{"meta":{"query_hash":"1944a097301e","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce"},"cohort_total":12,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"exported":12,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1944a097301e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Air+Law+and+Commerce"},"results":[{"id":"W1144749573","doi":"","title":"The Montreal Convention--the Eleventh Circuit embraces airlines' practices of \"bumping\" to deny plaintiffs' recovery for personal injury under Article 17","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eleventh; Bumping; Plaintiff; Personal injury; Convention; Law; Business; Political science; Engineering; Aeronautics; Mechanical engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.04655635939066351,"score_gpt":0.34428277134065155,"score_spread":0.29772641194998806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1144749573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025047705,0.0031706872,0.0068853186,0.20364347,0.005356235,0.0003934712,0.0007519688,0.00039573933,0.75435543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3361782,0.0012751156,0.005190946,0.23582092,0.0015282115,0.000431013,0.00018420535,0.0002062461,0.41918513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97913694,0.0033915436,0.0008318369,0.0020172908,0.008967926,0.0056544277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98290986,0.007597797,0.0012503387,0.0014845054,0.004958304,0.0017992733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016694445,0.0010501802,0.0006601155,0.0016421034,0.021346742,0.022460802,0.0048680413,0.027423043,0.013653765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032096572,0.0014365914,0.0013675824,0.0015334353,0.024338696,0.005440712,0.0053126966,0.024787921,0.0023661228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035527148,0.000049304334,0.0017988622,0.000040745206,0.000021693959,0.00015097705,0.0020237472,0.00019666311,0.00056209863,0.84026116,0.14791162,0.006947671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010158373,0.00012639961,0.010017931,0.00037256553,0.000092254304,0.0001522003,0.0022753167,0.00055054633,0.0017211492,0.055880718,0.92846215,0.00024721492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70798427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83183056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70798427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025171896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06631082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5874709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W23168527","doi":"10.1038/nutd.2012.15","title":"Does the Montreal Convention of 1999 require that a notice be given to passengers? What is the validity of notice of a choice of forum clause under Montreal 1999?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases","keywords":"Notice; Convention; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02824364281348419,"score_gpt":0.29866505292040174,"score_spread":0.27042141010691756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W23168527","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34291938,0.019606095,0.004197037,0.3603761,0.0071466416,0.0002721735,0.005445025,0.00015848978,0.2598792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93374157,0.0026806511,0.0010605392,0.026691781,0.0017076052,0.00010337428,0.0009189311,0.000077628785,0.033017967],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871895,0.0034665142,0.0005268184,0.0010200985,0.004937119,0.0028599682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9473778,0.020785132,0.009663975,0.0024196738,0.014576033,0.005177407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018861597,0.00028302748,0.0004986178,0.0019154287,0.0043051215,0.0067561767,0.002432729,0.0044327634,0.0132088065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0882114,0.00032393794,0.0005340111,0.0019727629,0.005829682,0.0032566476,0.0018329255,0.004523757,0.0013014419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007132014,0.0003223326,0.40485424,0.0003828948,0.00018874703,0.0009151864,0.010574105,0.00072511425,0.00091027847,0.20321758,0.24328992,0.13390642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011675403,0.00020220074,0.59199685,0.0012272546,0.000091376955,0.00024055848,0.0096658515,0.0011662577,0.00085109635,0.013368723,0.38083467,0.0002383616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6664707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66743845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6664707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017126005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01939093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.670987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765105073","doi":"","title":"The Montreal Convention - The Eleventh Circuit Embraces Airlines","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eleventh; Convention; Aeronautics; Aviation; Political science; Engineering; Law; Aerospace engineering; Physics; Acoustics","score_opus":0.032713507604828045,"score_gpt":0.30141526426500265,"score_spread":0.2687017566601746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765105073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014082085,0.005728284,0.0029986966,0.1542144,0.005993151,0.00021551846,0.0008944412,0.00019431314,0.815679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23414595,0.0013295255,0.0020560215,0.07087647,0.001701894,0.00017537297,0.0001789076,0.00011815399,0.6894177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905647,0.0015193305,0.0002331625,0.0013593473,0.0034943318,0.002829076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99372166,0.0011640722,0.00038983166,0.00048756757,0.003046182,0.0011905493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061220387,0.00088768353,0.0005757803,0.0010239644,0.017199876,0.019933734,0.002462885,0.013724339,0.021803241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01520317,0.0008492501,0.00074883853,0.0014211966,0.011944862,0.005080659,0.0035627102,0.01627595,0.0024891293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003024298,0.000029053232,0.0010152742,0.00003252002,0.000011179909,0.00008623051,0.0009135224,0.00015191392,0.0002630847,0.8474158,0.14189796,0.008153179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029096786,0.00003824981,0.004313489,0.00012049292,0.000015598807,0.000036346082,0.0007179251,0.0001553864,0.0004605374,0.031216199,0.9628162,0.00008047208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77782375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8737802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77782375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0411158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06459048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44696933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797406237","doi":"","title":"A Cure From Rome for Montreal’s Illness: Article 5 of the Rome I Regulation and Filling the Void in the 1999 Montreal Convention’s Regulation of Carrier’s Liability for Personal Injury","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Convention; Law; The Void; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013586109397004035,"score_gpt":0.278334226228995,"score_spread":0.26474811683199095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797406237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020634182,0.012222247,0.00657559,0.54215086,0.007405695,0.00033393074,0.000690392,0.00033254383,0.4096546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35533956,0.0030690227,0.0067284815,0.45703328,0.005424938,0.00064138527,0.00034101357,0.00032256448,0.17109971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818396,0.003477958,0.00092886644,0.001848267,0.00546674,0.0064385105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894936,0.0048268097,0.0010744329,0.0010795102,0.0019535187,0.0015721481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013007157,0.0012135498,0.001150408,0.0018887242,0.014350433,0.015309409,0.006623473,0.05392771,0.008204465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03266596,0.0013421591,0.0021245596,0.00116744,0.024407359,0.0061153863,0.008012813,0.02996879,0.001261378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043871383,0.000049526912,0.00072070205,0.000081055325,0.00002079867,0.0003543205,0.0036395967,0.00033248056,0.0005469552,0.83630705,0.15141176,0.0064918604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017012315,0.00010816997,0.0083223805,0.0010534591,0.000098111705,0.0002833103,0.0024973943,0.000614465,0.0012973163,0.067212865,0.91789025,0.00045210606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6188078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74206907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3811922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028801655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07875416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76687425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981633065","doi":"","title":"Pilots Out of Uniform: How the Sixth Circuit’s Etihad Decision Undermines the Purpose of the Montreal Convention","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Aeronautics; Political science; Operations research; Engineering","score_opus":0.02568142600922374,"score_gpt":0.27958152564666144,"score_spread":0.2539000996374377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981633065","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07936946,0.0020971557,0.0034522247,0.5589899,0.0039040605,0.00010585963,0.00022176311,0.0001703645,0.35168925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60014135,0.0006766699,0.0009907895,0.17389426,0.0010408334,0.00007416341,0.00006286146,0.00017669218,0.22294238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903751,0.002325758,0.00013637461,0.001002526,0.0020020208,0.004158198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99036145,0.00421495,0.00036240177,0.0005373961,0.0024304208,0.0020934122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010132702,0.00044433822,0.00042275825,0.0006777947,0.028064135,0.015531606,0.0036738738,0.017731082,0.014998824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02759814,0.000695948,0.0007364369,0.0008298892,0.015360911,0.005303019,0.004903737,0.01978344,0.0013372189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009702047,0.00007129112,0.003326322,0.00003854864,0.00002538712,0.0006787981,0.016107112,0.00036367247,0.0007496593,0.60988426,0.35090607,0.017751858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120542434,0.00008907479,0.009169113,0.00017471478,0.00006668976,0.00012847484,0.016308155,0.00084838853,0.0012246668,0.04065901,0.931019,0.00019215308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7897639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8811369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7897639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028258322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048550908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42294836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088460503","doi":"","title":"The West Caribbean Conundrum: The United States Versus France on the Availability of Forum Non Conveniens Under the Montreal Convention of 1999","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.022176400045676,"score_gpt":0.2745792757437305,"score_spread":0.2524028756980545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088460503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15471362,0.00945176,0.0009328774,0.17672728,0.000555702,0.00005729393,0.0008096393,0.000031371466,0.65672046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9202394,0.0025812401,0.0004888372,0.035762623,0.00041651557,0.000082300336,0.00011177794,0.00010329737,0.040213954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98855877,0.004514097,0.00025846803,0.00077240163,0.0024198391,0.0034765354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98263216,0.010299933,0.0012292457,0.0006917571,0.0037023346,0.0014445703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010717731,0.00032014225,0.0006079137,0.0030983195,0.013719319,0.019788187,0.0023064043,0.007407451,0.024532568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036848143,0.0004421348,0.00043185623,0.004037184,0.009488474,0.008867549,0.0047575133,0.0063881874,0.0008333228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036410586,0.000051235456,0.0054609315,0.00010859298,0.000041749976,0.00038438744,0.01983151,0.00016199698,0.0004764995,0.8854806,0.059674274,0.027964262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001929971,0.00014496976,0.05013147,0.0015561093,0.00021421914,0.00027262673,0.10061893,0.0006140242,0.0011228349,0.06987785,0.7750296,0.00022429749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6945189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8048149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6945189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019598056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02102711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61456025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293072862","doi":"10.25172/jalc.87.2.3","title":"Back to Air in Disarray?: Disparity in Practices and Interpretations on ADIZs Disrupting the Safety of Civil Aviation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Civil aviation; Aviation law; Aviation; State (computer science); Engineering; Political science; Scope (computer science); Law; Aeronautics; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Aerospace engineering","score_opus":0.021458729755373242,"score_gpt":0.3313914995370912,"score_spread":0.30993276978171796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293072862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49683648,0.02451573,0.016207153,0.13710622,0.0018668628,0.0000575506,0.0001131618,0.00008653213,0.32321036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882179,0.0028081865,0.0010659441,0.0042703506,0.00015835605,0.000018568591,0.000022905391,0.00003844417,0.003399421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98833585,0.007120701,0.0004822373,0.000949095,0.0019446085,0.0011675159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917813,0.005673611,0.00095418276,0.000418628,0.0008182518,0.00035397074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010144494,0.00027302263,0.00038439248,0.0019294875,0.007627556,0.015206575,0.0014542845,0.0031315293,0.00209346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014451697,0.00026832367,0.0002854254,0.0029635937,0.031846844,0.010888217,0.007910206,0.00713151,0.00034999085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021195643,0.000012340375,0.001839343,0.00010085498,0.0000039512574,0.00025374143,0.2904074,0.000071051145,0.00034404406,0.6787435,0.0030796896,0.025122914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066716957,0.000036342237,0.005981651,0.0010784616,0.000015064207,0.00040633293,0.66168654,0.0002945304,0.00060874247,0.10717069,0.22265574,0.0000592175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01247561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01604342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015206575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068847006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063287686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053649843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386382784","doi":"10.25172/jalc.88.2.2","title":"Recent Developments in Aviation Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aviation law; Aviation; Doctrine; Deregulation; Civil aviation; Law; Aeronautics; Aviation accident; Political science; Engineering; Tort; Business; Liability; Economics; Aerospace engineering","score_opus":0.028613245578562808,"score_gpt":0.3181537627697393,"score_spread":0.28954051719117646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386382784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007798281,0.2940434,0.003123652,0.26109174,0.00983092,0.000028481942,0.00018933126,0.00007816264,0.42381597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2649611,0.41207874,0.005826029,0.15245306,0.04936123,0.00010702226,0.0004546375,0.00013439264,0.11462367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958353,0.0011815801,0.00030625827,0.000729893,0.0015800181,0.0003669142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903502,0.0057092435,0.00073134125,0.00052002294,0.0022423563,0.00044674816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005311915,0.00033387632,0.0003363767,0.0027068972,0.0031456249,0.008601711,0.0012343903,0.0070904666,0.013148233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014130309,0.00033565637,0.0005075524,0.0038634315,0.007734257,0.010690016,0.0016286921,0.008011206,0.0021492182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014019316,0.000044422326,0.0002910553,0.00020827325,0.0000058185888,0.00015246753,0.0007272928,0.00019876944,0.00022351298,0.8517947,0.0793068,0.06703285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034043699,0.000025362435,0.0007163635,0.00037579497,0.0000036470096,0.00019229062,0.0002971183,0.00021531031,0.00012818922,0.058489844,0.93953824,0.000014493424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00750038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008080098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013148233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075181667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003746666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054548442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389583895","doi":"10.25172/jalc.88.4.5","title":"Navigating Through Cloudy Skies: The Montreal Convention & Article 17 “Accidents” Post-Moore","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Treaty; Confusion; Law; Accident (philosophy); Event (particle physics); Supreme court; Perspective (graphical); Air transport; Petitioner; Aviation; Rubric; Operations research; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Aeronautics; Psychology","score_opus":0.024108676342351684,"score_gpt":0.3435751679732096,"score_spread":0.3194664916308579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389583895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013160943,0.0061172303,0.0021528215,0.17772962,0.002201938,0.00026139,0.0013108678,0.00020868068,0.7968564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25684234,0.0045187576,0.0022445065,0.1897445,0.0020644874,0.0006441784,0.00035572302,0.00021040665,0.54337513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994615,0.0005299675,0.00012658036,0.0006493811,0.0025454066,0.001533649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828655,0.00050811056,0.00018241808,0.00012572852,0.000602322,0.00029482887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028810604,0.0010773614,0.00044291036,0.0008453445,0.016592773,0.012571884,0.0045831725,0.021663817,0.016495716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0082479,0.0008315987,0.0009160452,0.0011532106,0.00905698,0.005110484,0.0040339967,0.011317957,0.0021988405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021688029,0.000040125953,0.0010317559,0.00004336209,0.000009374554,0.00039421345,0.002776675,0.00033108777,0.0002666756,0.6117895,0.37654322,0.006752313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031326028,0.000033795623,0.005500323,0.00029558127,0.00002884835,0.00016540317,0.002889516,0.00057611696,0.0005582224,0.023449905,0.96633166,0.00013930348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8630281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91753745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8630281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028863635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042563282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27555704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400408708","doi":"10.25172/jalc.89.2.4","title":"Still Far From Home – How Personal Jurisdiction Doctrine Undercuts The Montreal Convention’s “Fifth Jurisdiction” For “Wandering Americans”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Doctrine; Personal jurisdiction; Convention; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018698728792123663,"score_gpt":0.2862827407417565,"score_spread":0.2675840119496329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400408708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07707287,0.0044474658,0.028135994,0.16196638,0.0016871969,0.0000679299,0.00011950276,0.0001808355,0.7263219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9043105,0.0008628928,0.0030687319,0.031314768,0.0005132754,0.0000615956,0.000044710625,0.0001115912,0.05971199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99158305,0.0024617852,0.00017805154,0.0016450133,0.0021777938,0.00195437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958103,0.0016518836,0.0001979506,0.00051753985,0.0012158612,0.000606486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008280818,0.0003450918,0.00038061026,0.0007965371,0.015911708,0.014685573,0.0028552986,0.009436535,0.007381936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012075507,0.000415613,0.0008433046,0.0006822252,0.03522168,0.00985279,0.0053335913,0.012651147,0.0010187674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031557772,0.0000041222806,0.00019407945,0.000004149872,0.0000018210858,0.00007333593,0.0026670115,0.000052533924,0.00007646973,0.9899743,0.004521973,0.0024269905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044369463,0.000060517257,0.0023906638,0.00026168686,0.000041037547,0.00025679087,0.0100192,0.001091369,0.0011548368,0.54182494,0.4427295,0.00012509356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38965347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37432128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38965347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018483927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027226688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77477086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400409519","doi":"10.25172/jalc.89.2.3","title":"The Case Law Of The Court Of Justice Of The EU On Art. 17 Of The 1999 Montreal Convention: An Evaluation From A Comparative Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Perspective (graphical); Convention; Economic Justice; European court of justice; Political science; European Union law; European union; Art; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.03890516883711586,"score_gpt":0.3594573218969947,"score_spread":0.32055215305987883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400409519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065405995,0.039570406,0.007685176,0.022262435,0.0011386287,0.00031475985,0.00024725628,0.000027209235,0.8633482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93543875,0.016790839,0.005182627,0.010148145,0.0016987411,0.00071786233,0.00033457295,0.00010442211,0.029583978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9555749,0.020313645,0.001015133,0.0021391574,0.016628195,0.004328996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95312774,0.03342563,0.002328798,0.0015516512,0.008802572,0.0007635335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03241802,0.00086825475,0.0014418516,0.009404976,0.011628614,0.020075873,0.003813222,0.0077151307,0.011300113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07055584,0.0006550989,0.001521073,0.0105745895,0.021977026,0.013104074,0.0065524653,0.00629856,0.0005999371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028268798,0.000032368822,0.00046968771,0.000101608384,0.0000170388,0.00015529581,0.002220856,0.00035509505,0.000052816238,0.9870603,0.00418044,0.005326281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025874964,0.00057597907,0.018812163,0.0040022093,0.0004565082,0.00074919657,0.031417947,0.006852768,0.0012185632,0.42511845,0.5102672,0.00027029295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14953928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12870921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14953928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042139914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019059429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30574793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W89481661","doi":"","title":"Recent developments in aviation law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Air Law and Commerce","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Plaintiff; Jurisdiction; Political science; Federal preemption; Doctrine; Tort; Aviation; Preemption; Engineering; Liability; Welfare","score_opus":0.017330550586254427,"score_gpt":0.2922876204488917,"score_spread":0.2749570698626373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W89481661","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041857725,0.6080514,0.003005033,0.12939872,0.005240268,0.000014350483,0.00014602329,0.00004438957,0.24991411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24688074,0.58480716,0.005077443,0.060150232,0.0361497,0.000088108914,0.00038264558,0.00009488409,0.06636913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728143,0.0009202341,0.00014271068,0.00062634394,0.0007723388,0.00025692186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98992705,0.0066368645,0.0006657346,0.0006031968,0.0016837561,0.00048352208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037874286,0.00045798774,0.0004355654,0.0037443354,0.0027323647,0.007819839,0.0013576936,0.0056578047,0.01667664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0104781445,0.00029034016,0.0005138654,0.005721991,0.013009048,0.010397878,0.0019967821,0.0066846865,0.0023790095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015885327,0.000026490761,0.00027040424,0.00028075365,0.0000052457535,0.000051858377,0.0005045473,0.00016198288,0.00008071582,0.8819071,0.043216106,0.073478915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004074876,0.000021563084,0.001130615,0.00062145764,0.0000038683643,0.00017107093,0.0004909589,0.00020981568,0.00007527282,0.122916564,0.8743427,0.000012109599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008947269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009041394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01667664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008410802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036437756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061024904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}