{"meta":{"query_hash":"31aeb3ccf066","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling"},"cohort_total":21,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":21,"exported":21,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/31aeb3ccf066","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Choice+Modelling"},"results":[{"id":"W1977561751","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2014.12.001","title":"Too many attributes: A test of the validity of combining discrete-choice and best–worst scaling data","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Variance (accounting); Confounding; Statistics; Econometrics; Sample size determination; Computer science; Sample (material); Conjoint analysis; Object (grammar); Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.40049335863368934,"score_gpt":0.2853370130650486,"score_spread":0.11515634556864074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977561751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7785619,0.0013861506,0.18563859,0.0064310934,0.00096381677,0.00062397186,0.0020285258,0.00037582652,0.023990095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759045,0.00013481408,0.021267401,0.00070071983,0.00035001012,0.00024822418,0.00078079343,0.000150842,0.000462626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.78734934,0.15569273,0.009463227,0.026583519,0.018332073,0.0025792131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08519907,0.84971404,0.014020701,0.04374085,0.005171021,0.0021543116],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.20716102,0.0019240892,0.0039014437,0.00473454,0.0034129166,0.0077217375,0.0072474154,0.0059988652,0.0119535485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6313557,0.0012657371,0.007412477,0.005508127,0.020667423,0.02041138,0.011350033,0.0065739774,0.0013674046],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024206528,0.0035332192,0.566486,0.0016979753,0.01832353,0.0011314709,0.006388846,0.06590354,0.0015705622,0.15590711,0.009717211,0.145134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036490955,0.004020889,0.10668947,0.00059743744,0.0035341799,0.0014912717,0.003938061,0.4240905,0.0018167658,0.44264132,0.0070180036,0.0005130751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032169167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011155534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20716102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017472816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026340592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9777116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982396960","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2014.05.003","title":"Categories shape preferences: A model of taste heterogeneity arising from categorization of alternatives","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Taste; Econometrics; Economics; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.17527289356895157,"score_gpt":0.24212320779035343,"score_spread":0.06685031422140186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982396960","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3954093,0.0007178682,0.5540587,0.005411552,0.00012632708,0.00014251286,0.0010081682,0.00032708744,0.042798646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96995354,0.00025413395,0.020158436,0.00027173996,0.000067490975,0.00011416686,0.0002527543,0.000055817836,0.008871941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978484,0.0011966398,0.00006273407,0.00030521138,0.00024029127,0.00034683643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98908687,0.007993066,0.00060314947,0.0010153053,0.00062190625,0.0006797802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034759988,0.00067706616,0.0014469636,0.0014209483,0.00094987836,0.005036336,0.003512872,0.003948104,0.013715223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017578084,0.0009504166,0.00244023,0.0025472024,0.0024187728,0.004795679,0.0021759276,0.002859994,0.0014636333],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036787376,0.00027411286,0.0044302545,0.00013540276,0.00020045786,0.000548285,0.0013794892,0.12140069,0.0009921828,0.8462663,0.0033753775,0.020629518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008724395,0.00004579653,0.0012911889,0.000023799885,0.000050522016,0.00019691969,0.00020228194,0.40244204,0.00006501009,0.5947337,0.00082451804,0.00003682368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070542735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043258276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013715223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017522391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000702707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045882046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985136372","doi":"10.1016/s1755-5345(13)70025-3","title":"Modeling the choices of individual decision-makers by combining efficient choice experiment designs with extra preference information","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":241,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Discrete choice; Preference; Computer science; Aggregate (composite); Variance (accounting); Limit (mathematics); Econometrics; Choice set; Revealed preference; Mathematical optimization; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.18418177185795115,"score_gpt":0.2408156124094176,"score_spread":0.05663384055146645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985136372","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15280125,0.00015454557,0.84477186,0.00040359457,0.00006791117,0.00046988123,0.00022564616,0.00010079602,0.0010045483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.632811,0.0003019778,0.36286187,0.00022701955,0.00010721425,0.0020850084,0.00030305868,0.0000310487,0.0012717796],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9535795,0.0406297,0.0011026745,0.0023116886,0.0014655375,0.00091097626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7847285,0.19427423,0.008861112,0.009351005,0.0017595178,0.0010256402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05212422,0.0023206142,0.003630075,0.0013425344,0.0004628713,0.0034453785,0.0027228247,0.0036268635,0.004051166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09129903,0.0022148928,0.0033081009,0.0019070313,0.0019054309,0.0047764825,0.0021080733,0.0032159293,0.0004233479],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005922458,0.0028104507,0.014028134,0.0008293291,0.002641892,0.00025868492,0.000928359,0.7682878,0.0031154798,0.1299773,0.00059603277,0.070603974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086918665,0.0009390095,0.0013832715,0.000028471932,0.00037225508,0.00004700679,0.000044792032,0.89547575,0.00094055815,0.099429205,0.00039755614,0.0000730252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010670923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001424431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05212422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012859361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019190045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27566248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006763140","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2014.01.003","title":"A GEV model with scale heterogeneity for investigating the role of mobility tool ownership in peak period non-work travel mode choices","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mode choice; TRIPS architecture; Work (physics); Mode (computer interface); Econometrics; Scale (ratio); Car ownership; Preference; Context (archaeology); Economics; Demographic economics; Public transport; Transport engineering; Microeconomics; Computer science; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.08059461768342124,"score_gpt":0.23521080693039223,"score_spread":0.154616189246971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006763140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5908304,0.0010519322,0.39626357,0.002143986,0.00013856502,0.0000998192,0.002146826,0.00053705974,0.0067878836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736849,0.00035733625,0.015586906,0.00015627309,0.00008367503,0.00010053672,0.0008602847,0.00009837764,0.009071647],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989197,0.00067048526,0.000031539836,0.00015366107,0.000043024247,0.00018160969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854093,0.01230484,0.0007957307,0.0005453846,0.00034095824,0.00060373463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004840542,0.0008459436,0.0028086412,0.0012457673,0.0006563434,0.0023265812,0.0027340178,0.0026490716,0.0104258135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013275368,0.0010581177,0.0018644744,0.0015744938,0.0016203346,0.0027106637,0.0015193304,0.0026299362,0.0009806027],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005438356,0.00017965907,0.016657133,0.00012010728,0.00030526344,0.000530565,0.00034007896,0.7950109,0.00082259916,0.17336826,0.0032331988,0.00888841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050823666,0.000042996104,0.0019046701,0.0000133977555,0.000045045137,0.00005175544,0.00010427146,0.9661891,0.00003231254,0.031046243,0.00049565156,0.000023769695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016274797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00853099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016274797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010886437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090334215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034877777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016566795","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2015.01.003","title":"Choosing how best to choose: Antecedent Volition and decision process representation in discrete choice models","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Volition (linguistics); Representation (politics); Discrete choice; Process (computing); Decision process; Aestivation; Computer science; Econometrics; Economics; Management science; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.04553781292878291,"score_gpt":0.30253848151198914,"score_spread":0.25700066858320625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016566795","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3185307,0.0002932845,0.6677915,0.0025288386,0.000078355115,0.00018422912,0.00032871176,0.00014876749,0.0101155285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965331,0.00012703273,0.032265533,0.0000828045,0.000025068726,0.00014029283,0.00012939463,0.000017692095,0.0018810997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540555,0.0032033604,0.00020416308,0.00049903826,0.0003395143,0.00034833132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96735525,0.029695418,0.00088494655,0.00084570254,0.00061661296,0.00060203456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009023741,0.0005818956,0.0012511875,0.0011491199,0.00069523806,0.0048823697,0.0017514202,0.0022579439,0.006717693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040161997,0.00073395396,0.0011900114,0.0012472247,0.0025539086,0.0051109255,0.0017796677,0.0032780562,0.00034701813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007366217,0.00073702575,0.010362529,0.00017685092,0.00019527704,0.000254587,0.002172514,0.3712883,0.0006006704,0.5698612,0.0007084367,0.04290607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005131801,0.00005108763,0.0011518074,0.000031860065,0.000051281222,0.000030001062,0.00019525984,0.7708436,0.0001686269,0.22706817,0.00032822954,0.000028656495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007326679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005820241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009023741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001824797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017039841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047722697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100075638","doi":"10.1016/s1755-5345(13)70002-2","title":"A pilot study into the perception of unreliability of travel times using in-depth interviews","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Transportation of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Preference; Christian ministry; Ministry of Transport; Actuarial science; Perception; Travel time; Test (biology); Face (sociological concept); Computer science; Economics; Econometrics; Operations management; Operations research; Marketing; Psychology; Applied psychology; Business; Transport engineering; Engineering; Microeconomics; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.21517230796746342,"score_gpt":0.28988073848766266,"score_spread":0.07470843052019924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100075638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981275,0.000013786989,0.0008596226,0.00009631651,0.0000054108,0.00019099627,0.00003875118,0.0000033576464,0.00066429115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971457,0.00006688666,0.0014082163,0.00011195309,0.000006156587,0.0004352214,0.00004758306,0.0000038515473,0.0007744625],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951799,0.003373772,0.00020133918,0.00028640777,0.00027751204,0.0006810899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94810444,0.04195063,0.0026023348,0.0015048645,0.003646118,0.0021915631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011093729,0.00051848503,0.0003540291,0.0008689285,0.00236623,0.00138003,0.00075267436,0.0012510379,0.0040122517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029467821,0.0006772004,0.0005005491,0.00073645805,0.0013967342,0.0024139315,0.0019181845,0.0026662215,0.00034096965],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085075176,0.0041895583,0.06425046,0.00028496314,0.000027286957,0.0018469541,0.89891124,0.00026859442,0.013094756,0.00068479363,0.0004387781,0.015151814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001598323,0.0058372254,0.0869585,0.00012853289,0.000045248045,0.00049759157,0.8979893,0.0012307913,0.0032679897,0.00058239297,0.0032323801,0.00007023222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00687645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010760385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011093729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016188511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018151633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058669984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137048146","doi":"10.1016/s1755-5345(13)70052-6","title":"Conceptual Relations Between Expanded Rank Data and Models of the Unexpanded Rank Data","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Victoria","funders":"University of Victoria","keywords":"Rank (graph theory); Ranking (information retrieval); Econometrics; Respondent; Logit; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Information retrieval; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.3950151912127773,"score_gpt":0.2862860371419336,"score_spread":0.10872915407084366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137048146","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10533063,0.0011785642,0.86846584,0.008003275,0.00011794676,0.00012320852,0.0016542365,0.0002652623,0.014861021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85873777,0.0010123822,0.1298156,0.00075910776,0.00036789765,0.00030334602,0.0014132417,0.0001592507,0.0074314536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899228,0.0064737587,0.0005528285,0.0014052856,0.0011926503,0.0004525413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79559296,0.16860242,0.011111228,0.01685881,0.0053521576,0.002482463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025964279,0.00070867897,0.0013573859,0.0034418458,0.0008689711,0.009612561,0.0055446774,0.0025630826,0.010977041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11080736,0.0012980341,0.0019885348,0.0042968104,0.00710777,0.022161968,0.0031162496,0.0059794853,0.00081934663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002356311,0.000023467352,0.00082716864,0.00003003845,0.00001672756,0.000039146715,0.0002624315,0.008876018,0.000052309064,0.98671883,0.00045699044,0.002673156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020986094,0.000021846528,0.0004647823,0.000022949136,0.000012382502,0.00007657098,0.00009092865,0.09212754,0.000058707217,0.9058885,0.0011908921,0.000023959785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048147673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033660044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025964279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029596528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015675462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13731384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143729190","doi":"10.1016/s1755-5345(13)70012-5","title":"On Jointly Analyzing the Physical Activity Participation Levels of Individuals in a Family Unit Using a Multivariate Copula Framework","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Multivariate statistics; Copula (linguistics); Psychological intervention; Physical activity; Demographic economics; Psychology; Household income; Multivariate analysis; Econometrics; Economics; Geography; Statistics; Medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15269014594847666,"score_gpt":0.4139989149787202,"score_spread":0.2613087690302436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143729190","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26588744,0.0004644187,0.73113066,0.0005955968,0.0000371215,0.00010003133,0.00042776568,0.00008877816,0.0012682421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9040192,0.0010214052,0.087305196,0.00017055268,0.00014655705,0.00038132322,0.0011603717,0.00018342289,0.0056120045],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975352,0.001535114,0.000064947366,0.00037723954,0.00016418958,0.00032328858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849785,0.012926322,0.00090539176,0.00044708082,0.0003359506,0.0004067706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055271704,0.001726912,0.0035617677,0.0012289679,0.00061454397,0.0020697794,0.0018378262,0.0016855532,0.0028448582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018213978,0.001257252,0.0030100374,0.0027358113,0.001298013,0.0022845524,0.0021380323,0.0017276444,0.0003421913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011857528,0.00015353828,0.012822054,0.00006369804,0.00050902064,0.0002552998,0.00028136675,0.95055395,0.00066778826,0.020026328,0.0005957341,0.013952656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006247832,0.000028290786,0.0022117265,0.0000065394843,0.000031943735,0.000023809942,0.000055566063,0.9900727,0.000070656075,0.0073649236,0.000113232665,0.000014406466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03224339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023222556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03224339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010166682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016173118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06411147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204800319","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2015.10.001","title":"What determines student satisfaction with university subjects? A choice-based approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Likert scale; Task (project management); Class (philosophy); Rating scale; Psychology; Sample (material); Scale (ratio); Applied psychology; Higher education; Mathematics education; Perception; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.20103268594713336,"score_gpt":0.3964668658721853,"score_spread":0.19543417992505197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2204800319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945531,0.000080189864,0.0037906587,0.00014494719,0.000012715921,0.00013026828,0.00020202051,0.000016782567,0.0010694629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966633,0.000033267137,0.0025398345,0.000028196268,0.000007978631,0.00012717971,0.00014407569,0.000009415392,0.0004467899],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874213,0.00981051,0.00044080405,0.00054977473,0.0012380341,0.00053954235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8564052,0.13166644,0.0043216413,0.0018223841,0.00257149,0.0032128883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015928598,0.00065601955,0.001881739,0.0023952515,0.0009962195,0.0038036685,0.0014476811,0.001757208,0.009339596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053095393,0.00047571782,0.0027493369,0.003219297,0.0017440693,0.0022040515,0.0017144359,0.0017448989,0.00077059015],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009036781,0.004380427,0.9153539,0.00038360138,0.0013030921,0.00011099847,0.0032898993,0.008645671,0.0010726198,0.0032857305,0.00061713386,0.052520026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082524505,0.010003289,0.8012319,0.00015562707,0.0011021956,0.00022713876,0.00885113,0.16197534,0.002520969,0.011526547,0.001341544,0.00023914957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056856973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053352816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015928598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021661443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012062995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08423948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230021276","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2015.12.003","title":"Simulations of firm location decisions: Replicating office location choices in the Greater Toronto Area","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Replicate; Test (biology); Business; Econometrics; Economics; Computer science; Marketing; Statistics","score_opus":0.1380040078716728,"score_gpt":0.28170847052108267,"score_spread":0.14370446264940986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230021276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99544793,0.0001000866,0.0010325812,0.00042388184,0.000017599406,0.000021602598,0.0007299408,0.00003339577,0.0021929652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968021,0.000068829686,0.0008334201,0.00004194466,0.000007261012,0.000020541627,0.0005664082,0.000013143331,0.0016463569],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994759,0.00018628605,0.000027214348,0.00009598398,0.000043732998,0.00017100359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923949,0.0052203145,0.0004454664,0.00041649496,0.00058393675,0.00093887956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011489919,0.00062866474,0.001053903,0.000878542,0.0011687207,0.0016540681,0.0031172968,0.0035222315,0.008608883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007644821,0.00085673697,0.0011677287,0.001607182,0.0016393033,0.0014375527,0.0012734352,0.0017736717,0.000540286],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002472131,0.00015185324,0.008632461,0.000031269396,0.000044851182,0.00014725055,0.00021715884,0.98540086,0.00017737043,0.002419344,0.001185092,0.0013452853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010544304,0.0000549428,0.0037930892,0.00001125126,0.00002142714,0.000011289437,0.00031025443,0.9943802,0.000105958155,0.000812893,0.0003702082,0.00002315488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6452177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6074426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35478228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066107507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029901892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7137433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337324867","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2016.03.002","title":"A formal and empirical comparison of two score measures for best–worst scaling","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Aggregate (composite); Scaling; Set (abstract data type); Econometrics; Computer science; Best practice; Data set; Statistics; Mathematics; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.34600149292892074,"score_gpt":0.32455674484749514,"score_spread":0.021444748081425602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337324867","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13917974,0.0012984588,0.829361,0.0023782966,0.0003209785,0.00029717808,0.0009774679,0.00050169823,0.025685046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8120004,0.00040565603,0.18400104,0.00018810629,0.00024285141,0.0003878553,0.00085143605,0.00023598924,0.0016866091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9699939,0.017162016,0.0018147161,0.002882859,0.007100237,0.0010462323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72693074,0.22140807,0.012094222,0.023795456,0.01325413,0.002517383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037167586,0.0014875436,0.0017909117,0.0067856945,0.001568489,0.009558212,0.003828008,0.0030764563,0.010150154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27757773,0.00058022107,0.0018221185,0.008164535,0.009627167,0.015462596,0.0054017943,0.0038579814,0.00097045995],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037266684,0.0002479288,0.018240314,0.0002849613,0.00019882066,0.000049197162,0.001361484,0.017059745,0.0006006763,0.84523946,0.004107491,0.112237155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008219371,0.00042187393,0.020236734,0.0002213424,0.00011160023,0.00018318054,0.0012401851,0.14998478,0.00076853717,0.822036,0.0045486623,0.00016488726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025547543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020364386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037167586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00349713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002028831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19656336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593641299","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2017.03.003","title":"An integrated model of intensity of activity opportunities on supply side and tour destination & departure time choices on demand side","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Demand side; Supply side; Economics; Business; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.11651466014018999,"score_gpt":0.33860507124015327,"score_spread":0.22209041109996328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593641299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5052191,0.0007669572,0.42479947,0.0030653488,0.0003506159,0.00022558264,0.006395859,0.0005597437,0.058617234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9207968,0.00035438465,0.018814985,0.00022285627,0.00009127174,0.00028465068,0.0014621859,0.00013442484,0.057838406],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991486,0.00021443165,0.00003575835,0.00023372608,0.000089274174,0.00027819656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985575,0.00068779394,0.00014181116,0.00007330041,0.00025758252,0.00028202144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011159595,0.0008924353,0.002340992,0.0010520332,0.00075257535,0.003662628,0.0040108287,0.003826206,0.018471867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029117933,0.0016983189,0.0022616596,0.0025374757,0.001375219,0.0029553415,0.0019080209,0.002474374,0.0018278898],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060303264,0.00009759738,0.0014582715,0.00002580151,0.000059816583,0.00007037899,0.000054128854,0.9767245,0.00030430077,0.018802505,0.00054362504,0.0017988094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029354162,0.000021217584,0.0006261519,0.0000058746073,0.000031136504,0.000015069315,0.000029668076,0.99489,0.000039524348,0.0037874104,0.0005118585,0.00001268753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08858741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052509375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08858741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033490863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003791931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17614353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622124186","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2017.11.003","title":"Discriminative conditional restricted Boltzmann machine for discrete choice and latent variable modelling","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Ryerson University","keywords":"Latent variable; Latent class model; Latent variable model; Discriminative model; Graphical model; Probabilistic latent semantic analysis; Boltzmann machine; Robustness (evolution); Generative model","score_opus":0.16022692900406607,"score_gpt":0.26893096574908915,"score_spread":0.10870403674502307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622124186","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012786228,0.0010256517,0.983639,0.0008416735,0.000104210696,0.000035357712,0.00028816555,0.00048958906,0.00079004926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70842826,0.0017744467,0.26858518,0.00094209774,0.00056990585,0.0007390613,0.0024823314,0.00048384303,0.015994864],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979686,0.001156954,0.000098966026,0.00040562486,0.00017760739,0.00019215187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98681194,0.0115544945,0.0003230556,0.00069216377,0.00035741352,0.00026094462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033958796,0.001060259,0.0036228022,0.00093330804,0.00068424863,0.0021957303,0.0036525112,0.0034926578,0.006966296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017730203,0.0012729034,0.0017170077,0.001813073,0.0026406455,0.0033323397,0.0034117152,0.005493035,0.001314123],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002659074,0.00015258191,0.0012271748,0.00027402607,0.00019391741,0.000101659294,0.00017279378,0.7352139,0.0005605544,0.19580798,0.0042314017,0.06179811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001142335,0.000007505596,0.00007822637,0.000009646894,0.000006659623,0.000008039048,0.000005049636,0.90875053,0.00005047679,0.09082765,0.00023689908,0.000007913206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0119795455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011614477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0119795455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021041557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001856139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023819625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130489108","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100451","title":"On-demand transit user preference analysis using hybrid choice models","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Transportation and Mobility Innovations","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Toronto Metropolitan University","keywords":"Latent class model; Preference; Service (business); Computer science; Public transport; Latent variable; TRIPS architecture; Discrete choice; Variable (mathematics); Revealed preference; Mode choice; Latent variable model; Service design; Operations research; Transport engineering; Business; Service provider; Econometrics; Marketing; Statistics; Economics; Engineering; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.08803331288135398,"score_gpt":0.27561199740919035,"score_spread":0.18757868452783638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130489108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51588804,0.00014872423,0.47989807,0.0002570268,0.00004311145,0.00017485842,0.00045858693,0.000102787635,0.003028717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783775,0.000073930154,0.019009426,0.000023342758,0.000016127307,0.00010294045,0.00020313999,0.000017199844,0.0021763637],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670863,0.0025109001,0.000068738496,0.0002369885,0.00017822658,0.00029645918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858925,0.012712958,0.00030131123,0.00034474515,0.00047256623,0.0002759132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035049806,0.0008759876,0.001653514,0.0012837553,0.0004935055,0.0020849411,0.0015530614,0.0011752677,0.007340078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069254753,0.00084217073,0.0027558107,0.0016076197,0.00078582886,0.0022944382,0.0012387512,0.0012083702,0.00034268232],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059098616,0.00032586564,0.0052132043,0.00010733301,0.00034229725,0.00015928916,0.00020115405,0.95371705,0.0007059983,0.027024388,0.00040982745,0.011202591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000093513445,0.0000345149,0.00033291295,0.0000020135155,0.000013866254,0.0000071433674,0.000040463066,0.99638546,0.00004765864,0.00307157,0.000047608173,0.000007492442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013177599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011878564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013177599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017961757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009994912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026201785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176909959","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2021.100302","title":"Separating generalizable from source-specific preference heterogeneity in the fusion of revealed and stated preferences","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Preference; Revealed preference; Premise; Econometrics; Generalizability theory; Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.2662613018923997,"score_gpt":0.2482723318761791,"score_spread":0.01798897001622063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176909959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5730024,0.0005743528,0.41950104,0.0014864206,0.000038426908,0.00008615189,0.0005051365,0.00009536645,0.0047106813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98623544,0.00022142856,0.0125692785,0.00010276273,0.000038045608,0.00003506925,0.00023046939,0.000023425318,0.00054395135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909831,0.0055702166,0.0005178172,0.0014084284,0.0008467847,0.0006736197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90076166,0.082352705,0.005684495,0.007980137,0.0021056775,0.0011152778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018146772,0.0006807366,0.002019009,0.0015047208,0.000512971,0.005609417,0.0018933014,0.0024632707,0.0036579985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06939961,0.0010485132,0.0025882304,0.0020112684,0.003253793,0.012243957,0.0034562736,0.004003912,0.00024143851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010885369,0.00035984087,0.029315896,0.00042420038,0.0012299675,0.00081970356,0.0025560122,0.11026505,0.0030681011,0.804488,0.0009373328,0.045447454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007287084,0.00012903153,0.011596874,0.000065237575,0.00022333635,0.00016913693,0.0005388526,0.26460388,0.00054574537,0.72158426,0.00038929086,0.00008147895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003197268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027494193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018146772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016231107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090082845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09597045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206765967","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2022.100343","title":"Volumetric choice experiments (VCEs)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Negative binomial distribution; Discrete choice; Econometrics; Multinomial logistic regression; Computer science; Multinomial distribution; Product (mathematics); Marketing; Statistics; Economics; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1863004751600981,"score_gpt":0.24866530143315282,"score_spread":0.06236482627305473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206765967","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22802505,0.0023237516,0.71989536,0.0010792431,0.0015753654,0.003363415,0.002912576,0.00096665445,0.03985856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8429949,0.0010471927,0.139283,0.00092799985,0.0002714577,0.005905213,0.00085469993,0.00020056336,0.008514977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809745,0.014916505,0.0005641589,0.0012354776,0.0017582182,0.00055118825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90902793,0.07923766,0.004048902,0.005555133,0.0010889841,0.001041431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013036537,0.0010283005,0.0013806636,0.0008321243,0.00043682987,0.0020618308,0.001883418,0.0022586123,0.015299953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0738573,0.0006170298,0.0009768566,0.0015270545,0.0022995796,0.002178359,0.002516227,0.001709067,0.0011329164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009160248,0.0027359158,0.005869487,0.0018378216,0.0009827858,0.00017392638,0.00053918146,0.04847511,0.008157481,0.69355696,0.008934028,0.21957707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034069412,0.006509474,0.0048049027,0.00043309233,0.0004636401,0.00029055213,0.0002089639,0.1662447,0.01120393,0.7682774,0.03794104,0.00021538013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070528797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068360724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015299953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010520743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010269206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06894463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385281006","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100431","title":"Theory-driven or data-driven? Modelling ride-sourcing mode choices using integrated choice and latent variable model and multi-task learning deep neural networks","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Transportation and Mobility Innovations","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Latent variable; Latent variable model; Econometrics; Discrete choice; Econometric model; Pandemic; Task (project management); Mode (computer interface); Preference; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Economics; Marketing; Business; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07617742007943569,"score_gpt":0.2935783376492094,"score_spread":0.2174009175697737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385281006","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4632891,0.0010621257,0.522861,0.0047591846,0.00020678998,0.00009805513,0.003335687,0.0004925582,0.0038954567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97668856,0.00026273465,0.01825168,0.00017890053,0.000049953866,0.00006122496,0.0010887671,0.000050824692,0.0033672892],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930596,0.00030856408,0.00002445007,0.00020015614,0.0000490557,0.000111844165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99583495,0.0031489523,0.00035132532,0.00020723886,0.0002532788,0.00020422955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029210919,0.00060325273,0.0011315887,0.00061542087,0.00027521403,0.0018753588,0.0020072476,0.0013792969,0.004450703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011339978,0.00079607655,0.001093868,0.0010555936,0.000846375,0.0030310508,0.0011430804,0.002526548,0.0006592275],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029350148,0.00029710453,0.021736788,0.00014400108,0.00024883627,0.000118861586,0.00022480867,0.8989849,0.0006069597,0.04377496,0.0031502924,0.030419081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071407935,0.000009983556,0.0010481792,0.00000952912,0.000009197546,0.000006767231,0.00002183714,0.981872,0.000071763105,0.016694296,0.00024132043,0.000007953673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023722839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03073104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023722839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015039609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014934522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047169507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389284528","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2023.100454","title":"Ordinal-ResLogit: Interpretable deep residual neural networks for ordered choices","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Ordinal regression; Ordinal data; Computer science; Residual; Logit; Consistency (knowledge bases); Artificial intelligence; Artificial neural network; Ordered logit; Statistics; Econometrics; Machine learning; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.14154998753375997,"score_gpt":0.25705404484906147,"score_spread":0.1155040573153015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389284528","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04583657,0.001192949,0.9345215,0.0009942668,0.000288456,0.00011160388,0.0030976713,0.009865018,0.0040919064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6312908,0.0006858208,0.3451221,0.0007333181,0.00013577097,0.0003741581,0.005189489,0.0011339487,0.015334616],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969673,0.00012344675,0.000018527426,0.00007143868,0.000049327704,0.000040542982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989247,0.00068768836,0.000057523535,0.0001589932,0.000118526834,0.000052633295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012724361,0.00090908416,0.0007881885,0.00047029267,0.00026192298,0.0009497576,0.0020178037,0.0016610404,0.011242324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060780584,0.0005903775,0.0008860801,0.00052803,0.0004905386,0.0018219434,0.0016391932,0.0028234557,0.0025162043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005044932,0.00027003343,0.001841735,0.0002756552,0.00015420392,0.00015864012,0.00011685737,0.59101343,0.0020265868,0.038000543,0.020992015,0.3446458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011867454,0.000015648822,0.00006715591,0.000012168467,0.000005086572,0.00000491269,0.0000044449253,0.98463756,0.00027628007,0.014390473,0.00056972855,0.0000046019527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007960549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01661127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011242324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094936363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008371486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03760934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403454640","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2024.100521","title":"Modelling household online shopping and home delivery demand using latent class & ordinal generalized extreme value (GEV) models","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Urban and Freight Transport Logistics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Latent class model; Class (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Econometrics; Ordinal data; Extreme value theory; Economics; Ordinal regression; Generalized extreme value distribution; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.19005623564280444,"score_gpt":0.24454234315325613,"score_spread":0.05448610751045169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403454640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6402267,0.00048418803,0.34785065,0.0011675917,0.00005796356,0.00015781184,0.0028015734,0.00019729736,0.007056268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97648495,0.00019034809,0.016888605,0.000055787088,0.000023360946,0.00012829628,0.0010982909,0.000023964318,0.0051063336],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984848,0.0009449023,0.000046437122,0.00020536457,0.00010555879,0.00021297693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965339,0.0026163957,0.0003373142,0.00016516879,0.00021034782,0.00013693783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022284214,0.00053911674,0.00065095426,0.00078929076,0.00035256497,0.0018752347,0.0016434947,0.001254101,0.0041755587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056196554,0.00045240298,0.0012278944,0.0014749812,0.000685823,0.0014172089,0.0011216096,0.0011344921,0.0004682589],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024919456,0.00026740436,0.05461261,0.00011655313,0.0001981284,0.00041222564,0.00069387135,0.82917535,0.00047045105,0.09115236,0.002401089,0.020250741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010202593,0.000026296892,0.0040720473,0.000009920638,0.000011292994,0.000026020358,0.00017720136,0.98029906,0.00003303639,0.014728371,0.00059394346,0.000012648482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024260886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02145593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024260886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001491381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007636222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04823935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405317212","doi":"10.1016/j.jocm.2024.100535","title":"Location choice of residential housing supply: An application of the multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Discrete choice; Value (mathematics); Econometrics; Economics; Extreme value theory; Business; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04952255018475651,"score_gpt":0.2495570566271881,"score_spread":0.2000345064424316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405317212","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104542784,0.0003257742,0.8859749,0.0010716927,0.00009969892,0.00012158904,0.0004891166,0.00015892735,0.0072154575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9391092,0.00032637478,0.050661728,0.00015193217,0.00007384378,0.00027192011,0.00041740885,0.00004604222,0.008941539],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981766,0.0009603452,0.000063781015,0.00034522166,0.00022112588,0.0002329962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615353,0.0028133432,0.00035863928,0.00018107794,0.00030716183,0.00018616079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027073736,0.0007568471,0.0010771024,0.00094693445,0.00050764915,0.0017742831,0.0030423587,0.0019173997,0.004516654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007956325,0.00066697114,0.0017562197,0.0013772964,0.001241921,0.0015323645,0.0018552461,0.0022054478,0.0004186819],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005635506,0.000076635486,0.007370821,0.000050577957,0.00008421724,0.00023157633,0.00019095185,0.903409,0.0002810086,0.080204375,0.0008014299,0.007243047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001094313,0.000020161193,0.0005377434,0.0000060959296,0.000010131432,0.00002250268,0.000036497844,0.9821385,0.00004365342,0.016742432,0.0004219806,0.000009414739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017534068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009518025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017534068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019002472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011300924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03486401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W644441382","doi":"10.1016/s1755-5345(13)70036-8","title":"Reducing simulation bias in mixed logit model estimation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Choice Modelling","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Mixed logit; Monte Carlo method; Logit; Logarithm; Variance reduction; Mathematics; Statistics; Econometrics; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.2578737441275352,"score_gpt":0.2775745288175643,"score_spread":0.01970078469002906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W644441382","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045999613,0.00042197647,0.9499622,0.00071293034,0.00012869715,0.000115631585,0.000121329234,0.0008605619,0.0016770681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6724639,0.00031191215,0.32375905,0.00048501734,0.00017731698,0.00035714978,0.00049573707,0.0003625991,0.0015872727],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.96107537,0.03393603,0.0011015739,0.0012579025,0.0022160865,0.00041297954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.52775776,0.44062093,0.005369149,0.018329753,0.007157384,0.00076494063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039612755,0.0008168373,0.0019016974,0.0020909163,0.0008232077,0.0021322505,0.00255986,0.0027076786,0.0050215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3395472,0.001440912,0.0015189904,0.0018557417,0.0010981179,0.0038131806,0.0038822133,0.0025484243,0.0007874145],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018169911,0.0004917323,0.03596698,0.00049241184,0.0010746571,0.0005153913,0.0008146933,0.63637,0.0020127962,0.12165008,0.0048177713,0.19397643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000830379,0.000054974487,0.00085653714,0.000044433295,0.00007202785,0.000081306316,0.000034884008,0.95097363,0.00073182984,0.046191413,0.0008552119,0.000020692112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053627724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004526506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039612755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012878396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022231445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20949477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}