{"meta":{"query_hash":"f398b58fc537","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f398b58fc537","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Benefit-Cost+Analysis"},"results":[{"id":"W2028463306","doi":"10.2202/2152-2812.1106","title":"Calculating the Social Opportunity Cost Discount Rate","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunity cost; Rate of return; Confusion; Economics; Government (linguistics); Cost of funds index; Exchange rate; Subject (documents); Actuarial science; Interest rate; Internal rate of return; Finance; Financial economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Psychology; Production (economics)","score_opus":0.10186890713197494,"score_gpt":0.2691368706177416,"score_spread":0.16726796348576667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028463306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94879496,0.00031273326,0.0023531534,0.0019844759,0.00035999386,0.00012972215,0.00018786378,0.000009828169,0.04586727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831307,0.000053734788,0.00012873171,0.0007581881,0.00047000172,0.000005051031,0.000009745144,0.000017223429,0.00024428012],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980717,0.00003646299,0.0012964776,0.00020388236,0.00005713956,0.00033436477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977451,0.00007995986,0.0016472376,0.00026192746,0.00008272488,0.00018307539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018786654,0.00017491436,0.0007381508,0.0004803087,0.00036067585,0.000104278384,0.00046901818,0.00010135931,0.0008721947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016936792,0.00014024542,0.0008591275,0.00065714057,0.000096147945,0.00040685915,0.000068186855,0.0003437454,0.000103539234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020333786,0.00042459785,0.6685674,0.000028998755,0.007158872,0.000043560907,0.00895271,0.001713471,0.000030168765,0.30167362,0.0038894527,0.007313764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007055964,0.00006952935,0.8952281,0.000010682724,0.0008226638,0.000015313253,0.00095524115,0.008121325,0.000074827905,0.08660732,0.006990577,0.0003988213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058963225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023717323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22666067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015016159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003246126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.954992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060631781","doi":"10.2202/2152-2812.1050","title":"A Benefit-Cost Analysis of Private and Semi-Private Hospital Rooms","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Business; Medical emergency; Medicine; Architectural engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.03859973499976844,"score_gpt":0.2542354784809491,"score_spread":0.21563574348118064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060631781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98606414,0.0021122328,0.007902195,0.0009797129,0.00021763219,0.00024544622,0.00036525898,0.00001470071,0.0020986586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948004,0.0027662455,0.0017603755,0.0002981376,0.00010843882,0.0000118427315,0.00003334392,0.000029422179,0.00019180718],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638164,0.000032358428,0.0023600848,0.00048904633,0.0001987241,0.0005381429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586856,0.000080893784,0.0027460398,0.0006827075,0.00022897232,0.0003928391],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001513279,0.0003304299,0.0019498895,0.004110885,0.00013249814,0.00008372418,0.0005721838,0.00018292894,0.0005186097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015539413,0.00033349072,0.0013384981,0.004233916,0.00009115618,0.00047587464,0.00018027128,0.00031515738,0.000028849658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001254345,0.0005189293,0.8512152,0.000090670976,0.028679658,0.000038844155,0.0025924703,0.0060746013,0.000025265377,0.10097625,0.00013009374,0.009532611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009477868,0.0003500773,0.9562461,0.000043687854,0.008118781,0.000004889126,0.0002664365,0.010368532,0.0002355884,0.012819468,0.010043306,0.0005553445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025208688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094632426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10503093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001617642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021891597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084595276","doi":"10.1515/jbca-2014-0025","title":"Retrospective evaluation of costs associated with methyl bromide critical use exemptions for open field strawberries in California","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Plant Disease Management Techniques","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bromide; Limiting; Ex-ante; Yield (engineering); Montreal Protocol; Business; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Agricultural economics; Economics; Ozone; Chemistry; Ozone layer; Engineering","score_opus":0.04785905540599532,"score_gpt":0.3245324041492249,"score_spread":0.2766733487432296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084595276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99754673,0.000035161745,0.000763702,0.0007506358,0.000016345348,0.00034928636,0.00036661475,0.0000089113655,0.00016259249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990516,0.000018415947,0.0006506423,0.00009228197,0.000029307505,0.000025431025,0.0001129429,0.0000010713911,0.000018347208],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852407,0.00019561085,0.00045139357,0.00016152485,0.00050801353,0.00015936265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767333,0.0009188812,0.00041046756,0.00006395887,0.0008578102,0.00007556787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020999843,0.00010432722,0.00044220928,0.00013172143,0.000083135,0.00013155716,0.00031246344,0.000070625014,0.0001304231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024830396,0.000045475557,0.0002075631,0.0008643691,0.00003518328,0.00045588703,0.000050904568,0.00010617297,4.38532e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006031223,0.00065437966,0.96067894,0.00001104898,0.001619354,0.0000052928003,0.000067875684,0.0014917558,0.0109869335,0.0022860589,0.0012568359,0.020338424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044712937,0.0004888479,0.98500466,0.000105132756,0.0025328554,8.3280867e-7,0.00013609145,0.0049846214,0.0014757867,0.004560726,0.00013299243,0.00013033376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066997885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0191938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024325732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016260738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016781174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165371533","doi":"10.2202/2152-2812.1013","title":"An Assessment of Important Issues Concerning the Application of Benefit-Cost Analysis to Social Policy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Public economics; Valuation (finance); Public policy; Cost–benefit analysis; Shadow price; Shadow (psychology); Futures contract; Policy analysis; Public good; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Social Welfare; Microeconomics; Political science; Economic growth; Psychology; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.020642149177077563,"score_gpt":0.38167601618747543,"score_spread":0.36103386701039786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165371533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98584706,0.00015703768,0.010819781,0.0019426192,0.00014471565,0.00026768073,0.00018149875,0.000012842651,0.0006267766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957842,0.00043611202,0.0025517517,0.0001708838,0.0008974446,0.000012507868,0.000048363014,0.000017777926,0.000080926475],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961858,0.00017762854,0.001483253,0.00030859976,0.0014180711,0.00042665107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950537,0.00015122138,0.0023051966,0.00054188765,0.0016377864,0.00031019474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003044719,0.00023416737,0.0010701094,0.0014241275,0.0005869927,0.00013827856,0.0010680387,0.0002157087,0.00011091903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017546804,0.0001834467,0.0011031133,0.0067435387,0.00026245008,0.0003163393,0.00006340352,0.00043351128,0.0000014019598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037812883,0.00029859436,0.89918196,0.00000930289,0.0051711663,0.0000021802286,0.01619458,0.028718792,0.009997138,0.030240411,0.00004544605,0.010102602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000292924,0.0001026723,0.95649374,0.000006448903,0.0073187994,9.3193586e-7,0.01748511,0.014672842,0.00019464204,0.0014481526,0.0017412329,0.00024248965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0152527355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04925178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05731178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019619358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004719878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99130476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168413301","doi":"10.1515/jbca-2013-0016","title":"The most appropriate discount rate","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Social discount rate; Economics; Pareto principle; Rate of return; Discounting; Time preference; Preference; Government (linguistics); Microeconomics; Cost–benefit analysis; Actuarial science; Operations management; Finance","score_opus":0.03629818199424466,"score_gpt":0.2061210276010885,"score_spread":0.16982284560684385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168413301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907629,0.001382692,0.003246645,0.0017103062,0.0002597638,0.00011708747,0.000022527107,0.0000036951585,0.0024944048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970759,0.0011103014,0.00024732374,0.00017029347,0.00013972938,0.000011715721,0.000010400906,0.000012581787,0.0012217178],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985553,0.000018301296,0.0009998657,0.00016408434,0.00005472209,0.00020770138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835455,0.000077298064,0.00115603,0.00027129677,0.00004583109,0.000094976065],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011857641,0.000119922785,0.0004156858,0.00024908374,0.00019020765,0.00021534912,0.00029608837,0.00005344648,0.0010775824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005719191,0.00008990502,0.00038743753,0.0003914964,0.00005260925,0.00048104834,0.000040404764,0.00014965108,0.0009135383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003265065,0.00016023201,0.90385926,0.0000073655306,0.0037762877,0.0000035752544,0.0004302288,0.04444526,0.0002727603,0.028500685,0.0024855642,0.016026113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004913447,0.000053033084,0.9376491,0.000005169723,0.00030512232,0.00000504319,0.0003349271,0.01962033,0.0001017886,0.033877257,0.0073480858,0.00020881354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002723709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000681885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03378981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017302242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009226473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253760496","doi":"10.1515/2152-2812.1084","title":"Gain and Loss Domains and the Choice of Welfare Measure of Positive and Negative Changes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Equivalence (formal languages); Compensation (psychology); Willingness to accept; Economics; Welfare; Willingness to pay; Econometrics; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Public economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04145325732786882,"score_gpt":0.22494917932136946,"score_spread":0.18349592199350062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253760496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99005216,0.007726661,0.00030397793,0.0013022027,0.000031157288,0.00008151748,0.00010450627,6.39684e-7,0.00039719872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752474,0.0021438901,0.00019448252,0.00005105707,0.000050961036,0.0000019577494,0.000003358113,0.0000059993636,0.000023583767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922985,0.000032102358,0.00047864375,0.000102615275,0.000048396956,0.000108387256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862176,0.00016648904,0.0010097286,0.000095759744,0.000036498233,0.000069783404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010746488,0.00009259434,0.0005528919,0.00024736923,0.00006975399,0.000016095451,0.000065564745,0.00005174321,0.000060234986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006932553,0.00007316926,0.0001223771,0.00017652544,0.00019223434,0.00023306742,0.00003965428,0.0000848214,8.338012e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007566446,0.00004449411,0.98260653,0.000015568608,0.0012448316,3.0176366e-7,0.0021241386,0.00024648098,0.000053382846,0.011447804,0.000006173075,0.002134653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011702864,0.000061389685,0.9946144,0.00001557757,0.00053338025,0.000007600652,0.0009775055,0.00063077733,0.00030598172,0.0015249491,0.00007826646,0.000079835336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002746465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015701566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012007943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039294177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000025563036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29837558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338022816","doi":"10.1017/bca.2015.2","title":"Musings on the Social Discount Rate","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Marginal product; Social discount rate; Rate of return; Productivity; Total factor productivity; Investment (military); Discounting; Yield (engineering); National Income and Product Accounts; Econometrics; Microeconomics; National accounts; Macroeconomics; Production (economics); Finance; Cost–benefit analysis","score_opus":0.07198001588244686,"score_gpt":0.2603267233446281,"score_spread":0.18834670746218124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338022816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601808,0.00024335209,0.00048345496,0.011338653,0.00034940004,0.000059103517,0.00008048948,0.00000582057,0.027258893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99711657,0.00002453873,0.000043825352,0.001724751,0.00071135873,0.0000024907645,0.0000046619025,0.00001420528,0.00035758276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859643,0.000025302,0.0008828341,0.00017663212,0.00006791351,0.0002509063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983925,0.00009400696,0.0010783408,0.00021303633,0.000083054554,0.00013901062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001840636,0.00014556787,0.00061548315,0.00054072007,0.0001695557,0.00015282829,0.00037429642,0.00007948562,0.00019783899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019183842,0.00011011849,0.00063890545,0.0006701668,0.000063242755,0.0002742775,0.000039565824,0.00025988196,0.0003093791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004136189,0.00044759698,0.12818219,0.000017387023,0.0062043313,0.000029425526,0.0066744727,0.010325178,0.00003706733,0.789668,0.056216497,0.001784248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024808943,0.0003908484,0.34086555,0.000028101947,0.0011822373,0.000020399082,0.0020910713,0.014907315,0.00023264854,0.54880685,0.088103205,0.00089087227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013650369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040457453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24086113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021042072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026155869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44905016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412873720","doi":"10.1017/bca.2015.4","title":"The Curiously Continuing Saga of Choosing the Measure of Welfare Changes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Willingness to accept; Compensation (psychology); Value (mathematics); Valuation (finance); Welfare; Contingent valuation; Willingness to pay; Measure (data warehouse); Estimation; Public economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Actuarial science; Statistics; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Accounting","score_opus":0.08825541393482839,"score_gpt":0.22803332309506436,"score_spread":0.13977790916023597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412873720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870808,0.008293465,0.0006771649,0.002569687,0.00018779385,0.00008210934,0.000034921537,0.0000018494713,0.0010722012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99886644,0.00075358315,0.00013877227,0.000034948047,0.00009241634,0.000002186851,0.0000037006596,0.000009917098,0.000098014876],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986778,0.000029377103,0.0009248306,0.00011422436,0.000110209476,0.00014354227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740976,0.00007986951,0.0020752985,0.00026279982,0.0001080055,0.000064239815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023732337,0.00010118098,0.0005275341,0.00024414342,0.00009825107,0.000041102754,0.00032160417,0.00005541216,0.000074145806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015103965,0.000069874615,0.00037369423,0.00036643018,0.00007978576,0.00015822604,0.000041713247,0.00013423075,0.0000091567135],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009564517,0.0001082731,0.9284526,0.000016048087,0.0027919973,0.0000017865665,0.0037885339,0.027933437,0.00022960706,0.010938714,0.00038499138,0.025258379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017811834,0.0002797099,0.9544761,0.0000823732,0.0015127168,0.00001790983,0.0067784144,0.008099078,0.0016297727,0.0072135804,0.017789135,0.00033998358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016661255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031260087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026023557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011845918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010288967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28494042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598689210","doi":"10.2202/2152-2812.1065","title":"Appropriate Discounting for Benefit-Cost Analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation","keywords":"Discounting; Generality; Hyperbolic discounting; Cost–benefit analysis; Economics; Order (exchange); Range (aeronautics); Microeconomics; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Computer science; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.10371656375519336,"score_gpt":0.2368113089852115,"score_spread":0.13309474523001813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598689210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9145123,0.0009048414,0.08073528,0.00014406447,0.0002732085,0.0002581458,0.00028354733,0.000011300215,0.0028773623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925009,0.00035291564,0.006084241,0.00011601262,0.00021686223,0.000030809915,0.00011470421,0.00003425299,0.00054929114],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707806,0.000014272675,0.0019165204,0.0004628006,0.00011063749,0.00041768124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966599,0.00007631814,0.002515452,0.00045629256,0.000101867765,0.00019020282],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001745761,0.00027471618,0.0013091812,0.0017911962,0.00019817529,0.000117441516,0.00045843795,0.00015151927,0.0015384433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079696074,0.0002832796,0.0019434849,0.0014854693,0.000054714634,0.0007020467,0.00006336902,0.0001965143,0.00013905976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000832412,0.00023155325,0.9417708,0.000014854407,0.01152094,0.000003291153,0.00077628717,0.030823398,0.00004211529,0.010771192,0.0000673266,0.0038950276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012517275,0.00013733961,0.9258904,0.000012337346,0.008467744,0.000005626599,0.00051061186,0.040397324,0.00033456544,0.020815788,0.0016168334,0.0005596998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035591426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003139584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07798866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029699615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014095001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752647198","doi":"10.1017/bca.2017.16","title":"Building a Set of Internationally Comparable Value of Statistical Life Studies: Estimates of Chinese Willingness to Pay to Reduce Mortality Risk","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic Research Service; Fudan University; World Bank Group; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"China; Willingness to pay; Preference; Economics; Payment; Demographic economics; Estimation; Household income; Geography; Demography; Socioeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.10858005907581163,"score_gpt":0.35370489164326496,"score_spread":0.24512483256745332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752647198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9462666,0.00031844372,0.052239932,0.00019099699,0.00015278238,0.00009653618,0.0006476912,0.0000013527776,0.00008570001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818779,0.00026068115,0.017738953,0.000023461687,0.000060815528,0.0000036669776,0.000010368018,0.0000097307,0.000014375926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978678,0.00001935267,0.0016444258,0.00020866228,0.00012742785,0.00013230332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960093,0.00021355189,0.003109356,0.0003630564,0.00016823897,0.00013648925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016216029,0.00013550374,0.0011605296,0.00040606293,0.00008817713,0.000031777246,0.00042537795,0.00004317986,0.00011901189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014287807,0.000119077755,0.0003098602,0.00022394405,0.000082960614,0.0002548038,0.00011508502,0.00010304384,0.000008790438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051788396,0.000080051235,0.7700137,0.000028176386,0.0020917235,6.950753e-7,0.00043663412,0.22366695,0.00019593321,0.0030688213,0.000029856155,0.00033569417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003970506,0.00011294684,0.95803565,0.00005113944,0.0004427383,8.9315205e-7,0.0001361386,0.026530413,0.00063788204,0.013520751,0.000021636235,0.0001127767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009833089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000121325065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19713654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013039548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023038478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48558497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774655121","doi":"10.1515/jbca-2013-0023","title":"The choice of the social discount rate and the opportunity cost of public funds","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Social discount rate; Economics; Crowding out; Government (linguistics); Public economics; Viewpoints; Opportunity cost; Consumption (sociology); Rate of return; Revenue; Social cost; Investment (military); Finance; Microeconomics; Cost–benefit analysis; Monetary economics; Political science","score_opus":0.05938591816842495,"score_gpt":0.2565203290424134,"score_spread":0.19713441087398845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774655121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750653,0.0009786283,0.0001395667,0.017676301,0.00019240715,0.00018383999,0.0001263576,0.0000017697649,0.0056358567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861485,0.00044561963,0.000008958991,0.00037639216,0.00019486072,0.000008851017,0.0000025564348,0.000009631827,0.00033830717],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981269,0.00009048393,0.0013153428,0.00013644785,0.00007913129,0.00025169656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964553,0.0004932512,0.0024265326,0.00034612897,0.00016858614,0.00011020876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026987754,0.00013644173,0.0007383198,0.00024383757,0.00039580223,0.00017107443,0.00065952126,0.00007815417,0.00016921083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005561172,0.00007303107,0.0007182116,0.00065736176,0.00048023867,0.00038076038,0.00012629584,0.00028049783,0.000008910708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012114372,0.00020286403,0.668711,0.00004691283,0.005514498,5.181339e-7,0.0017587302,0.0005628,0.000052032214,0.30982387,0.0047806595,0.008424982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010802884,0.00003129501,0.9283194,0.000007821094,0.0004020859,0.0000026816037,0.00061789755,0.004474409,0.000044781536,0.058040198,0.006849398,0.0001297476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010569264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051533716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25960842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068295805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004429862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30442306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904453811","doi":"10.1017/bca.2018.24","title":"Most Consumers Don’t Buy Hybrids: Is Rational Choice a Sufficient Explanation?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Association of Canadian Universities for Research in Astronomy","keywords":"Alternative fuel vehicle; Economics; Electric vehicle; Microeconomics; Public economics; Rational expectations; Gasoline; Business; Environmental economics; Marketing; Alternative fuels; Econometrics; Engineering; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.012805788480688902,"score_gpt":0.2598210689355955,"score_spread":0.2470152804549066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904453811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901451,0.0003652676,0.0040189186,0.0012572604,0.00028852446,0.00006573997,0.00011457416,0.000021983158,0.0037226668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956686,0.00036178858,0.0005604482,0.0015461359,0.000421072,0.0000069924367,0.00015792105,0.000024044297,0.0012529835],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757916,0.000051897918,0.00095817563,0.0002603539,0.00084113044,0.00030927715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979827,0.00015688952,0.00079285016,0.00030832883,0.0005293912,0.0002298369],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003485772,0.00023512443,0.00047008842,0.00085983664,0.00025963713,0.00008887906,0.0002947102,0.00009023798,0.003393257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073611474,0.00021122824,0.0004387184,0.0013525272,0.00017568577,0.00035073026,0.00001536548,0.00017545886,0.00008228882],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031769654,0.0011324203,0.42318612,0.000029885532,0.012890693,0.00006453683,0.006043405,0.50136024,0.005327217,0.03157245,0.010227373,0.007847962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029999323,0.00034836665,0.6895089,0.000053860844,0.0062459656,0.00004301043,0.0023056997,0.012362142,0.016596587,0.0006378969,0.268053,0.00084464776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019248235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006074434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48899812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014412192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008373677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99751776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914979035","doi":"10.1017/bca.2018.29","title":"Accounting for Timing when Assessing Health-Related Policies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Harvard University; University of Pittsburgh; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Discounting; Net present value; Key (lock); Value (mathematics); Consumption (sociology); Cost–benefit analysis; Present value; Actuarial science; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Econometrics; Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Production (economics); Finance","score_opus":0.2730674512870271,"score_gpt":0.44256298978370545,"score_spread":0.16949553849667837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914979035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9359643,0.0039314884,0.020915536,0.036815524,0.0007957638,0.00051119336,0.00012041955,0.000022608985,0.0009231638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798947,0.00011884414,0.011861904,0.0067498796,0.00047947594,0.0000132254545,0.000040387666,0.000044855566,0.0007967403],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921213,0.00013639539,0.006704289,0.00035034484,0.00017751218,0.00051018276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878936,0.0011325491,0.0100550875,0.00039350314,0.00030982058,0.00021548427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021297062,0.00020599535,0.002086999,0.0017465544,0.00027505597,0.0003263688,0.00038387513,0.00014929535,0.0005573719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016658017,0.00023778595,0.0008268024,0.0007535545,0.000025396686,0.0014807972,0.000041194773,0.00026577778,0.0002591807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048827824,0.00020504708,0.87608755,0.0006264652,0.004960573,0.0000017427188,0.0070933173,0.062173475,0.000040552175,0.033611353,0.011362866,0.0037882063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063554435,0.000531928,0.5901929,0.00096173235,0.0013391789,0.00007208651,0.013710252,0.24722353,0.000050853512,0.046390135,0.091378525,0.0017934222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010879893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015864728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28589466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008130338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021848502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9696629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980752308","doi":"10.1515/jbca-2012-0008","title":"More appropriate discounting: the rate of social time preference and the value of the social discount rate","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Time preference; Social discount rate; Economics; Shadow price; Stochastic discount factor; Contrast (vision); Value (mathematics); Investment (military); Preference; Econometrics; Shadow (psychology); Microeconomics; Present value; Range (aeronautics); Cost–benefit analysis; Statistics; Mathematics; Finance; Computer science; Capital asset pricing model","score_opus":0.03481651152743741,"score_gpt":0.21386165985612648,"score_spread":0.17904514832868906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980752308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99431944,0.0002867733,0.0002746636,0.004249151,0.000073997326,0.00019581753,0.000059161193,0.0000011690428,0.00053983013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991781,0.00015856033,0.00003275919,0.00013129898,0.00011513978,0.000009240846,0.000004874334,0.000009818857,0.00036021037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985485,0.00009100784,0.0009859783,0.00014742024,0.00007983691,0.0001472203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997347,0.00012429192,0.0022524518,0.00019585156,0.000055401903,0.000024992481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020034008,0.000128265,0.00060512975,0.00011047108,0.00027208863,0.00007926319,0.00040334556,0.000062423824,0.00032176587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006391848,0.00006871914,0.0005117033,0.0003133863,0.00038751325,0.00028239822,0.00010944582,0.00018298413,0.000022156699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044974586,0.0004611433,0.72106427,0.000114819704,0.010297171,7.343223e-7,0.03263008,0.039242994,0.0033245946,0.18652649,0.0013187602,0.004569184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082729216,0.000017753371,0.9593586,0.000008016834,0.00060603005,0.000001048976,0.0010159425,0.019133488,0.00019488769,0.018630346,0.000104272134,0.00010233796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036858523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001826932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2382943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066911845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016486933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35231104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091409955","doi":"10.1017/bca.2020.18","title":"Efficiency without Apology: Consideration of the Marginal Excess Tax Burden and Distributional Impacts in Benefit–Cost Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Allocative efficiency; Economics; Inclusion (mineral); Public economics; Offset (computer science); Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02665836988985898,"score_gpt":0.24468284168588686,"score_spread":0.21802447179602788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091409955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870207,0.00088692486,0.0032228928,0.007361709,0.00008372707,0.00013131728,0.00066983065,0.0000036928068,0.00061926333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999139,0.00013762727,0.00011771223,0.00030774038,0.00022176867,0.0000038258313,0.000036307094,0.000010000093,0.000026020214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997648,0.00003847625,0.0015564308,0.0003312485,0.000112193506,0.00031365955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975822,0.00013575851,0.0017096217,0.00024454904,0.00011984415,0.00020802725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008382873,0.0002070142,0.0012057836,0.00094304874,0.00013343546,0.000095845164,0.0003547235,0.00014010638,0.00020500785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035923324,0.00017948529,0.0007026171,0.00230885,0.0001578615,0.00034552036,0.00009148514,0.00032101801,0.000009237237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009639077,0.00005638645,0.943233,0.000019752926,0.0019478117,0.0000037079162,0.0005673424,0.039986476,0.000057531564,0.013691696,0.00007311421,0.00026679086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009696722,0.00008614093,0.9220228,0.000015871974,0.0012685297,0.000010785474,0.00021461023,0.06517275,0.0001501247,0.009593284,0.0002756609,0.00021973769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006982498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083928904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025186272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015519238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050140006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73191977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108247818","doi":"10.1017/bca.2020.25","title":"Averting Expenditures and Willingness to Pay for Electricity Supply Reliability","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Electricity; Willingness to pay; Economic shortage; Business; Mains electricity; Reliability (semiconductor); Service (business); Value (mathematics); Actuarial science; Environmental economics; Economics; Marketing; Microeconomics; Engineering; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Computer science","score_opus":0.0536239802309804,"score_gpt":0.2336543095594796,"score_spread":0.18003032932849922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108247818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552875,0.00044910307,0.041290525,0.002595129,0.00007465674,0.0001461569,0.000073364215,0.0000045696547,0.00007896172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99645704,0.00016314513,0.002458498,0.0006764667,0.00017767573,0.000007729973,0.00001288359,0.0000111666295,0.000035372916],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867207,0.000010010527,0.0008420775,0.00025953565,0.00004512126,0.00017118949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894387,0.000088170455,0.00064024585,0.000117168485,0.00003025499,0.0001802994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007418933,0.000112487185,0.0005473863,0.00018985884,0.0000924315,0.000059351754,0.00014666592,0.00005880404,0.0001653327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021274047,0.00010345374,0.0003138202,0.00026095484,0.000013633495,0.00023880026,0.00003239113,0.00011494614,0.00002083816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007295329,0.00003799024,0.9675692,0.000014152348,0.00034882402,8.210247e-7,0.00050989125,0.028127989,0.00018353552,0.0006865458,0.00032101944,0.002127078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071001507,0.00024678654,0.95364195,0.000007156538,0.00034392136,0.000002690262,0.00019895683,0.033475116,0.0011407285,0.0048621325,0.0051231165,0.00024741932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052548457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016462896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041169528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011939658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007691758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4218721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140502103","doi":"10.1017/bca.2021.5","title":"Economic Activity and the Value of Medical Innovation during a Pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shutdown; Nonmarket forces; Quarter (Canadian coin); Activity-based costing; Value (mathematics); Fell; Pandemic; Production (economics); Economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Business; Market economy; Factor market; Geography; Engineering; Macroeconomics; Accounting","score_opus":0.3162840270995809,"score_gpt":0.5194715721863609,"score_spread":0.20318754508677994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140502103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97570485,0.00069982203,0.000499559,0.022465477,0.000286787,0.00014289489,0.000015490725,0.0000073189312,0.000177773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957495,0.0026042652,0.00013542306,0.0010225797,0.00037558615,0.000007516146,0.0000039359297,0.0000115646535,0.00008968429],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99498224,0.0021064314,0.0017014388,0.00018948382,0.0007508345,0.00026954093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931715,0.0028879014,0.0026237404,0.000337553,0.0008105585,0.00016874359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011388594,0.00012602763,0.0008458175,0.0005158568,0.00038346014,0.00002301056,0.00026762355,0.00026192292,0.00055049296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038165208,0.00008793223,0.00025517284,0.0012947194,0.0001235817,0.00038944816,0.00017586863,0.0013493799,0.000008833321],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007365435,0.000113636255,0.9659669,0.00033060263,0.0026229317,0.000031837302,0.0030737375,0.00046759698,0.0013434759,0.009645946,0.000100864214,0.0155659765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002910864,0.00003131027,0.9867286,0.000254265,0.0014824796,0.000052677085,0.003020613,0.0028445877,0.00043761148,0.0014583754,0.0006567222,0.00012187945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016341807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044626943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021442898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029607594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013092249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60275114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307454518","doi":"10.1017/bca.2022.14","title":"Risk Perception, Learning, and Willingness to Pay to Reduce Heart Disease Risk","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Risk perception; Willingness to pay; Actuarial science; Perception; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Risk assessment; Estimation; Econometrics; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0266242929903668,"score_gpt":0.23351629778601732,"score_spread":0.2068920047956505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307454518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935096,0.00052735605,0.003954056,0.001408931,0.00016172913,0.00011978918,0.00021063049,0.000005917122,0.00010199903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99720687,0.00058743404,0.00087790634,0.00033015874,0.00012970658,0.00001860911,0.000020601607,0.000017853683,0.00081086304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986001,0.00006264354,0.00074057624,0.00031749584,0.00009377444,0.00018540348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865305,0.000044848228,0.00075151544,0.00018556156,0.000029844734,0.00033515983],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001508082,0.00012782085,0.00046593143,0.000592577,0.0004197798,0.00007234481,0.00016004832,0.000027486352,0.001920533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016489912,0.00013237362,0.00030161088,0.0005872472,0.000017963583,0.00018450202,0.00011204195,0.00031527525,0.00015967597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005260772,0.00004995495,0.76764596,0.0000016264967,0.0002111861,0.00000135022,0.00045681765,0.22913626,0.000027256156,0.000051826617,0.00039995983,0.0019651745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002968482,0.00015817638,0.97129464,0.0000030175293,0.00040202984,0.000004111444,0.00057550846,0.0047680195,0.0000049246537,0.0012619076,0.021051263,0.00017953846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002879559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029155111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22436824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032127186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012485995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99899185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377241589","doi":"10.1017/bca.2023.18","title":"A Test of Hirschman’s Hiding Hand Principle in World Bank-Financed Hydropower Projects","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Hydropower; Test (biology); Business; Phase (matter); Operations management; Computer security; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03574084530202451,"score_gpt":0.2898847448359412,"score_spread":0.2541438995339167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377241589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99299985,0.00012946707,0.00007648448,0.0008922538,0.00021660408,0.00025668935,0.000005278536,0.000042618278,0.0053807483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816877,0.0000402232,0.00019567461,0.00017744707,0.00045093775,0.000014989901,0.000026669946,0.00003892417,0.00088639493],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997002,0.000023357628,0.001249892,0.00034791196,0.0007990198,0.000577823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970449,0.0002097495,0.0016882204,0.00041430813,0.00060073327,0.000042086253],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018468784,0.00029029604,0.0009402635,0.0072262157,0.00013224749,0.00036715952,0.00064945244,0.00009700649,0.00019191233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001043484,0.00025728007,0.00053882296,0.015025322,0.000070308146,0.001727963,0.00028890104,0.00037319795,0.00008751487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001570907,0.00036656274,0.9735719,0.00023129517,0.0007842377,0.0002331813,0.00033090077,0.011885315,0.006423518,0.002262407,0.002020757,0.0017328447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035259079,0.00008396634,0.8912948,0.00066834636,0.0022836437,0.000012108409,0.00075087126,0.05948937,0.0059248796,0.0015686436,0.03349362,0.00090388145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031288317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027705398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08227713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015835873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000102470905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384131644","doi":"10.1017/bca.2023.25","title":"Best Investments in Chronic, Noncommunicable Disease Prevention and Control in Low- and Lower–Middle-Income Countries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; RTI International; Imperial College London; Harvard University","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Business; Investment (military); Population; Environmental health; Economic growth; Public economics; Medicine; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.025353526066580784,"score_gpt":0.3094261310966016,"score_spread":0.28407260503002085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384131644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870564,0.001593948,0.000031364383,0.010774919,0.00009896539,0.00017959366,0.000010567124,0.000011075445,0.00024320516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99416906,0.0023323034,0.00002238076,0.003119053,0.00024052603,0.000011198289,0.000018432926,0.000010677514,0.000076359174],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820334,0.000061044506,0.00090642466,0.0001768719,0.00021851539,0.000433829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879456,0.00017367165,0.00060145993,0.00020002539,0.00014358477,0.0000867305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018809282,0.00016038564,0.00067537325,0.0014194523,0.00011428586,0.00015342695,0.00020854436,0.00008435071,0.00004106643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030930282,0.00013976898,0.00014242552,0.001736634,0.0000779973,0.00091081945,0.00015688213,0.00022794183,0.000021841772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019549592,0.00010360001,0.9654968,0.0005116245,0.00028555648,0.00006748048,0.000038667455,0.02986351,0.0000047653325,0.0020607973,0.00075410947,0.000617624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022800774,0.000048732658,0.85164934,0.00071788044,0.0004820938,0.0000021541805,0.0001850228,0.12548259,2.0966e-7,0.0031073594,0.015874865,0.00016967359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004427662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005135447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113847435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018389054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008220477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66933304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386093884","doi":"10.1017/bca.2023.13","title":"One Million Lives Saved Per Year: A Cost–Benefit Analysis of the Global Plan to End Tuberculosis, 2023–2030 and Beyond","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Harvard University; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Cost–benefit analysis; Psychological intervention; Tuberculosis; Yield (engineering); Benefit–cost ratio; Investment (military); Economics; Medicine; Internal rate of return; Actuarial science; Production (economics)","score_opus":0.143966932762344,"score_gpt":0.37224834293825027,"score_spread":0.22828141017590625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386093884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792815,0.0018989295,0.00056551606,0.014751065,0.00029128906,0.00038747318,0.0019610727,0.000013616852,0.0008495737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952674,0.0012099964,0.0009041487,0.001915011,0.00019957878,0.000021766686,0.00009170521,0.00002273715,0.0003676507],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433833,0.00019000113,0.004146237,0.0004970634,0.00038611534,0.00044222723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99469304,0.0006495423,0.00329895,0.0006740219,0.0003024303,0.00038201467],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007826464,0.00025521152,0.0021879382,0.0026060373,0.00021870757,0.00013856495,0.0005392932,0.00016228882,0.0007650853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010345728,0.00025463727,0.0011445837,0.005747726,0.000079625395,0.00033433965,0.00014967726,0.00022800361,0.0002399881],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008061009,0.0001572974,0.9341187,0.000094894356,0.01435132,0.0000023194073,0.002153499,0.039677113,0.000032178763,0.0055246414,0.0027198652,0.001087592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058708276,0.00008971623,0.97739196,0.00006202446,0.003392727,0.000003985329,0.0019392072,0.010767355,0.000015165087,0.0025788685,0.0028823016,0.00028960707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012978455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004334469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04327329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005714117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009110236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396616770","doi":"10.1017/bca.2024.9","title":"Renewable Energy Support Through Feed-in Tariffs: A Retrospective Stakeholder Analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Renewable energy; Feed-in tariff; Environmental economics; Stakeholder; Business; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Economics; Energy policy; Engineering; Management","score_opus":0.0786791606550922,"score_gpt":0.2679076918844887,"score_spread":0.1892285312293965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396616770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84324735,0.021753274,0.05487329,0.0049451436,0.0019800365,0.00028137607,0.002929399,0.0001089716,0.06988118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917452,0.004066682,0.00058233365,0.00041379698,0.00037990074,0.000011308859,0.00010648822,0.000040326137,0.0026539983],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676454,0.000017169912,0.0019708893,0.00058161886,0.0001179904,0.00054780114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981466,0.00010669205,0.000980522,0.00048266348,0.00011522198,0.00016832259],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012385634,0.00030569025,0.001752164,0.004167749,0.000094122086,0.00036583317,0.0004140634,0.00021226704,0.0032784517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006399183,0.000326021,0.0017401831,0.006203023,0.00005181195,0.0008973252,0.00007280462,0.00035115052,0.00010685443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001412726,0.00043165585,0.73646903,0.000073577445,0.03411846,0.0003057342,0.005444079,0.13686505,0.00004142588,0.07766483,0.00773431,0.00071055314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028602197,0.00065913063,0.3652376,0.00016955547,0.018690797,0.000107794825,0.00326045,0.1522538,0.0007038351,0.27667877,0.17667608,0.0027019535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013679169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029122056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37123147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008203051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005507968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402447284","doi":"10.1017/bca.2024.16","title":"Valuing a Reduction in the Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Large-Scale Multi-Country Stated Preference Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Kidney disease; Valuation (finance); Contingent valuation; Medicine; Preference; Environmental health; Actuarial science; Economics; Finance; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.051535722289975286,"score_gpt":0.23542473462865035,"score_spread":0.18388901233867505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402447284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690895,0.0077088736,0.022058468,0.00015762699,0.00016446089,0.00014604023,0.0004533437,0.0000054344055,0.00021622218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963367,0.002602406,0.00071659463,0.000026590542,0.000099957455,0.00001195226,0.000093842,0.000012257345,0.0000997276],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984787,0.000049980554,0.00095450366,0.00024523714,0.00009161954,0.00017997157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889964,0.000039247414,0.000713669,0.00023706698,0.000022990083,0.00008736336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019092072,0.00012234575,0.00041876844,0.00063583587,0.00006176177,0.00007521682,0.00022480806,0.000060234295,0.0001967869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000648711,0.00010273373,0.0003631027,0.0009034276,0.00003588746,0.00039575505,0.000026087284,0.000272207,0.000023843642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006901919,0.0007036822,0.70444334,0.0001362237,0.0018874516,0.000006469379,0.0036055343,0.28512785,0.00012000919,0.0017010736,0.0003582326,0.0018410892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005700827,0.000044272783,0.5277179,0.00005296164,0.00072583504,0.000005988045,0.0007159793,0.46794966,0.00001966401,0.0012558547,0.0008147113,0.000127123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018331336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006017494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1828218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035676133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048621405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41893598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408273049","doi":"10.1017/bca.2024.39","title":"Economic Evaluation Under Ambiguity and Structural Uncertainties","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; The Graduate School, Northwestern University; University of Alberta","keywords":"Ambiguity; Econometrics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.11257570239479595,"score_gpt":0.43621619406841794,"score_spread":0.32364049167362197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408273049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99515843,0.001450646,0.0012808733,0.0007327648,0.0010386042,0.00006176377,0.00003375737,0.00001003175,0.00023313594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903363,0.00008414384,0.00038313548,0.000054852248,0.00021293225,0.0000012820965,0.0000048225265,0.000009245535,0.00021598123],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971375,0.00011433695,0.0012471809,0.00036649435,0.0009557705,0.00017874067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976759,0.0007368918,0.00057579717,0.00035195347,0.00050813623,0.00015130985],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005000179,0.00016294542,0.0005976797,0.0015201877,0.00014162206,0.0013756049,0.0004579842,0.00009115294,0.0013159873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003083105,0.00011092611,0.0006110812,0.0009169652,0.00008300378,0.0008444397,0.00008639504,0.00021915013,0.000085953005],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036534024,0.000009660776,0.020149492,0.00000170809,0.0005425162,0.00001022383,0.00024847593,0.14537372,0.000044545483,0.00049646455,0.00091849477,0.83216816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004025255,0.00011081241,0.1755712,0.000041574425,0.0034738884,0.00017127793,0.0016384772,0.44727093,0.00008976328,0.36848122,0.0024480347,0.00030028986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011292361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008278342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8318679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032081798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018626901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408911915","doi":"10.1017/bca.2024.45","title":"Ex-Ante Analysis of the Costs and Benefits of Legalizing Cannabis Markets in the Czech Republic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Ex-ante; Cannabis; Economics; Business; Macroeconomics; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.031573738837063096,"score_gpt":0.26027007220956055,"score_spread":0.22869633337249745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408911915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98166925,0.008430453,0.0003234872,0.0036277354,0.00011116558,0.000099312296,0.00010523859,0.0000019913693,0.005631369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978298,0.0014401235,0.0000731047,0.00025337888,0.000016537291,0.0000042433962,0.0000029694052,0.0000045773445,0.00037527393],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980915,0.000056144443,0.0013475423,0.00020057888,0.00013623445,0.00016799799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972003,0.0001324292,0.0019419598,0.00042124468,0.00027201857,0.00003202176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015335386,0.00013243154,0.0009875501,0.0021576735,0.00010309878,0.000062270046,0.000484693,0.000059338974,0.00006964611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036692125,0.000093395574,0.0007402048,0.006942664,0.00008044578,0.00017634276,0.00008939673,0.00018772874,6.328568e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003487476,0.00007700039,0.97063524,0.000017282113,0.005104049,7.973421e-7,0.00061861763,0.005376777,0.000008958738,0.014818099,0.00042131412,0.0028869798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030944336,0.00001743627,0.9917153,0.000045907414,0.0017516147,0.0000012160999,0.00082300097,0.0021096051,0.00006193468,0.00092781236,0.0021539545,0.00008276314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089925044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041751247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021080062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000923295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002948474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3808561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416718600","doi":"10.1017/bca.2025.10031","title":"Letter from Former SBCA Presidents and JBCA Editors to OIRA Administrator","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Diverse Perspectives in Modern Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Subject (documents); Administration (probate law)","score_opus":0.01864844290545083,"score_gpt":0.25988262435654924,"score_spread":0.2412341814510984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416718600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96598464,0.003918469,0.010645073,0.005862415,0.0025535258,0.00016024365,0.0004243768,0.000012044334,0.010439209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947139,0.00036153718,0.0013932737,0.0011843981,0.0011404954,0.0000057543675,0.000003964209,0.0000114040995,0.001185263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985874,0.000009840059,0.00076598645,0.00031460688,0.00010604137,0.00021610214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988655,0.000096278585,0.0005166061,0.0002530467,0.00014631025,0.0001222915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003118708,0.00016865609,0.0007382926,0.0010630233,0.00012209913,0.00016366216,0.00029431985,0.00007742066,0.0002675453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017832711,0.00017215028,0.00037815023,0.0007382932,0.000048562433,0.00032046792,0.00014040341,0.00017460146,0.00006485459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015977328,0.0001675773,0.8991177,0.000014634069,0.009687366,0.00002575073,0.001622636,0.0008909588,0.00004281791,0.004307666,0.081639856,0.002323255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000977679,0.0001165293,0.8188417,0.000051859995,0.0014423808,0.0000015616342,0.0008266235,0.0005859286,0.0001777788,0.016953306,0.15965083,0.00037383917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022830989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014452155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08027603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016221646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019437484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7020085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}