{"meta":{"query_hash":"33d990928690","filters":{"venue":"Journal of College of Education for Women"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/33d990928690","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+College+of+Education+for+Women"},"results":[{"id":"W3110037402","doi":"10.36231/coedw/vol30no3.11","title":"Zanjan , Name and Origin: A Glimpse of Its History","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of College of Education for Women","topic":"Archaeology and Historical Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Period (music); Islam; Order (exchange); Judaism; History; Geography; Front (military); Ancient history; Economy; Economic history; Political science; Archaeology; Law; Business; Art","score_opus":0.025428703209378487,"score_gpt":0.24730231569911368,"score_spread":0.2218736124897352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110037402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94113046,0.006801717,0.0000019820914,0.00070631085,0.0023395047,0.00016722205,0.00002894391,0.0000022338688,0.048821647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9272351,0.00015628984,0.00008141421,0.00005410102,0.00022910103,0.000006555108,4.260866e-7,0.0000046124883,0.07223239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994762,0.00001480015,0.00029074601,0.00004777834,0.00008951431,0.000080986996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902284,0.00009520434,0.0004011071,0.00004901467,0.00038836035,0.000043501823],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018529025,0.000052844563,0.00023918114,0.00011950743,0.000056747114,0.0000012608646,0.0000723693,0.000022868671,0.001064177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050160856,0.000042734395,0.000054620992,0.000015604253,0.00016644275,0.000110324145,0.000014461695,0.00005585313,0.0000030729511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004660043,0.00037529142,0.0012904825,0.00041108517,0.00016947719,4.5226022e-7,0.14831209,8.1709504e-7,0.00020109568,0.77701193,0.0701084,0.0016528848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040406702,0.00070311065,0.0005354051,0.000036187404,0.000019642455,0.000004435965,0.013878992,0.0000019727272,0.000026124651,0.007945555,0.9763977,0.000046804515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006269584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019186813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9062893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019735727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002785461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220740643","doi":"10.36231/coedw.v33i1.1559","title":"The Logical Pragmatics of Arguments in Argumentation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of College of Education for Women","topic":"English Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatics; Argumentation theory; Computer science; Persuasion; Argument (complex analysis); Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Inference; Relevance theory; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009632372453073199,"score_gpt":0.2787192505670652,"score_spread":0.269086878113992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220740643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919306,0.00018834475,0.0049255495,0.0010290793,0.0007610173,0.0001597495,0.0000045633096,0.00000297666,0.0009981337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99059576,0.0000066490766,0.008506942,0.00004150303,0.000035326444,0.000023371236,6.80222e-7,0.0000027199198,0.0007870659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990475,0.00014029963,0.00041094897,0.000048569476,0.00026368746,0.00008897849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987813,0.00030674424,0.00064163003,0.00010738566,0.00013560739,0.000027289363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015876808,0.000036974623,0.000113345326,0.00013745565,0.000103162325,0.00001362281,0.00038376718,0.00001131785,0.0000138921405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032344487,0.000027967368,0.00004208232,0.00024886226,0.000013803744,0.00015356287,0.00004914937,0.00013574092,1.13539464e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005447516,0.0052184328,0.020967195,0.0003723509,0.0002863481,0.000011700342,0.19829719,0.017482247,0.0036864474,0.5383568,0.018652324,0.19612421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009084502,0.008030228,0.050114673,0.00039159643,0.00006340388,0.00030225646,0.39694217,0.019114988,0.0053811045,0.30017653,0.20974469,0.00065383856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002461271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010632615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23818026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015987382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028184042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11404762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362651630","doi":"10.36231/coedw.v30i4.1316","title":"Differences of Style between English and Arabic Political Discourse: A Contrastive Study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of College of Education for Women","topic":"Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Linguistics; Emotive; Arabic; Grammar; Politics; Psychology; Contrastive analysis; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Political science; Art; Literature; Law","score_opus":0.019676473719352282,"score_gpt":0.3545238497919452,"score_spread":0.3348473760725929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362651630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875638,0.00028003159,0.000008183961,0.0004405073,0.0004373908,0.00038076408,0.00005053087,0.0000022170213,0.010836606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978583,0.000031700405,0.00013611779,0.000008930194,0.00043813314,0.000012954478,6.7893643e-7,0.0000037137481,0.0015094646],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990264,0.00013626378,0.0003790472,0.0000640854,0.0002468319,0.00014734265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733394,0.0010642847,0.0004300158,0.00009694171,0.0009785079,0.0000963315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008676231,0.000058764144,0.00033020612,0.0000988021,0.00011274789,0.000011299705,0.00019749967,0.000029972027,0.000047687685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017828622,0.00004563829,0.00004435125,0.0001223471,0.00022170639,0.000086519256,0.000021507907,0.00006360924,2.2171312e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009848497,0.00083506125,0.5693216,0.000060096016,0.00024529194,1.3821534e-7,0.2938903,1.1176267e-7,0.000011215644,0.1341947,0.00042939352,0.0009136482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064502936,0.0005756196,0.28029424,0.000053552885,0.000057154222,2.5783714e-7,0.7089184,5.544651e-7,0.000014540282,0.007290832,0.0020986432,0.000051147057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013920684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006786157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41502813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008504313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065974996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21343814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}