{"meta":{"query_hash":"537a70a5b201","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Cognitive Science"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/537a70a5b201","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Cognitive+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W2193673172","doi":"10.17791/jcs.2014.15.4.421","title":"A Longitudinal Case Study on A Chinese Returnee’s L2-attrition in the Aspect of Oral Fluency","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Science","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fluency; Attrition; Psychology; Longitudinal study; Medicine; Mathematics education; Mathematics; Statistics; Dentistry","score_opus":0.07224313156379542,"score_gpt":0.35020776147286153,"score_spread":0.2779646299090661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2193673172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99802244,0.00017286216,0.00023015196,0.0004315652,0.0000153905,0.000045222943,0.000036434398,0.000006681666,0.0010392892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99601954,0.00023363493,0.00050890667,0.00023588247,0.000020419913,0.0000384388,0.000068907284,0.000010946704,0.0028634137],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983614,0.0003974774,0.0001312669,0.00022371967,0.0003744053,0.00051167764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722326,0.0004576599,0.0005285003,0.0002021827,0.00079079176,0.00079760613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017674201,0.0007523936,0.00075067265,0.001449034,0.0084375,0.0013066205,0.0015038362,0.0016413508,0.0019489346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003955954,0.00039614463,0.00063752686,0.0011164561,0.0014536849,0.0009876507,0.002127798,0.0021212325,0.00040707804],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031028598,0.0014654762,0.2660666,0.00021467704,0.00006041271,0.3808399,0.3131646,0.00024955635,0.004984967,0.0012762347,0.0027061456,0.028661115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029769162,0.0019465397,0.18580742,0.00021810897,0.00010293742,0.39925876,0.3890601,0.0011302128,0.004277065,0.00059329823,0.017363463,0.00021232889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056131024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10253693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056131024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003792477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030225238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111608624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274993288","doi":"10.17791/jcs.2009.10.2.135","title":"Syntactic Cues to Individuation in Mandarin Chinese","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cognitive Science","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Mandarin Chinese; Noun; Linguistics; Syntax; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02054770571221965,"score_gpt":0.36183274781554964,"score_spread":0.34128504210333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274993288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965341,0.00010115544,0.0005086156,0.00004814343,0.0000045740203,0.0000049536916,0.000031501502,0.000015380832,0.002751433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985989,0.000098822384,0.00075334025,0.000025677067,0.0000045470174,0.0000055168657,0.000042297605,0.000012665934,0.00045817017],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997677,0.0000536553,0.000023590588,0.00006452221,0.000061156075,0.00002940884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834967,0.0007819379,0.00039824314,0.00012196261,0.00024795736,0.00010036075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055915344,0.00024540178,0.00020176377,0.0006229693,0.00052938616,0.0006620945,0.0002594161,0.00032655,0.0016165976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002964108,0.00027108585,0.00016493139,0.0003370704,0.00089296565,0.00081143435,0.00081744656,0.0003223692,0.00018896657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075726205,0.00005746544,0.09603199,0.00042937484,0.00004273981,0.003586133,0.04742719,0.000491398,0.78924257,0.007639058,0.00050406053,0.053790856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034251723,0.00034839037,0.8747453,0.00008169835,0.000110313355,0.0026968084,0.011813233,0.002843005,0.096040584,0.0055895555,0.0055510183,0.00014581915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065829707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008136934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065829707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057874393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038536167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013089299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}