{"meta":{"query_hash":"95ca7ae14edc","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy"},"cohort_total":80,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":80,"exported":80,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/95ca7ae14edc","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Applied+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W1777881526","doi":"10.1111/japp.12141","title":"Real‐World Love Drugs: Reply to <scp>N</scp>yholm","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Philosophy of love; Argument (complex analysis); Romance; sort; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Philosophy; True love; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science; Literature; Business; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.09033557131280645,"score_gpt":0.3287252332511948,"score_spread":0.23838966193838834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1777881526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001556695,0.00086758856,0.00008318526,0.9919477,0.0060755718,0.0000037485686,0.000012006898,0.000008163682,0.0008462867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027457639,0.00043829478,0.00010687763,0.9906915,0.0046989066,0.000021686688,0.0000044087383,0.000012727395,0.0012798418],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908935,0.0038818298,0.000680768,0.0015609253,0.0022984282,0.0006845578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598989,0.031151881,0.0013038012,0.0012085825,0.0050667115,0.0013702286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012655811,0.0008977978,0.0016139762,0.0009337675,0.008754074,0.00602954,0.0053546545,0.07583354,0.0045849085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047656834,0.0009651226,0.0016170024,0.0012528826,0.0147229135,0.009074684,0.004655901,0.09498433,0.0029786653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026516742,0.000014266752,0.00015816433,0.00007291211,0.000012928171,0.00046272334,0.000993801,0.00006250734,0.000084769694,0.017907351,0.9767091,0.003495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049625698,0.000038630806,0.0008976267,0.00064650486,0.00003212006,0.0009524363,0.003678745,0.00053849566,0.0004222708,0.034401577,0.95819485,0.0001471462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016794266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018912708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07583354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007925642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008958722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06693113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935024517","doi":"10.1111/japp.12069","title":"Why Should We Save Nature's Hidden Gems?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Argument (complex analysis); Natural (archaeology); Aesthetic value; Aesthetics; Taste; Environmental ethics; Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Psychology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02009919059838753,"score_gpt":0.23941302510338808,"score_spread":0.21931383450500055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1935024517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1867599,0.0066594444,0.011864277,0.38004082,0.0024580297,0.000045836347,0.00004757815,0.00008269913,0.41204143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537568,0.0009112816,0.0015049367,0.010234936,0.00015610544,0.000012591934,0.000008888086,0.000020823447,0.033393465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989988,0.00043458963,0.000015929149,0.00010899434,0.00022250328,0.00021917283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991166,0.0002737776,0.00007209706,0.00013480362,0.00021583775,0.00018689534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020642597,0.0001664768,0.00016250675,0.00026196244,0.0052378504,0.0031964811,0.0006134178,0.0024403168,0.0026557748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022942438,0.000096258234,0.00014178212,0.00025448398,0.019693175,0.0022743316,0.0016461452,0.003228687,0.0003346405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034212855,0.00003313343,0.0019404476,0.00008168507,0.00001059004,0.00045400657,0.029701056,0.0005176721,0.0011052296,0.9076514,0.03899157,0.019479018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002361202,0.00006388178,0.0053410823,0.00033033846,0.000022167289,0.00054483186,0.03547799,0.00089489674,0.0013965877,0.32059294,0.635276,0.00003564832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043900613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08603038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043900613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005196066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031473613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08729017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950612791","doi":"10.1111/japp.12040","title":"Exploitation, Justice, and Parity in International Clinical Research","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Citizenship; Law and economics; Parity (physics); Law; Deadlock; Subject (documents); Transactional leadership; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.6055928016743222,"score_gpt":0.6121652703710433,"score_spread":0.006572468696721123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950612791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16231118,0.0066260165,0.1873063,0.1828345,0.0010599219,0.0004997997,0.00008772145,0.00007953404,0.459195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98070085,0.0004538599,0.011912707,0.0042011645,0.00020688974,0.0003704083,0.000012226773,0.000018045854,0.0021238872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7991746,0.15792766,0.008714871,0.0072313375,0.020702027,0.0062495023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83728385,0.11422699,0.012327661,0.021100104,0.00949012,0.0055712205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15411595,0.00040403,0.0016778567,0.002118024,0.007097389,0.015389673,0.0025826846,0.006005175,0.003991914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17080885,0.00077452883,0.00074834103,0.0017389859,0.08324721,0.017066598,0.02492902,0.008636205,0.0003660366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024145429,0.000020599098,0.0006377829,0.00003640924,0.000010828503,0.000050977862,0.0023781182,0.00015516907,0.00007791364,0.99136764,0.00033981077,0.004900736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025155354,0.000038733346,0.0004587929,0.00013022272,0.000008504092,0.0000987107,0.0009977522,0.00040846065,0.00012135616,0.99356633,0.00413418,0.000011781972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009552986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080675224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15411595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060620625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010883143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81505275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001015618","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2005.00292.x","title":"Fatherhood and Child Support: Do Men Have a Right to Choose?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Abortion; Differential treatment; Child support; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Economics; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.013850035561207459,"score_gpt":0.274322794917293,"score_spread":0.26047275935608555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001015618","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31642693,0.03149042,0.0040619806,0.36887679,0.0012988381,0.000027470842,0.00010461653,0.000012710769,0.27770022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837262,0.0026481894,0.00019900486,0.007576138,0.00025351698,0.000009539888,0.000008019123,0.0000033757633,0.005576016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634856,0.0026642634,0.000060682687,0.0001695033,0.00033292067,0.00042411912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99523854,0.0032755816,0.00051185116,0.00016547908,0.00016496982,0.0006436386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005854863,0.00014605645,0.00035386372,0.00037394124,0.002597069,0.0037217243,0.00055589783,0.0024025925,0.00846115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009174168,0.00014174655,0.00013423109,0.00034264752,0.012667191,0.0033345402,0.0024817395,0.0026961213,0.0003275384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007963036,0.00007367133,0.009860561,0.00007744065,0.000014849388,0.00044671036,0.050191168,0.00014115228,0.00013983295,0.91064674,0.0064990576,0.021829158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007747967,0.0001914835,0.015088535,0.0010029527,0.000028113669,0.0014925976,0.100172035,0.00042590458,0.0003655405,0.6209658,0.26014566,0.000044008204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021179465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032443053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00846115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010340421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012459483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030963838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007979396","doi":"10.1111/japp.12007","title":"The Human Right to Subsistence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Subsistence agriculture; Human rights; Argument (complex analysis); Meaning (existential); Right to food; Subsistence economy; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Positive economics; Economics; Philosophy; History; Agriculture; Food security; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04324374214290207,"score_gpt":0.3176574348981043,"score_spread":0.2744136927552022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007979396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036415596,0.0065398724,0.036642373,0.17983668,0.0009093297,0.000050736722,0.0001751498,0.000068950954,0.7393614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625998,0.0019797652,0.004694944,0.011017336,0.00068937754,0.00007972639,0.000057589736,0.00003352772,0.018847873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943646,0.003258627,0.0001536185,0.0007221703,0.0009957228,0.000505203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945018,0.0032528709,0.00034320925,0.0007686288,0.0008305879,0.00030281267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059538735,0.00025729206,0.0005699269,0.0009698277,0.0029278467,0.0051136734,0.0008830219,0.004043067,0.006694652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008785177,0.00019519206,0.0004032866,0.0006465277,0.044203326,0.005387674,0.004181942,0.0046826093,0.00083726353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028780664,0.0000027659835,0.000041968757,0.000008964428,0.0000016437951,0.000008693636,0.00027624326,0.000055449345,0.000044882323,0.99747086,0.0008565317,0.0012292229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036563742,0.000004343899,0.00008661978,0.000052194617,0.0000027616293,0.00001617512,0.00020938643,0.000097255026,0.000092523034,0.97792065,0.021510564,0.0000038224302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027023854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015436404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006694652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030302727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031860296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031487465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026163012","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00361.x","title":"Other‐Consciousness and the Use of Animals as Illustrated in Medical Experiments","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Empathy; Psychology; Sentience; Moral responsibility; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.15412652765442186,"score_gpt":0.3252963515426744,"score_spread":0.17116982388825253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026163012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73828703,0.0030529043,0.037772458,0.010750092,0.0002491918,0.00024810433,0.000031334996,0.0001070985,0.20950179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929351,0.00030524697,0.0050754314,0.0005151571,0.000017272137,0.0000701168,0.000004388477,0.000009223481,0.0010680219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820815,0.015307772,0.0003517973,0.0005476293,0.0012982099,0.00041315355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98202986,0.012681265,0.001685508,0.0023408192,0.00047044168,0.0007920472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013760318,0.00029559276,0.00032614864,0.0008779751,0.0015991216,0.0023299095,0.000661218,0.0017671038,0.0027553628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018789906,0.00023713351,0.00028296193,0.00032736917,0.022487672,0.0024810277,0.004759067,0.0017422878,0.00017319105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008083201,0.0007944802,0.009611597,0.0008803618,0.00013407378,0.0015358016,0.0838614,0.0009810624,0.07073029,0.75057405,0.0019774113,0.07811108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042765288,0.004831489,0.04669164,0.0011931986,0.00023149065,0.006660728,0.03795213,0.0034160702,0.05840808,0.67588615,0.16400805,0.00029340398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019013412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023887992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013760318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091700634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006744691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07277238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039149379","doi":"10.1111/1468-5930.00186","title":"Nancy B and Nancy F","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Nothing; Argument (complex analysis); Significant difference; Slippery slope; Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.07848720679656264,"score_gpt":0.44148442760122064,"score_spread":0.362997220804658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039149379","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044218358,0.012313295,0.0032324058,0.67057127,0.024579521,0.00007312161,0.00014308764,0.00014839607,0.2845171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.063803084,0.006101459,0.003664356,0.23710293,0.0037058783,0.00017742757,0.00014094038,0.00020910085,0.68509483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982103,0.00048261933,0.000045018136,0.000368152,0.00063159195,0.00026227924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654466,0.00090199336,0.0001707442,0.00014437022,0.0012387887,0.0009994602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024135527,0.00051187596,0.00038606324,0.00081076584,0.0046353885,0.0033633888,0.00080776145,0.0047720713,0.038911875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010186827,0.000257028,0.0002753295,0.00051281706,0.0020235125,0.0031250059,0.0023812912,0.006245211,0.01127928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041150714,0.000017574741,0.00095659296,0.00004361354,0.0000055420905,0.00027076638,0.00051213184,0.00007857793,0.00016319781,0.07447048,0.89300275,0.030437538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009455182,0.0000104555165,0.0006328292,0.00007626363,0.0000027609674,0.0002756508,0.00049017527,0.00014728152,0.0002011447,0.011650922,0.9864863,0.000016827802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014269206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014032144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038911875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027461227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040738774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1301732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046043772","doi":"10.1111/1468-5930.00170","title":"Good Soldiers, A Traditional Approach","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cruelty; Courage; Virtue; Moral courage; Law; Harm; Dimension (graph theory); Psychology; Battlefield; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.12808098535980755,"score_gpt":0.23643978420642695,"score_spread":0.10835879884661939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046043772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04169717,0.0093572745,0.054403447,0.11909572,0.0025121567,0.00019426657,0.00010881695,0.00010938817,0.7725218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8411906,0.004673481,0.015099271,0.022831418,0.0017471117,0.00021266993,0.000058726793,0.0000898062,0.11409693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694866,0.0014474181,0.00009251675,0.0005231825,0.00069525617,0.00029303788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980934,0.00052965706,0.00023072302,0.00030413384,0.00047858973,0.00036352285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004448711,0.0006835125,0.0004682946,0.0022162178,0.005011142,0.0050642104,0.0013201822,0.003055422,0.0074381423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051936214,0.00026988902,0.00029707773,0.0006134918,0.03435301,0.006817049,0.0038384923,0.004527084,0.0013502608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006623735,0.000014081211,0.00033303833,0.00003380888,0.0000043805358,0.000039238214,0.0025421977,0.000080171245,0.00004953032,0.9873354,0.0036029322,0.0059586484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014003192,0.000047380272,0.00065350457,0.00014779398,0.000010219133,0.00018410773,0.0039266036,0.00041515398,0.00012002555,0.8148785,0.17958948,0.000013243523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028265628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049164207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074381423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040705474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025051725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029534042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054172929","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00342.x","title":"Iraq: A Morally Justified Resort to War","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Argument (complex analysis); Just war theory; Morality; Law; Spanish Civil War; Proportionality (law); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; History; Politics","score_opus":0.047799835661865936,"score_gpt":0.24008576791502126,"score_spread":0.19228593225315532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054172929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24340619,0.001003623,0.013870149,0.0783561,0.0010450041,0.00008596522,0.00005120696,0.000057621543,0.66212416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879611,0.00018718868,0.00053169404,0.003422295,0.00013417982,0.000021682677,0.000006114014,0.000010824618,0.007724922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939818,0.003782739,0.00015594457,0.00028654106,0.0007319636,0.0010610097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965239,0.001565908,0.0004095238,0.00035884778,0.0009166667,0.00022513575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004845191,0.0002984671,0.0003381288,0.00066637964,0.0067452583,0.0049356055,0.00091426907,0.005849076,0.0048117046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075953957,0.00017819092,0.0003114182,0.00058042933,0.027991155,0.0023057677,0.004618856,0.005268019,0.00056995783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020430856,0.000022733006,0.00051215506,0.000024339995,0.000006046594,0.00039192056,0.013672929,0.0002013183,0.00024791187,0.97909456,0.002971054,0.0028345587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006192771,0.00015255828,0.0031816396,0.00045210103,0.000024427254,0.0006668278,0.05819349,0.0015167589,0.0010761906,0.69385666,0.24075016,0.00006734696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00645427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069494923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067452583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037787922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036486848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027417123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056697798","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00364.x","title":"Equality, Justice, and Paternalism: Recentreing Debate about Physician-Assisted Suicide","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Autonomy; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Bioethics; Physician assisted suicide; Assisted suicide; Beneficence; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.10697190516270673,"score_gpt":0.43664445783216,"score_spread":0.3296725526694533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056697798","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021534,0.038954686,0.0033325388,0.86624676,0.0028928427,0.0000113349215,0.000012502026,0.000006399401,0.067008965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8235661,0.02519628,0.0012743803,0.13323005,0.009482287,0.000028671997,0.000014008387,0.000020473644,0.0071877106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9694166,0.022157587,0.0009767145,0.0013480744,0.0044750893,0.0016259748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92862976,0.06176163,0.0025274241,0.0011503481,0.004237667,0.0016931839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043532666,0.00027541746,0.00075636903,0.0012322757,0.008786896,0.0113502955,0.0024256883,0.024152474,0.0022741528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041860852,0.00043360214,0.0006278848,0.0017530759,0.05561879,0.008191001,0.006634894,0.02279757,0.00025678184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020580968,0.000018349014,0.00015801277,0.000082402024,0.0000064038027,0.0001477182,0.0073176986,0.00015908813,0.000045770652,0.98048776,0.0054388745,0.0061173653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054272947,0.00007179685,0.001703103,0.0011598215,0.000021643782,0.0004393039,0.012907667,0.0010181692,0.0003899377,0.74011827,0.2420637,0.000052299612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010178773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01071848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043532666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01403095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008348453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2302255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063734872","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00338.x","title":"A Living Will Clause for Supporters of Animal Experimentation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association for Co-operative Education; Suncor Energy (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Misfortune; Democracy; Sign (mathematics); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.11462184059586487,"score_gpt":0.3785454714203166,"score_spread":0.2639236308244517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063734872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009656994,0.0041131424,0.03328571,0.3386826,0.005138205,0.00019090682,0.0001033401,0.00014650406,0.6086825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4943232,0.0019158691,0.027087841,0.30011436,0.0059604435,0.0009915185,0.00011527297,0.0002141826,0.16927736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.975552,0.013285021,0.0015860999,0.001951433,0.0061348113,0.0014905843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9640987,0.023795102,0.0021133544,0.0035405748,0.0050311903,0.0014211744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037827257,0.000588723,0.000713265,0.00068838533,0.008729083,0.007816565,0.0019061537,0.020287195,0.010634836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054288507,0.00066368055,0.0009446942,0.0005782965,0.030210834,0.013694514,0.007533756,0.02423379,0.0024521647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010636882,0.000007760661,0.000035304536,0.000014932696,0.0000022203071,0.000024366766,0.00080467324,0.000022706408,0.00011427615,0.9906467,0.006977528,0.0013388812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007419176,0.00006904935,0.0002813099,0.00021397643,0.000022595315,0.0001913906,0.0008774852,0.00034181873,0.00045761716,0.5711404,0.42628366,0.00004642585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022911048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027293817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037827257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028709865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045319004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20005202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070916542","doi":"10.1111/1468-5930.00222","title":"Capital Punishment, Restoration and Moral Rightness","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Fantasy; Capital punishment; Opposition (politics); Restitution; Punishment (psychology); Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Philosophy; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.05082886597063347,"score_gpt":0.2267238373267597,"score_spread":0.17589497135612622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070916542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093636595,0.0035393813,0.036598936,0.03643361,0.00047237336,0.000055009183,0.000022460148,0.000090074456,0.8291516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98245287,0.00046998117,0.0019995926,0.0017520202,0.000064342945,0.000036140245,0.0000071518484,0.000016786575,0.013201278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755377,0.0010897124,0.00007138038,0.00031058368,0.000539079,0.00043551283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980332,0.00071714853,0.0003482046,0.00034824677,0.00026131875,0.0002918515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025598248,0.00031181096,0.0003053559,0.0005520257,0.0023591262,0.0037483221,0.0006412376,0.002999414,0.0038032872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046627363,0.00014789795,0.00033349523,0.00023407086,0.028411103,0.0035251633,0.0034122553,0.0038811567,0.00033091436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004731448,0.0000073549413,0.0000673562,0.000008268247,0.0000018901665,0.00003987371,0.00042261966,0.00012889878,0.00010322303,0.9969994,0.00051413244,0.0017022926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016483627,0.000013328291,0.00034522096,0.000023291417,0.000002187875,0.000083078885,0.0003114438,0.00037309722,0.00015844265,0.98429894,0.014367037,0.000007344545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019483486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001745875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038032872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028722384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015543344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020839691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076362515","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00382.x","title":"The Moral Psychology of Conflicts of Interest: Insights from Affective Neuroscience","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Normative; Irrationality; Neuroethics; Deception; Conflict of interest; Moral psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Rationality; Neuroscience; Political science","score_opus":0.189879244467696,"score_gpt":0.3282893007915307,"score_spread":0.13841005632383468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076362515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39741415,0.01647703,0.083405405,0.08244635,0.000587227,0.000050161194,0.000064320964,0.000041650183,0.41951364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99521977,0.0012145138,0.002016108,0.0007906087,0.000110132605,0.000009668171,0.000004534856,0.000003946276,0.0006306878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973858,0.0016607834,0.000061715655,0.00014293267,0.0005894587,0.00015925171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99209994,0.0054697483,0.0010157938,0.00028364302,0.00067228737,0.0004585793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039399406,0.00020601017,0.00022958395,0.00085572904,0.0011584912,0.0044210954,0.0005052877,0.0016701969,0.0018023117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01236141,0.00014413062,0.00019881711,0.0004914564,0.01320368,0.0045102527,0.0019022377,0.0024226913,0.00012233255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004421969,0.0000860623,0.0026232465,0.00011815568,0.000019741106,0.00020685731,0.006855042,0.0016801439,0.0010806037,0.9632218,0.001159438,0.022904614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012826,0.00001704845,0.0043790974,0.00006969503,0.0000059478134,0.00019308085,0.0019251159,0.0022537233,0.00024432834,0.9851586,0.0057280436,0.0000124153785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067373895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051000825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044210954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017265084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007345186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020836651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078117039","doi":"10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00263.x","title":"Capacities, Context and the Moral Status of Animals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Intellect; Epistemology; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08876108472863845,"score_gpt":0.2600836443225862,"score_spread":0.17132255959394774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078117039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6394889,0.005000082,0.014435182,0.005697989,0.00016772903,0.000030568805,0.00005239733,0.000041519095,0.3350857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970438,0.00041382015,0.0012729199,0.00016007047,0.000017263164,0.000009585781,0.000007254902,0.0000049284163,0.0010703144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863464,0.0008531731,0.000047051828,0.00015390669,0.0001587003,0.00015255962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981287,0.0007032027,0.00045357927,0.0001757141,0.00017595959,0.00036280457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015534941,0.0002483307,0.00020945129,0.0007484751,0.0019274666,0.003854902,0.00046887927,0.0009717909,0.0026117545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042822,0.00018135308,0.00015936956,0.00030729803,0.017906858,0.003880823,0.0033795408,0.0012451273,0.00024197155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087400185,0.000034466928,0.006503991,0.00010954277,0.000028277436,0.00027185056,0.012254739,0.00095441495,0.0025118834,0.96074694,0.00068527664,0.015811186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019521272,0.00010538829,0.01638979,0.0001546356,0.000022604549,0.00043745097,0.006560338,0.0008374623,0.00074986496,0.9455113,0.029163163,0.000048610247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080670917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011249926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003854902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009707179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050226226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008737206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094161273","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00387.x","title":"A Reply to Cholbi's ‘Suicide Intervention and Non‐Ideal Kantian Theory’","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Ideal (ethics); Morality; Rationality; Irrational number; Commit; Paternalism; Philosophy; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.023412852971586424,"score_gpt":0.27465330060993687,"score_spread":0.25124044763835046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094161273","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009693887,0.0029808434,0.0022441202,0.9862367,0.0021944393,0.0000053518647,0.000016103615,0.000019862982,0.0053331335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12357191,0.0056054876,0.0034494451,0.8482702,0.006943641,0.000120231176,0.000035397392,0.0000984583,0.0119052725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882456,0.0070534567,0.0005368477,0.0011167892,0.0023403615,0.00070690765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733533,0.020282583,0.00090270233,0.0011768322,0.0033597823,0.0009248173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02183899,0.0006132892,0.0011007572,0.0011064837,0.004736079,0.004446853,0.0030787825,0.029537816,0.006950559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046031974,0.0005604781,0.00083875266,0.001068581,0.025077153,0.010249254,0.005210717,0.034104683,0.0022522684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057231013,0.000034953737,0.00011894593,0.00011969617,0.0000133113745,0.000091426635,0.002606109,0.00018388339,0.000093922645,0.7333305,0.25464076,0.008709253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008846418,0.000037061785,0.000450416,0.00041839998,0.00001297101,0.00022891724,0.0015213167,0.0009273155,0.00030362545,0.6127286,0.38322333,0.000059666643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005482097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044569424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029537816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006919591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056422004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11549699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115213813","doi":"10.1111/japp.12084","title":"Comic Immoralism and Relatively Funny Jokes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Comics; Literature; Psychology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.07541071611739873,"score_gpt":0.2545362362568509,"score_spread":0.17912552013945215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115213813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8106169,0.0009652074,0.01206678,0.0047845277,0.00021759035,0.00003627211,0.000037141348,0.00007276557,0.17120281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985145,0.000034734097,0.00027599328,0.00011572302,0.000021217142,0.0000042871798,0.0000050598305,0.0000042770525,0.0010243198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982364,0.0008178229,0.00010670607,0.00019897312,0.00042418062,0.00021576055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992374,0.0031916786,0.002058854,0.00081302464,0.0009319978,0.0006304528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016390964,0.00025171108,0.00032368914,0.00097231695,0.0018308555,0.00281615,0.00043404775,0.0014384333,0.0034000054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007912501,0.0001991028,0.00020655045,0.00034144265,0.010177538,0.0021058605,0.003818635,0.0017192323,0.00023282641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007833264,0.00045321792,0.03627537,0.0005464986,0.000114489405,0.0068542687,0.06793885,0.00066335965,0.013512162,0.8338225,0.00527807,0.033757836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081044134,0.00031315026,0.047171433,0.00029896086,0.000067203386,0.01245089,0.040210173,0.0038502386,0.0078703305,0.85261,0.034988705,0.00008793055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051421055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034000054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007809273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041521128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011374116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119571480","doi":"10.1111/japp.12145","title":"Is There a Right to Surrogacy?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Ottawa; Fondation Brocher","keywords":"Harm; Interpretation (philosophy); State (computer science); Law and economics; Vulnerability (computing); Law; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.06660661995806746,"score_gpt":0.32523250132906645,"score_spread":0.25862588137099896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119571480","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027742172,0.012761775,0.030662749,0.51893973,0.0014989062,0.00006444871,0.000086325745,0.00003533222,0.40820855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9109338,0.007294401,0.0072887754,0.0459268,0.0010401001,0.00015368743,0.00003410484,0.00004584876,0.027282441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904919,0.006174922,0.00026205412,0.00071411364,0.0018804675,0.00047657316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914283,0.006497866,0.00054958736,0.0005709581,0.0006025796,0.0003505832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012666296,0.00021258165,0.000594678,0.0005935019,0.004288941,0.0070204367,0.0012011331,0.0068271323,0.0056086904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01484469,0.00026132906,0.0004845903,0.0007131267,0.044696238,0.008087558,0.004031352,0.00785558,0.0006608476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002684231,0.0000030811977,0.00006481279,0.000010174982,0.000001108195,0.00002235423,0.0010185409,0.00004344599,0.00003438792,0.99662894,0.0010132293,0.0011572501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055675173,0.000011713888,0.00012179107,0.00020137809,0.0000042571364,0.00010137995,0.001508235,0.00025383435,0.00009186698,0.93409145,0.06360085,0.000007786503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023563495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015920753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012666296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045650583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038618795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06698662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122233165","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00383.x","title":"Resources and the Rule of Rescue<sup>1</sup>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Obligation; Context (archaeology); Resource (disambiguation); Moral obligation; Law and economics; Resource allocation; Business; Economics; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.053719326149193225,"score_gpt":0.40659429842354755,"score_spread":0.3528749722743543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122233165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05149919,0.0026588948,0.16891962,0.09257093,0.001567766,0.00020574883,0.00017201438,0.00011311272,0.68229276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9493422,0.0006188826,0.024469048,0.007117958,0.00044368661,0.00020078145,0.000049215345,0.00004874687,0.017709436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9780804,0.013510154,0.0016985759,0.002006275,0.0034628084,0.0012418256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97731596,0.015862834,0.0014974521,0.001900752,0.0029707295,0.00045224337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018873554,0.00029614675,0.00091036,0.0011838153,0.003578284,0.0056311144,0.001668049,0.005924834,0.0045647076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021259625,0.0004469425,0.0010258122,0.00059413555,0.030968469,0.0075747347,0.0043757237,0.0062975693,0.0010554494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003837468,0.000002825715,0.000028118722,0.0000115467365,0.0000021779633,0.00003384395,0.00029740544,0.00026118246,0.00003581629,0.9977315,0.0007776344,0.0008140027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086100745,0.000008083281,0.000055619956,0.00004953541,0.000002907584,0.000049525584,0.000210624,0.00092754717,0.00009840383,0.986505,0.012073155,0.000010971339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003440227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016690015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018873554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040808055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038159348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09981412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132377965","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00333.x","title":"Authentic Education and Moral Responsibility","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Dialectic; Epistemology; Moral education; Sociology; Moral responsibility; Moral philosophy; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.04756807476837063,"score_gpt":0.35253974997761706,"score_spread":0.3049716752092464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132377965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04686521,0.0028754452,0.09463835,0.058091477,0.00039712925,0.000111735906,0.000042291504,0.00008778059,0.7968906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828608,0.0005382456,0.004451661,0.0012924365,0.00010799575,0.000054669174,0.00001315009,0.000022927581,0.010658071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988643,0.008209065,0.0002896851,0.00085721293,0.0013885592,0.0006124504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99241155,0.0041219187,0.0009402672,0.0010486647,0.0007803226,0.0006972116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008041765,0.00040044976,0.00034680218,0.000885033,0.0045792926,0.007662219,0.0011219399,0.0045099957,0.0058653215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012783464,0.00022247214,0.00047295203,0.00052288803,0.05539067,0.0076448577,0.007894042,0.0061648334,0.00069956045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014714544,0.0000051649145,0.000057151996,0.000008258967,9.786373e-7,0.000021840955,0.0015873685,0.00008665006,0.000018949311,0.996935,0.00025516466,0.0010219901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000754813,0.000012342889,0.00011056505,0.000066621644,0.0000025306588,0.00007191271,0.0013328312,0.00036140974,0.0001358764,0.9716551,0.026237093,0.0000061341643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001806276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009782927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008041765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00501505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039766696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042529464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133179509","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2010.00492.x","title":"Combat Trauma and the Moral Risks of Memory Manipulating Drugs","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Posttraumatic stress; Military service; Moral injury; Psychiatry; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08657595068658226,"score_gpt":0.33740625764771576,"score_spread":0.2508303069611335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133179509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40082425,0.036495306,0.0061369333,0.18134357,0.0011752336,0.00009470381,0.000076150376,0.000047925227,0.37380597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786791,0.004780976,0.0006812517,0.010777533,0.00033944368,0.000024939407,0.000005498408,0.000007010928,0.004704397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737096,0.0019312286,0.000062806816,0.000103462786,0.00033823817,0.00019335348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928837,0.004651779,0.0012882419,0.00041460159,0.00043837537,0.0003232473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029377844,0.00017508892,0.00020809688,0.000412135,0.0026046317,0.0034664513,0.0004104864,0.003052922,0.0047004106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008636108,0.00014546353,0.00033325047,0.00016291278,0.0112471115,0.0020789662,0.002374155,0.0030510793,0.00026332116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045527643,0.00059303234,0.011935206,0.00035622378,0.0001280206,0.0023299495,0.017216008,0.0005984681,0.0022070776,0.8724664,0.014397259,0.077317074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030135235,0.0023168249,0.022912117,0.0017977203,0.00022534006,0.012642219,0.029394569,0.0024906253,0.005419376,0.57946134,0.34289554,0.00014294653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082978845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006588406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047004106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012803382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010973801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01572448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137790678","doi":"10.1111/japp.12143","title":"Licensing Parents in International Contract Pregnancies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Political science; Vetting; State (computer science); Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05281687393416345,"score_gpt":0.318361155103381,"score_spread":0.2655442811692175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137790678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17625785,0.0020038022,0.023560269,0.03896132,0.0009900186,0.00018759588,0.000037983315,0.000058769925,0.7579423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97333884,0.00057714654,0.0019323663,0.005714233,0.00017522767,0.00010318104,0.000013155632,0.000016494645,0.018129418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879125,0.007079119,0.00058531895,0.0009939913,0.0018133556,0.0016157259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856527,0.00972672,0.0009856891,0.0015219561,0.0013512386,0.00076169206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018047648,0.0001909779,0.00032741914,0.00041803045,0.005299929,0.005643907,0.0009994498,0.005214612,0.005698067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031887222,0.00031016427,0.00032573816,0.00040451484,0.016898088,0.005767952,0.006638185,0.0053694732,0.0004954091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008221905,0.000014501351,0.00089107093,0.000007313912,0.0000011555537,0.00019499238,0.006704654,0.000059287144,0.00010240462,0.9852733,0.0013898044,0.0053534484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006312635,0.00016148543,0.0027627954,0.00045291,0.000032713244,0.0015237306,0.022880625,0.0014961184,0.0023531278,0.6869287,0.28127438,0.00007036197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043636663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032583615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018047648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002142719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045110984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09544623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141402416","doi":"10.1111/japp.12010","title":"Permissible Use and Interdependence: Against Principled Veganism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Animal ethics; Animal rights; Non-human; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.10257102526965022,"score_gpt":0.2652023652049446,"score_spread":0.16263133993529438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141402416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14559749,0.001983821,0.19716938,0.10565366,0.0009787942,0.00015455863,0.000066478955,0.00017684646,0.5482191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98232645,0.00021383827,0.009869119,0.004243743,0.00013940077,0.00012131522,0.00001122442,0.00004496834,0.003029855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9736115,0.018470643,0.0006597048,0.0024017647,0.0037303066,0.0011261872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97734606,0.013543577,0.0017600592,0.0041569,0.0024455935,0.0007477737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025366912,0.0005446162,0.0008068048,0.0010401846,0.0038357475,0.005173586,0.0024092454,0.005541717,0.002674177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027322806,0.000506016,0.0008242614,0.00046842764,0.08579006,0.010213975,0.008744983,0.0111987265,0.0003955173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014582206,0.00001053037,0.00015131006,0.00002005325,0.0000071782256,0.00003438586,0.0024815022,0.00019655663,0.000086141794,0.994785,0.000592045,0.0016206818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010867694,0.000009084655,0.000108954904,0.000032042186,0.0000040758828,0.000040830204,0.0004462201,0.00044035434,0.000111345485,0.9940347,0.0047530313,0.000008523045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012274203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011472064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025366912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033499491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023340464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13415468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160313205","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5930.2007.00359.x","title":"Cultures and Cultural Property","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Archaeological Research and Protection","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural property; Property (philosophy); Indigenous; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Law; Cultural heritage; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0305653152795875,"score_gpt":0.2682665543053608,"score_spread":0.23770123902577328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160313205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14154348,0.008408872,0.011103163,0.02068813,0.00026294455,0.00004099278,0.00008921727,0.000024856743,0.8178384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918419,0.0015577544,0.0007042161,0.0005586577,0.000083366744,0.000019964635,0.0000141831015,0.000009205176,0.0052108173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718165,0.001687055,0.000115541334,0.0003199064,0.00036894047,0.0003269071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964462,0.0018439159,0.0004873633,0.00056328607,0.00034991856,0.00030926344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022797522,0.0002797286,0.00033404666,0.0011584907,0.005212223,0.008835663,0.0007369582,0.0019866272,0.0076562385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040316754,0.00018825763,0.00030989706,0.0015216331,0.049258858,0.008280834,0.0063337963,0.00319565,0.00043115244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003930628,0.0000071180248,0.00045402948,0.000016410153,0.0000032280211,0.000065631095,0.0046181586,0.00008321406,0.00005931849,0.9927568,0.00032235205,0.0016097848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008249709,0.000023802695,0.0015070384,0.00015636465,0.000007923361,0.00017212535,0.013846102,0.00022129698,0.00022282111,0.9354119,0.04841011,0.000012311894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035628139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022106313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008835663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034774968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016136419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025612712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258432295","doi":"10.1111/japp.12179","title":"Divide and Rule Better: On Subsidiarity, Legitimacy and the Epistemic Aim of Political Decision‐Making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Legitimacy; Politics; Prima facie; Scrutiny; Political philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.033677623033598114,"score_gpt":0.3214303236464803,"score_spread":0.28775270061288216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258432295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22421446,0.001728202,0.0988108,0.051663056,0.00035970815,0.00011157902,0.000038385886,0.00006633061,0.6230075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99441504,0.000121685895,0.0024421741,0.00060801214,0.00006627763,0.000027443362,0.0000049960254,0.000011352302,0.0023029994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99043673,0.0054884744,0.00032450768,0.0013163666,0.0015142107,0.0009196976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812284,0.012210709,0.0014432401,0.0023827457,0.0015682622,0.0011667068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011316106,0.00025734064,0.00082176045,0.0014597526,0.004321755,0.00891839,0.00095654815,0.0037541348,0.0052440055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018979914,0.00023483917,0.00054661295,0.00064864394,0.03890508,0.008993465,0.006939627,0.0045794514,0.000479624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000120084915,0.000014636755,0.00018595613,0.0000083435425,0.0000038108847,0.000034575172,0.0011845601,0.0002619023,0.000079018246,0.99582076,0.00029204774,0.0021024202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013649343,0.000013292706,0.0002731663,0.000032638287,0.0000043740315,0.00001977776,0.0007790969,0.0010113888,0.00014455106,0.99311286,0.0045890547,0.000006252629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016140237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016403814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011316106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039056875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029799743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059845984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276258614","doi":"10.1111/japp.12196","title":"The Ethics of Immigration Revisited: Response to Brock, Fabre, Risse and Song","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Immigration; Politics; Action (physics); Frame (networking); Economic Justice; Intersection (aeronautics); Democracy; Political philosophy; Law; Chose; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04307058811292759,"score_gpt":0.3383278209411191,"score_spread":0.2952572328281915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276258614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014654011,0.0028751832,0.00006228302,0.99110013,0.0020942104,0.0000017144099,0.000003979195,0.0000030199162,0.0023940583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09835521,0.0043859724,0.00020151358,0.881218,0.009470073,0.000040707695,0.000009413956,0.00004537367,0.006273691],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828866,0.011740518,0.00038808162,0.0014161307,0.001869701,0.0016989891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9562811,0.035781827,0.0013400147,0.00077360094,0.0026364962,0.0031868964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0219722,0.0007315999,0.0015329717,0.0013817442,0.017890036,0.0131299,0.003917104,0.052658215,0.0036583461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04367112,0.00071501196,0.00088411634,0.0017156319,0.048441883,0.014929123,0.008675169,0.064989924,0.0009350753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006385451,0.000049289698,0.0004234901,0.00014184951,0.000014858806,0.000812792,0.030929083,0.00024211165,0.00009805129,0.39986318,0.5618496,0.0055118445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069437105,0.00003085876,0.0010335,0.0011321317,0.000014512494,0.00054545724,0.04579361,0.0003800772,0.00025061055,0.18558422,0.7650521,0.00011345316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016853223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015865339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052658215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01540348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00874226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11620146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279145249","doi":"10.1111/japp.12181","title":"Connecting Applied and Theoretical Bayesian Epistemology: Data Relevance, Pragmatics, and the Legal Case of Sally Clark","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Rationality; Pragmatics; Epistemology; Inference; Bayesian probability; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.020233070355000674,"score_gpt":0.2578727470564803,"score_spread":0.23763967670147962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279145249","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26903048,0.0044366727,0.12232265,0.4483016,0.00059119397,0.00017313208,0.00012929204,0.000098568744,0.1549164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98384136,0.00039310602,0.009350538,0.0044575366,0.00011875235,0.000055331937,0.000016543998,0.000032545282,0.0017342428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9461097,0.041600417,0.0014255989,0.0023810542,0.0065061226,0.0019770784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8297751,0.1517087,0.0055049933,0.0052849543,0.006218,0.0015081861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05957724,0.00037156392,0.00090022583,0.003194303,0.009650386,0.011348974,0.0033427863,0.0066496274,0.0044935243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15052912,0.00086214516,0.00058242877,0.0028494843,0.06751681,0.013346618,0.008945992,0.011659619,0.00026876404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003126658,0.00001635076,0.0012987185,0.000058468057,0.000014302206,0.0006805505,0.029366016,0.00045878912,0.00012228945,0.96038216,0.0021922134,0.0053789024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030091118,0.000013081442,0.0009835379,0.00018962951,0.000018304594,0.00034127454,0.018440932,0.002522683,0.00034162786,0.96006334,0.017011482,0.000044025874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043234263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04563685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05957724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015058237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010750517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31507832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296407064","doi":"10.1111/japp.12193","title":"Overview of <i>The Ethics of Immigration</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Citation; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.053773472919705155,"score_gpt":0.32824047622199193,"score_spread":0.2744670033022868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296407064","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034353796,0.5744336,0.018564666,0.14173397,0.006311307,0.00007939764,0.00017922575,0.000081673286,0.25518075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13139346,0.68508285,0.02182743,0.06825598,0.018017748,0.00032542326,0.000362113,0.00014123028,0.07459369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998211,0.0009482935,0.00015117464,0.0001245841,0.00037211642,0.0001928884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815744,0.001182103,0.00012115611,0.00007720919,0.00031824334,0.00014376329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004503089,0.00050087913,0.0006241463,0.0030351921,0.002469042,0.0059065293,0.0010510014,0.004342279,0.0055897133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021517752,0.00030674832,0.0006050161,0.0037262586,0.007954612,0.0047183353,0.0024739325,0.006118111,0.0011461764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008864934,0.000022640903,0.0001706848,0.0006888175,0.000007939553,0.000041938154,0.0019239235,0.00032642364,0.00016151638,0.9162059,0.040785745,0.039655663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035989224,0.000019846737,0.0006116652,0.0022471228,0.0000074087898,0.00012297438,0.0012759836,0.0003015138,0.000091941816,0.16314627,0.8321579,0.000013636755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075587034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0092049595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075587034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047414764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006618104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034401953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2311112747","doi":"10.1111/japp.12214","title":"Fiduciary Duties and the Ethics of Public Apology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Duty; Law; Duty of loyalty; Sociology; Criticism; Discretion; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.05561099989035762,"score_gpt":0.3145470765413991,"score_spread":0.25893607665104146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2311112747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14997636,0.004231005,0.08646376,0.076178215,0.0007829058,0.00008444222,0.00002141447,0.000101199716,0.68216074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990017,0.00025780176,0.0020099634,0.0011304014,0.00009741272,0.000023224207,0.0000027405426,0.00001664999,0.006444854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808117,0.014532821,0.00048684422,0.0007628936,0.0024287559,0.000977059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781044,0.013752237,0.0021888008,0.0025809938,0.002294732,0.0010787303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015648767,0.00031266024,0.0003667035,0.0008958896,0.005519462,0.007944271,0.0010687644,0.0060415515,0.0029585229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028606638,0.00031347567,0.00029833792,0.00045147713,0.055975325,0.0056031034,0.0054335953,0.0050608027,0.00054231833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047672606,0.000011923991,0.00017237577,0.000012172711,0.0000022379743,0.000058116133,0.005108877,0.00009623278,0.00005673096,0.9916918,0.00084415585,0.0019405114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009157451,0.000017862023,0.0003088099,0.00009748638,0.0000033290025,0.00017451038,0.0026281504,0.00066116854,0.00015665015,0.97256845,0.02336244,0.0000119585675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012324343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010310481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015648767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041135317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036467058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08275956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2437483072","doi":"10.1111/japp.12227","title":"Just Schools and Good Childhoods: Non‐preparatory Dimensions of Educational Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Early childhood education; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03460870043729657,"score_gpt":0.3283612645121003,"score_spread":0.2937525640748037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2437483072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28147563,0.0027435808,0.024880774,0.055966485,0.00024722292,0.00005793268,0.00007960922,0.000048889375,0.63449985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996268,0.00018939767,0.00076125097,0.00063753384,0.000029640994,0.00001312806,0.000004642569,0.000003884157,0.0020924914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99425393,0.0034180165,0.0001605026,0.0003766944,0.0006705388,0.0011203653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99117744,0.004356626,0.0014159787,0.0009795097,0.00085333217,0.0012171254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036879808,0.0001912133,0.00029158543,0.00085160165,0.0040038554,0.0066399486,0.0006223414,0.002113375,0.0039675846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006827097,0.00017426263,0.00028787326,0.0005736806,0.037716694,0.005796346,0.0062016654,0.0035951755,0.00017444999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005590066,0.000011891494,0.00046001162,0.000009249225,0.0000012019367,0.000021555561,0.0016926466,0.00004759393,0.0000296387,0.9963505,0.00023298508,0.0011371751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012161922,0.000024474311,0.0038519145,0.00010459012,0.000006432997,0.000082123246,0.005643446,0.00020834674,0.0002111151,0.9702294,0.019612048,0.000013936002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030705798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049813977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066399486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002973124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029152913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021571636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470079491","doi":"10.1111/japp.12232","title":"Overall Lifelong Fortune: A Critique of the Intrinsic Potential Account","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Norm (philosophy); Epistemology; Human life; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Theology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.021793306516657576,"score_gpt":0.22959776220603262,"score_spread":0.20780445568937506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470079491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07769085,0.0067191045,0.047243156,0.16176935,0.0007554092,0.00004935898,0.00016381177,0.00008143518,0.7055275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98638946,0.0007054379,0.0018326369,0.003894777,0.00029790212,0.000047390342,0.000024923325,0.000038678798,0.006768889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611616,0.0019480224,0.00012052889,0.00057238986,0.00089271634,0.0003501506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99235135,0.0038929447,0.00071129884,0.0007560372,0.0014384631,0.00084983197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053401804,0.00045102806,0.00054041145,0.0016044726,0.003244458,0.004774581,0.0016409007,0.0033420792,0.0055171433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010511331,0.0002007904,0.00047696417,0.0010281556,0.028795179,0.00767542,0.0051033157,0.006158678,0.00057755667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005609022,0.000005982041,0.0002227182,0.0000134602205,0.00000278543,0.000025881027,0.0005520301,0.00013566263,0.000013145332,0.9959693,0.0011869386,0.001866503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004285901,0.0000073622637,0.00053252425,0.00005480301,0.0000033289812,0.00004455576,0.00067860686,0.00044938183,0.00003451162,0.98782223,0.01036074,0.00000771951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040965215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004658319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055171433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045901276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023059149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033303857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509167444","doi":"10.1111/japp.12238","title":"Reclaiming Proportionality (Society for Applied Philosophy Annual Lecture 2016)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Proportionality (law); Wrongdoing; Consequentialism; Morality; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05799821567031576,"score_gpt":0.2582990294060854,"score_spread":0.20030081373576963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509167444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024047387,0.13854152,0.023980932,0.2776393,0.10258859,0.000051324576,0.00031227234,0.00059598585,0.4538853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13223311,0.10296976,0.020932654,0.040964827,0.052213207,0.00034944617,0.0005083669,0.0013956706,0.6484329],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967405,0.0013874795,0.0001515491,0.0004745383,0.0009951023,0.000250799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998408,0.0006776391,0.00011195369,0.0001722467,0.0003815444,0.0002485645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005827008,0.00087870605,0.0006752747,0.0010237059,0.0030073524,0.0072240448,0.00089857145,0.0030688376,0.043786094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074654324,0.00047363847,0.00083020324,0.0007858243,0.006845567,0.0075378106,0.005030318,0.009359343,0.017928047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024665653,0.000026863756,0.000110707,0.00014029193,0.000009806502,0.00004424534,0.0010024448,0.00021502309,0.00017627353,0.4139163,0.50491136,0.07942209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042275783,0.0000105054305,0.00022185226,0.00036623768,0.0000032104472,0.00005255812,0.00021483452,0.0002325014,0.000066091045,0.1369273,0.86189204,0.000008666027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023024871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025289562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043786094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005439205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046662297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14647901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553096919","doi":"10.1111/japp.12250","title":"The Problem of Predation in <i>Zoopolis</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Environmental Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Liminality; Sovereignty; Harm; Competence (human resources); Predation; Environmental ethics; Aside; Sociology; Intervention (counseling); Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Ecology; Biology; Social psychology; Psychology; Anthropology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00927120159844076,"score_gpt":0.2058311920312453,"score_spread":0.19655999043280456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553096919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13412091,0.006484234,0.012419063,0.12756415,0.00045442817,0.000039830178,0.0000540334,0.00004480231,0.7188186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96987975,0.0008989393,0.0012137487,0.005977905,0.000091444366,0.000032538926,0.000009858422,0.000014188928,0.021881694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975095,0.001524102,0.00006468066,0.00030035,0.00032112043,0.00028031628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998871,0.0005522128,0.00013832786,0.00014698114,0.00019208531,0.00009927095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034049677,0.00012965419,0.00025353464,0.0003788343,0.007503852,0.0048205606,0.0007338955,0.0033996985,0.0034091042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018237141,0.00024849342,0.00027914759,0.00035509284,0.023317099,0.0030269858,0.004077836,0.004677163,0.00029591646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004557854,0.000006003598,0.00036902327,0.00001245457,0.0000035158923,0.00011128356,0.0024828599,0.00010890397,0.00006739655,0.9926636,0.002654774,0.0015156829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018382014,0.000027655635,0.0013168782,0.00021346616,0.000014989348,0.00043769274,0.0051320973,0.001215978,0.00045030913,0.7727083,0.21843289,0.000031301915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018399443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015186176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018399443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061820764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028761113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044854283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554921354","doi":"10.1111/japp.12254","title":"On the Complementarity of the Ages of Life","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Psychology; State (computer science); Politics; Early childhood; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.0486300407714053,"score_gpt":0.21530622902009128,"score_spread":0.16667618824868596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554921354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19422655,0.0045192824,0.020218693,0.009519086,0.000280414,0.000046707864,0.0003246514,0.00003900895,0.7708255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873832,0.00068987097,0.0023188947,0.00042773216,0.000080749785,0.000029769346,0.00005850586,0.000018919553,0.008992309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771607,0.0011292654,0.00008983011,0.00032013128,0.0003362359,0.0004085352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920699,0.0038729042,0.0010243773,0.00065364013,0.0012996993,0.0010793577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003762873,0.0002204249,0.0003036321,0.0012458599,0.0027866566,0.004764366,0.00045590545,0.001164185,0.009813699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010385476,0.00029573712,0.00031255145,0.00054603495,0.009242072,0.008037137,0.0053339708,0.0023225239,0.0007095088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002728474,0.000005834591,0.00085067615,0.000010720388,0.0000019270278,0.000032764772,0.0025746974,0.000047913618,0.000047196074,0.99324894,0.00031160313,0.002840478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000198994,0.000047072845,0.0057947603,0.00014276883,0.00001544277,0.0002768385,0.0071233516,0.00032296477,0.00037132823,0.9353782,0.050486747,0.000020661439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016420315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024644402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009813699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026458486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012274196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03283006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2570731680","doi":"10.1111/japp.12256","title":"Why Childhood is Bad for Children","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Research Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Childhood studies; Identity (music); Criticism; Psychology; Early childhood; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Computer security","score_opus":0.034444986110267514,"score_gpt":0.3445870162201607,"score_spread":0.31014203010989316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2570731680","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15508537,0.016507212,0.0031882506,0.63321584,0.0020910613,0.000029435305,0.00017814236,0.00004717783,0.18965757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447965,0.005462865,0.0008190232,0.040894043,0.0004331436,0.000025110166,0.000037967147,0.000043515352,0.007487859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993375,0.003708443,0.00019653673,0.0005436493,0.00096068543,0.0012155568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921292,0.0030510277,0.0015501077,0.00048016367,0.0012922839,0.0014973166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066057765,0.00023538974,0.000484443,0.0007431683,0.006845101,0.0055752574,0.0006485735,0.0042265994,0.006476817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013883996,0.00027305805,0.0003480051,0.00058076467,0.03558779,0.006115024,0.0041219187,0.006486069,0.00092099345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057468616,0.000042158725,0.02061374,0.00015952851,0.00003753102,0.0015471431,0.106923066,0.00015741574,0.00043685123,0.79818034,0.054407462,0.017437251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023175291,0.00010079799,0.017834602,0.0013429509,0.00006633322,0.004257224,0.15213832,0.00016842915,0.0011280762,0.386374,0.43648306,0.000083050436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065570017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007074332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006845101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064251735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032685956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046618104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758668236","doi":"10.1111/japp.12287","title":"Kagan on Speciesism and Modal Personism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Modal; Argument (complex analysis); Prejudice (legal term); Object (grammar); sort; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05970444737332933,"score_gpt":0.24973127920241586,"score_spread":0.19002683182908653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758668236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09574447,0.006343631,0.039241277,0.14139232,0.0010960649,0.000043769276,0.00008853398,0.0001134332,0.7159365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795107,0.0008536825,0.0028236632,0.006227838,0.00023556514,0.000041150128,0.000014415273,0.000035018074,0.010257912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966846,0.0023082006,0.00006654538,0.0002894627,0.00041086014,0.00024036375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971758,0.0018744455,0.00017216313,0.00022983023,0.00040083504,0.00014693459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028788506,0.00029811103,0.00043002592,0.0009731817,0.0031819646,0.0027349112,0.0006825299,0.0019807704,0.004111618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042363056,0.00023282864,0.00043656823,0.00058621867,0.024056569,0.005971201,0.0033819603,0.0035693236,0.00045381577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000119570095,0.0000064633896,0.000108695785,0.000018793158,0.0000042600786,0.000030713545,0.0016583734,0.00008931662,0.000086638596,0.9940738,0.0024880322,0.0014229334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006990658,0.000008643118,0.00018837492,0.00003862536,0.000004598028,0.000047481153,0.00079763914,0.00027222626,0.00011802645,0.9828095,0.015699754,0.000008150522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024941415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017628815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004111618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024469877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000990926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017754257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791821199","doi":"10.1111/japp.12299","title":"The Ethics of Boycotting as Collective Anti‐Normalisation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Boycott; Politics; Harm; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05284431397674069,"score_gpt":0.32915282054449174,"score_spread":0.2763085065677511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791821199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2703998,0.0017164933,0.03647916,0.038663086,0.00041883482,0.000056007637,0.000021605492,0.00005687297,0.6521882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99451727,0.0000897275,0.0006298532,0.0005001278,0.00004558388,0.000011698571,0.0000019776878,0.000009397073,0.004194493],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867633,0.010043672,0.00023418118,0.0005673582,0.001375703,0.0010158115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99161243,0.0046337405,0.0013398044,0.00082090305,0.0011720156,0.00042102984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008251072,0.00023521161,0.00026414215,0.0005657937,0.0050412146,0.005579544,0.00081615965,0.003708805,0.001793774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008285346,0.00020804332,0.00017719281,0.00055467576,0.06208121,0.00251111,0.0030296103,0.004213487,0.00019669959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069411876,0.000009284864,0.00034955383,0.000012957461,0.000002669164,0.000073361705,0.017291749,0.00021101018,0.00016937076,0.9793562,0.0008307831,0.0016862046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002098289,0.00005337239,0.0018674927,0.00025494787,0.000012252887,0.0003301209,0.028144203,0.0021473984,0.0010612352,0.85562176,0.11044598,0.00004025387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004423396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003840137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008251072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004053641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030399456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04363638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793455378","doi":"10.1111/japp.12304","title":"Dissidents and Innocents: Hard Cases for a Political Philosophy of Boycotts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Boycott; Coercion (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Face (sociological concept); Group (periodic table); Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.08627191106746301,"score_gpt":0.36485099303001023,"score_spread":0.2785790819625472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793455378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103736274,0.0027721464,0.05436648,0.27020824,0.0013641106,0.00015530613,0.000045474833,0.00006931572,0.5672826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97551787,0.0003672418,0.0044395346,0.007656721,0.0005079438,0.000116521805,0.000007941751,0.000039787075,0.01134651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820092,0.012270871,0.0003778081,0.0012574373,0.0024947089,0.0015900203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803852,0.014706912,0.0011260496,0.0012303821,0.0011581228,0.0013933715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01714261,0.00062607485,0.0007649992,0.0016863837,0.012580292,0.012140528,0.0019927847,0.013419117,0.008390691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02089946,0.0005920375,0.0007054758,0.00076254964,0.09223399,0.016504368,0.008784101,0.018016053,0.00060499244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047115323,0.000005423913,0.00005588356,0.0000060048123,0.0000012639517,0.000049044473,0.0011483525,0.00006044062,0.000017326125,0.9973808,0.000861266,0.00040954107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019553878,0.00000816339,0.00011079727,0.00005131666,0.0000029770797,0.000061021925,0.0023834023,0.0006764713,0.0000556719,0.983404,0.013215035,0.000011416428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041135945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00385341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01714261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067005656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034431282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09065986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886846272","doi":"10.1111/japp.12337","title":"Adapting to Climate Change: What We Owe to Other Animals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Climate Change and Geoengineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Environmental ethics; Duty; Climate justice; Adaptation (eye); Context (archaeology); Animal rights; Action (physics); Animal ethics; Economic Justice; Political science; Human rights; Non-human; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Ecology; Psychology; Geography; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05200233163429923,"score_gpt":0.2708667214531159,"score_spread":0.21886438981881667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886846272","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10080814,0.013657009,0.03109452,0.44336304,0.0034976797,0.000050748306,0.0000663679,0.000078330224,0.40738422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575234,0.0030957095,0.0020534392,0.02716881,0.0007328875,0.00003327923,0.000019926743,0.00004647715,0.009326011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951757,0.0031159576,0.00009429701,0.0004938045,0.00043720126,0.0006830488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948696,0.0026313418,0.00043355138,0.00071916915,0.0006220128,0.000724242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009157384,0.00032748064,0.00054903235,0.00078825385,0.009246758,0.007945722,0.0011331048,0.0080337655,0.0040545766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007199082,0.00019010674,0.00045656282,0.00050389796,0.07404969,0.009862341,0.0043532667,0.00766286,0.00060441525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020610356,0.00005407089,0.001616881,0.00006577939,0.000024518997,0.00024974195,0.05580292,0.0002739645,0.0005913284,0.9223824,0.0073978365,0.011520002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009223709,0.0000581658,0.0018905161,0.00028309884,0.000023059612,0.00032161459,0.030213414,0.00037237388,0.00047794785,0.74139667,0.22490802,0.00004589216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049637943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005473309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009246758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024420423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020352984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04842949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891321095","doi":"10.1111/japp.12340","title":"Rights to the Oceans: Foundational Arguments Reconsidered","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Object (grammar); Epistemology; Commons; Global commons; Intellectual property; Property (philosophy); Law; Natural (archaeology); Human rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; History; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.014581995920986097,"score_gpt":0.24730410196817995,"score_spread":0.23272210604719384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891321095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042167805,0.004231809,0.055459127,0.0831964,0.00090184185,0.000057050256,0.00010100819,0.00005311151,0.813832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98037684,0.0011989846,0.004351997,0.0036891198,0.00053851755,0.00006706988,0.00003862486,0.000033894157,0.009705012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929081,0.00331547,0.00024464313,0.00081356853,0.0018496658,0.00086847827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883531,0.007664601,0.0006512466,0.0011877869,0.0016947858,0.0004486615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011516131,0.0004894606,0.00076963386,0.002914863,0.0067212507,0.009433255,0.002840933,0.009525755,0.006561986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015077853,0.000404161,0.000973535,0.0017465501,0.056863442,0.014018006,0.0063599534,0.0079919705,0.0006878332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015982101,0.0000019066186,0.000016849495,0.00000503701,9.755047e-7,0.000012244259,0.00029003923,0.00011236248,0.000008882719,0.9989631,0.00022446504,0.0003625349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008985947,0.000004774062,0.00008370382,0.000090855385,0.000004988899,0.000019097504,0.0006819306,0.0006376903,0.00006166155,0.9838307,0.014568694,0.0000068336776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01582174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010628822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01582174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010340306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047533386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075024486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941515313","doi":"10.1111/japp.12362","title":"Democracy and/or Consent: A Comment on Carol Gould's ‘How Democracy Can Inform Consent’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Citation; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Political science; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.049617835265609714,"score_gpt":0.2673889302624539,"score_spread":0.21777109499684422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941515313","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018728606,0.0008931761,0.00014802821,0.992837,0.004578364,0.0000043371324,0.000015444542,0.000009662111,0.0013266924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003957557,0.00024254592,0.00013072323,0.98935074,0.0039936244,0.00002500721,0.000005911241,0.000033486296,0.0022603718],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96158016,0.013155178,0.002620326,0.007719592,0.008357754,0.006567031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91860527,0.063770615,0.003186675,0.0024654488,0.0077578295,0.0042141364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03042361,0.0019858219,0.00371305,0.0021979546,0.02541013,0.02106086,0.010064951,0.1824441,0.008083382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09602765,0.0024530608,0.0037516549,0.0032602823,0.080911994,0.024198724,0.0159546,0.20991163,0.0044026207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046541736,0.000013249223,0.0001103994,0.00013467451,0.000039982486,0.00024395733,0.009597993,0.000099040124,0.00012804111,0.17243856,0.8148568,0.0022907082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011713824,0.000027318765,0.00055749255,0.0010948688,0.000074652344,0.0002462354,0.0085503915,0.00025363537,0.00045700587,0.1769341,0.81142634,0.0002609211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10639544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1400495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1824441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024397051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029334923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21155226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963325051","doi":"10.1111/japp.12383","title":"Getting Obligations Right: Autonomy and Shared Decision Making","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Dublin City University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Autonomy; Decision maker; Order (exchange); Health care; Psychology; Personal autonomy; Yield (engineering); Informed consent; Patient participation; Law and economics; Social psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Medicine; Business; Political science; Law; Management science; Economics; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.050576089375826264,"score_gpt":0.42717652858223437,"score_spread":0.3766004392064081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963325051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09923861,0.0044237752,0.25216922,0.19762851,0.0011163481,0.0003580474,0.000090327405,0.00009128214,0.4448839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97322685,0.00061731186,0.018355438,0.0042710123,0.00022461911,0.00014549198,0.000020845664,0.000017656492,0.0031207725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92921937,0.055201918,0.0025821826,0.002980417,0.007127228,0.0028887992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93611896,0.04412895,0.0052896035,0.0058478727,0.0045740046,0.0040405733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053666495,0.0004481481,0.00072515325,0.0011933696,0.0056336275,0.009515998,0.00187519,0.0062508043,0.003813501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055528466,0.00048776387,0.0010106084,0.00083740946,0.06450744,0.011175397,0.012868678,0.0081297215,0.0004859957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011249043,0.000013228371,0.00019937828,0.000025101624,0.000009489923,0.000097464996,0.0043947217,0.00041914257,0.0000615614,0.9912608,0.00075187907,0.0027559437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016329555,0.000010196794,0.000101242425,0.00005689968,0.0000041091334,0.000059601814,0.0009031684,0.00069119764,0.00009318834,0.9912794,0.006773311,0.000011373958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021041648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015134362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053666495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005860844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010536655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2838189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985183213","doi":"10.1111/japp.12393","title":"On a Promise or on the Game: What's Wrong with Selling Consent?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Value (mathematics); Service (business); Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Inequality; Sociology; Business; Law; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.032512548842043576,"score_gpt":0.28196334250740274,"score_spread":0.24945079366535916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985183213","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028286587,0.004119788,0.03527216,0.7009841,0.001987948,0.00011590849,0.000104625346,0.00009899893,0.22902985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92238814,0.002850922,0.006557865,0.050292164,0.0012473513,0.00022210002,0.000039397913,0.00012338748,0.016278688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97317964,0.01865705,0.0007597797,0.0019265335,0.0036833286,0.0017936119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689479,0.02451595,0.0009707271,0.0020439075,0.0025488902,0.0009726627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04377384,0.0005296168,0.0012003,0.0008406646,0.007329843,0.010109213,0.0027495567,0.014161358,0.010329185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061867185,0.00046462897,0.0011306648,0.00083807204,0.061583262,0.02403291,0.00535402,0.014104633,0.0014020184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018628625,0.0000114794775,0.000100520396,0.000022381442,0.000005175677,0.000076374956,0.001377588,0.00011721178,0.000034741508,0.99170035,0.003448813,0.0030867707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021864362,0.00001436917,0.000082536724,0.00009174495,0.000007023192,0.000059717746,0.0016101011,0.00068630395,0.00009807725,0.9819594,0.015350461,0.000018398703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010094603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049091754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04377384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072500957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005896883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23150098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001770078","doi":"10.1111/japp.12412","title":"The Ethics of Citizen Selection of Refugees for Admission and Resettlement","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Selection (genetic algorithm); Democracy; Worry; Order (exchange); Political science; Law; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Medicine; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.04209081317286596,"score_gpt":0.34301782832484057,"score_spread":0.3009270151519746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001770078","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22953305,0.0010800941,0.02704688,0.12417836,0.000535398,0.00015801584,0.00003962754,0.000046428144,0.61738205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986128,0.00011821611,0.0011068691,0.0035360442,0.00007331383,0.000064387525,0.000004669539,0.000012592988,0.008955932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98013777,0.015404635,0.00037597746,0.00095730077,0.0011792931,0.001944983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946786,0.0031629466,0.00036584827,0.00053429423,0.00061943993,0.00063893915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013533428,0.00020270149,0.00037721064,0.00043896542,0.009401978,0.0063220314,0.0009063221,0.005912899,0.0026481156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009351614,0.00027356253,0.00037313893,0.00044702156,0.040520277,0.0031781225,0.0057369256,0.00634442,0.00032239594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008586251,0.0000098764,0.00034864387,0.000005668187,0.0000017998993,0.00007186848,0.005787694,0.00010214591,0.000063395295,0.9915422,0.0012471084,0.00081096304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051252864,0.000056823304,0.0009940522,0.00014591549,0.000012968496,0.00016765787,0.0151186315,0.001672493,0.0004213351,0.9023298,0.0789936,0.00003543968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006810343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007021547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013533428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005097426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064574666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07157248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005685859","doi":"10.1111/japp.12403","title":"Socrates and the Ethic of Resistance: Comments on Buss","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"SOCRATES; Cowardice; Injustice; Resistance (ecology); Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.10845292264685172,"score_gpt":0.4356059928250321,"score_spread":0.3271530701781804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005685859","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000735653,0.0014651513,0.000059915517,0.9928438,0.0029631918,0.0000045035054,0.000011122795,0.0000067533706,0.001909961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04226464,0.0021470392,0.00027363942,0.9391908,0.009966608,0.000056873487,0.000010664241,0.000053611544,0.006036124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989806,0.0054381383,0.0004962499,0.0013760735,0.0016678096,0.0012156246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95056117,0.037441608,0.0020569207,0.0012287948,0.005584214,0.003127323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018363934,0.0010282652,0.0018503475,0.0009922382,0.013945608,0.008121658,0.0048946687,0.044520315,0.0072652292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055248223,0.00079696,0.0009427013,0.0017122631,0.032513294,0.015525213,0.0072410237,0.059890565,0.0018957683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045545912,0.000020717924,0.00029782343,0.00014446121,0.000009577637,0.00062596315,0.01414981,0.00011900009,0.000073934796,0.08310752,0.8973833,0.004022382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004055676,0.00005145512,0.0011624274,0.001015727,0.000012125963,0.00061284367,0.034443278,0.0004633634,0.0002076097,0.04425275,0.917594,0.00014382569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03184193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025190094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044520315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009483831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008346897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097118974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013654046","doi":"10.1111/japp.12422","title":"The Importance of History to the Erasing‐History Defence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Articulation (sociology); Character (mathematics); Statue; Public history; Sociology; Aesthetics; Law; History; Philosophy; Political science; Media studies; Art history","score_opus":0.034215150672097495,"score_gpt":0.2270285302195024,"score_spread":0.1928133795474049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013654046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03822981,0.008107645,0.009438239,0.09211666,0.0011916246,0.00004333595,0.000045472247,0.000058940037,0.8507683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9134543,0.001953361,0.0020424628,0.009272047,0.00047200164,0.00003105027,0.000023191571,0.000066860324,0.072684646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963554,0.0013109251,0.000068570705,0.0003641679,0.0010306573,0.00087031955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952608,0.0023987975,0.0003716365,0.0005539853,0.0009131217,0.0005017375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004679137,0.00041081506,0.00046952468,0.0013762298,0.01253196,0.010644182,0.0018885263,0.0035914262,0.006681382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007988471,0.00029816644,0.00030347236,0.0013115797,0.058245096,0.0063535594,0.005198884,0.0075792638,0.0005322006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038741123,0.000001466277,0.00007812772,0.0000115474695,0.0000013648033,0.000030020663,0.0031735625,0.00004311957,0.000029736546,0.99290437,0.001521982,0.002200813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016965392,0.000022130756,0.0011277943,0.00023666077,0.00001795238,0.0001240853,0.0076985722,0.0003275907,0.0003994273,0.52246034,0.46753654,0.000031954536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31790727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37488118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6820927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03085063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022993712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6321137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021160958","doi":"10.1111/japp.12437","title":"Bad Faith, Bad Behaviour, and Role Models","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Doping in Sports","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Admiration; Situational ethics; Faith; Agency (philosophy); Virtue; Social psychology; Existentialism; Bad faith; Conversation; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.03270623957627899,"score_gpt":0.27282788075106856,"score_spread":0.24012164117478957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021160958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45761228,0.0021845088,0.037153702,0.10402539,0.0008671701,0.00011666639,0.00003203208,0.00010096068,0.3979073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99604565,0.00015704508,0.0007730649,0.000837267,0.000022913982,0.000011791463,0.0000029323407,0.000006793227,0.0021424962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98348224,0.013064613,0.00023402792,0.0006476719,0.0013372492,0.0012342201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871229,0.005652889,0.0015926035,0.0012684272,0.001214232,0.0031489239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012360403,0.0004196453,0.00035311715,0.0012167819,0.0066004214,0.007782734,0.0011918775,0.0029259834,0.0026435282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009333232,0.00031503028,0.00033376654,0.00048122177,0.05216561,0.0050572483,0.006559472,0.0055417093,0.00030067025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002632015,0.000108404216,0.0033560689,0.00003141961,0.000011112124,0.00020395887,0.067022555,0.00022901507,0.00021554373,0.92227423,0.0022839166,0.0042374465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000459613,0.00014372288,0.003722958,0.0002702463,0.000022862465,0.000614149,0.109422624,0.0037818514,0.00040448282,0.80694467,0.074552104,0.000074380485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003232741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00239808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012360403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037288724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002918914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06536889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023215759","doi":"10.1111/japp.12434","title":"Poverty and the Peril of Particulars","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Poverty; Duty; Argumentative; Odds; Political science; Law; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Duty to protect; Law and economics; Social science; Computer science; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.059087654889512085,"score_gpt":0.21952844868064159,"score_spread":0.1604407937911295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023215759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09647461,0.0018328016,0.011392356,0.032746475,0.00023677951,0.000034217144,0.000055173743,0.000036888126,0.8571908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98774207,0.0003299212,0.0005534429,0.0012827226,0.00007194937,0.000022885566,0.000011623241,0.000017117594,0.009968331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591285,0.0020190827,0.00011172301,0.00058994535,0.00055501267,0.0008113072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966168,0.0013233216,0.00046342844,0.0005453907,0.0005473999,0.0005035877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004682607,0.00031702663,0.00043924147,0.0013365867,0.008872131,0.0059723197,0.00086736254,0.003371023,0.008848865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005663769,0.00032039903,0.00040279268,0.00079488184,0.04679418,0.008032162,0.009825925,0.0047026533,0.0004441407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004556399,0.0000047309695,0.00016490178,0.000009766824,0.000002618761,0.000045882145,0.0019456744,0.00006267974,0.000036538284,0.9960718,0.0008258728,0.0008250505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000084838275,0.000012159049,0.00065886125,0.00007184579,0.0000058923733,0.000114023605,0.004087854,0.00017798407,0.00008274621,0.9515862,0.04318677,0.000007188385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025910363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003714112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008872131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005473224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019336959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039711237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137886643","doi":"10.1111/japp.12503","title":"Is Humane Farming Morally Permissible?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Agriculture; Raising (metalworking); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Ecology; Mathematics; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.01398701940225664,"score_gpt":0.23336726815688213,"score_spread":0.2193802487546255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137886643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085619986,0.003434746,0.022918703,0.3025787,0.0016821936,0.000054331067,0.00006679688,0.000050221766,0.5835943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711929,0.0007243214,0.001991923,0.018733505,0.00038204854,0.000046905978,0.000017710718,0.000019660427,0.0068909368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869731,0.008617385,0.00024601095,0.000937656,0.0021568257,0.0010689888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986955,0.0076251086,0.0014868615,0.001329646,0.0018001461,0.00080319896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015181725,0.0003095185,0.0005215719,0.00071096135,0.0057647764,0.00595211,0.0014596491,0.00726198,0.0045569055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015919153,0.00026215482,0.00043246243,0.00059719756,0.062498167,0.006559065,0.004000641,0.007898595,0.00064642995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006204697,0.00001684427,0.00023660617,0.00002683638,0.0000056627646,0.00009150752,0.0024017259,0.000085906235,0.00009330229,0.9927234,0.0028398389,0.001472251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010607162,0.000014001894,0.00034767058,0.00014641393,0.00000660352,0.00012511415,0.0035473222,0.00029682135,0.00019643296,0.9608035,0.034492612,0.0000129788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016054048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001173213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015181725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031160037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031192359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08028954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159278972","doi":"10.1111/japp.12513","title":"Unintentional Residence and the Right to Vote","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Order (exchange); Citizenship; Democracy; Argumentation theory; Right to the city; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Politics; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03628425403623007,"score_gpt":0.31180703602831705,"score_spread":0.27552278199208696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159278972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31407422,0.0011014827,0.011741246,0.035648573,0.00034225246,0.000044199995,0.00013059271,0.000035370347,0.636882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911219,0.000089174966,0.00027302586,0.0007742614,0.000048301845,0.000015844054,0.000014715309,0.0000051175653,0.007657696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451005,0.0028070975,0.0001993968,0.00067322294,0.00053777616,0.0012724799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934227,0.0030673998,0.00094770076,0.0009717125,0.0009421394,0.0006482656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004782595,0.0001896024,0.00032820826,0.0005854152,0.0038494165,0.0038674981,0.00068890414,0.0022163116,0.010420816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064088656,0.00016374457,0.0002918666,0.00044121756,0.018045176,0.0020282161,0.0044922237,0.0032282574,0.0007632192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002197574,0.00003328853,0.0032793726,0.000014232811,0.00000696744,0.000095238844,0.0022585124,0.00017646277,0.0001448574,0.9897468,0.0012661099,0.0029562966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060817147,0.00009181951,0.0074578435,0.0001661771,0.000033245306,0.00028464585,0.005919723,0.00090827135,0.0006935734,0.9185141,0.06583029,0.000039461713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050340877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050588488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010420816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016863485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022233434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034861147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3167592270","doi":"10.1111/japp.12522","title":"Luck Egalitarianism and Disability Elimination","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Egalitarianism; Disadvantage; Redress; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Social justice; Political philosophy; Sociology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Politics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04187458730334446,"score_gpt":0.3229523279352526,"score_spread":0.2810777406319081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3167592270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102466494,0.0023643582,0.066981725,0.07590341,0.00045614113,0.00009292999,0.000070175476,0.00008648846,0.7515783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97995776,0.00029685404,0.003698988,0.0043568704,0.000113067916,0.00006119903,0.00001461667,0.000023141769,0.011477424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902046,0.0045895944,0.00030205247,0.0012373672,0.0019865271,0.0016798746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555427,0.0016410601,0.0006462111,0.00093127275,0.0007798377,0.0004473547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010032217,0.0004027266,0.00063494703,0.001283421,0.00492746,0.0047084703,0.0014567544,0.0037686473,0.0041986816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076418007,0.00027694492,0.0007226325,0.00075693254,0.05131983,0.0053225937,0.008747988,0.0064726947,0.0005998437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003558895,0.000004824557,0.0000727324,0.000006395487,0.000001770357,0.000008128504,0.0005284042,0.00010786706,0.00003164177,0.99825937,0.00027569995,0.00069956377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000149855005,0.000017598632,0.00025158643,0.000043696826,0.0000074806517,0.000029158788,0.00042035792,0.00041389576,0.0002438657,0.9844886,0.014058317,0.00001045588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052874875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005208071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010032217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063972343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057651834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05305612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175721929","doi":"10.1111/japp.12535","title":"Anti‐natalism and the Creation of Artificial Minds","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Position (finance); Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.05425609938950542,"score_gpt":0.30630006140786586,"score_spread":0.25204396201836043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175721929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09196889,0.0065939883,0.09233607,0.14633337,0.0020781946,0.00008697082,0.000048573587,0.00014647571,0.6604074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748259,0.00090667646,0.00926861,0.005719068,0.0003430979,0.00008235108,0.0000105751515,0.000054669366,0.008789117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99046636,0.0060351565,0.00028055138,0.00081782107,0.0019456295,0.0004545485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872443,0.0075360495,0.0014472926,0.001840989,0.0014984629,0.0004328526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013185997,0.00039300194,0.0005260106,0.001428805,0.0031844946,0.0066219857,0.0012054077,0.0039049047,0.0019190684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012076821,0.00030166714,0.00064964866,0.0004556537,0.058292747,0.006199644,0.004578821,0.00661864,0.00048717816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057918946,0.0000037818515,0.00005802225,0.000011626516,0.0000035653575,0.000022031647,0.0008621701,0.00008561078,0.00008338217,0.99786466,0.00037803323,0.0006213103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009617594,0.000011179715,0.0000801666,0.000030893894,0.0000038705066,0.00006428054,0.00031059518,0.00044411287,0.00029750477,0.9772456,0.021494277,0.000007890593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006045397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044757393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013185997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031174275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018812357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06973505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212584491","doi":"10.1111/japp.12564","title":"The Nature and Value of Vagueness in the Law. HrafnAsgeirsson, 2020. Oxford, Hart Publishing. x + 204 pp, $81.00 (hb)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Publishing; Citation; Value (mathematics); Library science; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.017511523821268526,"score_gpt":0.24105277202518935,"score_spread":0.22354124820392082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212584491","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045516572,0.92296153,0.0020429366,0.025769917,0.0029717607,0.0000069960497,0.00020432804,0.00005189148,0.045535415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07407743,0.76359254,0.00588476,0.005346966,0.006300389,0.000065836386,0.00036748123,0.00021580499,0.14414884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990081,0.00036933925,0.00008307681,0.00016459392,0.00030997576,0.0000648551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979936,0.0013296411,0.0001320273,0.00010934774,0.00033298408,0.00010240324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021769425,0.0014282512,0.0013835937,0.0022467203,0.001451393,0.0039777826,0.00087655574,0.0033242078,0.026787527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041608745,0.0014173136,0.00047832943,0.0025315387,0.009685568,0.009244356,0.0016137585,0.0034771645,0.0058651217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095424395,0.00002022406,0.00023523622,0.0007756968,0.000029066652,0.00017210282,0.0011876374,0.0005171122,0.00027544622,0.28431198,0.5094279,0.20295203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013033119,0.000016184486,0.0011102149,0.001977641,0.000013070996,0.00032184378,0.00078323577,0.00024567687,0.00014753037,0.2427958,0.7525493,0.000026547832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013188733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021742953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026787527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004217562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028548094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0896132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213452630","doi":"10.1111/japp.12561","title":"From Sovereignty to Guardianship in Ecoregions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo; European Commission; Queen's University; Universitetet i Oslo; H2020 European Research Council; Norges Forskningsråd; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Sovereignty; Treaty; Context (archaeology); Interdependence; Kyoto Protocol; Deforestation (computer science); Legal guardian; Natural resource; Biodiversity; Political science; Environmental resource management; Law; Climate change; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04356443142731427,"score_gpt":0.3168137493074591,"score_spread":0.27324931788014484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213452630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13733102,0.0065128817,0.05529891,0.22760876,0.0012619816,0.00014312887,0.00010968086,0.0000710587,0.57166255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97601616,0.00092981226,0.003229068,0.011487777,0.0002777771,0.00010949954,0.00002108109,0.000021613,0.007907242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99037117,0.006325527,0.0004465291,0.0011620818,0.00089665403,0.00079801946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99239385,0.0047147307,0.0005155806,0.001004572,0.0008836281,0.00048769292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017648613,0.000251594,0.0005245486,0.00062251464,0.005220138,0.0054865004,0.0011408188,0.005604517,0.0028280055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010277267,0.00033541935,0.00056889246,0.00062939944,0.05522193,0.008716479,0.0067481943,0.009066079,0.0002166275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028075337,0.0000021899634,0.00006672612,0.0000048708102,0.000001528517,0.000010336188,0.0008319464,0.00008805195,0.000023401772,0.9980317,0.0004581482,0.00047834907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019661566,0.000020330546,0.00026082655,0.000101655445,0.0000071748677,0.000039744587,0.0015920062,0.00040923237,0.00012127918,0.9628072,0.03460947,0.000011466204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068403753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043126256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017648613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005179005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007298831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09333587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200068504","doi":"10.1111/japp.12563","title":"Teaching Children How to Think: Rational Autonomy as an Aim of Liberal Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Rationality; Duty; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Enlightenment; Sociology; Practical reason; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022052687383898983,"score_gpt":0.3393262565037452,"score_spread":0.3172735691198462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200068504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35644504,0.0050118677,0.069091484,0.26167235,0.0011896568,0.00025693647,0.00009118632,0.00031528974,0.30592626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96750355,0.0013202245,0.014423631,0.008148547,0.00010724166,0.00012001702,0.000017539742,0.000051207506,0.008308038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911374,0.0070312424,0.00016159246,0.0003371398,0.00074586103,0.00058673084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98592156,0.010731393,0.0011473622,0.00061811897,0.00055596366,0.0010256555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008931389,0.0003458216,0.00029430067,0.00045213202,0.0024514731,0.005262492,0.00080785993,0.0030346178,0.0041856254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014307681,0.0003035175,0.00036580008,0.0003085204,0.02123266,0.0052368394,0.006570188,0.007911808,0.0008051321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006998883,0.00037223555,0.0040917597,0.0002494966,0.000011961716,0.0008446192,0.18241552,0.000953503,0.0014380203,0.7556695,0.021639567,0.032243952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010248752,0.00028326843,0.0035222177,0.0012015229,0.00004070289,0.0009106796,0.07906142,0.0023196344,0.0051795836,0.5325113,0.37478557,0.00008158675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001806564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029149528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008931389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043176184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004258817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047234237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200107615","doi":"10.1111/japp.12547","title":"Justice Principles, Empirical Beliefs, and Cognitive Biases: Reply to Buchanan's ‘When Knowing What Is Just and Being Committed to Achieving it Is Not Enough’","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Individualism; Argument (complex analysis); Ideology; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Sociology; Cognition; Positive economics; Empirical research; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.18243900778590025,"score_gpt":0.39298806443010226,"score_spread":0.210549056644202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200107615","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069218273,0.0041870927,0.002351292,0.9774948,0.0019650145,0.0000057486495,0.000017477027,0.000015316084,0.007041479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.595116,0.00506216,0.0038017072,0.37830436,0.012718189,0.00009214953,0.000025565827,0.00008593337,0.004793998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98821366,0.007877342,0.0004950241,0.0011988493,0.0017173034,0.0004978106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8839571,0.1039793,0.0031300748,0.002753565,0.0049118977,0.0012680768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030271547,0.0005196242,0.0010802905,0.001818917,0.0049946434,0.0065752603,0.0030980704,0.02507807,0.0030345155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07204453,0.0006410779,0.00052611285,0.0015337324,0.053608593,0.015016665,0.00642736,0.027149817,0.00072889775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009321128,0.000057328514,0.0008824495,0.00016584712,0.000042618052,0.00049148465,0.024398103,0.0004063214,0.00022466888,0.85272264,0.10400676,0.016508562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059615675,0.00002169188,0.00067215133,0.00042761635,0.000014129857,0.00030259954,0.00709372,0.0008697651,0.00033296508,0.9192989,0.07084397,0.00006290483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003611002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002738942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030271547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041872216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029277185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16009313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200177648","doi":"10.1111/japp.12569","title":"Why a <scp>UBI</scp> Will Never Be High Enough","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Economics; Workforce; Payment; Distribution (mathematics); Labour economics; Welfare; Perception; Consumption (sociology); Income distribution; Basic income; Economic inequality; Public economics; Demographic economics; Welfare economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Psychology; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.021939110970899595,"score_gpt":0.25444538529629745,"score_spread":0.23250627432539786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200177648","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11185485,0.0022852614,0.005267876,0.6854906,0.0036954654,0.000051325493,0.00009884212,0.00015071308,0.19110496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90334994,0.0008408554,0.0017509797,0.06606585,0.0005742834,0.00003730855,0.000023511815,0.00011180868,0.027245393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995876,0.0017098165,0.000115809315,0.00036982435,0.0011784375,0.00075011415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921382,0.002214982,0.00069890596,0.0007247698,0.0028419553,0.0013811534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006670618,0.00012556816,0.0002115063,0.00029960804,0.0042908886,0.0038078844,0.00072143046,0.0041769985,0.011307131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015965069,0.00015842308,0.00026825283,0.00032232585,0.0110957585,0.003261781,0.0016504626,0.004572297,0.0024250746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116427196,0.0001193949,0.018834507,0.00023830523,0.000044390737,0.00066943915,0.017320728,0.00026896846,0.002456868,0.5316658,0.3332377,0.09502754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029037323,0.0001685364,0.023917273,0.0005905826,0.00002815336,0.00081408577,0.03648877,0.00087717536,0.0023908883,0.23538555,0.6992143,0.000095659874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009231809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009420106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011307131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002867618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029095903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03782606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235174929","doi":"10.1111/japp.12283","title":"Issue Information","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.03018187578572432,"score_gpt":0.2135121829068259,"score_spread":0.18333030712110157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235174929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018928034,0.00066121056,0.00057460554,0.0029784015,0.011779919,0.00029342662,0.01680869,0.001824406,0.96489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006650889,0.00048820348,0.00024110553,0.0009776133,0.0015078448,0.000072474526,0.00611663,0.0005754493,0.9893556],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906284,0.00009746581,0.00007268397,0.00016890395,0.00048341538,0.00011473628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964682,0.0004138369,0.0001451856,0.0004309521,0.0014360659,0.0011057917],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009569452,0.0014478617,0.0013209066,0.0026785617,0.0017543606,0.008649471,0.00172675,0.0022710757,0.94369256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006360936,0.00048304172,0.0007475691,0.002879528,0.00058178074,0.00549072,0.0024101543,0.0023292003,0.90727997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001094081,0.000010963925,0.000027426273,0.00007647395,8.444213e-7,0.000011349777,0.0000075472763,0.000014637545,0.000053247084,0.00089946756,0.9817448,0.01714237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006279598,0.0000064844476,0.00012126039,0.00006149404,6.744871e-7,0.000017545768,0.000019250878,0.00002126572,0.000034535915,0.0004673021,0.99924135,0.00000255143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021077232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035795814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056307435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014539936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017815643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08031565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235605397","doi":"10.1111/japp.12303","title":"Issue Information","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.03018187578572432,"score_gpt":0.2135121829068259,"score_spread":0.18333030712110157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235605397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018928034,0.00066121056,0.00057460554,0.0029784015,0.011779919,0.00029342662,0.01680869,0.001824406,0.96489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006650889,0.00048820348,0.00024110553,0.0009776133,0.0015078448,0.000072474526,0.00611663,0.0005754493,0.9893556],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906284,0.00009746581,0.00007268397,0.00016890395,0.00048341538,0.00011473628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964682,0.0004138369,0.0001451856,0.0004309521,0.0014360659,0.0011057917],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009569452,0.0014478617,0.0013209066,0.0026785617,0.0017543606,0.008649471,0.00172675,0.0022710757,0.94369256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006360936,0.00048304172,0.0007475691,0.002879528,0.00058178074,0.00549072,0.0024101543,0.0023292003,0.90727997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001094081,0.000010963925,0.000027426273,0.00007647395,8.444213e-7,0.000011349777,0.0000075472763,0.000014637545,0.000053247084,0.00089946756,0.9817448,0.01714237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006279598,0.0000064844476,0.00012126039,0.00006149404,6.744871e-7,0.000017545768,0.000019250878,0.00002126572,0.000034535915,0.0004673021,0.99924135,0.00000255143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021077232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035795814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056307435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014539936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017815643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08031565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237303870","doi":"10.1111/japp.12326","title":"Issue Information","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.01590103709318002,"score_gpt":0.2873037962284564,"score_spread":0.2714027591352764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237303870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015861436,0.00045426033,0.0004587473,0.002017271,0.007073195,0.00025541353,0.0153809115,0.0012478384,0.9729537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006628792,0.00034358955,0.00023102072,0.0007896988,0.0008810583,0.00007504466,0.005807717,0.00045289352,0.9907561],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902403,0.000098574776,0.00007558409,0.00015143184,0.0005428119,0.00010748413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649006,0.00051949,0.00016536389,0.0004437919,0.0014698809,0.00091139245],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001118126,0.0013744602,0.0011699274,0.0029975006,0.0018866953,0.008097514,0.0016053749,0.0025342132,0.9356749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006592507,0.0005633316,0.0006795653,0.003069796,0.000602136,0.0050481437,0.0023306513,0.002506363,0.8962525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012687824,0.000012082134,0.000027114222,0.00007744902,7.6648615e-7,0.000011052311,0.000008458065,0.000015247824,0.000052949745,0.0012630599,0.98122644,0.017292613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064653686,0.000005849597,0.00011432326,0.000049726936,5.8749373e-7,0.00001729302,0.00001961102,0.000019680865,0.000040657957,0.0005166665,0.99920636,0.0000026822254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025353332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040066247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064325094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015883611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020479672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09175187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293223756","doi":"10.1111/japp.12613","title":"(E)‐Trust and Its Function: Why We Shouldn't Apply Trust and Trustworthiness to <scp>Human–AI</scp> Relations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Function (biology); Express trust; Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Public relations; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06930212240057451,"score_gpt":0.2698932261597339,"score_spread":0.20059110375915937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293223756","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13707586,0.014225323,0.08711091,0.42500064,0.0022475068,0.00011049199,0.000079269965,0.00016908732,0.333981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913731,0.00078775454,0.0021340183,0.0038828186,0.00014997563,0.000022630973,0.000005996577,0.00002415754,0.0016195654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899261,0.0063461536,0.00044175284,0.0010978783,0.0015153263,0.00067286205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9654166,0.018111825,0.0040230593,0.0032676302,0.006564747,0.002616079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016201701,0.00029539614,0.00069363153,0.0012550104,0.003499311,0.0080287205,0.0011864123,0.0051430184,0.0032233265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040347185,0.00036122312,0.00039733696,0.00082610926,0.06131981,0.013790915,0.003697707,0.005828469,0.0005314144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028483912,0.000017340128,0.0014083772,0.00008442442,0.00002226899,0.00009589805,0.0063356105,0.00028308525,0.00012940183,0.9803452,0.0031644856,0.008085448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000219181,0.000025381203,0.0014052254,0.00015488348,0.000014862598,0.00014114304,0.0026380501,0.0010709249,0.00013836834,0.98122644,0.013137441,0.000025273379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009133505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038557153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016201701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066738264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033938016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08568382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306407811","doi":"10.1111/japp.12630","title":"Normalization of Racism and Moral Responsibility: Against the Exculpatory Stance","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Ignorance; Racism; Normalization (sociology); Moral responsibility; Sociology; Epistemology; Criminology; Environmental ethics; Social psychology; Psychology; Gender studies; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.048242709360490584,"score_gpt":0.3038509386585937,"score_spread":0.2556082292981031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306407811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2687408,0.0020233414,0.11870808,0.10857361,0.00063744123,0.00018787943,0.000030812604,0.00038834225,0.5007098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920047,0.00010578016,0.0029740091,0.0024875747,0.00009699779,0.000051496823,0.0000035457927,0.000034794215,0.0022411295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96509135,0.020912196,0.0011282742,0.0025989437,0.008334484,0.0019346755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96891004,0.0114625,0.004450506,0.009056517,0.004792538,0.0013279858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02310915,0.00051716674,0.0009034954,0.001633659,0.00584547,0.0070953,0.0020764729,0.005946842,0.0015584211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037508786,0.0005149198,0.00104054,0.0006879164,0.10668934,0.008952979,0.014301058,0.011269825,0.00028001016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020769181,0.0000236908,0.0009143414,0.00004347041,0.000018078888,0.00016862157,0.008233896,0.0005636092,0.000409609,0.9836737,0.0006271594,0.005303103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002617789,0.00004900637,0.0017928213,0.00019673171,0.00002607618,0.00036372524,0.0037653586,0.0016800746,0.0012427367,0.97236156,0.018444182,0.000051524297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003093863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021682985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02310915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006868825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059796073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12221432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309907949","doi":"10.1111/japp.12631","title":"Work, Justice, and Collective Capital Institutions: Revisiting Rudolf Meidner and the Case for <scp>Wage‐Earner</scp> Funds","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond; Universidade do Minho; University of Oxford; Concordia University; British Academy; Universitat Pompeu Fabra; Independent Social Research Foundation","keywords":"Capital (architecture); Democracy; Wage; Economic Justice; Power (physics); Politics; Economics; Economic democracy; Property rights; Political economy; Law and economics; Political science; Market economy; Neoclassical economics; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04206139977257874,"score_gpt":0.29051686699867096,"score_spread":0.2484554672260922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309907949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07235205,0.03340846,0.01559418,0.2994333,0.0015808013,0.00005424661,0.000044660832,0.000047971138,0.57748425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97685176,0.0041358215,0.0014611727,0.0056068567,0.0005694907,0.000053003274,0.0000069460557,0.00002774231,0.01128729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99479103,0.002966295,0.00013142262,0.0004944197,0.00074932765,0.000867559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946785,0.0038488207,0.0004035609,0.0003216592,0.00039144055,0.00035615586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009319817,0.00035307204,0.00046452176,0.0024268182,0.007998377,0.009632584,0.0015506801,0.005827817,0.0030957225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063398886,0.0002526541,0.00047493033,0.0014358726,0.06250195,0.008922116,0.0062316754,0.0038773096,0.00037858702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001909513,0.000005332027,0.000049913106,0.00000854065,7.539537e-7,0.000030317051,0.0025014707,0.00008326181,0.000006548674,0.9955077,0.00083824346,0.00096604973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009008746,0.000006035924,0.00023833338,0.00012481435,0.0000025299446,0.000048078386,0.0034940683,0.0002846504,0.00004979785,0.9437995,0.0519337,0.000009522077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010577942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009603332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011702029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011702029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054848976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08490455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366450566","doi":"10.1111/japp.12599","title":"Issue Information","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.021011656307727167,"score_gpt":0.22909461696271435,"score_spread":0.2080829606549872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366450566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001700557,0.0008121295,0.00031004744,0.0015965562,0.0065910504,0.00015382633,0.010112915,0.001062494,0.9791909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007121982,0.00068649685,0.00025936117,0.00078327494,0.0010411113,0.000050580857,0.0054327766,0.00037905667,0.990655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993617,0.00004591763,0.000045419,0.00013528918,0.00032807168,0.000083625535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801385,0.00016825002,0.0000990964,0.00024634122,0.00089319254,0.00057924126],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067300996,0.0014159159,0.0010751812,0.003013478,0.0016233131,0.0069475053,0.0013629469,0.0019162903,0.91624504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030622506,0.0005530991,0.0006957127,0.003400269,0.00041427347,0.0037554316,0.0018990944,0.001941865,0.88077253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011352766,0.000013448663,0.00004410227,0.000071194874,9.379546e-7,0.000013284948,0.0000075023095,0.000013049406,0.00008792852,0.000909495,0.96646345,0.032364193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032624278,0.0000051021007,0.00016272278,0.000036491892,5.729341e-7,0.00001775497,0.000015814867,0.000011813753,0.00002896536,0.00026979626,0.99944574,0.0000019723263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002868121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005807717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08375496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011119075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017691964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119466305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385551352","doi":"10.1111/japp.12601","title":"Issue Information","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.021011656307727167,"score_gpt":0.22909461696271435,"score_spread":0.2080829606549872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385551352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001700557,0.0008121295,0.00031004744,0.0015965562,0.0065910504,0.00015382633,0.010112915,0.001062494,0.9791909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007121982,0.00068649685,0.00025936117,0.00078327494,0.0010411113,0.000050580857,0.0054327766,0.00037905667,0.990655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993617,0.00004591763,0.000045419,0.00013528918,0.00032807168,0.000083625535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801385,0.00016825002,0.0000990964,0.00024634122,0.00089319254,0.00057924126],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067300996,0.0014159159,0.0010751812,0.003013478,0.0016233131,0.0069475053,0.0013629469,0.0019162903,0.91624504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030622506,0.0005530991,0.0006957127,0.003400269,0.00041427347,0.0037554316,0.0018990944,0.001941865,0.88077253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011352766,0.000013448663,0.00004410227,0.000071194874,9.379546e-7,0.000013284948,0.0000075023095,0.000013049406,0.00008792852,0.000909495,0.96646345,0.032364193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032624278,0.0000051021007,0.00016272278,0.000036491892,5.729341e-7,0.00001775497,0.000015814867,0.000011813753,0.00002896536,0.00026979626,0.99944574,0.0000019723263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002868121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005807717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08375496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011119075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017691964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119466305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385809094","doi":"10.1111/japp.12686","title":"Edibility and <i>In Vitro</i> Meat: Ethical Considerations. RachelRobison‐Greene, 2022. Lanham, Lexington Books. x + 150 pp, £73.00 (hb)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.039834906505583564,"score_gpt":0.32162050767987804,"score_spread":0.28178560117429446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385809094","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040385275,0.79000825,0.0015030357,0.07288113,0.014172255,0.00005084799,0.00027977733,0.00028054052,0.12042035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030145703,0.34086004,0.0019353868,0.030325996,0.0039599976,0.00014567231,0.00036766828,0.00034930944,0.6190413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998632,0.0003290757,0.00007006619,0.00015008118,0.0007083498,0.000110387715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977696,0.0011919328,0.00019815139,0.00010385653,0.00048871705,0.00024772683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019609635,0.001373189,0.0008643805,0.0012590368,0.0012693845,0.0049971794,0.0011915546,0.0036990494,0.078360945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004207689,0.0008690482,0.00057552656,0.0015455179,0.0019145692,0.006134815,0.0023273295,0.0056367884,0.051880192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009371795,0.000009886296,0.00003805269,0.00030208085,0.0000029187127,0.00006297734,0.00026211995,0.000016213733,0.00017962455,0.00423461,0.9191859,0.07569634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010091296,0.0000047004964,0.00010473443,0.0004428959,0.0000011794771,0.00017156708,0.00015495776,0.0000076181996,0.000053687578,0.0012430969,0.9978098,0.0000045983097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036434794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009672015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078360945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017956328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030480262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2621435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387575490","doi":"10.1111/japp.12691","title":"<i>Ubuntu</i> Thinking on Biodiversity Loss: The Inadequacies of Egalitarian and Communitarian Solutions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"African cultural and philosophical studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Communitarianism; Anthropocentrism; Environmental ethics; Personhood; Sociology; Animal ethics; Biodiversity; Utilitarianism; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Ecology; Political science; Biology; Liberalism","score_opus":0.07455513470287974,"score_gpt":0.27709087858396747,"score_spread":0.20253574388108775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387575490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08001051,0.018820945,0.046927057,0.29685074,0.001840995,0.00004715033,0.0000354854,0.00009005954,0.5553771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748565,0.0022831652,0.0050197146,0.010618176,0.00034340934,0.000048324742,0.000008708585,0.000047037323,0.0067750835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933948,0.0048913877,0.0000921757,0.000311626,0.00081466034,0.0004954805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713385,0.0015653071,0.00027086193,0.00033162115,0.00044522106,0.00025303007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008548553,0.00047266157,0.00048433914,0.0015740291,0.0069632716,0.009393841,0.0015357243,0.003666775,0.0021777796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046374924,0.00021399994,0.0003531826,0.0008453304,0.0504706,0.008656093,0.0054020965,0.006595587,0.00029783943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059327185,0.000008382255,0.00007418802,0.000018097713,0.0000026336147,0.00001631027,0.003584137,0.0001263902,0.00003354066,0.9906149,0.0017843058,0.0037311912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043161917,0.00001089907,0.00021904083,0.00020104706,0.000004427925,0.00005253261,0.0049692215,0.00070137926,0.00013385728,0.95309806,0.040596157,0.0000090366275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042094192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003613001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009393841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006685821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039539705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04850924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388304075","doi":"10.1111/japp.12602","title":"Issue Information","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.021011656307727167,"score_gpt":0.22909461696271435,"score_spread":0.2080829606549872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388304075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001700557,0.0008121295,0.00031004744,0.0015965562,0.0065910504,0.00015382633,0.010112915,0.001062494,0.9791909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007121982,0.00068649685,0.00025936117,0.00078327494,0.0010411113,0.000050580857,0.0054327766,0.00037905667,0.990655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993617,0.00004591763,0.000045419,0.00013528918,0.00032807168,0.000083625535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801385,0.00016825002,0.0000990964,0.00024634122,0.00089319254,0.00057924126],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067300996,0.0014159159,0.0010751812,0.003013478,0.0016233131,0.0069475053,0.0013629469,0.0019162903,0.91624504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030622506,0.0005530991,0.0006957127,0.003400269,0.00041427347,0.0037554316,0.0018990944,0.001941865,0.88077253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011352766,0.000013448663,0.00004410227,0.000071194874,9.379546e-7,0.000013284948,0.0000075023095,0.000013049406,0.00008792852,0.000909495,0.96646345,0.032364193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032624278,0.0000051021007,0.00016272278,0.000036491892,5.729341e-7,0.00001775497,0.000015814867,0.000011813753,0.00002896536,0.00026979626,0.99944574,0.0000019723263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002868121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005807717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08375496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011119075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017691964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119466305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391051720","doi":"10.1111/japp.12711","title":"Productive Justice in the ‘Post‐Work Future’","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Riksbankens Jubileumsfond; Irish Research Council","keywords":"Economic Justice; Work (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Unemployment; Value (mathematics); Technological change; Sociology; Variety (cybernetics); Distributive justice; Production (economics); Relation (database); Law and economics; Economics; Positive economics; Law; Political science; Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.04695928595927107,"score_gpt":0.3757352954611961,"score_spread":0.32877600950192504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391051720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15165916,0.0025015052,0.025618415,0.056195255,0.0005098517,0.000040518935,0.000036853315,0.000037650098,0.76340085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99248683,0.00017638065,0.00057625485,0.00088940054,0.00010700517,0.000016033096,0.000005716477,0.000008292374,0.0057341275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934836,0.003594888,0.00016315508,0.00047963302,0.0010855913,0.0011931168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941239,0.0018301812,0.0006524558,0.00096866913,0.0014425608,0.0009821207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008493684,0.00019252907,0.00022236547,0.0009881195,0.00823011,0.007475163,0.0010976242,0.0031453287,0.0030715242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062713046,0.00015178895,0.00030380758,0.0005742392,0.041307587,0.0055313995,0.0045250263,0.0031582415,0.00033694625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049113764,0.000015691301,0.00025617986,0.0000057631787,0.0000013086922,0.000041861436,0.0066538844,0.00006574508,0.00005719401,0.99036014,0.0006663,0.0018709484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000543359,0.000021454103,0.0016570527,0.00006481538,0.0000030482147,0.00008144243,0.008515809,0.00031570878,0.00011823525,0.93688744,0.05231766,0.000011888646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034772623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003987368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008493684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004542229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003986153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04491937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391886626","doi":"10.1111/japp.12664","title":"Issue Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01632696698019745,"score_gpt":0.29798481513902125,"score_spread":0.2816578481588238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391886626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016604147,0.0007828921,0.00035667868,0.0019238675,0.006380411,0.00020170517,0.017863665,0.0009772171,0.97134745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00099594,0.00080535037,0.00037778117,0.0011487772,0.0012372193,0.00009586336,0.009752819,0.0004532542,0.98513293],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912375,0.000073173185,0.00006602531,0.00016620447,0.00046720495,0.00010366062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974202,0.00029833228,0.0001429256,0.00033013054,0.0011800723,0.00062829413],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008714396,0.0012758718,0.0010300243,0.003508001,0.0017545293,0.0070430967,0.0014989048,0.0020558604,0.9098304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004466066,0.00057703175,0.0006997125,0.0035764535,0.00046426593,0.003951216,0.002071698,0.002173193,0.85255766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000106128,0.000011238198,0.00004237617,0.00007802031,8.9078026e-7,0.000011694339,0.000009872313,0.000012310453,0.00006379327,0.0012507036,0.9756504,0.022858128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033819847,0.0000042025385,0.0001515947,0.000041571977,5.7251265e-7,0.000016168528,0.000018293265,0.000010919784,0.000025940559,0.00034509224,0.99938035,0.0000018859552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034335668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006548903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09016961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013421534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021386459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12861603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392706257","doi":"10.1111/japp.12724","title":"On the Ethics of Interacting","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"All Souls College, University of Oxford; Leverhulme Trust; University of Leeds; KU Leuven; Universität Wien; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Sociology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08602893023251612,"score_gpt":0.3967186661777949,"score_spread":0.31068973594527877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392706257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06748654,0.0027763385,0.06890084,0.04710718,0.00037143313,0.00008843065,0.00005379173,0.00005670388,0.8131588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97903603,0.0007830595,0.00555862,0.0018134487,0.00016632088,0.000111079884,0.000018397326,0.000038627102,0.0124744065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97309214,0.020982001,0.00056249456,0.0009771213,0.002974935,0.0014112537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841903,0.0095938565,0.0013909974,0.0019708711,0.001928642,0.0009253276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01038629,0.0003797627,0.0004267014,0.0010512428,0.006582687,0.007902553,0.0010732214,0.0039634393,0.0032391455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013208023,0.00033122808,0.0004266709,0.00071767264,0.062341347,0.006794551,0.0064179143,0.0047051646,0.00076710887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000426503,0.000004739679,0.00016024047,0.00000944554,0.0000012536138,0.0000366345,0.003575912,0.00012507028,0.000037321122,0.99425393,0.0005663904,0.0012248205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063627785,0.000009489938,0.00023465691,0.00006228775,0.0000026009002,0.00008795657,0.0029527247,0.0007110866,0.00011408791,0.9693207,0.026489442,0.000008712278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024360847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012947023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01038629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003661537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0549286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401780700","doi":"10.1111/japp.12667","title":"Issue Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017443749611837003,"score_gpt":0.25600946607575376,"score_spread":0.23856571646391675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401780700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019499239,0.0010338902,0.00036276277,0.001964602,0.007454726,0.00016416969,0.011069182,0.0011234937,0.9766322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00083545543,0.00082610245,0.00029646567,0.0010252197,0.0012557344,0.000058351055,0.005535439,0.00042534983,0.9897418],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932086,0.000051953753,0.00004866604,0.00014073086,0.00034951145,0.00008819125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978053,0.00021020162,0.00011765878,0.0002441693,0.0009537558,0.0006689176],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007394799,0.0013218644,0.0010304252,0.0030267802,0.001548826,0.0070715416,0.0013248003,0.0018844383,0.9132775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034232473,0.0005430412,0.0006854812,0.0031169192,0.0004220309,0.0036102454,0.0019871376,0.0019017301,0.8724692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012805347,0.000013166286,0.000044231416,0.00007364782,9.908118e-7,0.000012639683,0.000007498183,0.000013015961,0.00008811732,0.0008570494,0.9651675,0.033709295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003513798,0.000005292426,0.00016418016,0.000035744684,5.8201005e-7,0.00001900036,0.00001574134,0.000012220507,0.000027809092,0.00025825397,0.99945575,0.0000019293266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028031815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059843995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9132775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001090297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018057602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12369901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402616550","doi":"10.1111/japp.12764","title":"The Story of Romantic Love and Polyamory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Romance; Privilege (computing); Feeling; Transcendence (philosophy); Psychoanalysis; Skepticism; Philosophy; Philosophy of love; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02713665974751382,"score_gpt":0.2964339263012419,"score_spread":0.26929726655372804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402616550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36970484,0.0072832825,0.007891544,0.071235426,0.0011702453,0.000031531243,0.00006225516,0.00007338411,0.5425474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98518014,0.0006106749,0.00022426964,0.0018943888,0.00015870616,0.000011700523,0.000007952596,0.000017954691,0.011894276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957842,0.003463481,0.00002992924,0.00015117587,0.00028271883,0.00028837938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981659,0.0010693963,0.00018611894,0.00016088168,0.00013379422,0.00028405225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002212923,0.0003005963,0.00042954637,0.00054965203,0.010691175,0.004966577,0.0006094862,0.0021240888,0.0040592393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004394107,0.0002486074,0.00021573661,0.00051232456,0.030112354,0.0046592564,0.0066074166,0.0062256507,0.0005420687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058408397,0.000048688617,0.0009297713,0.000047266654,0.000008373461,0.0015628067,0.2387033,0.000087781875,0.00029207682,0.7410307,0.010590066,0.0066409176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003399897,0.00017907222,0.0019101376,0.00027100492,0.000012083463,0.004839174,0.26176086,0.0008342851,0.00085740985,0.1643699,0.56488234,0.000049739556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012901772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017428054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010691175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018822413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054402475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013656676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404312763","doi":"10.1111/japp.12668","title":"Issue Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017443749611837003,"score_gpt":0.25600946607575376,"score_spread":0.23856571646391675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404312763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019499239,0.0010338902,0.00036276277,0.001964602,0.007454726,0.00016416969,0.011069182,0.0011234937,0.9766322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00083545543,0.00082610245,0.00029646567,0.0010252197,0.0012557344,0.000058351055,0.005535439,0.00042534983,0.9897418],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932086,0.000051953753,0.00004866604,0.00014073086,0.00034951145,0.00008819125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978053,0.00021020162,0.00011765878,0.0002441693,0.0009537558,0.0006689176],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007394799,0.0013218644,0.0010304252,0.0030267802,0.001548826,0.0070715416,0.0013248003,0.0018844383,0.9132775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034232473,0.0005430412,0.0006854812,0.0031169192,0.0004220309,0.0036102454,0.0019871376,0.0019017301,0.8724692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012805347,0.000013166286,0.000044231416,0.00007364782,9.908118e-7,0.000012639683,0.000007498183,0.000013015961,0.00008811732,0.0008570494,0.9651675,0.033709295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003513798,0.000005292426,0.00016418016,0.000035744684,5.8201005e-7,0.00001900036,0.00001574134,0.000012220507,0.000027809092,0.00025825397,0.99945575,0.0000019293266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028031815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059843995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08672249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001090297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018057602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12369901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404970379","doi":"10.1111/japp.12776","title":"Post‐Christendom Ignorance in Secular Society","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Secularism; Criticism; Sociology; Veil of ignorance; Population; Secular education; Religious identity; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.014447846819327443,"score_gpt":0.3025109990023656,"score_spread":0.2880631521830382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404970379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8808295,0.00048534496,0.00065704004,0.01553644,0.000032795808,0.000008378079,0.00001955994,0.0000047792882,0.10242622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99856,0.000039717044,0.000018010427,0.0002322206,0.0000050135113,9.4383273e-7,0.0000016515583,4.871853e-7,0.0011420334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983455,0.00064463826,0.00003285882,0.000108503584,0.0002829995,0.0005855186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99627006,0.0013513125,0.0010438852,0.00019570524,0.00073268136,0.00040627964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026706695,0.000110846646,0.00021872035,0.00075690076,0.0060750167,0.0028771837,0.00049299654,0.0011725181,0.003918044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031996716,0.000114035574,0.00012492837,0.0005075606,0.018005097,0.0015836775,0.0021846395,0.002305382,0.00009543211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005814935,0.0001505408,0.04351785,0.00005833798,0.000020872503,0.0012086412,0.24814045,0.000496027,0.000844714,0.68834597,0.0027557306,0.014402713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045774214,0.00022618329,0.29085508,0.0005292205,0.00005045368,0.0009965532,0.3031889,0.0028201372,0.0016466164,0.28883204,0.11069654,0.00011261652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25278005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2747068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25278005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012375622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059166052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5026174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406938670","doi":"10.1111/japp.12789","title":"Pregnancy, Gender Identity, Autonomy, and Trust","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Autonomy; Identity (music); Sociology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.04038626860417289,"score_gpt":0.3573379683769712,"score_spread":0.3169516997727983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406938670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7765756,0.0044524544,0.0046842652,0.070770614,0.00037148167,0.00004019671,0.000035520054,0.0000120264085,0.1430579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976418,0.0004989666,0.000154076,0.00083477196,0.000015266944,0.000006435815,0.0000022340346,0.0000016067917,0.0008449318],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953572,0.0035908285,0.00007863837,0.00017217066,0.000326936,0.00047418536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941229,0.003001248,0.0011596337,0.00021411336,0.0002902548,0.0012119444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061552785,0.00012888871,0.000244251,0.00037279312,0.005026017,0.0046431217,0.00043293886,0.0014574906,0.0025398473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00814673,0.00013317775,0.00018390061,0.00028774596,0.024142187,0.0031962274,0.003668014,0.0023284336,0.0001815368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071209906,0.000101196565,0.017892245,0.00008234129,0.000010984317,0.0008536259,0.53530157,0.00016784878,0.0005028925,0.42715788,0.0021263298,0.01573193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021210551,0.00017187456,0.0152818365,0.000587883,0.000013907182,0.0010229669,0.7268348,0.00039521573,0.00044991492,0.19868486,0.05649715,0.000038348713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00576488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038481385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061552785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032907142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030596633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03255266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407422231","doi":"10.1111/japp.12797","title":"Climate Absurdism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Absurdism; Absurdity; Environmental ethics; Argument (complex analysis); Meaning (existential); Climate change; Seriousness; Epistemology; Rhetorical question; Action (physics); Law; Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Ecology","score_opus":0.2805796280846343,"score_gpt":0.4441382003087504,"score_spread":0.16355857222411607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407422231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038527824,0.0045586913,0.03216921,0.17303008,0.0045510177,0.000048017788,0.00009379388,0.00021114433,0.7468102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95732826,0.0011437597,0.0023985289,0.01940932,0.0016059252,0.000046501147,0.000030584913,0.00011526851,0.017921869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99392444,0.002913849,0.00016361118,0.0008259842,0.0017788999,0.00039315526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916224,0.004907608,0.00069528754,0.0009306163,0.0015238908,0.00032025037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005081283,0.00045676698,0.00038084853,0.0009012046,0.0046011,0.0039810636,0.0012480577,0.0041899146,0.008825046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013576192,0.00019820292,0.0003342069,0.0006397076,0.028055888,0.0062994766,0.0042141387,0.0075714127,0.0012666405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013793394,0.000007927514,0.00010354353,0.000038768772,0.00000523304,0.00008314935,0.004836447,0.000096913194,0.00018400524,0.9841854,0.0070745735,0.0033702478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013646141,0.000025633948,0.00033195023,0.00015439416,0.000011301769,0.00017663301,0.002733984,0.00075235777,0.00054852635,0.79642093,0.198813,0.000017673874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016020257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010027422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008825046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040821396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001561037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029618144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410234442","doi":"10.1111/japp.70018","title":"Excess Incarceration","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Criminology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.018620971115435054,"score_gpt":0.3175155368918833,"score_spread":0.29889456577644824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410234442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5035244,0.0015278473,0.05044911,0.005582353,0.00021432001,0.00007772749,0.00035554182,0.00025286604,0.43801582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906399,0.0002171096,0.0013498673,0.00020275825,0.000044976867,0.000021567217,0.000038975566,0.000017530243,0.007467262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985638,0.00033588053,0.00008743632,0.00029340823,0.0004853681,0.00023413659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739,0.0006544259,0.0006132227,0.00044277118,0.00061567326,0.00028387638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001008975,0.00024510667,0.00031958972,0.0012556297,0.00093472126,0.0016550936,0.00065531395,0.00042698317,0.00815444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004090363,0.00009947813,0.00023733797,0.0006835408,0.003483502,0.0017442985,0.002547658,0.00082796,0.00047487646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005304558,0.000057557263,0.011817613,0.00016215531,0.000028007065,0.00034297275,0.0036424769,0.0015737165,0.00085070333,0.9335753,0.0030647537,0.044831708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002086609,0.00018369996,0.03951491,0.00039380073,0.000057337136,0.0018697723,0.008258174,0.0070000608,0.0021186206,0.86375284,0.07679387,0.000036104357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010565575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013561976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00815444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012983407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008961436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027279377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411073256","doi":"10.1111/japp.70025","title":"Pregnancy, Caregiving, and a Supposed Obligation to Gestate","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Pregnancy; Sociology; Philosophy; Psychology; Law; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.014541956812367477,"score_gpt":0.29498988992545944,"score_spread":0.28044793311309196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411073256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17338383,0.032316964,0.02298009,0.26728114,0.0013564164,0.000039372077,0.00006703985,0.000030921685,0.5025442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98560625,0.002774739,0.0010817639,0.0049848063,0.00021568427,0.0000178653,0.0000067454157,0.000006540688,0.0053056125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964095,0.0028716626,0.00006625014,0.00016386922,0.00027887538,0.0002097997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972517,0.0017622977,0.0003271521,0.00015183316,0.0002049135,0.0003021075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045801997,0.0002225778,0.00019768011,0.00037853772,0.0039363997,0.003646219,0.00053556735,0.003124566,0.0028187584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004378257,0.00017202007,0.00019199065,0.0002443996,0.040405195,0.0032712591,0.0030319225,0.0028367226,0.00023465787],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007693231,0.0000071504346,0.00031803356,0.000014497988,0.0000013593705,0.00014612541,0.0123874545,0.00005802885,0.00007209689,0.9840232,0.0012125208,0.00175185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018350922,0.000041038173,0.0017625851,0.0004017101,0.000008906992,0.00078132225,0.018003022,0.00045249122,0.0002566224,0.87156,0.10669179,0.000022130158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038994872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024500124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045801997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028025976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002398532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024222672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414331524","doi":"10.1111/japp.70050","title":"The Epistemic Harms of Botched Apologies for Past Wrongs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation; Public Health Agency of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Silence; Reciprocal; Exploit; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.049895031536452535,"score_gpt":0.2816146781738573,"score_spread":0.2317196466374048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414331524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38753444,0.0023729196,0.16810565,0.066469185,0.0016826325,0.00022301498,0.00006763478,0.0006820026,0.37286243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888997,0.0001592364,0.003629816,0.0014606252,0.000100858844,0.000041413983,0.000006371867,0.00006120409,0.0056407573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810893,0.011352161,0.0006735141,0.001541312,0.0040404117,0.0013032339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9400725,0.040591,0.0045169047,0.00995337,0.0037141663,0.0011520045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020232486,0.00043801634,0.0005139864,0.0014002209,0.006800549,0.008205435,0.0019797487,0.010256755,0.0053046667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0672864,0.0005584536,0.0006917356,0.0005460971,0.033581473,0.013236143,0.011101165,0.009219034,0.0008285764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074805816,0.00006141598,0.00081945467,0.000088728426,0.000030547122,0.0012882239,0.04263373,0.0008495551,0.0011102278,0.9381733,0.0033691346,0.011500856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028054561,0.00006030263,0.00063209183,0.0003216315,0.00003593236,0.00088587706,0.013812483,0.0027173853,0.0021307652,0.9465537,0.032758713,0.0000631442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007829093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010057789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020232486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031646308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002827197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10700089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415788777","doi":"10.1111/japp.70058","title":"Tracking the Epistemic Harms of Marital Rape: The Case for Experiential Injustice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Injustice; Experiential learning; Economic Justice; Tracking (education); Experiential knowledge","score_opus":0.03823389083980112,"score_gpt":0.3390083767347817,"score_spread":0.30077448589498057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415788777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87215054,0.0018122186,0.032802563,0.022186905,0.00015779896,0.00011359354,0.0001025823,0.00009956243,0.07057419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99631053,0.00026649376,0.0022263152,0.00035479627,0.000016456712,0.000034724555,0.000010916182,0.000010291995,0.00076938764],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9763801,0.018585537,0.0005342911,0.0009461815,0.0026448823,0.0009089538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89092344,0.07851553,0.011839162,0.012399362,0.004726408,0.0015961557],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021247843,0.00035723872,0.0004928403,0.0027855267,0.005691919,0.00820284,0.0019621032,0.0039419397,0.0032049974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10127609,0.00056611275,0.00039542568,0.0014092636,0.023241347,0.013279459,0.014094173,0.0058102175,0.00029515853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002251726,0.00019416091,0.050657026,0.0004636131,0.00006206666,0.0022549967,0.72241807,0.00062568224,0.001814103,0.16460478,0.0015794979,0.055100936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023291333,0.0002487931,0.05080469,0.0020004725,0.00009516472,0.0043320702,0.69221807,0.0028855952,0.0032483293,0.19595048,0.048022754,0.00017031962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028699602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027119054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99430805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002951239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023659866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11237073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}