{"meta":{"query_hash":"49531b3dbd63","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Behavioral Public Administration"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/49531b3dbd63","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Behavioral+Public+Administration"},"results":[{"id":"W2911282377","doi":"10.30636/jbpa.21.47","title":"Trust in institutions: Narrowing the ideological gap over the federal budget","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Public Administration","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Ideology; Sacrifice; Government (linguistics); Public economics; Government spending; Population; Economics; Empirical research; Federal budget; Political science; Law; Finance; Sociology; Politics; Market economy","score_opus":0.139141437487426,"score_gpt":0.42188439366143715,"score_spread":0.28274295617401113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911282377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911699,0.0000825796,0.00072703947,0.0006327985,0.000005791626,0.000004989219,0.000011681925,0.0000021603823,0.007363013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99983454,0.00001196892,0.000042922646,0.000022491264,0.0000022030902,0.0000014756215,0.0000037935408,3.7851296e-7,0.00008016384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967283,0.0017862233,0.00012773939,0.00021377904,0.00048396704,0.0006599903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97545797,0.009290865,0.010153144,0.0017380397,0.0011058378,0.002254028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004843968,0.000106965155,0.00031374983,0.00094458443,0.001569493,0.0023444358,0.00029939532,0.00061331026,0.0037262659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026717864,0.00014928648,0.00018190067,0.00072869216,0.0028256543,0.0018957683,0.0022652627,0.0011072124,0.0001875825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010989718,0.0005593372,0.8401261,0.00008701711,0.00013857201,0.00035778072,0.028011579,0.0015214963,0.001528016,0.050731316,0.0013634164,0.0744763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010265776,0.00043150765,0.8933952,0.00013711552,0.00007271968,0.000385576,0.042249884,0.0062807286,0.0009732813,0.048788022,0.0071318396,0.000051581817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005086435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062349895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005086435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001622906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010918836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02561766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109620413","doi":"10.30636/jbpa.32.188","title":"Child care policy and child care burden: Policy feedback effects and distributive implications of regulatory decisions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Public Administration","topic":"Early Childhood Education and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Early childhood education; Quality (philosophy); Public economics; Affect (linguistics); Public policy; Business; Economics; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.028098834235878226,"score_gpt":0.35235819212880604,"score_spread":0.3242593578929278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109620413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94413626,0.0007359832,0.0036385406,0.008965372,0.000044923705,0.00023494111,0.00037435972,0.00003478331,0.041834865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985807,0.0001205435,0.00029452814,0.00032401466,0.0000192217,0.000048595735,0.000031228443,0.000005745787,0.00057538477],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96931016,0.019453058,0.0009188746,0.0017675996,0.005853944,0.0026963926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85727584,0.10546786,0.024308527,0.0050930046,0.0057935496,0.0020611165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025568467,0.00033498715,0.00072594394,0.0012450058,0.0017665431,0.003987478,0.0009621429,0.0017291288,0.010003635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10851531,0.0004278616,0.0006433428,0.0017586882,0.0052414117,0.002318393,0.0031363738,0.0021765106,0.00031809264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019007685,0.003911783,0.7789815,0.0004036697,0.0004970017,0.00038371852,0.018764315,0.014533866,0.0026697675,0.06804486,0.002764439,0.10714433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025543463,0.00051661645,0.9553093,0.0002407561,0.0001615218,0.000045743305,0.009304025,0.0058708265,0.0011923476,0.020234901,0.0067967107,0.000071942624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052625183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0481568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052625183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009929075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006529595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13522059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128272353","doi":"10.30636/jbpa.41.196","title":"Understanding the mechanisms of administrative burden through a within-case study of Medicaid expansion implementation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Public Administration","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Medicaid; Agency (philosophy); Documentation; Business; Unemployment; Health care; State (computer science); Process (computing); Public administration; Public economics; Economics; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.42752196446079316,"score_gpt":0.43191324571084216,"score_spread":0.004391281250049006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128272353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775023,0.0003325869,0.007812779,0.0023965584,0.00002832182,0.00067885005,0.00023730489,0.000015616855,0.010995788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900467,0.00036538512,0.0068334355,0.00024644312,0.00003135193,0.0006156849,0.00011506271,0.000010935549,0.0017350448],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97869945,0.016993616,0.0006076102,0.0008987269,0.0011755239,0.0016250991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94841135,0.03752722,0.0071160593,0.0027273258,0.002845646,0.0013724957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019111201,0.00045913734,0.0005693221,0.0020969352,0.0069780387,0.0038702914,0.0023653002,0.0022518055,0.0031164612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042451486,0.00062095386,0.0006752065,0.002708995,0.0036374966,0.005471075,0.0036570535,0.0036252006,0.00033589423],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091844145,0.0163277,0.34924984,0.0007400577,0.00034966852,0.008086807,0.30746835,0.010791469,0.001985236,0.22226286,0.0066515375,0.0751681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000555454,0.0034056688,0.20085256,0.00092905486,0.0003584518,0.0015825225,0.6464773,0.049633246,0.004209123,0.04832687,0.04341441,0.00025527528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03614035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050933342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03614035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009310817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070499093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10107088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224066054","doi":"10.30636/jbpa.51.292","title":"What is Behavioral in Policy Studies?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Public Administration","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Utilitarianism; Positive economics; Economics; Rationality; Action (physics); Currency; Behavioral economics; Subsidy; Public economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.1390645403902671,"score_gpt":0.4635564582267592,"score_spread":0.3244919178364921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224066054","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011744897,0.038811054,0.03619374,0.8619524,0.005279803,0.00017982179,0.00038710047,0.000073691255,0.045377534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72203237,0.0653014,0.034843832,0.15862873,0.011306155,0.0020910485,0.00040182375,0.00023629774,0.0051583974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.82986903,0.14820063,0.0038921034,0.0063013695,0.008198194,0.003538674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7113606,0.24276853,0.013444625,0.013580352,0.011305494,0.0075403755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12043563,0.0012483293,0.0030817285,0.008593091,0.007474922,0.020677637,0.0037009462,0.01155547,0.00736955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18991402,0.0012870382,0.0016421316,0.014001922,0.06654253,0.031634167,0.00673868,0.013157182,0.0011066387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042627176,0.00011064179,0.005682347,0.0008630768,0.00010575148,0.000058532434,0.0041869143,0.0005184628,0.000036915873,0.96229637,0.005660108,0.020438315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002487285,0.000032682085,0.0022455493,0.0018968013,0.00004144931,0.000054244825,0.004347784,0.0006084552,0.00006130393,0.96448505,0.02616597,0.000035861674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010071947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060523245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12043563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01549632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02041954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63693213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318701979","doi":"10.30636/jbpa.61.299","title":"Ambiguous COVID-19 Messaging Increases Unsafe Socializing Intentions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Behavioral Public Administration","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Simon Fraser University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Government (linguistics); Pandemic; Psychology; Public health; Health communication; Public relations; Social psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Internet privacy; Political science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.17712974392703248,"score_gpt":0.4550130478077827,"score_spread":0.2778833038807502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318701979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914402,0.00022945579,0.00012553573,0.0016307001,0.00005699005,0.000039219143,0.00016782398,0.000016320373,0.0062937746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99637777,0.00022739005,0.00034144262,0.0007707413,0.00004413411,0.00006060795,0.00012402816,0.000012176961,0.0020416917],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996977,0.0017045602,0.00012563654,0.0003118485,0.00043623635,0.0004446694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97207606,0.01881703,0.004122843,0.0014608412,0.0007372457,0.002786112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035976444,0.00039566323,0.00042306483,0.0003585679,0.0010730927,0.001640019,0.0005026198,0.0016894283,0.01554839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029351532,0.00060678984,0.00086899183,0.00018653179,0.00088586315,0.0011934289,0.001635806,0.0027375487,0.0013039134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008917827,0.02196719,0.85165554,0.00096158165,0.00080774346,0.0004940362,0.028753893,0.0005003435,0.0066965343,0.002372957,0.007852757,0.069019556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023330939,0.0031898436,0.9836385,0.00027325161,0.00035741384,0.00010736106,0.005537514,0.00077229965,0.001333455,0.0013704635,0.0031448356,0.00004162477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010145763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00718448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01554839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000618773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010877578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05201453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}