{"meta":{"query_hash":"9084842ee364","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Agricultural Research"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9084842ee364","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Agricultural+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W4381663707","doi":"10.58475/2023.61.1.1917","title":"PRECURSOR-INOCULUM INTERACTION FOR THE GROWTH PROMOTION OF COTTON UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural Research","topic":"Research in Cotton Cultivation","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Biotechnology Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Microbial inoculant; Randomized block design; Inoculation; Auxin; Yield (engineering); Rhizobacteria; Horticulture; Solubilization; Diazotroph; Biotechnology; Biology; Chemistry; Bacteria; Biochemistry; Nitrogen fixation; Rhizosphere","score_opus":0.21597757579681867,"score_gpt":0.4306389670819944,"score_spread":0.21466139128517572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381663707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9661693,0.0000486845,0.000026071242,0.032608267,0.00024318659,0.00056784076,0.000021163734,0.000015603222,0.00029990415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978958,0.00035025898,0.000035573317,0.000022818862,0.0005618242,0.00004766419,0.000044441764,0.0000010690203,0.0010405942],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997855,0.00029464083,0.00040125905,0.00013395707,0.0009886601,0.00032645217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926125,0.0044605955,0.00025337088,0.000047719586,0.0025342398,0.000091600996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002312678,0.0000852198,0.00015180607,0.00007332685,0.00038776864,0.0001118943,0.00043225274,0.00009276305,0.00015286327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023718374,0.000023570592,0.0001867048,0.0012889996,0.00009648819,0.00045020913,0.00008069731,0.00046758557,0.000023719416],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013431281,0.0001355283,0.0010362111,0.000040783394,0.00006268005,0.0000014136174,0.00018552033,0.000107719105,0.8971662,0.0018333984,0.089551225,0.009745015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034587464,0.0027538294,0.8205639,0.00016643958,0.000019929836,0.000038496284,0.0062065376,0.00023719658,0.15987521,0.004965593,0.0047169714,0.00011002276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010188631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011348401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8195277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091204274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031438645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2982442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385233990","doi":"10.58475/2023.61.2.2012","title":"ORGANIC MULCHING TO CONSERVE SOIL NUTRITIONAL QUALITY AND ENHANCE WHEAT YIELD","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural Research","topic":"Agricultural Science and Fertilization","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Biotechnology Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Straw; Mulch; Agronomy; Environmental science; Randomized block design; Soil quality; Nutrient; Soil test; Crop yield; Mathematics; Soil water; Biology; Soil science","score_opus":0.17005706858033812,"score_gpt":0.3917107203408821,"score_spread":0.221653651760544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385233990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755912,0.0001642206,0.0000028973898,0.023667196,0.000111036316,0.00019018646,0.000011130135,0.00003002768,0.00023209889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805933,0.00034610028,0.000046135723,0.00020750485,0.00054895016,0.000006558867,0.000016901591,7.475516e-7,0.00076776097],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974347,0.00024262769,0.00045786472,0.00025527843,0.0011270305,0.0004825204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974581,0.001008107,0.00013588212,0.000038327446,0.0010062637,0.00035329524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021570427,0.00012778284,0.00023175881,0.0000573733,0.00053957367,0.00022348025,0.0003857078,0.00010102775,0.00021942587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011560724,0.00003816642,0.00009856124,0.0022318957,0.000087998575,0.00050919125,0.00018816894,0.00039846145,0.000117667965],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049873575,0.000042773707,0.0061975406,0.000009800116,0.000008816058,0.000008516262,0.0002188693,0.000013791044,0.97296464,0.0001068974,0.01456567,0.0058128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083491075,0.00040824013,0.96781814,0.000105205414,0.00000388246,0.000056581106,0.002738091,0.000004977336,0.026739305,0.0004325397,0.001475538,0.00013399491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017316858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090691826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9616206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079423924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023448369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4150019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124433821","doi":"10.58475/2025.63.4.1147","title":"GROUND WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT USING WATER QUALITY INDEX: CASE STUDY OF AYUB AGRICULTURE RESEARCH INSTITUTE, FAISALABAD, PAKISTAN","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural Research","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Alberta Agricultural Research Institute","keywords":"Water quality; Agriculture; Irrigation; Groundwater; Soil water; Hydrology (agriculture); Range (aeronautics); Farm water","score_opus":0.2738746393907334,"score_gpt":0.530779078177599,"score_spread":0.25690443878686553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124433821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899668,0.00021274904,0.00013509253,0.0045563565,0.001320331,0.0022523354,0.00007047844,0.000016072745,0.0014697876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99458283,0.00015426341,0.00044741467,0.000055793123,0.0003570536,0.00003220744,0.000019344301,0.000023407874,0.004327691],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.965479,0.01601851,0.0050794766,0.001229765,0.009578465,0.0026147843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99216825,0.0010428306,0.0009421081,0.001101941,0.0038188095,0.0009260437],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050374776,0.000785971,0.0017405243,0.000986598,0.0031089988,0.0012592911,0.0021090396,0.00070144393,0.0013391614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003836548,0.00037492026,0.0006646864,0.003067737,0.0021994908,0.002820653,0.003152022,0.0061581107,0.00008433825],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014084469,0.017100528,0.07905126,0.001424438,0.001894986,0.0034576226,0.079421744,0.008153997,0.8000703,0.0015101131,0.004246474,0.0022600726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004483225,0.0026587935,0.6912177,0.0005568131,0.0001845156,0.0011268156,0.2646557,0.000050580667,0.029145867,0.0007464582,0.004411508,0.00076199335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06531096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010287214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77092445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005621616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006660586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}