{"meta":{"query_hash":"f87978b50beb","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice"},"cohort_total":9,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":9,"exported":9,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f87978b50beb","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Applied+Linguistics+and+Professional+Practice"},"results":[{"id":"W1977590870","doi":"10.1558/japl.v7i3.341","title":"Professional explanations of disease trajectories","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Disease; Perspective (graphical); Socioeconomic status; Health care; Politics; Rhetorical question; Function (biology); Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Environmental health; Pathology; Population","score_opus":0.22406102663946045,"score_gpt":0.5923553008018837,"score_spread":0.3682942741624232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977590870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73027164,0.00047494378,0.0015127151,0.08412266,0.023888918,0.0048349737,0.0003646091,0.00007608032,0.15445347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784349,0.000096820826,0.011198061,0.007898306,0.0015117653,0.0000811274,0.0000066140874,0.00001812421,0.0007542834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964729,0.0005333238,0.0015708192,0.00016590653,0.0008911915,0.00036586644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845849,0.010287048,0.0017463914,0.00017349998,0.0026784367,0.00052969175],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00300907,0.00014921634,0.00033881154,0.00021363128,0.0007445729,0.000016646576,0.0002247536,0.00011668559,0.0007714215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024015533,0.000109615175,0.000047759822,0.00027718244,0.00014954858,0.00019050202,0.00012383221,0.00093787565,0.000051381234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023805124,0.00070704054,0.014624565,0.0015226483,0.00015788856,0.000020009307,0.030418495,0.000044892127,0.0027644031,0.71363175,0.23062871,0.0030990548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023289141,0.00021603006,0.05975972,0.0006193166,0.00015097405,0.000008174993,0.029642465,0.0001534021,0.00014029362,0.03103357,0.87566364,0.00028349765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049996434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004544479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6825982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077209654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028430196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9842056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981380484","doi":"10.1558/japl.v5i1.31","title":"Is it Relevant? The Role of Off-task Talk in Collaborative Learning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice","topic":"Educational and Psychological Assessments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Sociocultural evolution; Task (project management); Psychology; Insider; Collaborative learning; Sociocultural perspective; Cognition; Presentation (obstetrics); Action (physics); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.030822917721998584,"score_gpt":0.42371757341425864,"score_spread":0.39289465569226006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981380484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33357286,0.0069737993,0.000022224445,0.009201086,0.0043730987,0.00034415175,0.00002097563,0.0000048470315,0.64548695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99443,0.00026634344,0.0017103455,0.0017396101,0.0010220851,0.00000886777,0.0000025746203,0.000008921626,0.00081123784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985828,0.00026968992,0.0005288824,0.000106131294,0.00032432913,0.00018819295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953555,0.0030282573,0.0009623642,0.000091270194,0.0004695251,0.00009310853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018878818,0.000105537205,0.00020882976,0.00006671736,0.00011879546,0.000014537037,0.00014204228,0.0001108966,0.00040158056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019514359,0.00006419444,0.0000359258,0.00020893598,0.00007867761,0.000046724945,0.000045499026,0.00085994083,0.00001891377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057955943,0.0046877544,0.05419859,0.000059058453,0.0005941971,0.000034288918,0.07712696,0.000038869963,0.0019241993,0.79143935,0.0326985,0.031402636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058386987,0.00017096485,0.028682873,0.000061053324,0.00006699094,0.00003871579,0.04695169,0.00001099004,0.00006844525,0.012307479,0.9109643,0.00009263648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009965625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.208379e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8782658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020077965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013219705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43970257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000087892","doi":"10.1558/japl.v4i3.309","title":"Theoretical bases of a conceptual framework with reference to intercultural communicative competence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Communicative competence; Intercultural communication; Intercultural competence; Intercultural relations; Competence (human resources); Psychology; Cognition; Linguistics; Sociology; Pedagogy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.023808965133358482,"score_gpt":0.3148083251118028,"score_spread":0.2909993599784443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000087892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6138831,0.00012912569,0.0001562634,0.0012751688,0.0007101116,0.00013204868,0.0000188121,0.000012312619,0.3836831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97018725,0.000009119434,0.027767383,0.0013866926,0.0005575762,0.0000020435014,0.0000028477702,0.00000946504,0.0000776389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991105,0.00010448976,0.00032531586,0.000095496966,0.00025026314,0.000113934046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99511975,0.0034598361,0.0005147335,0.00013612641,0.00066320377,0.000106368345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007102532,0.000108624445,0.00023202595,0.000050801074,0.0002345156,0.000061989755,0.00021457444,0.000057184225,0.0008934781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049959645,0.00006475328,0.000025628822,0.000028512286,0.00082980416,0.000044285127,0.00008567163,0.0016135613,0.0000038765565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008080837,0.00010133206,0.000019797968,0.000014620052,0.000048103408,0.000010703555,0.068626374,0.000005464285,0.00027191706,0.92895395,0.00011349055,0.0010261827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007043052,0.00088716025,0.00010678969,0.00066923036,0.00016913339,0.000090933536,0.34314066,0.00006636356,0.00031390696,0.022474555,0.6311116,0.00026534696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033315402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029521789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90647936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000629667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000094027484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9782959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089308932","doi":"10.1558/japl.v2.i1.105","title":"Evaluative expressions in analystical arguments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argumentation theory; Psychology; Construct (python library); Linguistics; Mathematics education; Expression (computer science); Pedagogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.031908613593201046,"score_gpt":0.3845415010640496,"score_spread":0.35263288747084853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089308932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03700558,0.0011100895,0.00029131802,0.0008449672,0.0023749908,0.00017983287,0.00001055358,0.000008831759,0.9581738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99293023,0.000076082826,0.0036668815,0.0005763638,0.002063834,0.000002217182,0.0000023931932,0.000010716345,0.0006712686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836206,0.00007565339,0.0006633598,0.0001315516,0.00056445244,0.00020289548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647635,0.0020164244,0.000618479,0.00009238902,0.00069295184,0.000103418606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028549396,0.00012937223,0.0003007574,0.00023710834,0.00024620138,0.00006631461,0.0001226076,0.000047236448,0.00038359655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059069092,0.00008947165,0.000058622067,0.00007255652,0.00019987578,0.0000709034,0.00008877893,0.00052216044,0.000009062658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010554512,0.0006440338,0.00020385733,0.000028226419,0.00037521558,0.0002443682,0.03372148,0.00005268524,0.00014670567,0.9568163,0.0034468966,0.0032647708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018017304,0.00022110432,0.0012641072,0.0003955092,0.0009595597,0.000022036722,0.17307094,0.00018789392,0.00016459958,0.042855214,0.7786954,0.00036193166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016021291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006696782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95750254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004080994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107895205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70715487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150925661","doi":"10.1558/japl.v2.i2.185","title":"Perceptions of bilingual competence and preferred language direction in Auslan/English interpreters","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice","topic":"Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Interpreter; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Sign language; Linguistics; Language interpretation; First language; Psychology; Perception; Language proficiency; Indo-European languages; Language transfer; Competence (human resources); Language education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Comprehension approach; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03533780070202801,"score_gpt":0.4244226428702977,"score_spread":0.38908484216826966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150925661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9529136,0.00051961106,0.000050951738,0.0004111539,0.0018345958,0.00027991025,0.00001434347,0.00001653631,0.043959323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920942,0.00082148326,0.0059224325,0.0004456729,0.0005124383,0.0000103270195,0.0000049590526,0.0000132509285,0.00017518767],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980228,0.00050553394,0.000909647,0.0001329248,0.0002525117,0.00017660993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941203,0.0036698969,0.00097235385,0.00016585158,0.0009665073,0.00010508596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015413652,0.00011084248,0.00029938712,0.00017118899,0.00040407965,0.000005683215,0.00013878646,0.00015976749,0.00003232485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00828025,0.00009205628,0.000032603035,0.0001298664,0.00013696475,0.00004984909,0.00012908885,0.0013815211,0.0000018888575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008904129,0.0011469524,0.17042394,0.0021313366,0.00022273112,0.00010877945,0.73489445,0.0001681614,0.0062990594,0.063062154,0.0035934402,0.009044881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005773311,0.0013250017,0.19511701,0.007977929,0.00027920277,0.0003090752,0.67539215,0.0028947333,0.000244624,0.004112426,0.10573355,0.00084097456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012908773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037180474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10214011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006843851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005082681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801001831","doi":"10.1558/japl.27025","title":"Multilinguals’ and monolinguals’ use of awareness-raising activities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Multilingualism; Psychology; Active listening; Raising (metalworking); Consciousness raising; Cognitive psychology; Metalinguistics; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Teaching method; Communication; Mathematics","score_opus":0.062493167541753214,"score_gpt":0.3396412939835896,"score_spread":0.2771481264418364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801001831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587244,0.0006199639,0.0004106408,0.00032894438,0.0023400134,0.00011838586,0.00001088857,0.000024612444,0.037422184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99089533,0.000118319746,0.005949774,0.00034098735,0.0022088664,9.35715e-7,0.0000020344196,0.000023103297,0.00046066917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867266,0.00017146215,0.0005422378,0.00014216083,0.00031167155,0.00015980423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939414,0.004317334,0.0010710778,0.000102028745,0.00047154923,0.00009658734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016355539,0.0001567087,0.0003558072,0.00014108098,0.00047937874,0.00018507038,0.000082986655,0.00007541797,0.000030099958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00810347,0.00012189635,0.000047545567,0.000023461353,0.00020227591,0.00013701229,0.00007310535,0.0006978494,8.673307e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013417043,0.0003964553,0.0010698537,0.0004222623,0.00025387816,0.000024475987,0.11712462,0.000493936,0.0015038756,0.8346244,0.0008205488,0.041923974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008292553,0.00029316585,0.0002899737,0.00051019253,0.00022474665,0.000036388854,0.01477629,0.0013899638,0.00045900926,0.008546642,0.9723834,0.0002610042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000077269695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010631318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9715628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011442387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012143762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97011966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908372700","doi":"10.1558/japl.32093","title":"The death of scientific evidence in Canadian policymaking:","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Ideology; Representation (politics); Government (linguistics); Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Positive economics; Law; Politics; Linguistics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.06227154528047897,"score_gpt":0.36718162015182376,"score_spread":0.3049100748713448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908372700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08061805,0.0058363755,0.000015860054,0.016068501,0.0053648637,0.0002434947,0.000031154686,0.0000058212527,0.8918159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99684197,0.00028063302,0.00024594297,0.0001987143,0.0009479421,0.0000017226008,1.8509942e-7,0.0000059749123,0.0014769059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989199,0.00006170115,0.00041083823,0.000089251334,0.00032749178,0.00019081628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959049,0.0025749072,0.00055726315,0.00011521405,0.00075921294,0.00008847099],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023904257,0.000076043994,0.00016091783,0.00016392139,0.00048354574,0.000118055475,0.00018390162,0.000023907465,0.00007135971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01009464,0.000035889,0.000037684087,0.000047180703,0.000387894,0.0000745791,0.000052266783,0.00017376232,0.00000346345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011167468,0.000030415535,0.00047805256,0.0000115260555,0.000058118254,0.000017163697,0.0052266913,0.0000014817176,0.000049653878,0.9901006,0.0012461536,0.0026684718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002144346,0.000040334096,0.0005923795,0.00047348684,0.00010561697,0.000006228948,0.009593653,0.000009754425,0.00005633807,0.033461154,0.95536345,0.00008315084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005641725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037223585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95663947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000516826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005863091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99824375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109875226","doi":"10.1558/jalpp.40427","title":"Inscribed objects in professional practices","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inscribed figure; Semiotics; Reflexivity; Conversation; Linguistics; Constitution; Relevance (law); Sociology; Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Social science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.04370054267949771,"score_gpt":0.3771662252157357,"score_spread":0.333465682536238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109875226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038650483,0.0012471754,0.0000035887474,0.0050868248,0.009867328,0.0002331809,0.00001412947,0.000011600946,0.9448857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893302,0.00028568314,0.0013163311,0.0008484474,0.0041698427,0.000007785988,0.0000027865672,0.000018907362,0.004020049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982278,0.00010596581,0.0006513599,0.00019463201,0.0005908224,0.00022947304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936444,0.001330272,0.0038370597,0.0002651912,0.0008246204,0.00009846544],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019520121,0.0001873299,0.00040289765,0.00017775739,0.0010980777,0.00043165544,0.00038898102,0.000075694064,0.00024849732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019438738,0.00013205735,0.00007126746,0.000027447235,0.000380067,0.00034500682,0.00025720315,0.00083616783,0.000013377222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014360723,0.00085956824,0.0007381719,0.000118889395,0.0003855803,0.00037149512,0.039556958,0.000014557349,0.00009890537,0.9395493,0.0133834705,0.0034869993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001293954,0.00012533076,0.001353564,0.00039894145,0.00033972025,0.000025775793,0.06617033,0.00006205323,0.00004748373,0.018552518,0.91135645,0.00027387284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000097452285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003360387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95067966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003278155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031157024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98882097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201996901","doi":"10.1558/jalpp.21053","title":"Mobilizing knowledge","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Citation; Situated; Government (linguistics); Commission; Linguistics; Speech act; Function (biology); Indirect speech; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Medicine","score_opus":0.030029296965206634,"score_gpt":0.35219433671637573,"score_spread":0.3221650397511691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201996901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004853697,0.0013805416,0.000031381314,0.0004735928,0.0035145273,0.00006079058,0.0000040064824,0.00000969143,0.98967177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816379,0.000113361886,0.0024684293,0.000671337,0.012510343,0.0000018704748,9.558298e-7,0.000013751962,0.0025820355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905884,0.000045176053,0.0003981759,0.00010801425,0.00024952576,0.00014026272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971849,0.00078770873,0.0005353519,0.000096008785,0.0013248206,0.00007121184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009529286,0.00011310314,0.00022652668,0.00010158948,0.00048755665,0.00010818857,0.00012572073,0.00003399111,0.00047884174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025269445,0.00007813289,0.000053951768,0.000038846792,0.00039189385,0.00006361217,0.00009783923,0.0003046915,0.00004236277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023141594,0.00020039368,0.000008926423,0.000027894772,0.00022933481,0.000018257777,0.035781693,0.0000012786543,0.00004798468,0.9378393,0.021163136,0.0044503626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002610993,0.00013151416,0.000012019172,0.00007683438,0.0002581798,0.000011288317,0.03563754,0.00003798919,0.00006510804,0.0098849265,0.9535185,0.000105015424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000071374075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031180098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98708975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001714881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011503618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52429813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}