{"meta":{"query_hash":"43311991cb46","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Assistive Technologies"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/43311991cb46","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Assistive+Technologies"},"results":[{"id":"W1856317910","doi":"10.1108/jat-10-2014-0030","title":"The iPad as a mobile assistive technology device","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Assistive Technologies","topic":"Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Assistive technology; Terminology; Set (abstract data type); Mobile device; Multimedia; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Psychology; Mathematics education; Human–computer interaction; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.09851804436888675,"score_gpt":0.4557157435544772,"score_spread":0.3571976991855904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1856317910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80165184,0.02329863,0.0073214,0.09532534,0.0033816535,0.002889804,0.000051295723,0.004249299,0.06183074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99120516,0.0009667744,0.0056559765,0.00025309413,0.00007789659,0.00042340852,0.0000019392621,0.00003193213,0.0013838444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963661,0.0006530939,0.0013986513,0.00033084681,0.0005493746,0.0007019432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99062526,0.002431651,0.0021835284,0.0014024156,0.0032273494,0.00012978411],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033617122,0.00033294904,0.0007054651,0.00064977305,0.0015069701,0.000027518843,0.0023556591,0.0010110935,0.00003443129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014605819,0.00020636302,0.00019231801,0.0013817011,0.002343123,0.00023501247,0.0012422724,0.003572485,0.00030103474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011261357,0.0006384726,0.57480055,0.00005746451,0.0007819286,0.00014403302,0.00075020466,0.0000118951975,0.0010220625,0.045285605,0.09926647,0.27611518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021741032,0.0018803392,0.119399466,0.00033787842,0.00015686831,0.00017272496,0.14496854,0.000025430183,0.0022132804,0.03239453,0.69584215,0.00043468215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031572756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010587929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5965757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010136125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014314328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940647742","doi":"10.1108/jat-10-2014-0026","title":"Co-designing a speech interface for people with dysarthria","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Assistive Technologies","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Personalization; Participatory design; Human–computer interaction; Interface (matter); Originality; Computer science; Dysarthria; User interface; Modality (human–computer interaction); User experience design; Domain (mathematical analysis); User interface design; Multimedia; Engineering; World Wide Web; Psychology; Creativity","score_opus":0.04068731344452398,"score_gpt":0.3205762683544178,"score_spread":0.27988895490989385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1940647742","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1114764,0.00016271073,0.8829026,0.0036300696,0.00034780454,0.00021014531,0.0000017801974,0.00054735166,0.00072109787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72065777,0.0000050746917,0.27918443,0.000026359363,0.000027819926,0.000015911684,3.3874667e-7,0.000010495981,0.00007180343],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.998691,0.00003871537,0.0004304955,0.00024521913,0.0003178302,0.00027669713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970261,0.00021011358,0.00087360886,0.00036123785,0.0014969062,0.000032031672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074918615,0.00019199862,0.00039443345,0.00069466355,0.000107094376,0.00012493365,0.0011749873,0.00018289921,0.0000020731222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010739128,0.00013898603,0.000069457084,0.0006935343,0.00022481084,0.0009321675,0.00014226847,0.0005770599,0.000012391397],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029079278,0.0012262551,0.04869381,0.00014617897,0.0018453916,0.00083944993,0.0059310487,0.0005587859,0.19977929,0.20821899,0.14672291,0.38312995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021672216,0.005662113,0.0028882083,0.0002857277,0.000038104383,0.0015992357,0.008426489,0.0009841708,0.94323784,0.02508058,0.0092206495,0.00040965553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000025469126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011159078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74345857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028548273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020252183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5667686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046577360","doi":"10.1108/17549450200700013","title":"Evaluation of an activity monitoring system for people with dementia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Assistive Technologies","topic":"Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Alzheimer Society","keywords":"Dementia; Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; Service (business); Nursing; Plan (archaeology); Applied psychology; Gerontology; Medicine; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.07626781301158582,"score_gpt":0.4273191686470855,"score_spread":0.3510513556354997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046577360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827193,0.00047508522,0.015134172,0.00016091317,0.00076596293,0.0003854041,0.000005533572,0.00009071391,0.00026290494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920199,0.000011169371,0.007802984,5.1052734e-7,0.00013132294,0.000017503098,5.5777247e-7,0.000009313806,0.000006720186],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865055,0.00012534525,0.0003920258,0.000094261384,0.00052901567,0.00020877538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963989,0.00035302262,0.0010260576,0.000152495,0.0020428675,0.000026605327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043076104,0.00008566917,0.0003070354,0.0002824152,0.0002148752,0.000005044562,0.00014856498,0.00015711716,0.000002706523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056711194,0.00005970967,0.000059445447,0.00025602418,0.000044152028,0.00017604283,0.000026633958,0.00027118446,4.905735e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002336085,0.00033972194,0.392625,0.0007611316,0.00074625225,0.000009816326,0.0024214708,0.00008883147,0.027215859,0.00028518133,0.0006198883,0.5725508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014832468,0.0010953087,0.84306985,0.00061496766,0.00072719186,0.0000110591145,0.09451546,0.000057729696,0.058050126,0.00020990448,0.00007964635,0.00008548165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039348775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009507464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5724653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044049567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003011022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24348897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057906438","doi":"10.1108/17549451211214373","title":"The search for a suitable outcome measure for use in evaluating the outcome of provision of an environmental control system","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Assistive Technologies","topic":"Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Originality; Control (management); Scale (ratio); Service (business); Psychology; Service provider; Measure (data warehouse); Medical education; Knowledge management; Applied psychology; Process management; Operations management; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Business; Marketing; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.25400213418398926,"score_gpt":0.49664710905937864,"score_spread":0.24264497487538939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057906438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9824444,0.00087193097,0.011730345,0.0018246273,0.00024471738,0.0026447526,0.00013154626,0.000071394934,0.00003625083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99150413,0.000019035402,0.008008385,0.00001910193,0.00002266074,0.0003619537,0.0000020451857,0.000015188456,0.000047505568],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99669564,0.00087134686,0.0015223414,0.00012906386,0.00036374983,0.00041786872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892888,0.007673125,0.0017613659,0.00073137565,0.0005133371,0.000032009746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012611213,0.00014633348,0.0005707809,0.00018306497,0.00065122556,0.000007509544,0.00090577424,0.00034749016,0.0000023699636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006805694,0.000075573524,0.00018238448,0.00016630073,0.00054399093,0.0002458359,0.00024098059,0.00097359385,7.8084105e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008084456,0.00021316261,0.9788716,0.00016398726,0.00007918186,1.681518e-7,0.00028185578,0.000011653746,0.0036241321,0.0031740405,0.000057771427,0.012713989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024844967,0.0011043492,0.9303503,0.00024281362,0.00011474665,0.0000046272576,0.0617454,0.0012001451,0.0021194161,0.00020488618,0.00033344785,0.00009537097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003275735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006966542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061463542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004987487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013747191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8147543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070822273","doi":"10.1108/jat-01-2014-0004","title":"Leveraging everyday technology for people living with dementia: a case study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Assistive Technologies","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Bespoke; Dementia; Originality; Mainstream; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Perception; Psychological intervention; Computer science; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11471423751290084,"score_gpt":0.39936271059902273,"score_spread":0.2846484730861219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070822273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97119325,0.0003039613,0.025092326,0.0011483945,0.0004748884,0.0013244719,0.0000056528415,0.00023266711,0.00022436788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890705,0.000024754156,0.010330105,0.00013899618,0.00007627491,0.00025209482,0.0000012872295,0.000022451773,0.000083534665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997836,0.00022234343,0.00086458167,0.00023295033,0.00029507352,0.0005490301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967326,0.0011544325,0.0011670829,0.00029698023,0.0005772104,0.00007171848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017925537,0.0002024045,0.00053410145,0.00062546396,0.0009851502,0.000011232623,0.0003103801,0.00020618382,0.000019085255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063486135,0.00013801397,0.00006956311,0.00045498635,0.00009066289,0.00014470969,0.00021019955,0.00079963566,0.000007132091],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001264264,0.00041607762,0.98183334,0.00043701622,0.00020094348,0.00012591663,0.0024023189,0.0000086065065,0.000037825666,0.0002784186,0.00075247517,0.01338066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0062989704,0.014232473,0.097430155,0.0039034493,0.00052311993,0.0009239974,0.8658697,0.0002581548,0.0003776608,0.0019950732,0.007648372,0.0005388458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007563311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052372064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88440317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027129945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022035326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75770783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175807348","doi":"10.1108/jat-10-2014-0027","title":"TalkBox: a DIY communication board case study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Assistive Technologies","topic":"Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Participatory design; Citizen journalism; Assistive technology; Engineering; Design technology; Value (mathematics); Design methods; Knowledge management; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Engineering management; Engineering ethics; Systems engineering; World Wide Web; Sociology; Qualitative research; Operations management","score_opus":0.1726837626750926,"score_gpt":0.47562139617355204,"score_spread":0.3029376334984594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175807348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98281974,0.0013806964,0.0015614877,0.0075856512,0.00034591995,0.0008085358,0.000008923124,0.0008034612,0.0046855626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990721,0.00013283586,0.008588028,0.00009519809,0.00002995306,0.00011357003,0.0000015437316,0.000018886121,0.00029897614],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968923,0.0010978176,0.0011415629,0.00019937768,0.00035110716,0.00031783967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940639,0.0010228836,0.001569328,0.0014659629,0.0017813576,0.00009654555],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031397666,0.00020948614,0.0005622854,0.00044835883,0.00069042254,0.0000146063285,0.0012001077,0.00043234913,0.000030747044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050895507,0.00015947154,0.00011318378,0.00055084034,0.0006846456,0.00026485437,0.0010331615,0.002312558,0.00005394166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026487897,0.0013446495,0.931833,0.000025685258,0.00027800267,0.0011044026,0.0043611587,0.0000044196254,0.000081181104,0.0013872167,0.035519708,0.023795681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00332584,0.001339597,0.18388902,0.00018497377,0.00017415437,0.0010209604,0.7823012,0.00003310309,0.00012806637,0.0045778416,0.022728523,0.0002967272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002545387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008252625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77794003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006284727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004588432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507234263","doi":"10.1108/jat-12-2015-0037","title":"An instrument to measure mobile shower commode usability: the eMAST 1.0","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Assistive Technologies","topic":"Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cronbach's alpha; Usability; Reliability (semiconductor); Convergent validity; Medicine; Clinical psychology; Psychology; Internal consistency; Psychometrics; Computer science; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.09309365045587749,"score_gpt":0.4185458071335911,"score_spread":0.3254521566777136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507234263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89332396,0.00034095792,0.020620907,0.081421696,0.00057145813,0.0012522525,0.000053947366,0.00074399734,0.0016708053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99445194,0.00013815721,0.0043876735,0.00047808726,0.00005252089,0.00029679507,6.7205485e-7,0.000018955545,0.00017521014],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970949,0.0007938376,0.00097289466,0.00027721428,0.00042070422,0.00044041284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481726,0.0014183115,0.00083034224,0.001742719,0.0010906665,0.00010069407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029199107,0.00022950962,0.000490326,0.0002663636,0.000829841,0.000013739741,0.001941863,0.00044246527,0.00016992773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032972544,0.00010761148,0.00014486295,0.00042746804,0.0010574352,0.00024899765,0.0006639979,0.0013239817,0.000088002045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039590572,0.0005303481,0.5025309,0.000021827418,0.00015770503,0.000006647862,0.0007220955,0.000004854425,0.010813728,0.0049478356,0.013347852,0.46652034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015215182,0.0019681046,0.8138368,0.00064698304,0.00009030994,0.000026944554,0.04247367,0.000011019285,0.0049221907,0.009500289,0.12461977,0.0003823693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019664349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019965848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46613798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073920476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032711218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.638255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}