846541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022127959,0.00015857158,0.7084177,0.00017878297,0.00002683557,0.00043339137,0.14352547,0.0030318645,0.0009963994,0.11240541,0.030728512,0.00007502488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073509677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014887772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073509677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016300854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007198931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01461637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408320449","doi":"10.1111/joac.70009","title":"Theatre of Enforcement at Sea: The Global Fight Against ‘Illegal Fishing’ and the Criminalisation of Fisher Peoples and Exploitation of Fish Workers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Universidad del Magdalena","keywords":"Fishing; Enforcement; Corporate governance; International waters; Punitive damages; Intervention (counseling); Crime control; Fishery; Fish stock; Environmental governance; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; Sociology; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.02878689325981885,"score_gpt":0.28890302297805853,"score_spread":0.26011612971823966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408320449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52922666,0.008770673,0.0025643336,0.10154028,0.00062777096,0.000050958162,0.00005297861,0.000028969564,0.35713738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99521637,0.00044792076,0.00014118405,0.0010334143,0.000038685095,0.0000071896984,0.0000031660827,0.000006460065,0.0031056583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612063,0.002249642,0.000084925414,0.00029097626,0.00043063296,0.0008232585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962424,0.0021177619,0.000616387,0.00032696192,0.00031708856,0.00037937416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032840972,0.000345052,0.00026352334,0.0012441973,0.01105534,0.007561455,0.00081065844,0.0029669264,0.0032872048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004247077,0.00013711883,0.00022480314,0.00086157146,0.04736334,0.0023988364,0.0048137438,0.0033644424,0.00013718082],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004547532,0.000042360585,0.015813675,0.00015317333,0.000011281099,0.00095901283,0.35765105,0.00027288863,0.0004413847,0.597917,0.006247621,0.020445002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023488476,0.00005502272,0.041724544,0.0010374414,0.000028785269,0.0004812139,0.6456299,0.0007104844,0.00059044414,0.06941992,0.24022448,0.00007429112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.115417324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13903436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115417324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012165252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061560837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22949106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410857680","doi":"10.1111/joac.70020","title":"What is the Value of Value for Agrarian Studies?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Value (mathematics); Economics; Political science; Geography; Mathematics; Agriculture; Statistics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06494134192094331,"score_gpt":0.29321298010883506,"score_spread":0.22827163818789176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410857680","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030462082,0.041051958,0.026146512,0.8204166,0.0049897255,0.000055610708,0.00010025663,0.00005947548,0.07671785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477141,0.011922435,0.0074953646,0.024894824,0.0037576891,0.00010723643,0.00003797153,0.00008512884,0.003985245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96657383,0.026784765,0.0007043578,0.0013619984,0.0031919815,0.001383098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87372714,0.10065863,0.004248744,0.0064010993,0.0104709,0.0044933837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04928792,0.00058660825,0.0014421145,0.0033894805,0.007439783,0.026424067,0.0029810753,0.0060961316,0.0036788112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059967946,0.0003511695,0.00060204015,0.0043115774,0.09252598,0.027494116,0.009993737,0.0093756,0.00049619697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018471574,0.000011070981,0.0004226998,0.00012659341,0.000009082863,0.00006533346,0.006696679,0.00007342438,0.000052954532,0.97869736,0.0044700876,0.009356133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000686007,0.000010748309,0.0002733287,0.00046952686,0.000006457771,0.00004839459,0.010626518,0.00023052632,0.0001086389,0.9531867,0.03501489,0.000017357243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026142036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027740665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04928792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0105881775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008809494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2606625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410920222","doi":"10.1111/joac.70019","title":"Challenging Agroecology—Promise and Pitfalls for Agrarian Studies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Agroecology; Agrarian society; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Geography; Agriculture; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0795674416792176,"score_gpt":0.2957950537602884,"score_spread":0.21622761208107083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410920222","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043103565,0.16083038,0.002649235,0.81322753,0.0035249423,0.000023634282,0.00006761608,0.00003392565,0.015332407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5124726,0.23802237,0.022542547,0.18096465,0.03409041,0.0003092163,0.00023142053,0.00018095324,0.011185712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744735,0.020435289,0.00049301103,0.0012749577,0.002144876,0.0011783747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8788983,0.095547386,0.0030721852,0.0049458705,0.008706144,0.008830182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06349844,0.00083859364,0.0019351514,0.0045294464,0.0076335967,0.016534511,0.004872848,0.010600569,0.009078446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041266564,0.00044323772,0.0008951895,0.0047301915,0.057788525,0.028653663,0.014904186,0.016359484,0.0015949513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006040425,0.00016149915,0.0014355787,0.0007928423,0.000026123744,0.00039298373,0.011122679,0.00039052355,0.00011778313,0.8831669,0.04551043,0.056822263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002278682,0.000052335734,0.0009908046,0.001718321,0.000007305226,0.00015882713,0.022228895,0.00036601606,0.00006961895,0.78919256,0.1851486,0.00004393095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075233025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009060755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06349844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010096251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017980525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33581585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410980427","doi":"10.1111/joac.70018","title":"How is Climate Change Changing Agrarian Studies?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Climate change; Agrarian system; Political science; Geography; Natural resource economics; Environmental planning; Economics; Agriculture; Archaeology; Ecology","score_opus":0.07771444435285543,"score_gpt":0.2705926434851198,"score_spread":0.19287819913226437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410980427","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03272036,0.054780517,0.004341723,0.854729,0.009556825,0.000029195477,0.00021844714,0.000089046735,0.043534774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8273737,0.050821587,0.0038189618,0.09804693,0.012809206,0.0000933946,0.0001468159,0.00017189958,0.0067175343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766881,0.01789832,0.00044533823,0.0017364027,0.0017197487,0.0015120459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95211226,0.037468378,0.002085251,0.0030143529,0.0033826153,0.0019371557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033156086,0.00032174253,0.00077289564,0.003204038,0.0060377615,0.018616289,0.0023403317,0.0064750747,0.007240931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030083735,0.00029994873,0.00056669716,0.0061220555,0.023659276,0.013942338,0.006612677,0.005152393,0.00065508636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092450915,0.000104184226,0.006726611,0.00093101896,0.000070761314,0.0003772907,0.056897454,0.000734939,0.00056976394,0.7900044,0.08158253,0.061908644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015771135,0.00003216477,0.005782849,0.0013431993,0.00003238895,0.00012298308,0.04799867,0.0004543967,0.00033770248,0.3657396,0.57808375,0.000056507804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053828135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065138442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033156086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009016764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005839033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17534822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411192452","doi":"10.1111/joac.70021","title":"Editorial Introduction: The 25th Anniversary Forums","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Library science; Media studies; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.013060500094949192,"score_gpt":0.21652517014404946,"score_spread":0.20346467004910027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411192452","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003076479,0.0006069192,0.000049779228,0.012958757,0.984068,0.000022195489,0.000044872864,0.000043739597,0.0021749123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007993959,0.0012934341,0.000111330286,0.012464133,0.9579661,0.000053353826,0.00008524226,0.00007143222,0.027155755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948037,0.0007183292,0.00048366914,0.0006954104,0.0028389618,0.00045980475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773351,0.0045190845,0.0013275292,0.0005971039,0.012018932,0.0042023514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007156263,0.0037637649,0.0022144977,0.0042625414,0.0043382547,0.009565464,0.0024662907,0.011221898,0.056660887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02713227,0.0008214869,0.0022880777,0.0013841414,0.0017092892,0.0039408314,0.0020517185,0.011754578,0.032330155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028851955,0.000016053984,0.000025010133,0.00009504747,0.0000040850628,0.00007569647,0.000009839702,0.000020427262,0.000059678565,0.00021136552,0.99558395,0.003870038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040298997,0.00004674177,0.00033108753,0.00041715632,0.000015250708,0.00013909739,0.000057517496,0.00014512366,0.00012306117,0.00097212935,0.99769163,0.000020869216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012487456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031633163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056660887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029819328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18954957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411665114","doi":"10.1111/joac.12591","title":"Issue Information","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University at Buffalo; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona; Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas; Boğaziçi Üniversitesi; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; University of New South Wales; Binghamton University; University of Sussex; Jawaharlal Nehru University; State University of New York; University of Denver; University of Oxford; Harvard University; Georgia Institute of Technology; Aligarh Muslim University; University of Toronto; London School of Economics and Political Science; Yale University","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.059808193313412375,"score_gpt":0.23271961213337283,"score_spread":0.17291141881996047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411665114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003676492,0.00070303783,0.00079012936,0.0050292676,0.0183153,0.00061044906,0.06834638,0.00239526,0.9034425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012065384,0.00043940116,0.00032438518,0.0013378983,0.0015334734,0.00015650381,0.01687446,0.00061189017,0.9775154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988186,0.00013583865,0.00009763472,0.00016589387,0.0006191301,0.00016284011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938646,0.0009619878,0.00023865249,0.0007079079,0.0029682305,0.0012585882],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013606722,0.001044896,0.0014798866,0.0030451221,0.0013854773,0.0050887205,0.0018498605,0.0021053206,0.94649124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009755202,0.00051000045,0.0007945358,0.0029125675,0.00038269995,0.0029426531,0.0018521484,0.001770721,0.8855012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030568714,0.0000186211,0.000041699204,0.0001282837,0.0000014660618,0.000013003889,0.0000077895265,0.000016714563,0.0000660579,0.00072132883,0.98269284,0.01626177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016056625,0.00001619675,0.00022721943,0.000102108315,0.0000017500947,0.000020744921,0.000020156429,0.000035640172,0.000081588325,0.0004851121,0.9989894,0.0000040446175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00221533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004157965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05350876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012202687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020820294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07632369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413288837","doi":"10.1111/joac.70034","title":"Labour and Land in Indonesia: An Introduction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science; Economics; Socioeconomics; Development economics; Agricultural economics","score_opus":0.01828253766266231,"score_gpt":0.22215787104673837,"score_spread":0.20387533338407607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413288837","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033814367,0.55112284,0.0034760733,0.032929584,0.008041983,0.00008841706,0.00073041464,0.000045436784,0.36975086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30350342,0.5560411,0.005468955,0.01095699,0.013718884,0.00022181249,0.0008182035,0.00013251674,0.1091381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997154,0.00008810885,0.000030878957,0.00005356471,0.00006791851,0.00004407807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997571,0.00013619871,0.000021984417,0.000011015531,0.000038006176,0.000035680387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040319798,0.0006132214,0.0005261743,0.00199033,0.0016095848,0.0045620366,0.0005243606,0.0011802545,0.00716209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046121218,0.00027284518,0.000308931,0.0029843354,0.0024846215,0.003658833,0.002138712,0.0022755684,0.0009118176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011310464,0.00042902236,0.016643602,0.0032529652,0.00002843473,0.0017900636,0.0246104,0.0024190105,0.0015274923,0.52803963,0.08753273,0.33361346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036923734,0.000059110833,0.0132306125,0.0020364174,0.0000066236194,0.00067334983,0.007874198,0.0006890267,0.00015658891,0.043115098,0.9321266,0.000028669252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057393117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074753007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00716209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018836644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001523684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023959577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414040020","doi":"10.1111/joac.70037","title":"Cultivating Climate Precarity: Mechanisms of Surplus Capture and Immiserizing Growth in Guatemala's Horticultural Export Sector","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Scarborough; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Agrarian society; Value (mathematics); Agriculture; Prosperity; Poverty; Politics; Agrarian structure; Indigenous","score_opus":0.024699646292278485,"score_gpt":0.22178850446509432,"score_spread":0.19708885817281585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414040020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9119514,0.0007468083,0.0030910298,0.009895481,0.000021955315,0.00007216867,0.000062221945,0.000067283545,0.07409167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984384,0.00015105109,0.00023059046,0.00016287163,0.0000037366362,0.000014982523,0.0000055275013,0.0000031666575,0.0009896352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994937,0.00018001163,0.000008267916,0.00006151684,0.000039595234,0.0002169045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915314,0.00022749843,0.0002677309,0.000106177664,0.00007970219,0.0001657255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011485553,0.0002866933,0.00016998955,0.0011645871,0.0024954076,0.0032260076,0.00067343406,0.0009645554,0.005419595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015668933,0.00018696465,0.00027100806,0.000917241,0.008444768,0.0015967572,0.004795704,0.0007115219,0.00023911532],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035498998,0.00043152057,0.15851255,0.00045388023,0.00009532628,0.005584622,0.13396415,0.0029982517,0.034054037,0.60132664,0.0039429977,0.05828103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106618005,0.0003771493,0.40332523,0.00047837006,0.00009789279,0.0013376983,0.20635737,0.00958509,0.008296993,0.28603768,0.08389333,0.00010655956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018197153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026518766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018197153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043490753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022028522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036182463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414201336","doi":"10.1111/joac.70038","title":"Finance, Land and Labour","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Land rights; Current (fluid); Land use; Land tenure","score_opus":0.019068680482074545,"score_gpt":0.21240565452297844,"score_spread":0.1933369740409039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414201336","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007632767,0.0021451258,0.005099933,0.023705002,0.010226018,0.002782864,0.6519696,0.0016178983,0.29482082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15264171,0.0038410206,0.008762413,0.005367311,0.0020947354,0.00608756,0.33330843,0.0016103416,0.48628646],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954971,0.00096056046,0.00035208612,0.00044451247,0.0017495175,0.0009962704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865774,0.0025060521,0.00090760854,0.002177538,0.0050532073,0.0027782382],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053481823,0.00054203614,0.001348219,0.0026978601,0.0010047331,0.0036519177,0.0020655931,0.0011903595,0.38818988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04568224,0.00025586222,0.00050316384,0.0046882755,0.0006532746,0.001480934,0.003139748,0.0017094788,0.08983886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033465575,0.000043723223,0.003273101,0.0006183656,0.000042600623,0.0001010503,0.00021031666,0.00025587154,0.00014325633,0.0099729225,0.916248,0.06875606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008961176,0.00006152979,0.009668214,0.00080716,0.000018487568,0.00011117354,0.0005650407,0.00050206925,0.0001368901,0.003755791,0.98426616,0.000017887553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018359145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019566704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38818988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023722653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0111652315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87267286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414602961","doi":"10.1111/joac.70042","title":"Small‐Scale Village Farmers, Farming Imaginaries and Enrichment Value Creation in Ankara, Turkey","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Industrialisation; Agroecology; Agriculture; Ethnography; Value (mathematics); Job creation; Value creation","score_opus":0.020814074419892827,"score_gpt":0.22648281745153984,"score_spread":0.205668743031647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414602961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99791044,0.00008287567,0.000037790458,0.0000722441,0.0000014479531,0.0000045962215,0.000011707541,8.821716e-7,0.0018779805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996275,0.00003746526,0.000032587744,0.0000066981133,5.6058445e-7,0.0000022163424,0.0000056315566,3.204463e-7,0.00028700157],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964476,0.00015238035,0.0000112221305,0.00005931618,0.000036532798,0.00009573168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936813,0.00028531533,0.00013452763,0.000016818238,0.000070752685,0.00012450472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073411735,0.00022420057,0.00018703705,0.00062404753,0.0017281512,0.0014617996,0.00043287445,0.00036649907,0.002377748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005735385,0.00017352247,0.000078850884,0.0005910126,0.0020644197,0.0007910922,0.0009068634,0.00034977723,0.00013049264],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003713,0.00046612087,0.37887147,0.00039700494,0.000044096912,0.010837942,0.54791653,0.00090304145,0.006305493,0.008331296,0.0023684439,0.043187223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009357518,0.0001815121,0.29953244,0.00006846202,0.000014214591,0.000600652,0.6907905,0.00052726426,0.00046375615,0.00072131015,0.007064484,0.000026032823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017771132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0495468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017771132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020373235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010194009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035335362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414748881","doi":"10.1111/joac.70048","title":"The Ambiguous Ecologies of Agri‐Alternatives: Exploring the Calculus of Social Reproduction in Rural India","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Manchester; Royal Geographical Society; European Commission; Multiple Sclerosis Scientific Research Foundation","keywords":"Scholarship; Construct (python library); Agency (philosophy); Reproduction; Ethnography; Narrative; Agrarian society; Social reproduction","score_opus":0.04870568365370114,"score_gpt":0.25102593066550927,"score_spread":0.20232024701180812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414748881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7386609,0.0008995075,0.024533497,0.007997573,0.000042861764,0.00008112918,0.000076958284,0.00007867803,0.22762884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835384,0.00006655646,0.0006092466,0.000032266904,0.0000022743811,0.000008749787,0.0000034792233,0.000007749199,0.00091586955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99594325,0.0027547178,0.00008675658,0.00024045173,0.00041061637,0.0005641519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99449867,0.0038539865,0.0005396251,0.00057993457,0.00024759662,0.0002802247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003789266,0.00028399733,0.00028825528,0.0015565116,0.006137635,0.0107627,0.0012437435,0.00095456385,0.0027298853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005586737,0.00035933286,0.0003777094,0.0013360726,0.06366404,0.0044809845,0.009126306,0.001952612,0.00017704672],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003422371,0.000022893948,0.0052985274,0.0000651529,0.000009959004,0.0011278468,0.22051044,0.0015293815,0.0006740342,0.76439846,0.00031233183,0.006016812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023467226,0.00005795087,0.013765251,0.00020821864,0.00003490986,0.00081645657,0.41131788,0.005021914,0.0013291901,0.4975011,0.06982741,0.00009620168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012799625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015860211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012799625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007580907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031178454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055003583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415545659","doi":"10.1111/joac.70051","title":"Class Dynamics of Tenancy and Accumulation in Capitalist Agriculture in India","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Leasehold estate; Agrarian society; Lease; Peasant; Agriculture; Marxist philosophy; Financialization; Production (economics)","score_opus":0.031678810095627855,"score_gpt":0.3148544419464263,"score_spread":0.28317563185079847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415545659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99664515,0.00002756822,0.000064211585,0.00007783686,9.475442e-7,0.0000040660957,0.000036298654,0.000002540681,0.0031413748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953544,0.000009821202,0.000018570123,0.0000039081096,6.172863e-7,0.000001309822,0.000013830408,7.040748e-7,0.00041582077],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995233,0.00008560886,0.000011340276,0.000059427526,0.00005940418,0.0002609488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985668,0.00037610866,0.00049052836,0.00010070706,0.00015869089,0.00030719762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048511906,0.00009932922,0.0001404161,0.0016871048,0.0015968857,0.0025623841,0.00046730976,0.00022246281,0.0033843848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014720963,0.00010412343,0.000119805176,0.0016585373,0.0023187492,0.0008611497,0.0022453493,0.0004616919,0.00028981306],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006068102,0.00023968963,0.85137534,0.00004160207,0.00003443083,0.00038400572,0.07942679,0.00081736885,0.002962055,0.028284937,0.00091382785,0.034913123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004588266,0.000063850275,0.95465285,0.000015138617,0.0000055939213,0.00007187394,0.03801749,0.0008279032,0.0003294156,0.002719852,0.0032755546,0.000015841455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02841527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042724714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02841527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002586921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087162305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05649972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417107337","doi":"10.1111/joac.70056","title":"No Remedy: Injustice and Constrained Citizenship in Indonesia's Plantation Zone","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Asian Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Citizenship; Injustice; Harm; Government (linguistics); Land grabbing; Colonialism","score_opus":0.037749521682889246,"score_gpt":0.30419796894980644,"score_spread":0.2664484472669172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417107337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96569955,0.00050463347,0.00017798047,0.0019612068,0.000039663453,0.00000527872,0.00000942388,0.0000041785997,0.031598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989827,0.00009740689,0.00001810538,0.000078579316,0.0000046807327,0.0000012022778,0.0000016559296,0.0000011835727,0.0008144625],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994937,0.00027483492,0.000019908062,0.000036076774,0.000058188845,0.00011733728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936086,0.00022321145,0.00020046285,0.00004172193,0.000033903652,0.00013976904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049534306,0.000096913456,0.00017138384,0.0003214807,0.003719982,0.0034978595,0.00035605213,0.00054911553,0.0024136363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081842946,0.0000840672,0.00006576836,0.00038671537,0.0068113534,0.0015960406,0.003387247,0.0015226201,0.00010131092],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007022678,0.00017985205,0.079043515,0.00014012691,0.000015480156,0.0029565904,0.822409,0.00020660454,0.001463026,0.06395548,0.0032872034,0.026272882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055313217,0.00005849569,0.103770204,0.00013723048,0.00000893374,0.00094739476,0.85412407,0.0003396218,0.00041838866,0.0064687445,0.033693984,0.000027437929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073764496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01648867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073764496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001482596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007441591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014667034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116687691","doi":"10.1111/joac.70058","title":"Revisiting Deere in an Extractivist Era: Agrarian Reform and Feminist Legacies in Coastal Ecuador","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agrarian Change","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; International Development Research Centre; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Agrarian society; Livelihood; Precarity; Redistribution (election); Politics; Ethnography; Agrarian reform; Political ecology","score_opus":0.030892855497605468,"score_gpt":0.25324108074618035,"score_spread":0.2223482252485749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116687691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9027361,0.0051855217,0.0011074744,0.034505893,0.000099310426,0.000024283976,0.000024552379,0.000014427817,0.056302376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956797,0.0006263842,0.00018509828,0.00070932315,0.000026396898,0.00001835439,0.000005587384,0.000005413062,0.0027437676],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895906,0.0006902598,0.00002058637,0.000075367265,0.000069855254,0.0001847533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899334,0.00063860364,0.0001589197,0.00007003582,0.0000712672,0.00006790177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034617123,0.00025857947,0.00025768438,0.0008240027,0.0063364166,0.004752682,0.00074770156,0.0011186395,0.003029482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002533013,0.0001355195,0.000101720296,0.0009276293,0.018553423,0.003607411,0.0049558566,0.0019899018,0.00006150509],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000712678,0.000108584856,0.0051149437,0.00018154908,0.000008414519,0.0013654212,0.69260496,0.00024081863,0.0012087874,0.2630211,0.0033874894,0.032686666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019317227,0.00007402882,0.01390363,0.00035489825,0.000011004241,0.000241506,0.77006155,0.00032546555,0.0009877724,0.02722135,0.186778,0.000021468653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010234725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015938407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010234725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006239869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019787636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04527366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}