{"meta":{"query_hash":"a04d8d75fa11","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Applied Communication Research"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a04d8d75fa11","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Applied+Communication+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W3173772358","doi":"10.1080/00909882.2021.1934513","title":"Spanning communication boundaries to address health inequalities: the role of community connectors and social media","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Communication Research","topic":"Social Media in Health Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Health care; Social media; Face (sociological concept); Qualitative research; Health promotion; Sociology; Business; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.3490149070704479,"score_gpt":0.5165263667235142,"score_spread":0.16751145965306624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173772358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8927789,0.004992332,0.000014562475,0.095582806,0.00024281438,0.00072878756,0.000010117671,0.000015469726,0.00563422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99575484,0.002188286,0.001246447,0.00041417108,0.00023204368,0.00012226218,0.000018644447,0.0000136071785,0.000009713827],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98923504,0.008339819,0.0008027872,0.00007784646,0.0011896295,0.00035485055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9749278,0.021139687,0.00071381294,0.00074296986,0.0022873671,0.00018840864],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021403521,0.00008556445,0.00034399287,0.0002291224,0.0058031194,0.00028374285,0.0013742362,0.000119790726,0.000053323904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008512861,0.00007910881,0.000050295097,0.0010115106,0.0020260066,0.00017759396,0.0004886394,0.0016319875,0.0000036348565],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006238419,0.00011346412,0.00057678,0.0000440208,0.000023899154,6.70471e-8,0.7465663,0.000003030092,0.00019186294,0.21938959,0.001494958,0.031533666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024748742,0.000049629372,0.010100718,0.000106688116,0.000008347966,0.0000012955196,0.77336234,0.000002705935,0.00063505553,0.03593662,0.1794779,0.00007123383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0093223555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011627633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18345296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048017153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003572631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308145989","doi":"10.1080/00909882.2022.2140595","title":"Dialogues for equity: precarious parent-scholars in times of crisis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Communication Research","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Autoethnography; Precarity; Equity (law); Sociology; Neoliberalism (international relations); Negotiation; Precarious work; Interdependence; Gender studies; Pandemic; Work (physics); Public relations; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Social science","score_opus":0.3523192259148563,"score_gpt":0.524580013642653,"score_spread":0.17226078772779674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308145989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52619064,0.0060919183,0.00027420127,0.10465972,0.0007923565,0.0029082934,0.000051822153,0.00003415521,0.35899693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959809,0.0013524682,0.0019836626,0.00007934798,0.000053674317,0.00014775713,0.000007172503,0.0000066461566,0.0003883701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972725,0.0010607095,0.0004197204,0.00007536242,0.0009664204,0.00020528893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977821,0.0011108163,0.00030186612,0.0003088653,0.00043190818,0.000064408974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0143137155,0.000039817787,0.0001437657,0.00031930415,0.000830437,0.00007186656,0.001040363,0.000031275355,0.0006984494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034819616,0.000041381063,0.00005576085,0.0005751781,0.000117522846,0.00015790123,0.00041125467,0.0006935505,0.0000036020078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088097993,0.0020536224,0.0023709368,0.00006717517,0.00015166205,0.0000017260701,0.2902603,0.0023935123,0.0013169801,0.45560035,0.16238359,0.082519196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058644527,0.00016418924,0.0014678144,0.000013702884,0.000012057133,5.2585983e-7,0.13027976,0.000023157489,0.00024383618,0.057639092,0.8095012,0.000068249916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007904482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030634447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64711756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036145665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057778106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7647531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308317817","doi":"10.1080/00909882.2022.2079915","title":"Documenting the mundane in quarantine","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Communication Research","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Quarantine; Novelty; Identity (music); Reflexivity; Narrative; Autoethnography; Repetition (rhetorical device); Sociology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Gender studies; Social science; Linguistics; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07167167684722614,"score_gpt":0.4247570701520456,"score_spread":0.3530853933048195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308317817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5102496,0.0023589504,0.0000205954,0.035972852,0.000115903276,0.00037412747,9.972753e-7,0.000013109265,0.45089385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965577,0.0011873712,0.0005038737,0.00018649967,0.00009135061,0.000030282514,7.7654016e-7,0.000006150802,0.0014359623],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662274,0.001538211,0.00032259885,0.00006803072,0.0012050319,0.00024341127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818605,0.0009350481,0.00026977356,0.0003717484,0.00019246148,0.000044912904],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017710013,0.00003888063,0.00011714292,0.00014054302,0.0028299529,0.00007293431,0.0015056547,0.000021040452,0.00045486094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016369528,0.000032230575,0.000061525505,0.0010337166,0.00073339674,0.00008563469,0.00028319992,0.0013235231,0.000010349782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035337958,0.0007187913,0.002375052,0.0000158264,0.00007566216,0.0000103121165,0.53634113,0.0013206849,0.004669219,0.29239926,0.100049615,0.061671056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025705036,0.000030502244,0.000688461,0.000006101476,0.0000023932657,0.0000016524447,0.2139391,0.000038408976,0.000024892157,0.0030586706,0.7819129,0.000039811403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012428736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028942432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6818633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043249727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040393628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327761215","doi":"10.1080/00909882.2023.2173532","title":"The labor of diversity in the 2020–2021 U.S. communication job market","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Communication Research","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes; McMaster University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Conceptualization; Job market; Public relations; Unemployment; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Law; Economic growth; Work (physics); Engineering","score_opus":0.3061623374633428,"score_gpt":0.4347190848653295,"score_spread":0.1285567474019867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327761215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67383516,0.0008786473,0.000006420841,0.098755054,0.000058699705,0.00046175133,0.000008981517,0.000009990315,0.22598527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794204,0.01983777,0.00012727054,0.0000753694,0.000035215977,0.0000053810227,0.0000029613327,0.0000025445247,0.00049304945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943034,0.0037034298,0.00035182267,0.00006756764,0.0013317176,0.00024204742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99435025,0.0037508048,0.00026637904,0.00085929333,0.0007249464,0.000048329246],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03438458,0.000046333767,0.0001237927,0.0001495832,0.0027829376,0.00010769546,0.0036443132,0.000072454626,0.00013318419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007178165,0.00003210589,0.000063284744,0.0017361348,0.00078852614,0.00015994521,0.0012608488,0.0008583866,0.00003487733],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063404144,0.00037756242,0.033659767,0.000038059025,0.000113573515,0.0000050463514,0.27870134,0.0001022581,0.00026100976,0.38230467,0.28286785,0.020934856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065292924,0.000055259105,0.29528335,0.00004751079,0.000015405343,8.143928e-7,0.45134613,0.00009408823,0.00008352617,0.071643785,0.18068624,0.00009097307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016999652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029777791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31066087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121321194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002443232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376107126","doi":"10.1080/00909882.2023.2206458","title":"Communication and decision-making of cesarean sections in China: an exploration of both obstetricians’ and patients’ perspectives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Communication Research","topic":"Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Distrust; Medicine; Maternity care; Family medicine; China; Nursing; Obstetrics; Psychology; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.12514799968075613,"score_gpt":0.45477472745639685,"score_spread":0.3296267277756407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376107126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967218,0.00095723645,0.000119861856,0.0006746766,0.000015265838,0.00025915026,0.0000089470705,0.0000058840164,0.0012371606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99211377,0.004954212,0.002853299,0.000006704652,0.000010634582,0.000013637678,0.000010465142,0.000008268803,0.000029037004],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862814,0.00020350904,0.00059066794,0.000082651364,0.00038952794,0.00010548688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980813,0.00056698016,0.0003137262,0.00038026375,0.00060195645,0.000055727516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018385163,0.00005561632,0.00021326212,0.00091127236,0.00015289409,0.000018743236,0.00020564158,0.000053326123,0.000025138654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027987757,0.000048764065,0.000031893946,0.0008241809,0.00017517038,0.00032137195,0.00016356188,0.000430106,9.974384e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0066691157,0.00592447,0.14913313,0.003459945,0.00023767403,0.000011240083,0.14589192,0.00082367624,0.0052429405,0.083653845,0.00076100824,0.598191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018213347,0.0011245116,0.93536025,0.0014955264,0.0000144512505,0.0000137157995,0.029257674,0.0018611957,0.00041337332,0.027962059,0.00060228724,0.000073628915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019093236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016705105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7862271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074007534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005924436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19885409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381248920","doi":"10.1080/00909882.2023.2222163","title":"A flow that comes when we’re talking: water metaphors for exploring intercultural communication during early childhood assessment interactions in a Yolŋu (First Nations Australian) community","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Communication Research","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Charles Darwin University; Speech Pathology Australia; Australian Government","keywords":"Ethnography; Intercultural communication; Reflexivity; Indigenous; Relevance (law); Metaphor; Sociology; Pedagogy; Political science; Social science; Anthropology; Ecology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.33448737306183246,"score_gpt":0.4619332120853241,"score_spread":0.12744583902349166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381248920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736255,0.00014058044,0.00008199364,0.017985476,0.00016584505,0.0011582598,0.000012908016,0.00010481381,0.006724616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921487,0.0011255518,0.004063893,0.000029672934,0.000057645146,0.001537493,0.00019798493,0.00005490045,0.0007841618],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951533,0.002138216,0.0011286447,0.00022156425,0.0007061801,0.000652065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99354756,0.002973383,0.00041641903,0.0022886721,0.00061647885,0.00015748884],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007417004,0.00024998872,0.00045470495,0.0019173677,0.002393918,0.0003587197,0.00275832,0.0001378694,0.00022871241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001993107,0.00021774015,0.00022795516,0.0011129642,0.0002438611,0.00087108347,0.0011479992,0.0033116054,0.00011884286],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015102831,0.0054053147,0.012158273,0.00042081464,0.0016143785,0.000012083368,0.9078975,0.00324522,0.012745855,0.023913356,0.008214217,0.02286275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006818531,0.0005262818,0.58371735,0.0016486433,0.00012950566,0.000059439997,0.3523161,0.0015199028,0.004350667,0.015078997,0.033083897,0.00075064495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072906015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028590567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57155913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069040636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000947186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395047501","doi":"10.1080/00909882.2024.2327417","title":"Learning mutual aid: food justice public pedagogy and community fridge organizing online","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Communication Research","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Reflexivity; Sociology; Public relations; Mutual aid; Economic Justice; Improvisation; Political science; Social science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.12025610322156724,"score_gpt":0.35636062867398133,"score_spread":0.2361045254524141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395047501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744373,0.0025692037,0.0000023090072,0.02030484,0.000046366094,0.00010387168,0.000011192404,0.000047540543,0.0024773756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971694,0.0019160463,0.00024077165,0.00007484375,0.00038105506,0.0000027432914,0.000048322345,0.0000026515374,0.00016419734],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791557,0.00085799815,0.00034610095,0.000121315585,0.00048391792,0.00027511743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971932,0.0019989214,0.00011467895,0.0001311609,0.00041359066,0.00014841497],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031432398,0.00010972939,0.00018553562,0.00006654494,0.0012363428,0.00041650882,0.00086630107,0.00012523259,0.00016130849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035901595,0.000043494892,0.000052697607,0.00091556134,0.00014868446,0.00022259975,0.000557447,0.0034143375,0.000029297384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114106544,0.0007582377,0.00023759487,0.00016583699,0.00017402685,0.000010377943,0.00851733,0.000009986883,0.64476603,0.014104741,0.011370106,0.31977162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008121202,0.0048632924,0.041838504,0.0004231325,0.00013117162,0.00038910226,0.23202048,0.00044664784,0.00887109,0.0068592075,0.70276463,0.0005806368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006188107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006284389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6913945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059379086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067550274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117647577","doi":"10.1080/00909882.2025.2591370","title":"Rooting in communication – rooting with community: conversations enabled by engaged scholarship","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Communication Research","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Community Based Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Organizational communication; Engaged scholarship; Scholarly communication","score_opus":0.10986617146295571,"score_gpt":0.4178164251495043,"score_spread":0.3079502536865486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117647577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79865056,0.0009800323,0.0002644764,0.013294549,0.000029960887,0.00056315155,0.0000012724007,0.000057107372,0.18615888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945842,0.001133409,0.0033468504,0.00028843686,0.00001878962,0.000054562413,0.00002837224,0.000017984205,0.00052740664],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716648,0.025973635,0.000735313,0.0001205525,0.0010391615,0.00046656013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852988,0.011343167,0.00047796042,0.0014620841,0.0012997799,0.000118224045],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05652984,0.00013658298,0.00030863253,0.00082168763,0.008157969,0.00044846645,0.0032756228,0.0001645565,0.00006626527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021479842,0.0001379382,0.000055891192,0.0023428947,0.00054060156,0.00045812712,0.0006700255,0.010754728,0.000014832288],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015533958,0.0035919393,0.09517241,0.00037291198,0.00064433843,0.000006254892,0.5038005,0.004942395,0.0073748943,0.2977425,0.008694584,0.076103896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002818087,0.00014138836,0.009630199,0.0013042215,0.000043440097,0.0000017687361,0.9009573,0.0002907737,0.0015637154,0.012094977,0.07088484,0.0002692796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0081172865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01684778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39715683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000724743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007333154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}