{"meta":{"query_hash":"427eec2f5757","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/427eec2f5757","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Applied+Animal+Ethics+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W2944712171","doi":"10.1163/25889567-12340002","title":"Why We Need a New Ethic for Animals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Unintended consequences; Cruelty; Environmental ethics; Animal ethics; Harm; Animal rights; Population; Political science; Animal welfare; Business; Sociology; Law; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.14095047183573814,"score_gpt":0.396129683110257,"score_spread":0.2551792112745188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944712171","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057535996,0.016442826,0.012024466,0.8996202,0.0059950794,0.00005662518,0.000044956618,0.000092874725,0.059969407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41659796,0.01999427,0.03815195,0.46640256,0.007844507,0.00046589502,0.000108991524,0.00025939842,0.050174516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.983472,0.011531663,0.0004456726,0.0011299888,0.0025591054,0.0008616853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97415674,0.010198836,0.0023999459,0.0034783152,0.005757981,0.004008185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0327502,0.00073950744,0.0009522281,0.0010489203,0.0047929944,0.009136747,0.0020928602,0.0107412,0.009785632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018005207,0.0003970219,0.00089089153,0.00047021374,0.06361684,0.01578045,0.0056166877,0.0127894115,0.0027097706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007299711,0.00013064311,0.0021480974,0.00047272298,0.00005865281,0.00027797,0.0059375223,0.0004488697,0.0012735324,0.8513873,0.101193585,0.036598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034242035,0.00009378495,0.0010831059,0.0010837724,0.000019106445,0.00041766174,0.0049803536,0.00027110387,0.0003339077,0.46058574,0.5310334,0.00006386356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025110503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029655444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0327502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033640058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062730107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17320168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390005881","doi":"10.1163/25889567-bja10046","title":"Rejecting an Additive Solution to Regan’s Lifeboat Case","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Animal rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Epistemology; Economics; Law; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5910350635621471,"score_gpt":0.5004238369302897,"score_spread":0.09061122663185739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390005881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12368516,0.00069070206,0.07069207,0.11818378,0.000888269,0.00019172003,0.0000781762,0.00022414236,0.68536603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9509772,0.00021577577,0.014615075,0.012843456,0.00020502725,0.00013433212,0.00003111846,0.00006315907,0.020914773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99267596,0.002902179,0.0002612727,0.0011706706,0.0017558511,0.0012340667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949634,0.0024943969,0.0005002743,0.00072580774,0.0008472546,0.0004689001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008290199,0.0006379657,0.00081848213,0.0016793021,0.0044548693,0.005908517,0.0025043038,0.010070972,0.013700337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01669324,0.00041578698,0.0012308159,0.0007260888,0.0158313,0.007213571,0.0076250774,0.0075881495,0.0019062046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012197827,0.000013717119,0.00014222343,0.000010645102,0.0000071630498,0.0003878991,0.00072685006,0.00018737416,0.00008254372,0.99405175,0.001972643,0.0024049268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004801945,0.00003394406,0.00030058736,0.00008961047,0.000024835756,0.001115355,0.0028475083,0.0022237154,0.0003077528,0.94383264,0.049144458,0.000031608393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020573824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034222568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013700337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003332438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002492398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045832217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403081941","doi":"10.1163/25889567-bja10052","title":"Sentience and the Issue of Animal Welfare","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sentience; Animal welfare; Welfare; Business; Environmental ethics; Economics; Biology; Philosophy; Ecology; Market economy","score_opus":0.08980948772784643,"score_gpt":0.48156082388648447,"score_spread":0.39175133615863805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403081941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08627291,0.020523325,0.04784169,0.3193825,0.002946541,0.00007871415,0.00004653294,0.000050914623,0.52285683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720291,0.0022627318,0.0035762168,0.013036491,0.0009067069,0.00008062908,0.000009531767,0.000025893876,0.008072679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844385,0.011963887,0.000287202,0.00068755844,0.0019286511,0.0006943535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984176,0.010634534,0.0014752039,0.0012307508,0.0015584447,0.00092509924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015556699,0.00031316202,0.00052822125,0.00092325895,0.004374178,0.0066912286,0.001159824,0.0063985987,0.004056499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017293822,0.00020648664,0.0005074554,0.0005367909,0.061643615,0.005112575,0.006287789,0.0069933734,0.00038143952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007604585,0.000012608863,0.00018824858,0.000024289297,0.0000036901313,0.000061458515,0.0020790938,0.000054397893,0.0001576238,0.9939674,0.0009127395,0.0025308253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007741593,0.00004078466,0.0008485314,0.00019452412,0.000006584558,0.00013941283,0.0032951848,0.00020913481,0.00029494843,0.9512011,0.043745883,0.000016223757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008627418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074336556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015556699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025024822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030227723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08227265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}