{"meta":{"query_hash":"7eb83feda3ad","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Argumentation in Context"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7eb83feda3ad","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Argumentation+in+Context"},"results":[{"id":"W2060136698","doi":"10.1075/jaic.3.3.02gla","title":"What’s in a name","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Field (mathematics); Discipline; Epistemology; Empirical research; Management science; Sociology; Data science; Social science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.023430960828870705,"score_gpt":0.2928926624987805,"score_spread":0.2694617016699098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060136698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9624694,0.0018019307,0.0000781472,0.0029454462,0.0017614221,0.00007622126,9.923037e-7,0.0000047957583,0.030861653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969942,0.00017169432,0.000048447102,0.00066238747,0.00031372995,0.0000030059607,8.238967e-7,0.000005207452,0.0018005153],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913645,0.00007652089,0.00045429773,0.000059559734,0.00018008106,0.000093066104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994546,0.000101486694,0.00026387855,0.000057496367,0.000102886755,0.000019609897],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050111534,0.000063223706,0.00019418851,0.00026134623,0.000035150555,0.00017074843,0.000093115304,0.000012370419,0.0013926859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008316772,0.000050790415,0.00006566691,0.000037729,0.00007123242,0.00086580426,0.000012300325,0.000106473504,0.000031654326],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012593149,0.00041656935,0.016684527,0.000038467144,0.0002256486,0.00006897276,0.56549835,0.00038157764,0.000108418964,0.2366273,0.008304191,0.17152007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038257828,0.00037257207,0.007394219,0.00070634496,0.00008236417,0.000012242418,0.8026282,0.0004208837,0.00020829591,0.013639508,0.17042929,0.0002802781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000982461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006296657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23712988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054931163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000148078725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067401275","doi":"10.1075/jaic.2.2.03han","title":"Argument kinds and argument roles in the Ontario provincial election, 2011","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Newspaper; Politics; General election; Political science; Currency; Public administration; Positive economics; Law; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.014173292909643887,"score_gpt":0.24331853765339712,"score_spread":0.22914524474375322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067401275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848527,0.00018287987,0.010924194,0.0028449984,0.0004659298,0.00050547323,3.099571e-7,0.000005342973,0.00021821416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978042,0.00003223143,0.001264387,0.0005470727,0.000090036956,0.000040040235,8.8974105e-7,0.0000040176756,0.00021711426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836504,0.0001850244,0.00070649927,0.00015804452,0.00041764145,0.00016775206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991124,0.00008381415,0.0004841466,0.00013585541,0.00013286201,0.000050906547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009213078,0.000113469505,0.00017614248,0.00025555564,0.00007321444,0.0002452142,0.00029611454,0.000045884113,0.00011021204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019369016,0.00007960767,0.000047444744,0.00014095119,0.000016947475,0.0011401809,0.000033682103,0.00021056029,0.000027030263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110085675,0.0011231205,0.6424714,0.000057063746,0.000104224935,0.000050569313,0.14139172,0.00048159843,0.00794622,0.010216759,0.010446781,0.18560047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028981026,0.00045534442,0.981775,0.00010701484,0.0000113720325,0.00010420218,0.0028370172,0.0032148121,0.0020586797,0.00212215,0.0042236205,0.00019268208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010184761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041458227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3393036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003531124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011592907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302292806","doi":"10.1075/jaic.21009.pim","title":"Argument Continuities in theory and practice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argumentative; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Adversarial system; Indigenous; Power (physics); Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02642262883803665,"score_gpt":0.37673395350577243,"score_spread":0.3503113246677358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302292806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.986287,0.0007932592,0.000022879523,0.006832177,0.000806854,0.00012732188,0.0000024876197,0.0000027113754,0.0051253294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974442,0.00028869507,0.00010962847,0.001565853,0.00013377625,0.0000111157815,4.254762e-7,0.0000033793578,0.0004428937],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977008,0.0014506088,0.00031885746,0.000048688693,0.0003539572,0.00012707511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973207,0.0022564312,0.0002749237,0.00002545142,0.00007312503,0.000049370996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030488688,0.00003982626,0.00011548266,0.00014422994,0.00014668381,0.000037308404,0.00008156363,0.000020627938,0.00031245552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001624821,0.000042384105,0.00002439562,0.00014082681,0.000099728226,0.00031704325,0.000021143933,0.00019489924,0.0000013793809],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041805176,0.00018199687,0.048505746,0.000006532772,0.000025714162,0.00006993487,0.6918767,0.000022338174,0.00024557218,0.23461777,0.0010013718,0.023028264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009921502,0.00011645178,0.0037415384,0.000016279608,0.000011626309,0.000013480749,0.8820224,0.0000012724211,0.00008359908,0.019229569,0.09371936,0.000052280575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070727634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006721923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2153882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030952625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019195523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34211686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402395607","doi":"10.1075/jaic.00027.gro","title":"Auditory arguments, advertising, and argumentation theory","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); sort; Key (lock); Computer science; Epistemology; Advertising; Psychology; Information retrieval; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01402189295301961,"score_gpt":0.31813968780421864,"score_spread":0.30411779485119905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402395607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96972406,0.011083861,0.00599224,0.00045678724,0.0053138537,0.00023771351,0.000009615005,0.00003136663,0.0071505224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958817,0.00029356038,0.00022662432,0.0006231632,0.00049921084,0.000017325168,0.00001092376,0.000020459012,0.002427048],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843264,0.00030005956,0.0006276792,0.00019290841,0.0002749468,0.00017176982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921423,0.00027278689,0.0002592833,0.000091749745,0.00008812556,0.00007381794],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009410941,0.00013539246,0.00019748352,0.00041950008,0.00005232,0.000113152484,0.00008693238,0.00007986279,0.0020126922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051222636,0.00011814182,0.000088633475,0.0001898009,0.000059249942,0.00057440286,0.000013953858,0.00025640117,0.00013165233],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009018695,0.00044617357,0.0072758375,0.00016005263,0.0007307733,0.0006232552,0.064873144,0.000012944442,0.011782554,0.06325733,0.020716812,0.8292192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024128282,0.0033234213,0.33771202,0.003448157,0.0015489776,0.0024140652,0.2985755,0.00045453038,0.016829843,0.20135352,0.10835219,0.0018595193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030600888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002448262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82735974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001337084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004942432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413311943","doi":"10.1075/jaic.24015.pim","title":"Is the Canadian administrative state committed to engaging in meaningful dialogue with Indigenous Peoples of Canada?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; State (computer science); Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02793837016358233,"score_gpt":0.31835492971188634,"score_spread":0.29041655954830403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413311943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9611238,0.00012877886,0.000023682296,0.013915668,0.00016139961,0.00016568173,0.000017445627,9.713897e-7,0.024462568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971109,0.000041134055,0.000052214386,0.002128847,0.000016664797,0.0000026836756,6.693131e-7,0.000002405708,0.00064447784],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990188,0.00020675542,0.00031753932,0.000053198728,0.0002727083,0.00013100741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908966,0.0003575456,0.00018845692,0.00003480072,0.00027339705,0.00005613265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006839133,0.00005013193,0.0001206894,0.00017392899,0.00024435832,0.000037110076,0.00016861262,0.000010194115,0.000026086063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002745116,0.000036859543,0.000017240296,0.00028212235,0.000070303046,0.0000965465,0.000009320757,0.0001320424,5.266335e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013207408,0.000041536416,0.34533677,0.000010717106,0.000120116216,0.000050142735,0.6276158,0.00022335438,0.00002889599,0.019547187,0.0042238454,0.002669583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093686115,0.00017626792,0.6164408,0.00039644446,0.000013684691,0.0000019411036,0.35061923,0.000008750458,0.0008302781,0.00058239937,0.029885499,0.000107874315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27699655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006530946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003392484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6018121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}