{"meta":{"query_hash":"1944a097301e","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce"},"cohort_total":12,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"exported":12,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1944a097301e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Air+Law+and+Commerce"},"results":[{"id":"W1144749573","doi":"","title":"The Montreal Convention--the Eleventh Circuit embraces airlines' practices of \"bumping\" to deny plaintiffs' recovery for personal injury under Article 17","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eleventh; Bumping; Plaintiff; Personal injury; Convention; Law; Business; Political science; Engineering; Aeronautics; Mechanical engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.04655635939066351,"score_gpt":0.34428277134065155,"score_spread":0.29772641194998806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1144749573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9360857,0.00037726256,0.003030993,0.0490178,0.00072209875,0.00026060836,0.000016994993,0.0000071554896,0.010481378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956814,0.00006438194,0.000110770525,0.0018899001,0.00042294248,0.000004286506,9.530917e-7,0.0000045216366,0.0018208417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898154,0.00016241737,0.0002846203,0.00006548082,0.0003776253,0.00012831177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998046,0.00070687116,0.0006083634,0.00005156964,0.0004963225,0.00009088679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017695806,0.000056350385,0.00010878043,0.00002355891,0.00049168477,0.00009794786,0.00018649941,0.000038615908,0.000010037104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048248348,0.000035304274,0.00008634825,0.00007015043,0.0001396707,0.00033795577,0.000022289607,0.000104426035,0.000002083597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013769744,0.0003055442,0.0033631297,0.000021537515,0.00028913448,0.000002521863,0.014513299,0.00022679959,0.00040134243,0.92350847,0.03233425,0.023656994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001767664,0.0013163077,0.028190328,0.00019527022,0.00019928043,0.000036326626,0.042423446,0.0007707541,0.0009731665,0.106164105,0.81769097,0.00027235856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016531901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007138514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81734437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055300618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017450328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39834586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W23168527","doi":"10.1038/nutd.2012.15","title":"Does the Montreal Convention of 1999 require that a notice be given to passengers? What is the validity of notice of a choice of forum clause under Montreal 1999?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases","keywords":"Notice; Convention; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02824364281348419,"score_gpt":0.29866505292040174,"score_spread":0.27042141010691756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W23168527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.926495,0.00028141998,0.00047317354,0.06488354,0.00046443852,0.0002721994,0.00006322252,0.000004320715,0.007062687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764246,0.00026652508,0.0000836363,0.0013840708,0.00018125112,0.0000015118477,0.0000023575703,0.000005794817,0.00043242282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830925,0.00031567665,0.00050335564,0.00008729646,0.00064393575,0.00014050699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974824,0.00088941114,0.0009428441,0.00014450724,0.00049520726,0.000045598314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089497305,0.00009334996,0.00027015907,0.000043644126,0.00018946535,0.000036562637,0.00031381167,0.000079542355,0.000024421182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006981199,0.00004957217,0.0001854632,0.00012656246,0.00032344053,0.000654799,0.00004877613,0.0001398758,3.2320452e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016139074,0.0020294318,0.053430878,0.0003814929,0.0008891743,0.000008903393,0.04404049,0.0017230391,0.005249183,0.8606331,0.018627765,0.011372645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038880298,0.001811035,0.7213312,0.0012641483,0.000983257,0.000015318357,0.06911029,0.00035261785,0.021647388,0.049802568,0.12932253,0.0004716171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07237683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06713239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81083053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039544444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006265918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765105073","doi":"","title":"The Montreal Convention - The Eleventh Circuit Embraces Airlines","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eleventh; Convention; Aeronautics; Aviation; Political science; Engineering; Law; Aerospace engineering; Physics; Acoustics","score_opus":0.032713507604828045,"score_gpt":0.30141526426500265,"score_spread":0.2687017566601746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765105073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49084476,0.0028669164,0.0015870812,0.123248175,0.002722535,0.00026627642,0.0000061379715,0.000026783058,0.37843135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522895,0.00023098927,0.000018865896,0.0011455027,0.0005532915,9.4819416e-7,5.598122e-7,0.000002492063,0.0028184187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991973,0.0001754405,0.0001738833,0.00003518096,0.00033108945,0.00008708117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992154,0.00019919086,0.00020223737,0.000047732876,0.00027749405,0.000057915186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012012814,0.0000395073,0.00006320147,0.000010393871,0.0005781534,0.00009485567,0.00018824094,0.000027050275,0.0000064763353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010151598,0.000020496569,0.00005201283,0.000041327257,0.00016982737,0.00022642117,0.000015604977,0.0001020112,0.0000037674406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031638858,0.000026642625,0.00090965955,0.0000010863804,0.000025485147,0.0000017521488,0.0020438987,0.00002203008,0.0000060522384,0.98232025,0.0060794638,0.008532028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037114188,0.00009895033,0.010482753,0.00002316126,0.000026335749,0.000016941649,0.005143374,0.00005984622,0.00003529268,0.08695885,0.89672977,0.000053563148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024351773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077032372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8953614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030526073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075280754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4446747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797406237","doi":"","title":"A Cure From Rome for Montreal’s Illness: Article 5 of the Rome I Regulation and Filling the Void in the 1999 Montreal Convention’s Regulation of Carrier’s Liability for Personal Injury","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Convention; Law; The Void; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013586109397004035,"score_gpt":0.278334226228995,"score_spread":0.26474811683199095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797406237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909001,0.00009621385,0.0005845323,0.0075465185,0.00013123713,0.00028774806,0.00007791831,0.0000016325615,0.00037412264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99929494,0.000016304972,0.00010309336,0.00023707112,0.00025848293,0.000006227518,0.000004176647,0.0000031487523,0.00007656141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991001,0.00019072896,0.00030450936,0.00007124647,0.00025252043,0.00008090717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987442,0.0004599719,0.00036712704,0.00007071515,0.00033718464,0.00002080553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011914679,0.000052574458,0.0001222437,0.000018920788,0.0003498908,0.000026658623,0.00012656926,0.00005193404,0.00000991586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014116222,0.000029300023,0.00007864442,0.000072589435,0.00028446634,0.00021782509,0.000014399134,0.00007035248,5.0900734e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028299002,0.00056995376,0.05795884,0.00014915821,0.000258311,3.7482377e-7,0.23298955,0.00027661416,0.011230566,0.6519721,0.004143431,0.037621193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008760956,0.00027365374,0.87444407,0.000107265885,0.00008454151,0.0000019606357,0.006658006,0.005461853,0.0012844768,0.10353698,0.0072001196,0.00007100188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009842259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02333518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8164852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036337315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004651026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981633065","doi":"","title":"Pilots Out of Uniform: How the Sixth Circuit’s Etihad Decision Undermines the Purpose of the Montreal Convention","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Aeronautics; Political science; Operations research; Engineering","score_opus":0.02568142600922374,"score_gpt":0.27958152564666144,"score_spread":0.2539000996374377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981633065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95258504,0.00014882941,0.00038337178,0.018403275,0.00071522564,0.00018795789,0.0000057600378,0.00000246691,0.027568098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974376,0.00014055001,0.000015068943,0.0005769103,0.00011837807,5.7645275e-7,4.3580675e-7,0.00000315859,0.0017073208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899906,0.00017938968,0.00022857859,0.00004557478,0.00046885028,0.00007854527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987664,0.0003570868,0.00044829294,0.000113696384,0.00029078167,0.000023731014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008294081,0.000053417632,0.00012068074,0.000018106113,0.00023028391,0.00003501536,0.00034230747,0.000040819188,0.00001847244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070173235,0.000023929962,0.000115055256,0.000069699636,0.00021359765,0.00019127857,0.00003855478,0.00012288854,0.0000013137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008972988,0.00009338,0.0073345127,0.000012270879,0.000051374187,5.9150966e-7,0.0038562075,0.000058924725,0.0007215719,0.9777367,0.0011267272,0.0089180125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024460256,0.0007515093,0.5273443,0.000641612,0.00022299118,0.000035549394,0.014687078,0.00022817496,0.003057871,0.17863975,0.2716937,0.00025146446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010974345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044665537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79909694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025461537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006653465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24924418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088460503","doi":"","title":"The West Caribbean Conundrum: The United States Versus France on the Availability of Forum Non Conveniens Under the Montreal Convention of 1999","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.022176400045676,"score_gpt":0.2745792757437305,"score_spread":0.2524028756980545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088460503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80442345,0.00017781748,0.0001630055,0.18726014,0.00033788738,0.00019474213,0.000025665233,0.000003691328,0.0074135833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960621,0.00026860135,0.00000348422,0.0034229658,0.00010215142,0.0000015019662,0.0000029091282,0.0000034611505,0.00013281526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879885,0.0003564282,0.00030031076,0.000057668945,0.00037658607,0.000110142166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975335,0.001565136,0.000432036,0.000107575564,0.00032422575,0.000037554728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096947013,0.00006410803,0.0001171027,0.00000968557,0.00063310127,0.000039321094,0.0003342376,0.00003446479,0.00002131703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000115156276,0.000027619863,0.000096030395,0.00012067002,0.0007183459,0.000084198036,0.000030643998,0.00021263403,0.000001612046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006008525,0.000074358795,0.0023657216,0.000009802209,0.00013972977,6.771982e-7,0.0084363995,0.0005464649,0.00007908499,0.98289835,0.0038796805,0.00096886494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032952786,0.0016854858,0.098721206,0.00016088175,0.00023633766,0.00000468298,0.11598773,0.0035825816,0.001841928,0.028051559,0.746193,0.00023935875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009606964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007331308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9548468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025032568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058920315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293072862","doi":"10.25172/jalc.87.2.3","title":"Back to Air in Disarray?: Disparity in Practices and Interpretations on ADIZs Disrupting the Safety of Civil Aviation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Civil aviation; Aviation law; Aviation; State (computer science); Engineering; Political science; Scope (computer science); Law; Aeronautics; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Aerospace engineering","score_opus":0.021458729755373242,"score_gpt":0.3313914995370912,"score_spread":0.30993276978171796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293072862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94616383,0.00006777141,0.00020415054,0.028415957,0.0001429727,0.0001254347,0.000009009315,0.0000015118593,0.024869364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981184,0.000048207417,0.00009947563,0.0015684213,0.000046255373,0.0000031816653,0.0000014686369,0.0000024558926,0.000112106856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989881,0.00034160656,0.00027623857,0.0000619361,0.00025637602,0.000075745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989463,0.00052860024,0.00039294915,0.000041403826,0.000058574075,0.0000321378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012156896,0.00004201804,0.00009906568,0.000058004804,0.0002677758,0.000022197017,0.000118775504,0.00001770054,0.00004414353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002683648,0.00003291797,0.000025490177,0.00014731949,0.000057912017,0.00028589863,0.00004717295,0.00021210994,6.0912845e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045730977,0.00031099506,0.18618819,0.000018532042,0.000025533032,0.0000034166592,0.04867421,0.003466545,0.00011729192,0.7565627,0.00033564694,0.0038396437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008020083,0.0004174435,0.88972837,0.0002137487,0.000023495399,0.000010707964,0.018167164,0.0006245239,0.000042571955,0.007803364,0.08202625,0.00014032754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038070627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04931522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7487593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009277308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040273793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9680323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386382784","doi":"10.25172/jalc.88.2.2","title":"Recent Developments in Aviation Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aviation law; Aviation; Doctrine; Deregulation; Civil aviation; Law; Aeronautics; Aviation accident; Political science; Engineering; Tort; Business; Liability; Economics; Aerospace engineering","score_opus":0.028613245578562808,"score_gpt":0.3181537627697393,"score_spread":0.28954051719117646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386382784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70365906,0.00011207416,0.000070890754,0.019342516,0.00073003443,0.000087002234,0.0000020762116,0.000020205764,0.27597615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99625283,0.00069302204,0.00018045909,0.0020382917,0.00011677386,7.864392e-7,0.0000024543215,0.0000025940776,0.000712776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993731,0.00007134349,0.00018269054,0.000038907216,0.00024493676,0.000089058485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965346,0.000065162036,0.00010161167,0.000020970634,0.00012026753,0.000038523984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000653898,0.00003202569,0.000066523775,0.00004809708,0.00015935527,0.000027075841,0.00007581946,0.0000329388,0.000019649975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003944844,0.000028993514,0.000018088329,0.00014007102,0.00003990383,0.00023655406,0.0000142540985,0.000079875994,0.00001448409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013393918,0.000022453492,0.004438656,0.0000018434425,0.0000064108704,0.000005989973,0.001785755,0.000012666557,0.000026649323,0.9836283,0.000793883,0.009264051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003033793,0.00002750581,0.08730106,0.000043167485,0.0000033133776,0.0000026117473,0.0005874123,0.000009192879,0.00008590875,0.016676389,0.8949065,0.00005352965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008801632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057981755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96695185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071992166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050182745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3235518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389583895","doi":"10.25172/jalc.88.4.5","title":"Navigating Through Cloudy Skies: The Montreal Convention & Article 17 “Accidents” Post-Moore","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Treaty; Confusion; Law; Accident (philosophy); Event (particle physics); Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Air transport; Petitioner; Aviation; Rubric; Operations research; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Aeronautics; Psychology","score_opus":0.024108676342351684,"score_gpt":0.3435751679732096,"score_spread":0.3194664916308579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389583895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602247,0.00008293049,0.00013281124,0.021588154,0.00029616573,0.000068769776,0.000003692521,0.000020051946,0.017582735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955316,0.0001166469,0.00010329332,0.002412615,0.00041261566,0.0000014726701,0.000004542013,0.000004992442,0.0014122191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904644,0.00014305644,0.00024397795,0.000060673912,0.00036557956,0.00014027272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999219,0.00021164925,0.00021610058,0.00006264528,0.00024511584,0.000045481156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007695546,0.000054856097,0.00009314346,0.000009595647,0.00063480524,0.000094348354,0.0001653715,0.00004048337,0.00005012129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011037456,0.000038705373,0.00007918155,0.00012472438,0.00011938336,0.00041387405,0.0000335743,0.00020197283,0.000028866476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012430291,0.00014345841,0.014375301,0.000014070207,0.00013083755,0.000022818374,0.048345737,0.0002326153,0.0007339226,0.9061735,0.01673194,0.012971459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017958375,0.00032632428,0.3053684,0.00042375078,0.00012890439,0.000062465966,0.041732684,0.00023563414,0.00048276753,0.13831927,0.51078266,0.0003412946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006720416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009291339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7678543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036205925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003180057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400408708","doi":"10.25172/jalc.89.2.4","title":"Still Far From Home – How Personal Jurisdiction Doctrine Undercuts The Montreal Convention’s “Fifth Jurisdiction” For “Wandering Americans”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Doctrine; Personal jurisdiction; Convention; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018698728792123663,"score_gpt":0.2862827407417565,"score_spread":0.2675840119496329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400408708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7617728,0.0034707938,0.090314925,0.12557319,0.00459444,0.00051637465,0.00022592467,0.00012364333,0.013407888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955876,0.0005980423,0.00023057152,0.0008293462,0.0012690629,0.0000055206824,0.000011937317,0.000009168878,0.0014587671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990845,0.0000985813,0.00020553738,0.000114049006,0.00035645138,0.00014091618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992349,0.00030707184,0.00015107298,0.000046896963,0.00018311322,0.000076948774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046740196,0.00008862385,0.00013992311,0.00005388754,0.0004101233,0.00022428704,0.0001241675,0.000056494744,0.000036846166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022855946,0.000063865526,0.00014983749,0.000095317075,0.00015176601,0.00043607733,0.000015757409,0.00019811818,0.0000022350741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031810394,0.00016313032,0.0013053195,0.0000440479,0.0006381002,0.00002381384,0.030828604,0.00011996137,0.00047789628,0.9008269,0.010447912,0.054806266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005579722,0.0002208048,0.013587298,0.000099675395,0.00014623719,0.00002441289,0.0027767278,0.001566397,0.000049567425,0.021548675,0.95928705,0.00013518275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00447655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003439947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9488391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001272841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010060443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6767235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400409519","doi":"10.25172/jalc.89.2.3","title":"The Case Law Of The Court Of Justice Of The EU On Art. 17 Of The 1999 Montreal Convention: An Evaluation From A Comparative Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Perspective (graphical); Convention; Economic Justice; European court of justice; Political science; European Union law; European union; Art; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.03890516883711586,"score_gpt":0.3594573218969947,"score_spread":0.32055215305987883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400409519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90217733,0.00059622695,0.000032554126,0.016177446,0.00071154267,0.00027886257,0.00008333863,0.0000022410477,0.07994047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922097,0.00003281518,0.000012691919,0.00028616487,0.0001351698,0.0000014268443,7.13307e-7,0.0000026000232,0.00030747853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983206,0.00065562193,0.0003123204,0.00006260483,0.00059007277,0.000058810456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979946,0.00059192453,0.0005268975,0.0001280808,0.0007375259,0.000020963396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010611033,0.000058382393,0.00014201595,0.0000128908305,0.00038746878,0.000024354811,0.00025920215,0.000036574518,0.000023909513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007701661,0.000026443093,0.00015123606,0.00011371734,0.000585515,0.0001452851,0.00003260799,0.00017032234,3.2112246e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099889054,0.00010361877,0.00011112501,0.000008588317,0.00010934522,0.0000012328607,0.015352562,0.00032695167,0.00021411243,0.9821877,0.0012493909,0.00023550206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044145607,0.0021005261,0.17134582,0.0031584762,0.0040534036,0.00018269721,0.3082721,0.016735923,0.02328289,0.3616666,0.104317956,0.0004690515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012754518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033365518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62052107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069891394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015161597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99381965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89481661","doi":"","title":"Recent developments in aviation law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Plaintiff; Jurisdiction; Political science; Federal preemption; Doctrine; Tort; Aviation; Preemption; Engineering; Liability; Welfare","score_opus":0.017330550586254427,"score_gpt":0.2922876204488917,"score_spread":0.2749570698626373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W89481661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4248567,0.00011781272,0.0007343666,0.013654678,0.0006252999,0.00007579414,8.6239464e-7,0.000008507961,0.559926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522007,0.00022015473,0.00057253166,0.003541761,0.00014953104,4.7530867e-7,9.678703e-7,0.0000022042884,0.00029228098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936783,0.00010916978,0.00018682933,0.000038544385,0.00022093371,0.00007666934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960476,0.0000684422,0.00012645878,0.000023352402,0.00013510927,0.000041867403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072751404,0.00003372096,0.00007281644,0.00002792335,0.00014436209,0.00002783128,0.00007770375,0.0000340136,0.000019488938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005141845,0.00002979302,0.000017276312,0.0000511866,0.000044456534,0.00023549765,0.000010243015,0.00008197177,0.0000045380966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011850324,0.000027557182,0.0036548595,0.0000013254768,0.0000040468644,7.4479084e-7,0.0009054308,0.00000581745,0.000018203302,0.98140794,0.00017908715,0.013783164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031647654,0.000037602586,0.04207591,0.000036606874,0.0000033870717,0.000002569907,0.00017265727,0.000009510696,0.000093868366,0.018317474,0.9388849,0.000049035916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009399434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006573388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9630904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066675864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034553297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3668105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}