{"meta":{"query_hash":"69c32031a9a9","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Child Custody"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/69c32031a9a9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Child+Custody"},"results":[{"id":"W1964942449","doi":"10.1300/j190v03n02_04","title":"Is “Best Interests” a Solution to Filling Potholes in Child Custody Planning?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Custody","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Best interests; Best practice; Ethnography; Work (physics); Sociology; Law; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.02984319559742418,"score_gpt":0.33420373925291674,"score_spread":0.3043605436554926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964942449","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05013515,0.0049136784,0.05641558,0.7079323,0.000839967,0.00007921888,0.00002718961,0.00010115536,0.17955583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97772455,0.0011009059,0.0072308946,0.010018081,0.00036043447,0.000084491134,0.000007853804,0.00004002788,0.0034328394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9145772,0.070840284,0.0012234186,0.0028226152,0.0063709146,0.0041656015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92908126,0.052950196,0.0051279184,0.003943217,0.0049645756,0.0039327163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06919281,0.0006442263,0.0009437923,0.002092218,0.014043556,0.019837925,0.0037469775,0.008568298,0.0048090066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06155791,0.00070120214,0.00063333183,0.0019494458,0.12361216,0.030745035,0.012074074,0.013388673,0.0004938198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001060302,0.000020689658,0.0004053474,0.000035445275,0.0000059637155,0.00009140867,0.015309395,0.00016493953,0.0000392343,0.97432005,0.0030114995,0.0065854588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013726949,0.000024170158,0.00034628363,0.00026240724,0.000007812858,0.00008806516,0.03748814,0.00036781162,0.00023298312,0.9253185,0.03582681,0.000023357186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073842914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008154297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06919281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013870117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017650101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3659309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973540500","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2014.953661","title":"The Ecological Validity of Parent-Child Observations: A Review of Empirical Evidence Related to Custody Evaluations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Child Custody","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Psychology; Empirical evidence; Best practice; Ecological validity; Criminology; Psychiatry; Cognition; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.23682099091796052,"score_gpt":0.4733131804116628,"score_spread":0.2364921894937023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973540500","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004663523,0.99838555,0.00017283519,0.000402898,0.00005703888,0.00001618043,0.000022512171,0.000002722156,0.00047390794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004771583,0.9943141,0.0005590515,0.0001875824,0.00005874054,0.000032272146,0.000032043856,0.0000032497528,0.000041498213],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.98059183,0.010039152,0.0030315712,0.0014688437,0.0046244836,0.00024411615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8383722,0.14076564,0.009640662,0.002075324,0.008626107,0.0005200445],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026856406,0.0011409563,0.0027622578,0.010403296,0.0011284782,0.0036458015,0.0026937937,0.002032863,0.002481874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.098157935,0.0010974042,0.0015378549,0.012059857,0.00454255,0.0041705314,0.0021837812,0.0024263796,0.0005174113],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010851153,0.00009298449,0.008098458,0.11446768,0.0006717921,0.00026926564,0.0026103933,0.00020195088,0.0001362238,0.004726253,0.00585241,0.862764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081436,0.00038700848,0.07712338,0.59362024,0.0034777524,0.0047578006,0.010073825,0.00037776952,0.0007224294,0.009831811,0.29933593,0.00021061733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01279047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018526675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9731436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004004344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011600385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14203197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987589187","doi":"10.1080/15379410802070393","title":"Parenting Coordination in Canada: An Overview of Legal and Practice Issues","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Custody","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Confidentiality; Arbitration; Mental health; Psychology; Dispute resolution; Legislation; Witness; Collateral; Fidelity; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Psychotherapist; Criminology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.07569656913395734,"score_gpt":0.3964755940512216,"score_spread":0.3207790249172643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987589187","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07847823,0.385921,0.004165524,0.3789681,0.0024165695,0.00040286142,0.0012059138,0.0001908334,0.14825101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51763874,0.43053624,0.009490776,0.024010185,0.0008203854,0.0002122806,0.0006284684,0.00008597869,0.01657693],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931722,0.0011250459,0.00042859206,0.00038535468,0.002969375,0.0019194109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97944975,0.0043018237,0.0016091274,0.00024804604,0.008932818,0.005458413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070364936,0.0004558262,0.0004558996,0.0050777867,0.012994215,0.006276882,0.002384246,0.0028751174,0.0054022577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012417948,0.0005174739,0.0004228123,0.0106408335,0.005099506,0.0018193707,0.0027481813,0.0029612107,0.00025339882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009693956,0.00019057274,0.05547224,0.00398663,0.000048270525,0.0052247145,0.020412557,0.0023457534,0.00068021455,0.13515708,0.18495294,0.59143203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041658994,0.000101374295,0.12622356,0.01040257,0.00006890365,0.0029012458,0.041162506,0.0017358273,0.0005204076,0.012623456,0.8039669,0.00025160753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9874669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8274924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17250758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42416596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9597739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993613376","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2014.954688","title":"Parental Support Provided by Nonoffending Caregivers to Sexually Abused Children: A Comparison Between Mothers and Fathers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Custody","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social support; Psychology; Child support; Support group; Child sexual abuse; Sexual abuse; Developmental psychology; Child custody; Clinical psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Psychiatry; Poison control; Social psychology; Medicine; Medical emergency; Criminology","score_opus":0.013332215348294695,"score_gpt":0.28505944993447485,"score_spread":0.27172723458618014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993613376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99974364,0.00011010757,0.000007684179,0.000010637399,0.0000017506998,0.0000013789723,0.000012002705,2.236602e-7,0.00011245221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99969995,0.00015773899,0.00001636505,0.0000070149918,0.0000023781245,0.000003576878,0.000028440754,5.3034995e-7,0.000084059364],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956626,0.00019258635,0.00003142836,0.00003980301,0.000075005104,0.00009495053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984894,0.00047376653,0.00051426183,0.00004521921,0.00015231765,0.00032509465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000613229,0.00017922491,0.00025667218,0.0006921636,0.0006376144,0.00047457847,0.00016449683,0.00022825343,0.0008874852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040259375,0.00015537493,0.00020160993,0.00036477382,0.00035273304,0.00035845782,0.00055881485,0.0003182783,0.000121013494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043265006,0.00009817673,0.9844508,0.000024850466,0.000033095563,0.00061277626,0.0066296733,0.00003218629,0.00049707235,0.000050735718,0.00006553316,0.0070724906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012736169,0.00048686145,0.9871545,0.000018542843,0.000018725814,0.000693146,0.011172768,0.00005090034,0.00013403282,0.000019650723,0.00023368491,0.0000044610074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037426264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006540204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037426264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033611766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027826353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0074416995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026258048","doi":"10.1080/15379410903084517","title":"A Framework for Addressing Allegations of Domestic Violence in Child Custody Disputes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Custody","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Intervention (counseling); Child custody; Analogy; Criminology; Paradigm shift; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Epistemology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.02884199268463888,"score_gpt":0.3744002327675769,"score_spread":0.345558240082938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026258048","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004441358,0.002917719,0.73832923,0.06936247,0.00093680347,0.0027587817,0.00024291324,0.0005032089,0.18050753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16487233,0.0020787916,0.81153226,0.004420386,0.00040838885,0.002604091,0.00021271298,0.00008165916,0.01378937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97398305,0.017386004,0.0019103269,0.0016542714,0.0033785761,0.0016877945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98617315,0.007450388,0.0010099249,0.000749123,0.0031789988,0.001438358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03521786,0.0021313943,0.0014193936,0.011338417,0.010133797,0.016305843,0.008171361,0.014946785,0.0071750237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021987163,0.001199497,0.002650367,0.0032270595,0.024603283,0.012512857,0.008077243,0.008971157,0.0014222634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003789767,0.000037062997,0.00021694318,0.000068694964,0.0000075609187,0.00028732873,0.0024123804,0.0019624087,0.00008825353,0.98252386,0.0035170426,0.008874728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003705226,0.000064515174,0.0005423971,0.0008731455,0.00003936981,0.0005188987,0.0070683886,0.011746448,0.00020905808,0.8827074,0.09611993,0.000073379284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028879104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04149017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03521786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014869654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031432606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18625212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033112572","doi":"10.1300/j190v02n01_02","title":"The Responsible Use of Psychological Testing in Child Custody Evaluations: Selection of Tests","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Custody","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Helpfulness; Psychology; Relevance (law); Psychological testing; Selection (genetic algorithm); Test (biology); Legal psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Applied psychology; Child custody; Psychological evaluation; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Law; Computer science; Political science; Criminology","score_opus":0.07751838305563233,"score_gpt":0.38938815254361003,"score_spread":0.31186976948797773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033112572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61815804,0.011869481,0.16184841,0.07856031,0.0015338234,0.004986446,0.00029944905,0.0004145401,0.12232955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91589147,0.0016880918,0.07469139,0.0025280756,0.0003030952,0.0010991947,0.00006270329,0.00005441126,0.003681573],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9372697,0.041939493,0.0060624015,0.00086213043,0.012583422,0.0012828237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.875429,0.083682775,0.012024504,0.006855329,0.018517502,0.00349097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07032227,0.0002759834,0.0003016263,0.0030770192,0.001707305,0.0028060554,0.0009814673,0.001305015,0.0017437141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16189073,0.00023462856,0.00030289832,0.0007396945,0.0033697148,0.0013844689,0.002603256,0.001766162,0.000446806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006245319,0.000537978,0.16760477,0.0008253843,0.00005972046,0.0040277652,0.018842062,0.0014431748,0.0066487347,0.056857012,0.023705754,0.718823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038480505,0.0041969386,0.3683763,0.012021813,0.00030064918,0.04377726,0.045605514,0.02561149,0.06472243,0.18342054,0.2510944,0.00048786082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010925698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024525332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07032227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012889059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006552863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37190413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045321814","doi":"10.1300/j190v02n04_04","title":"On Comparing Apples with Apples Deemed Nonexistent: A Reply to Johnson","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Custody","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rebuttal; Psychology; Child custody; Domestic violence; Terrorism; Criminology; Social psychology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Law; Political science; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.01521019883550883,"score_gpt":0.28196213725388686,"score_spread":0.266751938418378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045321814","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037767025,0.0014415025,0.00011283755,0.98910236,0.008520522,0.000004806949,0.000018381585,0.000012865781,0.0004090529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005582454,0.0012993602,0.0003411908,0.9822282,0.0094887875,0.000030341307,0.000009891687,0.000031517367,0.0009882885],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.980535,0.010613101,0.0019281617,0.0024183434,0.0036995413,0.00080590934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85916466,0.119370386,0.0032640044,0.002641719,0.011991575,0.0035676458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031851187,0.0011231685,0.0019041708,0.0017283272,0.0061589926,0.0064936196,0.006659319,0.038481582,0.004498743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15235446,0.00096392515,0.0013751981,0.00204406,0.013829016,0.013578606,0.0046765506,0.05389046,0.0026700473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000868412,0.000027224767,0.0007384797,0.000105571846,0.000030153324,0.00034717022,0.0020454514,0.00005005548,0.00009747369,0.007254443,0.9788117,0.010405493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014919983,0.00019332232,0.0051028873,0.0026339267,0.00014799258,0.002332564,0.021112796,0.0006849638,0.00096790865,0.049614824,0.9166454,0.0004142369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01599579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015878672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038481582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048241876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1684472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}