{"meta":{"query_hash":"43311991cb46","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Assistive Technologies"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/43311991cb46","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Assistive+Technologies"},"results":[{"id":"W1856317910","doi":"10.1108/jat-10-2014-0030","title":"The iPad as a mobile assistive technology device","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Assistive Technologies","topic":"Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Assistive technology; Terminology; Set (abstract data type); Mobile device; Multimedia; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Psychology; Mathematics education; Human–computer interaction; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.09851804436888675,"score_gpt":0.4557157435544772,"score_spread":0.3571976991855904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1856317910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20148094,0.045740597,0.106582865,0.01298274,0.0056398404,0.0012663514,0.0012679474,0.0027624203,0.6222763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7279982,0.030316705,0.09339607,0.005675611,0.0017822555,0.0011789077,0.00068926165,0.00039463857,0.13856839],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980824,0.0005624832,0.00017813554,0.00025506908,0.0007607571,0.0001611257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824,0.0006615648,0.00015907026,0.00019095223,0.00053471257,0.00021372832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010935293,0.00057469006,0.0003486194,0.0008308268,0.0008104059,0.0037422758,0.0008968249,0.0011777825,0.009971159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003621028,0.00018095148,0.00038809478,0.0007136689,0.0010480892,0.002810546,0.003158255,0.0011360218,0.0047809635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002898687,0.0003058335,0.012182381,0.003519083,0.000034036602,0.0025816849,0.011187496,0.00024885032,0.025217602,0.027691567,0.049857017,0.8668846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028475091,0.0011068841,0.019835168,0.0022089428,0.000114237046,0.015196436,0.0062291487,0.0006380217,0.010631834,0.0029683204,0.94096017,0.000082421495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004333313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005184013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009971159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003308604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080383423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033356905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940647742","doi":"10.1108/jat-10-2014-0026","title":"Co-designing a speech interface for people with dysarthria","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Assistive Technologies","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Personalization; Participatory design; Human–computer interaction; Interface (matter); Originality; Computer science; Dysarthria; User interface; Modality (human–computer interaction); User experience design; Domain (mathematical analysis); User interface design; Multimedia; Engineering; World Wide Web; Psychology; Creativity","score_opus":0.04068731344452398,"score_gpt":0.3205762683544178,"score_spread":0.27988895490989385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1940647742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79320216,0.0007780823,0.19039533,0.0006542763,0.00018448374,0.0019449943,0.00013965275,0.0020206629,0.01068038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6942051,0.00052528805,0.29155353,0.00039288675,0.00005011303,0.0016438618,0.00030664686,0.00033626336,0.010986203],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935221,0.0037155133,0.0005525433,0.00066920934,0.0012233559,0.00031740137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98941106,0.005853803,0.0004643037,0.0010742191,0.0025966237,0.00059993984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087804785,0.0009754067,0.0007673198,0.00096263527,0.0013833961,0.0028958677,0.0012090172,0.0017361862,0.0037836488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01856074,0.00041058447,0.0008545231,0.00037818335,0.0012360452,0.0022198246,0.00290587,0.0009149654,0.0018928357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001442616,0.003439683,0.035898935,0.0036890572,0.00026069043,0.003862071,0.13098451,0.0028169388,0.13463812,0.0027061615,0.0073758774,0.67288536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019826258,0.025630662,0.09784802,0.002618076,0.0020150042,0.0385691,0.18583827,0.05167125,0.26161364,0.012254552,0.31882808,0.0011306411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057300186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00121723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0087804785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005574251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001667691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04643619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046577360","doi":"10.1108/17549450200700013","title":"Evaluation of an activity monitoring system for people with dementia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Assistive Technologies","topic":"Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Alzheimer Society","keywords":"Dementia; Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; Service (business); Nursing; Plan (archaeology); Applied psychology; Gerontology; Medicine; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.07626781301158582,"score_gpt":0.4273191686470855,"score_spread":0.3510513556354997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046577360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937972,0.00019724903,0.0025783228,0.00018508338,0.00003658507,0.001191711,0.00013253311,0.00018853198,0.0016927569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825429,0.00028507705,0.014659445,0.00011331689,0.000029633415,0.00086900196,0.0003815551,0.000018955296,0.0011002251],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626154,0.002227792,0.000383105,0.00016619191,0.0007233175,0.00023807483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499017,0.0020349303,0.00025845243,0.0002594964,0.001958802,0.00049822644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059256344,0.0006349086,0.0006354855,0.00056306936,0.000719844,0.0008307754,0.00078494154,0.0006780832,0.0013162306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0141106155,0.00024334049,0.00041970232,0.0003319305,0.00036656056,0.0007732946,0.00074616796,0.00038043267,0.00025973312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018812828,0.020113802,0.14013472,0.0058680912,0.0005171818,0.0035676104,0.036392696,0.006295945,0.052943192,0.0007193148,0.007089031,0.7075456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01029325,0.2106775,0.536563,0.002003181,0.0025143567,0.0062890463,0.047878213,0.037253283,0.07456438,0.0008172191,0.070501335,0.00064525456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045692767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057346085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059256344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008517145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00139044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031338155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057906438","doi":"10.1108/17549451211214373","title":"The search for a suitable outcome measure for use in evaluating the outcome of provision of an environmental control system","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Assistive Technologies","topic":"Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Originality; Control (management); Scale (ratio); Service (business); Psychology; Service provider; Measure (data warehouse); Medical education; Knowledge management; Applied psychology; Process management; Operations management; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Business; Marketing; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.25400213418398926,"score_gpt":0.49664710905937864,"score_spread":0.24264497487538939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057906438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76660496,0.017888876,0.12754665,0.014054385,0.0016250637,0.026005968,0.009721405,0.00025542016,0.036297265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9023098,0.0022792758,0.06579764,0.0008535717,0.00019917855,0.025440086,0.0018704287,0.00005093044,0.0011989893],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92628294,0.049504984,0.012585929,0.0017144595,0.00908983,0.0008219236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8601399,0.087708466,0.022968806,0.00503309,0.0222451,0.0019045835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.078055836,0.00065317034,0.0015647813,0.0038743215,0.001806933,0.0033193897,0.0011037593,0.0013992058,0.0037782893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16634586,0.00025537942,0.0020947044,0.0042063724,0.0020412675,0.0039064838,0.0019972334,0.0017827038,0.0006281865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034890275,0.002267361,0.4423019,0.01706378,0.001521708,0.000295627,0.007997103,0.0015881116,0.0017559156,0.022163734,0.007916578,0.49163923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012505759,0.027044488,0.7894355,0.025610793,0.0036039555,0.001434308,0.0326265,0.011385381,0.015177468,0.036332298,0.055575836,0.000522832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001880653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002557312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078055836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034899323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007267734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41280365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070822273","doi":"10.1108/jat-01-2014-0004","title":"Leveraging everyday technology for people living with dementia: a case study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Assistive Technologies","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Bespoke; Dementia; Originality; Mainstream; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Perception; Psychological intervention; Computer science; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11471423751290084,"score_gpt":0.39936271059902273,"score_spread":0.2846484730861219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070822273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98264664,0.001965127,0.0019238616,0.0032883035,0.00013160253,0.0003667584,0.00008423251,0.000027794373,0.009565686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844528,0.0037201622,0.0033161538,0.0014528121,0.00009592699,0.0003604816,0.00005038162,0.000025376317,0.006525879],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953949,0.0026871467,0.00024016332,0.0002919006,0.0005896321,0.00079629145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99399143,0.0032262001,0.0006688534,0.0003673775,0.0004559825,0.0012900801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042722346,0.0010839057,0.0009375508,0.0022753694,0.014877374,0.003712429,0.0022166818,0.0052158907,0.0033132727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009410873,0.0008230802,0.0009902886,0.0019304069,0.005766766,0.0037857564,0.005557017,0.004570728,0.0007724142],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016592893,0.0017202789,0.011999935,0.0007609538,0.0000324389,0.07210372,0.8820425,0.00014479537,0.000984753,0.002828581,0.003508947,0.023707157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000457337,0.00072154356,0.00499281,0.00066262303,0.000039381397,0.080744974,0.8775225,0.00025823936,0.000804277,0.0009572195,0.033182632,0.0000681382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069519575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019588249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014877374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026770679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026613113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022594035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175807348","doi":"10.1108/jat-10-2014-0027","title":"TalkBox: a DIY communication board case study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Assistive Technologies","topic":"Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Participatory design; Citizen journalism; Assistive technology; Engineering; Design technology; Value (mathematics); Design methods; Knowledge management; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Engineering management; Engineering ethics; Systems engineering; World Wide Web; Sociology; Qualitative research; Operations management","score_opus":0.1726837626750926,"score_gpt":0.47562139617355204,"score_spread":0.3029376334984594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175807348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89163697,0.0009394808,0.017934602,0.008911484,0.00047988904,0.0012328819,0.00048553263,0.00028624444,0.078092985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436613,0.0007137009,0.009526391,0.001412261,0.000115097646,0.0009061475,0.00025664968,0.00018191157,0.04322654],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929461,0.0050137667,0.00027761783,0.00041436005,0.00070959295,0.00063865224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922351,0.004059166,0.00057996373,0.00051228446,0.00069755444,0.0019159548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005253521,0.00060280436,0.00042962068,0.0012826652,0.009536455,0.004409008,0.0015975381,0.003391248,0.013864274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012801193,0.00031120155,0.00037458507,0.0010790912,0.0036549969,0.004167714,0.005384849,0.002104993,0.002317093],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016127743,0.0041351924,0.036608454,0.0020588383,0.0000939565,0.09910687,0.55030817,0.0031099317,0.0073708883,0.04665671,0.07912523,0.16981304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016759452,0.0011867855,0.014551106,0.0008112681,0.00004722417,0.025165835,0.5204101,0.0032854655,0.004052776,0.0047267904,0.42548248,0.00011256766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046194717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007510357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013864274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033393977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022669877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04638064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507234263","doi":"10.1108/jat-12-2015-0037","title":"An instrument to measure mobile shower commode usability: the eMAST 1.0","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Assistive Technologies","topic":"Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cronbach's alpha; Usability; Reliability (semiconductor); Convergent validity; Medicine; Clinical psychology; Psychology; Internal consistency; Psychometrics; Computer science; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.09309365045587749,"score_gpt":0.4185458071335911,"score_spread":0.3254521566777136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507234263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9506897,0.0008030042,0.020101553,0.0005576165,0.00012466082,0.00577678,0.005664477,0.0007520756,0.015530227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8697262,0.0010803873,0.10583586,0.00054923154,0.00008578744,0.009190905,0.0065661604,0.00012222868,0.0068433266],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649066,0.001186265,0.0006925751,0.00018519921,0.0012413895,0.00020399949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98779094,0.004268363,0.0027831974,0.00053091487,0.0042130644,0.00041340126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070396727,0.0005514165,0.00050026603,0.0020990176,0.00029029255,0.0008140241,0.0008778685,0.0005517072,0.0036034626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021849122,0.00036012664,0.0011185867,0.00095635763,0.0003127398,0.0012746886,0.0013562668,0.0007950201,0.0011074212],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000911907,0.0014716738,0.4513689,0.0021707406,0.00028699872,0.00021356856,0.0027564638,0.001960725,0.007166817,0.0012347484,0.016035462,0.5144221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013321366,0.0030660436,0.9621467,0.0005870374,0.00016278184,0.00091952673,0.0011765503,0.0045111952,0.0024723827,0.00050946063,0.024186159,0.00012904125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019534067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037980892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070396727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006796408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001032835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037229776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}