{"meta":{"query_hash":"1e9b3d466fc9","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics"},"cohort_total":36,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":36,"exported":36,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1e9b3d466fc9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Agricultural+and+Environmental+Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W1506019050","doi":"10.1007/s10806-009-9180-7","title":"Paul B. Thompson: The Ethics of Intensification: Agricultural Development and Cultural Change (Volume 16: The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Environmental ethics; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Sociology; Agricultural economics; Economics; Geography; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04685450890861913,"score_gpt":0.22426750596834005,"score_spread":0.1774129970597209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506019050","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012028904,0.49257782,0.0015701065,0.4261858,0.012324918,0.000024615725,0.00007769841,0.000040218627,0.065995894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0760996,0.629719,0.0041587874,0.10920724,0.022489652,0.00016450488,0.00013790432,0.00022919996,0.15779416],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971449,0.001595796,0.00013611477,0.00020927466,0.0007533353,0.00016055717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960426,0.0028685802,0.00028240355,0.000134745,0.00034943662,0.00032231296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030406583,0.0007425022,0.0006319167,0.0014153011,0.0026722588,0.0069599976,0.0008506694,0.006115624,0.006912716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008954252,0.00040923865,0.00026297293,0.0032727772,0.0054549114,0.008876212,0.002429037,0.0050290935,0.0023971333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018586014,0.000014831973,0.00019213094,0.00024006522,0.000007668933,0.00009710118,0.0028764287,0.000101138095,0.00007527817,0.12314465,0.83389115,0.03934092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008907509,0.000009636165,0.0010448586,0.0012537934,0.0000056791214,0.0002443818,0.0023711678,0.00016402685,0.00015719494,0.10234942,0.8923687,0.00002220296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013033077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025394646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013033077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003042871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005242312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02591449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W194775982","doi":"10.1023/a:1009544714704","title":"Response to Evelyn B. Pluhar's ``Non-Obligatory Anthropocentrism''","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.011935383071246744,"score_gpt":0.2086191352990273,"score_spread":0.19668375222778053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W194775982","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017857573,0.0009732403,0.000072805764,0.986604,0.010420027,0.0000062848467,0.000022769318,0.000017284343,0.0017050692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018597906,0.00048105817,0.00011238596,0.9861806,0.0046083997,0.000020603307,0.000009633488,0.000025904445,0.0067017367],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99502254,0.0012856232,0.00037596058,0.0008872014,0.0015888186,0.0008398268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809589,0.0108914375,0.0011233465,0.000645952,0.0034690653,0.0029114548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068162647,0.0011161179,0.0013540122,0.00058865367,0.009184221,0.006848852,0.0034665389,0.044101458,0.012547188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035970606,0.001076634,0.0009214542,0.00096301455,0.008341595,0.006894494,0.0055269003,0.08140595,0.006768828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014413778,0.000008719268,0.00006588434,0.00003669304,0.000003998739,0.0001241358,0.00045865471,0.000017279455,0.000093576265,0.0035152463,0.993458,0.0022034352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014672079,0.000011997154,0.0004799965,0.00017416522,0.0000050806466,0.0002596495,0.001937302,0.00005934977,0.0002017691,0.0038619172,0.99296206,0.00003211695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009913365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018378345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044101458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044820886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006191168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041974545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950213229","doi":"10.1007/s10806-015-9574-7","title":"One Health, Vaccines and Ebola: The Opportunities for Shared Benefits","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Ministry of Health -Singapore","keywords":"Ebola vaccine; Virology; Ebola virus; Medicine; Outbreak","score_opus":0.2253252679073818,"score_gpt":0.33775234226511597,"score_spread":0.11242707435773416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950213229","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011100064,0.018982036,0.0052246633,0.90071577,0.002568096,0.00003281318,0.00003933828,0.00002314233,0.061314113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78404135,0.017274888,0.0065916786,0.1671355,0.0074556754,0.0002104048,0.000049231,0.00006458099,0.017176736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95633847,0.03268393,0.000868031,0.0017065344,0.004858028,0.0035449709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91649365,0.05952863,0.003906704,0.0056642694,0.0042450572,0.010161588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051677708,0.0005915282,0.001286703,0.0013294441,0.00814507,0.018398184,0.0015984814,0.021699319,0.017562067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06328435,0.0005059367,0.00077632815,0.0009783058,0.031462424,0.024021693,0.018682506,0.016185481,0.0010545951],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018923442,0.00022421003,0.0021225887,0.00025183888,0.00007845205,0.0005341207,0.005931314,0.00037498516,0.00049670687,0.88359773,0.044386562,0.061812177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009469835,0.0001377175,0.0019129238,0.0007347795,0.000036832782,0.0005200786,0.009751032,0.00046250015,0.00024321534,0.8272683,0.15876247,0.00007552517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023524137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004429446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051677708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006009486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01690456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27330106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964914450","doi":"10.1007/s10806-006-9027-4","title":"The Role of Science in Public Policy: Higher Reason, or Reason for Hire?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Position (finance); Process (computing); Science policy; Point (geometry); Public policy; Public sphere; Service (business); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Uncertainty; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Public relations; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Business; Social science; Computer science; Politics; Marketing; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23590761309315295,"score_gpt":0.40673408606657996,"score_spread":0.170826472973427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964914450","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07621994,0.005013516,0.021118866,0.7065743,0.0019399667,0.000047589303,0.00008133007,0.00008165593,0.18892281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97343296,0.0006496781,0.0019677314,0.01817039,0.001254348,0.00003710624,0.000017454151,0.000048751514,0.00442163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97668535,0.014003705,0.00068483286,0.0018492215,0.0032334118,0.003543522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8755099,0.09656764,0.006457165,0.007661823,0.0061433106,0.007660212],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039351337,0.00045879395,0.0011798526,0.0021969008,0.0067698695,0.014891772,0.0018019978,0.020029439,0.016574226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08259719,0.00049112487,0.00083044614,0.0017850549,0.06226435,0.021504946,0.005478035,0.013699623,0.0011909793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070581504,0.00006953617,0.0019734085,0.0000814516,0.000026021708,0.00007502242,0.006025322,0.0001990612,0.00018990658,0.97401005,0.0075272257,0.009752465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040060855,0.000017774353,0.0013013289,0.00010737643,0.000014232277,0.000041714065,0.0033537075,0.00043041946,0.00020129872,0.9767138,0.017752664,0.000025592213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044544446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037829173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059928265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009291853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20811218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999529764","doi":"10.1007/s10806-011-9353-z","title":"A “Practical” Ethic for Animals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.12307466657483485,"score_gpt":0.34120379266178563,"score_spread":0.2181291260869508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999529764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02434248,0.004179199,0.073791526,0.44314697,0.005533647,0.00039348344,0.00010084792,0.00017778279,0.44833404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6826854,0.0019871858,0.079260066,0.14074597,0.0030057023,0.0012827191,0.00009334806,0.00010120213,0.09083841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.977205,0.017997505,0.0007807874,0.0009392064,0.002022869,0.0010545823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871178,0.0050862716,0.0013573923,0.0027187928,0.0020345647,0.0016852182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023016287,0.0009069554,0.00051054225,0.000778879,0.0074597043,0.0051521463,0.0018038034,0.012584983,0.005305286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01654243,0.0005072412,0.00060899724,0.00038195582,0.04337469,0.004339402,0.0061443523,0.009541551,0.0012332434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026021124,0.00006616725,0.0006160313,0.00011952048,0.000017119773,0.00016506131,0.0034665135,0.00032763684,0.0016052123,0.96117043,0.021891808,0.010528556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036133577,0.0002263051,0.0015512636,0.000520776,0.00002313281,0.00072706817,0.0039905966,0.0005044118,0.0012730572,0.5363743,0.4547168,0.000056181085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009244234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030491378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023016287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019394424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053977864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121723235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010191070","doi":"10.1007/s10806-015-9529-z","title":"Ethical Issues and Potential Stakeholder Priorities Associated with the Application of Genomic Technologies Applied to Animal Production Systems","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Animal Genetics and Reproduction","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Genome Alberta","keywords":"Stakeholder; Scope (computer science); Credibility; Production (economics); Biotechnology; Business; Emerging technologies; Animal welfare; Genomics; Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Political science; Biology; Computer science; Public relations; Engineering; Economics; Genetics","score_opus":0.020888343698670327,"score_gpt":0.22579222341801952,"score_spread":0.2049038797193492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010191070","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117020935,0.0043901885,0.029240338,0.77737665,0.0017203484,0.00046652064,0.00007150083,0.000043673626,0.06966983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88328433,0.0028606048,0.028068338,0.07698611,0.0014210053,0.0004781852,0.000049525734,0.000050563023,0.0068013584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7810853,0.16765521,0.007439284,0.0040504565,0.028810479,0.010959239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68799305,0.24166824,0.016702702,0.0083733285,0.029761514,0.015501149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18417294,0.00039671833,0.00064119056,0.0013237623,0.01094497,0.016210588,0.0030864596,0.017900394,0.003657036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2103144,0.00064432237,0.0008218036,0.0017491898,0.019694427,0.0060911993,0.009033242,0.014631638,0.0004019011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005651407,0.0006670076,0.02513255,0.0012720737,0.00014912203,0.008970635,0.080231875,0.0045237998,0.009989722,0.7051717,0.029715445,0.13361084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015369194,0.00074896537,0.018454034,0.0038194065,0.00014296306,0.0060138437,0.15556633,0.0058430703,0.0061581456,0.56374013,0.23901083,0.00034847087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037344105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077913324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18417294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065950304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038168557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97401124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011904956","doi":"10.1007/s10806-014-9518-7","title":"The Ticking Clock: Addressing Farm Animal Welfare in Emerging Countries","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Developing country; Welfare; Developed country; Animal husbandry; Emerging markets; Business; Work (physics); Public economics; Economic growth; Development economics; Economics; Agriculture; Market economy; Medicine; Biology; Engineering; Ecology; Environmental health; Population","score_opus":0.04507346746205638,"score_gpt":0.3062339732453956,"score_spread":0.2611605057833392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011904956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89580727,0.011150908,0.0038178533,0.06484377,0.00074947375,0.00008636651,0.00011463876,0.000017258235,0.023412494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98611474,0.0066038948,0.0022312433,0.0035739015,0.00019090186,0.00006982296,0.000037822963,0.000006863929,0.001170896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972428,0.0020619223,0.00007042488,0.00008809183,0.00012646618,0.00041029594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903349,0.0044883164,0.0027933356,0.0002463938,0.0010960485,0.0010409501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007903234,0.0002627048,0.00017631895,0.000517233,0.0021038724,0.0021703143,0.0006790355,0.0014203185,0.0024783234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012388101,0.00014686758,0.00013885561,0.00071121514,0.0030727,0.0030510402,0.0018183249,0.0015940564,0.00014424583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055901636,0.0007566961,0.5593372,0.0013801799,0.00005062291,0.001309836,0.071912795,0.00094506494,0.002745842,0.05110065,0.015888479,0.2940136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004530361,0.001299956,0.46363103,0.004185123,0.00009522547,0.0010806386,0.4236316,0.0013512982,0.0011955887,0.015297487,0.08813377,0.000053019357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009553144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024938334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009553144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019594084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077013588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041796803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019762970","doi":"10.1007/s10806-005-0906-x","title":"Book review: Lisa Nicole Mills, Science and Social Context: The Regulation of Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone in North America. McGill-Queen’s University Press [Montreal &amp; Kingston], 2002. 206 pp. ISBN 0-7735-2375-8.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"American Literature and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Context (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Media studies; History; Biology; Zoology; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.009383588568928694,"score_gpt":0.18802077682262378,"score_spread":0.17863718825369507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019762970","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009583001,0.94372845,0.00033960564,0.017707981,0.024162052,0.000046004654,0.00037436956,0.00009118917,0.0134545155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010146531,0.87456375,0.0006220245,0.012078056,0.015609573,0.0001019001,0.0006231016,0.00008768568,0.09529932],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938726,0.00007480653,0.00005865878,0.000099389814,0.00033686176,0.000042996056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721485,0.0011315882,0.0002539267,0.00004489872,0.0010896045,0.000265105],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009486118,0.0022181293,0.0031907128,0.005651354,0.0008674118,0.0026766327,0.002923875,0.00289551,0.047054715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003597959,0.0009514939,0.0008164,0.008217299,0.0010268018,0.003921516,0.0012742244,0.0035783672,0.044313077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012725268,0.0000075006583,0.00002715521,0.0011090691,0.000009663642,0.000027446213,0.00003533684,0.000040447372,0.00006401923,0.00034864925,0.95641166,0.04190634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012683179,0.000010225879,0.00020901726,0.0011873217,0.00001958132,0.00023514857,0.000041128,0.00002778977,0.000051003946,0.0003247685,0.9978683,0.000012942154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01306969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028666412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027803774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033477226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15741366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020054675","doi":"10.1007/s10806-014-9523-x","title":"Animal Welfare Concerns and Values of Stakeholders Within the Dairy Industry","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Stakeholder; Lameness; Dairy industry; Welfare; Dairy cattle; Focus group; Business; Herd; Marketing; Veterinary medicine; Medicine; Public relations; Political science; Animal science; Biology; Food science; Law","score_opus":0.10437205173961292,"score_gpt":0.30607291801532627,"score_spread":0.20170086627571335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020054675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87160164,0.00082410284,0.0035424049,0.061310075,0.00017098818,0.000089259425,0.000031682644,0.000014182969,0.062415637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949945,0.00016485357,0.00038774687,0.0026208935,0.0000242078,0.000029045927,0.000006668107,0.000005229486,0.001766875],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9484597,0.039022062,0.000920969,0.0011686735,0.0051400946,0.005288647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9320632,0.039461482,0.0065364786,0.0013591619,0.009709324,0.01087036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042632874,0.00031452463,0.0003265052,0.0013005944,0.014098878,0.011498211,0.0011742366,0.005755303,0.0032449316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05167322,0.00041188832,0.00035797036,0.0008334602,0.013846468,0.0030524996,0.006716436,0.0065736654,0.0003222005],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006160233,0.0006629232,0.11269927,0.00028145956,0.00011399688,0.0033872062,0.69829404,0.000612916,0.010151618,0.108122535,0.0073253335,0.057732627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030651132,0.00042345555,0.038328372,0.0005740265,0.000044923425,0.0010625538,0.8614904,0.00069137214,0.0029467545,0.03513764,0.059170034,0.00009980527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00576728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008178104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042632874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053783683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011827802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2254669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042029571","doi":"10.1007/s10806-014-9489-8","title":"The Leading Canadian NGOs’ Discourse on Fish Farming: From Ecocentric Intuitions to Biocentric Solutions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Flourishing; Environmental ethics; Aquaculture; Embeddedness; Political science; Sociology; Law; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Social science; Fishery; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.021779296681044037,"score_gpt":0.23010786851106704,"score_spread":0.208328571830023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042029571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15978222,0.0032163335,0.005713102,0.16713364,0.00037889087,0.0000439184,0.00021390762,0.000047159192,0.6634708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98036754,0.00075818965,0.000931483,0.0038040224,0.0000425817,0.000018012319,0.000025483792,0.00003638727,0.014016462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942959,0.001977762,0.000112660724,0.00061640446,0.0014512512,0.0015461178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904755,0.003998043,0.00054724055,0.0004889058,0.0033095584,0.0011807422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070794947,0.0006913527,0.00043190212,0.0027551267,0.03864205,0.017435376,0.0029138876,0.0072228513,0.008115983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012111283,0.00048218993,0.00035754437,0.0059016924,0.062092815,0.0063502877,0.005545095,0.00785412,0.0003110313],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025672338,0.000011472579,0.0012913609,0.00006507585,0.000009509986,0.00017319749,0.17276068,0.00046397373,0.00019275933,0.8071234,0.012956167,0.0049266894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043309374,0.00001680207,0.008124673,0.0005312006,0.00004793737,0.000116823394,0.38930464,0.0009870365,0.00039278532,0.16479999,0.43550768,0.0001271521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.978152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9852954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14370644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14370644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12978685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99317914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064047893","doi":"10.1007/s10806-013-9473-8","title":"Operationalizing Ethics in Food Choice Decisions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Operationalization; Purchasing; Action (physics); Work (physics); Consumption (sociology); Marketing; Food choice; Management science; Business; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Economics; Social science; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03962501565456409,"score_gpt":0.23422379268027702,"score_spread":0.19459877702571293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064047893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42130005,0.0012485997,0.33705956,0.030630779,0.0004674952,0.00034339327,0.00017284791,0.00009421794,0.2086831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98320997,0.00010007715,0.015176913,0.00036076302,0.00006863949,0.00011452967,0.000024961351,0.000012389498,0.0009316841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9720551,0.021849994,0.0012445352,0.0012680942,0.0021913003,0.0013909875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8983193,0.07984856,0.008374772,0.0055805254,0.005843596,0.0020332674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02350473,0.0007230296,0.00088242895,0.001969463,0.0021081364,0.007821485,0.0013708848,0.0037206535,0.004239608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0757003,0.0005559975,0.00095647847,0.0020225903,0.017420147,0.010544647,0.003975312,0.0045399484,0.00021518975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000272997,0.00005980195,0.0018082614,0.000030417687,0.000023830667,0.00005920238,0.0008501861,0.0034220456,0.000082445586,0.98847955,0.00027794222,0.0048790197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010118772,0.000016632835,0.0005791608,0.000024521492,0.000009066897,0.000022279704,0.0005733629,0.006988515,0.00007702292,0.9906499,0.00104222,0.0000071806917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028166426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002189172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02350473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005483075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00450798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12430638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066225792","doi":"10.1007/s10806-010-9271-5","title":"A New Format for Learning about Farm Animal Welfare","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"European Commission; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Animal welfare; Welfare; Context (archaeology); The Internet; Business; Public relations; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Biology; World Wide Web; Ecology","score_opus":0.032883114696396445,"score_gpt":0.29372167584313386,"score_spread":0.2608385611467374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066225792","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015008765,0.0016113241,0.50797266,0.16542572,0.019928522,0.0011229112,0.00051514374,0.0029063462,0.28550857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16681683,0.001986576,0.6251004,0.025494149,0.006815329,0.0043893093,0.00058405637,0.0010734136,0.16774006],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901945,0.006136801,0.00045861374,0.00073556084,0.0019653763,0.00050916924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95782954,0.022254394,0.0013583769,0.008421145,0.0057252995,0.0044111274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016831527,0.0012948613,0.00088474253,0.0018654658,0.0045900363,0.0087195365,0.0033304968,0.0051281354,0.04691237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03858103,0.00066040654,0.0011335663,0.00086922076,0.008580539,0.018474646,0.009876329,0.013210645,0.011517147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021126978,0.0012126628,0.0013540185,0.00042610406,0.000019415413,0.00054113293,0.014943822,0.00046517115,0.003769815,0.33834594,0.17888972,0.4598209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013164437,0.0006207913,0.0014766969,0.0008414243,0.000027378113,0.0011056137,0.010509507,0.0020245465,0.0029014826,0.3784723,0.6017528,0.00013581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065216294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001801443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04691237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021688803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037259634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15693754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067970085","doi":"10.1007/s10806-011-9356-9","title":"Legal and Ethical Apprehensions Regarding Relational Object. The Case of Genetically Modified Fish","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Pluralism (philosophy); Object (grammar); Opposition (politics); Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Human animal; Environmental ethics; Computer science; Political science; Ecology; Law; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Biology","score_opus":0.02091586096435828,"score_gpt":0.25471389737548883,"score_spread":0.23379803641113056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067970085","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10391472,0.004035528,0.015219555,0.4808093,0.0010868832,0.00013736446,0.0000632873,0.000043457214,0.3946899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90797925,0.0013898334,0.0047135265,0.057329975,0.0006109843,0.00021914886,0.000021009588,0.000051035655,0.027685158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827161,0.009623208,0.0006388336,0.0018266961,0.0024894292,0.0027058136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98081446,0.014118124,0.0015021736,0.0011363368,0.0014405155,0.0009884065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026810493,0.0005504883,0.00082245097,0.0010959728,0.020089488,0.012155527,0.0035648998,0.04626134,0.0033302594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030622775,0.0009925786,0.0013511574,0.0011583859,0.068607084,0.012087396,0.010220201,0.028591054,0.00044829934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012700171,0.000015470521,0.00033164554,0.000015688469,0.000009679683,0.001522189,0.020450097,0.00013269091,0.00013965015,0.97094876,0.004628582,0.0017928296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056644763,0.00004863249,0.00101664,0.0005116957,0.000073665105,0.003953026,0.043857545,0.0012084465,0.00083774154,0.77799344,0.17032236,0.00012021444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030362546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031862143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04626134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009538888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010289461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14178914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069420339","doi":"10.1007/s10806-010-9240-z","title":"Legitimacy &amp; Canadian Farm Animal Welfare Standards Development: The Case of the National Farm Animal Care Council","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Agriculture and Farm Safety","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Animal welfare; Context (archaeology); Welfare; Public economics; Political science; Public administration; Business; Law; Economics; Biology; Ecology; Politics","score_opus":0.028043072863599323,"score_gpt":0.22998047014857176,"score_spread":0.20193739728497243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069420339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042210333,0.0041148337,0.0028709173,0.36015186,0.000549796,0.00030330347,0.00015267938,0.000042787477,0.58960354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8307689,0.001882485,0.0034593432,0.052136883,0.00035321814,0.0002547268,0.00006600802,0.00004954227,0.11102881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9571372,0.01513165,0.0009981703,0.0029139102,0.01312049,0.010698507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9434448,0.032167666,0.0024232804,0.0019650504,0.013483266,0.0065159355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031201104,0.0006258803,0.0006510851,0.0031939126,0.054678686,0.018203324,0.0054652533,0.03295308,0.0095457835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058261085,0.000940722,0.00091083115,0.0041529373,0.043084152,0.0056004045,0.0083301235,0.01730132,0.0004396369],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000185348,0.00004026591,0.0019763338,0.000044859036,0.000011664384,0.0006206608,0.009841051,0.00047629094,0.000109433524,0.9414833,0.038140617,0.007236975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012871368,0.0000743219,0.021378849,0.00082837266,0.00007849665,0.00051016384,0.038568452,0.003398116,0.00036385117,0.2704645,0.6638498,0.00035634355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9759556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98305297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82070494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1792951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3643659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9519014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085601634","doi":"10.1007/s10806-013-9477-4","title":"Attitudes of Canadian Pig Producers Toward Animal Welfare","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Welfare; Stakeholder; Business; Neglect; Psychology; Public economics; Medicine; Economics; Political science; Nursing; Biology; Public relations; Ecology; Market economy","score_opus":0.059382588800678496,"score_gpt":0.27903499378919094,"score_spread":0.21965240498851246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085601634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939692,0.00011544183,0.000049739487,0.0009271377,0.000013031199,0.000014230421,0.000042037635,0.0000018176622,0.004867382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99507153,0.00029552096,0.00012631642,0.0005531552,0.000008643446,0.000013341322,0.00004909798,0.0000034727987,0.0038789583],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744034,0.0007203567,0.000059058286,0.00016148046,0.0009820282,0.0006367186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98753893,0.0025439076,0.0020129245,0.00018933811,0.004283702,0.0034311654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034867928,0.000224786,0.00019665028,0.001207092,0.006459593,0.00230145,0.0006825429,0.0010683078,0.0045764376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068432814,0.00030315746,0.00028991033,0.0011421704,0.0035283107,0.00048864575,0.0009188881,0.0014590021,0.00024298324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050943723,0.00040193103,0.8594035,0.00007024615,0.000060488954,0.00066521484,0.115798816,0.00015704641,0.0021936635,0.0008672839,0.0043248865,0.015547603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001477448,0.00017388025,0.88144463,0.00007527539,0.00001804044,0.00011365248,0.11030105,0.00012710861,0.00019804717,0.00010235598,0.0073929736,0.0000382838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92483586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9744401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07516414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020138327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016548675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15121353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086541108","doi":"10.1007/s10806-009-9169-2","title":"Animal Welfare and Organic Aquaculture in Open Systems","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"World Health Organization","keywords":"Aquaculture; Sustainability; Animal welfare; Agriculture; Organic farming; Wildlife; Natural resource economics; Business; Aquaponics; Welfare; Fishery; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Biology; Economics; Environmental science","score_opus":0.013897413830520022,"score_gpt":0.24039185011959227,"score_spread":0.22649443628907226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086541108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865556,0.00038395938,0.000937203,0.0016528013,0.00003894056,0.000019769946,0.000019248522,0.0000011081312,0.010391354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984446,0.00013450012,0.00017566816,0.00017436959,0.00002299521,0.000021655153,0.000009113956,0.0000010613029,0.0010161281],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662304,0.0022166013,0.000114489594,0.00019174203,0.00044654333,0.00040751052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98516697,0.008289175,0.0034906152,0.0005361886,0.0011338493,0.0013832456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057037817,0.00015904015,0.00015594458,0.00046043954,0.0012367618,0.0017775901,0.00034215004,0.00092204136,0.003127868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011853606,0.00011952629,0.00019478862,0.00040708832,0.004116711,0.0011540161,0.0017234611,0.0006153681,0.00010505654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004468176,0.0046753953,0.68645364,0.0004061157,0.00023554829,0.0014923272,0.017006654,0.0030489673,0.013447143,0.12837769,0.0023362357,0.13805214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015711159,0.0045242202,0.8884395,0.0002958627,0.000102076534,0.00048365493,0.032364603,0.0022031728,0.003158648,0.05881741,0.0094092935,0.000044558776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034348085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009182516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057037817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020767427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030374278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030164838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088785180","doi":"10.1007/s10806-010-9251-9","title":"Ethical Considerations in Agro-biodiversity Research, Collecting, and Use","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Biodiversity; Agriculture; Context (archaeology); Equity (law); Environmental resource management; Global public good; Agricultural biodiversity; Business; Environmental planning; Political science; Public relations; Environmental ethics; Public good; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.10722743807266176,"score_gpt":0.3016838540832696,"score_spread":0.1944564160106078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088785180","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056350596,0.015028538,0.20365453,0.50833136,0.009871641,0.011178626,0.000414342,0.0002643618,0.19490598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47443947,0.012691906,0.2826599,0.16896577,0.0073056584,0.016368104,0.00032185263,0.00026479847,0.036982555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.49887696,0.41439083,0.030827325,0.0076505397,0.042076547,0.0061778245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5030202,0.39350104,0.021357734,0.035543744,0.036089778,0.010487435],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.31027412,0.0011717443,0.0019667747,0.0018509368,0.011677601,0.016619038,0.004600639,0.0225994,0.0030837287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3153566,0.0012176174,0.0011702675,0.0034719605,0.045301244,0.010383957,0.0077470792,0.0213374,0.0021570944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028767477,0.00046501603,0.0051526977,0.001115739,0.00009510716,0.0024360614,0.16239217,0.0013322737,0.0031212568,0.67649865,0.06891997,0.078183375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014025155,0.00049570913,0.00354717,0.0052462583,0.000090333866,0.004046335,0.05769275,0.0033528758,0.0031907912,0.42173475,0.50014967,0.00031317177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030486565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00578094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31027412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004462364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030915387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8505548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129037598","doi":"10.1023/a:1011321103091","title":"Assessment of GM Crops in Commercial Agriculture","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Precautionary principle; Value (mathematics); Scientific evidence; Judgement; Terminology; Meaning (existential); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Biotechnology; Epistemology; Biology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03345992096179443,"score_gpt":0.27402889781997186,"score_spread":0.24056897685817744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129037598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8376123,0.0014966702,0.012727856,0.006731311,0.00006329675,0.00042709152,0.00040625574,0.000039670424,0.14049563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99478877,0.0002142202,0.0026311467,0.00024237571,0.000012852647,0.000056750898,0.000059636357,0.0000040087534,0.0019902491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871187,0.006293757,0.00023975695,0.00045242935,0.0053011687,0.0005941754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96198463,0.022061873,0.0035232035,0.0015502442,0.009876212,0.0010037845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016330207,0.000442393,0.0002567882,0.0013723536,0.0009959746,0.0033326454,0.0012598736,0.0022628112,0.0039752363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03982682,0.00013213973,0.00037443812,0.0011809247,0.002141173,0.0027867123,0.0018829628,0.0010396824,0.00025420316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034910555,0.0020148782,0.18825778,0.0009979269,0.0004225682,0.0017025659,0.0032084994,0.04944633,0.02593323,0.37746236,0.008249975,0.33881283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002892663,0.007317628,0.30105135,0.0010482993,0.00048393375,0.0013766611,0.014166564,0.12002264,0.05146032,0.42302224,0.079598285,0.00016281389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003654087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056323265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016330207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006776061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048074163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086363435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131749770","doi":"10.1007/s10806-013-9469-4","title":"Consumer Choice and Farmers’ Markets","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Purchasing; Business; Marketing; Perception; Consumption (sociology); Quality (philosophy); Psychology","score_opus":0.012968548411791805,"score_gpt":0.19197082902717127,"score_spread":0.17900228061537948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131749770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8681928,0.0008572996,0.0053349887,0.010696433,0.000025554433,0.000026908847,0.00007778169,0.000011381737,0.11477682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99760926,0.00007808183,0.00012699729,0.00009185288,0.00001112552,0.00000490438,0.0000050213257,0.0000012992191,0.002071471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991252,0.0005417422,0.000017060996,0.00006902089,0.000100586134,0.00014641225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98735225,0.010969386,0.0007780837,0.00025443037,0.00031871052,0.00032703797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025446392,0.00012548844,0.0002725745,0.00043792828,0.0007539299,0.0026150295,0.00030110625,0.0020845563,0.015216126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008960352,0.00022653738,0.0002261696,0.00062190025,0.003046208,0.0028114414,0.00069086236,0.0009098411,0.00031841395],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069583487,0.00038833675,0.03339917,0.000103642466,0.00007660782,0.0009024141,0.0050204447,0.005998057,0.0014093284,0.92530674,0.0031529865,0.023546392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019132128,0.000106910345,0.028359294,0.000026924396,0.000020853375,0.00019280915,0.0054290914,0.009604147,0.00038775994,0.94626147,0.009389673,0.00002976927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023549453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002456267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015216126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014577701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055768416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050902963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132144312","doi":"10.1007/s10806-010-9257-3","title":"Commercialization of Perennial GE Crops: Looming Challenges for Regulatory Frameworks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Manitoba","funders":"Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; Foreign Agricultural Service; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Commercialization; Looming; Agriculture; Deregulation; Perennial plant; Business; Biotechnology; Natural resource economics; Agricultural economics; Economics; Agronomy; Market economy; Biology; Marketing; Ecology","score_opus":0.040143476032314614,"score_gpt":0.260883521150055,"score_spread":0.22074004511774037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132144312","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09251306,0.015690632,0.048539326,0.5018964,0.0020219777,0.00040414743,0.0002681406,0.00034997266,0.33831644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7512173,0.0076114372,0.04189323,0.15780155,0.0016935682,0.00066067785,0.00029725925,0.0001652228,0.038659763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856125,0.005075126,0.0006052735,0.001883299,0.005491755,0.0013319617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9364993,0.042486165,0.0035036558,0.0055061397,0.008790391,0.0032143139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032045536,0.00052351516,0.0007360055,0.001035792,0.0025435488,0.008371127,0.0038287279,0.0154563375,0.0051871804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037747312,0.00036370606,0.0008083547,0.0009502025,0.010225618,0.007956513,0.0045040846,0.011458703,0.00045727147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013766196,0.00027059813,0.00254254,0.0002527142,0.000035572964,0.0003767787,0.0013545756,0.001391575,0.010763769,0.8593055,0.028915254,0.09465347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012582148,0.0004629497,0.009010314,0.0013967145,0.000047346002,0.0006853473,0.0035954588,0.004287974,0.00568827,0.55579704,0.41877487,0.00012791726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040853545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077337557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032045536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004034022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0140822055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16947496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145800189","doi":"10.1007/s10806-012-9396-9","title":"She Came, She Saw, She Sowed: Re-negotiating Gender-Responsive Priorities for Effective Development of Agricultural Biotechnology in Sub-Saharan Africa","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University Health Network; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Agricultural biotechnology; Agriculture; Biotechnology; Food security; Sustainable development; Gender mainstreaming; Agricultural communication; Economic growth; Political science; Business; Gender equality; Economics; Sociology; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.045498892252121,"score_gpt":0.2542286930298852,"score_spread":0.2087298007777642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145800189","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11245348,0.028780786,0.04128535,0.6682074,0.0048404015,0.00059977965,0.000091785056,0.00011247221,0.14362857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8640441,0.019392973,0.024688965,0.07274195,0.0006498639,0.00076067087,0.0000635952,0.00012713057,0.017530883],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96892864,0.022768112,0.0006733244,0.0010030074,0.0019573667,0.004669607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751012,0.016152563,0.0017723783,0.0004458936,0.0021565864,0.004371481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055355616,0.00081477995,0.0006603707,0.0020049002,0.020449346,0.014848094,0.001952283,0.0066949856,0.0058056964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03245533,0.0006856227,0.0006521008,0.001426114,0.017500676,0.015051647,0.015330745,0.009477254,0.000918285],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090049994,0.0001331396,0.005047625,0.0013303469,0.000038665807,0.0037718767,0.50804996,0.00071461825,0.004351752,0.30676293,0.034451198,0.1352578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002132987,0.00010592027,0.0017683692,0.001889421,0.000028292541,0.0006005853,0.31912354,0.00034001196,0.0015178059,0.10930768,0.5652472,0.000049876788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076778033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008431567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055355616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011970795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03551705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29275203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159052511","doi":"10.1007/s10806-012-9425-8","title":"Hope in Environmental Philosophy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University; Grand Valley State University","keywords":"Action (physics); Worry; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Sociology; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Psychology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022081772381500428,"score_gpt":0.25886103619829753,"score_spread":0.2367792638167971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159052511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0595537,0.052593444,0.051043432,0.21743643,0.0024953876,0.00011179051,0.00007555019,0.000094563366,0.61659575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9605533,0.010730624,0.004848785,0.010400388,0.0010369295,0.00008070083,0.000018171399,0.000024906525,0.012306094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777323,0.0015755235,0.00005112911,0.00012506668,0.00025905078,0.00021597388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976815,0.0014735798,0.00019465962,0.00013812559,0.00019793032,0.00031419148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004163094,0.0003197933,0.0003038858,0.00075872464,0.00341499,0.0041993177,0.0005230211,0.0018714283,0.0024034944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003620493,0.0001532935,0.00046232497,0.0005694116,0.02607307,0.005220403,0.0034884796,0.004916458,0.0003021349],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004417477,0.000008394651,0.00013518582,0.000030004372,0.0000021760875,0.00002751222,0.0017843636,0.00010156565,0.000026021133,0.9923287,0.0019363783,0.0036151945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005176755,0.000017661978,0.00028716095,0.00009218057,0.0000030272643,0.00004970365,0.0014757712,0.0002206978,0.00003619043,0.96543735,0.032368302,0.0000068805825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010205202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010685642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041993177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027241986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018348632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022016823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W23601597","doi":"10.1023/a:1011301918973","title":"M.R. Redclift, J.N. Lekakis and G.P. Zanias (eds.), Agriculture and World Trade Liberalizationcolon; Socio-Environmental Perspectives on the Common Agricultural Policy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.042473400206705536,"score_gpt":0.3134669826524804,"score_spread":0.27099358244577487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W23601597","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021708757,0.893098,0.013225742,0.03471623,0.004369447,0.00002444683,0.00031325294,0.00017263705,0.05190928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014382599,0.92277735,0.0068847835,0.000963569,0.002996569,0.00003391866,0.00019723909,0.000059380436,0.051704623],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956805,0.00009564577,0.000027505163,0.00007964189,0.00018806677,0.000041093797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854434,0.000875031,0.00018811332,0.00006201248,0.00016000897,0.00017058893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012606154,0.0015277634,0.0015961052,0.0027334772,0.00094534154,0.004439298,0.0012106103,0.0026245222,0.026284833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001687092,0.00094490615,0.00049488264,0.0041197115,0.0015724734,0.0066501913,0.0010019261,0.0020585456,0.016878786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093947565,0.000076195196,0.0010597084,0.0017847253,0.000046636,0.00022358821,0.0010853241,0.0016061272,0.00075043493,0.07329766,0.4388906,0.481085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017754435,0.000043514196,0.0032109632,0.0016954315,0.00007303377,0.0010176499,0.0010777984,0.001761054,0.0007982786,0.09946662,0.89078426,0.000053719177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046835025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011620166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026284833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014063395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001790685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08793157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546360147","doi":"10.1007/s10806-016-9643-6","title":"Ecological Citizenship and Green Burial in China","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; Government of Jiangsu Province","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Humanity; China; Civilization; Harmony (color); Ecological civilization; Harmony with nature; Humanism; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Citizenship; Promotion (chess); Consciousness; Ecology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020505606929502748,"score_gpt":0.22050622149396368,"score_spread":0.20000061456446094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546360147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880756,0.00035138187,0.00015415536,0.0018595387,0.000011816779,0.0000042102456,0.000005161305,0.0000017992019,0.009536327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980894,0.000057802332,0.00003603199,0.00008696784,0.0000040631858,0.0000015310682,0.0000022781933,5.130099e-7,0.0017213894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875844,0.000287898,0.0000441444,0.00013410852,0.0001419002,0.00063351844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868196,0.00029404947,0.00024626034,0.000095645046,0.00014066488,0.0005412703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016927369,0.00017748839,0.00028329153,0.0007409803,0.007018502,0.0021674177,0.0007049167,0.0012130239,0.002523488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013047782,0.00017704065,0.00019772592,0.0011250189,0.0074290126,0.0012435397,0.0032493286,0.0011808262,0.00007482696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024219842,0.00039740335,0.3305497,0.0001445937,0.00009504443,0.0027153124,0.13716877,0.0017994307,0.0018030511,0.4742952,0.0035957193,0.04719358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013240858,0.00030535474,0.6715737,0.00019561294,0.00010337838,0.00053611235,0.13089496,0.004980586,0.0009354122,0.13531008,0.054890823,0.00014161623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061881788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18443997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061881788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054940404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008769019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12304318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550159099","doi":"10.1007/s10806-016-9648-1","title":"Who Loves Mosquitoes? Care Ethics, Theory of Obligation and Endangered Species","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Endangered species; Obligation; Environmental ethics; Normative; Moral obligation; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Argument (complex analysis); Normative ethics; Sociology; Ecology; Biology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025077012769260693,"score_gpt":0.22361670689538907,"score_spread":0.19853969412612837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550159099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23394866,0.01522838,0.03977888,0.26667628,0.00059602543,0.0000656349,0.00007310436,0.000018592069,0.44361448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893547,0.0015644879,0.0020931996,0.0027513318,0.00016244805,0.00002982492,0.000007700572,0.0000034032537,0.0040329513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971865,0.002104368,0.00006943474,0.00016220236,0.00026757442,0.00020997532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944653,0.0041847583,0.00043064772,0.0002469888,0.0003863012,0.00028597866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052925306,0.00019465476,0.00032255304,0.00054279383,0.002515636,0.0035124728,0.0006553811,0.004404968,0.002711565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008103602,0.0001665894,0.00022613598,0.00049507985,0.020293856,0.0059289555,0.0019495515,0.0026205634,0.00018895647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009764918,0.000017896471,0.0006289629,0.000021041897,0.0000035466876,0.000097158394,0.0036579426,0.00019354123,0.00008331626,0.98978746,0.0014215192,0.004077851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000087421595,0.00001680047,0.0011058192,0.000066873974,0.00000491528,0.00023681496,0.0052512023,0.0008606206,0.00007799802,0.9778462,0.014513476,0.000010537547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032383418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038786079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052925306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025000505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002200998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027989924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554825323","doi":"10.1007/s10806-016-9647-2","title":"Labels for Animal Husbandry Systems Meet Consumer Preferences: Results from a Meta-analysis of Consumer Studies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Rural Affairs","keywords":"Animal husbandry; Animal welfare; Business; Welfare; Labelling; Allowance (engineering); Marketing; Preference; Product (mathematics); Consumer behaviour; Public economics; Agricultural science; Economics; Geography; Biology; Agriculture; Operations management; Microeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.2929209776317693,"score_gpt":0.3687094507618947,"score_spread":0.07578847313012543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554825323","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4543128,0.53305036,0.0055198725,0.0018520495,0.00077651755,0.00034617886,0.002480755,0.0001107553,0.0015505865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738237,0.020578098,0.0027272112,0.0012925543,0.00016730507,0.00015577646,0.0008780659,0.00009905826,0.0002782681],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9564016,0.027617503,0.0056376588,0.0068382095,0.0026515236,0.0008534151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81559664,0.15443869,0.018232552,0.0069901184,0.003626948,0.001115127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034377933,0.0027726605,0.0064612916,0.003098583,0.0010204498,0.0050033457,0.0025115316,0.004280688,0.0040838593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08734168,0.0017982818,0.02926118,0.0049206982,0.0024087126,0.0031789325,0.0030059472,0.0034195827,0.00031757812],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0071729384,0.00007464205,0.05991483,0.015504249,0.90978056,0.00011602051,0.00069552974,0.00026626946,0.0005627841,0.00018356016,0.0004108113,0.005317807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015828423,0.0005013772,0.05837039,0.0026147093,0.93417245,0.0001299933,0.00043888285,0.0002976896,0.0003471993,0.0006218604,0.00085868925,0.0000639007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00811462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010577308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034377933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014934564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012085802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18181008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596035902","doi":"10.1007/s10806-017-9660-0","title":"Taxing Meat: Taking Responsibility for One’s Contribution to Antibiotic Resistance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Antibiotics; Antibiotic resistance; Business; Revenue; Public economics; Consumption (sociology); Animal welfare; Biotechnology; Economics; Biology; Ecology; Finance; Microbiology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05741911505246735,"score_gpt":0.32300181066153055,"score_spread":0.2655826956090632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596035902","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2942769,0.0039943554,0.06261464,0.3229017,0.0018623744,0.00012128048,0.00006721016,0.000073161405,0.31408843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643223,0.0006632896,0.0040469687,0.015337617,0.0003133556,0.000028444098,0.000009572846,0.000020133219,0.015258195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900413,0.0055187945,0.00031000705,0.0008146555,0.0022459053,0.0010692403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98821414,0.0047006393,0.0020944534,0.0017673115,0.0020315275,0.0011919636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009868867,0.0003205057,0.00035812482,0.0005304873,0.003177402,0.0046443916,0.0010293233,0.007135779,0.0023276152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019419115,0.00023051309,0.00045686736,0.00027989162,0.017576495,0.0035119138,0.0037051737,0.0050076083,0.00047174582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090033755,0.00016119266,0.011060874,0.00008772263,0.00006864342,0.00093616947,0.010860698,0.0010506602,0.0023546882,0.9357604,0.008516798,0.029052168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004327624,0.00025296537,0.010199561,0.0005363283,0.00008706946,0.0019550957,0.008626377,0.003034962,0.0032072146,0.8201838,0.1517446,0.00012875911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027604182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035679264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009868867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019461144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037441433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05219215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614619918","doi":"10.1007/s10806-017-9669-4","title":"Environmentally Virtuous Agriculture: How and When External Goods and Humility Ethically Constrain (or Favour) Technology Use","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Virtue ethics; Virtue; Flourishing; Environmental ethics; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Utilitarianism; Misappropriation; Engineering ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09329241037947165,"score_gpt":0.27244153740331467,"score_spread":0.179149127023843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614619918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77782387,0.00045471263,0.010997558,0.009466922,0.00009664997,0.000033277876,0.000016835804,0.000021813325,0.20108838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982856,0.000045979912,0.0006041658,0.00027805858,0.000007956364,0.0000060725874,0.0000025158693,0.0000079506,0.0007616045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956939,0.0024059245,0.00008678601,0.0003533089,0.0006507213,0.0008093956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893551,0.0058837165,0.0020141057,0.0006622142,0.00088121224,0.0012037451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043464266,0.0002074279,0.00022093664,0.0006632427,0.0019041989,0.007133702,0.00059338624,0.002896467,0.004293321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018222984,0.0002246283,0.00018237409,0.00041797428,0.013711914,0.0037382073,0.0032419548,0.0021088126,0.00033382032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005809114,0.0004604929,0.05708966,0.00023131596,0.00009405327,0.0011064564,0.053629186,0.0019468926,0.020663794,0.79427505,0.0029126096,0.067009605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006363945,0.00016820266,0.07090587,0.00020176564,0.00004201343,0.0005677301,0.056561597,0.0033349583,0.0061741346,0.8359387,0.025949884,0.00009148048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014163696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003579719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007133702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018329369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021554201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022986412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793996648","doi":"10.1007/s10806-018-9719-6","title":"Genetically Modifying Livestock for Improved Welfare: A Path Forward","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Animal welfare; Status quo; Argument (complex analysis); Agriculture; Livestock; Genetically modified organism; Public economics; Biotechnology; Economics; Business; Biology; Gene; Genetics; Market economy","score_opus":0.010140550027281345,"score_gpt":0.2625637185753724,"score_spread":0.25242316854809105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793996648","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029982148,0.10873312,0.10958459,0.66452175,0.0068437853,0.00013558309,0.0003379922,0.0005241898,0.079336874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47836307,0.17826901,0.17285864,0.11389386,0.005488642,0.00030637864,0.00044985724,0.0002802442,0.05009032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782914,0.00090924173,0.00011486496,0.00024349935,0.0007276546,0.00017558868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99396026,0.0031883754,0.0007193751,0.0006121147,0.00084283884,0.000677117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006916453,0.0005831448,0.00058346835,0.0004907381,0.00063992746,0.0029438888,0.0011136312,0.0046877055,0.008834812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005728769,0.00014324416,0.0004668065,0.00042753853,0.004616204,0.0029121726,0.0015163803,0.004055996,0.001380615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041022504,0.0006218593,0.0036376468,0.0015491802,0.0001496039,0.0006370393,0.0009103054,0.0010513145,0.06799276,0.50337887,0.06737411,0.35228708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011899884,0.00083905633,0.006149296,0.0013960946,0.00011412967,0.002283986,0.0018658096,0.0012138629,0.021942776,0.3533235,0.6106557,0.00009675072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005044047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012186337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008834812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012361435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032681264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03657812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947012423","doi":"10.1007/s10806-019-09777-0","title":"“That’s the Way We’ve Always Done It”: A Social Practice Analysis of Farm Animal Welfare in Alberta","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Genome Alberta; University of Alberta; Genome Canada","keywords":"Animal welfare; Animal husbandry; Welfare; Weaning; Animal rights; Business; Public relations; Political science; Marketing; Veterinary medicine; Medicine; Agriculture; Animal science; Biology; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.047213585529506386,"score_gpt":0.305710824989328,"score_spread":0.2584972394598216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947012423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97665226,0.00022780895,0.0005116139,0.0029997616,0.0000134723805,0.000043960034,0.000039236656,0.0000049130954,0.01950698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955265,0.00015867478,0.00031924996,0.00026812873,0.000004481828,0.000020921883,0.000024126868,0.0000049517753,0.0036730696],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932574,0.0028347664,0.00010192203,0.00038130602,0.0013438629,0.0020807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98753405,0.00488965,0.00111184,0.0003476958,0.0033772013,0.0027394046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055795363,0.00023668828,0.0003111449,0.0025536024,0.020224428,0.0055796844,0.0025038465,0.0017019049,0.003088441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010527814,0.00031655247,0.0002576075,0.005050889,0.012364397,0.0016763102,0.0041046278,0.0019920745,0.00011186078],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026749846,0.00059771043,0.32001716,0.00012643826,0.000092905946,0.0011361714,0.57149345,0.0013481913,0.00081084797,0.058954537,0.0044901497,0.040664997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012594984,0.000089643116,0.2837662,0.000113564674,0.00003463474,0.00006608571,0.70123225,0.00084025203,0.00013535681,0.0022925495,0.011385227,0.000031658627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9771385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99185103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098369025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.098369025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11147315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71372056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953039072","doi":"10.1007/s10806-019-09784-1","title":"Is Speciesism Wrong by Definition?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Centre for Research in Astrophysics of Québec","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Normative; Analogy; Principle of legality; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04817078529623694,"score_gpt":0.27781578763228754,"score_spread":0.2296450023360506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953039072","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019137586,0.013370726,0.0188583,0.7361096,0.0067763287,0.000026804617,0.0001491578,0.00007076625,0.20550074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8099656,0.0061465357,0.007924093,0.15089488,0.008106123,0.00018033665,0.00013836031,0.000225294,0.016418807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862205,0.0074220872,0.00074629945,0.0016123874,0.0030027607,0.000995995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97596675,0.015205326,0.001616411,0.0018891308,0.0039351806,0.0013871262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01844345,0.00052834215,0.001966232,0.0025247713,0.0062131104,0.009745993,0.0030554351,0.011084777,0.006678639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033654585,0.0004914255,0.0007984347,0.0019811569,0.06829277,0.022337457,0.0072881016,0.017863791,0.0014876698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107891055,0.000012309977,0.0002638141,0.00004484478,0.000012067414,0.00003275752,0.0012848828,0.000035715104,0.00003461293,0.9846683,0.009060338,0.0045396383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054432708,0.0000029845273,0.00013184066,0.00006969733,0.000003203989,0.000044728542,0.0007053339,0.00004844271,0.000028707269,0.9824927,0.016461156,0.0000057752654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025718708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024272627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01844345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042785965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048094923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097539425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236715534","doi":"10.1007/s10806-007-9060-y","title":"Book Review","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01906994691678377,"score_gpt":0.25919099157797315,"score_spread":0.2401210446611894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236715534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031314133,0.064367376,0.0010130716,0.03535573,0.034221057,0.00010186649,0.0006667135,0.00038290737,0.86357814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00075464376,0.011145644,0.00022198759,0.004622288,0.0035800615,0.000030324905,0.00022215828,0.00008756095,0.97933537],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929345,0.000074169155,0.000018395762,0.000068203866,0.00048662224,0.000059160673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980835,0.0004327227,0.00008257594,0.00013708224,0.00096809305,0.0002959802],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000690921,0.000634931,0.00072998455,0.0029640547,0.0015279985,0.0040198006,0.0010699282,0.002293592,0.30889544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003814166,0.00035043876,0.00040732702,0.0030362483,0.0007509513,0.0024702344,0.0013510713,0.002640216,0.25347897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026328185,0.0000054477314,0.000016348515,0.000036897363,7.164224e-7,0.0000108641325,0.000009150113,0.000019802697,0.000019782858,0.002075785,0.9691505,0.028652046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013370006,0.0000019103293,0.000051210336,0.000054877935,7.92566e-7,0.000020025778,0.000012250575,0.0000112472935,0.000010998104,0.0007025159,0.9991315,0.0000013151142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060892943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018539054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30889544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002176983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032213035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9857768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367678466","doi":"10.1007/s10806-023-09906-w","title":"Grass-Fed Beef, Alterity, and Care: Complicating food Binaries, Relations, and Practices","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Scholarship; Agriculture; Participant observation; Reflexivity; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Economics; Economic growth; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.03678529242109986,"score_gpt":0.2468054381870633,"score_spread":0.21002014576596345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367678466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90946126,0.0005981095,0.0011646976,0.05688175,0.00013535432,0.000021134383,0.000012698922,0.000009634866,0.03171547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996438,0.0001272143,0.00023290157,0.0018525852,0.000026298732,0.000007676614,0.0000023132657,0.0000050602657,0.0013080471],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918835,0.0053177658,0.00016539646,0.00026535365,0.00059674634,0.0017711743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986406,0.00721851,0.0019041388,0.0005887594,0.0009492521,0.0029333201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010660831,0.00011380789,0.00021881048,0.00049465534,0.011547869,0.0035767015,0.000994431,0.0025509354,0.0039920127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021666458,0.00024254528,0.00016943419,0.0006862401,0.012513652,0.002431047,0.004064378,0.004020034,0.00014300096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003873009,0.00062951323,0.1778174,0.000116237374,0.000036136287,0.0040328116,0.48627722,0.00028550578,0.0018782174,0.20118709,0.01172379,0.11562881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003416904,0.00013819538,0.08178421,0.00027891618,0.000027658269,0.0019151801,0.8206177,0.0008332617,0.00059324084,0.048307754,0.045416847,0.000052952993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04284362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14075065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04284362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061824573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008562106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08518845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394933732","doi":"10.1007/s10806-024-09926-0","title":"Community-Centred Environmental Discourse: Redefining Water Management in the Murray Darling Basin, Australia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Water Governance and Infrastructure","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Structural basin; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Sociology; Geography; Political science; Environmental science; Geology; Geomorphology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042228624958677706,"score_gpt":0.28956730609817105,"score_spread":0.24733868113949334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394933732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6684838,0.0029441207,0.00554272,0.13808797,0.00031133174,0.00014605078,0.00002678849,0.00003930641,0.1844179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98888713,0.00038929065,0.00082772353,0.001885888,0.000033111057,0.000044693512,0.0000036908737,0.000015492902,0.007912902],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912442,0.0060838056,0.00014942935,0.00044721304,0.0008703997,0.0012048767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850653,0.0100517515,0.00093328196,0.00047991026,0.0014922481,0.0019775128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011959543,0.00030624162,0.00035947454,0.0011537567,0.022024045,0.0114427805,0.0023231492,0.00580729,0.0032481502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020472847,0.00042506956,0.00021653331,0.0011259131,0.032409646,0.0067892475,0.013499463,0.005485725,0.00015827012],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030441477,0.00006224623,0.0021773041,0.00016700808,0.000011751275,0.00067699386,0.73281217,0.0006194809,0.0007690461,0.23798901,0.0049114665,0.01977307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024378496,0.00007819532,0.012439766,0.0004939321,0.000029612786,0.0001730338,0.6076822,0.0021449232,0.0007777812,0.13634804,0.23973483,0.00007324595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22864582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38026363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22864582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023994017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047664978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4546299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411311596","doi":"10.1007/s10806-025-09951-7","title":"Challenging Structural Barriers to Creating Ethical Space in Wildlife Research Ethics Policy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Yukon Department of Environment; Yukon University","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Space (punctuation); Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Space policy; Ethical issues; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Ecology; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.04712212004511478,"score_gpt":0.39497085201945076,"score_spread":0.34784873197433597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411311596","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051579777,0.0035809372,0.037023626,0.7836449,0.0011046521,0.00070729764,0.00012357348,0.00010857378,0.12212662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88627744,0.0022226307,0.037564974,0.060056206,0.00054730364,0.000841641,0.000084893436,0.00010267964,0.012302171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8000764,0.11841135,0.0075179427,0.009099973,0.03804127,0.026852971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71047276,0.18052086,0.014982273,0.013635225,0.044848237,0.035540655],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21710753,0.00044452187,0.0008041897,0.003385485,0.03941907,0.03401302,0.005128393,0.011689831,0.004060801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17059319,0.0015938317,0.0008622047,0.003807519,0.09192167,0.013580925,0.019922629,0.020586872,0.00049662305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019182964,0.000041772495,0.0022332587,0.0001451516,0.000017974728,0.00026192502,0.06064146,0.0005538042,0.00045534567,0.9055092,0.013603409,0.016517578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083121486,0.000063893516,0.011837658,0.002332386,0.000051890693,0.00029791743,0.108862996,0.0020616977,0.000892273,0.44906977,0.4242024,0.00024394931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6897098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8108655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98831016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13525441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39278474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98134404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W55304559","doi":"10.1023/a:1026302804166","title":"Britt Bailey and Marc Lappé (eds.), Engineering the Farm: Ethical and Social Aspects of Agricultural Biotechnology","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.02179320058916031,"score_gpt":0.18647308641199428,"score_spread":0.16467988582283397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W55304559","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00070608844,0.9188659,0.0024462007,0.040922284,0.007182922,0.000017347827,0.00009147773,0.000085017906,0.029682856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004374991,0.9582413,0.0019730232,0.002617524,0.0030024033,0.000021000476,0.000077237986,0.00003220941,0.02966035],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893373,0.00028006913,0.000086251945,0.00011411139,0.00052124483,0.000064593376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970788,0.0018771475,0.00021776454,0.000060651455,0.00041207054,0.000353552],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023313398,0.0018916668,0.0014868722,0.0025596824,0.0017415556,0.005759408,0.0014017693,0.0041175266,0.017983202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00264767,0.0011389501,0.00046865697,0.003737534,0.002319124,0.010168654,0.0012936784,0.004053071,0.01049477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009158152,0.000088251,0.000654494,0.0019193693,0.000034539917,0.00014566902,0.0022078285,0.00068105664,0.00041955296,0.022078006,0.67396104,0.29771858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013249205,0.000022993529,0.0015879143,0.0012093546,0.000030498568,0.00050271983,0.0016015379,0.00030966694,0.0002998314,0.018578323,0.97580725,0.00003655426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01175454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030718843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9982585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018837192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030976746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060159802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}