{"meta":{"query_hash":"49531b3dbd63","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Behavioral Public Administration"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/49531b3dbd63","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Behavioral+Public+Administration"},"results":[{"id":"W2911282377","doi":"10.30636/jbpa.21.47","title":"Trust in institutions: Narrowing the ideological gap over the federal budget","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Public Administration","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Ideology; Sacrifice; Government (linguistics); Public economics; Government spending; Population; Economics; Empirical research; Federal budget; Political science; Law; Finance; Sociology; Politics; Market economy","score_opus":0.139141437487426,"score_gpt":0.42188439366143715,"score_spread":0.28274295617401113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911282377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97285044,0.00004158097,0.000060969374,0.024146114,0.00053985196,0.0002430557,0.0000013630772,0.000008371666,0.002108253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989575,0.000002670133,0.000026526948,0.00028582726,0.00041864012,0.000008543023,0.000002446101,0.0000034246136,0.00029440928],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982444,0.000438324,0.00049160287,0.00008344173,0.0004812117,0.0002610364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992528,0.00012221718,0.0002622018,0.000102145605,0.00015982056,0.0001008305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017273489,0.00007392322,0.00013844568,0.000055538643,0.00039417995,0.00031715096,0.00023959146,0.0001079254,0.0002952056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002097696,0.000040654966,0.00009381494,0.0002898026,0.00020541894,0.0007653893,0.000014847413,0.00032909928,0.00001764444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004139772,0.00024163413,0.6393697,0.000003991339,0.000007143474,0.000013200336,0.0018021042,0.000022550745,0.00034643582,0.3559549,0.00093091524,0.001266014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010248424,0.0012220385,0.903389,0.00006927077,0.000046331046,0.00006286278,0.007643422,0.00021105667,0.000096495394,0.008383368,0.07757546,0.00027589913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011232801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008476776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34757152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018024142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068392185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47302398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109620413","doi":"10.30636/jbpa.32.188","title":"Child care policy and child care burden: Policy feedback effects and distributive implications of regulatory decisions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Public Administration","topic":"Early Childhood Education and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Early childhood education; Quality (philosophy); Public economics; Affect (linguistics); Public policy; Business; Economics; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.028098834235878226,"score_gpt":0.35235819212880604,"score_spread":0.3242593578929278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109620413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92006826,0.00082540885,0.00013342168,0.075512886,0.000108692184,0.00034373402,0.00007629648,0.000019475217,0.002911846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803436,0.00022794241,0.0005042404,0.00028741933,0.0008652509,0.0000055088676,0.000046353984,0.000009836802,0.000019067016],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859834,0.0001211252,0.0004793347,0.00018023927,0.00041169245,0.00020928025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980515,0.00008524394,0.0004713648,0.000119092256,0.0006995866,0.0005731693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018086779,0.00013187836,0.00023639506,0.00021040828,0.00057563675,0.00018623163,0.0001835409,0.00012641317,0.000016536163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067765993,0.00012626732,0.000082249826,0.0005866025,0.00024631378,0.00049847673,0.000048828173,0.00022819263,0.0000013564763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012976241,0.00051334564,0.16202217,0.00017223362,0.000107647895,0.000013195279,0.36373752,0.0000053110048,0.00040719274,0.15178186,0.0025121816,0.31859758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007468294,0.0006842024,0.9184975,0.00013443752,0.0000716636,0.000047477202,0.06476251,5.878757e-7,0.00043564197,0.00040727627,0.014005554,0.00020633933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022999902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026574807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7564753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025895436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031504533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5588769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128272353","doi":"10.30636/jbpa.41.196","title":"Understanding the mechanisms of administrative burden through a within-case study of Medicaid expansion implementation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Public Administration","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Medicaid; Agency (philosophy); Documentation; Business; Unemployment; Health care; State (computer science); Process (computing); Public administration; Public economics; Economics; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.42752196446079316,"score_gpt":0.43191324571084216,"score_spread":0.004391281250049006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128272353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9349241,0.000065201355,0.057309072,0.0066654915,0.00035631272,0.00035788873,0.000043963097,0.0000047910303,0.00027316285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855584,0.000023219818,0.0012122189,0.00007124562,0.000080639016,0.0000102766635,0.000011599206,0.000010166529,0.000024773432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768937,0.00012295008,0.0016604483,0.000167414,0.00020429197,0.00015553155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718124,0.000059965718,0.0022075477,0.00021811643,0.00025005703,0.000083049956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013545813,0.00011463168,0.00037036755,0.00015717323,0.00013191333,0.00006616835,0.00015407031,0.00006901831,0.0001833995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072078416,0.00010010945,0.000108641165,0.00035256395,0.00005539891,0.00057972595,0.00004375551,0.00017008942,9.597162e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010671624,0.0020362686,0.003391359,0.00009725543,0.000223242,0.00085123116,0.043962963,0.00002982209,0.0006378609,0.9463853,0.00031966687,0.0019582983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00320983,0.009095546,0.0012482405,0.000070760114,0.00018786457,0.0014710192,0.8925758,0.00021136257,0.0056424118,0.08528354,0.0007250219,0.00027857843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007051747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024023873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8611018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016021296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043284724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40823448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224066054","doi":"10.30636/jbpa.51.292","title":"What is Behavioral in Policy Studies?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Public Administration","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Utilitarianism; Positive economics; Economics; Rationality; Action (physics); Currency; Behavioral economics; Subsidy; Public economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.1390645403902671,"score_gpt":0.4635564582267592,"score_spread":0.3244919178364921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224066054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749385,0.0012307424,0.0000022629592,0.021303628,0.0017872202,0.0002699981,0.000016763817,0.000019763153,0.0004311287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759966,0.0006917601,0.00023651743,0.0003640275,0.00035027275,0.000054794742,0.000008211542,0.00001854354,0.00067621237],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727124,0.00033507094,0.0009377985,0.0002280078,0.0007896235,0.0004382355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985047,0.00004290617,0.0007719419,0.00016655718,0.00030430572,0.00020961913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014955394,0.00017745348,0.00040197955,0.00056089554,0.0007890412,0.0003746409,0.0004744505,0.00008006883,0.0004402796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004117884,0.00019706742,0.00019385527,0.00070866256,0.00031809259,0.0029102957,0.00019686896,0.0004904104,0.0000070797955],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007641122,0.014716706,0.40229267,0.000029347673,0.00017878215,0.00127666,0.3898421,0.000042679505,0.0055791843,0.05690554,0.019444343,0.10892787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002083088,0.0045486283,0.0062554274,0.000049191676,0.00011726554,0.00016773025,0.9106731,0.00000769563,0.0013169117,0.002328841,0.07176707,0.0006850744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006869694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002853272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.520831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002397341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015617374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8036176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318701979","doi":"10.30636/jbpa.61.299","title":"Ambiguous COVID-19 Messaging Increases Unsafe Socializing Intentions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Public Administration","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Simon Fraser University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Government (linguistics); Pandemic; Psychology; Public health; Health communication; Public relations; Social psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Internet privacy; Political science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.17712974392703248,"score_gpt":0.4550130478077827,"score_spread":0.2778833038807502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318701979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95550996,0.000023536333,0.002016302,0.03018094,0.0004578803,0.00016888604,0.000015943195,0.00016633666,0.01146022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980993,0.00007448582,0.00019783151,0.0005166945,0.00026563695,0.0000015493882,0.000029779623,0.000008046841,0.0008066284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978643,0.0002210586,0.0006008292,0.00008019342,0.0009392614,0.00029436522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819356,0.00006802509,0.00062016066,0.00008657198,0.00043256776,0.0005991179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002395806,0.00009148595,0.00016483413,0.00043227483,0.0008617232,0.00055358215,0.00022637332,0.000103802144,0.00048495881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015676926,0.00008933331,0.00014139511,0.00084747316,0.00015453715,0.0019935076,0.000024553803,0.0001970975,0.000034741435],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031236318,0.002349032,0.026352245,0.00013842496,0.0001822622,0.0005520544,0.15076713,0.00010296579,0.0034528414,0.3945596,0.2885918,0.1326393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022550789,0.0009657407,0.04367536,0.000111688845,0.00022726836,0.00024963933,0.553927,0.00021655843,0.00028156218,0.0046059056,0.39278144,0.0007027363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054455386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014016054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40315992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034341347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034290848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6627765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}