{"meta":{"query_hash":"60987298e1d7","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Altmetrics"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/60987298e1d7","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Altmetrics"},"results":[{"id":"W2970982669","doi":"10.29024/joa.20","title":"The Relationship Between Institutional Factors, Citation and Altmetric Counts of Publications from Finnish Universities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Altmetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Regional science; Political science; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.6515934642078601,"score_gpt":0.536494169042329,"score_spread":0.11509929516553108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970982669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98980206,0.0013556296,0.000473505,0.00023842546,0.000032429587,0.000012451363,0.00070968503,0.000017584758,0.007358186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982855,0.00038852106,0.00020778806,0.000014439259,0.000086488864,0.000008849443,0.0003821811,0.0000038998514,0.00062233186],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573517,0.0009912427,0.0009526026,0.00042680858,0.00145031,0.0004438382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.938227,0.03558945,0.016947538,0.0016159829,0.0049230442,0.0026968902],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004301612,0.00022804091,0.0004477139,0.015646204,0.00090496265,0.004276478,0.00055269385,0.0006176794,0.004310875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041913968,0.00011909647,0.00030853128,0.027217546,0.0006607226,0.002657617,0.001652214,0.00039969783,0.0006523699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072946335,0.00006834387,0.97057164,0.00017717721,0.00008911715,0.00017965629,0.002060112,0.00026780556,0.00045285528,0.0008466068,0.0003788989,0.024834855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027494793,0.000043045984,0.9932406,0.000038327464,0.00006282908,0.0001580653,0.0031140016,0.00041347323,0.00029880492,0.00055307255,0.0020604054,0.000014637893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044158367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055150557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013315539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011847923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022749364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994940827","doi":"10.29024/joa.21","title":"What Is Societal Impact and Where Do Altmetrics Fit into the Equation?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Altmetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Societal impact of nanotechnology; Social impact; Meaning (existential); Political science; Impact assessment; Sociology; Management science; Public relations; Social science; Data science; Psychology; Computer science; Economics; Public administration","score_opus":0.4838761285065922,"score_gpt":0.5875435062790783,"score_spread":0.10366737777248608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994940827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1955954,0.06793922,0.20377204,0.22689246,0.005307872,0.0006581019,0.008780468,0.0016395231,0.289415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93955183,0.016055005,0.0331059,0.004727797,0.0018594194,0.00026059532,0.0016539248,0.00031591425,0.0024697192],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722464,0.013740322,0.0021525663,0.0021207628,0.0085051935,0.0012348624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85184574,0.08823868,0.023758706,0.008568977,0.024947578,0.0026403684],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0347229,0.0013439365,0.001878051,0.022323474,0.0015711392,0.012884369,0.0018571253,0.0029369032,0.0069983755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22653209,0.00045922294,0.0020878897,0.0356299,0.0067393924,0.024379114,0.0043051215,0.0036939408,0.0030506498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011534735,0.00015327265,0.38718566,0.0018736209,0.0015288644,0.00021152271,0.004600105,0.00818637,0.00028292072,0.24535744,0.025438821,0.3250661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036363086,0.00020532934,0.27322587,0.0042331233,0.00066872296,0.0007172243,0.012417583,0.020758547,0.0008885197,0.5799518,0.106502086,0.00039482513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009945124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077663283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9776765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056620985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036909184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1836344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041922855","doi":"10.29024/joa.26","title":"Using a Diabetes Discussion Forum and Wikipedia to Detect the Alignment of Public Interests and the Research Literature","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Altmetrics","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Latent Dirichlet allocation; Scopus; Topic model; Public health; Original research; MEDLINE; Computer science; Political science; Library science; Data science; Information retrieval; Medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.14585160026767363,"score_gpt":0.4263458667255863,"score_spread":0.28049426645791264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041922855","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634357,0.0010774824,0.021619752,0.00061937695,0.00029657653,0.0003442698,0.005169657,0.0010726575,0.0063644173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.949959,0.00022732173,0.03920296,0.00015566037,0.0002460727,0.00049375865,0.0074703908,0.00010467241,0.0021401977],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99556196,0.0019141912,0.00048265906,0.0007915872,0.0009775263,0.00027205245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9548655,0.028703881,0.0078927735,0.0020539851,0.0045322524,0.0019516655],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068578357,0.0005576215,0.00047370844,0.014987917,0.0012008151,0.0022402606,0.0005623933,0.0010810158,0.0009343913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034171473,0.0002762872,0.00039936,0.0072867107,0.0005885633,0.004030854,0.0022159435,0.0006932783,0.00047726117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023497196,0.0010816016,0.6351467,0.0021979047,0.00041901547,0.0011299816,0.020133527,0.003206502,0.0329235,0.0055983,0.018710647,0.27710262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021465917,0.0010028194,0.7241478,0.0004955388,0.0003713862,0.0016994978,0.015121145,0.15436064,0.022869606,0.01255196,0.06682072,0.00034416796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036028856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005496907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9931422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010545941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009985133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036268175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125065800","doi":"10.29024/joa.38","title":"Large-Scale Comparison of Authorship, Citations, and Tweets of Web of Science Authors","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Altmetrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology","keywords":"Popularity; Social media; Altmetrics; Workflow; Similarity (geometry); Bibliometrics; Scale (ratio); Data science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Geography; Social psychology","score_opus":0.5215094072867599,"score_gpt":0.5995611686223555,"score_spread":0.07805176133559566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125065800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98147476,0.00065394613,0.0010305428,0.0002657029,0.000065402695,0.00004466708,0.012418715,0.00006771751,0.00397848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97238636,0.00084259943,0.0025188955,0.00007563871,0.00028371942,0.00014993544,0.020456307,0.000059173304,0.0032273654],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982222,0.0004336771,0.0002694184,0.0002602423,0.00065985584,0.00015467813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682837,0.018177332,0.006951515,0.0013471013,0.004219183,0.0010211898],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020836024,0.0002134359,0.00034155365,0.012124269,0.00067385036,0.0018023023,0.0003183323,0.00057604513,0.0018219512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017329076,0.00012709961,0.00030653254,0.0146681,0.00036804294,0.0021239482,0.0013006267,0.00039324723,0.0016012287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045363329,0.00018401584,0.9009811,0.00078395836,0.00030582809,0.0003927371,0.0062228544,0.00082006113,0.0076463805,0.0018252601,0.0072260043,0.07315817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023820303,0.00019684577,0.9624114,0.0001157882,0.00013627464,0.00042726804,0.006122664,0.004315649,0.0044593634,0.001288069,0.020451726,0.00005109524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016297122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035630544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047571756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005293273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01101923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159983384","doi":"10.29024/joa.41","title":"Urban Planning Academics and Twitter: Who and what?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Altmetrics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Social media; Public relations; Urban planning; Sociology; Resource (disambiguation); Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Engineering","score_opus":0.07665338017943327,"score_gpt":0.3712184149290081,"score_spread":0.29456503474957485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159983384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6154164,0.013614705,0.003512593,0.17404133,0.0006776655,0.0001419259,0.003665697,0.00015273664,0.18877688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97271943,0.009866226,0.0015430835,0.004126071,0.00050701783,0.00008227789,0.00080926117,0.000045201316,0.010301547],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980021,0.00091834523,0.00009626768,0.00016597594,0.0004613222,0.0003559879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99404895,0.0026807215,0.0012612477,0.00023299508,0.00078267296,0.0009934702],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002404376,0.00017963105,0.00032928016,0.0023988867,0.0028657848,0.0074760225,0.0005024167,0.00076047744,0.0076642637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010093069,0.00020255832,0.00019208422,0.011282535,0.0025303494,0.006111544,0.002351467,0.0011515366,0.0013460552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012284669,0.00011428793,0.48330808,0.0007239847,0.00007255229,0.00084002997,0.12254645,0.00055690116,0.00031062236,0.046855927,0.0749085,0.26963982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009216116,0.000051310602,0.20238464,0.00118755,0.000046190664,0.0004572802,0.43563035,0.0011611528,0.0005042743,0.0148943085,0.34359792,0.000075614065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04097606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07694541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036966654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004317145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08147508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}