{"meta":{"query_hash":"628dfc12829a","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making"},"cohort_total":62,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":62,"exported":62,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/628dfc12829a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Behavioral+Decision+Making"},"results":[{"id":"W1488440709","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1864","title":"Intelligence, Executive Functions, and Decision Making as Predictors of Antisocial Behavior in an Adolescent Sample of Justice‐Involved Youth and a Community Comparison Group","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Health; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; University of Toronto; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Attribution; Cognition; Executive functions; Sample (material); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Antisocial personality disorder; Economic Justice; Clinical psychology; Poison control; Injury prevention; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.27678916086873495,"score_gpt":0.41472923649241206,"score_spread":0.1379400756236771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488440709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9999163,0.000010681752,0.0000095366395,0.0000044213934,8.419864e-7,0.0000027360427,0.000013760135,4.4531416e-7,0.000041371703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998417,0.000011440222,0.000024319004,0.000004240171,0.0000017579907,0.0000048616953,0.000060741324,6.110229e-7,0.000050266175],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997478,0.000058448495,0.000025427627,0.000051473296,0.00007239623,0.000044541965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991811,0.00015009899,0.00025770726,0.000038491595,0.000121868194,0.0002506714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005359984,0.00038714494,0.00039185773,0.0012928563,0.0005443902,0.00066154357,0.000236373,0.00035580102,0.0012030482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021698826,0.000231661,0.00020412897,0.00043800133,0.0004439096,0.00037162643,0.0006454911,0.00057203276,0.00013766658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009027198,0.00017847146,0.9978829,0.0000034114812,0.000022505023,0.000091355585,0.00034661283,0.000020366855,0.0003853998,0.000016176062,0.00003902342,0.0009234519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075495536,0.00012264137,0.99884725,0.0000029638381,0.000008714521,0.00017918975,0.0004980314,0.00020166012,0.000070856964,0.00002215068,0.000037130238,0.0000017728479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004075606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005345474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004075606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025561426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021078176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008103788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576290844","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1792","title":"Extreme Outcomes Sway Risky Decisions from Experience","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Gambling Research Institute, University of Calgary; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Risk-seeking; Actuarial science; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.25457423032658,"score_gpt":0.45132422197669936,"score_spread":0.19674999165011936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576290844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99356914,0.000097050935,0.0016624065,0.00010010961,0.000012417141,0.000011537372,0.000023321745,0.000011592818,0.0045124446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854916,0.000058881422,0.0009962432,0.00006190436,0.000005860956,0.000010709756,0.000026298363,0.0000066519947,0.00028421555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987772,0.0006151694,0.00007184411,0.00022674153,0.00020883707,0.00010022263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920075,0.0045609865,0.0015841796,0.001001039,0.00018050872,0.00066578464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017122274,0.0003618861,0.00042462186,0.00029875463,0.00042257272,0.0015148715,0.00027687103,0.0008415964,0.0065651946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012850275,0.00038071678,0.00036394867,0.00016071,0.0012809174,0.0014089906,0.0018344326,0.0012954558,0.0003411514],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013776935,0.004876903,0.42846984,0.0021696943,0.0017420603,0.0020496761,0.015149644,0.03352722,0.25193378,0.05260701,0.0033967074,0.19030055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067840057,0.008952053,0.76752406,0.00039690145,0.0007558963,0.001202022,0.0065126303,0.03130662,0.030131422,0.14370051,0.008472187,0.00036735053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003764568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005986542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065651946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024922966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017465538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021962702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588403970","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1874","title":"A Goal‐Priming Approach to Cognitive Consistency: Applications to Judgment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Priming (agriculture); Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Preference; Wishful thinking; Task (project management); Process (computing); Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.30705424950436955,"score_gpt":0.4760887536961202,"score_spread":0.16903450419175065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588403970","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045641612,0.00044036383,0.93870544,0.00082184374,0.00011321716,0.00036667864,0.0000666348,0.00044246655,0.013401871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49927363,0.00022327328,0.4974801,0.00035331122,0.00015469879,0.0011699933,0.000034855973,0.00018451597,0.0011255923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921726,0.0058443015,0.0002219077,0.00084931677,0.00078825117,0.00012371442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92054296,0.06755133,0.0031748007,0.005377545,0.0024301817,0.0009231768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0145775415,0.00086908625,0.00086611876,0.0019675808,0.0008623037,0.0020434472,0.0013946275,0.0014278807,0.0065775095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06860009,0.000895736,0.0011287443,0.0018170719,0.0041039614,0.0031751993,0.0027746006,0.0027607097,0.00053502346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092963874,0.0009806941,0.008568928,0.0006691044,0.00020556935,0.0004110013,0.003907246,0.014833721,0.025198812,0.7146221,0.0019699465,0.22770311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024092116,0.00032212352,0.005628539,0.00007055663,0.0000743476,0.00025862624,0.00017371726,0.11046165,0.0070372135,0.87197727,0.0036744077,0.00008064201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081366353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003937146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0145775415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012125948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095492136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07709432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1776244204","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1795","title":"Altering the Shape of Punishment Distributions Affects Decision Making in a Modified Iowa Gambling Task","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; McMaster University; Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Skew; Iowa gambling task; Variance (accounting); Psychology; Preference; Task (project management); Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Analysis of variance; Perception; Econometrics; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Cognition; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Communication; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.13856622509164848,"score_gpt":0.4314551819299026,"score_spread":0.2928889568382541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1776244204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99899274,0.000011828494,0.0006505645,0.000016870896,0.000006884357,0.000012296205,0.00005002836,0.000014508753,0.00024427247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997413,0.000028132003,0.0017329056,0.00005233912,0.0000022510915,0.000050636256,0.000103497834,0.000020576064,0.0005966884],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.999539,0.00016673007,0.000047609872,0.00009663548,0.00010577077,0.000044216416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978617,0.0009005759,0.00054057076,0.0002827561,0.00009872778,0.00031572796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007149002,0.00042176724,0.00035717044,0.00023752655,0.000109910834,0.00057590374,0.00023415837,0.00037289283,0.0015866281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039669396,0.00024461336,0.00015678041,0.00014358028,0.00035795788,0.00020453948,0.00039498904,0.0007435073,0.00016174556],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013528585,0.004508221,0.057370987,0.00011849245,0.00025524508,0.0001409893,0.00040902453,0.00440391,0.896087,0.00045565885,0.0006741983,0.02204775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008668034,0.01213034,0.8196817,0.00007287256,0.00023073274,0.00035378296,0.00036404957,0.049674578,0.11271164,0.0022641341,0.0014934993,0.00015586094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009566029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013744542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0015866281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021103573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018434548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005307734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1806059501","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1863","title":"When Does Framing Influence Preferences, Risk Perceptions, and Risk Attitudes? The Explicated Valence Account","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"York University; Government of Canada; Defence Research and Development Canada","keywords":"Framing effect; Framing (construction); Prospect theory; Risk perception; Perception; Risk-seeking; Psychology; Valence (chemistry); Social psychology; Economics; Loss aversion; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Engineering; Chemistry","score_opus":0.1262111218641538,"score_gpt":0.4200131924037594,"score_spread":0.2938020705396056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1806059501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93533695,0.0007487716,0.02366378,0.0021795703,0.0001651929,0.00005556049,0.00010020048,0.00003324008,0.03771667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974172,0.00013124786,0.0019903656,0.00011522516,0.000031882584,0.00001487953,0.000028206752,0.000008148583,0.00026280017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971411,0.0018989552,0.00010052242,0.00021420766,0.00047917114,0.0001659924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795442,0.014057292,0.002867675,0.0018010653,0.0012238102,0.0005060607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044865333,0.0004940477,0.0004136671,0.00077789987,0.00037998505,0.0033195098,0.00049227383,0.0010759773,0.0028364544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023996586,0.00043276243,0.00044368513,0.00039443249,0.0020534357,0.002731047,0.0012635521,0.0018491114,0.0001882711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002991804,0.0015349819,0.32202816,0.0008938838,0.00086608157,0.0012645926,0.014160491,0.013994521,0.02339441,0.47419092,0.0024484056,0.14223176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031497734,0.000788121,0.24385603,0.00051868573,0.00063640374,0.00047153016,0.0049726483,0.07444609,0.0074573625,0.66182405,0.0044515464,0.00026263035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008183702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007279925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044865333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006702604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035684186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023727298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1813082302","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1844","title":"‘Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is!’: Effects of Streaks on Confidence and Betting in a Binary Choice Task","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Medical Research Council","keywords":"Roulette; Stochastic game; Psychology; Outcome (game theory); Task (project management); Randomness; Social psychology; Confidence interval; Econometrics; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08297874841532561,"score_gpt":0.41757058493766,"score_spread":0.33459183652233443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1813082302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992569,0.00002972941,0.0001945706,0.000020676891,0.000006328616,0.0000097895645,0.000031932927,0.00001534949,0.00043478297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826556,0.000044250297,0.0009403874,0.000061168044,0.000010878391,0.00005117083,0.00010897273,0.000027609909,0.0004900127],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983411,0.00064882636,0.00016945237,0.000276245,0.00047322232,0.000091181275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9609307,0.027845258,0.006916368,0.0021534653,0.00059872813,0.0015553304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023600704,0.00051650166,0.0006518392,0.00034845027,0.00021017846,0.0010272891,0.0005484641,0.0008935879,0.002635316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031486597,0.00052445236,0.000217742,0.0002406073,0.0005936275,0.0006423649,0.0006600825,0.0012997313,0.0003067916],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08305247,0.014823894,0.24280404,0.00063460576,0.00090347393,0.0008408724,0.0031308087,0.009210655,0.5777213,0.0009087032,0.0016470425,0.064322144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008174541,0.012792806,0.94074285,0.00006154033,0.00020562627,0.00037174995,0.0002761955,0.020418633,0.021974772,0.0014641227,0.00075365533,0.00012060888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087813404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009502056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002635316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021151477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013753945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012481451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965719994","doi":"10.1002/bdm.649","title":"Evaluating advisors: A policy‐capturing study under conditions of complete and missing information","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Advice (programming); Interpersonal communication; Contrast (vision); Psychology; Decision aids; Knowledge management; Computer science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2487715698887714,"score_gpt":0.5712880498592928,"score_spread":0.32251647997052146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965719994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974558,0.000051842693,0.0018382041,0.0001198827,0.0000027756898,0.00010838725,0.00012888758,0.0000051799475,0.00028918014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996376,0.000038776736,0.0030414986,0.000048003352,0.000008450749,0.00019526032,0.00019034535,0.000002200034,0.00009955902],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9629196,0.02878929,0.002126044,0.0021102906,0.0028494154,0.0012053936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.51145333,0.39918867,0.051009156,0.028332967,0.007378731,0.0026371256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04343806,0.0005273226,0.0011774763,0.0015635518,0.0023000534,0.0038303034,0.0020236503,0.0020952746,0.0034324443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21649389,0.0009332462,0.0014889898,0.0023124325,0.0018425706,0.0036675676,0.0033476492,0.0026298938,0.00025652637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007854831,0.0057867104,0.88552684,0.00094910996,0.001669478,0.0005001503,0.022668434,0.010583216,0.0025379525,0.005687209,0.00093998504,0.05529616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001235225,0.011648577,0.8287751,0.0005954571,0.002427936,0.0005911802,0.0320182,0.09522106,0.010184121,0.013224954,0.003691575,0.00038665516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011955182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009139268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04343806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003068426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025604602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22972518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977697135","doi":"10.1002/bdm.544","title":"The reasoning skills and thinking dispositions of problem gamblers: a dual‐process taxonomy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Taxonomy (biology); Set (abstract data type); Competence (human resources); Volition (linguistics); Cognitive psychology; Inference; Dual (grammatical number); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.05408152596689883,"score_gpt":0.40306658188837896,"score_spread":0.3489850559214801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977697135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986205,0.000055639557,0.00042922588,0.0000630477,0.000002590597,0.000046047742,0.00004908034,0.0000055521377,0.0007283391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884427,0.000045409208,0.0008024457,0.000012017461,0.0000027144329,0.000032657874,0.000104357794,0.0000015449859,0.00015437946],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937963,0.00012197276,0.000085539185,0.00006281866,0.00025347204,0.00009650652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953394,0.0014386943,0.001710047,0.00027658755,0.00043787033,0.00079748157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001545799,0.0006298994,0.00043879994,0.004162216,0.0005169979,0.0014228447,0.00047679257,0.00087799644,0.0026896733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010802626,0.00035679305,0.0005032315,0.0008940626,0.0014362009,0.0011706309,0.0015304731,0.0014114215,0.00026989827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002178331,0.00085576135,0.98071676,0.00004711987,0.000052082978,0.00027283284,0.0022283613,0.00046706232,0.0011894419,0.0012546601,0.00016510506,0.012532949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076201686,0.00063360255,0.9758512,0.00005577087,0.000047236394,0.0019573863,0.0027511786,0.007527923,0.00046776296,0.010074796,0.00052702083,0.000029969922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001833942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001433931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004162216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000533361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004916928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008997798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979248804","doi":"10.1002/bdm.626","title":"How do we evaluate future gambles? Experimental evidence on path dependency in risky intertemporal choice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Management and Science University; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Lottery; Discounting; Econometrics; Path (computing); Economics; Time preference; Intertemporal choice; Choice set; Prospect theory; Expected utility hypothesis; Value (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Statistics","score_opus":0.26264413727393615,"score_gpt":0.47354757966716654,"score_spread":0.2109034423932304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979248804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99192446,0.00010931467,0.003829486,0.00013626284,0.000010545327,0.00008057706,0.000041972286,0.000018795887,0.0038485224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934087,0.0001383887,0.0055806246,0.000099304765,0.000009954147,0.00011504063,0.000057940248,0.000019335173,0.00057066535],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99384695,0.0040014023,0.0003677596,0.0006618702,0.0009883873,0.00013352031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81032175,0.16088445,0.013510919,0.012324213,0.0015082131,0.0014504489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012545635,0.00041664043,0.00057643757,0.000421272,0.00034192912,0.0013356558,0.00085581915,0.0012283484,0.004574116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08895485,0.0007563625,0.0003953682,0.00036471678,0.0013589537,0.0027483879,0.0011840374,0.0022804032,0.00045194433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.046242338,0.026924506,0.23069547,0.0023109044,0.0013762689,0.0014041336,0.017991576,0.051782276,0.2629173,0.100401744,0.0031362849,0.25481716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004529784,0.026167138,0.54949254,0.0004380896,0.0006659555,0.0016708495,0.0015876658,0.16142868,0.09320212,0.14967829,0.010508352,0.0006305248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045639073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031637689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012545635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043038602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034601553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06634843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991011913","doi":"10.1002/bdm.414","title":"A domain‐specific risk‐attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1865,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Risk perception; Scale (ratio); Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social psychology; Sample (material); Perception; Actuarial science; Risk aversion (psychology); Construct (python library); Expected utility hypothesis; Business; Economics; Computer science; Financial economics","score_opus":0.11703020244390432,"score_gpt":0.38294582481598927,"score_spread":0.26591562237208494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991011913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98902017,0.00017876997,0.002900486,0.00020486658,0.000033623015,0.00043384405,0.00084052264,0.000053306125,0.00633442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841361,0.0003701004,0.010519281,0.00014036272,0.000027253249,0.0005658053,0.0013922851,0.000008381572,0.0028404673],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991431,0.00022448109,0.00012800284,0.000043094078,0.00040227693,0.0000590635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943222,0.0016750966,0.0019560233,0.0002938654,0.00093582086,0.0008170404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014751969,0.00038146062,0.0003394854,0.000859905,0.0002331563,0.0005307498,0.000425707,0.00058206613,0.0061026793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007777077,0.00019612841,0.00073971465,0.0004612333,0.0002795916,0.00047221844,0.00055631786,0.0008516622,0.0010300085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006245474,0.0022542975,0.88441163,0.0002730528,0.00042335372,0.00021744084,0.0010511364,0.0016279643,0.004145831,0.00081063324,0.003354775,0.1008054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008056458,0.0009647125,0.9885169,0.00007576684,0.000091761765,0.00037909733,0.0005575961,0.002588983,0.0012836921,0.0012869478,0.0041394443,0.00003446459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004379665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001130045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061026793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021461029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034175333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020415485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005516635","doi":"10.1002/bdm.540","title":"Classifying simulated air threats with fast and frugal heuristics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Heuristic; Contrast (vision); Probabilistic logic; Constraint (computer-aided design); Task (project management); Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.09805858381858683,"score_gpt":0.4133919434235256,"score_spread":0.31533335960493875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005516635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955497,0.000022808692,0.0035550024,0.000023526749,0.0000058444207,0.000034847897,0.0000125000515,0.000019289817,0.000776502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995344,0.00002536966,0.0043076794,0.00003180897,0.000004500844,0.000017355303,0.00003742098,0.0000048831234,0.0002270125],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830794,0.0007634655,0.00013053296,0.00021626816,0.00044001304,0.00014184228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884282,0.007936719,0.0019182469,0.0008883635,0.0004409395,0.00038750737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031432721,0.0005218123,0.00039713492,0.0004835434,0.0002171337,0.0013704193,0.0003645574,0.00056221563,0.0008973436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01952748,0.00022881519,0.00029828446,0.00018631776,0.0007593572,0.0008664663,0.00064093,0.00055820215,0.00019148042],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010701987,0.0023165082,0.38893425,0.00069590093,0.00069463777,0.0006710174,0.0030927055,0.090098575,0.220776,0.010372983,0.0021468305,0.26949868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005898766,0.0082520675,0.26700988,0.000166952,0.00027141478,0.0009207325,0.0014128187,0.6224754,0.07424088,0.02121516,0.0032137856,0.00023118347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009752584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011407862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031432721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041516713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003161631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016623378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013660131","doi":"10.1002/bdm.683","title":"A choice prediction competition: Choices from experience and from description","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":340,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Harvard Business School; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Stochastic game; Competition (biology); Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Baseline (sea); Econometrics; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Economics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Political science","score_opus":0.1433559998342561,"score_gpt":0.42074730310549663,"score_spread":0.2773913032712405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013660131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9039595,0.0010931761,0.07238432,0.0059163645,0.0004340772,0.0006435065,0.0015196584,0.00016816921,0.013881101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538118,0.00017795397,0.038155578,0.0010608535,0.00014861325,0.0005367916,0.0018757877,0.000077680226,0.0041548954],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838611,0.012223504,0.0005106319,0.0015283359,0.0014630595,0.0004134174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8272174,0.15269718,0.0039342595,0.009174422,0.0037323562,0.0032444226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024363115,0.00090918766,0.0020756104,0.0008029217,0.0013741866,0.0034258266,0.0020959757,0.0029260474,0.0060009384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08551706,0.00061849435,0.0012564043,0.00089781533,0.0020480782,0.004387214,0.00309757,0.005014967,0.00072324194],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.029150713,0.013299494,0.07284096,0.0017800475,0.0018088302,0.0009224233,0.0043631615,0.19795878,0.010494867,0.18416336,0.08540213,0.39781526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037810458,0.0048455554,0.040066842,0.00028055193,0.0002876664,0.00026371985,0.0015575559,0.70354253,0.008171204,0.2122358,0.024331028,0.00063643465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032671061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037747533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024363115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020582618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014257547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12884599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014960425","doi":"10.1002/bdm.583","title":"Subjective valuation and asymmetrical motivational systems: implications of scope insensitivity for decision making","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Université Laval","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Feeling; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Scope (computer science); Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.18786858322453592,"score_gpt":0.47161238862498295,"score_spread":0.283743805400447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014960425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99266714,0.00007728458,0.0042183395,0.00014539377,0.000005765239,0.000016267226,0.000028433957,0.00000997571,0.0028313044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993926,0.000015174604,0.0005018412,0.000028440338,0.0000042139154,0.0000042884876,0.000009462432,0.0000019201925,0.000042039752],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843997,0.0006213917,0.00012546885,0.00021723653,0.00047392564,0.000121987716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97857076,0.013638814,0.003767638,0.0023491718,0.000692747,0.0009809579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032480084,0.00031735445,0.00031441698,0.00073527533,0.00017826416,0.0011887063,0.00028846395,0.00040815593,0.0019327641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01864573,0.00021911925,0.00028956254,0.00024160522,0.0020458505,0.00077543384,0.0013339384,0.00094966125,0.000080538026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004199537,0.00101283,0.6061827,0.00035248208,0.0005981535,0.0017335246,0.004061087,0.010365385,0.23223534,0.044417847,0.0003981553,0.09444295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010751141,0.0006092592,0.92462504,0.00005022186,0.000097467804,0.0010417885,0.0005569014,0.012983221,0.016142132,0.043356802,0.0003587564,0.00007094714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035988173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002218475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032480084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030764862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020047283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017177284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054517012","doi":"10.1002/bdm.595","title":"To buy or to sell: cultural differences in stock market decisions based on price trends","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Stock market; Stock (firearms); Stock price; Financial economics; Economics; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.27664190879715905,"score_gpt":0.45870632994063953,"score_spread":0.18206442114348048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054517012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991277,0.000052033745,0.000020352412,0.000037512295,0.0000028991083,0.0000032516004,0.000016325464,2.421821e-7,0.00073975394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99971324,0.00006689933,0.000025843374,0.000027172257,0.0000016913549,0.000002015787,0.000021150558,5.4523633e-7,0.0001414871],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993593,0.00021385067,0.000046996203,0.00006978248,0.00019036967,0.00011973841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580115,0.0017672015,0.0010360297,0.00019758893,0.00068677246,0.00051134086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015924391,0.00018904009,0.00020153921,0.0007290182,0.0007722791,0.0011983904,0.00022523417,0.00028723723,0.0020051484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062579964,0.00013285887,0.00022439325,0.00072938757,0.0013718336,0.0004105974,0.00041165182,0.00041746418,0.000115075614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044316598,0.00014126353,0.9434353,0.00004900876,0.0001665574,0.00031650628,0.04336597,0.00016339945,0.0018439398,0.00039970706,0.0002786387,0.009396455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014772147,0.00007127078,0.97502613,0.000023746468,0.0000390776,0.00013351972,0.02334384,0.00031178223,0.0002831682,0.00023248639,0.00049548305,0.000024660698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.107925326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16254243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107925326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009370476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087516784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21459424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102243960","doi":"10.1002/bdm.520","title":"Visceral influences on risk‐taking behavior","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Gratification; Psychology; Condom; Reading (process); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)","score_opus":0.12982249729933912,"score_gpt":0.3870396823925007,"score_spread":0.2572171850931616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102243960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926467,0.0003080995,0.0005168028,0.00010994041,0.000007503454,0.0000055625283,0.000040540006,0.00001082461,0.0063541615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991518,0.00014637204,0.0003582639,0.000027758802,0.0000065937274,0.0000031505597,0.000015781097,0.0000024703756,0.00028790347],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997453,0.00011563937,0.0000074742925,0.00003865979,0.000063551364,0.000029343355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837685,0.0007077343,0.00051300356,0.00011769183,0.00009537685,0.00018944271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032228592,0.00022112884,0.00015422302,0.00031389942,0.00017297319,0.0006873934,0.00010423927,0.00023521586,0.0054641985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033479566,0.00013110753,0.00012611727,0.00011558137,0.00042821313,0.0001618409,0.00039355364,0.0005148342,0.00019120566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052759782,0.0017349856,0.37445235,0.0008451456,0.0005304693,0.0018437544,0.0043221447,0.0016625479,0.4606871,0.008383939,0.001223229,0.13903834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005939335,0.0012105347,0.980472,0.00008397688,0.00020715535,0.00068587123,0.0008300996,0.0014372282,0.0092754215,0.00440393,0.0012964929,0.000037938444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004409651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004863882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054641985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017758437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008634158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018279552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112727590","doi":"10.1002/bdm.513","title":"Illusion of confirmation from exposure to another's hypothesis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Confidence interval; Point (geometry); Illusion; Psychology; Econometrics; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.11590702150322214,"score_gpt":0.389568273463285,"score_spread":0.27366125196006286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112727590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909298,0.000165977,0.004279897,0.0005056537,0.000029080895,0.000022652737,0.000026398655,0.00004961104,0.003991093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983015,0.000060046063,0.0011938415,0.00017060486,0.00001489444,0.000009617857,0.000020043672,0.000008736813,0.00022072205],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942531,0.0025179654,0.00031689878,0.0006338129,0.0020141958,0.0002639614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89090997,0.0777467,0.016178235,0.010669743,0.0023517127,0.0021435653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007072868,0.0004044622,0.0003986379,0.00059878005,0.00047438557,0.001858579,0.0005400067,0.0013611744,0.0033868367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07993371,0.0004004536,0.00045669035,0.00023775813,0.0033302533,0.001943174,0.0023457687,0.0032074265,0.0002195697],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023371525,0.001998243,0.21579263,0.0010961186,0.0008013018,0.0028652076,0.04650405,0.0051892474,0.51244575,0.031365518,0.0018911399,0.15667926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008502815,0.011621124,0.7529929,0.00049026666,0.00097385,0.0056742174,0.0103300745,0.023502925,0.13708062,0.04624569,0.009698262,0.0005396776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007436923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036317852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007072868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005945105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041967133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037405312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118224716","doi":"10.1002/bdm.725","title":"The Value of Task Conflict to Group Decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Decision quality; Psychology; Social psychology; Group decision-making; Preference; Quality (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Group (periodic table); Microeconomics; Economics; Statistics; Operations management; Computer science; Management; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12606847796572296,"score_gpt":0.4047300640592875,"score_spread":0.27866158609356456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118224716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822819,0.00049454183,0.0077441265,0.00045881924,0.00005109159,0.00005584519,0.000028887485,0.000023923982,0.008860866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979145,0.00006898856,0.001713207,0.000053126907,0.000022960172,0.000024671717,0.000014177426,0.000009401695,0.00017887089],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757165,0.019639475,0.00070082606,0.0006997302,0.0025321397,0.00071137183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7387713,0.2222589,0.018412076,0.010601631,0.005355968,0.00460012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019377593,0.00052411377,0.00066345325,0.0009425886,0.0009633729,0.0037048284,0.0007512727,0.0011097218,0.0032931485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17360663,0.00026835004,0.00044479847,0.0008659567,0.0017813017,0.00195314,0.0024331098,0.0018790208,0.00022915554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014384894,0.00309773,0.40783438,0.0015193267,0.0016035705,0.0012088674,0.019100565,0.06365405,0.031485945,0.045424365,0.002629729,0.40805665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016544377,0.013324231,0.47492322,0.0008879017,0.0014924536,0.0016031539,0.012049149,0.20587316,0.03621632,0.23596837,0.015492768,0.00051481253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051535433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046275862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019377593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009491302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006848025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102479696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130962282","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1904","title":"Inferring Others' Hidden Thoughts: Smart Guesses in a Low Diagnostic World","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Irish Research Council for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Psychology; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Confirmation bias; Cognitive psychology; Lie detection; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Deception","score_opus":0.0869167357280344,"score_gpt":0.4202337297077499,"score_spread":0.3333169939797155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130962282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99280655,0.000083029634,0.005415855,0.00024038876,0.000011670064,0.000012091432,0.000028352648,0.00003227954,0.0013697292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99815995,0.000026203286,0.0016374276,0.000050986113,0.0000065560967,0.000003808669,0.000025929074,0.0000062350073,0.00008295586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969194,0.0016676008,0.00023181939,0.00037731114,0.0006213685,0.00018238346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9532139,0.030957583,0.008846016,0.0046184603,0.0014141124,0.0009499005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00517634,0.00038153064,0.00043872508,0.0008274521,0.00053884415,0.0020658153,0.00047952821,0.0011114717,0.0027902925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07152654,0.0004952991,0.00025094431,0.00029824977,0.0021975583,0.0029733074,0.0017010974,0.0014026079,0.0003785433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010040017,0.00077454816,0.5802402,0.00091004814,0.00064319064,0.0036218192,0.051791653,0.009092271,0.16807064,0.02196902,0.0022122755,0.15063427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000451468,0.0024532306,0.59928876,0.0006790671,0.0006379093,0.0059181214,0.02219775,0.0974944,0.10446668,0.16089252,0.0049935393,0.0005265415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003961029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035709012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00517634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033909435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020743225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0273754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134566371","doi":"10.1002/bdm.663","title":"Aggregating conclusive and inconclusive information: Data and a model based on the assessment of threat","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences; Experimental Psychology Society","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Navy; Computer science; Psychology; Econometrics; Social psychology; Operations research; Mathematics; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.14938528113511285,"score_gpt":0.40964541019210227,"score_spread":0.2602601290569894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134566371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93244344,0.0004183754,0.057992987,0.00060004566,0.000057852998,0.0010734414,0.00041308612,0.00018215536,0.006818639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96972656,0.00015348736,0.028126957,0.00016812496,0.000037381862,0.00045337065,0.00040151647,0.0000618243,0.0008708021],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9718399,0.016373597,0.001869295,0.0032592658,0.00589941,0.0007585116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5571626,0.38958713,0.02186377,0.020943498,0.008288426,0.0021545945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038358886,0.0019448346,0.002767726,0.003472304,0.001000614,0.005977176,0.003329389,0.0034985675,0.0076439097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2801208,0.0020879195,0.003015428,0.0025212504,0.0045028683,0.011197427,0.00637666,0.0038861963,0.0011375269],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013978326,0.0052986084,0.20136032,0.0033026747,0.0022996755,0.0015444407,0.01875284,0.4712211,0.03834783,0.06708071,0.0020942886,0.1747192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054549053,0.0017569289,0.04611123,0.00021199744,0.0004936596,0.00040891508,0.0012504623,0.90078044,0.0050307033,0.041723646,0.0013331581,0.00035341195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004387987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019871907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038358886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022961656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011680757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20286357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134645122","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1763","title":"The Effect of Temporal Distance on Attitudes toward Imprecise Probabilities and Imprecise Outcomes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Salience (neuroscience); Construal level theory; Outcome (game theory); Ambiguity aversion; Dimension (graph theory); Psychology; Subjective expected utility; Social psychology; Econometrics; Computer science; Expected utility hypothesis; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.08945839551006228,"score_gpt":0.43622934465415264,"score_spread":0.34677094914409035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134645122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957438,0.000070138594,0.0007536432,0.00010986553,0.000009530207,0.0000066956813,0.000009526434,0.0000029406558,0.0032938134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991856,0.000049399197,0.0004491605,0.000036207082,0.0000071960562,0.0000057467296,0.000011330771,0.0000022762413,0.000253055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978064,0.0012297566,0.00012103753,0.00019387393,0.00054173445,0.00010720569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9578434,0.029660068,0.0075072865,0.0018558938,0.001026529,0.0021068512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037228174,0.00023783655,0.00027797132,0.00041734046,0.0004195725,0.0021742678,0.00028630407,0.0007930041,0.0054551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027132204,0.00023230311,0.00033362527,0.00034449963,0.0010247022,0.0010585045,0.0009210062,0.0013612573,0.0002091025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017459482,0.007719609,0.72105044,0.00074344425,0.0011057792,0.0014841096,0.022255844,0.017245485,0.057771645,0.04032835,0.0014962383,0.11133951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000528824,0.005656433,0.90549254,0.00017398481,0.00052054337,0.0007859233,0.008639412,0.024942571,0.006653164,0.042479582,0.0039095264,0.00021749387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073193986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084252714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041490287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025246557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019688368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139262047","doi":"10.1002/bdm.620","title":"Sex differences when searching for a mate: A process‐tracing approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mate choice; Moderation; Psychology; Term (time); Sample (material); Social psychology; Biology; Ecology; Mating","score_opus":0.15647956645107045,"score_gpt":0.4409172547155165,"score_spread":0.28443768826444604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139262047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97608054,0.00020308292,0.020816391,0.0000800837,0.000004087902,0.000096602336,0.00009595812,0.000029758152,0.002593558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98188204,0.00016949612,0.017030742,0.000016593389,0.0000043765367,0.00011634675,0.00007417742,0.000009605915,0.0006966327],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989888,0.00057299266,0.0000392397,0.00016729128,0.00016915853,0.000062618994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860437,0.010590301,0.0015659475,0.0011870775,0.00036926926,0.00024379221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004149927,0.00039308946,0.00043049842,0.0015578156,0.0003694813,0.0015636181,0.00061102695,0.0006944577,0.0031510915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015113399,0.0003791781,0.0006293227,0.00097443373,0.0008321354,0.0011546077,0.0008772237,0.0008635593,0.00021944351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026279003,0.0018962764,0.773263,0.0005667418,0.00053731364,0.0003930452,0.010595908,0.007915496,0.063069895,0.025459852,0.00019950539,0.1134751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001133261,0.0022351632,0.8492374,0.00013472998,0.00030590256,0.0006103197,0.0030858137,0.091529764,0.013998536,0.036697283,0.0019610436,0.000090763475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016451629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011766601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004149927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004867173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045452098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021947205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150333374","doi":"10.1002/bdm.746","title":"Overpredicting and Underprofiting in Pricing Decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Microeconomics; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Mode (computer interface); Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.07797033400427854,"score_gpt":0.31743996089986853,"score_spread":0.23946962689558998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150333374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950045,0.00012752261,0.0023352585,0.00014446375,0.00000858616,0.000009799766,0.000039042967,0.000033126333,0.0022977912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994,0.000031823514,0.00038125503,0.000027868975,0.0000070968927,0.0000019509441,0.000027511634,0.0000046351206,0.00011781952],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795026,0.0009528297,0.00013015835,0.00036124286,0.00047487867,0.00013062317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.963785,0.023659933,0.00690878,0.003173694,0.0015672973,0.0009053225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044279494,0.00034522408,0.0004340132,0.00057956396,0.00025450072,0.0020083045,0.00034623314,0.00064505875,0.0020285635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04237652,0.00030645134,0.0002844393,0.00052445487,0.00058665074,0.0015232394,0.0007721194,0.00095010916,0.00033915936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071830745,0.00038468512,0.93388414,0.00007599754,0.00014187896,0.0001355273,0.00043492595,0.016684538,0.0028233884,0.001834446,0.0005082364,0.04237384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025653782,0.00027060634,0.8842917,0.000030665164,0.000085545966,0.0002309184,0.0003156524,0.10122843,0.002448376,0.010249611,0.0007817309,0.00004105167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039925966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00317702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044279494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068995636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004987286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023417532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150479185","doi":"10.1002/bdm.741","title":"What People Want From Their Professionals: Attitudes Toward Decision‐making Strategies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Public relations; Political science","score_opus":0.4211742596639609,"score_gpt":0.516615133703507,"score_spread":0.0954408740395461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150479185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931322,0.00059146056,0.0003711362,0.0015052921,0.0000373117,0.000014645079,0.00001483407,0.0000035411394,0.004329612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985851,0.00036310998,0.00022805968,0.00055308215,0.000017005197,0.00001009219,0.000014306844,0.0000020723783,0.00022707136],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99392915,0.0039831386,0.0003482088,0.00022914617,0.0011837394,0.0003264993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95436794,0.033663854,0.0054042973,0.00086574524,0.0024855272,0.0032126456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012949038,0.0002954271,0.00029207955,0.0012498992,0.001324118,0.0047984994,0.0002844477,0.001498047,0.0025762047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039734013,0.00030570896,0.0004934006,0.00048561202,0.0027011172,0.0017190097,0.0013299077,0.002041999,0.00027259972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053281116,0.00065708783,0.710118,0.00039079806,0.0003448653,0.00060488895,0.21392062,0.00042266631,0.001890882,0.004472151,0.002737764,0.063907534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002296524,0.0012822292,0.48224717,0.0008557579,0.00023858366,0.0017852187,0.48583427,0.0024453776,0.0015032481,0.009709056,0.013680667,0.00018875574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018600266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024547928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012949038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007270395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010286523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06848186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154772733","doi":"10.1002/bdm.617","title":"A behavioral account of compensation awarding decisions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Value (mathematics); Object (grammar); Economics; Microeconomics; Zero (linguistics); Actuarial science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.27258908242826174,"score_gpt":0.46125417756629405,"score_spread":0.1886650951380323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154772733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3746211,0.0009916129,0.124919765,0.022613542,0.00032632303,0.0002318357,0.00042249338,0.00017908897,0.47569424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885599,0.00019506324,0.004145519,0.0009057456,0.00009915509,0.000053198553,0.00006804121,0.000016942045,0.0059564672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970386,0.0015756576,0.00013486018,0.00029283355,0.00065283384,0.0003051976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922788,0.0037304112,0.0015084669,0.00086855586,0.0010344584,0.0005793275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040509026,0.00068175857,0.0003770136,0.0010327726,0.0010506945,0.0030765643,0.00086054724,0.0026238656,0.016341968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014497024,0.0002995201,0.00047754424,0.0007130774,0.002807761,0.002887337,0.0012473245,0.0024983862,0.0009331377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020967463,0.00052539725,0.015126277,0.00014447357,0.00010453376,0.00027405782,0.0010181882,0.017749568,0.0020209907,0.9287732,0.004222227,0.029831473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010362102,0.00013797695,0.01543678,0.00007576883,0.000061476676,0.00019535384,0.00076244347,0.053524304,0.0007422454,0.9189268,0.0099846665,0.000048575694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025239775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023404108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016341968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023927505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011832933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05466926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165868536","doi":"10.1002/bdm.645","title":"Goal attainment as a resource: The cushion effect in risky choice above a goal","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Salient; Resource (disambiguation); Goal pursuit; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05689584315870033,"score_gpt":0.43832850563218967,"score_spread":0.38143266247348934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165868536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9615254,0.00054324465,0.008292886,0.0011502925,0.000029474919,0.000038584687,0.000041646173,0.000035156623,0.028343309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983734,0.00007292011,0.00090255,0.00006772722,0.00000878093,0.000013966308,0.000010701601,0.000005372427,0.00054458535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988122,0.0006431486,0.00003366032,0.00015384688,0.00021840457,0.00013871257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98032147,0.01365982,0.0029430331,0.0010059736,0.00045942547,0.0016102793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027220063,0.00039817186,0.00052944163,0.0006626772,0.00062246894,0.0016856012,0.00035575745,0.0008656155,0.0070981085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0145023875,0.00030503032,0.00049831404,0.00051110954,0.0023062187,0.0011952884,0.002122136,0.0017403573,0.00022950387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045215795,0.0019308516,0.45667428,0.00064179156,0.0007034344,0.0019113254,0.008723135,0.024328532,0.020199224,0.36751252,0.0039517977,0.10890157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029115225,0.0013502667,0.71080583,0.00024967064,0.0006867285,0.0006911417,0.0024260525,0.04701174,0.0037543785,0.22543052,0.0071068704,0.00019567291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023386967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029221075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070981085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000985441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006373756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023745537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334115192","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1794","title":"True Context‐dependent Preferences? The Causes of Market‐dependent Valuations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Context (archaeology); Product (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Reservation; Microeconomics; Distribution (mathematics); Market price; Econometrics","score_opus":0.17888837313145575,"score_gpt":0.3073040042169438,"score_spread":0.12841563108548806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334115192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94375765,0.000635958,0.03484086,0.00200374,0.000040002844,0.000041560488,0.00019042437,0.0000402699,0.018449571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987633,0.00007479662,0.00080673344,0.00007072483,0.000016920658,0.0000062362956,0.000019437872,0.000005100786,0.00023675885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979455,0.0009976651,0.00010753954,0.00041025333,0.00035380368,0.00018526314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9575502,0.02814301,0.006039167,0.0060639023,0.001610429,0.0005933405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004895897,0.00026562938,0.00057916,0.00062275084,0.00043665292,0.0025783877,0.0008336345,0.0014893649,0.0052381135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05270183,0.00052187004,0.00058339105,0.0006247807,0.0025305673,0.0037361886,0.0011815712,0.0021237582,0.00027859403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001294193,0.0007195688,0.28630495,0.00042854142,0.0008231908,0.0038455867,0.008337391,0.034783263,0.010384624,0.5556012,0.0033717589,0.0941058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009629954,0.00014600647,0.18747205,0.00006156074,0.00013828742,0.0011673383,0.0017116971,0.061982337,0.0021253238,0.7426735,0.0022711472,0.00015443815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010837734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075172324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052381135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000734841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022963542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025892258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414376403","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1965","title":"For the Win: Risk‐Sensitive Decision‐Making in Teams","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Football; League; American football; Psychology; Actuarial science; Marketing; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.08746145299335434,"score_gpt":0.4757352038551683,"score_spread":0.388273750861814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414376403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99113584,0.00006886865,0.0023087997,0.00044482146,0.0000143931775,0.000036708796,0.00002187747,0.000007757558,0.0059609525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822134,0.000046386896,0.0013283549,0.00006862898,0.0000041436438,0.00003618877,0.00001745015,0.000001987937,0.00027543324],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962631,0.0025497507,0.000116493706,0.00029735596,0.00050340185,0.00026983937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924247,0.0040637376,0.0019210876,0.00040858885,0.0003922883,0.000789611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044942624,0.0003835173,0.00026373623,0.0006044573,0.0012402028,0.0027094393,0.0004140273,0.00067983416,0.004389166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017328832,0.00022466856,0.00036590258,0.00032987742,0.0011709912,0.0009739334,0.001547128,0.0011706013,0.00027754763],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014030697,0.0052317227,0.7021735,0.00056602864,0.00044384965,0.0007217244,0.057898946,0.010261671,0.005997651,0.014299127,0.00596136,0.19504142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027712775,0.0022913485,0.8060481,0.0005852634,0.00024852876,0.00081417355,0.05466241,0.04098792,0.0037173764,0.08090398,0.009282759,0.0001810152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025758052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036680694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044942624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097235217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011365007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023768246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494441066","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1973","title":"Real‐World Correlates of Performance on Heuristics and Biases Tasks in a Community Sample","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Heuristics; Psychology; Debiasing; Sample (material); Discounting; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.21325087115341906,"score_gpt":0.44435378110373414,"score_spread":0.23110290995031507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494441066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997304,0.00001734845,0.00003558296,0.00000905909,0.0000013692803,0.000005655469,0.0000518312,8.0296036e-7,0.0001479756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996105,0.000021574899,0.00008656914,0.000016443913,0.0000029999278,0.000007681059,0.000106707026,0.0000011900352,0.00014645292],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959546,0.000099393925,0.0000474788,0.000082210034,0.00011224602,0.00006329079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975459,0.00038373872,0.00096443197,0.00019868178,0.0004482434,0.00045902462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065724854,0.0002793318,0.0002624234,0.0009970883,0.0006774576,0.00084711163,0.0002738624,0.00043117296,0.0020197518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045101694,0.0002566624,0.0002317054,0.00062994676,0.00046465243,0.00054072955,0.00062494393,0.0007050971,0.00034949087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006890976,0.0002141802,0.9967528,0.0000067698224,0.00002175824,0.000050940707,0.0005445404,0.000027236085,0.0003338192,0.000022298003,0.00007726946,0.0018794718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006540225,0.0001723295,0.9982785,0.000004361494,0.000008505661,0.00020483184,0.0008145185,0.00016881916,0.00012500193,0.00007470238,0.00013469953,0.0000072172215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004642591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007283559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004642591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016073683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019539187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00923115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529245342","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1995","title":"Cultural Variations in Reasons for Advice Seeking","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Advice (programming); Closeness; Psychology; Competence (human resources); Social psychology; Dilemma","score_opus":0.1560057382188668,"score_gpt":0.4741543567155689,"score_spread":0.31814861849670206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529245342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966294,0.0006882883,0.00016945571,0.00009931216,0.00001368026,0.000015425756,0.000094937546,0.0000020627842,0.0022875508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99929035,0.00025233877,0.00017780327,0.000027493692,0.0000027595888,0.000008695237,0.000047496233,0.0000019544245,0.00019121953],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821943,0.00077682803,0.00022099074,0.00015697275,0.00048731884,0.00013852665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98551524,0.008707451,0.0027093499,0.0005990665,0.0017820712,0.00068675977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003566745,0.00014454323,0.0002776421,0.0010200677,0.00058377767,0.0012483145,0.00032992146,0.0003113885,0.0021282334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0130025605,0.00018041911,0.00039404712,0.001138168,0.00078844285,0.00036778918,0.00047228078,0.00044691373,0.0001154624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000199051,0.00007717144,0.93935704,0.00031625896,0.00036531876,0.00027658697,0.034482624,0.000120460034,0.0009258462,0.00068169675,0.00041908238,0.022778956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007662714,0.00003673205,0.9827366,0.00012768168,0.00005402914,0.00014677682,0.014753416,0.00015150507,0.0002774518,0.00022457377,0.0014616535,0.000021852908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024251267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042950105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024251267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067186024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009153879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048220277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562319537","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2000","title":"Associations Between Delay Discounting and Risk‐Related Behaviors, Traits, Attitudes, and Outcomes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Impulsivity; Delay discounting; Psychology; Generality; Deviance (statistics); Discounting; Trait; Intertemporal choice; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Econometrics; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.08440660447203183,"score_gpt":0.44278682257452184,"score_spread":0.35838021810249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562319537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99955434,0.00004148827,0.00015311631,0.0000073833667,0.0000018216214,0.000003442427,0.00008692662,0.0000034920986,0.00014798144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995993,0.000026442898,0.0001732228,0.0000033586005,0.0000024221704,0.0000033042134,0.00008145103,0.0000013874499,0.00010930601],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997042,0.0000734752,0.000039480183,0.000082760525,0.00006741678,0.000032702264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901816,0.002941118,0.004873052,0.0007540051,0.00038466838,0.00086558564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010725658,0.00029479407,0.00022197187,0.0007246379,0.00016143954,0.0005419326,0.00023197554,0.0002460247,0.002051007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007834966,0.00016660416,0.00027782243,0.0005907853,0.00022874275,0.0002640263,0.00035173626,0.0007146111,0.00009577526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021630108,0.000140753,0.9959929,0.00001024227,0.00008094136,0.000016607684,0.000073747164,0.00020351294,0.000746332,0.00005687218,0.000020666783,0.0024411203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037666855,0.0000957573,0.9988324,0.0000036347676,0.000018832387,0.000044951692,0.000042696247,0.0006385902,0.00016758604,0.00011317043,0.000034729648,0.000003806411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029362568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028447218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029362568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019392504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015982459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0068612695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597723177","doi":"10.1002/bdm.554","title":"Inventor perseverance after being told to quit: the role of cognitive biases","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Overconfidence effect; Optimism; Pessimism; Procrastination; Sunk costs; Cognitive bias; Psychology; Regret; Population; Optimism bias; Economics; Social psychology; Cognition; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.14771364963490355,"score_gpt":0.4587705466139139,"score_spread":0.3110568969790104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597723177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988612,0.0002122782,0.00009694209,0.0001956378,0.000006001276,0.0000031542422,0.00004650046,0.0000023369983,0.0005759324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994797,0.00012738789,0.0000635666,0.00004298167,0.000012725159,0.0000027911028,0.000062404564,0.000001102753,0.00020727499],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826425,0.0007817879,0.00019409132,0.00018164462,0.00039409354,0.00018413985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8934367,0.06343779,0.033424232,0.0039331773,0.0022508241,0.0035173658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057519507,0.00022486788,0.00042600906,0.0008972329,0.00048454554,0.0016541407,0.00044823394,0.000913892,0.003827926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044529594,0.00023129796,0.00042987117,0.00064372766,0.00059856294,0.0007026065,0.0005766603,0.0013487245,0.00041181807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002289993,0.00014014273,0.98922616,0.000013723103,0.00008437125,0.000087061926,0.0006089927,0.00019274646,0.00017031144,0.00007212513,0.000101485915,0.009073856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009226978,0.000092199545,0.9977035,0.000017468015,0.000043419564,0.00016387389,0.00063118245,0.0005713611,0.00021853446,0.00035559706,0.00018235936,0.0000113724545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030772137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004347372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057519507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044137114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000330803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030419588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604806010","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2010","title":"On the Counterfactual Nature of Gambling Near‐misses: An Experimental Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Medical Research Council; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Wellcome; Shenzhen University; National Natural Science Foundation of China; University of Cambridge; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Luck; Counterfactual conditional; Regret; Near miss; Psychology; Social psychology; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2653274951832202,"score_gpt":0.5239354939175626,"score_spread":0.25860799873434237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604806010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99871826,0.000016617605,0.00057287485,0.00002312005,0.000011467707,0.000082484774,0.000026358764,0.000004149666,0.00054475915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954738,0.000046109904,0.002983034,0.00010069141,0.00003512768,0.00048544482,0.000103572216,0.00001372039,0.0007585586],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968184,0.001338565,0.00030889426,0.00073726894,0.0006445103,0.00015230382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777558,0.014137807,0.0035040881,0.0033854616,0.00048142904,0.0007354661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003647385,0.0005126709,0.0006123617,0.00029275005,0.00057702407,0.0013537414,0.0008576808,0.0009773062,0.0031966753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016925296,0.00052112417,0.00038105354,0.00021807359,0.0016635504,0.00085311243,0.0010536124,0.0018096113,0.000256943],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.09350181,0.1416928,0.13175304,0.00095171673,0.0007889083,0.0015412864,0.014612431,0.006234711,0.53642344,0.013693756,0.0010595318,0.05774665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007441132,0.25900373,0.5797023,0.00015873187,0.0007325611,0.0022963348,0.0029962275,0.039918162,0.08616235,0.015681429,0.0053212396,0.00058577565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046683496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050242315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003647385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035920256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029216005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019289434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604872011","doi":"10.1002/bdm.559","title":"Calibration accuracy of a judgmental process that predicts the commercial success of new product ideas","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Commercialization; Predictability; Product (mathematics); Aggregate (composite); New product development; Process (computing); Order (exchange); Computer science; Calibration; Econometrics; Economics; Marketing; Business; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.25807420759035893,"score_gpt":0.4807887113451321,"score_spread":0.2227145037547732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604872011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98488,0.00014786262,0.01045217,0.00018905391,0.000023022234,0.000039822353,0.00017443523,0.00009461583,0.0039989804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985833,0.00003539061,0.0010969287,0.000016628012,0.000009062894,0.000008493518,0.000146202,0.000006666505,0.0000973685],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99407864,0.0030889576,0.0004123249,0.00090934563,0.0012311956,0.00027952032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80954224,0.14672625,0.02003367,0.012396801,0.00957687,0.0017241366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017043024,0.00046307853,0.00053114095,0.0018519908,0.00034330637,0.0025851263,0.0006991336,0.001506731,0.0018922726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19927509,0.00030441096,0.00061681843,0.001172603,0.0008210948,0.0023805662,0.0009779516,0.001218625,0.0006485147],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019331542,0.00034698306,0.8043419,0.00013188078,0.000547076,0.00015391025,0.0018561289,0.084439024,0.004233905,0.0024615156,0.0014195818,0.09813491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007352075,0.0005848807,0.57958835,0.00008540082,0.00013743792,0.00017998464,0.0008161595,0.40314355,0.0043065264,0.009945033,0.00096082065,0.00017833992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045553697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024554294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017043024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008606652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005449662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09013319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606816334","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2018","title":"Evaluating Effort: Influences of Evaluation Mode on Judgments of Task‐specific Efforts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Social psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.29063699774748036,"score_gpt":0.5750266530973823,"score_spread":0.28438965534990196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606816334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99601537,0.00005563425,0.0012161214,0.000016274984,0.000006526021,0.000026863892,0.000016907883,0.000011323498,0.0026349942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848217,0.00003365132,0.0011338575,0.000014504798,0.0000043393093,0.00002488302,0.000025269303,0.000011218737,0.0002702383],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99669087,0.0017925955,0.00020111635,0.00044174198,0.0007301036,0.00014355521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95145386,0.036578387,0.005727216,0.0027112162,0.0020230531,0.001506321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058959406,0.0005099465,0.0002784509,0.0005877415,0.00027063137,0.0016342595,0.0002798663,0.00049985416,0.0019966727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051663242,0.0002678521,0.00024017229,0.00029233447,0.0006036527,0.00079379376,0.00089271506,0.0006410366,0.000174856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011020155,0.0035288564,0.62625605,0.00062031095,0.00066885055,0.00047132434,0.013555598,0.009090995,0.19938736,0.004111088,0.0011065169,0.13018282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007902853,0.001983639,0.98053575,0.00006036688,0.000083372506,0.00008294885,0.0012196837,0.0078039314,0.006006838,0.0016396836,0.00044362198,0.000061015708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069147034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096734386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058959406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030849536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019418834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031181097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753598526","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2032","title":"How Incidental Confidence Influences Self‐Interested Behaviors: A Double‐Edged Sword","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Altruism (biology); Self-confidence; Low Confidence; SWORD; Social psychology; Confidence interval; Statistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.10043095133927911,"score_gpt":0.4425084805309055,"score_spread":0.34207752919162643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753598526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907164,0.00068371376,0.0026838519,0.0005754645,0.00006311949,0.000035002235,0.000099083714,0.000027177613,0.0051161596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962664,0.00019561831,0.0018311692,0.00030590736,0.000029887075,0.00004844974,0.000052672956,0.00003410959,0.0012357364],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970708,0.0012787138,0.00013122504,0.0007135392,0.00063408224,0.00017163975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668615,0.022344917,0.0030910878,0.0052736355,0.0009731188,0.0014557745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034232847,0.0004970391,0.0011692413,0.0004522596,0.0005504185,0.0019054898,0.0010413775,0.0014232296,0.010004919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018607102,0.0005602009,0.0007841363,0.00028842656,0.001605115,0.0014865149,0.0019824,0.0017948578,0.0005642204],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019682545,0.010922718,0.54009086,0.0022588316,0.0043298174,0.0017127593,0.009702586,0.004363993,0.1792981,0.0322738,0.00372591,0.19163814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041706345,0.0031651868,0.9479837,0.00027388308,0.0013555409,0.00048217372,0.0012384339,0.0076829703,0.015270866,0.018536068,0.00346169,0.00013238197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010261833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009199261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010004919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033530794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005720491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033469737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755120453","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2039","title":"Why Improvement Can Trump Consistent Strong Performance: The Role of Effort Perceptions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Perception; Promotion (chess); Trait; Psychology; Investment (military); Social psychology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.09829980618987051,"score_gpt":0.4108718380136088,"score_spread":0.3125720318237383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755120453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802263,0.0007240024,0.0038866813,0.001500502,0.000061980114,0.00002805675,0.00005924554,0.00002708576,0.013486082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989857,0.00007411535,0.0005942727,0.0001296559,0.000016543174,0.0000065031545,0.000019410169,0.000006562046,0.00016725216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922651,0.0045959926,0.00042729217,0.0007295123,0.0015130544,0.00046918882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92469484,0.040038824,0.019585133,0.0047814217,0.007944546,0.0029551212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015255404,0.00030283767,0.00042475664,0.0014799316,0.00065721665,0.0038316206,0.0005191965,0.0011071044,0.003247735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09165516,0.0002524995,0.00031541314,0.00083751086,0.0026782968,0.0029522118,0.0018239616,0.0012613096,0.00035426475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030768802,0.00063659874,0.7305839,0.0010359896,0.00065266615,0.0004907743,0.028386218,0.001981054,0.015570964,0.02569693,0.004846897,0.18704121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009241323,0.0009050674,0.9333386,0.0006328704,0.00018831168,0.00022221784,0.019916233,0.004906762,0.004801364,0.029492209,0.0053585544,0.00014540127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001379967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019632548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015255404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007156115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042549663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08067924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766389015","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2055","title":"Geopolitical Forecasting Skill in Strategic Intelligence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; York University; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"York University; Defence Research and Development Canada","keywords":"Interpretability; Intelligence analysis; Benchmarking; Forecast skill; Ignorance; Certainty; Strategic intelligence; Scoring rule; Econometrics; Calibration; Psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics; Knowledge management; Management; Political science","score_opus":0.16176651398594338,"score_gpt":0.38874849566519576,"score_spread":0.22698198167925238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766389015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965378,0.000049856895,0.0005398824,0.00008688615,0.0000122432675,0.0000138508085,0.00013686095,0.000014868466,0.0026076813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946135,0.000019489264,0.00022316002,0.000014704786,0.0000076080646,0.00000692746,0.00012782107,0.0000027635222,0.00013617647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975891,0.0011030162,0.00021467987,0.00043161976,0.0005172867,0.00014434218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90941286,0.073592745,0.008547918,0.0042571397,0.0027346513,0.0014546753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055098017,0.00033450846,0.00037027203,0.0011555622,0.00027555352,0.0015062591,0.00041564868,0.0004886653,0.003448055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06971454,0.00014439046,0.0004721925,0.0012338468,0.0008391021,0.0016599708,0.0013255898,0.0008820646,0.0004258176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095242634,0.0003201298,0.9297192,0.00012767398,0.0004069196,0.00008171304,0.0022097721,0.0071312087,0.0012581791,0.0011201347,0.0009121781,0.055760566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003771842,0.00039112833,0.976916,0.00007258686,0.00010179876,0.000053985517,0.00094463024,0.015463091,0.0013257305,0.003431998,0.0012275914,0.00003374341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003113439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025056421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055098017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047613718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047526974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029138982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772399711","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2070","title":"Maximizing Scales Do Not Reliably Predict Maximizing Behavior in Decisions from Experience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Maximization; Stochastic game; Utility maximization; Sampling (signal processing); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Econometrics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.19936453230406184,"score_gpt":0.45244649938424725,"score_spread":0.2530819670801854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772399711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952553,0.00006125762,0.002754572,0.000016621185,0.000004549174,0.000015869895,0.000037000205,0.000013276447,0.001841561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867517,0.000016056872,0.001136947,0.000009280198,0.0000023330183,0.000011937759,0.000038410846,0.0000039488527,0.0001057936],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985129,0.00070392137,0.00012207565,0.00024635493,0.00034360576,0.00007106004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688938,0.018979182,0.0065512066,0.0031092938,0.0011268426,0.0013396988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033760318,0.0002987102,0.00030716357,0.00047468682,0.00016396063,0.000835419,0.00026816892,0.00036853398,0.0018653142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0334787,0.00015986209,0.00026586172,0.00024655234,0.0006497586,0.0009224789,0.0007361731,0.0005786857,0.00022074375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001044706,0.000587525,0.9193016,0.00014568874,0.00028424105,0.000105041196,0.0011556192,0.0027617156,0.026572803,0.0020524128,0.0002699659,0.045718648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000143912075,0.00047357974,0.9861318,0.000022002458,0.000026424586,0.0001403179,0.00027096222,0.0060963617,0.003798272,0.0026273266,0.0003674831,0.000031016072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027754204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043208065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033760318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015705901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010547664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017854393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801881220","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2081","title":"Explaining reluctance to benefit from others' misfortune","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Misfortune; Harm; Psychology; Social psychology; Relation (database); Positive economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1591990378291487,"score_gpt":0.38261933651372065,"score_spread":0.22342029868457194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801881220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928114,0.00012524315,0.0016735021,0.00035038125,0.000011091986,0.000008838228,0.0000100109555,0.0000065850854,0.00500288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994417,0.000036999198,0.0002984373,0.00007269026,0.00000478495,0.0000034608865,0.0000060216867,0.0000024265903,0.00013359309],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978891,0.0013090185,0.00011747446,0.0001825412,0.00036085866,0.00014095241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9651831,0.022615036,0.008745539,0.0014935943,0.0013708932,0.0005918876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003909697,0.0002987757,0.00023156563,0.0004542198,0.00045136226,0.0020938055,0.0003582638,0.0012209825,0.0027622366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027517164,0.00021570742,0.0003362154,0.00016895826,0.0018391283,0.0010393992,0.00082549854,0.0015410895,0.00025111352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013266347,0.00097226724,0.7716862,0.0009295164,0.00047398437,0.0021815908,0.09123429,0.0026629567,0.04002506,0.020766594,0.001398961,0.06634199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001185803,0.0007411021,0.87005603,0.00040560585,0.0002610739,0.0018760599,0.046793614,0.015152166,0.010590013,0.046468765,0.007336212,0.00020068456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008332303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010906787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003909697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040568595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002399736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020676672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908259334","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2115","title":"Less willing to pay but more willing to buy: How the elicitation method impacts the valuation of a promotion","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Willingness to pay; Product (mathematics); Contingent valuation; Promotion (chess); Business; Value (mathematics); Economics; Microeconomics; Marketing; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.24953057628420264,"score_gpt":0.35777278047272504,"score_spread":0.1082422041885224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908259334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95840156,0.00031366386,0.016863368,0.0015161365,0.000050990682,0.000121410274,0.000116080984,0.00006897802,0.022547934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99287546,0.00011912129,0.005712208,0.00019844831,0.000011209875,0.0000917981,0.000045716424,0.000027753837,0.000918295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872723,0.010091028,0.0003876331,0.00056539633,0.0013345308,0.0003490898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7944393,0.18780991,0.008854056,0.0041493615,0.0034874894,0.0012599113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012925515,0.0003878501,0.00041846564,0.0005201364,0.0006200029,0.0037280915,0.00066845317,0.0012087564,0.013313141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.113821484,0.00034105388,0.0004946688,0.00073250826,0.0012508568,0.0026830724,0.0013488067,0.0017040563,0.00081934594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015302224,0.0077058403,0.37640268,0.0030387521,0.0012018658,0.0015525876,0.026145518,0.027543142,0.074451946,0.105649345,0.0067360275,0.35427007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001495811,0.004107724,0.48059946,0.0013469369,0.0017822246,0.0012944203,0.028107641,0.15189493,0.03197079,0.2736513,0.02305763,0.0006910379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015024551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016011923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013313141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001081437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083184405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06835753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973154528","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2154","title":"Examining children's ability to delay reward: Is the delay discounting task a suitable measure?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Research Councils UK","keywords":"Delay discounting; Discounting; Delay of gratification; Psychology; Gratification; Task (project management); Temporal discounting; Impulsivity; Sensation seeking; Intertemporal choice; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Econometrics; Economics","score_opus":0.09533285482985453,"score_gpt":0.3918347828173961,"score_spread":0.29650192798754155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973154528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99874544,0.00015319389,0.00031604737,0.00003602117,0.0000058751984,0.000011248106,0.00021261137,0.000006740389,0.0005128889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983234,0.00020564983,0.0010211838,0.000019315834,0.000004670484,0.000024223698,0.00021193599,0.0000048333773,0.0001848803],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992872,0.00018476076,0.00013080076,0.000100596684,0.00021233916,0.0000843269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888747,0.0032961147,0.0056877285,0.0005839751,0.00090168614,0.00065575825],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030135736,0.0004144269,0.0003723712,0.0009614501,0.000159877,0.0009434206,0.00038293423,0.0004905676,0.0010862879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014651127,0.00025293633,0.00045508574,0.00064169365,0.00041913457,0.0007266894,0.00038171178,0.0008953989,0.00023968228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015057225,0.00011251913,0.99096864,0.00004663345,0.00004085461,0.00008525184,0.000600003,0.00012605943,0.0018483438,0.00010546561,0.00016537726,0.0057503083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008737007,0.00027670607,0.99668175,0.000030766176,0.00002622226,0.0003269202,0.00041457705,0.00043081882,0.001298968,0.000116660754,0.00037757767,0.000010355564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047211577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007424165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99698645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002976518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030748177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015937448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014622127","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2179","title":"How representations of number and numeracy predict decision paradoxes: A fuzzy‐trace theory approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Nursing Research; Savoy Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Numeracy; Categorical variable; GiST; Psychology; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Ordinal data; Statistics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12275054784696351,"score_gpt":0.420808850625137,"score_spread":0.29805830277817347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014622127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96015,0.0000783925,0.03410518,0.0007191742,0.00001612087,0.00004199651,0.00006325791,0.00003535557,0.004790411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99710387,0.000015150409,0.0026694506,0.00002980493,0.0000036775211,0.000012165177,0.0000188384,0.0000037317768,0.00014327146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814427,0.00094243494,0.000078975885,0.0002304243,0.0005010425,0.00010281446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97300684,0.019182911,0.0030266433,0.0021693269,0.0017200962,0.0008941635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052373484,0.0003443921,0.00046818165,0.0017457571,0.00041150276,0.0029922314,0.0009444445,0.00069858815,0.0036193237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056008983,0.0003561998,0.0005924572,0.00069138437,0.002393658,0.003866927,0.0017630744,0.0012983469,0.00016642363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001965316,0.0014635467,0.5858416,0.0003797551,0.0006640382,0.00058633526,0.011457582,0.054620273,0.012918675,0.20324428,0.0019322854,0.12492643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001085889,0.00038822336,0.14298928,0.00006172911,0.00010858942,0.0002952297,0.0017451376,0.35615173,0.0030396495,0.49416697,0.0008311152,0.00011376905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030193932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016132802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052373484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082440354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007983944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0276981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089376958","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2210","title":"The moderating role of processing style in risk perceptions and risky decision making","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Risk perception; Perception; Psychology; Social psychology; Risk aversion (psychology); Risk analysis (engineering); Style (visual arts); Risk assessment; Medicine; Computer science; Economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer security","score_opus":0.08454026949192234,"score_gpt":0.4135205257038696,"score_spread":0.32898025621194726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089376958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968804,0.000053830456,0.00044680052,0.000088605695,0.000008472245,0.000010496683,0.00001958396,0.0000045216943,0.002487224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880266,0.000054161203,0.00062813354,0.000031673186,0.000007406146,0.000013847221,0.000019377521,0.0000047837284,0.00043800363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990415,0.00048262844,0.00005597517,0.00012989879,0.00020854917,0.0000814159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803908,0.013471331,0.0036738869,0.00084671343,0.0005694109,0.0010479343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019850282,0.0003724585,0.00020420937,0.0004416752,0.00041519606,0.0028396188,0.0002595888,0.00068589847,0.009530265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01846175,0.0002263396,0.00038460142,0.0003319321,0.00081529573,0.0011323063,0.00072677905,0.0010037114,0.0002751912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019260942,0.0031631142,0.8939818,0.00043732102,0.000420165,0.00044141957,0.027669908,0.0015641819,0.016418114,0.0058165286,0.00083347445,0.047327813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008963318,0.00072378304,0.9767989,0.00014411114,0.00016857636,0.0001905072,0.008485879,0.004156231,0.0019713643,0.00570617,0.0015126885,0.00005230511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012774653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001728923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009530265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030993248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032314367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03188193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3105916523","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2214","title":"Resistance to cognitive biases: Longitudinal trajectories and associations with cognitive abilities and academic achievement across development","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Sophistication; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive bias; Cognitive development","score_opus":0.25177638378962885,"score_gpt":0.46229602915947454,"score_spread":0.2105196453698457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3105916523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993131,0.00008375866,0.000090804184,0.000022849634,0.0000015143348,0.0000036236283,0.00031751406,0.0000059887393,0.00016066096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988953,0.000089665475,0.00019324773,0.0000054443212,0.0000021124254,0.000011583381,0.0005527697,0.00000387297,0.00024592498],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950325,0.00009613209,0.00005200959,0.00013571452,0.000112628,0.00010016606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946485,0.000822987,0.002529026,0.00036131137,0.00094646076,0.0006917327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020015207,0.0003026287,0.00024775838,0.001423359,0.00048215504,0.0010235119,0.00048430887,0.0005746761,0.0010265973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061296388,0.00036655442,0.00046697137,0.0009528288,0.00040474723,0.0006419956,0.00094557897,0.0010402432,0.00024576375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006126733,0.000042116815,0.9969722,0.000004767463,0.000026925112,0.000051734954,0.00026257974,0.00009800712,0.0003797153,0.000037569014,0.00005088986,0.0020122684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.5292254e-7,0.000067394176,0.9993079,0.0000040353793,0.000006351486,0.00006959347,0.00013358332,0.00016816318,0.0001395146,0.000024437668,0.0000751407,0.0000030217136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013555135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010868678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013555135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042925592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005456489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026952505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113706740","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2226","title":"Individual differences in exploring versus exploiting and links to delay discounting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Discounting; Temporal discounting; Delay discounting; Preference; Exploit; Adaptation (eye); Psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Cognitive psychology; Time preference; Intertemporal choice; Social psychology; Computer science; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.298145339055819,"score_gpt":0.4214703928566457,"score_spread":0.1233250538008267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113706740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998857,0.00008802255,0.0003429794,0.00002472858,0.0000047515473,0.000005476727,0.000058549937,0.0000039792203,0.0006145501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995776,0.00003082151,0.00020408536,0.000010986876,0.0000028450552,0.0000030212443,0.000035438483,0.0000027011272,0.00013253657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992719,0.0003008554,0.00006877634,0.00016736759,0.00014607434,0.00004507474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741527,0.016350674,0.005152507,0.0025393004,0.00063862174,0.001166212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029367316,0.00025377213,0.00028874323,0.0006532267,0.00017179713,0.0008295094,0.00024543336,0.00037662082,0.002002565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017688712,0.00019175374,0.00018137884,0.0005094509,0.00051289966,0.00032226348,0.00030644052,0.0007765982,0.00015184368],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014275106,0.0005518375,0.97305876,0.0000454019,0.0002641412,0.00010625252,0.0013864154,0.0019115952,0.0061190245,0.0010661117,0.00020349018,0.013859447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013692503,0.00033323115,0.99375373,0.00001137539,0.00004436735,0.00012060813,0.00023379784,0.0025678894,0.00087823736,0.0017642375,0.00025619403,0.00002256352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011171348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010367285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029367316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017242484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012094025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015531123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119649307","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2222","title":"Consumption on steroids: The effect of testosterone on preferences for conspicuous consumption and the moderating role of intrasexual competition","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Sexual Differentiation and Disorders","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Testosterone (patch); Sexual selection; Conspicuous consumption; Competition (biology); Consumption (sociology); Digit ratio; Psychology; Biology; Endocrinology; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.03180580714231282,"score_gpt":0.34031504968975607,"score_spread":0.3085092425474433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119649307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991486,0.000182145,0.00008116282,0.000026195943,0.0000039262354,0.0000023016744,0.00004561318,0.0000033822582,0.00050673436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906236,0.00006270535,0.000119948294,0.000020789572,0.000004850948,0.000002938656,0.000044018998,0.0000032083638,0.00067912065],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997863,0.00008219077,0.0000073201986,0.00004180164,0.000048874655,0.000033509274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982445,0.0006329456,0.00056784885,0.00013477629,0.000068776884,0.00035106114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039873747,0.00030249718,0.00020724624,0.00023314895,0.0002698962,0.0007279169,0.00015915332,0.00021342593,0.0034038126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014919597,0.00016318967,0.00018727903,0.00027052403,0.00029707432,0.0002044141,0.00024918382,0.0004247896,0.0001952926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039702095,0.0013250955,0.89261395,0.000112750145,0.00040061516,0.00020240866,0.0006954538,0.00030883923,0.07497982,0.0004977897,0.00022160157,0.024671491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064545493,0.00025202724,0.99777114,0.0000032501819,0.000032872635,0.000031636522,0.00009035402,0.00017505013,0.001454252,0.00006993039,0.000108770735,0.000004323889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026671092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00481479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034038126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013791819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024125211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011386871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123962758","doi":"10.1002/bdm.735","title":"Effects of Spikes in the Price of Gasoline on Behavioral Intentions: A Mental Accounting Explanation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Gallon (US); Mental accounting; Gasoline; Economics; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Public economics; Microeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.16415801977220304,"score_gpt":0.4335051786725509,"score_spread":0.2693471589003479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123962758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837345,0.00008400398,0.003236055,0.0013295943,0.00003469142,0.00008241417,0.00010982243,0.00004345635,0.011345416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799925,0.00004467544,0.0012867975,0.00018595248,0.000011508746,0.00004491415,0.000046563684,0.000007606171,0.00037272784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986626,0.0007167598,0.00006677582,0.00017022915,0.00026544253,0.00011816442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715424,0.020267738,0.0038903167,0.0027621067,0.00085095793,0.00068649667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028105152,0.0004728835,0.00041150412,0.0005425207,0.0005399215,0.0021265948,0.00078733684,0.001777381,0.008070065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02781436,0.00043937296,0.0007613566,0.00033630934,0.001813073,0.0019757177,0.0017633706,0.0019703074,0.0003150537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0128659075,0.009800882,0.568129,0.0012088995,0.0010393296,0.0020854701,0.022180106,0.03189149,0.0786605,0.11300484,0.0051728976,0.1539606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076796924,0.0021296765,0.79198664,0.00014261997,0.00060450495,0.00042289458,0.005407398,0.08016322,0.008036457,0.107669555,0.0023554696,0.00031357148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039279694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024001547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008070065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009903027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004927816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02699703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124191659","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2232","title":"Arithmetic computation with probability words and numbers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of National Defence; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Calculator; Computation; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Point (geometry); Computer science; Statistics; Probability distribution; Arithmetic; Percentage point; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.12452005511506391,"score_gpt":0.42987133092850005,"score_spread":0.30535127581343613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124191659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90155137,0.00054295594,0.075476274,0.00065097417,0.00009194581,0.000098374294,0.00016041382,0.00014333251,0.021284368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98176944,0.00011935575,0.017062163,0.00005866114,0.000029893023,0.000054900735,0.000071267306,0.000021923328,0.0008125429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973923,0.0013700286,0.00024893828,0.00035314268,0.000551772,0.000083766776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96588176,0.026604919,0.0039699282,0.0018572909,0.0012555462,0.0004305457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014905148,0.00038823189,0.00030864865,0.00077111245,0.00030385368,0.0027494037,0.0005462103,0.000458844,0.01013796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047779,0.00027387048,0.0003008268,0.0008597395,0.0015114617,0.0047329427,0.0014177961,0.0007503383,0.00069383753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036874816,0.0005750834,0.080959424,0.002202069,0.00025664974,0.0012399858,0.01995279,0.038401745,0.081099465,0.40832785,0.004189858,0.35910767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028204877,0.0009900323,0.094193004,0.000465266,0.00020233491,0.0013864702,0.003809985,0.11125523,0.028227549,0.7446689,0.014317459,0.00020177031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039021065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022329796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01013796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005246341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003546973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033914804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180279903","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2259","title":"The effects of trait social anxiety on affective and behavioral reactions to others' resource allocations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Ultimatum game; Dictator game; Trait; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Interpersonal communication; Anxiety; Trait anxiety; Empirical research; Resource allocation; Interpersonal relationship; Developmental psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.05696202337491201,"score_gpt":0.44714086562130034,"score_spread":0.3901788422463883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180279903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999605,0.000020038937,0.000036799927,0.000008811757,0.0000020094596,0.0000028624643,0.000014380978,0.0000010885442,0.00030901775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99984,0.000016875854,0.000034311004,0.000008467741,0.0000029053392,0.0000051489505,0.000017030367,6.214728e-7,0.000074567484],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926287,0.0004003196,0.000033359956,0.00007157048,0.00013721857,0.00009469756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938793,0.0033696136,0.0014840446,0.00032239908,0.00020852726,0.00073606987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009785314,0.0002718206,0.00020594221,0.00035449938,0.000246108,0.0006611875,0.00012883895,0.00020925226,0.0014509079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057237055,0.00015082663,0.00027314707,0.00021034549,0.00046573218,0.00019077296,0.00042494942,0.0006569956,0.00009151529],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036463153,0.0020745033,0.9519135,0.0000862617,0.0005680162,0.00021480028,0.0022671535,0.0004264497,0.019720934,0.00023429093,0.00018423269,0.01866351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010452853,0.0006989231,0.9981629,0.0000034507802,0.000039711704,0.00004512384,0.00031963328,0.00017912404,0.00043677152,0.000054340788,0.000043279204,0.000006338433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082347286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014826971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0014509079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001304613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011544864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0051749945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220750995","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2280","title":"Information‐seeking when information doesn't matter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Portfolio; Certainty; Action (physics); Psychology; Instrumental variable; Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Finance; Econometrics","score_opus":0.06879234510743981,"score_gpt":0.3845880225931744,"score_spread":0.31579567748573456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220750995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98557127,0.00025563352,0.0033978266,0.0005123985,0.000041652027,0.00006398961,0.000076288925,0.000044891127,0.010035942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99750805,0.00009994466,0.0013016483,0.00022395713,0.000017859309,0.000029631705,0.00004444362,0.000013541552,0.00076088327],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753773,0.00092244433,0.00028744354,0.0004034902,0.0006305151,0.00021841857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94052655,0.044574767,0.00636755,0.00611686,0.0009432876,0.0014709908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003901675,0.00026314348,0.0005889696,0.0005460706,0.0002866318,0.0015169999,0.00038355662,0.001227201,0.007824532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037143543,0.00028486998,0.00034531314,0.0002759476,0.0008303769,0.0019352942,0.0010724524,0.0015436743,0.00054005894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023776483,0.009757956,0.35405988,0.003709726,0.0012998701,0.0010804122,0.007769352,0.008145524,0.25318745,0.04900383,0.0044639423,0.28374565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014583893,0.015823837,0.7373574,0.0005734819,0.0014843799,0.0016119047,0.0034031267,0.04332209,0.07111896,0.110843845,0.012726899,0.00027570178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034619536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035948193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007824532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033435572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029137646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026175678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308752211","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2307","title":"Meta‐informational cue inconsistency and judgment of information accuracy: Spotlight on intelligence analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Data Quality and Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Ontario; Government of Canada; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Information quality; Quality (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Natural language processing; Information system","score_opus":0.25537479457183065,"score_gpt":0.45268452003447074,"score_spread":0.19730972546264008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308752211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93519,0.0021190965,0.047465265,0.001693901,0.000079160345,0.000110412664,0.00009774774,0.0002047241,0.013039672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99423087,0.00012798564,0.0052934163,0.000102036414,0.00003913215,0.000025022633,0.000026306956,0.00003782487,0.000117414085],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9593492,0.025190728,0.0018541381,0.0028487167,0.010143594,0.00061355694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5374678,0.3667196,0.036366172,0.036902484,0.019917917,0.0026260815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038970124,0.000692038,0.0011439746,0.003938154,0.0009177445,0.0055752415,0.0015637163,0.0014616158,0.0020077177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32401663,0.00085695664,0.00077234936,0.0023858708,0.0044357674,0.007837624,0.0033504174,0.0028593878,0.00017116647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0088532055,0.0012834313,0.4764299,0.0021366393,0.0025701437,0.00044397768,0.0313784,0.014696938,0.039249334,0.072847925,0.002748813,0.34736133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043026387,0.0028964079,0.6590626,0.0009376091,0.0014240176,0.0009661384,0.009953573,0.08302068,0.03330317,0.2025114,0.004693738,0.0008003636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020382612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011200684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038970124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015120317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012395545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20609617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324141783","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2322","title":"Demand for information about potential wins and losses: Does it matter if information matters?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Action (physics); Chose; Instrumental variable; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.05207263000074558,"score_gpt":0.3937826926659199,"score_spread":0.34171006266517434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324141783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99363554,0.00014271785,0.0005336998,0.00046154603,0.000012384373,0.000012982598,0.00012332028,0.000009518766,0.005068267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917716,0.00005065326,0.00020357546,0.00009044977,0.000011451398,0.000009152987,0.000071233495,0.000007504934,0.00037894564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998442,0.0006049665,0.00012486821,0.0003220837,0.00035849813,0.00014765079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9422439,0.041425698,0.008727413,0.00344267,0.0012009316,0.0029593732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028951766,0.0002156741,0.0006288988,0.00040672487,0.000370795,0.0018833033,0.00038161557,0.0009983344,0.011403385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036248095,0.00031596274,0.0002898556,0.00038412175,0.0008350266,0.0015928615,0.0007186523,0.0010494086,0.0005953267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0136598945,0.0033105465,0.86490554,0.0005458293,0.000476748,0.00051779044,0.0025171395,0.0032822066,0.030509843,0.009552557,0.0022936014,0.06842837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025488218,0.0014304366,0.96928746,0.00007074569,0.00024416798,0.00026137682,0.0011574611,0.0065574283,0.0033961968,0.015150762,0.002119353,0.00006969925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001350275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013547867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011403385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044275544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003337481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038148105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387894662","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2361","title":"Preference for quicker offers: The critical roles of temporal reference points and evaluation mode","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Preference; Mode (computer interface); Point (geometry); Salient; Feeling; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Psychology; Joint (building); Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Human–computer interaction; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.39145312597477916,"score_gpt":0.524278844454063,"score_spread":0.13282571847928387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387894662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97937894,0.00065131806,0.005592282,0.00041367064,0.00003687523,0.000044884448,0.0000533228,0.000026583875,0.01380204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963869,0.0001697219,0.0027651133,0.000082097584,0.000022311575,0.000022048083,0.00003353327,0.000021445418,0.00049679255],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658656,0.00207139,0.00020070598,0.00027971822,0.00069221616,0.00016944423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93533605,0.05107534,0.0066468227,0.0029277594,0.0021400242,0.0018740009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0084899785,0.00025387836,0.00032753558,0.0006726839,0.00052140286,0.003426418,0.00056605664,0.00097345654,0.00958845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056287996,0.0003383534,0.0003655881,0.0006001956,0.0010388165,0.0031571954,0.0010485931,0.0014316365,0.0004346046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017724385,0.002960516,0.5251743,0.0019246804,0.0011403903,0.0019922105,0.036839865,0.008328849,0.046490937,0.07763503,0.004028218,0.2757606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007337621,0.003019761,0.8472342,0.00064930425,0.00065536384,0.0011430478,0.019982805,0.016715147,0.007443937,0.08917467,0.012825615,0.0004222916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008654292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014001683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00958845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005388978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040763256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04489982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392863756","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2377","title":"Attention! Do We Really Need Attention Checks?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.1264952074393649,"score_gpt":0.4466319224044139,"score_spread":0.32013671496504903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392863756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96682054,0.0022107481,0.018132126,0.0032974547,0.0005940401,0.00021917716,0.00029628663,0.00042184902,0.008007742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869284,0.00042782314,0.00948588,0.0015528604,0.000249612,0.00021774453,0.00013066322,0.000051286486,0.00095565594],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927193,0.0046762615,0.00040116842,0.0006940548,0.001209181,0.00029997024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81926817,0.14266546,0.015340027,0.013204347,0.006125393,0.0033965213],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017085927,0.0005394215,0.0010525129,0.0006419754,0.00043564616,0.001630014,0.0013041316,0.0012762278,0.0061888597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12392766,0.00027235318,0.00040598403,0.00044567764,0.0015407461,0.0030526852,0.0009269035,0.0013344155,0.0010568242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015531944,0.006643622,0.23927537,0.0031886743,0.00092338596,0.00034875763,0.0034268876,0.0013895403,0.04164179,0.0063813296,0.012123514,0.6691252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013436158,0.020582303,0.8219915,0.001679523,0.0008376047,0.0010804218,0.0030542053,0.010412357,0.066924065,0.039973237,0.031660374,0.00046079778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005954275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061563205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9829141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039942743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059075124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090360105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394617843","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2381","title":"Measuring Rational Thinking in Adolescents: The Assessment of Rational Thinking for Youth (ART‐Y)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Rationality; Numeracy; Cognition; Literacy; Developmental psychology; Mathematics education; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.21265458672150173,"score_gpt":0.4519607289546748,"score_spread":0.2393061422331731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394617843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99509287,0.00029162478,0.0017569422,0.000060504568,0.000019550522,0.00018229497,0.00067345885,0.00003928293,0.0018835322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98831683,0.00036520686,0.008438696,0.000046765515,0.000015042797,0.00056070066,0.0012199352,0.000012634319,0.001024205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988716,0.00034913034,0.00021947201,0.000121364734,0.00033049684,0.00010784545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920284,0.0017482957,0.0036114457,0.00036364153,0.0015631618,0.0006851114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026820186,0.00047022363,0.0004228927,0.0014225676,0.00032423425,0.0010247871,0.00035064746,0.0004376733,0.0015832644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00664087,0.00027092927,0.0008141277,0.000629072,0.00034135493,0.00060914294,0.001049789,0.0011651963,0.000361833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014059295,0.00037602635,0.95961064,0.00009366188,0.00007900634,0.000086173946,0.00059868454,0.0005242641,0.001045286,0.00045201115,0.0010173386,0.03597636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018899458,0.00048799088,0.99341834,0.000058605634,0.00004841062,0.00037430457,0.00028808572,0.0016216534,0.001476754,0.0006295225,0.0015567768,0.000020636355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015815768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003103256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026820186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031721892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008022736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014183998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400512097","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2399","title":"When Half Is at Least 50%: Effect of “Framing” and Probability Level on Frequency Estimates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Forecasting Techniques and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Ministère de la Défense Nationale","keywords":"Framing (construction); Econometrics; Statistics; Framing effect; Psychology; Mathematics; Economics; Social psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.19638431250553035,"score_gpt":0.4594626639077974,"score_spread":0.26307835140226704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400512097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98707366,0.00017948834,0.0064551844,0.0002543307,0.00006977918,0.0000834696,0.00008150073,0.000045052308,0.005757546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956766,0.00005553508,0.0037465293,0.000111735826,0.000029743878,0.000066417175,0.000039657993,0.000020099264,0.00025361867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.98527825,0.011340427,0.00058742904,0.0011289408,0.0013184081,0.00034655537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4914871,0.48386133,0.014999184,0.0061328723,0.0021973187,0.0013222909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016518297,0.00043600693,0.00053517777,0.00046978053,0.00046456011,0.0018375585,0.000568851,0.0010019934,0.0048699887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18144327,0.00039610857,0.00039865443,0.00031173395,0.0010758918,0.0014146725,0.000820959,0.0014858907,0.00030050977],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07356605,0.006269468,0.4494149,0.0020048257,0.0014897059,0.0010935913,0.017481642,0.02892804,0.13244551,0.020771915,0.003954613,0.26257974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013918601,0.013511938,0.81104344,0.0006692502,0.0023035007,0.0006693807,0.004227906,0.07372016,0.044309955,0.041147817,0.0063337814,0.000671057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012214954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000986714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016518297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054203975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035778372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08735812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401679999","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2406","title":"A Clean Slate: Adapting the Realization Effect to Online Gambling and Its Effectiveness in People With Gambling Problems","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Realization (probability); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1148528157262643,"score_gpt":0.4562247691559809,"score_spread":0.3413719534297166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401679999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99895203,0.000024343197,0.0001655211,0.000039261202,0.0000053094395,0.000037134912,0.000013942694,0.000008405181,0.0007539657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991881,0.000026509471,0.000505072,0.00002427765,0.0000044433114,0.000031656567,0.000022800587,0.0000029237176,0.00019417054],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871755,0.0006193131,0.00007622081,0.00013484168,0.0003661932,0.000085869404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99354255,0.0039512627,0.0010446713,0.00050546066,0.00020446388,0.0007516524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021820394,0.00034598733,0.00044192877,0.00055922725,0.00035591214,0.001069434,0.00036417652,0.00068503915,0.0026018533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0140093295,0.00026185505,0.0004653519,0.00024627417,0.0007860943,0.00087690866,0.0008893158,0.0009740931,0.00020820464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009696884,0.0244627,0.760601,0.00044279985,0.00058307475,0.00033592296,0.0076323557,0.0019840172,0.018216673,0.0014760424,0.00093599723,0.17363253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002626243,0.0062657525,0.98588157,0.000033971475,0.00018632427,0.00013970849,0.001220307,0.0033159712,0.0010917339,0.001015492,0.00054456264,0.000041937175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008277975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00120577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026018533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026487248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023379273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011539876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401931553","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2407","title":"Reference‐Dependent Risk‐Taking in the NBA","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Point (geometry); Prospect theory; Econometrics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Reference model; Psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.23926284374588752,"score_gpt":0.4892373095558045,"score_spread":0.249974465809917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401931553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99215746,0.00009458819,0.0024746493,0.00010673396,0.000011010804,0.000018414268,0.00013421917,0.000009904948,0.004992926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984207,0.00003992671,0.00056194724,0.000018923822,0.0000032233863,0.000010605304,0.00009916546,0.0000038511466,0.0008416385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970547,0.0015315684,0.00013917971,0.00045519302,0.00051667687,0.00030266808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98381954,0.0051887683,0.005723396,0.0021241207,0.0012720348,0.0018722031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072090235,0.00025105054,0.0007277954,0.00081893685,0.00078442594,0.002599935,0.00091270456,0.0006934217,0.004654288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026975624,0.00030931438,0.0003855702,0.0008230292,0.0011214745,0.0014155417,0.0013881756,0.0011186299,0.00095045014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021140878,0.0011913006,0.9019795,0.00009207891,0.0003563973,0.00028464184,0.0046201297,0.014920747,0.0038882913,0.020320961,0.0018097606,0.048422147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004033816,0.00052178284,0.944205,0.000047211208,0.00003843768,0.00010254819,0.0021456683,0.026542438,0.00059727504,0.02204555,0.0036327916,0.00008098625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02045729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026058313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02045729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011220531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047020367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040676475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408646938","doi":"10.1002/bdm.70013","title":"When Certainty Backfires: The Effects of Unwarranted Precision on Consumer Loyalty","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Loyalty; Business; Psychology; Advertising; Marketing; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06292381277000407,"score_gpt":0.4205145747289105,"score_spread":0.35759076195890643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408646938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939878,0.00016281391,0.00072313065,0.0006891099,0.000018494093,0.000007360399,0.000023140665,0.0000071366044,0.0043809745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99949574,0.000035852496,0.00013270164,0.00014838399,0.000007847319,0.0000034712882,0.000008920709,0.000002453824,0.00016455055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955149,0.0025180255,0.00024436877,0.00026570668,0.0010542012,0.00040275382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9172547,0.06211846,0.011122648,0.003677934,0.0039009927,0.0019253314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005530576,0.00015776356,0.0003391089,0.00036268946,0.0007707264,0.0031734854,0.0003995803,0.0013606423,0.0035891335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053821713,0.00023220923,0.0004171028,0.00035280472,0.0011520265,0.0018118169,0.0011674883,0.0031148025,0.00026043586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048177494,0.0015955791,0.83601665,0.00034979964,0.00060485105,0.00083660305,0.020780593,0.004923155,0.009127524,0.01342532,0.0020799094,0.105442286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009089925,0.0016224065,0.93605924,0.0002331401,0.0004448015,0.00047726286,0.020301873,0.01369283,0.0043167816,0.019641865,0.0029355919,0.0001833038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039364933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041935053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005530576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009561081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004951174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029248834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415030829","doi":"10.1002/bdm.70046","title":"All Together Now: Genes, Interpersonal Touch, and Self‐Conscious Processes Jointly Guide Cooperative Behavior","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Context (archaeology); Interpersonal communication; Mediation; Interpersonal interaction; Interpersonal relationship; Social relation; Point (geometry)","score_opus":0.04450700889586586,"score_gpt":0.4121226493409576,"score_spread":0.36761564044509176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415030829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900802,0.00019777413,0.006075688,0.00039394287,0.000016703712,0.00001545681,0.000022505657,0.000035495417,0.0031621782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974139,0.000050975174,0.002038595,0.00005598346,0.0000026828784,0.000010075279,0.000006931284,0.0000045459633,0.00041615657],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995016,0.00023639805,0.000020462983,0.00011388133,0.000059801972,0.000067799934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843746,0.0006534565,0.00039401912,0.00013596019,0.00012160897,0.0002575528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000815129,0.0003853273,0.00029008728,0.00037099727,0.00041642762,0.0016506385,0.0002341211,0.0006229541,0.0026663507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002870614,0.0002638353,0.00021543015,0.00017985403,0.0019227727,0.0007629781,0.0009074355,0.00060164894,0.00016634082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014926445,0.0006598609,0.32262996,0.0005503904,0.0004914916,0.0020928164,0.009040609,0.01343263,0.50821096,0.054580037,0.0014699841,0.08534866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011062896,0.0014369146,0.8616385,0.00021329534,0.00031805626,0.0009475541,0.0048774392,0.03248158,0.046161365,0.0479921,0.0035776454,0.00024492407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015971396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015130586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026663507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003657568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044670652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008919835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416769878","doi":"10.1002/bdm.70050","title":"Me?! Never! Social Distance as a Moderator of Other Contextual Factors on Responses to Ethical Scenarios","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Construal level theory; Moderation; Self construal; Social distance; Order (exchange); Social influence","score_opus":0.12964347015159772,"score_gpt":0.5123643097010452,"score_spread":0.38272083954944747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416769878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99901354,0.000030292493,0.00023471341,0.00006796442,0.0000061089745,0.00001651967,0.00001881858,0.0000021818314,0.00060990214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994287,0.000027347804,0.0003289449,0.000020903039,0.0000036903268,0.000034982506,0.000018478384,0.0000029512958,0.0001340495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931778,0.005168365,0.00027591028,0.00049006345,0.0006216027,0.00026639333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9387297,0.048167896,0.0081974175,0.0021562248,0.0011517734,0.0015970482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047035837,0.00028682125,0.00036428086,0.00040846423,0.00082307705,0.0019382337,0.00038352332,0.0007309612,0.0036980268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03332024,0.00025034568,0.00035663528,0.00031967196,0.0014494178,0.0007901332,0.0015387748,0.0012398278,0.00013438836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031227537,0.0024012763,0.90161306,0.0004355163,0.00066257437,0.0004554979,0.050430734,0.0014476564,0.011791075,0.0022176376,0.00035308997,0.02506903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051046674,0.0012117038,0.9775643,0.00008272721,0.00011706607,0.00010409103,0.0149486745,0.0017149537,0.001955408,0.0013579644,0.000850892,0.000041159594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009586904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017584655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047035837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004771536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044760763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024875224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417101574","doi":"10.1002/bdm.70052","title":"Precommitment in Stochastic Versus Deterministic Social Dilemmas","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Precommitment; Social dilemma; Investment (military); Ego depletion; Interdependence; Dilemma; Dynamic inconsistency","score_opus":0.06348813658226708,"score_gpt":0.44132935919212357,"score_spread":0.3778412226098565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417101574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96396637,0.0002502337,0.026292074,0.00078430533,0.000026063912,0.00009554161,0.00004413847,0.000026788292,0.008514537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997077,0.00003989648,0.0025254495,0.00005321507,0.000006447021,0.000043527212,0.000008682383,0.00000202815,0.00024373036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868269,0.0102044465,0.00044048662,0.00085568306,0.0010552093,0.0006172634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92799705,0.056076355,0.010191965,0.0025201682,0.0012482419,0.0019662797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013393751,0.00059845624,0.00071562483,0.00075903663,0.0007999456,0.0025129858,0.0011744272,0.0016323086,0.0021543056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05571775,0.00041916274,0.00056925777,0.00046968626,0.0030542456,0.002971469,0.0019378399,0.0014388738,0.00012821647],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002843389,0.002030338,0.032951843,0.0008752515,0.00055708195,0.0008183098,0.004460833,0.39524415,0.015554057,0.49778652,0.0014383784,0.0454398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059570867,0.0015055204,0.01957519,0.00011822414,0.00015700514,0.00031866017,0.0016342083,0.4851947,0.0030351717,0.48477218,0.0029533328,0.00014013192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012491215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013419535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013393751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028157977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001183429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07083374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}