{"meta":{"query_hash":"f398b58fc537","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f398b58fc537","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Benefit-Cost+Analysis"},"results":[{"id":"W2028463306","doi":"10.2202/2152-2812.1106","title":"Calculating the Social Opportunity Cost Discount Rate","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunity cost; Rate of return; Confusion; Economics; Government (linguistics); Cost of funds index; Exchange rate; Subject (documents); Actuarial science; Interest rate; Internal rate of return; Finance; Financial economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Psychology; Production (economics)","score_opus":0.10186890713197494,"score_gpt":0.2691368706177416,"score_spread":0.16726796348576667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028463306","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02189383,0.004068911,0.7473907,0.08242486,0.020573594,0.00045089028,0.0011296831,0.000592445,0.121475086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50725234,0.007236794,0.42103216,0.008059103,0.010935092,0.00090189825,0.00089347176,0.0016562912,0.042032875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99072874,0.0047204765,0.00051927543,0.00055961247,0.003068527,0.00040329364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95157546,0.03034901,0.002694896,0.002691507,0.011816738,0.00087237515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013783226,0.00077390985,0.0006915109,0.0034766279,0.0011609553,0.005141613,0.0018379006,0.0030142358,0.012153975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1285488,0.0004648872,0.0014229679,0.0017278082,0.0018771313,0.005616576,0.0024116498,0.005507192,0.0029522858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066063905,0.000027656497,0.0032390591,0.00010687639,0.00005462555,0.0001893175,0.0004476541,0.015934404,0.00014306008,0.82234186,0.095073596,0.06237588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033259937,0.00006587233,0.0020876494,0.0005213351,0.000056396915,0.0004634483,0.00058272947,0.08972844,0.0012189643,0.7379576,0.16713637,0.00014800129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034771997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032191272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013783226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030762309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002900109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07289356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060631781","doi":"10.2202/2152-2812.1050","title":"A Benefit-Cost Analysis of Private and Semi-Private Hospital Rooms","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Occupancy; Business; Medical emergency; Medicine; Architectural engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.03859973499976844,"score_gpt":0.2542354784809491,"score_spread":0.21563574348118064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060631781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8935444,0.0037421968,0.05042049,0.0037701486,0.000094539675,0.00027908466,0.0020012932,0.00005956938,0.046088286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99172455,0.00048708825,0.0040074103,0.00009696125,0.000042132087,0.000052744577,0.00026111864,0.000014752958,0.0033132818],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983903,0.0009242678,0.000038587074,0.00011412416,0.00026293492,0.00026987374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99160856,0.0069601126,0.00045469528,0.00021795784,0.00043677437,0.00032186962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024059662,0.00060512766,0.0006271534,0.0014626831,0.00039791138,0.0016395116,0.0009092262,0.0012307392,0.008365574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0089501105,0.00041105913,0.0012808578,0.0013521081,0.00078594894,0.0023139082,0.0010032175,0.001434135,0.000305556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011996684,0.00039655034,0.01679544,0.00029151276,0.0002563537,0.00029519948,0.00026949868,0.7708374,0.0014603606,0.16971232,0.004295113,0.034190618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016643807,0.00079048733,0.028285906,0.00011112264,0.00039666687,0.00033428593,0.0007779284,0.89590406,0.000756251,0.06585794,0.0065285894,0.00009033457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009401498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007466754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009401498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003725303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011591149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027985632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084595276","doi":"10.1515/jbca-2014-0025","title":"Retrospective evaluation of costs associated with methyl bromide critical use exemptions for open field strawberries in California","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Plant Disease Management Techniques","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bromide; Limiting; Ex-ante; Yield (engineering); Montreal Protocol; Business; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Agricultural economics; Economics; Ozone; Chemistry; Ozone layer; Engineering","score_opus":0.04785905540599532,"score_gpt":0.3245324041492249,"score_spread":0.2766733487432296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084595276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933074,0.00017340759,0.00043504848,0.000065696186,0.00000820183,0.00010008993,0.0031283533,0.0000114185395,0.002770493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924603,0.00021111853,0.00079867616,0.000026690872,0.0000093349145,0.00006709278,0.0036358777,0.000008059703,0.0027829509],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852943,0.00022135346,0.00011435656,0.00023271542,0.00075323327,0.00014884115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939288,0.0015367153,0.0015490338,0.00024449022,0.0025433812,0.00019754117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019464375,0.00041078276,0.00024457116,0.0014449877,0.000704216,0.0009724495,0.0007753352,0.00036822612,0.0024348686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042742877,0.0003637426,0.000540474,0.0011022845,0.00026095784,0.0006259233,0.00042296769,0.00065322075,0.00020336453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027370956,0.0009342583,0.9015124,0.00039291996,0.0003565927,0.0006152606,0.00046261886,0.03467667,0.0030244186,0.0011281188,0.0056265607,0.048533127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036301815,0.0013070186,0.9782526,0.000056903904,0.0001568097,0.00016428156,0.00076823204,0.010935277,0.0026736984,0.00017491286,0.0054314197,0.000042500782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10826827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18010928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10826827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00828206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019119069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21527612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165371533","doi":"10.2202/2152-2812.1013","title":"An Assessment of Important Issues Concerning the Application of Benefit-Cost Analysis to Social Policy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Public economics; Valuation (finance); Public policy; Cost–benefit analysis; Shadow price; Shadow (psychology); Futures contract; Policy analysis; Public good; Economics; Consumption (sociology); Social Welfare; Microeconomics; Political science; Economic growth; Psychology; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.020642149177077563,"score_gpt":0.38167601618747543,"score_spread":0.36103386701039786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165371533","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060987707,0.026600856,0.39940313,0.20271032,0.0025199081,0.0016308976,0.00076666,0.0002931661,0.3050874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85550463,0.008992515,0.114481114,0.008284586,0.0025669122,0.0015105924,0.0001269301,0.00017483375,0.0083578555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9294632,0.057801597,0.0014530972,0.0013721602,0.0085373055,0.0013725547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7246472,0.25131035,0.0037840805,0.0051813438,0.013770829,0.0013061548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07803369,0.0022367118,0.003043882,0.0056860065,0.003437467,0.013345005,0.0044902386,0.008604529,0.01191656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22114298,0.0010689761,0.0028263626,0.0054464126,0.01029107,0.011377209,0.006000793,0.010205335,0.0009502129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110627116,0.00012080813,0.0011185714,0.00048784068,0.00012950924,0.00016080038,0.0004036161,0.064258635,0.00013838758,0.877527,0.00863544,0.046908755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032519827,0.00008907574,0.0008020785,0.00077069254,0.000072088485,0.00006927441,0.00062369066,0.08032022,0.00018275584,0.90234804,0.014624974,0.00006462358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009994774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067530097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07803369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0117704915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009918932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41268653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168413301","doi":"10.1515/jbca-2013-0016","title":"The most appropriate discount rate","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Social discount rate; Economics; Pareto principle; Rate of return; Discounting; Time preference; Preference; Government (linguistics); Microeconomics; Cost–benefit analysis; Actuarial science; Operations management; Finance","score_opus":0.03629818199424466,"score_gpt":0.2061210276010885,"score_spread":0.16982284560684385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168413301","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023255853,0.013826295,0.69768286,0.022685215,0.0042688693,0.00080311333,0.0018667148,0.0010306702,0.23458046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6742757,0.018527139,0.24404266,0.0028554874,0.0028464075,0.0009923816,0.0008275962,0.0011364877,0.054496113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99555737,0.001765551,0.0003935091,0.0005556374,0.0013691726,0.0003587509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98981726,0.00456335,0.001030259,0.0015329309,0.0024732144,0.0005831381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059802993,0.0011735042,0.0011485136,0.00097175007,0.0008808458,0.004333991,0.0021171083,0.0026810379,0.018146232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040360652,0.00046580724,0.00095295906,0.00085172907,0.0009395941,0.004664806,0.0015050102,0.002994564,0.0053764093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041038555,0.00012108055,0.0012322197,0.0008418068,0.000083844534,0.0004158712,0.0004598435,0.0216905,0.0032867654,0.72387373,0.0452736,0.20231041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001898031,0.00019580737,0.00093916483,0.0015778727,0.00018432329,0.0013508878,0.00064673705,0.0302402,0.0058723334,0.6996365,0.2590052,0.00016117093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011929872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070986146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018146232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014288892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018757123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060705245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253760496","doi":"10.1515/2152-2812.1084","title":"Gain and Loss Domains and the Choice of Welfare Measure of Positive and Negative Changes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Equivalence (formal languages); Compensation (psychology); Willingness to accept; Economics; Welfare; Willingness to pay; Econometrics; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Public economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04145325732786882,"score_gpt":0.22494917932136946,"score_spread":0.18349592199350062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253760496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5230928,0.0050418777,0.34124586,0.010514592,0.0006072158,0.00028891116,0.0009178606,0.00016773227,0.118123144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97994906,0.0006467946,0.01753566,0.00025149976,0.00010432536,0.000119089906,0.00015222929,0.00002686051,0.0012143933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923441,0.00531547,0.00034976704,0.00042139617,0.0012002181,0.00036897237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789342,0.016317185,0.0013331843,0.0013272649,0.001270064,0.00081812625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018889224,0.0008608896,0.0009768603,0.0036014344,0.00079487695,0.005000773,0.0010161792,0.0015874283,0.003593379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0460872,0.00026999452,0.0010574854,0.0019275353,0.008547708,0.0097098425,0.0031253102,0.0025516965,0.00036269534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077556865,0.00034590275,0.013275144,0.00029741347,0.0001965305,0.00026637554,0.0008093048,0.023591196,0.0017812802,0.8411854,0.0026451126,0.11483079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045226847,0.0002938204,0.01594899,0.00035294192,0.00006633103,0.0003286908,0.0012923192,0.02741869,0.001033126,0.9474176,0.0057264804,0.00007582195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063406775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058930233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018889224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016909295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005566415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09989691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338022816","doi":"10.1017/bca.2015.2","title":"Musings on the Social Discount Rate","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Marginal product; Social discount rate; Rate of return; Productivity; Total factor productivity; Investment (military); Discounting; Yield (engineering); National Income and Product Accounts; Econometrics; Microeconomics; National accounts; Macroeconomics; Production (economics); Finance; Cost–benefit analysis","score_opus":0.07198001588244686,"score_gpt":0.2603267233446281,"score_spread":0.18834670746218124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338022816","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09650868,0.018871702,0.70496726,0.01454516,0.0027211246,0.00015862608,0.0017672052,0.00034132486,0.16011892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9100216,0.012245286,0.057901543,0.0015482001,0.0029766446,0.00017154796,0.00047314417,0.00024508513,0.014416961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481946,0.0022295502,0.00040819377,0.0008773545,0.0012144591,0.00045091458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9583203,0.028786534,0.003564145,0.0051969225,0.003448193,0.0006837851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009717401,0.0009868216,0.00087270763,0.0016276685,0.000934146,0.0044362936,0.0016314759,0.0016560875,0.0062995357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061412908,0.00048035607,0.0012667647,0.0016690588,0.0028748084,0.008425596,0.0019580324,0.004339923,0.00077300845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008206019,0.000013254014,0.0024976267,0.000098592696,0.00006561667,0.00008203233,0.00031846637,0.011430749,0.00028139236,0.9519514,0.0024702759,0.030708445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000144027235,0.000074275915,0.0035904578,0.0002844999,0.00007849695,0.00028170878,0.00027809956,0.03747874,0.00079307397,0.9161643,0.040866226,0.00009575485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003685005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001866529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009717401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028700393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000750971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051391184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2412873720","doi":"10.1017/bca.2015.4","title":"The Curiously Continuing Saga of Choosing the Measure of Welfare Changes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Willingness to accept; Compensation (psychology); Value (mathematics); Valuation (finance); Welfare; Contingent valuation; Willingness to pay; Measure (data warehouse); Estimation; Public economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Actuarial science; Statistics; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Accounting","score_opus":0.08825541393482839,"score_gpt":0.22803332309506436,"score_spread":0.13977790916023597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2412873720","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011945641,0.05446625,0.28397495,0.591747,0.013930638,0.00015420697,0.0006883516,0.0003468618,0.04274616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4260174,0.050671525,0.2971983,0.17871936,0.032181226,0.0012087014,0.00067378575,0.0009783173,0.012351362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95670015,0.02047361,0.0033089828,0.007582338,0.011356061,0.00057882915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9077524,0.058081385,0.0046744416,0.010956194,0.016366396,0.0021692095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06728905,0.001794002,0.0039449553,0.006678769,0.0041509047,0.012717504,0.007424605,0.010408324,0.004456911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12806742,0.0007846454,0.0016931753,0.0061318995,0.04972444,0.02232524,0.006538946,0.030276928,0.0029089276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109900604,0.000065251836,0.0016930938,0.00056437886,0.0001076411,0.000035525427,0.0008455327,0.0007747173,0.00033005196,0.9265087,0.02660375,0.04236143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018269302,0.000082637875,0.0011008505,0.00064501114,0.000032799206,0.00014296979,0.0011081574,0.001814312,0.00031304522,0.94272614,0.051937282,0.00007860779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034918897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023255444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06728905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054331236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029290426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35586274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598689210","doi":"10.2202/2152-2812.1065","title":"Appropriate Discounting for Benefit-Cost Analysis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation","keywords":"Discounting; Generality; Hyperbolic discounting; Cost–benefit analysis; Economics; Order (exchange); Range (aeronautics); Microeconomics; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Computer science; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.10371656375519336,"score_gpt":0.2368113089852115,"score_spread":0.13309474523001813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598689210","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007002354,0.0010769041,0.9812102,0.00073925854,0.00015925699,0.00023726076,0.00015092391,0.00006938168,0.009354568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4578161,0.0031332783,0.53173923,0.0004907305,0.0002498402,0.000682049,0.0002911039,0.000282129,0.0053155283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901058,0.006171314,0.00045195443,0.0006777484,0.0021596258,0.00043359995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747892,0.018297898,0.0014169962,0.0025851098,0.0026290542,0.0002818236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018350096,0.0015020352,0.0011205231,0.0015837739,0.0005553328,0.0031577984,0.0020974702,0.0015077025,0.0042566378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.093950324,0.0007783964,0.001419514,0.0018934086,0.0014065244,0.0064852643,0.0016617009,0.0054891105,0.00062049826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010833031,0.00004904241,0.0011011258,0.0003117199,0.000062384126,0.00012413146,0.0002838514,0.103985675,0.00075689773,0.8371343,0.003148632,0.05293389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031439566,0.000053776723,0.00070663844,0.00024249002,0.000065304834,0.00014171173,0.00016721513,0.25126046,0.0013404074,0.72838515,0.017542696,0.000062684456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003071628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018703938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018350096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003437875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001969656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09704572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752647198","doi":"10.1017/bca.2017.16","title":"Building a Set of Internationally Comparable Value of Statistical Life Studies: Estimates of Chinese Willingness to Pay to Reduce Mortality Risk","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic Research Service; Fudan University; World Bank Group; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"China; Willingness to pay; Preference; Economics; Payment; Demographic economics; Estimation; Household income; Geography; Demography; Socioeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.10858005907581163,"score_gpt":0.35370489164326496,"score_spread":0.24512483256745332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752647198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8195154,0.0009250036,0.14265321,0.00056338724,0.000116457726,0.0010591423,0.0069215293,0.00014395868,0.028101886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395479,0.00032856344,0.051592886,0.00012657497,0.000031300628,0.0012659001,0.005774329,0.000025777877,0.0013068048],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99346477,0.0038883938,0.00067305146,0.00073250866,0.0010910154,0.0001502717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817254,0.0058761844,0.002965454,0.004558188,0.0045170924,0.0003577629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01658897,0.0009291649,0.00085825555,0.006840777,0.00088470796,0.0025443062,0.0014966498,0.0006197539,0.0030479755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039461195,0.00038729663,0.0022253478,0.0052385586,0.00073489634,0.002298909,0.0024653547,0.0011238898,0.00033242197],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049089483,0.0006046087,0.60132766,0.0009074248,0.0027945773,0.0003691645,0.005091165,0.04428875,0.0023853406,0.045834146,0.004454461,0.29145184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025986173,0.0017323279,0.81822103,0.0006584742,0.0014871722,0.00030670807,0.006085563,0.112095006,0.005508749,0.02804379,0.025224162,0.00037725162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02167177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01240152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02167177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002456885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023212524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0877319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774655121","doi":"10.1515/jbca-2013-0023","title":"The choice of the social discount rate and the opportunity cost of public funds","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Social discount rate; Economics; Crowding out; Government (linguistics); Public economics; Viewpoints; Opportunity cost; Consumption (sociology); Rate of return; Revenue; Social cost; Investment (military); Finance; Microeconomics; Cost–benefit analysis; Monetary economics; Political science","score_opus":0.05938591816842495,"score_gpt":0.2565203290424134,"score_spread":0.19713441087398845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774655121","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07474889,0.014562273,0.7478227,0.03605668,0.002474491,0.0005038609,0.0005456888,0.00016321489,0.12312214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84806716,0.008332016,0.13310368,0.0018309454,0.001000097,0.0006547298,0.00011502591,0.000131727,0.006764643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.974163,0.017903399,0.001196606,0.0016047711,0.004403609,0.0007285772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9031632,0.08114197,0.005866567,0.0054880683,0.0036138578,0.00072629726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03592352,0.0013004297,0.0012382694,0.0022167177,0.001018448,0.007637672,0.0025920677,0.004147254,0.0028685918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13139908,0.0008202958,0.0015358252,0.0020830133,0.007203292,0.0098556755,0.002523142,0.006307577,0.00044976283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008473028,0.000016767806,0.0010342506,0.000100537014,0.00005315069,0.000043491716,0.0003261356,0.007029467,0.00011632683,0.9684997,0.0009785795,0.021716768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049643826,0.00009941192,0.001550237,0.0005239627,0.00009105644,0.00014920252,0.00054014643,0.019508054,0.00070191827,0.9576513,0.019016212,0.00011879556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023023426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017499928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03592352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005815696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024677422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18998402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904453811","doi":"10.1017/bca.2018.24","title":"Most Consumers Don’t Buy Hybrids: Is Rational Choice a Sufficient Explanation?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Association of Canadian Universities for Research in Astronomy","keywords":"Alternative fuel vehicle; Economics; Electric vehicle; Microeconomics; Public economics; Rational expectations; Gasoline; Business; Environmental economics; Marketing; Alternative fuels; Econometrics; Engineering; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.012805788480688902,"score_gpt":0.2598210689355955,"score_spread":0.2470152804549066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904453811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7368754,0.0040136296,0.04017125,0.12548554,0.00042192164,0.00021731023,0.0011281226,0.00015286826,0.09153401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904991,0.0006722647,0.0011875534,0.0045329365,0.00018553266,0.000033605993,0.00014048375,0.000013873277,0.0027347181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876046,0.0004091466,0.000047382262,0.00026272004,0.00024468076,0.0002756314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98830557,0.008238368,0.0016071004,0.00089227,0.0006547905,0.0003019203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030049612,0.0003607181,0.00092918356,0.0006339578,0.0006933629,0.0025361509,0.0011248378,0.003148344,0.012734315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015616571,0.0002463606,0.00091090926,0.0007202753,0.002769871,0.0033884596,0.00069485395,0.0026125072,0.001235359],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012772871,0.0009713456,0.14650182,0.0005041154,0.00035293726,0.0028292625,0.005182553,0.009421157,0.0010198903,0.6930389,0.03684714,0.1020536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027051105,0.0001479884,0.03506778,0.00013594136,0.00010864226,0.0005950117,0.004300111,0.029203137,0.0004214045,0.9119877,0.0176845,0.00007720269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045485375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030759326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012734315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010137251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055918464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042600572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914979035","doi":"10.1017/bca.2018.29","title":"Accounting for Timing when Assessing Health-Related Policies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; Harvard University; University of Pittsburgh; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Discounting; Net present value; Key (lock); Value (mathematics); Consumption (sociology); Cost–benefit analysis; Present value; Actuarial science; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Econometrics; Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Production (economics); Finance","score_opus":0.2730674512870271,"score_gpt":0.44256298978370545,"score_spread":0.16949553849667837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914979035","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016507672,0.014263986,0.9176213,0.007868964,0.0019099521,0.0030150888,0.002369913,0.00047493077,0.03596819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33586693,0.020011397,0.62773395,0.0017064527,0.000951286,0.004173738,0.001325423,0.0003541464,0.007876772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89108366,0.083749,0.007505468,0.002785073,0.012728335,0.0021484075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6146042,0.3274319,0.028359234,0.013487123,0.014844518,0.0012730514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14678703,0.0032748126,0.0042992737,0.008086463,0.0014182086,0.01081954,0.0045296764,0.00476973,0.011713527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36981642,0.0018778436,0.0044098017,0.011032836,0.0022814341,0.023647698,0.0048377337,0.0078024073,0.0011103236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004964291,0.00015853115,0.009698891,0.0031532722,0.0008465302,0.00021464437,0.0010693249,0.19479702,0.000505307,0.5768408,0.0071456484,0.20507374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012865567,0.00063239265,0.006491613,0.004765056,0.001006043,0.00019377594,0.0016416663,0.11005832,0.0024086512,0.8107869,0.061598316,0.0002885794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013801218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011084662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14678703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00993036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015792852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7762933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980752308","doi":"10.1515/jbca-2012-0008","title":"More appropriate discounting: the rate of social time preference and the value of the social discount rate","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Discounting; Time preference; Social discount rate; Economics; Shadow price; Stochastic discount factor; Contrast (vision); Value (mathematics); Investment (military); Preference; Econometrics; Shadow (psychology); Microeconomics; Present value; Range (aeronautics); Cost–benefit analysis; Statistics; Mathematics; Finance; Computer science; Capital asset pricing model","score_opus":0.03481651152743741,"score_gpt":0.21386165985612648,"score_spread":0.17904514832868906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980752308","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1112911,0.015681548,0.75142103,0.016377732,0.0029210285,0.00034044145,0.0011479965,0.00017766203,0.10064144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8887847,0.006181956,0.09129125,0.0013594286,0.001347914,0.00018175264,0.00037586357,0.00021143598,0.010265588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99005765,0.0057802964,0.0005558252,0.0010508315,0.0020992705,0.00045610315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9487729,0.03382198,0.0058104,0.0057828533,0.005257683,0.00055417523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014794982,0.0012785041,0.0010909021,0.0018444861,0.00076478923,0.005473465,0.0020187476,0.0022987428,0.0059153405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09385983,0.00050162117,0.0018429093,0.0023880485,0.0022998543,0.009730433,0.0015322508,0.006129087,0.00049425825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022158418,0.000068797584,0.0073044975,0.00030142,0.00022133559,0.00029146837,0.001240647,0.029042117,0.00077350956,0.8909476,0.004700106,0.06488694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008012023,0.00016994451,0.010381097,0.0005852776,0.00021113262,0.0007224954,0.0010061238,0.08598931,0.0018940392,0.84430385,0.054375794,0.00028083348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053662527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037336566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014794982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032418869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011473775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07824427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091409955","doi":"10.1017/bca.2020.18","title":"Efficiency without Apology: Consideration of the Marginal Excess Tax Burden and Distributional Impacts in Benefit–Cost Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Allocative efficiency; Economics; Inclusion (mineral); Public economics; Offset (computer science); Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02665836988985898,"score_gpt":0.24468284168588686,"score_spread":0.21802447179602788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091409955","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05192265,0.0034841495,0.6978106,0.06515678,0.0011060978,0.00058575807,0.00026096776,0.00017846798,0.17949454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8977132,0.0012816392,0.08591566,0.0046428833,0.0007907876,0.00051552476,0.000054976932,0.00020845875,0.008876953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9528496,0.03307185,0.0016478552,0.0018521628,0.00895424,0.0016243339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7490936,0.20858552,0.009344123,0.013946727,0.01696752,0.002062483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061693497,0.00092251453,0.0020753131,0.0028839866,0.0023181206,0.009646326,0.002890947,0.00484003,0.010247344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23116775,0.0008484335,0.0012713694,0.0031133622,0.012771476,0.01460157,0.0051373243,0.010286762,0.0006877345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004109815,0.000030348614,0.00070740486,0.00009018766,0.000035306377,0.00005200081,0.00024574116,0.009621289,0.00007195382,0.97461194,0.0025153144,0.011977439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018849587,0.000027513906,0.00047646524,0.00018128517,0.000035415822,0.000047639704,0.00019112557,0.019435281,0.00022871683,0.9732878,0.006047478,0.000022397637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040092515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035110349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061693497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074775754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00965717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32627034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108247818","doi":"10.1017/bca.2020.25","title":"Averting Expenditures and Willingness to Pay for Electricity Supply Reliability","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Electricity; Willingness to pay; Economic shortage; Business; Mains electricity; Reliability (semiconductor); Service (business); Value (mathematics); Actuarial science; Environmental economics; Economics; Marketing; Microeconomics; Engineering; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Computer science","score_opus":0.0536239802309804,"score_gpt":0.2336543095594796,"score_spread":0.18003032932849922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108247818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99041533,0.000098926255,0.003997583,0.0005480494,0.000010027509,0.000033160515,0.00017655065,0.000011738538,0.00470861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99920696,0.00002285976,0.00019276641,0.000017417693,0.0000037597881,0.0000057097536,0.000042221367,7.1944424e-7,0.0005075155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991385,0.00044581582,0.00004179324,0.00007174451,0.00010285809,0.00019921582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98857915,0.007886646,0.0023068609,0.00035472956,0.00039273276,0.0004797939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017393744,0.00026846366,0.00030726226,0.0005150528,0.0002602708,0.0013189267,0.0003641024,0.0011827191,0.0058450596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0102400975,0.0002303169,0.00061038753,0.00046005016,0.0005580529,0.0009334507,0.0005547498,0.0013057832,0.00025518032],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010647849,0.001326709,0.6694596,0.00021189058,0.00066802924,0.0012913747,0.0009936838,0.22880234,0.0032116575,0.049974263,0.00198948,0.041006215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009547687,0.0020179325,0.46848455,0.00012763344,0.00034781423,0.0013981268,0.0033762471,0.4720795,0.0017847406,0.047033384,0.0031143383,0.00014020372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026510393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024763036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058450596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00118162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038711043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019553721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140502103","doi":"10.1017/bca.2021.5","title":"Economic Activity and the Value of Medical Innovation during a Pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shutdown; Nonmarket forces; Quarter (Canadian coin); Activity-based costing; Value (mathematics); Fell; Pandemic; Production (economics); Economics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Business; Market economy; Factor market; Geography; Engineering; Macroeconomics; Accounting","score_opus":0.3162840270995809,"score_gpt":0.5194715721863609,"score_spread":0.20318754508677994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140502103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8831747,0.005876286,0.0015724578,0.030613698,0.0002856918,0.0000650533,0.001280631,0.00001982697,0.077111624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870574,0.00045841874,0.00008225303,0.00016874763,0.00006423779,0.0000051825878,0.00006743256,0.0000016456058,0.00044635922],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834514,0.0009101263,0.00007403605,0.000054075914,0.000268971,0.00034771004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99096996,0.0038477334,0.0024719834,0.00019199992,0.0010100702,0.001508343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024892017,0.000116968404,0.00016087038,0.0012396979,0.00050171866,0.0022752872,0.00027718823,0.000927921,0.00375409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018243577,0.000086336644,0.0002809011,0.0012059031,0.00091635424,0.0012331066,0.0011662545,0.00092262786,0.00025376244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019041239,0.00072474405,0.6696799,0.00036457303,0.0005362184,0.0015822987,0.0017694457,0.036924366,0.0012779612,0.12277221,0.016040755,0.14642335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010385087,0.0008389908,0.8409251,0.0005818501,0.0001572306,0.000983161,0.007694546,0.031619217,0.000704818,0.07045197,0.04582491,0.00011436458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004076622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003936817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004076622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002692956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011874106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01953882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307454518","doi":"10.1017/bca.2022.14","title":"Risk Perception, Learning, and Willingness to Pay to Reduce Heart Disease Risk","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Risk perception; Willingness to pay; Actuarial science; Perception; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Risk assessment; Estimation; Econometrics; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0266242929903668,"score_gpt":0.23351629778601732,"score_spread":0.2068920047956505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307454518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996869,0.00010660148,0.0012992579,0.00017779143,0.0000045303273,0.000014212337,0.00008818302,0.0000062060153,0.0014342294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99943775,0.000026369053,0.00034111724,0.000020849016,0.0000045948573,0.0000057636594,0.000051748866,9.3236474e-7,0.00011083146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974674,0.0015289129,0.00015469301,0.00021353071,0.0004404521,0.0001950848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.924191,0.05709122,0.012290487,0.002601046,0.0019067794,0.0019194721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061294814,0.00025380333,0.0003683427,0.00069776404,0.00021604745,0.0014083339,0.00029874066,0.0007893577,0.0034149513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040475722,0.00017798427,0.0005849997,0.00055654807,0.00062121876,0.00090182474,0.00055738183,0.0013447099,0.0002689945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005268138,0.00087431254,0.96410275,0.000064579355,0.00030530812,0.00006423,0.0007111169,0.0063637025,0.000641871,0.0012142947,0.0002414302,0.024889586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025608426,0.00056695676,0.97713125,0.000031943626,0.00007098069,0.00008340868,0.0007232302,0.016848184,0.0004721739,0.0036264458,0.0003818668,0.00003796722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016792014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014467845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061294814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004368659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023845576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032416224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377241589","doi":"10.1017/bca.2023.18","title":"A Test of Hirschman’s Hiding Hand Principle in World Bank-Financed Hydropower Projects","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Public-Private Partnership Projects","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Hydropower; Test (biology); Business; Phase (matter); Operations management; Computer security; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03574084530202451,"score_gpt":0.2898847448359412,"score_spread":0.2541438995339167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377241589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877247,0.0000962203,0.0023148824,0.0002964297,0.00001866031,0.000073757146,0.000090806374,0.0000045038814,0.009380117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999368,0.000013753048,0.00033366313,0.000026959846,0.000011724025,0.00003484796,0.00003090027,8.2218213e-7,0.00017940649],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97799,0.00958463,0.001535361,0.0023201688,0.0067457743,0.0018241978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6019945,0.3403513,0.04146465,0.006309852,0.005678258,0.0042014685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033632703,0.00033884682,0.00064645003,0.0021495149,0.0010561896,0.0017595985,0.0012504571,0.0008968218,0.006357971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11786648,0.00021400016,0.0009865819,0.001863298,0.0065800054,0.0024547335,0.0022036477,0.0011924157,0.00023259789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027351738,0.0006796355,0.9107149,0.0002200709,0.00066892133,0.00088551233,0.002635096,0.0074317823,0.0013151001,0.0431654,0.0008808261,0.028667504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040622568,0.0066616307,0.9109319,0.00016580419,0.00042939428,0.00040848923,0.013846148,0.02774834,0.00349867,0.032693308,0.003122351,0.00008769589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042076525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030460793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033632703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017416684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002801256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1778689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384131644","doi":"10.1017/bca.2023.25","title":"Best Investments in Chronic, Noncommunicable Disease Prevention and Control in Low- and Lower–Middle-Income Countries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; RTI International; Imperial College London; Harvard University","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Business; Investment (military); Population; Environmental health; Economic growth; Public economics; Medicine; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.025353526066580784,"score_gpt":0.3094261310966016,"score_spread":0.28407260503002085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384131644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8262174,0.024625342,0.047928434,0.023738813,0.0007038355,0.0003998827,0.012882385,0.0006803671,0.06282356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98842317,0.0019123647,0.0070661847,0.0006090331,0.000031911113,0.000075366406,0.000864957,0.000024399431,0.0009927506],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962036,0.0023911104,0.000119484,0.00020403256,0.0003721658,0.0007096487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612963,0.0019764297,0.000624866,0.00024469438,0.0005230559,0.0005012899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052425954,0.0010319026,0.0013760377,0.001715649,0.00070313906,0.00455641,0.0009112057,0.0015269738,0.0044849557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010525351,0.00086446037,0.002086972,0.002246187,0.00094812113,0.0031976996,0.0022476912,0.001464513,0.00040290307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010353121,0.0004112096,0.066654675,0.0015600784,0.0020212668,0.0005914967,0.0002411528,0.7969459,0.00068443,0.058324877,0.014240221,0.05728936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009736405,0.0022815652,0.129637,0.0037441456,0.0035726002,0.00079372374,0.002975918,0.6672594,0.0037336557,0.11131716,0.07335486,0.00035633837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026095135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0193072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026095135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051185056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004061555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05188644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386093884","doi":"10.1017/bca.2023.13","title":"One Million Lives Saved Per Year: A Cost–Benefit Analysis of the Global Plan to End Tuberculosis, 2023–2030 and Beyond","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Harvard University; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Cost–benefit analysis; Psychological intervention; Tuberculosis; Yield (engineering); Benefit–cost ratio; Investment (military); Economics; Medicine; Internal rate of return; Actuarial science; Production (economics)","score_opus":0.143966932762344,"score_gpt":0.37224834293825027,"score_spread":0.22828141017590625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386093884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91591716,0.010703244,0.018316846,0.0053968416,0.00029534314,0.00094690244,0.011287081,0.00014090189,0.036995687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906006,0.0017364038,0.0043252613,0.00030666142,0.000038834587,0.00017103947,0.0014410119,0.00001491057,0.0013652287],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978902,0.001543863,0.000045687077,0.000082554754,0.00027020997,0.00016758114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979315,0.0015865536,0.00017201398,0.00005569186,0.00017743233,0.00007689751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043327543,0.0007769557,0.00080247043,0.0013921639,0.00023951757,0.0013444121,0.00044622153,0.00080623646,0.0035858117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060996255,0.00031465958,0.002391896,0.0019686045,0.00045275028,0.0010716798,0.00090004137,0.0013430063,0.00027561132],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007960819,0.0007389139,0.030534357,0.0011876385,0.002667334,0.00042943837,0.0001455492,0.8472988,0.0017938312,0.028096385,0.009204842,0.06994217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002231408,0.009007642,0.119310535,0.0012190866,0.00908917,0.000601876,0.0015840075,0.77040285,0.004319425,0.047980275,0.03391098,0.0003427287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012103179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00985757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012103179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036916286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016514363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026784778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396616770","doi":"10.1017/bca.2024.9","title":"Renewable Energy Support Through Feed-in Tariffs: A Retrospective Stakeholder Analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Renewable energy; Feed-in tariff; Environmental economics; Stakeholder; Business; Natural resource economics; Environmental resource management; Economics; Energy policy; Engineering; Management","score_opus":0.0786791606550922,"score_gpt":0.2679076918844887,"score_spread":0.1892285312293965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396616770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690833,0.00021501197,0.008959691,0.0004986082,0.0000044223616,0.0003832226,0.0042872997,0.000021769662,0.01654671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99625045,0.00008964529,0.0012762964,0.00004172521,0.000003956803,0.000063584645,0.0012993659,0.0000043419864,0.00097058766],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960289,0.0021229119,0.00017296594,0.00018259315,0.0011266164,0.0003660057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866065,0.005962662,0.0018701289,0.0007829497,0.004602522,0.00017519455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072023715,0.00026965034,0.00034714918,0.0021909832,0.0005351242,0.0013608504,0.0005223324,0.00048007406,0.0022540167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017171655,0.0001990865,0.00065291295,0.0021407756,0.0004316204,0.0013284702,0.000780851,0.00060081144,0.00022512658],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010646689,0.0007745786,0.7524365,0.00038367612,0.000656983,0.00080280314,0.0023257877,0.10536466,0.002234506,0.04722651,0.0075453613,0.07918395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102359314,0.0012129426,0.68659097,0.00038998903,0.0005873291,0.0004994962,0.016135186,0.23449792,0.00558458,0.016797427,0.037427578,0.00017418782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08401296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068183035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08401296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046117716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021561114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16704792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402447284","doi":"10.1017/bca.2024.16","title":"Valuing a Reduction in the Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Large-Scale Multi-Country Stated Preference Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Kidney disease; Valuation (finance); Contingent valuation; Medicine; Preference; Environmental health; Actuarial science; Economics; Finance; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.051535722289975286,"score_gpt":0.23542473462865035,"score_spread":0.18388901233867505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402447284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79866695,0.0009829294,0.18929331,0.0011727607,0.000047998055,0.0006768305,0.0009887198,0.000055875644,0.0081146415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97275734,0.0002481238,0.02599005,0.0000741176,0.000014764066,0.00025530622,0.00026773015,0.0000050734643,0.00038750458],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817591,0.01631072,0.0003688201,0.0005491377,0.0006364762,0.00037590077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.960426,0.0343523,0.0021514485,0.0015011441,0.0011024955,0.00046670286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017315561,0.0011249412,0.0016129131,0.0026470078,0.00071583287,0.0032030314,0.0015793653,0.0014422835,0.004769608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030207597,0.00074347894,0.0027611023,0.0030593406,0.0011521654,0.0031800717,0.0024743527,0.0017106282,0.00023418448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023471026,0.0024677925,0.13092792,0.001232351,0.0044394685,0.002178432,0.0020553507,0.6732292,0.0036481766,0.0695536,0.0022959583,0.10562464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014921225,0.0013835239,0.030694705,0.00016156479,0.0004261052,0.00030516266,0.0030075216,0.9064037,0.00080035505,0.055102788,0.0014066723,0.00015865486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004798602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048269127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017315561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026373386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008855446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09157455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408273049","doi":"10.1017/bca.2024.39","title":"Economic Evaluation Under Ambiguity and Structural Uncertainties","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; The Graduate School, Northwestern University; University of Alberta","keywords":"Ambiguity; Econometrics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.11257570239479595,"score_gpt":0.43621619406841794,"score_spread":0.32364049167362197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408273049","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22736323,0.008788775,0.6064593,0.042669818,0.00091836427,0.0011793671,0.00062953704,0.0001395514,0.11185205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95886767,0.0010487436,0.037723605,0.0008185715,0.00030092263,0.0002633743,0.000047761172,0.000020993813,0.00090831815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8685243,0.10458914,0.004610538,0.0047600023,0.014708211,0.0028077336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5875336,0.36843008,0.022151256,0.009501397,0.010740834,0.0016428311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09107116,0.0014826774,0.002742179,0.0028707709,0.0015927113,0.010383203,0.001869382,0.004233672,0.004154521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2902135,0.0007902473,0.0015928319,0.0024425327,0.010907502,0.0107271895,0.005076777,0.005938411,0.00032069976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047812337,0.00011530798,0.0023493313,0.00065763853,0.00032987449,0.0005194739,0.0011840226,0.14221789,0.00046111693,0.8184387,0.0014675538,0.03178098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006258664,0.00009871119,0.0005789403,0.00036450126,0.00007348646,0.000051197654,0.000375831,0.05048241,0.0004441102,0.94564515,0.0017716358,0.000051468083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017111013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010069842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09107116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075428206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004280862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4816361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408911915","doi":"10.1017/bca.2024.45","title":"Ex-Ante Analysis of the Costs and Benefits of Legalizing Cannabis Markets in the Czech Republic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Czech; Ex-ante; Cannabis; Economics; Business; Macroeconomics; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.031573738837063096,"score_gpt":0.26027007220956055,"score_spread":0.22869633337249745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408911915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9417135,0.0015991023,0.012458947,0.0015242188,0.00007224175,0.0007121861,0.004274331,0.00008632668,0.03755901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99704057,0.00023596376,0.0010330672,0.00005828211,0.00000645381,0.0000665501,0.00028975532,0.0000063524562,0.0012629664],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745625,0.0011738897,0.000091904156,0.00018975092,0.00037806883,0.0007101061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99458104,0.0036019667,0.00064580474,0.00029379054,0.00058233534,0.00029502282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003947227,0.00082552695,0.0011790835,0.0016752046,0.0008903866,0.0033642533,0.0016555476,0.0015340932,0.0059176995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009480061,0.0008952611,0.0028339482,0.0015570326,0.0012725295,0.0017033508,0.0016595814,0.0018980219,0.00027397857],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011361096,0.00019634078,0.009784742,0.00025188547,0.00033432315,0.00041616493,0.00003987627,0.95926076,0.0010220361,0.019617572,0.0008285522,0.007111627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001151885,0.002243702,0.0625449,0.00045147524,0.002275682,0.0006979899,0.0009659825,0.89067173,0.0039810627,0.026232908,0.008491111,0.00029162943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054271728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035053167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054271728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009962953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063432963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10791165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416718600","doi":"10.1017/bca.2025.10031","title":"Letter from Former SBCA Presidents and JBCA Editors to OIRA Administrator","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","topic":"Diverse Perspectives in Modern Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Subject (documents); Administration (probate law)","score_opus":0.01864844290545083,"score_gpt":0.25988262435654924,"score_spread":0.2412341814510984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416718600","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002269254,0.0032565168,0.00065195304,0.69803226,0.17847648,0.00023886496,0.0009375861,0.00057373015,0.1155634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012035289,0.0029580023,0.0009753442,0.30229566,0.05559181,0.00020547051,0.00041977348,0.0003671051,0.6251516],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978478,0.00024652676,0.00015367517,0.00026505932,0.001066299,0.00042068484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904603,0.0016609879,0.00034636701,0.0003299368,0.004626583,0.00257592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003814492,0.0006616908,0.00076827506,0.0009077896,0.004513063,0.005331745,0.0009835478,0.008759384,0.13147354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016529316,0.00048964657,0.0006981469,0.0007732641,0.0008930018,0.0025971062,0.0013887865,0.00974799,0.06891046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012477407,0.000009359176,0.00010269143,0.000009644313,8.5337155e-7,0.000038665243,0.00002005238,0.0000075511325,0.00003566146,0.0003371317,0.99743867,0.0019871895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009844869,0.000011207694,0.0006024729,0.00004675844,0.000003497491,0.00006830305,0.0002549461,0.00006982752,0.00007593554,0.00034762872,0.9984977,0.000011789936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008432455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019335318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13147354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001990364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006325022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4398228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}