{"meta":{"query_hash":"69c32031a9a9","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Child Custody"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/69c32031a9a9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Child+Custody"},"results":[{"id":"W1964942449","doi":"10.1300/j190v03n02_04","title":"Is “Best Interests” a Solution to Filling Potholes in Child Custody Planning?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Custody","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Best interests; Best practice; Ethnography; Work (physics); Sociology; Law; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.02984319559742418,"score_gpt":0.33420373925291674,"score_spread":0.3043605436554926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964942449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9429947,0.0005255719,0.00086014287,0.02080463,0.0006159635,0.00022600459,0.00000952633,0.000023584436,0.03393988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683404,0.00004474728,0.00024094376,0.00072727184,0.0017070348,0.0000025841275,0.0000040967598,0.000015171879,0.00042411857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980953,0.00015265924,0.0006430609,0.00018039455,0.0005357765,0.00039281903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911547,0.00006841715,0.0003790532,0.00012835684,0.00014224839,0.00016643657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008471499,0.00015332951,0.00028266234,0.0003966878,0.0004653437,0.00014302525,0.00028019559,0.00012788379,0.00016065658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011873706,0.00012562594,0.00014727584,0.0004299789,0.00009257977,0.00043557078,0.000031780604,0.00042102108,0.000053195778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014873267,0.0042661214,0.41214138,0.0001149978,0.00031473735,0.00068461744,0.20911618,0.055343375,0.0014619504,0.06760774,0.22337142,0.024090145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028014476,0.0006425345,0.3824805,0.0027116674,0.00015308308,0.00022411146,0.0040349155,0.00059476285,0.0017909901,0.00626484,0.59736735,0.0009337844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018046895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003055823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37399596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001816802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010547994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51228774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973540500","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2014.953661","title":"The Ecological Validity of Parent-Child Observations: A Review of Empirical Evidence Related to Custody Evaluations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Child Custody","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Psychology; Empirical evidence; Best practice; Ecological validity; Criminology; Psychiatry; Cognition; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.23682099091796052,"score_gpt":0.4733131804116628,"score_spread":0.2364921894937023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973540500","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036449826,0.9810823,0.00004632394,0.0126020815,0.00092420366,0.0016228129,0.000025921587,0.000021017393,0.0033107952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001325872,0.99644274,0.00016905162,0.0012518883,0.0005820496,0.000033974393,0.000011643908,0.00003372354,0.00014904188],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887147,0.0042336727,0.004227089,0.00038186877,0.0019290815,0.0005135924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869695,0.0050002467,0.0051335637,0.00082302344,0.0016847594,0.00038893352],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0134535525,0.00045204762,0.0030806072,0.0002842745,0.00090499135,0.00007656197,0.0020800668,0.00049878797,0.00029064014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025597174,0.00027385607,0.0018588777,0.0015427863,0.0005780209,0.00031740277,0.00016844663,0.0014285312,0.000051240826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014474684,0.0025426322,0.005568184,0.05890743,0.0026894256,0.000051980987,0.007796405,0.00014281455,0.0000017493845,0.036218982,0.22613141,0.6598042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016828017,0.00026438473,0.0019798214,0.1377762,0.001977583,0.000057814028,0.0001453992,0.0000025732772,7.1208245e-7,0.0004110246,0.8569556,0.00026060315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036214344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013528635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65954363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003165356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020584473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987589187","doi":"10.1080/15379410802070393","title":"Parenting Coordination in Canada: An Overview of Legal and Practice Issues","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Custody","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child custody; Confidentiality; Arbitration; Mental health; Psychology; Dispute resolution; Legislation; Witness; Collateral; Fidelity; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Psychotherapist; Criminology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.07569656913395734,"score_gpt":0.3964755940512216,"score_spread":0.3207790249172643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987589187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9229579,0.032273713,0.000006304261,0.042644903,0.0002041595,0.00008995769,0.0000021689789,0.0000023089772,0.0018186077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903213,0.0073876735,0.00066558155,0.0011341299,0.0004052107,3.3023537e-7,0.0000017555013,0.000007852464,0.00007620914],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868643,0.00013972465,0.0005421836,0.00007681235,0.00043676197,0.00011805718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998665,0.00019928113,0.0004415717,0.00009281031,0.00046866297,0.00013269336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009531737,0.00006944942,0.0003140725,0.00011120523,0.000049733673,0.0000058085534,0.000056073397,0.000057374353,0.000014875834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013173872,0.00005714048,0.000030159297,0.0001647509,0.000031173793,0.00033768063,0.000015190009,0.00058281724,1.661322e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014152622,0.0012587359,0.90324503,0.0026144106,0.00026750547,0.0055844765,0.017976312,0.00017987174,0.0005791134,0.013250237,0.016154118,0.03747492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002449503,0.00094745954,0.67037374,0.0011743364,0.00017768011,0.0085730245,0.00503734,0.0001893795,0.00036253515,0.000098868615,0.3104325,0.0001836256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37920913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12147309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29427838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016309903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016358956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8945577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993613376","doi":"10.1080/15379418.2014.954688","title":"Parental Support Provided by Nonoffending Caregivers to Sexually Abused Children: A Comparison Between Mothers and Fathers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Custody","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social support; Psychology; Child support; Support group; Child sexual abuse; Sexual abuse; Developmental psychology; Child custody; Clinical psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Psychiatry; Poison control; Social psychology; Medicine; Medical emergency; Criminology","score_opus":0.013332215348294695,"score_gpt":0.28505944993447485,"score_spread":0.27172723458618014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993613376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891238,0.00022808324,0.00050270604,0.0018822894,0.0005042082,0.0003313381,0.00003578883,0.000036674184,0.007355099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980522,0.000008826119,0.00012872907,0.0008457463,0.00066432107,0.00000317251,0.000017296241,0.000050888848,0.000228838],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980865,0.00014399322,0.0006478297,0.0003281225,0.00036962857,0.0004239178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986414,0.000116866395,0.0005021482,0.00027108483,0.00005875828,0.00040978732],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004313802,0.00028343368,0.0006134206,0.00026188418,0.00015984647,0.000079549456,0.0003642496,0.00014140742,0.00032940923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029969855,0.0002477726,0.00016221569,0.00016877105,0.00007141668,0.00018249478,0.00004321788,0.0005128838,0.00007241265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049459003,0.00047059509,0.7569487,0.00001940815,0.0012062596,0.000029376633,0.03399622,0.00005863847,0.00048246185,0.0003000359,0.1549987,0.050994974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010677264,0.003133838,0.85860467,0.00022830749,0.0005089885,0.00061699183,0.008273213,0.000016411179,0.0009957436,0.00005332803,0.11600437,0.00088686007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057637222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019018558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101655945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007305471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034790857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026258048","doi":"10.1080/15379410903084517","title":"A Framework for Addressing Allegations of Domestic Violence in Child Custody Disputes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Custody","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Intervention (counseling); Child custody; Analogy; Criminology; Paradigm shift; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Epistemology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.02884199268463888,"score_gpt":0.3744002327675769,"score_spread":0.345558240082938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026258048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6144462,0.012573116,0.118524335,0.02844122,0.0041415864,0.0026997623,0.00008964012,0.0001544714,0.21892965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99185383,0.00083989574,0.0061523933,0.00057611684,0.0005445663,0.000004266927,0.000001391121,0.000009804646,0.000017707102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981852,0.00012580401,0.0006834671,0.00015418486,0.00048275295,0.0003685449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845666,0.00039810242,0.0005697957,0.0001585915,0.0002756503,0.00014119624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010296805,0.0001404799,0.0003824245,0.0002534701,0.00038251127,0.00006290686,0.00047322284,0.00015060481,0.000036124697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011256682,0.00012200538,0.00019685412,0.00046647596,0.00021265849,0.00041763418,0.000019052071,0.00047969105,0.000004027084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041618713,0.0016299695,0.0107435845,0.00013439669,0.000107970736,0.000089872345,0.020245992,0.004417831,0.00058575196,0.89813554,0.0022609427,0.061231986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038968734,0.0014123308,0.58563393,0.021676818,0.0003148366,0.0002383768,0.009013596,0.0013506084,0.001465241,0.3595432,0.0143756885,0.001078514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053532553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021151858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5748903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080211066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002097892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49752352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033112572","doi":"10.1300/j190v02n01_02","title":"The Responsible Use of Psychological Testing in Child Custody Evaluations: Selection of Tests","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Custody","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Helpfulness; Psychology; Relevance (law); Psychological testing; Selection (genetic algorithm); Test (biology); Legal psychology; Reliability (semiconductor); Applied psychology; Child custody; Psychological evaluation; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Law; Computer science; Political science; Criminology","score_opus":0.07751838305563233,"score_gpt":0.38938815254361003,"score_spread":0.31186976948797773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033112572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805581,0.0012665609,0.00004335992,0.0040424787,0.00038747885,0.00027757956,0.00000495846,0.000016639642,0.013402861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975276,0.00013361002,0.0012735043,0.00031418752,0.0005179953,0.000005583486,0.0000010808556,0.000022021244,0.0002044037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972245,0.0004769587,0.0012904472,0.00021592168,0.00048218993,0.0003099829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967993,0.00125422,0.0010672937,0.00035709562,0.00043799277,0.00008410282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018451555,0.00018062087,0.0004089039,0.0004315293,0.00017729124,0.000030757787,0.00034108345,0.00017044434,0.00030099487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014913391,0.00012382862,0.00019430982,0.00091586896,0.00013897661,0.00029301606,0.000031037995,0.00085389573,0.000028798207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008326346,0.012333352,0.48374036,0.00007229869,0.0010794327,0.00016079159,0.0075077387,0.018579306,0.0139176035,0.021363914,0.04871977,0.38419908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026353095,0.0008813543,0.9790827,0.0003743321,0.00009572915,0.0015187571,0.00017110686,0.00016685248,0.001188535,0.00049087364,0.01323955,0.00015490993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002987038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014684351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49534234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006952578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009078988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50495845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045321814","doi":"10.1300/j190v02n04_04","title":"On Comparing Apples with Apples Deemed Nonexistent: A Reply to Johnson","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Child Custody","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rebuttal; Psychology; Child custody; Domestic violence; Terrorism; Criminology; Social psychology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Law; Political science; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.01521019883550883,"score_gpt":0.28196213725388686,"score_spread":0.266751938418378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045321814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4868249,0.0004553393,0.0027375172,0.0029107265,0.00042348038,0.00040884595,0.000004772669,0.000058262714,0.5061762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966244,0.000058660997,0.00093071425,0.001414785,0.0006800588,0.0000046515984,0.0000013025725,0.000014204081,0.0002712412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835086,0.000085776286,0.00038384937,0.0001581953,0.00068433565,0.00033699165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913955,0.00007239239,0.00029467832,0.00014869102,0.00018192283,0.00016276237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065722445,0.00013577723,0.00029577265,0.00017383702,0.00043062022,0.00011256505,0.0003438424,0.000047897265,0.00003542467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056542995,0.00010126543,0.00010060091,0.00029203208,0.00011976685,0.00016849925,0.000025067417,0.00026172888,0.00005295432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018617882,0.0019724173,0.093091846,0.000106457635,0.00035672422,0.0003847621,0.012999911,0.030654991,0.0019816838,0.6025005,0.2469559,0.0071329977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023337142,0.0010009847,0.2904283,0.0012089171,0.00014755517,0.0001531413,0.003748354,0.00011815926,0.0017489821,0.0025160399,0.69590706,0.00068879884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007205792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000298666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59998447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010560634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009934349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41294846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}