{"meta":{"query_hash":"1e9b3d466fc9","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics"},"cohort_total":36,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":36,"exported":36,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1e9b3d466fc9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Agricultural+and+Environmental+Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W1506019050","doi":"10.1007/s10806-009-9180-7","title":"Paul B. Thompson: The Ethics of Intensification: Agricultural Development and Cultural Change (Volume 16: The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Environmental ethics; Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Sociology; Agricultural economics; Economics; Geography; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04685450890861913,"score_gpt":0.22426750596834005,"score_spread":0.1774129970597209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506019050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9369929,0.0041821734,0.0000011987091,0.057868414,0.0002628361,0.00041430193,0.00012674919,0.000018445673,0.00013300126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869627,0.009887387,0.00032175938,0.0016173325,0.00051320635,0.000012897193,0.0002829981,0.000003501863,0.000398271],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964942,0.00038205867,0.0010712127,0.00040631753,0.0012676099,0.0003786424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977107,0.00076989614,0.001055322,0.00009818285,0.00012858801,0.00023732329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010503147,0.0005024056,0.00054993364,0.000026462672,0.0008328337,0.00019403854,0.00067604973,0.0005847372,0.00007366992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013319336,0.00013631604,0.00021244599,0.00024016282,0.0007058562,0.0009381625,0.00042746996,0.0022170683,0.000003641839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000837526,0.0027283246,0.091507524,0.0005541182,0.0025823172,0.000034225654,0.2107224,0.00009896277,0.49982566,0.011836898,0.02677613,0.1524959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037392174,0.0006177286,0.9377935,0.00018353599,0.000099889454,0.000637291,0.043363504,0.000002421477,0.006814035,0.0005172074,0.009225275,0.00037168284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018001838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000071142735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.846286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105157655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026639045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96321815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W194775982","doi":"10.1023/a:1009544714704","title":"Response to Evelyn B. Pluhar's ``Non-Obligatory Anthropocentrism''","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.011935383071246744,"score_gpt":0.2086191352990273,"score_spread":0.19668375222778053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W194775982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98897266,0.0008188394,0.0000013074418,0.0071300454,0.00029083987,0.00009286158,0.00008790631,0.000008334729,0.00259722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857631,0.0011339881,0.00012412552,0.0025290714,0.0004957197,0.0000019138101,0.000018805518,0.000012397979,0.00992092],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987164,0.000103367085,0.00037993724,0.0001617416,0.00039629778,0.00024223406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994073,0.00011865221,0.000099991856,0.00008734111,0.000013556406,0.00027319603],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003882833,0.00020168499,0.00023426829,0.000049788632,0.00040839417,0.00015101227,0.00014852225,0.0001220481,0.0036988389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020469708,0.00012449968,0.00011569964,0.00002800008,0.00035837977,0.0004942122,0.00004752156,0.0006834325,0.00019610424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005703782,0.0023186954,0.0047413795,0.00027067258,0.000600422,0.0005509825,0.5688484,0.0009579085,0.16134505,0.0056439047,0.22104414,0.027974684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091881223,0.0009371227,0.17298087,0.00018654564,0.0000732346,0.00037958933,0.026590377,0.0000023646605,0.0016032765,0.00026234618,0.79562145,0.00044400606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009537885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000082803945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57457733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085170024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001157439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99721193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950213229","doi":"10.1007/s10806-015-9574-7","title":"One Health, Vaccines and Ebola: The Opportunities for Shared Benefits","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Ministry of Health -Singapore","keywords":"Ebola vaccine; Virology; Ebola virus; Medicine; Outbreak","score_opus":0.2253252679073818,"score_gpt":0.33775234226511597,"score_spread":0.11242707435773416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950213229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9100551,0.0046033594,0.000013454533,0.08499205,0.00006873732,0.00016545814,0.000024933532,0.0000031984184,0.000073722054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883626,0.009203626,0.00024195244,0.0011210652,0.0002847081,0.000003883218,0.000021296788,0.0000047002286,0.0007561796],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993127,0.000041789826,0.00020716217,0.00006328116,0.00025572767,0.00011934934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994665,0.00010140582,0.00010945422,0.00003578329,0.00005690838,0.00022997736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055041345,0.000073385076,0.00017494411,0.00002615257,0.00020069366,0.0000358844,0.000032882792,0.00007226612,0.000008580273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056503053,0.00003389059,0.00005095562,0.000027950555,0.00008840546,0.0001383301,0.00004203874,0.00040450238,7.37665e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043691928,0.00311355,0.051352438,0.0024213127,0.0025028074,0.00008549185,0.05587076,0.0006275828,0.09386866,0.0074773924,0.14578004,0.63253075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025602144,0.0034294105,0.94547904,0.00022272316,0.00012340872,0.001977166,0.029638363,0.000043454493,0.00082014635,0.0003168913,0.015250627,0.00013856372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029577712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019268164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8941266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050926377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004689576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1757384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964914450","doi":"10.1007/s10806-006-9027-4","title":"The Role of Science in Public Policy: Higher Reason, or Reason for Hire?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Position (finance); Process (computing); Science policy; Point (geometry); Public policy; Public sphere; Service (business); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Uncertainty; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Public relations; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Business; Social science; Computer science; Politics; Marketing; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23590761309315295,"score_gpt":0.40673408606657996,"score_spread":0.170826472973427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964914450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97418773,0.00077056023,0.0000026049177,0.022164872,0.00011267347,0.00009135958,0.0000045928546,0.0000023958464,0.002663194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97995347,0.019200416,0.00012221605,0.000110682224,0.00016483155,0.0000010943679,0.0000027631718,0.000001733207,0.000442774],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991078,0.000078961486,0.00022381866,0.000054656935,0.0003662291,0.00016853528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913764,0.0004523428,0.00020830236,0.00005701057,0.000052067786,0.00009266201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030387114,0.000047974936,0.00007920596,0.000047872774,0.00064715394,0.000053206175,0.00024223246,0.000085528736,0.000025749685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003591756,0.00002310319,0.00003828499,0.00021320702,0.000989395,0.0002789379,0.000051024348,0.0002412411,8.596373e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064872083,0.0006938066,0.07389572,0.000049164348,0.00004217693,0.0000021392643,0.23943259,0.000015098839,0.17571124,0.13092083,0.0010105075,0.377578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021798623,0.0000899925,0.7933405,0.000031731564,0.00000576703,0.000009887691,0.08636814,0.0000027173717,0.0003260488,0.0015207179,0.11802638,0.00006013748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002810443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002728296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71944475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021004846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007985199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.497745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999529764","doi":"10.1007/s10806-011-9353-z","title":"A “Practical” Ethic for Animals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.12307466657483485,"score_gpt":0.34120379266178563,"score_spread":0.2181291260869508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999529764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766892,0.0005056978,0.00027028762,0.021116612,0.00014082134,0.00018384156,0.000016661186,0.0000056529334,0.0010712112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892233,0.0009983182,0.0075086113,0.001860169,0.00021921162,0.0000020143918,0.0000080860245,0.000005434326,0.0001748507],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991929,0.00004365994,0.00028707532,0.00008260572,0.00024694434,0.00014680738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999214,0.00019803713,0.0001731891,0.00004763611,0.00003727159,0.00032987658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005840816,0.00008718354,0.0002029136,0.000022644654,0.00008537511,0.000012126272,0.00003362632,0.0001534809,0.00016214323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002365556,0.000046042765,0.00011796654,0.0000294859,0.00009497179,0.0001223572,0.000019920182,0.00059095887,0.000005287593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022603996,0.019504298,0.13588355,0.01012057,0.005807216,0.0014673761,0.16038848,0.000033780594,0.19636117,0.161401,0.13737603,0.14905253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00206694,0.0032426678,0.95652455,0.00017128196,0.00040542887,0.0027505392,0.0145406425,0.000013955028,0.0007518907,0.0016728421,0.017679092,0.00018017205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007430209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012378805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.820641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038835336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081841456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2567455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010191070","doi":"10.1007/s10806-015-9529-z","title":"Ethical Issues and Potential Stakeholder Priorities Associated with the Application of Genomic Technologies Applied to Animal Production Systems","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Animal Genetics and Reproduction","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Genome Alberta","keywords":"Stakeholder; Scope (computer science); Credibility; Production (economics); Biotechnology; Business; Emerging technologies; Animal welfare; Genomics; Ethical issues; Engineering ethics; Political science; Biology; Computer science; Public relations; Engineering; Economics; Genetics","score_opus":0.020888343698670327,"score_gpt":0.22579222341801952,"score_spread":0.2049038797193492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010191070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931458,0.0018757848,0.00016023921,0.0045976294,0.00004863345,0.00015763714,0.0000045174447,0.0000033495621,0.000006387138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874973,0.0007986763,0.00015783087,0.00002871142,0.00016344644,0.0000040479536,0.000011330856,0.0000045262186,0.000081692495],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940234,0.000040030387,0.00015406514,0.00013331382,0.00019873338,0.000071539376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996644,0.0000065878376,0.00017131124,0.000063472165,0.00005910528,0.00003510713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040049382,0.00008148769,0.00010950555,0.00001450994,0.00007701986,0.000019472938,0.000059112805,0.00020790048,1.16019756e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039554052,0.0000405747,0.000017160059,0.000030523795,0.00022026892,0.000005279905,0.00006419534,0.0002988968,2.3400291e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001294205,0.000025801672,0.00077515823,0.000012016924,0.000046540594,2.330147e-7,0.00045613403,0.0014667072,0.9964478,0.000062718376,0.00022037675,0.00035710412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008423903,0.0039625606,0.72364825,0.00005833253,0.0001988191,0.0005857684,0.04818289,0.000029097544,0.21670865,0.000101873724,0.005314011,0.0003673564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007300495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005450796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77973914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017537011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015166092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16545883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011904956","doi":"10.1007/s10806-014-9518-7","title":"The Ticking Clock: Addressing Farm Animal Welfare in Emerging Countries","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Developing country; Welfare; Developed country; Animal husbandry; Emerging markets; Business; Work (physics); Public economics; Economic growth; Development economics; Economics; Agriculture; Market economy; Medicine; Biology; Engineering; Ecology; Environmental health; Population","score_opus":0.04507346746205638,"score_gpt":0.3062339732453956,"score_spread":0.2611605057833392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011904956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902831,0.0017801209,0.0000054652514,0.0074496083,0.00014491648,0.000047496444,0.000005168633,0.0000064833885,0.00027767327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823004,0.0013724645,0.00005884594,0.00011266157,0.00017925829,0.0000014090075,0.0000028139532,0.0000073006477,0.000035203742],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988442,0.000121803845,0.000364236,0.00011044552,0.00034229946,0.00021699573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945766,0.00019565088,0.00021672256,0.0000513576,0.00002114321,0.000057448327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005787237,0.00015009008,0.00020063824,0.000024765739,0.00079548545,0.00008159051,0.00012129084,0.00010594172,0.000015658732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006114164,0.00007486665,0.000079765836,0.000044037897,0.00022105018,0.00017224037,0.00012548505,0.0007782064,0.0000036939414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020712046,0.0003823937,0.71069396,0.00028397192,0.00031980698,0.00034321827,0.040916115,0.00026746833,0.19137433,0.013813051,0.00059946143,0.038935002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030667055,0.00046688865,0.9720283,0.000090596644,0.000036192003,0.00045591523,0.016101373,0.000011341973,0.0001287781,0.000034581015,0.010204912,0.00013440664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022471095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036503752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2613344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073021365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005194196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6118311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019762970","doi":"10.1007/s10806-005-0906-x","title":"Book review: Lisa Nicole Mills, Science and Social Context: The Regulation of Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone in North America. McGill-Queen’s University Press [Montreal &amp; Kingston], 2002. 206 pp. ISBN 0-7735-2375-8.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"American Literature and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Context (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Media studies; History; Biology; Zoology; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.009383588568928694,"score_gpt":0.18802077682262378,"score_spread":0.17863718825369507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019762970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71763015,0.19714689,0.000002485117,0.078437716,0.0003021597,0.00080158445,0.00039822047,0.000019790601,0.005261028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80666083,0.16527164,0.00005728838,0.009151241,0.00038662239,0.0000017880933,0.000057965186,0.000009216625,0.018403398],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988877,0.000096131065,0.00031004442,0.00014333994,0.0004064296,0.00015631455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992534,0.000052165153,0.00046079262,0.00005718021,0.00010236982,0.00007410012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002693931,0.00014522483,0.00027313628,0.000026496711,0.00051905005,0.000043002157,0.00015307267,0.000061566905,0.0001140985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027111202,0.000076334676,0.000070328664,0.00007273603,0.0010600658,0.00067783793,0.000076888886,0.000531479,0.000001401289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027853245,0.0004095282,0.00024023319,0.00019137707,0.00009585946,0.000007005024,0.067060575,0.00002747198,0.0032266781,0.0025448122,0.9179016,0.008016335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003917539,0.00019653859,0.08540107,0.00012317048,0.00007489042,0.000028261014,0.006652557,0.0000029752284,0.000034883185,0.000005574066,0.9069569,0.00013138988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038189706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031219417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08903071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001286366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002285684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39921656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020054675","doi":"10.1007/s10806-014-9523-x","title":"Animal Welfare Concerns and Values of Stakeholders Within the Dairy Industry","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Stakeholder; Lameness; Dairy industry; Welfare; Dairy cattle; Focus group; Business; Herd; Marketing; Veterinary medicine; Medicine; Public relations; Political science; Animal science; Biology; Food science; Law","score_opus":0.10437205173961292,"score_gpt":0.30607291801532627,"score_spread":0.20170086627571335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020054675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99443424,0.00061501533,0.000001941206,0.004601208,0.00008540021,0.00005580668,0.000024414945,0.0000043260497,0.00017766896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930537,0.00030294186,0.000059991497,0.000117494514,0.00015566398,8.231314e-7,0.000003456239,0.000005931619,0.00004832922],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903375,0.00012496665,0.00032001332,0.0001049522,0.0003035503,0.00011277459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994229,0.00011666027,0.0003058339,0.000057157293,0.000022446337,0.00007500396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040721887,0.00014194446,0.00022543344,0.000015083131,0.00029349487,0.00002274999,0.00010269391,0.0002064639,0.000026755588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043889362,0.00006676064,0.0000712064,0.000030893603,0.0005243164,0.00016637049,0.00012222189,0.0010518001,8.616521e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001385548,0.00043713744,0.5612515,0.0003008057,0.00063169736,0.00008479794,0.05410186,0.000111892135,0.36867523,0.006058212,0.002269881,0.004691448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034165793,0.0013635637,0.9531628,0.00004763773,0.000100902274,0.00043963417,0.043365356,0.0000034668215,0.00053428835,0.00006223773,0.00046920986,0.000109287364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026070033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004180948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39191127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002270094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005634611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45696065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042029571","doi":"10.1007/s10806-014-9489-8","title":"The Leading Canadian NGOs’ Discourse on Fish Farming: From Ecocentric Intuitions to Biocentric Solutions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Flourishing; Environmental ethics; Aquaculture; Embeddedness; Political science; Sociology; Law; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Social science; Fishery; Politics; Biology","score_opus":0.021779296681044037,"score_gpt":0.23010786851106704,"score_spread":0.208328571830023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042029571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.959473,0.00015613661,0.00007810632,0.036866415,0.0003718828,0.00015897435,0.00008673664,0.000008273135,0.0028004746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944524,0.0011851793,0.00016169685,0.0035543956,0.00024054639,0.00000412951,0.000025408699,0.000012421912,0.0003638217],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979858,0.00016720145,0.00038624025,0.00025402522,0.000736775,0.00046996967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848366,0.0005047803,0.00019474144,0.00017158336,0.0000068724676,0.0006383632],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000760095,0.00023040932,0.00019317034,0.000046521618,0.0014577914,0.000104518265,0.0003404965,0.00020227411,0.0001655434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020134725,0.00013514514,0.00012483246,0.00017954591,0.000496357,0.00027539075,0.00019637927,0.0011651616,0.00041221993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062002335,0.0038043924,0.18227352,0.00008552228,0.0012039755,0.00019325974,0.06586994,0.20461167,0.122937866,0.031051034,0.17441462,0.21293418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006664605,0.00064864656,0.89096856,0.000097733835,0.00011953775,0.00010217443,0.0040728375,0.00013326008,0.0009437057,0.0047371183,0.096930966,0.00057900324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002007888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012471364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70869505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096730486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025744335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064047893","doi":"10.1007/s10806-013-9473-8","title":"Operationalizing Ethics in Food Choice Decisions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Operationalization; Purchasing; Action (physics); Work (physics); Consumption (sociology); Marketing; Food choice; Management science; Business; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Economics; Social science; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03962501565456409,"score_gpt":0.23422379268027702,"score_spread":0.19459877702571293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064047893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.968826,0.00084578956,8.3961834e-7,0.029995752,0.00011422689,0.000115022216,0.000017686256,0.000006847934,0.00007784841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99704987,0.0013340866,0.0001665669,0.00091229595,0.00036380917,0.0000031710188,0.000037129445,8.8805047e-7,0.00013218726],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861884,0.00013884463,0.00040914756,0.00015860374,0.0004702913,0.0002043008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985989,0.0009896192,0.00017517185,0.000025152221,0.000052008018,0.000159201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039747363,0.00016180641,0.00020485213,0.000012736514,0.0002719707,0.000113564085,0.00019110985,0.00032890838,0.00024790975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028560284,0.000047302503,0.000094183444,0.00016965563,0.00008054039,0.00050608395,0.00009036908,0.0014132787,0.00002464153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067485726,0.00025274264,0.010533016,0.0000097293605,0.000037439084,0.0000036056122,0.0019570151,0.000098814286,0.9758344,0.0003498807,0.002472019,0.008444577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021668707,0.00042690983,0.98487526,0.00008512562,0.000009714595,0.0001536937,0.0046923244,0.000003824108,0.0017899873,0.00040407522,0.0071675577,0.0001748447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000081530765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005341774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9743422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052532443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010181651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6140071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066225792","doi":"10.1007/s10806-010-9271-5","title":"A New Format for Learning about Farm Animal Welfare","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"European Commission; Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Animal welfare; Welfare; Context (archaeology); The Internet; Business; Public relations; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Biology; World Wide Web; Ecology","score_opus":0.032883114696396445,"score_gpt":0.29372167584313386,"score_spread":0.2608385611467374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066225792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957216,0.00037536054,0.000054852553,0.0032543936,0.00023339414,0.00009828081,0.000019142084,0.000012582062,0.00023039163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99748373,0.00036537673,0.0013416111,0.00007791772,0.00038162543,0.0000025404477,0.000015058545,0.000010044237,0.00032208746],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912,0.000025210435,0.00030139333,0.00011228399,0.00024416088,0.00019697004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994941,0.00007623108,0.00021635924,0.000040497376,0.000027287053,0.0001455627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021738319,0.00016481604,0.0002198974,0.000023966408,0.0004740604,0.000047106296,0.00010450916,0.00018865729,0.00009023817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004817674,0.000095932155,0.00016755171,0.00002784553,0.000087411165,0.00023434528,0.00009003047,0.0012665679,0.0000065933737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011528964,0.00015856249,0.045794316,0.000108690074,0.0001667472,0.000050636863,0.008372413,0.000013120066,0.9168844,0.0021685227,0.0014836183,0.023646064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006474015,0.001901509,0.9550633,0.000023197243,0.00008804312,0.0013802862,0.0070706336,0.0000034260945,0.0005016656,0.000043329346,0.033093728,0.00018351662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017184071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016209386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91638273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028297274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009295588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55026776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067970085","doi":"10.1007/s10806-011-9356-9","title":"Legal and Ethical Apprehensions Regarding Relational Object. The Case of Genetically Modified Fish","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Pluralism (philosophy); Object (grammar); Opposition (politics); Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Human animal; Environmental ethics; Computer science; Political science; Ecology; Law; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence; Biology","score_opus":0.02091586096435828,"score_gpt":0.25471389737548883,"score_spread":0.23379803641113056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067970085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972891,0.00064225955,0.0011170552,0.00064530433,0.000055311688,0.000041524505,0.000007813902,9.962937e-7,0.00020063011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99701744,0.0009504435,0.0017123494,0.0001769149,0.00009137216,6.9315286e-7,0.000006917958,0.000004066915,0.00003978842],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994477,0.000052063835,0.00021500661,0.000090327914,0.000112022615,0.000082902494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970335,0.000055894558,0.00008692969,0.00005982775,0.000022824344,0.00007115099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024522655,0.000083139756,0.00009839954,0.000011404825,0.00010145641,0.000008312004,0.000050730676,0.00022468358,0.0000052122564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063118416,0.00004565227,0.000060920745,0.000019409641,0.00018498297,0.00000459582,0.00008171685,0.0005286058,1.4620583e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013636447,0.00007651134,0.0014941011,0.00004794684,0.00019332259,0.000086469474,0.0025495903,0.0022627586,0.98721725,0.0035980868,0.0004640862,0.0018735013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022395859,0.0018212618,0.7561616,0.00013022312,0.00042274295,0.039944574,0.010748951,0.0005145784,0.18308544,0.0010156436,0.0032568318,0.0006586124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010453775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015893249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8041318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000049206315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011598498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22965585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069420339","doi":"10.1007/s10806-010-9240-z","title":"Legitimacy &amp; Canadian Farm Animal Welfare Standards Development: The Case of the National Farm Animal Care Council","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Agriculture and Farm Safety","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Animal welfare; Context (archaeology); Welfare; Public economics; Political science; Public administration; Business; Law; Economics; Biology; Ecology; Politics","score_opus":0.028043072863599323,"score_gpt":0.22998047014857176,"score_spread":0.20193739728497243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069420339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98865145,0.00036880915,1.576839e-7,0.009149183,0.00018891886,0.00015848315,0.00047745387,0.0000051175093,0.0010004488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987742,0.00009533811,0.00007478239,0.00048048058,0.00038826573,0.000003031935,0.0000477457,0.0000014797438,0.00013470133],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979556,0.00009223632,0.0004287206,0.00017637115,0.0010763762,0.00027065593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988475,0.00013824282,0.000333131,0.000042702035,0.0004250329,0.00021340683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000796163,0.0002193195,0.00021263376,0.000008869552,0.0012844767,0.00007875376,0.00035109266,0.00026218322,0.00012871613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007686211,0.00005523968,0.00017228385,0.00016340826,0.00032710424,0.00014300855,0.000118564516,0.00136363,0.000002768316],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028450935,0.0003029111,0.022567244,0.0000751627,0.00030226042,0.00013024235,0.026936121,0.00007281004,0.91055053,0.0042924643,0.0027019028,0.031783834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022147146,0.00015879322,0.7324236,0.000020299156,0.000038543963,0.0029243496,0.015763009,8.191655e-7,0.00097400986,0.000027928369,0.24724711,0.00020004269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039758272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34132418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90957654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003826698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023255391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9879287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085601634","doi":"10.1007/s10806-013-9477-4","title":"Attitudes of Canadian Pig Producers Toward Animal Welfare","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Welfare; Stakeholder; Business; Neglect; Psychology; Public economics; Medicine; Economics; Political science; Nursing; Biology; Public relations; Ecology; Market economy","score_opus":0.059382588800678496,"score_gpt":0.27903499378919094,"score_spread":0.21965240498851246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085601634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868642,0.0005809065,2.2431581e-7,0.011893645,0.00009278837,0.00010397433,0.000031068957,0.000004230716,0.00042892652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879843,0.00075082417,0.00015822037,0.000091280825,0.0001026427,0.0000026099904,0.000008754797,0.000006856751,0.000080362566],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903715,0.000046478304,0.00032278823,0.00011838513,0.00028211312,0.000193116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994966,0.00002820072,0.00018198749,0.000053641623,0.00004863365,0.00019093645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014663271,0.00014934145,0.00024006295,0.00008247867,0.00019425563,0.000024541427,0.00011502265,0.00012868519,0.00027809592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025546145,0.00008641935,0.00010676266,0.000079192236,0.00019436925,0.00028380958,0.00006866296,0.0005057371,0.000017743005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022424708,0.00034721207,0.50481915,0.00023971776,0.0003415513,0.0001158201,0.010798294,0.000014367082,0.47547477,0.0006135717,0.0047003115,0.0023109808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001749645,0.0010221719,0.98819697,0.00003543615,0.000051014886,0.00044119864,0.008015621,2.5749196e-7,0.00058869465,0.000009385341,0.0013333926,0.00013088806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008755543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008573428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4833778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008704877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018565308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99784523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086541108","doi":"10.1007/s10806-009-9169-2","title":"Animal Welfare and Organic Aquaculture in Open Systems","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"World Health Organization","keywords":"Aquaculture; Sustainability; Animal welfare; Agriculture; Organic farming; Wildlife; Natural resource economics; Business; Aquaponics; Welfare; Fishery; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Ecology; Biology; Economics; Environmental science","score_opus":0.013897413830520022,"score_gpt":0.24039185011959227,"score_spread":0.22649443628907226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086541108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859476,0.0009462829,0.0000012073236,0.011060467,0.00005113623,0.00015168254,0.0000050360377,0.0000038052092,0.0018327484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972594,0.0016965696,0.00014290884,0.00034268215,0.000068966925,0.0000011110934,0.0000061211317,0.000003827793,0.00047842332],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988975,0.00007640114,0.00033080622,0.00018892245,0.00032268427,0.00018371057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995973,0.000030313257,0.00018578816,0.00005624955,0.0000052756855,0.00012504983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035917142,0.00017983129,0.00027821233,0.000017020735,0.00021547252,0.00010985544,0.0002153476,0.0001462102,0.000119086944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030644467,0.0000964758,0.0000442689,0.0000973842,0.00014442601,0.0004990163,0.00032908816,0.00062960444,0.00000918558],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043574578,0.0011099288,0.40813968,0.00011956555,0.00019989804,0.00023670866,0.02403112,0.00062964595,0.5374882,0.0033696166,0.011695801,0.012544069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053229684,0.00044725445,0.98209864,0.000042577147,0.000026233633,0.00043395784,0.0071618212,0.0000064569044,0.00018123491,0.00010879723,0.008781644,0.00017911165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009402561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009796787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57395893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009205578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000031294992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3934169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088785180","doi":"10.1007/s10806-010-9251-9","title":"Ethical Considerations in Agro-biodiversity Research, Collecting, and Use","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Biodiversity; Agriculture; Context (archaeology); Equity (law); Environmental resource management; Global public good; Agricultural biodiversity; Business; Environmental planning; Political science; Public relations; Environmental ethics; Public good; Geography; Economics; Ecology; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.10722743807266176,"score_gpt":0.3016838540832696,"score_spread":0.1944564160106078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088785180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98075825,0.000069678994,2.103358e-7,0.018959792,0.000055896748,0.00009961903,0.000017736662,0.0000033949489,0.000035393834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986813,0.00049628963,0.000363595,0.00030061093,0.00008116128,8.393007e-7,0.0000068141103,4.4500118e-7,0.00006894034],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984956,0.00031826724,0.00023744917,0.00016529427,0.0005480278,0.0002353991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978143,0.0017966859,0.000068530135,0.000027332608,0.00007345721,0.00021968452],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014939249,0.00009420517,0.00014691183,0.000027362077,0.00048999453,0.00016333719,0.000101226935,0.00042390212,0.00014685387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009244145,0.00003438602,0.000038110422,0.00014071204,0.0005413787,0.00017112815,0.00019353896,0.0037432478,0.00000688422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018292845,0.000083281244,0.053013977,0.0000042758047,0.000008180021,0.000020627966,0.000880498,0.0000042006855,0.9443467,0.00032450457,0.0006470487,0.0006484079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001992413,0.00028205957,0.9900258,0.000010905201,0.0000057656935,0.0003162372,0.0024615517,0.000003018281,0.004938368,0.0009251619,0.00074167526,0.00009021848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023371763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021579277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93940836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033044704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016163127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129037598","doi":"10.1023/a:1011321103091","title":"Assessment of GM Crops in Commercial Agriculture","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Precautionary principle; Value (mathematics); Scientific evidence; Judgement; Terminology; Meaning (existential); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Biotechnology; Epistemology; Biology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03345992096179443,"score_gpt":0.27402889781997186,"score_spread":0.24056897685817744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129037598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99538326,0.00029255275,0.0000034983775,0.0038349398,0.000061026443,0.00009992624,0.000015998294,0.0000031064014,0.0003056906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99726015,0.0020241186,0.00030318063,0.00012347156,0.00016100364,0.0000012711823,0.000021939155,8.187235e-7,0.000104040395],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983942,0.00016768576,0.00045499217,0.00014282056,0.00061220763,0.00022807308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993237,0.00024023901,0.00021037976,0.00003097997,0.000045882334,0.00014880691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005157027,0.00014289017,0.00027250938,0.000018519646,0.00010670619,0.000033136454,0.0002295325,0.00022504645,0.00017490241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004417404,0.000044820317,0.0001020459,0.00020555402,0.00016637203,0.00014073006,0.00012365509,0.00087039365,0.0000030427507],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024745998,0.00027804842,0.14500393,0.000009718756,0.000017273856,0.000017582808,0.00028147444,0.00010334882,0.84627396,0.00010970238,0.00013771914,0.007742485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028033459,0.00050037005,0.99212986,0.00003498954,0.000012726512,0.00021038728,0.0020194429,0.0000047379,0.0035682137,0.000109024135,0.0010131111,0.000116782925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013875065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005289109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84712595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006841883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011120714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37814757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131749770","doi":"10.1007/s10806-013-9469-4","title":"Consumer Choice and Farmers’ Markets","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Purchasing; Business; Marketing; Perception; Consumption (sociology); Quality (philosophy); Psychology","score_opus":0.012968548411791805,"score_gpt":0.19197082902717127,"score_spread":0.17900228061537948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131749770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844967,0.0017150366,1.3212087e-7,0.013436246,0.00010219938,0.00009778363,0.000014760994,0.000008086488,0.0001290578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99608874,0.0025918325,0.00006146809,0.0005699795,0.00027611066,0.0000015677052,0.000017133894,7.5414425e-7,0.00039242397],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906343,0.00007353464,0.00025881734,0.00014652427,0.00026936602,0.0001883026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999283,0.00027871595,0.00018156796,0.00001963274,0.000028678123,0.00020839316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016922758,0.00016360007,0.00019401412,0.0000061950145,0.00021711993,0.00009588557,0.00011129781,0.00019058115,0.00036934964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003420597,0.00004450788,0.000071250586,0.000071658906,0.00014737701,0.00035133568,0.00008392542,0.0005522032,0.000022030985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000860279,0.000099345176,0.021537993,0.000014978154,0.000068486625,0.0000031509214,0.00045673046,7.222537e-7,0.94527507,0.000030808194,0.0063632913,0.026140813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018252859,0.00022211982,0.97801614,0.000028235052,0.000034049433,0.00035107997,0.003758078,9.034519e-7,0.0012105451,0.00008147587,0.015955219,0.00015960459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053958436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025805613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9564782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019165647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000026460918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40441194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132144312","doi":"10.1007/s10806-010-9257-3","title":"Commercialization of Perennial GE Crops: Looming Challenges for Regulatory Frameworks","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Manitoba","funders":"Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; Foreign Agricultural Service; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Commercialization; Looming; Agriculture; Deregulation; Perennial plant; Business; Biotechnology; Natural resource economics; Agricultural economics; Economics; Agronomy; Market economy; Biology; Marketing; Ecology","score_opus":0.040143476032314614,"score_gpt":0.260883521150055,"score_spread":0.22074004511774037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132144312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99373144,0.0005068939,0.000022041895,0.0054105436,0.00016055736,0.00011429547,0.000021906002,0.0000036121148,0.000028721763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972131,0.0012600139,0.00095877016,0.00008285778,0.0004271898,0.0000017711767,0.000019480967,0.0000012298675,0.0000355635],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989712,0.0000654723,0.0003140006,0.00012200729,0.0003658359,0.00016148777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999161,0.00040630755,0.0002109625,0.00003367755,0.00006793996,0.00012011205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005307472,0.00010779861,0.00019036552,0.000010801264,0.00017223947,0.000035095716,0.00017473694,0.00046301633,0.00007696756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014604795,0.000037970225,0.00009976535,0.000045299028,0.00022004102,0.000110818044,0.00007401672,0.0009761824,0.000001214002],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038648224,0.00009119126,0.0016270336,0.000021775666,0.000016803408,5.116381e-7,0.0006541924,0.000012931308,0.9744938,0.0006150812,0.000050856474,0.022377161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023320278,0.0005433029,0.97260493,0.000031672018,0.000025623123,0.000054806515,0.0025155174,0.000013900946,0.021440683,0.00082723255,0.001587737,0.00012141225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013131861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001022775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9709779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016018876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000075666985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42410812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145800189","doi":"10.1007/s10806-012-9396-9","title":"She Came, She Saw, She Sowed: Re-negotiating Gender-Responsive Priorities for Effective Development of Agricultural Biotechnology in Sub-Saharan Africa","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University Health Network; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Agricultural biotechnology; Agriculture; Biotechnology; Food security; Sustainable development; Gender mainstreaming; Agricultural communication; Economic growth; Political science; Business; Gender equality; Economics; Sociology; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.045498892252121,"score_gpt":0.2542286930298852,"score_spread":0.2087298007777642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145800189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99368054,0.0035898776,0.00002417724,0.0018511901,0.0001628579,0.00058361667,0.000052949723,0.000011619897,0.000043149776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962481,0.0014666481,0.0019068791,0.00004458543,0.00021616137,0.000027010597,0.000034260942,0.0000031150967,0.000053208798],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997462,0.0002803355,0.00072896434,0.0002634673,0.00063792366,0.00062730483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809235,0.0011512707,0.00037975083,0.000052208226,0.00009565609,0.00022874722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011382734,0.00029467882,0.00046391968,0.00005491992,0.0003341595,0.00005478626,0.00031714927,0.0005129656,0.000033872588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036025338,0.00010874382,0.00015253923,0.00025338278,0.00031305628,0.00030790505,0.00024761452,0.0009699507,0.0000062824765],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011499257,0.00019519118,0.003103833,0.000049773098,0.00006813545,0.00000216936,0.0038295123,0.00008093915,0.98236597,0.000072864204,0.00021422922,0.009902374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004436102,0.00057442277,0.85131264,0.00006408436,0.00003305679,0.000086071035,0.0118089365,0.0000042558845,0.13370052,0.000061983206,0.0016559904,0.00025444498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002593658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000093559865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8486655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022602739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029730814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44344443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159052511","doi":"10.1007/s10806-012-9425-8","title":"Hope in Environmental Philosophy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University; Grand Valley State University","keywords":"Action (physics); Worry; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Sociology; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Psychology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022081772381500428,"score_gpt":0.25886103619829753,"score_spread":0.2367792638167971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159052511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903147,0.0028562828,0.000005117176,0.0013569279,0.0005803958,0.00008074076,0.0000099540075,0.000004817881,0.0047910614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962989,0.0017269027,0.0001690219,0.0005690506,0.0006525919,0.0000021437834,0.000015990028,0.000011763854,0.00055362744],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865526,0.00014806463,0.00040934604,0.00013575667,0.00031704415,0.00033455304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993604,0.00011913372,0.00021508834,0.00008548008,0.000002728303,0.0002172155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005061139,0.00018766175,0.00023882776,0.000059469083,0.00010689659,0.000019536801,0.00012722192,0.00025373575,0.00043140884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009848382,0.000120411816,0.00010953706,0.000050594484,0.00017181893,0.0004191156,0.000071819166,0.0010683526,0.00012483819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055641594,0.0044424734,0.74687487,0.0000961416,0.0005489716,0.00021806883,0.117322005,0.0003690667,0.0998217,0.005798945,0.004138467,0.0198129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093506166,0.00024213642,0.9846212,0.000041210827,0.000044943805,0.0007564647,0.008795382,0.0000012351858,0.00040572337,0.00030031547,0.0036249126,0.00023140019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011416726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016701553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23774637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010794417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004354155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49102515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W23601597","doi":"10.1023/a:1011301918973","title":"M.R. Redclift, J.N. Lekakis and G.P. Zanias (eds.), Agriculture and World Trade Liberalizationcolon; Socio-Environmental Perspectives on the Common Agricultural Policy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.042473400206705536,"score_gpt":0.3134669826524804,"score_spread":0.27099358244577487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W23601597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92727274,0.0019868333,0.000013671826,0.06981553,0.000067774454,0.00019492049,0.000040957962,0.0000106166035,0.000596929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98692787,0.008526856,0.00007012388,0.001223953,0.00044374226,0.0000064492474,0.00001496056,0.000007492075,0.0027785504],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756813,0.0004014777,0.0005962373,0.00033509932,0.00087849546,0.00022056035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979676,0.0010697421,0.00056560553,0.00014662353,0.000021028492,0.00022940164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009582003,0.00026987126,0.00032197812,0.00009330072,0.0010872894,0.00027724393,0.00029123007,0.00018960537,0.000108404725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016016176,0.000115284915,0.00013985607,0.0003595549,0.00084187463,0.0005609059,0.00014487965,0.0009714655,0.00001594796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009002351,0.0038634385,0.108839445,0.00005279692,0.0010948709,0.000095460215,0.22975019,0.0029265254,0.25692114,0.20585915,0.10820414,0.08149261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051576697,0.00028294357,0.8489181,0.00003097342,0.00006014317,0.0012388951,0.11650907,0.000008705867,0.00035915367,0.0065293927,0.025289956,0.00025692116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010065052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017065202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7400786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012726794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013760089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8362661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546360147","doi":"10.1007/s10806-016-9643-6","title":"Ecological Citizenship and Green Burial in China","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; Government of Jiangsu Province","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Humanity; China; Civilization; Harmony (color); Ecological civilization; Harmony with nature; Humanism; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Citizenship; Promotion (chess); Consciousness; Ecology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020505606929502748,"score_gpt":0.22050622149396368,"score_spread":0.20000061456446094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546360147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874362,0.00017034571,0.0000059592053,0.011283141,0.00009485596,0.00008245175,0.000009814562,0.000004825518,0.0009124553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972956,0.0015637816,0.00031361327,0.00041480697,0.00011798971,0.000001685875,0.0000017355634,0.000006889189,0.00028387408],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845874,0.00014791092,0.00038395906,0.00022267224,0.0005484219,0.00023826567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927425,0.00026700748,0.00018245651,0.00007314032,0.0000021305614,0.00020101793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007782692,0.00018814017,0.00023289883,0.00001673303,0.00016570087,0.000025260444,0.00014491679,0.00029432005,0.00035819414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009215038,0.00009316785,0.000068323985,0.000055241813,0.0009965515,0.00030886024,0.00027555457,0.00075360213,0.000038572056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045046667,0.00064507243,0.6129437,0.000054251348,0.000093112045,0.0001995774,0.007666298,0.00038433934,0.3561183,0.0008968427,0.0009862238,0.0195618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010046677,0.00037479636,0.980746,0.000047088055,0.00001922468,0.00036870898,0.00024977667,0.0000034688032,0.00050506217,0.016119666,0.00037010794,0.00019147592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036236823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045765642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36780223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028902685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007497335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3921975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550159099","doi":"10.1007/s10806-016-9648-1","title":"Who Loves Mosquitoes? Care Ethics, Theory of Obligation and Endangered Species","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Endangered species; Obligation; Environmental ethics; Normative; Moral obligation; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Argument (complex analysis); Normative ethics; Sociology; Ecology; Biology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025077012769260693,"score_gpt":0.22361670689538907,"score_spread":0.19853969412612837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550159099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920363,0.0012503768,0.000054297325,0.005059541,0.000119458775,0.0000989575,0.000041415526,0.0000054891525,0.0013341801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903342,0.008304467,0.00034497777,0.00030666744,0.00012309865,0.0000011384213,0.000006539643,0.000010835793,0.0005680677],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997954,0.000251177,0.00046263932,0.00022894664,0.00090181426,0.00020138371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986405,0.00062175136,0.00042520126,0.00012197226,0.000015418778,0.00017515957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009892829,0.00022267405,0.00029769583,0.000025616426,0.00022122062,0.000024590048,0.00018072549,0.00037364755,0.00022464118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020992586,0.00011818574,0.0001077803,0.000060774186,0.0016747091,0.0005949011,0.00027715132,0.0009063821,0.00001901038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022878192,0.00017655043,0.10044847,0.00017649462,0.00011375028,0.000012246768,0.048996266,0.0001818488,0.8361889,0.0038617856,0.00035333575,0.009261581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000724497,0.0004338559,0.9455932,0.0002262554,0.0000789449,0.00012198367,0.011551109,0.0000011367976,0.030228315,0.0094400905,0.0013413162,0.00025932942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016939659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032262236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8451447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028208146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014594848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61705357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554825323","doi":"10.1007/s10806-016-9647-2","title":"Labels for Animal Husbandry Systems Meet Consumer Preferences: Results from a Meta-analysis of Consumer Studies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Rural Affairs","keywords":"Animal husbandry; Animal welfare; Business; Welfare; Labelling; Allowance (engineering); Marketing; Preference; Product (mathematics); Consumer behaviour; Public economics; Agricultural science; Economics; Geography; Biology; Agriculture; Operations management; Microeconomics; Market economy","score_opus":0.2929209776317693,"score_gpt":0.3687094507618947,"score_spread":0.07578847313012543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554825323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9697688,0.025467096,0.0000129260625,0.0012386828,0.00011513698,0.00017102133,0.0031729224,0.000006355844,0.000047063982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924979,0.0070639336,0.00016222292,0.000042200263,0.000059105136,0.0000138196,0.000031140527,0.0000069560956,0.00012270195],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980841,0.00018734121,0.0008794287,0.00024046373,0.00042869596,0.00017996902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748653,0.0014064326,0.00077059504,0.00010967056,0.00013886712,0.00008789751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056937675,0.00024478984,0.0012344786,0.00006751966,0.00018796844,0.000021249774,0.0001322336,0.00016754543,0.000039528895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017727072,0.00009977034,0.00068566407,0.000085977896,0.00042183202,0.00022620389,0.00010574887,0.00021874903,0.000002691631],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0064491746,0.00068404374,0.032483894,0.00027028963,0.48055273,0.00007284339,0.017691864,0.00004679539,0.45481503,0.0005330182,0.00585136,0.00054895354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002745346,0.0029399109,0.73919374,0.00016112838,0.2208172,0.00014173407,0.029093448,0.0000032534995,0.00189191,0.00012561244,0.0023520924,0.00053463544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007041319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003584267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70670986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050526458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009538581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40685165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596035902","doi":"10.1007/s10806-017-9660-0","title":"Taxing Meat: Taking Responsibility for One’s Contribution to Antibiotic Resistance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Antibiotics; Antibiotic resistance; Business; Revenue; Public economics; Consumption (sociology); Animal welfare; Biotechnology; Economics; Biology; Ecology; Finance; Microbiology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05741911505246735,"score_gpt":0.32300181066153055,"score_spread":0.2655826956090632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596035902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99183166,0.00012320385,0.00036979042,0.006749841,0.00017102784,0.0002892131,0.000041789423,0.000006380061,0.0004171125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995791,0.0002525949,0.0026793927,0.00062881777,0.00012168804,8.921581e-7,0.000007014473,0.000008856837,0.0005096975],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984078,0.000085088264,0.00040046347,0.00026718964,0.00049878267,0.00034067885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986603,0.000200087,0.00056899263,0.00019614566,0.000009143587,0.00036529682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009636417,0.00019237607,0.0002841043,0.000019063911,0.0008940848,0.00013439005,0.00032235455,0.00015169196,0.00008398759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007824382,0.00012979275,0.00012618878,0.00003480102,0.00047429677,0.0006097526,0.00030977748,0.0004807098,0.00003583776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044601416,0.00030703703,0.0741217,0.000051689723,0.000055405013,0.0000128301745,0.0006605539,0.00028763438,0.9203925,0.00029802258,0.00046785118,0.0028987401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069645635,0.00022960492,0.9334251,0.00014888839,0.00006595861,0.00004859339,0.00020664839,0.000015949701,0.061531734,0.00045153144,0.0029640978,0.00021538622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016311444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054225064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8593035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023471913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007072249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6876668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614619918","doi":"10.1007/s10806-017-9669-4","title":"Environmentally Virtuous Agriculture: How and When External Goods and Humility Ethically Constrain (or Favour) Technology Use","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Humility; Virtue ethics; Virtue; Flourishing; Environmental ethics; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemic virtue; Epistemology; Utilitarianism; Misappropriation; Engineering ethics; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09329241037947165,"score_gpt":0.27244153740331467,"score_spread":0.179149127023843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614619918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.959223,0.00039942973,0.00004489693,0.039892264,0.00018642099,0.00014004599,0.00005169437,0.000010877581,0.00005137804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908956,0.0056121713,0.0012289128,0.001481058,0.000119131306,0.0000026639877,0.0000029891462,0.0000072535004,0.0006501981],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983227,0.00016159704,0.00034234428,0.00040052377,0.00049324724,0.00027958053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878585,0.00027012505,0.00049559446,0.00016447263,0.000011420111,0.00027251837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004408287,0.00027672885,0.00033193128,0.000046172594,0.0009052473,0.00028084527,0.00032248523,0.000477986,0.000028981229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037261835,0.00015013521,0.00007694315,0.000023748991,0.0024961333,0.0007668243,0.00037276122,0.0015471614,0.000003665175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018074427,0.00023798407,0.023562474,0.000028196815,0.000039248156,0.0001707158,0.0007592433,0.0000052326923,0.9677186,0.000735095,0.00032356667,0.0062389025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013036217,0.00081941317,0.9673133,0.00010778727,0.00006481219,0.007160266,0.0011446952,0.0000055855485,0.018029368,0.0022435999,0.0014993618,0.00030819394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010427177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017065728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057813195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013921117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9197107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793996648","doi":"10.1007/s10806-018-9719-6","title":"Genetically Modifying Livestock for Improved Welfare: A Path Forward","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Animal welfare; Status quo; Argument (complex analysis); Agriculture; Livestock; Genetically modified organism; Public economics; Biotechnology; Economics; Business; Biology; Gene; Genetics; Market economy","score_opus":0.010140550027281345,"score_gpt":0.2625637185753724,"score_spread":0.25242316854809105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793996648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848093,0.001000396,0.012699976,0.0011701377,0.00015624016,0.00011134353,0.000018319288,0.0000023093892,0.000031974258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99053586,0.00082196086,0.0077363695,0.00018199651,0.0005749964,0.0000032554897,0.00002369304,0.000008697752,0.00011319261],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994129,0.000015540609,0.00020122052,0.00012470837,0.000096510375,0.00014912311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996928,0.000015924377,0.00008802327,0.000063259315,0.0000354492,0.00010455653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016091159,0.00011310435,0.00011538778,0.000012699497,0.00012684581,0.000020267044,0.0000847971,0.0001576213,0.000005079537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004740311,0.000073717245,0.00009537783,0.00001731049,0.00009847275,0.000005630356,0.000061406136,0.00017428852,7.5804996e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006187544,0.0000294744,0.00015160882,0.000019784593,0.000049023627,3.9821776e-7,0.00022328498,0.00013012368,0.99634176,0.000027043709,0.00027519724,0.0026904275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037402427,0.010059983,0.2704833,0.00010581813,0.000287491,0.0010549702,0.00356731,0.0010112149,0.6203349,0.00036549644,0.08799705,0.0009922097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000013735804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033980334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37600684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012250022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010450615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30061018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947012423","doi":"10.1007/s10806-019-09777-0","title":"“That’s the Way We’ve Always Done It”: A Social Practice Analysis of Farm Animal Welfare in Alberta","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Genome Alberta; University of Alberta; Genome Canada","keywords":"Animal welfare; Animal husbandry; Welfare; Weaning; Animal rights; Business; Public relations; Political science; Marketing; Veterinary medicine; Medicine; Agriculture; Animal science; Biology; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.047213585529506386,"score_gpt":0.305710824989328,"score_spread":0.2584972394598216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947012423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95949966,0.00047035186,7.931699e-7,0.039029557,0.0000829846,0.00010807972,0.000038326838,0.0000024104636,0.0007678426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818534,0.001216738,0.000037720136,0.00026585456,0.00007193516,0.000002197764,0.000015941503,0.0000072825414,0.0001969953],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984247,0.00020594604,0.00047642362,0.00016552811,0.0005300329,0.00019737915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890447,0.00040987853,0.00051488815,0.00007945017,0.000037718673,0.0000536233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005059327,0.00019284489,0.0004676601,0.00007427932,0.00023495227,0.00002800732,0.00017641188,0.0001894642,0.00014506195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054100903,0.00009797123,0.00029688404,0.00022399431,0.00018808646,0.00028485007,0.00017266949,0.00094377797,0.000009132024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006053832,0.002288793,0.5458551,0.00027209375,0.0070356396,0.00030966307,0.19501366,0.00027858836,0.23356223,0.004045833,0.0015870982,0.003697468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044586667,0.00077484874,0.92400897,0.000025682406,0.0009700624,0.00022294279,0.07021535,0.0000059540225,0.00009730171,0.000007554143,0.0030779298,0.00014755427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046352885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038444038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37815383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009284172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008128389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4100298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953039072","doi":"10.1007/s10806-019-09784-1","title":"Is Speciesism Wrong by Definition?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Centre for Research in Astrophysics of Québec","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Normative; Analogy; Principle of legality; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04817078529623694,"score_gpt":0.27781578763228754,"score_spread":0.2296450023360506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953039072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9245786,0.00055354467,0.000003938322,0.04274556,0.0002614335,0.00005460259,0.000028775068,0.000005448817,0.03176811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929767,0.0026018128,0.00010071052,0.0025739109,0.0003042392,2.918678e-7,0.0000063663324,0.000003104402,0.0014328477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988184,0.00012302407,0.00021518131,0.00008809742,0.0005624698,0.00019282913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999317,0.00030107173,0.0001259427,0.000041129962,0.000021061658,0.00019379452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005521236,0.000085285006,0.00013787216,0.000015559805,0.00030707632,0.00005011024,0.00011765796,0.00024150476,0.00036026762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007178136,0.00005462658,0.00009061596,0.000045002886,0.00038948708,0.0003312411,0.00003433506,0.00084574136,0.000096653195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009477935,0.00065479305,0.025067313,0.00013697779,0.00026056098,0.00001928155,0.10225097,0.000024236653,0.045224678,0.7856021,0.039436743,0.0012275411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015429766,0.00074250245,0.43255544,0.00022719115,0.00016804122,0.00015789446,0.0827044,0.000002405278,0.0026797275,0.1808914,0.29748476,0.00084329303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005617546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008197936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60471076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000699621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029875151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39446777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236715534","doi":"10.1007/s10806-007-9060-y","title":"Book Review","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01906994691678377,"score_gpt":0.25919099157797315,"score_spread":0.2401210446611894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236715534","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3151647,0.67559904,0.000020282117,0.008198271,0.00018773518,0.00014407253,0.00001606579,0.000013037891,0.0006568364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37826002,0.5747258,0.0007000496,0.04197864,0.0006848477,9.75816e-7,0.000036665777,0.000035084184,0.0035779],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985318,0.00006970454,0.0004989393,0.00009574252,0.00060197915,0.00020180439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991428,0.00015240986,0.00040588184,0.000061998544,0.000023364923,0.00021352539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015203456,0.00014630359,0.0002482955,0.000030265375,0.000117734766,0.000016722523,0.00011796699,0.00012727514,0.0003452926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007770485,0.00007730131,0.00013182402,0.00007522125,0.00016307674,0.00038429274,0.000055750847,0.0010287648,0.00019423102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100407204,0.0003027554,0.0020982234,0.0005319444,0.00016895703,0.00012855203,0.0014346284,0.000025119072,0.19915308,0.00008726691,0.79240155,0.0035675399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045947358,0.00025816512,0.40614986,0.001005002,0.00015931392,0.0031697792,0.00086720585,3.071496e-7,0.0033295031,0.000029082134,0.58434474,0.0002275515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000016738152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021046133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40405163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001248592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009795088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44695285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367678466","doi":"10.1007/s10806-023-09906-w","title":"Grass-Fed Beef, Alterity, and Care: Complicating food Binaries, Relations, and Practices","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Scholarship; Agriculture; Participant observation; Reflexivity; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Social science; Economics; Economic growth; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.03678529242109986,"score_gpt":0.2468054381870633,"score_spread":0.21002014576596345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367678466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9739933,0.002967685,1.77269e-7,0.02275025,0.00006921745,0.000095909876,0.000054781358,0.00002159222,0.000047058486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99490005,0.0044169608,0.00010244984,0.00014566898,0.00025465924,0.0000017431026,0.00009787998,0.0000011108248,0.000079474725],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898314,0.00009082897,0.00027673348,0.00019157189,0.0002806508,0.00017707337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898726,0.0003674409,0.00044013176,0.000024020179,0.000028993794,0.00015214494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027905195,0.00015717921,0.00019685605,0.000011557507,0.00055252475,0.00013957622,0.000099744735,0.00018415121,0.000013454421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009959057,0.00005179513,0.000048158287,0.00017165687,0.00015207038,0.00036310457,0.00017365586,0.0005817945,0.000004980518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005337002,0.000117673044,0.06283149,0.00009377121,0.00012076933,0.000014593091,0.005434914,0.000008858284,0.9101381,0.0005353651,0.003690441,0.016960662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019985708,0.0008168653,0.9658877,0.000051062645,0.00004835931,0.00039277604,0.021119818,0.0000033171234,0.000799441,0.00023704731,0.010271637,0.00017207421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003127671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015191993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90933865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025142635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000054958045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42496294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394933732","doi":"10.1007/s10806-024-09926-0","title":"Community-Centred Environmental Discourse: Redefining Water Management in the Murray Darling Basin, Australia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Water Governance and Infrastructure","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Structural basin; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Sociology; Geography; Political science; Environmental science; Geology; Geomorphology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042228624958677706,"score_gpt":0.28956730609817105,"score_spread":0.24733868113949334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394933732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98845094,0.00059158466,0.0000035366306,0.009625871,0.0003413563,0.000098093355,0.000016094562,0.000005528052,0.0008670145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961664,0.002169149,0.000108567314,0.0003265645,0.0002484973,0.0000016335958,0.000027073176,0.0000053214385,0.0009467602],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983188,0.00041554746,0.0002901827,0.00010452954,0.0006042835,0.0002666811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996825,0.00009323149,0.000078301404,0.00007498996,0.0000025902953,0.00006838006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010202801,0.00013758893,0.00013977583,0.00003423169,0.00058423483,0.00021648617,0.0002835142,0.00013295471,0.00012489792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008519564,0.00006247763,0.000091182104,0.000057783487,0.0003709373,0.0005127136,0.00008940635,0.0015350896,0.000017976115],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000740835,0.0003997657,0.01312362,0.00016104453,0.00032004146,0.00037170545,0.9303272,0.0005993618,0.031017784,0.005118099,0.008980062,0.009507245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045397988,0.00014185335,0.37682986,0.00029604105,0.000121864825,0.00018240846,0.55337,0.000004285232,0.0010274907,0.0017678975,0.065523684,0.00028065863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018586492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008761359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3769572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017856986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007752491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6669285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411311596","doi":"10.1007/s10806-025-09951-7","title":"Challenging Structural Barriers to Creating Ethical Space in Wildlife Research Ethics Policy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Yukon Department of Environment; Yukon University","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Space (punctuation); Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Space policy; Ethical issues; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Ecology; Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.04712212004511478,"score_gpt":0.39497085201945076,"score_spread":0.34784873197433597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411311596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72509015,0.00041175532,0.000015408361,0.273171,0.00009638224,0.00014955697,0.000005556194,0.0000047062863,0.0010554731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98433673,0.0014932257,0.0005192124,0.012916999,0.00036093558,0.0000023913378,0.000007222272,0.00000723657,0.0003560387],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975344,0.0004497657,0.0004907954,0.0001950404,0.0009164765,0.000413505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997765,0.0010515025,0.00010013238,0.00010265752,0.00009018845,0.00089053466],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032260711,0.00015101401,0.00034323026,0.00029243313,0.00042598357,0.00005686129,0.000120228935,0.00058619643,0.00004802633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050570313,0.00009384098,0.000093541734,0.00041454518,0.00022562667,0.00011818962,0.00014144143,0.0068934364,0.0000029423518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034161238,0.0009080395,0.4078861,0.0055607925,0.0009880603,0.00075465435,0.2986549,0.00892865,0.023356007,0.20065306,0.012372897,0.036520697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013169766,0.0006057323,0.92362046,0.0012867218,0.000044456803,0.00025763508,0.06626925,0.00012701284,0.00008411107,0.0013377133,0.004879302,0.0001706458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031266935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049528666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5157344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047226658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008426058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W55304559","doi":"10.1023/a:1026302804166","title":"Britt Bailey and Marc Lappé (eds.), Engineering the Farm: Ethical and Social Aspects of Agricultural Biotechnology","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.02179320058916031,"score_gpt":0.18647308641199428,"score_spread":0.16467988582283397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W55304559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856303,0.0026727095,0.00000175475,0.009854602,0.00039606905,0.000058542133,0.000020167443,0.0000071389904,0.0013587566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969955,0.0019796921,0.000040665207,0.00018228586,0.00014546374,8.306911e-7,0.0000022323043,0.0000029811576,0.0006503605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991824,0.00005457816,0.00023738363,0.00011626491,0.00026854905,0.00014082824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960554,0.00014121042,0.00014268945,0.00003091021,0.000028457673,0.000051192867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030654317,0.00012862928,0.00022217432,0.000028050386,0.0005038983,0.000064309184,0.00007637467,0.00018090247,0.000040199782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053514163,0.00005906692,0.000067030065,0.00002951667,0.00088659633,0.00008678119,0.000082872866,0.00087650586,0.0000016550316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004990448,0.00027287242,0.0006786672,0.00026275124,0.000483029,0.000026149195,0.13516644,0.000034781737,0.06675571,0.78269374,0.008799766,0.004776171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015174455,0.0007345036,0.28275296,0.00013263781,0.00036187272,0.00085941266,0.14046158,0.000007799233,0.002306856,0.0026509322,0.5675271,0.00068690034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025040728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049127986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7800428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027558384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005659817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38756293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}