{"meta":{"query_hash":"628dfc12829a","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making"},"cohort_total":62,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":62,"exported":62,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/628dfc12829a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Behavioral+Decision+Making"},"results":[{"id":"W1488440709","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1864","title":"Intelligence, Executive Functions, and Decision Making as Predictors of Antisocial Behavior in an Adolescent Sample of Justice‐Involved Youth and a Community Comparison Group","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Health; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; University of Toronto; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Attribution; Cognition; Executive functions; Sample (material); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Antisocial personality disorder; Economic Justice; Clinical psychology; Poison control; Injury prevention; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.27678916086873495,"score_gpt":0.41472923649241206,"score_spread":0.1379400756236771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488440709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876317,0.00018357404,0.011004426,0.000009189405,0.0008822419,0.00020930993,0.000056185672,0.000008082489,0.00001532741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99338573,0.000049833372,0.006441643,0.00004575717,0.0000576793,0.000002027003,0.0000029280607,0.000013515903,8.9881144e-7],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710417,0.0004737684,0.0011870263,0.00022044663,0.00079505116,0.00021953107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772584,0.00069486385,0.00092887995,0.00020224646,0.00027287917,0.00017530368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014445962,0.00019244466,0.00054687844,0.0005210156,0.00020542827,0.00004819302,0.00034265826,0.0001489808,0.000011227264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005764844,0.00016665313,0.000100300516,0.000353495,0.00032134773,0.00047323309,0.00023769191,0.0007327335,7.9521055e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041226964,0.004006733,0.8239362,0.000031688956,0.0000071281233,0.00006140867,0.007853664,0.00025284657,0.0090077,0.00010784451,0.00010076917,0.1505113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020683117,0.004708391,0.9311383,0.0020185078,0.000374951,0.00014386543,0.05156273,0.00059537025,0.0016176682,0.0054689115,0.000015654805,0.00028736415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000086674496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015997254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15022394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010405707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059918362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6795917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576290844","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1792","title":"Extreme Outcomes Sway Risky Decisions from Experience","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Alberta Gambling Research Institute, University of Calgary; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Risk-seeking; Actuarial science; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.25457423032658,"score_gpt":0.45132422197669936,"score_spread":0.19674999165011936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576290844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97025037,0.00029585822,0.02414725,0.00026732095,0.0043106,0.00028409637,0.000041989773,0.000046948528,0.00035554805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91559833,0.00004366936,0.08342809,0.00035451588,0.00027686235,0.000013621954,0.0000013299865,0.000055407687,0.0002281666],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887774,0.0003178201,0.004804611,0.000970225,0.0044009364,0.00072901417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98193175,0.010111512,0.003158725,0.0018820004,0.0022618806,0.00065411563],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032354286,0.0005844201,0.0015835525,0.0015202323,0.000501359,0.0022529624,0.0038312997,0.00037120335,0.009733296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075475154,0.0003876143,0.001219808,0.0012619777,0.00023944888,0.0032377471,0.00081631547,0.0008833464,0.0028653992],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010003722,0.00033098902,0.14045422,2.0700219e-7,0.000012912146,0.00017615366,0.00076813344,0.00023498767,0.0011728394,0.000023065208,0.0090426495,0.8476838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017582374,0.0004840493,0.6257657,0.0005285926,0.00014488079,0.0002995914,0.0061937687,0.0011823869,0.00032385445,0.34998837,0.0124085415,0.00092207576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025604715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000087112414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8467617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027177163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019920741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588403970","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1874","title":"A Goal‐Priming Approach to Cognitive Consistency: Applications to Judgment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Priming (agriculture); Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Preference; Wishful thinking; Task (project management); Process (computing); Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.30705424950436955,"score_gpt":0.4760887536961202,"score_spread":0.16903450419175065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588403970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7019922,0.000115734096,0.29380745,0.0002036997,0.0009389473,0.00058264914,0.000030437306,0.000025194226,0.0023036483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83172065,0.0000026560072,0.16704693,0.0007503858,0.00025691433,0.0000429174,0.0000011803395,0.000036285786,0.00014205296],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99245226,0.00020658359,0.0028115697,0.00080482534,0.0031950527,0.00052972883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916941,0.0017615019,0.0013409824,0.00084769406,0.0031941885,0.001161513],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006779051,0.0003697402,0.000997614,0.0017654892,0.0003014193,0.0010021082,0.0017824055,0.00018580671,0.00010630117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033215163,0.0002851192,0.00047641236,0.001902658,0.0000897308,0.0007141015,0.0006808002,0.00049117696,0.0009912872],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004653574,0.00063198863,0.0028264525,0.0000012743366,0.000011423469,0.00006465824,0.0016739818,0.0023316005,0.00024876348,0.00014665323,0.010108877,0.98148894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012799449,0.010486857,0.0515356,0.004398453,0.0018354664,0.0059704706,0.1293878,0.0038152554,0.0016839023,0.40666643,0.3656303,0.005790016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013775776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018394505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97569895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004668146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048344088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1776244204","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1795","title":"Altering the Shape of Punishment Distributions Affects Decision Making in a Modified Iowa Gambling Task","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; McMaster University; Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Skew; Iowa gambling task; Variance (accounting); Psychology; Preference; Task (project management); Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Analysis of variance; Perception; Econometrics; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Cognition; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Communication; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.13856622509164848,"score_gpt":0.4314551819299026,"score_spread":0.2928889568382541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1776244204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93666494,0.0003295831,0.060391292,0.00020096429,0.0017352888,0.0005024217,0.000027516719,0.000019903375,0.00012811847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741769,0.00004325308,0.025443602,0.000092534465,0.00016548856,0.00001844351,0.0000012515457,0.00004377201,0.000014788449],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908539,0.00040259122,0.00414315,0.0007166232,0.00314511,0.0007385973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872999,0.0067017656,0.003203011,0.0012546376,0.0012942926,0.00024634931],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007827435,0.0004794934,0.0012780332,0.0017156039,0.00037338416,0.0012766406,0.0027067354,0.0002905858,0.00071008655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034582398,0.00030836658,0.0008197068,0.0020194233,0.00021242295,0.001739704,0.00091209676,0.0010041383,0.00011303616],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028828578,0.00037833006,0.013763425,0.0000040215423,0.000011321283,0.00013317629,0.00056689896,0.009188701,0.003124032,0.00011582001,0.0012882805,0.9711377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005112563,0.001894005,0.46768278,0.008726379,0.00036967522,0.0014500532,0.0076524876,0.102394216,0.0012569783,0.3990611,0.002633805,0.0017659484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045865985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008981985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96937174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046358764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021579115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1806059501","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1863","title":"When Does Framing Influence Preferences, Risk Perceptions, and Risk Attitudes? The Explicated Valence Account","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"York University; Government of Canada; Defence Research and Development Canada","keywords":"Framing effect; Framing (construction); Prospect theory; Risk perception; Perception; Risk-seeking; Psychology; Valence (chemistry); Social psychology; Economics; Loss aversion; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Engineering; Chemistry","score_opus":0.1262111218641538,"score_gpt":0.4200131924037594,"score_spread":0.2938020705396056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1806059501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875091,0.0007047849,0.010142555,0.000114402945,0.0011582156,0.00023303322,0.00006821042,0.000032121687,0.00003761252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97299016,0.00071832293,0.025914771,0.00008950238,0.00020169938,0.000007955903,6.7110716e-7,0.000028233171,0.0000486826],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928395,0.0006558561,0.0024806967,0.0007230158,0.0028496666,0.00045123068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894738,0.0036382845,0.003297805,0.0011602144,0.002025019,0.00040485017],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011411691,0.00038669474,0.00076612935,0.0006660608,0.000716005,0.0019437281,0.0024077098,0.0002567957,0.000284278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00653951,0.0001982554,0.00032524284,0.00070191355,0.00036679715,0.002187063,0.0007273781,0.0012417207,0.00016329112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013355029,0.00010328884,0.42923877,8.982191e-7,0.00000922106,0.000025419116,0.0013664116,0.0013327372,0.000058401627,0.000007275555,0.0015285397,0.5661955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010260409,0.0005800709,0.7838513,0.00052481267,0.00033518937,0.00043735086,0.008365598,0.0017093526,0.000032893935,0.19576299,0.0068394677,0.0005348985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022783471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5656606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002243068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026760288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1813082302","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1844","title":"‘Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is!’: Effects of Streaks on Confidence and Betting in a Binary Choice Task","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Medical Research Council","keywords":"Roulette; Stochastic game; Psychology; Outcome (game theory); Task (project management); Randomness; Social psychology; Confidence interval; Econometrics; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08297874841532561,"score_gpt":0.41757058493766,"score_spread":0.33459183652233443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1813082302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99627876,0.0005592459,0.0015638472,0.00014115777,0.0010793254,0.00023020459,0.000016997406,0.000014987258,0.00011547321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923109,0.00005450408,0.0071120244,0.00023376799,0.00017541362,0.0000030378415,4.0365597e-7,0.000040735318,0.00006924204],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931698,0.00039696688,0.0029075593,0.000751144,0.0022736161,0.0005009248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98946464,0.005930544,0.0027441354,0.00083647453,0.000719838,0.00030436626],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049707238,0.00043106845,0.0013117618,0.0015890542,0.0001918354,0.00051265367,0.0013329589,0.00031810143,0.00008424497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039125644,0.0003267685,0.0004085284,0.0008825633,0.00015743161,0.00096694235,0.00041410592,0.00086942565,0.000044960285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003694426,0.00038512304,0.08189202,0.00001574129,0.000008502304,0.00022769129,0.0010138737,0.0011097903,0.00577442,0.000037255595,0.00084980467,0.9083163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00836168,0.0059148585,0.880949,0.012669063,0.00040968638,0.0005045571,0.0050604544,0.014132379,0.0035620215,0.06267384,0.004076315,0.0016861197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009735472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006589137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9066302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014508519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012725298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965719994","doi":"10.1002/bdm.649","title":"Evaluating advisors: A policy‐capturing study under conditions of complete and missing information","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Advice (programming); Interpersonal communication; Contrast (vision); Psychology; Decision aids; Knowledge management; Computer science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2487715698887714,"score_gpt":0.5712880498592928,"score_spread":0.32251647997052146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965719994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99283713,0.000023745339,0.0048166574,0.0011696174,0.00006201177,0.00016433994,0.00000698318,0.000007997742,0.0009114889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940338,0.000005526488,0.005686619,0.00013189387,0.00012727488,7.897946e-7,7.7168545e-7,0.0000027090105,0.000010607718],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775445,0.00022574388,0.0007405753,0.00006826611,0.0010119965,0.00019893383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845046,0.0002802951,0.0006001486,0.000086525746,0.0004468732,0.00013567947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025085416,0.00007325972,0.00019442354,0.0005505908,0.00052611553,0.00028881885,0.00019763345,0.0000529335,0.000057682904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072933285,0.00006570576,0.00006904368,0.00042004467,0.00009405298,0.0013346808,0.00003423085,0.00020245816,0.0000014930647],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021225681,0.00070734887,0.0053816224,0.0000104072915,0.000025004922,0.000017524106,0.051855844,0.0007319226,0.0066202735,0.02383089,0.00016771453,0.9104392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003850354,0.0033109884,0.72461206,0.0011041068,0.00015348372,0.00011248339,0.14168979,0.0023956627,0.00015402958,0.1205666,0.0015952875,0.00045513044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012521887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000065689084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90998405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103056496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055747514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40465087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977697135","doi":"10.1002/bdm.544","title":"The reasoning skills and thinking dispositions of problem gamblers: a dual‐process taxonomy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Taxonomy (biology); Set (abstract data type); Competence (human resources); Volition (linguistics); Cognitive psychology; Inference; Dual (grammatical number); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.05408152596689883,"score_gpt":0.40306658188837896,"score_spread":0.3489850559214801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977697135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953768,0.00088009716,0.0025226942,0.00003551015,0.00043859385,0.00022202704,0.0000074848554,0.000014604395,0.0005021597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98671913,0.000015349384,0.012992936,0.000010716352,0.000101033576,0.000019831194,0.0000016701142,0.00002464904,0.00011469633],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800557,0.00008801752,0.00089222286,0.00020154817,0.0005240297,0.00028862976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805206,0.0003066034,0.00094948255,0.0002430471,0.0003809014,0.00006787597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067877735,0.00018422473,0.00032929718,0.00023763787,0.00039999944,0.00016819515,0.00023803716,0.00011017707,0.000052627573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023689543,0.00012365595,0.00016564035,0.00032351122,0.00010520809,0.00027351736,0.00006143402,0.00031239394,0.0000046605937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044412396,0.0025713653,0.7463652,0.000019577805,0.00011430507,0.0007635755,0.002697571,0.0002688306,0.0011690084,0.0034135669,0.0010160019,0.24115689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027581032,0.0007563898,0.97743773,0.0019148056,0.0007069881,0.0015770495,0.00247405,0.000015071911,0.00041527662,0.010903127,0.00072536775,0.00031603983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000079202204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040191768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24084085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060397888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004759444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5042543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979248804","doi":"10.1002/bdm.626","title":"How do we evaluate future gambles? Experimental evidence on path dependency in risky intertemporal choice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Management and Science University; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Lottery; Discounting; Econometrics; Path (computing); Economics; Time preference; Intertemporal choice; Choice set; Prospect theory; Expected utility hypothesis; Value (mathematics); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Statistics","score_opus":0.26264413727393615,"score_gpt":0.47354757966716654,"score_spread":0.2109034423932304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979248804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989277,0.004257583,0.001197477,0.0006730829,0.0041893143,0.00028939484,0.000012680455,0.000026334152,0.000077123936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888704,0.00056470354,0.009480841,0.00013440373,0.00070658355,0.000008893208,4.683652e-7,0.000055615,0.00017811847],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904598,0.0006162848,0.0030439363,0.0010220214,0.0041865753,0.0006713739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918974,0.0028928923,0.0026538896,0.0011973243,0.0009667092,0.00039177446],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056484495,0.0005943064,0.001312342,0.0019670082,0.00037503205,0.0011502275,0.0026136779,0.00038075537,0.0006007361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025604223,0.00042245258,0.0008537914,0.0013347969,0.0001726675,0.0030705605,0.00048325458,0.0013543393,0.00017704329],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011424583,0.0008946142,0.099686265,0.0000023628033,0.000008217731,0.0019327522,0.0014277005,0.00037974046,0.0015522212,0.000021911485,0.0050850455,0.88786674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018112777,0.018466642,0.68566614,0.023379674,0.00047658844,0.015717603,0.043308165,0.0049662767,0.007415326,0.12229724,0.054299235,0.0058943345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002519598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007107101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8819724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000668756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034816423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991011913","doi":"10.1002/bdm.414","title":"A domain‐specific risk‐attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1865,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Risk perception; Scale (ratio); Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Social psychology; Sample (material); Perception; Actuarial science; Risk aversion (psychology); Construct (python library); Expected utility hypothesis; Business; Economics; Computer science; Financial economics","score_opus":0.11703020244390432,"score_gpt":0.38294582481598927,"score_spread":0.26591562237208494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991011913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96964645,0.001469503,0.026080042,0.00004948712,0.0020329,0.00027435413,0.00015872522,0.00005677701,0.00023178669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.903582,0.0030639274,0.09276636,0.000026754871,0.00038317378,0.000006863917,6.6896575e-7,0.000073253235,0.00009704755],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897375,0.00094366714,0.0038543423,0.0011269706,0.003560494,0.0007770251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98926723,0.00280027,0.004568108,0.0014161895,0.0012781167,0.0006701068],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009656786,0.0006340348,0.0013695385,0.0020064884,0.0015246639,0.0018369744,0.0018661877,0.00043032155,0.002872855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011803235,0.00048804583,0.0010329889,0.001363686,0.00040302935,0.0017636892,0.00057304517,0.0020580164,0.0006126005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115528346,0.00037946994,0.3669881,8.068766e-7,0.000014499855,0.00013486756,0.0012001669,0.00045383244,0.00023348826,0.000007660229,0.0025699225,0.6279017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030276747,0.0011205416,0.90600944,0.00061803655,0.00091280363,0.0018187107,0.006753746,0.00094248255,0.000053321026,0.048026122,0.029479042,0.001238064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000077919474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002684172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6266636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036959996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006203675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005516635","doi":"10.1002/bdm.540","title":"Classifying simulated air threats with fast and frugal heuristics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Heuristic; Contrast (vision); Probabilistic logic; Constraint (computer-aided design); Task (project management); Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.09805858381858683,"score_gpt":0.4133919434235256,"score_spread":0.31533335960493875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005516635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9715783,0.0003603477,0.026563434,0.000107209766,0.0008150662,0.00013427317,0.00001663844,0.00003226503,0.00039246472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678869,0.000018663912,0.031527825,0.00007763676,0.0002723938,7.396703e-7,0.0000010903046,0.00004624948,0.00016849836],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940724,0.0001471667,0.0024013496,0.00060159614,0.0023080364,0.00046946725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940532,0.0018908696,0.0019231141,0.00062825816,0.0012621469,0.00024242289],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025930663,0.00039287913,0.000947479,0.0010152505,0.00038246388,0.00090795505,0.0009096403,0.0002428072,0.00017910382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004804822,0.0002572459,0.0002975931,0.0008792951,0.00021696731,0.0010142243,0.00027278758,0.00064588705,0.000055842145],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005791248,0.0002847104,0.120254815,0.0000019873391,0.000009607036,0.0008585823,0.00013433486,0.01551845,0.0003150014,0.00009308269,0.0014984849,0.8604518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008405733,0.0041694976,0.4777646,0.0024595847,0.00081024104,0.0073385555,0.0039243186,0.030967463,0.00048846967,0.44866797,0.012627012,0.0023765466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026095737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009331981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85807526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016158598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015667352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013660131","doi":"10.1002/bdm.683","title":"A choice prediction competition: Choices from experience and from description","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":340,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Harvard Business School; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Stochastic game; Competition (biology); Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Baseline (sea); Econometrics; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Economics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Political science","score_opus":0.1433559998342561,"score_gpt":0.42074730310549663,"score_spread":0.2773913032712405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013660131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759563,0.00051356916,0.020810323,0.00014700057,0.002203128,0.00011813662,0.00008815348,0.000034667144,0.0001287289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707935,0.00007094371,0.02813558,0.0002727015,0.0006737429,0.0000019462718,0.0000048699944,0.000015703754,0.000031010706],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946666,0.00018277344,0.0022254759,0.0006459431,0.0019871292,0.0002920855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948398,0.0018866425,0.0016766319,0.0006055871,0.00072090625,0.00027043387],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015139522,0.00029726076,0.0007176154,0.0006446995,0.0003299964,0.0014464705,0.0009719542,0.00023115698,0.00082352647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001158228,0.00022983745,0.00029420241,0.0005556525,0.0001206301,0.002702948,0.00015130057,0.00048074286,0.00006832281],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026986096,0.00022026486,0.07419473,2.7595792e-7,0.000005588207,0.00007879453,0.0008399134,0.00016268613,0.0053521725,0.000028842573,0.0008376809,0.9180092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012630136,0.00069756183,0.8201799,0.00056537025,0.00011281692,0.00014744549,0.0015993519,0.0017521136,0.00027392004,0.16378197,0.009286573,0.0003399665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001136052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007630166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91766924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016277489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006606347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014960425","doi":"10.1002/bdm.583","title":"Subjective valuation and asymmetrical motivational systems: implications of scope insensitivity for decision making","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Université Laval","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Feeling; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Scope (computer science); Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.18786858322453592,"score_gpt":0.47161238862498295,"score_spread":0.283743805400447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014960425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5704291,0.00022412078,0.4280619,0.000040854342,0.0007635148,0.0003653059,0.00004003363,0.000009135639,0.00006605328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8635279,0.00001733032,0.13615842,0.00005119238,0.00019725105,0.000007173794,0.0000017002571,0.0000302438,0.000008792352],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925492,0.00022774085,0.0037713696,0.0006363498,0.00238699,0.00042837102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96714765,0.02353138,0.0034774507,0.00060295995,0.0050135404,0.0002270419],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0145827085,0.00031889108,0.0010223535,0.0026023989,0.00038149237,0.00057802605,0.0007700843,0.0003093254,0.00005382835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013303233,0.0002512123,0.0004840639,0.0018056037,0.00017276384,0.0013145467,0.00028009998,0.00040870204,0.000013874802],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006801576,0.00030187436,0.061153423,0.000004979019,0.0000147756755,0.00001612848,0.00018184967,0.0011679513,0.0013130368,0.00068085256,0.0005847338,0.93390024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010921282,0.00074362906,0.73994815,0.0009456395,0.0001333978,0.00050451513,0.0011784569,0.0028272464,0.00025524764,0.25176048,0.00028918806,0.00032192364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018968936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044552224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9335783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040047447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026606963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054517012","doi":"10.1002/bdm.595","title":"To buy or to sell: cultural differences in stock market decisions based on price trends","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Stock market; Stock (firearms); Stock price; Financial economics; Economics; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.27664190879715905,"score_gpt":0.45870632994063953,"score_spread":0.18206442114348048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054517012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848206,0.0000312962,0.011307922,0.0006052567,0.0018675058,0.00029873836,0.000046163226,0.00003288893,0.000989641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9389937,0.000016547256,0.05852131,0.000895472,0.00019650842,0.000013710061,7.7129494e-7,0.000047047506,0.0013149657],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98981917,0.00042127917,0.003640669,0.0010462767,0.0042606555,0.00081195653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98831624,0.007061054,0.0013171982,0.0011904621,0.0012319778,0.0008830411],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046154456,0.00059020147,0.001513025,0.00495979,0.00046688382,0.0007603314,0.002852704,0.0002940041,0.003175728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007194691,0.00036468566,0.00067795056,0.004672063,0.00010338814,0.00094599405,0.0004571234,0.00084469735,0.00042400407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003680079,0.0008393277,0.058983628,7.7276553e-7,0.0000053478398,0.0013450971,0.0008447871,0.0049472963,0.00016437644,0.0000053625636,0.04940889,0.87977505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003318218,0.005953169,0.94769174,0.001813078,0.00008477987,0.0011961715,0.0020614306,0.0070043136,0.00009949249,0.003762164,0.025636941,0.0013785074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024005032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023534901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8887081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005363128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037233598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102243960","doi":"10.1002/bdm.520","title":"Visceral influences on risk‐taking behavior","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Gratification; Psychology; Condom; Reading (process); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)","score_opus":0.12982249729933912,"score_gpt":0.3870396823925007,"score_spread":0.2572171850931616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102243960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99670815,0.000058919963,0.0006018887,0.000112058624,0.0015539525,0.00010392194,0.000010547353,0.000025456548,0.0008250873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954756,0.000018346596,0.0035973825,0.00041165616,0.0003987414,0.0000036280899,3.7218877e-7,0.000017678176,0.00007662931],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973426,0.00014473734,0.0008329572,0.00030326965,0.0010566335,0.0003198103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769086,0.0002954215,0.001617386,0.00019407096,0.00011127146,0.00009100273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004969057,0.00020314242,0.00029632443,0.0003808158,0.00030259145,0.00012400966,0.0004857254,0.000110895024,0.00027603563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019574136,0.00015366322,0.00026952685,0.00027396274,0.00011757597,0.00038763075,0.00006866093,0.00056373846,0.000093742216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001207946,0.002610612,0.31981102,0.000005076429,0.0000070246056,0.002544786,0.0001514535,0.004922462,0.18457308,0.0015968739,0.0050667305,0.47750294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001002075,0.00096438697,0.9781173,0.000333919,0.0000826955,0.00084664585,0.00004359795,0.00006134646,0.009636725,0.007533382,0.0011133591,0.00026460146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024587702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008752769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65830624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010384637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003189764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6266204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112727590","doi":"10.1002/bdm.513","title":"Illusion of confirmation from exposure to another's hypothesis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Confidence interval; Point (geometry); Illusion; Psychology; Econometrics; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.11590702150322214,"score_gpt":0.389568273463285,"score_spread":0.27366125196006286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112727590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9671181,0.00018618842,0.030592723,0.00015197397,0.0014102267,0.0001661992,0.00006901558,0.000016385946,0.00028920788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93169063,0.0000075395915,0.067763485,0.00014419432,0.0002807183,0.0000017112778,0.0000012146629,0.000031714208,0.00007878085],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99301183,0.0002171278,0.003439423,0.0004536738,0.002574579,0.0003033851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919792,0.0029595504,0.0026959265,0.0007984669,0.0014185345,0.0001483693],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031948083,0.0002878992,0.00096349674,0.001301699,0.00016341837,0.00042062168,0.0013874213,0.00023167039,0.0012744907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001366269,0.00021215892,0.00056923943,0.0009445983,0.00008034022,0.0008299098,0.00025501015,0.0002863942,0.0002230292],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045731093,0.00031782826,0.011554822,9.73052e-7,0.000006376143,0.00007064388,0.00032430008,0.0036687688,0.020927642,0.00003375002,0.006035322,0.9566023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034382779,0.0026434162,0.54421014,0.0017054195,0.00034912524,0.00030194293,0.0031626427,0.00093683397,0.013360791,0.39645076,0.032237515,0.001203135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013825056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012002694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95539916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001577884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011560004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118224716","doi":"10.1002/bdm.725","title":"The Value of Task Conflict to Group Decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Decision quality; Psychology; Social psychology; Group decision-making; Preference; Quality (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Group (periodic table); Microeconomics; Economics; Statistics; Operations management; Computer science; Management; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12606847796572296,"score_gpt":0.4047300640592875,"score_spread":0.27866158609356456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118224716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97458464,0.00020563544,0.018941537,0.00020924142,0.0011693549,0.0002205962,0.0000015789578,0.000010954272,0.004656447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921554,0.00018971517,0.007241729,0.000083655956,0.00013806227,0.0000018126971,1.3813904e-7,0.00000858106,0.00018093162],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791133,0.00014477046,0.0006846675,0.000104060426,0.00094020885,0.0002149859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812204,0.0006163013,0.00057195243,0.0001975979,0.0003734994,0.000118618314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023740612,0.00008636323,0.00019511694,0.00025696706,0.0004667214,0.00009873975,0.00063093234,0.00006336833,0.00018923478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051385735,0.000059668168,0.000189864,0.0004595459,0.00008900758,0.00031208486,0.00011937067,0.00014872225,0.000020192083],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000383245,0.0001923154,0.009620618,0.0000011490334,0.000021387548,0.00003177602,0.022731379,0.000022737653,0.0010354867,0.044008903,0.0036824008,0.9182686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010350676,0.0010845583,0.35171446,0.0007010583,0.00028527033,0.000014495269,0.01433766,0.000088127315,0.00028892263,0.017397868,0.61268723,0.00036526078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020311707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056735665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91790336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006986961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006157066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35896906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130962282","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1904","title":"Inferring Others' Hidden Thoughts: Smart Guesses in a Low Diagnostic World","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Irish Research Council for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Psychology; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Confirmation bias; Cognitive psychology; Lie detection; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Deception","score_opus":0.0869167357280344,"score_gpt":0.4202337297077499,"score_spread":0.3333169939797155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130962282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781808,0.00053734926,0.0068646944,0.00015296535,0.008439836,0.00013850055,0.0000026303674,0.00003528704,0.0056479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946823,0.000013714901,0.0035593472,0.0003524625,0.0005320576,0.000008283545,5.513744e-7,0.000033516197,0.00081773376],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976314,0.00022215482,0.0010562507,0.00025269517,0.00050050614,0.0003370214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980789,0.0005446148,0.0005858591,0.00032760162,0.00026147367,0.00020153967],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011255504,0.00019357231,0.0004328824,0.0012140307,0.00004598775,0.000080522186,0.00034248424,0.00016001737,0.0014364115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038661016,0.0001660384,0.00017850492,0.00075812114,0.000082130246,0.00031541285,0.00006770601,0.00058930856,0.00038019023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012788315,0.0009973646,0.22787996,0.0000056093627,0.000037080725,0.002068571,0.0048263907,0.00018704789,0.00013078135,0.00032708066,0.037802614,0.7244587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010278108,0.0016802228,0.87863976,0.0021997376,0.00015083453,0.0034298778,0.007849684,0.00008628954,0.00010683803,0.01658006,0.07816053,0.0008380837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002701227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043964968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7236206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018030756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058429385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99947643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134566371","doi":"10.1002/bdm.663","title":"Aggregating conclusive and inconclusive information: Data and a model based on the assessment of threat","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences; Experimental Psychology Society","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Navy; Computer science; Psychology; Econometrics; Social psychology; Operations research; Mathematics; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.14938528113511285,"score_gpt":0.40964541019210227,"score_spread":0.2602601290569894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134566371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9756135,0.00003525044,0.020851146,0.0028243999,0.00011049388,0.00012560457,0.000029607187,0.000003835003,0.00040617527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828125,0.000031611522,0.013872422,0.0032516464,0.000025019643,5.504825e-7,0.0000010510296,0.0000027896074,0.0000023705327],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863076,0.00006963757,0.00048718601,0.00013411372,0.00057226577,0.000106024265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984823,0.00046839323,0.0006349684,0.0002229481,0.00014408496,0.00004731846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063812925,0.00010148728,0.00019222155,0.0001314227,0.0001963178,0.000062033585,0.000355242,0.000045857803,0.000014118483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024626538,0.00006220393,0.000035441702,0.00012634888,0.000106295105,0.00062751985,0.00019663821,0.00023991491,5.688326e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075166504,0.0005320497,0.005728091,0.000016377659,0.000010462205,0.00015039428,0.0014772081,0.02059994,0.026789699,0.0061638984,0.002734677,0.93504554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028625473,0.0021622237,0.07083558,0.0014870284,0.00010405644,0.000582729,0.0007053554,0.89701325,0.0021059774,0.02159979,0.00026049276,0.00028097906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.002668e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.948308e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93476456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034354314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007194365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25366026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134645122","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1763","title":"The Effect of Temporal Distance on Attitudes toward Imprecise Probabilities and Imprecise Outcomes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Salience (neuroscience); Construal level theory; Outcome (game theory); Ambiguity aversion; Dimension (graph theory); Psychology; Subjective expected utility; Social psychology; Econometrics; Computer science; Expected utility hypothesis; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.08945839551006228,"score_gpt":0.43622934465415264,"score_spread":0.34677094914409035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134645122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99440676,0.0012105748,0.0012887437,0.000118407486,0.002509537,0.0003286038,0.000028475835,0.00001570602,0.00009321957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956418,0.00006130911,0.0039629927,0.000028937508,0.00016666515,0.000008916002,3.4995963e-7,0.000032888933,0.00009611803],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933597,0.0004732071,0.002755813,0.00042148307,0.0024237947,0.0005660182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833494,0.012530829,0.00228768,0.00092560065,0.00059507036,0.00031144693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010653427,0.0004240856,0.0012479265,0.0005319155,0.00038948565,0.00065642135,0.0014339885,0.00019448531,0.00008562748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004419752,0.00021329007,0.0007019969,0.00047904564,0.00039963477,0.0012303726,0.000414658,0.00056067895,0.000033004166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077738427,0.00012772054,0.4586644,0.000004707054,0.0000108203585,0.000011060711,0.00030240737,0.00004944053,0.00008088354,0.00006757002,0.00049825467,0.53940535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002969097,0.0052557588,0.93788,0.0011373785,0.00032038213,0.0003606432,0.0019222985,0.0001758932,0.0014874036,0.039293103,0.008373215,0.0008248264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012175873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027044027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53858054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001719588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076367636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86977166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139262047","doi":"10.1002/bdm.620","title":"Sex differences when searching for a mate: A process‐tracing approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mate choice; Moderation; Psychology; Term (time); Sample (material); Social psychology; Biology; Ecology; Mating","score_opus":0.15647956645107045,"score_gpt":0.4409172547155165,"score_spread":0.28443768826444604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139262047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9326255,0.00045896514,0.06470721,0.000038302813,0.0009045318,0.00031004642,0.000011991877,0.00003421919,0.000909235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96348965,0.000007996895,0.035106037,0.00007534557,0.00037213805,0.00003999746,0.0000028262675,0.000036934758,0.00086905714],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752873,0.00015428504,0.0009346487,0.00035710007,0.0005678303,0.0004573894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983294,0.00029839898,0.0006523913,0.0002768365,0.000307437,0.00013554915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009411335,0.00023381399,0.0005182988,0.00050248695,0.0005540543,0.00005431049,0.00054140633,0.00023370964,0.0007120601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039996707,0.00019211034,0.00030599002,0.00016335833,0.00017006266,0.00038334247,0.000047956073,0.0006760368,0.000026924496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0049423305,0.005535277,0.6966857,0.00009310621,0.00020094361,0.0016129842,0.075113595,0.00016599281,0.0019522863,0.0022124792,0.016848281,0.19463703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045408057,0.0021551666,0.95005727,0.0006226826,0.00035420427,0.011767708,0.009174614,0.0003719185,0.00004097262,0.019622039,0.0005630033,0.00072959333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000052466125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027817105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2533716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069292735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082645725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7834032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150333374","doi":"10.1002/bdm.746","title":"Overpredicting and Underprofiting in Pricing Decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Microeconomics; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Mode (computer interface); Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.07797033400427854,"score_gpt":0.31743996089986853,"score_spread":0.23946962689558998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150333374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99082726,0.00027512657,0.0055119903,0.000018440056,0.0006153709,0.00011290213,4.937781e-7,0.00002683628,0.002611595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98840654,0.000024114564,0.011133896,0.00014914674,0.00024792372,0.0000016302865,3.4296266e-7,0.000029919607,0.0000064629826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788374,0.000022889988,0.0010299647,0.00023037905,0.0005042966,0.00032872902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840677,0.000370433,0.00078622176,0.00017310998,0.00023329243,0.000030191492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016177972,0.00020088155,0.00038124202,0.0011277192,0.00019414672,0.00024784432,0.00028727253,0.00009771345,0.00020389727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042492003,0.00017618045,0.00013096292,0.000676944,0.000042261694,0.0017502886,0.00032568132,0.00047001307,0.00000866653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014158775,0.000073177245,0.5893249,0.000009033903,0.0000038244834,0.0002475079,0.00031963194,0.000011257097,0.00045952026,0.00023658812,0.000036690883,0.40913627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010663231,0.000047667374,0.9854082,0.0020750407,0.00017138511,0.00021451662,0.002385477,0.0014242182,0.000033120905,0.0064879456,0.00037058978,0.00031553584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021875746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016438808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40882072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056393907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034689645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71844304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150479185","doi":"10.1002/bdm.741","title":"What People Want From Their Professionals: Attitudes Toward Decision‐making Strategies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Public relations; Political science","score_opus":0.4211742596639609,"score_gpt":0.516615133703507,"score_spread":0.0954408740395461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150479185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9699138,0.0075070686,0.012862171,0.0003824096,0.008154861,0.00085658306,0.00004160213,0.000088791756,0.0001927444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91586626,0.0004732304,0.082573645,0.0005258185,0.0003896645,0.00006613715,0.000007935685,0.00008011328,0.000017178092],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99267375,0.0011303326,0.0033477973,0.0004951981,0.0015527293,0.00080016674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98901474,0.004240916,0.0031831735,0.001269433,0.001962578,0.0003291356],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014295855,0.00046636257,0.0010340784,0.00063265,0.0013295397,0.00020769543,0.0018118133,0.00052670244,0.0024748275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00059279805,0.00033998053,0.00041677483,0.0005763208,0.00010376745,0.0032333573,0.001064827,0.0023438528,0.00016822334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002346091,0.0010660054,0.5353388,0.00016031906,0.00008809352,0.00014112408,0.13181978,0.000061445535,0.00028255308,0.0007342114,0.0029921227,0.32496944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015503893,0.0004714278,0.6909887,0.023632057,0.00011896923,0.000046972673,0.22794756,0.00026884343,0.000039301456,0.053422365,0.0009834444,0.00052992324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025887674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001795488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32443953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055239093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001349265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154772733","doi":"10.1002/bdm.617","title":"A behavioral account of compensation awarding decisions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Value (mathematics); Object (grammar); Economics; Microeconomics; Zero (linguistics); Actuarial science; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.27258908242826174,"score_gpt":0.46125417756629405,"score_spread":0.1886650951380323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154772733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96961856,0.00023692149,0.026791496,0.00006503452,0.0027550885,0.00022899457,0.0000431736,0.000030039611,0.00023066727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434223,0.00008317858,0.05605462,0.000067569745,0.0002463375,0.000003332564,0.0000019200133,0.000053080395,0.0000676256],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884306,0.00031390437,0.0053168377,0.0006976986,0.0046694414,0.00057150295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98622936,0.0043779304,0.004517649,0.0012796957,0.003225907,0.000369465],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005866947,0.0004755408,0.0016701331,0.0024146468,0.0005547293,0.00037995487,0.0023983563,0.0003585522,0.00084992155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030378203,0.0003634138,0.0012784989,0.0017871924,0.0003512778,0.001922982,0.00054718874,0.00079630205,0.00019465512],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062406505,0.0009929629,0.054891482,0.0000016707626,0.000017222586,0.0006244075,0.0011866278,0.002158424,0.003426891,0.000098209166,0.0054414533,0.93053657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013645395,0.0088969525,0.59671825,0.0052152374,0.0015430768,0.021552313,0.017072072,0.008490362,0.006413112,0.2724988,0.043639984,0.0043144487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040386625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041886906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92622215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034339115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048149482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165868536","doi":"10.1002/bdm.645","title":"Goal attainment as a resource: The cushion effect in risky choice above a goal","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Salient; Resource (disambiguation); Goal pursuit; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05689584315870033,"score_gpt":0.43832850563218967,"score_spread":0.38143266247348934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165868536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952866,0.00040459176,0.0010061429,0.0008908883,0.0012503335,0.00040558216,0.000008465873,0.00002345118,0.00072393747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99604046,0.000025075127,0.002498979,0.00078900566,0.0004229694,0.0000054555862,6.6339766e-7,0.000032067586,0.00018532324],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906982,0.00082662393,0.0032868234,0.0007352837,0.00375881,0.0006942626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894495,0.006316191,0.0022642622,0.001170383,0.0004976332,0.00030205102],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01303724,0.0004818562,0.0011423242,0.0012917075,0.00040069962,0.0012345882,0.0026084401,0.00032420122,0.00042682094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042805164,0.00028168998,0.00085138704,0.0015614494,0.00013951941,0.0010010267,0.0003442579,0.0013905517,0.00035031847],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010312253,0.00037041825,0.02694178,8.247527e-7,0.0000058285823,0.0005196054,0.0005953002,0.0017107431,0.00057623483,0.000038561375,0.0052617206,0.9629478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0077041453,0.009403849,0.7033191,0.0020250564,0.0003717243,0.0021155886,0.0042456775,0.0025701812,0.000543382,0.17863896,0.08760681,0.0014555502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041627103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000096092066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9614922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005669817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018703674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334115192","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1794","title":"True Context‐dependent Preferences? The Causes of Market‐dependent Valuations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Context (archaeology); Product (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Reservation; Microeconomics; Distribution (mathematics); Market price; Econometrics","score_opus":0.17888837313145575,"score_gpt":0.3073040042169438,"score_spread":0.12841563108548806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334115192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894498,0.0012959401,0.0067410367,0.00012048645,0.0006338022,0.00024209604,0.000027666903,0.0000036664137,0.001485493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99772495,0.00020986896,0.0015544113,0.00007475797,0.000071320785,0.000013068315,0.0000011468034,0.000014283369,0.0003361722],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980368,0.00004846044,0.0013947787,0.00017898332,0.00017951155,0.00016147338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978807,0.0002056512,0.0014742152,0.0002932471,0.000087883425,0.00005832539],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014800711,0.00012791099,0.00039925528,0.00020924257,0.000108781285,0.000098484896,0.00037654547,0.000082013394,0.0062180227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010068354,0.00010054391,0.00023224062,0.00008992277,0.0000639747,0.00057448633,0.000090759924,0.00020829921,0.00023695771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008737928,0.000584198,0.7426188,0.000013747173,0.00015039314,0.0000070271594,0.0014984137,0.003909398,0.00037056487,0.005190278,0.0039635915,0.24160619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008076888,0.00026648218,0.9521082,0.000099913195,0.00006641269,0.00003351819,0.0015220041,0.0012847692,0.00018115126,0.042758048,0.0006928015,0.00017899784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000160697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004830944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24142718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017866277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026525702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414376403","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1965","title":"For the Win: Risk‐Sensitive Decision‐Making in Teams","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Football; League; American football; Psychology; Actuarial science; Marketing; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.08746145299335434,"score_gpt":0.4757352038551683,"score_spread":0.388273750861814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414376403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85601914,0.000684657,0.13877264,0.00030491606,0.003598125,0.0004276867,0.00005196285,0.000014792832,0.0001260979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867735,0.000059880076,0.01232564,0.00019386402,0.00037913435,0.000030390858,3.9580527e-7,0.00004134403,0.000195874],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670184,0.00023722005,0.0016237214,0.00031689156,0.0005620642,0.0005582925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946667,0.0030511955,0.0011932361,0.00045503807,0.00049257244,0.00014126088],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024150275,0.00023478523,0.00047419665,0.00052523904,0.00030891426,0.00007604112,0.0005551451,0.00022539783,0.00091659994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042828656,0.00012702112,0.00061035634,0.00038042082,0.0001054316,0.00037624,0.00010410482,0.000588716,0.00009392875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016157486,0.00034366027,0.040623263,0.0000017082876,0.000014823915,0.00012837666,0.0005943882,0.000014735824,0.00012219527,0.00028525776,0.007254993,0.94900084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046706693,0.0018461753,0.9658995,0.004127889,0.00026792532,0.0006029471,0.0030956373,0.0000847291,0.00005932923,0.0073832436,0.011591838,0.0003700727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064843225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035036576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94863075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029350768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000985641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494441066","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1973","title":"Real‐World Correlates of Performance on Heuristics and Biases Tasks in a Community Sample","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Heuristics; Psychology; Debiasing; Sample (material); Discounting; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.21325087115341906,"score_gpt":0.44435378110373414,"score_spread":0.23110290995031507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494441066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99728984,0.000060082297,0.0015530656,0.00005242272,0.00071082206,0.0000989575,0.000059829832,0.000008986312,0.0001659729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912536,0.00020456186,0.00838832,0.000032382595,0.000048820093,0.0000012617679,4.4222486e-7,0.000021124932,0.00004945074],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99527943,0.00037620196,0.0024597417,0.00028449748,0.0013042704,0.00029583913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793416,0.0173837,0.0017953849,0.0007064109,0.0006181187,0.00015477554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005695039,0.0002440949,0.00084194733,0.0016226606,0.00019656646,0.00017779073,0.0010155737,0.00013699214,0.00021248669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059580207,0.00014525026,0.00021833277,0.00081150717,0.00023298222,0.0006412604,0.00033100543,0.0006039002,0.000026173886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045512337,0.00028335283,0.33620015,0.0000019994006,0.0000026226057,0.000034873712,0.00021473863,0.00025326558,0.0003448673,0.00005740661,0.00026673378,0.66188484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002306911,0.002585849,0.9012395,0.0047700517,0.00007737722,0.00018042649,0.001210247,0.00096665137,0.000686003,0.08404859,0.0014699824,0.00045837878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000970184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038659395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6614265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016594099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010575041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71327376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529245342","doi":"10.1002/bdm.1995","title":"Cultural Variations in Reasons for Advice Seeking","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Advice (programming); Closeness; Psychology; Competence (human resources); Social psychology; Dilemma","score_opus":0.1560057382188668,"score_gpt":0.4741543567155689,"score_spread":0.31814861849670206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529245342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97593075,0.00017391598,0.021781566,0.00033978221,0.0012811708,0.0001317382,0.000016862865,0.00001496763,0.00032926435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98623776,0.000014487834,0.012917169,0.00005187762,0.00025377123,0.000008562317,7.960046e-7,0.00001162177,0.0005039273],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866605,0.00006941393,0.00062301266,0.00015682224,0.00024689038,0.00023783081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866235,0.00042144983,0.00043256412,0.00013472962,0.00028382055,0.00006506176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043677413,0.00011931928,0.00025649715,0.00018609781,0.00008501763,0.00006230555,0.00023873929,0.00010305461,0.00056918635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013646956,0.00006482702,0.00020570727,0.00018280471,0.000023180823,0.0003603217,0.00003545225,0.00014097936,0.000023228973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072360534,0.00037852506,0.13333404,0.000004874912,0.000032549644,0.00009054972,0.0036619508,0.000009771343,0.010584827,0.007255224,0.010532555,0.83339155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027893137,0.0005520961,0.97657615,0.0011474664,0.00011015899,0.00030612113,0.002231936,0.00010247565,0.000030361238,0.008929047,0.0069620507,0.0002628339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002840952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000098002885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8432421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009705879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022883136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62321913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562319537","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2000","title":"Associations Between Delay Discounting and Risk‐Related Behaviors, Traits, Attitudes, and Outcomes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Impulsivity; Delay discounting; Psychology; Generality; Deviance (statistics); Discounting; Trait; Intertemporal choice; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Econometrics; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.08440660447203183,"score_gpt":0.44278682257452184,"score_spread":0.35838021810249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562319537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99774635,0.00048044557,0.000797661,0.00007324697,0.0005226297,0.00014093267,0.00017713264,0.000027294067,0.000034314373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968767,0.00006990133,0.0027746721,0.000009037985,0.0000641043,0.0000036136316,0.0000036058443,0.000037680173,0.00016068376],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765575,0.0001533661,0.0010423763,0.00030564665,0.0005045451,0.00033829658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776405,0.00064168853,0.0010652627,0.00018624036,0.00017240593,0.00017037198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008684907,0.00025197706,0.00058294385,0.00036547674,0.0002819871,0.00012998462,0.0001864872,0.00023660017,0.00017270372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100247904,0.00016065259,0.00019244896,0.00017073572,0.00009270196,0.00042679807,0.00009322545,0.00037151802,0.000016462996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021803644,0.00018735055,0.7129731,6.5346705e-7,0.00008095312,0.00011372778,0.00038036058,2.6050554e-7,0.00013855936,0.00004103878,0.000061257786,0.2860009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022501994,0.0002707186,0.99527854,0.00021008524,0.0009710934,0.00017961909,0.00010683856,2.8738464e-7,0.000011475887,0.00047273145,0.00005853554,0.00018990613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011059667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056311244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.285811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117758675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002778049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6551223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597723177","doi":"10.1002/bdm.554","title":"Inventor perseverance after being told to quit: the role of cognitive biases","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Overconfidence effect; Optimism; Pessimism; Procrastination; Sunk costs; Cognitive bias; Psychology; Regret; Population; Optimism bias; Economics; Social psychology; Cognition; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.14771364963490355,"score_gpt":0.4587705466139139,"score_spread":0.3110568969790104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597723177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874369,0.0014878147,0.0059826653,0.00013714578,0.0038236352,0.0005348146,0.00017414235,0.00001813496,0.000404747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98746127,0.00006029763,0.011284539,0.00041442335,0.0005982816,0.000016443344,0.0000019926129,0.0000694749,0.0000932865],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988763,0.00040007403,0.0047872667,0.000984351,0.0044106212,0.0006547036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98023254,0.0100514535,0.004591722,0.0013759241,0.0033366517,0.0004117381],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009518945,0.0006606486,0.0017988292,0.0022377241,0.00026348673,0.0010681645,0.0033775426,0.0005853419,0.000829159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009855664,0.00043063107,0.0015891021,0.0011846767,0.00026554358,0.000639882,0.0024730614,0.0018162942,0.00015187806],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016208371,0.00037899264,0.024764488,0.0000045510815,0.00003509909,0.00034309307,0.0037803585,0.0019381017,0.00023633265,0.000022867282,0.0008733047,0.966002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037449151,0.0036725807,0.21948399,0.051087696,0.0024928597,0.0015556662,0.047475815,0.0024306881,0.0051439316,0.6395569,0.019407999,0.003947001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000064758075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015749747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96205497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034646087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004781076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604806010","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2010","title":"On the Counterfactual Nature of Gambling Near‐misses: An Experimental Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Medical Research Council; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Wellcome; Shenzhen University; National Natural Science Foundation of China; University of Cambridge; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Luck; Counterfactual conditional; Regret; Near miss; Psychology; Social psychology; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2653274951832202,"score_gpt":0.5239354939175626,"score_spread":0.25860799873434237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604806010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961399,0.000112829155,0.0005138987,0.00009424404,0.002612593,0.00027460902,0.000016487564,0.0000102892245,0.00022513683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969981,0.0000031966904,0.0026212872,0.00012120102,0.00018139924,0.0000026773905,2.3476488e-7,0.000034179717,0.00003775758],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931187,0.00031084332,0.002307181,0.0005469516,0.003378592,0.0003377515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899243,0.0028083373,0.0038075575,0.0021461465,0.0011138915,0.00019974602],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075874496,0.0003391054,0.00087525015,0.0004887624,0.0012293584,0.0029266954,0.004412923,0.0002564524,0.0008654739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038478442,0.00019221808,0.0004959135,0.00025233979,0.00029648875,0.0016443665,0.0005470603,0.0011142349,0.000064913234],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033764048,0.008362226,0.062891014,0.000001951464,0.00005156107,0.0008225817,0.0075733135,0.0026711666,0.0048534377,0.00041179603,0.004929761,0.90405476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0153159285,0.05570191,0.4302086,0.004237016,0.0009794192,0.0020914446,0.21940374,0.011809428,0.019182352,0.22933334,0.008097368,0.0036394433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022404727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003890173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90041536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013558392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018381517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604872011","doi":"10.1002/bdm.559","title":"Calibration accuracy of a judgmental process that predicts the commercial success of new product ideas","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Commercialization; Predictability; Product (mathematics); Aggregate (composite); New product development; Process (computing); Order (exchange); Computer science; Calibration; Econometrics; Economics; Marketing; Business; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.25807420759035893,"score_gpt":0.4807887113451321,"score_spread":0.2227145037547732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604872011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95229775,0.0003687908,0.04234885,0.00032699737,0.0038086292,0.00058109354,0.000042664615,0.000012361592,0.00021288797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936001,0.000022002136,0.00546379,0.00013448828,0.00062980026,0.0000030555148,0.0000072786015,0.00003241441,0.000107078005],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881441,0.00029392636,0.004608366,0.0005135038,0.006101811,0.00033830054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98234046,0.0021238865,0.011166414,0.0008833322,0.0033298568,0.00015602805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009228428,0.00039124055,0.0011537623,0.0015140278,0.00023247342,0.0004594814,0.0026692867,0.00033618955,0.00048192995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055477824,0.00023852734,0.00060430064,0.001652805,0.00023367288,0.0010004602,0.0011113444,0.0013668004,0.0000034740822],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015827286,0.0006072253,0.11818862,0.000076015895,0.00004646393,0.000058642876,0.00549379,0.0053433273,0.0011644743,0.00026233934,0.009475758,0.8577006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007580944,0.0018849564,0.7085023,0.015861591,0.0011234129,0.0010266077,0.016394243,0.02374802,0.04773864,0.17022823,0.0038085848,0.002102484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007099651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006751849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85559815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011766371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010311152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97268623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606816334","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2018","title":"Evaluating Effort: Influences of Evaluation Mode on Judgments of Task‐specific Efforts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Social psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.29063699774748036,"score_gpt":0.5750266530973823,"score_spread":0.28438965534990196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606816334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956209,0.00046341668,0.0003749052,0.000022542203,0.0025623066,0.00036568972,0.000023778406,0.0000053871813,0.0005610693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950568,0.000017871027,0.004700689,0.00002020361,0.00012209913,0.000013381151,0.0000027837864,0.000021132286,0.000045023487],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956911,0.00018788547,0.0019773468,0.0002451593,0.0016084651,0.0002900035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99391145,0.00011947472,0.004042639,0.0007215439,0.0010802989,0.00012458711],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030844216,0.00018806859,0.00055041176,0.0004746317,0.00029169908,0.00006335515,0.00056976615,0.00017649533,0.0010926297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016035065,0.00015668962,0.0004198215,0.00012793357,0.00012717927,0.0004624989,0.00007363203,0.00038991947,0.000023187107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010320657,0.0009179874,0.080962986,0.00001638144,0.000026119395,0.000031783595,0.000650899,0.0005760075,0.005069446,0.00026604405,0.0006485669,0.9098017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002494654,0.0031461853,0.9872448,0.002636708,0.0002837473,0.00006213567,0.00033108873,0.00045922946,0.0013701478,0.0016582039,0.00014115646,0.00017194542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010548352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002719128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90962976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013711261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011593938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753598526","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2032","title":"How Incidental Confidence Influences Self‐Interested Behaviors: A Double‐Edged Sword","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Altruism (biology); Self-confidence; Low Confidence; SWORD; Social psychology; Confidence interval; Statistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.10043095133927911,"score_gpt":0.4425084805309055,"score_spread":0.34207752919162643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753598526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99529904,0.0005297147,0.0001033988,0.00045539025,0.0023781192,0.00032501653,0.0000073019146,0.000051167142,0.00085087674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99345404,0.00020351174,0.0056504956,0.000052187792,0.00040035776,0.000012258075,5.4033364e-7,0.000030890897,0.00019571507],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679404,0.00013562871,0.0009990502,0.0003721174,0.001141656,0.00055752916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99605757,0.00016262734,0.0022669237,0.00056436274,0.0006483777,0.00030015802],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014066943,0.00031709985,0.000662855,0.00032969256,0.0023411324,0.0027002767,0.0019954278,0.00022670055,0.0001333629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023471759,0.00029213788,0.00040653063,0.00014446121,0.00074693083,0.0035472508,0.00057474506,0.0005532019,0.000030154626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094684074,0.00096148404,0.8588216,0.000010653502,0.000079340694,0.0011711285,0.02817083,0.00000857054,0.017860707,0.0031614876,0.0011306541,0.087676704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010139264,0.0025664095,0.81658304,0.0037773226,0.0011943985,0.00066579366,0.12686846,0.000029532071,0.012939071,0.0077600856,0.014774742,0.0027018678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013084676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035785744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09869763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006660856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028263047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755120453","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2039","title":"Why Improvement Can Trump Consistent Strong Performance: The Role of Effort Perceptions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Perception; Promotion (chess); Trait; Psychology; Investment (military); Social psychology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.09829980618987051,"score_gpt":0.4108718380136088,"score_spread":0.3125720318237383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755120453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961573,0.00010860248,0.0008129792,0.0003728289,0.0017571413,0.00022343377,0.000035335248,0.000008568489,0.00052384404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99558574,0.000048040565,0.003908225,0.0001537861,0.00019893203,0.0000050825565,6.032844e-7,0.000025732244,0.00007383615],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99397427,0.000089960704,0.0026304754,0.0004125145,0.002478214,0.00041459184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920963,0.0007013901,0.0039297664,0.0017632378,0.001306504,0.0002028263],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046743006,0.00029622085,0.0008062332,0.00054270856,0.0012304209,0.0011812237,0.0030989654,0.00016016034,0.0006828564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007826372,0.00017480567,0.0007559717,0.00022546422,0.00039623346,0.00097244827,0.0006703504,0.0005805074,0.00003955479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016761376,0.00018930582,0.104556344,0.0000014388925,0.000013758859,0.000019704643,0.00038758692,0.00046858733,0.0017809995,0.000047842153,0.0013257501,0.8910411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029051306,0.0033591364,0.8791837,0.0012227229,0.0006390121,0.000759557,0.019809216,0.0056731063,0.0028571263,0.05355115,0.0291111,0.0009290085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008317038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020950513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89011204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020841237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023280732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766389015","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2055","title":"Geopolitical Forecasting Skill in Strategic Intelligence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; York University; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"York University; Defence Research and Development Canada","keywords":"Interpretability; Intelligence analysis; Benchmarking; Forecast skill; Ignorance; Certainty; Strategic intelligence; Scoring rule; Econometrics; Calibration; Psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics; Knowledge management; Management; Political science","score_opus":0.16176651398594338,"score_gpt":0.38874849566519576,"score_spread":0.22698198167925238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766389015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786899,0.000103562634,0.007233482,0.00005960208,0.0010875877,0.00007301862,5.858059e-7,0.000009090358,0.012743185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968896,0.000008733101,0.0019514135,0.00008773132,0.001005517,0.0000011783766,2.8120456e-7,0.000016358077,0.000039181068],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982665,0.000010457048,0.00078995986,0.00018628512,0.0004203274,0.00032644125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818105,0.00015557461,0.0008134225,0.00028878747,0.00053651404,0.000024661198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069758005,0.00016290753,0.00031066764,0.000464527,0.00027884328,0.00086485216,0.0008223788,0.00007508286,0.00039777902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048012193,0.00013695884,0.00017216672,0.00016936855,0.0001021025,0.0016087415,0.00033691595,0.00039937836,0.00012463484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026160394,0.00046340702,0.19231842,0.000048962214,0.0000093917715,0.0019619504,0.00016155449,0.0002754742,0.00021770583,0.08354641,0.00013303665,0.7206021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094456825,0.0002480287,0.26450947,0.006016143,0.00016037456,0.00047943485,0.0046130316,0.032629076,0.000451242,0.68492204,0.0040561585,0.0009704507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010421343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037524052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7196316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006869361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043881362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83397895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772399711","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2070","title":"Maximizing Scales Do Not Reliably Predict Maximizing Behavior in Decisions from Experience","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Maximization; Stochastic game; Utility maximization; Sampling (signal processing); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Econometrics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.19936453230406184,"score_gpt":0.45244649938424725,"score_spread":0.2530819670801854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772399711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98663306,0.0003798744,0.00679341,0.00019116372,0.005163692,0.00036096244,0.00010449916,0.00004066863,0.0003326544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9149145,0.00015056494,0.08424159,0.00012193409,0.0004078764,0.000021591079,0.0000018150345,0.00008048302,0.000059680424],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871762,0.00032853178,0.0054822857,0.0014287515,0.0046098367,0.0009744418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837966,0.0053599803,0.0053948937,0.0034677903,0.0013822535,0.00059848296],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00679457,0.0007055794,0.0018653543,0.0021608896,0.0014125076,0.005093642,0.007011964,0.0005605382,0.00083517836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01268012,0.0005566853,0.0010958329,0.00074640673,0.0004982959,0.0044173556,0.0018302122,0.0014743209,0.00026507757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007426606,0.00044454806,0.19687238,7.1511624e-7,0.0000071618747,0.0016430716,0.0007321888,0.00040228156,0.0019371577,0.000026430198,0.0007871262,0.7964043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034641826,0.0006373414,0.9123949,0.002427193,0.00020502023,0.0006899352,0.0050519495,0.0014291904,0.00083765027,0.06753544,0.0041638347,0.0011633754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020949401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041818075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7952409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005047213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028648123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801881220","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2081","title":"Explaining reluctance to benefit from others' misfortune","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Misfortune; Harm; Psychology; Social psychology; Relation (database); Positive economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1591990378291487,"score_gpt":0.38261933651372065,"score_spread":0.22342029868457194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801881220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887865,0.00006349867,0.0076288995,0.00069560396,0.0021507211,0.00007294748,0.000012092203,0.000017881213,0.00057184853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671908,0.0000137180805,0.029704584,0.0022975544,0.0006347989,0.0000014320625,2.3750147e-7,0.00001795283,0.00013889236],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806494,0.000040842922,0.00061270705,0.0003043323,0.00070672395,0.0002704633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988435,0.00020794722,0.00038882045,0.00022548842,0.00015566885,0.00017856722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033421672,0.00014906655,0.00026012812,0.0002249962,0.0001971596,0.00006969968,0.0005109181,0.00008088923,0.0007365764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016342076,0.00012098125,0.00013994813,0.0002691206,0.00008378936,0.00032050212,0.00009911311,0.00024385088,0.0002512565],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001585299,0.0003542897,0.0052455417,0.0000015146952,0.000008050652,0.000557291,0.0014492853,0.00015452957,0.47333655,0.000569964,0.009552296,0.5071854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007833076,0.010338055,0.44971693,0.006094744,0.0002730895,0.002929491,0.002492605,0.0007413722,0.28433645,0.119921446,0.11304698,0.0022757722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007170264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011970653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50490963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022903609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80649954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908259334","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2115","title":"Less willing to pay but more willing to buy: How the elicitation method impacts the valuation of a promotion","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Willingness to pay; Product (mathematics); Contingent valuation; Promotion (chess); Business; Value (mathematics); Economics; Microeconomics; Marketing; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.24953057628420264,"score_gpt":0.35777278047272504,"score_spread":0.1082422041885224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908259334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7437873,0.0001031814,0.2537996,0.0014346829,0.00046206548,0.00037137928,0.000010125845,0.000003145869,0.000028539547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97370034,0.00003279069,0.025840688,0.00020736357,0.00012311507,0.000008552125,0.000002495943,0.000021733626,0.00006292605],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983852,0.00007335466,0.00094107765,0.00021452823,0.00020493908,0.00018088879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804556,0.00023428153,0.0012767,0.00027124817,0.000106034284,0.00006620141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037678129,0.00013584862,0.00035004865,0.0002969125,0.00013026896,0.00013286075,0.00030443398,0.0000770948,0.000067868576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018460647,0.00008774097,0.00018031157,0.00026664825,0.000017926446,0.00053802255,0.00007100114,0.00021110552,0.000058566904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025878265,0.00022246911,0.31848738,0.000025072717,0.00006129437,0.0000026332355,0.008618061,0.21077813,0.013441869,0.0023234272,0.00027392717,0.44550696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077894627,0.00080795074,0.9534994,0.0004083836,0.00007527808,0.00003861366,0.004896427,0.025274565,0.001527387,0.011953211,0.0004692133,0.00027065372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043321426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013204837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.635012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028179996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023206285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3577973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973154528","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2154","title":"Examining children's ability to delay reward: Is the delay discounting task a suitable measure?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Research Councils UK","keywords":"Delay discounting; Discounting; Delay of gratification; Psychology; Gratification; Task (project management); Temporal discounting; Impulsivity; Sensation seeking; Intertemporal choice; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Econometrics; Economics","score_opus":0.09533285482985453,"score_gpt":0.3918347828173961,"score_spread":0.29650192798754155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973154528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871695,0.0002511408,0.008520564,0.0003763179,0.0026942955,0.0005430431,0.00003879352,0.00003078703,0.00037557934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98432416,0.000007549591,0.014394056,0.00067513133,0.00031665605,0.000006282915,8.1038553e-7,0.000062536696,0.00021280587],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894874,0.0004760784,0.0036310786,0.0010778763,0.0044740117,0.0008535289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890381,0.0043285345,0.0024516957,0.0020064863,0.0017729852,0.00040215935],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018623397,0.0005228278,0.0012459981,0.0010212549,0.00061368797,0.0020593037,0.0034929065,0.0003096487,0.0012967489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038364439,0.00031672925,0.0008071544,0.0017644472,0.0001287015,0.001775378,0.00096059596,0.0011993332,0.0010744323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033313825,0.00020339918,0.35898072,0.0000017620349,0.000018348179,0.0000869523,0.0012545526,0.0025007618,0.0013509538,0.000019499901,0.0061867433,0.6290632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037451345,0.002884985,0.8948073,0.0025362922,0.0006476755,0.0036560008,0.010878001,0.0016342364,0.0006026054,0.051149983,0.02504198,0.0024158303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000066019966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006192549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62664735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040374548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030940503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014622127","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2179","title":"How representations of number and numeracy predict decision paradoxes: A fuzzy‐trace theory approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Nursing Research; Savoy Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Numeracy; Categorical variable; GiST; Psychology; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Ordinal data; Statistics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12275054784696351,"score_gpt":0.420808850625137,"score_spread":0.29805830277817347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014622127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8462578,0.000476932,0.15146464,0.00039569117,0.00067051424,0.0002523848,0.00004551532,0.000024221446,0.00041228827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87194365,0.00007368594,0.12750402,0.0001288514,0.00023030337,0.000004226952,0.000001275603,0.000042621537,0.00007134656],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99220175,0.00046703516,0.0030563218,0.0008584545,0.0030018303,0.00041463872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98835933,0.0058940253,0.0029883222,0.0008938156,0.0013472985,0.0005172163],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005031053,0.00041546536,0.0013043494,0.00066076167,0.00028711738,0.0011617173,0.0016544616,0.0002836691,0.00031810396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069204047,0.00030128373,0.0006986399,0.0013871092,0.0002864915,0.0021504748,0.0005614263,0.00075572194,0.000049248865],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012968853,0.00039613215,0.03570601,0.0000072599796,0.000025733445,0.0001442573,0.0017621039,0.0010061284,0.0007746186,0.0004543057,0.004359371,0.9540672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072915377,0.0025460506,0.094425306,0.001579921,0.0010369993,0.0034860922,0.034639973,0.011537939,0.001003771,0.82699746,0.013688278,0.0017666505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000050491344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029963815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95230055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007747873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001845189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089376958","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2210","title":"The moderating role of processing style in risk perceptions and risky decision making","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Risk perception; Perception; Psychology; Social psychology; Risk aversion (psychology); Risk analysis (engineering); Style (visual arts); Risk assessment; Medicine; Computer science; Economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer security","score_opus":0.08454026949192234,"score_gpt":0.4135205257038696,"score_spread":0.32898025621194726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089376958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95943815,0.0013262534,0.038449742,0.00012471835,0.0003406198,0.00019362252,0.000018875977,0.000015360349,0.000092675335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94048154,0.00017055997,0.059075452,0.0000739725,0.00015460001,0.0000030723465,2.2091834e-7,0.000035890185,0.000004714019],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99282086,0.00037476176,0.0035847435,0.0006129865,0.0021608511,0.0004457901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899465,0.005084128,0.0032302486,0.00053228455,0.00097201276,0.00023484464],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063690785,0.00033369468,0.00092699326,0.0007107198,0.0007714703,0.0012689568,0.0013804493,0.0002153954,0.00012106496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005781884,0.00021765199,0.00039889914,0.0012299586,0.00020980828,0.001303943,0.00057484955,0.0010099827,0.000022150658],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039935738,0.00009884835,0.08635632,0.0000022717904,0.0000041784724,0.000032481476,0.0025697213,0.006809933,0.00085793354,0.000015156384,0.00016615825,0.90268767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033078827,0.0016015493,0.34763262,0.0033220598,0.0003139661,0.00056520227,0.055790216,0.29554367,0.00019741587,0.28850117,0.0021338076,0.0010904318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017728353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001415643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9015972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013527214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019241919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3105916523","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2214","title":"Resistance to cognitive biases: Longitudinal trajectories and associations with cognitive abilities and academic achievement across development","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Sophistication; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive bias; Cognitive development","score_opus":0.25177638378962885,"score_gpt":0.46229602915947454,"score_spread":0.2105196453698457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3105916523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98570627,0.00038829332,0.012690793,0.00048512622,0.0002253951,0.00030081894,0.00016098717,0.000017961027,0.00002433087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98281723,0.00003115612,0.016573237,0.00039194713,0.00011517855,0.000010016342,0.0000021000026,0.000025294052,0.00003384529],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951529,0.00015968837,0.0018103245,0.00066387415,0.0018056291,0.00040758145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904051,0.006210736,0.0012687619,0.00015850394,0.0014963264,0.00046057493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028343496,0.00032490742,0.0007999209,0.00033399896,0.0005641156,0.000773835,0.00045825212,0.00015374318,0.000054658518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068374695,0.00023515362,0.00012085708,0.0007707115,0.00023275481,0.00096594566,0.00037570146,0.0005965284,0.000019872861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018741069,0.00013547331,0.37023392,0.000004869468,0.00003857623,0.00015158649,0.017776474,0.0000595098,0.000117942356,0.00001844281,0.00033967258,0.6092494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021010798,0.0014700084,0.93932384,0.0024037391,0.00020819798,0.00013109592,0.04816121,0.000037959308,0.0005519005,0.0040148436,0.0009919443,0.00060421065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000057357456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024189745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6086452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017027852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024395938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95892864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113706740","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2226","title":"Individual differences in exploring versus exploiting and links to delay discounting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Discounting; Temporal discounting; Delay discounting; Preference; Exploit; Adaptation (eye); Psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Cognitive psychology; Time preference; Intertemporal choice; Social psychology; Computer science; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.298145339055819,"score_gpt":0.4214703928566457,"score_spread":0.1233250538008267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113706740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99786085,0.00032827395,0.00020859794,0.0005716562,0.0006878814,0.00012921487,0.0000028410354,0.000015027804,0.00019565316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99176306,0.000112664224,0.0076665888,0.00011334211,0.00031808048,0.000008615423,1.9135939e-7,0.000015512045,0.0000019758913],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980734,0.000084468316,0.00072384917,0.00023056497,0.00055459014,0.0003331375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898785,0.0002811194,0.0003530844,0.0000639902,0.00008964295,0.00022430447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080912083,0.00015227206,0.00038819865,0.00023159833,0.00033979412,0.0003051428,0.00035514336,0.00009604029,0.000034921617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031397058,0.00014516576,0.0000869162,0.00032706434,0.00009147638,0.0010160898,0.0003277048,0.00047968392,0.0000061635637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043669197,0.000093380564,0.66706616,0.000005115604,0.000014805049,0.00018808474,0.12374238,0.0000612404,0.0010969939,0.0005319958,0.000055783374,0.20670739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050377455,0.0026983991,0.31688794,0.0022497654,0.00025299756,0.00003113798,0.66738504,0.00021884481,0.0009240234,0.0011771884,0.001682125,0.0014547984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001686799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000526416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54364264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017978389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060916012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5919688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119649307","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2222","title":"Consumption on steroids: The effect of testosterone on preferences for conspicuous consumption and the moderating role of intrasexual competition","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Sexual Differentiation and Disorders","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Testosterone (patch); Sexual selection; Conspicuous consumption; Competition (biology); Consumption (sociology); Digit ratio; Psychology; Biology; Endocrinology; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.03180580714231282,"score_gpt":0.34031504968975607,"score_spread":0.3085092425474433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119649307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942743,0.00079142884,0.004535875,0.000027319207,0.0001315186,0.00020771858,0.000017688597,0.000001347745,0.000012770208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994413,0.00008112599,0.0003499936,0.000056496217,0.00003460402,0.0000066215007,0.000019739962,0.000006004172,0.0000040793716],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902314,0.0002048651,0.0003854848,0.00010917656,0.00020682978,0.000070475646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987931,0.00046622127,0.0004398791,0.000118455915,0.0001625974,0.000019744923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040803925,0.00009080832,0.00020092037,0.0000445133,0.0000815727,0.00003417254,0.000079048514,0.00006524181,0.000014622133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019447543,0.000051168136,0.00007751394,0.000028219905,0.00011846767,0.000009461774,0.000031075222,0.000091902606,3.6852177e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00867738,0.0003111187,0.05598419,0.00010951608,0.00009036042,0.0000021038227,0.00050760387,0.0012280894,0.69465387,0.0010231244,0.00007688298,0.23733577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020464208,0.016128568,0.15362217,0.001665423,0.0006419707,0.00017618923,0.0030343009,0.0031777315,0.79754514,0.002976394,0.00016878078,0.00039914608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000191417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017294702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23693663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000072748744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020241954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2086576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123962758","doi":"10.1002/bdm.735","title":"Effects of Spikes in the Price of Gasoline on Behavioral Intentions: A Mental Accounting Explanation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Gallon (US); Mental accounting; Gasoline; Economics; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Public economics; Microeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.16415801977220304,"score_gpt":0.4335051786725509,"score_spread":0.2693471589003479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123962758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956763,0.00013835193,0.002361841,0.000028483937,0.0012100588,0.0003181338,0.000013610515,0.0000068528557,0.0002463744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907884,0.000028824319,0.009028251,0.000048996768,0.00006933525,0.000006161095,8.953305e-7,0.000020523219,0.000008584948],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931432,0.00032290685,0.003119982,0.00036380024,0.0027466982,0.00030343691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922088,0.0028215428,0.0033380322,0.00059040944,0.0009629884,0.00007825295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006089029,0.0002655447,0.00079849776,0.001692005,0.00012121675,0.00015760117,0.0017267078,0.00016665323,0.00016203128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021157693,0.0001679519,0.0005351818,0.0011753052,0.00013981845,0.00097066385,0.00020495278,0.0005148815,0.000016517468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013758864,0.0045295097,0.08126008,0.000015118241,0.000010280694,0.00028479449,0.00698434,0.0001301428,0.013504677,0.00026492547,0.00076345954,0.89087677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006541163,0.009165042,0.85201705,0.006039559,0.0006142765,0.0010240414,0.026147256,0.00088070583,0.027614532,0.0680867,0.0008163348,0.0010533648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051975283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006997262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88982344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013488231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010784365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68488795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124191659","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2232","title":"Arithmetic computation with probability words and numbers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of National Defence; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Calculator; Computation; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Point (geometry); Computer science; Statistics; Probability distribution; Arithmetic; Percentage point; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.12452005511506391,"score_gpt":0.42987133092850005,"score_spread":0.30535127581343613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124191659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93258786,0.00019689223,0.06594165,0.0001823094,0.00073746237,0.00010565514,0.000006930043,0.000014672619,0.0002265811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8244649,0.00001244922,0.1752975,0.000083009705,0.0000728423,0.000001248858,5.928349e-7,0.000018259401,0.000049184084],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514574,0.0002543314,0.0018074338,0.000554141,0.0019528903,0.00028547147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994292,0.0020563803,0.0012917166,0.00048288162,0.0016445563,0.00023245254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035932735,0.00024225327,0.00072341796,0.00048261674,0.00021813413,0.0010106497,0.0004986632,0.0001430224,0.00025704937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014064017,0.00016546194,0.00024425957,0.0010203499,0.00017148393,0.0009040588,0.00023863536,0.0004582916,0.00003227552],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025175526,0.00024883082,0.04999125,0.0000023613559,0.0000082609595,0.00051240955,0.00040148397,0.001467321,0.00015455118,0.000044011045,0.00045373332,0.946464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044197724,0.0020839716,0.23372224,0.0015756983,0.00046381567,0.01094361,0.008218624,0.0038807269,0.0004727304,0.7262675,0.006756052,0.0011952176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006931796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000093810006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9452688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001516274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002984204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9745718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180279903","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2259","title":"The effects of trait social anxiety on affective and behavioral reactions to others' resource allocations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Ultimatum game; Dictator game; Trait; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Interpersonal communication; Anxiety; Trait anxiety; Empirical research; Resource allocation; Interpersonal relationship; Developmental psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.05696202337491201,"score_gpt":0.44714086562130034,"score_spread":0.3901788422463883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180279903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961006,0.00044918136,0.0009715149,0.00046348295,0.0012995619,0.0002912085,0.000027024382,0.000013396285,0.00038405132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777865,0.000021724281,0.0012888624,0.0001545586,0.00017368,0.00002760121,0.0000019623005,0.00002857553,0.00052440306],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775726,0.0003615571,0.0008651855,0.00024695057,0.0004571368,0.00031192426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790585,0.00061843055,0.0005659014,0.00028707925,0.00044002608,0.00018271524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064315397,0.00017251489,0.0003441187,0.0002361412,0.00054244616,0.00007517986,0.00023772856,0.00017103221,0.00018631261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012998581,0.00013525697,0.00036409227,0.00045368946,0.00010621223,0.00013223414,0.00006876617,0.00058426376,0.000012326489],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007175585,0.0017967584,0.004728097,0.000016522976,0.000039693274,0.00010881015,0.005525444,0.000007548217,0.005797049,0.0019076046,0.011033861,0.968321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026769305,0.0052705794,0.92028093,0.0015616085,0.00060721603,0.0006176534,0.01126189,0.0000056947333,0.0017036132,0.00087600655,0.054742422,0.00039546238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006825487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017290714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9679256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013739019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009135349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55156195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220750995","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2280","title":"Information‐seeking when information doesn't matter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Portfolio; Certainty; Action (physics); Psychology; Instrumental variable; Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Finance; Econometrics","score_opus":0.06879234510743981,"score_gpt":0.3845880225931744,"score_spread":0.31579567748573456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220750995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95093215,0.000052183943,0.04245535,0.00051897974,0.0042752237,0.00020456807,0.000074686875,0.000029485687,0.001457378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97722656,0.0000041325284,0.020486519,0.0019991482,0.00014088397,0.000010067993,0.000006215738,0.000018754541,0.000107712294],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99083084,0.0002801255,0.004082189,0.00021622161,0.00416108,0.00042956937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264747,0.0012262323,0.0038448556,0.00079083204,0.0012827722,0.00020782309],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071700956,0.00029514433,0.00069446623,0.0024530306,0.0007965349,0.0018593883,0.0022549576,0.00012533998,0.010631663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010104725,0.00023163547,0.000584885,0.0010330768,0.00006809542,0.008702168,0.0010586074,0.0009223677,0.0015474465],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033180384,0.00011103992,0.017907742,0.0000017968661,0.0000076237484,0.000037016413,0.0026252398,0.00509273,0.000045519555,0.000060904997,0.06502555,0.90875304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025674116,0.0010312385,0.050225276,0.00022029967,0.00015603704,0.0025296798,0.01883617,0.0027825008,0.000045744608,0.23867439,0.68198794,0.0009433099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001897346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000052978125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90780973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005016725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024255562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308752211","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2307","title":"Meta‐informational cue inconsistency and judgment of information accuracy: Spotlight on intelligence analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Data Quality and Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of Ontario; Government of Canada; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Information quality; Quality (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Natural language processing; Information system","score_opus":0.25537479457183065,"score_gpt":0.45268452003447074,"score_spread":0.19730972546264008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308752211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7592959,0.00031063138,0.23718295,0.000900719,0.00085891,0.00030822615,0.0002341331,0.000012210082,0.0008963562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884812,0.000037959675,0.010907713,0.00050212035,0.000016280215,0.0000063078824,0.000009860017,0.0000034443788,0.000035064346],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929978,0.00026814063,0.002623358,0.00016153896,0.003798485,0.00015067977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945153,0.0015747736,0.002763584,0.00044123927,0.00061395817,0.00009115424],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008691698,0.00014439768,0.0006220968,0.0023270058,0.0002719886,0.00030313386,0.0009350239,0.000036583864,0.0018028534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008950435,0.000102062884,0.000494375,0.0018330141,0.00005891373,0.002349505,0.0007124312,0.00029189876,0.000021473554],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058087305,0.00035439467,0.0028185935,0.000010352548,0.0007851437,0.000027204977,0.0028479588,0.059287526,0.000023018316,0.013411547,0.0038774507,0.9159759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034895511,0.006507377,0.23922455,0.000378076,0.024972262,0.0006091426,0.08099983,0.050321255,0.0012739977,0.27747,0.31280836,0.0019456032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014513696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013103307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9140303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011791789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008493637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324141783","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2322","title":"Demand for information about potential wins and losses: Does it matter if information matters?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Action (physics); Chose; Instrumental variable; Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.05207263000074558,"score_gpt":0.3937826926659199,"score_spread":0.34171006266517434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324141783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92578113,0.000019048983,0.069713935,0.0015124799,0.0024358442,0.00031899457,0.00010694718,0.000031139065,0.00008047313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98360515,0.000042164727,0.01429478,0.0017419453,0.00018782966,0.000009880241,0.000011823578,0.000019182855,0.00008723398],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946274,0.000085791464,0.0029445866,0.00025714672,0.0016703594,0.00041467947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994753,0.0012316181,0.0021375923,0.00044646685,0.0012305361,0.00020078551],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004512706,0.00028298658,0.0006279767,0.0019941295,0.00039777614,0.0026094443,0.00084782933,0.00029587312,0.00041912496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084534806,0.00018707772,0.00039358585,0.00076797034,0.000100262354,0.008098995,0.00032496592,0.00039356656,0.00088422716],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045546924,0.00004845578,0.008082543,0.000013509356,0.00001155759,0.000025766105,0.001728381,0.0031493648,0.00010212897,0.000029509016,0.070435375,0.91591793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0075565493,0.0015362509,0.40258262,0.0018970583,0.0005607246,0.001570521,0.026609238,0.02402565,0.00024282256,0.18160698,0.35002902,0.0017825525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008602563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011652777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9141354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109857225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010051801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387894662","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2361","title":"Preference for quicker offers: The critical roles of temporal reference points and evaluation mode","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Preference; Mode (computer interface); Point (geometry); Salient; Feeling; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Psychology; Joint (building); Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Human–computer interaction; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.39145312597477916,"score_gpt":0.524278844454063,"score_spread":0.13282571847928387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387894662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898777,0.00016555128,0.008109759,0.0005397597,0.00083992176,0.0003286984,0.00006553513,0.000015848742,0.000057216286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98403436,0.00003449556,0.01569925,0.000062838844,0.0001035429,0.000013298457,0.000002411265,0.000021647991,0.000028130118],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940299,0.0003488071,0.0022200693,0.0004613573,0.0025946237,0.000345243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98808527,0.007191706,0.001350111,0.00064213015,0.0025765686,0.0001542357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0115430765,0.00023273635,0.0006792863,0.0007624645,0.0002886683,0.0004617581,0.0011620438,0.00018849375,0.00016340564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007569799,0.00013993074,0.0003093733,0.0007739161,0.00026436197,0.00087152846,0.00032863024,0.0003632797,0.000034817418],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005446819,0.00012889616,0.0114220735,0.0000055187593,0.000008234431,0.000013167078,0.0006819144,0.0005828563,0.00079165446,0.0004938905,0.0028350845,0.982492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020089105,0.0014631965,0.08489515,0.0010183026,0.00039062093,0.00021615029,0.006675794,0.052951828,0.0005211486,0.8461867,0.0031851623,0.00048706483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010408702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008069297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98200494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008815377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025463957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90623033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392863756","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2377","title":"Attention! Do We Really Need Attention Checks?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.1264952074393649,"score_gpt":0.4466319224044139,"score_spread":0.32013671496504903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392863756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96229255,0.00303048,0.025176616,0.0007958623,0.007887752,0.00018650468,0.00002778261,0.00008402177,0.0005184412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802429,0.00038377364,0.017796148,0.00006910239,0.0006658209,0.00000396896,0.0000016582349,0.00006533754,0.0007712747],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99111813,0.00026042387,0.0037295031,0.000838955,0.0035170296,0.0005359846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938785,0.0019541306,0.0015302283,0.00093120115,0.0013733224,0.00033261106],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007622189,0.00043174115,0.00094996067,0.002440485,0.00031970468,0.0035741245,0.001761173,0.00033997145,0.001683501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010967609,0.0003107623,0.0013681257,0.0019202334,0.00013195851,0.0023385473,0.00040103108,0.00094179815,0.0013607983],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001956325,0.00020691929,0.005363513,0.000005656034,0.000020332842,0.00077150785,0.00022692501,0.00021823419,0.0035934353,0.00025728668,0.020179778,0.96896076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025890793,0.002404212,0.06192491,0.010041416,0.0008781422,0.005374103,0.0064797923,0.0065115895,0.00018048339,0.68628204,0.21554251,0.0017917124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008302816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001748595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96716905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037456365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028110968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394617843","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2381","title":"Measuring Rational Thinking in Adolescents: The Assessment of Rational Thinking for Youth (ART‐Y)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Rationality; Numeracy; Cognition; Literacy; Developmental psychology; Mathematics education; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.21265458672150173,"score_gpt":0.4519607289546748,"score_spread":0.2393061422331731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394617843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84026617,0.00041682125,0.15521201,0.00029367697,0.0031554056,0.00036949595,0.0000524957,0.000019727035,0.00021420378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9609181,0.000020646901,0.03850875,0.000096214804,0.00036851264,0.0000063538387,0.0000035010423,0.00003564902,0.000042256386],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99166745,0.00028046255,0.0033536274,0.000533723,0.0037941237,0.00037059793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935459,0.0031043885,0.0015183417,0.0005105446,0.0012171482,0.00010370738],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014599217,0.00029950982,0.000735218,0.0014174375,0.00048990495,0.001516694,0.0017408279,0.00018288333,0.00015956206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010221561,0.00019026647,0.0007407049,0.0010501058,0.000113552065,0.0014798251,0.00019985992,0.000792991,0.00002025727],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005827327,0.0007681063,0.076395586,0.000039422284,0.000052588846,0.00018777732,0.0065494087,0.030827848,0.0011682608,0.008776992,0.0027713748,0.8718799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033754653,0.0010413064,0.12687732,0.0142688155,0.00047953878,0.00050645677,0.010642966,0.061882477,0.00034715058,0.77141637,0.008130046,0.0010320778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009332241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015774004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8708478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040133146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087891135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400512097","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2399","title":"When Half Is at Least 50%: Effect of “Framing” and Probability Level on Frequency Estimates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Forecasting Techniques and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Ministère de la Défense Nationale","keywords":"Framing (construction); Econometrics; Statistics; Framing effect; Psychology; Mathematics; Economics; Social psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.19638431250553035,"score_gpt":0.4594626639077974,"score_spread":0.26307835140226704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400512097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97316545,0.00060143915,0.025129298,0.00033258088,0.00027127523,0.00023188497,0.000039626426,0.000034005094,0.00019446276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8986863,0.00001045638,0.101117,0.00002353604,0.000051894614,0.000005985532,5.050213e-7,0.00001674318,0.00008761109],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965896,0.00010336381,0.001273535,0.00039845973,0.0014378629,0.00019717404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958049,0.0026158472,0.0006184198,0.00046698883,0.0003829687,0.00011084851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00390909,0.00020169262,0.0005102733,0.00048256427,0.00016523944,0.00033124947,0.0005982096,0.00012604987,0.00032742674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011121556,0.00012435361,0.0002872195,0.0004572701,0.00016333145,0.000353127,0.00024537515,0.0003468758,0.00003266785],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002348438,0.00013609894,0.042835984,0.000044465163,0.0000137151155,0.00006340894,0.00061049487,0.00006674937,0.008678873,0.0012699721,0.009658796,0.9363866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009777471,0.0058081606,0.09041595,0.005886418,0.00036626792,0.0014435956,0.00015980887,0.010107175,0.028125761,0.8459273,0.010081154,0.00070067483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027721873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014591005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93568593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012552734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059424285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50709933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401679999","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2406","title":"A Clean Slate: Adapting the Realization Effect to Online Gambling and Its Effectiveness in People With Gambling Problems","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Realization (probability); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1148528157262643,"score_gpt":0.4562247691559809,"score_spread":0.3413719534297166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401679999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900993,0.0013087353,0.007088079,0.00003788749,0.0007747148,0.00062119873,0.000006994331,0.000039235227,0.000023824086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887085,0.000021151955,0.00085711473,0.00001901373,0.00011584816,0.000027935133,0.0000034812501,0.00006182627,0.000022774182],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769664,0.00035338127,0.0006819295,0.00037901042,0.00053902017,0.00035001745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984111,0.0008393427,0.00025267177,0.00020493226,0.00018348468,0.00010843183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002033715,0.00026610165,0.0004529126,0.0007604569,0.00014955759,0.00027245426,0.0002096963,0.00012657505,0.000030096871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007692394,0.0001623445,0.000115433824,0.0011261195,0.000019372741,0.0003134778,0.000080450984,0.00055696256,0.000010495621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020078663,0.0005063923,0.40286544,0.00011638296,0.00008476721,0.0015579556,0.0076145204,0.006276463,0.0033815708,0.00021237711,0.000025908796,0.57535034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002796613,0.0031174857,0.9787179,0.008959691,0.00051549275,0.0016898781,0.0012358201,0.0019975076,0.00030173705,0.0002121072,0.00010330015,0.00035242215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011291871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003871586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5758525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001706699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000483104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66202164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401931553","doi":"10.1002/bdm.2407","title":"Reference‐Dependent Risk‐Taking in the NBA","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Point (geometry); Prospect theory; Econometrics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Reference model; Psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.23926284374588752,"score_gpt":0.4892373095558045,"score_spread":0.249974465809917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401931553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862411,0.0011633717,0.007453742,0.00026586346,0.0034265858,0.00017299181,0.000025119929,0.000027514176,0.0012237289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992337,0.00011259698,0.006910908,0.0001636506,0.00035150797,0.000004551779,5.516426e-7,0.00003252417,0.000086702166],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99162596,0.00064793223,0.003104411,0.0006384556,0.0035041226,0.00047909314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98920137,0.006824191,0.0023504787,0.0009517891,0.0005326117,0.00013954382],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017586632,0.00033188818,0.00073802914,0.001840696,0.0002799627,0.0027676318,0.0028124521,0.00024393752,0.0009901173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036736098,0.00018422974,0.0005898977,0.0017846588,0.00010616269,0.0012925353,0.00031348734,0.0016869545,0.00050454034],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014142507,0.00016175296,0.011703251,0.000001800948,0.000006681979,0.0014212684,0.0012420182,0.0009883957,0.000121039135,0.00027195894,0.004094623,0.97984576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017280054,0.0014064214,0.15901393,0.0029821496,0.0003997318,0.0046022437,0.014893098,0.0059838057,0.000106425374,0.7308099,0.076953046,0.0011211967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005128433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021913905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9787246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002768627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024932643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408646938","doi":"10.1002/bdm.70013","title":"When Certainty Backfires: The Effects of Unwarranted Precision on Consumer Loyalty","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Loyalty; Business; Psychology; Advertising; Marketing; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06292381277000407,"score_gpt":0.4205145747289105,"score_spread":0.35759076195890643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408646938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822609,0.0007353435,0.010699152,0.00034500877,0.00493921,0.00042979402,0.000018350482,0.000020397312,0.0005518795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99316776,0.000083995335,0.0058397204,0.00037906357,0.00010271724,0.0000054355905,6.2894384e-7,0.000029686347,0.00039098042],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917327,0.0006789525,0.0035998938,0.0006371319,0.0028955706,0.0004557358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738084,0.020028785,0.0026915486,0.0015397541,0.0017550323,0.00017649577],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065869945,0.00042727042,0.0012781003,0.0015549512,0.0003960484,0.0005424159,0.002835466,0.0003131765,0.00043447767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010101506,0.00023961697,0.0009783666,0.0013537217,0.0003159391,0.0005475428,0.00050083897,0.0008939736,0.00011770086],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001323269,0.0005071188,0.0092154415,0.000010415824,0.00003291985,0.000114332535,0.000470733,0.00053070183,0.0012751307,0.00019037093,0.02837975,0.9579498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009345301,0.0050611943,0.14013632,0.013921177,0.0012029246,0.00041201,0.0041627535,0.003070273,0.00969601,0.7313896,0.080168046,0.0014344032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002813447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041536347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95651543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023049161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034176165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99823684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415030829","doi":"10.1002/bdm.70046","title":"All Together Now: Genes, Interpersonal Touch, and Self‐Conscious Processes Jointly Guide Cooperative Behavior","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Context (archaeology); Interpersonal communication; Mediation; Interpersonal interaction; Interpersonal relationship; Social relation; Point (geometry)","score_opus":0.04450700889586586,"score_gpt":0.4121226493409576,"score_spread":0.36761564044509176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415030829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882578,0.003975494,0.0030902773,0.00022887184,0.0022196951,0.00033767955,0.000023919309,0.00005039247,0.0018158234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986677,0.00015034893,0.008603442,0.00082380883,0.0002711847,0.000045115237,0.0000034706604,0.000036132828,0.0033895122],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973718,0.00020141287,0.0011606071,0.00046832714,0.0003950987,0.00040278264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979194,0.00028462807,0.0005329129,0.00032908202,0.00079231214,0.00014166921],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005623919,0.00033301167,0.0005534419,0.0006339022,0.000274699,0.00011899837,0.00047315436,0.0003374376,0.0015627778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052955438,0.000285059,0.00019581342,0.00033690612,0.00023778858,0.00035872092,0.00014937922,0.0006922963,0.00007272695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025545598,0.007012358,0.5714174,0.000055999102,0.00045328747,0.0033600652,0.010987762,0.000023064233,0.006277934,0.0026607537,0.11935971,0.27583712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0071559288,0.0028697464,0.8420502,0.0015942119,0.0024636916,0.0066262954,0.0065145674,0.000021875945,0.00038697862,0.0021427695,0.12698358,0.0011901509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016518152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015448868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27464697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016986631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024129979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416769878","doi":"10.1002/bdm.70050","title":"Me?! Never! Social Distance as a Moderator of Other Contextual Factors on Responses to Ethical Scenarios","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Construal level theory; Moderation; Self construal; Social distance; Order (exchange); Social influence","score_opus":0.12964347015159772,"score_gpt":0.5123643097010452,"score_spread":0.38272083954944747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416769878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890921,0.00014479055,0.007493334,0.0009107925,0.0016224982,0.00023387608,0.00007102685,0.000015091995,0.00041649994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99594694,0.0000014027034,0.0009757547,0.0018357598,0.000101294085,0.000008345437,7.871656e-7,0.000023921808,0.0011057743],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711734,0.00036568122,0.001295872,0.00025734073,0.000622597,0.00034114684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980841,0.00043527212,0.0005854114,0.00025519435,0.00046306915,0.00017690458],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007896623,0.00020986909,0.0005618134,0.0005765188,0.00021804469,0.000055288707,0.00039631678,0.0004185992,0.0012509717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023438656,0.0001714867,0.00045974235,0.0004078446,0.000093997194,0.0001509953,0.00007087393,0.001072665,0.000050938794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.051730223,0.00581442,0.095168434,0.000048018974,0.00017945434,0.0004946842,0.0162286,0.00006648842,0.006601265,0.06778787,0.07721142,0.6786691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007360852,0.0104623465,0.9075386,0.005717407,0.0005352964,0.00011578621,0.013265501,0.00005005545,0.0018171464,0.0057908306,0.046399362,0.0009468336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010505933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006482545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8123701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019143528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019912793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417101574","doi":"10.1002/bdm.70052","title":"Precommitment in Stochastic Versus Deterministic Social Dilemmas","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Decision Making","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Precommitment; Social dilemma; Investment (military); Ego depletion; Interdependence; Dilemma; Dynamic inconsistency","score_opus":0.06348813658226708,"score_gpt":0.44132935919212357,"score_spread":0.3778412226098565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417101574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805951,0.00012366063,0.015284565,0.00023405076,0.001734308,0.00012455852,0.0000016804014,0.0000095551995,0.0018925156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871945,0.000007715323,0.000891255,0.000032797267,0.00018395748,0.0000036987958,3.9178605e-7,0.000004074114,0.00015666301],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986221,0.00024277595,0.00047537932,0.00009578712,0.00039250313,0.00017143202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991212,0.00041269607,0.00020620316,0.000062187675,0.00016012102,0.000037577483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010895001,0.00007606866,0.0001780222,0.00026720765,0.0003754468,0.00007675402,0.00022991723,0.000085472646,0.0001663371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023372007,0.000072447576,0.00009560874,0.0003484162,0.00008494803,0.00027752033,0.00004340456,0.00021487195,0.000007793639],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003003024,0.000622093,0.0029915315,0.000005603492,0.000020144163,0.00012547571,0.009653454,0.0029565424,0.00019911872,0.054204956,0.0009978359,0.92522025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025182799,0.0046587526,0.42842782,0.0060767797,0.0013281362,0.00008505072,0.070283934,0.0067052,0.00011220214,0.4151779,0.039747458,0.0022139647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002136722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058971933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92300624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037714822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027632088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29543263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}